McCain v Obama: Tensions from Election ’08 Boil Over at Bipartisan Health Care Summit
Jake Tapper and Karen Travers report:
A wonky discussion on insurance reform at the bipartisan health care reform summit was briefly replaced this afternoon by a tense exchange between President Obama and his 2008 GOP opponent, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.
McCain criticized the president’s bill and brought up the promise then-Sen. Obama made and did not keep to hold the previous year’s negotiations for the bill in front of C-SPAN cameras.
“Both of us during the campaign promised change in Washington,” McCain said. “In fact, eight times (as a candidate) you said that negotiations on health care reform would be broadcast on C-SPAN cameras. I'm glad that more than a year later they are, here. Unfortunately, this product was not produced in that fashion, it was produced behind closed doors.”
McCain continued saying the American people “want us to go back to the beginning. They want us not to do this kind of legislation. They want us to sit down together and do what’s best for all Americans, not just for some people who live in Florida or who happen to live in other favored states. They want a uniform treatment of all Americans.” He suggested “the special deals for the special interests and favored few” should be removed from the bill.
“Let me just make this point, John, because we’re not campaigning anymore,” the president said. “The election’s over.”
“I am reminded of that every day,” McCain said, forcing a smile.
“We can spend the remainder of the time with our respective talking points going back and forth,” the president continued. “We were supposed to be talking about insurance.”
Continued the president: “My concern is that if we do that we’re essentially back on Fox News or MSNBC on the split screen just arguing back and forth. So my hope would be we actually focus on the issues of how we actually get a bill done.”
- Jake Tapper and Karen Travers
Email
Obama: 'Now Is the Time For Common Sense Action'
Romney Takes Aim at Conservatives
I think there was some key text missed here, and that was that people don’t care about the process by how the bill was created, but that the end justifies the means — and Obama is dead wrong on that. Backdoor deals ensures that all men are not created equal under his plan.
Posted by: Jim | February 25, 2010, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
Barack Obama accused someone of being stuck in campaign mode?
Posted by: Matt | February 25, 2010, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
President Obama’s remark to John McCain seemed curt. McCain was trying to say that the bill should be open to exchange and hasn’t which I agree with. There are issues that the American people do not know and are delivered behind closed doors. I agree with McCain/
Posted by: Florence | February 25, 2010, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
And of course Obama didn’t address or answer a single point or question McCain presented.
Posted by: ctmom | February 25, 2010, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
“The election’s over.” “I’m on the next election now, you old coot. I’ve moved on to a whole new level of lies.”
Obama, how about you do that thing you do so well and throw the whole Dem Congress and this hated bill under the bus? You tried to save it, haha.
That way you can stand alone as the exalted hero for the nation, the role you love to pose for. Only YOU can do this!!
Kill the bill! Be the hero, and throw your friends and mentors over the cliff like you have always done. Bet it would win you an election.
Posted by: Carol | February 25, 2010, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
I can relate to McCain’s torture. Everytime I have to see or hear him speak, I’m tortured!
Posted by: Jackson | February 25, 2010, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
We need to get more republicans out of office if anything constructive is going to get done.
Posted by: pt | February 25, 2010, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Need to get more repub’s out of office if we expect anything to get accomplished.
Posted by: pt | February 25, 2010, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
“Continued the president: “My concern is that if we do that we’re essentially back on Fox News or MSNBC on the split screen just arguing back and forth. So my hope would be we actually focus on the issues of how we actually get a bill done.”
Wow, did BHO actually quasi admit that MSNBC is biased left??? First honest thing he’s said since taking office!
Posted by: Obama, the Second Coming | February 25, 2010, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
fox news is considered comedy, not news.
Posted by: pt | February 25, 2010, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
McCain is a Drama Queen, a partisan hack who lacks any credibility whatsoever. He nominated a goofball for VP, and has turned into the grand flip-flopper and talk show celebrity (which is ironic given the campaign accusations). He’s obviously still drinking sour grape whine– and looking for attention via that very split screen the President mentioned.
Earth to Planet John: Get over your loss and move on. If you want to be constructive, then do so, but if you just want to show off you’re grumpy temperament, we’ve seen it. We weren’t impressed.
I *was* impressed by the President, a few of the Dems, and, surprisingly, Dr. Coburn.
BooMan at the BooMan Tribune blog has a good post up about how watching Republicans changed his worldview.
Ditto.
Also, if you go to the Wonk Room, there’s a viewer’s guide to the summit, what Republicans will say and why they’re wrong. It was written beforehand, but it works.
Posted by: There is no Planet B | February 25, 2010, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
How can Obama not understand that a process in which people were bribed to support a bill using sleazy deal making would not be a concern to average Americans?
Posted by: wow | February 25, 2010, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
Obama isn’t the least bit interested in bipartisanship, and he never has been.
Nor is he interested in putting forth a bill that actually will reduce costs, and actually will provide coverage for all those who need it.
His bill is all about giving some people special access, which is denied to others. Simply not acceptable.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | February 25, 2010, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
How can Obama not understand that a process in which people were bribed to support a bill using sleazy deal making would not be a concern to average Americans?
Posted by: wow | Feb 25, 2010 1:45:16 PM
_______________________________________
Cutting deals to pass legislation has been absolutely commonplace for years.
Which ‘bribes’ exactly are you talking about?
Posted by: tierra | February 25, 2010, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
His bill is all about giving some people special access, which is denied to others. Simply not acceptable.
__________________________________
Which people are being given ‘special access’?
Posted by: tierra | February 25, 2010, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Now the president would like to forget his campaign promises because the election is over ( and like to rub it in) those promises dont matter? buy insulting McCain, is he really showing good will? McCain was setting up his point: the president’s proposal was cooked behind closed doors and needs to be trashed and start over with common objectives and inclusive ideas w/o special deals for anyone!!!
Posted by: nels | February 25, 2010, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
“So my hope would be we actually focus on the issues of how we actually get a bill done.” – So…STAY FOCUSED JOHN!!!
Another example of how politics is more important to some in Washington than fixing Americas problems!
Posted by: Gerald | February 25, 2010, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
Those of you saying Obama is for special interests, why does not your senators call his bluff? Give specific examples, dont hand wave…call him out. You have the opportunity. Which ohter president allowed this kind of opne debate? None!! Call your senators to tell them to use the opportunity…and not be cry babies. If you make good arguments, people will get it. But saying now because your party lost…..that is childish.
Posted by: matt | February 25, 2010, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Why dont the repulicans take the opportunity to call Obama’s bluff in public. But they cant…they are talking at high levels. They need to come down to specifics. Did McCain suggest any ideas? NOOOOO….
Posted by: matt | February 25, 2010, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
McCain seems to be losing his grip on reality not only on HCR, but in recent days his complete revisionist account of his Fall 08′ campaign history.
Posted by: XXX | February 25, 2010, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
Republicans need to move forward. They are dragging their feet in hope nothing gets done. Democrats need to be realistic on whether these changes are affordable. Folks, we are borrowing money from China because we overspend. How much longer can it go on?
Posted by: Rick | February 25, 2010, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
People are we watching the same news?
Obama lies to our face all the time. He has been caught in many already. McCain was saying hey remember when you promised to make a POSITIVE change? But so far its been negative. And don’t ya’ll just love how Obama advoids answering questions by being a smart-A to the McCain- “the campiegn is over” like McCain didn’t already know. McCain was just throwing in his two cents like everyone else in the meeting. Obama thinks he has everyone fooled. He NEVER answers the question he is asked. He always lies to make it sound nice. Like the acron thing. He told us straight to our faces that he has nothing to do with acron, he hadn’t talked to them in 13years. LIE LIE LIE!!!! he was caught on camera talking about how Acorn gets first say in what he does. he even told Acron dont call me I’ll call you. OBAMA IS A LIAR LIAR LIAR
Posted by: Sara | February 25, 2010, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Sara: McCain NEVER had any respect for Obama on the campaign trail (think “that one”) and never really looked at him during any debates they had. Mccain was trying to score more disrespect points today.
Posted by: shelby | February 25, 2010, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
BO the liar and a deceiver. he knows Republicans will go easy on him because he is the President and can not look like angry old man confronting the president on national TV. The truth is that eventhough I need healthcare reform, I dont want the government to give it away to a buch of lunatic hippies, who dont want to work to afford the goods things in life. about 15 mil are young people who do not buy insu because they dont want to pay for it. another 15 mil are illegals and the 10mil are poor old and children. lets focus on them!! tort reform and free market
Posted by: nels | February 25, 2010, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
The media will use this soundbite over and over again, get a lot of mileage out of it, and the main focus of this meeting today is lost. This is the way it always happens! You’ll see and hear more of this drama moment than any thing else!
