By Jonathan Blakely

Jan 20, 2010 12:17pm

Plouffe: Dems Need to Pass Health Care Reform; House Passing Senate Bill a “Sound Option”

This morning I spoke with David Plouffe, the campaign manager for then-Sen. Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign, who said giving up on health care reform legislation would be a victory for the insurance companies and a disaster for Democrats.

“You’re seeing a lot of Republicans out there saying, you know, ‘Let’s just scrap it, let’s start over,’” Plouffe said. “That’s what we’ve been doing in this country for years, decades, and even generations. And that’s what the insurance companies want us to do.”

Plouffe said “the health care plan has become a caricature. And if we walk away from it now everyone who supported it is going to have all of the downside and none of the upside.” Not passing health care reform legislation would be “the worst thing we can do as a Democratic party.”

On the other hand, Plouffe said, “if this passes, every American is gonna say, ‘Hey—nothing’s changed for me in my ability to see my doctor.’ Seniors are going to see that they’re going to get relief on health care costs. Businesses are going to see costs go down. Pre-existing conditions are no longer going to be an issue in terms of coverage. So I think we have to press forward here. Most importantly because it’s the right thing to do for the country.”

As to what strategy Democrats should pursue in a Senate with only 59 Democratic votes, Plouffe said “the bill that was passed out of the Senate accomplishes a lot of the president’s priorities or all of them: Lowering costs, ending insurance company abuses, providing coverage in a way that’s going to strengthen our country for the long term.”

Asked about plans to have House Democrats pass the Senate bill, Plouffe said, “to me, it would probably be the, you know, a sound option because I think we cannot wait in this country.”
“We were given control of the House and Senate in 2006, we won the White House in 2008, we have to deliver, we have to lead, and if we don’t I think people will rightfully question you know how well this has really turned out,” Plouffe said. “So we have to really lead on this and have the courage to do so. And I think if we do that in the years to come, the country will be better off in the years to come but I think also politically we’ll be better off.”

In a not-so-veiled shot at Massachusetts attorney general Martha Coakley and her failed Senate campaign, Plouffe said, “obviously what’s frustrating about Massachusetts is I think even a mediocre campaign on our side would have won that race.”

Plouffe said that Sen.-elect Scott Brown’s opposition to Democrats’ health care reform proposals worked because “what’s happening now is on health care is there’s a lot of energy on the Republican party but even independents I think are being told, ‘Here’s what’s going to happen on health care: You’re not going to be able to see your doctor anymore, there’s not going to be any cost relief, you know, you’re not going to be able to get your procedures.’ None of that is going to happen and perhaps we need to do a better job of messaging that.

“I think the thing that’s going to solve that problem is to pass it. Because health care reform ultimately if it passes, the evaluation of it is not going to be a Washington, DC, spin war. Every  American is a consumer of health care and they’ll make their own decision about what does health care reform mean to me and I think if we pass this we’re going to begin to get the upside politically of taking on the insurance companies finally and delivering on some of the promise of the campaign from 2008.”

- jpt

User Comments

I’m waiting for Obama’s daily TV appearance.
Surely he will come out and tell us how successful his first year has been.
No anniversay celebration at the White House? Party number 170?

Posted by: kyle | January 20, 2010, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

Unfortunately, for this administration, the American people are not depending on either party to interpret legislation. They are reading it themselves, and it does not do anything even remotely as the democrats describe. This huge, overreaching attempt at a power grab has spurred the people to the realization that we must draw back the power in this country to ourselves where are founders intended it to be. We have just begun the process of wresting that power from the irresponsible hands of the political class.

Posted by: trinket59 | January 20, 2010, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

Health care reform would be an excellent legacy for this Congress. Even if it costs them their seats, they should look at Medicare – just as viciously opposed by Republicans (except it was going to turn America Communist overnight, not Socialist) and now so beloved Republicans are rushing to defend it. (In a similar vein, the Democrats who ended up supporting Welfare reform in the 90′s often lost their seats, but they did the right thing for America.) Do what’s right for America first, then worry about your campaign slogans.

Posted by: jhw539 | January 20, 2010, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

Jake,
Why in the world are good journalists like you talking to political hacks about the huge issues facing our country?!
He runs CAMPAIGNS. God help us that his kind is running the country.
Where are the “statesmen” among Obama’s advisers, ones interested in the country’s Good rather than the Democratic leadership’s Good? Is there one? Are there any at all?

Posted by: Carol | January 20, 2010, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

mr obama its time to be transparent. thats what we wanted instead of bribing senators. for once the pain in my stomach is gone thanks to the people of mass for showing me they do not move lock step iwth the democrats. i cant wait too see nancy pelosi on a commercial airline in november.

Posted by: catman | January 20, 2010, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Most of the American people have no idea what is in either of the health care bills.
I agree with Plouffe – the public image of the bill is a caricature.
Pass the bill. Let the people vote the Democrats out of power if that’s their will – and then let them deal with the Republicans back in power.
Pity America when that happens.
But lessons sometimes have to be learned the hard way.

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Do what is right for America by stopping this bill. Dont pass it. Why would you want to pass something that the American people as a majority dont want. Regroup, get leaders together and hash it out in the open, in public and get it right! Dems still have 59 votes in the Senate. 59.

Posted by: ted | January 20, 2010, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Why in the world are good journalists like you talking to political hacks about the huge issues facing our country?!
____________________________________
24 hours journalism means its all a great American Idol contest – that is why Brown won with his hogwash about being ‘Independent’ and (as a rich lawyer) having an old truck.

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Why would you want to pass something that the American people as a majority dont want.
____________________________________
You would pass it because most of the American people don’t know what’s in the bill – they are reacting to a caricature of the bill.
I say pass it, and let the Democrats be voted out if that’s what people want.
Then they’d be punished with having the Republicans back in power. Pity America when that happens. I would fear for the future with the war mongers back in power, but so be it. If ignorance is to reign, let it reign.

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

THE FAR LEFT’S DAYS OF CONTROL ARE NUMBERED
_______________________________
Oh goody! It’s back to the war mongers, the bankers and big oil in the Republican crowd. Perfect.

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Everyone knows what is in those health care bills and they REJECT this legislation. If every Senator who voted for this trash has to be replaced by someone who will not take bribes or burden us with extra taxes, or increase the deficit, then yes…..
sometimes lessons will be the learned the hard way.

Posted by: Jenny | January 20, 2010, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

Tierra-
The lesson that is being taught here in America since Jan. of 2009 is that people want transparency, change, hope. The lesson has been learned in NJ, Virginia, and MASS last night, that we need someone who is actually going to do it. YOU ARE RIGHT SOMETIMES LESSONS HAVE TO BE LEARNED THE HARD WAY. The DEMS are learning that lesson

Posted by: ted | January 20, 2010, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

always difficult to put your faith in people who want healthcare reform to fail when they are they same folks who rant about Obama’s birth certificate..

Posted by: OOPs | January 20, 2010, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

Everyone knows what is in those health care bills and they REJECT this legislation.
___________________________________
Nonsense. People do not know what is in these bills. People know what a truck is – that’s about it.

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

they compiled the worst track record on jobs in decades. And they ended up with the worst stock market in decades. I mean, it was a decade of conservative failure. And yet, Obama’s their villain?
-Think of all the crises and the disasters that you’ve described. And I would add to them things like the, what happened in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. And the Madoff scandal on Wall Street. And, you know, on and on and on. The Jack Abramoff scandal. The whole sordid career of Tom DeLay.
All of these things that we remember from the last decade. I mean, some of them that we’re forgetting. Like who remembers all the scandals over earmarking, anymore? And who remembers all the scandals over Iraq reconstruction? All that, you know, disastrous, when we would hand it off to a private contractor to rebuild Iraq. And it would, you know, of course, it would fail.
Those things have all sort of been dwarfed by the economic disaster and the wreckage on Wall Street. But I would say to you that all of these things that we’re describing here are of a piece. And that they all flow from the same ideas. And those ideas are the sort of conservative attitude towards government. And conservative attitudes towards governance.

Posted by: JayZ | January 20, 2010, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Everyone knows what is in those health care bills and they REJECT this legislation.
___________________________________
Nonsense. People do not know what is in these bills. People know what a truck is – that’s about it.
Posted by: tierra | Jan 20, 2010 12:37:50 PM
Hold on a minute, tierra. I thought you’d been chirping on the boards for quite a while that this healthcare bill has been the most open, transparent, explained, etc. etc. So, how could the people NOT know what’s in these bills? I mean, it’s been in the open ALL over the place, right?

Posted by: Shoe | January 20, 2010, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

The lesson here is that the Progressive NUTS do not care what the American people want or even what their own “party” can agree on. We need to get these progressives out of our government

Posted by: Scott | January 20, 2010, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

Scott Brown’s win is a wakeup call to Obama and the hacks that surround him.
We don’t like the direction they are taking our country.
Can they hear us now?
Boxer and Reid–we’re coming for them next.

Posted by: mick | January 20, 2010, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

Hold on a minute, tierra. I thought you’d been chirping on the boards for quite a while that this healthcare bill has been the most open, transparent, explained, etc. etc. So, how could the people NOT know what’s in these bills? I mean, it’s been in the open ALL over the place, right?
_____________________________________
Of course it has been. If you can find any bill that has recieved this much coverage, been posted for open review etc. – you go ahead and show us.
Regrettably, the American people bombarded by media tend NOT to really review what’s there – but instead rely on caricatures or cartoons of the legislation as put forward by million-dollar media hacks.

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

I think the telling news is that Brown tried to present himself as an ‘Independent’ – that even he knew people don’t really want Republicans at all.

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Looks like Obama’s new fake populist tone isn’t working.
Must have something to do with all the bribes, lies, and sweetheart deals.
The MSM can only hide so much.

Posted by: larry | January 20, 2010, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

Happy Anniversary to Obama
Sorry about you losing that supermajority. It wasn’t working anyway.

Posted by: ollie | January 20, 2010, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Sorry about you losing that supermajority. It wasn’t working anyway.
ollie | Jan 20, 2010 12:49:12 PM
A “supermajority” that included Joe “Vote for McCain” Lieberman and lasted just a bit over SIX MONTHS…

Posted by: jhw539 | January 20, 2010, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Hold on a minute, tierra. I thought you’d been chirping on the boards for quite a while that this healthcare bill has been the most open, transparent, explained, etc. etc.
Shoe | Jan 20, 2010 12:41:45 PM
I think I’ve been harping on that. And can you name ANY BILL, EVER that has had more hours of televised floor debate and amendment? Dedicated town halls in almost every district? Televised committee meetings, public markups and drafts released?
This has been the most transparent process for a large bill in the history of our nation – can you refute that by naming a bill?
As for people not understanding everything in the bill, calculus is open and transparent too…

Posted by: jhw539 | January 20, 2010, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

The MSM can only hide so much.
____________________________________
The MSM is owned by the big corporations – you’re a joke if you think they’re backing the current President.

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

People do not know what is in these health insurance bills. People know what a truck is – that’s about it.
_______________________________________
Sorry Jenny – this is the truth. Go ahead and try to dispute it.
Its not only the truth, its the primary reason why we’ve seen the results we did.

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

What Obama, his Administration, the Congressional leadership, and the Obamabots on this board do not understand is that Obama was voted in due to INDEPENDENT support, not far left wing Progressive support. They always get that support. This country remains a center, to center-right dominant country.
It’s the same lesson that Bush, the GOP, and the Christian evangelicals on the far right failed to understand in the middle of W’s terms.
Both candidates won because they ran on moderate, pragmatic platforms and promised to be uniters not dividers, to be post-racial, to be pragmatic and good for the country.
Instead, both W and O and their far right or left backers misread the mandate and thought the country all of a sudden turned red or blue and wanted radical conservative or liberal change.
The US and the electorate are like a race car that needs to go into the shop for tune-ups. They don’t want a new car that is radically different. They want their system tweaked and fine tuned by small incremental change.
This health bill and other pending legislation of cap and trade and card check is a huge over-reach that the INDEPENDENTS are rejecting.

Posted by: Aaron | January 20, 2010, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

This has been the most transparent process for a large bill in the history of our nation – can you refute that by naming a bill?
As for people not understanding everything in the bill, calculus is open and transparent too…
Posted by: jhw539 | Jan 20, 2010 12:52:39 PM
=======================================
Let’s first do a vocab/definition lesson here: Transparent=able to be seen through with clarity…free of deceit …easily understood or seen through….having the property that theories and practices are publicly visible, thereby reducing the chance of corruption…
Now…….Nebraksa and Louisianna come to mind first, but that is a no brainer on how corrupt those two back room deals were.
What about the fact that the bill itself is so vague and full of crap that refers to more crap that refers to more crap that most do not understand; that is of course unless you have many weeks and more than two lawyers to read the bill like the moron representing Michigan stated when he thought it was ludicrous that he was expected to read the bill let alone understand it.
But’ let’s dimiss that too.
how about the fact that for an administration who touted itself as being the most transparent ever and then refusing to televise the health care meeting on CPSAN like they said they would.
But, let’s dismiss that too.
How about the fact they worked out a deal with the Union’s so that their “cadillac plans” are not taxed something fierce like Congress wanted?
But, let’s dismiss that too.
How about the fact that there is more wording in there that gives special priviledge to the educating, hiring and retaining of minorities versus QUALIFIED indivdiuals irrespective of race.
But, let’s dimiss that too.
How about the vage and BS wording of whether or not abortion will be covered with tax payers dollars or that insurance companies will be forced to cover them. The fact that it does not EXPLICITLY state that it is either covered or not covered, in a court of law means it is covered until otherwise noted.
But, let’s dimiss that too.
No, this health care bill is NOT transparent JHW and I am a tad saddened at the fact that you think because a bunch of American’s showing their dislike for it at a town meetings means that it is.

Posted by: UnPoliticallyCorrect | January 20, 2010, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

This health bill and other pending legislation of cap and trade and card check is a huge over-reach that the INDEPENDENTS are rejecting.
____________________________________
I disagree. My take is that the Independents do not like the ugly politics – the ‘corruption’ of the Congress, the bickering, the image of the ‘big time’ politician.
That’s why they voted for Obama and the Democrats after the disaster that was the Bush presidency.
They expected the Obama administration to miraculously change all this.
What damaged the Democrats in this past year was the ‘Blue Dog’ Democrats who extended the bickering, the posturing and the infighting – and made it look like Washington was just ‘business as usual’.
In effect, the Blue Dogs were the same as the Republicans – posturing and strutting and bringing their power politics into the legislative process.

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

Posted by: UnPoliticallyCorrect | Jan 20, 2010 1:15:28
Lots of naysaying without answering the question. Can you name a big sweeping bill that has been more transparent–can you name ANY BILL, EVER that has had more hours of televised floor debate and amendment? Dedicated town halls in almost every district? Televised committee meetings, public markups and drafts released? Or is naysaying and picking apart the only quiver in your pack? Because while you may pat yourself on the back for that, most people with a brain find that pretty tired and boring–and brainless.

Posted by: There is no Planet B | January 20, 2010, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

The other thing to remember about the election in Massachusetts is this – that state already has its own form of universal health insurance coverage.
People in Massachesetts were told they’d be ‘paying twice’ if the Democrats passed their health care legislation.
Anybody want to vote for paying twice?

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Let’s first do a vocab/definition lesson here: Transparent=able to be seen through with clarity…free of deceit …easily understood or seen through….having the property that theories and practices are publicly visible, thereby reducing the chance of corruption…
UnPoliticallyCorrect | Jan 20, 2010 1:15:28 PM
So anything you don’t understand is not transparent. Got it.
Meanwhile, CAN YOU NAME ONE MAJOR BILL IN THE HISTORY OF OUR NATION THAT IS MORE TRANSPARENT? The bill name – lets see how open it’s process was, how many hours of televised debate, how many markups were released within hours of committee deliberations, how many town halls held that directly impacted the bill’s contents.
Cute trick – set an impossible bar (health insurance reform has to be so simple I understand it AND it has to be fully defined/legalese to stand up in a court of law!) and then whinge when the xxxx bill (doesn’t really matter what the bill is, as long as Obama likes it, Right?) doesn’t meet it.

Posted by: jhw539 | January 20, 2010, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

Those things have all sort of been dwarfed by the economic disaster and the wreckage on Wall Street. But I would say to you that all of these things that we’re describing here are of a piece. And that they all flow from the same ideas. And those ideas are the sort of conservative attitude towards government. And conservative attitudes towards governance.
Posted by: JayZ | Jan 20, 2010 12:40:49 PM
=======================================
WOW……natural disasters…..Bush must have had a joy stick at his hands and made the hurricane not only roll right into New Orleans, but he forced the vast majority of them to stay even though they were warned to leave.
Better yet, heaven forbid we rest the blame for a failed evacuation plan by the idiot mayor of his own chocolate city, MORON in Charge Nagin.
Nope, much easier to blame a white man right? Heaven forbid anyone think about individual responsibility-what a notion.
Then of course it was Bush’s fault that the levees failed too, because the decades of reporting prior to Bush even being governor of Texas had nothing to do with it either huh?
Does that make Katrina Clinton’s fault too? I mean, the levee’s were failing during his era too!
Tom Delay—LOL—like Harry Reid? Dispute this please, it should be hilarious!
Wait…Robert Byrd, yes please explain him in the Democratic platform old MR KKK himself!
I suppose you think it is okay to have a Black Caucus but not a White Caucus huh?
Oh that’s right, some home white people of today must some how pay for the past indiscretion of others.
Right-forgot about that rule!
Housing crisis—Clinton warned about it and the Democrats said there were no problems. Republicans and Bush warned about it and the Democrats not only said no problems, they said Fannie and Freddie were doing just fine and that Franklin “Scam the books” Reins was doing a fine job.
LMAO….remind me of that scandal.
Wait, Chris Dodd scandal
Wait, Charlie Rangle scandal
Wait, William Jefferson from LA convicted
Wait…..oh i give up, the list goes on and on and on

Posted by: UnPoliticallyCorrect | January 20, 2010, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

We have just seen evidence of the system working. Bad politics can be stopped! Thanks Mass! This is a win for “We The People!” Democrats, Republicans and Independents should all see this as a step in the right direction. Any super majority will cause division. Ultimate power corrupts.

