Scott Brown Gets ‘Presidential Timber’ Question

Why are Republicans always searching for another pretty face? Haven’t they learned from the disaster of the previous airheads like Bush and Palin?

I’d be happier seeing Scott Brown running in 2012 than any of the other current contenders (as long as he didn’t pull a McCain with his VP pick). He is the closest thing to a Republican moderate in the running (OK, maybe Romney – who just a few years ago was the governor of the “blue” state of Massachusetts…).

Brown was not voted in on his own merit. The people voting were getting back at a party that was off the mark. It is not over and more dems are to fall. We should never allow one party to control – it just leads to wide left and right turns.

I liked GWB (most of the time) but i would not call him “another pretty face! Sarah yes but George? BTW..Scott Brown’s daughters qualify as “pretty faces!”

How about we see what he actually DOES as a Senator before talking about a higher position.
We just did that and look what it got us.

indy_voter……. The GOP/Republicans did not ask him if he was going to run for Pres it was the reporter.
FYI: Brown calls himself a “Fiscal Conservative” and a “Social Moderate”. Not what I am looking for in a candidate.

Considering what Sen. Brown ACTUALLY said, this entire story is written in a very misleading fashion. The media needs to STOP picking our candidates and let the people do it!

George Washington for President 2012. Has anyone seen George yet?

That is a very wacky NONE ANSWER!

“I didn’t ask for this Health Care Bill failure! I inherited it from Massachusetts and the previous administration!!” from The Once and Future Prince of Bel Air.

While I was glad to see Brown win, I think the GOP should start pushing presidential candidates with more experience. It is ridiculous that they are asking him this question when he has spent 0 days beyond State Senate.

Brown for President? Crazy? Maybe, Maybe Not.

What are you gonna do now Senator Elect Brown? I’m going to Disney World!

Can’t anyone see through this guy? He’s another political phoney just like the other Republicrats. Jus because he ran against a disliked idiot in beantown and won that does not make him a viable candidate for Presidency.
When will this crazyness end?

It’s a bit premature to start talking about Senator-elect Brown running for president. But he will have more experience than our current president by that time. But I don’t think he was ever a community organizer, so that might hold him back. I’m sure he would do a better job than that of the current occupant of the people’s house.

ISN’T THIS A BIT “PREMATURE”??
One would think that Senator-elect Brown might be as full of himself as the former “senator” barack obama, who thought that his merely showing up IN the Senate Chamber constituted enough “experience” to run for President!
After all, isn’t APPEARANCE everything?!

What is it with these right-wing loons and their empty vessel candidates?
Brown/Palin 2010! A beauty queen and a Cosmo model. That’s what we need in this country – two brainless right-wing ciphers to do the bidding of the RNC.
Pathetic.

“Why are Republicans always searching for another pretty face? Haven’t they learned from the disaster of the previous airheads like Bush and Palin?”
Indy, I’m a Bush fan, but I’d never consider him a ‘pretty face.’ I’m not even sure Bush thinks he has a ‘pretty face.’

What? A presidential candidate with just two years experience in the Senate? What kind of nut job could even suggest such foolishness?

Don’t let the liberal media select the Republican candidate. They have no respect for conservative values and we’ll end up with a bad candidate again like McLame.
While it’s grand that Brown won in liberal MA, we can find a proven conservative. Remember, Conservatism is taught, and we need to make sure our candidate not only has a solid understanding and belief of conservative values, but can also teach those same values.

What sweet justice that the Senate seat once held by Ted Kennedy is filled by a Republican. Kennedy worked his entire career to socialize healthcare and he was replaced by the very man that will stop it. It is astoundingly poetic…

I like Brown a lot so far. But let’s see him finish a term, get re-elected, and then finish that term. If, in the course of his efforts he shines, then let’s talk about President Brown.
We are Conservatives, for God’s sake. Let’s act like it and vote for proven leaders. We don’t want to end up with a joke like 0bama leading us just because we lack patience.

Correction of a mistake in my previous post. The next to last paragraph should read: I personally feel governing too far to the left or right is dangerous, especially if there is a majority of one party running both the administration and congress.

