Jan 14, 2010 12:45pm

President Obama to Big Banks: “We Want Our Money Back”

ABC News’ Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller report:


“We want our money back, and we’re going to get it,” President Obama said sternly this afternoon from the Diplomatic Reception Room.


The president was announcing a new tax on big banks – what he calls the “financial crisis responsibility fee” – to repay the up to $120 billion in Troubled Asset Relief Program funds that the taxpayers are expected to lose. The tax comes at around the same time the top five financial institutions in the US — Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase and Morgan Stanley — have allocated roughly $90 billion for overall compensation. Bonuses are more than half that figure.


Trying to channel or at least reflect some populist outrage amongst, the president said, “If these companies are in good enough shape to afford massive bonuses, they are surely in good enough shape to afford paying back every penny to taxpayers.”

“My commitment is to recover every single dime the American people are owed,” the President said, adding that his determination to achieve this goal was only heightened when he’s sees reports “of massive profits and obscene bonuses at some of the very firms who owe their continued existence to the American people, folks who have not been made whole and who continue to face real hardship in this recession.”


In his FY2011 budget proposal, President Obama will promise a tax on 50 of the top financial firms to be in place for 10 years, or as long as it takes to raise the full amount necessary to cover the taxpayer losses.


The cost will not be borne by community banks or small financial, firms – only the largest firms with more than $50 billion in assets. The size of the fee each bank owes will be based on its size and exposure to debt, Obama said, “so that we are recovering tax dollars while promoting reform of the banking practices that contributed to this crisis.”


Some critics of the proposal have suggested that banks will simply pass that tax onto consumers, but the president suggested the banks take the money out of their bonus pool instead.


“Instead of sending a phalanx of lobbyists to fight this proposal, or employing an army of lawyers and accountants to help evade the fee, I’d suggest you might want to consider simply meeting your responsibilities,” he said. “I’d urge you to cover the costs of the rescue not by sticking it to your shareholders or your customers or fellow citizens with the bill, but by rolling back bonuses for top earners and executives.”


The president appeared with key members from his economic team – Office of Management and Budget director Peter Orszag, Council of Economic Advisers Chair Christina Romer, Secretary of the Treasury Tim Geithner, and National Economic Council director Larry Summers.


The president noted that this should not be seen as a “punishment” to Wall Street firms, “but rather to prevent the abuse and excess that nearly caused the collapse of many of these firms and the financial system itself.”


Mentioning again that there are reports of firms engaging in risky bets, reaping quick rewards, and returning to compensation practices, the President called this, “business as usual.”


“The financial industry has even launched a massive lobbying campaign, locking arms with the opposition party to stand in the way of reforms to prevent another crisis,” he said. “That, too, unfortunately is business as usual.”


-Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller

User Comments

The Community-Organizer-in-Chief speaks.

Posted by: tjp612 | January 14, 2010, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

If Obama were really interested in getting our mopney back, he would fire Geithner, etc and appoint people who really care about our country such as Paul Krugman and Robert Reich.
Obama is just pretending to be mad at the banks.

Posted by: Bubbles | January 14, 2010, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Office of Management and Budget director Peter Orszag
Ah yes, him:
2002: he predicted that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose zero effective risk to our government.
This is the same Peter Orszag who co-authored a paper in 2002 whose purpose was to “to provide further insight into the magnitude of the expected direct costs from the implicit government guarantee on GSE {Government Government-Sponsored Enterprises – Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac} securities.” The paper “concludes that the probability of default by the GSEs is extremely small.” The paper went on to state “the expected cost to the government of providing an explicit government guarantee on $1 trillion in GSE debt is less than $2 million”, and “the risk to the government from a potential default on GSE debt is effectively zero.” Compare his risk assessment to what actually did occur: about $700B of bailouts by the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve, all by mid-2009 – a total which can easily increase as home foreclosures continue to occur.

Posted by: Broke | January 14, 2010, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

-If Obama were really interested in getting our mopney back, he would fire Geithner, etc and appoint people who really care about our country such as Paul Krugman and Robert Reich.-
Where’s Dodd when ya need him?!

Posted by: Ekonomiks 101 | January 14, 2010, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

“We want our Vote back!”
- most of the people who voted for Obama

Posted by: Randy R. | January 14, 2010, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

GSEs caused this. There are other less important factors, but ultimately government intervention into the free market removed the risks that banks used to undertake when loaning money. Barney Frank and Chris Dodd were chief architects of this debacle. I encourage folks to listen to speeches given by Ron Paul on the house floor back in 2002 and 2003 concerning Fannie and Freddie.

Posted by: Huh | January 14, 2010, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

DAILY GUIDANCE FOR THE VICE PRESIDENT, Thursday, January 14, 2010:
In the morning, the President and the Vice President will receive the Presidential Daily Briefing and the Economic Daily Briefing in the Oval Office. These briefings are closed press.
At 11:30 AM, the Vice President will meet with Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood to discuss the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. This meeting is closed press.
Afterwards, the President and the Vice President will have lunch in the Private Dining Room. This lunch is closed press.

Posted by: Opaque | January 14, 2010, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

I’d like our money back from the UAW and AIG too. When is Obama going to get up on that soapbox?

Posted by: Bridget | January 14, 2010, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

The Banks already paid back the government; the banks have a right to make a profit, that is what we want them to do…now Obama wants a piece of that profit…Obama has no clue at what he is talking about, he is only trying to get the people to “hate profit” especially by the banks. But it is alright to make profit, that is what all businesses try to do. Only in Socialism can you not make a profit and a socialist leader wanting the people to hate profit..it will not work in the United States, which is why Obama’s approval rate is at 32% (and falling). Obama is a one term president and maybe less if he is Impeached for his anti-American activities and comments.

Posted by: Peter King | January 14, 2010, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

How can we get our money back from the
auto companies? How can we get our money
back from those committing fraud in
the medicare system which acknowledged
just this week is in the billions. How
can the taxpayers be reimbursed the
bonus’s from the exec’s at Fannie and
Freddie who manage a deeply flawed
program. How can we get our money back
from the government officials made a
holiday of it by taking themselves and
their families to Copenhagen for
the Global Warming summit which was a
total waste of time and money and
charged it as business. If we are going
to ask how taxpayers get their money
back you better be asking more than
the bankers.

Posted by: wis134 | January 14, 2010, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

“My commitment is to recover every single dime the American people are owed,” the President said, adding that his determination to achieve this goal was only heightened when he’s sees reports “of massive profits and obscene bonuses at some of the very firms who owe their continued existence to the American people, folks who have not been made whole and who continue to face real hardship in this recession.”
What wrere those names that started in F?

Posted by: Barney | January 14, 2010, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

“Some critics of the proposal have suggested that banks will simply pass that tax onto consumers”
Yes, and if they do that the top 50 largest financial institutions in the nation will lose customers to the top 75-50th largest financial institutions and the too big to fail problem solves itself.
This fee approach is a text book market-based approach to removing the competitive distortion that exists since too-big-to-fail banks get special insurance for free. Make them pay for their insurance and if their customers can’t bear the cost pass through, they’ll leave and that’s the invisible hand fixing the system right there.
First becoming rabid defenders of every cent of Medicare funding wasteful or not, and now firing economically ignorant soundbites against removing an enormous market distortion (making the biggest banks pay the value of their taxpayer insurance policy)… I guess Republicans hope to win by becoming the worst of what the Democrats used to be.

Posted by: jhw539 | January 14, 2010, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

we want our stimulus momeny back that you stoled…FAKE zip codes… fake districts…. more Obama culture of corruption

Posted by: I'm sorry, I'm just a left wing liberal racist | January 14, 2010, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Face it, the American people elected an anti-freedom, anti-business, anti-capitalism person as President and stacked the Congress to be his partner. This Administration and Congress do not understand even the most basic principles of economics. We are experiencing the biggest intrusion into our private lives in the history of the country and the biggest perversion of our economic system as well. Obama is pointing us to a future of stagnation. Obama is the worst president in a half a century. He is going against the will of the people and his vow of transparency and non-partisanship have turned out to be outright lies. VOTE THEM OUT!!!

Posted by: AngryMobVoter | January 14, 2010, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

we want our stimulus momeny back that you stoled…FAKE zip codes… fake districts…. more Obama culture of corruption
I’m sorry, I’m just a left wing liberal racist | Jan 14, 2010 1:37:39 PM
Real projects, real roads, real roofs, real bridges. You claim stimulus money was stolen. Every Republican has been looking for evidence of that, but o Republican in office has made that claim because it is a LIE. A paving contractor not caring about filing out the congressional district on a reporting form correctly is not theft-the road is still fixed.

Posted by: jhw539 | January 14, 2010, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

Real projects, real roads, real roofs, real bridges.
Trips to Copenhagen, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (and their bonuses), war spending…

Posted by: Nancy P | January 14, 2010, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

and now firing economically ignorant soundbites
You leave Orszag out of this!

Posted by: Fannie | January 14, 2010, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Trips to Copenhagen, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (and their bonuses), war spending…
Nancy P | Jan 14, 2010 1:46:34 PM
Gee, I wonder why the RNC isn’t publicizing all this illegal stimulus spending? Did you not follow the discussion, or are you blatantly lying by claiming stimulus bill spending went to “war spending” or Freddie Mac bonuses?

Posted by: jhw539 | January 14, 2010, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Gee, I wonder why the RNC isn’t publicizing all this illegal stimulus spending? Did you not follow the discussion, or are you blatantly lying by claiming stimulus bill spending went to “war spending” or Freddie Mac bonuses?
Because they still run Congress and one is the POTUS!

Posted by: Cheney | January 14, 2010, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Did you not follow the discussion, or are you blatantly lying by claiming stimulus bill spending went to “war spending” or Freddie Mac bonuses?
And how come GM and Chrysler aren’t mentioned?

Posted by: Ford | January 14, 2010, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

“Did you not follow the discussion, or are you blatantly lying by claiming stimulus bill spending went to “war spending” or Freddie Mac bonuses?”
And how come GM and Chrysler aren’t mentioned?
Ford | Jan 14, 2010 1:51:21 PM
Bring a suit. Do it. Waste your money in the courts – the RNC has enough competent lawyers not to bother. Wonder why that is? I don’t have a lot of respect for the Bush administration, but they were within the law when they first extended the $17 billion in TARP funds to GM and Chrysler, and the Obama administration’s actions were EXPLICITLY within the law since the passage of the TARP extension.

Posted by: jhw539 | January 14, 2010, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

What do they mean he wants his money back? If they get it all they are going to do is spend it on pork and not pay back the loan it came from. Practice what you preach Obama.

Posted by: Jim Rod | January 14, 2010, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

We want all of our money back that went to pay off timmy’s tax evasion debt!

Posted by: kinggreg123 | January 14, 2010, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

We want our money back too! From the failed stimulus, from ACORN, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac. No, we want our country back!

Posted by: pauldia | January 14, 2010, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

Oh yeah, I also want the money for Brian Williams’ Five Guys burger!!

Posted by: kinggreg123 | January 14, 2010, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

If Obama were serious about any of his phony anger he would have placed the conditional safeguards in place before a penny of taxpayer money was given to these bungling fools…sorry the Government had regulations in place and chose not to enforce which allowed the banks to go haywire….”stupid is as stupid does”.
Ron Paul is right, this country needs a SERIOUS REVOLUTION to take back our country from a Government out of control!

Posted by: CC | January 14, 2010, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Does he know that the banks are just going to turn around and get the money out of us in higher fees, etc? Oh, YEA.. he knows that.. He also knows that most of us are too stupid to know this and believe he is taking it out on “The Man”!

Posted by: ajax | January 14, 2010, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

Yeah, I agree with pauldia.Give us our country and our right to privacy back!You’ll get your money in 2012,just in time for your re-election campaign!

Posted by: knggreg123 | January 14, 2010, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Oh, did everyone here that “THE UNIONS” are going to get their way?? Their “Cadillac” Insurance Plans will NOT get taxed like all the other “Cadillac” plans that others in America have!

Posted by: ajax | January 14, 2010, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Finally, a responsible, sensible President. Thank goodness we dont have Bush around, especially during these hard times.

Posted by: Really? | January 14, 2010, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

We are going to have to pay even more in banking fees so the government can get our money back.Let me get this straight, the Federal Reserve is raking in record profits loaning money to these banks,so why don’t Obama ask Ben Bernanke for the money?

Posted by: kinggreg123 | January 14, 2010, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

jhw539 is absolutely right. If my bank enacts any fees onto my account I will simply take my money else where.

Posted by: oilhog | January 14, 2010, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

So Obama and the Fed forced some of these banks to take the money (a couple did not want it), some have paid it back, and some never took any ofit —- But now Obama wants to force ALL large banks a tax to recover the funds!! — Sounds just like his other socialist ideas — Not being fair, just finding ways to TAX MORE, because the taxpayer is going to end up paying the banks more to cover thier costs, so we end up paying ourselves back on the loans!!

Posted by: HoosierValues | January 14, 2010, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Obama is simply playing off the populist anger over throwing tax money at the bank villians. It’s another show.

Posted by: LongT | January 14, 2010, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

“jhw539 is absolutely right. If my bank enacts any fees onto my account I will simply take my money else where.”
Another possibility (it’s those ol’ unintended consequences rearing their ugly heads again) is that banks will tighten credit/loan standards even further to further cut risk and avoid losses (gottta pay for those Obama bank taxes somehow).
On the one hand Obama is begging banks to lend, on the other he is discouraging them from doing so. This guy is clearly in way over his head. He should have stuck to community organizing.

Posted by: tjp612 | January 14, 2010, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

I’m waiting for Bank of America to screw around with my VISA credit card agreement which we pay off every month for the last 20 years. Go ahead, force me to go to the local community bank up the street.

Posted by: LongT | January 14, 2010, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

We want our money back from YOU MR. President, all the money you spent in the stimulus, the Bail outs of GM and Chrysler. Bribes for the health Care bill. Where is our money? Give it back. When do we want it? Now!
The biggest crooks are in the GOVERNMENT, not on Wall Street.

Posted by: Kala | January 14, 2010, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

Obama has to find some capitalist enterprise to “demonize”!! — Two years ago it was “big oil” — but you don’t hear about them anymore! — The with the healthcare reform it was “evil insurance”! — Now it’s “big banks”, and tomorrow it will somebody else (follow the Dem’s legislative emphaisis)!! — Demonizing some entity into the “rich” class has kept the uneducated and entitlement-driven folk holding on to the Dem’s coattails for decades — part of the “master plan”!!!

Posted by: HoosierValues | January 14, 2010, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

@LongT, I used to try to deal with nothing but a local bank. No sooner then I get set up with them, guess what.. they would get bought out by a bigger one, then I would move again. NOW, we have no local banks in my area anymore.

Posted by: ajax | January 14, 2010, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

This started before Obama. In a free market economy, if a business runs itself poorly, they will eventually fold and new businesses arise to do the job better. It is ludicrous to bail out poorly run businesses in a free market economy, but that is exactly what we did. Why should the banks ever think that they should change their practices, when we foolishly bail them out when they screw up.

Posted by: Brian Levine | January 14, 2010, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

First it was the people complaining about giving the money to the banks now its the same people crying because he wants to get the money back lol .. you people just want to blame everything on Obama.. Probably because you voted for President Bust… none of this would be an issue if he weren’t ever President.. He ruined a whole nation and people are blaming a President who’s been running the country for a year in the worst economic downfall in ages lol .. whatever

Posted by: Love | January 14, 2010, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

“jhw539 is absolutely right. If my bank enacts any fees onto my account I will simply take my money else where.”….

LOL, now that is funny.. go ahead move your Money to the other bank. I am not going to get into it here, because I do not have the time, nor does this Forum have the space. You better do a little bit more reading on how money gets moved from one bank to another, how banks lend to each other, and they charge each other fees and interest. YOU TRULY think you going to NOT help PAY THIS?? LOL, HAHAHA to you.

Posted by: ajax | January 14, 2010, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

These conservatives in here are just mad because their leaders are not in charge to steal the money anymore. Yet we’re still paying for the republican administration & the horrible 8 years we had to endure. Some people just dont like Obama and thats fair, but at least give him a chance. He hasn’t done much wrong, but no one expect him to be perfect, especially after having a President who didn’t care less what happened. 9/11– he continue to read.. Katrina– he continued to do whatever he was doing instead of helping this country. Conservatives never find fault with themselves but we all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. Maybe if Conservatives really read what their principles are, they wouldn’t spend their days ripping folks because they aren’t like them. No wonder I would never vote for them folks– some of the message is good but the people are hypocritical and they use God’s name in vain

Posted by: Love | January 14, 2010, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

I am a Liberal that is fiscally conservative. No smart remarks are needed. I vote for President Obama and I agree that those that were given TARP funds should pay back their share with interest. That interest should be in alignhment with what they charge on their respective credit cards. This tax or fee should only be on those banks that received TARP money and NOT on those that were sound, responsible and did not accept these funds.
Regardless of the fact that GM and Chrysler went through bankruptcy they should not be protected from repaying their share with interest also!
Now for AIG and the others. AIG should be broken up, sold off and the government paid back immediately. How did AIG get away with lying to the SEC, Wall Street and shareholders when they had to be part of Sarbaes Oxley requirements. Why are companies not being charged under SOX for any violations in truthful reporting? This did not happen overnight but in Sept 2008 it sure felt like it did.

Posted by: AGetRealLiberal | January 14, 2010, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

randy– most of the people can’t get their money back from Obama because we’re still dealing w/ the mess that President “Bust” left behind… guess you dont remember that huh? selective memory these days? or were you brain washed by the GOP too? lol

Posted by: Love | January 14, 2010, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

& we all know conservatives dont want this (just like the tax increases) becauase some how, someone informed them they are fiscally responsible (which is a lie.. look at the deficit after 2008) because they dont want it regulated. That would mean their cut would be less and that can’t happen!! Such greedy folks in the world but someone need to tax all these businesses that make all this money. It’s obvious they have used the American public for years and I feel they should have been taxing these big banks. I wish they could put a cap on how much some of these CEO’s make. You would think they would be more responsible and lessen some of their bonuses, but they wont because they are all greedy!!

Posted by: Love | January 14, 2010, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

2 Kala– I dont know what country you are living in but to say Wall Street is not a problem is ignoring the problem. Those folks are greedy and make excessive amounts of money. They are an issue because they want to do whatever they want and not have rules. Well guess what I got rules to follow and so do you so what makes Wall Street different? NOTHING!!

Posted by: Love | January 14, 2010, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

No you can’t. Keep the CHANGE you filthy animals – Big Banks

Posted by: freedom | January 14, 2010, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

We must demand simple rules, that the banks follow. Or we will end up paying some bill for the banks because of a loop hole. We could us a smaller government also, with less jobs out here it seems like the government maintanes the same amount of jobs as always.

Posted by: Aaronson1963 | January 14, 2010, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

Be a true American, RE-ELECT NO ONE!!!!

Posted by: Aaronson1963 | January 14, 2010, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Lets send them the message that they will never forget. Put them in the same unemployement lines we are in! America RE-ELECT NO ONE!!!!!
Past this on like Obamadamma did!!!!
We can change it ourselves!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Aaronson1963 | January 14, 2010, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

I can’t see the mirrors .. for all the smoke being blown about…

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | January 14, 2010, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Mr. Obama is now attacking Wall Street to try to keep Americans from understanding how much they’re going to get shafted by his “national healthcare” program (which all polls clearly indicate the nation doesn’t want), how his approach to Iran is almost identical to the approach that Jimmy Carter took (we all know how THAT turned out), and a myriad of other mistakes that this administration makes daily. Mr. Obama believes (or wants you to believe) that big business is BAD, but unions and the “little people” are GOOD. He’s clueless and in way over his head.

Posted by: Conservative Ken | January 14, 2010, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

his approach to Iran is almost identical to the approach that Jimmy Carter took
____________________________________
You’re making the wrong comparison. What about the Bush administration approach?
On Bush’s watch Iran developed its secret nuclear facility. On Bush’s watch North Korea tested its first nuclear weapon. On Bush’s watch Bin Laden and al Qaeda escaped in Afghanistan.

