Howard Dean on Global Warming: Republicans ‘Don’t Believe in Science’
ABC News’ Rick Klein reports: With some climate-change skeptics using the record snowfall totals to argue that global warming doesn’t exist — the family of Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., built an igloo near the Capitol and labeled it “Al Gore’s New Home” — former DNC Chairman Howard Dean today blasted back. In an interview with ABC News, Dean said this attitude reflects a GOP rejection of science.
”One of the most disturbing things about the Republican Party over the last couple of decades is that just they don’t believe in science any more. And that is not an approach that is likely to generate any kind of creative thinking,” Dean said. “People who use snowstorms as an example of why global warming doesn’t exist don’t understand the science and they don’t care.”
Email
Can Mitt Romney Win Conservatives Back?
Possible Contraception Compromise in D.C.
the science is cooked and the crooks rely on the gullible masses to perpetrate the fraud
Posted by: l | February 11, 2010, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
But MSNBC arguing that the snowstorm is proof of global warming is something, I’m certain, Dean is super cool with.
Posted by: Caleb | February 11, 2010, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
I is correct. Plus, the global warming scientists got caught red handed.
I am a former “believer”, but when the Bush administration went from ridiculing global warming to becoming big supporters overnight, it gave me pause. When the email’s proving conspiracy among the scientists were revealed, it was no longer reasonable to believe.
Posted by: Tom | February 11, 2010, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
If the 2012 presidential election had Dean for Democrats and Palin for Republicans, who would win?
Answer: none of the above!
Posted by: malcat | February 11, 2010, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
Tom posted “When the email’s proving conspiracy among the scientists were revealed, it was no longer reasonable to believe.”
You sound easily swayed there Tom. Those emails don’t prove any conspiracy. Do you have any idea how many scientists around the world believe in global warming? You’re condemning all of the scientists in the world over a couple of questionable phrases in some emails?
Posted by: Faurtz8 | February 11, 2010, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
We have already outsourced our manufacturing, most jobs are government or government managed (health care, education), record unemployment… And now the Democrats want to tax what’s left of the middle class, while their elite bretheren (Obama’s staff) doesn’t even PAY taxes!
In the face of all this you want to “audit” my property and force me to weatherize it so Obama’s cronie companies like Serious Materials can get profits that they funnell back to his reelection committe?
Let’s see we have declining temperatures, record snowfall, and that is evidence of Global, let me see if I am terming this correctly… “WARMING”!?!
Mr. Dean, to put it bluntly: “Have you no decency, sir?” Here’s a clue, stop jet setting around the world and emitting “deadly” carbon, live by the proper example before you throw stones on other peoples’ houses, and oh yeah… CREATE REAL JOBS that aren’t based on gimmicky government, shell game, tax shelter type funding.
If you want to recycle and pay money to cronie capitalist that have political connections to the White House, knock yourself out.
But rasing taxes and fees after you have bankrupted the people to bailout Wall St. and international financiers and bankers is downright criminal.
Posted by: jafo | February 11, 2010, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
Climate change is Real and mankind’s gluttony is accelerating it. That is the truth, science has put it forth, but they can’t help you believe it.
Stick your head in the sand all you like, but facts are clear. Arctic and Antarctic ice is melting, and the the massive snows and rains we are having are a direct result.
Acknowledge facts, or the the truth that you do not have the courage or intelligence to change, and step out of the way of those who do. We will be able to adapt for your children’s sakes.
Posted by: DewyB | February 11, 2010, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
We believe the left corupts science in the name of politics… “climate justice”…
Posted by: yarrrrr | February 11, 2010, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Faurtz8 wrote: “You sound easily swayed there Tom. Those emails don’t prove any conspiracy. Do you have any idea how many scientists around the world believe in global warming? You’re condemning all of the scientists in the world over a couple of questionable phrases in some emails?”
Interestingly enough, my best friend uses the same line on me regularly. Kind of like a lawyer asking a witness if he still beats his wife.:) There are other factors as well. The carbon tax scheme most notably. There are also thousands of scientists worldwide who disagree with the conclusions of the global warming scenario, or more to the point, mankind’s role in it. The most convincing evidence I had seen FOR global warming was the Antarctic icecap’s reduction. Then I found out the icecap at the north pole was thicker than ever. Sounds more like “climate shift” to me. I also would point out that those “questionable phrases” do indeed raise the quantums of evidence for a case of conspiracy to “beyond reasonable doubt” for me.
To be fair, I will disclose that I am a Creationist as well as a treehugger. But before you label me as a Bible thumping fool, consider how often scientists discover that they had it all wrong on long held beliefs.
Posted by: Tom | February 11, 2010, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
There is a difference in weather and climate change. One is temporary, and the other is defined as a trend.
NASA’s CERES mission measures radiation (incoming, leaving the Earth, etc.), which is an energy that can cause global warming. If you’re so worried about a conspiracy, access the data (it’s available to the public after all) and confirm the data against the same data available from independent agencies. While there is variability in temperature (even as the trend increases upwards), CERES has shown that energy from the radiation is increasing, not decreasing.
As far as conspiracies in general… the scientific community is huge. Those scientists who don’t believe in global warming help peer review the articles about the fact that global warming exists. You don’t think that they look for a flaw in the methodology? The same goes in reverse. Scientists that do believe in global warming look for errors in journal articles attempting to disprove the existence of global warming.
Posted by: whoopsie | February 11, 2010, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
We believe in science that can be evaluated by all, not in “trust me” science paid for by politicians looking for a certain outcome. Where the data is conveniently lost when questioned. Global warming is obviously a scam and those who believe in it are either con artists or fools.
Posted by: cardiodude | February 11, 2010, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
Hence the reason that I told you to go compare NASA’s data to independent agencies (as in, not politicians). And, if you need a thermometer, and 100 years to prove it to yourself, that’s fine. It takes a different approach for everyone, I suppose.
And I believe in global warming. I’ve neither insulted your choices, nor do I believe I’m a fool. I don’t take a few scientists’ poor choice of words as the end all be all, either. Whatever your occupational choice is… are you defined by everyone who has the same occupation?
Don’t generalize.
Posted by: whoopsie | February 11, 2010, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
The earth is flat. All the science to the contrary is cooked.
Posted by: factscount | February 11, 2010, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
Our local weatherman does not believe in climate change either, his favorite tagline is “follow the money”… well, who profits from the status quo?
Al Gore and several democrats have been bashed for “investing” in green tech, when that is the American way. If you believe in something, put your money where your mouth is.
But who benefits from the status quo?
Posted by: DewyB | February 11, 2010, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
AGW skeptics simply demand better. Was there a conspiracy to commit fraud? Probably not. Was there a conspiracy to corrupt the peer review process in periodicals like Science, Nature, AGL, and even worse, the IPCC reports. It certainly looks that way.
We need to start over. Skeptics demand that Hansen’s methodology be completely reviewed. We demand his source code is audited to ensure his methodology is implemented correctly. We demand that GISS’s processes are held up to military standards. That’s not too much to ask if climate change is the greatest crisis of our lifetimes, is it?
Posted by: Woody | February 11, 2010, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
What is Dean – or anyone els e – supposed to say when you have Republicans screaming that mid-winter snowstorms are proof that warming is hoaxed? What ever will they say when it’s July and 100 degrees somewhere…
Posted by: matt | February 11, 2010, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
The compelling thing about any simulation modeling intended to predict a future outcome is, by it’s very nature, assumptions must be made…..see where I’m going with this?
Posted by: LongT | February 11, 2010, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
There are record high temps in Rio of something like 110 degrees…
Posted by: LongT | February 11, 2010, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
If the data is corrupt, then the science is worthless.
Peer reviews require integrity, and conclusions re the data must be able to be independently replicated.
The global warming data is not only corrupt, but gone…erased by the very scientists that should have protected it at all costs.
Draw your own conclusions…but mix enough money, and power, and even the most reclusive scientist can be corrupted.
Posted by: Karl Jay | February 11, 2010, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
To be fair, I will disclose that I am a Creationist as well as a treehugger. But before you label me as a Bible thumping fool, consider how often scientists discover that they had it all wrong on long held beliefs.
=====================
Nothing wrong with religion, but how often have Christian “scholars” been completely wrong causing horrible consequences?
Good Christians persecuted people because they had the nerve to say the world was round. The church killed people for suggesting the earth wasn’t the center of the universe. They burned people because they were “witches” or “deamons”. Do you still think they were right in doing so? Well the church isn’t necessarily any smarter about earth science.
Contrary to conspiracy theory accusations, the vast majority of scientists DO believe man is impacting the climate. There is emperical evidence world wide to back this up. And not any legitimate scientist denys the first law of thermodynamics.
The “conspiracy” has been, as most things coming from the right these days, manipulated and distorted. There was no eveidence of a conspiracy, just possibilities of poor scientific methods by a marginal number of scientists. But certain “news agencies” are promting the “cover up” and misleading their viewers by cherry picking the information that supports their narrative.