I wounder if thats what these people will tell Jesus…well we didn’t want to govern to far to the right or left we wanted to stay in the middle we can have a little satan with are God right? No wait Jesus don’t spit us out becase were not hot or cold please. you have to go left or right if you walk down the middle of the road you get smashed just like grape

Forget party lines politicians. Scott Brown is a true politician that why he got votes across the board. He answered straight up and with out the mumbo jumbo crap. You want a job this fall then get with the American people because we vote for US!

FYI: Brown calls himself a “Fiscal Conservative” and a “Social Moderate”. Not what I am looking for in a candidate.
How’s that Obama guy working out for you then?

As long as he isnt a progressive, Ill vote for him.
If he is, then he should expect to pack his bags in 2012 and never return.
We are done playing around.

I agree that first it was a stupid question. Second, it is way, way too early to even be thinking about the Presidency. However, Mr. Brown does have the potential to do great things. Therefore, I nominate him for the 2010 Nobel Peace Prize.

Looks like some posters are falling back into Bush-era logic by putting the bar on the ground and cooing when some newcomer steps over it. The only noteworthy thing he’s acomplished is posing nude in a national magazine and still getting votes. I doubt a female could get that far.Even Sarah Palin would have been in trouble had she posed nude. Let’s get a grip here, conservatives!

Well, he would be a far better President than Mr. Obama!

I thoroughly enjoyed watching the lefty shows like Maddow,Matthews, and the ever bumbling Obermann fool after the election. if Scott Brown can resist the special interest, lobbys, and stupid questions like this one, he should do well in congress.

If he can carry Massachusetts the most liberal state be afraid you liberal Democrates BE VERY AFRAID the REVOLUTION has started and you are looking at the next PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES-

Ron Paul 2012

To me Scott Brown is an ordinary fellow from a town near the town I grew up in MA.
Not a fancy dandy who went To HARVARD and refuses to give any true facts about himself. So let him go to Washington and prove his worth.

All this election proves is America and its cadre of hypocrites are hell bent on themselves and not their common man. The insurance industry is a Gestapo. And as Obama said health care will BK America. I hope sooner rather than later. And all of you babies will cry on your mama’s lap. TOO BAD.

Who cares… It’s 3 years away!
Right now we have to fend off the Marxist Coup as envisioned by the Progressive radicals controlling the “Democratic Party”!
They were SOUNDLY rejected Tuesday!
Finally the TRUE Democrats will take back their party and tell the Obamas, Emmanuals, Olbermans and Moores (all Alinski deciples)…
THIS IS NOT A SOCIALIST COUNTRY!

Interested in the latest hub-bub;
“Downriver”
GLENN BECK ON SCOTT BROWN: “I want a chastity belt on this man. I want his every move watched in Washington. I don’t trust this guy. This one could end with a dead intern. I’m just saying. It could end with a dead intern.”
4:53 pm, Jan 20, 2010

Scott Brown Gets ‘Stock Market Crash’ Question
ABC News’ Teddybear Davis reports:
At a Wednesday press conference in Boston, Senator-elect Scott Brown, R-Mass., was asked if he sees himself as the cause of the 1929 “Stock Market Crash.”
He noted that he had not yet even been born at that time — but, at the same time, he didn’t seem to rule out that he had caused the the Crash or the resulting Great Depression.
Stay tuned for Teddybear’s next example of fair and balanced news reporting: “Scott Brown admits he caused greatest economic disaster in American History!”

Brown was elected to send a message to Washington that Americans aren’t going for the Marxist direction in which they’re heading. The health care bill is a monstrosity, a transfer of power, rights, and wealth from us to the government. Anyone who’s looked into it beyond what the mainstream media reports is aware of this.
It’s nice to hear a politician say they are “proud” to have been elected. These days, they all tend to say they are “humbled,” and most of them sound like they’re lying.

We elected one horrendously unexperienced person to the presidency, why would we want to make the same mistake?

