Does Killing Democratic Legislation Create ‘Certainty’?: Behind Closed Doors of President Obama’s Bipartisan Meeting
Sources with both the White House and congressional Republicans tell ABC News that at President Obama’s meeting with the bipartisan leadership of the House and Senate in the Cabinet room this morning, House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, told the president that concerns about Democrats’ policies – possible tax hikes, health care reform legislation, the energy bill – is creating significant uncertainty in the business community and hurting job creation.
The president responded that some uncertainty is expected given that the nation just faced the most severe economic crisis since the Great Depression. But he talks to business leaders all the time, the president said, and their concerns are that they’re not convinced Washington can agree on anything. Your argument is that if we don’t pass health care reform or energy legislation then that amounts to certainty, the president said.
No, no, said Boehner. I’m saying we should settle these issues.
That’s great, said the president. Let’s settle them. If we work together we can create an environment where businesses can thrive. Right now small businesses don’t know if we can agree on anything.
The sources say there were two tense moments in the meeting, both between the president and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.
The president took McConnell to task for the 63 holds Senate Republicans had put on his appointments.
McConnell pointed out that such holds have happened before.
The president replied that it hasn’t happened to this degree before – President Bush had holds put on six of his nominees.
“I have ten times that,” the president said, referring to 63 nominees who have been held up.
The president also criticized McConnell for statements he made against the bipartisan debt reduction commission, which he had voiced support for in the past.
McConnell said he’d said that before the president’s “spending binge.”
We can go outside and have that argument, the president said — meaning they could have the argument in public about the steps the administration took to shore up the faltering economy – but if you guys have ideas about how to deal with the debt problem just by spending cuts, then by all means bring them to the commission. Nobody’s excited to raise taxes.
McConnell said he’d raised the issue of a fiscal commission with the president even before his inauguration but had heard nothing for over a year from the president until Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., brought the bill to the Senate floor. The president had endorsed the commission the Saturday before the vote, which failed.
The president asked McConnell and Boehner to join Reid and Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., in pledging to appoint members to his fiscal commission, formed by executive order, which he said would be based on the same fiscal commission that failed in the Senate.
Boehner argued that if the White House is serious about cutting spending then it should start now.
You should use your authority to send proposals for spending cuts to the Hill, Boehner said, and you will have our cooperation if you do. Boehner outlined concerns he has about the commission, including that the commission should issue its recommendations before Election Day, not afterwards, as President Obama has proposed.
Both McConnell and Boehner refused to make any commitments on appointing members to the president’s debt reduction commission, saying they want to see the details of the proposal before they can sign off.
There were some areas of agreement in the meeting. Boehner expressed support for the president’s proposed elimination of capital gains taxes for small business investment, though he did express concern over whether the president’s proposed hiring tax credit is workable.
McConnell said he was confident there could be bipartisan cooperation on four issues – off shore drilling, expanding the use of nuclear energy, the development of so-called clean coal, and furthering US exports, all of which the president mentioned in his State of the Union address.
– jpt

Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
One problem that creates this posturing and lack of cooperation.. is the nature our republic.. too many elections..too close together.. we (they) are always delaying action until they can sort out the power balance after November 2010.. it affects the day to day business..
I think Obama was spot on.. he need his Congress to support his every move while the iron was hot.. he knew that his political capital was limited.. he was let down by his own party.
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | February 9, 2010, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
You have 342 comments on the Gibbs hand joke thread. I’m # 2, talking about the Gibbs Hand joke thread. I don’t think many people are interested in Obama’s bipartisan meetings.
Posted by: Axey | February 9, 2010, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
McConnell said he’d raised the issue of a fiscal commission with the president even before his inauguration but had heard nothing for over a year from the president until Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., brought the bill to the Senate floor. The president had endorsed the commission the Saturday before the vote, which failed.
=========
Interesting.
Obama wants to keep reusing the TARP money for new supposedly jobs-producing initiatives, while he keeps some of the budget-busting Stimulus money as a slush fund to roll out new spending programs every month or so. The stimulus, which was supposed to create jobs.
And now that he’s spending on whatever he wants to spend on, he thinks the GOP’s idea of sharing responsibility for the hard part sounds pretty darn good.
Posted by: MayBee | February 9, 2010, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
Thank you, Mr. President.
Posted by: sara | February 9, 2010, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
One problem that creates this posturing and lack of cooperation.
=========
True.
But it’s ok, sometimes, for there to be posturing and lack of cooperation. Government doesn’t need to be busy doing stuff all the time. Legislation should be a slow, deliberative process.
Posted by: MayBee | February 9, 2010, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Since none of them know what they’re doing (especially the administration) I’d be happy if they announced they were going to do absolutely nothing, NOTHING for at least the next 24 months. It’s the uncertainty that’s causing a big part of the problem. Small businesses are in self-preservation mode right now, forget about growing or hiring. They don’t need loans, they need government to stay out of their business.
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 9, 2010, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
Wow President Obama taking the Congressional GOP to school AGAIN.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 9, 2010, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
I guess we could ask the question.. what power does the executive branch of government have..
Maybe the reason it needs to be slow and deliberative is that.. once it has passed and enacted .. it seem irreversible..
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | February 9, 2010, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
One thing the GOP does know.. is that they should never underestimate this President.. he cleaned their clocks in 2008!
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | February 9, 2010, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
===Wow President Obama taking the Congressional GOP to school AGAIN. ===
As Obama’s nominee for card check is rejected by the senate. Obama can school the GOP all he wants. The GOP is winning.
Posted by: Axey | February 9, 2010, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
McConnel is right on about business not knowing what Obama is going to do next. We are sitting on our hands until he plays ball or is no longer in office. That’s the way it works folks.
