By Dschabner

Jan 5, 2010 9:07pm

‘This Was a Screw-Up That Could Have Been Disastrous’

President Obama says intell on Christmas Day bomber was there, but dots were not connected.

Our World News report:

– jpt

User Comments

Just now realizing that huh?…maybe a bit too much shaved ice ya think.

Posted by: Wake me up when bodies start falling from the sky | January 5, 2010, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

Nice to have an administration that treats the public like adults, rather than frightened children that need an infallible father figure. And also that basis their opinions and statements on facts, rather than just ‘going from the gut’ telling them to ‘bring it on’ and ‘staying the course’.

Posted by: jhw539 | January 5, 2010, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

This is all Obamas fault. How does that sound. Cant blame this on Bush. For all you Bush Haters I just had to say that. Honestly its the Terrorist fault. Nobody elses fault. How stupid can people be for blaming this on the President. I know it wont change the idiots of america that blamed everything on Bush, but really think how stupid it sounds now that your president is in office and people say its Obamas fault every time something goes wrong. We have open borders, we let anyone come in this country so things like this will continue. These terroist have not bought into the idea we want to be friends with now, that obama is president. They dont care about him or anybody. If we really think he is going to change the attitude of a terroist we are the real stupid people in the world.

Posted by: ted | January 5, 2010, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Mr. Obama is a screwup we could have avoided if the MSM had done it’s duty…

Posted by: tj | January 5, 2010, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

JHW- Here is a statment for you I have yet to see.”CHANGE” that was a campaign slogan I think. Also, some word called “Transparent” government? I dont think either of those have been remotely done this year. I guess I can “HOPE” and “WAIT” for 3 more years and “HOPE” I see some “CHANGE”. How frightening is it to tell people, Hey there are terrorist out there and they dont care about you and yes they will come to the US and Kill you. I think that is a factual statement is it not?

Posted by: ted | January 5, 2010, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

The irony in this screw up is that Mr. Obama is a threat to our security than the terrorists.

Posted by: young_voter | January 5, 2010, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Yup, it was a massive screw up thanks to the “alleged, isolated” action by a few agents who failed to connect the dots… Responsibility goes up the chain of command and for what happened presenting a cool crappy golfer image was not what a president should have been doing. Granted that he should not have rushed back to the capitol pushed by the “isolated, alleged bomber”; but atleast a semblance of hand on preoccupation with what was very close to 911-like tragedy would have gone a long way in infusing public confidence in this pitiable president who goes around the world mea-culpa-ing for all the good that the US has done for the world… If only Bush had done this, just imagine how many forests would have been wiped off and carbon produced by the media… Surely, Joe Klein would be busy drafting an “in defense of BHO” What a shame…

Posted by: Ba-Ba-Bamba | January 5, 2010, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

JHW- Here is a statment for you I have yet to see.”CHANGE” that was a campaign slogan I think. Also, some word called “Transparent” government? I dont think either of those have been remotely done this year… How frightening is it to tell people, Hey there are terrorist out there and they dont care about you and yes they will come to the US and Kill you. I think that is a factual statement is it not?
ted | Jan 5, 2010 10:14:07 PM
I saw the change I was after in the first month. By the documented facts – from his first executive order revoking Bush’s Executive Order 13,233 “I can arbitrarily refuse to release historical presidential records” to the unprecedented release of the Whitehouse visitor logs to the again unprecedented website releasing details of stimulus spending (at some political cost by revealing the mess EVERY past administration has kepthidden) – by actual reality, Obama has met my expectations well. His having the fewest lobbyists of any modern administration (not perfect, but I’ll take better than any president in my lifetime happily), rationale approach to the Afghan war, and centrist policy making is icing on the cake.
As for talking about terrorists, I’m sorry if your grasp of English was too poor to understand what he meant in his inaugural address:
“We will not apologize for our way of life, nor will we waver in its defense. And for those who seek to advance their aims by inducing terror and slaughtering innocents, we say to you now that our spirit is stronger and cannot be broken — you cannot outlast us, and we will defeat you.”
Or his acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize:
“Still, we are at war, and I am responsible for the deployment of thousands of young Americans to battle in a distant land. Some will kill. Some will be killed…Terrorism has long been a tactic, but modern technology allows a few small men with outsized rage to murder innocents on a horrific scale…”
I’m not at all sad that Obama doesn’t feel the need to promote fear rather than reality.

Posted by: jhw539 | January 5, 2010, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

JWH- Oh you forgot this one. I will have C-Span show the health care reform and show america what we are doing. What a load of crap! Oh yea the stimulus website that shows cities and places who received federal money that dont even exist. What about the banks who have said they dont have to show one dime of where that money is spend. Yep Real Transparency.
Terrorism- If I am not mistaken, after 9/11 till 2008 we didnt have a terrorist board a plane in the US and almost blow it up. I am well aware of the English Language that is spoken, and if you think singing Kum-Ba-Yay and holding hands with terrorist and talking to them in a nice way is reality then this wont be the last time. Its funny how you say fear tactics, but since you are having trouble with the English Language its called the WORD-TRUTH. The truth hurts sometimes and I would much rather get hurt by the truth than to get hurt by a terrorist.

Posted by: ted | January 5, 2010, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

“Let me be clear”….” This was a screwup that could have been potentially disastrous”……for my presidency. – that is.

Posted by: rednorth | January 5, 2010, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

What an arrogant performance by Mr. Obama.
When will he again accept questions from the media? Event though they are adoring and out practice, it would be refreshing to see a little interplay.

Posted by: tj | January 5, 2010, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

Obama said that he will not tolerate any finger pointing, but his whole campaign and now the Presidency is about finger pointing and blaming. The terrorists maybe pointing their middle fingers at us, but we have to point the index finger at Obama.

Posted by: Politicoli | January 5, 2010, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

JWH- Oh you forgot this one. I will have C-Span show the health care reform and show america what we are doing. What a load of crap! Oh yea the stimulus website that shows cities and places who received federal money that dont even exist. What about the banks who have said they dont have to show one dime of where that money is spend. Yep Real Transparency.
ted | Jan 5, 2010 11:15:39 PM
I gave the documented examples of more transparency than any other administration in history. Being rational, I’m fine with merely “best ever” rather than the “absolutely perfect” you seem to expect. (I know you may have trouble believing this, but like most Obama supporters I do NOT and never did think Obama perfect or able to walk on water, merely the best option and a capable centrist based on his documented record in IL).
Ultimately, I am more interested to see how his economic policy comes out – if he proves as effective as Bill Clinton I’ll be thrilled.

Posted by: jhw539 | January 6, 2010, 12:06 am 12:06 am

When will he again accept questions from the media? Event though they are adoring and out practice, it would be refreshing to see a little interplay.
tj | Jan 5, 2010 11:31:38 PM
Are you serious? Just last year Obama was widely mocked for TOO MANY press conferences. Now you condemn him for not having more? Get a grip. You hate him and everything he does, we get it. At least TRY to be a bit less petty and transparent.

Posted by: jhw539 | January 6, 2010, 12:08 am 12:08 am

“Let me be clear”….” This was a screwup that could have been potentially disastrous”……for my presidency. – that is.
Posted by: rednorth | Jan 5, 2010 11:31:05 PM
____________________________________
There were a lot of people on that plane.
Something in the security system screwed up – of course he’s intense and demanding about this. Somebody didn’t do their job properly, or some system put in place did not work.
We don’t know – it is entirely possible a saboteur could have screwed some part of the communication system up.
I would be identifying exactly where and how this happened – and holding people absolutely accountable at that level.

Posted by: tierra | January 6, 2010, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Following Mr. Obama’s new security directives, Joan Rivers was refused permission to board a flight in Costa Rica bound for the US. Seems like he can protect us from Joan Rivers, let’s see how well he does in the future against terrorists.
Actually he probably did her a favor, think of the laughs she will get from this one..

Posted by: tj | January 6, 2010, 12:16 am 12:16 am

JWH- Yes you would have to get records from his work in Illinois because he was never at work while congressman in Washington. Really though quite using the word Transparent with this president. Being truthful he has shown to strike down a Bush order, but has done nothing with it than any other president has done. Dont even try to compare him to Clinton. He is on the verge of Jimmy Carter. Actually Carter’s Approval rating was higher than Obamas at this time in their presidency’s/

Posted by: ted | January 6, 2010, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Responsibility goes up the chain of command Posted by: Ba-Ba-Bamba
so you finally admit, Bush was responsible for Sept 11th… impressive
always fascinating how the ‘fringe’ and the ‘right’ demand instantaneous action, immediate solutions, prompt press conference and accountability, now, …it is a shame that Bush & the republicans were not held to those standards as the country would not be in the dire circumstances we find ourselves in

Posted by: XX | January 6, 2010, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Carter
Posted by: ted
Carter had a greater level of job creation than ‘W’,
in only 4 years….. Republicans are such failures, they claim victory as the country falls off the cliff.

Posted by: TJ | January 6, 2010, 12:20 am 12:20 am

It seems that others are now using my moniker again…

Posted by: tj | January 6, 2010, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Responsibility goes up the chain of command Posted by: Ba-Ba-Bamba
so you finally admit, Bush was responsible for Sept 11th… impressive
always fascinating how the ‘fringe’ and the ‘right’ demand instantaneous action, immediate solutions, prompt press conference and accountability, now, …it is a shame that Bush & the republicans were not held to those standards as the country would not be in the dire circumstances we find ourselves in
____________________________________
Good catch on the hypocisy about the chain of command and the double standards XX. The right seem to have no shame and little sense of ethics at all.

Posted by: tierra | January 6, 2010, 12:32 am 12:32 am

XX- Your man needs to be responsible for his actions. Quit bringing up Bush for things like, Oh I dont know a man getting on a plane with a bomb. Its getting old. This is exactly how bush was treated everyday. The media still lets obama off. Its getting old and bring up Bush is getting real old. This President has gotten tons of legislation already in place and its not working. Auto industry, bailouts, foreclosures, guantanamo bay, ACORN, global warming, cap and trade, not renewing income tax laws, pork barrel spending again was passed. Biggest deficit in History. I am sure bush will be the reason why most of this happened, but my goodness you guys just have no clue

Posted by: ted | January 6, 2010, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Posted by: ted | Jan 6, 2010 12:33:03 AM
XX was making an excellent post – the right wing and the Republicans have double standards – hypocritical. They hold Obama to one standard and their own president to another. Sleazy.

Posted by: tierra | January 6, 2010, 12:35 am 12:35 am

Really though quite using the word Transparent with this president. Being truthful he has shown to strike down a Bush order, but has done nothing with it than any other president has done.
ted | Jan 6, 2010 12:17:51 AM
What other president ever, in the history of the nation, released the Whitehouse visitor logs?
I’m not using the word transparency, I’m giving documented, verifiable examples of the unprecedented (and still lacking in many areas) transparency of this Whitehouse. Again, I’m please with Best Ever even as I support groups pushing for Better (and only a fool or a partisan blinded by hatred would consider Not 100% Perfect a complete failure).

Posted by: jhw539 | January 6, 2010, 12:46 am 12:46 am

Terrorism- If I am not mistaken, after 9/11 till 2008 we didnt have a terrorist board a plane in the US and almost blow it up.
ted | Jan 5, 2010 11:15:39 PM
You are mistaken. The underwear bomber did NOT board a plane in the US, he boarded in Europe. Just like the shoe bomber, who even used the same explosive when he boarded a plane in Europe on Dec 22, 2001 – AFTER 9/11.
I suppose you don’t consider the anthrax attacks terrorist attacks after 9/11/2001 either. That just doesn’t fit with your fantasy narrative that Bush kept us safe. Does the fact that your supporting arguments are in fact utterly wrong impact your opinion at all?

Posted by: jhw539 | January 6, 2010, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Oh I dont know a man getting on a plane with a bomb. Its getting old. This is exactly how bush was treated everyday. The media still lets obama off.
ted | Jan 6, 2010 12:33:03 AM
This is a lie. Look up how Bush was treated over the shoe bomber affair versus the critical attacks on Obama (who is documented as responding far more quickly). The coverage is still on the Internet – Democrats and the ‘liberal’ media rallied around the President. Republicans and the ‘liberal’ media have attacked Obama under almost identical circumstances (although Obama took half the time of Bush to respond).

Posted by: jhw539 | January 6, 2010, 12:53 am 12:53 am

There is no question that there is a systemic problem and, from appearances, The President is on it. Though I have been supportive of firing some of the key players in this story it is really the President’s job and, frankly, we all need to give him a break and let him do what he needs to do.
No question I have been a critic of this President and this Administration and will more than likely continue to be. No question there was a major screw up in this case that could have resulted in a major National disaster. In fact, the potential here was a game changer. The President sees it and as far as I am concerned is working his way through it to find a solution.
This is the good news – he sees it and is on it. Maybe there was this letting down of the guard or, at least the perception of it when the Obama administration took the reigns. I tend to think that the President wanted to send the message to the rest of the world that he wants to open the lines of communication and ease the terse measures that has caused the US to be viewed as the evil empire. If true, then he has to adjust his approach.
In the end, he is our President and, though subject to public scrutiny and on this issue we need to let him do his job. In my view he is ready to do what he needs to do to protect the citizens of this nation.
Let’s thank our lucky stars that this man was stopped. The other thing is that this administration was given a wake up call that they need to be very careful on the messages they send the world – there are people out there that want to hurt us. In my view they got the message and I am grateful for all the above.

Posted by: Lone Star Rules | January 6, 2010, 6:42 am 6:42 am

Can the brilliant orator complete a sentence without looking at his notes.
He’s not forceful he’s mechanical and totally scripted.
Look left, look down, look right.
Add alittle inflection to make it sound good.
Check to see if he runs on a battery.

Posted by: kyle | January 6, 2010, 9:17 am 9:17 am

Obama considers his Cairo speech to be one of his top three tactics to fight
terrorism.
That’s how arrogant, clueless and dangerous this president is.

Posted by: larry | January 6, 2010, 9:19 am 9:19 am

Obama had not taken questions from the press since his “acted stupidly” comment.
Since then at townhalls he’s said rediculous things like doctors amputate limbs and take out tonsils to make money, and given shout-outs after a terrorist attack.
Obama’s team knows he is a liability when off the prompter.
He’s not connected to or in touch with most Americans.

Posted by: ollie | January 6, 2010, 9:25 am 9:25 am

Too bad Obama wasn’t as “upset” about the red flags missed before the Ft Hood attack.
Those dots weren’t connected either.
Obama blew that off too as an isolated attack by a guy that went nuts.
He tried to do the same exact thing with the Detroit bomber. Downplay it.
Pretend it was an isolated incident.
Obama didn’t get away with it this time.

Posted by: kandy | January 6, 2010, 9:31 am 9:31 am

Your man needs to be responsible for his actionsI -sure bush will be the reason why most of this happened, but my goodness you guys just have no clue
Posted by: ted
I guess you will have to provide the facts to back up what you claim re: how the President is not ‘responsible for his actions’.
re: Bush
while you may not understand or realize it,
the actions and policies of GW Bush have a profound effect on what Obama chooses to do at this time. Bush has a track record as do republicans for 8 years, it’s not a very good record, in fact many of the Bush policies need to be corrected, some enhanced, some trashes, but to assume on your part that Bush bears no responsibility for many things taking place in our country is a willful act of denial on your part.
you mention among other issues things like, ACORN, global warming, cap and trade,
why don’t you express your opinion and reasons, you say all the items on your list aren’t working, can you prove all are not.
you mention in another comment ‘ singing Kum-Ba-Yay and holding hands with terrorist ‘
implying Obama is not dealing with terrorists,
that is false, any reasonable person capable of reading the ‘news’ or watching TV knows this.
You may not like Obama’s policy decisions, or the speed at which they are implemented,
but your perspective is tragically slanted as you repeat ideology you don’t even understand.

Posted by: XX | January 6, 2010, 9:35 am 9:35 am

In the end, he is our President and, though subject to public scrutiny and on this issue we need to let him do his job. In my view he is ready to do what he needs to do to protect the citizens of this nation.
Posted by: Lone Star Rules
well said

Posted by: XX | January 6, 2010, 9:38 am 9:38 am

“to assume on your part that Bush bears no responsibility for many things taking place in our country is a willful act of denial on your part.”
Does this mean we can blame FDR and LBJ for massive unfunded entitlements we face today?
How many of you in the working world get to blame your predecessor for things gone wrong at your job one year into your tenure? I surely can’t get a way with it and expect to remain employed….after all, wasn’t I hired (among other things) to fix what’s wrong?
Obama seems to operate under a different set of rules.

Posted by: tjp612 | January 6, 2010, 9:57 am 9:57 am

O ya Presindante Oduma Blame Bush or someone else,afterall you do no wrong . Sussest you look in the mirror.

Posted by: Joeray | January 6, 2010, 10:03 am 10:03 am

correction suggest you look in mirror.

Posted by: Joeray | January 6, 2010, 10:04 am 10:04 am

In the end, he is our President and, though subject to public scrutiny and on this issue we need to let him do his job.
==========
I do not believe anyone is stopping him from doing his job.

Posted by: MayBee | January 6, 2010, 10:12 am 10:12 am

In July 2009 the Inspector General of Homeland Security published a report:”Not all known or reasonably suspected terrorists are prohibited from boarding an aircraft…” WHY NOT? Mind you, this is SIX MONTHS after Obama took office.What is the excuse for this? Was Napolitano more interested in looking for deranged Iraqi war vets who were obviously much more likely to commit terrorist acts than say- A TERRORIST???!!!

Posted by: Nephron | January 6, 2010, 10:25 am 10:25 am

This doesn’t seem like a failure of the White House but seems like a failure of the C.I.A. or whatever organization didn’t send out a warning on this guy with the info they had on him.
I’m puzzled why if this man was on a no-fly list in Britain, that isn’t good enough for us to also put him on our no-fly list? Wouldn’t this save a lot of time and money investigating each case if we exchanged lists with our ‘friends’?

Posted by: Lydia | January 6, 2010, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Jhw- Obama responded real quickly. Yea right! It happened on DEC. 25th came back from Vacation on Jan.4. Ft. Hood attack and the attempted bombing we didnt connect the dots but knew about it. He cant brush all this stuff off now. Its time to flex the muscle. That works I know you think he should give speeches and tell the Arab world we want to be friends but guess what they dont CARE. They know it is the weakest this country has been and will be for attacks. This is not a priority to our administration. FACT! If it was we would see more muscle.

Posted by: ted | January 6, 2010, 11:00 am 11:00 am

But when was this a screw up and who screwed it up?
Two of the masterminds of the recent Christmas attack were released from Guantanimo in 2007 by the Republicans.
Republicans have such a short memory that they put those two in the position to plan their attack on the USA in the First Place.

Posted by: Angie | January 6, 2010, 11:16 am 11:16 am

I see Obama wore a tie this time to make himself look more serious.
His fake outrage reminds me of the other times Obama was “angry”.
The AIG bonuses, his stern talk with bankers, sanctions on Iran, climate talks in Copenhagen.
He’s simply not credible.
Obama’s fake anger is just a show to look like he’s doing something.

Posted by: hank | January 6, 2010, 11:34 am 11:34 am

Obama really is getting tough.
Took him 12 days to revoke the underwear bombers visa.
That’s bound to deter more attacks.
You can’t make this stuff up!

Posted by: kyle | January 6, 2010, 11:40 am 11:40 am

Not unlike the Bush/Cheney screw up of 9/11?

Posted by: Doppelganger | January 6, 2010, 11:58 am 11:58 am

Could have been disastrous??? Mr. President, behind the scenes, this was disastrous, an attempted bombing on the Christmas Holidays nonetheless….This jihad got very very close to completing his objective…don’t you think those that may try to follow are using this information to their benefit……Time to get tough and put these extremists under military authority. These individuals have declared HOLY W-A-R on westerns. They have used bombs and combat techniques against us..MOST ARE NOT AMERICAN CITIZENS and self declared W-A-R combatants therefore should not be granted civilian trials in our country.. Military trials will be NO SHOW trials. If civilian trials are used they are going to play our justice system and the media to their benefit, propaganda on steroids not to mention vital information that will be released into the public domain that may help future bombers…AND a whole lot of civilian lawyers are going to get rich at taxpayers expense and America’s tragedy……THINK…..Could have been disastrous???? You just handed the repubs their tag line for the 2012 campaign. That statement alone probably lost you the 2012 re-election and rightly so….THIS IS A DISASTROUS..

Posted by: Parallex View | January 6, 2010, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Could have been disastrous???
___________________________________
The logic isn’t that difficult to follow. There was no detonation, no explosion and no loss of life. There could have been.

Posted by: tierra | January 6, 2010, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

How many of you in the working world get to blame your predecessor for things gone wrong at your job one year into your tenure?
Posted by: tjp612
typical foolish reply,
comparing ones personal employment to inheriting 2 wars and a crashed economy, and massive unemployment,
I’m tempted to say apples and oranges but you might not understand

Posted by: XX | January 6, 2010, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

always funny to see the lame timeline comparisons of how fast Obama is doing something.. the implication is always that somehow republicans did something better, which is wrong, as 8 years of dreadful policy clearly shows

Posted by: TJ | January 6, 2010, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Doppleganger:
9/11 was Bill Clinton and Janet Reno’s
screwup! They were there for 8 years
during which the U.S.S. Cole was
attacked, the first Trade Center bombing
occurred etc.
I guess Bill was too busy with Monica to
notice Bin Laden!
They treated terrorists the same way
your saviour, Obama, is treating them
like common criminals!
That is wrong-headed and stupid!
Bush and Cheney kept us safe after
9/11! It’s doubtful Mr Blah, Blah, Blah
can do the same!

Posted by: reaganfan | January 9, 2010, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.