The Arctic glaciers were never the main concern. But the changes in the Artic glaciers are still in line with Climate Change Theory. It are those in Greenland that are the most telling. I grew up 60 miles from Glacier National Park. There’s ONE glacer left and it will be gone in the next two decades. I’ve seen the Patagonia glaciers on two occassions. New lakes exist where there once was ice.
The partisan ideology these days is rediculous. The “we refuse to believe anything our party doesn’t tell us to believe” mentality is stupid. Peoplae will re-write history, ignore facts, and believe outrageous claims just because it supports their own pre-conceived notions.
The problem here is not one of economics or social agendas. It’s a matter of leaving a planet that is still inhabitable for future generations. To do nothing is because we might have to pay for it is selfish and socially irresponsible.
Posted by: Dave in VA | February 11, 2010, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
Posted by: yarrrrr | Feb 11, 2010 6:25:09 PM We believe the left corupts science in the name of politics… “climate justice”…
More specifically, they are alarmists in making prediction such that (1) our coastal city (like NY) will be flooded due to ocean level rise as a result of ice melting in Alaska (2) the agriculture in California will be dead by the end of century as a result of drought. The current huge rain and snow storm ( which dump a large amount of sea water over land )over a great part of U.S. just show the opposite.
Posted by: austin | February 11, 2010, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
Science has never backed the Gorebull Warming scam—hence all the lies and fabrications they repeatedly get snagged in.
Posted by: horseforfeathers | February 11, 2010, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
The question is whether it is man made, not whether it exists. The earth has had much warmer periods in its history. Precision of the eqinoxes. Earth’s magnetic field weakening allowing more solar radiation in. Active sun cycle etc.
Posted by: Huh | February 11, 2010, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
Help me I’m freezing and I can’t get out of this 6 foot high snow drift and Al Gore is in hiding with Osama Bin Laden talking about global warming I mean climate change! Everywhere I look there’s snow in Washington in New York in Pittsburgh in Columbus, OH in Little Rock in Dallas, Texas and now I heard that a winter storm warning is in effect for Pensacola Beach, Florida. Obama and Al Gore your being laughed at by your pets, by Americans and even God is laughing at you! O I do have one bit of good news however!It is supposed to warm up in Columbus to 31 degrees 7 days from now. By the way Columbus, Ohio average temperature for this time of year is 42 degrees! And look at the facts(not the tampered emails) next time before you make such an insane accusation!
Posted by: AL Gore's pet | February 11, 2010, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
hidden emails, cooked data, disagreement in the scientific community, and Al Gore set to make a $100M. Who wouldn’t be skeptical? Dean, what is your cut?
Posted by: james | February 11, 2010, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
Stick your head in the sand all you like, but facts are clear. Arctic and Antarctic ice is melting, and the the massive snows and rains we are having are a direct result.
——–
Yet know one mentions that the ice fields in southern South America are…. Yes you guessed it are actually growing!!! What do you say now? Ice melting does not equate to… warming. If scientists took same measurements 400 years ago was it melting at an alarming rate?
Posted by: Dan Bradshaw | February 11, 2010, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
If sun is getting hotter, why are all eyes on preventing global warming?!?!?? The sun will eventually become a white dwarf. Maybe not tomorrow but one day. Best prevention of that is to…. leave earth at, as Capt. James T. Kirk said… “Warp Speed!”
Posted by: Dan Bradshaw | February 11, 2010, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
Howard Dean is not a scientist, he majored in political science, medicine and partying.
I don’t know about republicans but as a scientist and as an independent voter I think man-made climate change is a hoax and I am not alone in my opinion.
Obama proposes a Climate Office in spite of the fact that over 650 dissenting scientists from around the globe now challenge claims made by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and former Vice President Al Gore?
A new 231-page U.S. Senate Minority Report –
updated from 2007’s groundbreaking report of over 400 scientists who voiced skepticism about the so-called global warming “consensus” — features the skeptical voices of over 650 prominent international scientists, including many current and former UN IPCC scientists, who have now turned against the UN IPCC.
This updated report includes an additional 250 (and growing) scientists and climate researchers since the initial release in December 2007. The over 650 dissenting scientists are more than 12 times the number of UN scientists (52) who authored the media-hyped IPCC 2007 Summary for Policymakers.
Posted by: Ed Taylor | February 11, 2010, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
Howard Dean does not believe in a Balanced Budget either!!! Do your stupid job, how hard can that be, Mr. Dean!?!? Doofus!
Posted by: Dan Bradshaw | February 11, 2010, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
The deniers refuse to acknowledge that global warming experts predicted that storms would more extreme in their power and behavior. Cold areas could become warm and have rain, warmer areas can have extreme snow storms, etc, etc. But the fringe has its agenda – and reality is irrelevant: “Don’t bother me with facts, just say what I want to hear”. The right wing is no different than the Iranian government: “The demonstrators are enemies of God”. That is what the nutwads say about anything that isn’t right wing….
Posted by: Sentinel1946 | February 11, 2010, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
Why do republicans like to hide their head in the sand? Are they afraid of what they might see? Why are republicans so clueless and why does anyone even try with these neanderthals. Let them live in their fantasy world with Fox and Palin. Some people are just dumb as sticks and aren’t worth the effort. And in my book, that’s the majority of today’s republicans. You betcha!
Posted by: pamp205 | February 11, 2010, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
And the earth is flat and beyond this point there be monsters.
Posted by: gollywiggle | February 11, 2010, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
“CERES has shown that energy from the radiation is increasing, not decreasing”
——-
Which in my mind says: “Wow, the sun is getting hotter!” Solar flares are getting more severe and that some how is not to be overlooked? Compare the apple to the apple not to a coconut! It is hard to take readings from let’s be accurate and say… 1,780 cities from east to west and north to south of each of the 7 continents and take the highs and lows of the day (would be tough if a cold front came thru and messed up the average) then take the measurements for 10 years and determine each cities average temperature for each day then calculate the average to compare each day’s high and low. Don’t group cities or approximate. With the above (actual and not junk) science theory, you can imagine how hard it would be to take acurate readings and run the numbers for 10 years let alone a hundred. You can see how science becomes a problem when you look at the way it gathers and formulates the data.
I am dead set against the way science skews the results based on it’s data collection and testing to prove “global warming”. Think like you are a college student and just imagine how you could test this theory? I’d rather count stars knowing I could get a better/acurate reading than proving “Global Warming”. Don’t you agree?
Posted by: Dan Bradshaw | February 11, 2010, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
Of course we’re experiencing climate change. We’ve been warming ever since the last Ice Age ended about 10000 years ago. We’ll continue warming until we begin to cool again as we head for another Ice Age. That’s just the way the earth’s climate fluctuates historically. Nothing we can do will stop the cycles. Any effective effort we might make would require drastic actions that could alter the natural process of climate change for all time forward. The results might not be pretty. We think we’re so smart but we know so little about the big picture. We most certainly aren’t qualified to be predicting the future.
Posted by: gollywiggle | February 11, 2010, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
Having lived in AZ, unfortunately, the last 10 years, I agree with you. And if they don’t want to believe the scientist, I would have thought that they would at least believe that the earth can NOT support much more growth of the human population.
But of course they don’t believe that either.
They don’t believe in much, not even traffic laws, ethics, or manners.
They do, however believe in money (the more the better) and guns! That’s about it! Oh, and telling OTHER people how they’d better live!
Posted by: dale | February 11, 2010, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
Dean is just a typical politician – calling his opponents names or claim they have lack of intelligence when they don’t.
With the e-mail scandals, the lack of proper temperature sensor reporting over time, and the lack of allowing for alternative scientific views the IPCC and Global Warming (now Global Change) is just another scam to get your money via higher taxes or fees.
If the Environmentalists and the politicians in both parties wanted things to change in this country, we would have drilled off the coast of Florida, in various areas in the continental US, and Alaska, to produce Natural Gas to power our vehicles without major change.
Posted by: Jeff G | February 11, 2010, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
Are the ice caps on Mars still melting? What causes that to happen could there be global warming cased by humans? Could there be a correlation between the two?
If you go just by numbers of scientists that believe they still out number the non-believers..
Posted by: Jeff | February 11, 2010, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
Give em hell Dr. Dean!!
Posted by: Demandside | February 11, 2010, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
Dean sounds like an idiot. I BITTERLY RESENT what this party’s leadership has been doing this past year and since 2006, when they took control of Congress. They’ve lied, deceived, contradicted, and engaged in such actions as to be criminal. They’ve looked down upon the American people with such arrogant conceit and even went so far as to dismiss the millions who’ve spoken out against their policies. I do NOT, for one minute, believe nor trust anything they say. They say what we want to hear for one purpose and one purpose only; to get themselves relected. There can be only one response: VOTE THEM ALL OUT OF OFFICE!! NO MORE!! THEY ALL NEED TO GO IN 2010 and in 2012.
Posted by: THINK ABOUT IT! | February 11, 2010, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
Of course Republicans do not believe in Science, they belive in their home-spun subjective rhetoric of reality.
I am persuaded that Republicans are the hereditary manifestation of the genes of people in our distant past who confidently believed the world was flat and watched bear baiting spectacles…
Posted by: threeriverscrossing | February 11, 2010, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
Climate change or “global warming” requires no belief. The simple and basic facts are not questioned by any side of the debate: that humans are adding to the “greenhouse gases” in the atmosphere, that the average global temperature has risen anomalously since the beginning of the Industrial Age, and that these facts are based on historical data, not scientific hypothesis nor extrapolation.
What it all means and what the possible consequences may be are open to debate. The basic facts are not.
Posted by: SteveXO | February 11, 2010, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
Rupert Murdoch believes in climate change.
Posted by: secondlook | February 11, 2010, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
My dog ate my data doesnt cut it in the world of science. You are supposed to be a skeptic FIRST but these people are zealots not scientists. They are not offering up some data to be stand up to scrutiny. No they are saying its TRUE without listening to or dealing with the challenges against their idea.
Scientists are to be skeptics. These people are ruining science for personal GAIN. Follow the money and I bet it leads to some hefty Warming grants or stock options.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | February 11, 2010, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
Have you folks ever thought of Bobs Theory. It goes like this. The planet goes through cycles of warming and cooling. The warming causes glaciers to melt etc.. UNTIL they cool the oceans and when they do the snow and cold comes back and the earth cools for a while. When it cools the polar ice stops melting because the of the natural cooling. The ocean gets warmer because less ice is melted into it from the arctic and the cycle repeats.
Bobs Global Cycles. That theory has as much guess work as Global Warming. I bet I can even come up with models to prove it. So all this hysteria is just that. They have no real proof.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | February 11, 2010, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
republicans don’t believe in science in the sky…but they believe in fairies in the sky and guardian angels at your bedside…
Posted by: half_tilted | February 11, 2010, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
A good dose of skepticism is a good thing when science says they can fix anything. Science is an evolving set of theory and propaganda mixed with a bit of fact. Only fools take it for gospel. I find it interesting that all republicans are now being labeled as anti-science. Yet another spin tactic to fool the weak minded.
Posted by: Deception is Evil | February 11, 2010, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
threeriverscrossing, Once a parrot always a parrot.
Posted by: Deception is Evil | February 11, 2010, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
ChicagoBob posted “My dog ate my data doesnt cut it in the world of science. ”
Wow Bob, your a scientist. Who would have know. You have a Phd in the worlds climate and you’re sharing your knowledge. That’s really great.
Please post your findings so that we can see how brilliant you really are. You can do that, can’t you? Or are you just like most people here that have little knowledge in this field. Don’t feel bad, I don’t have the training in this field either. But I do know that when the argument about global warming boils down to “Democrat Al Gore is championing this and I hate Democrats” that I should IGNORE everything such a poster says.
Posted by: Faurtz8 | February 11, 2010, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm
This man is a Physician??????? What a miserable human.
Posted by: DJ | February 11, 2010, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
What science? — The conjured up kind of science? — The science base on anecdotal evidence? — The science proven to be wrong or intentionally misleading? — Well, gosh almighty, I must just be too dumb, you know, like all those other conservatives who just dont understand the “science”!!! — Howard Dean is a first-class jerk!!
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | February 12, 2010, 12:29 am 12:29 am
Faurtz — Please try to rationally comprehend the information that has come out over the last 12 months!! — The HOAX is exposed!! — I know you must be terribly upset about this, considering you bought up all of Al Gore’s “green” stock, but please try to take it like a man, you’ve been duped!
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | February 12, 2010, 12:34 am 12:34 am
“People who use snowstorms as an example of why global warming doesn’t exist don’t understand the science and they don’t care.”
I’ve been writing on these boards, ever since the Fri-Sat Mid-Atlantic storm that anyone using a single weather event to argue for or against GW is scientifically illiterate (yes, I’m a scientist).
What Dean is say is simply a fact, whether or not there’s a grain of truth in GW.
Posted by: The_Mick | February 12, 2010, 2:12 am 2:12 am
One cold snap for a week in one portion of one country disputes global warming??
32 people died in Brazilia Brazil this week as a result of record HIGH temperatures there.
Posted by: Gregory in Memphis | February 12, 2010, 2:36 am 2:36 am
>>
The evidence isn’t just a few emails, actually hundreds of emails. Parts of the IPCC report, which most of the discussion has been based, has been proven to be fraudulent; other parts based on weak observations. People have been prevented from publishing articles against GW. Sensors have been put on asphalt, cement and in other areas that exaggerate the heat. Data from cold countries like Russia were precluded from the “worldwide” statistics. The evidence against those perpetrating this fraud is staggering. Besides, does anyone care what Dean thinks….he’s a loon.
Posted by: Gwen | February 12, 2010, 3:08 am 3:08 am
Check out some “real” data collected by agencies who have the job of collecting such data. Facts often get in the way of liberal logic.
Posted by: Gwen | February 12, 2010, 3:17 am 3:17 am
Many of the comments here just serve to prove Dean’s point. Either the science is rejected or the messenger is attacked. Examples: MSNBC never argued that the snowstorm was proof of global warming. Al Gore did not invent global warming. The science is not cooked. If the public is “gullible,” that includes the American Meteorological Society, the American Academy for the Advancement of Science, and about two dozen other professional organizations, all of whom recognize a human contribution to social warming. We know it’s possible for an individual to live in a world of psychotic delusions. Is it possible for a whole segment of a population to do the same thing?
Posted by: Robert Maxwell | February 12, 2010, 3:26 am 3:26 am
Dean once again embarrasses himself. Screaming or not this guy is truly nuts.
Think about it. The Democrats made him the leader of their party. Sometimes II’m still surprised by liberals outrageous lies and this one is a whopper.
Posted by: Kala | February 12, 2010, 6:53 am 6:53 am
If the Republicans don’t believe in science, why do they support NASA – and the Dems don’t? As far as the number of scientists who “believe” in AGW, how many believed that the earth was the center of the universe? Did consensus make it so? BTW, I am a degreed engineer and a Republican, does that mean that I don’t believe in science?
Posted by: Brad | February 12, 2010, 7:00 am 7:00 am
Vancouver, British Columbia. Site of the 2010 Winter Olympics. It is raining instead of snowing becuase the climnate has changed since the games were awarded to the city. Let’s see Limbaugh and his lapdogs reconcile that with their deluded world view…
Posted by: NovaB | February 12, 2010, 7:35 am 7:35 am
Let’s see…the global warming scientists at East Anglia have cooked the books to produce data that fit their predtermined conclusions, deleted the data needed to independently test their assertions, actively worked to subvert and bury any dissent and have ignored recent cooling trends that call their theories into question. It’s not that Republicans don’t trust science, it’s that they have correctly questioned the scientists and their motives. It seems to me that the certainty of Man Made Global Warming, based on the scientific studies that now exist,is one of the biggest hoaxes ever. Much more real science must be done before we take drastic measures.
Posted by: BubblerDad | February 12, 2010, 7:39 am 7:39 am
Let’s see…the global warming scientists at East Anglia have cooked the books to produce data that fit their predtermined conclusions, deleted the data needed to independently test their assertions, actively worked to subvert and bury any dissent and have ignored recent cooling trends that call their theories into question. It’s not that Republicans don’t trust science, it’s that they have correctly questioned the scientists and their motives. It seems to me that the certainty of Man Made Global Warming, based on the scientific studies that now exist,is one of the biggest hoaxes ever. Much more real science must be done before we take drastic measures.
Posted by: BubblerDad | February 12, 2010, 7:40 am 7:40 am
I find it so amazing that so many Americans are so misinformed. Not becuase they don’t have access to the information but because they simply do not want to believe what they are told.
Statistically, right-wingers are eductaionally challenged, so why do they vote against education, afforadable healthcare and a clean environment? They would rather listen to the disembodied voice of an arrogant, illiterate fat man laughing out his backside at the world, attacking everything American while cashing those 8-digit paychecks (buys lots of French wine, Cuban cigars and prescription drugs) and accept him as the fount of all knowledge. You just can’t fix stoopid.
Posted by: NovaB | February 12, 2010, 7:44 am 7:44 am
We all just need to plant a tree then hug and nurture it. No…seriously. Preferably a hardwood variety. Trees feed on carbon dioxide and produce oxygen. The world would be a better place with more trees.
Posted by: gollywiggle | February 12, 2010, 9:28 am 9:28 am
Just because Keynes theorized that there was a better way to develop an economy doesn’t mean his theory is viable in practice. So many over educated people take the theories they’ve been exposed to during their education as fact that they now have trouble separating documented fact from speculation. A general knowledge is a good foundation for learning but when that general knowledge is touted as expertise in a particular field we get the kind of results witnessed in Mr. Dean’s assertion that Republicans are stupid, a position that naturally validates his perception of Democrats and their theories as being superior. I was taught to build up everyone because tearing them down only makes the one who is tearing them down look small. Mr. Dean appears miniscule today. This comment from an independent voter.
Posted by: gollywiggle | February 12, 2010, 9:40 am 9:40 am
If liberals really believe in man-made global warming, why are they spending billion$ to rebuild New Orleans. Its 15 feet below sea level!
