By MichaelJames

Feb 14, 2010 12:25pm

Counterterrorism Czar Brennan Draws Fire for Comments on Gitmo Recidivism

Comments by John Brennan, assistant to the president for homeland security and counterterrorism, at the Islamic Center at New York University on Saturday, are drawing fire and have prompted at least one call for his resignation by a Republican senator.

At one point, Brennan was asked about a recent assessment from the intelligence community that 20 percent of detainees transferred from Guantanamo are confirmed or suspected of recidivist activity, as Brennan confirmed in a letter to Congress earlier this month.

Earlier this month in a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Brennan used that figure and pointed out about the 20 percent recidivism rate that "all of these cases relate to detainees released during the previous administration and under the prior detainee review process. The report indicates no confirmed or suspected recidivists among detainees transferred during this administration, although we recognize the ongoing risk that detainees could engage in such activity."

Shayana Kadidal of the Guantánamo Global Justice Initiative at the Center for Constitutional Rights challenged that figure, saying that his organization believes fewer than half a dozen former Guantanamo detainees have gotten involved in "any criminal activity."

Brennan stood by the figure, calling the assessment "very rigorous," though he acknowledged it's "very difficult to get precise figures" on recidivism.

"People sometimes use that figure, 20 percent, say 'Oh my goodness, one out of five detainees returned to some type of extremist activity,'" Brennan said. "You know, the American penal system, the recidivism rate is up to something about 50 percent or so, as far as return to crime. Twenty percent isn't that bad."

Brennan added, "Many of these detainees have returned, have engaged not just extremism, but terrorist attacks. It is something that we have to look at very carefully."

He said the Obama administration has a "more rigorous review" than did the Bush administration before detainees are transferred.

On Fox News Sunday, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said Brennan's assessment of 20 percent recidivism being not "that bad" was "mindboggling and unnerving."

"He has lost my confidence," Graham said of Brennan, "and it's the best evidence yet how disconnected this administration has come from the fact that we're at war. … I don't see how most Americans can feel safe when the head of counterterrorism tries to tell us you can get all the information you need within 50 minutes of an interview of a guy right off the airplane who tried to blow it up, and tries to tell us that the process did finally work, and say that a 20 percent recidivism rate's OK in the war on terror."

Graham said, "I think it'd be better to have a new person in that job."

Last week, the ranking Republican on the Senate Intelligence Committee, Sen. Christopher "Kit" Bond, R-Mo., told the National Review that Brennan “needs to go,” and is no longer “credible.” Brennan’s recent “troubling" decisions “have destroyed my confidence in him," Bond said. "Our problem now is that we have to wonder whether we can trust [Brennan] after he has been a mouthpiece for the political arm that I thought only came out of the White House press office.”

White House spokesman Nick Shapiro responded: “Through his pathetic attack on a counterterrorism professional like John Brennan, who has spent his lifetime protecting this country under multiple administrations, Sen. Bond sinks to new depths in his efforts to put politics over our national security.”

- jpt

UPDATE: Writing at the Weekly Standard, Thomas Joscelyn takes issue with Kadidal's assertion, citing twenty examples of recidivists including the 11 Saudis cited in this report from the NEFA Foundation.

 

 

User Comments

Who is Mr. Brennan, anyway? What powers does he exercise? Who does he report to? What is his job description?
Is it true that his company does business with the government in the area of security? Isn’t this a conflict of interest?
Does he really talk with reporters “off the record” essentially buying them off with access to keep them from investigating him and his conflict of interest?
When will a reporter start to look into this guy?

Posted by: Quo Warranto | February 14, 2010, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

As far as I’m concerned, these terrorist trials are the least important thing in the world. Just try them and hang them. Quit the stupid partisan bickering! Enough already!

Posted by: rich | February 14, 2010, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

Posted by: Quo Warranto
you obviously have the true info,
tell us, give us the facts…

Posted by: manny | February 14, 2010, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

This cavalier attitude permeates this adminstration. We are all in jeopardy.

Posted by: drjohn | February 14, 2010, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

This administration knows nothing about foreign policy and even less about the economy – Obama is the price we paid for taking out Saddam, period.

Posted by: bill | February 14, 2010, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

This cavalier attitude permeates this adminstration. We are all in jeopardy.
Posted by: drjohn | Feb 14, 2010 1:07:10 PM
____________________________________
Same old paranoid extremism – the Republican right pushing the propaganda that anyone else but them running things puts the country in grave danger of attack or collapse.
It’s fear mongering Republican right hogwash – yet again. Twisted.

Posted by: tierra | February 14, 2010, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

Once again this mind boggling administration is at its confusing best again. Let’s see if we can put these two pieces together to make any kind of sense:
“People sometimes use that figure, 20 percent, say ‘Oh my goodness, one out of five detainees returned to some type of extremist activity…Twenty percent isn’t that bad.” Brennan said.
Next we have this: Brennan added, “Many of these detainees have returned, have engaged not just extremism, but terrorist attacks. It is something that we have to look at very carefully.”
So, let’s put this together, class. Say 100 detainees are released. 20 of them go back into their terrorist groups. Since Brennan then claims that many of them have engaged not just in extremism, but terrorist attacks, that means the potential of those 20 to carry out an attack is practically 100%. If the 20 “renewed terrorists” each got on a plane carrying 300 Americans and successfully carried out their mission, that would be 6,000 Americans DEAD. But, according once again to Brennan, this 20% is “not that bad” ??????
Moving on…
He said the Obama administration has a “more rigorous review” than did the Bush administration before detainees are transferred.
Does he honestly think that a more “rigorous review” of the detainees is going to keep them from returning to a life that is the only one they have ever known? Terrorists do not threaten and kill for the hell of it. It is what they are ‘bred’ to do. They don’t change their minds. They don’t turn over a new leaf. They don’t decide to turn and repent just because Barack Obama is in charge and the one who signals their release. To think otherwise is utterly stupid.
I am in total agreement with those calling for his resignation. Anyone as confused as he is doesn’t need this position.

Posted by: Shoe | February 14, 2010, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

There’s no doubt that Mrs. Palin is not fit to be President. But after seeing Mr. Obama in action for a little more than a year, America will not be hurt any further if we give Mrs. Palin a turn.

Posted by: young_voter | February 14, 2010, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

Oh get real. The guy was simply stating the recidivism rate is better than that of American prisons.
Once again the Republican right posturing to spread their propaganda. Pathetic.
Don’t forget, it was the Republican Bush administration that actually let this 20% go free. They made the releases, not this administration.
They should be pointing fingers at themselves.

Posted by: tierra | February 14, 2010, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

Well, Graham can be happy that the recidivism all happened under the previous administration.
Not one happened under this one, after they changed the procedures to make it more rigorous and tight.

Posted by: tara | February 14, 2010, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Republicans have no credibility. They are the Party of No and their primary objective is to defeat the Democrats regardless of what it does to the country.

Posted by: msgijoe | February 14, 2010, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Golly gee! would you look at the ABC headlines!!!….”GOP attacks”, “Cheney attacks” …Grab your flak-jackets and head for the hills!

Posted by: cindy | February 14, 2010, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Funny was it not just a week or so ago that the White House was touting the released Terrorist by Obama had not gone back to terrorist activities? Like the Jobs created by the stimulis bill not provable. Why can we not keep them locked up till they are too old to return to terrorist activities?

Posted by: stormerF2 | February 14, 2010, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

Who is Mr Brennan, you ask?
Well he happens to be the head of a security company whose employee “cauterized” Barack Obama’s passport file in early 2008 9 the employee also rifled thorugh Mccain’s and Hillary’s as a diversion–only Obama’s was purged.
From NewsMax:
>>Obama’s Intelligence Adviser Involved in Security Breach
Monday, January 12, 2009 1:46 PM
Obama’s top terrorism and intelligence adviser, John O. Brennan, heads a firm that was cited in March for breaching sensitive files in the State Department’s passport office, according to a State Department Inspector General’s report released this past July.
The security breach, first reported by the Washington Times and later confirmed by State Department spokesman Sean McCormack, involved a contract employee of Brennan’s firm, The Analysis Corp., which has earned millions of dollars providing intelligence-related consulting services to federal agencies and private companies.
During a State Department briefing on March 21, 2008, McCormack confirmed that the contractor had accessed the passport files of presidential candidates Barack Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, and John McCain, and that the inspector general had launched an investigation.
Interesting , eh?
What do you say Jake Tapper?

Posted by: Djohnson | February 14, 2010, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

American evangelicals in America and Israel do not like this man. He talks straight and is not running around saying the sky is falling in order to pump up more fear in the United States and the world so Israel can use the US as a war fighting proxy.

Posted by: BillO | February 14, 2010, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

JAKE??
Say it isn’t so! You edited OUT the below line from the above NewsMax story about Brennan’s firm cauterizing Obama’s passport file??
What in the H is going on with JOURNALISTS nowadays?????
Be standup! Stop protecting Obama, chips must fall where the facts lead! Honesty, let’s see honesty man!
You or your staff JUST removed this line from my previous post:
“Sources who tracked the investigation tell Newsmax that the main target of the breach was the Obama passport file, and that the contractor accessed the file in order to “cauterize” the records of potentially embarrassing information.”

Posted by: Djohnson | February 14, 2010, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

Funny was it not just a week or so ago that the White House was touting the released Terrorist by Obama had not gone back to terrorist activities?
__________________________________
The 20% being talked about in this news article were released by the Republican Bush administration.

Posted by: tierra | February 14, 2010, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

I thought all you Obama supporters wanted ALL Guantanamo detainees to go home? (and of course rejoin the war against the civilized world) Now, you boast that none of your releases(a lie) have engaged in criminal activity? Which way do you want it Democrats? Whatever suits their argument on a given day is the answer.

Posted by: Craig Johnson | February 14, 2010, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

Protecting and glorifying the enemies of America, it is what Liberals do.
No thug, killer or dictator is beyong the adoration of the Left if they will only join in the hatred of regular America.

Posted by: LogicalUS | February 14, 2010, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Brennan is also the guy who said “the system worked 364 days out of 365 – it only failed on Christmas Day” (he conveniently ignores Ft. Hood and the Arkansas Recruitment center). He sounds like Jack Nicholson in “Mars Attacks” after the Martians destroy the White House: “I want the American People to know that they still have 2 out of 3 branches of the government working for them, and that ain’t bad”.
The man has a big problem, and frankly I do not trust my safety and the safety of my family to him.
He has to go.

Posted by: Nick in Virginia | February 14, 2010, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

As far as I’m concerned, these terrorist trials are the least important thing in the world. Just try them and hang them. Quit the stupid partisan bickering! Enough already!

agreed rich. as a democrat, i could care less, military, article III, don’t care.
just hang ‘em.
and we don’t want the gitmo detainees to go home. we want them hung and/or convicted.

Posted by: x | February 14, 2010, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

I think Congress should draft and pass a bill to ban the use of the word “change” , “bipartisanship”, and “both sides of the aisle”. Since we elected prolific lying Mr. Obama, there’s really no change. We have distrust the government more since Mr. Obama became President.

Posted by: young_voter | February 14, 2010, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

IRONIC THAT THE AMERICAN SOLDIER HAS AT LEAST ONE SKILL THAT HIS(HER)COMMANDER IN CHIEF WILL NEVER HAVE …………….ENEMY IDENTIFICATION.

Posted by: Tom Barnow | February 14, 2010, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

Protecting and glorifying the enemies of America, it is what Liberals do.
No thug, killer or dictator is beyong the adoration of the Left if they will only join in the hatred of regular America.
Posted by: LogicalUS | Feb 14, 2010 6:20:40 PM
____________________________________
Nonsense.
Again, the extremist Republican right fear mongering – spreading their paranoid hogwash – that if they aren’t in power the country is in imminent peril – that ONLY THEY can save the country. Paranoid, extremist garbage – cheap and sleazy.

Posted by: tierra | February 14, 2010, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

IRONIC THAT THE AMERICAN SOLDIER HAS AT LEAST ONE SKILL THAT HIS(HER)COMMANDER IN CHIEF WILL NEVER HAVE …………….ENEMY IDENTIFICATION.
Posted by: Tom Barnow | Feb 14, 2010 9:27:51 PM
___________________________________
Again, more extremist nonsense from the Republican right – fear mongering and smear tactics. Sad lot of people and bad for the country.

Posted by: tierra | February 14, 2010, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

I think Congress should draft and pass a bill to ban the use of the word “change” , “bipartisanship”, and “both sides of the aisle”. Posted by: young_voter | Feb 14, 2010 8:45:06 PM
With idiotic ideas like this, more legislation more useless laws motivated by people who would censor the wise, we’d be stuck in 100 years of repression and political malfeasance.

Posted by: HolyVoice | February 15, 2010, 3:03 am 3:03 am

“. . . a 20 percent recidivism rate’s OK in the war on terror”
There is no war on terror. It is a foolish concept made up by hell-bent conservatives that need to idiolize war for their own profit. It’s like identifying a mafia, from any part of the world, and calling them terrorists. They are not a sovereign government, hold no territory, and do not have an identifiable military. They are hoodlums and should be prosecuted like criminals.

Posted by: HolyVoice | February 15, 2010, 3:10 am 3:10 am

Another clueless incompetent, what else would you expect from the amateur-hour Obama administration? I don’t even have the patience anymore to comment, these people leave me speechless.

Posted by: Terry | February 15, 2010, 3:49 am 3:49 am

Another Republican deviate runs his corrupt mouth…

Posted by: Sentinel1946 | February 15, 2010, 9:08 am 9:08 am

No thug, killer or dictator is beyong the adoration of the Left if they will only join in the hatred of regular America.
Posted by: LogicalUS | Feb 14, 2010 6:20:40 PM
____________________________________
It was a Republican administration that gave chemical weapons to Saddam Hussein.
It was a Republican administration that gave money to Osama Bin Laden to recruit mujahideen in Afghanistan.
It was a Republican administration that started Irans nuclear program under the Shah.

Posted by: Flash Override | February 15, 2010, 9:09 am 9:09 am

Obama is so desperate to turn things around he has had to release Joe Biden.
Brennan’s stupid comments will be minor compared to what is likely to come out of Biden’s mouth.

Posted by: kyle | February 15, 2010, 9:58 am 9:58 am

I’ve got a “FLASH” for you Flash Override. It was Democrat Charlie Wilson and the democratic controlled congress that got Bin Laden and the now so called Taliban the weapons to fight Russia. Nuclear capability was obtained from the Russians and French, not the U.S. The former Shah of Iran was sold fighters and other weapons. NOT nuclear capabilities! Get your BS together and know you facts before spreading lies.

Posted by: Lee | February 15, 2010, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Flash Override; BS!

Posted by: LongT | February 15, 2010, 10:02 am 10:02 am

Biden has been released.
Eric Holder hidden away.
Brennan may join him soon.

Posted by: mick | February 15, 2010, 10:04 am 10:04 am

For those of us who keep yelling at one another instead of the real problem, while we are actively involved in a circular firing squad, the real enemy plots his next murder. If there is anyone on this post who believes events are “not that bad,” then I would invite him/her to take a bike ride through the countryside of any middle eastern country and send us back a report.

Posted by: wantingbalance | February 15, 2010, 10:17 am 10:17 am

Dr. William Petit’s wife and daughters were killed by recidivists.
Dr. Petit would likely have an issue with Brennan on 20% being an accetpable number.
They should not be released. Period.

Posted by: drjohn | February 15, 2010, 10:30 am 10:30 am

We have idiots in charge of our security.

Posted by: drjohn | February 15, 2010, 10:31 am 10:31 am

BRENNAN: “…all of these cases relate to detainees released during the previous administration and under the prior detainee review process.”
There is a difference between being “released” and “transferred.” “Released” means the detainees were freed. “Transferred” means they were transferred to other countries with restrictions (some are incarcerated in those countries, while others are monitored or have travel limitations).
By March 2009, 520 detainees had been either transferred or released. During the Bush Administration, the overwhelming majority of the detainees were “transferred.” And many of the “released” detainees were ordered released by the federal courts. (NOTE: It is possible that some detainees who were ordered to be released were actually “transferred” instead.)
Now the question is does the 20% recidivism rate apply to only those “released” or does it also include those “transferred.” AND what is the recidivism rate of those whom the Bush Administration “released” without a court order, compared to the recidivism rate of those whom the courts ordered “released?”

Posted by: James Danley | February 15, 2010, 10:34 am 10:34 am

The neighborhood activist P. Obama needs to stop appointing the city dog catchers as head of our security forces.

Posted by: Jim Rod | February 15, 2010, 10:47 am 10:47 am

GOP Attacks – if we could go one day without that headline, this country would be a much better place. Don’t even read the articles anymore because I know the song and dance. And it’s getting very tiresome. If only they just act instead of attack. Now, that would be a headline.

Posted by: pamp205 | February 15, 2010, 10:59 am 10:59 am

There is no question that the claim by the administration, is highly suspect.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | February 15, 2010, 11:01 am 11:01 am

idiots in charge of our security.
Posted by: drjohn
illuminated so clearly by Bush/Cheney et al., ‘in charge’ when the Sept 11th attacks happened….

Posted by: XXX | February 15, 2010, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

shouting down and demonizing those practicing their constitutional right to free speech.
Posted by: Member of US Constitution Party
were you living in America after 9•11 ?
judging by your comments I’m guessing you were not, as if you were you missed the demonization of anyone who held a contrary opinion to the Bush/Cheney administration and the ranting rightwingers.
you only need to examine what happened to the Dixie Chicks for expressing their ‘freedom of speech’ to see what a fraud your post is.

Posted by: XXX | February 15, 2010, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

This hoof in mouth seems rampant in this administration.. like.. how dumb are these sycophants?

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | February 15, 2010, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

This hoof in mouth seems rampant in this administration.. like.. how dumb are these sycophants?
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | Feb 15, 2010 3:44:19 PM
________________________________
Oh come on. He was simply stating the recidivism rate is better than from U.S. prisons.
Let’s not forget, the 20% that are returning to terrorist activities were RELEASED under the LAST administration, not this one.

