By MichaelJames

Jan 16, 2010 6:00am

Obama Questions the ‘Audacity’ of Those Who Say the Bank Fee Is Unfair

ABC News' Sunlen Miller reports:

In his weekly address, President Obama unloaded on critics of the bank fee, questioning how anyone could have the “audacity” to suggest his proposal is unfair.

“Like clockwork, the banks and politicians who curry their favor are already trying to stop this fee from going into effect," he said. "The very same firms reaping billions of dollars in profits, and reportedly handing out more money in bonuses and compensation than ever before in history, are now pleading poverty. It’s a sight to see.”

The president said the poverty plea is hard to believe when Wall Street banks are handing over more money in bonuses and compensation this year than the cost of the fee over the next 10 years. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay back the American taxpayers, the president said.

“Those who oppose this fee have also had the audacity to suggest that it is somehow unfair,“ President Obama continued, “that because these firms have already returned what they borrowed directly, their obligation is fulfilled. But this willfully ignores the fact that the entire industry benefited not only from the bailout, but from the assistance extended to AIG and homeowners, and from the many unprecedented emergency actions taken by the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and others to prevent a financial collapse. And it ignores a far greater unfairness: sticking the American taxpayer with the bill.”

The president said that this is unacceptable to him.

“We’re not going to let Wall Street take the money and run. We’re going to pass this fee into law,” the president said, pledging to work with Congress to get his proposal passed.

“After a very tough two years," he said, "after a crisis that has caused so much havoc, if there is one lesson that we can learn, it’s this: We cannot return to business as usual.”

-Sunlen Miller

User Comments

The president complains that there are no jobs created because the banks are not making loans, then put a tax on them so they will not make loans talk about audacity. Need to fire whatever czar you have advising you on this.

Posted by: earl | January 16, 2010, 7:29 am 7:29 am

Those who say the bank fee is unfair do so for one reason only….It was proposed by Obama…No one looks objectivity at a decisions merits any longer…If it is proposed by a Democrat Republicans oppose and vice versa. And the parties work very hard to sway those in the middle..It is all politics…That is why more and more people are shunning political parties..

Posted by: indy_voter | January 16, 2010, 7:50 am 7:50 am

“We’re not going to let Wall Street take the money and run.
“after a crisis that has caused so much havoc, if there is one lesson that we can learn, it’s this: We cannot return to business as usual.”
Another load of feces from the comedian in chief LOL
What is the real difference between wall street and your pathetic administration as far as taking OUR money and running? With wall street there is some chance of a return with your policies OUR tax dollars are just vanishing into your redistribution scheme.
Business as usual? where’s your CHANGE and HOPE You need to be sent back to the minor league you do not have the the tools for the big show

Posted by: formerdem | January 16, 2010, 8:07 am 8:07 am

*87% of Americans do not work for unions*…………… Obama just exempted the unions cadillac healthplans from a 40% tax until 2018..in response to this decision, the AFL-CIO immediately packed its baseball bats and descended on Massachusetts to clear the deck for Obama…and the president is lecturing on AUDACITY this week?

Posted by: cindy | January 16, 2010, 8:21 am 8:21 am

Any new fees will ultimately be passed on to bank customers so in effect Obama is creating a tax on the American people.

Posted by: Simple | January 16, 2010, 8:23 am 8:23 am

I don’t know about banking, only what is reported. Banks have made a big deal about paying back tarp, with interest. As a matter of fact it was then Congress that suggested that they might use these profits for further jobs bills. Some banks didn’t need tarp but were forced to take it. If these banks then played by the rules set by tarp, kept the financial system from collapsing, paid the money back with interest then what is this tax really about? Absent from any of the talk of banks doing wrong is Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, institutions with a far worse record than banks ran basically by the Government with many board members part of the political elite. Why is there no mention of these guys?
Stealing is wrong. It doesn’t matter if it is a bank getting legislation passed to make stealing easier or if it is people playing the “Alinsky” playbook using other means to steal back what they claim has been stolen from them.
From an outward perspective it looks as if this is a diversion tactic to take peoples minds off the fact that they are getting poorer by the minute, that jobs are not being created and homes are still being lost and that healthcare reform is another tactic to rob from Peter to pay Paul.

