Sen. Bond to the WH: ‘I’m Supposed to Apologize?’

Repubs, directed at only one goal since January 21, 2009-discrediting the Commander-in-Chief-will never apologize, never admit fault, and always counter-attack. (See Ex.CIA Director Porter Goss) To them it’s immaterial that their antics put American servicemen and women in more danger.

I don’t think I would apologize either. Seriously, Obama doesn’t know how to pronounce corpsman, and this man is our Commander in Chief. Thats a little scary.

Well perhaps if he prounced the military corpsman correct and recognized that TERRORISTS DO NOT have Constitutional RIGHTS then perhaps he would actually STOP telling our state secrets to the world.
He is do ideologically LEFT and has spent the better part of the last 5 years working to UNDERMINE our National Security that he has FORGOTTEN that he is now responsible for the lives of 300+ million people instead of just some stupid Democrat working to defeat President Bush!

Sara – by the way you ended your message it’s clear you’ve been watching too much Olberman. I agree with Bond. Obama has no idea what he is doing.

Now Obama has made as many gaffes as Bush did – so case closed on that one. Go Senator Bond. Americans are sick of this President’s condescending attitude. He screws up and then demands an apology. What a fool. No wonder European newspapers call him President Pantywaist.

“the Republicans said the Democrats should not criticize the commander in chief while the country is at war.”
Almost correct. They did say that IOKIYAR, but what they actually said was that the country needs to be at war so that Democrats shouldnt criticize the President.
BTW, the president is only CinC during times of war.

Sen Bond(R-Boeing)is never going to live down his vote in favor of torture. He has been particularly slimy in that he has attempted to justify torture yet at the same time refuse to call it torture.
Classic consciouness of guilt.

Go Sen Bond. You don’t have to put up with this WH’s condescending junk.

This administration is like George Costanza. Can’t keep a secret.
JERRY: Hey. How’d it go with Gary?
GEORGE: (shifty, avoiding Jerry’s eyes) Fine, fine. (he removes his coat)
JERRY: (suspicious) Really?
GEORGE: (shifty) Yeah.
JERRY: You look like something’s on your mind.
GEORGE: No. Nothing. Fine. (he sits at the table)
JERRY: So, that’s your poker face.
GEORGE: My regular face.
JERRY: No it isn’t. I’ve seen your regular face. That is not it.
GEORGE: What are you saying?
JERRY: All right George, c’mon, what d’you got? (sits opposite George)
GEORGE: I got nothing.
JERRY: What you got, a pair of bullets?
GEORGE: What you talking about?
JERRY: Two pair? Three of a kind?
GEORGE: Will you stop it?
JERRY: Oh my God, you got a flush! You’re holding a flush!
GEORGE: I don’t have a flush.
JERRY: A full house? You got a full house? Turn ‘em over George, I wanna see
‘em. Come on, I’m calling! (thumps hand on table) What d’you got!
GEORGE: (broken, shouts) Gary Fogel never had cancer!

I don’t think I would apologize either. Seriously, Obama doesn’t know how to pronounce corpsman, and this man is our Commander in Chief. Thats a little scary.
Posted by: Chuck | Feb 4, 2010 6:45:36 PM
Chuck,
Can you prove that? Please provide a link. Heck, Bush couldn’t pronounce nuclear, so what?
Posted by: ACME | Feb 4, 2010 6:49:01 PM
I think it was at the Prayer Breakfast this morning. And if you’ve been around here long enough, you’d know links are not allowed.
“Heck, Bush couldn’t pronounce nuclear, so what?” Exactly! Bush is still being laughed for that! You don’t like it when Obama is made fun of – but you’re ok making fun of Bush?

Bring on the Special Prosecutors ala the Plame affair. Let’s see who is hiding what.

“they attempted to shame the person who had first hand knowledge and ‘refuted’ what they had been saying”
I don’t think that word means what you think it does.
Bond got caught lying. Again.
Bond is now trying the hypocritical IOKIYAR gambit, assuming that we’ll forget his role in the Plame affair.

BTW, the president is only CinC during times of war.
Posted by: Flash Override | Feb 4, 2010 7:03:41 PM
Not sure that’s true:
“The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States;”
which I believe means when the militia is called into service (if that’s what you are referring to). I would say he is always the Commander in Chief.
Anyone?

Have followed Senator Bond for many years.He is one of the few truely HONORABLE men serving WE THE PEOPLE!

Thank you, Sen. Bond!
This group of coercive, dishonest political hacks make every other administration in my lifetime look FANTASTIC, every single one
Don’t give these thugs an inch.

GIBBS: “…no briefing is done here or anywhere in this administration where classified information is used in a place where it shouldn’t be.”
Sen. Bond did not accuse the White House of divulging “classified” information. It was “sensitive” information, and not declared as “classified” information (maybe it should have been). Typical of Gibbs to give an answer that is not on point.

Why is Obama still trying to play nice with the Republicans? They have declared outright war against the governmnet of the United States, and Obama had better wake up and smell the coffee.

Flash, any backup for this important rant of yours?

Kit Bonds nefarious lying record speaks for itself, a self serving hypocritical fraud if there ever was one.

the left gets hyper
Posted by: Quo Warranto
really?..
as opposed to the ‘serene’ ‘right’ exemplified by….
Rush, Boortz, Savage, Beck, Hannity, Coulter, Breitbart, Collins, Bond, McConnell, Bachmann, Fox, Schmidt, Palin……. etc

Thank you, Senator Bond, for standing up to an administration that has no qualms about disclosing sensitive information. Of course Holder’s show trials in NYC were going to be all about disclosing even more sensitive information, but that doesn’t seem to be working out so well for them now. Aw.

You will notice that Gibbs actually changed the subject. He didnt say Bond was wrong, only that “no briefing is done here or anywhere in this administration where classified information is used in a place where it shouldn’t be”.
The White House is at fault here and trying to cover their rumps.

A long time, honorable and respected senator not facing a new campaign because he is retiring….oh the next few months could be fun seeing what Bond and others decide to say.

I gave up on Jake for awhile, but now that Obama is floundering publicly, I have renewed hope that Jake is one MSM reporter who is going to man up and speak truth to power. Better late than never. . .

“The smartest man in the room pronounced, not once but twice, corpsman as corpseman.”
Posted by: Axey | Feb 4, 2010 10:42:04 PM
This is just after Dear Leader got caught saying “The Middle East Is Obviously An Issue That Has Plagued The Region For Centuries.”

“You guys NEED FoxNews to tell you waht to think.”
Posted by: Ryan C | Feb 5, 2010 3:59:39 PM
This from an idiot who takes his orders from Keith Olbermann.

Have they already followed the leads from Abdul (even though they are over a month later)? Because I think putting it out there in public that he is “flipping” on the Imam in Yemen might tip the Imam off that he’s become a more wanted man. Also is there going to be protection for the extended family who before and now after the incident seem to be helpful to the US. Again disclosing their further involvement doesn’t exactly help them either. The real question is was it really necessary to disclose what they chose to disclose or on the flip was it really necessary to conceal this for the time being. Not an expert but it just seems waiting a little to act on the intel and cover the bases may have been the better move for a couple of reasons.
Who knows what Bond was told but in the briefing in Congress on Tuesday (before the White House disclosed) he did seem to be indicating concealing the info which would back up his take.