By Jonathan Blakely

Feb 22, 2010 9:23am

New Name for Iraq Mission Meets With Criticism from Left

As we were first to tell you last week, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates wrote a memo to Central Command commander Gen. David Petraeus telling him that as of September the mission in Iraq will no longer be called "Operation Iraqi Freedom," but rather "Operation New Dawn."

Gates wrote in a memo exclusively obtained by ABC News that by changing the name at the same time as the change of mission — the scheduled withdrawal of U.S. combat troops — the US is sending "a strong signal" that "our forces are operating under a new mission."

The move, Gates writes, "also presents opportunities to synchronize strategic communication initiatives, reinforce our commitment to honor the Security Agreement, and recognize our evolving relationship with the Government of Iraq."

The move has met with some criticism. In a statement, Brian Wise, executive director of Military Families United said, “You cannot end a war simply by changing its name.  Despite the Administration’s efforts to spin realities on the ground, their efforts do not change the situation at hand in Iraq. Operational military decisions should not be made for purposes of public relations, as the Secretary of Defense cites, but should be made in the best interests of our nation, the  troops on the ground and their families back home.”

And some criticism is now coming from the Left as well.

On her website, Arianna Huffington writes this "New Dawn will, incidentally, still see 50,000 U.S. troops left in Iraq…'Operation New Dawn' sounds like 'A New Way of Forgetting This Ever Happened.' It's time to brand the war what it always was — 'A Huge, Tragic Mistake' — and get the hell out."

And on her blog, Cindy Sheehan writes that she "found out that the 'operation' that killed my son is over. 'Operation Iraqi Freedom' got its name after the 'great' Powers That Be figured out that 'Operation Iraqi Liberation' stood for 'OIL.' Now, Obama’s SecDef, Robert Gates, has changed that benign name to an even more New-Agey, Sweeter-than-Honey name: 'Operation New Dawn.' Doesn’t that sound nice? Who doesn’t like New Dawns? Except perhaps the people of Falluja who were brutalized in a Marine siege back in 2004 that was inappropriately entitled, Operation New Dawn."

Continues Sheehan: "It doesn’t matter what the U.S. decides to call its 'Operations:' part of us will reject the propaganda, and part of us will embrace it wanting very desperately to believe that our country is not a rogue state and/or that Obama is not as bad, or worse, than Bush. Innocent people still die and our soldiers are still victims, whether they come home dead or alive, whatever the war criminals in DC decide to label their crimes as."

- jpt

User Comments

>’Operation New Dawn’ sounds like ‘A New Way of Forgetting This Ever Happened.’ It’s time to brand the war what it always was — ‘A Huge, Tragic Mistake’ — and get the hell out.”
Wait…didn’t Joe Biden say this was going to be one of the greatest accomplishments of THIS ADMINISTRATION?
If we had listed to morons like Biden or blowhards like Huffington, Saddam Hussein would still be in power with Iran pursuing nukes next door. Yea. That would have been an AWESOME situation to let fester for the last decade.

Posted by: Good Lt. | February 22, 2010, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Veterans are known by what operations they served in. My son is a veteran of Iraqi Freedom. You even have to list it on the income tax forms.
This is just another inane attempt at pr at the cost of who knows how much money and another red tape headache.
Some veterans wait for a year to get re-enlistment bonuses. Payments are not made to for their GI bill schooling. Promises of active duty until this date is cut with no warning so the vet is “laid off” without a thank you, kiss my butt or anything else.
Returning vets who have six-month active status, for instance, get it cut into two orders so they can avoid paying a housing allowance, part of their pay.
Let’s focus on taking care of our troops instead of thinking up ways to change every single thing that occurred during the previous administration.
Changing the name doesn’t change the war, it just leads to more headaches for the military and I think they have all they can handle right now.
Want to make a change that matters and will save lives? Change the ROE.

Posted by: Julie Weathers | February 22, 2010, 9:42 am 9:42 am

How much taxpayer money did this name change cost?
They will have to change all of the patches on the uniforms of those serving in this theater. They will have to change all stationary used by members in this theater. They will have to change service medals of people serving in this theater as well as campaign ribbons, etc.
This all adds up and adds to the depressed economy we already have. As so many others have said, same war different name.

Posted by: Robert Bockenkamp | February 22, 2010, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.