No one among the GOP can be ruled out. However, Brown will not cut it if he is a Pro-Choice candidate. The time for killing babies is over and the question of abortion on demand is a very complex question of morality. You are either a “moral” person who believes all life is precious or you are falling in line with another philosophy. The Health Care Bill that Democrats propose not only includes abortion possibilities but it also indirectly proposes euthanasia for the elderly. Do your homework Scott Brown and let’s see what you come up with in 2012. Rudolph J. Girandola, Author: The Jade Chalice (fiction blaming the RCC for its own ills)

Democrats have had complete control of Congress for the last 36 months.
How do YOU like what they’ve accomplished so far?

Brown is PRO_choice … He is a Rudy Giulani CLONE , Thats why Rudy went to meet and support him during the campaign and NOT a PRO-LIFE conservative.
So we have seen this SCRIPT BEFORE.

he’s the male palin. admit it. and we’re seeing what a stark contrast there is between judging a conservative man vs. judging a conservative woman.

yep!! he is for a woman right to choose , thats really going to play well with the true Conseravtive base.
the guy is a independent that cares about a few republican ideals .
he is OK with regular Abortion but against partial birth.sounds like a Clinton to me .
But then again you have to be to win in those type liberal states.

Let’s be frank here. Senator Brown won a referendum against the Health Care Debacle. Nothing more.

jezzika, sarah palin would be toxic to the ticket… my guess is that she is a kingmaker. whoever gets her endorsement will end up being the next president.

Chappaquiddick Teddy must be rolling over in his grave right about now, knowing that a Republican is in HIS seat!

EARLIER ON, OBAMA WAS LIKEABLE AND BELIEVABLE. WHAT A DISGUSTING DISSAPPOINTMENT. OF COURSE, HE, HIS LIBERAL CRONIES AND THE BIASED MEDIA LIED TO US UNTIL IT WAS TOO LATE.
SCOTT BROWN IS VERY LIKEABLE AND BELIEVABLE. I HOPE HE DOESN’T CHANGE. HE HANDLED THE MEDIA BEAUTIFULLY — WITHOUT A TELEPROMPTER.

Bush was a pretty face?

What both Parties can learn from Scott Brown is that Congress does not ultimately belong to either Party but to the people who vote. He seems to know that. Here’s hoping he doesn’t forget after he gets to Washington.

I didn’t see where Brown alluded to presidential aspirations, nor have I heard overtones of the Republicans recruiting him for a presidential bid. It was a stupid question, but in a good political answer Brown managed to point out that he has a job to do and deflect the question.
I agree with those who have pointed out that we recently elected someone without a proven track record and now are dealing with consequences. I’d suggest that the best course of action for choosing the next president is to look for someone with real experience managing a larger operation, because the president needs managerial skills. Senators are legislators, not executive types. They tend to make lousy presidents (Bush 41, LBJ, failed candidates like Mondale and Dole, and 0bama) because they don’t think like an executive needs to think. Oftentimes governors are the best presidents as they have the skill set to be president, having been in an executive office already, the most glaring recent exception being Carter.

Romney / Brown 2012

Why are Democrats always looking for another unqualified minority face? Obama had ZERO qualifications to be President of the greatest nation on Earth — and now it shows.
So please don’t question the qualifications of potential Republican candidates. It is a little like the proverbial pot calling the kettle…well…you get the picture.
=)

I don’t care what he said. Thank goodness “Curling Iron” Lady didn’t win!! That anyone could think to support her seriously calls into question where we are headed in this country.

What he should’ve said was, “Look, I was just a state senator, I’ll only have served in the U.S. Senate for two years, how could anyone POSSIBLY think I’d be qualified to be president in 2012???”

Brown’s answer should have been “That’s a silly question. It seems the Democrats tried that strategy of running a person for President that had no experience other than voting ‘present’, and now look what a mess we have…although I did more than vote ‘present’ here in Massachusetts and I promise to spend more time being a Senator than campaigning, unlike that other guy.”

Indy,calling others airheads is not very nice you maroon. When is Obama going to accept the problems he is causing and stop blaming everything on George W. Bush?

Ron Paul is the only presidential candidate that would bring any real and actual POSITIVE changes to Washington. Vote Ron Paul 2012!!

