By Kristina Wong

Jan 13, 2010 3:29pm

Obama on His First Year: Americans Have “Every Right” to Feel Deflated

From Sunlen Miller: Nearly one year after his inauguration, President Obama admits that Americans have every right to feel deflated at the progress made in his first year in office. “They have every right to feel deflated because the economy was far worse than any of us expected,’” the president tells People magazine in an interview, “The day I was sworn in, we now know that we were in the process of losing 650,000 jobs in December and 700,000 jobs in January, another 650,000 in March. So people rightly have been anxious this year.” Mr. Obama said that he has not been able to bring people together as much as he’d promised in the 2008 presidential campaign. “What I haven’t been able to do in the midst of this crisis is bring the country together in a way that we had done in the Inauguration. That’s what’s been lost this year…that whole sense of changing how Washington works.” The President says the yet-to-be-passed health care reform bill will be his proudest moment this year, if it does end up getting passed. “Having a health-care bill through the House and the Senate is a potentially historic accomplishment. I’ll be that much prouder when I actually sign it.” Next Wednesday marks Mr. Obama’s one year anniversary of being president. He says that he still has not adjusted entirely to the “bubble” that comes with being president. “I still have not adjusted and I hope never to adjust entirely, to being in the bubble. Day-to-day spontaneous interactions are missing from my life. And there’s the aspect of loneliness that just has to do with the fact that sending young men and women to war – ultimately that’s your decision.” The President said this is what he signed up for though, and added that he is “pretty good” at his job. People magazine’s interview with President Obama hits newsstands Friday. -Sunlen Miller

User Comments

In modern day parlance:
EPIC FAIL.

Posted by: Obama: World's Greatest Celebrity | January 13, 2010, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

And some in Washington are feeling more deflated than others:
—Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) issued a blunt, angry statement on Wednesday, accusing the Senate of “holding a gun” to the House’s head in healthcare negotiations.
“The House has shown deference to the Senate in this process. But I am tired of hearing how hard it was to get 60 votes in the Senate — getting 218 votes to pass our healthcare bill in the House wasn’t easy,” said Weiner, who has taken an increasingly prominent role during the healthcare debate.
“We don’t like negotiating with a gun to our head,” he added.—

Posted by: Health Czar | January 13, 2010, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Blah,blah,blah-economy worse than we thought,not our fault,the progress we’ve made.If the health care bill is so great why did the drug companies and the insurance companies have a fund raiser for Coakley last night-the 60th vote for the bill?I don’t think Obama even knows what is in the health bill-just get a bill,any bill passed!The clock has struck midnight-Cinderfella is done.

Posted by: Nephron | January 13, 2010, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

If he thinks passing healthcare reform
is going to help he really is a dope.

Posted by: wis134 | January 13, 2010, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

I don’t think Obama even knows what is in the health bill
____________________________________
Nonsense.

Posted by: tierra | January 13, 2010, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

It was all Bush…..It couldn’t have been I’m trying to spend more than all former Presidents combined from the beginning of the USA all by myself.
This administration is right in line with his generation. Spend money you don’t have until you lose everything, and blame it on someone else.
Spending money is not the answer to anything. Cutting back on spending is how you get out of debt. Could this administration be this stupid not to understand this? Stop everything you’re doing, cut programs, STOP SPENDING MONEY IDIOT!!

Posted by: TB | January 13, 2010, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Does any body remember that the “great depression” lasted many years? And after the mess the Bush team left us in, you all really expected Obama to fix that mess in under a year? Get real! You’re just still mad that a dark skin man is in the oval office. We libs know how dark skinned people get on you repubs/conservs/christians nerves. And to think the republican party was founded by “anti slavery” groups in the early 1800s. Let me repeat, Anti Slavery groups! Boy, how a party can change. Change we know we can believe in!

Posted by: JACKSON | January 13, 2010, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

More Hollywood rhetoric, that is relatively meaningless.
Obama’s priorities have been totally wrong from day one, and he hasn’t learned one thing since day one.
That’s fine. 2012 will be along soon enough.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | January 13, 2010, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

Tired of hearing the Dems keep trying to feed off Bush like maggots. If they were as smart as they said they were, they would have known the state of the economy. The reality is their plan sucks, and now stuffing a bad health care plan down our throats isn’t going to make things any better. But, oh, maybe they can blame Bush for that too.

Posted by: yadayadayada | January 13, 2010, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

Obama interviewed by People magazine? Where’s Oprah? LOL

Posted by: CW | January 13, 2010, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Americans may feel deflated, but not my fault – I give myself a solid B+!
B. Obama
BTW – I hope Dems continue to blame Bush and campaign against him. It’s worked very well in NJ, VA, and perhaps next week in MA! Great strategy for 2010 midterms!

