Unions Win Key Concessions in Health Care Negotiations
The White House, congressional Democrats, and labor leaders announced an agreement on a key sticking point in health care reform negotiations: how to handle a new excise tax on so-called “Cadillac” insurance plans.
“The president is pleased with this agreement,” White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer said in a conference call with reporters. “The president’s overarching goal, as he’s said from the beginning…has been to bend the long term health cost curve,” and the health care reform legislation achieves that goal.
“We will endorse it and we’ll do that proudly,” said AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka of the emerging health-care deal. “We’ve been at this for 60 years and we are extremely proud of the constructive role that labor’s played in advancing health care reform.”
Unions have long opposed such a tax, arguing that many of their members have accepted generous health insurance in lieu of wage increases in the past, and that the proposal – which in the Senate bill would impact family plans costing more than $23,000, and individual plans costing more than $8,500 – would be a harsh tax increase on their middle class members. (The threshold increases each year at the rate of inflation plus one percentage point.)
The White House and advocates of the tax say that it will help drive down health care costs, largely by encouraging companies to seek out less expensive plans. The Senate proposal would raise $150 billion in revenue to help pay for health care reform.
The new deal raises the threshold for plans considered “Cadillac” plans to $24,000 for families and $8,900 for individuals.
Significantly, it exempts insurance plans that were part of state and local collective bargaining agreements – union members – until January 1, 2018. They call this a “transition period” in which unions and re-adjust the way they’ve negotiated wages and health insurance in agreements with employers.
In addition, there will be three exemptions allowing adjustments in the threshold:
• one for “unexpected” rises in health care costs beyond what is predicted between 2010 and 2013;
• for various age and gender issues;
• for high risk retirees and those in high-cost states.
In addition, insurance coverage for vision and dental are not taxable.
These changes to the Cadillac tax would end up shaving $60 billion off the $150 billion in revenue expected to be generated under the original proposal, meaning it would raise $90 billion.
“We don’t have an estimate from the Joint Committee on Taxation,” which is responsible for cost analyses, a senior administration official said. So the administration does not yet know how much this agreement will change the bill.
“It is appalling to me that this White House and union bosses have struck a back-room deal to strong arm the 90% of Americans who don’t belong to unions into either pay more health care taxes or joining a union,” said Rep. Kevin Brady, R-Texas, who said this “so-called deal punishes Texas and 21 other ‘right-to-work’ states.”
-jpt

Email
Gulf of Mexico to Become Gulf of America?
Can Mitt Romney Win Conservatives Back?
“It is appalling to me that this White House and union bosses have struck a back-room deal to strong arm the 90% of Americans who don’t belong to unions into either pay more health care taxes or joining a union,” said Rep. Kevin Brady, R-Texas, who said this “so-called deal punishes Texas and 21 other ‘right-to-work’ states.”
___________________________________
Amen, Mr. Brady. It is unfair, to say the least to those of us who are lower to middle class hard working Americans NOT involved in a union. When does the bargaining stop? What group or organization will be next? This is all about winning votes in the next election by pleasing those who they want on their list.
And, of course, this all goes on behind closed doors. Transparency my ***.
Posted by: Shoe | January 14, 2010, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Good luck explaining how this is fair to the American people. Not that public opinion matters one iota to this adminstration and the Democrats, but I will be VERY curious to see what this does to Obama’s approval ratings on HC.
Posted by: Mike in Costa Mesa | January 14, 2010, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
So now the unions get their cut. What about the American WORKER!!!
Posted by: jafo | January 14, 2010, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
Makes you wonder how Obama still gets 46% job approval.
How does this fit in with Obama’s plan to unite the country in 2010.
Backdoor deals to tax some and not others. What an unfair, underhanded, and sleazy thing to do.
Posted by: fran | January 14, 2010, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Has anyone explained who is going to pick up the tab on that $60 billion now that the unions are off the hook?
Posted by: Mike in Costa Mesa | January 14, 2010, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
of course it’s unfair – obama’s administration has instituted a policy of favoring friends and attacking enemies that is reminiscent of the old soviet style. not a surprise, since the man is a walking talking marxist.
De Tocqueville warned that the only force that could destroy America was America itself, and damned if the left and the media have not opened the door.
congratulations, comrades!
Posted by: gregg lambert | January 14, 2010, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
I say we all form the UOVA..union of voting Americans, and give this govt more than they “bargained” for this NOV..they are turning us into millions of greedy cat fish.. flopping and thrashing all over each other as we desperately grab for ANY benefits, even at the expense of other americans…the unions, the old folks, wall street,main street, blacks, whites,Nebraskans..A house divided cannot stand… We are DOOMED as a country if we don’t stop cannibalizing off each other!
Posted by: cindy | January 14, 2010, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Has anyone explained who is going to pick up the tab on that $60 billion now that the unions are off the hook?
Borrow from the PRC. You’ll pay the interest…
Posted by: Beijing Banker | January 14, 2010, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
No explanation needed…It will all be explained to us when we see it deducted from our paychecks…well most of us non-union labor that is…Never mind that most companies consider your “Cadillac” medical benefits as part of your salary and the Obama Administration considers it as just another perk for those that truly can afford the hit……………..”We’ll endorse it proudly.”..GEE YA THINK?????
Posted by: Parallex View | January 14, 2010, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
This story calls to mind some of my favorite Obama quotes:
“When special interests put their thumb on the scale, and distort the free market, the people who compete by the rules come in last.”
BARACK OBAMA, Aug. 2, 2008
“By standing up to the special interests who prevented reform for decades and who are furiously lobbying against it now, the Senate has moved us closer to reform that makes a tremendous difference for families, for seniors, for businesses and for the country as a whole.”
BARACK OBAMA, Dec. 21, 2009
“I know these steps won’t sit well with the special interests and lobbyists who are invested in the old ways of doing business, and I know they’re gearing up for a fight as we speak. My message to them is this: ‘SO AM I.’”
BARACK OBAMA, Feb. 28, 2009
Posted by: Mike in Costa Mesa | January 14, 2010, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
Obama may go down in history as one of America’s most corrupt Presidents. But it will not stand because free Americans will not let it stand. President Obama, we will not allow a communist to transform this country into a third world country. For those Democrats who contributed to this? Your futures in politics are not bright.
And for the ABCs and other liberal outlets of the world? Where were you when all of this happened to our country?
Posted by: donc | January 14, 2010, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Obama may go down in history as one of America’s most corrupt Presidents.
____________________________________
Hogwash.
Posted by: tierra | January 14, 2010, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
The President forged a compromise agreement – how awful. That someone would actually meet someone half way in a negotiation.
Posted by: tierra | January 14, 2010, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
It’s just another day in Obamaland. He thinks all Americans are idiots… I’m beginning to think he’s right.
Posted by: marks | January 14, 2010, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
Where were you when all of this happened to our country?
Posted by: donc | Jan 14, 2010 7:29:41 PM
Where were you when the Bush administration sold the country to the Chinese communists?
Posted by: tierra | January 14, 2010, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
forged a compromise agreement? HAHA! Okay, so you and me and Marks go out to the movies. How about I pay for my ticket and Marks’ m&ms, Mark will pay for his drink, and you will pay for Mark’s ticket, your ticket, your pop corn, my pop corn, your drink and my drink and both our m&ms..and you can’t join me and Mark in the theater until the movie is half over. If Marks and I think this is a pretty good deal, could we call it a negotiated compromise?
Posted by: cindy | January 14, 2010, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
“the Senate bill would impact family plans costing more than $23,000, and individual plans costing more than $8,500″…
The new deal raises the threshold for plans considered “Cadillac” plans to $24,000 for families and $8,900 for individuals.
Significantly, it exempts insurance plans that were part of state and local collective bargaining agreements – union members – until January 1, 2018.”
This compromise works for me. Raising the threshold by such a small amount was basically just face saving for the unions, and the grandfather clause is a short blip on a program that will become as permanent as Medicare and Social Security (which Republicans also fear mongered and grandstanded against, although in that day the catch term was “Communists!!!”). The grandfather clause hurts the 10 year CBO number everyone cares about, but it gives unions (and all contract workers) time to serve out their current contracts and then renegotiate under the new reality.
Not at all a costly compromise, and if 10% of Americans belong to a union (as the Republican talking points implicitly state) then it is entirely appropriate their input was considered.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 14, 2010, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
Wow are you liberals that ignorant to think this is a good thing for America?
Posted by: Scott | January 14, 2010, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
No explanation needed…It will all be explained to us when we see it deducted from our paychecks…well most of us non-union labor that is…
Parallex View | Jan 14, 2010 6:57:38 PM
Yup, that’s how the market works. And make no mistake – this is a lite version of the free market approach McCain campaigned on.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 14, 2010, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
Wow are you liberals that ignorant to think this is a good thing for America?
Scott | Jan 14, 2010 8:14:47 PM
To such a compelling, well supported argument I think the most appropriate reply is: Yes.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 14, 2010, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
JHW..we are all at the same potluck dinner here..with a finite amount of food available..if the big UAW guy ladels more baked beans and 3 burgers on his plate..someone else will have to eat less…talk about the new reality…IT’S HERE! and lets STOP this garbage about hardworking Americans…sheesh. My husband leaves the house at 5am and gets home about 7pm…he is NOT a union member..does that mean he is NOT hardworking? Is he less deserving than the Union guy to get a break on healthcare? Obama obviously thinks so.
Posted by: cindy | January 14, 2010, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
This compromise works for me. Raising the threshold by such a small amount was basically just face saving for the unions, and the grandfather clause is a short blip on a program that will become as permanent as Medicare and Social Security (which Republicans also fear mongered and grandstanded against, although in that day the catch term was “Communists!!!”). The grandfather clause hurts the 10 year CBO number everyone cares about, but it gives unions (and all contract workers) time to serve out their current contracts and then renegotiate under the new reality.
Not at all a costly compromise, and if 10% of Americans belong to a union (as the Republican talking points implicitly state) then it is entirely appropriate their input was considered.
Posted by: jhw539 | Jan 14, 2010 8:07:41 PM
__________________________________
Interesting jhw . . .
Posted by: tierra | January 14, 2010, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
JHW..we are all at the same potluck dinner here..with a finite amount of food available..if the big UAW guy ladels more baked beans and 3 burgers on his plate..someone else will have to eat less…
cindy | Jan 14, 2010 8:22:38 PM
You do understand that the big UAW guy is paying for the food and your not, right? He’s just not going to have pay as much until 2018.
Seriously, that was the worst metaphor I’ve ever heard applied to a group that is still STILL GETTING A TAX INCREASE that no one else is getting.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 14, 2010, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
JHW..what do you mean I’m not paying? We pay through the nose for healthcare! And I’m sure we will be paying more soon! There are people eating for free, but rest assured, it isnt my family of six! And if you dont think we are talking about a limited resource..just wait and see when the doors open up to all the hungry newcomers.
Posted by: cindy | January 14, 2010, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
The President forged a compromise agreement – how awful. That someone would actually meet someone half way in a negotiation.
Posted by: tierra | Jan 14, 2010 7:39:49 PM
____________________________________
Oh, yeah. He forged a compromise agreement for 10% of working class Americans so the other 90% will end up footing the shortfall…behind closed doors…with union big wigs who could probably rival some of the bank CEOs in compensation. Boy, that’s what I call a bipartisan, transparent, “bringing the country together” negotiation!! Why didn’t we try this earlier, huh?
Posted by: Shoe | January 14, 2010, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
JHW..what do you mean I’m not paying?
cindy | Jan 14, 2010 8:43:54 PM
The entire compromise the unions struck REDUCES but does not eliminate a tax that DOES NOT APPLY TO YOU. Do you understand? Union members have agreed to pay more AND eat less so your costs can be reduced. And you are condemning them for it.
Feel free to stand against this on the principle of the matter, but the facts of the matter are from your self description this reform will reduce your health care costs. Sorry if that upsets you.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 14, 2010, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
He forged a compromise agreement for 10% of working class Americans so the other 90% will end up footing the shortfall…behind closed doors…
____________________________________
Nonsense. The other group targeted for increased taxes (besides the union and cadillac program holders) are people earning high incomes $250,000 – that is not the other 90% of the people – not by any stretch of the imagination.
Posted by: tierra | January 14, 2010, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
JHW…”The finance committee defines high-cost or “Cadillac” as any plan with premiums higher than $8,000 for individuals or $21,000 for families.” (not my words)- The tax does apply to me, the 2018 exemption does not because my husband is not a union member.
Posted by: cindy | January 14, 2010, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
JHW…”The finance committee defines high-cost or “Cadillac” as any plan with premiums higher than $8,000 for individuals or $21,000 for families.” (not my words)- The tax does apply to me, the 2018 exemption does not because my husband is not a union member.
__________________________________
cindy you still don’t seem to understand. The union and cadillac plans are getting ADDITIONAL taxes put on them to help pay for the overall health care of everyone. This agreement puts those taxes in place, but delays their implimentation for a certain number of years.
Posted by: tierra | January 14, 2010, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
the Amish also, apparently, got an exemption. I’m not sure sure if there is any exemption for other religious people or those with a conscience against some facets of Obamacare.
Not that it matters anymore but I was wonder about the CONSTITUTIONALITY of forcing citizens to give money to private, for-profit corporations. Living is not like driving so the auto insurance analogy is weak. And note that Obamacare won’t use TAXES to support the mandate so doesn’t pass Constitutional muster there (fostering public good etc). Obamacare says you must personally give. It is like if Bush said you must cut a check to Halliburton or we will audit, fine, or otherwise penalize you! In this Obama is saying “cut a check” to the insurance companies or we’ll punish you. Wonder how much the insurance industry is giving politicians these days!
Posted by: Ed | January 14, 2010, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
I knew you’d be back..scroll up Tierra..nm, ill paste it for you…Significantly, it exempts insurance plans that were part of state and local collective bargaining agreements – union members – until January 1, 2018. My hardworking family will start paying those taxes immediately on our “cadillac” plan…the union members won’t till 2018!
Posted by: cindy | January 14, 2010, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
Posted by: cindy | Jan 14, 2010 9:32:49 PM
cindy the new deal raises the threshold for plans considered “Cadillac” plans to $8,900 for individuals – not $8,000.
Posted by: tierra | January 14, 2010, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
The tax isn’t assessed on employees. Its assessed on the insurance companies. The result will be that they will reduce benefits so that they can offer policies that are under the taxable amount.
The question is whether you think these benefits are “cadillac” benefits or just “ford or chevy” benefits. In some parts of the country, the thresholds aren’t that far above the cost of many employer-provided policies, regardless of whether those are union or non-union employees
Posted by: jeffl | January 14, 2010, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm
So let me get this straight. I am not in a union but my neighbor is. I will pay a tax on my healthcare plan and he will not. Look folks it is time we put an end to this joke. VOTE Democrats OUT of office in November. We have to STOP the sleaze and corruption of Obama and the Democrats. It is UNAMERICAN.
Posted by: Steve Johnson | January 15, 2010, 4:15 am 4:15 am
The tax isn’t assessed on employees. Its assessed on the insurance companies.
Posted by: jeffl | Jan 14, 2010 11:53:34 PM
______________________________________
Thanks for pointing this out.
Posted by: tierra | January 15, 2010, 5:39 am 5:39 am
Jeff and Tierra..you cant have it both ways..are the health insurance companies evil or not? I have a feeling you guys would say evil, yes? So are these evil insurance companies going to just accept a 40% tax and swallow hard? OR..pass it right on down to the customers? Remember the ultimate goal is single payer..this is just a sloppy, slower way of squeezing everybody out of private insurance coverage.
Posted by: cindy | January 15, 2010, 7:11 am 7:11 am
How much is a Cadillac (health plan or building the car) going to cost Americans????
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | January 15, 2010, 7:46 am 7:46 am
So,
Because I don’t belong to a union, I have to carry their load plus my load now.
Makes sense – and seems totally fair.
I’m sure this is how Jefferson intended our government to work.
Posted by: concerned | January 15, 2010, 10:18 am 10:18 am
Some americans can have medicare advantage, some can’t.
Some americans can have to pay taxes for medicaid, some don’t.
Some americans get extra federal money pumped into their state, most do not.
Now, some will have to pay tax on BENEFITS while others do not.
ALL DEALS DONE BEHIND CLOSED DOORS. ALL FLYING IN THE FACE OF BASIC FAIRNESS. ALL DEFYING ANY CONCEPT OF “EQUAL PROTECTION” UNDER THE LAW.
This government (Obama, Reid, Pelosi) is a snake pit. How much you are taxed or what goverment services you recieve will be based on who you are, and what connections you have (or in some cases, what connections your senator has).
This is an outrage – Americans should not stand for this.
Posted by: flank | January 15, 2010, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Now we have gotten the blatent, codified favoritism in the tax code for Obama’s friends.
This is over the top.
And eveyone else just got a little more to pay for a plan that is going to bust the country anyway.
Posted by: waitingforjustice | January 15, 2010, 10:26 am 10:26 am
“No man’s life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session.” This is doubly true with this Congress. Why the rush to pass Healthcare Deform? As to the grandfathering of the unions’ so-called Cadillac Plans, I would imagine the thought there is that the exemption would be extended as 2018 draws near, especially if the Democrats have any say in the matter. Once exempted, it will remain exempted. And they will have eight years to accomplish it. The unions apparently understand this and this is the price of their support.
I am disappointed that this Congress does not listen to its constituents but to its special interests. If it did, Healthcare Deform would not be on the “fast track” it is on.
Also consider that the Tenth Amendment was meant to keep federal government’s hands out of our lives. The Healthcare Deform bill is a violation of that amendment. This Congress does not seem to care that they are violating their oath to support and defend the Constitution in attempting to pass this travesty.
It is time the states call for a Constitutional Convention so the people can finally be heard.
Posted by: Dalgor | January 15, 2010, 10:56 am 10:56 am
This article should be titled “Americans lose Key Concessions in Health Care Negotiations”
It is illegal to bribe the unions or anyone with tax payer money. Obama belongs in jail, not the Whitehouse.
Posted by: Brian | January 15, 2010, 11:13 am 11:13 am
tierra —- So what do you think of all this behind the door partisan negotiations and bartering for this legislation?
Posted by: lfrichar | January 15, 2010, 11:26 am 11:26 am
“”"”"”facts of the matter are from your self description this reform will reduce your health care costs. Sorry if that upsets you. “”"”"
Posted by: jhw539
Really? Fact? How is this legislation going to reduce health care costs? I don’t want theory, you said fact. There is nothing in this legislation that does anything to reduce health care costs. This is government subsidized insurance and nothing more. Now, the unconstitutional act of taxing a newborn from their very first breath might help the government pay for it, but please tell us the facts on how it will reduce our health care costs.
Posted by: lfrichar | January 15, 2010, 11:29 am 11:29 am
The tax isn’t assessed on employees. Its assessed on the insurance companies.
Posted by: jeffl _____________________________________
Thanks for pointing this out.
Posted by: tierra
And just like the taxes on the banks, it will flow right down to the people. Obama has found a way to indirectly tax us through institutions and doesn’t have to violate his promise of no taxes to those under $250K. You are naive if you don’t believe it won’t be passed to the consumer.
Posted by: lfrichar | January 15, 2010, 11:32 am 11:32 am
“The result will be that they will reduce benefits so that they can offer policies that are under the taxable amount.”
Posted by: jeffl | Jan 14, 2010 11:53:34 PM
_________
Sounds like you are admitting that some individuals who are satisfied with their CURRENT plans will NOT be allowed to keep their CURRENT coverage! Isn’t that another broken promise by President Obama and the Democrats?
Posted by: James Danley | January 15, 2010, 11:37 am 11:37 am
In the old days the term “Cadillac” was something everyone aspired to. Recently “Cadillac” is associated with bankrupt Government Motors. (The plan should be a Mercedes, BMW or Lexis Plan) Also unions are blamed by many Americans as a major contributor of the destruction of the American industrial base including General Motors.
Posted by: tillyerkt | January 15, 2010, 11:47 am 11:47 am
So what the Obama Administration and Democrats are really saying is that some people have healthcare plans that provide too much coverage! So what happened with “pursuit of Happiness?” These people pursued these specific “cadillac” healthcare plans so they can provide the best possible healthcare coverage for themselves and their families. And now the federal government wants to punish these individuals for all their efforts!
What’s next? Are they going to add a federal property tax on those who have homes and property that are worth “too much?”
Posted by: James Danley | January 15, 2010, 11:54 am 11:54 am
If one applies common sense (Obama and the congress are a bit handicapped here) he would quickly understand that if you tax so called Cadillac insurance plans that very tax will be passed on to the consumer!
If it’s automobiles the sticker price will include it, that’s why people didn’t buy American made cars, trade unions had too much impact on the sticker price!
Is our government stupid, I don’t think anyone need answer that?
Posted by: Ed Taylor | January 15, 2010, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Like many large employers, my employer self-funds good prescription coverage. Consequently we have a great Cadillac-equivalent plan that only costs about $6000 per year/person in total (employee + employer premiums since script coverage isn’t part of that. The dental and vision insurance is a small part of that, about 5-6%.
So how is the prescription coverage (which I’ve learned IS included in the Cadilac tax calculation) figured in? Based on what the employer PLUS the patient pays per person on average? If the company has a lot of insured retirees that’s going to run that average way up.
So what about companies with insurance for retirees vs. companies that don’t insure retirees?
What a dreadful web!
Posted by: The_Mick | January 15, 2010, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
This is simply just another outrageous example of why we need to eliminate unions. They have simply raised the cost of doing business to unsustainable levels and forced jobs overseas, perpetuated a sense of entitlement within their membership and angered many by their strong armed extortionist mentality. It is ludicrous for them to say “many of their members have accepted generous health insurance in lieu of wage increases in the past”. They have always had wages AND benefits vastly outpacing the private sector in general. It won’ stop here – next theyll want card check to intimidate new businesses to unionize – Then there will be the TSA. Before you know it, the self employes, job creating entrepreneurial “rich” will be on welfare and the unionized and public sector worker will become the “highly compensated” and “overpaid elite”
Posted by: WeOpinedotcom | January 15, 2010, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
An 18 year “transition” period is insane – all other “cadillac plan” owners/users get to start paying the hidden tax right away! Looking on the bright side, my boss will be able to afford to give me a raise when my health benefits are cut to the bone to come under the “cadillac” benchmark…right? lol
Posted by: WeOpinedotcom | January 15, 2010, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
@Ed Taylor Suffolk County New York already has a 1% tax on mortgages over $1 million dollars (which I might add doesn’t buy nearly as much house or property here on Long Island as in other places – even with the housing market in the toilet) Who’s to say the feds arent looking at that too?
Posted by: WeOpinedotcom | January 15, 2010, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
The Unions and Acorn elected Obama, of course they are getting a deal. I knew that would happen as soon as the Unions started complaining. Andy Stern is one of the most frequent visitors at the White House. Obama will pay off anyone to vote for him or what he wants. Haven’t you people figured that out yet? All the lies he told in the campaign-the C-Span on Tv deal. Not going to happen. the “sit down with anyone and go over the healthbill line by line”. Not happening. Shut out Repubs. and Blue dogs that DID happen. You have to be in the “special group” to get anything done with Obama. Can’t wait until 2010 and 2012 to turn the tables on him!!!!
Posted by: TXAR.55 | January 15, 2010, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
Shut out Repubs. and Blue dogs that DID happen.
______________________________________
Nonsense, the public option was taken off the table in the Senate as pushed for by the Blue dogs.
The extension of Medicare to younger people was as well.
This entire process has been filled with negotiated compromises – and it still is.
Posted by: tierra | January 15, 2010, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
@Tierra, The ONLY reason they made concessions to the blue dogs (republicans WERE shut out) was because they wanted their vote I.E the nelson vote was bought. The country has gone to the socialists dogs, if the liberals get their way we’ll look like Europe. Befor people say whats wrong with that ill explain; For example Denmark they have Universal Hcare and if they loose their job the govt. Pays for 90% of their salary for up to 5 years. Catch is they have a population of ~5million. They and all of socialist Europe have to ration healthcare (this is a fact)because the incentive for doctors is non-existent… If the U.S did this……. Take the deficit and multiply it by 5…. 10.2% unemployment + another 8% of people who have given up. Take all those peoples salaries and imagine the govt paying for them. Also Denmark’s income tax on EVERYBODY is well above 50%. Also in the U.S you have to factor in illegal aliens and lots of them. They are and would bankrupt hospitals because they make no money off of govt insurance plus they make NOTHING off of illegals. In conclusion Liberalcare works in some contries, others it doesnt and the U.S is one of them…
Posted by: Levi | January 16, 2010, 12:36 am 12:36 am
What most people who are bashing Unions dont realize is that our medical plan is based from hourly contributions. The last 5 years I have paid $20,000 a year for health benefits. I think we contribute way more than our fare share. I am an Iron Worker. I risk my life every day im @ work, I think Its way more dangerous than any cop or fireman, and most of them get their benefits paid by the state and contribute nothing, I admit that Unions are not perfect, but people should be more supportive instead of bashing them.People who hard to support there families deserve a decent wage and benifets.
Posted by: BOB | January 16, 2010, 9:01 am 9:01 am
No one is created equal anymore thanks to Obama. Work for a Union or the Government or you’re screwed.
Posted by: Janie | January 16, 2010, 11:57 am 11:57 am
Public service unions should be put out of business. If you want to know why your kids don’t get a good public education, it’s the unions; if you want to know why Calif. is bankrupt, it’s unions; if you want to know why manufacturing jobs have left the country, once aghain, it’s the unions. Basically what we have is less work, lower quality work, at higher pay and benefits.
Posted by: Ron | January 16, 2010, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
I will support the health plan when government employees, senators, congressmen, cabinet members, staffs of cabinet members, Mr. and Mrs. President sign up for the same plan they are asking me to support and pay for. I don’t see them including themselves in this so-called wonderful health plan.
Posted by: hezzy | January 16, 2010, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm
Obama’s transparency has brought one thing to light. We have known that politics are corrupt, but ever turning a blind eye to the process we kept on electing scoundrels to public office.
With Obama’s brand of Chicago politics, there is no longer a “blind eye” to turn bbribery, threats and political arrogance are clearly visible.
The deals may be made in the dark, but even a liberal media scrambling for something to report is bringing it to main street. Even a liberal media is beginning to hammer on Obama’s campaign LIES!
Harry Reid comments to the effect that deals are expected in politics. And deals are all that Obamacare seems to offer.
Alexis de Tocqueville said it quite prophetically, “The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public’s money.”
So, what has Obama accomplished in just one year? He has birthed a movement of unity in America that is growing by leaps and bounds, though it be a unity against his corrupt and arrogant march into socialism and government takeover.
We can thank Mr. Obama for awakening the unquenchable American spirit of independence and freedom. A spirit that will prevail until the foundations of a democratic republic are re-established.
Posted by: Ed Taylor | January 17, 2010, 10:01 am 10:01 am
Unions Win,No the Unions got Bribed to support Obamacare. Cheat, Lie and Steal and Obama says it is OK. How frickin crooked does it have to get before,we call for his impeachment?
Posted by: stormerF2 | January 17, 2010, 11:17 am 11:17 am
For almost a century, the Insurance Companies have controlled the health care system in the USA. They decided who was able to afford the best with overpriced insurances, they dropped patients and their coverage when the patients got terminoloy ill. They denied live saving procedures, allowing patients to die who otherwise would have lived with the procedure.
Why have health care reform?
It’s the humane thing to do.
Posted by: Angel | January 17, 2010, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
SERVICE UNIONS PAY WAY MORE THAN THERE FAIR SHARE. MOST OF YOU BASHING UNIONS HAVE NO CLUE HOW THE PLANS ARE SET UP. I PAY $8.75 AN HOUR OR $20,000 A YEAR FOR INSURANCE NOW. I DONT LIKE HOW THE IMMIGRANTS STEALING MY JOB AND DRIVING THE COST OF LABOR DOWN WILL HAVE THE SAME THING.
Posted by: BOB C | January 17, 2010, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
Harry Reid and Alexis de Tocqueville never met but Alexis certainly had Harry’s number when he uttered this, “The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public’s money.”
Harry is using our money for his bribes, threats and backroom deals. The national debt reveals how much of our great grandkids money is being squandered by Obama and HIS congress. GOOOH!
Posted by: Ed Taylor | January 17, 2010, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
why would union members (middle-class working heroes they are said to be) have “cadillac” plans? i thought these plans were supposed to be perks of corporate fatties.
Posted by: davidfrat21 | January 17, 2010, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
What the unions are doing (especially the UAW)is discusting. corruption at its finest…
Posted by: Bill | February 23, 2010, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
hoes does the new healthcare bill effect the young person and the insurance plans for next year. also the cost fot the elderly? the cost for a day care person who make 7 dollars a hour who has no insurance?
Posted by: norma castillo | April 10, 2010, 8:20 am 8:20 am