Jan 19, 2010 12:01am

Obama To Announce “Race To The Top” Expansion

ABC News’ Mary Bruce Reports:

President Obama will announce plans today to continue and expand the “Race To The Top” stimulus grant competition for education reform, requesting $1.35 billion in his FY-2011 budget to fund the program.

“We want to challenge everyone – parents, teachers, school administrators – to raise standards, by having the best teachers and principals, by tying student achievement to assessments of teachers, by making sure that there's a focus on low-performing schools, by making sure our students are prepared for success in a competitive 21st century economy and workplace,” President Obama said in a statement.

While the President’s announcement – to be made at the Graham Road Elementary in Falls Church, VA – will specifically relate to the FY-2011 budget, the administration wants to continue the competition indefinitely.

“We certainly want to support this type of competition and this level of reform until we felt like, and others felt like, we had made significant progress across the country,” a senior administration official said. “There’s no definite end date or cut off, but we certainly see this as a key reform and a key investment that we would want to continue funding and that’s why it’s a permanent part of our FY-2011 budget.”

The administration also envisions expanding the competition to the district level. “There are great benefits to opening ‘Race To The Top’ to school districts who are willing to take on the blueprint of reform and the changes needed in district-level policy to better advance some of those reform priorities,” according to a senior administration official. Competition at the district level would likely require a new scoring system and criteria.

Obama’s announcement comes on the same day as the deadline for states to apply for the first of two rounds to compete in the $4.35 billion “Race To The Top,” funded by the Recovery Act. 

“This competition has generated an overwhelming response from over 30 states in just the first round of funding. By continuing, we have an opportunity to create incentives for far-reaching improvement in our nation's schools,” Education Secretary Arne Duncan said in a statement.

So far 11 states have moved to change their laws or policies to better compete, including Massachusetts, Tennessee and California (to participate states must show they are improving teacher instruction and assessments, adopting common academic standards, overhauling failing schools, and using data systems to inform decisions). In New York, lawmakers met yesterday for a special session to debate legislation that could better the state’s position to compete.

Other states have opted not to enter the competition at all. In Texas, for example, Governor Rick Perry pulled out their submission last week saying he did not want to hand over the state’s education system to “unelected bureaucrats and special-interest groups” in Washington.

– Mary Bruce

User Comments

How will they judge the progress during the “Race to the Top”? Will there be objective grading criteria, as in “No Child Left Behind”, or will it truly be “Race to the Top” as in preferences for certain schools?

Posted by: csbd | January 19, 2010, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Democrats have owned public education since the 60′s and it never gets better. It’s just this side of a sure bet that it will not improve under this president.

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | January 19, 2010, 1:01 am 1:01 am

good action from Mr. president

Posted by: vietnam | January 19, 2010, 1:14 am 1:14 am

nice action and informations

Posted by: buat web | January 19, 2010, 1:17 am 1:17 am

really nice info

Posted by: propolis | January 19, 2010, 1:17 am 1:17 am

re: Governor Rick Perry ..state’s education system to “unelected bureaucrats and special-interest groups” in Washington.
Hilarious Perry saying that when as you can see from the following that Texas provides a real ‘non-biased’ education for it’s students free of religion and religious dogma
The Republican majority on the board also gave a thumbs down to requiring history teachers and textbooks to provide coverage on the late Sen. Edward Kennedy and new Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor,
the board’s social-conservative bloc, Republicans left Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton and former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall, the nation’s first black justice, on the list of important figures
they also added, on a 7-6 vote, Eagle Forum founder Phyllis Schlafly, the National Rifle Association, Moral Majority and the Heritage Foundation to the list of persons and groups that students will learn about.
Texas’ State Board of Education adopted new health textbooks that promote traditional marriage and focus almost exclusively on abstinence among forms of birth control. The books were heavily supported by social and religious conservatives and opposed by many educators and public health advocates. Texas has the nation’s highest teenage birth rate.

Posted by: Oh how they did'st ramble | January 19, 2010, 1:24 am 1:24 am

Democrats have owned public education since the 60′s and it never gets better. It’s just this side of a sure bet that it will not improve under this president.
__________________________________
Nonsense. The Republicans have been in power many times since the 60′s. Are you saying the Republicans are that inept they can’t make changes when they’re in power? Or just that they didn’t care?

Posted by: tierra | January 19, 2010, 2:09 am 2:09 am

“Race to the top”..I want to believe it , I do. Three of my kids have graduated from public schools. Our education system is the vice grip of the teacher’s union. My son’s AP physics teacher disappeared for three weeks and returned with an ankle bracelet. He was being monitored as a result of his third DUI. My daughter’s AP chem teacher was so illiterate in her subject, she actually had them watch Pirates of the Carribean in lieu of an exam, and gave them points-(equivilant to those of a test)-for bringing in toppings for an ice-cream sundae party. And yes, I complained bitterly to anyone (the principal, the board, other teachers) who would listen. Both of these teachers are now tenured.

Posted by: cindy | January 19, 2010, 6:43 am 6:43 am

We parents also bear our share of the blame. I know dads who will attend every single one of their sons’ football PRACTICES, but wouldn’t think of spending one second helping them with their math homework.

Posted by: cindy | January 19, 2010, 6:47 am 6:47 am

apologies all around, my third post..this officially qualifies as a rant..but if our system stinks so bad, and is turning out kids who are ill prepared for college and the work force..why do we still “teach” HOME ECONOMICS?? My kids were “taught” how to make micro-wave smores at school…How about a class on personal finance instead? How to create a budget, sign a contract, buy a home, dress for success..DITCH THE MARSHMALLOWS!!

Posted by: cindy | January 19, 2010, 7:10 am 7:10 am

Exactly why is this needed? There is a Department of Education with a budget of $70 billion a year.
What are THEY DOING?
It doesn’t educate a single kid.
This is just throwing away more money. It is as big a waste as is the Education Department.
This is more PC tripe. BTW, Head Start is a miserable failure.

Posted by: drjohn | January 19, 2010, 7:25 am 7:25 am

“We certainly want to support this type of competition”
Competition? What about the self-esteem of the losers?
“making sure our students are prepared for success in a competitive 21st century economy and workplace,”
I’ve been listening to this crap for 30 years. It hasn’t changed since the days Obama was doing cocaine.

Posted by: drjohn | January 19, 2010, 7:28 am 7:28 am

Doesn’t the word competition mean someone is left behind?
If everybody wins no matter what happens, it’s not a competition.

Posted by: drjohn | January 19, 2010, 7:29 am 7:29 am

If I were a teacher,good at what I was doing and interested in making more money I would be “racing” for the nearest school that had the best students.
Pity the poor teachers who are dealt a room full of lugheads like myself.

Posted by: david | January 19, 2010, 7:40 am 7:40 am

Can’t this guy take a breath in
running to spend money? You want
to do something to grab the attention
and turn lemons into lemonade, why
not tackle the 60 billion dollars
of waste and fraud in medicare and
then use that to fund something else ? They don’t want to fix whats wrong, they
just want to add to the bureacracy.

Posted by: wis134 | January 19, 2010, 8:34 am 8:34 am

Pity the poor teachers who are dealt a room full of lugheads like myself.
_______________________________
No pity here. You’re getting paid to teach – get on with it, or get out.

Posted by: tierra | January 19, 2010, 8:38 am 8:38 am

Doesn’t the word competition mean someone is left behind?
____________________________________
Nothing the matter with encouraging excellence in our kids. Everyone should be encouraged to the height and the heart of their skills. Excellence in teaching works with children at all levels including the top.

Posted by: tierra | January 19, 2010, 8:43 am 8:43 am

It will be interesting to see how many Republicans pile in with knee-jerk attacks on the administration even though this program is very popular with conservatives since it so strongly (and effectively) promotes charter schools and performance-based education (yes, and the holy grail of teacher pay based on performance).
Performance pay for teachers, allow charter schools, allow the firing of ineffective administrators, based funding on tested results – if they weren’t so distracted by healthcare, the left’s liberal fringe would be howling. The carrot approach has worked well, it is the local state legislators and parents best positioned to put pressure on the teacher unions and the rapid rate of reform successes (law changes allowing charter schools and pushes for teacher pay for performance) are concrete proof of this.
“States that do not have public charter laws or put artificial caps on the growth of charter schools will jeopardize their applications under the Race to the Top Fund,”Secretary Duncan June 8, 2009

Posted by: jhw539 | January 19, 2010, 9:00 am 9:00 am

why not tackle the 60 billion dollars
of waste and fraud in medicare and
then use that to fund something else ?
wis134 | Jan 19, 2010 8:34:07 AM
The Democrats have tried, and that is actually part of health care reform. The Republicans have strongly pushed back, with numerous ads attacking Democrats for daring to suggest there is any waste or fraud savings to be found in Medicare.
Read that again. The Republicans are so obstructionist that when the Democrats are trying to reduce Medicare waste and fraud *Republicans* are attacking them.

