By Lindsey Ellerson

Feb 26, 2010 6:23pm

Government-Backed Lender Fannie Mae Lost $75 Billion Last Year, Wants $15 Billion More In Federal Support

ABC News' Matthew Jaffe reports: Government-backed mortgage lender Fannie Mae today asked for $15.3 billion in federal support after losing nearly $75 billion last year, according to a company statement released Friday. In the final three months of last year alone, Fannie Mae lost $16.3 billion, the company said. Today Fannie Mae asked the Treasury Department to provide the federal infusion before March 31. In four previous infusions, the government has provided the ailing lender with around $60 billion to date. Just before Christmas last year, Treasury essentially agreed to provide a blank check to Fannie Mae and fellow government-backed lender Freddie Mac, removing the cap for federal support. In a statement this evening, Fannie Mae CEO Mike Williams touted the support the company has provided to homeowners during the country’s economic downturn. “Our homeownership assistance initiatives grew significantly in 2009, reaching more than 3 million borrowers,” Williams said. “We continue to work closely with our industry partners and the government to reach every borrower we can and to address rising foreclosures. Our overriding objective is keeping people in their homes whenever possible.” Earlier this week Freddie Mac reported losing nearly $26 billion last year. Freddie Mac has received around $51 billion in taxpayer money. At a hearing on Wednesday featuring Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-TX, blasted the federal support for the two government-sponsored enterprises, arguing that the United States had deteriorated into “a bailout nation where the big get bigger, the small get smaller, and the taxpayers get poorer.”

User Comments

Fannie and Freddie having some financial problems? Can’t be. Barney Fwank said they were as good as gold!
There’s another idiot Congress can do without.

Posted by: Dell | February 26, 2010, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

The GSE’s , i.e. Fannie & Freddie, are now Federal agencies with guarantees. Having said that, the liabilities, costs, and guarantees are nowhere to be found in the budget. Enron like accounting to be sure. The debt to GDP ration is 130%, if these expenses are “on the books”. I believe a Congressman has legislation pending to do just that. This is the opaque and cryptic nature of our federal government and all taxpayers are being defrauded.Those who look at Greece as a Sovereign debt crisis, are only at kiddie land.ABC and all major news organizations should be asking questions of why the liabilities of American citizens are kept off the books? And support should be given to any lawmaker who proposes legislation make transparent the true nature of the debt crisis headed our way .

Posted by: pauldia | February 26, 2010, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Fannie and Freddie having some financial problems? Can’t be. Barney Fwank said they were as good as gold!
There’s another idiot Congress can do without.
Posted by: Dell | Feb 26, 2010 6:35:57 PM
______________________________________
The person responsible for regulating Fannie and Freddie was Bush appointee and former school chum James Lockhart.

Posted by: tierra | February 26, 2010, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Never fear.
Obama is ever so generous with our money.
He gave Fannie/Freddie a blank check on Christmas Eve.
And the MSM kept it quiet, to cover for him.
I don’t know who is hurting America more–Obama or the MSM.

Posted by: chase | February 26, 2010, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

“And the regulator Mr. Bush chose to oversee them — an old prep school buddy (James Lockhart) — pronounced the companies sound even as they headed toward insolvency.”
NY Times
And he was paid very well to regulate Fannie and Freddie – and it was his responsibility.

Posted by: tierra | February 26, 2010, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

When Obama is throwing one of his fake outrage hissy-fits, he never blames F/F
for causing the economy to tank.
And now that his rich friends on Wall Street have threatened to support Republicans, Obama has dropped his “fatcat” populist routine aimed at bankers/Wall Street.
Obama has sliding principles–which means he really doesn’t have any.

Posted by: kyle | February 26, 2010, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Waxman (the guy that never seems to be standing) was the man in charge of the oversight of these fine institutions. These were ACORNS personal banks to give out those home loans that are now in foreclosures. But dont worry obama said he has saved the economy and we have seen the worst of this recession.

Posted by: Susan T | February 26, 2010, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

Obama has sliding principles–which means he really doesn’t have any.
Posted by: kyle | Feb 26, 2010 7:38:30 PM
_____________________________________
You’ve become so used to the lying, posturing and posing from the Republican right that you can’t tell the real thing anymore.

Posted by: tierra | February 26, 2010, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

Democrats treated Fannie/Freddie like another taxpayer funded entitlement program.
They gave out loans to anyone qualified or not.
And there was Obama’s rent-o-mob, ACORN, screaming in people’s faces pushing them to go for it–go buy a house you deserve it, it’s your right.
ACORN pressured banks to give out bad loans.
I don’t know how all of those responsible can sleep at night.
They ruined lives, wrecked families, wrecked the economy.

Posted by: ollie | February 26, 2010, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

The person responsible for regulating Fannie and Freddie was Bush appointee and former school chum James Lockhart.
====================================
This little chestnut gets repeated every chance tierra gets. Lockhart was appointed in June 2006 and he still is part of the TARP oversight committee under Obama. So you might want to ask Obama why that big, bad Lockhart is still around. What about all those years that Fannie/Freddie was protected by Dodd and Frank? What about all the oversight that Bush tried to initiate in 2003? Republicans can take some blame as well. But, seriously who got richer from Fannie Mae than Franklin Raines and Jamie Gorelick?

Posted by: ConservativeWoman | February 26, 2010, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

tierra wrote: “And he was paid very well to regulate Fannie and Freddie – and it was his responsibility”…
.
Rahm Emanuel made a cool $320K in stock options and salary from being a board member of Freddie Mac all the while they were cooking the books. He turned a blind eye while Freddie Mac was misleading the shareholders (now unfortunately you and I the taxpayer).
.
Freddie Mac eventually had to restate some $5 billion in earnings pay some $600 million in fines and legal settlements. They have been nothing but a financial playground for well connected *-DEMOCRAT-* politicians.
.
When does Rahm pay back his money that he scammed from us hard working taxpayers. When does ABC and the rest of the totally worthless news media start hammering this latest culture of corruption. I guess they are just too enamored with the COOL president to be bothered with little issues like $75 billion GONE that we have to cover for.

Posted by: gk | February 26, 2010, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

And he was paid very well to regulate Fannie and Freddie – and it was his responsibility.
=====================================
Not as well paid as Frank Raines and Jamie Gorelick.

Posted by: ConservativeWoman | February 26, 2010, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

Lets hear it for government run Financial Institution. Ok Barney are they as good as gold. You know if you are making payments to one of these fincancial institutions. You have to pay them interest then your being taxed to bail them out.

Posted by: aforefreedom | February 26, 2010, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

Ahh, the amazing Friday afternoon hide-the-news Dump. Ain’t it somethin’?
The Summit carnival also helped create cover while Congress renewed the Patriot Act without a moment’s hesitation — you remember that supposedly terrible law that was screamed about all through 2008 by the very people in charge now? yeah, that one. Passed without a whimper by the Dems.
The audacity of hypocrits is breathtaking.
And speaking of misleading, sanctimonious hypocrits, take a bow, Tierra. Trying to blame Fannie and Freddie frauds on Pres. Bush is the worst kind of lie.
He was blocked from making them solvent by the WorstCongressEver (part I, class of 2007), and so when they collapsed in 2008 they were put under Mr. Lockhart’s agency for oversight.
But if you wonder about Fannie and Freddie problems, why not ask Mr. Emmanuel, he who constantly whispers in our president’s ear. He made hundreds of thousands serving on Freddie’s board during the phase where they were having to pay out fines for fraud. He could probably tell you all about how we have come to this miserable spot.
Bah!

Posted by: Carol | February 26, 2010, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

Government-backed Fannie Mae, the U.S. Postal Service, Medicare, Medicaid, etc. AND OBAMA/PELOSI/REID want to strap us with government-run healthcare? NO THANKS!

Posted by: THINK ABOUT IT! | February 26, 2010, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

Apparently, at least to me, a commentor whose name is another name for a crown, is being repeatedly disingenious and appears to be a paid hack for a certain political party, shamefully. Funny, my party dosen’t need such a phoney to represent us. We all know what we are talking about and we actually believe what we say! So give it up twinkle-head!

Posted by: kathrynf | February 26, 2010, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

Funny, my party dosen’t need such a phoney to represent us
____________
If you’re a Republican, you have plenty of phoneys representing you– see the so-called “conservatives” in Congress who ran up the deficit and ran around saying the fundamentals of the economy were strong as it headed for the cliff.
Meanwhile, Geithner says Fannie and Freddie reforms are coming next year.

