Is There Even Bipartisan Agreement on What ‘Bipartisan’ Means?
The president surprised us with an impromptu press conference today, where — following his meeting with the bipartisan congressional leadership — he talked about bipartisanship.
"Bipartisanship cannot mean simply that Democrats give up everything that they believe in, find the handful of things that Republicans have been advocating for, and we do those things, and then we have bipartisanship," he said. "That's not how it works, you know, in any other realm of life. That's certainly not how it works in my marriage with Michelle, although I usually do give in most of the time. But the — there's got to be some give and take, and that's what I'm hoping can be accomplished."
We covered the president's presser tonight on World News:
And you can read more about his press conference in this story by me and my spectacular colleagues Karen Travers and Sunlen Miller HERE.
- jpt
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
“I won. I’ll trump you on that”.
Hey, Tapper, you clueless twit..remember that?
Posted by: Barney | February 9, 2010, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
Just another Photo Op…
Can Oblama just not be in the friggin news for just one night..
Talk about over exposure.
Posted by: abc is going down the tubes | February 9, 2010, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
America is NOT a dictatorship. Bush learned it the hard way, and Obama will too. Doesn’t stop them from trying though, does it?
Posted by: jafo | February 9, 2010, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
According to Obama, bipartisanship means: “I won the election, therefore anything I propose, regardless how radical it is, must be agreed upon by you.”
Talk about politics as usual.
Posted by: EPU | February 9, 2010, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
Is this the pivot to jobs using an “unpassable” (to a one party majority) healthcare bill to promote bipartisanship. Republicans haven’t held up that awful bill democrats have.
Why not work on some bipartisan jobs efforts.
Posted by: GO | February 9, 2010, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
Ms. Palin issued a call for “bipartisan solutions” in her keynote address to a third party convention. Ponder that.
Posted by: bicurious | February 9, 2010, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
Bipartisan means only one thing: At least enough Republicans vote with the Democrats to offset those Democrats who are up for reelection and who don’t dare vote liberal before November.
Let’s hope the Republicans become not only the party of NO!, but of HELL NO! (RHL).
Let’s return to a government of enumerated powers.
Posted by: Quo Warranto | February 9, 2010, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
Let’s hope the Republicans become not only the party of NO!, but of HELL NO! (RHL).
Let’s return to a government of enumerated powers.
Posted by: Quo Warranto | Feb 9, 2010 11:18:41 PM
_____________________________________
Sad. Re-election First! Country Second! Watch them fade away . ..
Posted by: tierra | February 9, 2010, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
Republicans haven’t held up that awful bill democrats have.
GO | Feb 9, 2010 10:47:34 PM
Amazing. EVERY Republican Senator votes to filibuster it (that is deny it a majority vote), Republicans spend months stringing along Baucus in the Senate pretending to be willing to compromise (even bragging about their bad faith negotiations), and yet it is all the fault of Democrats. And I assume you are counting Joe “Vote for McCain” Lieberman, who defeated a Democrat in his last election, as a Democrat.
Posted by: jhw539 | February 10, 2010, 12:04 am 12:04 am
Republicans haven’t held up that awful bill democrats have.
GO | Feb 9, 2010 10:47:34 PM
Amazing. EVERY Republican Senator votes to filibuster it (that is deny it a majority vote), Republicans spend months stringing along Baucus in the Senate pretending to be willing to compromise (even bragging about their bad faith negotiations), and yet it is all the fault of Democrats. And I assume you are counting Joe “Vote for McCain” Lieberman, who defeated a Democrat in his last election, as a Democrat.
_____________________________________
The healthcare bills PASSED the senate and the house. They can’t get them to now agree, hence the reason for reconciliation. Go ahead use it we’ll meet in November.
Posted by: GO | February 10, 2010, 12:11 am 12:11 am
BUNCH OF BULL, WITH OBAMA TRYING TO SAVE FACE. Rebubs have good bills that will really improve our heath care, NOW, but Obama wants no part of that. HE NEEDS TO FOCUS ON THE ECONOMY AND THE WAR ON TERRORISM!!