Posted by: jas | February 25, 2010, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
McCain was saying hey remember when you promised to make a POSITIVE change?
Posted by: Sara
old cliche but true enough…takes two to tango
re: I dont want the government to give it away to a buch of lunatic hippies,
Posted by: nels
‘lunatic hippies” ?
what’s next … the ‘Beat generationers’
..’Beatniks’,.. ‘hipsters’.. ‘folkies’… ‘Lindy hoppers’
Posted by: XXX | February 25, 2010, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
The truth is that eventhough I need healthcare reform, I dont want the government to give it away to a buch of lunatic hippies, who dont want to work to afford the goods things in life
.Posted by: nels
this roughly translates to I would rather die than see someone else get help that I don’t classify as ‘worthy’.
Posted by: XXX | February 25, 2010, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
How many of you believe that your kids and grand kids will have the freedoms that we had in the past? If the president insists on pushing Teddy’s dream through, why didn’t he do it in chicago first. Why are the big unions exempt, why did he, say he wouldnt, but in fact did turn down public funding for his president’s campain funding? Do you think that he has taken this difficult road just because its something he believes in? He is a grand politician, he’s good at it. Have you ever known a lawyer that wasn’t crooked? Do you think this health bill is for us. He OWES somebody, and we gotta pay.
Posted by: Sam | February 25, 2010, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Why do health care, etal. issues always have to be a contest between the Democrats and Republicans? Moreover, why (when being interviewed on any given agenda) is it a ‘given’ that a Republican will always support a “republican” idea and a Democrat, “democratic” idea?? It reminds me of a Debating Team member who is equally adept, credible and convincing at making a case for the side they choose.
Any and every issue should be about leveling up the quality of every American’s life.. period!!!
Obama is glib and credible, but highly flawed, and we Americans should see opposing views from Democrats as well as Republicans.
Posted by: Treat | February 25, 2010, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
“They want a uniform treatment of all Americans.” He suggested “the special deals for the special interests and favored few” should be removed from the bill.” – John McCain
Good point John. It’ll help move things forward if the special unjustified deals are removed from the Bill.
What say you Mr. President?
“So my hope would be we actually focus on the issues of how we actually get a bill done.” – President Obama
Gee that was what John McCain was trying to do.
Why on Earth would Obama bring up the Campaign then?
Maybe he was trying to avoid the issue and not address McCain’s concern?
Posted by: Noz | February 25, 2010, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
why didn’t he do it in chicago first.
Posted by: Sam
why stop there, as Obama was the ‘only’ person working on these problems, your question is a ‘fair’ one, Why didn’t Obama, by himself, fix the following:
why didn’t he cure the crime problem in Chi
why didn’t he cure the poverty problem in Chi
why didn’t he cure the healthcare problem in Chi
why didn’t he cure the economic problems in Chi
why didn’t he cure the energy problem in Chi
Posted by: XXX | February 25, 2010, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
More Political Theater.. and it’s not even very good.
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | February 25, 2010, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Need to get more repub’s out of office if we expect anything to get accomplished.
Posted by: pt | Feb 25, 2010 1:33:50 PM
Like for the last year when the democrats HAD the majority in both house and senate.
Posted by: Lizzie | February 25, 2010, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
It hardly seems fair.. but Obama and the Democrats are going to take the full brunt of this mess.. McCain said he wanted reform also.. but it wasn’t true.. Obama and his party are probably being hoisted on a bipartisan petard..
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | February 25, 2010, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
America…look what we have now! We all agreed this doesn’t work. The ‘Party of NO” already has their lips formed to say it again.
Posted by: Gerald | February 25, 2010, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
If you pretend that Obama has any real idea of the nature of the problem or any idea of how to solve it, you live in a Dream World. He is a sham, a small time scammer from the Chicago thuggery.
Posted by: mac | February 25, 2010, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
“He suggested “the special deals for the special interests and favored few” should be removed from the bill.”
How hypocritical can you get? If the GOP allowed an up or down vote then idiots like Lieberman, Landreiu, and Nelson wouldn’t have been able to extort any of that pork in the first place. And don’t tell me you disagree with your GOP collegues who are attempting to extort their own pork by filibustering nominations, John, because there’s no evidence whatsoever that you have even complained about it.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 25, 2010, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
“He suggested “the special deals for the special interests and favored few” should be removed from the bill.”
How hypocritical can you get? If the GOP allowed an up or down vote then idiots like Lieberman, Landreiu, and Nelson wouldn’t have been able to extort any of that pork in the first place. And don’t tell me you disagree with your GOP collegues who are attempting to extort their own pork by filibustering nominations, John, because there’s no evidence whatsoever that you have even complained about it.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 25, 2010, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
Wow, the prez was really irritated with McCain and it showed through. “The campaign is over”– you could hear the unspoken “I won” hanging in the air. It was silly to snarl at McCain at that point– it is bound to make the evening news and the endless dissection on the cable outlets tonight. Which means it will highlight the context of the exchange– mcCain was complaining about the special deals in the bill and Obama said we should worry about the outcome, not the process. But the deals are PART of the outcome– they will cost the rest of us money, they will create an uneven playing field, we are stuck with them if the bill passes with them in it. So McCain’s discussion of process was very germaine.
Obama showed himself to be the thin-skinned, “just do what I want you to do and be quiet about it” fellow some of us recognized back when he was speaking condescendingly to Hillary during the campaign. “Oh, Hillary, you’re likeable enough.” Radars should have been going off, but not enough did. And now we have to deal with it.
Posted by: moderate | February 25, 2010, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
Obama showed himself to be the thin-skinned,
Posted by: moderate
actually I think the Pres showed an amazing amount of patience and self control while listening to both sides and especially some of the Republicans
Posted by: XXX | February 25, 2010, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
Yes, you won, by lying, by buying votes
Posted by: klsdjfalkjfdsj
just can’t stand the fact that a republican didn’t win in 2008….. oh well..
Posted by: XXX | February 25, 2010, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
you stick your fat belly
Posted by: klsdjfalkjfdsj
are we talking about the same Pres,..
Obama may be a lot of things to different people, but he certainly does not have a weight problem
Posted by: XXX | Feb 25, 2010 5:47:58 PM
=====
XXX, The fat belly is his $1 trillion that he is spending for your great great great great great daughter. But, of course, why would you care since you are long gone.
Posted by: jfsdlfaj | February 25, 2010, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Man, I like Mr. Obama less and less.
Posted by: young_voter | February 25, 2010, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
Man, I like Mr. Obama less and less.
Posted by: young_voter | Feb 25, 2010 6:51:19 PM
Well, I can even that out as I like him more and more.
He listened politely for hours, exhibiting his knowledge on the topic and set the stage for moving ahead without the Republicans.
He gave it a shot– and the Republicans didn’t move.
Sure,the President showed occasional flashes of temper– but my lord, who wouldn’t. They peddled the same bundle of lies they’ve been peddling, though a couple of them came across more serious-minded. (Coburn, who knew??? I know he’s a doctor and friend of Obama’s but I’ve never seen him put the political gameplaying aside and sound so reasonable.)
McCain needs to get over it and move on. His hypocritical self-righteousness gets old. As Salon points out:
“As it happens, in order to attend the healthcare summit, McCain had to cancel his other plans for today — a fundraiser sponsored by BGR PAC, the political action committee run by the lobbying firm Barbour, Griffith and Rogers. And (maybe you can guess where this is going?) in 2006, the last year for which ####.com lists records, PhRMA paid the lobbying firm $200,000.”
I wasn’t thrilled about the Pharma deal, to say the least about it, but its hard to take someone with a plank in their own eye– and a sour uneven temper– very seriously.
Posted by: progressive mama | February 25, 2010, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
Wow, the prez was really irritated with McCain and it showed through. “The campaign is over”– you could hear the unspoken “I won” hanging in the air.
—
And thank God. What you consider condescending, I consider not taking McCain’s b.s.– and why should he? McCain is a hotheaded little jerk. Sure, he has a compelling story and I like his daughter– but he’s a jerk.
Posted by: progressive mama | February 25, 2010, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
“So my hope would be we actually focus on the issues of how we actually get a bill done.”
ROFL
Obama doesn’t have any more interest now in getting a bill done than he did as a state or US Senator.
Posted by: malclave | February 25, 2010, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
McCain needs to get over it. He lost, thank God and he can’t except it. That’s all this is about. He is not interested in bi-partisan.
