Senator Voinovich: ‘I Am Not a Vote For The Health Care Bill’
ABC News’ Karen Travers Reports: Sen. George Voinovich, R-Ohio, met with President Obama today at the White House to discuss the national debt, but the main political story of the day, the Massachusetts Senate race, was Topic A when he spoke to reporters. When asked about the Massachusetts Senate race and the future of health care reform, Voinovich said he is still opposed to the pending legislation. “That’s out of the question – I am not a vote for the health care bill, period,” he told reporters. Voinovich said he discussed with the president his idea for a bipartisan commission to focus on bringing down the national debt and increasing revenue. He said Obama’s main concern with that suggestion is whether there is support for it. Voinovich said that while many people are opposed to that, he asks, “what are you for?” “That’s the dilemma the president has – he’d like to do the commission but the concern he has is he won’t have the support that’s necessary to get the commission done in the Congress,” he said. “And if he doesn’t get some kind of consensus on a commission than he’s going to have to move forward to do something as an alternative to address the problem that I believe would not be as successful as if we could do it on a bipartisan basis.” There has been speculation that since the moderate Republican senator is not seeking reelection, he may vote with the Democrats on health care reform. Asked today if he discussed health care with the president, Voinovich indicated he had not. “There were certain things he didn’t bother with because he knows George Voinovich and I take a position on something and that’s just the way it is,” the senator from Ohio said. Voinovich told ABC News’ Jonathan Karl in September that despite suggestions to the contrary, he is not planning to vote for Democrats’ health care bill. “As you know, I am a debt hawk,” Voinovich said. “I just think with the financial crisis we have in this country, we have to be careful of taking on something we can’t afford to pay for, particularly when we can’t afford to pay for what we’ve already got.” For Voinovich the bottom line is costs: “We can’t afford what we are doing now. How can we afford to do more?” — Karen Travers

Email
Can Mitt Romney Win Conservatives Back?
Possible Contraception Compromise in D.C.
“That’s out of the question — I am not a vote for the health care bill, period,” he told reporters.
—————————–
Until he gets his price.
And so it begins. Which republican is going to sell out?
Posted by: herewegoagain | January 19, 2010, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
I guess this is part of the “most transparent” bill in the history of mankind.
Posted by: herewegoagain | January 19, 2010, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
If Voinovich is such a debt hawk, why does he oppose a health care bill that will reduce the deficit?
Posted by: Dave | January 19, 2010, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
“Until he gets his price.
And so it begins. Which republican is going to sell out?”
How much did the senator from Louisiana get?
Posted by: Nelson | January 19, 2010, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
Dave, he opposes the health care bill because it will NOT reduce the deficit. It may appear to reduce the deficit at first…after all, the govt would take in revenue without having to provide any service for 4 years. Heck, yes…that would make it APPEAR to reduce the deficit. But it’s smoke and mirrors. A shell game. If I collected money from you and several million other Americans, and provided you no service or goods, my ‘deficit’ would rapidly turn into an surplus. But, man, 4 years later when i had to start producing those services or goods, my surplus would evaporate faster than Obama’s approval ratings.
Posted by: ncpilot09 | January 19, 2010, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
?
Posted by: ncpilot09 | January 19, 2010, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
Posted by: Dave | Jan 19, 2010 2:14:45 PM
If Voinovich is such a debt hawk, why does he oppose a health care bill that will reduce the deficit?
_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_
Because he doesn’t live in fantasy village and knows how preposterious that assertion is?
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
Posted by: Projectilevomit | January 19, 2010, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Anyone that believe the current healthcare bill will reduce the deficit is delusional. The US is broke!!! We need to be making cuts across the board not blowing more $$ that we don’t have.
Posted by: Desmond | January 19, 2010, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
I’d be happy to see him as a vote for a bipartisan budget commission. It worked for military base realignment and it is the best option to get government spending under control. But it may not happen if the Republicans stick to their unprecedented obstructionism (no Congress in history has ever filibustered as much as this Republican minority – they have filibustered 3 times more in a single year than in all of the 19th century combined).
Posted by: jhw539 | January 19, 2010, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Maybe Voinovich is trying to find a job in the obama administration after retirement.
Posted by: Jenny | January 19, 2010, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
“I’d be happy to see him as a vote for a bipartisan budget commission. It worked for military base realignment and it is the best option to get government spending under control. But it may not happen if the Republicans stick to their unprecedented obstructionism (no Congress in history has ever filibustered as much as this Republican minority – they have filibustered 3 times more in a single year than in all of the 19th century combined). ”
———————————-
Ubstructing socialism is exactly the correct thing to do.
Obstruction isn’t a bad word when you are doing the right thing.
Posted by: herewegoagain | January 19, 2010, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
This newly anointed “deficit hawk” is the same guy who voted for the 2003 Medicare expansion bill that has already added $500 billion to the deficit and will add another $700 billion by 2013. At least the current healthcare bill is designed to be deficit neutral. The 2003 Bush era bill was a complete unfunded mandate. He’s just another ideological Republican. Ditto for Snowe, Collins, Hatch and all the other Republicans who voted yes in 2003, but no in 2009. Useless lot.
Posted by: Jason | January 19, 2010, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Well surprise…surprise…who’d thunk it. Seriously, what republican would vote for anything President Obama would like to do? They started this from day one and are still continuing it..what Americans they are….I won’t play unless I get my way.
Posted by: talmag | January 19, 2010, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Obstruction isn’t a bad word when you are doing the right thing.
herewegoagain | Jan 19, 2010 2:59:44 PM
And yet in the entire history of our Republic, no minority party has EVER considered this level of complete obstructionism to be the right thing. The last three years, each setting a new record for filibusters, is the strongest argument I’ve seen for elimination of the undemocratic filibuster entirely (and I say that knowing that Republicans will take back the Senate sometime in my life).
Posted by: jhw539 | January 19, 2010, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
“If Voinovich is such a debt hawk, why does he oppose a health care bill that will reduce the deficit?” BWAHAHA Dave, Bwahaha, stop, you’re killing me! BWAHAHA
Posted by: JamesJ | January 19, 2010, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
For those of you that believe health care will reduce the deficit, read the TEA leafs. Of course the first 10 years look good. 10 years of tax increases and 5 years of service = budget nuetral? That’s real funny math. As a small business owner, with a $850,000 payroll, I will pay an additional $90,000 in taxes and penalties that I will pass on to you the consumer if it passes.. if this passes, you might find a $5 Sausage McMuffin at McDonald’s. Remember who pays taxes; the consumer. What is sad is that health care reform is attainable if we do some things:
1. Allow insurance companies to do business in 50 states
2. Real TORT reform
3. Let the market drive costs down
The government has never provided a competive market for anything. Why would it start now with Health Care as written. This has nothing to do with Obama. It has everything to do with his policies.
Posted by: Rich | January 19, 2010, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
How’s that Hope and Change working for you in the new world of Obama transparency? I keep looking to CNN to see the negotiations. H’mmmm. I can’t seem to find it. I must have misunderstood the 8 different clips I’ve seen saying Obama would have CNN broadcast the negotiations openly. Can anyone help me understand why we can’t see any of the secret backroom deals?
Posted by: John | January 19, 2010, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Stand up and be proud. Keep slapping themin the face so the dems will wake up.
Posted by: Jim Rod | January 19, 2010, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
“Of course the first 10 years look good. 10 years of tax increases and 5 years of service = budget nuetral?”
The new right wing talking points whose logic is on par with the “its snowing outside, global warming is a hoax” idiocy.
Check the CBO as they have been issuing regular reports on the various proposed plans and amendments offered by both Democrats and Republicans.
“1. Allow insurance companies to do business in 50 states”
IOW allow insurance companies to sell you coverage without any consumer protection offered by your state.
“2. Real TORT reform”
Tort reform has already occurred in many states and the impact has been minimal.
In fact the CBO estimated the impact or tort reform as less than 1 half of 1 percent on cost largely because it has already been done.
“3. Let the market drive costs down”
IOW let people with pre existing conditions struggle and allow insurance companies to drop patients that develop chronic illness because the profit is in in insuring healthy people not sick people who need insurance.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 19, 2010, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
-IOW let people with pre existing conditions struggle and allow insurance companies to drop patients that develop chronic illness because the profit is in in insuring healthy people not sick people who need insurance.-
Not my problem. But you can make it yours by donating your money.
Posted by: V6 | January 19, 2010, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Any bill can reduce the deficit. Just tax people more and more until it does. Then you can claim any bill is good for the country because it reduces the deficit.
Posted by: b1izzard | January 19, 2010, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
“Not my problem”
Good luck never having you or your family with such circumstances.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 19, 2010, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
How can you take any Republican seriously about the deficit when they voted for an unfunded illegal war that worsened our national security, a massive unfunded education mandate and an unfunded Medicare drug benefit? They have increased this country’s liabilities by many trillions of dollars and now they lecture Democrats about debt?
The reason for pushing health care reform now is that if we do nothing, the combined weight of taxes and premiums will kill our economy stone dead. Premiums on private policies have more than doubled since 2000; Medicare and Medicaid are deeply in the hole and that means tax increase danger. Every economic analysis done so far shows health care reform costing us less in taxes and premiums than doing nothing. But when you see George Voinovich’s lips moving, all you hear is the voice of the insurance industry, not America.
Posted by: DBX | January 19, 2010, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
You think ole George is going to do anything? He and his successor Taft took us from highly ranked schools to the likes of Mississippi. I just remember his goofy appearance at a labor day parade riding a Huffy bike which he proudly proclaimed to be Ohio made by Ohio workers! 4 months later Huffy closed the plant and moved production to China. He squandered a surplus left by a Democratic Governor. He is best described as a person who supports whatever the Republican bosses tell him to. He dull boring and predictable. Good riddance!
Posted by: DC | January 19, 2010, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
“And yet in the entire history of our Republic, no minority party has EVER considered this level of complete obstructionism to be the right thing. The last three years, each setting a new record for filibusters, is the strongest argument I’ve seen for elimination of the undemocratic filibuster entirely (and I say that knowing that Republicans will take back the Senate sometime in my life). ”
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Your historical point is meaningless.
What is at issue is the bills that have been put in front of this Congress.
And they have been marxist crap. If you want to take the historical tact, you can just as easily make the argument that never in American history has such a breath taking array of really bad ideas been put on the floors of the House and Senate.
And you’d be right.
Posted by: herewegoagain | January 19, 2010, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
By the way, if you are such a champion of democracy – you should check the polls in regards to this health care monstrosity.
The American people know that their freedom is being sold down the river. They know that their children’s and grandchildren’s hands are already being firmly bound by the commitment to mandated annual spending that is being committed to here.
The American people do not want this. As a committed democrat (small ‘d’), you need to take heed to the call for this farse to be put to quick death.
Posted by: herewegoagain | January 19, 2010, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
“How can you take any Republican seriously about the deficit when they voted for an unfunded illegal war that worsened our national security, a massive unfunded education mandate and an unfunded Medicare drug benefit? They have increased this country’s liabilities by many trillions of dollars and now they lecture Democrats about debt?”
==============================
There are not many true conservatives that supported the Medicare Part D boondoggle.
As for the war – it never ceases to amaze me how the same people that cheered for the TARP, for the 1st stimulus, for the second – $800 BILLION stimulus, for the MASSIVE omnibus supplemental, the bailouts of GM and Ford, the massive and expanding bailout of Freddie and Fanny -
-the ones who have never found a social program that they didn’t love.
- All of a sudden become deficit hawks whenever the war in Iraq is brought up.
Hilarious.
Posted by: herewegoagain | January 19, 2010, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
“By the way, if you are such a champion of democracy – you should check the polls in regards to this health care monstrosity.”
Yeah the most popular parts of the the plan are
1) Taxing the wealthy
2) Make insurance companies cover preexisting conditions
3) Covering the uninsured
4) A public option
These are all liberals proposals bitterly hated by right wingers.
There are also by far the most popular ideas in health care reform.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 19, 2010, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
” If you want to take the historical tact, you can just as easily make the argument that never in American history has such a breath taking array of really bad ideas been put on the floors of the House and Senate”
I think the Terry Schiavo bill takes that cake for that one.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 19, 2010, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
“”2. Real TORT reform”
Tort reform has already occurred in many states and the impact has been minimal.
In fact the CBO estimated the impact or tort reform as less than 1 half of 1 percent on cost largely because it has already been done. ”
====================================
Don’t tell the doctors that are still being battered by frivilous lawsuits that they aren’t actually being battered by frivilous lawsuits – becuase TORT reform has already taken place.
I imagine this would come as quite a suprise to them, and their liability insurance providers.
Posted by: herewegoagain | January 19, 2010, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
“”3. Let the market drive costs down”
IOW let people with pre existing conditions struggle and allow insurance companies to drop patients that develop chronic illness because the profit is in in insuring healthy people not sick people who need insurance. ”
========================
No – allow programs such as HSA work.
Let market forces drive CARE decisions. Use catestrophic insurance to cover the big events.
Provide tax free spending for the smaller stuff.
Let the market force doctors into actual competition.
Posted by: herewegoagain | January 19, 2010, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
“Let market forces drive CARE decisions. Use catestrophic insurance to cover the big events.”
So how does an insurance company profit insuring a chronically ill patient without relying on premiums charged to healthy people?
How does an insurance company profit by insuring the elderly?
You do know we have Medicare for a reason, right?
Posted by: Ryan C | January 19, 2010, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
Only in America, The democrats are going to pass a health bill that will hurt us all and they don’t care what the majority of Americans think. Who do they think they work for?
This group of liberals will do more to hurt our country in the next three years than any group of terrorist.
Too bad we didn’t elect a president instead we elected a hell of a speaker and nothing else. Obama now lives in the White House and Pelosi and Reid run the country (the real president.
To be fair Obama has never done anything in his life that he can point to other than get elected and that where it stops.
He has not kept one promise and he has changed nothing only made it worst. The press can be proud for bias reporting gave obama the margin he needed to get elected they are still beating up Plain she scared them to death.
We can no longer respect or believe the press.
Can you tell Iam mad as hell
Posted by: a citizen | January 19, 2010, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
If Voinivich is such a debt hawk, where was he when Bush was racking up $5 Trillion dollars in national debt? The guy voted for tax cuts over debt reduction.
Posted by: Jake | January 19, 2010, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
He is another one who can’t see past his own wealth. When people die for lack of health care, he is another one who can share the responsibility, but that’s alright because his pockets are full. The health care “insurance” reform needs a lot of work, but if people like Voinavich, and Bohner, would get off their wallets, and help work on this instead of acting like it isn’t a problem, maybe it wouldn’t be getting rushed like it is. TAKE OFF THE BLINDERS!
Posted by: Gary | January 19, 2010, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
The Socialist/Totalitarian regime that Obama and his cronies are trying to set up will ultimately be the death of freedom in the U.S. The Constitution prohibits ALL of the things that Obama has done since his election, but the democratic party doesn’t want the public to realize that little secret. ANYONE who cares about this country will do everything in their power to stop this health care takeover. Just because Obama will stand there and lie to you like he did during his entire campaign, doesn’t make those statements any more plausible. He’s going to cut Medicare by over $500 billion? How can that be done without simply withholding medical care to senior citizens? How is he going to provide health care for the entire country when he can even pay the bills that he has already incurred? Obama has spent over $4 Trillion dollars that he can’t provide. The U.S. government has a perfect record of screwing up EVERYTHING that it tries to take over. US Postal Service, AMTRAK, etc. This so-called health care bill will set up over 400 new commissions, and add thousands of government employees that will stand between you and your health care. Every single thing that Obama promised and vowed during his campaign turned out to be lies – he IS raising taxes on people making less than $200 million/year, he has NOT closed Gitmo, he has NOT pulled out of Iraq, etc, Quite simply, Obama’s entire campaign was lies, smoke and mirrors, clouding the facts with any lie he could make up about his opponent. This man is trying to make the U.S. a Socialist country, without any question. The Constitution that he swore to defend was written to constrain the powers of the federal government and retain power over just about everything else to each individual state. EVERYTHING that Obama has done is unconstitutional and NOT in the best interest of the U.S. citizens, if you believe in freedom.
Posted by: billy396 | January 19, 2010, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
Posted by: billy396 | Jan 19, 2010 8:55:09 PM
Billy – you nailed it.
The sad thing to see in regards to Obama is just how blatant and just how big the lies are.
Yet, at the same time, there are many (many, many) who trust him enough to make intimate decisions about their lives that they should be making for themselves.
This unthoughtful, amoral, and narcissistic generation is a disgrace.
Posted by: Hawthorne | January 19, 2010, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
“As you know, I am a debt hawk,” Voinovich said
(except when it comes to farm subsidies, increasing the debt limit, military contractor and energy company welfare)
How long is the press going to let these people get away with their bald faced lies?
Posted by: Flash Override | January 19, 2010, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
Why is it so many people don’t understand what insurance is? It is a shared pool of risk against a catastrophic event. Not guaranteed payment for every ailment. When you get a chronic disease, you now are automatically above the pool of risk actuarially speaking.
Can you buy life insurance when you know you will die? Can you buy health insurance when you know you already have a catastrophic illness?
When you people point fingers at corporate profits do you know where your paycheck comes from?
How many people die because you eat at McDonald’s once in awhile? How many kids go hunger because you went to see Avatar instead of donating that money?
Why is it you want to take money out of other people’s pockets instead of your own?
Posted by: Fred | January 20, 2010, 2:04 am 2:04 am
And what are the seniors going to do when Medicare and medicaid are eliminated because the funds are no longer there? This health care bill would at least added 9 yrs. on to the current funding. We could see many seniors with no health as soon as 2014.Then watch a bill pass and I hope its just not to late by then!!
Posted by: wdworld51 | January 20, 2010, 5:08 am 5:08 am
where oh where is dat birth certfcate??
Posted by: realman1963 | January 20, 2010, 6:56 am 6:56 am
NO MEN!!!!….IT’S NOT THEIR PROBLEM TO SOLVE …. IT WAS THEIRS TO CREATE!
Posted by: sara | January 20, 2010, 7:27 am 7:27 am
It is sad that so many people will continue to suffer because they have no healthcare insurance. Many of you care more about what the Healthcare companies
want than what is the right thing for
your fellow American. Now while I do
agree the healthcare bill had some
problems, the main point was give
healthcare insurance to help those who
need it and stop healthcare commpanies
from gorging it’s customers. The problem
with many is as said in 1 Tim. 6:9,10.
It deals with the love of money.
And that is the bottem line for them.
But, that many of you cannot see it is
the really shame. I also wonder how many Republicans will get more campaign funds because they are working to kill Healcare reform. Maybe that’s what you need to look into.
Posted by: dhamm55 | January 20, 2010, 8:11 am 8:11 am
I really think that some people who comment here believe money grows on trees. The problem is that we do not have enough money in this country to pay the bill this government writes. I am amazed at how some people think that the government can just keep taxing. People are just ignorant to economics and that is why we as a country are in the troubles we are.
Posted by: Jack | January 20, 2010, 8:49 am 8:49 am
How many people actually die for lack of health care, I am below the poverty level myself and have never seen or heard of it myself. I have had health insurance for over a year now, but I cannot afford the (thankfully inexpensive) copays, because I need to pay my house payment, which is also cheap (about what it costs to rent).
There is just not enough money coming in to cover bare essentials, even though I work two part time jobs and my wife works 30 hours. We make a little above minimum wage, and there is just not enough to raise our family on. This is my third year of college and I am concerned about finding employment even then.
The fact is this WE NEED JOBS, not an expensive, inefficient, bureaucratic, take over of the best health care system in the world. However, yes, there are many things wrong with the health care system, and the fact that our society requires health insurance to provide even basic care is one of those unacceptable problems.
Posted by: Ben | January 20, 2010, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Has it occurred to anyone that, yes some of this is Bush’s fault and Republicans refuse to defend Bush’s over spending. (ever heard of Obamacans?). It is just amazing that people actually voted Obama believing that he would actually reduce the national debt, pull out of Iraq (which was just plain stupid), and create AFFORDABLE healthcare for all, not to mention airing his meetings on C-SPAN.
In the words of Abraham Lincoln: “It hurts to much to laugh, but I am too old to cry”
Posted by: Ben | January 20, 2010, 10:34 am 10:34 am
Hope all those who are unemployed with no health care and others who cannot afford health care or are losing their homes because of health care are satisfied. If you think you wait a long time in the emergency rooms now, just wait.
Posted by: talmag | January 20, 2010, 10:40 am 10:40 am
We must stop paying for all the pretentious rich folks who have children with disabilities. We are tired of helping out the rich. They have money, make them spend it on their own needs and stop making the rest of America pay for them. If she and her husband knew of the problem before the baby was born, that would be preexisting condition, and insurance should deny claims. Also, Medicaid or Medicare shouldn’t be responsible for these children either. We are tired of paying for their DNA mess ups. It’s time we stop paying for hospital write offs that go back to taxpayers in their communities, counties, and states.
If Republicans want individual freedom, then that also comes with health care. We don’t pay for their DNA problems. If they won’t pay for abortions, then we aren’t going to pay for their DNA mess ups. They get what they get. We Americans are tired of being taxed to care for their children who have needs that most know about before birth. If they want their DNA messed up children, then they pay for them at their own costs, not at the American taxpayer’s expenses.
You Republicans don’t want health care, well, we don’t want to care for you anymore either. War has been declared on health care, and the line has been drawn in the sand by Massachusetts voters.
Stop funding the republicans and the wealthy. They deserve nothing according to Bible and God’s word.
Posted by: Elle | January 20, 2010, 11:32 am 11:32 am
Let’s take a look at the comments by Hawthone,what’s the driving force in your attempt to discredit the President’s agenda when in fact your choice to vote prior to this current election is in keeping with most left-wing bias, racist hater of all our country’s non-white..people of color. The fact of the matter is not about a pending bill or anything pretaining to the welfare of the under-educated, low income producting Americans be it born in our country or else where by legal imigration as a means of citizenship. With regardings to your Socialist post views of the president you must know a great deal about our Constitution and freedom of every citizen not based on color,creed or religious freedom of ex- pression.
Posted by: dennis | January 20, 2010, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm