Financial Regulation: Popular, But Less So
Word of a possible deal on financial industry regulation may be encouraging to most Americans: Sixty-two percent in our latest poll favor the idea, with support crossing the partisan spectrum. But that’s well down from its peak, suggesting that critics still could get a shoe in the door.
Seventy-two percent of Democrats, 62 percent of independents and 52 percent of Republicans support stricter federal regulations of banks and other financial institutions, our ABC News/Washington Post poll finds. Overall support, though, is 14 points lower than it was when we first tested the idea a year ago, with the decline occurring pretty much across the political board.
Backing off a Democratic-only plan, Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., the Banking Committee chairman, said today he was negotiating a regulation package with Republican Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee. Dodd said he’s hopeful of a deal.
One element sure to be on the table is how strict new banking regulations should be, and on that there’s a division, and another decline – 36 percent of Americans say new rules should be “much” stricter, down from 49 percent a year ago. An additional 26 percent say they should be stricter, but just “somewhat.”
Love of Wall Street is not behind the shift in attitudes: In our poll last month 79 percent of Americans said the country’s banks and other financial institutions bore blame for the economic crisis, steady from last spring. But new restrictions may be seen as chiefly a product of the Obama administration, and it’s lost support on this, as well as other issues, in the past year. As we reported yesterday, Obama’s lead over the Republicans in Congress in trust to handle the economy has shrunk from 37 points a year ago to a mere 5 points today.
Our new poll shows two other continued concerns about the financial system. Americans divide about evenly, 48-52 percent, on whether the government is or is not putting measures into place that will make another crisis less likely in the future (with vast partisan and ideological gaps). And 60 percent are not confident that financial institutions will change their business practices to the same end.
Notably, people who think the banks won’t act by themselves are twice as likely as others to say regulation should be “much” stricter than it is now.
Click here for the poll questions.
Email
Obama: 'Now Is the Time For Common Sense Action'
Romney Takes Aim at Conservatives
We have had too much regulation. Fractional reserve banking, insured deposits, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae, Sallie Mae, Federal Reserve messing with interest rates, FIAT currency inflation, etc. are all regulations on the not-so-free market that have lead to our insolvent country. One can say that some of these are good regulations and we just need more regulations to make up for their pitfalls, but I don’t buy it.
Posted by: Huh | February 11, 2010, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Corruption of our system has done what no foreign power has been capable. It has nullified the checks and balances in our government.
Oil monopolies, Insurance monopolies, Wall Street, and the Banks if not in league are aiding and abetting Bin Laden, who’s plainly stated goal is to bankrupt the United States like they did the Soviet Union.
Does it really matter which one succeeds?
Posted by: Lee | February 17, 2010, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Wow! This blog looks exactly like my old one! It’s on a entirely different subject but it has pretty much the same layout and design. Wonderful choice of colors!
Posted by: antique | September 29, 2011, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm