By MichaelJames

Feb 26, 2010 8:25pm

Obama Administration Officials: Af-Pak Plan Proceeding, Battle for Kandahar City Next

ABC News' Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller report:

Senior administration officials briefed reporters today on the pending battle for Kandahar City and the larger strategy in Afghanistan and Pakistan, which they described as progressing well.

The recent military activity in Marja “is the tactical prelude to larger, more comprehensive operations later this year in Kandahar City,” one official said. “It’s strategically important because Kandahar City is the home base, capital city, if you will, of the Taliban movement.”

The Taliban were founded in and around the city, the sources said, and before 9/11, the city was Mullah Omar’s home base.

“It’s their fountainhead, if you will,” the source said, “their center of gravity.”

The sources described developments both pending and recent in the region as the result of President Obama’s new strategy for Af-Pak, as announced at West Point.

“We’re not even 90 days beyond the West Point speech on Dec. 1,” a senior administration official said. “That speech for us was really a mile marker because it transitioned us inside the administration from policy development … to policy implementation.”

In the previous nine months, the Obama administration has seen a “significant strategic shift” in Pakistan, the officials said: “the decision by the Pakistani security forces to take the fight to the Pakistani Taliban.”

There has been more intelligence sharing and joint activities; of course, it hasn’t all been karahi and kheer.

“This isn’t going to be easy,” an official said. “This is not going to be straight line progress. … Two steps forward, one step back is about what we ought to expect.”

In the past, the U.S. government has argued to the Pakistani government that the extremists in the region – the Afghan Taliban, Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (the TTP, or Pakistani Taliban) and al Qaeda — “are more like a syndicate, and it’s very difficult to separate and discriminate one piece from the network itself.”

Pakistani government officials haven’t always  agreed with that view, but right now there are two Pakistani army divisions holding the Swat Valley, including two divisions that came off the front lines with India and are now conducting a “classic counterinsurgency” in the Swat region.

How long this cooperative mindset will continue is unclear; the officials described the capture of Mullah Baradar as the result of some luck and a lot of hard work.

Either way, it’s working.

“There are fewer places to hide” in Fatah and the Af-Pak border, an official said. “A number of key commanders and leaders [of the Taliban] have been taken off of the battlefield over the last several months. The trend line is strong. It’s positive.”

But the U.S. will need to continue its outreach.

“Pakistan is in tough straits and we are reaching out to them on multiple fronts,” the official said. "We have recently made progress in reinitiating a prolonged, deliberate, strategic dialogue, bilateral dialogue.”

The dialogue has taken place since last fall and has continued with a series of senior American engagements in Islamabad.

“And we anticipate in the next 30 days or so it will feature a strategic dialogue event here hosted by Secretary of State” Hillary Clinton.  No date has been announced yet.

The goal for Afghanistan this year is to degrade the Taliban and reverse its momentum over the last couple years. In this first 90 days, the U.S. is still bringing resources to bear and the Afghan security forces have increased their numbers.

The strategy, as we know, is: clear, hold, build, transfer. In Marja, allied forces are well into the first phase, but it is not yet complete.

“We don’t have adequate security yet in all of the districts in and around Marja,” an official said. There is “reasonable” security in the town center itself, “but there are pockets of resistance on the outside. So we are somewhere between clear and hold and that’s pretty much on track.”

The building process will be the most challenging, the officials said, because it means “bringing governance into a place where the Taliban used to govern, and that’s going to be tough because they, from the outset, enjoyed the trust and the confidence of the people, the local people. They are suspicious and we have to win that trust and win that confidence before they are willing to side with the Afghan government. And that’s really the  contest.”

“So it’s not so much a matter of the physical contest of who controls the weapons and all that. It’s a question of who controls the confidence of the people … and that will only come after we’re able to deliver.”

President Obama gets a weekly, lengthy, comprehensive written assessment of how things are going in the theater. On a monthly basis, he meets by way of video conference with military and civilian leaders in the field and hears firsthand from them what he gets via the written reports.

Quarterly, there is a “bottom to top” review against a set of metrics and measure how they are doing.

Annually – in December, this year – they will do another major comprehensive review. The president will ask the question, “Is the approach taking hold and working?”

- Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller

User Comments

THis country owes 12 TRILLION dollars. We are broke. OUr congressman/women are spending money like drunken sailors, adding billions everyday to our national debt. It is predicted that by the end of Obama’s term, we will owe 19 TRILLION DOLLARS (we are only talking three years from now.) If you added up the assets of everybody in this country, including the assets of William Buffett and Bill Gates, we would not have enough money to pay the US debt. Does anybody even know how many ZEROES there are in a TRILLION dollars? 12 TRILLION is incomprehensible.
What people don’t understand, including many on this board who want to strangle Senator BUNNING (and I feel for those of you suffering…please do not think for one minute that my heart does not ache when I hear stories of human suffering by my fellow countryman)..but what people don’t understand (or even believe) is that we are moving towards CHAOS. Very soon, the government is going to break down.
Think.
What happens to the person who is broke…maxed out on credit…and continues to try to spend more…What if, despite being broke, he tries to do everything in his power to keep spending…borrowing and borrowing. Eventually this person’s world is going to collapse. It is inevitable and unstoppable. Now substitute this person for the Federal government. This is what our Federal Govt is doing. ..Spending and spending and spending.
We are in a very dangerous place in America, because we are becoming so indebted that soon our savings accounts, our 401ks, our homes will all become worthless. And when our dollar continues to drop and become just like MONOPOLY MONEY, there will be political and human chaos in the United States of America. It won’t just be 30 million suffering…it will be all of us….all of us trying to find a way to eat, pay for heat, live….can you imagine that world??? It is a dangerous vision.
So this lone senator…Senator Bunning…is looking at the 12 trillion dollar debt of this country and he is PLEADING with Congress (just as he would plead with the broke debtor on the street determined to spend more) to either stop spending…or find a way to pay for the money it wishes to spend. He is pleading with them to take the money from the stimulus package. FIND THE MONEY…don’t just spend from borrowing and adding to the 12 TRILLION.
But the other senators don’t want to listen…as they never do.
Bunning, in my opinion is not the enemy. We need people like Bunning to plead with government to stop spending before their actions take ALL of us down. For those who don’t believe me, or want to blast me….please look…everyday…at this website… The spending never ends.

Posted by: kc | February 26, 2010, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

kc,
And that has to do with the Battle for Kandahar City how exactly?

Posted by: progressive mama | February 26, 2010, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

kc: You are right in what you say but it’s Warren Buffet, not William Buffet. Credibility is important and a command of the facts…essential.

Posted by: kathrynf | February 26, 2010, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

“soon our savings accounts, our 401ks, our homes will all become worthless.”
————————————
Now that economic crisis hits the overprivileged, all of a sudden they become concerned. A day late and a dollar short, as they say.
Speaking on behalf of the majority who don’t have these things, I’d have to say your tears are long overdue, and your priorities are skewed.

Posted by: Flash Override | February 26, 2010, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

Afghanistan could be one of George Bush’s greatest achievements.

Posted by: For The Record | February 26, 2010, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

Didn’t we take this city once before? Maybe there will be a third time too. Bring our boys home.

Posted by: Huh | February 26, 2010, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

And if we win in Afghanistan, we’ll have the world’s largest collection of dust and rocks. Oh, with lots of live land mines. Insiders there call it Trashistan.

Posted by: PM | February 26, 2010, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

“Quarterly, there is a “bottom to top” review against a set of metrics and measure how they are doing.”
Etch-a-Sketch.

Posted by: For the Record | February 26, 2010, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

New Obama Interrogation Unit Not Deployed to Question Captured Taliban Chief
Two [U.S.] officials say their understanding was that the reason that HIG personnel had not been sent to question Baradar was because Pakistan’s government was reluctant to allow them to do so. However, two other officials say that the Obama administration did not ask Pakistan for permission to send a HIG team to question Baradar, though these officials would offer no explanation for why the administration would not want to use HIG in this case. A White House official declined to comment on the matter. A Pakistani Embassy spokesman had no immediate official comment. -Newsweek, 2/26

Posted by: For the Record | February 26, 2010, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

Posted by: kc
but Cheney said deficits don’t matter, how come it matters now and not then for the republicans?
I’m asking not due to snarkiness,.. if there’s a reason that it was OK to run deficits, and hand out 2 tax cuts while waging 2 wars I’d like to know..

Posted by: PO'd | February 27, 2010, 1:44 am 1:44 am

Posted by: For the Record
I’m not even for wasting time in Afghanistan or Iraq, but the Pres has done more in 1 year in Afghanistan and Pakistan and Yemen and who knows where else, than the Bushies with all their bravado did in 8 years of neglect

Posted by: PO'd | February 27, 2010, 1:47 am 1:47 am

Posted by: For the Record
I’m not even for wasting time in Afghanistan or Iraq, but the Pres has done more in 1 year in Afghanistan and Pakistan and Yemen and who knows where else, than the Bushies with all their bravado did in 8 years of neglect
Posted by: PO’d | Feb 27, 2010 1:47:08 AM
I’m not a military expert but I do think that, luckily for Obama, the war in Iraq is going well and he is ABLE to concentrate on Afghanistan. Setting aside for a moment the reasons why we are in each country, it would be interesting to see what he would be doing when the war in Iraq was at its worst.

Posted by: For the Record | February 27, 2010, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

You can’t rewrite history and make the claim that Bush succeeded in Iraq in any way.
Iraq is quieter now because of the wholesale slaughter of the Sunni population.
Iraq is not a success in any way.
“Winning” means getting out of there.

Posted by: Flash Override | February 27, 2010, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

it would be interesting to see what he would be doing when the war in Iraq was at its worst.
Posted by: For the Record
but, that’s just the point,
what we know..
is that after the initial Iraq invasion there were many years of bad policy, strategy, and disastrous results. At some point you have to come to grips with the fact that where the US ended up after the Bush/Cheney neocon fantasy that involved Iraq is a near miracle .
re: he is ABLE to concentrate on Afghanistan.
again that’s the point, Afghanistan is where Bin Laden was, and Bush abandoned that fight to go to Iraq… it was hubris, and arrogance and short sighted.

Posted by: PO'd | February 28, 2010, 1:05 am 1:05 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.