Let’s not jump ahead of ourselves or be lead by an inane journalist asking a ridiculous question. We’ve been down that road too many times. Rather, let’s give him a chance and judge him on his actions. Maybe the only timber we’ll see is the type that goes crash in the woods.

Apparently he’s been good in his other positions…
As for press, ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC are not really ‘news’ channels… they don’t dig for the hard facts and ignore a lot that goes on around them.
I mean how have you not have sacrificed your journalistic integrity when you can ignore reporting that 1.7M people are standing on the Capitol lawn?
FOX is the only ‘news’ channel — reports the good, the bad and the ugly.
Those others just have ranting maniacal head cases like Maddow, and that nasty Olbermann and Schultz.

This discussion is waaaay waaay too early. Just stop. Let the guy go to the Senate first. And don’t ask him about this for awhile

Scott might as well run for President in 2012 as he probably will have a snowball’s chance in hell in being re-elected to the Senate. It does show how thin the field of good GOP Presidential hopefuls are doesn’t it?

for all of you that are complaining, of what he should have said, or didn’t say, I think his answer was perfect. It was gracious. He was humble. And he didn’t want to be rude to the person asking the question. and it’s obvious he’s extremely tired. Wouldn’t you be?
Brown’s winning of the election in Massachusetts, gives him incredible political capital. It’s only natural that people start to speculate, what could happen.
He seems like a normal guy. If he sticks to his principles and votes down any new spending increases, we might just have something. he has the opportunity of a lifetime.

Wow;
I am sorry… for REAL change in America..
1) Term limits for Senators and representatives – 2 Terms for Senators, and 4 terms for representatives
2) Remove all ability to exempt themselves for the laws they write.
3) Remove all fringe benefits from them. No retirements, no free medical/dental
4) No ability for Lawyers to serve in the office of Senator and/or Representative
5) No ability to become lobbyists.
The point being – you come to Washington, you serve your people. You leave office and have to return to living like the rest of America. No more ROYAL families serving.
Just my 2 cents…

Quoting Indy_Voter: “Why are Republicans always searching for another pretty face? Haven’t they learned from the disaster of the previous airheads like Bush and Palin?”
It’s not about a pretty face. It’s about picking a person who BELIEVES what he or she is doing. Not even what their own party line is doing.
I would rather elect someone who believes and does what he or she thinks is right then someone who plays the political game.
We all warned you obama was of this latter class, and how are you feeling about his results to date? From the poll numbers across the election, far-left liberals to moderates feel betrayed by that just-another-party-man politician who claimed to be more.
If you continue to want career politicans or wanna-be career politicans, keep voting for the incumbents like a good trained dog.
The rest of us like people who we at least HOPE will try to represent us. Right or wrong!
I am against Palin, but would like someone away from a beltway insider to represent the REST of us for four or eight years!

That is a misleading, stupid question asked to get Mr. Brown to speak while at a emotional time. It was made waiting for him to say something stupid.

President? How about we let the man get seated in the Senate, first.

Repubs have all the pretty faces, I mean where is one in Obama’s admin? Bawney Fwank?

Browns not the real story here. The real story is how a tone deaf airhead whose not even a US citizen like Hussein Obama used a pretty face and voter anger to get elected president in the first place. And how short of a time it took for said airhead to destroy his presidency and be well on the way to destroying this country. THAT my friends is why Scot Brown won, and why dems lost in Virginia and New Jersey.

Why is this even being discussed? Let’s first see if he is a REAL conservative. Only time will tell.

At least Brown was born in this country, and we can see his records. The added plus is that he served in the military. Not unlike the current occupier whose wife didn’t like the USA for a long time and her husband who we still haven’t seen any of his records.

I am from Massachusetts, and will try and bring some reality to these comments.
Obviously, Scott’s ambitions are not now to one day be POTUS, but just as obvious – he is apparently very well qualified to go down that path.
He may be a good looking man, but his qualities have nothing to do with his looks. He is a man of the people, has common sense, and is an independent thinker. He has been battle tested as a tiny minority state Senator in the highly corrupt Massachusetts world of politics. He is a decent speaker and handles himself well with the press. He’s comfortable in his own skin.
He’s a patriot, a family man, and someone you’d love to have a beer with.
Not a Reagan Democrat, a Scott Brown Republican.

Hello,
Scott Brown is not another pretty face as some “IDIOT” has said in there post here. He is a RESPECTED MEMBER of the Armed Services of this nation, and you shall treat him as that. What have you done for your country indy_voter. Obama is nothing more than a empty suit to begin with. This man has military service. He would make a “GREATER” President than Obama ever has been. He has a GREAT sense of humor, and he is about to embark on a great quest to help really transform Wacko D.C., and help it to return it back to what it was before all the foolish progressives took over, and MAYBE IT CAN BECOME WASHINGTON D.C. ONCE AGAIN. THE “PEOPLES” HOME, THE “PEOPLES” CAPITAL. GET RID OF ALL THE BUNS IN 2010. NO MORE PROGRESSIVES IN “OUR” GOVERNMENT.
Thanks,
Larry C.
“IN GOD WE TRUST”

Scott Brown is the nearest politican I have heard in a long time that sounds like America comes before party ambitions. Some fresh air just blew into Washington.This may be the start of “Change the “Change”.

the drudge report heading was a tongue and cheek statement regarding the reality of obama’s inexperience.

Sorry it’s just wayyyyyy tooooooo early in the game to even ask Brown that kind of question.

Amazing!
It takes 60 Democrats to waste time and money in an effort to destroy America.
It takes 1 Republican to change history!
Republicans need to stick to being the party of “NO”. NO more Socialist, Marxist ideas. NO more wasting of OUR money. NO more union control. NO more Chicago thugs. NO more illegal immigrants. NO more protecting terrorists. Remember President Obama’s quote January 23, 2009— “I won. So I think on that one, I trump you.” Well President Obama DEAL THE CARDS AGAIN—its a new day!!!!!!!!

Hey! Media, let’s get the priorotoes straight. I think Brown really wants to serve the people of Mass. unlike the Obama phemom that was brought to us by those who are still unknown to the public and sit grinning and a pickin’ in Chicago.

GONZO Journalists are always trying to rewrite or influence the outcome of history. It’s a bit sickening…

ABC always asks stupid questions. What else would you expect.

You people don’t know anything about Brown. I live in MA and nobody here knows anything about him. Least of all, the national Republican party knows him… they just heard his name a few weeks ago. Didn’t we learn anything from electing an unknown in President Obama? His election was based not so much in policy, but in methods. The two parties, going back 10 years, have been arrogant and pushed insider candiates and self absorbed agenda on the people. Brown’s opposition campaign took MA voters for granted and further insulted the electorate. The Brown for President question (and headline) shows how little work the press has done to figure out what really happened here.

Wait, not fair!!! You can’t ask him that question before the spin doctors have a better chance at him. Now let’s see, the naked model thing didn’t stick, what else to try? Hmmm, he drives a truck – aha! He hates the environment – send that to press.

The election is like a fresh breeze that blows away the fetid stench of democratic machine politics in MA. It has served to shake all but the most die hard doctrinaire lefties out of their collective delusion that the country supports centralized socialist policies that intrude on how we conduct our day-to-day lives. The Obama administration’s elitist tactics of running roughshod over popular sentiment have collided with reality. If they learn anything meaningful from Tuesday’s events, perhaps the people will be better served and the focus will shift toward programs that allow businesses to create jobs and get people back on their feet rather than cynical attempts to broaden government powers and use the electorate’s pain as a catalyst to implement sweeping social and economic changes fly in the face of the principals that have made our country the greatest in the world. A new broom sweeps clean.

Wavygravy is… well… an idiot. The whole point is that people don’t WANT to vote as republican or democrat anymore. To say that independents don’t know about issues… that you have to be a party member to vote on issues… what arrogance. Not recognizing that politics has been mostly emotional for thousands of years also makes Wavygravy ignorant.

Can we at least wait until his sex scandal is revealed and find out his nude pictures appeared in a gay magazine before we send him to the White House? Jeeeez!!

Anyone can talk a good game; look at Obama. I feel we should wait to see what he does, not what he says.

What’s the rush? Let the man prove himself in the Senate. We are saddled with a flash-in-the-pan butt hole now and we don’t need to push some one for President before we know how he does in a lower office. Conservatives have got to stop letting the Lame Stream Media choose our candidates for us.

The republicrats are desperate first palin now brown? This is the best they got? Give me a break. More like scraping the bottom of the barrel.

How ridiculous. Some guy spends a couple terms in a State Senate, then gets elected to the US Senate against a week candidate, so he’s qualified to be President because he’s attractive and gives a good speech?
Oh, wait, nevermind.

We need someone even more conservative then Brown to run for President in 2012. It is clear the country has bought into freedom, individual rights and responsibility, smaller govt, lower taxes…. Lets start abolishing the Dept of Education, Agriculture, energy, HHS, etc….Put the bureaucrats out on the street and tar anf feather the PROPGRESSIVES!!!!
As ACORN would say enuf is enuf.

Come on. That is ignorance. We don’t know yet who this guy is and you want him as the GOP nominee. We can’t be that desperate to anoint someone based on his limited background. Plus he has issues with abortion that will be red flags to us righties.

I think that it has been made quite clear that serving less than one full term in the Senate is not enough experience for the position of POTUS in the 21st century.

Heck, Scott Brow may be the type of senator to actually READ the bill before he votes on it.

As a Lt. Col. in the Army National Guard, he already has more real leadership qualifications to be president than Obama ever had! This man has a bright political future. Perhaps a new political party will emerge from the Tea Party Movement, and he will be the party’s nomination. It could happen, I’m just saying. . . .

As a conservative I for one think that this is just stupid. Why, simply because he won a Senate seat, would I or anyone else vote for him for president? He may be conservative, but he won because over 60% of Americans, even those from Mass. are against this healthcare bill, cap and trade, bailouts and more and more and more and more government interference in their lives! I say no to anyone who is/has ever served in Washington, we need all new people! People who are reluctant but willing and who like our founders only want whats best for the future of our country… not special interest groups or their own personal gain.

“George Washington for President 2012. Has anyone seen George yet?”
Right on Thomas! I second that! George Washington, the man who could have been king but chose to go back to Mount Vernon instead, he was a true hero and the embodiement of what we should always be looking for in a president!

The more Democrat responses I read, the more it appears that many in your party are delusional.
Obama even says that the public is angry and frustrated about jobs. Well, here’s my observation.
It’s not the jobs, Obama, it’s YOU. A lot of American people can’t stand YOU. You are following a progressive (Communist) agenda, and it scares us. Communism is not what America is about. The best thing Obama can do is resign, partly because he is not qualified (non-US citizen), and partly because he is a traitor.
Any questions, Barry?

I just feel that the best thing in the world is Scott Brown. Our Guardian Angel. Our Savior, if you will. Thank God for him and his timing. Scott, do not allow washington to change you in such a way to get you to think they get you..they understand you…or even agree with you./ do not trust them…..none of them

That airhead Palin is the primary reason we don’t have the democratic health care plan. Her post on death panels stopped that train in its tracks. Two days after her post on terrorism (related to the Detroit incident) titled “It’s a war not a crime spree” our smart president finally came to his senses and said the same thing. How is that smart thing working our for Obama?
Palin/Pence in 2012! (or Palin/Bachman)

It is way to early for this kind of speculation. Do a good job in the Senate, then maybe do a good job as a Governor – and then maybe we can talk about the White House. America doesn’t need another Senator like Obama being fast tracked into the top job while having a resume that is even thinner than Sarah Palin’s.

Good grief, he isn’t even a Senator yet. The person who asked that dumb question should be sent back to the mail room.

Dear God…haven’t we learned our lesson? We just put a freshmen senator into the oval office…how is that working out? Brown may turn out to be a very good senator. Give him a chance to gain experience before elevating him to POTUS.

What a stupid question. Have we not learned a lesson from the last presidential election which got us an unknown, untested and inexperienced Obama?? We don’t even know this man. Give him a break and let him do the job he was elected to do before conducting another coronation. The last one sure screwed things up, didn’t it?

“FYI: Brown calls himself a “Fiscal Conservative” and a “Social Moderate”. Not what I am looking for in a candidate.”
Perhaps not, but it is EXACTLY what I’m looking for, and I suspect I’m not alone.
Having said that, Brown’s a young man (in legislative years) and should put in some real time in the Senate before indulging any further ambitions. Let’s keep an eye on the man and see what what kind of a resume he develops.

What an alarming, sad, and ironic loss for democrats! I voted for Obama in 2008. I thought he would be a fair-minded politician and a better president than George W. Bush. How mistaken I was! As a moderate democrat, I had so much hope that Obama would become a centrist. Not only he is an extreme leftist, he is also showing the American public what a liar and incompetent leader he is. Talk about buyer’s remorse! I am deeply regretting my vote that went to Obama!
Obama and his criminal thugs –Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi– will not have a chance to be re-elected in the next elections. I know they will never get the votes of moderate democrats and independents.
Our country is heading on the wrong path and we need to take it back in the elections of 2010 and 2012. I can not believe that I will come to the point where I say this……….but right now Bush looks a much better president than Obama.
I am so disgusted by what Obama, Reid, Pelosi and the leftist democrats are doing to our country, our economy, and our national security. They all need to be voted out…..and they will be come 2010 and 2012. They all will pay the price when the American people go to the polls……..as they just did in Massachusetts by electing Scott Brown. We need more Scott Browns all over America.

Where in the quote did Senator(elect) Brown say he was running for President in 2012. For heaven’s sake stop the spin.

The greatest impediment to a Democrat Party mid-term course correction to avoid a certain 2010 electoral tidal wave is that their anointed “Standard Bearer” ,Barack “ACORN” Obama , is narcissistic to the point of being delusional. In Obama’s Marxist mindset, it’s simply not plausible that his Socialist agenda is anathema to the American public. Greg N

What nonsense. I voted for Brown, but before anybody is considered for president they should have done something and have some kind of track-record. Now we all can see what happens when you vote someone in who has no experience, track-record – nothing – as president.

Senator Brown.. do you plan to run for President in 2012… Answer: It didn’t work out so good last time a freshman senator did that, did it?
Of course the Zero we have now is a Marxist. That might have something to do with his problems.

CHRIS SAID- “Now we all can see what happens when you vote someone in who has no experience, track-record – nothing – as president.”
My reply- Senator Brown does have a track record. A state representative and a soldier for 30 years. He is also of good character. And I believe what he says.
Compare that to Obama, who doesn’t have good character or a good track record. Of course, Obama TALKS alot, but be wary of that pathological liar and narcissist. If you go by Obama’s actions, he is an imposter, a liar, a thief, a traitor, a Communist and he should be out of office and in prison.

Too soon to say for sure, let’s see what he actually does in DC. One thing for sure, the Republicans need a new face, new leadership and some new strategies. They have no one out there to inspire the country in a presidential bid, all their possibilities are the same old, same old except Sarah Palin and I doubt her chances at being elected.

Pretty fair answer. He wouldn’t want to say “No, I don’t want to run for President” in case it comes back to haunt him years down the track.
Realistically, pretty much every Senator and Governor (and ex Governors) must wonder at some at some point if they are a chance. Just they wait until it is time to say it out loud.
When is Brown up for re-election? Get past that first. See if Mass. returns to the Dark side.

How about proving himself first? We know nothing.

Bush and Palin weren’t as cute as this guy is…and he’s not an anti-abortionist freak, either.

Wow.. the worst thing the GOP could do is send up a 2012 candidate that resembles the mold of Barack Obama. It’s a historically observed fact that Senators generally make bad presidents. Governors usually make… better… Presidents.
The Republican Dream Team for 2012 is some combination of Romney/Palin/Gingrich. Don’t argue.. you’ll be wrong.

Palin/Brown in 2012. Stupid and pretty.