Posted by: Barbara | February 25, 2010, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
moderate wrote: “Wow, the prez was really irritated with McCain and it showed through. “The campaign is over”– you could hear the unspoken “I won” hanging in the air.”
.
oBama couldn’t help but let his arrogant side show with his response back to McCain. This is the most petulant little person I think has ever set foot in the White House.
.
“It was silly to snarl at McCain at that point– it is bound to make the evening news and the endless dissection on the cable outlets tonight.”
.
oBama is covered with the evening news reporting… why just look at how Jake Tapper reported this exchange. If you watched it in person you see the smarmy little oBama acting like “how dare you speak to me like that”. All Jake reports is that there was a “tense” exchange. oBama came across as a little punk. This is a leader????? what a disgrace.
Posted by: gk | February 25, 2010, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
Obama’s arrogance is disturbing.
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 25, 2010, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
This is a leader?????
Posted by: gk | Feb 25, 2010 8:55:24 PM
Absolutely. The disgrace was the Republican performance and attitude in general with a couple of surprising exceptions.
I think Ezra Klein gets this right:
The big story out of the summit is …. The Democrats are not taking reconciliation off the table, they are not paring back the bill, and they are not extricating themselves from the issue. They think they’re right on this one, and they’re going to try and pass this legislation.
Today was a boost for that effort… I imagine that this will be the last bipartisan summit we see for awhile. The format is simply too kind to the president, and he takes advantage of it ruthlessly. When the camera panned, you could almost see Republicans wondering why they’d accepted the invitation.
The people who came off best were those who knew the most about the issue. Paul Ryan and Tom Coburn on the Republican side. Durbin and Dodd for the Democrats. But above all of them, the president, who got to enter, adjudicate and conclude discussions at will — not to mention say when others didn’t know that much about the issue, or weren’t offering comments in good faith.” (WaPo)
I’m glad the President called out those who didn’t know what they were talking about and/or were being wholly disingenuous.
Posted by: progressive mama | February 25, 2010, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Hmmmmm…..this, too, from WaPo
“Republicans accomplished two purposes. They made sophisticated arguments respectfully, in contrast to the tone of a radio rant or a tweet by Sarah Palin. And Republicans made clear that they have alternative health-reform ideas, undermining the accusation that they are merely the “party of no.” They knew they were entering a trap and seemed prepared.
Two developments that preceded the summit, however, made the summit itself largely irrelevant in terms of policy debate.
First, in finally setting forth of the details of his own plan, Obama essentially dropped the major cost control component of Democratic reform — delaying a tax increase on high-cost health plans until 2018 under pressure from unions. So the president is now promising all the goodies of health reform without a serious approach to containing health inflation. This seems transparently political and fundamentally unserious.
Second, by signaling a willingness to use reconciliation in passing a Democrat-only bill, Democratic leaders have revealed their outreach to be a pose, a sham.”
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 25, 2010, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
Barbara, when you write, “McCain needs to get over it. He lost, thank God and he can’t except it. That’s all this is about. He is not interested in bi-partisan,” I must respectfully disagree. McCain is painfully aware that he lost the presidential election and accepts it just fine. He has thrown himself into his work in the Senate with abandon. In his speech, he did point out that candidate Obama made promises president Obama wasn’t keeping, but then he focused on the terrible deals that were put into the senate bill to garner votes. He had a valid point. The president certainly makes reference to his prior experience (such as it is), saying things about when he was a senator, when he was a young father, etc. McCain does the same thing. What’s the problem?
McCain does not seem nearly as bitter about losing the biggest election of his life as some others– such as Kerry. He laughed at the president’s shot about “the election’s over” and made a joke about “I am reminded of that every day” with a smile on his face.
Posted by: moderate | February 25, 2010, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
Posted by: jennifert7 | Feb 25, 2010 10:28:43 PM
Gerson not particularly gifted in health care wonkery and he’s partisan, but I’m sure his take is representative of the Republican takeaway.
I agree that Paul Ryan and Tom Coburn and a couple others came off as seeming more intelligent than, say, Sarah Palin. McCain didn’t fare as well but that’s never his role. And Alexander has always been likable even while he’s peddling the same debunked b.s.
Unfortunately, Gerson is incorrect on the goodies and reconciliation. The pilot programs for cost control, the provisions regarding Medicare fraud, and the all the other cost containment items discussed in the first hour or so are still in the bill. Plus, Obama is willing to talk to Coburn further on his ideas.