Posted by: Post the truth! | January 20, 2010, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

The problem with the current Congress is most are like “tierra” and just want to pass the bill. They say Americans don’t know what’s in the bill or what’s good for them. The truth is Americans know more about the bills than Congress and we certainly know what’s better for us.
Democrats should be thankful that Brown was elected because they still have a chance to keep their majorities where if they passed the bill the rallying cry to “Reverse ObamaCare” would have led to Republicans overtaking both chambers…a potato could beat incumbent Democrats if ObamaCare passes.
It’s still going to be a great election for Republicans just not as successful as if a health bill was passed.

Posted by: ProudAmerican | January 20, 2010, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Obama needs to drop the populist routine..it is not working for him. I don’t think when he campaigned on transparency he meant this. It is so obvious what he is trying to do to drum up populist support it is sort of funny and sort of sad all at the same time.

Posted by: Big Cedar | January 20, 2010, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Nope, much easier to blame a white man right? Heaven forbid anyone think about individual responsibility-what a notion.
_______________________________________
Okay, we know where you’re going from now. Thanks for spelling it out.

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

tierra, Un Political is right. Stating fact is not being racist.

Posted by: Post the truth! | January 20, 2010, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

I disagree. My take is that the Independents do not like the ugly politics – the ‘corruption’ of the Congress, the bickering, the image of the ‘big time’ politician.
That’s why they voted for Obama and the Democrats after the disaster that was the Bush presidency.
They expected the Obama administration to miraculously change all this.

I agree with you, Tierra. I’m actually pretty ticked that we’ve offered up such lame candidates in NJ, MA and VA. I have to hand it to Brown and McDonell for running good campaigns with an independent gloss.
Also, I’m ticked at independents for being much less independent of insurance and oil shill influence than one would hope for from “independents.”

Posted by: There is no Planet B | January 20, 2010, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

So anything you don’t understand is not transparent. Got it.
Meanwhile, CAN YOU NAME ONE MAJOR BILL IN THE HISTORY OF OUR NATION THAT IS MORE TRANSPARENT? The bill name – lets see how open it’s process was, how many hours of televised debate, how many markups were released within hours of committee deliberations, how many town halls held that directly impacted the bill’s contents.
Cute trick – set an impossible bar (health insurance reform has to be so simple I understand it AND it has to be fully defined/legalese to stand up in a court of law!) and then whinge when the xxxx bill (doesn’t really matter what the bill is, as long as Obama likes it, Right?) doesn’t meet it.
Posted by: jhw539 | Jan 20, 2010 1:25:33 PM
=======================================
Actually JHW, I do understand the bill as it is written today in both the house and the senate. The problem is that most Americans do not and they should be able to.
there is no need for the language that is currently in there, ESPECIALLY when Congressional leaders cannot even understand it.
If they cannot understand it, remind me then what qualifies them to be allowed to vote for or even against it?
The fact that there is more language in there that does NOT pertain to covering the alleged 47 million who do not have it today is the issue.
It would make more sense to pass something small that would cover the basic and THEN work on fine tuning it.
I am curious as to your answer for this:
if the health care bill is such a necessity right now so that more people do not die or go bankrupt because they cannot afford it, then why even make abortion part of the bill?
They would have had most senators on board just by denying abortion-period.
whether you are for or against abortion is not the issue, the issue is making tax payers pay for and insurance companies cover it.
Do you see the irony it this?
We will not pass health care if abortion is not in there, therefore more people are going to die and/or go bankrupt because they cannot afford healthcare that we will not approve unless abortion is covered.

Posted by: UnPoliticallyCorrect | January 20, 2010, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Plouffe said, “if this passes, every American is gonna say, ‘Hey—nothing’s changed for me in my ability to see my doctor.’ Seniors are going to see that they’re going to get relief on health care costs. Businesses are going to see costs go down”
What is this guy smoking? Your ability to see you doctor will change when they are overwhelmed by so many more people being in the system. How are seniors going to get relief on health care costs when the government isn’t going to pay providers as much for Medicare? I guess they’ll see relief if they just die. How are businesses going to see costs go down? There is NOTHING in this bill to bring down the cost of healthcare nor the cost of insurance premiums.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 20, 2010, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

This is important . ..
The other thing to remember about the election in Massachusetts is this – that state already has its own form of universal health insurance coverage.
People in Massachesetts were told they’d be ‘paying twice’ if the Democrats passed their health care legislation.
Anybody want to vote for paying twice?

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

There is NOTHING in this bill to bring down the cost of healthcare nor the cost of insurance premiums.
___________________________________
You’re an expert? Sorry, I’ll take the studies by the Congressional Budget Office over your guesses.

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

People know exactly what is in the Senate’s version of the healthcare bill (which is a misnomer) and don’t like it. The problem is that the Democrats on the Hill don’t understand WHY people don’t like it & assume that the only reason they don’t like it is that they don’t understand it. They don’t get that the Federal government has NO business getting involved in this. They don’t understand why people don’t want the Federal government intimately involved in their lives. And THAT is the problem.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 20, 2010, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

People know exactly what is in the Senate’s version of the healthcare bill (which is a misnomer) and don’t like it.
___________________________________
People know ‘exactly’ what’s in the bill – don’t be foolish. People know only whatever their particular brand of media has told them is in the bill.

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

tierra, I think you underestimate the voters in Mass. If you work for a living and have any idea of how business works, you should be able to understand the health care proposal (as it is/was) is bad for our economy and the individual. If on the other hand you are on welfare, the bill might look really good. I suggest improving your life with education and work hard to get out of debt. Improve your health with exercize and diet and stop smoking. Take control of your own life.

Posted by: Post the truth! | January 20, 2010, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

he Federal government has NO business getting involved in this. They don’t understand why people don’t want the Federal government intimately involved in their lives.
Posted by: ellsbells930
cancel on medicare, repeal all banking laws and let the consumer beware, bring back segregation and slavery.. let rampant pollution begin..
light the fires, and lets get to burning books

Posted by: IOU | January 20, 2010, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Lines like this crack me up:
“As to what strategy Democrats should pursue in a Senate with only 59 Democratic votes”
Eisenhower, Reagan, Bush ’41, and Bush ’43 never had as many senators ‘on their side’, and were very effective leaders. This administration is going all wee-wee because they have to make a deal to get ONE Republican to agree withthem. One. That is minimal number needed to be considered bi-partisan, and that is (apparently) a bridge too far for the Dems…
Democrats wave squandered/wasted their supermajorities, and now all is unravelling because the lost ONE seat!?
Grow up and lead, stop whining Dems.

Posted by: N2vip | January 20, 2010, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

tierra, I think you underestimate the voters in Mass
___________________________________
Not at all.
Massachusetts already has its own form of universal health insurance coverage.
People in Massachesetts were told they’d be ‘paying twice’ if the Democrats passed their health care legislation.
Anybody want to vote for paying twice?

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

tierra, You are using a quote from Olberman, over and over again. Boring.

Posted by: Reality | January 20, 2010, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

Also, it will be interesting to see how Reid and Pelosi fare in their fight for power. Then we will be able to see where the country stands, without lame excuses.

Posted by: Reality | January 20, 2010, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

What is in the bill or not in the bill, the majority of america does not care. They dont want this bill. How hard is it to get through some peoples heads. LISTEN TO THE PEOPLE! I know how everybody has to have facts and backups for an argument. The majority of america is telling us no. Politicians just to the right thing.

Posted by: ted | January 20, 2010, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

tierra, You are using a quote from Olberman, over and over again. Boring.
____________________________________
Not at all; its my own observation – haven’t watched Olberman.

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

tierra, ok.

Posted by: Reality | January 20, 2010, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Yesterday, Americans voted for FREEDOM over hot air empty promises.
If you want to find the nation with the ultimate social safety net, look no further than the Soviet Union.
Maybe, for just a short period of time, Americans have regained a bit of common sense.
Davie Crockett said best when stated, “Any government that is big enough to give you anything you want is big enough to take away everything that you have.”
Does America really want to have every finite aspect of their lives determined in Washington? Is FREEDOM no longer valued?
Yesterday at least, in Massachussetts at least – the people voted for FREEDOM.

Posted by: review | January 20, 2010, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

What is in the bill or not in the bill, the majority of america does not care. They dont want this bill.
_____________________________________
You are wrong and you are right.
Most people only know what their particular brand of media has told them about these bills.
They do not know what is in the bills.
They are suspicious of ‘big time politicians’ – so they are suspicious of the bills. That’s the essence of it. That’s one of the main reasons Brown won – he pretended to be an ‘Independent’.

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

What is in the bill or not in the bill, the majority of america does not care. They dont want this bill.

Thank you, Ted. Right wingers and tea party types don’t want this bill no matter what’s in it or not in it. They just wanted to oppose it, no matter what. Your honesty is refreshing as most people on the right try to hedge and pretend they do have a brain and care about health care reform in some shape or form.

Posted by: There is no Planet B | January 20, 2010, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

“You’re an expert? Sorry, I’ll take the studies by the Congressional Budget Office over your guesses.”
You mean the study that compared 10 years of revenu to six years of service outlays?
Or the study that included only the federal portion of millions of new enrolless added to Medicaid as key feature of the bill. (The states say, “Hello unfunded mandate.)
Or the study that assumes a 20% slash in Medicare reimbursements to doctors two years from now?
Is that the study you mean?

Posted by: review | January 20, 2010, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

THERE IS NO PLANET-
I know I am right. The majority(DEM,REP,IND.)dont want THIS bill. If your a democrat you get to help with the bill, if your not you cant come to the back room and make deals. WAKE UP, MASS showed you last night what they thought of their DEMS. They voted for a REP. probably not because they like rep. but because they want to wake up the DEM. My brain works just fine, better get yours reevaluated after last night if you think you all can keep on doing the same old thing

Posted by: ted | January 20, 2010, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

“Anybody want to vote for paying twice?”
No. And that’s just one more reason why any productive, taxpaying person would not want the health care bill. They’d be paying at least twice – for their own premiums and to support the free loaders.
Thanks for making this point.

Posted by: smoothhoops | January 20, 2010, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

tierra go and check msnbc poll…74% say NO HEALTH CARE BILL AND FOCUS ON JOBS. thats from MSNBC. the far left is out of touch even with the far left. yesterday was the first step to getting this country back from the grips of george soros and obama.

Posted by: catman | January 20, 2010, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

if the dems were smart they would put nancy pelosi back on commercial airlines. she is done and she is ruining your party.

Posted by: catman | January 20, 2010, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

Posted by: smoothhoops | Jan 20, 2010 2:04:19 PM
Sorry, you missed the point.
I was referring to the vote in Massachusetts and why the results are what they are.
Massachusetts already has its own form of universal health insurance coverage.
People in Massachesetts were told they’d be ‘paying twice’ if the Democrats passed their health care legislation.
Anybody want to vote for paying twice?
——————————
p.s – I don’t think you have a very good understanding of these bills nor how premium payments would work.

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

Tierra-
he didnt pretend to be an independent. He won because he listened to what people wanted. Its a new concept in politics, not very politicans have ever used this tactic before but it works!

Posted by: Ted | January 20, 2010, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

tierra – You don’t have a very high opinion of your fellow Americans, do you? You sound exactly like the liberal pundits from last night. “The people can’t possibly know what is in it, otherwise they would want it.”
Sorry to tell you, people DO know what is in the bill from their own research.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 20, 2010, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

he didnt pretend to be an independent.
__________________________________
Ted you’re not being honest. Even in his acceptance speech Brown presented himself as an independent. He distanced himself from the Republican party – and that is understandable given the party’s appalling record when they were last in office. The Republicans are lucky people bombarded by 24-hour media seem to have short attention spans.

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

tierra …the dems are being viewed as marxists and maoists h@ll bent on tearing this country down and tranferring wealth. WE WANT JOBS.i cant believe that the dems self destructed so fast. THANK GOD.

Posted by: catman | January 20, 2010, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

IOU – You are being a bit dramatic, don’t you think? Actually, I would like to see Medicare go away. The creation of that program is what caused our healthcare system to end up where we are.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 20, 2010, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

Posted by: tierra | Jan 20, 2010 2:08:18 PM
“Anybody want to vote for paying twice?”
DIDN’T MISS YOUR POINT.
No. And that’s just one more reason why any productive, taxpaying person would not want the health care bill. They’d be paying at least twice – for their own premiums and to support the free loaders.
Thanks for making this point.

Posted by: smoothhoops | January 20, 2010, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

If democrats push thru this disaster of a bill.. THEY ARE FINISHED
Every left wing america hating poster in here has been repudiated..THE MAJORITY has spoken.. they will not accept a corrupt, bribe laden, lobbyist paid bill by the Corruptocrats

Posted by: another crisis, another photo-op | January 20, 2010, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Sorry to tell you, people DO know what is in the bill from their own research.
_____________________________________
Now you’re just being ingenuous. Talk about drinking the kool aid.
Most Americans do not know anything about these bills other than what they’ve been told by their favorite brand of media.

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

I listened to Plouffe this morning and thought you are just like Bush, so self-righteous to believe that once you set a course there is no turning off the course. The American voters did say they didn’t want self-righteousness in 2006 and 2008 but now they are saying they don’t want the new brand in 2010.

Posted by: tiredtoo | January 20, 2010, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

Didn’t Obama promise to be an “independent”, too? The American people are already sick of Obama and are in revolt over Congress. What are you guys trying to defend?
The masses are huddling at the gates with torches and screaming for blood, and you guys think that everything is A-OK…
You can defend your delusion til your blue in the face, but the majority of the people WILL have their say one way or the other.
Actions speak louder than words, and the people are sick of the excuses and backroom deals. They have seen the corruption of the GOP followed by the corruption of the Democrats and are ready to demand CHANGE, and kicking out the status quo…
Acting like a title gives you the right to disreguard the will of the people is the same thing that got Kings a date with the guillotine. I suggest that unless the politicans want to see riots in the streets they better start listening to THEM!
To quote Gerald Celente: “When people have nothing left to lose, they lose it!” Do you really want to antagonize and agitate an already unstable powder keg.
People expected Bush to exploit them, they voted for the Democrats and Obama to do the opposite. Yet he steals from Americans to give to wall st. and the medical, military, and government industrial complexes… This isn’t change were seeing… this is feudalism and tyranny. And the people are waking up to it. And that right soon!

Posted by: jafo | January 20, 2010, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

Tierra-
but the 24 hour bombardment of media is all liberal and slanted, but one channel. I watched MSNBC last night, talk about 1 sided.

Posted by: ted | January 20, 2010, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

I would like to see Medicare go away.
Posted by: ellsbells930
OK I’ll play,
what’s your plan if medicare did ‘go away’ ?

Posted by: IOU | January 20, 2010, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

“Now you’re just being ingenuous. Talk about drinking the kool aid.
Most Americans do not know anything about these bills other than what they’ve been told by their favorite brand of media.”
===================================
****SNICKER****

Posted by: field survey | January 20, 2010, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

The masses are huddling at the gates with torches and screaming for blood
Posted by: jafo
sounds like the KKK

Posted by: 666 | January 20, 2010, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

People expected Bush to exploit them, they voted for the Democrats and Obama to do the opposite. Yet he steals from Americans to give to wall st. and the medical, military, and government industrial complexes… This isn’t change were seeing… this is feudalism and tyranny. And the people are waking up to it.
______________________________________
I agree – time to kick the Blue Dogs out of the Democratic party. They’re Republicans anyway.
Give the people an alternative to the ‘big time politicians’ we see in the Republican party and the Blue Dog fat cats.

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

My brain works just fine, better get yours reevaluated after last night if you think you all can keep on doing the same old thing

first you say people don’t want the bill no matter what is in it, and then you completely ramble–altering your point– and make claims about the fine workings of your brain afterward. Whatever. So much for the honesty thing — I mispoke. LOL. Same old, same old.

Posted by: There is no Planet B | January 20, 2010, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

this is feudalism and tyranny.
Posted by: jafo
do you ever look up the meaning of the terms you use?

Posted by: 666 | January 20, 2010, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

666…sounds like the patriots of the 1700s to me. last night was the shot heard round the world.

Posted by: catman | January 20, 2010, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

It’s funnny how “allowing” people and companies to keep the money that they earned for themselves is the same as “give aways”.

Posted by: review | January 20, 2010, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

Boston Globe wrote a piece on how their healtcare(Universal) in their state is terrible and losing money fast. Is that true? I am just curious. So which plan would the people of Mass have if National health care was passed, the national or state one?

Posted by: ted | January 20, 2010, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

sounds like the patriots of the 1700s to me
Posted by: catman
the US is going to war with England again ?

Posted by: 666 | January 20, 2010, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

but the 24 hour bombardment of media is all liberal and slanted, but one channel. I watched MSNBC last night, talk about 1 sided.
___________________________________
Nonsense. The MSM is owned by big corporations. They allow whatever is needed to serve their own needs. If that means providing people with an excuse to think the media is biased, that will be done. They are much smarter than you think.

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

the land of the free because of the brave. thank you scott brown and the peole of mass

Posted by: catman | January 20, 2010, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

What are you guys trying to defend?
The masses are huddling at the gates with torches and screaming for blood, and you guys think that everything is A-OK…
Who is the “you guys” who think everyhing is A-ok. I think people want change and are making the same mistake yet again– voting for a Republican and thinking that has anything to do with small government, better reform or populism. We’ve read this book before. I’m fighting against that. If you really want change, vote in some actual independents, not a Republican ken doll.

Posted by: There is no Planet B | January 20, 2010, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

People paid premiums and got sick and were cut from their insurance…nobody cares, Obama’s white mother died of cancer fighting to get her care from a
private health provider.. nobody cares.
During the Bush Administration, the friendlest administration for any big
business, my health care cost increased
every year. Mass. voters just robbed the rest of the country, they don’t care, why? because they have a good state run health care system that every has to join. And the Republicans sold
their souls to the Devil for campaign
contributions…have done everything in
their power to derail the President’s
plans, even some that they had supported
in the past. And nobody cares about any
one but themselves…America has lost the ability to sacrifice anything for
the common good.

Posted by: blackie | January 20, 2010, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

NEW REPUBLIC: Forget Massachusetts. Obama’s problem is nationwide…

Posted by: another crisis, another photo-op | January 20, 2010, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

666…the war against tyranny and taxation without representaion. the chickens are comming home to roost.

Posted by: catman | January 20, 2010, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

“Boston Globe wrote a piece on how their healtcare(Universal) in their state is terrible and losing money fast. Is that true? I am just curious. So which plan would the people of Mass have if National health care was passed, the national or state one?”
=-===================—========
Yes it is true. The taste of socialized medicine that “they are already benefitting from” tastes a lot like castor oil.
Their costs have exploded well, well beyond what was budgeted for – and what was sold to the people.
Does ANYONE doubt that the numbers being presented for the federal bill wouldn’t explode as well?

Posted by: philpot | January 20, 2010, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Independent Voters Abandon Dems …

Posted by: another crisis, another photo-op | January 20, 2010, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

.America has lost the ability to sacrifice anything for the common good.
Posted by: blackie | Jan 20, 2010 2:27:56 PM
I agree. Its very disappointing.

Posted by: There is no Planet B | January 20, 2010, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

the war against tyranny and taxation without representaion
Posted by: catman
so you’re saying that the US government is going to take up arms against it’s own citizens

Posted by: 666 | January 20, 2010, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Some of the political writing I have seen since the vote in Mass. have said
that the message of the election was,
that Congress should work to solve the
economic problems and nothing else..
That is the stupidest thing I’ve heard in a long time. The minute something
happens to the US, people demand to know
what we were doing about it or was
someone sleeping at the switch.
Dammed if you do and dammed if you don’t.

Posted by: blackie | January 20, 2010, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

.America has lost the ability to sacrifice anything for the common good.
Posted by: blackie | Jan 20, 2010 2:27:56 PM
I agree. Its very disappointing.
=====================
Here’s an idea.
Go find somebody that doesn’t have health insurance. Out of your own pocket – pay for all of their health care from this day forward.
Come back to us in a couple of years and then preach us about sacrificing for the common good.

Posted by: review | January 20, 2010, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Posted by: blackie | Jan 20, 2010 2:27:56 PM
“America has lost the ability to sacrifice anything for the common good.”
/////////////////////////////////////
Serious up.
Like those union and state employees that are/were getting a free ride on their cadillac insurance plans.
Right?

Posted by: JoeinNV | January 20, 2010, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Posted by: review | Jan 20, 2010 2:39:11 PM

That would be only one person. I pay all the majority of insurance costs for ten employees, three with pre-existing conditions. I’d rather legislation was passed that helped small business owners like me. I’m not in love with the bill, but I’m certainly not going to listen to Republicans on health care or domestic issues. Their record speaks for itself– and I find their platform to be completely idiotic– a platform for self-centered morons.

Posted by: There is no Planet B | January 20, 2010, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

666 the president signed an executive order today ordering the IRS to go after contractors….the contractors who employ people and create jobs. you know perfectly well what is going on but the elites think they are above the fray. how wrong they are and have been. sometimes you have to hit rock bottom before you can pull your self up. we are there.its time to take care of the AMERICAN ECONOMY AND NATIONAL SECURITY. this pie in the sky utopia dreams of something or other sells books. it doesnt put food on the table or protect us from other countries or terrorrists.

Posted by: catman | January 20, 2010, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

“That would be only one person. I pay all the majority of insurance costs for ten employees, three with pre-existing conditions. I’d rather legislation was passed that helped small business owners like me. I’m not in love with the bill, but I’m certainly not going to listen to Republicans on health care or domestic issues. Their record speaks for itself– and I find their platform to be completely idiotic– a platform for self-centered morons. ”
==================================
You ARE in love with the bill. Your comments here over time confirm this.
And oddly enough, after calling all republicans “self-centered morons” (nice broad brush) -
you then proceed to admit that your interest in the bill is your own financial gain.
Odd. Odd indeed.

Posted by: review | January 20, 2010, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

this pie in the sky utopia dreams

Pie in the sky utopia dreams? Sounds like the tea partiers and free market libertarian types voting for Republicans and falling completely for the propaganda put out billionaires tied to oil and insurance, and thinking anything will change. We’ve seen this movie before.

Posted by: There is no Planet B | January 20, 2010, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

planet b…i too pay for over a hundred peoples healthcare and pre existing conditions. its tax deductable and it works.i dont like the extreme of any party but in my heart i know bigger government helps no one other than the government. this bill INCREASES the cost of healthcare and most people know that ILLEGAL ALIENS WILL benefit from it.this america not a new world order.

Posted by: catman | January 20, 2010, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

And by the way folks – that is the way it always is with liberals.
Take, take, take, take, take.
If you don’t pay up, you’re self-centered and you are greedy.
Now, if you are a recipient of government largess – if you do absolutely nothing – but the check from the feds shows up in your mailbox – you are not greedy. To the contrary, you are a victim. Society is not being fair to you – and it’s time the self-centered morons were made to pay.
When you start pealing the onion just a little bit – you start to understand what liberalism is really about.

Posted by: review | January 20, 2010, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Odd. Odd indeed.
Posted by: review | Jan 20, 2010 2:52:22 PM
First, my comments have shown no such thing. Am I in love with the House or Senate bill? Did I like other bills better? Do you know which ones? You have no idea.
Its not just my own financial gain–the point was I likely know a heck of a lot more about paying for others’ insurance than you do– and I pay for three part timers out of the goodness of my heart. Remember, I don’t have to buy insurance for anyone– including the full-timers and I’d fall under an exemption under the current bills so under the mandate, I still wouldn’t have to pay anyone’s premiums.
Learn some facts. Can the speculation about other commenters.

Posted by: There is no Planet B | January 20, 2010, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Talking to Plouffe.. sort of like talking to the bored washing machine repairman.. that never gets a phone call. Glad J.T. threw the mutt a bone. Like giving a shout out to that parachute pants.. cant touch this guy.

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | January 20, 2010, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

Wow talk about delusional. BTW people with pre-existing conditions will still be excluded for another 4 years under this obscene “plan” the dems are on a suicide mission if they keep pushing this sack of wet excrement and kickbacks. Well Done Nelson well done…

Posted by: SPQR US | January 20, 2010, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

Thank You Massachusetts!

Posted by: Heidi | January 20, 2010, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

i support the tea party movement and free market capitalism. this president and administraion are better suited to be professors at some liberal college.this is what happens when you promote people who havent paid their dues and have no experience.

Posted by: catman | January 20, 2010, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

food for thought for you progressive nuts
“without debate, without criticism, no administration and no country can succeed and no republic can survive”. John F. Kennedy

Posted by: Scott | January 20, 2010, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Posted by: catman | Jan 20, 2010 2:55:45 PM
Well, you’re in a bind too, but you have a bigger risk pool. I wouldn’t mind starting over on the health care bill, honestly, if I thought Congress would do a better job of it and actually pass a bipartisan bill that unbinds coverage from employment and makes it portable and covers catastrophic and emergency medicine for everybody (or I like straight up single payer). But I think a big chunk of people are simply going to oppose any kind of health care reform (as one commenter noted though he tried to talk that back, but I think he hit the truth in his first statement) Its depressing to me– as the current system really does not work that well for many of the small business owners I know who choose to provide insurance, in part to remain competitive with bigger businesses, but also because our employees need it and can’t afford it.

Posted by: There is no Planet B | January 20, 2010, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

“without debate, without criticism, no administration and no country can succeed and no republic can survive”. John F. Kennedy
Posted by: Scott | Jan 20, 2010 3:09:30 PM
So if you yell no to everything I say and offer up no good or logical ideas or solutions, is that supposed to be a debate?

Posted by: There is no Planet B | January 20, 2010, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

this is what happens when you promote people who havent paid their dues and have no experience.
_______________________________
We all saw what happens when you promote people who have ‘paid their dues’ like Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and so on . ..
People are frustrated with politicians. Brown’s main platform was that he has a truck and isn’t a Republican – “I’m an independent voice’ etc.
Let’s hope the American people regain their attention span before the next elections.
p.s – out with the Blue Dog Democrats

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

Posted by: There is no Planet B | Jan 20, 2010 2:59:02 PM
“Its not just my own financial gain”.
===============================================
Sure it isn’t.
Now, should you drop the insurance you are paying “out of the goodness of your heart” – your employees will leave you and work elseware.
You can re-hire, sure, but you will get a more desperate, and less qualified employee.
Now – you are paying them as part of an arrangement in which you reap the benefit of their labor.
What you are asking everyone else to do is to pay for insurance for others in which there would never be such a benefit.
I like the way you paint yourself as some sort of saint just becuase you do what most other businesses do, while reaping the reward of attracting well qualified employees.
Then, you rattle your finger at everyone else and tell us that we should BY FORCE pay for the upkeep of others.
Tell you what – do this. Go out and find somebody that doesn’t have health insurance. Pay for all of their healthcare from this point forward. AND make sure that you do NOT in any way reap any benefit from that arrangement.
Then come back to us in a couple of years and talk to us about sacrificing for the “common good”.

Posted by: review | January 20, 2010, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

Planetb
The Catholic Bishops do not support this bill based on moral grounds. Also, I don’t know what planet B you’re living on, but health care isn’t free. Most of the small business owner I know do not support this current bull, I mean bill. If you want to talk about the morality of passing this legislation, the Unites States Conference of Catholic Bishops disapproves of this bill because of its provisions that make taxpayers like yourself pay for unethical medical practices. Look it up: USCCB Office of Media Relations or USCCB health bill.

Posted by: EPU | January 20, 2010, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

food for thought for you progressive nuts
“without debate, without criticism, no administration and no country can succeed and no republic can survive”. John F. Kennedy
Posted by: Scott | Jan 20, 2010 3:09:30 PM
____________________________________
Food for thought for the entire country.
We remember how much Bush, Cheney and the other Republicans encouraged ‘debate and criticism’ basically accusing everyone who spoke an alternative viewpoint as ‘traitors’.
_____________________________________

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

panet b i want reform and i think pre existing conditions should go away and tort reform should occur. i want costs down but i am against universal health care because i believe in my heart that quality and ingeninuity will suffer in the u.s. and globally as most advances are done for profit and to be sold in the u.s. market.moreover free health will encourage more illeagl immigration.a simple bill is where we need to start.my brother and sister( in their 50s and college educated)have lost their jobs and health cre. i spent all day monday with him the emrgancy room because he has finally lost it due to lack of work and he got very good care and no questions asked. whats wrong with that.

Posted by: catman | January 20, 2010, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

YES!!
I just can’t beleive that any honest American could support a bill that has an individual mandate (makes people buy insurance).
That just doesn’t seem to jibe with anything that America was based on.
Hopefully, this is the begining of the end of this government intrusion into our lives!

Posted by: freedombaby | January 20, 2010, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

Here’s an idea.
Go find somebody that doesn’t have health insurance. Out of your own pocket – pay for all of their health care from this day forward.
Come back to us in a couple of years and then preach us about sacrificing for the common good.
Posted by: review | Jan 20, 2010 2:39:11 PM
Sacrificing for the common good is what provides you with a strong military, law enforcement, infrastructure, public works, and social engineering. Go live on a mountain for the rest of your life and tell us how it is in comparison!

Posted by: danTX | January 20, 2010, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

teirra…julius ceasar is dead and bush is no longer president.the new coach isnt hacking it and next season is ahat we should be focusing on.i care about america not about democrats or republicans.

Posted by: catman | January 20, 2010, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

but health care isn’t free.

I don’t know what planet you’re living on, but the size of the risk pool, and the cost of insuring those with pre-existing conditions are matters most small business owners in the under 20 employee category should be thinking about (the ones you know may not provide insurance or want to provide it, which I do get– but as I said earlier, I do worry about the common good and helping others– you know, like my employees– get insurance. and if the small business owners you know think far right Republicans are in their corner, they’re nuts.. they should be seeking out independent, Libertarian and business-minded Dem candidates on the local level, and small business oriented Dems on the national level. Of course, it does vary with industry, I’ll give you that. )

Posted by: There is no Planet B | January 20, 2010, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Is it just me, or does this tierra person still think that George Bush is President?
From what I can tell, no matter what the subject is – if there is something wrong – it’s George Bush’s fault.
Time to catch up – it’s 2010. This is Obama’s country now.

Posted by: blackout | January 20, 2010, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

===We remember how much Bush, Cheney and the other Republicans encouraged ‘debate and criticism’ basically accusing everyone who spoke an alternative viewpoint as ‘traitors’.===
I have no recollection of Bush or Cheney calling anyone a traitor. Can you provide the exact quote where either did that?

Posted by: Axey | January 20, 2010, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

For those of you progressives who keep saying conservatives are the party of know, the democrats cant even agree on these radical agendas this administration is trying to shove down our throat. FYI the republicans are insignificant in passing anything, the left has enough seats

Posted by: Scott | January 20, 2010, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

I googled “Bush” and “traitor” and all I got was the left calling Bush a traitor. I will have to wait for the quote to be provided to me, since I can’t find it on my own. I will now go look for the “Cheney” and “traitor” quote. I suspect it will be the same as Bush’s. Non-existent with him calling someone a traitor, but overused by those calling Cheney a traitor.

Posted by: Axey | January 20, 2010, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Posted by: danTX | Jan 20, 2010 3:24:06 PM
“Sacrificing for the common good is what provides you with a strong military, law enforcement, infrastructure, public works, and social engineering. Go live on a mountain for the rest of your life and tell us how it is in comparison!”
==================================
People doing that stuff get paid, right? If you’re getting paid to do it – it’s not sacraficing for the public good.
Okay, so – go and be a law enforcement officer – and tell the city you are working for that you don’t want to get paid.
Then come back in a couple of years and tell us about “sacrificing for the public good”.

Posted by: review | January 20, 2010, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

===People doing that stuff get paid, right? If you’re getting paid to do it – it’s not sacraficing for the public good.===
I beg to differ. They sacrifice a lot, sometimes with their lives. For little pay.

Posted by: Axey | January 20, 2010, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

The Republicans would like to forget about Bush and Cheney and their time in government. Weren’t they Republicans?
Republicans can’t run on their record. They run away from their record.

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

I love to see the yokels continuing to rail against Bush and Cheney. That’s what Coakley did, and the rest is history.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | January 20, 2010, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

Now, should you drop the insurance you are paying “out of the goodness of your heart” – your employees will leave you and work elseware.

The part time employees, no– they won’t get insurance elsewhere which is why I singled them out for the goodness of my heart thing. Learn the facts. Can the speculation. I provide insurance to them, and better insurance than other businesses in the area to the full time employees because I believe there’s no point in voting for ideas, believing in something, and then not putting your money where your mouth is. As for subsidies for others, its not exactly like I’d be exempt, dude. I’d be paying them too. And I’d pay extra. I give a lot to charity. I provide free goods to the hungry and homeless. I pay tuition for my nephews. I donated a modest inheritance for a scholarship. Get it? I’m a so-called bleeding heart. I do believe people reap benefits from that so its not completely altruistic– I make no claims that I do it for altruistic reasons. I do it because I feel really crummy about myself if I don’t and because I believe its what God would want me to do. It makes me sleep better at night. I think the Republican platform is self-centered. I believe in community.

Posted by: There is no Planet B | January 20, 2010, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

“sacrificing for the common good”
So this chestnut has made it’s appearance has it?
Whenever they pull that one out, you better grab your ankles because you KNOW what’s coming next.

Posted by: FrankinWA | January 20, 2010, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

===The Republicans would like to forget about Bush and Cheney and their time in government.===
Not me. I would love to go back to Bush/Cheney running things. I would even settle for Clinton at this point. If things go much further, Carter might be elevated in my eyes.

Posted by: Axey | January 20, 2010, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Sacrificing for the common good is what provides you with a strong military, law enforcement, infrastructure, public works, and social engineering. Go live on a mountain for the rest of your life and tell us how it is in comparison!
Posted by: danTX | Jan 20, 2010 3:24:06 PM
Exactly. Go galt if that’s your thing. Don’t let the door hit you on the bottom on your way to nowhere.

Posted by: There is no Planet B | January 20, 2010, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

IF I WERE PRESIDENT OBAMA:
I would find a few superior “apologistas” to defend my Presidency. Plouffe…with idiotic comments like “pass healthcare, pass healthcare” borders on political idiocy..what’s he trying to do…guarantee a sure loss 3years from now? I would ask Axelrod to leave…at least, keep him off the news commentary shows …to many ummms and ahhhhs…doesn’t inspire confidence in whatever he is selling….take the Press Secretary with him….also sounds like a wind-up toy. Finally, Rahm….he may be learning that Washington politics are more than just “what worked ” in Cook County, but the last thing a President needs is a negative here from a comicbook. Hear no evil…speak no evil…..just do it. These advisers, along with overpaid czars….give folks great pause about Obama….get to the root of your problems, POTUS.

Posted by: justj joey | January 20, 2010, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

“The part time employees, no– they won’t get insurance elsewhere which is why I singled them out for the goodness of my heart thing. Learn the facts. Can the speculation. I provide insurance to them, and better insurance than other businesses in the area to the full time employees because I believe there’s no point in voting for ideas, believing in something, and then not putting your money where your mouth is. As for subsidies for others, its not exactly like I’d be exempt, dude. I’d be paying them too. And I’d pay extra. I give a lot to charity. I provide free goods to the hungry and homeless. I pay tuition for my nephews. I donated a modest inheritance for a scholarship. Get it? I’m a so-called bleeding heart. I do believe people reap benefits from that so its not completely altruistic– I make no claims that I do it for altruistic reasons. I do it because I feel really crummy about myself if I don’t and because I believe its what God would want me to do. It makes me sleep better at night. I think the Republican platform is self-centered. I believe in community.”
================================================
That’s all heart-warming. It really is.
Being that this is an anomious blog, you could be lying through your teeth – but let’s give your self-congratulations the benefit of the doubt.
The difference between you and most “self-centered” Republicans is that you think the government as the right to force such acts of charity/wealth re-distribution upon people.
While most conservatives – in point of fact do make significant charitable donations – do NOT BELIEVE THAT GOVERNMENT HAS THE AUTHORITY – OR SHOULD – TO FORCE PEOPLE TO DO THESE THINGS.
Charity at the point of a gun is not charity.

