By MichaelJames

Feb 20, 2010 2:33pm

Michelle Obama to Governors: ‘Let’s Act, Let’s Move’

ABC News’ Yunji de Nies reports:

Michelle Obama is calling on the country’s governors to help in the battle against childhood obesity. 

"Let's act. Let's move. Let's give our kids the future they deserve, " she said in a speech, kicking off the annual winter meeting of the National Governors Association.

“There's no place for politics when it comes to fighting childhood obesity,” Mrs. Obama said, “Because with a phone call or the stroke of a pen, you can determine whether a child can see a doctor or get a decent education or have a safe place to play, because you all are fighting the real battles every day on behalf of our kids, and you don't have time for the fake battles.”

The first lady highlighted successful programs in several states to combat the problem, including Arkansas, with a nod to former Gov. Mike Huckabee.

“Arkansas started on the issue of childhood obesity way back in 2003 — something former Gov. Huckabee and I discussed yesterday when I appeared on his TV show,” the first lady said, “They screened students' BMIs, which was controversial.  They got healthier food into their schools and required regular physical education classes.  And as a result, that state was able to halt the rise of childhood obesity completely.

The first lady’s interview airs tonight and will be her first on Fox News.  The former Republican presidential candidate has waged his own, very public, battle of the bulge, losing more than 100 pounds as then-governor of Arkansas.  He went on to write a book chronicling his experience, entitled, "Quit Digging Your Grave With a Knife and Fork."

Mrs. Obama said helping America’s children get healthy is not only the right thing to do, it makes financial sense at a time when health care expenses are straining state budgets. She noted that each state has its own unique challenges and characteristics, and encouraged the governors to think creatively.

“Folks in West Virginia have taken the lead in bringing 'DDR' — that's 'Dance, Dance Revolution' — it's a new video game that gets kids up and moving,” she said. “And let me tell you, I can attest to 'Dance, Dance Revolution.'  We got it at Camp David, and it will make you sweat.  And it is addictive in a very good way.  The president still can't do it.”

FLOTUS Fashion Watch: Mrs. Obama wore a sleeveless coral sheath dress and pearl necklace.

User Comments

The issue isn’t whether obesity is good or bad – it’s definitely bad. But to the loony-left d-crat socialists, it’s another issue they will exploit to allow the federal government to control yet another aspect of your life and the life of your children. AND THAT IS VERY, VERY BAD.
Most “first ladies” work at trying to beautify America; in “for the first time in my life I’m proud of my country” michelle’s case, she clearly lacks the qualifications to do so.

Posted by: TeaPartyPatriot | February 20, 2010, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

“They screened students’ BMIs, which was controversial. They got healthier food into their schools and required regular physical education classes. And as a result, that state was able to halt the rise of childhood obesity completely.”

Posted by: tierra | February 20, 2010, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

TeaPartyPatriot:
Negative energy

Posted by: T | February 20, 2010, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

If the government is serious about the obesity issue then start by modifying the food stamp program. Limit purchases to real food.. not soda, candy, cake etc.

Posted by: emmy | February 20, 2010, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

emmy – excellent post! Food stamps need to be a LOT more restrictive on what they can be used for.

Posted by: Zinglesloff | February 20, 2010, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

Fighting obesity epidemic by encouraging kids exercise is great. But how about their parents? All parents who are lean or obese must also participate regular exercise. You can not force kids do something while you are not doing with your kids.

Posted by: Paperwhite | February 20, 2010, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

I read where in Missouri the state legislature is considering drug testing for welfare (food stamp) recipients.

Posted by: midwestflyover | February 20, 2010, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

There was room for several more pictures of the Obama’s on the ABC homepage. Why isn’t there more hoopla over the obama’s. Why don’t we have their bathroom schedules? You have a long way to go before you’re as good as CBS or NBC/MSNBC. Please, I’m begging you, I want non-stop coverage of everything that contains anything about the Obama’s. When was the last time you did a good story on his brother? Or the deportation of his illegal aunt? I want to know everything!!!