Posted by: tierra | February 15, 2010, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

Oh puleeze! This guy like Podesta, Rahm, all of the czars are just incompetent naifs under the spell of Obama as they dis the former Admin. Who btw, had us all safe, even these dunces. Now in one yer, this dolt in the WH has had 3 terror incidents and has not explained any of them: when was the last time you heard about the Islamist at Ft. Hood. And Biden and Brennan are a team wondering if military trials are really the best with…foreign terrorists. This inept Admin. is going to get us all killed, even the liberal lemmings who actually believe these socialist pacifists.

Posted by: Glenn Koons | February 15, 2010, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

In one year, it should read. Oh well, when one types fast and wants to respond to such absurdity, one is apt to type and spell with dots and dashes. Sorry. Still, one could add: unless as many of these Dem reps in Congress loses in Nov. as possible, dolts like Brennan will still have a job. My guess is, with one more slip like this and with the Graham deal in the works, he goes. Thankfully.

Posted by: Glenn Koons | February 15, 2010, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

. This inept Admin. is going to get us all killed, even the liberal lemmings who actually believe these socialist pacifists.
Posted by: Glenn Koons | Feb 15, 2010 7:57:32 PM
___________________________________
More hogwash from the Republican right – who claim as usual that they, and only they, can run the country properly. Everyone else will DESTROY it!
Fear mongering and arrogance of the worst kind.
Under the last Republican president, North Korea tested its first nuclear weapon, Iran developed a secret nuclear facility, Bin Laden and al Qaeda escaped in Afghanistan, 9/11 happened, the shoe bomber happened, the anthrax attacks took place, tens of thousands were killed or maimed looking for weapons of mass destruction that didn’t exist and on and on . . . Republicans are as bad, if not far, far worse . ..
Quit your fear mongering.
You have no record to rest

Posted by: tierra | February 15, 2010, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

p.s. – ALSP – it’s estimated 20% of the detainees released under the last Republican president, went back to terrorist activities . . .

Posted by: tierra | February 15, 2010, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

Mr. Brennan reminds me strongly of some blowhard bullies I have known.

Posted by: Quo Warrranto | February 15, 2010, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

Mr. Brennan reminds me strongly of some blowhard bullies I have known.
Posted by: Quo Warrranto
‘blowhard bullies’, hmmmmm
lets see….. could that reference be to the entire Bush/Cheney neo-con crime family

Posted by: XXX | February 16, 2010, 1:02 am 1:02 am

Brennan and Obama sent hard core terrorists to yemen to be freed. Six of them were freed.
Obama released these terrorists to yemen including some who fought with bin laden in tora bora.
They were released to Yemen even after the fort hood attack and the fact that a radical cleric was operating in yemen.
Obama had Brennan go to yemen and try to install a similiar plan that the saudis used which was known to have already been a failure. Obama had Brennan go to the Saudi Arabia and wanted saudis to take even some so the yemen detainees even though their system of release was a failure.
Obama released the six hard core yemen terrorists because only one was under legal appeal and instead of appealing obama respects his lefty judges so much he released all six back to yemen the worst place to release them.

Posted by: jason | February 16, 2010, 4:26 am 4:26 am

illuminated so clearly by Bush/Cheney et al., ‘in charge’ when the Sept 11th attacks happened….
Posted by: XXX | Feb 15, 2010 1:46:44 PM
======================================
Hey, XXX, Bill Cliton and Al Core had missed a great chance to catch Osama Bin Laden. At that time Bill had kept himself busy with Monica.
I mean it’s useless to remind things
happened 15 or 10 years ago. America has been on the TWO WARS NOW.
Graham sharply pinpoints out that it’s the best evidence yet how disconnected this administration has come from the fact that we’re at war. … In addition
President, Obama had admitted American Admin. failed to connected between Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano and CIA or TSA. BEING DESCONNECTED INFORMATIONS BETWEEN GOV. AND OBAMA’S ADMINISTRATIONS INSIDE MOST HAS BEEN SCARY AMERICAN CITIZENS RATHER THEN TERRORISTS.

Posted by: John Brennan gotta go away | February 16, 2010, 11:55 am 11:55 am

Condi Rice said similar comments about recidivism during the bush admin, where was the outrage then. And Bush-Cheney released the detainees that planned the christmas bombing in Yemen. If you didn’t criticize the previous admin for this then you are just being a hypocrite.

Posted by: Bill | February 16, 2010, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

He has no tact.

Posted by: Camron Barth | February 16, 2010, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.