Posted by: Manitu | February 10, 2010, 6:10 am 6:10 am
In this instance.. it’s just another word for desperation.
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | February 10, 2010, 6:53 am 6:53 am
All this talk of bipartisanship..just a stalling tactic..
While the president is dressed up in non-confrontational checkered shirts, joking and smiling for the cameras, I keep looking for the real power brokers…Where is Pelosi these days? Where is Harry?
Posted by: cindy | February 10, 2010, 7:21 am 7:21 am
Republicans to Obama… “You Won”
If the Democrats wanted to draft Health Care, Cap and Trade and Porkulus (I & II) all on their own, with the Republicans locked out of the room, it is a little late to ask for some “bipartisan” fig leaf when the policies lose favor with the American People.
Posted by: Gridlock | February 10, 2010, 8:32 am 8:32 am
Im sick of this “mess Bush created” line. Lets assume he did, and you were hired at your job to fix your predecessors “mess”. How long do you think youd get before it became your problem and you became responsible for the so called clean up. Not long!
Posted by: wyatt | February 10, 2010, 8:37 am 8:37 am
Tapper – Don’t you miss the good old days? Back when your cries of how demonic the Repubs where.
Posted by: jim duffy | February 10, 2010, 8:41 am 8:41 am
What’s the deal with the Michelle comment? First he says he gives better gifts than he gets (christmastime comment) – now he says he usually ‘gives in’ to her.
Me thinks this relationship is not that great.
Posted by: Lily | February 10, 2010, 8:42 am 8:42 am
Maybe Michelle is a closet Republican.
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | February 10, 2010, 8:45 am 8:45 am
Couldn’t be a bigger case of Orwellian DoubleSpeak.
Obama is projecting big time, accusing the Repubs of the very behavior that he’s blatantly guilty of.
The disingenuousness of Obama and his administration has gotten to be utterly disgusting.
He needs to try taking his own advice, and stop whining, harping and scolding everyone else.
He needs to GROW UP and get a little class and dignity of office.
Posted by: And Atlas Shrugs Yet Again | February 10, 2010, 8:45 am 8:45 am
Republicans should NOT attend this meeting.
Instead, they should stand up and say there are more important items that need adressing sooner.
Economy.
Taxes.
Jobs.
Deficit.
Republican’s have a great opportunity to LEAD here.
Will they? lol. No way.
Where’s my tea?
Posted by: WIS_Dave | February 10, 2010, 8:49 am 8:49 am
Barney, they (LSM) only have selective memories to their good feelings about their heroes. Jake is the John McCain of reporting, which puts him just right of Helen Thomas. Bush lied people died, will forever be etched into their memory, as their only victory call for so-called journalism. They’re still lieing to themselves, only this November, game ovah!
Posted by: VancouverAndy | February 10, 2010, 8:51 am 8:51 am
Obama is such a hard-core collectivist that he can’t accept anything that places responsibility and freedom in the hands of individuals. He’s the one who needs to bend, because he’s the one that is going against the very nature of this country. Repubs need to stand their ground.
Posted by: Angela | February 10, 2010, 8:53 am 8:53 am
Obama’s version of bipartisanship is “I won.”
Obama said that Republicans have no ideas but he has read them. Go figure.
This suggestion of working together is as much garbage as is everything else Obama says.
Posted by: drjohn | February 10, 2010, 8:54 am 8:54 am
Obamas magnanimous, and oh so sacred “bipartisanship”
Obama: “OK Repubs accept what is now on the table (all 2000 plus pages). Now if YOU repubbies have any additional ideas for ME to look at for consideration, let’s do it.”
LOOK OUT FOR THIS TRAP!!!!
Posted by: Born Yesterday NOT | February 10, 2010, 8:56 am 8:56 am
“What’s the deal with the Michelle comment?”
Good question.
Posted by: drjohn | February 10, 2010, 8:56 am 8:56 am
Will no journalist point out that the budget Bush signed in 2008 was OPPOSED by Republicans and APPROVED by 55 democrats? INCLUDING OBAMA! He approved of Bush’s spending for his last budget while republicans abandoned Bush. Yet, he says it’s the budget mess is the republicans fault. NO ONE, no journalist, at a presser can confront President Obama on this fact?
