By Kristina Wong

Feb 18, 2010 8:12pm

Obama: Stimulus Stopped Possibility of Second Depression

From Jon Garcia and Yunji de Nies:

Before President Barack Obama began touting the political bonafides of Michael Bennet – at a fundraiser for Bennet – he made sure to mention that his year old stimulus stopped a second depression. 

“One year later, thanks largely to the Recovery Act, we can stand here again and say that a second depression is no longer a possibility,” Obama said, adding all the statistics about job growth (“about 2 million”) and economic growth (“nearly 6%”).

Obama then launched into his usual laundry list of all the things he says his administration did in its first year to pull the country out of the economic downturn: extending unemployment insurance, cutting taxes for first time home buyers, making COBRA health care cheaper, and keeping police and fire personnel employed by giving more money to the states.

As for Bennet, Obama said "politics-as-usual" still pervades Washington and electing Bennet will help change that.  “Politics as usual.  We’ve become accustomed to it, become numb to it. We’re just accustomed to all sorts of exaggerations and slash and burn politics.  But Michael and I, we don’t have time for that nonsense,” he said.

Obama called Bennet “an agent of change for some time” adding that Bennet has never cut a tv commercial nor mastered the art of the soundbite. 

For his part, Bennet, in his introduction of Obama, said he wanted to ban all former legislators from becoming lobbyists, curb legislator health care and pay until the economy is on better footing, and reform everything from health care insurance to how wall street does business.

“Washington needs a big dose of Colorado common sense,” Bennet said, before a mostly standing crowd of 2700 on the floor of Denver’s historic rock venue The Fillmore auditorium. 

After the rally, Obama continued his push for Bennet at a smaller, more expensive, reception at a downtown hotel.  Obama told that crowd to raise more money for Bennet than they did for him during his campaign –make more calls and “tweet” on twitter for Bennet’s campaign.

Bennet is running to continue in the seat to which he was appointed last year when Obama tapped then-Colorado Senator Ken Salazar to become Secretary of the interior.

Bennet is facing a primary challenge from former Colorado house speaker Andrew Romanoff.  Romanoff is not too happy with Obama for endorsing in the primary, but Bennet’s campaign pushes back, saying Obama had supported Bennet long before Romanoff got in the race.  “He knew what he was getting into when he decided to run,” a Bennet campaign spokesperson said of Romanoff.

The campaign didn't have final numbers for their take but a spokesperson said rally tickets cost $25-$250 per person. Access to the smaller reception went for $1000–and even higher for a chance to get a picture with the president.

User Comments

We agree!

Posted by: Fanne, Freddie and Goldman Sachs | February 18, 2010, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

You know, last week I stopped a cow from jumping over the moon.

Posted by: Rasputin3.14 | February 18, 2010, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Well..I saved the entire planet from spontaneously imploding by my little old self…now give me $1.2 trillion.
Ummm..the stimulus stopped us from having an unemployment rate over 8%…right?
Hey, you pandering poodles in the media..we’re not laughing with you. We’re laughing at you

Posted by: barney | February 18, 2010, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

The only effect the stimulus has had here in RI is to bail out our incompetent and bloated state government. The state legislature used every buck to balance the state budget instead of making the hard choice to reduce the size of government. So in a sense, Obama is absolutely right. The stimulus HAS saved jobs. Unfortunately they’re government jobs.

Posted by: Woody | February 18, 2010, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

Whether the porkulus saved anything is debatable; the real question is:
What are all of those States going to do NEXT year?
This is only a stop-gap load of money that will do little more than postpone the inevitable one more year. Then what???

Posted by: Dell | February 18, 2010, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

As for Bennet, Obama said “politics-as-usual” still pervades Washington and electing Bennet will help change that. “Politics as usual. We’ve become accustomed to it, become numb to it. We’re just accustomed to all sorts of exaggerations and slash and burn politics. But Michael and I, we don’t have time for that nonsense,” he said.
_____________________________________
Bennet will help change that? Really? And how does he plan on doing that? Even Barack Obama couldn’t change that. And Barack Obama is the One we’ve been waiting for!
Moving on in the comment, Obama says: “We’re just accustomed to all sorts of exaggerations…” Yep. You should be, Mr. Obama. You’ve been using them for quite a few years now. I think the best one so far was the fear mongering exaggeration over the Stimulus Package. You remember? ‘If we don’t pass this bill, unemployment will be over 8%’. Ummmmm…what were the latest figures on unemployment?

Posted by: Shoe | February 18, 2010, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

Nice to see he is still out of touch with reality because we aren’t out of the first one yet..

Posted by: Stanley | February 18, 2010, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

Who can argue with a guy who bought a lawnmower and created 50 jobs!?

Posted by: For The Record | February 18, 2010, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

I think the best one so far was the fear mongering exaggeration over the Stimulus Package. You remember? ‘If we don’t pass this bill, unemployment will be over 8%’. Ummmmm…what were the latest figures on unemployment?
Posted by: Shoe | Feb 18, 2010 8:48:12 PM
_____________________________________
Let’s see, so the President was ‘fear mongering’ in order to pass the Stimulus by saying unemployment rate would go over 8% – and yet the unemployment rate is even worse than projected. Seems to me he wasn’t ‘fear mongering’ at all and that the situation was actually WORSE than described, not EXAGGERATED.

Posted by: tierra | February 18, 2010, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

The Republican right is actually disappointed the economy is beginning to turn around. How sad.

Posted by: tierra | February 18, 2010, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

More Plouffe Fluff.Obama is given poll tested sound bites by his campaign guru.That ship has sailed.

Posted by: bobmac | February 18, 2010, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

A little premature…
A tidal wave of debt is about to wash over the U.S. Economy. No one will escape the consequences… not one. You will not escape.
Things are going to get very rough. Start now to figure how you are going to handle it…

Posted by: Quo Warranto | February 18, 2010, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

hey….. the economy was saved from the Brink….and saved us from another great depression. Now, unless you are and Expert on Financial Systems, or how the world’s economy operates, you are just partisan haters.

Posted by: sara | February 18, 2010, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Now, unless you are and Expert on Financial Systems, or how the world’s economy operates, you are just partisan haters.
Posted by: sara | Feb 18, 2010 9:29:02 PM
————-
So which are you, a financial wizard or a partisan hater?
In fact, one need not be a financial wizard to understand what the looming threat of inflation and devaluation of the dollar will mean. As I said in November 2008, buy gold and head for the hills. If you followed my advice then you would be very pleased right now. Platinum and silver aren’t bad ideas either.
What’s that sound? I believe it’s the sound of the Fed raising their base rate. It’s starting, take preparations immediately.

Posted by: Woody | February 18, 2010, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

@sara, if these Idiots in DC were Experts on the economy, we WOULD NOT be in the shape we are in. I have yet to SEE ANY PROOF that we were going into a depression. Just because obama says we were, does not make it so. WE HAVE RICH/ELITE running our Country from the Left and the Right. IF YOU SUPPORT EITHER, then YOU ARE THE PARTISAN. I think we should throw everyone of the out and start over. A bunch of HOMELESS DRUNKS could NOT DO MUCH WORSE at running this Country then the people we have been putting in office for the last 100 years. Everytime we walk into a Voting Booth FROM NOW ON, we should vote for the NEW PERSON. PERIOD.

Posted by: ajax | February 18, 2010, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

tierra wrote: “Let’s see, so the President was ‘fear mongering’ in order to pass the Stimulus by saying unemployment rate would go over 8% – and yet the unemployment rate is even worse than projected. Seems to me he wasn’t ‘fear mongering’ at all and that the situation was actually WORSE than described, not EXAGGERATED.”
.
Looks more like he and his “economic” team were and still are totally clueless and incompetent. These were the intelligentsia and said they had all the answers during the election. They were what this planet was waiting for, for so long. The turnip truck had a full load when it dumped this bunch off in the White House in Jan ’09.

Posted by: gk | February 18, 2010, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

What is wrong in this picture? Everything, same ole same ole and we watch it take place in front of us and still do nothing. It is time!

Posted by: Myra | February 18, 2010, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Well..I saved the entire planet from spontaneously imploding by my little old self…now give me $1.2 trillion.
Ummm..the stimulus stopped us from having an unemployment rate over 8%…right?
Hey, you pandering poodles in the media..we’re not laughing with you. We’re laughing at you
Posted by: barney | Feb 18, 2010 8:33:27 PM
Actually the stimulus prevented a run on the banks and a complete breakdown of the financial sector, but apparently your brain is not big enough to grasp that.

Posted by: Jim Bob | February 18, 2010, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

“A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations has been 200 years.”
Does anybody know who wrote those words..?
Well, doesn’t matter, we are up the proverbial tributary with a proper means of propulsion…

Posted by: Quo Warranto | February 18, 2010, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

If someone goes and stills a loaf of bread at a convience store, he will be put in jail. All of these people that was bailed out with tax dollars, they knew what was going on long before the bottom fell out. What did congress do, NOTHING, but give a green light to continue in the same path that got us where we are NOW. Hey we deserve a bonus they say for a failed job! They got it. It’s legal they say! Shame on you. No punishment, no justice. What a scam they big boys pulled off with the assistance of our government. The only comfort and hope is a Risen Savior, REMEMBER!

Posted by: Myra | February 18, 2010, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

Jobless claims rise…
Wholesale inflation surges…
16.8% annual?
—————————————-read the news lately ODumba?

Posted by: What? | February 18, 2010, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

CNN SHOCK POLL: MAJORITY SAY OBAMA DOESN’T DESERVE 2ND TERM
and the news gets better :)

Posted by: What? | February 18, 2010, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

I still believe a depression is coming.

Posted by: Huh | February 18, 2010, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Wake up America to the corruption, and lost lives. Stand up for what you belive is RIGHT and stop beliveing that our government has our best interest at heart. They are in it for THEMSELVES, and the BIG TIME CORPORATION, that asked the American people to bail them out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Sunshine | February 18, 2010, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Does anybody know who wrote those words..?
Well, doesn’t matter, we are up the proverbial tributary with a proper means of propulsion…
Posted by: Quo Warranto | Feb 18, 2010 10:15:32 PM
————-
Was it Franklin? DeToqueville?

Posted by: Woody | February 18, 2010, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Some think it was from that great critical thinker “Unknown”. Other thing it was a paraphrase of Alexander Tytler.
Doesn’t matter, our goose is cooked. Batten down the hatches – the going will be getting rough…

Posted by: Quo Warranto | February 18, 2010, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

Obama will say anything to make himself look good.

Posted by: irishrose | February 18, 2010, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

Second Despression? if i recall, there have been several in our history. Once again the liberals just love to distort the truth, when they really have no idea what they are talking about

Posted by: Derek Ellis | February 18, 2010, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

Why the hell our idiot VP is now touting a ‘second stimulous’? Is he paying for it? Does anybody get that any jobs out of a stimulous are not sustaining? The only way to sustain job growth is by encouraging private investment and lowering taxes. Get a Clue Barry, I realize you were an avout Maxist back in your wonderful youth, but this is the real world now.

Posted by: Bill | February 18, 2010, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Jim Bob wrote: “Actually the stimulus prevented a run on the banks and a complete breakdown of the financial sector, but apparently your brain is not big enough to grasp that.”
.
Got your talking points mixed up. TARP was supposed to prevent the run on the banks and keep the financial sector from “the precipice of global disaster”. The stimulus was supposed to keep unemployment under 8%. Which one worked? And which one was signed by Bush and which one was signed by oBama?

Posted by: gk | February 18, 2010, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

I’m surprised his arm hasn’t fallen off from patting himself on the back. He is obviously out of touch with the real world and should seek medical advice (delusions of grandeur, etc.).

Posted by: JustMe | February 18, 2010, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

I have no doubt about it. Different kind of attitude amongst the people these days. Don’t see as much fear. The only thing that would drive the nation back down is if republicans take control.

Posted by: rightbehind | February 18, 2010, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

Complete and utter HOGWASH!

Posted by: CC | February 18, 2010, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

Second Despression? if i recall, there have been several in our history. Once again the liberals just love to distort the truth, when they really have no idea what they are talking about
Posted by: Derek Ellis | Feb 18, 2010 10:43:33 PM
****************************************
Um, no. Only one. You’re recalling wrong.

Posted by: secondlook | February 18, 2010, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

“Doesn’t matter, our goose is cooked. Batten down the hatches – the going will be getting rough…”
That’s negative wishful thinking on your part….because otherwise in 2012 you’re looking at four more years.

Posted by: Skip | February 18, 2010, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

It is obvious, based upon some of these comments, that folks are spouting off while completely uninformed. If you read the economic information published by reliable sources, you would see that we really did “miss a bullet” economically. We’re not out of the woods yet, but we are a heck of a lot better off now, then we were a year ago. The radical right-wings live in a very delusional world (it must be a nice place to visit, but I wouldn’t want to live there!).

Posted by: jmb | February 18, 2010, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

Stopped a second depression? Start making new jobs! Throwing the people stimulus this and stimulus that isn’t going to last very long. Jobs will make people stronger and safe. Where is the change????

Posted by: Tracy | February 18, 2010, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

@secondlook, actually you need to do a little research.
We have had 4 economic depressions in the USA not counting the Great Depression of 1929 – 1941.
1807-1814
1837-1844
1873-1879
1893-1898

Posted by: ajax | February 18, 2010, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

What a load of crap! Obama gets the Nobel Peace Prize, stops Depression(from occurring in the next five minutes), and is faster than a speeding train! Keep drinking — and for the record I really disliked George W too! They have the same agenda folks across the board with barely and subtle differences! Wake up America!

Posted by: W. Wallace | February 18, 2010, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

I wonder what it would be like if McCain and Palin had won the election?

Posted by: nora | February 18, 2010, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

Tax payer mandated entitlements for Wall St. Government insurance guarantees Wall St. Wall St price fixs with banks,insurance, health care,pharmaceuticals,real estate,oil, commodities. Cost of living keeps going up. Government taxes the increases and both Wall St and govt just keep getting bigger. The people are in a “depression” keeping Wall St and the govt “happy”. Let the govt and wall st have a “depression” and let the people be “happy”. Please remember….If someone is dumb enough to “invest” in the stock market they are dumb enough to get ripped off….remember the govt guarantees the right to bankruptcy.

Posted by: sftiusa | February 18, 2010, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

‘The stimulus stopped another Great Depression’
yeah right, especially when most of the money hasn’t even been allocated yet (about 2/3), and much of the money that HAS been allocated went to places that don’t exist.

Posted by: Joe White | February 18, 2010, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

@ W. Wallace, I do not think people really realize that we are ALL being played like a fine tuned banjo by the RICH/ELITE that rule this Country and all the others around this world. People need to wake up and look around.
We need to start replacing our Representives with a NEW ONE every election. PERIOD. If they can’t make it a Carreer and get rich from it, the low-lifes and crooks will stop running and the bigger low-lifes and bigger crooks will stop pooring money into re-electing them. WAKE UP AMERICA.

Posted by: ajax | February 18, 2010, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

Prove it, Mr. President!! — Show us how it saved us!! — Your “created” statistic of “Jobs Saved” doesn’t hold water!!

Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | February 18, 2010, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

@Nora — It would look exactly the same because the president really does not do anything but follow orders. McCain and Palin would be doing the same thing since it is obviously ‘the agenda’ no matter what party they are a part of. And sadly many Americans cannot see past this glorified game of good cop/bad cop being played on Americans and the world! You could not destroy the middle class and turn the U.S. into an Orwellian police state better than by the agenda starting with Poppy Bush through to Obama! America, wake up!

Posted by: W. Wallace | February 18, 2010, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

@Quo Warranto
While nobody really knows who actually said those words, Alexander Tytler often gets credit for it, despite the fact that it never really appears in anything he’s ever committed to paper.
If Obama actually believes any of this, he’s a bigger moron than he appears to be. I work in an economy driven field, and I lose a few hours every week or so.
Of course, he wouldn’t have a clue as to the real hardships that Americans are enduring, as he’s lived exclusively on the taxpayer’s dime for the past year. It’s easy to think things are going great when you’re “king.”

Posted by: Hosfac | February 18, 2010, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

This must be sort of like Biden’s Iraq War statement of triumph.

Posted by: EPU | February 19, 2010, 12:01 am 12:01 am

This seems naively premature to declare this “stimulus” has worked. Most of America is horrified by this deep hole of debt we have created. I wish we had leaders that had the guts and the integrity to make this country sacrifice to get us out of this debt. The leader who can do that may not be popular in the short term, but will save the economic future of America.

Posted by: LK | February 19, 2010, 12:17 am 12:17 am

The Obama camp just doesn’t get it!
Stimulus jobs in WNC are highways, bridges and sidewalks which are temporary jobs adding nothing to the GDP.
Any real stimulus would result in business ventures which would add to GDP and the multiplying factor of other business suppliers would compound the growth.

Posted by: Ed Taylor | February 19, 2010, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Obama should have made this statement on an aircraft carrier with a “Mission Accomplished” banner in the background.
We are a few weeks shy of the next real estate collapse.

Posted by: Wenjo | February 19, 2010, 12:26 am 12:26 am

The Obama camp just doesn’t get it!
Stimulus jobs in WNC are highways, bridges and sidewalks which are temporary jobs adding nothing to the GDP.
___________________________________
Are you kidding? You don’t think they know this? Get a grip on reality – of course they know this.

Posted by: tierra | February 19, 2010, 12:27 am 12:27 am

If Obama actually believes any of this, he’s a bigger moron than he appears to be.
________________________________
More insult and name calling by the almighty right aimed at the President . . . juvenile.

Posted by: tierra | February 19, 2010, 12:37 am 12:37 am

Obama’s Stimulus saved millions of jobs just like Bush’s overthrow of Saddam saved millions of lives. :0

Posted by: Grey Stone | February 19, 2010, 12:45 am 12:45 am

America is prone to have depression, because the people say the financial regulation is not there and everybody can cheat others.I don’t know what kind of financial regulation they want.So finally we can conclude that if anything is not written in law we will cheat others that seems to be American slogan of the day.No doubt in the world now America is declining very fast and by reading the comments of people of US they don’t have any confidence it will get better in near future.GOD SAVE AMERICA, IN THE GOD WE TRUST.Slowly becoming sick country?

Posted by: chandu | February 19, 2010, 12:53 am 12:53 am

Last week Blue Cross anounced that they will raise californians 39% more to their medical cost. If you still love America then please support this.LETTER FROM SENATE DEMOCRATS TO LEADER REID
Dear Leader Reid:
We respectfully ask that you bring for a vote before the full Senate a public health insurance option under budget reconciliation rules.
There are four fundamental reasons why we support this approach – its potential for billions of dollars in cost savings; the growing need to increase competition and lower costs for the consumer; the history of using reconciliation for significant pieces of health care legislation; and the continued public support for a public option.
A Public Option Is an Important Tool for Restoring Fiscal Discipline.
As Democrats, we pledged that the Senate health care reform package would address skyrocketing health care costs and relieve overburdened American families and small businesses from annual double-digit health care cost increases. And that it would do so without adding a dime to the national debt.
The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) determined that the Senate health reform bill is actually better than deficit neutral. It would reduce the deficit by over $130 billion in the first ten years and up to $1 trillion in the first 20 years.
These cost savings are an important start. But a strong public option can be the centerpiece of an even better package of cost saving measures. CBO estimated that various public option proposals in the House save at least $25 billion. Even $1 billion in savings would qualify it for consideration under reconciliation.
Put simply, including a strong public option is one of the best, most fiscally responsible ways to reform our health insurance system.
A Public Option Would Provide Americans with a Low-Cost Alternative and Improve Market Competitiveness.
A strong public option would create better competition in our health insurance markets. Many Americans have no or little real choice of health insurance provider. Far too often, it’s “take it or leave it” for families and small businesses. This lack of competition drives up costs and leaves private health insurance companies with little incentive to provide quality customer service.
A recent Health Care for America Now report on private insurance companies found that the largest five for-profit health insurance providers made $12 billion in profits last year, yet they actually dropped 2.7 million people from coverage. Private insurance – by gouging the public even during a severe economic recession – has shown it cannot function in the public’s interest without a public alternative. Americans have nowhere to turn. That is not healthy market competition, and it is not good for the public.
If families or individuals like their current coverage through a private insurance company, then they can keep that coverage. And in some markets where consumers have many alternatives, a public option may be less necessary. But many local markets have broken down, with only one or two insurance providers available to consumers. Each and every health insurance market should have real choices for consumers.
There is a history of using reconciliation for significant pieces of health care legislation.
There is substantial Senate precedent for using reconciliation to enact important health care policies. The Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), Medicare Advantage, and the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA), which actually contains the term ‘reconciliation’ in its title, were all enacted under reconciliation.
The American Enterprise Institute’s Norman Ornstein and Brookings’ Thomas Mann and Molly Reynolds jointly wrote, “Are Democrats making an egregious power grab by sidestepping the filibuster? Hardly.” They continued that the precedent for using reconciliation to enact major policy changes is “much more extensive . . . than Senate Republicans are willing to admit these days.”
There is strong public support for a public option, across party lines.
The overwhelming majority of Americans want a public option. The latest New York Times poll on this issue, in December, shows that despite the attacks of recent months Americans support the public option 59% to 29%. Support includes 80% of Democrats, 59% of Independents, and even 33% of Republicans.
Much of the public identifies a public option as the key component of health care reform — and as the best thing we can do to stand up for regular people against big insurance companies. In fact, overall support for health care reform declined steadily as the public option was removed from reform legislation.
Although we strongly support the important reforms made by the Senate-passed health reform package, including a strong public option would improve both its substance and the public’s perception of it. The Senate has an obligation to reform our unworkable health insurance market — both to reduce costs and to give consumers more choices. A strong public option is the best way to deliver on both of these goals, and we urge its consideration under reconciliation rules.
Respectfully,
Michael Bennet (D-CO), U.S. Senator
Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), U.S. Senator
Jeff Merkley (D-OR), U.S. Senator
Sherrod Brown (D-OH), U.S. Senator

Posted by: cony007 | February 19, 2010, 1:21 am 1:21 am

What Obama says may be true. But the perception is that it was a costly boondoggle. That is the impression that has taken root.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | February 19, 2010, 1:22 am 1:22 am

Messiah-complex or just a run-of-the-mill, big-mouth, liar, or both? Politicians, and particularly this one, and Washington D.C., have become new ‘dirty words” in Americans’ vocabulary, minds, and hearts.

Posted by: K. Daraa | February 19, 2010, 2:36 am 2:36 am

Imagine the outrage and comments from the far left if Bush had claimed to “save” 2 million jobs from his tax cuts.
__________________________________
The economy didn’t collapse on Obama’s watch – the economy collapsed on the Republican president’s watch. Americans know this.

Posted by: tierra | February 19, 2010, 3:05 am 3:05 am

Sure, a second depression isn’t a possibility anymore. The problem is that it was never likely to begin with.
Obama is really desperate to stretch the truth to justify his spending all that money. The truth is that as soon as the money stops – the jobs it has helped will go away.
You can’t play artificially with the economy. We’re just not smart enough to do that.

Posted by: JonF | February 19, 2010, 3:43 am 3:43 am

we are in a depression out here in the real world. 50% of my generation in my family has had successful small businesses drop to almost zero income. One closed their business, one dropped to between 4-12 hrs per wk and one has the business open but no work in months. They all have had thriving businesses for decades. We are middle to upper middle class and all college educated. But: this type of reduced or unemployment does not show up in the unemployment figures and there is no unemployment as a safety net. Yeah, that’s a depression: we are all in our 50′s and 60′s and have never experienced this in our lifetime. Yep, its a depression.

Posted by: alicewan | February 19, 2010, 3:50 am 3:50 am

Oh, and to add to my previous comment: the politicians in washington just don’t get it.

Posted by: alicewan | February 19, 2010, 3:52 am 3:52 am

Less than 9 months to go before we can show this administration exactly what we really think about the stimulus waste. We are so much in the hole most of us will have to work until we’re 80 or 90 just to cover the taxes that we’ll owe. November 2010 can’t come soon enough to start voting Obama’s cronies out of office!!

Posted by: Steve | February 19, 2010, 4:42 am 4:42 am

Obama even delighted in recounting a section of his State of the Union address last month in which he talked of the tax cuts from the stimulus plan and watched Republican lawmakers fail to applaud the idea.

Posted by: r4 gold | February 19, 2010, 4:58 am 4:58 am

No one can definitively say that we cannot have an economic depression.. I think he may be saying we avoided a very close call with his help.
I’ll give him this one on a technicality.. but politicians can be easily bitten by such loose talk.. and there are some that are feeling just as left out and broke as if the country has had a depression. Our inner cities have been in an economic crises for many years.. and this is not any political statement.. just fact.. under both parties.

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | February 19, 2010, 6:21 am 6:21 am

If Cali goes bust.. it could domino this whole country into an economic death spiral.. so speaker beware.

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | February 19, 2010, 6:22 am 6:22 am

Whether the porkulus saved anything is debatable
***
If “porkulus” is supposed to refer to the stimulus, what really isn’t debatable is whether or not it did what a stimulus bill is intended to do. I thought Matthew Yglesias had a very nice reality check for ABC at his blog yesterday under the header “ABC can’t find economists who think stimulus failed” : “A funny thing seems to have happened on the way to a he-said, she-said story for ABC on the stimulus:
“The stimulus worked,” said Stuart Hoffman, chief economist at PNC Bank. Without it, “the unemployment rate would probably be closer to 11 percent” and the economy might not have grown at all last year.
Mark Zandi of Moody’s Economy.com thought the nation would be “still in recession.”
“It played a significant role supporting recovery,” said economist Diane Swonk of Mesirow Financial.
…They’ve attempted to frame this as a standard piece of “experts disagree on shape of the earth” shoddy policy journalism, but what you’re actually seeing here is that despite their best efforts they can’t find anyone to endorse the standard Heritage/NRO/GOP view that the stimulus is harming the economy. Hoffman and Zandi deem the stimulus vital. Swonk says it played a “significant role” in bolstering recovery. Wyss is sniffy and derisive, but the essence of his sniffy derision is to say that of course the stimulus helped. And Bryson says the economy recovered faster because of the stimulus. Everyone agrees!”

Posted by: progressive mama | February 19, 2010, 6:24 am 6:24 am

Why any serious candidate would want the toxic Prez. to campaign for him/her is disturbing. Have they not noticed that the honeymoon is long over? What a serious lapse of judgment.

Posted by: s | February 19, 2010, 6:42 am 6:42 am

“One year later, thanks largely to the Recovery Act, we can stand here again and say that a second depression is no longer a possibility,” Obama said, adding all the statistics about job growth (“about 2 million”) and economic growth (“nearly 6%”).
Obama then launched into his usual laundry list of all the things he says his administration did in its first year to pull the country out of the economic downturn: extending unemployment insurance, cutting taxes for first time home buyers, making COBRA health care cheaper, and keeping police and fire personnel employed by giving more money to the states.

His usual laundry list of what he *says* has been accomplished? How silly. It IS what has been accomplished.
The media is part of our misinformation problem.
Worth a read is Jonathan Chait’s smack down of Reihan Salam’s straw man argument at National Review : “I don’t thing that anyone doubts that ARRA helped perk up growth…”
Really? If only that were true. If they don’t doubt it, they sure do lie a lot.
Chait:
“..it’s indisputably a very-widely held opinion among Republicans and conservatives, and I’d argue represents the consensus GOP view. When new party poster boy Scott Brown asserted that the stimulus “didn’t create one new job,” he was simply parroting a line that has been circulating among his party for a year. Which other conservatives have said this, you ask? Which ones haven’t? There’s John Boehner (“the stimulus isn’t creating jobs for American workers.”) The Washington Times editorial page (“Mr. Obama’s policies delayed the recovery.”) Andrew Wilson at the American Spectator (“It is a $787 billion shell game — taking money out of the private sector and putting it to less productive use in the public sector or passing it around as hand-outs to politically favored Democratic Party constituents. In doing so, the “stimulus” has actually destroyed jobs.”)
How about some examples closer to home? Here’s National Review’s Mark Steyn: (“It didn’t just fail to stimulate, it actively deterred stimulation, because it was the first explicit signal to America and the world that the Democrats’ political priorities overrode everything else.”) Here’s Brian Riedl, also in National Review. (“The stimulus is not failing because it is too small or because too much of it is being saved. It’s failing because Congress can only redistribute existing demand, not create new demand.”) With more time I could go on and on. Reihan, a former TNR Reporter-Researcher, is a bright and terrific guy, but he has an unfortunate tendency to imagine that the Republican Party is filled with people who think like he does. It isn’t.”
Others like Ambinder at Atlantic Monthly also call out reporters for their reporting on the stimulus:”the way the media covers the “battle” over whether the economic stimulus package worked is unsound. The stimulus packaged did what it was originally intended to do: it injected hundreds of billions of dollars worth of demand into an economy that was teetering on the brink of collapse.”

Posted by: progressive mama | February 19, 2010, 6:58 am 6:58 am

he made sure to mention that his year old stimulus stopped a second depression. >>>>> More lies from the liar and chief.

Posted by: ChicagoBob | February 19, 2010, 7:15 am 7:15 am

That Mr. Obama would miss represent facts has been proven so many times that it no longer surprises me. There was no depression likely. I guess one could argue a bank crisis was averted but as so many on both sides like to point out that was Bush’s TARP. All Obama has done is use 787 Billion of my GRANDCHILDREN’s tax Dollars to do, Is erect Tax Payer funded Green Campaign Signs, Make Down Payments on Cars my grandchildren will never see, and Pay the Mortgage for people who took out loans they new they knew they couldn’t afford. He has used three generations worth of taxes to try and BUY VOTES. None of this surprises anyone Obama is a Chicago/Blagojevich politician he is accustomed to buying Vote and Offices.

Posted by: Rick | February 19, 2010, 7:27 am 7:27 am

Why doesn’t Obama mention the Website that is supposed to count the jobs created with the stimulus package or why the unemployment has gone over 8%?
This looks like another O-failure.

Posted by: Albert Friday | February 19, 2010, 7:29 am 7:29 am

Bushes TARP which everyone complained about is just about PAID back. The economy was in recovery mode and Obama didnt have time to get or spend ON DIME of stimulus. In general this is a pathetic attempt to rewrite history but gullible people will believe it. My only hope is Obama’s average stays intact and this man is trounced in the election.

Posted by: ChicagoBob | February 19, 2010, 7:32 am 7:32 am

cony007 >>>> LOL thats too funny. Here is what I can tell you the public option doesnt decrease COST. In fact it might even increase costs. You place a bunch of mandates on the medical industry and it will have to abide which will more than likely make that raise you are complaining about 50% instead of 39. Is that your goal? To raise the cost of health insurance? If so keep backing the insane democrats and all their dumb ideas.

Posted by: ChicagoBob | February 19, 2010, 7:36 am 7:36 am

All the stimulus did was temporarily save government jobs. Someone else is going to have to pay those salaries this year when the funds dry up. It’s merely delaying the pain.
TARP saved us from depression. I hate to say it, but saving AIG especially was the big one.

Posted by: drjohn | February 19, 2010, 7:37 am 7:37 am

What’s next? Will Obama take credit for Spring? How about the Saints Super Bowl win? He’s already taken credit for the success we’ve seen in Iraq that is the direct result of the ‘surge’ strategy which he vigorously opposed. The amazing capacity of the semi-free market capitalism we now have has begun to heal all the hurt associated with the disease of very poor governmental policies. I’m appalled that President Obama, who is so opposed to everything that capitalism has to offer, would take credit for a mild recovery that has occurred in spite of all the terrible policies he has implemented. His arrogance is unbounded.

Posted by: BubblerDad | February 19, 2010, 7:38 am 7:38 am

Seems like “saving us from depression” is the signature fragrance Obama has sprayed over his entire budget busting agenda.

Posted by: cindy | February 19, 2010, 7:42 am 7:42 am

If so keep backing the insane democrats and all their dumb ideas.

They don’t even bother telling the insane lie that “health care will be cheaper” anymore. (people really believed that garbage, too) Now, if someone will just take this “cost curve” hockey to task people would begin to realize how much obama wants each individual to shell out to pay for the gov’t's mishandling of Medicare. That’s all this has ever been about but lying about it is the only way he got elected.

Posted by: smartlillena | February 19, 2010, 7:51 am 7:51 am

This seems to be his chant these days…dangling the word “depression” before any discussion of this horrific debacle called a stimulis.
Look, most modern Presidents inherited a recession. The only difference here is Obama used the stupidity and fear of the people to shove through this useless waste of taxpayer monies. It was a failure, it was used to broaden and deepen our dependancy on the federal government.
Well, Americans are waking from the slumber, and all of his planted bloggers here and all over the net can’t fight this fact. We are awake and we won’t tolerate any more of this attempt to change our Republic to a Socialist economy.
America rejects Obama and all he stands for. Our goal is to limit his power until 2012.
Obama, the mask is off.

Posted by: mjishernameo | February 19, 2010, 8:02 am 8:02 am

progressive mama wrote: “…said Stuart Hoffman, chief economist at PNC Bank….Mark Zandi of Moody’s Economy.com ..Diane Swonk of Mesirow Financial….”
.
If you can convince true economists like Thomas Sowell or Walter Williams then you’ve got my concurrence… but they say otherwise.
.
” but what you’re actually seeing here is that despite their best efforts they can’t find anyone to endorse the standard Heritage/NRO/GOP view that the stimulus is harming the economy”.
.
If I went out and borrowed 10x my annual income and started blowing money wildly, then its going to look like I’m doing pretty good… for a while… until the money has to be paid back. Then what!
.
If I followed oBama and the democrat philosophy they are employing here, I would start robbing banks to pay back that money to the bank for the original loan.

Posted by: gk | February 19, 2010, 8:12 am 8:12 am

Dr. John is right. Our BROKE city council hired 33 firefighters with stim-bucks and has not hidden the fact that once the funds are used up there will be no money to pay them. Maybe the govt. should start burning down abandoned homes to lower the inventory of foreclosures and give all these firemen something to do. (I would laugh except none of this is funny anymore.)

Posted by: cindy | February 19, 2010, 8:13 am 8:13 am

Albert Friday wrote:” Why doesn’t Obama mention the Website that is supposed to count the jobs created with the stimulus package or why the unemployment has gone over 8%?”.
.
He is like Joe Biden and can’t remember the “number” to that website, so he doesn’t mention it and look foolish like Joe.

Posted by: gk | February 19, 2010, 8:15 am 8:15 am

The government taxing/borrowing/printing money and giving it to someone else in a government job is Obama’s business model for creating jobs. That’s honestly how liberals think business works. It’s not sinister, it’s ignorance. These people have never been in business or worked for a dollar, they have spent their life lobbying and organizing for public dollars. To them, money does just grow on some tree in Washington. They really do not have a clue.

Posted by: Mac | February 19, 2010, 8:21 am 8:21 am

Our BROKE city council hired 33 firefighters with stim-bucks and has not hidden the fact that once the funds are used up there will be no money to pay them.

So is it better that they had a year to prepare for this with stimulus funds, and that the layoffs will be less dramatic than they would have been– or not? Or should we have supported a bigger stimulus?
Bruce Bartlett had a good column in Forbes yesterday about conservative hypocrisy and/or confusion about the deficit yesterday, and he’s written several blog posts about their cluelessness when it comes to TARP and the stimulus.
The mixed messages and misinformation are getting old.

Posted by: progressive mama | February 19, 2010, 8:23 am 8:23 am

progressive mama wrote: “I also love when morons write dramatic purple prose and think they speak for America or the people — as if the other half of the country doesn’t exist or aren’t real. LOL.”
.
We’ll see what those “morons” have to say in November. The producers are really tired of carrying the many non-producers on their back all the while they are stealing money out of our wallet.

Posted by: gk | February 19, 2010, 8:25 am 8:25 am

If I followed oBama and the democrat philosophy they are employing here, I would start robbing banks to pay back that money to the bank for the original loan.
Posted by: gk | Feb 19, 2010 8:12:15 AM
Okay, if you’re not a hypocrite, do you support Paul Ryan’s budget plan, or increasing taxes– or cutting the military significantly?
Do you typically vote for Republicans who give conservatism lip service but grow government and spending?
What exactly do you propose beyond demogoguing using rigid ideological rhetoric? Anything?

Posted by: progressive mama | February 19, 2010, 8:27 am 8:27 am

progressive mama wrote: “So is it better that they had a year to prepare for this with stimulus funds, and that the layoffs will be less dramatic than they would have been– or not?”.
.
Instead of dealing with the situation, the democrats want to kick the can down the road another year by stealing from my kids and grandkids.
.
“Or should we have supported a bigger stimulus? ”
.
Now you want to steal from my great-grandkids.

Posted by: gk | February 19, 2010, 8:32 am 8:32 am

as if the other half of the country doesn’t exist or aren’t real

Of course they exist. Their existance is documented in Obama’s steadily shrinking poll numbers. Their existance is documented in the numbers of “retiring” Dems and the number too stupid to give up the losing battle for reelection.
What is more moronic, voicing one’s dissatifaction with a foolish politician or carrying water for that politician? All while refusing to acknowledge their rapid decline.

Posted by: smartlillena | February 19, 2010, 8:33 am 8:33 am

mama..I am not an economist, but hiring 33 firefighters to sit around lifting weights-waiting for the bell to ring- just doesn’t seem logical to me. I’m not a fan of repaving every American road either, but at least you have something to show for the money. In our neck of the woods we are closing parks, reducing library hours and getting ready to put parking meters at the beach. The cost of a drivers license has tripled, you have to buy a permit to fish from a bridge, and pay a fee to launch your boat from a county ramp. This is BORROWED money that is being sloshed around and splattered here and there and everywhere to create an employment bubble that will burst when the well runs dry..I am literally petrified of the disaster we are creating for our kids.

Posted by: cindy | February 19, 2010, 8:39 am 8:39 am

progressive mama wrote: “Okay, if you’re not a hypocrite, do you support Paul Ryan’s budget plan, or increasing taxes– or cutting the military significantly?”
.
I will support anyone’s budget plan that recognizes that we are in a hole. The democrats want to put the shovels down…. but they now want to get a backhoe to dig faster.
.
“Do you typically vote for Republicans who give conservatism lip service but grow government and spending?”
.
I vote for fiscal conservatives. The Republicans are just big-government-spending Democrats from 20 years ago and the Democrats have moved on to the socialist/communist side of the political spectrum.
.
“What exactly do you propose beyond demogoguing using rigid ideological rhetoric? Anything?”
.
You will see in November… there have already been some promising signs in the last few months. The little teenagers in the White House and the Congress are going get their credit cards torn up, the keys to the liquor cabinet taken away, and Dad’s new Corvette is going back in the garage. They have PROVEN they cannot be trusted to be good stewards of the producers tax money.

Posted by: gk | February 19, 2010, 8:44 am 8:44 am

support Paul Ryan’s budget plan, or increasing taxes– or cutting the military significantly?
—-
Currently if every bit of that is to be considered the responsibility of any one person that one person is President Borak Obama. Trying to change the focus, three years from the next potus’ election, is nothing more than an attempt at isdirection.
If you’d like to talk about relevant budgets, where in Obama’s budget is the money hidden that will be neccesary to get his health care mess off the ground? That budget was written with a health care bill in mind.

Posted by: smartlillena | February 19, 2010, 8:49 am 8:49 am

“This is only a stop-gap load of money that will do little more than postpone the inevitable one more year. Then what??? ” – Dell
A deepening 2nd or 3rd or 4th depression, whatever they might wanna call it. Actually it’s all the same depression that started a year and a half ago. We won’t see the light of day from this for at least 2 more years so buckle up you people and pandering poodles, enjoy the ride.

Posted by: Noz | February 19, 2010, 8:50 am 8:50 am

Posted by: gk | Feb 19, 2010 8:32:59 AM
Its easier to just yell no and raise a fist in the air than to actually come up with ideas that will work and get through Congress– and/or to vote in people who will do what they pay lip service to during campaigns. Or to vote in people with fresh politically feasible solutions. I wondered if you had any. But if you’re into the crackpot Sowell, its unlikely. He’s not solution oriented (unless you consider a military coup to put Republicans back in power an actual solution. )
As for Dems putting down the shovel, its interesting that they weren’t, in large numbers, the ones who voted against a deficit commission or health care reform or demagoguing against sensible cuts in Medicare waste.
I do agree with you that Republicans aren’t conservative– unless you define conservative as clinging to the past and the status quo in order to keep the same power hierarchy going so that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer– and tripling deficits and the size of government and such.

Posted by: progressive mama | February 19, 2010, 9:04 am 9:04 am

if every bit of that is to be considered the responsibility of any one person that one person is President Borak Obama.
Posted by: smartlillena | Feb 19, 2010 8:49:22 AM
I’m not sure where you’re from, but in America we have three branches of government, as well as federal, state and local governments.
As for misdirection, I’ll admit you seem very well-versed in that, but with a tendency to project your own tactics onto others. LOL.

Posted by: progressive mama | February 19, 2010, 9:09 am 9:09 am

I’m not a fan of repaving every American road either, but at least you have something to show for the money.
—-
We agree on this. If we needed to pump money into the economy, and I believe we did (and the majority of well-respected economists seem to agree), then it would have been great if on short notice we would have been able to put it all on something that benefits the citizenry for years to come– infrastructure like paved highways and roads, reinforced bridges, high speed rail, energy grid and so on. Medical IT was a good investment also, imo.

Posted by: progressive mama | February 19, 2010, 9:13 am 9:13 am

mama, here’s an idea…UNLEASH the energy companies. Get us off foreign oil and create excellent, long term jobs with benefits. I live in Florida. We won’t drill off shore, eventhough China will drill off Cuba (which puts them right off OUR shores)-we wont permit new nuclear, and the environmentalists won’t allow windfarms because of the birds AND the fish. (vibrations in the water.) But we are repaving perfectly decent roads that would be the envy of anyone living in the North East.

Posted by: cindy | February 19, 2010, 9:16 am 9:16 am

Instead of dealing with the situation, the democrats want to kick the can down the road another year by stealing from my kids and grandkids.

They hardly kicked the can down the road, though a robust jobs bill out of the gate would have been useful. What would you have done?
I read a good letter to the Congressional leadership of both parties from several economists (posted at Brad DeLong’s blog) regarding a hiring tax credit this morning.
“Dear Speaker Pelosi, and Messrs. Boehner, Reid, and McConnell:
A great number of different policy actions–including the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the financial rescue, and the extraordinary monetary policy measures taken by the Federal Reserve–have in their sum played an important role in changing the trajectory of the economy from one of terrible decline to one of growth. But with the latest unemployment rate at 9.7 percent, it is clear that additional emergency policy measures to jump-start job creation are still warranted.
A well-designed temporary and incremental hiring tax credit is a cost-effective way to create jobs, and could work well in the current environment. At a time when GDP is beginning to rise and demand is starting to return, private firms are likely to respond to such a tax incentive by hiring sooner and more aggressively than they otherwise would have done. Such a credit could thus help put Americans back to work more quickly than otherwise. And by targeting firms that are growing, such a tax credit supports the businesses most likely to lead the recovery of employment.
There are many ways to design an effective hiring tax credit, but in general the beneficial effects will be greater the stronger the hiring incentives …”
I support that and hope at least a few Republicans can find it in their hearts to rise above the scorched earth b.s. and do something about jobs, for crying out loud.

Posted by: progressive mama | February 19, 2010, 9:21 am 9:21 am

you mention high speed rail..from Tampa to Orlando I have to be honest with you, the price tag on this is SO high, (est $51MILLION/mile) it makes me nervous. I’m also not sure that the passengers will be there..and frankly, you have to wonder about political paybacks on this project..just a fluke that DISNEY co is at the end of BOTH proposed rail-lines? (Doesn’t DISNEY own ABC?)

Posted by: cindy | February 19, 2010, 9:25 am 9:25 am

mama, here’s an idea…UNLEASH the energy companies. Get us off foreign oil and create excellent, long term jobs with benefits.

I do agree with pursuing all avenues there, with the caveat that I prefer drilling for natural gas over oil, and think we need to reduce fossil fuel emissions. But yep– I agree.

Posted by: progressive mama | February 19, 2010, 9:25 am 9:25 am

you mention high speed rail..from Tampa to Orlando I have to be honest with you, the price tag on this is SO high, (est $51MILLION/mile) it makes me nervous. I’m also not sure that the passengers will be there..and frankly, you have to wonder about political paybacks on this project..just a fluke that DISNEY co is at the end of BOTH proposed rail-lines? (Doesn’t DISNEY own ABC?)
Posted by: cindy | Feb 19, 2010 9:25:26 AM
On a purely selfish note, my mother-in-law lives in St. Pete’s Beach, and I’d love to be able to pick up high speed rail from Tampa to Orlando– but cost is a consideration.
It bugs me that America is decades behind the curve when it comes to fast trains. France, Italy, Spain– all have great rail lines, and I envy them. I think China, Japan and Taiwan do too but I’ve never been to either or experienced them firsthand.
Not an expert on rail–but I worry about America keeping its competitive edge as jobs are shipped overseas and we do little to keep up in certain areas.
Your note about political payback and Disney is interesting and something to consider, though it could also have to do with heavy traffic patterns, right? And tourism?

Posted by: progressive mama | February 19, 2010, 9:36 am 9:36 am

The second depression is no longer a possibility… It’s a certainty. It will be brought about by the massive spending. There is no believable scenario under which this debt can be repaid, or even sustained.

Posted by: Quo Warranto | February 19, 2010, 9:39 am 9:39 am

mama, public transportation in the US can be a tough sell..people like the freedom of having their own car, even on vacation. I grew up in Germany where public transport ( inconveniences and inflexibilities included) are just part of living..and you can get almost ANYWHERE using some combination of buses, trams, trains and walking. I have taken AMTRAK up to Philly several times, and it is no Orient Express let me tell ya! (YUCK) I don’t know what the answers to all our problems are, these are tough times..and frankly I feel like Dorothy who assigned all these mystical powers to the wizard of OZ only to pull back the curtain and see a dud..I am not convinced that our “leaders” are the smartest people in the room, and boy, is that scary. Anyway, I’d better get going here on my “to-do” list..ttyl!

Posted by: cindy | February 19, 2010, 9:53 am 9:53 am

progressive mama wrote: “But if you’re into the crackpot Sowell, its unlikely.”
.
Sounds like a pretty racist statement to me.

Posted by: gk | February 19, 2010, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Newsflash. This is a second depression. It is world-wide, and it will last at least into 2014.
In my book, that qualifies as a for-real depression.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | February 19, 2010, 10:16 am 10:16 am

Sounds like a pretty racist statement to me.
Posted by: gk | Feb 19, 2010 10:09:19 AM
I suppose you’ll find it sexist for me to point out that Bachmann’s a crackpot as well. LOL.
And maybe you’ll its anti-fat white dude or anti-addict for me to point out that I think Limbaugh is one, too.
And whatever will you think if I mention that I think Glen Beck is a fruitcake?
Or that I laughed out loud at Scott Brown’s appearance on Fox yesterday– you know ,the one in which he commented on an anti-government nut who flew his airplane into a building and connected the incident to his own campaign, seemeing to want to rationalize the actions of a domestic terrorist, as if Stack’s murders can be understood if only we appreciate how “frustrated” people are.
And you know I chuckled when Wonkette insinuated he was a bimbo, too.
Golly, I am just so politically incorrect, aren’t I?
Now, let’s think about whether I care about Republicanesque self-righteous hypocrisy, particularly after watching the Tea Partiers and CPAC whackadoodles in action?
Hmmm… not so much.

Posted by: progressive mama | February 19, 2010, 10:29 am 10:29 am

I prevented world war 3 last year as well. You should all thank me. And don’t forget to bow.

Posted by: Mike | February 19, 2010, 10:32 am 10:32 am

progressive mama wrote: “Golly, I am just so politically incorrect, aren’t I?”
.
Nope, you pretty much rattled off all the communist talking points that I figured you would. The name “progressive” is a bit inaccurate.

Posted by: gk | February 19, 2010, 10:37 am 10:37 am

You should all thank me.

Actually, we all should thank President Obama and those who voted for the stimulus, as imperfect as it was. As the NYT (see Leonhardt’s article “Judging stimulus by job data reveals success) and ABC mention– and Matthew Yglesias (see ABC can’t find economists who think stimulus failed) and Steve Benen at Political Animal reiterate, economists agree that it helped.
As Steve Benen puts it: For many on the right, the stimulus package that rescued the economy wasn’t just a mistake, it actually hurt the economy. Can anyone, anywhere, find a credible expert to support this nonsense? Nope.
Meanwhile, in the present, we need to move on jobs (and health care). And the Republicans won’t help. Good lord, at CPAC they’re calling for a return to the days of Bush-Cheney. Not so conservative of a movement going on after all. Just more of the same b.s.

Posted by: progressive mama | February 19, 2010, 10:45 am 10:45 am

osted by: gk | Feb 19, 2010 10:37:55 AM
It would be intellectually amusing to watch you try to tie those to communism. LOL.
Are you from a Texas? I read a very funny poll.
“Nearly a third of Texans believe humans and dinosaurs roamed the earth at the same time, and more than half disagree with the theory that humans developed from earlier species of animals, according to the University of Texas/Texas Tribune Poll.” (See article titled Meet the Flintstones, lol)
“Prindle says the results recall a line from comedian Lewis Black. “He did a standup routine a few years back in which he said that a significant proportion of the American people think that the ‘The Flintstones’ is a documentary,” Prindle says. “Turns out he was right.”

Posted by: progressive mama | February 19, 2010, 10:50 am 10:50 am

progressive mama wrote: “Nearly a third of Texans believe humans and dinosaurs roamed the earth at the same time”
.
In Texas those folks are known as democrats.

Posted by: gk | February 19, 2010, 11:02 am 11:02 am

In Texas those folks are known as democrats.
Posted by: gk | Feb 19, 2010 11:02:11 AM
So, you didn’t go to the source. LOL. Republicans were more likely to be Flintstones types, and of those Republicans, they were more likely to vote for Hutchinson than Perry.
Along similar lines, Fox News was decrying college educations because the tendency to be liberal increases with education and maturity. The spin was a true masters class in b.s. (Oh nooooes! Professors must be brainwashing them!)

Posted by: progressive mama | February 19, 2010, 11:25 am 11:25 am

“Fox News was decrying college educations because the tendency to be liberal increases with education and maturity.”
Most politicians in Washington went to elite universities. How’s that turned out for us? There are plenty of educated idiots out there.

Posted by: Mary | February 19, 2010, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

“Fox News was decrying college educations because the tendency to be liberal increases with education and maturity.”
Most politicians in Washington went to elite universities. How’s that turned out for us? There are plenty of educated idiots out there.
Posted by: Mary | Feb 19, 2010 12:39:44 PM
____________________________________
Keep the people ignorant and lie to them – and you can get them to believe Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11.

Posted by: tierra | February 19, 2010, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

There are plenty of educated idiots out there.
Posted by: Mary
true enough, but there are certainly more ‘uneducated idiots’ running rampant around the country….. Cantor, Bachmann, Schmidt, Fox, Bond, Tancredo, Rush, Beck, Coulter, Savage, Boortz, Breitbart just to name a few

Posted by: XXX | February 19, 2010, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Mary..you are completely missing the point because you believe in the lies you were told about college. The problem is not the “educated” politicians as much as it is the “uneducated voters” who send them to Congress and then expect them to pander to their “little constituency” rather than make the right decisions for the nation as a whole. In fact it used to work that way until the eighties when a group of evil men decided to define the “conservative movement” of divisiveness we see today. Now it is all about lies, misinformation, fear and negativity.

Posted by: CND FOX | February 19, 2010, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

“Nope, you pretty much rattled off all the communist talking points that I figured you would”
ROFLMAO!
You got your butt kicked by a girl!

Posted by: Ryan C | February 19, 2010, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

“Nearly a third of Texans believe humans and dinosaurs roamed the earth at the same time”
.In Texas those folks are known as democrats.
Posted by: gk
with all due respect, those folks are kinda known as evangelical christians..
( there might be some Dems, but I tend to doubt it)
there was an interesting episode last year where Bill Nye ‘the science guy’ was in Texas giving a talk about how the biblical events could be interpreted using science, esp. astronomy.
He made reference to a passage in the bible implying that the moon was like the sun giving off light…he stated that we know that light is just reflected sunlight…… at that point a sizable contingent left ranting that Nye was against the bible because he didn’t believe it word for word.
I know, the moon is different from the sun.
Texas , the secessionist home planet is changing their educational syllabus to reflect fictional, slanted version of historical fact.. concentrating on great historical figures like Phyllis Schlafly. Along with them are the ‘christian nation’ folks who are so very tolerant to allow others in ‘their country’.
Here in PA, it wasn’t too long ago where the religious fanatics tried to get ID taught in public schools under the fraud religion is science meme.
blind faith of the religious zealots, regardless of christian, muslim, or any one else. usually ends up badly for everyone around them.. history bears out that sad story.

Posted by: XXX | February 19, 2010, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Dow Jones facts:
Feb 2008 12,266.39
Feb 2009 7,062.93
Feb 2010 10,392.90
Did the stimulus work or not?

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | February 19, 2010, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Unemployment facts:
Jan 1980 6.3%
Jan 1981 7.5% Reagan sworn in.
Jan 1982 8.6%
Jan 1983 10.4%
Jan 1984 8.0%
Jan 1985 7.3%
—–23 Years later—-
Jan 2008 5.0%
Jan 2009 7.7% Obama sworn in.
Jan 2010 9.7%
Have we given Obama enough time?

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | February 19, 2010, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Mary | Feb 19, 2010 12:39:44 PM posted: “Most politicians in Washington went to elite universities. How’s that turned out for us? There are plenty of educated idiots out there.”
So what are you saying – less education would be somehow better? Such a position is downright destructive.
A new study by economists Rick Hanushek and Ludger Woessmann shows that bringing US education levels up to the level of Finland would raise our GDP by over $100 trillion over the next 80 years.
That’s a LOT of income. Any other suggestions how our nation can whack down the deficit besides eliminating stupid politicians?

Posted by: CenterOne | February 19, 2010, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

I’m sure many people said that the last Great Depression could never happen.

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | February 19, 2010, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

“So what are you saying – less education would be somehow better? Such a position is downright destructive.”
Is that what I said? No, it isn’t. My point is that you can have a very expensive elite education and still be an idiot and used our politicians as examples of that.
“Any other suggestions how our nation can whack down the deficit besides eliminating stupid politicians?”
Sure. How do households cut their debt? THEY STOP SPENDING and CUT THEIR LIFESTYLES. It’s not rocket science. It’s common sense. Even the SOCIALISTS in Greece are doing it now.
Our federal government only brings in about $2.1 trillion a year (it took $1.89 trillion to cover SS, Medicare, Medicaid, unemployment, welfare, and interest on the debt in 2009). But they spend $1.6 trillion more than that to run the rest of our bureaucracies. They should only be allowed to spend the tax receipts they collect. PERIOD. Their habit of not doing so is one of the major reasons why we’re in this mess today.
We’re quickly reaching the tipping point where we can’t grow our economy fast enough to pay the interest on our debt. Once that happens, there’s a good chance we’ll default on our debt or experience hyperinflation which will devastate all but the wealthiest among us.

Posted by: Mary | February 19, 2010, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Mary | Feb 19, 2010 3:48:04 PM – Great to hear you believe in Education! Thankfully, not every student is destined to choose a career as a political “idiot”.
This Recession is already forcing people to re-evaluate spending habits. Credit card use continues to drop at an unprecedented rate. And the Recession hammered the U.S. deficit down from $695 Billion in 2008 to $380 Billion.
But cutting back on spending alone is not the solution to grow our economy and keep America a preeminent player in the fast moving global economy. The projected $100 Trillion addition to the GDP due to improved education seems like a solid investment for our nation’s future.
I agree with Hanushek and Woessmann’s assessment – there are serious reasons to invest US spending on Education. It’s worth a read – the PDF is online.

Posted by: CenterOne | February 19, 2010, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

Of course a second depression is coming: Of Mortgage Brokers, ARMs, Attrition and Marathons. It will end in sovereign default, at last.

Posted by: CrisisMaven | February 19, 2010, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

crisismaven | Feb 19, 2010 4:49:38 PM
Noriel Roubini, or “Doctor Doom”, the economist who predicted this Great Recession several years ago seems to believe the US economy isn’t quite as bleak as your crystal ball.
Today Roubini estimates that U.S. real GDP will grow 2.7% in 2010, against a potential growth rate of around 3%.

Posted by: CenterOne | February 19, 2010, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

there’s a good chance we’ll default on our debt or experience hyperinflation which will devastate all but the wealthiest among us.
Posted by: Mary
thank you GW Bush…
re: expensive elite education
- there are colleges and universities that cost a great deal to attend, I know there are many catholic high schools and colleges that charge a pretty penny for admittance..
so, all catholic high schools and religious universities that are expensive are also elite ?

Posted by: XXX | February 19, 2010, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

progressive mama wrote: “Are you from a Texas? I read a very funny poll.”
.
I can see you get your material from DU. But you don’t see the real deal here on the ground. You’ve got time to play on the democrat underground while Texas is busy supporting the rest of the country (yourself included). Those of us who are too busy trying to keep things afloat don’t have time to spend countless hours reading the drivel on DU. We know that those of us who produce will have a good portion of our hard work taken away to support those who have no concept of what it takes. They only know what they have been taught in Government schools. So if they think man and dinosaurs roamed the earth together, then that is a bigger indictment of the quality of government education these days than anything.
.
So, enjoy the party while it lasts. In November comes restitution retribution. Your free ride comes to an end.

Posted by: gk | February 20, 2010, 12:08 am 12:08 am

thank you GW Bush…
Posted by: XXX | Feb 19, 2010 11:55:12 PM
——————–
It’s funny how the libs are always searching for a way to pin things on GWB.
It doesn’t matter…
There is plenty of blame to go around…
It doesn’t matter…
The coming tidal wave of debt will engulf us all…

Posted by: Quo Warranto | February 20, 2010, 12:10 am 12:10 am

It’s funny how the libs are always searching for a way to pin things on GWB.
Posted by: Quo Warranto
‘searching for a way ‘?
not really, no need,
it’s all historical fact if anyone cares to look, unless you’re into the ‘righty’ revisionist crowd that likes to rewrite recent history. 8 long years of corruption and malfeasance, ineptitude, arrogance and treasonous acts against the people and constitution of the United States
what’s funny is how the current crop of rightwing/republican nihilists are always denying that anything went wrong during ‘Ws’ administration

Posted by: XXX | February 20, 2010, 2:13 am 2:13 am

I can see you get your material from DU.

You missed the target completely, gk.
In regards to the poll, I received a link via Twitter.
Thanks for playing “let me keep whining about the messenger.” Its been fun.

Posted by: progressive mama | February 20, 2010, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

I agree with Quo Warrant. There’s no way to kn ow for sure if all the budget-busting moves enacted by both administrations prevented a second Great Depression.

Posted by: Karl the Depression Aid Guy | August 30, 2010, 2:59 am 2:59 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.