Posted by: Rueuhy | February 20, 2010, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

If the government is serious about the obesity issue then start by modifying the food stamp program. Limit purchases to real food.. not soda, candy, cake etc.
Posted by: emmy
Oh, I agree.
But then, they might buy a cake mix and some eggs and MAKE a cake!
Okay, we can add cake mixes to the banned list, too.
But then they might buy some flour, some eggs, some milk, some baking powder, some sugar, some salt, and some oil and make a cake entirely from scratch!
Okay, lets ban flour, eggs, milk, sugar, baking powder, salt and oil.
And I certainly agree that the fact that a kid got born into a poor family, or his parents lost their jobs through no fault of their own and are now facing homelessness, is HIS fault and he should definitely NOT get even a single bite of chocolate for Easter. That ought to teach him!!

Posted by: JaylahPriest | February 20, 2010, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

The First Lady gots “back” and she working to reduce it. Good luck Michelle!

Posted by: DeTwane | February 20, 2010, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Does she ever wear sleeves, even in the dead of winter? She’s proud of her shoulders, we get it, but she’d be taken more seriously if she dressed more professionally. She’s speaking to government officials, not attending a cocktail party.

Posted by: profodt | February 20, 2010, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

Wouldn’t it be pretty simple to just go back to the types of lunches that were served in the 60′s and 70′s before they let the pizza chains, and other fast food vendors come in and take out the soda machines? I remember healthy balanced meals when I was in school, and we ate them whether we “liked” them or not. This isn’t rocket science ….it has evolved into lazy; I venture that 80% of these kid’s parents do not know how to cook from scratch.

Posted by: CW | February 20, 2010, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

I think Mrs. Obama is wasting our money. The solution starts at the mind, not at the stomach. The Big Macs, the oily fries and the sodas are just that powerful.

Posted by: young_voter | February 20, 2010, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

young_voter: agreed. And when I hear people say that there is a genetic predisposition to be fat, I just wonder why this genetic-based malady has only recently emerged and only in the USA and not other parts of the world. People are not eating properly and are not feeding their children properly. Definitely not rocket science — it’s Eating 101.

Posted by: profdot | February 20, 2010, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

profdot – I was born on a diet. Yes some of us have a sluggish metabolism. This is scientific and not a myth.

Posted by: secondlook | February 20, 2010, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

Actually, profdot, that “genetic predestination” HAS started showing up recently in other nations. Nations that tend to eat a more westernized diet (read, eat like Americans).
But I don’t think Mrs. Obama is “wasting money” any more than Mrs. Bush (Barbara, not Laura) was wasting money supporting literacy in Americans. Both issues are important problems in our society and one of the first things that has to happen to work on a solution is that attention must be brought to the problem. Something that a First Lady is in a wonderful position to do.
Yes, it’s the FOOD we’re eating that is making us fat, but — I think — for a lot of Americans they kinda think, “So what? It’s just one Big Mac.” They need to be educated to truly understand that the Big Mac they eat today will ultimately end in a stroke or heart attack, or both.
And I also agree with Paperwhite, that this must start with the parents. We can’t be doing the “do as I say, not as I do” with our kids. And — for the most part — at least with younger children — we, as parents, have a good deal of influence over what goes into our childrens mouths. AND how active they are (or aren’t.)
While I’m never going to suggest McDonalds is a healthy place to eat, they’re at least trying to do their part. For example, offering apple slices instead of fries with a meal. Now we need to start educating people as to why it’s so important that they at least start choosing the apples over the fries.

Posted by: JaylahPriest | February 20, 2010, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

I am not sure on this, but it seems to me that about the time they took recess out of the school day and all these unhealthy choices for lunches were brought in is about the time the obesity issue began. If the kids are eating cr*p and not getting any physical exercise, it isn’t hard to understand what will happen for cryin’ out loud.

Posted by: CW | February 20, 2010, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

I spent my lunch money on a chocolate cream pie every day before school and I purchased this
treat from our high school snack window which was open at 7;30 AM .. and never was overweight … but then again, we never had this junk available to us at home! Yeah for the government school programs! Your tax dollars at work!

Posted by: Linda | February 20, 2010, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

they should eliminate all sodas from the school vending machines, eliminate all sweets, eliminate the fast food and make veggies the only choice for those on the school lunch programs.. then , of course, add PE back to the program and we might see some progress. Keep in mind, those eating subsidized lunches often get ONLY junk at home so they certainly don’t need any more at school.

Posted by: Linda | February 20, 2010, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

But I don’t think Mrs. Obama is “wasting money” any more than Mrs. Bush (Barbara, not Laura) was wasting money supporting literacy in Americans. Both issues are important problems in our society and one of the first things that has to happen to work on a solution is that attention must be brought to the problem. Something that a First Lady is in a wonderful position to do.
__________________________________
You just don’t get it. Nothing the Republicans do is a waste of money. Everything the Democrats do is a waste of money. Did the right wing programming fail?

Posted by: tierra | February 20, 2010, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

I’m inclined to agree with Linda’s post.
I can’t help but wonder how much of the increase in diagnoses of supposed ADD we’re seeing in our kids isn’t actually just the caffeine and sugar they’re ingesting with all those sodas and candy. (As in, they don’t really have ADD, they’re just on a constant sugar and caffeine buzz.)
And a parent even *attempting* to watch how much junk their kid is eating isn’t helped at all when, once the kid goes to school, he’s surrounded by a smorgasbord of unhealthy choices.
How can parents try to teach their kids stuff at home when our schools are doing the exact opposite?
I think kids all deserve a few sweets every once in a while. Even “food stamp kids.” But why should a food stamp mother be all that concerned about not giving her kids chips at home when they’re surrounded by junk food at school?

Posted by: JaylahPriest | February 20, 2010, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Kids need physical engagement and education on choosing the right foods to eat…..we educate them on sex, cigarettes and drugs. Bad food could be as “toxic” as all of the above. Good work, Mrs. Obama. It’s about time we get back to basics with our children … our future.

Posted by: sara | February 20, 2010, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

Doesn’t Michelle’s personal staff know that it is winter? Why is she always dressing in sleeveless summer dresses???

Posted by: jody | February 20, 2010, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

Not reported here, but she apparently made the statement that the WH is a “news free zone” – she doesn’t watch any news so she can make up her mind – kind of hard to do without any input – and this is a smart woman??? And, of course he signed a $10 Billion bill for her project – can’t he say “mmmm” as in million – as in, wouldn’t several hundred Million dollars to see if this has any merit be better?

Posted by: dukeymom | February 20, 2010, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Oh, I forgot to add that the staffers SHOULD know. After all, WE pay them $1.5 million per year to assist her, and groom her, and clothe her.

Posted by: jody | February 20, 2010, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

jody, you can’t come up with anything better to bash the Obama’s about today?
Believe me, if I had Michelle’s arms, I’d be baring them, too!
Which doesn’t even address the question, WHY is Michelle Obama’s wardrobe of such a concern to you anyway?

Posted by: JaylahPriest | February 20, 2010, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

Well, if the government (rather than the parent) is responsible for getting kids into physical shape, why not start a mandatory youth program like Germany had in the 1930s? It would go well with the mandatory insurance program.

Posted by: Publius | February 20, 2010, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

Publius, I don’t think anybody is suggesting that it’s the “government’s responsibility to get kids into shape.”
But I also think it’s not the governments responsibility to get my kid OUT of shape, either.
I would never deprive a child of an occasional “mini” candy-bar. (You know, those adult-two-bite sized ones?) But the candy bars in vendo-land at schools are full size. No kid needs 528 calories from one Snicker bar. (The “fun sized” Snicker bars are 70 calories.)
And I want to be the one that decides how often, and how many, candy bars (or other “junk food treats” my kids get.
Also, studies have shown (repeatedly) that children simply learn better when their day is broken up by periods of physical activity.
Back when I was a kid, we had neighborhood schools, so we walked almost a mile to school, almost a mile home for lunch, almost a mile back to school, and almost a mile back home at the end of the school day. PLUS we had recess (for the first few grades), AND PE class all the way through 12th grade.
Now most kids ride the bus to school because they live too far away to walk, they stay at school over lunch (where they can eat nothing but junk food if they choose), and then come home to sit in front of a video game all day if their parents let them.
Health care costs in this country are skyrocketing because Americans are getting fatter. If the government wants people to get healthier and make healthier life choices, then I think they have an obligation to practice what they preach. And that means our schools need to get on-board this whole project, too.

Posted by: JaylahPriest | February 20, 2010, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Publius, it’s because WE spend a lot of OUR money for her personal assistants. Maybe she needs to fire them, and hire some new staffers who understand the seasonal changes and appropriate attire.
That’s all.

Posted by: jody | February 20, 2010, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Oh, and my typical lunch after I walked home in the middle of the day in grade school? A cup of soup and a half sandwich.

Posted by: JaylahPriest | February 20, 2010, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

Jaylah, “If the government wants people to get healthier and make healthier life choices, then I think they have an obligation to practice what they preach.”
I wonder why Michelle did not tackle smoking?? Kids are smoking in their early teens. Do you think it would look like she was a hypocrite since her hubby still smokes? (Smoking is far worse for health than being chubby.)

Posted by: jody | February 20, 2010, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

jody, Michelle Obama pays for her own clothes.
She does not (as you seem to imply) have a “dresser” (like British royalty do), that comes in every day, lays out her clothes, and dresses her.
She can dress the way she wants to, she doesn’t need to consult you before she gets dressed, and you trying to make an issue about it just shows your ignorance.

Posted by: JaylahPriest | February 20, 2010, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Jaylah,
It’s because WE spend a lot of OUR money for her personal assistants. Maybe she needs to fire them, and hire some new staffers who understand the seasonal changes and appropriate attire.
That’s all. You’re right — I don’t like Michelle – she’s an angry hater. All the image-makers in the world can’t hide THAT fact, because her countenance shows that hatred.

Posted by: jody | February 20, 2010, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Jaylah, You are wrong. WE pay $1.5 million for her stylists!! Wake up and read about it!! Her image-makers have talked about how they needed to change her perceived image in the media…to a softer perception. You mean to tell me, you can’t see how her clothing has changed? Geez, it figures you are duped by these people.

Posted by: jody | February 20, 2010, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Oh Jaylah,
Just so you know, they aren’t called “dressers”. They are called “image consultants” and they help with everything involved in a person’s perception. From clothing, jewelry, elocution, facial expressions, etc.

Posted by: jody | February 20, 2010, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

Actually, jody, if you read anything other than comic books, you’d know that health studies have shown that smoking and being overweight have pretty much equal negative effects on health.
Michelle Obama cannot take on every single issue this country faces. Not only is there not enough time in the day to do that, but — if you start trying to take on too many causes — your message about all of them gets watered down so much they’re meaningless.
So, just like EVERY OTHER FIRST LADY THIS COUNTRY HAS EVER HAD, she has to choose the two or three issues she feels the most strongly about. Childhood obesity is one of the causes she has chosen to focus on.
It’s clear you don’t like Michelle Obama. You are entitled to your own opinion. But coming here to complain about her dress, or her choice of causes, when the article is clearly about childhood obesity and her speech to the National Governors Association about childhood obesity only — as I said — shows your ignorance.
Why don’t you turn your computer off, make yourself a big sign that says, “SMOKING IS BAD FOR YOU” and go park your butt on a busy corner. You’d do a lot more good doing that than sitting around complaining about Mrs. Obama’s wardrobe.
At any rate, I’m tired of explaining the patently obvious to you.

Posted by: JaylahPriest | February 20, 2010, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

ROLFMBO
Is that the “I know you are, but what am I” defense?
How does it feel to know that people you’ve never even met are laughing themselves silly at you?

Posted by: JaylahPriest | February 20, 2010, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Kudos Ms. Obama! She came to the first grocery store with fresh foods that North Philly has had in 10 years yesterday! She recognized the work that a local N. Philly school has made over the last decade. Obesity was cut in half in comparison to the other schools in the area! Corner stores are now carrying healthy foods instead of just processed crap. I think this is an AWESOME cause to get involved with and so happy people are taking this seriously. Access to affordable healthy foods now!

Posted by: Valerie | February 20, 2010, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Since when do the states have to listen to Washington to determine policy? Let alone the (harrumph!) first lady… Jeez her husband could use a few pointers…
The states created the government, under the 10th amendment they don’t have to follow one thing Washington says.
All Washington does is buy their obedience with YOUR tax dollars! (As in money they stole from you by mere force)
If the states wise up and see that Washington is spending them into insolvency, and want to limit or even sever the one sided, abusive relationship… I say THANK YOU!
If they want to ride “the road to serfdom” on the backs of the poor, on behalf of the elite (or as Obama and GW Bush put it, “their base.”) Then make them WORK for a living by firing THEM! (You know, instead of settling for being fired yourself!)

Posted by: jafo | February 20, 2010, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

When is it the states problem to stop child obesity and not the parents. This is like telling teenage girls not to get pregnant, but if you do you can collect more welfare for each kid you have. Tell cities to build more supervised play grounds and furnish the equipment for playing games.

Posted by: Pablo | February 20, 2010, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

Kudos Ms. Obama! She came to the first grocery store with fresh foods that North Philly has had in 10 years yesterday! She recognized the work that a local N. Philly school has made over the last decade. Obesity was cut in half in comparison to the other schools in the area! Corner stores are now carrying healthy foods instead of just processed crap. I think this is an AWESOME cause to get involved with and so happy people are taking this seriously. Access to affordable healthy foods now!
Posted by: Valerie | Feb 20, 2010 7:02:39 PM
______________________________________
Good to hear from someone who actually knows about the project – instead of just the hate mongers with their pre-conceived agenda and prejudice.

Posted by: tierra | February 20, 2010, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

jafo, if you’d bothered to read the article, you’d have known that this is about a speech Mrs. Obama gave to the National Governors Association.
Which, of course, would be the association that the governors of each STATE belong to.
Mrs. Obama holds absolutely no office in the United States government. She speaks only as a concerned citizen and as a parent of two children. “Washington” isn’t telling anybody anything.
Perhaps you think childhood obesity (which inevitably turns into adult obesity) is a good thing? Higher health costs and all that?

Posted by: JaylahPriest | February 20, 2010, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

Pablo, how can you reasonably expect parents to do anything about childhood obesity when schools have eliminated all physical activity from their programs and not only allow junk-food vendo-lands in their buildings, but often offer junk food as part of their school lunches?
Yes, I agree this is something that parents should be responsible for. But they should not have to fight governments (whether school boards, the state, or federal) to do it.
The school lunch program operates under federal government rules. It’s the federal government that is giving the okay to include junk food as part of the school lunch program.
It is often school boards that decide to allow vendo-lands filled with junk food into school buildings.
States have the authority to decide whether recess or physical education classes can be cut from school curriculums.
Yes, the parents are responsible, but they shouldn’t have to fight the government to keep their kids healthy.

Posted by: JaylahPriest | February 20, 2010, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

What school are you guys talken bout…cause the PUBLIC schools my children attend not only DO NOT have vending, the lunches served DO NOT include white bread any more…only wheat. And gym is still a mandatory course in elementary through high school (9th grade to receive the credit for graduation).

Posted by: Jesus_Allah_Budda | February 20, 2010, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

I’m watching the first lady on Huckabee and if anyone that has access to her by chance monitors what people say about her, please tell her she needs to stop saying “you know”.

Posted by: Axey | February 20, 2010, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Let’s give our kids the future they deserve

Eating rice and red beans?

Posted by: smartlillena | February 20, 2010, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Oh my. I love how the haters have really stepped out. So what if the American people pay for her wardrobe as they did for previous First Ladies. Who cares, what you need to do is listen to the message that she is trying to get across. Every First Lady had some kind of cause she cared about. Please, if you have an issue, try to state it without being so hateful. Wake up, she is her for the next three years and there is nothing you and I can do about. I am happy that we pay to keep our First Lady looking incredible since the world always have thier eyes on her. It was just a suggestion and not a law.

Posted by: babyj21 | February 20, 2010, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

Jesus_Allah_Budda, you are lucky to live in the school district you live in then.
I’m afraid that it’s quite true that a whole lot of schools DO have junk-food vendo-lands in them, DON’T require PE classes, and DO serve a lot of junk-type food in their school lunches.
So basically, Mrs. Obama was suggesting the type of schools your kids go to should be the standard for all schools. And I agree with her.

Posted by: JaylahPriest | February 20, 2010, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

The McDonald CEO said that they are willing to put out healthy foods, but once they do, there’s little demand. People still demand triple cheese burgers, sundae hot fudge with three layers of colouring, supersize french fries with a super large coca cola. Everything now is super sized, super large, buy 1 get 1 meal free. The CEO said that if the market wants healthy food, he will make sure that McDonald will supply them.

Posted by: young_voter | February 20, 2010, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

Oh my. I love how the haters have really stepped out.

How can you call it hatred because I question (ridiculous) claims of creating THOUSANDS of jobs with a $400 million program?

Posted by: smartlillena | February 20, 2010, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

Oh my. I love how the haters have really stepped out. So what if the American people pay for her wardrobe as they did for previous First Ladies. Who cares, what you need to do is listen to the message that she is trying to get across. Every First Lady had some kind of cause she cared about. Please, if you have an issue, try to state it without being so hateful.

Posted by: tierra | February 21, 2010, 4:05 am 4:05 am

It is so sad that today in the USA people will spend time trying to criticize the messenger rather than listen to the message.
She is making sense, admit it.
Why is it so difficult to see the light. Discussing her clothes and assistants will not solve the obese problems. Remember small minds discuss people.. big minds discuss issues. Grow Up.

Posted by: jude | February 21, 2010, 7:22 am 7:22 am

I just think it is sad that the Governor of New York State was at a hockey game throwing out the ceremonial 1st puck rather than being in Washington listen to the First Lady. Maybe he wasn’t invited!

Posted by: Laurie Blount | February 21, 2010, 9:02 am 9:02 am

Maybe he wasn’t invited!

He probably didn’t give a rat’s ***. Actually, I doubt that she or anyone there cared about anything except getting it over with.

Posted by: smartlillena | February 21, 2010, 9:22 am 9:22 am

Now that her husband in in power, she finally cares??? Too little — too late.

Posted by: THINK ABOUT IT | February 21, 2010, 11:48 am 11:48 am

I would like to know why we the American people have to pay $400 million or $10 billion (read both amounts) for a first lady’s pet project. Look at the incredible amount of staff time that’s gone into making her look good –coordination with Valerie Jarriett (remarks at the Oluympics) plus with those planning Gov meetings, plus all kinds of other coordination, because God forbid a first lady could just do her thing without it being a major hoo-haw. No, all Obama ventures must be first, best, biggest, whatever, even when they fail.
I have no quarrel with her taking this up. I have MAJOR issues with us paying for it. We did not elect her.
WOuld love to know how this endeavor compares, staff and money-wise, with other First Lady projects.
Go to it ABC!

Posted by: liz | February 21, 2010, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

I would like to know why we the American people have to pay $400 million or $10 billion (read both amounts) for a first lady’s pet project.
Posted by: liz | Feb 21, 2010 2:20:53 PM
____________________________________
If you gave it half a thought, or had done a sliver of research on the subject you would know obesity is going to have a HUGE economic impact on the health care system if it isn’t shifted. It’s already begun.

Posted by: tierra | February 21, 2010, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Note to All:
West Virginia is not part of Virginia.

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | February 21, 2010, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

All first ladies have to come up with some kind of personal project…it must be in the job description. This one should be a breeze for all of us…..the way her husband is handling the economy, losing weight ain’t gonna be hard for anyone.

Posted by: justj joey | February 21, 2010, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

the way her husband is handling the economy, losing weight ain’t gonna be hard for anyone.
Posted by: justj joey | Feb 21, 2010 4:15:11 PM
_________________________________
“I find it interesting that you have a lot of the Republicans running around, and pushing back on the stimulus money and saying, ‘This doesn’t create any new job,’” said Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. “And then they go out and do the photo ops, posing with the big check and they say: ‘Isn’t this great, look at the kind of money I’ve provided for the state and this is money to create jobs, and this has created 10,000 new jobs, this has created 20,000 news jobs, and all those kinds of things.’ It doesn’t match up.”
It’s hypocrisy, said host Terry Moran. “Exactly,” Schwarzenegger replied.
“Anyone that says this hasn’t created a job, they should talk to the 150,000 people getting jobs in California,” he added, “from the private sector and also from the public sector.”

Posted by: tierra | February 21, 2010, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

You know, I really do not care about your kids being overweight. I am doing this to pad the pockets of SEIU, ‘you know’.

Posted by: MsL | February 21, 2010, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

You know, I really do not care about your kids being overweight.
_______________________________________
Hogwash.

Posted by: tierra | February 21, 2010, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

You know it’s interesting that Michelle Obama is up to all kinds of stuff, she wants to tackle American child and teen Obesity and also Education. It’s funny she has an impressive education herself, but her own education had nothing to do with nutrition, but I guess being married to the President is enough of a qualification for any job…lol. Seriously though she has an impressive background,

Posted by: markmarks | February 21, 2010, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

It’s funny she has an impressive education herself, but her own education had nothing to do with nutrition
_______________________________________
The head of an airline corporation does not have to know how to fix a jet engine.

Posted by: tierra | February 21, 2010, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

tierra, whether obese children affect future health care costs has NOTHING to do wit MIchelle Obama’s entry into making policy and spending OUR money. We did not elect her. We (well, I didn’t) elected her husband to make policy and drive legislation, not a dilettante first lady who wants to make her mark in the world. Fine — do so, but don’t spend my money or waste the time of people being paid with my money. Don’t spend my money making things better for the lunch workers who are unionized and who — guess what! — would get more benefits and better pay under the Michelle Obama plan. Who’d have thunk it…

Posted by: liz | February 21, 2010, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

tierra, whether obese children affect future health care costs has NOTHING to do wit MIchelle Obama’s entry into making policy and spending OUR money.
____________________________________
First Lady’s typically take up particular causes and initiatives. Nancy Reagan’s major initiative was her anti-drug crusade, Laura Bush was involved in issues of concern to children and women, both nationally and internationally focused on education and women’s health. And yes, these initiatives involve financing.
Sounds to me like you’re just biased against this First Lady.

Posted by: tierra | February 21, 2010, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

One wonders if the First Lady has really considered the main problem with kids and obesity?
That is…..kids cannot go outside, without parental supervision, because of child predators.
Since most kids live in cities, and since going outside in a city, can get a kid killed, unless their parent is right there with them, the probability of kids getting more healthy exercise, is pretty dismal.
Parent simply can’t be there, all the time, due to the demands of work, family needs, and other issues.
This is a losing battle, unless the country returns to a single wage earner economy, which is likely impossible.
All this talk will accomplish little, because the conditions of the world’s environment, simply won’t be able to support it.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | February 22, 2010, 10:46 am 10:46 am

It’s so ridiculous how some people have their negative reactive system always activated each time a subject that requires a very critical attention as it affects the overall health of those involved, is shared.

Posted by: Austin Chuks | February 22, 2010, 11:30 am 11:30 am

Rick McDaniel – Interesting points, but really! Parents should be with their children. (parents could use the excercise too!) Have the schools implement PE classes again. Parents could buy a treadmill. Parents could take responsibility and feed them proper nutrition in stead of dumping them off at the fast food restaurants. Parents could quit buying all that video game crap that’s loaded with violence. PARENTS COULD DO A LOT, IF THEY WEREN’T SO SELF CENTERED!

Posted by: Jackson | February 22, 2010, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

Least we forget Michele and most of Washington elites KIDS go to schools (TRUE) who have FRENCH chefs…she (family) Washington hucksters ALL eat $150 KOBE beef from JAPAN and ALL organic foods!!!
If she cared so much – WHY (media didn’t cover – would make them look bad) did the Obama administration cancel VOUCHER program for D.C. kids –back to the ghetto schools for them. As for Valerie Jarret (unbelievable) Google Valerie Jarret one of our nations top TEN slum landlords.
States can’t feed – give services to the down and out – out of work and they want MILLIONS to fight FAT – give me a break. Why not take up the battle of EMPTY food pantries or thousands of thousands (including HAWAII) living in TENTS in Super Power USA.

Posted by: Yankee228 | February 22, 2010, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Yankee228 | Feb 22, 2010 5:08:18 PM posted: “WHY…did the Obama administration cancel VOUCHER program for D.C. kids”?
Here’s the reason: The DC School Choice Incentive Act of 2003 established the first federally funded private school voucher program in the US. This Act also mandated an independent, rigorous evaluation to assess the impact of the program on academic achievement, school safety, and other outcomes.
This evaluation found both good and bad. For example kids reported feeling safer in schools with access to Vouchers. But there was NO evidence of a statistically significant difference in test scores between Voucher students and public school kids.
As with any Federal funded program, if results do not justify the costs, it makes sense to explore other solutions. I don’t understand why this is a problem, unless the underlying issue has more to do with destruction of public schools, replaced by government support for religious schools.
You can find the study online: Evaluation of the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program: Impacts After One Year.

Posted by: CenterOne | February 23, 2010, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

“Folks in West Virginia have taken the lead in bringing ‘DDR’ — that’s ‘Dance, Dance Revolution’ — it’s a new video game that gets kids up and moving,” she said. “And let me tell you, I can attest to ‘Dance, Dance Revolution.’ We got it at Camp David, and it will make you sweat. And it is addictive in a very good way. The president still can’t do it.”
I LOL’ed .. a new game? No dear, it’s not a new game, been around for what, 8, 9 years now? It IS great exercise – an hour of DDR can burn up to 400 calories, help with stamina, balance, control, concentration and motivation.
It could actually be a fairly inexpensive way to bring PE back to the schools and in a way that a lot of kids would like – and adults. Yeah you sitting here reading this. Go get a console (the most expensive part granted), one of the DDR games and pad and get moving!

Posted by: miso | May 18, 2010, 1:16 am 1:16 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.