Posted by: JDW | February 10, 2010, 8:57 am 8:57 am
How brave of Obama to finally deign to meet–unannounced–with the remnants of the WH Press Corpse (heh) during a blizzard. The guy’s a real hero…
Posted by: Chris | February 10, 2010, 8:57 am 8:57 am
Mark Knoller gets it right:
“When a sitting president calls for bipartisanship by the opposition – he really means surrender.”
Posted by: drjohn | February 10, 2010, 8:59 am 8:59 am
“Yet, he says it’s the budget mess is the republicans fault. NO ONE, no journalist, at a presser can confront President Obama on this fact?”
Absolutely right. I’ve been asking that for more than year.
I’m also waiting for the US media to cover the global warming fraud.
Posted by: drjohn | February 10, 2010, 9:03 am 9:03 am
It would help if BO would quit demonizing President Bush and blaming him for the “mess” he left – when he was actually running for the office, he said he’d fix everything! Also, tell the press secretary to quit mocking Sarah Palin.
Did he ever think about the terrorism mess President Bush had to deal with when he took office? You know, on account of all those lesser attacks against America during the Clinton administration having been ignored? And can you imagine the mess the next administration will face? How many trillions of dollars in debt are we?
Posted by: MissButterfly | February 10, 2010, 9:04 am 9:04 am
Barack (my records are sealed till 2059) H. Obama, the “head” of an administration that has raped the public treasury at the tune of more than $6 trillion in just one year, and live the good life making fun of the rest of us and our “stupid” leader Sarah Palin, wants now “bipartisanship.”
Give it to him I say, right between his legs.
Posted by: The Anti-BHO | February 10, 2010, 9:13 am 9:13 am
Tone deaf:
Obama calls on Washington to put aside “petty politics.” And in the same press conference, mind you, his trained monkey Robert Gibbs writes notes on his hand and openly mocks Sarah Palin.
January 2013 cannot come soon enough.
Posted by: Obama: World's Greatest Celebrity | February 10, 2010, 9:18 am 9:18 am
Bipartisanship = I will give in on a few things that we all agree is needed in the best interest of this country if you then surrender on all the big government stuff that will transform this nation beyond recognition.
Posted by: Kingston53 | February 10, 2010, 9:18 am 9:18 am
Bipartisanship for the Democrats means “Photo op”. You can’t sincerely want bipartisanship at the same time you’re attacking the very people you want bipartisanship from. This is like punching someone in the face telling them you like them at the same time. With Obama’s team it’s all about campaign mode. I don’t see anything sincere…I see the Axelrod machine at work.
Posted by: MomofFour | February 10, 2010, 9:19 am 9:19 am
Obama lies, democracy dies! What a fraud – I watched the majority of this “presser”….it was a photo op and he was basically saying “if you don’t do it my way, I will find a way, i.e. Executive Order/Recess Appointments”.
The man is possibly the most corrupt, naive, delusional incompetent EVER to hold the office of POTUS….he makes Jimmy Carter look great!
Posted by: Allie F. | February 10, 2010, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Barry, “We won”.
Your days are numbered.
Easily the stupidest and worse President elected in modern history. Somewhere a peanut farmer is whistling a gleeful tune.
Posted by: LogicalUS | February 10, 2010, 9:41 am 9:41 am
I put more faith in the professor on Gilligan’s Island than the professor(haha) in the WH.
Posted by: Sam Deakins | February 10, 2010, 9:46 am 9:46 am
Easily the stupidest and worse President elected in modern history.
—-
I thought we weren’t supposed to talk about Bush or the right wingers would get all riled and start whining about history having no bearing on the present– but I agree. The past decade has been the dreariest and the dopes who voted for Bush twice, yet still cling rigidly to a worn out ideology, are trying to paint Obama with the same brush as Carter to make their mistakes seem less dire. Its gross, isn’t it?
Posted by: progressive mama | February 10, 2010, 9:56 am 9:56 am
Wow, this is like the pot calling the kettle…stainless steel. Obama’s idea of bipartisan is for Republicans to agree with what HE wants.
I think it’s time to bring up an old phrase from the 2008 campaign. What Obama is trying to do is essentially “put lipstick on a pig” (with the “pig” being the current health care bill). No matter what Republican ideas Obama might accept (and I don’t think he’ll accept them…he’ll stand there on TV and tell them why they won’t work or how they’ll only benefit greedy insurance companies), we’ll still have the same old bill.
Republicans HAVE to go, however.
Posted by: sydney jane | February 10, 2010, 10:01 am 10:01 am
Neither side has the slightest idea of what bipartisanship means, nor any interest in being anything but a dictator.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | February 10, 2010, 10:05 am 10:05 am
I say no meeting.Let the Dems own it.Keep the pressure on.Anyone else notice even w/teleprompter BHO has been stuttering and stumbling ?
Posted by: Doug Edwards | February 10, 2010, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Jake:
Correction:
In the article you linked, you said, “[Obama] reiterated his call for a bipartisan fiscal commission, which recently was blocked by Republicans in the Senate.”
Several prominent Democrats in the Senate have also publicly rejected the Commission approach, so I believe it is inaccurate to cast this as another instance of Republican opposition alone.
Posted by: JM Hanes | February 10, 2010, 10:17 am 10:17 am
>>Will no journalist point out that the budget Bush signed in 2008 was OPPOSED by Republicans and APPROVED by 55 democrats? INCLUDING OBAMA! He approved of Bush’s spending for his last budget while republicans abandoned Bush. Yet, he says it’s the budget mess is the republicans fault. NO ONE, no journalist, at a presser can confront President Obama on this fact?
Posted by: JDW | Feb 10, 2010 8:57:33 AM<<
Excellent post!
Posted by: grannysunni | February 10, 2010, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Jimmy Cater says he likes Barack, he reminds him of himself when he was younger and stupider!
Posted by: iammychoices | February 10, 2010, 10:37 am 10:37 am
“Bipartisanship cannot mean simply that Democrats give up everything that they believe in, find the handful of things that Republicans have been advocating for, and we do those things, and then we have bipartisanship,”
Of course not. Here’s what bipartisan means to Obama:
“Bipartisanship means simply that Republicans give up everything that they believe in and get behind the things that Democrats have been advocating for. After all, I won.”
See? Simple.
Posted by: Odysseus | February 10, 2010, 10:44 am 10:44 am
Republicans need to withdraw from this so called bi-partisan (what a joke) HC summit. You idiots already invited him in to your own summit and what did he do but obfuscate and use strawman arguments and you let him get away with it. The result? He got a slight bounce in the polls and you were made to look foolish. The Republicans will play nice while Obama is using them for a photo op like he did our military. You’ve been the party of no (thank God) for the past year and I say continue with that and say no to this Obama photo op. The only thing standing in the way of a complete routing of the Dems in November is a wimpy GOP. Man up Republicans, state why you won’t meet with this tool and let the MSM do their worst. They’d do that anyway so what’s the loss?
Posted by: neyney | February 10, 2010, 10:54 am 10:54 am
Well.. as usual, he didn’t give a straight answer or a definition. Again as usual, he just stated to what it doesn’t mean to him. I bet his actual definition of bipartisanship include the words ‘hope’ and ‘change’ somewhere..
Posted by: Ilpalazzo | February 10, 2010, 11:04 am 11:04 am
Obama, Pelosi, Reid and the rest of the liberals in Congress based the entire 2008 campaign on lies. Then they spent the 12 months of 2009 doing as they pleased. Thank God for Scott Brown and the people of Massachusetts for giving them a wake-up call. This corrupt administration is campaigning again, saying what we want to hear, to keep us from focusing on what they are doing wrong! Obama has no real intention of considering GOP views. This is more smoke and mirrors.
Posted by: THINK ABOUT IT! | February 10, 2010, 11:06 am 11:06 am
So…bi partisanship doesn’t mean “giving up” anything. That apparently means that for Obama bipartisanship means, “GOP gives up everything.”
Idiot.
And you all thought Bush was stupid.
Posted by: Vita | February 10, 2010, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
How anyone can be so stupid as to believe anything that any Republican says is a deep mystery.They lied for 8 solid years, they continue to lie now and represent the wealthy Wall St thugs and the greedy thieving corporations for everything they stand for…yet, here is middle America,proving once again that stupidity run very deep, lambasting their own interests because they can’t handle a man of color in the White House. Exactly how bad does it have to get before people wake up? I am not saying that Obama is the greatest but I am saying that most of the stalement that is halting any forward motion is the Republicans racist fault. That’s correct,my contention is exactly that…this is entirely racist,nobody does racist better than the Americans, even the South Africans finally gave it up and have a better society that we do.Of all our ill’s racism is the one that is dragging our “empire” down the toilet.Ya’ll better brush up on yer Chinese, bubba…
Posted by: GP | February 10, 2010, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
I know that bipartisan has something to do with the don’t ask, don’t tell military thing.. bipartisanship can be expressed more openly.. under the new plan.
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | February 10, 2010, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
I’m using a felt tip to write it on my prompting palm.. as I type.. I may have to use a dash.
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | February 10, 2010, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
OP-ED
Heath Care Reform Revolution March February 24, 2010
To Americas Second Line Of Defense:
We Veterans are able , disabled or reserve. We once fought for our country, many still are, we where trained to be the best but it was with the support of those we were fighting for, The American people. we have fought with other nations, for there peoples freedom, Well our freedom is at risk. The freedom of the American people as well as the worlds is at risk, if we do not solve the health care reform issue; not just here in America but as long as there is one unhealthy human being the rest of the population we’ll be at risk for extinction. we are no different than any other species. We must act swiftly. Years ago during many past wars in a slumping almost none existing economy the wives, Mothers and children made great sacrifices back here on the home front sending us weapons armor and munitions that they assembled to send to us to help win a war. Why would we do any less for them. We were trained to be the best. We must stand together once more just as we did in our respective military careers. Immobilize to live 2/24/2010
We must stand strong, We must not waiver the American people are counting on us once again to show our might and protect the defenseless against the terrible wrong done to them by not having in the Constitution the right to all having equal opportunity to live a healthy and long life, for all mankind. They helped us receive many benefits since America existed. Lets pay it forward and honor the American people without health insurance by Marching for them on February 24, 2010 on all state capitals to show our legion belongs to the American people. (An unhealthy Human race makes it impossible to colonize another planet if that’s what we need for our survival). If you work against Heath Care Reform your working against your own survival.
PO3 Dethaniel Henry, Disabled
Posted by: PO3 HENRY | February 10, 2010, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
The man actually STILL believes he’s God’s gift to this country. Vote for another “community organizer”, will ya!
Posted by: smartlillena | February 10, 2010, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
He absolutely is God’s gift to this country in comparison to the right wing neo-Nazis that want to take over, too bad most Americans are so brain dead and support Anti-Americans like Palin. She is the worst thing that could happen to this country, she supports her husband who believes this country should be separated into their own countries. As for people like the vet Henry that writes here they have other idea’s for folks like you and they don’t include health care or any other kind of care…remember what it was like under Bush? It’ll only get worse so vote Republican and you can see your Vets every day begging at the highway ramps.
Posted by: GP | February 10, 2010, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
I am a war vet and the Republicans are without a doubt the worst as far as war veterans are concerned…all hot air and no action. The VA hospitals are ten times better than they were under Bush and the red tape is a lot less.Mr Obama has made a huge and immediate difference, under the Republicans things were filthy and doctors would not even admit to obvious maladies like combat stress. Always remember the republicans want to take from the average person….take whatever they can.
Posted by: GP | February 10, 2010, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
He absolutely is God’s gift to this country in comparison to the right wing neo-Nazis that want to take over, too bad most Americans are so brain dead and support Anti-Americans like Palin. She is the worst thing that could happen to this country,
—
I agree on Palin mainly because she’s Obama’s only hope of a second term. If he were God’s gift he certainly wouldn’t be threatened by the likes of Sarah Palin. He’d run on the support for his policies. The support that still exists is getting weaker by the week. Sounds like popularity to me!
Posted by: smartlillena | February 11, 2010, 6:56 am 6:56 am