Posted by: review | January 20, 2010, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

And yes – if you drop the insurance you are paying for your part timeers, they may or may not get insurance elsewhere – but they are cetainly more likely to look.
So while your doing all your wonderful good things – add this -
Go and find an uninsured person and pay for their healthcare with no strings attached.

Posted by: review | January 20, 2010, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

While most conservatives – in point of fact do make significant charitable donations – do NOT BELIEVE THAT GOVERNMENT HAS THE AUTHORITY – OR SHOULD – TO FORCE PEOPLE TO DO THESE THINGS.

Are the Drama Queen caps for emphasis or are you shouting at me? LOL. Interesting that others caring about the common good gets your hackles up.

Posted by: There is no Planet B | January 20, 2010, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

most “self-centered” Republicans

I’ve noticed that the Republicans really have a chip on their shoulder– if you say their platform is self-centered, they immediately think you’re saying all Republicans are self-centered (when really I think most– but not all– are just too darned stupid or entrenched to realize how self-centered,rigid and detrimental their ideology and platform is; just to clarify).

Posted by: There is no Planet B | January 20, 2010, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Isn’t GITMO supposed to close tomorrow?

Posted by: Jenny | January 20, 2010, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

=== Interesting that others caring about the common good gets your hackles up.===
Interesting that you need to change what was said to make a point. What gets our hackles up is forced charity.
===are just too darned stupid or entrenched to realize how self-centered,rigid and detrimental their ideology and platform is===
Much better if we just follow the left off their cliff.

Posted by: Axey | January 20, 2010, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Interesting tidbit from Democracy for America regarding polling yesterday:
“By a margin of three-to-two, former Obama voters who voted for Republican Scott Brown yesterday said the Senate healthcare bill “doesn’t go far enough.” Six-to-one Obama voters who stayed home agreed. And to top it off, 80% of all voters still want the choice of a public option in the bill.
The message is clear, there is only one way out of this mess if Democrats want to win in 2010. It’s time to pass healthcare with 51 votes in the Senate using the budget reconciliation process. And it must include the most popular piece of bold reform: the choice of a public option. “

Posted by: There is no Planet B | January 20, 2010, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

Interesting that you need to change what was said to make a point. What gets our hackles up is forced charity.

Did I change it?–
“Come back to us in a couple of years and then preach us about sacrificing for the common good. Posted by: review | Jan 20, 2010 2:39:11 PM”
Its a repeated refrain, providing a tell of the sore spot or achilles heel. LOL. But nice try.

Posted by: There is no Planet B | January 20, 2010, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

Much better if we just follow the left off their cliff.
Posted by: Axey | Jan 20, 2010 4:15:18 PM
Much better if they actually put their money where their mouth is and think and vote as independently and representatively as they claim they do rather than returning to the corporate nannystate of the Republican patriarchy for lollipops and pats on their docile heads.

Posted by: There is no Planet B | January 20, 2010, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

“Interesting tidbit from Democracy for America regarding polling yesterday: ”
You can save your time and stop reading that comment right about there.

Posted by: philpot | January 20, 2010, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

GIVE. ME. A. BREAK.
Posted by: review | Jan 20, 2010 4:24:18 PM

I’d love to. You’re on break.

Posted by: There is no Planet B | January 20, 2010, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

“Posted by: philpot | Jan 20, 2010 4:28:50 PM
Living up to the close-mindedness thing. Good for you!”
I just know a bs source for what it is.

Posted by: philpot | January 20, 2010, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

“I’d love to. You’re on break.”
Ah, the ol’ non-response response.
Persuasive!

Posted by: review | January 20, 2010, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

disastrous economic policy…
Posted by: review | Jan 20, 2010 4:24:18 PM

Tips from an expert on disastrous economic policies given the likely voting track record, yes? But here’s the thing– once you’ve voted for folks who have driven the economy into the ground, you are supposed to actually be one of those innovators you’re so concerned about, and come up with something that might actually work.
And, as an aside, do you realize how stupid it is to talk to a small business owner about not caring about the innovators, producers and risk takers? Do you know anything at all about it?
Maybe you can find a job for folks who are supposed to regurgitate propaganda?Maybe that IS your job?
LOL, LOL, LOL.

Posted by: There is no Planet B | January 20, 2010, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

“Tips from an expert on disastrous economic policies given the likely voting track record, yes? But here’s the thing– once you’ve voted for folks who have driven the economy into the ground, you are supposed to actually be one of those innovators you’re so concerned about, and come up with something that might actually work. ”
———————————–
Under Bush:
- Set record for consecutive quarters of GDP growth
- Unemployment under 4.5%
- Low inflation
- Low interest rates
- Lower tax rates across the board
- Deficits shrinking
- Tax revenues growing
Then comes Pelosi and Reid:
One year later – Economic collapse.
LOL indeed.

Posted by: review | January 20, 2010, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

“While most conservatives – in point of fact do make significant charitable donations – do NOT BELIEVE THAT GOVERNMENT HAS THE AUTHORITY – OR SHOULD – TO FORCE PEOPLE TO DO THESE THINGS.”
This is true.
Why is it that there are so many people that think it is the job of government to steal money from one set of people and give it another set of people?
With hundreds of government administrators taking their own little cuts in between.

Posted by: motiveforce | January 20, 2010, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

clearbrook…appology accepted. funnything….i do live on a mountain an hour from my business. i am an independent and used to be a democrat untl every agency known to man invaded my business and wanted money while em-ploying over a hundred people.

Posted by: catman | January 20, 2010, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

===Did I change it?–===
Yes.

Posted by: Axey | January 20, 2010, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

===Much better if they actually put their money where their mouth is ===
I think you meant to say “much better if they actually put their money where your mouth is” didn’t you? Not really you, but those needy you describe.

Posted by: Axey | January 20, 2010, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Is this guy serious? Did he really just say they should just pass it and THEN let the American people decide if they like it, 1/6 of the economy be damned? What a fool.

Posted by: Mike in Costa Mesa | January 20, 2010, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

===Posted by: Mike in Costa Mesa | Jan 20, 2010 4:56:35 PM===
Yes, he said it. And I’ll go him one better…Obama told Stephy today that it is Bush’s fault Massachusetts elected Scott Brown.

Posted by: Axey | January 20, 2010, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

I think you meant to say “much better if they actually put their money where your mouth is” didn’t you? Not really you, but those needy you describe.
Posted by: Axey | Jan 20, 2010 4:54:02 PM
Nope. I meant what I said– there goes another Republican that likely spouts independence, liberty and freedom but is constantly trying to cram their words and versions of things into others’ mouths and down their throats. So hypocritical.

Posted by: There is no Planet B | January 20, 2010, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

===Posted by: There is no Planet B | Jan 20, 2010 5:02:04 PM===
So you really don’t want my money for the greater good of the community? I misunderstood what you said then.

Posted by: Axey | January 20, 2010, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

there goes another Republican that likely spouts independence, liberty and freedom but is constantly trying to cram their words and versions of things into others’ mouths and down their throats. So hypocritical.
_____________________________________
For Republicans, its freedom to think the way they do . .. anything else is ‘anti-American’. Hypocrites is right PlanetB. The Republicans and the right are the worst.

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

===Posted by: tierra | Jan 20, 2010 5:14:12 PM===
I thought you were looking for those quotes. Guess not.

Posted by: Axey | January 20, 2010, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

im sure they are going to have nancy pelosi tied up with a sock in her mouth like they did with biden. obama needs to go back to college and take reality 101. also it will be along time before we have another jimmy carter candidate or i should say an obama. it takes guys like this to bring the country back to its senses. this means the next pres will be like regan. thank god.

Posted by: catman | January 20, 2010, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

..the original idea wasn’t bad, but it grew bigger and bigger, nobody understood what they were reading, people lied about money, and fees, seedy deals were made, dishonest brokers protected their own..its HEALTHCARE 2010..the sequel to the housing bubble!..brought to you by ..the same group of bad actors!

Posted by: cindy | January 20, 2010, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

“By a margin of three-to-two, former Obama voters who voted for Republican Scott Brown yesterday said the Senate healthcare bill “doesn’t go far enough.” Six-to-one Obama voters who stayed home agreed. And to top it off, 80% of all voters still want the choice of a public option in the bill.
_________________________________

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

The Bush Republican government spent the country into the ground, watched the economy crash and burn – and then handed it all to the Obama administration.
I wonder what would happen if the Obama administration spent the country further into the ground, crashed and burned what is left of the economy – and then handed it back to the Republicans.
Sounds like a dream made in heaven.

