By Dschabner

Feb 20, 2010 6:31pm

Ron Paul Wins CPAC Straw Poll

ABC News’ David Chalian and Matt Loffman report:

The libertarian-leaning Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, came out on top in the straw poll at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, D.C., this weekend winning 31 percent of the nearly 2400 votes cast. 

The straw poll is entirely unscientific and not necessarily representative of the overall Republican electorate.  In fact, if past is prologue, not much should be read into the results.  Former Gov. Mitt Romney, R-Mass., a once a likely future presidential contender, won the straw poll here for the last three years including in 2008 on the same day he dropped out of the presidential race.

Mitt Romney came in second with 22 percent of the vote followed by Sarah Palin at 7 percent and Tim Pawlenty at 6 percent.

The organizers of the straw poll included 11 names on the ballot.  Other than the top four vote-getters, Governors Haley Barbour, Mitch Daniels, and Tim Pawlenty appeared on the ballot.  Newt Gingrich, Mike Huckabee, Mike Pence, Rick Santorum, and John Thune were among the other names listed.

And, of course, Sarah Palin’s name was on the ballot for the second year in a row despite her not showing up at the conference to rally the troops.

Nearly half of all those voting in the CPAC straw poll were students.  Young people were a clear part of the activist energy fueling Ron Paul’s candidacy in 2008 too.

If Ron Paul decides to make another run for the White House in 2012, he will likely be as much of a longshot as he was in 2008.

Interestingly, 53 percent of CPAC attendees who participated in the straw poll said they were dissatisfied with their crop of possible 2012 contenders showing room for others in the conservative movement to consider a potential White House bid.

Here are the full results of the CPAC 2010 straw poll:
Paul        31%
Romney    22%
Palin        7%
Pawlenty    6%
Pence        5%
Gingrich    4%
Huckabee    4%
Daniels        2%
Santorum    2%
Thune        2%
Barbour    1%
Other        5%
Undecided    6%

User Comments

The poll matters, unless it doesn’t. If RINO Romney won, the media would be preaching it as gospel.
Alas an actual Republican won, and it therfore is meaningless… Um, WHAT!?!
Jeez ABC, we can’t all be John McCain/Scott Brown/Teddy Kennedy “Republicans.”
You know, like the centrist Democrats like Evan Bayh that you just threw out!

Posted by: jafo | February 20, 2010, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

C’mon Ron, you can do it! You are one of the few leaders that know we can’t keep printing the free money forever. Go, Ron Paul, Go!

Posted by: AuntieB | February 20, 2010, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Let’s hope not. That’s a conservative’s assessment.

Posted by: denn84116 | February 20, 2010, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

I have been telling anyone who will listen that the Republican Party (thanks to the extreme conservatives) were about to tear themselves apart. Looks like I was right on the money. Looks good on them too. They were the ones that created and pandered to this “poisonous” group of extremisdts and now they can no longer “control the monster”. Thank goodness this group is a “shrill minority”.

Posted by: CND FOX | February 20, 2010, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

Oh My God, 10 minutes ago I was
reading how the GOP wanted to copy
the 2008 democratic strategy for bringing
the youth to the table. Now they want
Paul, the 90,000 year old geezer ??????
What is happening to that group?
gasping for air ????

Posted by: spacerook1 | February 20, 2010, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

At least they have some sense instead of promoting BabyDoll… err, Sarah Palin for President of the USA! I will listen to them now!

Posted by: S | February 20, 2010, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

I am an independent, although left leaning, and I would say, if anyone has a chance at beating Obama, Ron Paul is the one. Republicans will never get the independent vote for the right-wing extremists like the ones that filled the stage during the last election.

Posted by: Shawn Irwin | February 20, 2010, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

“Poisonous group of extremists”?? Ha! Ron Paul is the only politician who just lays it on the table and is incapable of pointless blathering and waxing nostalgic like 95% of congress uses to talk their way around things. This is probably coming from a guy who voted Obama/Biden. Biden is like a bobble-head that won’t stop making a complete moron out of himself. Obama is bogged down. Nobody wants a RINO Republican anymore. Ron Paul 2012

Posted by: Jason Shackelford | February 20, 2010, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

“53 percent of CPAC attendees who participated in the straw poll said they were dissatisfied with their crop of possible 2012 contenders”
They can’t even come up with a list of contenders. How do they think they can run a country?

Posted by: JaylahPriest | February 20, 2010, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Ron Paul was the best guy for the job in the 2008 elections and he is STILL the best guy for the job now.. Little difference between Democrat and Republicans these days.. Ron Paul stands with few as a fiscally responsible leader who wants to see America survive rather than crash with worthless currency and socialist governing.

Posted by: Rich T | February 20, 2010, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

Cheney should see this as a complete rejection of him and his political audience. I just wish Paul would drop the Republican tag. Ron Paul 2012.

Posted by: rich | February 20, 2010, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

Doesn’t Ron Paul want more de-regulation?

Posted by: secondlook | February 20, 2010, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

He wants to legalize all drugs.

Posted by: rich | February 20, 2010, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

I’m not a conservative, I’m proudly liberal. However, Ron Paul would be an intriguing candidate. I wouldn’t necessarily like his politics, but he seems to be honest.

Posted by: plantain_11 | February 20, 2010, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

Interesting that most picked a moderate/liberal candidate in Ron Paul. Is that odd due that this is a convention of *conservatives*? From what I heard about Paul, he would ask for more tighter rules and regs, etc.
I like the guy’s ideas, but what are his chances of becoming of winning the GOP candidancy? Close to nill due to the large number of *right-wing* conservatives in the party.

Posted by: GWP | February 20, 2010, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

Yes, that’s how to energize the youth…pick someone as old as grandpa…

Posted by: Pen | February 20, 2010, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

Ron Paul can’t get elected any more then Sarah. This group just keeps showing how far off they are and how disorganized they are. Just more bs from a bunch of confused idiots.

Posted by: Jim | February 20, 2010, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

Ron Paul is an improvement over the empty suits that are trying to get the nomination. Paul is consistent on principal which cannot be said for Rommney or Palin.

Posted by: bob samms | February 20, 2010, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

Palin was 3rd. Bwaaaaaaaaahh.. Funny as heII.

Posted by: Jim Bob | February 20, 2010, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

Same thing happened prior to last presidential election on fox news with hannity. Paul won the poll but was dimissed like he was a kook. That is why the republicans won’t win in 2012.

Posted by: bob samms | February 20, 2010, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

I love Ron Paul. I think he is so smart and he truly loves his country.
How dare anybody turn their nose up at him. Are you listening to yourselves? I like him but he is old you are repeating what McCain, Bush, Palin,and any body else who does not want Ron to run again. Well there are a lot of old gezers out there who might just vote for him.He truly is the only candidate who wants to give the money back to the people
Nobody in Washington is happy about him winning that straw poll. HA!! HA!! Take that Nancy and GW ccCheney and all the rest of you bullies the people are almost awake YES!
I am sure there will be lots of questioning of him as a candidate. As someone who keep tabs on him I can assure you he might considering run. His people raised more money from in one day than any other candidate he was heavily supported by the military and received more donation from the military than all the candidates combined. He is well loved and a lot of people are for him!!! Don’t turn your back on him or you will be turning your back on yourself.

Posted by: Lisafrequency | February 20, 2010, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

Gosh, do you think he’ll do as well as he did in 2008, brouhahahahahaha
Well, at least he’s a real candidate instead of the airhead from Alaska.

Posted by: JR | February 20, 2010, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Well fellow Republicans, if we want to win back what we lost…..we need to jump on the bandwagon. We can always dump him later for a true elitist.

Posted by: rich | February 20, 2010, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

RON PAUL… my hero.
Read his book: A Foreign Policy of Freedom – easy read, short speeches, highly insightful.
Ron Paul cured my apathy – vote Debra Medina for Texas Governor. Freedom not Serfdom.

Posted by: Sleuth51 | February 20, 2010, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

I wasn’t going to bother posting, we are used to the ‘Rules Of Ron Paul Journalism’ which dismisses all accomplishments he has despite how they would be trumpeted for other candidates.
However, the nonsense about ‘how can an old man appeal to the young’ just shows how some posters aren’t paying attention. The YOUTH adore Ron Paul. His biggest strength is at colleges.
Think about that.

Posted by: spinnikerca | February 20, 2010, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

I could live with Paul, as long as he had a democratic congress to work with, we’ve already seen what happens when the GOP controls ALL branches of government, the destruction of America.

Posted by: JR | February 20, 2010, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

You know nothing about Ron Paul if you think he can’t bring in the youth. He is a rock star on among young people.
If the GOP wants a youth movement, Ron Paul is the only one that can deliver it.
BTW, he runs 5 miles a day and rides a bike 10 miles a day unless he’s on the road at places like CPAC. He is in better shape than most people half his age.

Posted by: Ron Paul 2012 | February 20, 2010, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

“Oh My God, 10 minutes ago I was
reading how the GOP wanted to copy
the 2008 democratic strategy for bringing
the youth to the table. Now they want
Paul, the 90,000 year old geezer ??????
What is happening to that group?
gasping for air ????”
In case you aren’t aware, it’s the youth that are the driving force behind the good doctor’s poularity.

Posted by: RP2012 | February 20, 2010, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

interesting that in 2009 ABC did not call the CPAC Straw Poll ‘unscientific’ So when Ron Paul wins the nomination, and then the presidency will they not count then also?

Posted by: Damon | February 20, 2010, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

Ron Paul for President! Vote out ALL incumbents of both parties!

Posted by: thecanimalshsuband | February 20, 2010, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

Obama is a fraud.
Obama lied about change!
Ron Paul 2012 gets my vote!

Posted by: Jeremy Bowen | February 20, 2010, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

Well…Ron Paul doesn’t turn me off near as much as most of the other contenders. It’s a start.

Posted by: bravebrick | February 20, 2010, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Ron Paul is an honorable man who predicted our current fiscal nightmare a decade ago and how it would transpire. For me he is the only choice amongst a bunch of warmongering buffoons.

Posted by: Huh | February 20, 2010, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

secondlook – Deregulation? Remember regulation actually caused the current financial chaos. It was the regulation of Fannie and Freddie on the not-so-free market that removed risk from mortgage lending. Of course Ron Paul explained this. For an even better articulation, might I recommend Ron Paul’s economic advisor Peter Schiff who is currently running in the CT Senate race.

Posted by: Huh | February 20, 2010, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

Ron Paul is against abortion and if he can overturn and bann it, I am all for him. That is the greatest evil in the world right now. I would love to see Gingrich in there. He is one of the most intelligent people, I have ever heard speak. We should be so lucky.

Posted by: Sensons | February 20, 2010, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

He is not beholden to special interests. Is there anyone else in the Federal government that can make that claim. Ron is the one for me. I consider him a personal hero given the fact that he has challenged the corruption in DC all the while getting laughed at. Ron Paul in 2012. He may be 76 years old at the time, but his wisdom more than makes up for it. Maybe add Kucinich to the ticket. We need men or women of integrity.

Posted by: Ben | February 20, 2010, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

Ron Paul deserves every single accolade that he wins, in my books! I like him very much, admire him, and consider him to be the most principled political voice in America at the present time.
By contrast, I think Glenn Beck is a rational egotist and a psychopath. Other than that, I have nothing against him.
God bless

Posted by: Paul Richard Strange Sr | February 20, 2010, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

What is fascinating to me is that the speakers at CPAC all went after Obama whereas Paul went after Woodrow Wilson. Paul railed against the Wilson Doctrine of nation building and policing the world. He argues on philosophic terms rather than partisan bickering. He also reminded conservatives how much policing the world costs. It also creates lots of enemies to boot, i.e. 911. Oh ya and we are broke. He did alude to that too. By the way, our Iraq and Afghanistan extravaganzas are costing us $720 million a day. Are we insane?

Posted by: Ben | February 20, 2010, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

Sensons-He submitted the Sanctity of Life Act as opposed to Obama’s Freedom of Choice Act. Abortion is a horrible thing, but ultimately I must take Paul’s position of leaving it up to the states. The Federal government has no constitutional authority to legislate on abortion. It is reserved for the states to decide.

Posted by: Ben | February 20, 2010, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Look’s like a list of who is not going to be the next president.

Posted by: steve | February 20, 2010, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

‘The straw poll is entirely unscientific and not necessarily representative of the overall Republican electorate. In fact, if past is prologue, not much should be read into the results’ — so it’s not really news then is it.

Posted by: Person Man | February 20, 2010, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

I don’t think anyone could be worse than the communist we have in now.

Posted by: horseforfeathers | February 20, 2010, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

we do? i don’t think so. this is what happens when liberals shang high and corrupt a poll.

Posted by: picklepants7 | February 20, 2010, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Ben, At first, I did not believe your $720 million per day number. I thought it is was way too high.
So, I went to cost of war.com… about $10,000 per 1.5 to 2.0 seconds. $300,000 per minute. $18 million per hour and $432 million per day… Yes, I’d say at least more than $500 million per day.
Good gracious. Where are the pro-war people to defend this? How can Congress spend our money at this rate? Not our money. Rather, money borrowed from the Chinese.
Ron Paul was the only GOP Presidental candidate willing to speak out against the war and the 700 bases we have in 140 countries. Obama hinted that he was anti-war, but once he realized that the neo-cons were in control, he had to bow to their wishes – disgusting state of affairs.
GO GREEN, RECYCLE CONGRESS

Posted by: Sleuth51 | February 20, 2010, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

John Bolton

Posted by: sid | February 20, 2010, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

I congratulate Ron Paul. For all of you who do not know what Ron stands for please see his archives. Disinformation is rampant on the blogs. He stands for your States Rights. To know him is to love him

Posted by: Chuck Wilson | February 20, 2010, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

Sleuth51 – I saw $720 million a day in the Washington Post. This may have been a couple of years ago though. Still nuts considering we are borrowing money from China and getting the Fed to print dollars to fund the killing.

Posted by: Ben | February 20, 2010, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

OK… here’s my position. In 2004, I left the Republican party because I could clearly see that it had lost its way.
I watched Ron Paul during the last general election get rejected by the old school republicans (smurking at him during the GOP debate), and was even further disappointed in the party, as he was the only one who’s ideas stuck with the TRUE platform of the party.
If Ron Paul is the primary candidate again Obama, I would vote for him. If some one else is selected, I’ll vote for Obama again.
Your choice republican party.

Posted by: X-Republican Because of Bush | February 20, 2010, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

This proves that the Conservatives are tired of the Republican in name only folks and are now looking for people who follow their ideals of less Government and less spending of YOUR dollars. Sadly, the folks in 2008 picked a candidate that had no chance of wining (McCain) and he attempted to correct this by picking a VP that thought “outside the box”. If RP had been elected, we would not be in Iraq, would be exiting Afganistan, and we would be saying buh-bye to Japan, Korea, and most of Europe. The ‘Cold War’ ended over twenty years ago and he recognized this. He also recognizes that our biggest enemy is the most populous country: China and would have implemented controls for the products. As to health care, he believes in catastrophic protection for everyone, that is how folks loose homes and everything else. We don’t loose in on scrapes, bumps and buises, we loose them when we rack up 60K in unexpected bills. He also believes in sealing our Southern border and placement of the military on it as that is their job, protect this country from all enemies, foreign and domestic. He also believes that GHW Bush was wrong in giving tax breaks to the fantasically rich and large corporations and would have reversed every tax cut to them. We got McCain and Obama and we all know how that battle turned out.

Posted by: James McKenzie | February 20, 2010, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

I am so happy to see the young conservatives rallying around this great man. I watched the CPAC speeches and his received a standing ovation from the young people. The older folks in front looked a bit uncomfortable which makes me smile all the more. We are taking our country back which the baby boomers have bankrupted. It is going to be a long way back to prosperity, but I believe Ron’s message is the correct one. I will continue to fight for liberty and freedom, not for Goldman Sachs’ ability to make profits.

Posted by: Huh | February 20, 2010, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

Ron Paul/Rand Paul 2012! A truly historic election.

Posted by: Caleb | February 20, 2010, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Ron Paul can change the world. Enough of this big brother BS. We cannot let the government make our decisions and control our destiny. Ron Paul is all about the people. If you have common sense, you would vote Ron Paul. For those who fear actual freedom, then Ron Paul is not for you and you belong with the rest antagonists

Posted by: Joe | February 20, 2010, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

I’m pleasantly surprised. I thought they’d be dumber than this….

Posted by: Cassandra | February 20, 2010, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

Ron Paul/ Andrew Napalitano in 2012
The Constitutional Dream Team

Posted by: Eric Manning | February 20, 2010, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

I will sleep with satisfaction tonight. It took a crisis to wake Americans up. Thank God.

Posted by: Danielle | February 20, 2010, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

good good…:D

Posted by: Lisafrequency | February 20, 2010, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

I usually vote democrat but I could get on board with Ron Paul. I agree with a lot of his ideas.

Posted by: Janice | February 20, 2010, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

Ron Paul is his own worst enemy. He has some great ideas and he would make a great president but he speaks like he’s in a panic all the time. I don’t trust people who panic so just the sound of a panicky voice scares me.
I once heard him speak in a non-political interview and he came across as intelligent and self assured. On the campaign trail he goes back in to panic mode. He’s a brilliant man but the manner of his speech makes him sound like a nut.
I’m not trying to insult the man, I hope he reads this and takes my advise. Calm down, lower your voice a few octaves and try not to sound like you’re in a panic.

Posted by: oonogil | February 20, 2010, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

Excellent – the best the republicanistas can come up with is this used up retread. There is a good reason why he was dismissed as a kook last time. Because he IS a kook!

Posted by: Art Weiss | February 20, 2010, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

Ron Paul. Sounds like the name they give you in high school foreign language class. For pro-nun-ci-a-tion’s sake. A name that makes you feel like somebody: “Répète, si vous plaît, ‘R-R-R-Rowne Pole, R-R-R-Rowne Pole.’” Until the bell rings. And there you are…back to your same old boring name.
Ron Paul. Simple. Easy to remember. Name they would recommend in business correspondence class. Like the screenname you glimpse on fast rolling credits. When you go, What did that say? From the HBO Special Presentation. Way back in the cool 70′s. With the beautiful tropical beach. Dotted with gorgeous vixens. The exotic automobles. Where even the exhaust pipes mean something. Mansions where swimming pools have swimming pools. Where the soundtrack wavers with never before heard melodies of popular favorites. Then there’s the single giant hair that appears on the screen. And then, somehow-how, unbeknownst to anybody-by itself disappears. Which of course tells you that this stuff is REAL. No overproduction here. And of course last but not least there’s the shy tennis pro. The film makes no sense. And so you cannot help but feel left with a certain sense of awe. Call it the mystery of art. The good part you ask? (Fast forward. Towards the end of the film.) The good part entitled, The End.

Posted by: Jerry Rosen | February 20, 2010, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

I highly recommend everyone watch Ron Paul’s speech at CPAC. He is a truly inspired libertarian and statesman. America would be proud to have him as President.

Posted by: Oscar_DeGrouch | February 20, 2010, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

paul IS a kook. Lord help us if he gets into the mix again. he’s all talk. he’d be disastrous. talks one way and votes another. and speaking of all talk, do you ever seriously watch his facial features when he talks? would you want to look at that for 4 years? come ON. we can do better. he’s just plain scary.

Posted by: gus | February 20, 2010, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

I just feel hopeful that they chose the guy that isn’t a warmonger for a change.

Posted by: secondlook | February 21, 2010, 12:37 am 12:37 am

With the way Obama and company are running things, the republicans can’t lose no matter who they put up

Posted by: Will | February 21, 2010, 12:43 am 12:43 am

Ron’s the man. No kook in my book. Someone that has gotten everything right is no kook. Fringe maybe since the mainstream has gotten everything so wrong.

Posted by: Dave | February 21, 2010, 12:43 am 12:43 am

“He wants to legalize all drugs”
The USA taxpayer funds drugs by making them expensive. We pay $20 billion per year for drug interdiction overseas via DEA alone. We paid Columbia $500 million per year. We pay Peru, Mexico and a whole litney of other countries.
We spend about $30 billion in USA on drug interdiction.
In total, the whole drug enforcement expense approaches $100 billion per year.
Result: Drug trade increases every year.
Ron Paul is right. Stop it. If you stop interdiction, the profit will disappear and those drug dealers will be out of business in a heartbeat.
Do the opposite: Tax drugs to reduce the deficit.

Posted by: Ken | February 21, 2010, 12:47 am 12:47 am

No new ideas. No desire to work across the isle. No hope. This isn’t what America wants.

Posted by: Mom | February 21, 2010, 1:16 am 1:16 am

I voted for Obama in 2008. Obama was a big disappointment. I hope Ron Paul runs in 2012. I will vote for him.
No independent is stupid to vote for Sarah Palin or Mitt, or these other neocons.
I also found out that Ron Paul was the one who started these tea parties back in 2007 and now the neocons have hijacked the movement.

Posted by: Joey | February 21, 2010, 1:34 am 1:34 am

OMG Joey, I’m glad people noticed that the Tea Party was hijacked by these republicans. What a bunch of fakes and frauds.
Sarah Palin for Prez? Hahahahaha!

Posted by: Ken in NJ | February 21, 2010, 1:39 am 1:39 am

Posted by: Jason Shackelford | Feb 20, 2010 7:35:06 PM
“They can’t even come up with a list of contenders. How do they think they can run a country?”
This is why liberals need proper schooling.
Here are the full results of the CPAC 2010 straw poll:
Paul 31%
Romney 22%
Palin 7%
Pawlenty 6%
Pence 5%
Gingrich 4%
Huckabee 4%
Daniels 2%
Santorum 2%
Thune 2%
Barbour 1%
Other 5%
Undecided 6%
That’s 11 Contenders + the 5% other.
OH! Also? This was part of the original article.

Posted by: Jerry Wm Bowers Jr | February 21, 2010, 2:11 am 2:11 am

Ron Paul Rocks Me!!

Posted by: sibkiss | February 21, 2010, 2:15 am 2:15 am

WOW!! How exciting, the most honest and deserving one on the list won. I’ll empty my bank account to support RON PAUL! The rest may turn out as bad as obama.

Posted by: Mark P. | February 21, 2010, 2:21 am 2:21 am

Media. You dismiss Ron Paul and the TRUE Constitution Movement at your own peril. You cannot expect to contain the dissatisfaction with both the DEMS and REPS by trying to focus us on label pins and soundbites any longer. The impact that the two party system has had on America is all to evident in the voters pocketbooks and prospects.

Posted by: bondservant1958 | February 21, 2010, 3:30 am 3:30 am

Note that neither ABC, nor CNN actually show Ron Paul’s speech. This show the media bias of any one who criticizes Israel.

Posted by: hotdog | February 21, 2010, 6:31 am 6:31 am

Ron Paul lives and votes by THE CONSTITUTION. Maybe more of you morons (DC elite included) should do the same thing. This country wouldn’t be in such a mess if we had more Ron Paul’s in the White House.

Posted by: Connie | February 21, 2010, 8:20 am 8:20 am

Ron who?

Posted by: SearamblerOne | February 21, 2010, 8:26 am 8:26 am

rich said, “He wants to legalize all drugs.”
Really? Is this true? ALL drugs? That doesn’t seem like a position likely to get him elected to anything in this country……..

Posted by: SearamblerOne | February 21, 2010, 8:27 am 8:27 am

At least Ron Paul doesn’t kiss Tea P-John Birch Soc.-GOP butt. He states his beliefs and has stood by them for years. I wouldn’t vote for him, but I can admire his convictions and honesty.

Posted by: Trent | February 21, 2010, 8:39 am 8:39 am

“If Ron Paul decides to make another run for the White House in 2012, he will likely be as much of a longshot as he was in 2008.”
That’s it ABC – just try & marginalize him again. He got NO press in the 2008 run. I’ve been prepared to vote for a 3rd party candidate in 2012 – but if Ron Paul does run, I’ll vote for him in the primary. And if he wins the nomination, I would definitely vote for him. Otherwise… 3rd party, here I come.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | February 21, 2010, 10:29 am 10:29 am

Those who support Ron Paul fall for the lines like, “Bring back the Gold Standard and stop inflation!”
They don’t want to hear that we were on the Gold Standard in the 1800′s and we had plenty of inflation.
They also don’t want to hear that by the late 1800′s, the Gold Standard restricted the money supply so badly that it was causing recessions because only big business was getting any credit. It was removed because it didn’t work then and it would be even worse now.
If we went back to the Gold Standard, Americans would have to wait 10 to 20 years for the next mortgage to be issued – there wouldn’t be any capital available.
But you get people saying “Check out Ron Paul and see how good his ideas are,” yet they can never spell out how his ideas will play out.

Posted by: The_Mick | February 21, 2010, 11:35 am 11:35 am

I am a conservative and i would never vote for ron paul to me he isnt even conservative he is more like a democrat this poll is way stupid if you republicans dont start voting conservative people like sarah palin or mitt romney you will lose again if you dont stick to real conservatives unlike mccain and ron paul

Posted by: angela hill | February 21, 2010, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

The_Mick – you are wrong. From 1800 to 1900 the dollar’s purchasing power remained remarkably stable. Gold or a basket of commodities is what will keep the size of government in check. Germany used land-backed money to get itself out of hyperinflation. Ron Paul is quite astute of monetary history. Obviously you are not.

Posted by: Huh | February 21, 2010, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

angela hill – “ron paul to me he isnt even conservative he is more like a democrat”
Please elaborate this nonsensical statement.

Posted by: Huh | February 21, 2010, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Ron Paul can be the unifying element to the TEA party if he wanted to. If that becomes the case, the republican party will become deceased.

Posted by: adam | February 21, 2010, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

I’m tired of all these people acting like Ron Paul is a “Nut.” all his ideas are pragmatic, logical, and I dare say conservative. He is the only candidate that brings facts to the table and not just endless catch phrases. If the GOP really cares about bringing new ideas to the table, and really wants to help America they will choose Dr. Ron Paul
Go Ron Paul 2012!!!!

Posted by: jacob | February 21, 2010, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

But iz Ron Paul a 911 Truther?

Posted by: Truther Ron Paul | February 21, 2010, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

Truther Ron Paul – No he has stated that he believes Bin Laden’s ilk flew planes into the various buildings. Why don’t you do your own research before you spew such garbage. He has stated that folks in government were incompetent and a few may even have turned a blind eye. Let’s face it war plans with Iraq were in the works long before. With our corporate fascist system serving special interests anything becomes possible.

Posted by: Huh | February 21, 2010, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

Of course they chose an old white guy. they want someone that remembers what it was like when blacks, hispanics and women had no rights!

Posted by: john | February 21, 2010, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

Right now, Ron Paul is our country’s only hope.
He already has my vote. I just think it would be better for him to run as an independent, but maybe not.

Posted by: David M. | February 21, 2010, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Ron Paul’s personality and nature reminds one of former President Harry Truman. Honest and leaves no doubt where his ideas about running the USA are and should be if we are to survive, in spite of the eletist, of both parties, That got this country in a very dangerous position due, specifically, to 4 corrupt (Opinion) U.S. government officials that conspired (Opinion) to subvert, for their own friends and cronies by acting outside the financial rules of the government. SEE, on your local PBS station’s website, under (Frontline) the premier documentary producer in this country, the 60 minute production titled “THE WARNING” and you will be amazed by the actual evidence provided showing who and how we went Bankrupt, but didn’t file as such and instead just started printing money. Are you afraid to view the document’s facts and truth? Billions spent by the goverment and thousands out of work as a direct result of these individual’s conspiracy and actions (Opinion), when the Congress held hearings, were warned what was coming and why, but chose to listen to the conspirators (Opinion). Judge for yourself. You have a brain and are capable of sound reasoning. You are, aren’t you? The next round of what we are going to go through is just around the corner and much larger. The fall of the Commercial Real Estate Loans, which will put thousands more out of work and cost Billions and Billions that, again, we don’t have. What will we do then. Start up the printing presses and Drive the Dollar down to zero value for good? Please THINK and view (THE WARNING)for proof positive what the press and media have been hiding from the American people. I am not a conspiracy nut and believe in the greatest nation ever on this planet, but we are pretty much out of the ability of surviving the lies, in my humble opinion. Thanks for your consideration, be what it may be.

Posted by: Jack | February 21, 2010, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Ron Paul has one little problem…he is from TEXAS!Its going to be a longggg time before anybody warms up to the idea of another Texan in the white house,Thanks to the indellable record of by all accounts “the worst president in US history” Gee Dubya…..Good luck with running anybody from that state…

Posted by: rick | February 21, 2010, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

If we have a straw poll that gives 31% to Ron Paul, and the presentation of that fact brings boo’s ….Our problem is with the maddening crowd/media, not the candidate. Romney is a pretty boy, but I have never seen him or any of the other contenders stand up to
the bankers. Dr. Ron understands the real threat to our Republic and personal freedoms. We are in need
of a BIG CHANGE when truth is sacrificed on the altar
of popularity. What kind of leadership do we want?

Posted by: PJP | February 21, 2010, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

Paul for President? His campaign went about as far as George Papoon’s (but with a completely opposite platform.)
It owuld appear that America is neither extreme nor radical when it comes to the sanity issue.
Yes, I was VERY strongly in suport of HR2755, but he’s unfortunately also a DANGEROUS “Free Market” NUT.
And we can see how even a head fake in the direction of deregulation essentially brought down the economy.
It’s a good bet it won’t ever recover this time, given the “success” of shortsighted absolutist Corporate and investor/gambler GREED.
It’s “just good business” NOT to create or retain American Jobs – unless we get a Single Payer Health Care System, devoid of reliance on private profit or employer participation.
But all industries -and corporatist politicians- are too greedy and stupid to recognize that.

Posted by: Rodney Hytonen | February 21, 2010, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

The way Obama’s going right now, any one of those Republicans stand a good chance to beat him in the Democratic primary.

Posted by: betsy | February 21, 2010, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

Rodney Hytonen – You couldn’t be more wrong. Regulation is what brought the economy down. Regulation through Fannie and Freddie took risk out of mortgage lending. The free market would have never allowed this crisis too occur. Why can’t you folks get this to sink in?
Yes greed is part of it, but if you ignore the regulation of interest rates and of mortgage lending you will miss the boat. Tune into Ron Paul and Peter Schiff to have a greater understanding. Cheers.

Posted by: Huh | February 21, 2010, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

He does remind me of the scarecrow in the Wizard of Oz.

Posted by: threeriverscrossing | February 21, 2010, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

I would have voted for Sarah, I really liked her in that “Nailin” movie.

Posted by: Stevo | February 21, 2010, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

I keep confusing Ron Paul with RuPaul. I guess we’ll be finding out more about him in the future.

Posted by: Stevo | February 21, 2010, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

Ron Paul are two good men. Wish that they had been on the ticket last time.

Posted by: richard fusilier | February 21, 2010, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

I’m a Democrat and I like Obama, yet I would love Ron Paul to be President. To some that might seem strange, but here’s why. Many policies we have today are basically the worst of both worlds. Take healthcare for example. OK, so we’re not socialist when it comes to healthcare. OK, so we’re capitalist? Not exactly. Most consumers of healthcare don’t pay their medical bills. Do you think everyone seeing a therapist would pay $200 a week for therapy if it wasn’t covered? Is it “worth” 200 dollars? To some people I’m sure it is, but what if therapists lost half their customers? Some would get the bright idea to lower their prices, or innovate to help people in different ways that take less time. But there’s no incentive to compete or innovate though because most people don’t even know what they’re paying for and how much it costs. “You say I need this test? OK, sure, it couldn’t hurt.”
On the other side of it, not being socialist has its downsides too. People often have to deal with tons of headaches with insurance companies (if they’re lucky enough to be covered). Worrying and fighting with you insurance company is not a pleasant way to spend your day off. Doctors spend something like 3 hours a week dealing with insurance companies. We could essentially create tens of thousands of doctors overnight if we went socialized, which would help greatly with the impending doctor shortage. Also we’d save money on emergency room visits and preventable diseases.
The system we have now is basically the worst of both worlds. Almost anything would be better, either making it a true free market (where hospitals couldn’t charge your insurance company $65 for a bandage) or covering everyone with a simple universal system that eliminates headaches and hardship. Ron Paul would probably be for the former, and (I thought) Obama could deliver something resembling the latter. I’m beginning to think we might be out of luck though.

Posted by: James | February 21, 2010, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

Art Weiss posted “There is a good reason why he was dismissed as a kook last time. Because he IS a kook!”
If he is a kook, then we need more kooks like him. BTW, what kooky idea of his don’t you like? Avoid entangling alliances? Stop policing the world? Follow the Constitution? Stop starting needless wars? We were attacked on 9/11 because of the meddling we’ve done in the Middle East?

Posted by: Faurtz8 | February 21, 2010, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Forget age, Ron Paul is as sharp as a tack. He attracts youth because we now have the highest population of unemployed people aged 18 – 30 ever, and he is the only one that gives them something to believe in.

Posted by: John Szoke | February 21, 2010, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

You make some very good points. I should have paid for my daughters stitches out of pocket. It was a relatively small cut, but because I charged insurance, I am sure the cost was inflated. We need free market reforms as well as some of the reforms Obama addresses with regards to tort and selling across state lines. In the end though medical costs are high because there is an overutilization of insurance. This is greatly due to the American public being physically sick from all the toxic food they ingest. Until those things change, there is no way to cover everyone, especially since we are closing in in bankruptcy.

Posted by: Huh | February 21, 2010, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

Whaddaya know. Conservatives voting on substance rather than fluff? Now if the Liberals can do the same we may have a chance for peaceful revolution against the military industrial complex that the last two REAL Conservative and Liberal presidents warned us about.

Posted by: Tom | February 22, 2010, 7:05 am 7:05 am

Ron Paul should have learned in the last election that the GOP syndicate runs the show. Either he plays ball or they will ruin him.
Ron Paul doesn’t have a chance.

Posted by: Wayne | February 22, 2010, 8:22 am 8:22 am

The GOP is trying to recruit more younger conservatives. This is backfiring on the old conservatives.
Young conservatives support Ron Paul, as well as conservative gay policies over the policies of the angry old men and false religionists. Yet another internal battle with the GOP.

Posted by: KsDevil | February 22, 2010, 9:04 am 9:04 am

Hmmmm, I wonder who could draw crowds that almost matched obama’s after he had been campaigning for 2 years, with fawning media coverage, while she had been unknown until 2 months prior- with horrific media coverage? Could that be Sarah Palin? She facebooks about whatever our current socialist prez says or does, and she commands almost the attention of any of his 1,000 primetime addresses. Ron paul who? I wouldn’t be taking any bets on that one!

Posted by: nuffsaid | February 22, 2010, 10:23 am 10:23 am

I don’t think Ron Paul will be viable as an electable candidate.
If the GOP doesn’t come up with a better option, they will not win back the WH in 2012.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | February 22, 2010, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Ron Paul DOES represent the majority opinion of this country. He is the only honest congressman. He will put the Federal Reserve system that has BKed this country to rest. The FED is owned by private investers. Many of the same names appear on the board of the major media corperations. The media will never support Ron Paul because the ones who own NEWS CORP, TIME WARNER ect. will lose thier place at the top when he legalizes competing currencies and ends the banking oligarchy that runs our country. These people have billions upon billions of dollars. It is foolish to believe that they don’t run the show.

Posted by: Roger | February 22, 2010, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Well…I scanned and read many of the comments and know what I posted back on 2/20/20 is right> This is the beginning of the end for the Republican Party thanks to the extremists and wing-nuts who just don’t get reality. Ron Paul cannot/will not be able to stand up to “national scrutinY” any better than “Sister Sarah” Conservative extremists and crackpot wing nuts are destroying the Grand Old Party. For that I am thankful.

Posted by: CND FOX | February 22, 2010, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

CND FOX – 4 years ago everyone was sounding the death-knell for the Democratic party… Gee… they are still around.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | February 22, 2010, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Ron Paul 2012! :)

Posted by: Apolo Drakuvich | February 22, 2010, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

ellsbells930…Didn’t say they wouldn’t “be around”, just no longer effective. This “side of the ledger” has “accumulated too many wing-nuts, extremists and purists” for the educated moderates and independents to be anywhere near their candidates.

Posted by: CND FOX | February 22, 2010, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Ron Paul could be a very good choice for President however he won’t get elected for the dumbest of reasons. His looks, he’s not that chiseled out, youthful looking guy everyone seems to vote for. And the shame of it is we are letting a lot of talent go by the way side because of the 5th avenue packaging of candidates.

Posted by: hkdakota | February 23, 2010, 10:49 am 10:49 am

GWP
Ron Paul moderate/liberal? Hogwash, Ron Paul is without a doubt the most conservative member in congress and in Washington period, look at his voting record. Neo-conservative ideas such as interventionist wars are originally democratic-left wing ideologies (see Woodrow Wilson) and as far as the bush/cheney/palin/romney republicans, they are all neocons that will say they will cut spending or not go against the constitution, but support unconstitutional laws like the patriot act and support military interventionism and pre-emptive wars.

Posted by: clay | February 23, 2010, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

LOL! Ron Paul a liberal??? NO. A Libertarian???? NO. A Constitutionalist??? Absolutely.
Romney is a liberal. Look it up. Palin is nothing. The rest of the neo-con warmongers are the absolute death to America.
I always wondered how the crowd could have clamored for Barrabas over Jesus. Now I understand. They were ignorant and entrenched sheep.
Oh, and I’m in no way comparing Paul to my Lord Jesus Christ. Just an example of stupidity run rampant. Most so-called conservatives (neo-cons) have never even read where Ron Paul stands on the issues but are quick to dismiss him because he’s opposed to us murdering people around the world for their resources.

Posted by: Henry | February 23, 2010, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

From what I know of Ron Paul, he does NOT fit the republican “social-conservative” agenda. They’d brand this guy a turn-coat just like they recently did with Brown. Paul is about returning more to our American roots… the republicans say the words, but their actions have ALWAYS been quite different. This guy could do some good, IF it wasn’t for the partisan BS in congress.
The conservatives, desperate, are trying to ride waves of popularity AND THEN hoping to reign that in to their agenda. It won’t work. The majority of Americans, thankfully, are better educated.

Posted by: Troy Street | February 23, 2010, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Doesnt matter how old he is…his immigration policies are right on the frikin money…better an old geezer than a youg ‘IDIOT” like osama obama!

Posted by: Lise | February 24, 2010, 7:29 am 7:29 am

John, actually without insurance it would probably cost you even more. I know that seems unbelievable given how much things in hospitals cost even when you’re insured, but hospitals have special deals with insurance companies. The people who pay out of pocket pay something like 3 times more for everything. I don’t even know why they call it “insurance” anymore. It seems like the real function of insurance these days is to act as a kind of medical value club, like Costco or something. You pay them a membership fee and everything’s cheaper.
I’m still not sure why everything in a hospital costs so much to begin with. I had an idea once to open a store right next to a hospital that sold aspirin and bandages and stuff at normal costs. The hospital might ban bringing outside items in though, like how they ban outside food in movie theaters so they can sell you a 6 dollar soda.

Posted by: James | February 26, 2010, 2:53 am 2:53 am

Ron Paul has been the most consistent politician in recent history, if not longer. His views are mostly conservative, but he attracts younger informed voters due to his “hands off”, “live and let live”, smaller governement ideas. We all need to forget if the candiate has a “R” or “D” next to their name as thier policies mirror each other. Ronpaul.com and look at his issues and past videos to truly understand.
Vote on issues and Ron Paul can get us

Posted by: John | April 23, 2010, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.