Posted by: tjp612 | January 13, 2010, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

The only thing that should be deflated is Obama’s ego.

Posted by: CW | January 13, 2010, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Well, thank you Mr. Obama for letting us know we have a few rights left. Unfortunately for you, Americans don’t get “deflated”…we get angry…and then we vote.

Posted by: HA! | January 13, 2010, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

He gave in on EVERY goal. He abandoned us.

Posted by: Disappointed Again | January 13, 2010, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

You Bushie supporters are wonderful. I am as messmerized by your support for that idiot as much as you are messmerized by us wanting to make sure the world knows who really screwed it up. Oh and thank you each and every repub/conserv/christian for working with the president to see that this country is corrected. Glad to see how supportive you’ve been. And your answer to everything, oh yes, you guys didn’t create an answer to the problems you’ve decided to make them worse. Now that’s good Godly people if I’ve ever seen it!

Posted by: JACKSON | January 13, 2010, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

I wasn’t and still am not deflated at all. I voted for him based on his long centrist record in IL and I haven’t been disappointed. He has not risen to the stature of a great president, but it has been comforting to see a return of competence to the Whitehouse. I have little doubt he’ll rank at least as high as Bush Sr (a good president who also took a drubbing from an inherited economic mess) and he has every potential of rising to the caliber of Bill Clinton (sans the pathetic drama).
Sure all the kids for whom this was their first dance are feeling deflated, but Obama was the best option for them. Hopefully they’ll stay engaged (the number of people under 30 who voted was the highest since 1972, the year the voting age was lowered) and continue to contribute their energy and ideals.

Posted by: jhw539 | January 13, 2010, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

-and continue to contribute their energy and ideals.-
Right on! And their $$$…

Posted by: Soldman Gachs | January 13, 2010, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

Obama needs to be “deflated”

Posted by: CW | January 13, 2010, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Change we can NOT believe in. A year later and it’s business as usual in Washington and Obama is one of the people doing business as usual. Bribing senators with anything they want so they will vote in favor of his health care bill. Change we can believe in? What a joke

Posted by: R D | January 13, 2010, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Complaints about the economy and spending are completely out of ignorance. First of all, the 2009 budget under Obama was already written by Bush before he left office. The difference between the Bush 2009 budget and the Obama 2009 budget was tiny. The Bush budget for 2009 was already at 1.3 trillion dollars. Obama’s budget ended up being 1.4 trillion, so Obama spend a whole 100 billion more than projected by Bush.
If you want to complain about budget deficits, look at the last 3 Republican presidents. The only president to run budget surplus and pay down the debt in the past 40 years was Clinton. It was Reagan, Bush, and Bush who dug America into the debt hole.
Its not like Obama came in and all the sudden in one year created a massive debt, that debt was created over the past 30 years of REPUBLICAN deficit spending.

Posted by: Jeff | January 13, 2010, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

What do you really expect Americans to feel when Obama has done NOTHING to help the private sector. The Stimulus has been proven to be a slush fund at best, growing government and their salaries as unemployment rose every month last year. From Feb thru November ALL he cared about was Health Care. #1 rule of any president in a recession should be the economy, and this is why Obama has failed us. He waited until November for a “jobs summit.” Forget the fact that he invited only unions, and left the two biggest private sector firms OUT of the discussions. Unfortunately it’s not funny because who knows IF we recover from the failed economic policies of this president and the last.

Posted by: Karl | January 13, 2010, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

“I am as messmerized by your support for that idiot as much as you are messmerized by us wanting to make sure the world knows who really screwed it up.” Actually, you want to misdirect the blame from where it squarely lands – on the “get rich quick” American public who were conditioned with years of social programs and legislation that nothing was ever their fault, actions had no consequences, and the world owed them a living. When the house flipping was going well I doubt your were wringing your hands and agonizing over how your investments were skyrocketing and am pretty sure that were probabgly cheering the fact that the poor and downtrodden (read: unqualified) buyers were finally getting homes of their own.

Posted by: Publius | January 13, 2010, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Excuse me, all you Bush supporters! The idiot dems had control for a few years DURING Bush’s reign and shot down everything Bush asked for….so much for blaming Bush when Bush asked twice for Congress to do something about Fannie and Freddie because they were getting out of control and Barniebutt said there were no problems with those programs….well, the fall of the American empire fell with those famous words! And Barniebutt should go the way of Dodd! Put the blame where the blame belongs! I did not vote for Bush but am glad Gore lost..guess where we would be with Gore in the Whitehouse..what a scary thought!!