Posted by: billy bob | February 9, 2010, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
Anyone who thinks that the problems with our economy are solely due to too much government intervention is too stupid to own a business.
Posted by: Azdak | February 9, 2010, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
Wow President Obama taking the Congressional GOP to school AGAIN.
Posted by: Ryan C | Feb 9, 2010 5:10:11 PM
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I take it you’ve not yet been blessed with living with a petulant teenager or two?
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 9, 2010, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
There is nothing in Obama’s budget, nor internal working documents that indicate he is really behind drilling, or clean coal. Nothing. Boehner and McConnell won this one, BTW.
Posted by: sybilll | February 9, 2010, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
I really doubt that US business is hanging its hat on legislative matters.. it’s just a bad economy.. and cyclical economics is the nature of faux capitalism. It’s a way for the GOP to say.. we can save the economy.. well that hasn’t always proven true.. business is adaptive and faster than the government..
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | February 9, 2010, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
Wow President Obama taking the Congressional GOP to school AGAIN.
———–
Yes. He did.
I like this: “Your argument is that if we don’t pass health care reform or energy legislation then that amounts to certainty, the president said.
No, no, said Boehner.”
Liar. LOL. Either that or he can’t follow his own lack of logic.
Posted by: progressive mama | February 9, 2010, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
Maybe the reason it needs to be slow and deliberative is that.. once it has passed and enacted .. it seem irreversible..
========
Absolutely.
Take, for example, the Medicare prescription plan. It’s unfunded and expensive. It’s also relatively new, and passed by a now-unpopular president. President Obama has knocked it several times. But he has never, ever suggested dropping it. Even though he could.
Posted by: MayBee | February 9, 2010, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
I like this: “Your argument is that if we don’t pass health care reform or energy legislation then that amounts to certainty, the president said.
No, no, said Boehner.”
Liar. LOL. Either that or he can’t follow his own lack of logic.
===========
No.
Obama is pretending there are only two options.
Boehner is saying the issues should be settled. That doesn’t mean they should be settled in the way Obama wants them settled.
There are several issues. Uncertainty is one huge problem. But part of the uncertainty is that businesses are afraid BAD policy will be passed.
Posted by: MayBee | February 9, 2010, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
You progressive liberal dems cannot even see what is happening right in front of your face. The latest defeat Obama and you suffered just happened. Obamas nomination for labor relations was just shot down, sorry unions but card check aint going to happen. You guys keep on cheering your leader on as he and you are slowly being surrounded by the enemy.
Posted by: billy bob | February 9, 2010, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
Obama needs to continue to seek public, unscripted debate with Congressional Republicans. Call their bluff. Obama has the facts and a fine ability to debate on his side. Behind closed doors meetings are pretty pointless.
Posted by: jhw539 | February 9, 2010, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
They don’t need loans, they need government to stay out of their business.
—
I take it you don’t know a lot of people in small business. Opening up credit at the community bank level is an issue. I also think the hiring tax credit is interesting– don’t know if it will work, but I’d try to take advantage of it.
Posted by: progressive mama | February 9, 2010, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
Fascinating stuff here. Too bad the GOP refuses to have these discussions in the open and in front of their beloved C-SPAN cameras.
Posted by: matt | February 9, 2010, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
progressive mama Let me get this straight, you are a progressive and a small business owner??? That is an oxymoron to say the least.
Posted by: billy bob | February 9, 2010, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
I’ve never seen such a lack of American Pride than in the Republic Party of NO! They have no ideas, no plans, no legislation, no health care options, no leadership and that includes Palin and McCain who are nothing but “talkaholics”! McCain want even vote in the affirmative for legislation he co-sponsors! No, No, No! No More Republicans will be elected from my state!
Posted by: john copeland | February 9, 2010, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
Not expecting anything to get done, for real, until after the November election.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | February 9, 2010, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
The adminstration did mot permit C-Span to broadcast the closed-door-sessions during Nov. and Dec. The public was not given the opportunity to hear any debate during this period of negotiations. It’s crystal clear now why the doors are being flung open in 2010.
Posted by: ivoteny | February 9, 2010, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
“The adminstration did mot permit C-Span to broadcast the closed-door-sessions during Nov. and Dec.”
The admin didn’t do that.
Congress did and they were wrong to do so.
“The public was not given the opportunity to hear any debate during this period of negotiations. It’s crystal clear now why the doors are being flung open in 2010.”
You think the GOP is gonna televise their handing the keys of power over to their corporate lobbyists?
ROFLMAO!
Posted by: Ryan C | February 9, 2010, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
The adminstration did mot permit C-Span to broadcast the closed-door-sessions during Nov. and Dec.
ivoteny | Feb 9, 2010 6:01:34 PM
So after the most transparent bill process in history, it was an utter failure because the final internal party strategy sessions were closed doors? OK – we’ll have to remember that unprecedentedly high bar and apply it equally to future administrations, right? Most transparent ever in the history of our nation (NAME a bill that had more hours of debate and amendment televised, more committee drafts released, town halls in almost every district, etc) is just not good enough.
Posted by: jhw539 | February 9, 2010, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
I really doubt that US business is hanging its hat on legislative matters.. it’s just a bad economy.. and cyclical economics is the nature of faux capitalism. It’s a way for the GOP to say.. we can save the economy.. well that hasn’t always proven true.. business is adaptive and faster than the government..
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
No desrepect, but you couldn’t be more wrong considering the types of legislation that has been proposed and is hanging out there. Cap and trade and HCR are huge concerns to small business. Literally life and death for many of them.
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 9, 2010, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
“Obama needs to continue to seek public, unscripted debate with Congressional Republicans. Call their bluff. Obama has the facts and a fine ability to debate on his side. Behind closed doors meetings are pretty pointless.”
Agreed.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 9, 2010, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
progressive mama Let me get this straight, you are a progressive and a small business owner??? That is an oxymoron to say the least.
billy bob | Feb 9, 2010 5:44:34 PM
My boss is a progressive. Our company has grown 25% in the last year and projects to continue doing so for the next 5. We’re a mechanical engineering firm that also has a few foreign clients (at the moment, we are bringing money into US paychecks from India). Progressives make excellent business men, from Warren Buffet to the CEO of Costco. But that’s just reality.
Posted by: jhw539 | February 9, 2010, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
“Obama needs to continue to seek public, unscripted debate with Congressional Republicans. Call their bluff. Obama has the facts and a fine ability to debate on his side. Behind closed doors meetings are pretty pointless.”
Agreed.
Posted by: Ryan C | Feb 9, 2010 6:09:33 PM
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Count me in! I’m all for it, lol. I’d also like to see Obama do a few unscripted Q & A sessions with some local Chamber of Commerce members.
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 9, 2010, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Do you win a debate if you state things authoritatively but are untrue? Take the Palin, Biden debates. On the face of it Biden dominated and showed superior command of the facts, but when you fact check what he was saying, he was pulling things out of his rear end. The same holds true with Obama, he is a great orator and debater, but he is prone to either exaggerate or plain dissemble and since he has the last word on a subject his statements ofttimes go unchallenged
Posted by: gsplsngr | February 9, 2010, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Stimulus money? Government contracts? ;)
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 9, 2010, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
“Do you win a debate if you state things authoritatively but are untrue? Take the Palin, Biden debates. On the face of it Biden dominated and showed superior command of the facts, but when you fact check what he was saying, he was pulling things out of his rear end.”
FactCheck on Biden-Pailn debate
“Biden and Palin debated, and both mangled some facts.
-Palin mistakenly claimed that troop levels in Iraq had returned to “pre-surge” levels. Levels are gradually coming down but current plans would have levels higher than pre-surge numbers through early next year, at least.
-Palin repeated a false claim that Obama once voted in favor of higher taxes on “families” making as little as $42,000 a year. He did not. The budget bill in question called for an increase only on singles making that amount, but a family of four would not have been affected unless they made at least $90,000 a year.
-Biden wrongly claimed that McCain “voted the exact same way” as Obama on the budget bill that contained an increase on singles making as little as $42,000 a year. McCain voted against it. Biden was referring to an amendment that didn’t address taxes at that income level.
-Palin claimed McCain’s health care plan would be “budget neutral,” costing the government nothing. Independent budget experts estimate McCain’s plan would cost tens of billions each year, though details are too fuzzy to allow for exact estimates.
- Biden wrongly claimed that McCain had said “he wouldn’t even sit down” with the government of Spain. Actually, McCain didn’t reject a meeting, but simply refused to commit himself one way or the other during an interview.
- Palin wrongly claimed that “millions of small businesses” would see tax increases under Obama’s tax proposals. At most, several hundred thousand business owners would see increases.”
IOW not only did Biden during the debate “dominate and show superior command of the facts” he did not lie nearly as much as Palin.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 9, 2010, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
Count me in! I’m all for it, lol. I’d also like to see Obama do a few unscripted Q & A sessions with some local Chamber of Commerce members.
============
That would be great.
I liked his unscripted Q&A with doctors at the ABC health care forum.
I wouldn’t mind him doing an unscripted Q&A with every business/group he seeks to regulate or publicly denigrates in a speech.
Posted by: MayBee | February 9, 2010, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Obama has yet to really have anything debated in the open. The GOP thing was nice. He needs to it with his own party.
Business hates uncertainity. The status quo is a known commodity and can be extrapolated out. while the magnitude of the proposed changes will render all but the highest ROI projects or the must survive ones to get funding.
If a business is not assured of a market rate of return on their invested capital, then they will employ it esle where, which includes savings and or overseas investments.
from my small business experience and customers, the uncertainity with legislation is weighing heavily on decions and the potential impact is being factored into their decisions.
Posted by: scott jeffries | February 9, 2010, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
“Cap and trade and HCR are huge concerns to small business. Literally life and death for many of them.”
How does cap and trade affect small business?
And why would a small business be upset by a government takeover of healthcare (I am assuming you think small biz is operating out of the fear of such an arrangement)?
Posted by: Ryan C | February 9, 2010, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
And why would a small business be upset by a government takeover of healthcare (I am assuming you think small biz is operating out of the fear of such an arrangement)?
Maybe because everything from Fannie to Freddie to the Post Office is in debt.
Posted by: Orszigzag | February 9, 2010, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
from my small business experience and customers, the uncertainity with legislation is weighing heavily on decions and the potential impact is being factored into their decisions.
scott jeffries | Feb 9, 2010 6:26:35 PM
What uncertainty SPECIFICALLY? The tax climate is known, the carbon trading bill has both been shelved and would have a far smaller impact than normal energy market fluctuations, and the health care bill would not impact small businesses. This is why Obama should welcome every chance for public debate with Republicans – can YOU go beyond a shallow bumper sticker and provide specific examples?
The biggest uncertainty is if Republicans are willing to actively hurt the economy with their obstructionism just to have soundbites for their next campaign (in the same way they actively protected Bin Laden in the 90′s for the sake of a “Monica Missiles!” soundbite).
Posted by: jhw539 | February 9, 2010, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
The tax climate is known, the carbon trading bill has both been shelved and would have a far smaller impact than normal energy market fluctuations
I’ve got a bridge for sale!
Posted by: 9.7 | February 9, 2010, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
Count me in! I’m all for it, lol. I’d also like to see Obama do a few unscripted Q & A sessions with some local Chamber of Commerce members.
jennifert7 | Feb 9, 2010 6:15:34 PM
Oh please. You probably want him to help out your local Girl Scout troop distribute cookies too. And you would never believe that a town hall with Chamber of Commerce members was actually unscripted anyway – you can’t blow off his being questioned live (except on Fox who got embarassed for their party and cut away) by House Republicans. Debating the Republican members of Congress (has any President EVER taken unscripted questions, televised live, from the opposition caucus as Obama has now done)(twice) is the only course the paranoid Right can’t dismiss as a stunt.
Posted by: jhw539 | February 9, 2010, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
Cap and trade and HCR are huge concerns to small business. Literally life and death for many of them.
jennifert7 | Feb 9, 2010 6:08:24 PM
The most alarmist conservative distortion of Cap and Trade has its impact less than already-seen oil, electricity and natural gas price fluctuations, and HCR would have an overall beneficial impact on small businesses. But that’s just based on, you know, documented reality.
Posted by: jhw539 | February 9, 2010, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
I’ve got a bridge for sale!
9.7 | Feb 9, 2010 6:56:23 PM
LOL. A perfect encapsulation of the strength of Republicans current arguments! I’m sure you’ll move onto your compelling “yo mama” rebuttals next.
Posted by: jhw539 | February 9, 2010, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
MR PRESIDENT, YOU HAVE PROMISED SO MUCH AND DONE VERY LITTLE,LIKE MAKING IT PUBLIC ON TV WHAT HAPPENED ABOUT HEALTH CARE?,TAKING SO MANY VACATIONS WHILE THE REST OF US WORKED…. DON’T YOU THINK IT’S TIME TO WORK OR YOU GOING TO TALK US TO DEATH.. IF THE JOB IS TOO MUCH FOR YOU LET SOME ELSE HANDLE IT.I THINK SARAH PALIN DO ALOT BETTER JOB..
Posted by: GARY SAMUELS | February 9, 2010, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
(in the same way they actively protected Bin Laden in the 90′s for the sake of a “Monica Missiles!” soundbite)
=========
I’ve asked you for any evidence of Clinton’s desire to go after Bin Laden after that one incident, any evidence their comments obstructed that incident, and for evidence that the GOP stopped him in any future incidents.
So far you’ve produced nothing, though you are obviously quite taken with your own soundbite.
Posted by: MayBee | February 9, 2010, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
There is something about the tone Obama and the Democrats are using regarding this ‘meeting’ with Republicans on healthcare that seems disingenuous. I would understand a meeting where each side came in on a level playing field with a variety of ideas and pooled them together for a bill that would benefit the public-not the party-the public. However, the way this is playing out, Obama has seemingly said that the bill as it is will remain as it is, and it will need to be built upon and/or changed to HIS specifications (which we know lean left) that may or may not be what the public thinks is best for us. From what I’ve read and heard, the public opinion about this particular bill as it is now is very low. Yes, people want reform, but not necessarily THIS reform bill. So, to be truly sincere that he and the Democrats in Congress are actually interested in what the Republicans have to say, and in essence, what the public has to say, I would think a clean slate to build on would prove a better option.
I guess what I’m trying to say is this: it seems as though the Republicans are going into the courtroom to prove their case to a partial jury for the prosecution. A truly bipartisan meeting resulting in a truly bipartisan bill should begin at square one.
Posted by: Shoe | February 9, 2010, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
Posted by: Shoe | Feb 9, 2010 7:06:34 PM
Barry and Co. just want to cram it through so the Feds can run stuff just as well as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, or the USPS, or the Dept of Education…
Posted by: Send $ | February 9, 2010, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
Nothing will happen until midterms. They might as well go home. Lame duck President with falling approval ratings and a lame duck congress will get you nowhere fast.
You can’t lock out the opposition party and beg for bipartisanship on a bill they had nothing to do with, and doesn’t even meet the most pressing need, and therfore the most obvious need for these guys reelection which is… the ECONOMY STUPID!!!
Maybe Obama should hire Carville. At least HE “get’s it!!!”
Posted by: jafo | February 9, 2010, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
And why would a small business be upset by a government takeover of healthcare (I am assuming you think small biz is operating out of the fear of such an arrangement)?
I can’t imagine why!
The other day…
A Tale Both Positive and a Cautionary: President Obama’s Phantom $15 Billion Program for Small Businesses
A $15-30 billion program for small businesses and no details have been released?
Posted by: The Usual | February 9, 2010, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
It looks like Boehner and McConnell kicked his butt.
Posted by: Rasputin3.14 | February 9, 2010, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
And why would a small business be upset by a government takeover of healthcare
______________________________________
Faulty premise makes for a faulty argument.
Posted by: tierra | February 9, 2010, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
Lame duck President with falling approval ratings
____________________________________
The President’s approval rating has been holding steady at about 50% for several months now.
President Reagan fell to 35% approval rating during his first term.
Posted by: tierra | February 9, 2010, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
Yes, people want reform, but not necessarily THIS reform bill.
Posted by: Shoe | Feb 9, 2010 7:06:34 PM
__________________________________
There is no “THIS” reform bill. There are 2 bills that would be reconciled into a 3rd. This is where input from all interested parties can be accommodated.
The Republicans should bring their best ideas to the table and forget about the politicking.
Their obstructionism is not helping anyone. And it’s becoming more and more obvious its posturing for partisan, Republican political gain.
Posted by: tierra | February 9, 2010, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
progressive mama Let me get this straight, you are a progressive and a small business owner??? That is an oxymoron to say the least.
billy bob | Feb 9, 2010 5:44:34 PM
My boss is a progressive. Our company has grown 25% in the last year and projects to continue doing so for the next 5. We’re a mechanical engineering firm that also has a few foreign clients (at the moment, we are bringing money into US paychecks from India). Progressives make excellent business men, from Warren Buffet to the CEO of Costco. But that’s just reality.
Posted by: jhw539 | Feb 9, 2010 6:10:16 PM
——
Okay, I have to laugh. On various threads here, conservatives are trying to apply some sort of purity test as to whether I’m progressive or not, or making cracks about oxymorons. The Republicans haven’t done much for small business, and they haven’t done much for stock portfolios either in my adulthood. I’m a progressive, and my husband, another small business person, is an independent (more right of center libertarian– though he’d love for the government to get out of our personal business as well as our business business, something many Republicans ignore as they try to legislate their narrow-minded morals.) If you compare Clinton and Bush, it’s pretty obvious that Dems have a way better track record. Republicans are liars. They say one thing, do another– and they support big box small business killers like Wal-Mart. Fugeddaboudit. I’m about independents, business and progress– and I still trust the Prez more than most politicians.
jhw539 is right, btw- many Republicans are too inside the box, risk averse and status quo oriented to be very good entrepreneurs at the small business level. They’re more corporate suit oriented. And I’ll point out that many small business owners would love to have single payer health care to level the playing field– and that right there could be enough to consider many of us “progressive” — yes? If not single payer, some other way to untie employment and health care benefits. Its an outdated system.
Posted by: progressive mama | February 9, 2010, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
“The most alarmist conservative distortion of Cap and Trade has its impact less than already-seen oil, electricity and natural gas price fluctuations, and HCR would have an overall beneficial impact on small businesses. But that’s just based on, you know, documented reality.”
Distortion? Beneficial impact? Documented reality? You mean the documented reality you choose to ignore?
January 2008:
“Under my plan of a cap-and-trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket,” Obama told the San Francisco Chronicle. “Coal-powered plants, you know, natural gas, you name it, whatever the plants were, whatever the industry was, they would have to retrofit their operations. That will cost money. They will pass that money on to consumers.”
So tell us, oh wise jhw539, how do skyrocketing energy prices benefit businesses and consumers already struggling in a horrific recession?
Posted by: Mary | February 9, 2010, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
“The most alarmist conservative distortion of Cap and Trade has its impact less than already-seen oil, electricity and natural gas price fluctuations, and HCR would have an overall beneficial impact on small businesses. But that’s just based on, you know, documented reality.”
Distortion? Beneficial impact? Documented reality? You mean the documented reality you choose to ignore?
January 2008:
“Under my plan of a cap-and-trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket,” Obama told the San Francisco Chronicle. “Coal-powered plants, you know, natural gas, you name it, whatever the plants were, whatever the industry was, they would have to retrofit their operations. That will cost money. They will pass that money on to consumers.”
So tell us, oh wise jhw539, how do skyrocketing energy prices benefit businesses and consumers already struggling in a horrific recession?
Posted by: Mary | February 9, 2010, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
“The most alarmist conservative distortion of Cap and Trade has its impact less than already-seen oil, electricity and natural gas price fluctuations, and HCR would have an overall beneficial impact on small businesses. But that’s just based on, you know, documented reality.”
Distortion? Beneficial impact? Documented reality? You mean the documented reality you choose to ignore?
January 2008:
“Under my plan of a cap-and-trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket,” Obama told the San Francisco Chronicle. “Coal-powered plants, you know, natural gas, you name it, whatever the plants were, whatever the industry was, they would have to retrofit their operations. That will cost money. They will pass that money on to consumers.”
So tell us, oh wise jhw539, how do skyrocketing energy prices benefit businesses and consumers already struggling in a horrific recession?
Posted by: Mary | February 9, 2010, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
Tierra: “Their obstructionism is not helping anyone.”
Obstruction? Name ONE Republican filibuster in 2009. Just one.
Posted by: Mary | February 9, 2010, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
“Name ONE Republican filibuster in 2009. Just one.”
We had over 100 in 2009.
Including the filibustering of a defense bill before Christmas to deny debate time to health care.
If you want to know what they were just look up cloture vote 111th congress.
You’ll get the Senate website and can search on your own.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 9, 2010, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
“The president took McConnell to task for the 63 holds Senate Republicans had put on his appointments.”
Where does that number come from? Sen Shelby (R-Airbus) had no less than 70 holds himself.
Why no mention of what the senators putting the holds on want?
Jake you are simply covering for corrupt politicians who are trying to extort some pork. If the press did its job, they would be so embarrassed they would be forced to release the holds, like Shelby did this morning.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 9, 2010, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
Screw bipartisanship. The pundits and the polls don’t know squat. The people are going to go ‘Anti-Empire’ Third Party starting in 2010 and exploding in 2012.
– New ‘Anti-EMPIRE’ Clubs/Leagues/Movement to champion Green Party wins in
2010/12 elections:
Today, there is a massive, and intentional, misreading of the angst, anger,
and frustration of the American public.
In this post-2006 Democratic mid-term election victory/mandate and its
failure, post-2008 Obama election mandate and its failure, post-financial
9/15/08 ‘shock-doctrine’ and its economic failure, post-Scott Brown election
shock and its coming failure, and post-Tea Party movement and its coming
failure, average Americans are in a state of vast disappointment,
frustration, induced-fear, and serious concern over the direction and very
survival of their country.
According to the latest polls at least 58% believe the country is headed on
the ‘wrong track’, and all the supposed pundits are doing nothing but
reporting that the American public is frustrated, arguing among themselves
about whether the angry independents are really left-center or right-center,
and trying to understand what are the ‘hot issues’.
What no one in the media (including the internet’s supposedly alternative
media) is recognizing is that the American public senses that their country
has been taken over by something beyond their control — and they are
right. It has been taken over by a guileful and disguised EMPIRE, which
none among the pampered elite in the media, and political structure (of
either money corrupted party), want to disclose to the angry public.
The anger and angst is universal and undifferentiated from far left to far
right, and has taken form in the gut manner of the ‘Tea Party’ predominantly
on the reactionary right. Most of this frustration and activist anger is
reflective of the anger of early American colonialists, for whom the
movement is named, and is similar to the pre-revolutionary anger aimed at
the British Empire’s ‘royal governors’ and laws that taxed tea, stamps, and
other necessities without any representation. Among this modern ‘Tea Party’
mob the populist intensity is great but the understanding of what they are
rebelling against is slim, since they do not understand that the true
oppressor and target of their rage should be the integrated Empire
itself —- something that America’s founders better understood.
The frustration on the left is less intense but based on a far superior
historical and ideological understanding and focus of the impact of Empire,
particularly among the leading academics and intellectuals among both
principled progressives and anti-war libertarians. Currently, the broader
generic left and libertarian right’s attention and focus is divided and
distracted (perhaps intentionally by the Empire) on a plethora of
‘symptomatic issues’ like; health care, economic inequality, civil rights,
anti-war, environmentalism, judicial fairness, global warming, Gitmo, whales, clear
cutting, .. ad nauseam, which thus saps the movement from focusing on the
singular and seminal cause of all these symptom ‘issues’, problems, and
‘sorrows’ —- which IS Empire itself.
The first truly independent third party which refuses to take money from the
corporate/financial/militarist Empire, which publicly commits itself to
actually confront that Empire, and which secures the support of the growing
Anti-Empire movement in America will easily displace the dying inertia of
both the existing Republican and Democratic wings of the disgraced corporate
Empire’s phony parties, and secure a massive lead in political support from
all average Americans.
The existing corrupt political system of the two arrogant, elitist, and
unresponsive corporate Empire-controlled parties will collapse much more
quickly than the out-of-touch and elite pundits can imagine — just as the
Soviet Empire collapsed faster than the CIA and secret national intelligence
state imagined.
The path toward this collapse is already happening, and will accelerate
greatly as a new ‘Anti-Empire’ movement captures the attention and loyalty
of most average Americans who have been by-passed, disenfranchised, and
deserted by the current corrupt and ruling-elite corporate-financial Empire.
This overt and fast growing ‘Anti-Empire’ movement is springing quickly from
the same empathetic academic, intellectual, and artistic elements that
birthed the ‘Anti-Imperialism’ and ‘populist progressive’ movements of the
late 19th century — when corporate, banking, financial, and ‘trust’
interests first tried to take over control of our American political
democracy.
The ‘Tea Party’ has already tapped into the energy of anger that will swell
the Anti-Empire movement, but the Tea Party movement has not yet recognized
that the basis of their populism is actually Anti-Empire anger. In fact,
the Tea Party still wrongly thinks that their appeal is only
anti-government, and does not realize that, like the American Revolution,
the battle is one of democratic self-government precisely against Empire in
all its indivisible corruption of political, economic, financial, and
military power — of which the economic is the most cancerous element in
the tumor of Empire.
The Green Party, and its more intelligent leaders, already understand the
primacy of the economic/financial core tumor of Empire, and realize that all
the deceits and oppressions of the corrupted political and military sphere
of the current ‘Vichy’ government swell from the economic death-spiral of
the Empire. Thus the Green Party already fore-swears all corporatist
financial bribes, adheres to a consistent platform that aligns with the
majoritarian views of all average Americans, and can best leverage and
benefit from a wide-spread and energetic populist ‘Anti-Empire’ centered
movement.
Naturally, the Green Party can not simply sit back and expect this growing
‘Anti-Empire’ popularity and election winning opportunity of being the
successful third party of 21st century America to fall in its lap. First
the Green Party needs to forcefully grasp the mantle of Anti-Empire
leadership, then expose and educate all average Americans about the real
nature of Empire as the seminal cause of all our separate ‘issues’, ‘sorrows’,
and problems (both foreign and domestic), and then clearly define
non-violent programs to un-plug America from its “Empire Illusions” and
regain the path toward the light of America’s peaceful, progressive, and
inclusive journey to sustainable and equitable prosperity for all.
The role of all Americans who already sense and understand the opposing
‘dark path’ of Empire’s inevitable death-spiral is to develop the
educational and motivational ‘Anti-Empire’ clubs, leagues, and movement that
will feed and support the birth of a Green Anti-Empire Party for the
survival of the country that we all love.
Alan MacDonald
Posted by: Alan MacDonald | February 9, 2010, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
Obstruction? Name ONE Republican filibuster in 2009. Just one.
Posted by: Mary | Feb 9, 2010 8:10:43 PM
===================================
Mary, I don’t think you understand this story. I don’t blame you for that, I blame Jake for not doing his job.
The ‘holds’ mentioned above are filibusters. Thats what holds are.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 9, 2010, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
Ryan C,
Cloture motions end debate.
A filibuster is denying a vote for cloture by continuing debate, in order to deny a vote on the matter at hand.
Motion to cloture can be overidden to continue debate.
A filibuster is used to stop a vote.
There were no Republican filibusters in 2009.
The lesson as always? Left wingers lie.
But we knew that.
Posted by: Mary | February 9, 2010, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
Tierra: “Their obstructionism is not helping anyone.”
Obstruction? Name ONE Republican filibuster in 2009. Just one.
Posted by: Mary | Feb 9, 2010 8:10:43 PM
_________________________________
November 17th, 2009
WASHINGTON — Democrats on Tuesday crushed a Senate filibuster against a controversial appeals court nominee . . . U.S. District Judge David Hamilton of Indiana . . .
There are tons more examples; a little research on your part would do you well.
“We have crossed the mark of over 100 filibusters and acts of procedural obstruction in less than one year,” Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, said on the floor on December 20, 2009. “Never since the founding of the Republic, not even in the bitter sentiments preceding Civil War, was such a thing ever seen in this body.”
Posted by: tierra | February 9, 2010, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
Today, only a few hours ago, the routine nomination of Craig Becker to the NLRB was defeated in a filibuster.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 9, 2010, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
Cloture motions end debate.
“A filibuster is denying a vote for cloture by continuing debate, in order to deny a vote on the matter at hand.:
Sigh….a filibuster is extending the debate to prevent a vote.
A cloture vote seeks to stop that filibuster.
It either succeeds or fails.
Then the legislation is either voted on or withdrawn
The lesson for the day? Right wingers don’t know their civics.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 9, 2010, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
A filibuster is denying a vote for cloture by continuing debate, in order to deny a vote on the matter at hand.
Mary | Feb 9, 2010 8:30:23 PM
This is just utterly wrong. It is impossible to prevent a vote for cloture by filibustering. Indeed, the filibuster is just a tactic that is commonly defined by counting failed cloture votes.
Posted by: jhw539 | February 9, 2010, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
A $15-30 billion program for small businesses and no details have been released?
The Usual | Feb 9, 2010 7:15:47 PM
The program provided a worst case buyer of last resort, and if you bothered to read the post, which provided concrete metrics, that assurance appears to have freed up the markets. As the markets have freed up, the worst case buyer program never had to be utilized. In a similar fashion, the assurance provided by the FDIC prevents runs on banks and results in it rarely (compared to the crash that spawned it) needing to be used.
Posted by: jhw539 | February 9, 2010, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
So tell us, oh wise jhw539, how do skyrocketing energy prices benefit businesses and consumers already struggling in a horrific recession?
Mary | Feb 9, 2010 8:08:25 PM
A few important points to note: Cap and trade IS NOT BEING PASSED IN A RECESSION. It’s shelved. This was obvious and announced when it was formally excluded from using the reconciliation process. Why don’t you dredge up lies about the fairness doctrine being alive next?
Actually studies, using numbers and everything, have found the increased cost predicted under the cap and trade bill would be less than the Bush energy cost shocks.
And unlike the Bush energy shocks, the increase in price will be directed to the US budget, where it can pay down the debt, rather than a bunch of tribal desert countries that house many who want to murder us. (Not to mention the natural market forces would work to continuously reduce consumption over time.)
Posted by: jhw539 | February 9, 2010, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
tierra:”We have crossed the mark of over 100 filibusters and acts of procedural obstruction in less than one year,” Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, said on the floor on December 20, 2009.”
I regret to say that Sheldon Whitehouse is my Senator. He is the epitome of a privledged, elitist, pompous, windbag of an empty suit. He was a complete and total failure as the RI’s AG. But, being as he’s from RI, where we continue to send that serial drug abuser Patrick Kennedy back to Congress year after year, Mr. Whitehouse was easily elected as Senator from the People’s Republic of Rhode Island.
Is he one of your heroes?
Posted by: Woody | February 9, 2010, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
AP) Senate Democrats circulated a jobs bill Tuesday that’s light on new initiatives on boosting hiring and heavy with provisions sought by lobbyists for business groups, doctors and the satellite broadcasting industry.
The 362-page measure is still in draft form and has not been officially released. It has bipartisan backing but very few new ideas for creating jobs, other than a $10 billion plan to exempt companies from paying the employer’s share of Social Security payroll taxes for new hires if they are unemployed and hired this year.
Oh well typical day in the Senate
Posted by: What? | February 9, 2010, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
jwh539:”Actually studies, using numbers and everything, have found the increased cost predicted under the cap and trade bill would be less than the Bush energy cost shocks.”
Please, PLEASE, PLEASE! Please run with this issue, Democrats. It is a complete boat anchor. Have you been following the state of so-called climate science lately? The IPCC reports are being shredded in the foreign press. Evidently “peer review” consists of quoting WWF and Greenpeace literature, master’s students’ theses and casual phone calls with scientists. In a recent Pew survey climate ranked dead last in a list of 21 national issues of concern. Correction: dead last AGAIN for the second year in a row.
Jones, Mann and Hansen will go down as frauds and imposters who chose political expediency and hubris over the scientific method and integrity. To put it bluntly, people ain’t buyin what they’re sellin, with good reason.
Posted by: Woody | February 9, 2010, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
The IPCC reports are being shredded in the foreign press.
___________________________________
Nonsense. One ‘fact’ in one report (about the rate of deterioration of Himalayan glaciers) has been withdrawn – that’s it. Nothing else was ‘shredded’.
As the President quite accurately stated, it’s time to close the gap between the rhetoric and the reality.
Capable of that?
Posted by: tierra | February 9, 2010, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
their are not enough rich to pay for all the dems want to give to the poor who never had a job. wise up ave. working person, it´s either print money, or take it from you.
Posted by: madmax | February 9, 2010, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
I often think that Mr. Obama is a tricky man. When he was in the Senate for a short time, he didn’t want to work with anyone. Now he want everybody to work with him. It seems that it’s his way or we are not working together.
Posted by: young_voter | February 9, 2010, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
. wise up ave. working person, it´s either print money, or take it from you.
Posted by: madmax | Feb 9, 2010 9:28:48 PM
____________________________________
The Republicans under Bush DOUBLED the national debt during ‘good’ economic times – and then left the country in that severe debt for the big economic collapse.
Where did they think all that money was going to come from? The moon? Macdonalds workers?
Posted by: tierra | February 9, 2010, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
Nonsense. One ‘fact’ in one report (about the rate of deterioration of Himalayan glaciers) has been withdrawn – that’s it. Nothing else was ‘shredded’.
As the President quite accurately stated, it’s time to close the gap between the rhetoric and the reality.
Capable of that?
————–
Dear tierra, I’ve worked in scientific fields for twenty years. My livelihood is based on the scientific method, and in all modestly I’ve done quite well over the years. I’ve literally bet my life on my work with DoD combat systems by testing them in the field. The last two people in the world I care to be lectured from regarding things scientific are the President and you.
You need to read a little more. The glacier gaffe was just the tip of the iceburg (pun intended).
Posted by: Woody | February 9, 2010, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
tierra:”We have crossed the mark of over 100 filibusters and acts of procedural obstruction in less than one year,” Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, said on the floor on December 20, 2009.”
I regret to say that Sheldon Whitehouse is my Senator. He is the epitome of a privledged, elitist, pompous, windbag of an empty suit. He was a complete and total failure as the RI’s AG. But, being as he’s from RI, where we continue to send that serial drug abuser Patrick Kennedy back to Congress year after year, Mr. Whitehouse was easily elected as Senator from the People’s Republic of Rhode Island.
Is he one of your heroes?
Woody | Feb 9, 2010 9:06:11 PM
Note how tierra posted a primary source fact that can be verified as accurate. While Woody posted a classic character assassination devoid of any facts and closed it with a personal insult. Watch for this pattern in Republican lawmakers too (although they are usually much more subtle).
Posted by: jhw539 | February 9, 2010, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
My livelihood is based on the scientific method,
Woody | Feb 9, 2010 9:37:41 PM
Sure it is. Your playground style debate and contempt for providing any actual facts makes that oh so clear.
Posted by: jhw539 | February 9, 2010, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
The IPCC reports are being shredded in the foreign press.
__________________________________
Nonsense. One ‘fact’ in one report (about the rate of deterioration of Himalayan glaciers) has been withdrawn – that’s it. Nothing else was ‘shredded’.
If you have some other documented evidence ‘shredded’ in the ‘foreign press’ – bring it on.
Posted by: tierra | February 9, 2010, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
ABC reports today that despite all the talk of green jobs, the overwhelming majority of stimulus money spent on wind power has gone to foreign companies, according to a new report by the Investigative Reporting Workshop at the American University’s School of Communication in Washington, D.C. Nearly $2 billion in money from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act has been spent on wind power, funding the creation of enough new wind farms to power 2.4 million homes over the past year. But the study found that nearly 80 percent of that money has gone to foreign manufacturers of wind turbines.
Even with the infusion of so much stimulus money, a recent report by American Wind Energy Association showed a drop in U.S. wind manufacturing jobs last year.
Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., called the flow of money to foreign companies an outrage, because the stimulus, he said, was intended to create jobs inside the United States.
Yes We Can.
Posted by: young_voter | February 9, 2010, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
McConnell said he was confident there could be bipartisan cooperation on four issues — off shore drilling, expanding the use of nuclear energy, the development of so-called clean coal, and furthering US exports, all of which the president mentioned in his State of the Union address.
All of which would PRODUCE real sustainable (not saved or created) US jobs. SO now we’re working and focusing all our energy on a dead healthcare bill.
Posted by: GO | February 9, 2010, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
McConnell said
Posted by: GO
well, that settles it then..
re: healthcare bill.
just ignore that 40% increase in insurance rates in Ca…. coming to a theater near you
Posted by: PO'd | February 10, 2010, 2:35 am 2:35 am
Woody — Are you a climate scientist? A meterologist, even? No. You’re a defense contractor of some kind. What could you possibly know about climate change that other educated individuals don’t? The science is robust and the peer-reviewed consensus is universal. Maybe you get your “science” from the Fox News Talking Points scientific method.
Posted by: Enenjay | February 10, 2010, 4:15 am 4:15 am
Why is Obama so entirely focused on this health care business while giving scant attention to creating jobs? His lukewarm, half-hearted gestures towards creating jobs shows that he is incompetent to do what needs to be done. Obama is a dreamer, that’s all he is. Jobs will not materialize out of thin air.
He is too incompetent to do the difficult thing and tell the environmentalists, unions, and activist groups to step aside for America’s job boom. He can’t do this so he twiddles his thumbs on a health care program.
Obama needs to cut federal regulations, union controls, and environmentalist red tape while permanently lowering taxes on all Americans, even on the rich. These are the job killing obstacles that have a stranglehold on our economy.
Loosen up federal restrictions to increase manufacturing, drilling for oil, commercial fishing, farming, and forestry, create incentives for large companies to create jobs and increase salaries – not by taxing them to death, decrease wasteful spending and bureaucracy to accomplish goals in DC – taxing people is the easy way out of solving our nation’s problems. The only solution is to cut the red tape that has tied our country down for the last few decades and get our country producing again. We GROW our way out of a recession not SPEND our way deeper into debt.
Posted by: EPU | February 10, 2010, 4:25 am 4:25 am
BRAVO for McConnell and Boehner for leading and clearly articulating the Ameican majority view at this time. Now, how about getting the HC bill withdrawn and starting on some good legislation that addresses specific healthcare concerns of Americans without tanking the whole economy. YOU GO GUYS.
Posted by: Pluck | February 10, 2010, 7:35 am 7:35 am
McConnell said
Posted by: GO
well, that settles it then..
re: healthcare bill.
just ignore that 40% increase in insurance rates in Ca…. coming to a theater near you
______________________________________
If that healthcare bill does pass then unless you’re a member of a union not only CA but the rest of the states (will the possible exception of Nebraska) would also be getting a 40% premium increase “coming to a noationwide theater near you.
Posted by: GO | February 10, 2010, 8:22 am 8:22 am
“Nobody’s excited to raise taxes.”
How does this square with Obama’s “spread the wealth around” comment?
Posted by: tjp612 | February 10, 2010, 9:38 am 9:38 am