Posted by: david | January 16, 2010, 9:10 am 9:10 am

I especially like the way Obama has punished Fannie/Freddie for their part in screwing up the economy.
He gave them a blank check.
Talk about audacity.

Posted by: ollie | January 16, 2010, 9:19 am 9:19 am

Done you love Obama’s new populist tone.
He’s the people’s president–looking out for the little people.
Going to bring us together in 2010.
So how does he explain those backdoor sweetheat deals that reward his special friends.
If Obama is so worried about our money maybe he should stop using it for bribes.

Posted by: kandy | January 16, 2010, 9:24 am 9:24 am

And we should believe anything Obama says because…..
I’m thinking he has looked at the polls and will say just about anything to bring up his numbers.
Guess he’s counting on the MSM to hide those transparency lies and sleazy deals with the unions.

Posted by: kyle | January 16, 2010, 9:33 am 9:33 am

Should we be surprised that the Republicans opposed this tax? Republicans fuels the greed that ruin this country economy and they will continue to do so as long as their Banking Pimps bankrolls their campaigns. The Republicans are the biggest hypocrites in America. They politicize everything and do nothing for middle class except provide a lot of lip service and scare tactics with no substance or solutions of their owns. I’m sick of Republicans. I wish they would become distinct.
So if obama can’t keep his promise, just like health care, the Republicans will obstruct passage and than later blame obama for failure. If the voters don’t know by now that the Republicans will do anything they can to make sure Obama fails, they have not been paying attention. They could care less about what is best for the country, but instead they will do what they can to make Obama fail or what is best for Republicans and their rich cronies. Like I said, Republicans are a bunch of hypocrites.

Posted by: jack | January 16, 2010, 9:38 am 9:38 am

The “audacity” to call himself a president and a leader, as he buries the middle class..The culture of corruption continues
Where did the stimulus money go that was sent to 114 non existent districts and 14 FAKE zip codes???

Posted by: another crisis, another photo-op | January 16, 2010, 9:40 am 9:40 am

“Should we be surprised that the Republicans opposed this tax?”
Oh, Jack- go back and re-read your pre-digested democrat talking points. This is not a “tax”, it is a “fee”.
Interesting omission in the list of participants in this “fee” – somehow Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac won’t be included. Wonder why that is?
It’s almost as puzzling as how the health care plans of seiu and other unions won’t be classified as taxable “cadillac plans”.
Ah, love the smell of Chicago politics in the morning. Smells like….hot garbage.

Posted by: 2Brixshy | January 16, 2010, 9:57 am 9:57 am

The audacity lies with him and that
crazy bunch of loons running this
country. The audacity lies in taxing
the hell out of one group of people
and padding the pockets of others.
The audacity is that they think their
vision is all that there is with no
regard to the other view. He says
that Rep. have no ideas but just say
no. What do you call the Dems who
refuse to let Rep. into their den of
secrecy and let the voices of the other
half of the country who did not vote
for that empty suit ?

Posted by: wis134 | January 16, 2010, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Obama wants another tax.
What a surprise.
He’s got to find a way to replenish the Obama Stash Fund.

Posted by: larry | January 16, 2010, 9:58 am 9:58 am

“The “audacity” to call himself a president and a leader, as he buries the middle class..”
The middle class was already buried before Obama got elected. I thought the claim was he is trying to redistribute wealth from the often an unfairly maligned upper class. Right-wingers can’t keep their own baloney straight.

Posted by: Skip | January 16, 2010, 10:00 am 10:00 am

“The audacity lies in taxing
the hell out of one group of people
and padding the pockets of others”
The real audacity lies in giving the richest Americans trillion dollar tax cuts while doing nothing to stop your buddies from shipping our jobs overseas, throwing a drug plan and a multi-hundred billion dollar war on a Chinese credit card and then tell us you didn’t just totally rob the middle class.

Posted by: Skip | January 16, 2010, 10:17 am 10:17 am

Banks won’t lend, businesses won’t hire, people won’t spend.
It’s simple.
There is no real trust in this administration.

Posted by: ollie | January 16, 2010, 10:36 am 10:36 am

What a joke.
Obama is worried about our money?
Should have thought about that before he signed a stimulus that guaranteed bonuses to AIG.
And why didn’t he veto earmarks like he promised?
Obama doesn’t care about our money.
Or the future of our kids/grandkids.

Posted by: phil | January 16, 2010, 10:42 am 10:42 am

Obama creating villains again to try and hide that he is the biggest villain.
He’s the one making shady deals with our money just to ensure that his legacy survives.
The unfairness of the deal he made with unions is unbelievable.
Corrupt, underhanded,disgusting.
Compared to Obama, the banks look like saints.

Posted by: kandy | January 16, 2010, 10:48 am 10:48 am

It doesn’t matter if Obama’s presidency is an epic failure.
He has nothing to lose.
His future is set, his kids are set for life.
After Obama has virtually destroyed America he will probably just move to Europe.

Posted by: mick | January 16, 2010, 10:51 am 10:51 am

Skip, then you have to be outraged
that Obama has compounded the problem.
I won’t defend the actions of the last
eight years, but no way can you be
happy that this guy we voted in is
George Bush on steroids.

Posted by: wis134 | January 16, 2010, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Debates held behind closed doors,not on cspan as promised. Giving medicare deals to one state while neglecting another, taxing fast and loose bankers while rewarding Freddie and Fannie and the Politicians that oversaw the collapse with unlimited tax resources. Excluding unions, especially Government employee unions from the cadilac tax but “break it off” in others in the private sector and my number one “glaring” point is that Congress will not be part of healthcare reform therefore passing a law that does not apply equally to everyone.
Hope and Change? I think not.

Posted by: david | January 16, 2010, 11:03 am 11:03 am

The “fee” is just one more aspect of the Left’s overall effort towards wealth redistribution and the ultimate agenda of destroying Capitalism and Individual Freedom.
President Obama admitted, “that because these firms have already returned what they borrowed directly,” doesn’t mean “their obligation is fulfilled.” So paying back the bailout loans including the agreed upon interest isn’t enough. Now JUST BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE MONEY they should pay even more. Yes that IS UNFAIR! So yes the Republicans are against it! In fact ALL Americans should be against it because it is UNAMERICAN!

Posted by: James Danley | January 16, 2010, 11:47 am 11:47 am

I believe Mr. Obama needs to re-introduce himself to the “kitchen table” of the middle class because he obviously has to clue as to how jobs are created thus bills paid and houses kept…He has loss touch to the real world as he sits in his Ivory Tower…………..

Posted by: Parallex View | January 16, 2010, 11:52 am 11:52 am

President Obama admitted, “that because these firms have already returned what they borrowed directly,” doesn’t mean “their obligation is fulfilled.” So paying back the bailout loans including the agreed upon interest isn’t enough. Now JUST BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE MONEY they should pay even more. Yes that IS UNFAIR! So yes the Republicans are against it! In fact ALL Americans should be against it because it is UNAMERICAN!
Posted by: James Danley | Jan 16, 2010 11:47:30 AM*****************
If he gets this approved, what next? It could only be a short jump to those evil people who have made money in their 401K’s that also need to help GM, Fannie, and AIG stay afloat.

Posted by: wheresmymoney | January 16, 2010, 11:53 am 11:53 am

skip…He’s just dug the grave deeper don’t spin Obama has not help one promise…Try volunteering at a food pantry, shopping for REALLY poor kids and have a single mom fall into your arms crying with thanks for your efforts, just for buying coats for the kids, I have, not a pleasant feeling..check out the unemployed lines at the EDD, people stressing out over getting their benefits extended as so not to lose their house, which my college educated kid with a new baby is going through now, been shopping at a mall of late, notice all the empty store fronts with for lease signs…check out the empty parking lots and streets…Your President Obama promised “change” we voters just didn’t realize the change meant to the negative…Time for a change all right…Please people VOTE in 2010/2012

Posted by: Parallex View | January 16, 2010, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

the plans of unions will be taxed just at a ater date like 2018

Posted by: matsuiny2004 | January 16, 2010, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

These fees are a sideshow. 16 months since the financial meltdown and Washington still hasn’t done one significant thing to stop it from happening again.
We have the best gov’t that Big Finance can buy.

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | January 16, 2010, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

check out the unemployed lines at the EDD, people stressing out over getting their benefits extended as so not to lose their house, which my college educated kid with a new baby is going through now, been shopping at a mall of late, notice all the empty store fronts with for lease signs…check out the empty parking lots and streets…Your President
Posted by: Parallex View
what you mention as being Obama’s fault shows that you lack the knowledge of economic realities caused by the crash.
if your assumption is that any other president would have somehow put the majority of the country back to work after such a collapse, you are foolish…. will all of Obama’s pronouncements and policies work? of course not, but to assume that what happened would be fixed in a short period time is nonsense.

Posted by: TJ | January 16, 2010, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Obama questions the audacity of anyone who questions him period! This is nothing new.

Posted by: whatsgoingonhere? | January 16, 2010, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

How about the audacity of raising taxes on Americans during a recession?
Liberal lawmakers all over the country are still pushing the raising of taxes. Passing government health plan will result in our taxes raised to pay for it.
Obama himself, while he was campaigning of course, said that raising taxes during a recession was a bad idea. Now he’s advocating removing charitable contributions as a tax write off so that he can take more of our money – to distribute it of course.
BTW: jack – where were you the last 9 years?

Posted by: EPU | January 16, 2010, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

How about the audacity of raising taxes on Americans during a recession?
***************************************
How about lowering taxes during a time of War? After all we are at war in Iraq, Afghanistan; we have the war against terror, the war, against drugs, The GOP has the war against Obama, and America. How do you expect to pay for it all?

Posted by: Thinking | January 16, 2010, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

I love how the Republicans can always get the little guy to do their bidding like feeling sorry for the banks. These banks had devised so called “programs” like sub-prime mortgages to get people to buy houses that in some cases they could not afford. Remember, your mortgage banker gets commission on the closings so it is in his or her best interest for themselves to get you a loan for a home. In my opinion, banks and mortgage companies will always qualify you for a larger mortgage than you can really afford because their thinking is that you will forego vacations, going out to dinner,etc. in order to make your mortgage payment. I believe they knew exactly what they were doing when they instituted these scams.. oh, I mean programs. I think the banks knew they were risky from the start, but continued to push these programs because it brought in alot of revenue for their companies. So let’s all feel sorry for these banks. Have you checked your bank’s fee schedule lately…every fee from copies of documents to overdraft fees have gone up so they can make more money off their customers. Check the rates paid on Certificates of Deposit they have gone down so as the banks take in more in fees they will pay out less in interest.Just another way to makemore money. Funny the banks don’t feel sorry for us. Looks like the bank customers will be paying for the banks making bad decisions.
So now the Repubs want us to feel sorry for the big banks. Well boohoo, I don’t. They dug their own graves with their GREED. If you did something at your workplace that caused the business to lose money and possibly go out of business do you think you would get a big fat bonus. No, you would be fired immediately.

Posted by: What the Hey | January 16, 2010, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

I can’t believe Obama has the “audacity” to say this stuff. Well actually I can…he will say anything to get the populist response.
Obama loves to create villians for everyone to hate. By pitting groups against each other constantly, the public tends to focus on the latest “outrage” and ignore his consistent failures as a leader and as a decent person. This tact is exactly what leaders in Iran and Venezuela and other fine upstanding nations do when they have a willing media to pull if off.
I am concerned that the “class” warfare that he and his administration is creating will have severe negative long term effect on our great nation.The democrats should be held accountable for this in 2010.
I think there is a great opportunity for someone to come in and fill the void with leadership and a true message of hope and unity. Let’s hope someone can rise to the occasion.

Posted by: Big Cedar | January 16, 2010, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

And let’s not forget about the Auto Industry and the Unions that got bailed out too! They should be taxed also instead of getting ‘special exemptions’!!!
DOUBLE STANDARD PARTY (aka Democrats)

Posted by: RUKidding?? | January 16, 2010, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Well, obama, we Americans question your audacity in saying that the bank fee IS fair.
Get over yourself.

Posted by: ceeLeelee | January 16, 2010, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

If he wanted to stop the banks from looting the taxpayers he would fire Geithner and Summers, etc. But he says one thing and does another. We need leaders who put Americans first.

Posted by: Bubles | January 16, 2010, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

“These banks had devised so called “programs” like sub-prime mortgages to get people to buy houses that in some cases they could not afford.”
Posted by: What the Hey | Jan 16, 2010 1:00:25 PM
_______
Actually it was the federal government and organizations like ACORN who used extortion (the government threatening hefty fines; and ACORN threatening and actually filing lawsuits) that FORCED the banks and lending companies to lower their lending standards and give out high risk loans.
I don’t want you to feel sorry for the banks. I want you–and all of America–to understand that it is the principle of the thing. You don’t steal money from people just because they have the money. It would be just as wrong for the banks to declare–AFTER YOU PAID YOUR LAST MORTGAGE PAYMENT–”since you have demonstrated that you can afford to pay us over the last 30 years, you should continue paying us for the rest of your life,” as it is for the federal government to now charge a fee/tax on these companies above their already agreed upon payback.
Wake up America! Stop the Left’s assault on Capitalism and Individual Freedom.
Banks are private companies. They have the right to determine what they want to do with their profits. If they choose to give themselves hefty bonuses then that is their right. The recipients of these bonuses will pay their taxes on that money. And most will either invest or spend that money–and that creates jobs. The federal government stealing money from these companies will only mean less profits–less spending and investing–and fewer jobs being created.

Posted by: James Danley | January 16, 2010, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

I will tell those who are worried about how we pay for everything with two wars going on, stop paying medicaid (stop spending your money on tats, cell phones, gold teeth…, spend it on insurance), food stamps (don’t work, don’t eat), SCHIP (see medicaid above), education department (government wing of teachers union because we know the kids don’t vote)…. I could go for hours. Spend the collected taxes on what the constitution allows the government to spend it on, like wars, border inforcement… Get the idea? No, another example of why we should get rid of the department of education.

Posted by: jim | January 16, 2010, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Hey, I’d like to get some interest on my savings! What is Obama trying to do – break the banks?
You couldn’t give me a Chevy with their baloney EPA ratings. A solar panel would be worthless too. Now am I supposed to put my money under the matress?

Posted by: Bill | January 16, 2010, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

I just got news from MoveOn that VISA is charging a 3 % handling fee for a donations that you make for Haitian relief. I just made a donation through my VISA credit card, and I am infuriated. The CEO’s of Wall Street banks will get additional bonuses because of the earthquake in Haiti.
Bear in mind that Scott Brown, like every member of the GOP, gets campaign contributions from the banking industry. In addition to killing health care reform, Brown will kill all attempts to reform the banking industry, so VISA will get to keep all they money they are making right now because of this earthquake. The banking industry will reward Scott Brown by giving him generous campaign contributions.
So Scott Brown will win the election, but the people of Haiti and all the Americans who are making donations through their VISA credit card will lose

Posted by: William Joseph Miller | January 16, 2010, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

More Bait-and-Switch from the Tyrant, pointing fingers again to keep you from noticing his own deep links to the Evil Bankers.
The very best thing that could happen to him and his damn Despotic Democrats in power is for Scott Brown to win on Tuesday. We need the Democratic Party to be forced to return to democratic principles.

Posted by: Carol | January 16, 2010, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Credit card companies charging companies and organizations a 3% handling fee for accepting credit card charges has been going on for decades.
The fact that Scott Brown gets campaign contributions from the banking industry is no different than Martha Coakley getting contributions from unions.

Posted by: James Danley | January 16, 2010, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

“More Bait-and-Switch from the Tyrant, pointing fingers again to keep you from noticing his own deep links to the Evil Bankers.”
Posted by: Carol | Jan 16, 2010 3:40:39 PM
“Hey, I’d like to get some interest on my savings! What is Obama trying to do – break the banks?”
Posted by: Bill | Jan 16, 2010 3:05:11 PM
________________________________________
Same problem. The anti-Obama types can’t get their stories straight. One week he’s in the pocket of the big banks and Wall Street – the next he’s redistributing the wealth to the poor.
One moment he’s enslaving the population to socialist, big government health care, the next he’s selling out to the capitalist health insurance industry, and big pharma.

Posted by: tierra | January 16, 2010, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

“Actually it was the federal government and organizations like ACORN who used extortion (the government threatening hefty fines; and ACORN threatening and actually filing lawsuits) that FORCED the banks and lending companies to lower their lending standards and give out high risk loans.”
To quote one of your favorite icons James: “there you go again…” No, the government or anybody else for that matter didn’t force the banks to lower their lending standards to give out high risk loans to all your Republican friends so they could flip houses and move into mcmansions they couldn’t really afford. Lending institutions were happy to do so on their own by dumping the risk off on the derivatives market and elsewhere.

Posted by: Skip | January 16, 2010, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

So, any taxpayer who has a bank account will end up paying part of those outrageous bonuses twice? Anyone who believes that the banks will eat it and not pass it on to customers is naive at best. Audacity is trying to pull the wool over the taxpayers eyes again and again.

Posted by: Temujin | January 16, 2010, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Posted by: Temujin | Jan 16, 2010 3:57:21 PM
Right. Banks should be allowed to reap as much profit, pay themselves as gigantic bonuses as they want – basically just do whatever they want because if we attempt to tax them, or put on fees, or influence them in any way they’ll just charge us for it.
So just let them take whatever they want, they’ll get it anyway. That’s the American spirit!

Posted by: tierra | January 16, 2010, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

This person is a complete incompetent. Those who continually defend him are defending the unconscionable.

Posted by: Chiara | January 16, 2010, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

Posted by: tierra | Jan 16, 2010 4:06:58 PM
The American spirit thrives in the Free Market. Charge what you want and make as much profit as you want. THAT IS THE AMERICAN DREAM. Only keep in mind that if you charge too much customers will go elsewhere and you may go out of business.

Posted by: James Danley | January 16, 2010, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Next up on the agenda he’ll be addressing the “audacity of plaintiffs lawyers who have been looting the medical system for decades!
Oh wait, they give all their donations to democrats so no need for outrage there!

Posted by: Rick H. | January 16, 2010, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

THAT IS THE AMERICAN DREAM. Only keep in mind that if you charge too much customers will go elsewhere and you may go out of business.
____________________________________
No it is the American Dream having become the American Nightmare when people are too afraid to speak out or attempt to corral the megalithic monopolies of large corporations because they might charge them higher fees.

Posted by: tierra | January 16, 2010, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

No it is the American Dream having become the American Nightmare when people are too afraid to speak out or attempt to corral the megalithic monopolies of large corporations because they might charge them higher fees.
Posted by: tierra |
When are the Democrats going to do something besides demagogue the banks? 2010? 2011? Ever?

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | January 16, 2010, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

Right. Banks should be allowed to reap as much profit, pay themselves as gigantic bonuses as they want – basically just do whatever they want
Posted by: tierra | Jan 16, 2010 4:06:58 PM**************
That is what PRIVATE businesses do. As long as they are within the law, it is noone else’s business. The President is trying to place “FEES” after the deal was done. The banks borrowed money, and they paid it back with interest. The deal is done. YOU can’t take someone else’s money just because they have more than you and you don’t think it is right, and the President shouldn’t be able to either.

Posted by: wheresmymoney | January 16, 2010, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

“Bear in mind that Scott Brown, like every member of the GOP, gets campaign contributions from the banking industry.”
Interesting. And yet you believe that obama received no money whatsoever from countrywide? Check the records- clownshoes is right up there with Dodd in the donations rankings from countrywide. We’ll just sit back and wait for your outrage about that, miller.
And speaking of Massachusetts, you’re okay with coakley receiving gobs of big pharma cash for her campaign?

Posted by: 2Brixshy | January 16, 2010, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

That is what PRIVATE businesses do. As long as they are within the law, it is noone else’s business.
_______________________________________
The President can also do whatever is within the law including imposing fees on banks.
I am not going to weep over banks who are paying individuals millions of dollars in bonuses – you go ahead and weep for those people receiving the millions of dollar.
Most of the American public is not weeping for those dealing out or receiving the millions dollar bonuses. Most of the American public is just trying to feed their families and make the mortgage payment – and if they’re lucky – keeping their health insurance.

Posted by: tierra | January 16, 2010, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

“The President can also do whatever is within the law including imposing fees on banks.” Posted by tierra***********
But is it legal? We shall see. It looks like Mafia strong arming. Only there do you owe more after the debt is paid.

Posted by: wheresmymoney | January 16, 2010, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

A $60 billion gift to the unions.
That’s audacity.
I pray the MA race starts the beginning of the end of Obama, Pelosi, Reid.
I’d be willing to bet that many in his own party do not even like Obama as a person. The man cares more about his legacy than anything else.

Posted by: fran | January 16, 2010, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

This is how Obama is described in “Game Change”.
Arrogant,sensitive to slights, bored with his job in the Senate. Someone with a Messianic self-image, cold calculating Chicago politician.
The MSM is more concerned about the way Palin, Hillary, and Elizabeth Edwards are trashed in the book.
The MSM is the only thing saving Obama’s butt. They got him elected and now they are protecting their investment.

Posted by: mick | January 16, 2010, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

Complaining because the bank PAST ON A FEE for charging a donation……But I am betting you are a supporter of Obama’s passing on additional fees to banks, who provide financial services for the community as well as business loans, …who….wait for it…will only in turn pass the extra cost of Obama’s fees on to you the consumer and business…The banks are a for profit business who must declare a profit for their shareholders OR they will no longer remain in business because they no longer declare a profit..Would you invest your hard earned money in a company who looses money??? Of course not, because if you did you would not have the means to donate to worthy causes such as Haiti….AND…Banks need to profit so that they will be there for the consumer for things like school loans, home loans, business loans. They do more good than some would have you believe..Get use to it, the extra fees of banking, and stop complaining…besides isn’t this what Obama’s supporters wanted…sticking to big business…LOL…And now big business will be sticking it to the people…..Auh the humanity of it all….

Posted by: Parallex View | January 16, 2010, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

“The banks are a for profit business who must declare a profit for their shareholders OR they will no longer remain in business because they no longer declare a profit..”
_______________________________
You mean those banks that had to be propped up by the taxpayer because they failed so absolutely?

Posted by: tierra | January 16, 2010, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

No tierra, I mean those banks that PAID BACK THE GOVERNMENT LOANS WITH INTEREST…You on the other hand must be confusing the banking industry with the automobile industry, oops let us NOT forget about AIG as well, like GM and Chrysler and BIG Labor Union who have paid back ZIP…..but yet get a 40% tax pass on health care “Cadillac” plans, that companies also provide these plans as part of salary compensation to their non-union employees, the rest of us are surely going to have to make up for….

Posted by: Parallex View | January 16, 2010, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

, I mean those banks that PAID BACK THE GOVERNMENT LOANS WITH INTEREST…
__________________________________
Yes, those would be the ones who were failing so catastrophically the tax payer had to prop them up.

Posted by: tierra | January 16, 2010, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

40% tax pass on health care “Cadillac” plans
____________________________________
That tax applies ONLY to the amount over the limits, not on the entire plan. In other words only on the part of the plan premiums received by the insurance company that are above $,8900 for individuals and $24,000 for families – and the tax is assessed on the insurance companies, not on the payer.

Posted by: tierra | January 16, 2010, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

“…the ones who were failing so catastrophically the tax payer had to prop them up.”
The emphasis is on the tax payer HAD TO prop them up, because he or she had no say in the issue. The federal government didn’t ask the tax payers if they wanted to have their money used to prop up the banks (or the auto companies). The federal government made the decision and the tax payers had to live with–and pay for–the decision. The Tea Party folks are absolutely right. Enough is enough! We need to put a stop to this tax & spend madness by the Democrats.

Posted by: James Danley | January 16, 2010, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

We need to put a stop to this tax & spend madness by the Democrats.
__________________________________
Stop your nonsense. The TARP funds were conceived and put in place under the direction of the Republican Bush administration. Pinpointing blame on the Democrats is bogus.

Posted by: tierra | January 17, 2010, 2:59 am 2:59 am

Tierra, the Democrats have had control of the both Houses of Congress since January 2007. It’s Congress that appropriates and spends the money. But at least you are consistent–give credit and blame for the President and apparently none of either to the Congress! You don’t seem to give the Republicans credit for the economic success of the 1990s even though they had the control of both Houses of Congress during President Clinton’s last SIX years.

Posted by: James Danley | January 17, 2010, 9:08 am 9:08 am

Correction: I should have just said, “It’s Congress that appropriates the money.” Obviously the Executive and Judicial Branches spend money too!

Posted by: James Danley | January 17, 2010, 10:30 am 10:30 am

This is great news. I hope they enforce this new fee against all banks and insurance companies who received TARP funds and all bad faith insurance companies. The government needs to stop these corrupt insurance companies.

Posted by: Frank | January 17, 2010, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

Tax on banks because of bonuses, etc? How stupid does the government think we are? Any tax levied on banks will be passed through to bank users so that banks maintain their profit margin. So the government again uses a thin excuse to justify sucking money out of American’s pockets. Besides, it was corporate greed AND the failure of government regulation that led to this mess to start with. I’ve got a great idea: why don’t we all move our accounts to credit unions and vote the current politicians out of office in upcoming elections? There’s an idea that makes sense.

Posted by: J Jay Evans | January 18, 2010, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

The more I thought, the madder I got. The final quote “We cannot return to business as usual.” What tremendous gall! Again, the implication is that business is bad, government is good. People, our government LET the businesses act in the way that led to the spot we’re in now. Without reform in the way that the government does business, we are NEVER going to get the economy on track again. After using taxpayer funds to bail out business, is the best they can come up with to tax banks and bust insurance companies in ways that will ultimately cost even more taxpayer dollars? Congress votes itself raises and better benefits, regardless of them trying to turn everyone in the country into paupers who lick the government’s fingers for their daily crumbs! Quit blaming business. Instead, blame and deal with the ones who were supposed to control this mess and didn’t — our representatives in government.

Posted by: J Jay Evans | January 18, 2010, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.