Posted by: tierra | January 14, 2010, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Is everyone who received TARP money going to be taxed?

Posted by: deanbob | January 14, 2010, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

Hey can I join a union? They are getting an exemption on paying taxes on cadillac health plans. Ahh good ole Rahm, not letting a crisis go to waste. Focus on Haiti and bad old banks and screw the general populace while no one is looking.(or news networks not covering it)

Posted by: wjss75606 | January 14, 2010, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Did everyone read about the Unions getting their way with Obama? It will be changed so that the UNION’s “Cadallac” Insurance policies DO NOT GET Charge a TAX. But, Eveyone else that has one, will. Obama buying everyone off. Oh… all this CHANGE is really making me feel sooo warm and cozy.

Posted by: ajax | January 14, 2010, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

wjss75606 | Jan 14, 2010 4:54:24 PM
…Well, they had to repay all that money the union spendt getting Obama elected. A debt’s a debt, right?

Posted by: deanbob | January 14, 2010, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

The people (in this case banks) who pay back the loans,promptly, according to the terms of the loan, get the tax shaft. That’s Obama justice?

Posted by: deanbob | January 14, 2010, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

OBOMA IS CORRECT. Do you know why real estate isn’t moving? It’s not because of a lack of buyers, it’s because the lenders don’t want to sell the properties. Lern about short sales. They are a nightmare and the banks rather keep REAL property, verses a lousy 1 or 2 year mortgage payment, when they hold on and sell it later. Regardless of what is happening today, the fact is that there will be almost 80 million boomers retiring in next several years. WE have a total of 300 million people living in this country, so real estate in the states that are hurt the most (warm states), are hurting even more because lenders want to hold on and sell it slowly. The loam modification is only buying people time before they foreclosure, because their value already is down, and the aggreement with the modification is that the owner cannot sell until it pays back a certain percentage to the bank, which means the owner is paying rent and unless values rise dramatically they will be upside down. It’s sickening to think that banks were the cause for our countries demise, yet they got bailout money. They promoted the negative mortgage loan which is what has destroyed people and even those who worked for banks. Everyne trusted the banks knew what they were doing, and the more successful one was the harder they fell. The banks were thiefs and were encouraged to stay in business are allowed to do short sales that never close, do loan modifications that will only get them richer and you say we have a socialist regime, or even a free trade economy. What we have is a country run by the banks, and who will bring all of us down, plus the government. We used to have a military run regime under Bush, and now we have a country run by the banks. How fun. I really feel free with the right to life, liberty and persuit of happiness. I’m just so happy right now I could crack my face. It was great to hand it all to the banks and to see Bush and Obama give the crooks what they wanted. What fools. I taught one had to have a political background to understand dangers we could face. I’m not sure anyone retained the lessons because we the people are no longer in charge, nor is your government. The banks are in charge and what you’ll see will be extreme poor and extreme rich, and soon you will be begging immigrants to care for the elderly as they retire, and soon we’ll be so desperate for their work and tax money so we can care for almost 80 million people and people listen to Limbaught and help him bring us down even more. Not a very fun country, and I for one no longer care to have the white picket fance and would rather rent. When you add your interest, taxes, insurance, plus 30 years you’ll pay ten times what your home is worth, plus your stuck and can’t move if you can’t sell the home, or for a job. Renting gives me the freedom, and much cheaper, yet it took buying a couple of homes and be screwed by banks yo learn that lesson. So much for analysts and economists who could tell the country was being screwed and still is.

Posted by: Lola | January 14, 2010, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

GET you MONEY out of the banks NOW.
so what if there’s a run, after Wall Street gets their money out first there wont’ be anything left–so get the run going now before they get their bonuses and we’ll all be on the street together instead of them in their penthouses with guards at the lobby protecting them from us peasants.
Welcome back to feudalism where the lords own the land and us peasants rent.
and they are making us think that’s what we want, freedom to roam the land looking for work…

Posted by: brntp | January 15, 2010, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.