Posted by: jhw539 | January 19, 2010, 9:02 am 9:02 am

If I were a teacher,good at what I was doing and interested in making more money I would be “racing” for the nearest school that had the best students.
david | Jan 19, 2010 7:40:28 AM
That could prove pretty foolish. It is far easier to take a room of D students (never do homework, sleeping in class, making pictures on the test scantron sheets as a joke, etc) up to a room of C+ students than raise a room of B+ students (already doing homework, focusing, studying) to A+. Performance pay can be tied to the *improvement*, and the worst students usually have a lot more potential improvement starting up an easier slope.

Posted by: jhw539 | January 19, 2010, 9:06 am 9:06 am

To be fair, there are excellent teachers in the system as well, and frankly they should be the most outraged of all that the unions insist on retaining those who have proven themselves to be unworthy of their positions..but even the teachers are muzzled by their “real” bosses..and I’m not talking about the principal or the board.

Posted by: cindy | January 19, 2010, 9:12 am 9:12 am

“Nonsense. The Republicans have been in power many times since the 60′s.”
Posted by: tierra | Jan 19, 2010 2:09:11 AM
_________
Most of the large urban school districts have been controlled by the Democrats for the past 60 years. Yet it’s these same urban school districts that are failing and have very high dropout rates. That’s because the Democrats are more interested in the rhetoric–and having a perpetual campaign issue–rather than actually solving the problems.

Posted by: James Danley | January 19, 2010, 9:17 am 9:17 am

Many of these comments seem to be coming from people who have not been in the educational field of “teaching.” We pass laws, offer pay for excellence, and we deal with the product cast forth. In a business world we can cast out the inferior products. What a ruckus if we did that with children. Some people need to get a real life in touch with real people and try education for a while.

Posted by: JohnBoy | January 19, 2010, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Many of these comments seem to be coming from people who have not been in the educational field of “teaching.” We pass laws, offer pay for excellence, and we deal with the product cast forth. In a business world we can cast out the inferior products. What a ruckus if we did that with children. Some people need to get a real life in touch with real people and try education for a while.

Posted by: JohnBoy | January 19, 2010, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Could The Military Really Not Have Known About Bible Verses On Rifles?
perfect public education technique, put info on guns and sights, keep having wars, get religious indoctrination, learn while you kill…
Brilliant

Posted by: Oh Yeah | January 19, 2010, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Education will mean little if there are no jobs in the US, unless we all want to emigrate to other countries.
There must be government incentives to manufacture products and goods within our own borders, or jobs will not exist here.
We can either be taken over by China, for default on our debt, or we can be taken over because we have no means of support. The end result is the same.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | January 19, 2010, 10:50 am 10:50 am

drjohn | Jan 19, 2010 7:25:50 AM psoted: “This is just throwing away more money. It is as big a waste as is the Education Department. This is more PC tripe. BTW, Head Start is a miserable failure.”
I suspect the world has changed since you were a kid Dr. John. Back in 1950, 70% of teens were in school compared to 30% in Europe. This gave our country a huge advantage over economic competitors.
Graduation rates peaked in the 60s at 80%. Today, according to an educational advocacy group founded by Gen. Colin Powell, almost HALF of high school students in the 50 largest American largest cities do not graduate. This erosion of educational attainment puts our country at risk, threatens our long term prospects, and widens the gap between rich and poor.
I encourage you to read economist James Heckman’s report called “Schools, Skills, and Synapses”. America’s educational decline is not because of falling school quality or tuition costs. The core problem starts much earlier – according to Heckman, it’s because of deteriorating family environments over the past 40 years.
There are big gaps in educational attainment by age 5. Some kids are bathed in a family atmosphere that promotes education, but increasingly many don’t grow up the same way kids did in the 50s and 60s. Heckman’s study shows it is possible by age 5 to predict who will complete college and who won’t. Programs like Head Start are critical for these kids’ lives, for future graduation rates, for our country.
It’s not outsourcing, the evil trade unions, or illegal immigration that widens inequality and weakens America. It’s a basic SKILLS GAP. Boosting educational attainment at the bottom will always be vastly less expensive and more beneficial than trying to bully or quickly reorganize a global economy in our favor.
Our country desperately needs to improve educational attainment – this results in more tax payers, stronger competition, and less government handouts for future generations. Isn’t that what we all want regardless of our politics?

Posted by: CentrerOne | January 19, 2010, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.