Jan 19, 2010 10:30am

Upset of the Century?

Will Scott Brown pull it off? What does it mean for health care and the rest of President Obama’s agenda?

If Martha Coakley loses to Brown, it would certainly be the biggest political upset I have seen in my career.

My sources in Washington tell me that Democrats are hoping for a miracle win for Coakley, but they are bracing for a big defeat. 

Brown’s win could hurt Obama’s overall agenda, but most importantly, it could derail health care efforts that Democrats have been working on for months now.

We talked about it all on GMA:

Here is my conversation with political strategists Donna Brazile and Mary Matalin:

User Comments

There is nothing that says Brown will not support the health care bill. Just as most of the independents there, lean towards the Dems, so too, can a Republican.
Personally, the country would be better off, if the bill fails, but no one really knows how Brown might vote on that issue.
I did like some of the things Brown had to say, that I heard, however, and wish him luck in the election.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | January 19, 2010, 10:38 am 10:38 am

It would be hard to think of something better for our country than a Scott Brown victory today.
That would force NoBo to the center and make him to retool the Health Care Reform.
It would force him to truly consider the “other” viewpoints and bring a bipartisan Bill to the congress that included true cost cutting measures such as tort reform.
It would make our president do what he said he would and bring the repugs and demos together.
That is, if he really meant what he said during the campaign, which becomes more doubtful as each day of his presidency passes by.

Posted by: Noz | January 19, 2010, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Whatever happens today; this particular chowder is not a national recipe nor is it likely to make the journey too far out of Bean town (before spoiling).

Posted by: MJ Napier | January 19, 2010, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Once again the media shows its biased, while the piece run, only pictures of Brown were showed. There we go with the media trying to influence the process.

Posted by: Jorge Pereira | January 19, 2010, 11:01 am 11:01 am

I’d hope that, if he does win that the dems are forced into reconciliation that makes them take apart the health care bill and pass it in pieces and improve it along the way. The health insurance regulation portion is most important first. Without that, the mandate is just tyranny and may very well wind up in court for years and the Democrats will have shot themselves in the foot.

Posted by: DIRT WORKS | January 19, 2010, 11:01 am 11:01 am

after they got the insurance regulations in place they could go after the cost of drugs and pass that separately, then work on a public plan in earnest. I’m okay with it passing by slim margins and taking some time. There’s no constitutional mandate for 60 votes and the senate and press need to get over themselves on this self imposed road block.

Posted by: DIRT WORKS | January 19, 2010, 11:03 am 11:03 am

I am rooting for Brown today. This health care bill, in my opinion, will do so much harm to the American people and if by being voted in Brown can stop this health care bill in its tracks, then I sincerely hope he pulls it off. No way do I want my tax dollars paying for abortions.

Posted by: Justice | January 19, 2010, 11:08 am 11:08 am

There is nothing that says Brown will not support the health care bill…
Rick McDaniel | Jan 19, 2010 10:38:41 AM
Are you lying or is Scott Brown lying? His position is very clear. If you don’t care to really listen to any of his speeches on the subject, you could spend 30 seconds on his website:
“I am opposed to the health care legislation that is under consideration in Congress and will vote against it.”-Scott Brown website, “Issues” section
Once again, a Republican chooses to make up their own fact rather than bothering to look at reality.

Posted by: jhw539 | January 19, 2010, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Brown isn’t winning because of who he is he is winning because he offers some hope of stopping the big government socialist take over underway in DC.

Posted by: David | January 19, 2010, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Despite all of the criticism of Barack Obama/Democrats in these comment posts, I can’t help but remember that it was Republican support of big business over the voter that got us into this mess in the first place. Brown will be more of the same, and shame on the MA voters who support him today.

Posted by: JeffB | January 19, 2010, 11:35 am 11:35 am

This woman ran a lackluster campaign. People felt she thought she was entitled to the job and did not have to campaign. If she loses, it will be her fault not anyone elses. She did not put much of herself out there and according to those in her state did little campaigning to get herself and her politics known. She did not get out and meet the people who knew little about her….so this is her loss not Obama’s. Of course, everyone will blame Obama, as usual.

Posted by: talmag | January 19, 2010, 11:36 am 11:36 am

For the good of our country my hopes is that BROWN will win in this race. Then I think that both parties needs to come together and do what is best for the USA.

Posted by: BJean | January 19, 2010, 11:36 am 11:36 am

Dirt Works “No way do I want my tax dollars paying for abortions.”
I don’t like the bill, but I detest lies even more. No Way this health care bill pays for abortions.

Posted by: Observer | January 19, 2010, 11:37 am 11:37 am

Typical sensationalized headline. There are 90 years to go in this century.

Posted by: TJ ORourke | January 19, 2010, 11:39 am 11:39 am

If Brown wins he will vote to kill health care reform for Americans and it will be one more bit of evidence that America is in decline, the country is simply unable to meet big challenges even when it comes to the health of it’s own citizens.

Posted by: Eric | January 19, 2010, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Brown is another tea-bagger raging against the machine he helped create. What a liar. Also, I have YET to hear him explain why he voted to deny benefits to 9/11 workers blaming it on the budget, but found the money to build a golf course in his district within the same budget. He is just like all the other conservatives… they will tell you exactly what the want to hear while making hay for themselves.
And as for being a “moderate”, this guy is FAR from it.

Posted by: CC | January 19, 2010, 11:41 am 11:41 am

Scott Brown, a “regular guy” in a pickup truck who owns five pieces of property (3 Boston condos, permanent family estate, and Aruba vacation home)
Scott Brown on gay people who adopt children: “not normal”
Is Scott Brown a moderate? Let’s see:
1) pro-life? No (says he would not vote against Roe but you know he would support pro-life Supreme Court nominees)
2) supportive of Bush foreign policy? Yes (supports continuation of “harsh interrogation techniques, i.e. torture and waterboarding)
3) supportive of Bush economic policy? Yes (wants to continue the oh-so-successful policy of Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, does not want more financial regulation)
4) supported (financially and in spirit) by the tea party movement? Yes
Doesn’t sound like much of a moderate to me.

Posted by: Jessica | January 19, 2010, 11:41 am 11:41 am

I hope that if Brown does win, the Democrats will enact what they can through reconciliation. The lesson to learn from this election is that, win or lose, a 30-point lead is never a reason to become complacent. After all, polls are only a snapshot of a particular moment, and the only poll that really counts is what results of the election show. I hate the thought of the Party of No being emboldened.

Posted by: Anne | January 19, 2010, 11:42 am 11:42 am

I think Coakley fit well with the high browed really left wing of the Democrat party but the average person, those of in the middle wouldn’t heave themselves over a cliff should she lose.
It isn’t necessarily all Republicans who are pushing back against those who would Govern us. If that were the case we would have had some version of healthcare already passed. I am glad that there are at least some Democrats who suspect some of stuff that has passed already was nothing more than payback to a select few.

Posted by: david | January 19, 2010, 11:42 am 11:42 am

If Brown wins it is a statement by Mass voters that the Dems have moved too far to the right. Voters have lost interest in the party after all the hope they had when they elected the President.
When Dems continued the Repub bailout of the banks while in effect ignoring homeowners and taxpayers, it showed that the only socialist policies they implement is socialism for the rich. The current health care bill that supports pharmacutical companies, and turns the government into a collection agency for insurance companies, does not match the progressive reforms voters want.
If Brown wins Dems should wake up and move to the left.

Posted by: Chris | January 19, 2010, 11:42 am 11:42 am

If Brown wins, the Democrats will just call the state of Massachusetts “fringe” voters! LOL!

Posted by: steve | January 19, 2010, 11:43 am 11:43 am

This woman ran a lackluster campaign…If she loses, it will be her fault not anyone elses.
talmag | Jan 19, 2010 11:36:08 AM
Saying she campaigned poorly is an understatement. I do agree a loss will not reflect the public sentiment towards Obama, but it does indicate that Obama’s coattails are limited. That has real implications for his ability to control Congress, which is already pretty stretched (as for every Democratic president since FDR).

Posted by: jhw539 | January 19, 2010, 11:45 am 11:45 am

I no longer think there will be a good health reform bill, and I think Obama is at fault for thinking the republicans want change, they want to distroy Obama. Obama stayed out of the health converstion thinking the bill would prevail wiht out his vigorous input. I think unless Obama sees the republican agenda is to distroy him, he will be a one term president, and our hopes for a change that would bemefit the poor and middle class will be over.

Posted by: Roxie Pruitt | January 19, 2010, 11:45 am 11:45 am

There we go again. ABC drama Queen G. Stephanopolus being used by his corporate media masters to make sure that Coakley is defeated. “Upset of the Century”. STOP TRYING TO INFLUENCE OUR GOVERNMENT YOU CORPORATE DOGS!

Posted by: Mark | January 19, 2010, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Wow, this analysis took all of about 2 minutes of your time George. MA has universal healthcare, Brown is more middle of the road, not a referendum, health insurance reform will pass no matter what. Where is your analysis of Brown – he’s another “free marketer” like most GOP and one of the people that will continue to move jobs from MA.

Posted by: jpthom | January 19, 2010, 11:46 am 11:46 am

If you think that the Republicans are truly interested in Health Care Reform then your truly in need of a reality check. Brown already stated that he will be the 41 vote to filibuster the bill. The Republicans have no ideas and no interest in governing. The only goal is to defeat Barack Obama by obstruction and delay. If you haven’t caught onto this yet, then your not paying attention.
The current situation goes well beyond right and left. Its who is interest4ed in working for the American people and who is not. It is clear the Republicans have no interest in governing. The Republicans destroyed the economy, assaulted the middle class, gave the top 1%, 28% of the countries wealth, took us into two wars, and ran up astronomical deficits. Then they have the audacity to claim that government is the problem. Ya its the problem when they run the government. They will do anything to destroy the Obama presidency only to get power back.
Watching people actually voting for Brown is another laugh track to governing ability of the Republican Party.
A vote for Brown is not a vote for change or Republican. A vote for Brown is about continuing an assault on those who are actually working for the American people. Does that make sense?
We deserve better.

Posted by: Ben | January 19, 2010, 11:47 am 11:47 am

Coakley claimed to be a fighter against big insurance and pharma and then ran down to DC to raise money from their lobbyists. When a reporter tried to ask about it she had him roughed up. She’d fit right nin with the gang of Chicago thugs running DC now.

Posted by: eRtwngr | January 19, 2010, 11:47 am 11:47 am

Why don’t you just call the election already george. You shoud be on Faux Nooze with you constant shilling.

Posted by: BlueJersey | January 19, 2010, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Brown actually backing health care reform? Wake up and start paying attention. He already stated that he will join the filibuster. If the Republicans cared about health care reform, don’t you think they would have given it shot when they held majorities?
Start paying attention.

Posted by: Ben | January 19, 2010, 11:49 am 11:49 am

people saying a Brown win will force Obama to work with Rs, uh, have you been watching the last year? The Rs want Obama to fail and have no interest in working with him or the Ds.
It’s also obvious that the current HC bill is something supported by mainstream Rs like Dole and even the ’94 version of Gingrich. It’s the looney far right that have co-opted the R party that have distorted the current bill. It’s a very middle-of-the-road bill by all sensible accounts, people.

Posted by: dave | January 19, 2010, 11:49 am 11:49 am

further proof that this article, ABC news, stephanopolous are all just trying to sensationalize something:
the first couple sentences, where he says coakley losing would be a huge upset, and then that coakley winning would be a miracle.
do you not understand how mutual exclusivity works? because there is a prime example.
if coakley wins, it’s a miracle. if she loses it’s an upset.
because it’s always win/win for the republicans in the media.

Posted by: the bipolar bear | January 19, 2010, 11:50 am 11:50 am

If Brown wins because Massachusetts Democrats who have a 3to1 advantage are too lazy to vote…Then our country deserves to continue to go down the toilet.
What has a Republican EVER done for the Average American? They had total power for years and they couldnt even get Abortion limited. When are you right leaning people going to learn? They are just using you to make their cronies and themselves richer? STOP LETTING THEM USE YOU TO VOTE AGAINST YOUR OWN SELF INTERESTS!!!!!

Posted by: Beka | January 19, 2010, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Time pass health care reform AND abolish the fillibuster. Why should the will of the majority be blocked by a minority.

Posted by: Peter | January 19, 2010, 11:50 am 11:50 am

How can Brown win? I don’t get it. How is Obama a socialist? How does health care cost more money- it will cut the deficit?
The republicans presided over the worst 8 years for the USA in recent history. What have they done for this country since 2000? What have then done the last 12 months? How have they earned the right to more power in the Senate? They haven’t- they haven’t done anything positive for this country for years and continue to stop progress. If anyone’s concerned about spending- where were you the last 8 years. The Dems are not perfect but by far the lesser of two evils. If the Republicans run this country expect the worst- never ending war, continued economic hardship and a government that fails to act to resolve the problems. The government is too big to help it’s citizens but not too big to invade foriegn countries.

Posted by: Nate | January 19, 2010, 11:51 am 11:51 am

For those supporting Brown. You all are truly ill informed. Those thinking he’s a ‘moderate’ are dilusional.
It’s also not just about health care. The party of NO will now want to stop ANYTHING (good or bad, as we’ve already seen happen) from passing. So, until the Republicans can start voting for the PEOPLE and not the party, they will do nothing to help “us”. Sure, we can point out all their “NO” votes on important issues during their campaign season, but what is that going to do for us NOW? I’d really rather not wait until November before we can even THINK about passing another bill!

Posted by: Laura | January 19, 2010, 11:52 am 11:52 am

What I hope a Brown Victory would do is bring about “change” that is truely Bi-Partisan (which Obama ran his Presidentcey on but has failed miserbly) and open forum discussions on Health Care reform for all to see on C-Span(Also a promise by Obama). A push all one way from Congress is never a good idea which ever side you support. A New health Care reform Bill than could be worked out that really fixes problems and saves Americans Money. Not one that fixes none of the reall ills and costs us all a trillion more dollars…..John.

Posted by: John P | January 19, 2010, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Roxie, let’s face it: the Republicans are out for the rich, the Democrats are out for the poor. NOBODY is for the middle class. Don’t delude yourself.
I voted for Scott Brown this morning. Not as a statement against Obama, but as a statement against the rampant, shameful scandal and corruption that runs unchecked in our Democrat-governed state. From state reps stuffing cash bribes into their bras, to Deval Patrick hiking the already-high income tax, to the Dems ignoring the will of the people when it came to putting the marriage petition to a public vote, to Dems changing the rules to suit themselves, and then changing them back again when it suited them yet again, to a parade of Democrat house speakers indicted, and so on and so on and so on. ENOUGH is ENOUGH.

Posted by: DG | January 19, 2010, 11:55 am 11:55 am

Mr. Stephanopoulos has been bashing the Democratic party since his years in the Clinton White House.
He tries to pass him self off as a moderate, but is a shill for corporations.

Posted by: Chris | January 19, 2010, 11:57 am 11:57 am

If Brown wins, it means that the Republicans won the message on Health care. It also means kudos to Sarah Palin. I look at her as brainless but to some other people she may exemplify Intelligence. I think the resistance towards Healthcare started as racial but now it is more of an ideology. The war in Afghanistan and Iraq doubles the price on Healthcare but I have not seen one, not one argue that it is going to cripple the enonomy but the fight on Healthcare rages day-in, day-out. The irony, the people fighting against this Healthcare will be the ones that will gain the most. The people that they are fighting against are all already on Medicaid or Medicare.

Posted by: vuzous | January 19, 2010, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

When people comment that Obama will move more toward the Center I suppose they mean he will move more to the Left. Our President is a war mongering President concerned about the interest of the financial Right. He is no man of the People, nor a Constitutionalist.

Posted by: William Kimbell | January 19, 2010, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

This was a 30 point race in late November/early December…What happened in December that could have turned people’s opinions around on these candidates? Hmmm…Which candidate wants to stop the healthcare bill again? Hmmm…

Posted by: Mass appeal | January 19, 2010, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

If people see this coming from this far out, it hardly qualifies as the upset of the century. And given Coakley’s campaign, it hardly qualifies as an upset at all.

Posted by: Jake A | January 19, 2010, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

The people have tired of the dictatorial methods of the Dems.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | January 19, 2010, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

Oh please, let the GOP win, what did the Democrat did with their 60 votes, nothing, this Health care bill is republican bill they’re not voting for it.
Oh yes people of Massachusetts, send us an other crazy GOP to the senate because we don’t have enough of them. like what did Connecticut send us Joe Lieberman, he killed even Medicare buy in.

Posted by: Tony | January 19, 2010, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

No matter the outcome, this should force the dems and Obama to the left. People do not want right wing politics and that is what the dems are giving them. Might as well vote republican if there is no change in philosophy. By being strong liberals or progressives can the dems give the people a clear alternative.

Posted by: Bobby | January 19, 2010, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

Scott Brown is no centerist. Mass will not enjoy a Scott Brown victory.
Please pay attention to what is really going on out there.

Posted by: kathy | January 19, 2010, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

I cast my vote for Scott Brown this morning. I’ve been an Independent since the Carter administration. I’m not ideological, I don’t care about all the fighting and name-calling between Dems and Repubs. I just want the government to stop spending my children and grandchildren into oblivion. If Medicare and Medicaid are in trouble, how can we possibly afford more social programs? I’ll vote for whichever party stops the spending.

Posted by: Ida Roescher | January 19, 2010, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Upset of the century?? What was Hoffman? I thought was supposed to be a vote on Obama policies yet the GOP lost a seat they have held since the Civil War. Why is it that is not an upset yet this is? Come on George, this reaks of political hackery.

Posted by: Josh | January 19, 2010, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

If Brown wins, it’s partly because of people like George who don’t correct the Giuliani’s of the world when they say there were no attacks under Bush.
Keep them stupid hey George?

Posted by: Bill | January 19, 2010, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

The obama machine and the rest of the liberal socialists have been willfully ignoring the people. 2010 and 2012 are not going to go well for the democrats.

Posted by: Palin4prez | January 19, 2010, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

Mr. Stephanopoulos has been bitterly attacking Democrats ever since his time in the Clinton White House. He has become a shill for corporate America. What a waste of a great brain.

Posted by: Chris | January 19, 2010, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

Isn’t it sad that George is using his post to influence the vote. MA hadn’t even opened the polls and you are telling us its over. Shame on you.

Posted by: lee | January 19, 2010, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

My first post! What’s wrong with you people? Aren’t we Americans first, regardless of political (or lack of) affiliation? Supposedly we have the best political system in the world. But who says that? We do. With that said, and if somehow the MA election results in the health care bill being rejected, that’s ok with me. After all, isn’t this a government of the people, for the people? Obama’s doing the best he can, with what he has to work with. I miss Teddy, even as a Republican. He did great things in congress for this country. Can’t we, the country, have options on healthcare reform and choose -ourselves- through a referendum of the country? None of it makes any sense right now.

Posted by: andwhy | January 19, 2010, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

I just looked over my financial statements for 2008 and 2009. The US markets were in free fall for all of 2008. Try blaming that on the Democrats and Obama you Republican fools. A Brown victory is just a step toward financial ruin, back to the BUSH agenda.

Posted by: Liza | January 19, 2010, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Again, we have people voting for a Republican against their own self-interest. Brown will finish health care reform and stand up for the rich. Just because he’s got personality and drives around in a truck. The health care bills are already a compromise with Republicans but they still won’t vote for it because they only care about detroying the Democrats. Republicans don’t care about getting affordable health care for people in this country.

Posted by: Diane | January 19, 2010, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

I can’t believe what I am reading here,
frankly I do not know either one of them who are running for the seat.but to call a bill that is for the benefit of most americans a socialist bad thing..come on people wake up you have been conditioned by plutocrats allof your lives, indeed wake up you are going down the drain.

Posted by: Eurolander | January 19, 2010, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

I am an Indpendant.
Say what you will, whether Brown wins or loses, the ground swell has begun.
We are mad as hell and all of Washington, we are coming for you next!!

Posted by: bennybeaver | January 19, 2010, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

How is the world did the Democrats allow this race in Massachusetts to reach this point?
I’m heard Coakley’s campaign run was lackadaisical. I’m not an expert, but I also heard she incorrectly spelled the name of the state in one of her ads.
This loss in Massachusetts may doom our health care package and 60 seat majority. So many of us worked hard to get Obama elected, to get health care to this point, to get the Senate leverage we need. I hope our moment is not over – with so little accomplished.

Posted by: David | January 19, 2010, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

This wouldn’t be the “upset of the century” of course.
It might actually be good for getting real health care passed, because the Democrats could stop tying themselves up with the delusion that they can get the Republicans to participate in anything constructive. Instead the Democrats can use their majority to get bills passed the old fashioned way. The result would be a much less expensive, more effective health care bill than the mess the Republicans are forcing us into now.

Posted by: Laird Popkin | January 19, 2010, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

Well, the upset of the century might be the Haitian tragedy but maybe not to these talking heads and buyers of conservative media crap. Mainstream news outlets are jokes being they’re nothing but opinion stations, ex. Fox News. Dems might get a wake up call but that can only be a good thing. But other than that, nothing will change tomorrow except a lot of repubs will have wet their pants thinking something actually has. You betcha!

Posted by: pamp205 | January 19, 2010, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Jessica – love the call out but you’re talking to the hand. repubs could care less about any of that. All that matters to them is that big red R behind his name.

Posted by: pamp205 | January 19, 2010, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

Dems thought it was just a “gimme” and didn’t bother to try to run — they imagine they are the elite and needn’t mingle with the “little people” of the U.S..
If just one thing is the earmark of this sorry new administration, it’s the Chicago-style CRONY SYSTEM — gosh, I HOPE this could be the end of it — this is certainly the end of Obama’s chances for re-election — can you feel the VIBE? It is humming throughout the U.S. and it is turning 100 percent on the Democrats.
CRIME-GIMME ATTITUDE-RACE BASED FILLING OF JOBS-LOSERS PRAISED AS WINNERS IN EDUCATION-ANYTHING GOES IN ‘MORALS’ = What the Dems have given us.
As much as I despite the hardnosed, hate-the-poor attitude of Republicans, at least they are what they are and don’t try to dress it up. The Democrats are USELESS.
– FORMER Dem

Posted by: Former Dem | January 19, 2010, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Wall Street is already rallying in anticipation of a Republican victory in Massachusetts. Jim Cramer predicted a leap in the market, and the Dow is up 100 today in expectation that a 41st Republican seat in the Senate will put a halt to the anti-business policies of this administration.

Posted by: felixw | January 19, 2010, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

“Upset of the Century?” Or should the headline say “Democracy arrives in Massachusetts.”

Posted by: libertyville | January 19, 2010, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

I am a sympathetic Democrat, but I must say that Coakley is just about the worst candidate. Lazy, uninspired, not too bright about winning strategy. While a much better campaigner, Brown is a scary, National Socialist candidate, harkening back to Germany in the 1930s. He’ll do great in the Senate and will quickly befriend, ironically, Joseph LIEberman, eh?

Posted by: Jawaralal Schwartz | January 19, 2010, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

We were so quick to squander THREE TRILLION DOLLARS in Iraq without question, but health care reform for most Americans is out of the question? Where are our PRIORITIES?

Posted by: MG | January 19, 2010, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Vote for martha coakley if you want your money back from big banks and more jobs to help the unemployed. She supports the bank tax and obamas jobs bill scott brown does not.

Posted by: matsuiny2004 | January 19, 2010, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

“Real cost cutting measures like tort reform”
This is an old worn out GOP adage that ignores every single fact available.
Negligence related injuries cost health insurance companies hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars a year, raising premiums and the cost of health care for all. The health insurance companies have written into their health insurance contracts that they will provide the medical care caused by the negligence of the negligent party, but are first in line to recover the costs of the health care provided in the event of tort claim recovery from the negligent party. The persons who recover those funds – to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars a year to private insurance plans and an additional hundreds of millions of dollars to Medicare?
Tort Claimants and their trial lawyers.
Medical malpractice claims – with insurance- constitute less than 3/4 of 1% of all health care costs in the U.S. – and save families the costs of untold expenses that would otherwise drive them to bankruptcy.
Enough lies. Think and educate yourself before you speak. Media is so irresponsible on this issue it is pathetic.

Posted by: TaoTeBJP | January 19, 2010, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

I just called the STARK COUNTY OHIO DNC to tell them I’m EXTREMELY DISPLEASED with the DEMOCRATS. The REPUBLICANS RULE THIS COUNTRY BECAUSE OF YOUR S-P-I-N-E-L-E-S-S-N-E-S-S.
BARACK WHOOOOOOO??????????????

Posted by: Sharon | January 19, 2010, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Don’t count Coakley out yet. “Daily Kos” reporter says voter turnout in a few Dem. precincts is “huge”. If this is true all over Mass. Coakley just might pull this out.

Posted by: ohgee | January 19, 2010, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

You heard it here..If Brown wins, Obama will Offer a republician millions of dollars to be the 60th vote

Posted by: another crisis, another photo-op | January 19, 2010, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

HELLOOOOOO????? “There is nothing that says Brown will not support the health care bill. ” That’s the whole basis of his campaign. That’s exactly why he is going to win, to kill this corrupt bill.

Posted by: Tony | January 19, 2010, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

A Brown victory in Massachusetts will be a shot in the arm for Obama and his party. They need it very badly.
They can see this as a learning experience and as an opening to corrective measures , or ignore the signs of the times and go down to an even greater crushing defeat on a much broader scale in November. The Massachusetts senate rate has become a popular referendum on this administration. To ignore the public ire is to invite disaster and to guarantee Obama is limited to one term in office.

Posted by: Athelstan | January 19, 2010, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

brown is winning because massachusetts is squarely owned and run by corporate interests and uber rich elites: big pharmas, big insurance, big finance, big hospitals, rich butchers-AKA-doctors.

Posted by: curious steve | January 19, 2010, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Wasn’t the bigger upset not calling out Guliani for saying there were no terrorists attacks during Bush’s terms?
Lose the hyperbole, George. Neither candidate has much to offer. If they did, the race would not be close.

Posted by: mike riley | January 19, 2010, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

brown is winning because
the govt mandate for private health insurance without competition and cost control looks like this:
my family of three healthy members pay $1700 / month, with high copay and deductibles, no dental coverage, but with prescription coverage we never use.
i have no option. i am forced to participate in the looting of the public by uber rich and powerful.

Posted by: curious steve | January 19, 2010, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

If the media would just this one time allow the process to work . The media are too involved in our voting process and has really become a stumbling block in the process . What is wrong with letting the people go to the polls , count the votes when it is time and let the system work . the talking head media are far to vocal and someone needs to change the way they do business. If the media decides a wk before an election and start discussing who the winner is ahead of time , this will persuade voters to not bother to vote . This is not the way this process is supposed to work . Polls need to be abolished , now.

Posted by: DWB | January 19, 2010, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Stephanopolus is no journalist and should stick with entertainment, his interviews are vapid and pointless and he adds nothing. Of course this is an interesting election but so are all and in the end there will be some new regulation of health insurance that will help millions and the Senate will be as dysfunctional as ever both for the good and the bad. Government will function from the center as it always has from the foundation of the Republic. So all of this is much to do about nothing certainly NOT some century occurring event. George Please Stick with Entertainment it suits you best

Posted by: Bill | January 19, 2010, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

The only reason why Scott Brown is winning is because he has stronger financial support from the GOP and because he took advantage of Martha Coakley’s shoddy campaign. Had she been more aggressive and started her thing in December, things would be a lot better for her.
One thing that I find disturbing is that a lot of women are voting for Brown because they think he is attractive; men are voting against Coakley because they hate who she is. They aren’t even aware of the realities of what they are criticizing her for.
Brown’s campaign has been all about hatred – and he’s been encouraging it. He did an 11th hour apology in regards to smiling at someone when they said that Coakley should be raped with a curling iron. He denied hearing it, which is clearly a lie.
Scott Brown is the worst thing that could happen to Massachusetts. If he does, these people who voted for him are going to realize after a few months what a bad mistake they made.

Posted by: John | January 19, 2010, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

This is a pretty significant upset – I’m not sure if its the “upset of the century”, but it sure is pretty exciting (Boston resident here).
Obama over Hillary is probably the upset of the century in my book.

Posted by: Suidae | January 19, 2010, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

I’m a solid Democrat who is opposing the healthcare bill from the left. I called my best friend in MA and encouraged him to vote Brown. (He said no, oh well…)

Posted by: larry from Purdue | January 19, 2010, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

Alan Khazei is who i votede for in the primary..it would be a different race if he were the dem candidate

Posted by: Kitty | January 19, 2010, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

At this point, I am voting for whatever candidate stops SPENDING SO MUCH MONEY. Congress and the office of the president (current and the last eight years) need to learn what families have had to learn….if you can’t afford it…don’t buy it!

Posted by: Linda | January 19, 2010, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

It’s is vital, it is imperative for Brown to win so the health care reform is defeated all together. Then in the next 20 years, when the middle class won’t be able to pay for its insurance, I’ll laughing my butt off to the bank. You have to hit the rock bottom so perhaps then you’ll come to your senses. Americans’ demise is coming and I gleefully be watching and hedging against this crash.