Posted by: tierra | January 20, 2010, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

tierra – why in the world would the people of Massachusetts want to get on board with and pay for a federal public option when they already have it at the state level? This is double taxation to them with no marginal benefit.

Posted by: Mike in Costa Mesa | January 20, 2010, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Posted by: There is no Planet B | Jan 20, 2010 4:57:46 PM
A few points:
The numbers do look really good from 1992 to 2000. Guess who controlled Congress for eight of those years?
Perhaps you can post Jimmy Carter’s numbers?
And Bush’s numbers were great – considering that he had to deal with a major terrorist attack on American soil that shook every one’s confidence for years.
Again, for the comparison of payroll jobs between decades – thank Newt for pulling Clinton to the center.
The stock market explosion during the Clinton years was due to the tech bubble. Clinton was care taking the White House at the time, but he didn’t have anything to do with it. If you believe that his policies caused the run up on stocks – please be specific and pointing out just what they were.
Budget surplus – Clinton doesn’t sign a budget until Congress sends him one.
Perhaps you will recall the almost yearly pitched and violent budget battle between Clinton and Congress. The gov’t got shut down multiple times.
Guess what? Clinton ALWAYS wanted to spend more – a lot more – than Congress did. Those massive budget battles came done to Clinton wanting to spend a lot, and Congress not wanting to spend a lot.
If it were not for Congress – you would not have seen such surpluses.
(Not to mention that the major factor in the budget surpluses was the “peace dividend” with base closures and reductions in intelligence spending, etc. That worked out well. ;))
As for Bush’s spending – no honest conservative agreed with Bush on his spending orgies. You seem to be complaining that Bush is too much like Obama.
As for Welfare reform – I will refer you to the Contract With America. Brought to you by the 1994 Republican Congressional class – welfare reform was a key feature. It’s nice to see the art of history revision is not dead. But in actuality – Congressional Republicans put welfare reform on Clinton’s desk – and left him little political room not to sign it.
As for Bush’s deficits, I already addressed that above. As for Reagan’s,
1) the money he spent went to defense and ended up crushing the Soviets – money well spent. 2) the social welfare money that got spent came from the democratic congress of the time.
Basically the compromise between congressional democrats and Reagan was that they would both get what they wanted from the budget – so the deficit went up.
Hope that helps you out. Now, would you like to put up some of Carter’s numbers?

Posted by: review | January 20, 2010, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

Has anybody that is so brainwashed by Bobo and his friends even stopped to think about why the same people trying to pass this heap arent taking any of it? This bill DOES NOT apply to memebers of congress!! Does that worry anyone? If someone passed a bill that said ‘everyone gets their home paid off’ and the person who wrote it didnt want it, I would be worried about the fine print. Just because they say “Sheep, this is good for you. We have no way to prove it and no way to prove the opposition wrong besides saying “we are right and they are wrong.” Why can congress keep their “Cadillac Plans” FOR LIFE without being taxed on it. Why doesnt the same body that is trying to stuff this down the throats of the American people want to make it apply to them?? Because it is a bad idea that says if you are blessed by your productive employer with an expensive insurance plan, you will taxed! ASK QUESTIONS AND ACUTALLY LISTEN FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER!! How did they get people to blindly follow them?? The leftists will ask you to prove them wrong when the same people they are idolizing cant even tell them how the opposition to health care is wrong!!

Posted by: Chris | January 20, 2010, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

“The Bush Republican government spent the country into the ground, watched the economy crash and burn – and then handed it all to the Obama administration.”
Posted by: tierra | Jan 20, 2010 5:30:17 PM
===============================
Under Bush:
- Set record for consecutive quarters of GDP growth
- Unemployment under 4.5%
- Low inflation
- Low interest rates
- Lower tax rates across the board
- Deficits shrinking
- Tax revenues growing
Then comes Pelosi and Reid:
One year later – Economic collapse.

Posted by: review | January 20, 2010, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

Democrats want to pass a bill, any bill, just to save face.
It’s 2AM and closing time, and anything looks good to them.
‘loopholes to allow illegals access to publicly paid healthcare’ SURE!
‘massive fines and/or jail time for uninsured citizens’ SURE!
‘tax on health care benefits’ SURE!
‘unconstitutional mandate to buy a private product’ SURE!
‘no repeal of the regulatory exemption for self insured plans’ SURE!
‘cuts in Medicare’ SURE!

Posted by: Joe White | January 20, 2010, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

I wonder what would happen if the Obama administration spent the country further into the ground, crashed and burned what is left of the economy – and then handed it back to the Republicans.
Posted by: tierra |
What do you mean “IF”?

Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn | January 20, 2010, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

Posted by: review | Jan 20, 2010 5:35:37 PM
And what were the income, poverty and jobs numbers again? Plus, don’t you mean six years when it somes to Republican leadership in Congress during Clinton’s terms, and in all didn’t the Republicans have 12 years of Congressional rule, and wouldn’t that really put the majority of the economic/domestic mess on their heads– or do you know how to acrobats with that too? LOL.
Propaganda and bull crap. Its the mainstay, apparently. But you sure sound like you believe in what you’re selling and since Americans aren’t all that bright in general, I’m sure you’ll find buyers. In fact I see virtual high fives have come your way, haven’t they? It would be precious, really, if I didn’t care about the country and hate the Republican party (not the people–the party and its platform and hypocrisy) with a passion.

Posted by: There is no Planet | January 20, 2010, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

Persuasive!
Posted by: review | Jan 20, 2010 4:34:08 PM
I’m not here to be persuasive. I’m here to vent my frustration and say what I want so I don’t do it in real life with people that matter to me.

Posted by: There is no Planet B | January 20, 2010, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

“Reform Deform” I say! I don’t know about you, but I think this Health bill is making America Sick. And nobody’s getting any better. And guess what the economy hasn’t recovered, so who’s paying the bill…You know with all this talk of our so called “healthcare Reform” I was wondering what on earth (in a perfect world of course) could actually constitute a good Reform…I guess this kinda got me on the right track though…
<a href="http://####

Posted by: billy37 | January 20, 2010, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

Then comes Pelosi and Reid:
One year later – Economic collapse.
Posted by: review | Jan 20, 2010 5:48:53 PM
Must not have been a very strong foundation or administration for Dems to be able to destroy such a strong economy in such a short time– while doing several things the administration actually wanted done.

Posted by: There is no Planet B | January 20, 2010, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

To reiterate:
A few points:
The numbers do look really good from 1992 to 2000. Guess who controlled Congress for eight of those years?
Perhaps you can post Jimmy Carter’s numbers?
And Bush’s numbers were great – considering that he had to deal with a major terrorist attack on American soil that shook every one’s confidence for years.
Again, for the comparison of payroll jobs between decades – thank Newt for pulling Clinton to the center.
The stock market explosion during the Clinton years was due to the tech bubble. Clinton was care taking the White House at the time, but he didn’t have anything to do with it. If you believe that his policies caused the run up on stocks – please be specific and pointing out just what they were.
Budget surplus – Clinton doesn’t sign a budget until Congress sends him one.
Perhaps you will recall the almost yearly pitched and violent budget battle between Clinton and Congress. The gov’t got shut down multiple times.
Guess what? Clinton ALWAYS wanted to spend more – a lot more – than Congress did. Those massive budget battles came done to Clinton wanting to spend a lot, and Congress not wanting to spend a lot.
If it were not for Congress – you would not have seen such surpluses.
(Not to mention that the major factor in the budget surpluses was the “peace dividend” with base closures and reductions in intelligence spending, etc. That worked out well. ;))
As for Bush’s spending – no honest conservative agreed with Bush on his spending orgies. You seem to be complaining that Bush is too much like Obama.
As for Welfare reform – I will refer you to the Contract With America. Brought to you by the 1994 Republican Congressional class – welfare reform was a key feature. It’s nice to see the art of history revision is not dead. But in actuality – Congressional Republicans put welfare reform on Clinton’s desk – and left him little political room not to sign it.
As for Bush’s deficits, I already addressed that above. As for Reagan’s,
1) the money he spent went to defense and ended up crushing the Soviets – money well spent. 2) the social welfare money that got spent came from the democratic congress of the time.
Basically the compromise between congressional democrats and Reagan was that they would both get what they wanted from the budget – so the deficit went up.
Hope that helps you out. Now, would you like to put up some of Carter’s numbers?
====================================
You can ignore that if you want – history revision does seem to be your strong point.
Again, would you like to put up Carter’s numbers?

Posted by: review | January 21, 2010, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

All that the failure of health care reform shows is that one party or another, Righty-Loon or Liberal Snob, they’re all the same party of corporate servants and insulated bourgeoisie. I’ve been a working class democrat my entire life, and I’m having trouble contemplating my own political future. It’s not as easy as the commenters here seem to suppose. But at least Obama tried to obtain even the most modest of needed reforms for this country, against a sea of unending waves of insanity. And insanity, as we’ve come to learn, is multi-polar.

Posted by: Party-less Democrat | January 30, 2010, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.