Feb 16, 2010 8:09am
Bayh: ‘No Truth Whatsoever’ to Obama Challenge
That's what he told me this morning on GMA. As for 2016, well, Bayh laughed that off.
But he did get serious when talking about his decision to leave the Senate: "I simply reached the conclusion that I could get more done to help my state and the American people by doing something in the private sector.”
See the entire interview here:
Email
Obama: 'Now Is the Time For Common Sense Action'
Romney Takes Aim at Conservatives
Politicians with ambitions for high office never say too early that they intend to run for president. It means absolutely nothing.
Posted by: LongT | February 16, 2010, 9:46 am 9:46 am
I think it’s very telling that he is retiring because he feels that he would be more effective in the private sector . His frustration with congress is with his oun party since they are the only ones who hold the cards!!! I think it’s obvious which progressives he was refering to! The state of our country is facing is so sad untill we All stand up for what is right!!!!! I suspect their will be more to follow. I believe it’s these people who have the morals and values and that’s why they are leaving. Sadly these politicians are the ones who America needs!! Thanks
Posted by: Diana holland | February 16, 2010, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Diana, I don’t think it has as much to do with his own party as it does with the muddle that the D.C. atmosphere has become and that’s more largely related to the opposition (that’s right, I’m referring to the GOP) and the political climate they’ve created. In the follow-up to an election year that saw major losses for the Right, rather than reform themselves to be better then they’ve been, they opted to stall, politicize, obstruct, and just plain _dig in their heels_ with all the impetulance of a tantrum throwing child. The GOP’s showing so far has been extremely unimpressive and it’s no wonder they aren’t making ALL of D.C. fed up w/ their antics.
Posted by: Diana holland, what? | February 16, 2010, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Of course this is what Bayh will say now. The real kicker is what he’s saying a year from now…
Posted by: matt | February 16, 2010, 10:56 am 10:56 am
I don’t thin the “muddle that the D. C. atmosphere has become” is “largely related” to the GOP. Not too long ago the democrats were blocking every judicial appointee of Pres. Bush. My hope is that Sen. Bayh’s actions are a reflection of what millions of Americans are feeling. They are angry about the fact that nothing has really changed. It is still the same deal-making, greedy, corrupt process that works towards what improves the interests of the policticians and the lobbyists that feed them. I stand here with one voice, one vote, but on the other side of the street stands a lobbyist with millions of dollars. Now who do you think the polician is going to listen in that situation. Back in the days of the Mafia, they sold protection. Now we have lobbyists selling reelection.
Posted by: Roger H. | February 16, 2010, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Why is the charge that the Senate is broken only bad for Democrats? Aren’t the Republicans just as guilty of partisianship and small minds?
Posted by: Pat | February 16, 2010, 11:44 am 11:44 am
That, in some respects, is a solid point Roger H but more often than not, Bush got his agenda through in a largely Democrat Congress. Obama has not had similar fortune it would seem and his party is in the majority. Is it because Democrats just can’t come together? Perhaps. Is it also because the Republican party has efforted to make it as hard as they possibly can? Perhaps.
I think you probably have a very solidified answer if you combine those two ideas.
Posted by: Diana holland, what? | February 16, 2010, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Thank you Diana, and please believe me, I am not trying to defend the Republicans efforts to put up roadblocks. It is something both parties are well versed in doing. But why is it that both Democrats and Republicans are unable to come together within their own parties? Could it be all the special interests pulling them in other directions?
Posted by: Roger H. | February 16, 2010, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
The only question is in which party will Evan Bayh run for president? He’s never really been a Democrat. Maybe he’ll give Lieberman his second chance to become vice president; this time as Republicans.
Posted by: judyinnm | February 16, 2010, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
You all make points in which to ponder!!! ESP the the point someone made re: bush pushing his agena through with dems. By the same token president Clinton did the same with the majority being repblicans in senate and congress!! The recipe I think seems to work is the president being a different party then senate and or congress… This seems to balance things out since both parties bring valuable ideas to the table!!!! All I know I want the America I know and loved back! PLEASE!!!!!!! Thanks Diana
Posted by: Diana holland | February 19, 2010, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
I’ve never seen the animosity towards another party that the dems have demonstrated this past year. Pelosi, Reid and Baucus have pretty much said, we’re in control, we don’t care what you want or what you think. I watched quite a bit of this wrangling on C-Span and it was astonishing to see people get slapped down like they were.
Can we have time to read the bill like we were promised?
Sign the bill and then you have all the time you want to read it.
Would you go to a mortgage lender and sign a contract without reading it? What would you do if the banker told you to just sign it and read it later.
There has been zero attempt to reach out to anyone except when it comes to reaching out for bribes for votes. Some even brag about how much their vote went for and chide others for not making better deals for theirs.
Buying votes used to be against the law. Now it is put out in the open and when people complain about it, it’s just shrugged off as those trouble makers blocking things again.
I can understand why some politicians are sick of it in both parties.
Even better, more Americans are getting sick of it and the fat cat politicians better start worrying more than the fat cat bankers.
Posted by: Julie Weathers | February 23, 2010, 8:37 am 8:37 am
we were told the bill would be posted on c-span and debated in public. what happened? sign on folks we’ll give you details later. what part of we don’t want to be saddled with this government mandated socialized medicine do you not understand.
Posted by: carol rasmussen | February 26, 2010, 12:36 am 12:36 am