Posted by: Avin | January 19, 2010, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

The message is loud and clear to this radical Obama Pelosi Reid administration. America is not ready for your radical agenda. This is not the corruption that we voted for. Once we see the reality of the false campaign where Dems posed as moderates a majority oppose almost all of Obama’s policies.

Posted by: winkywright | January 19, 2010, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

People get the government they deserve !!

Posted by: Tony | January 19, 2010, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

It’s a great day to be an America. God bless us all.

Posted by: Dogface | January 19, 2010, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

I think ABC has it backwards. It seems to me that the conventional thinking now is that Scott Brown is going win. Therefore, at this point the upset would be if Martha Coakley pulls it out.

Posted by: Craig | January 19, 2010, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

Let me see if I can get this straight. John Thune beats Tom Daschle, Al Franken beats Norm Coleman and Barack Obama beats Hillary Clinton all in this century. But state Senator Scott Brown beating state AG Martha Coakley in a special election is the biggest political upset of the century? Really? Thanks for feeding the Bizzarro world conservatives live in George.

Posted by: Seeryer | January 19, 2010, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

Poor George, he forgets NY 23rd. 1st time in over 100 years the Dems held that seat. I can understand George forgetting it, it was way back in NOV of 09

Posted by: Joe | January 19, 2010, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

It is interesting to see that Republicans think that all viewpoints have not been considered. The Dems have bent over backwards to accommodate them and they get kicked in the teeth. The Republicans, as it has been for the 20-30 years, have outmaneuvered the Democrats once again. The GOP has frames the bill in their terms and they are telling America what it is not the President or the Democrats. An Ass is a good symbol right for the Democrats because that is what they are being made into.

Posted by: Tim | January 19, 2010, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

MA is finally getting it RIGHT!!!

Posted by: Sam | January 19, 2010, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Massachusetts is finally getting it RIGHT!!!!!

Posted by: Sam | January 19, 2010, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

=======================
If President Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid don’t realize that the American public are speaking LOUD AND CLEAR that they flat-out REJECT the liberal Democratic agenda, then these politicians must be woefully BLIND, DEAF AND DUMB.
=======================

Posted by: N Waff | January 19, 2010, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

What’s with the hyperbole? The century just started. Besides, this story doesn’t even compare with the Haitian earthquake. Regardless of who wins tonight, your life will be made worse by Congress. The winner will be bought and paid for by whatever interest group bought the election.

Posted by: Kevin | January 19, 2010, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Hyperbole! If Ted Kennedy was beaten then the “upset of century” might begin to apply. Instead, we had an untested, honorable but lackluster candidate who held 19 campaign events to opponent’s 66. When questioned if she should get out and meet voters more, she disdainfully replied something like…you mean go to Fenway Park and shake hands in the cold! Brown was there and everywhere in his everyman’s truck. But at least she knew the name of the Park, because previously she stated that Curt Schilling was a Yankee fan! Of course she lost.
We have universal health care in MA, that’s what the national press talk about, not the MA voters! Brown did tap into anger over economy, political process (yes, including health care), and dislike of incumbents in general. He tied Coakley to existing political machine. His most brilliant line and I hear it repeated everywhere: “It’s the people’s seat, not the Kennedy seat.”

Posted by: Gordon | January 19, 2010, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

either way, I hope this makes all those in Washignton “slow down and think” about what is going on. it doesn’t have to be an all or nothing event. Unfortunately too many politicians feel/think that if they win, it is a “clear mandate” that their side and agenda should be strongly and unchanged move forward–even if it is a 51-49 win. Both sides should look at what’s right for the country not their party exclusively-that hasn’t worked too well on either side. Perhaps there isn’t so much urgency that if we don’t do it now, it isn’t worth doing. Clearly some reform is needed, but with margins of 51-49 or close to that, perhpas there are good ideas on both sides of the aisle. What was that Pres Lincoln said about a house divided?

Posted by: dan | January 19, 2010, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

The political upset of the century? First of all, if Coakley wins, it will now be an upset. Second, you can’t possibly think that this is a “bigger upset” than Barack Obama’s defeat of Hillary Clinton.
As for the possibility of Brown winning, it seems to reflect a combination of an ugly mood in this country (in part for good reasons) as well as a lot of ignorance on the part of voters. The ignorance is hardly surprising given that since Americans know so little about government and economics, and they definitely do not understand the health care bill.

Posted by: Jim Orlin | January 19, 2010, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

The bill does not fund abortions. Do your research before you start listening to the banter from the right.

Posted by: Tim | January 19, 2010, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

A Brown win would be a disaster to those who seek reclamation from the 8-Bush disaster years. I can’t believe that Mass. voters have been so taken in as to vote for this GOP NO<NO<NO man. He is anathma to the values Mass. voters have long put forth.

Posted by: ron,w | January 19, 2010, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Can you fool most of the people by presenting a faux image of yourself? Scott Brown is about to prove this as true or false. It’s a real test of Mass. voters who may or may not be fooled by this snake oil guy in a prop truck.

Posted by: ron,w | January 19, 2010, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

It’s interesting how many people are so afraid of socialism in this country when we’re around half a trillion dollars in debt to a communist country (that would be China) and nobody seems overly bothered by that fact. Our future is tied inextricably to China’s, so what’s all the whining about.

Posted by: ray wylie coyote | January 19, 2010, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

As a Massachusetts resident and voter, It’s really shocking to read the comments here. It’s very clear this is some sort of partisan backlash against Obama’s agenda because these comments reflect a lack of understanding of who Scott Brown is and what he represents.
A few weeks ago, if you asked most people from MA if they knew Brown they would have said no. It’s not like he has been some brilliant State Senator. A Globe columnist characterized him as ” Although well-liked by his colleagues, he hasn’t cast much of shadow at the State House. ” and ““He has never been known as someone who is all that interested in legislation,’’ says one Republican colleague.
Comments here characterize him as a moderate, but he has voted 96% of the time with Republican agendas. He is against marriage equality, anti emergency contraception n Catholic hospitals, pro-water boarding, pro-gun ownership, pro-military buildup, and not that articulate. We call him the Sara Palin of Massachusetts.
So before you all cheer at the prospect of a Brown victory here, you better get ready to see your civil rights erode in the process. . .

Posted by: Robert Zeleniak | January 19, 2010, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Upset, YES, HUGE. Posters who sppt this bill have CLEARLY NOT read it. Anyone who repeats the mantra: won’t lose ur plan, won’t incr deficit, wont ration care, won’t gut Medicare/kill seniors, won’t raise premiums etc. has NOT READ CBO scoring of bills and the Manager’s Amendment (read it, 380pp), CBO scoring of Man Amend (38 pp). The FACTS are CLEARLY laid out in language that all but the most inept can deal with. People spptng this bill are their OWN worst enemy when it comes to health care. Please note, to get the bill passed, CONgress bribed: Dem Senators, Drug co’s, ins co’s, AARP, Unions. CBO states “…Estimates of the second 10 years are MEANINGLESS (their word)…” This bill hurts young people whose premiums will go up, Seniors whose care will be rationed (Mayo Clinic in AZ NO LONGER seeing Medicare patients), biz’s, working people. Take the time, and it’s not a lot, to READ THE FACTS B4 making up your mind.

Posted by: JohnLeeHooker | January 19, 2010, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

George: YOU ARE AN IDIOT! You learned NOTHING when you embarrassed yourself nationally by not countering Rudy Giuliani’s insane assertions about the Bush years and now this?
Whether Brown or Coakley win the Dems have at least an 18 vote majority in the Senate.
YOU are the BIG LOSER!

Posted by: Sue Cohen | January 19, 2010, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Observer “I don’t like the bill, but I detest lies even more. No Way this health care bill pays for abortions.”
What do you have your head buried in the sand. Of course this bill funds abortion!

Posted by: Paul | January 19, 2010, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

the way Brazile says “we will win” shows me she knows something no one else does…ACORN??

Posted by: darkknight | January 19, 2010, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Of course George is shocked. They just found out that they don’t control the news. People are looking at other sources to get their information. We’ve all know how the majority of Americans don’t like this bill. However, ABC is just waking up to this fact. They’ve passed stories that promote this and stories that blast the GOP. Well, it’s time to realize it’s not a Democrat vs. Republican “thing”. It’s the American people vs. liberalism.
The President has touted how this will model the system that they have in Massachusetts. Not one story about the real life situation being played there. If they did any sort of piece on it, they would have found that the cost is outrageous, the doctors are inshort demand and that the Massachusetts people hate it.
It is a disgrace that they consider themselves a “news organization”.

Posted by: djaymick | January 19, 2010, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

So I saw a post here that says maybe “NoBo” will do what he said he’d do and bring R’s and D’s together. That pretty much says it all. How will he bring anything together with an attitude like that?

Posted by: scott | January 19, 2010, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

This is what happens when you pick a bad canidate that acts like she didn’t even want the job, but felt obligated to run, and entitled to the position, in spite of what I previously mentioned. You HAVE to do better than THIS!
Next time, do your homework, have somebody who actually engages the voters, and stays AWAY from the teleprompter.
Martha Coakley was NOT Barack Obama, so why did she think she could win a campaign running just like him?

Posted by: jafo | January 19, 2010, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Brown voted for Universal Healthcare in Mass., and has stated he feels that nationally, healthcare needs an overhaul. Today he was quoted as saying that if he wins the first thing he will do when he gets to Washington is drive his pickup truck to the White House, shake Pres. Obama’s hand and offer to take him on in a game of basketball. Poor old dumb Americans on the Right and Left just spitting at each other while a new senator climbs into bed with the rest of the good ol’ boys in Washington. Sorry folks, but it’s politics as usual in the USA.

Posted by: JoeWill | January 19, 2010, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Someone on Martha Coakley’s staff seemingly dropped the ball when it came to spelling Massachusetts properly, but that was the least of her political problems. I respectfully believe that “Political Tsunami Victim” will be indelibly and justifiably tattooed on her forehead after the results of today’s MA election are in!
Heretofore, I never put much stock in “Divine Providence.” Now, however, as a result of Scott Brown’s miraculous surge in the polls in MA, I’m just starting to become a true believer that Divine Providence in the form of constructive political change may be just around the corner! But we’ll all just have to wait and see the ultimate results of tonight’s truly historic political drama/outcome.

Posted by: Fred Harden III | January 19, 2010, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

I agree with those who feel that Coakley ran a week campaign. I attended her rally at Northeastern this last week and was surprised that hardly anybody had a Coakley sign. Yet every Brown supporter who came to heckle had a Brown sign. The line to get into the event went many blocks down Huntington Ave. They could have distributed Coakley signs to those people and it would have made a visual statement to those passing by. Just one snapshot of failed opportunities by her campaign.

Posted by: mtnwocky | January 19, 2010, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

From my experience, most of the people who say they don’t like the health care bill don’t even know what’s in it.
You don’t like restrictions on excluding people from coverage because of pre-existing conditions?
You don’t like a rule against lifetime caps on coverage?
The healthcare bill isn’t perfect, but it’s a hell of an improvement.

Posted by: Captain Spaulding | January 19, 2010, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

They merely want to kill a reform presidency. They have no alternative. They have no policy that could restrain health insurance costs and the desperate plight of the uninsured. They have no plans for tackling climate change, when they can bring themselves to admit it exists. They have no plans to win or end the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that Obama himself isn’t trying. They have no idea how to balance the budget – except more tax cuts!

Posted by: Red | January 19, 2010, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Win or lose, Scott Brown has provided a clear focal point of the total repudiation of Obama Pelosi Reid policies that have been shoved down America’s throat against it’s will. Obama has re-invigorated even the Republican Party that have a lot of work to repair the damage of their big spending big government ways in order to convince voters that we can trust them again. But trust them or not we know we can’t trust this new Radical Progressive Democratic Party! I hope this Obamanization of America is toast!

Posted by: winkywright | January 19, 2010, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

It”s time for change, I believed the president when I heard this.

Posted by: r karris | January 19, 2010, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

This is Bush’s fault! He disgraced us all by making Ted Kennedy’s seat go to a Repub!! This would NEVER have happened if he had not left so many messes for President Obama. It’s time to PREVENT GOPers from ever voting again – they are too stupid and can’t vote for health care or other things our country must have.

Posted by: Voter2Be | January 19, 2010, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

A vote for Scott Brown was a vote AGAINST Obama. It’s time to wake up, and take this country back! Socialism didn’t work in Russia, and it won’t work here. God wil seeing to it that evil and greed do not win. He always does.

Posted by: Kaylor McKay | January 20, 2010, 4:35 am 4:35 am

You never know what you have until it is gone – Boston already has a heathplan in place which is somewhat similar to the President’s plan. It just so happens that the best man won.
So please stop turning big issues into political footballs and think about those that have suffered at the hands of FatCats – People wake up and see the people destroying your lives – Why is no one talking about excessive bonuses

Posted by: Pammy | January 20, 2010, 9:35 am 9:35 am

The problem with this is not just Mass. It is everywhere, if there were more elections right now.
As long as Obama and his underlings let “The Health Care Program” be the first thing out of their mouth everyday for breakfast, nothing will change for them. People with jobs do not really care about the NEW health care program that may be years away.
JOBS for the people has to be number 1. How hard is it to understand that. It really is now coming down to the issues not politics. IF a politician is not on the right side he will be out. Watching the arrogant bankers last week was sick. Mostly they were nice during the hearings, except Dimon. But afterwards they were back to being their normal condescending selves as they got in the limos.
The banks here in Kansas are not lending to anyone. Unless the Mom and Pop’s cannot get money to survive and grow, there is no hope. Starting a business today is near impossible. The SBA is a nothing agency. They do not force the banks to do anything. Even providing a 95% guarantee on an SBA loan does not get a bank to loan – because the loan HAS to have the burrowers HOUSE as collateral. No house OR no equity in a house and you get ZIPPO. The rules need to change. The problem is the banks lie to the Feds and the Feds believe everything the banks say. Bankers are just used car guys in striped suits.
Whether you are a Dem or Repub, if you are not going to help people get jobs AND penalize those on Wallstreet that caused the mess you should be out. I do realize it is not just Wallstreet – it is the lobbyists and the government officials who listen to them that LET much of the crisis happen. Stop the lobbyists and clean house at the Fed occasionally and it will help.
I saw the interview with Plouff as well. What arrogance. Sitting there with the smug cocked head and chin up. He came off as a real jerk.
In the 60′s the Smother’s Brothers did a song called “Mediocre Fred”. Well today we need some Freds running the Fed not a bunch of bought and paid for attorneys.

Posted by: Ronald Litton | January 20, 2010, 9:40 am 9:40 am

Let us hope that the Dems can no longer deal under the table, to try and pass their bad bill.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | January 20, 2010, 10:42 am 10:42 am

Just the fact that a republican-independent-whatever unthroned the Dems in MA should give all lawmakers pause. Personally, I don’t know the guy–but if he believes in stopping the nation from continuing to plunge headlong into financial insolvency? Hey-I’m on his side.

Posted by: Dennis in AZ | January 20, 2010, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

George… do you have the balls to own your failure on that Obama interview..
How can you..George just like Diane Sawyer and every one else advertise..”a no holds bared ” interview when you fail to get the ANSWERS to your questions…
So what!!! that you..George, ask the right questions.. You are just as AFRAID as everyone else to demand a actual answer:
1: You..George asked: WHY THE HEALTH CARE DEBATES ARE NOT ON CNN…
Obama did noy answer that..and you LET THAT SLIDE..
2: You..George asked: WHY NOT START W SMALLER PACKAGES.. Obama answered.. Once they actually see whats in the bill…YET YOU..George did not ask…so when will we be able to actually do that..
NO ONE ASKS THIS:and a An idiot can solve this… take the health care bill and make smaller bills.. so that the great parts (and there are some) can be understood “by the people” and passed and the crap stopped…
The American people rule this country and we are demanding to see and understand all the parts of this bill..so give us smaller bills….
I am tired of big named reporters getting paid for asking the “big questions” but FAILING to ask for the answers.. Im tired of all of you getting paid to be afraid
Lets hear you pubically own your failure to get the answers
Diana Faraci

Posted by: Diana Faraci | January 21, 2010, 8:44 am 8:44 am

Pay for everyone who can’t afford it to get a good blood analysis. Present them with the results and suggestions. (ex. if they have high chlorestorol present them with suggestions of a low fat diet. If they fallow those suggestions and lower their chlorestorol they get a huge discount on their health care becuse they have saved hard working American’s who will be paying for their health care money. Blood results and fallow up can be used for research.

Posted by: Sarah Betts | January 22, 2010, 9:30 am 9:30 am

Ffirst of all, having a universal public system open to all and it is not socialism. And it offers a practical solution in that all Americans can have affordable health care .
And many Americans won’t be denied coverage because of pre existing condition, or because they can’t afford health care coverage for themselves or thier family. Or
And they have to make a choice between paying the bills and having affordable health care.
heath care reform with out universalism is just wasting money on Insurance companies to allow them to make even more profit and to limit coverage for individuals and theirr families. Insurance companies, are like blood suckers ; sucking and drainking all the life of individuals of thier hard earn income and sweat.

Posted by: sadek rahman | January 26, 2010, 9:15 am 9:15 am

Republicans and bipartisan This must a joke right…. Since President Obama historical victory the Republican party has been a party of No No No and No….. And no alternatives… just say no to Obama…
Is this what you call bipartisan politics…

Posted by: sadek rahman | January 26, 2010, 9:21 am 9:21 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.