Posted by: JamesJ | February 12, 2010, 9:52 am 9:52 am
What scientists throw away their original data?
Posted by: Count Down | February 12, 2010, 10:57 am 10:57 am
Not entirely true. They just tend to put money ahead of environment.
In other words, they are afflicted with the worst of greed, and couldn’t care less about tomorrow.
That doesn’t mean they don’t actually know what is happening….they do. They just choose to ignore it.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | February 12, 2010, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Let’s keep in mind it was one group responsible for the bad data. They are not the sole provider of climate data, and other organizations actually provide transparency.
This is -global- warming we are talking about, many other countries are collecting data as well. And, as usual, the US data was compiled from previous totals, with the original data being deleted, and then heavily modified through arbitrary functions.
The US is corrupt. This isn’t news to anyone. To use the inherent dishonesty of our country as an argument against the entire field is just silly. If you were to follow that line of thought to it’s strictest conclusion, one could easily determine that every single aspect of life is fake because a corrupt American tampered with the data.
I doubt many of these deniers would be as fast to discredit God just because some of the priests love to molest children.
Once again, it’s just people looking for reinforcements for their completely ignorant ideas. Fun times.
Posted by: JT | February 12, 2010, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
The broader meteorological phenomenon we are witnessing is the “el nino southern oscillation” (ENSO). These weather patterns which have been observed for the last 300 years are triggered by marked warming or cooling of the tropical pacific surface waters. The last 20 years have seen an uncharacteristically high number of southern oscillation events which have result in strange weather patterns all over the world.
The entire earth doesn’t just magically warm or cool over night. The atmospheric cycles just start getting weird, and the prevailing thought amongst climatologists is that it could eventually break down completely. It’s not difficult to grasp. Come on people.
Posted by: jason | February 12, 2010, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
“The earth is flat. All the science to the contrary is cooked.”
The difference is you don’t have a number of emails that show collusion and deception on the part of the round earthers. Climate change is real. AGW is a giant lie.
Posted by: Robert in CA | February 12, 2010, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Laying aside for one moment the relative merits of the debate on “does man cause global warming,” it is absolutely farcical to suggest that Science! is at all suited to set policy in dealing with it.
Setting policy requires input from science eon what the effects of policy will be, from economics on what can be afforded, and from politics on what the people expect in the way of tangible benefits and bearable costs.
The current Green Marauders fixation on one and only one response to the “crisis” (massive disincentives on CO2 emissions) is not due to any superior claim t Science!, it is a political position consistent with their radical ideology. Because this is a fringe ideology, their proposed solution is not going to come to pass, and tot he extent we face a problem, we’d best start looking for politically and economically viable solutions.
A modest carbon tax funding R&D of alternative energy, to make switching to “greener” energy economically desirable, would be one such idea.
Posted by: JMartJr | February 12, 2010, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
Howard Dean is a certified idiot!!! Why anyone would even care about what this moron has to say is beyond me!
Posted by: JR | February 12, 2010, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Snowstorms may not be a refutation of global warming in and of themselves, but with southern cities getting their worst blizzards and lowest temperatures in 10-30 years, they certainly do put the lie to the Global Warmer climate predictions. And science that – using corrupt and/or fabricated data – predicts one outcome, yet sees the opposite happen in reality, isn’t science, it’s a busted hypothesis.
Republicans are clearly less gullible than Dean and Gore, since they can apparently tell science from science fiction.
Posted by: INTJ | February 12, 2010, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
When somebody like Mr Dean believes IN science, rather than TO scientific facts, then SUCH science (AGW) is a sect of buddism
Posted by: Dan in VA | February 12, 2010, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Global Warming? Goldman Sachs has already set up a company to sell allocations or credits to companies that go over their alotments from companies that don’t use all of theirs.BHO will auction off carbon credits, and Goldman Sachs who was the biggest donor to BHO’s campaign will be sitting pretty again and create a new “Bubble”. Yes FOLLOW THE MONEY!!
Posted by: carol in Alabama | February 12, 2010, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Read “The Great American Bubble Machine” by Matt Taibbi.
Posted by: carol in Alabama | February 12, 2010, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Many of the comments here just serve to prove Dean’s point. Either the science is rejected or the messenger is attacked. Here are some non-hysterical facts: MSNBC never argued that the snowstorm was proof of global warming. Al Gore did not invent global warming. The science is not cooked. (Read the link below.) If the public is “gullible,” that includes the American Meteorological Society, the American Academy for the Advancement of Science, and about two dozen other professional organizations, all of whom recognize a human contribution to social warming. Taking steps to reduce GW is just common sense, even if the danger is remote. It’s the same reason we pay for fire insurance even though we don’t expect our house to burn down. We know it’s possible for an individual to live in a world of psychotic delusions. Is it possible for a whole segment of a population to do the same thing?
Posted by: Robert Maxwell | February 12, 2010, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
We believe in science, just not “junk science” Mr. Dean.
Posted by: anonymous | February 12, 2010, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
“The Republicans don’t believe in science.” Isn’t it more reasonable to say that Republicans don’t like lying?
Posted by: Bill Carson | February 12, 2010, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
We believe in REAL science. Just not made up science, and honestly, it didn’t take a brain surgeon to know that global warming was a huge scam. Real scientists remain skeptical – they are willing for their theories to be disproved, because it’s about TRUTH. These “climate scientists” that have perpetrated this scam should be arrested given how much the fraud has cost the world. We’re not talking about “a best guess” like the earth being flat, that was then disproved with exploration… We’re talking about a purposefully executed con. It is the height of hubris to think that anything we do is effecting the climate… but wait – that’s the whole problem with people like Gore and Dean and the rest anyway.
Posted by: Jen | February 12, 2010, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
“Do you have any idea how many scientists around the world believe in global warming?”
Do you have any idea how many (Muslims, Buddists, Pagans) beleive in . . .
No wait, scientists are a special class, I have to believe what they say or I do not believe in “Science”
Science is a process. If the data is not legitimate, the conclusions have no value, regardless of how many (name your authority) chose to believe.
Posted by: Mike | February 12, 2010, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
The Church of Climatology
Greenhouse gases are about 95% water vapor, about 3 ½ % carbon dioxide and 1 ½ % methane and nitrous oxide. With carbon dioxide at 3 1/2 % of the greenhouse gas in the atmosphere 3-4 percent of that is human caused…That must be so significant that it is worth changing any and every human behavior!
So you do the math. We are talking about three–and-a-half percent times four percent. Say 0.035 times 0.040. This turn out to be a huge number 0.0014000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
That is whopping 14/10,000. You can say it, Fourteen ten thousandths, yes that is really 10,000ths – Huge Number.
So we can just say that 0.0014000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 is 14/10,000.
Now deniers will say we can reduce this fraction to lowest terms by dividing both the numerator and denominator by 2. This is the kind of trick deniers use. Everyday they are saying crazy things like the answer is really seven five-thousandths, which sounds much smaller, but that can’t be true. This thing is too huge. We have found the answer and the answer is 0.0014000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
So even if a denier comes to you and clams the answer is 7 / 5,000 show them the math. This is Huge.
Posted by: Ray in L.A. | February 12, 2010, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
Dr. Dean should stick to taking human temperatures. They too go up and down.
Posted by: Hawkeye | February 13, 2010, 2:22 am 2:22 am
The global warming is catching up attention of all the public. There has been a significant change the earth weather and climatic condition. The temperature of the earth has increased significantly. the rainfall pattern is also changing around the clock.
Posted by: Sam | February 13, 2010, 2:27 am 2:27 am
It’s important to keep the global warming myth going for the liberal agenda to succeed. Look out the window. All that snow and ice is global warming, but we’ll call it climate change to cover any weather. Peyton Manning threw the interception in the Super Bowl because of global warming, it affected the temperature of the ball.
Just remember, weather has never undergone changes until evil man came and started using hair spray. Get real folks!!!
Posted by: Zeke | February 13, 2010, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
We’ve got global warming in Michigan, in Wisconsin, in Rhode Island and California…whoooahhhhh !!!!
Posted by: Dean scream | February 13, 2010, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
It is so hard to care about the artic ice cap when you just collected your last unemployment check and your front door is sealed shut by three feet of hard pack snow.
Posted by: cindy | February 13, 2010, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Where is AL? Leaveing a huge carbon footprint to fly his jet somewhere it is warm. HIDE AND WATCH…..LOL
Posted by: Mike | February 14, 2010, 5:09 am 5:09 am
Record-breaking snow in the Mid-Atlantic region does not prove or disprove global warming. This is, after all, a weather event and climate involves weather over decades and centuries–and that is the perspective of global warming, or climate change. However, climate scientists tell us that we can expect–as a direct result of human-caused warming–all kinds of weather extremes: warming, of course, but also droughts, heavy rains and flooding, and extreme summer and winter storms. The complexity of global climate systems is beyond easy simplifications. It is also beyond the politics of global warming.
Posted by: Larry Chamblin | February 14, 2010, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Maybe Inhoffe’s tiny little brain was frozen inside the igloo… this could be opportunity though as it will help him connect better with his constituency
Posted by: lee | February 14, 2010, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm