‘Top Line’ — The Argument for Obama Tacking Left
ABC News’ Rick Klein reports: The results from last week’s Senate election in Massachusetts have set off a raging debate inside the Democratic Party over what should come next. Should President Obama adjust his priorities to reflect the nation’s polarized politics? Or should he use the setback as a call to arms for the liberal base that helped propel him to office? On ABC’s “Top Line” today, Robert Borosage, co-director of the liberal Campaign for America’s future, said the president must use his State of the Union address to chart a clear path for the party — a path Borosage said should tack leftward, starting with a restated commitment to passing comprehensive health care reform. “He’s got to lay out the direction of the administration and the argument headed into the fall, and I think he’s got to take a very strong position now,” Borosage told us. “It’s time to show that Democrats are prepared to put down a gauntlet about what is the direction that’s best for this country. And I hope he does that. In that case, health care and getting health care passed is absolutely essential to the economy — it’s essential to every family’s pocketbook. It’s essential to businesses, and I think he ought to push forward.” Of those — including Sen. Evan Bayh, D-Ind., and Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla. — arguing for a scaled-back agenda in the wake of the Massachusetts vote, Borosage said that misreads political realities.
“There’s two problems with it. One is, Republicans have made it clear they’re not cooperating. They’re not in the bipartisan game — they are in an obstruction game, and it’s working for them. So you’re not going to get more cooperation going forward,” Borosage said. “The second thing is, Democrats have the majority, it’s time to produce. We’re going to be held accountable for it and you’ve got to be — you’ve got to let people know the choice. The fact is we had a set of policies that drove us off the cliff, that created the worst economic condition since the great depression and we have a Republican Party [that] wants to go back to those. You’ve got to draw the line and draw the distinction.” He also warned that a centrist strategy risks alienating the president’s core supporters: “If you take Evan Bayh’s strategy and you retreat and you let health care go by the board and produce nothing, then you’re going to see a lot of people stay home or stay on their hands in the fall,” Borosage said. “I think if you draw the lines and you give people a choice, that’ll stoke the base. And you take on the banks and you start pushing for jobs — let Republicans argue about deficits and against regulation — you’ll see people come out in the fall.” Watch the full discussion with Robert Borosage HERE. We also checked in with Republican campaign attorney Ben Ginsberg, to discuss the fallout of last week’s major Supreme Court ruling on campaign financing. Watch that segment HERE.

Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
please track to the left please.i want pelosi flying commercial the second week of november. please tack left.
Posted by: catman | January 25, 2010, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
Please Mr. President go left, you do that and R’s will be running congress again and you’ll be one term President. So please, ignore the people and turn leftward. Obama = Fail
Posted by: Jay | January 25, 2010, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
the elites dont give a rat about what the majority of people want.
Posted by: catman | January 25, 2010, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
When are Dems going to get it? They have to start doing something that actually is good for the people, before the GOP is going to participate.
Sorry Dems, but the GOP isn’t going to blindly follow the leader, off the cliff.
Now, if we could just replace them all, with an entirely new political party, that has candidates who genuinely want to better America for its people, and not for themselves, we would get somewhere.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | January 25, 2010, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
I’m beginning to have doubts about our direction and I’m on the payroll.
Posted by: Ellie Light | January 25, 2010, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
He’s screwed. Continue his liberal agenda and lose the country, or be reasonable like Clinton was after ’94 and lose his base.
Either option and he loses the next election. The best way forward would be to pull a Clinton and appeal to the broader electorate in the country. It worked for Bill, it can work for Obama. If he gets the libs in line he can gain votes, if he let’s them dictate his agenda, he goes down with them.
Ultimately it’s his choice…
Posted by: jafo | January 25, 2010, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
obama read the American peolple wanted change, and they did. The change we expected was a reversal of the bush years, not a head long rush into socialism, that he took the opportunity to exploit. He purposly ignored job creation early on, in place of health care aimed at controling 1/5 th of the American economy. The stimulas attempt was aimed at political payback, to consolidate the WH control of the major segments of the US economy, which he though he had in the bag.
Fortunatly, the people who eleced him, saw the intention and deliberate direction of obama.
He had his chance and blew it by a combination of arrogance and deception.
Hence – The Mass. reaction, which spoke for majotity of America.
Posted by: nns | January 25, 2010, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
What this guy is forgetting is that while there are more Democrats than Republicans, the Democrats that I know are just as disgusted with the leftward policies as Republicans. More important to most of us are jobs, jobs, jobs.
Posted by: david | January 25, 2010, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
“He purposly ignored job creation early on”
The stimulus was passed on Feb. 17, less than a month after he took office. And since the largest single component of the stimulus was a $288 billion tax cut, I’m not sure how that equates into “WH control of the major segments of the US economy”.
Posted by: gary | January 25, 2010, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
Isn’t America’s government supposed to be “Of the People, By the People and For the People?” Well, I don’t see the Republican Party representing this ideal. I see the Republican Party representing a government “Of Big Business, By Big Business and For Big Business.” A sort of “trickile down”, or shall I say “tinkle on the poor and middle class” economics. How did our Government get so twisted? God save us.
Posted by: TexMex4Obama | January 25, 2010, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
Really what is the difference from “Big Buisness” (Bush); and (Obama) bailing out Wall St. and the multinational bankers. WHAT!?!
Either way the people lose, but hey at least it’s “bipartisan.” There’s never any bickering over wether or not to screw the taxpayers and the American people. Just over the method, is all…
What’s the point of changing captains when they continue to steer us into the iceberg?
Posted by: jafo | January 25, 2010, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
Yeah. Tack left! Haha. Please. And make sure to call everyone mean names too … like “meanie” and “racist”. Make Saul Alinsky proud. Fight. Fight. Fight. Yes We Can! Hope And Change! Tack left Mr Pres.
Posted by: pjoesmith | January 25, 2010, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
“Republicans have made it clear they’re not cooperating. They’re not in the bipartisan game — they are in an obstruction game…”
What is the minority party supposed to do? Just roll over and let the majority party do whatever they will? It was meant to be an adversarial system. I, for one, WANT the minority party, whichever it is, to do battle in the marketplace of ideas on behalf of the American people. May the best man win and be rewarded with votes.
The Dems whining about those nasty Republican opponents need to get a spine and a clue about what America really wants. They had a super majority in the Senate and they STILL couldn’t win any significant fight. That kind of poor performance doesn’t earn them the right to hold the keys to power. The problem isn’t that the Republicans are so good at opposing. It is that the Dems are so out of touch with the country they are doing a pitiful job of leading. By all means, they should tack to the left if that’s what they really believe in. Then we’ll see what they earn come election time.
Posted by: Don | January 26, 2010, 1:19 am 1:19 am
Push forward Mr. President, define it, claim it and mvoe forward. Rahm Emanuel should go, and the President need a front man. The Republicans ARE NOT, NEVER DID is going to work Bipartisanship….the only way they thought they could beat him is by Screaming and Not playing the game. It’s about time the American people DEMAND more from these Hacks.
Posted by: sara | January 26, 2010, 10:36 am 10:36 am
I thought ELITIST was the wealthy, don’t give a rats arse about nobody but myself….Elitist means Educated? What’s wrong with education?
Posted by: sara | January 26, 2010, 10:46 am 10:46 am
I took a sec to watch a pundit’s little jab on my yahoo, “tepid tea party.” It showed what everybody w/a brain’s been saying. The clown on “top-line” was right where he should be. I felt sorry for the loser. But thanx abc for giving him work on your “top-line” whatevere that is. Go American People!
Posted by: Ed Wayne | February 7, 2010, 4:19 am 4:19 am