Posted by: ross | January 13, 2010, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Wow what an arrogant bast—. Come out and just point blank say this is unbelievable.

Posted by: Jim Rod | January 13, 2010, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

The idiot dems had control for a few years DURING Bush’s reign and shot down everything Bush asked for
ross | Jan 13, 2010 4:32:55 PM
Meanwhile, back in reality, the two years that Republicans were in the minority party in the Senate they set records for the number of filibusters they launched to protect the Republican policies Bush had implemented. The Republican minority filibustered almost twice as many times as any Democratic minority in Senate history. But that’s just documented fact.

Posted by: jhw539 | January 13, 2010, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

“Its not like Obama came in and all the sudden in one year created a massive debt, that debt was created over the past 30 years of REPUBLICAN deficit spending.”
So how would you explain that under Obama’s budgets, the national debt is projected to DOUBLE by 2019? (from roughly 10 trillion to 20 trillion)
(to put this in more stark terms, Obama’s debts will equal ALL the debt accumulated by the 43 administrations that preceded him, Republican and Democrat)

Posted by: tjp612 | January 13, 2010, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

What do you really expect Americans to feel when Obama has done NOTHING to help the private sector. The Stimulus has been proven to be a slush fund at best, growing government and their salaries as unemployment rose every month last year.
Karl | Jan 13, 2010 4:32:49 PM
When you float something that outrageous, the burden of proof is on you. The stimulus website lists where billions of stimulus money went, warts and all. It was not government bureaucrats who said ‘screw this documentation garbage, I’ll just put in my lucky number 27 for “District” and get this paving project going.’

Posted by: jhw539 | January 13, 2010, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

Complaints about the economy and spending are completely out of ignorance. First of all, the 2009 budget under Obama was already written by Bush before he left office. The difference between the Bush 2009 budget and the Obama 2009 budget was tiny. The Bush budget for 2009 was already at 1.3 trillion dollars. Obama’s budget ended up being 1.4 trillion, so Obama spend a whole 100 billion more than projected by Bush.
If you want to complain about budget deficits, look at the last 3 Republican presidents. The only president to run budget surplus and pay down the debt in the past 40 years was Clinton. It was Reagan, Bush, and Bush who dug America into the debt hole.
Its not like Obama came in and all the sudden in one year created a massive debt, that debt was created over the past 30 years of REPUBLICAN deficit spending.
______________________________________
And increases in the national debt were kept at their lowest during the Carter presidency when the Democrats controlled all 3 levels of power – the White House, the Senate and the House.

Posted by: tierra | January 13, 2010, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

I bet the repubs have Ronnie on ice. He might be thawd by the 2010 elections. There a trickle down we can believe in.

Posted by: JACKSON | January 13, 2010, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

I appreciate him being honest for once, but I wish the focus wasn’t always on his personal self. And I wish our President wasn’t talking to People Magazine. He’s a child of his times.

Posted by: Chiara | January 13, 2010, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

(to put this in more stark terms, Obama’s debts will equal ALL the debt accumulated by the 43 administrations that preceded him, Republican and Democrat)
____________________________________
The Bush Republican administration basically already accomplished this after promising ‘small government’ and a ‘business’ approach.

Posted by: tierra | January 13, 2010, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

===When you float something that outrageous, the burden of proof is on you. ===
The proof is in the pudding. Or poll numbers. Which brings me to an amusing moment…do you want me to use Rasmussen numbers or would you prefer one of the other pollsters?

Posted by: Axey | January 13, 2010, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

Obama and his cronies based the entire campaign on lies and most Americans bought them. With all the corruption in our US government, hardworking U.S. taxpayers can’t trust Obama, his administration or the liberal members of Congress. They need to concentrate on unemployment, the economy and more important issues that affect us! What happened to transparency and allowing us to review everything on TV? Why have some senators been offered perks for their individual states at the cost of all American taxpayers? I may never vote for another Democrat!

Posted by: 1carolinaunc | January 13, 2010, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

When you float something that outrageous, the burden of proof is on you. The stimulus website lists where billions of stimulus money went, warts and all. It was not government bureaucrats who said ‘screw this documentation garbage, I’ll just put in my lucky number 27 for “District” and get this paving project going.’
Posted by: jhw539 | Jan 13, 2010 4:37:53 PM
Excuse me sir, but class is about to be in session. If that Stimulus bill was so imperative that we had to pass it without reading it, then why has only 220 billion of 787 billion been spent in 2009? Money going to imaginary districts that don’t exist with the intent on saving jobs. Instead raises were given, or people bought lawnmowers, boots, and the pathetic list goes on. The latest breakdown of the fraudulent information is $145,000 per saved or created job. Gotta love our hardearned taxpayer dollars at work. I’m sorry but you lose all credibility when OUR money disappears in imaginary districts. It’s ok though, Obama will be stimulating democratic districts 2:1 with the majority of the money come this summer and fall; right in time for elections.

Posted by: Karl | January 13, 2010, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Stop corporatism and government distortion of the free market. That will allow us to inflate once again, albeit at a reasonable pace.

Posted by: Huh | January 13, 2010, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

whats laughable is the typical response.. ‘we didnt know how bad it was when we got here’. another stab at ‘w’….so in actuality- he isnt accepting ANY responsibility for this mess he created. what a lozer

Posted by: realman1963 | January 13, 2010, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

No comparison between Bush deficits and Obama, who has taken pork, his redistribution agenda and lack of focus on jobs to a new level. This guy and his team has never run a business and it shows. As a small business owner, he and Princess Nancy are killing us. Remember all the new jobs under Bush until 2006 when the Dems took over Congress,
Fire the Dems in 2010 and Barry in 2012

Posted by: aredub | January 13, 2010, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

If that Stimulus bill was so imperative that we had to pass it without reading it, then why has only 220 billion of 787 billion been spent in 2009?
____________________________________
Nonsense. The bill was not only read, the Democrats incorporated major changes requested by the Republicans (who then refused to support it anyway out of partisan political motives).

Posted by: tierra | January 13, 2010, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

If that Stimulus bill was so imperative that we had to pass it without reading it, then why has only 220 billion of 787 billion been spent in 2009?
____________________________________
Nonsense. The bill was not only read, the Democrats incorporated major changes requested by the Republicans (who then refused to support it anyway out of partisan political motives).
Posted by: tierra | Jan 13, 2010 4:52:29 PM
So what your saying is that they are in incompetent then, thanks for clarifying. Maybe you don’t understand what money disappearing in districts that don’t exist across America. That’s called stealing, and they are stealing from us and generations to come. If the Democrats called it TARP2 or “Government growing bill” then maybe the country wouldn’t have expected, you know jobs or a growing economy?

Posted by: Karl | January 13, 2010, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

Be all you can be in the army. Obama is asking for a budget increase to 700 billion dollars for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. No better time to join the army because that is where the jobs are. I hope the salaries for our troops is increased substantially.

Posted by: gjkotw01 | January 13, 2010, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

“The Bush Republican administration basically already accomplished this after promising ‘small government’ and a ‘business’ approach.”
I do not appreciate your partisan smears.

Posted by: tjp612 | January 13, 2010, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

“The Bush Republican administration basically already accomplished this after promising ‘small government’ and a ‘business’ approach.”
I do not appreciate your partisan smears.
________________________________
I don’t blame you – if I were a Republican I wouldn’t want it pointed out that up until Bush the entire national debt accumulated over all of the previous administrations totalled approx $5 trillion dollars. And the Bush administration added that much again in just one administration.
Plus of course they left the economy and the economy in sterling shape for the future. Pffft!

Posted by: tierra | January 13, 2010, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

There’s a man from WI who lost his job and his wife can’t afford her cancer treatment. Must suck not to have insurance. I thought everyone did. Anyway he couldn’t find work so he joined the army. And guess what? Now he can get medical treatment for his dieng wife. Be all you can be!

Posted by: JACKSON | January 13, 2010, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

tierra….only the 42% of beleivers beleive anymore. the credibility is gone, the trust is gone…no transparany on and on.obama owes pelosi and reid for his down fall and its only going to get worse.WE ONLY WANTED A JOB

Posted by: catman | January 13, 2010, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

“if I were a Republican I wouldn’t want it pointed out that up until Bush the entire national debt accumulated over all of the previous administrations totalled approx $5 trillion dollars. And the Bush administration added that much again in just one administration.”
But guess what? Obama is set to DOUBLE Bush’s $10 trillion over 10 years (I predict earlier as interest rates are historically low, more borrowing will be required to service higher debt payments).
So when Obama contributes $5 trillion to national debt in four years (same as Bush in 8 years) will we be hearing the outrage from you? (I don’t think so, given it won’t be written for you in the talking points you recieve)
Bush = Bad
Obama = DISASTER

Posted by: tjp612 | January 13, 2010, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

How dare this country become a socialistic country. Get rid of medicare and social security right now!

Posted by: JACKSON | January 13, 2010, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

How dare this government regulate everyone. Aren’t we all God fearing christiana who know the right way to be?
NOT!!!!!!!!

Posted by: JACKSON | January 13, 2010, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

“So when Obama contributes $5 trillion to national debt in four years (same as Bush in 8 years) will we be hearing the outrage from you?”
Notice right wingers run away from explain what Bush actually did to complain about what might happen under Obama.

Posted by: Ryan C | January 13, 2010, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

In 2005 tighter regulations were proposed to rein in Freddie and Fannie. Barney Frank was downright angered at this suggestion telling the committee that there was no housing bubble and that fanne and fredie were in fact healthy.
In 2006 the senate and house came under Democrat control.
Anyone who thinks this was one mans fault is in la la land, and anyone who thinks one man can get us back to health shares this same mental state.

Posted by: david | January 13, 2010, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

So when Obama contributes $5 trillion to national debt in four years (same as Bush in 8 years) will we be hearing the outrage from you?
_____________________________________
Unlike the Republicans (and Bush), Obama didn’t come in promising ‘smaller government’ and a more ‘business-like approach’ and then double the entire history of national debt in the country.
Obama came in on the heels of the largest economic collapse the country has seen since the Great Depression – and – LIKE EVERY OTHER WESTERN INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRY in the world – has instituted stimulus plans, deficit financing and tax cuts. You seem to be the only one foolish enough to think the economic collapse can just be laughed off.

Posted by: tierra | January 13, 2010, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

If that Stimulus bill was so imperative that we had to pass it without reading it, then why has only 220 billion of 787 billion been spent in 2009? Money going to imaginary districts that don’t exist with the intent on saving jobs. Instead raises were given, or people bought lawnmowers, boots, and the pathetic list goes on.
Karl | Jan 13, 2010 4:47:02 PM
Passed without reading it? They had weeks to read it and staffs of dozens of lawyers to research the final (very limited) markups. And I suppose you believe Warren Buffet doesn’t listen to his staff of lawyers but rather personally reads every last word of a merger contract? A shallow urban legend is hardly a compelling argument.
The money isn’t being spent fast enough? Well, of the $787 billion, almost a third were tax breaks (including $70 billion defined by an accepted Republican amendment). When is that spent in your ‘analysis’?
So off the actual spending, about half of the $500 billion in real spending was spent in the first year? That seems right, particularly since job growth is well known to lag economic recovery (has in every recession on record). It would make perfect sense to spend half the money to get the economy stabilized and half to continue the stimulus to avoid a double dip recession and get job growth established.
The jury is still out on whether the stimulus is big enough, period, to get job growth started again (most economists say no, but it was the biggest stimulus Congress could pass), but the timing of spending is pretty close to textbook. A bit slow due to all the anti-waste documentation and supervision going on, and the tax cuts are pretty poor stimulus (but included in a futile attempt to appease Republicans), but nothing unusual.
And arguing that the money was spent too slowly than pivoting to whining about ‘fraud’ that is actually typos is disingenuous. Hundreds of billions of dollars have been spent and the Republicans have not found a single juicy case of even half a percent of the money being stolen or spent on a bridge to nowhere. That kind of management takes time, but it has left them with nothing more to whine about than money that was spent on legitimate projects that didn’t properly define the congressional district they were performed in.

Posted by: jhw539 | January 13, 2010, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

So when Obama contributes $5 trillion to national debt in four years (same as Bush in 8 years) will we be hearing the outrage from you?
tjp612 | Jan 13, 2010 5:13:35 PM
And if he doesn’t? Will we be hearing from you just like all those Republicans recanted their dire warnings about Clinton’s tax increases when he left office with the smallest deficit (an actual surplus by many accounting methods) in a generation?
Bushes tax cuts were an unfunded trillion dollar liability AND DID NOT CREATE JOBS AS WELL AS CLINTON’S TAX HIKES. Yet no Republicans cared about the disproving of their trickle down dogma, and even after the Republican rubber stamp Congress proved the failure of tax cuts to stimulate the economy under Bush, what do they want now?

Posted by: jhw539 | January 13, 2010, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

“Notice right wingers run away from explain what Bush actually did to complain about what might happen under Obama.”
Notice that I stated “Bush = Bad”. Liberals make a mistake in assuming that conservatives all unblinkingly supported Bush. Most of us despised his penchant for spending money (particularly late in his term).
I have yet to hear any of you Obamabots offer any criticism of your Messiah’s performance on spending or anything else.

Posted by: tjp612 | January 13, 2010, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

The thing most democrats are afraid of is that eventually all countries get the government they deserve. What is sickening is so many UNEDUCATED IDIOTS who watch Faux News actually deserve to be ruled by the likes of Palin and Cheney and Glen Beck. The rest are smarter but they are greedy jerks or superstitious (NOT spiritual) morons. I hope they’re children enjoy living in a second class country —their moronic parents and grandparents will never tell them the truth —they elected union-busting , war-mongoring , people whose motto was Greed is Good and thus they are getting what they deserve. Unfortuntly they will probably drag us educated democrats down with them!!!

Posted by: Debbie Curnes | January 13, 2010, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

In 2006 the senate and house came under Democrat control.”
Correction, Democrats assumed Control of Congress in Jan 2007.

Posted by: Ryan C | January 13, 2010, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

“And if he doesn’t? Will we be hearing from you?”
Yes, jhw, you will. Unfortunately, I will not be proven wrong.

Posted by: tjp612 | January 13, 2010, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

“Bushes tax cuts were an unfunded trillion dollar liability AND DID NOT CREATE JOBS AS WELL AS CLINTON’S TAX HIKES.”
So, jhw, if tax hikes can be used to “create jobs” and tax cuts do not, why is it that Obama has proposed tax credits to small businesses to encourage job creation.
Something doesn’t quite mesh here, perhaps you can help out.

Posted by: tjp612 | January 13, 2010, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Nice to know that we still have “the right to feel deflated”

Posted by: Cw | January 13, 2010, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Democratic Congress, and White House and it’s STILL the last guys fault. Um, so when do we hold him accountable? After we give him a second term for his accomplishme… er, speeches!?! The idiocy of the personality cultists knows no limts. No wonder they are losing the American people. (But don’t feel bad… Europe still likes you!)

Posted by: jafo | January 13, 2010, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

The annointed one, with all of his super powers hasn’t gotten unemployment below 10% yet?
Tsk, tsk.

Posted by: fred | January 13, 2010, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

What?? Some people are blaming Bush? Didn’t Obama make the comments? LOL

Posted by: Cw | January 13, 2010, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Correction, Democrats assumed Control of Congress in Jan 2007.
Ok, you got me. Know what Lame ducks are?

Posted by: david | January 13, 2010, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Several months into his first term, President Bush’s popularity was in the low 40′s, and the economy was heading south. Only 9/11 “rescued” his first term popularity as new wars tend to. After being handed a disaster of two wars and a near-dead economy, Obama had popularity more than ten points above Bush at a similar juncture. He has worked almost to completion a major overhaul of the nation’s health care system,and still has a majority with him. So what does Fox News have to say? Just the usual nonsense.

Posted by: Eugene | January 13, 2010, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

I don’t know anyone who feels “deflated” I know a lot of people who feel CONNED by Obama.

Posted by: Cw | January 13, 2010, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Why do so many Democrats mention Fox news in an ABC website? If people listen to Fox don’t you think they would be there?
Get a clue!!

Posted by: Cw | January 13, 2010, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Whatever they say about fox news doesnt move anybody. Fox news is the best media house as they speak the truth and most of the others remain so bias!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: paul | January 13, 2010, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

“I look at all these negative posts & I suddenly realize that their are so many mentally ill people in our great country. They listen to Fox , they all love Limbaugh. And the hate just keeps spewing from their insides. That is the downfall of this great country. Very sad.”

Posted by: tierra | January 13, 2010, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

Fox remains the best and people all over the world are coming to realise the fact that foxnews is the best place to get the real fact about the US govt.This is the reason why their ratings are going up.

Posted by: paul | January 13, 2010, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

“I look at all these negative posts & I suddenly realize that their are so many mentally ill people in our great country. They listen to Fox , they all love Limbaugh. And the hate just keeps spewing from their insides. That is the downfall of this great country. Very sad” posted by tierra 7:10
Oh give me a break you hypocrite….LOL your posts are some of the worst written here!

Posted by: Adam | January 13, 2010, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Adam….They have not facts to refute. So, they must ‘shoot’ the messenger. They are desperate.

Posted by: bonbud | January 13, 2010, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

Regardless of what he inherited he has surrounded himself with incompetents.
He is fond of saying “the buck stops here” but he spends Trillions. My grandchildren will be paying mortgages and down payments on cars for people long dead because of this guy. He is pushing a Bill MisLabeled Health Health Care Reform that will Cost TENS OF THOUSANDS of jobs. I am not deflated I am enraged! As I have said before I am an Independent, so I don’t buy “The Other Guy was worse Justification for the Obama incompetence.

Posted by: rick | January 13, 2010, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

Eugene | Jan 13, 2010 6:48:03 PM…Can you be more specific about what Fox says? What about AP and CNN?

Posted by: bonbud | January 13, 2010, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

I want Scott Brown to win so he may prevent the healthcare catastrophy. So, I went to his website and mad a small donation.

Posted by: bonbud | January 13, 2010, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

“Fox remains the best and people all over the world are coming to realise the fact that foxnews is the best place to get the real fact about the US govt.This is the reason why their ratings are going up.”
By that logic Survivor has some of the finest acting every presented on the silver screen.
If course stupid logic but hey its the right wing.

Posted by: Ryan C | January 13, 2010, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

I believe we can start this dialog by starting as follows: In the first year of Obama, Americans are fed up and over-inflated with false promises, and exhausted and deflated financially, mentally, and spiritually over the still
catatonic economy, expanded wars, and anxiety over expected retaliation by terrorists.
I expect Obama public approval ratings to sink further as the Wall Street firms will start passing out the 2009 year-end million bonuses to their employees -at a time that unemployment is still at its highest levels. That will have a profound effect on millions of ordinary Americans who thrive on conspiracy theories among the government and the big corporations to gulp most of the wealth of our country at their expense. And, given the fact that ordinary Americans have spent their extra money on the Christmas season, while the unemployed and financially strapped are still struggling to survive, I don’t see where the spending needed to move the economy -and Obama’s ratings- upward will come from.
That continued uncertainty would probably translate into “an egg in the face of Obama.” Having pumped out trillions from the U.S. Treasury to re-inflate the collapsed Wall Street conglomerates without prohibiting them to take as much as they want in bonuses was bad enough. But now they are getting ready for their second round of millions in bonuses – before they did their part to restore the economy as they were supposed to. And that will be viewed by many suffering Americans like a robbery of public funds, while the Obama administration stands by like a look out co-conspirator!
The current sliding in polls shows that Obama does NOT represent the “change”
he touted so much during his presidential campaign. In fact, he is doing worse in both the economy and the wars than Bush would have done if he were still president. Nikos Retsos, retired professor

Posted by: Nikos Retsos | January 13, 2010, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Oh come on Adam
Don’t you know that Democrats never “spew hate” as long as it’s to inform the “ignorant” and —what was it tierra—-”foolish” Republicans! Hate is a terrible thing and there is plenty to go around on BOTH sides! The attitude that people may not disagree or question Obama will be the downfall of the Democrat majority next year.

Posted by: brittany | January 13, 2010, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

isn’t this the same guy who gave himself a B+ for his first year?

Posted by: davidfrat21 | January 13, 2010, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

How much did it ‘cost’ us to hear we have every right to feel deflated ?. What an absolute failure.

Posted by: cfiman | January 13, 2010, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Don’t you know that Democrats never “spew hate” as long as it’s to inform the “ignorant” and —what was it tierra—-”foolish” Republicans!
_________________________________
Because people say ‘foolish’ things is not a grounds for ‘hating’ them, nor is it a hateful thing to say about someone.
On the other hand, you can watch right wingers and Republican on this very blog spew hatred at the President and the Democrats day after day after day, many times a day.
Anyone who frequents this blog has seen it. These people embarrass and disgrace whatever legitimate remnants of the right wing might be left in America.
And they set a very poor moral tone for the country.

Posted by: tierra | January 13, 2010, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

For Pete’s sake! The guy had been in the Senate prior to spending the majority of his time running for president!! His excuses have caused more ‘DEFLATION’ because they show a LACK OF LEADERSHIP AND DETERMINATION ON HIS PART>
He might start by getting rid of his Sec of Treasury and his Chief OMB!! Geithner may prove to be part of the meltdown problem (and if he didn’t know what was going on in Wall Street, WHY DIDN’T HE??) And as for his Chief OMB, that boy needs to learn to take some cold showers. Let me get this right: 1) he is married with kids, but recently got a divorce; 2) had a girl friend who just delivered his kid; 3) and at the correspondent’s dinner last spring, met and fell over heels for one of ABC’s reporters, who he is now engaged to!! This guy does not have time to do his job at OMB!! Get someone who can keep his mind on this COUNTRY — NOT THE OPPOSITE SEX!!
Obama is not engendering confidence with the people he hires!!!

Posted by: PappyHappy | January 13, 2010, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

Same old excuse…..they did it so I can do it too. What are you — 8 years old? It’s OK if you decide to drop to their level—–but don’t expect to get a free pass when you try to lecture others about posting “negative posts” or “spewing hatred”. That makes you a hypocrite.

Posted by: brittany | January 13, 2010, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

I coin this behavior “Political Baron Von Munchausen Syndrome”. Create a problem, then bask in the sick attention whilst proclaiming the cure. It’s getting pathological folks.

Posted by: Osteoblast | January 13, 2010, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Just wondering why Obama was so desperate to please Georgie Soros that he allows these 9/11 twits to be tried in NY civil courts. Then he’s got the stones to tell everybody that we’re ‘at war with Al Qeada’…well duh. But you don’t see him backing off treating terrorist murderers as though they just robbed a liquor store. And then I’ll hear the Dems say Palin is not qualified.

Posted by: Bill | January 13, 2010, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

Posted by: Bill | Jan 13, 2010 9:58:05 PM
If you kept up with this particular news blog you would have learned that “since 9/11, hundreds of terrorists have been convicted in civilian courts, including the so-called “shoe bomber” Richard Reid, who is now serving a life sentence in a maximum security detention facility.”
In other words, hundreds of terrorists were tried in civilian court under the Bush administration.
Maybe Obama and Bush are right?

Posted by: tierra | January 13, 2010, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

And we’re more and more deflated the longer these Democrats stay in power.

Posted by: JustMe | January 13, 2010, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

And we’re more and more deflated the longer these Democrats stay in power.
_________________________________
Come on . .. everybody knows we’re all just trying to pick up the pieces from the Bush Republican administration. Nobody wants to go back to that nonsense. We haven’t even got the mess cleaned up from their last party.

Posted by: tierra | January 14, 2010, 1:15 am 1:15 am

I feel like Obama did not have the back ground to appreciate how important it is for Americans to have a JOB. Perhaps too much affirmative action help for him.
I wish he would have made jobs a priority. Too many people are suffering in this great country and we are going down hill in many ways.

Posted by: tm | January 14, 2010, 1:51 am 1:51 am

No wonder he hasn’t been able to bring people together. He’s lied to us constantly. The only thing transparent about his administration is their lies! (Example: his promise to put health care discussions on CSpan. He could do that, but won’t.) Also, there is NO WAY that it was Holder’s decision to try KSM in civilian court. He truly thinks we”re STUPID if he thinks we believe him on this. Please give us back our country!

Posted by: jyychem | January 14, 2010, 2:50 am 2:50 am

More of the same. We inherited this mess and can’t do a thing about it. It’s like “I’ve fallen and can’t get up”. “Must be Bush’s fault but I’m still great”.
Did it ever dawn on anyone that the job losses in Dec, Jan, Feb and Mar were due to Obama outlining his policies since the early Nov election: raise taxes, healthcare costs uncertain, cap & trade, necessarily higher energy prices (Obama’s words), anti-business rhetoric, more regulations for business and card check. All kill employment and move jobs overseas.
Can’t any of the libs give a strong argument on why Obama is good for the country or the economy without mentioning Bush or blaming someone else. Obama says he is “pretty good”. Defend his economic positions please…..you can’t!

Posted by: Gwen | January 14, 2010, 2:53 am 2:53 am

Did it ever dawn on anyone that the job losses in Dec, Jan, Feb and Mar were due to Obama outlining his policies since the early Nov election:
_____________________________________
Nonsense.
The economic collapse during the Bush administration was a world-wide economic collapse. The banks and financial institutions did not collapse because of something Obama said. The automobile companies did not go bankrupt because of something Obama said.
Jobs have been moving overseas for decades – the vast majority under the Bush administration. (see the following)
—————————
February 10, 2004
WASHINGTON — The movement of American factory jobs and white-collar work to other countries is part of a positive transformation that will enrich the U.S. economy over time, even if it causes short-term pain and dislocation, the Bush administration said Monday.
The embrace of foreign outsourcing, an accelerating trend that has contributed to U.S. job losses in recent years and has become an issue in the 2004 elections, is contained in the president’s annual report to Congress on the health of the economy.
LA Times

Posted by: tierra | January 14, 2010, 6:32 am 6:32 am

Obama’s ego needs deflating.

Posted by: Cw | January 14, 2010, 7:30 am 7:30 am

All of that hope and change.. can be very deflating…

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | January 14, 2010, 8:36 am 8:36 am

Tierra – and I suppose that the poor Dems are totally blameless and spreading nothing but sunshine and lollipops?

Posted by: mj | January 14, 2010, 9:03 am 9:03 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.