Posted by: progressive mama | February 27, 2010, 12:32 am 12:32 am

Passed without a whimper by the Dems.
________
All Dems aren’t liberals, but for the record…
Fox News: “Many liberals in the House opposed the controversial act, saying it tramps Constitutional protections and civil liberties.”
ACLU: “Congress refuses to make reforming the Patriot Act a priority and continues to punt this crucial issue down the road,” said Laura W. Murphy, Director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office. “Once again, we have missed an opportunity to put the proper civil liberties and privacy protections into this bill. Congress should respect the rule of law and should have taken this opportunity to better protect the privacy and freedom of innocent Americans. We shouldn’t have to live under these unconstitutional provisions for another year.” …In addition to reforms needed regarding the three provisions that were just extended, the National Security Letter (NSL) statute, which was broadened with passage of the original Patriot Act, must be narrowed.
Dennis Kucinich:”This legislation extends three problematic provisions of the PATRIOT Act and, at the same time, leaves some of the most egregious provisions in place, absent any meaningful reform and debate.”
Electronic Frontier Foundation: “The one silver lining? Despite a push by Republican leaders for a four-year extension, the renewed provisions are now set to expire in one year. So, although this battle’s been lost, the effort to roll back PATRIOT’s worst excesses is far from over. Thank you to everyone who took action to support PATRIOT reform this past year; we hope that you’ll continue the fight with us in the next year.”

Posted by: progressive mama | February 27, 2010, 12:56 am 12:56 am

Absolutely one of the many cases where individual members of congress should be held financially accountable. They have no problem forcing laws on the country that cause financial meltdown and then spend another trillion of tax money we don’t have trying to pay for their mistakes. If the losses had to come from their campaign funds or even their own bank accounts, maybe they would put just a little logic in the actions they take.

Posted by: wantingbalance | February 27, 2010, 8:29 am 8:29 am

But dont worry obama said he has saved the economy and we have seen the worst of this recession.
Posted by: Susan T

We’ve seen the worst of nothing. And that was before we had to pay for the magnitude 9 earthquake we just caused!

Posted by: smartlillena | February 27, 2010, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Meanwhile, Geithner says Fannie and Freddie reforms are coming next year.
====================================
Wanna bet?

Posted by: ConservativeWoman | February 27, 2010, 10:04 am 10:04 am

progressive mama wrote: “Meanwhile, Geithner says Fannie and Freddie reforms are coming next year. ”
.
Unbelievably BOLD action here…such great leadership…where do we write the thank-you notes to geithner and his boss oBama for tackling this problem NEXT year. Fannie lost $75 billion and wants another $15 billion to cover their ongoing fraud. Just imagine how much more we would be on the hook for, if geithner decided to wait for say, two years before reforming Fannie and Freddie.

Posted by: gk | February 27, 2010, 10:05 am 10:05 am

Wanna bet?
Posted by: ConservativeWoman | Feb 27, 2010 10:04:44 AM
Nope. And once they do come, I’m not going to be on how good they’ll be, but I read the little updates on what Geithner and Bernahke said on Stock Market Daily and though it was odd the post didn’t mention that.

Posted by: progressive mama | February 27, 2010, 10:18 am 10:18 am

Dennis Kucinich:”This legislation…
Posted by: progressive mama

LOL. Mr Idiot himself.
Fact is, a few years ago, on another site, I was rather fond of a red-line Kucinich supporter!

Posted by: smartlillena | February 27, 2010, 10:19 am 10:19 am

I’m not going to *BET* on how good they’ll be

Posted by: progressive mama | February 27, 2010, 10:19 am 10:19 am

Mr Idiot himself.
_______
He’s consistent. And I think, brave. And I love those kind of passionate, consistent spirits– the ones that can’t be bought and sold. To you that may be idiotic, but someone would have to think your judgments prudent and fair or wise in some way to think that matters when making their own evaluations.

Posted by: progressive mama | February 27, 2010, 10:27 am 10:27 am

To you that may be idiotic, but someone would have to think your judgments prudent and fair or wise in some way to think that matters when making their own evaluations.
Posted by: progressive mama

As a voter -who votes!- my judgement matters every bit as much as every other voter in this country. As does the opinion I voice.
I know it’s hard to admit, probably even physically painful to some, but politicians listen to MY opinion just as much as they listen to YOURS.

Posted by: smartlillena | February 27, 2010, 10:51 am 10:51 am

Posted by: smartlillena | Feb 27, 2010 10:51:33 AM
I didn’t say otherwise. the question is are other voters swayed by your hyperpartisan denigrating opinions?
Moreover, your name calling doesn’t change the fact that Kucinich was a liberal who spoke out, or that voters voted for him.

Posted by: progressive mama | February 27, 2010, 11:12 am 11:12 am

Posted by: smartlillena | Feb 27, 2010 10:51:33 AM
Way to miss the point. The question is do other voters make their evaluations based on your opinion?
Likely not. I, for example, certainly would not.

Posted by: progressive mama | February 27, 2010, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Posted by: smartlillena | Feb 27, 2010 10:51:33 AM
I didn’t say otherwise. the question is are other voters swayed by your hyperpartisan denigrating opinions?
Moreover, your name calling doesn’t change the fact that Kucinich was a liberal who spoke out, or that voters voted for him.
Posted by: progressive mama

I’m not trying to sway anyone. That is what the ‘essay posters’ think they are doing by cherry picking public opinion. -That’s not working too well, is it?-
Health reform is popular.
This bill isn’t.
Politicians aren’t.
Trillion dollar price tags are even less popular.
After coming off this ’10 trillion jobs saved or created’ garbage (don’t give me the CBO, they can’t unring that bell) the majority doesn’t take this man’s word for anything. Pelosi/Reid’s word even less. Do you really think the climate hi-jinx aren’t bearing on voters’ opinions of this crowd? They ARE the people in charge but, make no mistake, they are listening to their constituents, as a whole. Just as my representatives are listening to their constituents (me).
That’s how they get/lose their job.
* No one here has more hyperpartisan denigrating opinions than ???

Posted by: smartlillena | February 27, 2010, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Posted by: smartlillena | Feb 27, 2010 10:51:33 AM
Way to miss the point. The question is do other voters make their evaluations based on your opinion?
Likely not. I, for example, certainly would not.
Posted by: progressive mama

I did not miss your point. Your just a little hard to get hemmed into an answer! ;)

Posted by: smartlillena | February 27, 2010, 11:47 am 11:47 am

* No one here has more hyperpartisan denigrating opinions than ???
Posted by: smartlillena | Feb 27, 2010 11:43:07 AM
Republicans.

Posted by: progressive mama | February 27, 2010, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

Your just a little hard to get hemmed into an answer! ;)
Posted by: smartlillena | Feb 27, 2010 11:47:24 AM
I didn’t know “Mr. Idiot himself” was a question, lol. Maybe its supposed to be in Republican land.
Go figure.

Posted by: progressive mama | February 27, 2010, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

I’ve nothing personal against Kuceenich. Unlike mr ubama, he’s definitely no phony. But my judgement seems to be fairly solid. It is clearly in the majority. You seem to have the shaky judgement.

Posted by: smartlillena | February 27, 2010, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

Remind me why I care about these liar and thugs in suits? Oh, they want more money for bonuses. They think that it is a virtue and skill if they can convince congress to make darn sure they get their bonuses or they are going to all quit and go to work for private industry and have congress pay their bonuses. Either way, I am supposed to pay for these incompetent idiots.

Posted by: Roy West | February 27, 2010, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Richard Hass has said that we need all the money we can keep to pay for the illegal war in Iraq. We need to steal their oil to keep our SUV’s tanked up going to a tea beggar meeting. America the home of the idiot! Ok, we still need trillions to rebuild Iraq while our country falls apart. We need to barrow more money from the Chinese so that we can buy oil from countries that hate us. Did I say Palin was an idiot. Oh well, what choice do we have.

Posted by: Roy West | February 27, 2010, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

They should all be in jail for violation of RICO Laws. They are thugs in suits. Very much like the clowns in big oil companies. Lie to the American people until it will not get any more mileage out of your lies that you posted then blame it on the democrats for saying it was wrong in the first place.

Posted by: Roy West | February 27, 2010, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

the dems told the agency to loan to deadbeats with 0 down, no income verification and acted shocked at the defaults. then they gave their hack a 100 million dollar retirement golden parachute. stop giving money to people ,and firms that go broke. tarp was bad, Auto was nothing but a gift to the UAw for voting democratic

Posted by: madmax | February 28, 2010, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

Just before Christmas last year, Treasury essentially agreed to provide a blank check to Fannie Mae and fellow government-backed lender Freddie Mac, removing the cap for federal support.
In a statement this evening, Fannie Mae CEO Mike Williams touted the support the company has provided to homeowners during the country’s economic downturn.
——
Hysterical. I wonder what his bonus was? Thanks Barry!

Posted by: GS | February 28, 2010, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

“…then blame it on the democrats for saying it was wrong in the first place.”
I blame Palin!

Posted by: Sucker | February 28, 2010, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

The entire housing program of the Dems, has been a bust. Why should we allow the government to continue to pour money down the drain?

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | March 1, 2010, 9:28 am 9:28 am

H A N G Thieves

Posted by: Damned Thievery | May 10, 2010, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.