By Jacqueline Klingebiel

Feb 28, 2010 12:19pm

Roundtable: Rangel Scandal, Health Care and Desiree Rogers

Lots to discuss on our powerhouse Roundtable this morning with George Will, Cokie Roberts, Sam Donaldson and Paul Krugman. What’s next for Charlie Rangel? Will he be forced to relinquish his chairmanship? And how about recent news that Desiree Rogers has stepped down from her role as White House Social Secretary?

Watch the videos below for some top highlights from the TW Roundtable:

Health Care Summit Stalemate

George Will: “It's a Calder mobile. If you touch something here, something jiggles way over here. So, at the end of the day, it turns out we have two parties for a reason, and they have differing views about, A, the purposes and, B, the competence of government. And so we slog ahead." Watch how the rest of the Roundtable sees it HERE:

Rangel Under Fire
The embattled Chairman of the House Ways and Means committee has felt the heat from the right calling for him to step down from his role as chairman of the committee in charge of writing tax laws. The Roundtable this morning seemed to have a “wait and see” outlook.

Cokie Roberts: “Yes, he can hold it, as long as people — you know, his colleagues say he can hold it. But whether it becomes too hot for him to hold is something that, you know, sort of evolves."

Patterson Bows Out
New York Gov. David Paterson announced this week his decision to end his election campaign due to recent accusations of impropriety during his tenure and cleared the way for Democratic challenger New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo. Here’s how the Roundtable weighted in:

Sam Donaldson: "His father, is a man ofgreat substance.  His son has proved not to be.  And I think one of the lessons here is, when you run — because they run as a team in New York, governor and lieutenant governor — you ought — just like a president and vice president — you don't put someone on the ticket because there's a political advantage who is not capable of stepping in, as he has proved not to be capable.  And I think it's a real question whether he should serve out the rest of his term." 

Desiree Rogers Steps Down
The woman in charge of shaping the “Obama brand” stepped down this week providing fodder for the Roundtable on how this will impact the White House.

George Will: "It is axiomatic that when there's no penalty for failure, failure proliferates.  She failed conspicuously in her one great challenge, which was the first state dinner, and she's gone.  If she's
gone because she failed, that's a healthy sign." 

Sam Donaldson: "People who work for the president understand or should understand their place, which is to be spear-carriers.  There are two stars in anyone's White House, the president and the president's spouse.  After that, this passion for anonymity that once was a hallmark of people who worked for a president, has been lost.  She wanted to be a star herself…"

Paul Krugman: " Can I say that 20 million Americans unemployed, the fact that we're worrying about the status of the White House social secretary… 

User Comments

Rangel should just say that he is doing “God’s work”. That way he can get a bonus and a bailout. Ya baby!

Posted by: Huh | February 28, 2010, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

It’s unfortunate that Paul Krugman was feeling dismissive on the Desiree Rogers front this morning. A few months ago, he was perhaps the most succinct pundit on the roundtable in pointing out that concern about the president’s security was at the very heart of the Salahi flap. When the person who is either responsible, or taking the fall for such a spectacular security breach is being shown the door, that seems pretty important to me. In my opinion, from a national perspective, it may even trump the earlier rondtable talk about NY pols.

Posted by: klean2 | February 28, 2010, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

I am surprised to find how tolerant is Krugman, the ‘deficit loving economist’ ( according to Harvard historian Neill Furguson), to the well known serious mistakes made by Dem. Congressman Charlie Rangel and WH social secretary Desiree Rogers as he says they are fine to him because their errors have nothing to do with nation’s economic problems.

Posted by: austin | February 28, 2010, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

As they had fessed up, the Secret Service bore that responsibility, not the social secretary!

Posted by: doctor don | February 28, 2010, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

George Will vs everybody else is a fair fight

Posted by: Jocko | February 28, 2010, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

After watching This Week yesterday morning, I begin to question how ABCNews considers itself a news organization. You have two noted liberals (Donaldson and Krugman) with Roberts being another firm Dem on a panel with a lone conservative (Will). As an independent voter, I would appreciate a “fair” roundtable, or simply call yourself MSNBC and get it over with. Discussions on the Health Care debate and “Mr” Rangel were simply liberal postering by at least half of the panel…

Posted by: angry indy | March 1, 2010, 9:01 am 9:01 am

Yeah, and “firm Dem” automatically means liberal? That would be like saying “independent” is shorthand for conservative, no? (Oh, wait…)

Posted by: klean2 | March 1, 2010, 9:20 am 9:20 am

Why is it that in time people in leadership positions develop a sense of entitlement that goes beyond the perameters of the laws we lesser humans must succumb to?

Posted by: gollywiggle | March 1, 2010, 9:39 am 9:39 am

Rogers let the the Secret Service be blamed for her mistake.
Charlie Rangel blamed his aids for his mistake/problems.
Barack Obama blames Bush for his problems.
Where are the prople with integrity, who can admit fault and take responsiblility? The above are children trying to pass themselves as adults.

Posted by: Downwithsocialism | March 1, 2010, 11:12 am 11:12 am

Does it bother anyone else that Sam referred to Ms. Rogers as a “spear-carrier”?

Posted by: Stuart Kaufman | March 1, 2010, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

Please…we are not dopes, but people working hard on our feet everyday with jobs and lifestyles that do not allow for the luxury time to read up or even figure out where to begin the research to understand the complexities of insurance ,credit cards, etc. I would welcome assistance in the form of a base plan for health care or at least some source of simplified assistance to help navigate all of these critical economic issues.
My husband and I are in our late 50s,college graduates. I am a RN and Dave is a Postmaster in a small town. Our expectations for a good quality of life is draining away.
We are tired, stressed out and so discouraged.
Our son’s graduated from college. The oldest is an airline pilot, no health insurance, income near poverty, can’t afford tires for his vehicle, bunks with a bunch of pilots. My other son has returned to college for a degree in Speech Therapy. He has no health insurance, we pay insurance for his vehicle which is about on it’s last leg.

Posted by: Kris Martens | March 7, 2010, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.