Some of my favorite parts were Louise Slaughter talking about the realities of health care for women, Durbin talking about how the Republicans overblow the need for tort reform and mistate what it has accomplished, Obama taking on McCain and Barasso– and I thought Obama made a Obama made a very strong case for the national exchange in his back and forth with Blackburn.
Posted by: progressive mama | February 25, 2010, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
Various others chime in:
CNN’s David Gergen:
The folks in the White House just must be kicking themselves right now. They thought that coming out of Baltimore when the President went in and was mesmerizing and commanding in front of the House Republicans that he could do that again here today. That would revive health care and would change the public opinion about their health care bill and they can go on to victory. Just the opposite has happened
CNN’s Gloria Borger:
The Republicans have been very effective today. They really did come to play. They were very smart.
They took on the substance of a very complex issue. … But they really stuck to the substance of this issue and tried to get to the heart of it and I think did a very good job.
They came in with a plan. They mapped it out.
CNN’s Wolf Blitzer:
It looks like the Republicans certainly showed up ready to play.
The Hill’s A.B. Stoddard:
I think we need to start out by acknowledging Republicans brought their ‘A Team.’ They had doctors knowledgeable about the system, they brought substance to the table, and they, I thought, expressed interest in the reform. I thought in the lecture from Senator John McCain and on the issue of transparency, I thought today the Democrats were pretty much on their knees.
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 25, 2010, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
Someone told the democrats to each show up with a sob story from back home. Their insincerity is the only thing transparent about them.
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 25, 2010, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
“McCain is a hotheaded little jerk. Sure, he has a compelling story and I like his daughter– but he’s a jerk.” – progressive mama
No evidence of progressive thinking here.
Move on folks – nothing to see here – keep it moving.
Posted by: Noz | February 25, 2010, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
No evidence of progressive thinking here.
Move on folks – nothing to see here – keep it moving.
Posted by: Noz | Feb 25, 2010 11:10:30 PM
If you’re talking about McCain, and most of the Republicans at the summit today, I agree wholeheartedly. If you’re talking about me– oh well.
For why I think as I so, see:
McCain Assails Reconciliation, Forgetting He Once Said The GOP Laid ‘The Groundwork’ For Its Use
Cranky McCain Chastises Mullen And Gates For Expressing Opinion On DADT Before Consulting Him
McCain Rewrites History, Falsely Claims Bush Asked Him To Suspend His Campaign In Sept. ‘08
McCain’s flip flop on climate change
McCain rails against PhRMA concessions in healthcare bill, but his supporters take lobbying money from the group
Flashback: McCain Refused To Grant 30 Seconds Of Time During Iraq War Debate
McCain’s Angry Letter To Obama (2006)
Posted by: progressive mama | February 25, 2010, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
Posted by: jennifert7 | Feb 25, 2010 10:49:21 PM
To each their own. It would never occur to me to quote the people on CNN. Lol. Not very fresh thinking at CNN, imho, but, again, to each their own.
One of my favorite quotes about events came from Andrew Sullivan of Atlantic Monthly (Daily Dish blog):
“Yes, he [Paul Ryan] voted for the Medicare Prescription Drug Act when Bush was president, the most fiscally irresponsible measure in decades. Today, he railed against it, without holding himself accountable.
This is what drives me nuts about today’s Republicans. They are like Eliot Spitzer railing against Obama for not cracking down on prostitution.”
Posted by: progressive mama | February 25, 2010, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm
it all gets back to what gets done, or not, when one party or the other is in full control of the government.
Republicans always speak about ‘less government’ but historically, they have really never accomplished that while they were in full control.
Republicans talk about addressing health care reform and other health related issues, but, again, they’ve done little when they had the chance..
Republicans talk about fiscal restraint, but as was painfully evident during the last administration, they didn’t really do that either, in fact, V.P. Cheney made the claim that ‘deficits don’t matter’..
Republicans never seem to understand that not everyone in America is making over a 50K a year in income.
It’s a curious thing that when oil speculators and oil companies drive the price up, and people are paying $4- for gas, and increased heating oil prices, people want ‘something done’ about the outrageous prices. This is an easy issue for people to understand.
Take the same situation for increased pricing, and move it to the health care issue, suddenly people are happy with paying high prices?
Dems will be judged by what they do when they are running things.
Both party’s do the country a great disservice with the invective and partial selective truths that are used to make respective points, but the proof as ‘they say’ will be in what gets done and whether the policies are indeed effective and do what was promised.
Posted by: XXX | February 25, 2010, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
So was it disrespectful of President Obama to repeatedly refer to Senator McCain as “John”. I’m not a huge McCain fan, but it seemed like an attempt to diminish him. McCain’s reply was cute, but let’s imagine this exchange instead…
“Let me just make this point, John, because we’re not campaigning anymore,”
Then with a smile, “Thank you Barack, I’m aware of that.”
The liberals would have gone NUTS. “How dare he disrespect the President!”, etc.
Posted by: Open-Mind | February 26, 2010, 12:38 am 12:38 am
As a Health Ins. agent dealing specifically with Medicare plans…it kills me to hear the stories that I hear from the seniors….how they choose between their prescriptions and eating. ….I hope you all wake up soon…..the problem isn’t as small as healthcare reform….we need to make a government reform….it doesn’t matter what party is in office they all have an agenda and “we the people” are not on the agenda…..it is all about suppression….we allow it to go on by continuing to vote them in….we allow them to pay themselves more than they are worth…and we allow them to collect that same pay when their time in office is over…they get a healthcare plan unlike what we are offered….and they do it on our tax dollars and americans gripe about it but no one is proactive in making the biggest change needed and that’s taking back control of our government and stop letting them push us into poverty
because you think we can’t do anything about it….Americans incase you forgot this is OUR country without us there wouldn’t be them!!!!!
Posted by: Teresa | February 26, 2010, 12:45 am 12:45 am
XXX, instead of focussing on R vs D, I think it’s more constructive to focus on conservatives vs progressives. Conservatives believe in smaller government, less spending, lower taxes, personal responsibility, and a strong national defense. Progressive want the opposite of that.
Today, the D’s in congress are mostly progressives. Unfortunately about half the R’s are also, and those are the R’s you are really complaining about. It’s also the trigger for the recent rebirth of fiscal conservatism.
Posted by: Open-Mind | February 26, 2010, 12:53 am 12:53 am
Unfortunately about half the R’s are also, and those are the R’s you are really complaining about. It’s also the trigger for the recent rebirth of fiscal conservatism.
Posted by: Open-Mind | Feb 26, 2010 12:53:07 AM
What????
A large majority of the liberals and progressives in Congress favor universal health care (and a public option or single payer), diplomacy over military action, stem cell research, the legalization of same sex marriage, secular government, transparent government, environmental protection laws, climate change legislation, the preservation of abortion rights, civil rights, human rights and the protection of civil liberties.
There’s no way half the Republicans in Congress are “progressive”. What they are is neoliberal neocons (who are perfectly comfortable with deficits and big guv.)
Since our culture is so into sound bites, the easiest way to distinguish a progressive from a conservative is to ask yourself whether they are for progress or trying to conserve the good ole days of the last President they voted for (so in presently, that would be the good ole days of Bush-Cheney– see Cheney being cheered at CPAC, a conservative gathering.)
Posted by: progressive mama | February 26, 2010, 1:25 am 1:25 am
. “How dare he disrespect the President!”, etc.
Posted by: Open-Mind |
in your imaginary setting, one might have to also imagine that during a presidential address to congress, a republican would shout out:
‘you lie’..
re: conservatives vs progressives:
Conservatives believe in smaller government, less spending, lower taxes, personal responsibility, and a strong national defense. Progressive want the opposite of that.
to state that ‘Progressives’ don’t want a strong national defense is a canard. There is a great debate about what is necessary, and how to form policy to insure national defense, but to imply that ‘progressives’ want the opposite of a strong national defense is at best a lame ‘talking point’.
As I mentioned, call ‘them’ Republicans or Conservatives, ‘they’ do not initiate ‘smaller government’, With ‘less spending, lower taxes’, these are wonderful folksy sayings but what do they really mean? Less spending on what?
re: personal responsibility
you’ll have to elaborate your view of what that means.
Posted by: XXX | February 26, 2010, 1:40 am 1:40 am
xxx wrote: “Dems will be judged by what they do when they are running things.”
.
Well, based on what they have done so far in the last 3 years? UNPRECEDENTED FAILURE!
.
oBama said the same thing: “Judge me by the people with whom I surround myself”.
.
OK, if you say so, RADICAL and INCOMPETENT are the first things that come to mind.
Posted by: gk | February 26, 2010, 7:53 am 7:53 am
How come everyone is bickering on this site about who sounds like an idiot? Or who snapped at who?
Seems to me the bill writers got what they wanted. Everyone is discussing the attitudes of these two, but no one is discussing the points McCain brought up.
Why is Florida getting more money for seniors than other states? There are seniors in every single state, and they should get the same treatment as Florida seniors. And why is a hospital being built in CT, but not in other states that may need hospitals? These special clauses are of great concern in my opinion, but they weren’t even discussed. Instead the President goes on the defensive like a little kid and says “The election is over, John”. Way to ignore the actual issue at hand. The President loses my respect a little bit more each day he is in office.
Posted by: Keith | February 26, 2010, 9:39 am 9:39 am
Progressive Mama, regarding the progressive ideology, I was focusing on national fiscal and national defense issues. The rest of the issues you mentioned (abortion, gay marriage) etc should be regulated at the state (not federal) level when necessary. That way you can pick the state that meets your ideals without imposing them on the rest of us.
Posted by: Open-Mind | February 26, 2010, 9:56 am 9:56 am
XXX, you keep interchanging conservative and republican as if they are the same thing, but they are not. R and D are political parties. Parties care about getting their party reelected and maintaining its power base. C and P describe a spectrum of ideologies which have already been described here. Clearly, most people will not believe in ALL the ideals of their favorite ideology. For example, a person might be believe in gay marriage, but be a traditional conservative in all other respects. My point was … it is the fiscal policies of the progressive ideology which have gradually brought the USA to its knees over the last 100 years, and now things are declining faster.
Example. $5T debt when Bush (fiscal progessive) started. About $10T when Obama (super progressive) was elected. About $14T by the end of this year. Our out-of-control plane is accelerating towards the ground because its progressive engines are now running at full-throttle.
Posted by: Open-Mind | February 26, 2010, 10:08 am 10:08 am
progressive mama | Feb 25, 2010 7:34:18 PM posted: “… to attend the healthcare summit, McCain had to cancel his other plans — a fundraiser sponsored by BGR PAC, the political action committee run by the lobbying firm Barbour, Griffith and Rogers…PhRMA paid the lobbying firm $200,000.”
Thanks for this update from Salon, progressive mama. While McCain is clambering for “transparency”, it’s unholy how he, and Congress in general, work in the shadows with a gaggle of health industry Lobbyists.
These anti-consumer companies represent the very corporations who have fought for years to stop even small reforms.
Posted by: CenterOne | February 26, 2010, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
Posted by: XXX|
“How dare he disrespect the President!”, etc. in your imaginary setting, one might have to also imagine that during a presidential address to congress, a republican would shout out:
‘you lie’..
——–
Not sure what Joe Wilson’s outburst has to do with my question. Maybe you’re just dodging it because you don’t like the answer.
Otherwise it sounds like you’re equating Joe Wilson’s outburst with Obama’s disrespectful treatment of McCain yesterday. I recall that Wilson apologized profusely, was condemned by both parties, and was pretty well thrashed by the media for a couple weeks.
Obama? Not so much.
Posted by: Open-Mind | February 26, 2010, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
Posted by: Open-Mind | Feb 26, 2010 9:56:48 AM
The point was Open-Mind, we don’t claim the big guv Republicans. They are Republicans, and they do what Republicans have been doing for years– provide corporations with welfare and pump money into the military-industrial complex, increasing the deficit.
Posted by: progressive mama | February 26, 2010, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
“one might have to also imagine that during a presidential address to congress, a republican would shout out:
‘you lie’..”
.
Hard to imagine that a president would stand there and blatantly lie to congress. As the bamster said himself “we’re gonna call you out”. Well, he got a taste of his own medicine.
Posted by: gk | February 26, 2010, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
Adult stem cells are the key to understanding how humans develop the way they do. the use of stem cells is also a high -anticipated application. although certain cells are already utilized for this purpose(cancer cells for example are used to test anti tumor drugs). testing on Pluripotent cells would open up this field to a much better of cell types. the most important application would be cell therapy which is the use of stem cells to produce the cells and tissues required for the renewal or repair of body organs that have been damaged by mortal diseases such as cancer,spinal cord injuries, glaucoma, Parkinson’s,etc.
Posted by: Cathy Davis | February 26, 2010, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm