WH: Some Critics ‘Serving the Goals of al Qaeda’*
In an oped in USA Today, John Brennan — Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Advisor for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism — responds to critics of the Obama administration's counterterrorism policies by saying "Politically motivated criticism and unfounded fear-mongering only serve the goals of al-Qaeda."
Brennan writes that, "Terrorists are not 100-feet tall. Nor do they deserve the abject fear they seek to instill."
In the oped, titled "'We need no lectures': Administration disrupts terrorists’ plots, takes fight to them abroad," Brennan writes that politics "should never get in the way of national security. But too many in Washington are now misrepresenting the facts to score political points, instead of coming together to keep us safe."
The administration op-ed is in response to a USA Today editorial entitled "National security team fails to inspire confidence; Officials’ handling of Christmas Day attack looks like amateur hour."
Brennan provides a detailed defense of the administration's handling of failed Christmas Day bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab whom, he says, was "thoroughly interrogated and provided important information."
He suggests that many critics are hypocritical and clueless.
The most important breakthrough in the interrogation occurred "after Abdulmutallab was read his rights, which the FBI made standard policy under Michael Mukasey, President Bush's attorney general," he writes, noting that failed shoe bomber Richard Reid "was read his Miranda rights five minutes after being taken off a plane he tried to blow up. The same people who criticize the president today were silent back then."
Brennan said anyone who wants to change the policy would be casting aside lessons learned "in waging this war" on extremists.
"Terrorists such as Jose Padilla and Saleh al-Mari did not cooperate when transferred to military custody, which can harden one's determination to resist cooperation," he writes.
He calls it "naive to think that transferring Abdulmutallab to military custody would have caused an outpouring of information. There is little difference between military and civilian custody, other than an interrogator with a uniform. The suspect gets access to a lawyer, and interrogation rules are nearly identical."
Moreover, Brennan says, hundreds of terrorists have been convicted in criminal courts while only three have been convicted in the military tribunal system.
The former CIA official also asserts that the Obama administration is doing a better job than the Bush administration did in taking the fight to al Qaeda. "This administration's efforts have disrupted dozens of terrorist plots against the homeland and been responsible for killing and capturing hundreds of hard-core terrorists, including senior leaders in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia and beyond — far more than in 2008."
"We need no lectures about the fact that this nation is at war," he says.
USA Today's editorial writers see it all a bit differently, of course, writing that though "the Obama administration's national security officials have struggled to assure the public that they know exactly what they're doing," they are so far "achieving the opposite, and they're needlessly adding some jitters in the process."
The editorial writers fault the Obama administration for announcing "last week that an attack by al-Qaeda is likely in the next three to six months. The warning is bound to frighten the public, with no obvious benefit beyond the ability to say 'I told you so.'"
They also refer to National Intelligence Director Admiral Dennis Blair (ret.) as having "had a 'Duh!' moment" for acknowledging that "authorities fumbled the initial questioning of Abdulmutallab by failing to call in the high-value interrogation group, which was created to question terrorism suspects. Refreshingly candid, yes, but not a statement that inspires confidence. Especially when the same day, at another Senate hearing, FBI Director Robert Mueller testified that the high-value unit was still in its 'formation stages' and that 'there was no time' to get it to Detroit."
USA Today's editorial writers say that when senior administration officials revealed Abdulmutallab's cooperation with authorities, "the news pretty much negate(d) earlier claims that no intelligence was lost when Abdulmutallab was prematurely read his rights."
- jpt
UPDATE: Missouri Sen. Christopher "Kit" Bond, the ranking Republican on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said in response to the Brennan op-ed: "The only one making this political is the White House. The Administration must do better, because trying to pass the buck for their dangerous decisions and divulging sensitive information to al Qaeda is not an effective terror-fighting strategy."
*This post has been updated.
Email
GOP Rap: 'Take America Back'
Afghanistan Timeline Realistic?
As much as people complained about Bush/Cheney, people felt safer under their administration than they do under the current one. Perhaps that is why similar processes were not criticized. These people can’t even keep people out of a State Dinner that weren’t invited! Had the bomb not failed, we would have lost 289 people on Christmas. It doesn’t exactly encourage us to place our fate in their hands. BTW, aren’t the Republicans still waiting for that list of convicted terrorists? Hmmmmm….makes you wonder, doesn’t it?
Posted by: Bobbi | February 9, 2010, 7:35 am 7:35 am
As much as people complained about Bush/Cheney, people felt safer under their administration than they do under the current one.
==========================================
An asinine, self-serving statement….I for one certainly never felt safe with Bush\Cheney war-mongering and utter disregard for the Constitution..
Posted by: indy_voter | February 9, 2010, 7:43 am 7:43 am
This is a game thwat worked well for the Bush administration. About time this White House got around to shaming their critics.
Posted by: matt | February 9, 2010, 8:00 am 8:00 am
Funny, when Obama was in the Senate he thought it proper to criticize any and all war efforts on an almost weekly basis. Now however it undermines our ability to wage war and encourages our enemies. Got news for you Mr. President, it did as much damage then as it does now.
The panty bomber was stopped by a civilian on the airplane, not by Obama or his people. Stop trying to claim credit for it. The government did not stop the panty bomber, civilian intervention stopped him and as far as I know, no one has asked about his party affiliation.
Posted by: oonogil | February 9, 2010, 8:11 am 8:11 am
Well the only really asinine belief is to think we are safer under Obama than Bush. Every poll says it. It is also obvious to anyone with a brain that our enemies are emboldened by the Obama administration. They have clearly stepped up their attacks. But I state the very obvious.
Posted by: jonny | February 9, 2010, 8:26 am 8:26 am
As much as people complained about Bush/Cheney, people felt safer under their administration than they do under the current one. ……..Yes, Cheney made me feel safe when he was putting anthrax in the mail!
Posted by: rich | February 9, 2010, 8:28 am 8:28 am
One thing I know for a fact: the new administration’s change in rhetoric and ostensible reaching of a hand, through Obama’s overtures and Secretary Clinton’s Muslim country partnership, is definitely changing attitudes in the Muslim world to a positive.
If you look at some of the cases we’ve confronted this past year, all of them were radicalized during the Bush administration, with their radicalization culminating into terrorist actions now:
Abdul-Mutallab got radicalized in London c. 2005-06.
Omar Hammami joined the Shabab as a result of the Iraq War.
Same with so many other terrorists.
What that says is that the radicalization occurred during an administration that was not only waging wars, but was producing and offering the worst kinds of alienating and hatred filled rhetoric.
Like it or not, calling a billion or more people who have claimed a 1500-year old religious identity “fascists” and offering other terminology that make it seem like it’s the religion and faith you have a problem with, instead of politically-motivated terrorists, make a whole bunch of people who have nothing to do with anything feel victimized and assaulted.
Preposterous as it may sound, the Bush/Cheney admin gave the impression, fed the unfair image, that one billion or more people of this world were not human beings but rather some sort of disembodied “evil.” Despite any of Bush’s sayings to the contrary, the milieu of that administration made a billion people or more people’s lives feel victimized, oppressed, hated. They created the perfect storm for some evil political terrorist to have a whole petri dish of radicalized youth.
The Obama administration and the Clinton State Department have taken tangible steps to calm the storm and to recognize the humanity of others.
There’s been a shift in the ground levels of the populace that want to help make the world a better place. That cast away that feeling of being victimized and want to build partnerships of goodwill and human progress. That shift in mentality will lead to something positive, and will prevent radicalization.
Unlike the other administration, this administration is tangibly making us safer.
Posted by: let's talk about safe | February 9, 2010, 8:35 am 8:35 am
Shorter Obama White House:
If you criticize us, you’re helping the terrorists.
Hmmm. Sounds a lot like what the Bush Administration used to be accused of saying, no?
CHANGE?
Nope.
SAME.
Posted by: Good Lt. | February 9, 2010, 8:56 am 8:56 am
I was against zero before it was cool to be against him…
Posted by: zero | February 9, 2010, 8:57 am 8:57 am
These anti-American Mofo’s occupying the WH would love to have Americans/US believing that!
Posted by: dAVE | February 9, 2010, 8:57 am 8:57 am
As a former 6 year ReCon Marine …. This mob in the white house scars me far worse than any terrorist or Al Quada cell .
Read the Art of War for proof .
Posted by: ReCon USMC | February 9, 2010, 8:59 am 8:59 am
I guess it only matters if you or yours are on the particular plane. One day, one of these poorly trained and equipped zealots may succeed in killing themselves and dozens more. That’s not fear mongering.
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | February 9, 2010, 8:59 am 8:59 am
Reminds me of a desperation move by an out of touch administration that is hell bent on covering their socialist/international anti-american focused agenda.
Posted by: Former Democrat | February 9, 2010, 8:59 am 8:59 am
I’d feel safer this administrations wouldn’t put time deadlines on when we plan to withdraw out there. I’d feel safer is waterboarding terrorists was still being used. I’d feel safer if miranda rights weren’t given to non-citizen enemy combatants. I’d feel safer if terrorists weren’t turned back to Yemen. The Obama administraton is WEAK!!! I’m not afraid because of the warnings, I’m concerned because of what the Obama administration is and isn’t doing. He gets EVERYTHING wrong!
Posted by: Tones | February 9, 2010, 9:00 am 9:00 am
The president still owes the American public a human sacrifice for bungling the Christmas Day bomber case and Brennen seems to have nominated himself. Methinks there may be an obscure Embassy position in the works for “Amb” Brennen. Mr. Brennen is so stupid, he actually makes Eric Holder and Rham Emanuel look smart!
Posted by: Dr. John Coleman | February 9, 2010, 9:00 am 9:00 am
And all the Bush bashing from the Democrats helped. This Administration is becoming more frightening every day. Someone better take off the tutu and put on some pants. At least Hilary wears pants.
Posted by: Jeff Locke | February 9, 2010, 9:00 am 9:00 am
These statements are the statements of a desperate administration. I would have thought that The White House wouldn’t continue to insult the intelligence of Americans. Who was it that said dissent is patriotic?
Posted by: Superpower | February 9, 2010, 9:00 am 9:00 am
Liberals are insane. Their man-child is a narcissist. How many critics has the Bolshevik not attacked? Talk about a warmonger on freedom of speech!
Posted by: Marvin | February 9, 2010, 9:01 am 9:01 am
You have got to be kidding. Sorry ABC, this story is about 8 years late.
Posted by: DUGinFLA | February 9, 2010, 9:01 am 9:01 am
Oh, the delicious Hypocrisy of the Obama Administration.
Where have we heard the ‘you are either with us or your against us’ line before?
Now its, you either blindly and uncritically support Obama’s decision to treat terrorists like pick-pockets or you are in league with Al-Qaeda.
Obama must realize this will only damage his polls by alienating more Americans?
Posted by: What Hubris | February 9, 2010, 9:02 am 9:02 am
That plane *Did* blow up, for all intents and purposes. This isn’t about being afraid of the terrorists, it’s about treating a serious issue seriously, not like someone just throwing a snowball at you.
Posted by: DredBen | February 9, 2010, 9:02 am 9:02 am
Another excuse for incompetence.
Posted by: Mark | February 9, 2010, 9:02 am 9:02 am
”CBS News is reporting that President Obama has decided to send 40,000 more troops to Afghanistan. Obama says it’s all part of his plan to finally deliver on the campaign promises made by John McCain.”
Posted by: zero | February 9, 2010, 9:02 am 9:02 am
Hillary Clinton told us that it was patriotic to disagree with a sitting administration. Of course, at the time, the sitting administration was a republican one. My how things have changed.
Posted by: John | February 9, 2010, 9:03 am 9:03 am
If this administration has made us” tangibly safer” by outreaching to the terrorists why hasn’t the attempts stopped. They hated us before the Iraq war.They hate us because we’re infidels. When they come for you,hold out that olive branch,they’ll take it out of your dead hand after they cut your head off.
Posted by: geraldo | February 9, 2010, 9:04 am 9:04 am
anybody who thinks Obama knows what he is doing must be living under a rock……
Posted by: sifto77 | February 9, 2010, 9:04 am 9:04 am
The left did NOTHING but undermine the Bush administration during the entire eight years. I have to wonder where we might be today if the left hadn’t demonized and obstructed at EVERY turn in the War on Terror.
The sad reason is they did it for political gain.
Posted by: Chris | February 9, 2010, 9:04 am 9:04 am
Obama’s message to voters: ‘don’t believe your lying eyes, ears, and minds.’
Where’s the wide-spread consensus among the intelligence community that Obama’s ‘new’ way of dealing with terrorist attackers and spies is the way to go?
Selective ignorance more than anything else enabled 9/11. Obama has proven he’s up to the task of Changing things Back to our pre-9/11 ignorance.
Posted by: bluecollarbytes | February 9, 2010, 9:04 am 9:04 am
I think the obama administration’s bestowing of Constitutional rights upon terrorists is what ultimately helps al Qaeda achieve their objectives.
Posted by: Superpower | February 9, 2010, 9:04 am 9:04 am
Hey rich. Twice as many terrorists killed during Obamas admin than bushs. Look it up. Obama increased the military presence in afghanistan. I assume u didn’t know that since your statement is so ignorant. Oh. And 9/11 happened under bush’s watch.
But you probably forgot that too
Posted by: Rich | February 9, 2010, 9:05 am 9:05 am
I am sure bin Laden has been sleeping much better at night with Obama in the White House…just sayin’
Posted by: Phil_M | February 9, 2010, 9:05 am 9:05 am
Look – no administration can make everyone (mostly the right wing paranoid nuts) completely safe. It’s humanly impossible. Somebody is likely to slip thru and do some damage. It’s a scary world but don’t let the right wing scare you into staying home. They whip up hysteria and bloviate about how Obama is soft. In the end, they stand out as wackos who don’t have anything useful to do
Posted by: Bob | February 9, 2010, 9:06 am 9:06 am
Miranda rights to terrorists serves the goals of al Qaeda, president obvious.
Posted by: Superpower | February 9, 2010, 9:06 am 9:06 am
This administration would be hilarious if the situation wasn’t so serious. Thanks so much, America, for voting in such a complete imbecile. Say what you want about Pres. Bush’s intelligence, but he surrounded himself with great people. This guy? Not so much…
Posted by: Mark | February 9, 2010, 9:07 am 9:07 am
HAHAHAHAHA….
So you can’t have a beer with the terrorists and get them to love you?? Honestly, I don’t think you could right a movie this good!
Well Big O, I guess you’re learning the meaning of the phrase “heavy is the head that wears the crown!”
Posted by: Adam | February 9, 2010, 9:07 am 9:07 am
This is just another attempt on the WH’s part to close the gap between patriotic Americans and terrorists. Questioning your government is not only patriotic, but it is necessary according to the founding fathers. This government has not been checked for over a hundred years and it is high time for the people to reclaim their voice in this political system.
To the WH… The ability to embolden terrorists belong only to you. The criticism from the people of this country is due to your attempt to Socialize every aspect of our lives and economy. We are critical because you have earned it. If this government returns to principles of liberty and fiscal responsibility, then I suspect you will hear crickets from the silent majority.
Posted by: jdog | February 9, 2010, 9:07 am 9:07 am
Noone’s served Al Qaeda’s cause as much as Bush.
Practically the entire Muslim world saw 9/11 as an outrage and an atrocity, now after invading and occupying Iraq – it’s clear to the world this was purely to steal oil wealth – support for Al Qaeda in much of the Muslim world is at an all time high.
Nothing Al Qaeda could have done could have given them the support and following that Bush’s corrupt actions have.
Posted by: James | February 9, 2010, 9:07 am 9:07 am
For eight years the Democrats and their media buddies eviscerated the Bush Administration in any way they possibly could. Many Democrats are on record for calling our troops disparaging names and accusing them of some awful things (with no evidence I might add). People like Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and others went on foreign soil and denounced Bush to overseas audiences. There was never any concern of what impact this behavior would have on the country or our safety. The agenda was to discredit Bush and his party at all cost to allow Democrats to win back power. Well, they achieved their objective. Millions of ignorant people voted for this administration and put Democrats in complete control of the legislature. You asked for it, you got it. How’s that Hope and Change working out for you?
Posted by: smarty p. | February 9, 2010, 9:08 am 9:08 am
Okay, Richard Reid was a citizen of the United States. Therefore, the Constitution applies to him. The Underwear bomber was Nigerian. The Constitution does NOT apply to Nigerian citizens. It’s not about giving terrorists Miranda rights, its about giving foreigners rights reserved for WE THE PEOPLE of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA. And for the Left to cry about politicizing the war has got to be the best example of hypocrisy I have ever seen.
Posted by: Jeff | February 9, 2010, 9:08 am 9:08 am
Is this really happening? Or is this some strange parallel Universe. This White House has OFFICIALLY gone off the deep end. How can anyone say these things with a straigt face. The volumes and volumes of hatred, and disgust and vitreal and venom expressed toward Bush during a war with Al Queda cannot be quantified. And the ring leaders sat in Washington DC. How can we forget Hillary’s shrill monologue about how tired she is of being called unpatriotic every time someone criticizes the Bush administration. How stupid does this White House think we are. I am personaly offended and insulted that they think no one would notice this GINORMOUS hypocrisy. I am completely dumbfounded by this.
Posted by: treeb | February 9, 2010, 9:08 am 9:08 am
To bash Bush was patriotic, according to the media. To say anything critical of President Obama makes you a racist traitor. Got it.
Posted by: Mac | February 9, 2010, 9:09 am 9:09 am
The arrogance of these fools never fails to amuse me. I really believe that if alQaeda wants to destroy this country, they better hurry before Obama and his crew do it first.
Posted by: savage24 | February 9, 2010, 9:09 am 9:09 am
OMG now the White House is TRYING TO SAY THAT WE ARE DOMESTIC TERRORISTS for not agreeing with Obama.
Here it comes people… if you know your history you know what comes next when you have a radical government that is also narcissistic and arrogant and starts accusing it’s own people of HELPING THE ENEMY when they disagree.
Wake up! The nightmare is starting.
Posted by: Art | February 9, 2010, 9:09 am 9:09 am
What a Laugh from these thin
skinned, short memory, clueless
idiots. Be very afraid!
Posted by: Concerned | February 9, 2010, 9:09 am 9:09 am
The only people helping the terrorists are Obama and his minions. Treating terrorists as criminals and giving them rights is a bad mistake.
Posted by: Brian | February 9, 2010, 9:09 am 9:09 am
We shouldn’t worry about a little thing like terrorism when we have to worry about melting ice caps and rising seas. We should be sandbagging our shorelines and building arks DAMN IT! How that “HOPE AND CHANGE” working for you?
Posted by: Tommy Gee | February 9, 2010, 9:10 am 9:10 am
Maybe he now has a good excuse to push for the cyber security act, where at his whim he can shut down the internet.
They have been planning this for years.
Posted by: Helen | February 9, 2010, 9:10 am 9:10 am
Didn’t you guys get the memo? Anything that goes wrong during the first year of your administration is to be blamed on your predecessor. Therefore 9/11 was Clinton’s fault, not Bush’s. Although you never heard Bush say that.
Posted by: John | February 9, 2010, 9:10 am 9:10 am
Whaaaaaaaa!!!! Excuses are like rearends Brennan, we all got one and they all stink.
Posted by: ksdavid | February 9, 2010, 9:10 am 9:10 am
I guess Obama’s, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and John Murtha’s not stop ridicule and undermining of our troops during the Bush administration didn’t encourge terrorists in Iraq, Afghanistan, and worldwide?
ps Mr Brenen the Iranians are making Jackasses out of you too.
Posted by: pukeonme | February 9, 2010, 9:11 am 9:11 am
Last time I checked, during the Iraq war, the talking points of the Democrat party (including the Messiah) in office now were indistinguishable from the garbage spewing from the mouth of Osama bin Laden. Also, I may have forgotten, but which party is unified in their support of the President’s military moves in the Afghan/Pak theatre? That would be the REPUBLICAN party (not the Democrat party).
The problem that the President has is that he ran for the office that he holds as a very different candidate from what we got and now (as his long-time Pastor Wright once said) his chickens are coming home to roost. He bamboozled the communist left of his party that he would stop all the wars and stop the oceans from rising, while at the same time he LIED to independents and led them to believe that he would be a centrist on issues of economic/tax/health care policies.
And now when his own advisors are telling us that an attack is imminent, what is the priority #1 for the Messiah? Not protecting America – no the most important military policy announced at the State of the Union address was repealing “Don’t ask don’t tell.” Give me a break. This administration is the biggest bunch of cry babies I have ever seen. America voted in 2008 for something different, but what we got was an empty suit, elitist/statist who cares more about arugula and his date nights than the safety and security of the American people.
Posted by: Aaron Burr | February 9, 2010, 9:11 am 9:11 am
This administration deliberately blurs the distinctions between civil trials and military tribunals in order to appease Al Quaeda. They were ready to have civil trials in NYC until American citizens stopped them!!!
The Great Appeaser Obama is constitutionally incapable of understanding that it’s not a good idea to dress up like Ahmidinejad when addressing him. Holder is equally incompetent.
Posted by: Daisy | February 9, 2010, 9:11 am 9:11 am
Eddie, what’s it like to be a “sheeple” or “useful idiot” for the dems and the Messiah? It’s always about Bush. The shelf life for radical lefties like you is about up.
Posted by: smokehouse | February 9, 2010, 9:11 am 9:11 am
The White House critics aren’t the ones serving Al Queda’s goals. The White House and this administration does that quite nicely – ON THEIR OWN!
It’s “Terrorist Handling Amateur Hour” from trying to close Gitmo… to giving the terrorists miranda rights. It’s National Security – not time to coddle the poor burned terrorist (who was trying to bring down a plane over Detroit!).
Posted by: Disgusted | February 9, 2010, 9:11 am 9:11 am
Dissent is still Patriotic. The lying, fear-mongering, xenophobic fascist bullying of people like Cheney, Palin, Limbaugh, and the always Unfair and Unbalanced Glenn Beck is treasonous.
Posted by: Steve From NH | February 9, 2010, 9:12 am 9:12 am
So giving Miranda Rights to terrorists and trying them in a civilian court doesn’t assist Al Qaeda? These things don’t send the message that this sitting boy wonder is WEAK on terrorism? These things don’t embolden the terrorists totry harder next time if all they will get is the right to remain silent and then end up in a kangaroo court with free representation and the same rights as American Citizens although they are enemy combatants and try to kill innocent civilians and military personnel one in the same? No wonder we the people despise the way this country is being run! Some say it is a continuation of the Bush policies, Bush would have never given them miranda nor allowed them trial in US civilian courts. And, for the record, Reagan would allow them to be tried by the military and faced the firing squad to recieve their 72 virgins and their check slip from Gitmo. Not a vacation trip to Bermuda and fancy hotel with swims in the ocean before rejoining their Al Qaeda buddies in Yemen.
Posted by: Gorio | February 9, 2010, 9:12 am 9:12 am
In the immortal words of then Senator/presidential candidate, now Secretary of State Clinton -
Oddly, this same “defense” from the “administration” could have been written (and largely have been just as true) under the Bush’43 administration.
Posted by: n2vip | February 9, 2010, 9:13 am 9:13 am
God, can you move 2012 here a little faster, so we can remove this ^$%#$ from our House.
Posted by: q | February 9, 2010, 9:13 am 9:13 am
To Good Lt.:
LOL, Yeah right. There were not terrorists before George W. Bush. Sure. Those guys who flew jets into our buildings, when were they “radicalized”? Wasn’t that whole plan concocted during the Clinton regime? (Hint: The answer is “yes”) And weren’t our foreing embassies and the USS Cole attacked during the Clinton Administration. When were those attackers “radicalized” exactly? Get real. George W. Bush’s policies did not create terrorism and they did not even stoke terrorism. This argument is flawed on its surface, and is only believed by Kool-Aid drinking leftists.
Posted by: smarty p. | February 9, 2010, 9:13 am 9:13 am
Eddie: So, under that logic it’s fair to say all the 911 hijackers were Clinton’s fault? That blame game’s been played right and left for too long.
Honestly, as an independent, I’m drawn away from the rhetoric of both party extremes right now. I long for a President with the guts to: admit when he’s wrong, listen to her critics, not hide behind the flag and (most importantly) not try and re-write the constitution to suit their agenda.
Posted by: Dave in Dallas | February 9, 2010, 9:13 am 9:13 am
Translation: “Our terrorist strategy designed for political gain rather than effectiveness is getting our butts kicked politically.” Must. Deflect. Blame.
Posted by: LaLydia | February 9, 2010, 9:13 am 9:13 am
Another self-serving article for inclusion in the Obama Presidential Library aka The House of Lies.
Posted by: Robb | February 9, 2010, 9:13 am 9:13 am
A.Q. isn’t concerned about what the public thinks.. it has a well defined set of goals.. we can’t P.R. them away… and most likely, they will keep trying new terror tactics until they find something that works easily and causes mass economic and psychological impact.
These are not only smart adversaries (not the suicide soldiers) but patient and focused enemies.
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | February 9, 2010, 9:14 am 9:14 am
“Brennan writes that politics ‘should never get in the way of national security. But too many in Washington are now misrepresenting the facts to score political points, instead of coming together to keep us safe.’”
That’s absolutely HILARIOUS coming from a Democrat. No, really, I nearly peed myself. Great stuff, John. Keep it coming.
And as long as indy_voter is yammering on about “asinine, self-serving statements,” he’d be well-served to take a look at this gem from let’s talk about safe:
“Like it or not, calling a billion or more people who have claimed a 1500-year old religious identity “fascists” and offering other terminology that make it seem like it’s the religion and faith you have a problem with, instead of politically-motivated terrorists, make a whole bunch of people who have nothing to do with anything feel victimized and assaulted….Preposterous as it may sound, the Bush/Cheney admin gave the impression, fed the unfair image, that one billion or more people of this world were not human beings but rather some sort of disembodied “evil.” Despite any of Bush’s sayings to the contrary, the milieu of that administration made a billion people or more people’s lives feel victimized, oppressed, hated.”
Fluffy, revisionist nonsense. And yes, it sounds preposterous. Why don’t you tell us about your “milieu”?
There have already been three terrorist attacks/attempted attacks on American soil since BHO took office. Yes, compared to 9/11 they were unspectacular, but it is undeniable that these lunatics have been reduced to such crude methods/retarded recruits (Detroit) because of the risks the Bush administration took to cut their legs out from under them.
If “the Obama administration and the Clinton State Department have taken tangible steps to calm the storm and to recognize the humanity of others,” why are ‘others’ still attacking us? Let me guess: Much like BHO, they still haven’t shaken off the lingering vexation caused by Bush/Cheney.
Posted by: Brian | February 9, 2010, 9:14 am 9:14 am
Barack Obama and all the people in his administration are seriously delusional. They have no idea what they are doing. The fearless leader is a self-admitted youthful drug abuser. Because of the youthful indiscretions, he suffers from arrested maturity. We literally have a snot-nosed high-school sophomore running this country. Thank you, Obama voters!
Posted by: William | February 9, 2010, 9:14 am 9:14 am
all terorist should be tried by the military and if convicted hung. people have forgotten already . us troops being dragged through the steets or their heads cut off . bush is not our president anymore just thought the left should know
Posted by: rls | February 9, 2010, 9:14 am 9:14 am
Let me get this straight. Criticizing Obama is helping the terrorists but the people that criticized Bush we’re simply exercising their right to free speech?
Posted by: Frank | February 9, 2010, 9:14 am 9:14 am
oops spelled terrorist wrong
Posted by: rls | February 9, 2010, 9:15 am 9:15 am
can you say HYPOCRIT? The fact that moron can even say that w/out giggling just shows how stupid they think the US voter is.
Posted by: Candy | February 9, 2010, 9:15 am 9:15 am
Really, no one should have skipped a beat when Big Sis Jan assured us “the system worked” in the case of the panty bomber. People can be so unreasonable!
And, ofcouse, it goes without saying, Americans are upset with Obama’s policies “because they have been misled” by the dangerous forces of extremist right wing evil. Get it right people.
Posted by: Sara | February 9, 2010, 9:15 am 9:15 am
Brennan is a slimy, smarmy weasel. You can tell just by watching his body language and the way he talks. Totall and utterly disingenuous and has taken a 100% political stance, without regard to national security.
Posted by: buster | February 9, 2010, 9:16 am 9:16 am
Funny… now isn’t that the pot calling the kettle “black”…
You need go no further than the Apology Tour speeches Obama spewed as well as Holder’s intentional treatments of enemy combatants. This “Administration” is sympathetic to Al-Qaeda. “Fundamentally transform” America, Mr. President? It seems you’re willing to hand it over to our enemies.
Posted by: Rightshift | February 9, 2010, 9:16 am 9:16 am
That has to be the funniest thing I’ve ever heard. How about the Obama administration is helping Al Qaeda by giving foreign born terrorists the same rights as US citizens.
Posted by: Mike | February 9, 2010, 9:16 am 9:16 am
The statement about this administration killing or capturing more Al Qaeda than Bush did in 2008 is 1) ONLY true if you take out actions in Afghanistan and Iraq and 2) ONLY true for that one year, the year Bush was a lame duck with Democratic Congress So….IT’S REALLY JUST A BUNCH OF HOT AIR!
Posted by: mobes | February 9, 2010, 9:16 am 9:16 am
Nice try White House. How stupid do you think we are? And when it was pointed out your kinds of policies during the Bush admin. were emboldening the terrorists you jumped up and down like little crybabies. Biden warned us we wouldn’t like your responses and you’re right – we don’t. Incompetence on all fronts. It’s too bad Al Quaeda isn’t part of a union-maybe you could control the situation better.
Posted by: Dee | February 9, 2010, 9:16 am 9:16 am
Here we go again! President Barry Barack goes out of his way to make the United States impotent when it comes to his foreign relations, especially against those that are, contrary to his opinion, at war with us. Now that he sees our enemies laughing at the “great Satan”
and seeing how the Messiah II and his minions are trying to give all out enemies equal protections under the Constitution and he blames us, his critics. Maybe Barry ought to look in the mirror and see just who is at fault. We don’t need press interviews. We don’t need presidential lectures. We don’t need finger pointing. We don’t need airhead subordinates telling us how things “worked” when we can tell that the system failed internally. What we do need is what we have a total lack of: LEADERSHIP.
Posted by: Thomas | February 9, 2010, 9:16 am 9:16 am
Inside your guts you know Obama is nuts. I love how the idiots that follow him still blame Goerge Bush. By their standards Bush inherited 9/11 from Clinton. Bush should have blamed Clinton for the next four years but BUSH WAS SANE! Obama??? NOTSOMUCH!
Posted by: Christian | February 9, 2010, 9:16 am 9:16 am
The Obama administration is doing what they can to keep the war off of American soil. He nor you can control every move another person makes (unless we live in a communistic country). You people need to open your eyes and recognize the accomplishments he has done thus far within his rookie state of presidency… It is hard to pick up positive points in a transition and ignore the negatives… At this point, the current President Obama has tackled presidency when there are extremely tough issues on the table… You ignorant people out there bashing our president… You would not be able to do better, nor fill a toe portion of his shoes…
Posted by: Anunakisan | February 9, 2010, 9:17 am 9:17 am
Well….It looks like the verdict is in as far as these comments go. Obama and gang had better wake the hell up. I don’t think his massive ego will let him admit his mistakes though. Unfortunate.
Posted by: Vicodumb | February 9, 2010, 9:17 am 9:17 am
Oh, I get it. Dissent during Bush/Cheney was patriotic. Dissent during Obama/Biden serves the goals of terrorists.
Surely somewhere in DC are adults who can take these children to task.
Posted by: Roxanna | February 9, 2010, 9:18 am 9:18 am
Hey rich. Twice as many terrorists killed during Obamas admin than bushs. Look it up. Obama increased the military presence in afghanistan. I assume u didn’t know that since your statement is so ignorant. Oh. And 9/11 happened under bush’s watch.
But you probably forgot that too
============================
Twice as many huh? I din’t know we were keeping score like some video game. It doesn’t shock me that you are another lib who likes to blame Bush. Did it ever occur to you that the Clinton admin had eight years to deal with bin laden? I am not as ignorant as you, so I am not going to lay the blame on ONE president or one administration. There were multiple failures in the intel community that led up to 9-11.
Posted by: WV77 | February 9, 2010, 9:18 am 9:18 am
What happened to “dissent is patriotic”?
Posted by: Hambonnet | February 9, 2010, 9:18 am 9:18 am
Wheres the AFLAC goose when we really need it?
The goose is like all Americans after we hear Yogi Osama talk to us like we’re lemmings- shaking it’s head in frustration over gibberish.
Name me one thing that Obumma has done in his 13 months in office to make me as an American feel safer from our enemies?
Absolutely nothing!
‘How’s that hopey change workin’ out fur ya’?
Thank you Scott Brown!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: slapshot | February 9, 2010, 9:19 am 9:19 am
It was stupid of the Bush administration to read Richard Reid Miranda rights, and it is stupid of the Obama administration to do so with Abdulmutallab. Richard Reid was a citizen of the United Kingdom, by the way, not of the United States, if I recall correctly. The Bush administration did a number of idiotic things in the name of political correctness, including its refusal to apply profiling in screening airline passengers. Little old white ladies were subjected to enhanced screening while young men from Yemen and Somalia were allowed to pass right on through. Well, Bush is history. Haven’t we learned ANYTHING in nine years? Sadly, we replaced an occasionally stupid administration with a TERMINALLY stupid and socialist administration.
Posted by: Thomas Beckett | February 9, 2010, 9:19 am 9:19 am
Democrats,leftist liberal progressives and Brennan should CHOKE on those words after the way the “hateful LEFT” and “hypocrit Democrats” were acting and attacking Pres BUSH – who really was doing good for our County and cared unlike THIS BIG LIE AND LIAR OBAMA.
Obama is the empty suit the arrognat snob and radical anit Amreican leftist people warend about before the election
the BIASED Press sold this fake to Armeica with propagands and false reporting and manipulating info.
OBAMA IS THE ONE WEAK ON TERROR AND SECURITY OBAMA IS THE ONE HARMING OUR CONTRY NOT THOSE THAT OPPOSE AND CRITIZE HIM.
Posted by: jkjane | February 9, 2010, 9:19 am 9:19 am
Proving once again that giving The Gang That Can’t Shoot Straight more time doesn’t improve thier message or credibility. Experience does matter.
And was it Kit Bond that authorized Miranda rights?
Posted by: Barry Bin Inhalin | February 9, 2010, 9:19 am 9:19 am
Does anyone else notice how things are getting worse much faster right now. Obama better get control or he may end up with a couple more wars on his hands. While his staff are nickel and diming their response to Christmas day bomber, they are losing the big picture.
Posted by: Bulldog | February 9, 2010, 9:19 am 9:19 am
“We must stand up and tell this Administration that WE ARE AMERICANS, and WE WILL NOT BE QUIET WHEN WE DISAGREE”…
Hillary Clinton.
“THE WAR IS LOST.”
Harry Reid.
“Those Marines LOST IT. THEY KILLED INNOCENT WOMEN and CHILDREN, IN COLD BLOOD.
Jack Murtha.
Dissent is the “NEW PATRIOTISM”.
The LEFT.
“I APOLOGIZE FOR MY COUNTRY.”
Barak Hussein Obama.
Posted by: Timothy L. Pennell | February 9, 2010, 9:20 am 9:20 am
Three terrorist attacks since 911. All since Obama became Pres. Case closed
Posted by: jack | February 9, 2010, 9:20 am 9:20 am
Saying I am emboldening terrorists because I criticize this administration is plain, flat-out, outrageous! I criticize because I see how things are being mishandled.
Following 9/11, Bush used a heavy hand in dealing with terrorists. We did not have an attack ONE. Since BHO has been in office we have had what…five or six attacks? Ft. Hood, recruiting office in Arkansas, the BVD bomber, among others. Even one was more than Bush had following the implementation of Homeland Security and TSA.
These clowns think they can sit down and reason with these people. If we only let them see we are a peace loving people, they will back off. BS! They want to kill us. Talk all you want but they want to kill us. We need to find the serpeants head and cut the damn thing off.
In his campaign, he said he was going to do what Bush failed to do…take out bin Laden. Well? We’re waiting. Mr. Big Talk with the teleprompters, it ain’t so easy now, is it?
Posted by: Tim | February 9, 2010, 9:20 am 9:20 am
Now I’m scared…of the White House. I would expect something like this from Chavez, but not here.
Posted by: stopwaste | February 9, 2010, 9:21 am 9:21 am
President Obama has the domestic finesse of Jimmy Carter and the international diplomacy credentials of Neville Chamberlain.
Oh God, please help us survive till 2012..
Posted by: Gruntled | February 9, 2010, 9:21 am 9:21 am
Thank you, Mr. Brennan, for your contribution to conservative Republican momentum. Please continue to share your views with the American people as broadly as possible for as long as you remain in office.
Posted by: Ted | February 9, 2010, 9:22 am 9:22 am
They must be mistaken here because it’s the White House that’s ‘Serving the Goals of al Qaeda’.
Posted by: Ricky | February 9, 2010, 9:22 am 9:22 am
Like when Reid said “the war is lost”? Or when Clinton called Petraeus a liar? Or when Murtha called the Marines mass murderers of women and children? etc., etc., etc.?
Posted by: Patti O'Riley | February 9, 2010, 9:22 am 9:22 am
Pot, meet Kettle.
Posted by: Brian | February 9, 2010, 9:23 am 9:23 am
They Mirandized the foreign national who was found with explosives on his person on an especially symbolic day for many Americans. He almost killed over 300 people and almost took down an American aircraft. This is not a case of U.S. citizens misunderstanding a complex issue or second guessing an otherwise competent ant-terror policy. It was utter insanity by an unprepared administrarion and an out of control Attorney General and the American people know it.
Posted by: LLorimar | February 9, 2010, 9:23 am 9:23 am
wow! what a load of crap. These people is the White House and the liberals are such liars!
And these morons that voted them in!?!?!!?!
Wow!
It is simply amazing to see what they will say next!
Keep talking liberals….. keep talking!
I cannot WAIT for November!
tick tock
Posted by: Michelle | February 9, 2010, 9:23 am 9:23 am
If Mr. Brennan had been in one of the twin towers, I wonder if he would have thought, ” Terrorists don’t deserve the abject fear they seek to instill.” The U.S. Constitution was meant to apply to CITIZENS of this country, not people who try to attack us through terrorism. If a member of your family had been killed by one of these nuts, I wonder if you would still be as determined to protect their “so called” rights.
Posted by: Ray | February 9, 2010, 9:23 am 9:23 am
The main terrorist organization that America should fear is the Barack Hussein Obama administration. I dare to say that Al-Qaeda and Hellbollah are more american; I fear them less.
Bin-Laden isn’t confiscating more of my earnings. Bin-Laden didn’t take over G.M.. Bin-Laden isn’t trying to take away my health care plan and herd me into some cuban-styled health care plan. Bin-Laden isn’t trying to force me to pay higher taxes than an a person who belongs to a union that contributes to Obama. Bin-Laden isn’t saying that my charitable contributions shouldn’t receive the same tax treatment from the I.R.S.. Bin Laden isn’t trying to let openly gay men serve in the armed forces. I haven’t seen any members of Al-Qaeda making fun of the Special Olympics or any members of Bin-Laden’s staff calling people retards.
Now in terms of coordinating the hijacking of airplances and using them as missiles against buildings, I think Obama is a better american than Bin-Laden on that count. But that’s about it.
Posted by: Hugh | February 9, 2010, 9:23 am 9:23 am
The president and his merry band of fools are totally lost and are reacting like a gaggle of spoiled children.
Posted by: rplat | February 9, 2010, 9:23 am 9:23 am
Pretty simple, you tell the terrorists your buddy told us where you are and then you think they might move?
Nah, the Obama administration thinks that the terrorists are as naive and wet behind the ears as they are.
Barack, next terrorist’s (God Forbid) may not have a mommy or daddy to come here and tell their kid to talk.
You liberals made the Iraq war a political game and now you cry when you are caught with your naive actions.
Please!!!
Posted by: Dennis L | February 9, 2010, 9:24 am 9:24 am
We need no lectures from the White House, either. “We the people” have every right under the Constitution to criticize this Administration. It wasn’t too long ago that Hillary Clinton said that dissent “was the highest form of patriotism.” It works both ways.
Posted by: Jeanne T. | February 9, 2010, 9:24 am 9:24 am
So far in the past year we have had 2 terrorist attacks no matter what you want to call them. The second one just didn’t work. I have news for you, no matter what we say it is not going to embolden the terrorists. They are already bold.
Posted by: mike5150 | February 9, 2010, 9:24 am 9:24 am
Oh Yes, it is all George Bush’s fault.
Idiots!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Doug Moll | February 9, 2010, 9:25 am 9:25 am
Did Bush critics help the terrorists??
Posted by: darrell | February 9, 2010, 9:25 am 9:25 am
Didn’t VP Biden warn us of an attack within the first 6 months of President Obama’s reign?
Posted by: Joan | February 9, 2010, 9:26 am 9:26 am
Obama’s critics aren’t encouraging al Qaeda… the ones who refuse to acknowledge that we are battling terrorists are! This administration can’t even call these guys terrorists… rather, they call them extremists. You know, not everyone with extreme views BLOWS PEOPLE UP. This administration is so morally confused… and to top it off, they are pathological blamers. They have all the power, and they STILL try to blame republicans for their own failures. Scott is right… they are truly little children.
Posted by: Jill | February 9, 2010, 9:26 am 9:26 am
Though I am generally conservative in many areas, I don’t think the Republican Leadership is thinking clearly on this matter. They are behaving much like the liberals with a knee-jerk reaction. The FBI is OUR main weapon against terrorism within the US and its what Reagan, Clinton, both Bush’s and now Obama have followed. Let the FBI handle these guys they really do know what they are doing.
Posted by: Rob | February 9, 2010, 9:26 am 9:26 am
james, no one is buying your idiotic theories. the muslims were jumping for joy at 9/11 if i recall correctly seeing on tv. also i don’t see any u.s. oil tankers filling up in iraq. we didn’t get any oil contracts last year. you need to go educate yourself and loose the ideology. bush kept the u.s. safe and didn’t cry everyday about bill clinton’s failures.
Posted by: easy brown | February 9, 2010, 9:27 am 9:27 am
Mommy, Mommy! Those big, bad Americans citizens are calling me names and criticizing my incompetence, please make the stop! Wah!Wah!Wah! Now, now Barry, it’ll be OK as soon as we dump your sorry tail!!!
Posted by: BobbyB | February 9, 2010, 9:27 am 9:27 am
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. The anti-American Dems raised hell every day and lied about the president everyday for years, but they were being patriotic! These fools are unbelievable!!!!!
Posted by: Don | February 9, 2010, 9:27 am 9:27 am
What a hypocrite! It’s appropriate that their party symbol is the jackass.
Posted by: Crispus Attucks | February 9, 2010, 9:28 am 9:28 am
It isn’t the criticism directed against the President that helps al Qaeda, its the fact that the criticism is clueless. You know, like al Qaeda. And the Republicans.
Posted by: Peter | February 9, 2010, 9:28 am 9:28 am
That is pretty rich coming from the democrats who destroyed Bush with their “Bush lied people died” mantra. To quote Hillary “We have a right to disagree”. We need to get rid of every liberal in DC or we as a nation are doomed.
Posted by: dan | February 9, 2010, 9:28 am 9:28 am
You have got to be kidding me! Obama’s problem is that he’s got critics on both sides of him with scant support in the middle. He campaigned on closing Gitmo within a year, not done. He stated that we should not be in Iraq, we still are. And he’s added 10′s of thousands more troops in Afghanistan, all while finding time on his busy schedule to apologize to every two bit dictator and tyrant known to Man. It’s hardly unpatriotic to criticize someone who has basically done the exact opposite of what he campaigned to do.
Posted by: Jim | February 9, 2010, 9:29 am 9:29 am
“Politically motivated criticism and unfounded fear-mongering only serve the goals of al-Qaeda.”
Actually, in obama’s never-t0-be-humble opinion, ANY criticism of obama, his “administration”, or Democrats in general “only serve[s] the goals of al-Qaeda” (or any other obama bogeyman du jour)!
As for “Vicodumb”, and his ilk, CONSTANTLY BLAMING BUSH WILL NOT ERASE or EXCUSE obama’s blunders…
But since obama himself doesn’t know that, we can hardly expect you to either!
Posted by: Chisco | February 9, 2010, 9:29 am 9:29 am
“Politically motivated criticism and unfounded fear-mongering only serve the goals of al-Qaeda.”
Actually, in obama’s never-t0-be-humble opinion, ANY criticism of obama, his “administration”, or Democrats in general “only serve[s] the goals of al-Qaeda” (or any other obama bogeyman du jour)!
As for “Vicodumb”, and his ilk, CONSTANTLY BLAMING BUSH WILL NOT ERASE or EXCUSE obama’s blunders…
But since obama himself doesn’t know that, we can hardly expect you to either!
Posted by: Chisco | February 9, 2010, 9:29 am 9:29 am
Obama is the one aiding the terrorists. He is the one the refuses to believe they are a problem. It is his people who didn’t handle the Christmas bomber correctly. It is he and his idiots in Washington that decided to merandize terrorists. Bleeding heart liberals everyone. I think we should box them up and send them to the war zones with a big red bow on the package. Come on will this administration ever stop whining lide a buch of two-year-olds that they are being picked on and that its everyone elses fault. Point in fact Mr. Presiden could you stand up and be a man or is that to much for you.
Posted by: toughteach | February 9, 2010, 9:30 am 9:30 am
So the B.O. administration is resorting to this now? Hmmmm, seems like I recall the Dems caterwauling about President Bush for years, and the media never (not even once) making the case that the left was helping AQ… guess it just depends on whose side the media are on. Not lost on the American public, it’s also a function of how much class the reigning administration has. The American people see through this ploy… just like the billboard in Minneapolis asks: “Ya miss me yet?” [G.w. Bush]
Posted by: myron_monk | February 9, 2010, 9:31 am 9:31 am
So, any criticism of Obama’s policies and practices is now not only RACIST, but also terrorism.
Hey Republicans, we call this message control. Watch and learn.
Posted by: Ministry of Truth | February 9, 2010, 9:31 am 9:31 am
FACT. Bush was right. Even the lawyer / professional politician is following Bush’s lead. The liberals panties must be in a bunch. What I have been hearing from Obama is “Bush was right”. Obama lied to become president and now is following Bush’s lead.
Posted by: Bush WAS RIG. HT | February 9, 2010, 9:31 am 9:31 am
@ Posted by: Jim | Feb 9, 2010 9:25:45 AM
Well Said. `Nuff said.
Posted by: Norlina | February 9, 2010, 9:32 am 9:32 am
And Al Queda said one of his goals was to bankrupt America from within. Looks like the WH and congress is trying to meet that goal.
Posted by: LongT | February 9, 2010, 9:33 am 9:33 am
“He suggests that many critics are hypocritical …”
Exactly right. Republicans have not been critical enough. Obama should be impeached by the House and convicted by the Senate for going abroad, bad-mouthing out country, and thereby giving aid and comfort to our enemies. Obama is a clown, and a dangerous one at that.
Posted by: Jack Thompson | February 9, 2010, 9:33 am 9:33 am
This is about national security and not about Bush or Obama. The problems that we are facing got created way back when we decided to rely on satellites rather than human intelligence – without assets on the ground conducting good old fashioned intel gathering – we have had catastrophic results under both democratic and republican watches.
Should we be allowed to criticize – YES – this is America
Should the criminals and terrorists be accorded the rights as specified by our constitution – hmmmm… what should we do now?
If we don’t have principles – what do we have left
last observation – every new administration seems to have a rocky first year. Look it up – Reagan, Clinton, Bush (up until 9/11), now Obama. It’s a big job and it appears that the first year is spent being idealistic, the second grudgingly compromising, the third doing actual work, and the fourth being a lame duck. Doesn’t sound too efficient.
Posted by: Srikant Varma | February 9, 2010, 9:33 am 9:33 am
Dissent used to be the highest form of patriotism…not so much anymore, eh?
Posted by: PA | February 9, 2010, 9:34 am 9:34 am
How dare you disagree with us!
Posted by: LongT | February 9, 2010, 9:34 am 9:34 am
Unbelievable. After Brennan attacked Bush for years, suddenly criticism of the White House is aiding the enemy?
Brennan is incompetent. He, and anyone in the White House who approved this insulting editorial (Obama), should be fired.
Posted by: Charlie | February 9, 2010, 9:35 am 9:35 am
@JOAN..
Yeah he did, and also said he would go on to show himself having a “spine of steel” But apparently that steel spine is covered with skin of tissue when it comes to taking criticism of any kind.
Posted by: mike5150 | February 9, 2010, 9:35 am 9:35 am
This is the only President to attack Americans in the history of this Republic – it sounds like he is the terrorist – you had better stop pointing fingers BUBBA Americans don’t like being attacked by Kenyans – NOW DO YOUR JOB CLOUSEAU
Posted by: jackspratt1 | February 9, 2010, 9:35 am 9:35 am
The title of the article is incorrect. It should read, “White House: Obama ‘Serving the goals of al-Qaeda’”
Posted by: Barry Chavez | February 9, 2010, 9:35 am 9:35 am
Balderdash!
Posted by: Kweeveen | February 9, 2010, 9:36 am 9:36 am
Obama the appeasing surrender-ist in chief has lost ground in EVERY international foreign policy
Area….yet he still blames his predessor! Iraq victory will be lost soon, afghan 3rd rate cave dwellers become fearless, Russia and China grow brave against us openly undermining our every move, terrerists return to our soil without fear of gitmo interrogations, …. Even France (compared to Omama) becomes seen as a lion! Illegals and who knows what terrorists stream across our borders with obama stopping the fence-building (and the REAL I.D. Checks at voting booths,schools and colleges and subsidized public social services, etc
Posted by: Ricksandiego | February 9, 2010, 9:36 am 9:36 am
To the idiots who say B.O. is working hard to keep terrorism off our soil, I say, “He has failed already.” To wit: the panty bomber who succeeded in triggering a faulty bomb on Christmas Day. If the ignition had worked, it would have been KA-BOOM! Of course, it’s quite revealing how the B.O.s have dealt with Abdumutallab… and how that contrasts with the military tribunals commissioned by the Bush administration. That’s the thing that cannot be covered up by this White House. Try as they might. Oh, and Brennan needs to be fired for politicizing the issue of terrorism and national security. To the B.O.s: Fire Brennan!!!
Posted by: myron_monk | February 9, 2010, 9:36 am 9:36 am
does anybody see the distinction with the shoe bomber? He is an American citizen who is entitled to the protection of the Constitution. The underwear bomber is a foreign national who was trained as an enemy combatant who was conducting an operation against his sworn enemy. If he deserves protection of his “Constitutional” rights, doesn’t every enemy combatant on the battlefield deserve those same rights before any military action? frankly, if I am in a firefight, I do not want to delay the return of fire until I have mirandized the enemy.
Posted by: Contenental | February 9, 2010, 9:36 am 9:36 am
John Brennan is utterly incompetent, which means he fits in perfectly with the people around him.
Posted by: Flyoverman | February 9, 2010, 9:36 am 9:36 am
LOL NOW THATS FUNNY. Talk about being clueless and hypocritical. These are the same socialists who called Bush EVERY VULGAR NAME IN THE BOOK for 8 years and now noone can say anything about THE ONE, THE ALMIGHTY HUSSEIN OBAMA!!!!! Listen this president is a disgrace. He and his band of communist thugs dont have a clue, arent ready for prime time, are making every mistake in the book and constantly have shown bad judgement for the last year. THEY ARE PUTTING US ALL AT RISK from weak defense polices like giving rights to terrorists and treating terrorists like American citizens. REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER WE WILL TAKE AMERICA BACK!!!!
Posted by: THE TRUTH | February 9, 2010, 9:36 am 9:36 am
Brennan is trying to be clever, using one of the right wing complaints against the left when Bush was President.
The problem is that it doesnt hold up. The right wing and the independents both have a problem with the Democrat’s handling of terrorists as a domestic issue.
The left, under Bush, were rallying against the war against terror, standing in the way, declaring quagmires, declaring the war was lost, declaring Bush was Hitler, declaring it was all about the oil, it went on and on and on for 8 solid years.
Now that was truly aiding and comforting the enemy, what is going on today is the discussion of handling terrorists after our military (who is overwhelmingly right wing) catches them.
So dont try to be cute with me Brennan, you are a puerile child.
Posted by: IntelliQ | February 9, 2010, 9:36 am 9:36 am
the fbi couldn´t even catch Al Capone. The CIA. NASA do more . The perception is the Dems are soft on terrorist. his apontments haven´t changed anyones mind on that.
Posted by: madmax | February 9, 2010, 9:36 am 9:36 am
I pray for bo daily…….pray that he is gone soon!
Posted by: watchinbo | February 9, 2010, 9:36 am 9:36 am
“Dissent used to be the highest form of patriotism…not so much anymore, eh?”
Posted by: PA | Feb 9, 2010 9:34:01 AM
2008: Dissent is the highest form of Patriotism.
2009: Dissent is the highest form of Racism.
2010: Dissent is the highest form of Terrorism.
Posted by: Ministry of Truth | February 9, 2010, 9:36 am 9:36 am
How dare this FOOL accuse detractors of this idiot that got put into office JUST BECAUSE OF THE COLOR OF HIS SKIN suggest this helps the enemy!
I have had enough of this narcissistic administration to last a lifetime! The arrogance of the these people is ASTOUNDING! ENOUGH!
Posted by: OneOfMillions | February 9, 2010, 9:37 am 9:37 am
The true terrorist are the ones undermining our currency. When the value of the dollar becomes zero then the enemy will have won. HMMM who is destroying the value of the dollar?
Posted by: photonsoflight | February 9, 2010, 9:37 am 9:37 am
Mr Brennan should stop infuriating the American people by offering poor excuses for his departments failures. By trying to say it’s not my fault it only draws more attention to this administrations failures in National Security. Perhaps he should keep quiet and go back to his war room and try to stop the next attack which everyone admits is coming.
Posted by: JCPogue | February 9, 2010, 9:37 am 9:37 am
Welcome to Bizarro America! Up is down, left is right, yes is no…
First, these “progressives” told us that the economy was in terrible shape at the time it really wasn’t.
Second, we (not me but the majority) voted them in (in 2006).
Third, since then they’ve done everything they possibly could to wreck the economy.
We need to not allow the MTV Generation to vote. I’m ready to pass an amendment to the Constitution that says only responsible (those committed to working and taking care of their family) citizens can vote.
Tough love baby!
Posted by: One American | February 9, 2010, 9:38 am 9:38 am
WAAA…WAAA…WAAA
Obama wants his bottle!!
Posted by: Bob N | February 9, 2010, 9:38 am 9:38 am
Seems like Obama is just reinforcing that George Bush was right all along.
I’m ashamed to say I voted for Obama.
Posted by: David Steiner | February 9, 2010, 9:39 am 9:39 am
Remember, Barry stated as a senator and presidential candidate that the country was “less” safe since 911 with no evidence. Could those sentiments have served the goals of al Qaeda? Clearly, these words were not in the best interest of the country but in Barry’s political interest. Now, the evidence clearly indicates the country is less safe under President Obama and his feckless team members do not like the criticism. Suggestion: drop the political correct strategies and introduce “we win, they lose” strategies.
Posted by: Thron | February 9, 2010, 9:39 am 9:39 am
For years the Democrats have criticized Bush and in the process helped our enemies. So as usual, the hypocrisy of the left is exposed
Posted by: Doron | February 9, 2010, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Well, here’s old Jake again, on the 0′s payroll – oops, sorry, news reporters are supposed to be unbiased, so I must be wrong.
And yes, the 0 can pander to the terrorists all he wants and still get killed – that’s why it is called terrorism!
Posted by: RepublicusMaximus | February 9, 2010, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Shame Shame Shame…….well it should come as no suprise when the checks and BALANCES get elected in the fall……
Posted by: DEESEE | February 9, 2010, 9:40 am 9:40 am
John Brennan may be a slower learner than Obama.
Posted by: Bill Hirst | February 9, 2010, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Here we go again… Let the blame game begin… oops… I meant… Let the blame game continue! So freakin’ unbelievable.
Posted by: JLC | February 9, 2010, 9:40 am 9:40 am
“Let the FBI handle these guys they really do know what they are doing.”
How about we keep the terrorists OUT of the U.S. and the FBI would less to do! Then they might have time to locate the millions of illegals, the drug gangs, the smugglers bring al-Qaeda operatives over the the damn border!
Posted by: Trike | February 9, 2010, 9:41 am 9:41 am
Americans are either with Obama or with the terrorists, I guess.
Posted by: Johnny Utah | February 9, 2010, 9:41 am 9:41 am
Dear Lord help us all..we have an immature crybaby in the White House!!
Posted by: Ghost Rider | February 9, 2010, 9:41 am 9:41 am
So now we are cowards AND terrorists. Are there any grownups in Washington? Are there any traditional Americans that respect the right to disagree? Just keep it up dummies…we’ve got the broom out and we’re comin’ for you all. Stunning failures…a lesson to be learned about electing community organizers. All they know how to do is agitate.
Posted by: Phocus | February 9, 2010, 9:42 am 9:42 am
Democrats pretty much joined Jihad against Bush, at the cost of sounding almost as radical as al Qaeda in some instances, (fortunately, as in everything else Dems do, they failed)…which makes this particular chapter in “it’s everybody else’s fault but ours” so much more pathetic.
Thank God for genius of our political system which renders politicians like Obama and his sorry bunch of losers..impotent.
Posted by: Beau | February 9, 2010, 9:42 am 9:42 am
More of the same.
Posted by: Jack | February 9, 2010, 9:42 am 9:42 am
Isnt this exactly what Bush said?
Posted by: lop | February 9, 2010, 9:43 am 9:43 am
These people get more and more like GW Bush everyday.
Posted by: Randall | February 9, 2010, 9:43 am 9:43 am
What’s wrong, you crybabies? It was okay when Bush was saying this kind of fact. And protest was Un american back then, too!
Obama is just reinforcing that George Bush was right all along.
Posted by: Yousf Ojacf | February 9, 2010, 9:43 am 9:43 am
Barry has already shown the world he is weak. He let Putin push him around on the missile shield in Eastern Europe, he stood paralyzed in fear of offending Muslims when the 4 Somali pirates held the tanker captain hostage. He turns a blind eye and plays golf for 3 days in Hawaii before issuing a robotic, teleprompter speech on the underwear bomber. Never mind he ran all over the Muslim world apologizing for the US and pledging a new era in relations with the Muslim world. Plus the rush to blame and criticize Isreal at every chance. Iran is ultra defiant and will have some type of weapon nuke built before too long.
To Bin Laden, al-Qaeda, Hamas, Iran and everybody other member of the “religion of peace”, Barry has telegraphed his weakness by doing all he can to “appease” The terrorists sit back and laugh at Barry, as if peaceful overtures by Barry mean something to them.
When Isreal has been wiped out, the West destroyed and Islam has dominated the world (as told by the Koran), only then will there be peace.
Posted by: Chuck | February 9, 2010, 9:43 am 9:43 am
What happened to dissent being the highest form of patriotism. I think Springsteen needs to go on a tour and sing us a song about obeying the President or something.
Posted by: RobbieRob | February 9, 2010, 9:43 am 9:43 am
unbelievable. the dems have been the party of undermining the war on terror for the last eight years. this is an incredible statement. heck, the dems care and give more rights and comfort to al qaeda and the taliban then their own american children who they enslaved under massive chains of debt. ripping off rights of the children and giving rights to the enemy thats obama.
Posted by: richard hyytinen | February 9, 2010, 9:44 am 9:44 am
Hey folks, John Brennan is only saying what Obama and his incompetent White House Chicago Gangsta advisors send him out to say. He is mouthing memorized words he better get right or he might lose his head along with his job. Nobody in the White House, of any importance, knows how to lead and govern. They are campaign hacks and campaign is all they do. Just listen to Obama’s Tele-Prompter fed speeches and you’ll know that nothing comes from the heart and nothing stands on principles.Give the sock puppets like Brennan a break.
Posted by: Cheyenne | February 9, 2010, 9:44 am 9:44 am
IS THIS DUDE SERIOUS???? This twerp is 2nd in charge of Homeland Security? What a nauseating report. Someone stuff a pacifier in his mouth to shut him up. What drivel.
Posted by: Randall Tunnell | February 9, 2010, 9:44 am 9:44 am
Terrorist’s don’t need critics to aide them, they have this idiot Brennen, Eric Holder, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, and all Barry’s White House staff aiding them.
Posted by: Fat_Drunk_TeddyK | February 9, 2010, 9:44 am 9:44 am
More projection from the second Carter administration….demonize critics- in this case, the American people- for wanting a government to do what it is supposed to do: defend and uphold the Constitution of the United States and defend it’s citizenry from all enemies, foreign and domestic. I guess increasing taxes, instilling socialism, and revising history can do that………..HA!
Posted by: souldoktor | February 9, 2010, 9:45 am 9:45 am
Actually mirandizing terrorists, and closing down GITMO serves the goals of al Qaeda. Critics talking about it does nothing. What, the White House think their policies are not known to the terrorists?
So what is the he trying to say, if the conservatives would just quit complaining about the ploicies it wouldn’t be an issue, because they will not find out about it.
Everybody in the world was complaining about Bush’s policies, and al Queda was on the run. Now they are on the attack, and only conservatives are complaining about Obama policies. Hmmm. Maybe it is the policies not the objections.
Posted by: Mark | February 9, 2010, 9:45 am 9:45 am
OUT: Stickin’ it to the Man.
IN: Gettin’ the Man re-elected.
Posted by: Subvert the Dominant Liberal Paradigm | February 9, 2010, 9:45 am 9:45 am
Obama and Bin Laden are both part of the Global Warming or Climate Change Caliphate. It’s all about despotism. It’s about raising global taxes and impinging upon liberty and capitalism. If causing Al Qaeda problems also causes Barry Sotero (Indonesian Citizen?) problems who cares. Move back to Indonesia Barry.
Posted by: kwills | February 9, 2010, 9:45 am 9:45 am
This coming from those who have done the most damage to our National Security. More than even Al Qaeda.
The only thing deeper than the Snow in D.C. is the BS coming out of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Posted by: Logan | February 9, 2010, 9:45 am 9:45 am
This man-child needs to grow up! What a self-righteous idiot he is.
Posted by: Chukkalady | February 9, 2010, 9:45 am 9:45 am
Good job Jake!!!! When is the next message from Rahm arriving?
Posted by: shirl | February 9, 2010, 9:46 am 9:46 am
This president and now I see his wife are so thin skinned. It’s all about him. The sooner he gets it, the better off he’ll be and maybe do something for the American people, who he represents.. Sorry, but i WANT to know if things are getting screwed up. Any administration needs to be called out on this stuff. Don’t tell me that G.Bush didn’t get the same ole stuff that Obama is getting now. They can dish it out, but they can’t take it. wahhhhhhhhhhh….
Posted by: Teresa | February 9, 2010, 9:46 am 9:46 am
New name for Obama -Elmer Gantry
Posted by: mike croft | February 9, 2010, 9:47 am 9:47 am
Ooops, I forgot, the next one will be a ranting about Toyota. Keep the wires hot with that and sell more GM’S & Chryslers.
Posted by: shirl | February 9, 2010, 9:47 am 9:47 am
Um, Isn’t this exactly what the Democrats did to George Bush? These guys are morons.
Posted by: Eddie | February 9, 2010, 9:47 am 9:47 am
This coming from a guy employed by the “Lecturer in Chief”!
Posted by: bobd | February 9, 2010, 9:47 am 9:47 am
“Brennan writes that politics “should never get in the way of national security. But too many in Washington are now misrepresenting the facts to score political points, instead of coming together to keep us safe.” ”
And the Obama administration should know – they misrepresented the War on Terror at every turn, just to score political points.
Hypocritical and clueless, indeed.
Posted by: CSR | February 9, 2010, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Now that Iran has warned of a major shocker for the West this week, my only question is whether or not Obama will wear a tie when he gives his surrender speech.
Posted by: LensmanCt | February 9, 2010, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Spending a billion dollars on a show trial (Obama and Holder’s words not mine) that gives terrorists a huge world platform to sell their crazy does help terrorism. I am sorry if the obvious truth hurts, they are horrible on terrorism. They aren’t even bringing a knife to the gunfight. It’s more like bringing a legal document to gunfight.
He’s doing a good job in Pakistan, but secretly and unlawfully invading a country like Pakistan was what he was completely and utterly against…
But let’s be honest all of Washington is horrible. We can send troops over and spend trillions of dollars on security or we could have a domestic energy policy that destroys all of our enemies without lifting a finger.
Posted by: JasonSC | February 9, 2010, 9:49 am 9:49 am
When Republicans protest, they hold the American flag high. When Democrats protest, they burn the American flag.
Posted by: Oregon | February 9, 2010, 9:49 am 9:49 am
So when the ‘left’ used to criticise the Bush administration; were they helping Al Qaeda?
Posted by: Bob Borquez | February 9, 2010, 9:49 am 9:49 am
On every front, Republicans do what they can to sabotage the President in hopes of bringing him down in 2012. From Senator Shelby holding up important national security appointments, to stonewalling on health care even though the health care plan is based on a Republican initiative in Massachusetts, the swiftboating is endless. I am glad to see the Administration fighting back.
Posted by: Joel Miller | February 9, 2010, 9:49 am 9:49 am
This isyet again Obama’s way of saying na, na na na naa! We elected Peewee Herman as President. What a joke. Him serving as president does more for Alquieda than any other thing!
Posted by: scott-n-texas | February 9, 2010, 9:50 am 9:50 am
I thought during the Bush that you were an incompetend boob, boy was I wrong you are just a spineless boob.
Posted by: LEWIS M BASKIND | February 9, 2010, 9:50 am 9:50 am
I thought during the Bush that you were an incompetend boob, boy was I wrong you are just a spineless boob.
Posted by: LEWIS M BASKIND | February 9, 2010, 9:50 am 9:50 am
‘Meet the new boss…same as the old boss’
Posted by: Chris | February 9, 2010, 9:50 am 9:50 am
This is just another weak exercise on part of the Obama camp to silence their critics. They’ve already called us all sorts of other names next they’ll probably threaten that we must not like kittens. Only a jerk would not like like kittens, right? These people are not only incompetent but they are dangerously so and we desperately need to wake up to and be vigilant about what we are facing here. These folks are trying to con us. This administration is a horrible mistake that will only get worse. Very sad for our great nation and also very scary not only for us today but for our future generations. There are principles involved here that need to be defended that are being dodged by these guys. Wake up America. It’s time to wake up.
Posted by: cbgb | February 9, 2010, 9:50 am 9:50 am
Again, leftist reverse psychol;ogy to the teleivision educated mindset. This administration has done more to encourage and embolden al Qaeda and reverse eight years of security initiatives than even I expected and predicted.
The Aemrican people better wake up. The tenor of terrorist activity and attempts at tectical action right here inside the U. S. have gone up dramatically in just 12 months while at the same time, Homeland Security turns off their national operations satellite and publishes that fact.
Then we have the constructive espionage of the President himself compromising very serious classified interrogation techniques and information-causing grave damage to national security-then publishing the documents which were not redacteed enough for my liking. This was done deliberately, it is blatant.
Then add to that the bastardization of giving foreign fighters in foreign lands engaged in war against us Constitutional protections of Miranda-BUT-start to move toward requiring our own soldiers to appear at the Hague.
The time has come to ask why, and initiated impeachment procedings against Obama-and disbarment and termination actions against this Attorney General.
Maybe we can call Gerald Walpin as out first witness.
Posted by: vincenzo4 | February 9, 2010, 9:51 am 9:51 am
Of course, what the Democrats did for 7 years of the Bush Administration was “legitimate criticism?”
Bien sur!
Posted by: SecondEdition2 | February 9, 2010, 9:51 am 9:51 am
Heckuva job “disrupting” the Christmas Day plot, Brennan.
Posted by: Mmm, Mmm, Mmm | February 9, 2010, 9:51 am 9:51 am
No, you fools! What we critics are trying to do is jolt the American people into awareness that the engines of our national security are being driven by people who are clueless at best and malignantly subversive at worst. And we will continue to criticize, more loudly if necessary, until the last straggler in this gaggle of Marxist clowns walks the plank.
Posted by: John Breland | February 9, 2010, 9:52 am 9:52 am
I know I’m probably going to be flamed for this, but I actually agree with the sentiment. However, the state reeks of hypocrisy. In fact, members of both parties are “serving the goals of al qaeda” by fear-mongering and spending ridiculous sums of money erasing civil liberties to fight these oppressive, but impotent thugs we call “terrorists”.
For the previous admin, this includes the PATRIOT Act and Iraq War. For this administration, it includes of continuing the Iraq War and spending millions on invasive body scanners that are hardly effective.
Stop giving into this madness. By doing so, they’ve already won.
Posted by: Cornelius | February 9, 2010, 9:53 am 9:53 am
Counter intuitive but not surprising coming from the administration. What people are saying is that the President is serving the goals of al Qaeda by assuring them that will get their chance as our guard has already been lowered. They don’t need US to remind them!
Posted by: SecondEdition2 | February 9, 2010, 9:53 am 9:53 am
Wasn’t it patriotic to criticize our government during the last administration? Now we’re helping the enemy.Keeping Brennan,Obama,Gates,Holder and the rest of this incompetant gang in charge is what seems to be really helping our enemies. Doesn’t any of them have the decency to admit that and resign?
Posted by: jadams76 | February 9, 2010, 9:53 am 9:53 am
Give me a break. Do you think we are that stupid.
Obama is the one helping Al Queda big time.
Posted by: micky | February 9, 2010, 9:54 am 9:54 am
SO, when the NY Slimes and all the other left wing news printed our secrets and demanded W’s head what was that?
Posted by: Jstain | February 9, 2010, 9:54 am 9:54 am
The “Audacity of Hope..
…that no one remembers what we said a few years ago”
Posted by: Phil_M | February 9, 2010, 9:55 am 9:55 am
If you’re not with us, you’re against us. -BObama
Posted by: George Bush | February 9, 2010, 9:55 am 9:55 am
So he says we basically treat them the same now as when they were in military custody, and that the same practices implemented under the Bush administration are being used today, and that they work… so if it is the same treatment, and it worked, then why the need to change it? And secondly, if you call today’s critics hypocrites for being silent when Bush was doing these things, then shouldn’t you also call Bush’s critics hypocrites for being silent now?
Posted by: jones | February 9, 2010, 9:55 am 9:55 am
According to Brennan: “… too many in Washington are now misrepresenting the facts to score political points, instead of coming together to keep us safe.”
Brennan is himself responsible for some of the most egregious and overt lying and politicizing. (For example, take note of his claim that Republican and Democrat leadership was “informed” of the process planned for Abdulmutallab, which has been denounced as utterly false and misleading by those he supposedly informed.) Once again I wonder at the capacity of administration spokestools to issue public statements utterly at odds with the realities and then stand proudly, clad in the Emperor’s new clothes, and slander those who dare to call attention to their falsehoods and misrepresentations.
Brennan has shown himself to be completely unreliable and willing to utterly ignore the requirements of national security while promoting Obama’s political agenda. He is a disgrace. God save us from these liars and charlatans.
Posted by: novaculus | February 9, 2010, 9:55 am 9:55 am
LMAO Obama grasping at straws to save the failing and collasping presidency
Obama: don’t they know how important and smart I am
Posted by: What? | February 9, 2010, 9:55 am 9:55 am
Boy that sounds very close to the language being used in Iran to brand critics of the regime as working with the US intelligence agencies. Very very dangerous speach coming from this administration.
Posted by: rightside | February 9, 2010, 9:57 am 9:57 am
I guess we see now who really understands “democracy.” Not once during his term did President Bush or any high level aid ever attack his critics as “serving the goals” of the enemy. It’s just another indicator of how low the current administration has sunk.
Posted by: Roger | February 9, 2010, 9:57 am 9:57 am
The knee-jerk reaction to criticism is Obama’s way of preparing to blame Bush and the conservatives on the next attack that will occur on Obama’s watch.
Posted by: charles | February 9, 2010, 9:57 am 9:57 am
Just what are the goals of Al-Qaeda? I don’t think anyone has bothered to publicize them.
I think the primary goal is simply to spread Islam around the world, and to eliminate all other religions.
Most everything else is secondary.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | February 9, 2010, 9:57 am 9:57 am
President Bobo’s lawyering up of Islamic terrorists probably does the MOST to help al Qaeda. Does that make too much sense?
Posted by: Superpower | February 9, 2010, 9:57 am 9:57 am
Why not, if we can’t blame Bush, or Fox,or Tea “Baggers”, then let’s blame critics as traitors.Next, we can silence critics as enemies of the State!
Posted by: pauldia | February 9, 2010, 9:57 am 9:57 am
John Brennan better stop the conciliatory tone of his submissive speech patterns and start being more assertive in national security matters. We are here today like this because for eight years under Clointon-and I doi not care what they try to claim and lie their way out of, NOTHING was done, resulting in an steady upscope of attacks and lethality of the continuing, unconfronted attacks right up to 9/11-and who do they blame? BUSH!!!!
Then as BUsh fights the war they allowed to gain momentum they-leftists, democrats continue to torment and taunt and show dusunity during the eight years he was President.
Start doing your own research, I did. After we seized 65,000 boxes of Iraqi government documents and discovered 750 metric tons of yellowcake uranium, I started researching open sources. I am convinced, corroborated that not only was Bush absolutely correct, it is deeply much more worse than just the issue of WMD.
Ask Sandy Berger.
Posted by: vincenzo4 | February 9, 2010, 9:58 am 9:58 am
And, can this White House drop the “Richard Reid” thing?
Reid was 3 months after 9/11 – and there were no special terrorist ops responders like we supposedly have now (hmmm….where was that special ops group in the underwear bomber case, Brennan?) and no military tribunals/terrorist interrogation procedures set up in 2001.
We supposedly have all of that in place now, right Brennan? Then why didn’t you use it?
There was NO NEED to mirandize the underwear bomber. He’s a foreign terrorist who should have been interrogated by the CIA and NSA. But, Brennan and Obama think foreign terrorists have the same rights as Americans. That’s the point.
Brennan and Obama are incompetent. This article proves it.
Posted by: Charlie | February 9, 2010, 9:58 am 9:58 am
PUHLEASE! Does criticizing the man-child president put enemy combatants in civilian court?
Silly Rabbit those Trix are for kids.
Posted by: Freemon Sandlewould | February 9, 2010, 9:58 am 9:58 am
LOL I think we need to stop the prisoner taking business and start the terrorist killing business hehe lol IB
Posted by: thetossedsaladguy | February 9, 2010, 9:58 am 9:58 am
“Terrorists are not 100-feet tall, nor do they deserve the adject fear they seek to install.” I am confused, are they takling about al-qaeda or the fear mongering coming out ot the whithe house?
Posted by: Rick Pipkin | February 9, 2010, 9:58 am 9:58 am
Ummm, actually, it’s Obama’s policies that are helping serve the goals of al-Qaeda. Between the desperate Christmas Day attempt and the cryptic message Obama bin Laden left shortly thereafter, I would give a 95% chance they’ll achieve that goal in 2010.
Posted by: Ben | February 9, 2010, 9:58 am 9:58 am
I love the double standard in washington (both sides) especially the hypocrites now. I critisizing Obama is helping Al Kaida then when the democrats (including senator obama) did it to President Bush the democrats were then helping Al Kaida… The only one here with clean hands is Bush, after all, unlike obama, Bush hasn’t critisized the president… and that makes democrats losers (game, set and match).
Posted by: Soul Leister | February 9, 2010, 9:59 am 9:59 am
“We must stand up and tell this Administration that WE ARE AMERICANS, and WE WILL NOT BE QUIET WHEN WE DISAGREE”…
Hillary Clinton.
“THE WAR IS LOST.”
Harry Reid.
“Those Marines LOST IT. THEY KILLED INNOCENT WOMEN and CHILDREN, IN COLD BLOOD.
Jack Murtha.
Dissent is the “NEW PATRIOTISM”.
The LEFT.
“I APOLOGIZE FOR MY COUNTRY.”
Barak Hussein Obama.
Posted by: Timothy L. Pennell | February 9, 2010, 9:59 am 9:59 am
Yes Free speech and your right as an american to dissent is helping only the enemey just as it did when W was Pres. Its time to burn up the constitution because it only gets in the way of total victory. Um, I thought we had a military to protect our right to dissent.
“Terrorists such as Jose Padilla” Padilla and his two co-defendants – Adham Hassoun and Kifah Jayyousi – foundguilty of all the charges that the trio conspired to supply extremists with money, recruits and material for terror attacks, even though the three men were never linked to any particular terrorist plot.
Padilla is an american citizen held for many years in the US without charges in violation of our entire legal system.
No administration has defined terror terrorists, terrorism, war, or torture.
If this is an example of how to do things correctly, We are in deep doo-doo.
Posted by: Funky-President | February 9, 2010, 9:59 am 9:59 am
I remember when the Dixie Chicks were calling our President names when the war started and all the Demos
stuck up for them..now they are complaining about free speech?
Posted by: pinkstar | February 9, 2010, 10:00 am 10:00 am
Read “The Obama Timeline,” by Don Fredrick, then try to tell me about Obamageddon’s good intentions.
Posted by: gm | February 9, 2010, 10:00 am 10:00 am
Okay, okay, we get it. obama “inherited” terrorism.
When next thousands of Americans are killed by terrorist, obama will be to blame and he will not be allowed to blame his predecessor. This administration will be the death of this Republic and its people.
Posted by: cj | February 9, 2010, 10:00 am 10:00 am
I thought the Obama was the un-Bush administration? Now they are claiming that they did same as Bush did with Reid as the reason they are right. Can’t have it both ways.
Posted by: Jon | February 9, 2010, 10:00 am 10:00 am
Just another problem that doesn’t get solved because of partisan bickering. Get off you high horses on both sides and start thinking country first.
You think this country got through previous wars by arguing who is right? This country is in dire straights because neither party wants to give up political advantage. If you are one of these politicians, then GET OUT of my government, I don’t want you!
I am sick of all this bickering on both sides. This isn’t why you were voted into office to obstruct the running of this country.
For all you adding to this bickering, you only inflame an otherwise already bad situation with the constant flaming of the other side, ENOUGH OF THIS CRAP!
Posted by: indymind | February 9, 2010, 10:01 am 10:01 am
Hell, the Three Stooges could come up with something better than that!
Posted by: Mr. Ravelli | February 9, 2010, 10:01 am 10:01 am
HA HA when the critics were ripping BUSH a new one over Iraq.. it was “Freedom of speech” when someone does it to a screaming liberal its “helping our enemies” Love the double standard that the left allways plays with impunity.
Posted by: Cale | February 9, 2010, 10:01 am 10:01 am
Divide & Conquer. There is an imaginary line between the left and the right. It doesn’t exist except in the imagination of those that choose to join either the left or the right. Divide & Conquer was invented to constantly keep each side at each others throats while the real terrorists, the globalist, have their way with us. We are in Asia to protect the poppies for the globalists, Middle East to keep the oil from flowing and for Israel. The globalist bankersters have striped us of 28+ trillion dollars so far and want more. Step outside the false left/right paradigm and take a good look, were being had Americans! Back in George Washington’s days there were no partys, no false left/right paradigm, just real Americans and traitors posing as Americans. The Constitution and Bill of Rights were drafted to keep us together as one nation undivided and to keep the banksters at bay and not to get entangle ourselves in illegal wars for the banksters!! Neo-cons and neo-libs, I want you both to get the hell out of my country before you destroy it beyond repair! Real American is waking up because of the Bush’s and Obama.
Posted by: XPIOLT | February 9, 2010, 10:01 am 10:01 am
God help this country. obama won’t.
Posted by: Lee | February 9, 2010, 10:02 am 10:02 am
So when calling Obama’s critics racists doesn’t work, change the charge to helping the terrorists! Clever!
Posted by: aj;sfe | February 9, 2010, 10:02 am 10:02 am
David Steiner: I left the Democratic Party because of what I witnessed during the 1990s-to include Chinagate. That party is deeply penetrated and as a result this angst and conflict whewre there needs to be one tight fist.
This party deliberately neglects national security wholesale, then complains when confronted with the results of this neglect-when criminal malfeasance charges are well in order.
Posted by: vincenzo4 | February 9, 2010, 10:02 am 10:02 am
Okay folks. This is scary. Very scary. This man is in the loop of our national security and national defense, and he’s attacking the people. The only person helping terrorists is Obama, which is what makes this sooo scary.
Obama’s Admin are using national security as a wedge protecting Obama’s popularity. This is Iran type of politics.
This story is the most dangerous news I’ve heard all year. This is far more dangerous than an underwear bomber. This is our country in the control of these psychotic personalities.
THIS IS VERY, VERY SCARY!
Posted by: deadjournalism | February 9, 2010, 10:03 am 10:03 am
What do you expect from a communist administration! How’s your hope and change!! I know it’s Bush’s fault!!!
Posted by: cleatus | February 9, 2010, 10:03 am 10:03 am
I love the double standard in washington (both sides are guilty) especially the hypocrites now. If critisizing Obama is helping Al Kaida then when the democrats (including senator obama) did it to President Bush the democrats (obama included) were then helping Al Kaida too… The only one here with clean hands is Bush, after all, unlike obama, Bush hasn’t critisized the president… and that makes democrats (like obama) the biggest losers bar none (game, set and match).
Posted by: Soul Leister | February 9, 2010, 10:03 am 10:03 am
Ried: this war is lost Mr. president
Pelosie: the surge will not work and is a waste of our national treasure
Obama:I oppose this Unjust war against muslims
Murtha: those Marines are murders
Do they think we forget that quickly?
Did those and other statements prolong the conflict?
Posted by: dontdothat | February 9, 2010, 10:04 am 10:04 am
Did he confess after water boarding?
Posted by: KCEddie | February 9, 2010, 10:04 am 10:04 am
Our politicians shouldn’t spend our money building up armies of other countries and spent time trying to fix our declining country. Strengthen our borders and attack hard whenever someone messes with us. Don’t get involved in tribal squabbles. The people we are giving aid to now switch sides without hesitation. Keep out of other countries except when we have to respond d to a significant threat or to an attack. Should we have bombed a Islamic extremist country after 9/11? Yes! Should we leave after making a powerful response, to send a message not to mess with us? Yes! Obama, Democrats and Republicans have made mistake after mistake in economic and military security matters. Should we criticize? Yes, because some of us saw have predicted things accurately from the start but people don’t listen to us because we don’t give the rosy picture double tongued politicians dish out. Register Independent to vote both parties out! No more two party system unless you want to destroy this country!
Posted by: Greg | February 9, 2010, 10:04 am 10:04 am
the more i hear from this Brennan guy, the more i think he’s an idiot. i was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt the first couple of times i listened. i really didn’t think you’d pick a neophyte for the job he has. the more i hear from him, the more i am convinced he’s not up to the job. at least he’s got the admin whine down pat!
Posted by: rider237 | February 9, 2010, 10:05 am 10:05 am
Question: Wasn’t criticism and dissent during the Bush Admin. categorized as the highest form of patriotism?
Posted by: Deadeye Dave | February 9, 2010, 10:05 am 10:05 am
And I guess “The war is lost” Harry Reid and “The Marines are guilty of murder” Murtha were not helping AlQ, huh?
Puhlease. This is the most devisive president ever.
Posted by: ster | February 9, 2010, 10:05 am 10:05 am
In reality the only thing serving al Qaeda is keeping buffoons like Brennan in office.
Posted by: Temp | February 9, 2010, 10:05 am 10:05 am
“I APOLOGIZE FOR MY COUNTRY.”
Barak Hussein Obama.
Enough said…
Posted by: ster | February 9, 2010, 10:06 am 10:06 am
King Obama and his Seven Dwarfs are mad because after only one year his Presidency is a lame duck. Health care, poor terrorist policies and his neglect of the job crisis were his waterloo. His influenece is over, he has only a 20 % Independent approval rating ( TERRIBLE LOL) and dems are running away from him in droves. He could pass a sobriety test let alone a major bill.
Posted by: THE TRUTH | February 9, 2010, 10:06 am 10:06 am
These clowns have an excuse for everything….they have endangered this country from the first day
Posted by: Texas | February 9, 2010, 10:06 am 10:06 am
In what way is “Kit” Bond an expert on terrorism? He rubber stamped the war in Iraq, even though Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 9/11. He finds nothing wrong with torture, even though that’s an extemely inefficient way to get terrorists to cooperate.
The GOP is simply trying to get publicity. They really don’t care about national security. If they did, they’d do something about global warming, which will generate massive global unrest, rather than pretending it does not exist.
P.S. Let’s not forget that Kit Bond wants C-17 transports built in his state, even though the Defense Department does not want the plane. So much for being a fiscal conservative.
Posted by: William Joseph Miller Los Angeles | February 9, 2010, 10:06 am 10:06 am
So, if you’re against the President then you support the terrorists?
Hmmm…this rhetoric sounds eerily familiar.
Posted by: TheMagicCracka | February 9, 2010, 10:06 am 10:06 am
How can you tell if the White House is lying? Answer, their lips are moving.
Critics helpilng al Qaeda? That’s a new low for the White House. I suspose the snowfall is also critical of global warming?
Blame, blame, blame, no accountability in D.C. any more, just finger pointing at non-existent other guys.
Give me a break?
Posted by: Oren | February 9, 2010, 10:07 am 10:07 am
Factually, Eric Holder and Barack Obama have done the most to serve the goals of al Qaeda.
Posted by: Superpower | February 9, 2010, 10:08 am 10:08 am
Finally the Administration has uttered the words “goals of al-Qaeda” which a majority in the country have been concerned about for a long time. Maybe Mr Brenan can transition from the “overseas contingency” mentality to actually fighting a war against radical Islamic extremeists. Welcome to the real world.
Posted by: Ralph | February 9, 2010, 10:08 am 10:08 am
Surprise surprise….abc new?
Posted by: jim | February 9, 2010, 10:08 am 10:08 am
Everything about Obama and his WH is about politics! As Bill Cristal pointed out, and they continue the path of debating this in public, which is bad for them! For the common people, terrorists whould not be read Miranda’s rights, they should be kept in Guantanamo, they should not be tried in civilian courts, and we should waterboard them or use any enhanced technique to extract information for them! Most common people are for those things above! They are clueless about what people think!
Posted by: FanDaElis | February 9, 2010, 10:08 am 10:08 am
Like the Economy, current day TERRORISM is all George Bush’s fault!
Our WH needs to get off its ###, do its job, and sing an honest tune!
Posted by: Patrick Martin | February 9, 2010, 10:09 am 10:09 am
But Hilary said is was ok to debate and disagree with this administration. I’m so confused. Did she just mean THAT administration?
Posted by: ctmom | February 9, 2010, 10:09 am 10:09 am
The sheer desperation and absolute lack of anything resembling leadership (or American values for that matter) by this clown and his admin is becoming embarrassing.
Do the country a favor and step down. You are clearly in way over your head and you obviously neither respect the American people or our values!
The longer this empty suited wonder stays in office the more he seems to resemble forrest gump – though not nearly as honorable or intelligent.
Posted by: DJH | February 9, 2010, 10:09 am 10:09 am
Obama please report to Gitmo for further processing and deportation. Thank you for your cooperation.
Posted by: Magneto | February 9, 2010, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Critics don’t get attorneys for terrorists,Obama did.
Posted by: scotty | February 9, 2010, 10:10 am 10:10 am
What exactly is Mr. Brennan’s position, where does he fit in the chain of command, what are his responsibilities and powers?
I’ve heard his company is a contractor to the Government in the area of security, exactly the area where he is an “adviser”.
Can you imagine the hullabaloo in the press if this clear conflict of interest existed in the Bush administration?
Where is the media on this guy…?
Posted by: Quo Warranto | February 9, 2010, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Unfortunately for the administration, comments by them prior to taking office on this very topic can be easily replayed or read. Their claim is not any different than that of the previous administration. The problem Democrats face is one of credibility and it does no good to deny previous statements when they are readily available by critics. The only thing most politicians in office care about is staying in office, caring more for that than doing what is in the best interest of the country.
Posted by: TxnByBrth | February 9, 2010, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Obama is basically saying – you are either with us or with the terrorists which is taking a page out of Bush’s book.
Posted by: Mojo | February 9, 2010, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Does anyone besides me find it odd that this guy is taking the time to write an op-ed for a newspaper??? Shouldn’t he be out … of I don’t know … DEFENDING OUR NATION or something???
Posted by: Teri | February 9, 2010, 10:10 am 10:10 am
THE SILENT MAJORITY IS SILENT NO MORE!!!! We really are taking america back! Cant wait till november!!
Posted by: PROUD PATRIOT | February 9, 2010, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Shakespeare had it right…”me thinks thou protest too much”. The Obama Administration is filled with dangerous inept foolish “creatins”…the Country is at risk each day they are in office. November 2012 cannot come fast enough!
Posted by: Vigilant | February 9, 2010, 10:11 am 10:11 am
This white house has NO shame!
Posted by: Bella | February 9, 2010, 10:11 am 10:11 am
To the person who nailed it on the head (deadjournalism)… this guy is attacking the people, the same way that the administration attacks ANY person who questions their way of doing things. They prefer to take the war and “keep on message” to the people who question, and rightly so, if they are up to the job of keeping the American people safe. The day Obama quits blaming Americans and starts taking the fight to the real terrorists thats the day I will reconsider that he and his adminstration are a bunch of bumbling idiots. From Napelatiano, Sebelius, to this Brenner guy, who seems more focused on keeping “on Obama message” than doing his job, I worry that we are not being protected. They are playing politics with the lives of Americans in an attempt to not look like the bumblers that they are. Imcompentent, bumbling, inexperienced is how I describe this adminstration and the people who are appointed by the President to keep us safe.
Posted by: Valentina | February 9, 2010, 10:12 am 10:12 am
This is by far one of the most politically motivated administrations I’ve ever seen. Anyone who elected this guy thinking that the era of bipartisanship was going to end should be greatly disappointed. Where is the better world we were promised?
Posted by: T | February 9, 2010, 10:12 am 10:12 am
Gee and I thought when Bush was in office, the mantra was “dissent is the highest form of patriotism”.. What happened to that, eh?
Posted by: You_Lie!! | February 9, 2010, 10:12 am 10:12 am
Comrade Obama will put more Al-Qaeda members in US prisons so they can personally recruit and train new Muslim converts to become the home grown variety of terrorist.
Posted by: Calvin | February 9, 2010, 10:13 am 10:13 am
When the AG is a terrorists lawyer, and when the President seems more interested in covering up islamic terror, nothing these mouthpieces say means squat.
2012 please hurry; we have a deceiver running things now. A weak, bowing, useless (purposeful) deceiver
Posted by: yes | February 9, 2010, 10:13 am 10:13 am
The WH policies to treat terrorism as ‘one-off’ events, to encourage ‘patience’ towards those commiting terrorist acts, to donate US funds to muslim nations, and to purchase costly obsolete body scanner technology have failed to stop terrorism. The people speak because of many concerns about jobs, safety, and the economy. In response, the WH mocks the concerns of its citizens rather than to fix and address the core issues and problems.
Posted by: Simon | February 9, 2010, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Don’t you understand, it only hurts our national interests when we slam Democrats. Slamming Republicans is Free Speech. The Dems are still blaming W for failing to prevent 911. He had 9 months. By their own standards 100% of what happens now falls on Obama. What scares me the most is that perhaps he is doing his best to stop the “man made disasterists”.
Posted by: SoWhat | February 9, 2010, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Oops, I forgot to add “and its all the previous adminstrations fault” that they can’t get their stuff together to keep the American people safe even after one whole year in office. Consider that Obama started running to be President in 2007, thats 2 whole years for him to have gotten his stuff in order, but he seems to have done little to get prepared. Maybe being President isn’t as easy as he thought it would be, when all you have to do is blame Bush. HUMMMMMMMM
Posted by: Valentina | February 9, 2010, 10:15 am 10:15 am
now that he’s being judged like any white guy, he is proving daily that he is not up to the task–you have to do more than just show-up. Failure is difficult to swallow after you were told, and then believed, that you can walk across lake Michigan.
He’s a lame duck–I can hear him quacking right now.
Posted by: MacDaddyWatch | February 9, 2010, 10:15 am 10:15 am
Another mouthpiece for the empty suit trying to BS the populace….
Posted by: ErnieK | February 9, 2010, 10:15 am 10:15 am
Why was it ok to bash The previous administration but not this one?
Posted by: Greg | February 9, 2010, 10:15 am 10:15 am
Once again, this administration is hypocritical to the max. So, if someone criticizes THEIR glorious leader, that person is helping Al Qaeda…but, when all the Democrats were protesting George Bush and talking trash about his administration, they were just righteous dissenters? More LEFTIST B.S. Come on November…remember my fellow Americans, THINK, then VOTE!
Posted by: Heartland Patriot | February 9, 2010, 10:15 am 10:15 am
How funny.
Are they serious?
Posted by: Brock | February 9, 2010, 10:15 am 10:15 am
Obama when you say the truth about Fort Hood, or your birth cert, or anything else, call us. Until then stop talking you liar.
Posted by: yes | February 9, 2010, 10:15 am 10:15 am
So were the Democrats helping Al Qaeda when they pounded Bush continually for eight years?
Posted by: Eric | February 9, 2010, 10:16 am 10:16 am
Prove it thou, my accuser.
Posted by: john smith | February 9, 2010, 10:16 am 10:16 am
same complaint was made by the bush administration. much of it true. a weak prez opens up weaknesses that enemies exploit. the difference is as bush stated policies that would protect us, the left called him a liar and said he just wanted to kill muslims. obama says he wants to be buds with everyone and everyone with a brain calls him dumb for being ignorant. obama also defeats our agencies efforts to keep us safe by undermining the intelligence efforts.
it is easy to see that brennan plays real loose with numbers and facts here. not a surprise though.
Posted by: infinitewisdom4u | February 9, 2010, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Hmm, what’s going to be proposed next? Herding critics into interrment camps? How about secret police monitoring street corner discussions? Commizars in every company to observe protocol violations? Gulag’s for those who continue to be “troublesome” to the administration by asking tough questions or attempting to hold them responsible?
If Obamarx acts quickly he can head off the 2010 elections and ensure his party is Always in control!
Posted by: Big_Al | February 9, 2010, 10:17 am 10:17 am
It has been almost 15 months since the election of this administration…TRUE
But yet they continue to compare themselves against the prior Bush administration…WHY
Please understand, the people gave you the keys to the car…NOW DRIVE
If everyone remember that horrible day in American history, 9/11, this day occurred less than 11 months after the election in which we were unsure of whom our President would be…but then the inauguration occurred and the Bush administration took over…so the question is whom received the blame…not Clinton…
So I beg for the answer, do they have an inferiority complex on Pennsylvania Avenue? Or perhaps they themselves do not believe they belong in their positions and consistently act like the common 2nd Grade child and compare themselves to their peers to justify their actions or in this case their inactions.
Maybe next time the people of this fine nation will vote without allowing our anger and emotion take control. This President and his administration are not equipped to run this country or to lead the world.
Posted by: BBlank | February 9, 2010, 10:17 am 10:17 am
What is a person in his capacity doing writing an op ed? Propaganda!! GET TO WORK AND QUIT THE POLITICAL BULL!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: resipsaloquitur | February 9, 2010, 10:17 am 10:17 am
How pathetic of Brennan. The White House must be really scared for its political lives for him to take such cheap shots at their political opponents. Obama’s ratings are down and they don’t know how to handle it, so they attack.
Posted by: BayAreaBill | February 9, 2010, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Isn’t this the guy who is still looking for the smoking gun??
Posted by: Paul | February 9, 2010, 10:18 am 10:18 am
OP ED!!!! Shut up and go to work!!!
Posted by: resipsaloquitur | February 9, 2010, 10:18 am 10:18 am
The man has beclowned himself yet again. This is quickly moving from funny to pathetic. And be sure not to miss the “Bush did it” theme.
Posted by: Wintoon | February 9, 2010, 10:19 am 10:19 am
This is so 1984. These people are killing us with their spin and fearmongering. If we disagree with the fools we are racist or now helping the terrorists. If you want to know who’s really helping the terrorists, look no further than the communists in the White House and Congress. It’s time to start locking these traitors up and trying them for treason!
Posted by: Susan | February 9, 2010, 10:19 am 10:19 am
And Al Queda also said they wanted to bankrupt America from within.
Posted by: LongT | February 9, 2010, 10:19 am 10:19 am
Hillary said during the election, This is not a job for on the job training, Man was she so right, This President may go down as the worst man to serve in the office unless he changes to the middle, I have hope for him, but it’s running very thin right now in my eyes. Come’On Mr President, THINK!!! Your policies stink right now,
Posted by: Steve In Danville, KY | February 9, 2010, 10:19 am 10:19 am
Here’s an idea. All of the would be defense lawyers for these terrorist; make them hold there pre-trial meetings on the border of Pakistan and Afghanistan. Just a thought.
Posted by: duhhuh | February 9, 2010, 10:20 am 10:20 am
I thought “criticism was the highest form of patriotism”?
Oh, that’s right… only when a Republican is in power.
Hypocritical weasels practicing late-stage CYA.
Posted by: Edo Van Ede | February 9, 2010, 10:20 am 10:20 am
Why does the administration continue to call this Christmas Day bomber a “failed attempt”? It was not a failed attempt – it worked, its just that the mechanism of the detonation failed. And – this country’s defense mechanism against this type of attack failed.
Posted by: Phil | February 9, 2010, 10:20 am 10:20 am
Failed Christmas Day bomber Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab? He was assisted in boarding the plane by US intelligence. Just what did US intelligence want to happen that day? Google ‘kurt haskell’ the witness whose story hasn’t changed despite seven revisions by the FBI.
Posted by: dicktater | February 9, 2010, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Obama and Holder are traitors aiding and abetting Terrorists.
The Attorney General and the President of the United States, the Commander-in-Chief of our armed forces, are responsible for preventing the immediate interrogation of an enemy combatant from taking place.
Terrorist Abdulmutallab’s failed bombing attempt on the civilian U.S. airliner on Christmas day led to his immediate capture. Before even an hour had passed, Attorney General Eric Holder, acting under the authority of Barack Hussein Obama, provided an attorney for this enemy combatant, forbidding the gathering of enemy intelligence crucial to the safety of the American people from future terrorist acts.
Holder’s decision to protect Abdulmutallab from interrogation has facilitated enemy efforts to continue surprise terror attacks against American citizens at home and abroad. Thus, Holder and Obama have given a measure of aid to our enemies.
Whatever cripples our efforts to close with and destroy our enemies empowers those enemies to kill and maim us. Knowing that their captured comrades will not be subject to standard military interrogations doubtless comes as a great relief to our sworn enemies. Al-Qaeda leaders know full well that the granting of constitutional rights to their fellow terrorists helps keep secret the time, nature, and place of their future attacks. Thus, Holder and Obama have given not only aid to our enemies, but a measure of comfort as well.
Holder and Obama cannot take back or justify what they have done. However hard they may try, their propagandists cannot tinsel over Holder’s and Obama’s dereliction of duty by cleverly embellishing their excuses. By protecting the terrorist from immediate interrogation, Holder and Obama delivered a sledgehammer blow to the framework of our national security. Who knows how much crucial information on planned enemy strikes has been lost as a result of their ineptitude and betrayal of the public trust?
Upon taking office, Holder solemnly swore that he would “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” Yet instead of supporting and defending the Constitution against foreign enemy Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, Holder shielded the terrorist from interrogation, using our founding document as his pretext for doing so. There is no provision in the U.S. Constitution for granting constitutional rights to enemy combatants. By granting Abdulmutallab such rights, Holder has violated his oath of office.
In the event that anyone has missed the point, here is the crux of the matter: Instead of acting to protect us from enemy combatants, Eric Holder acted to protect an enemy combatant from revealing what he knew about planned terrorist operations directed against us. In doing so, Holder has demonstrated an unfathomable indifference to our national security and person safety.
Posted by: Max Hathcoat | February 9, 2010, 10:22 am 10:22 am
No we dont miss Bushie or Cheney. However Obama is even worse and more dangerously naiive. He still doesnt understand that Iran and N Korea and others dont want to make nicey-nicey with us. He just wants to talk talk talk talk talk..he loves to hear himself talk…. so does Chrissy Matthews, Keith Olbermann, Andrea Mitchell and Rachel Maddow – all 4 devoted koolaid drinkers who are out of touch with the rest of America.
Posted by: jimbo | February 9, 2010, 10:22 am 10:22 am
If you disagree with us, you are an Al Queda terrorist sympathizer.
Posted by: LongT | February 9, 2010, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Critics of Obama are aiding terrorists? What a large and steaming pile of BS.
Mr Ineffectual is much more wonderful on the Campaign Trail….Not such in office…What a sad disappointment he has proven himself to be.
Posted by: x32792 | February 9, 2010, 10:23 am 10:23 am
The criticism is valid and necessary. The Obama Administration is releasing information that the Underwear Bomber is talking as a “see, I told you we knew what we were doing” ploy. Now, any information this guy knew or MIGHT HAVE KNOWN is no longer good. And training camps he attended are not empty. Any future plans he may have overheard are now changed.
But Obama feels better about himself. Who exactly is helping the terrorists?
Posted by: Tom White | February 9, 2010, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Wow, now being in political opposition meant that you are a terrorist sympathizer or supporter?
How low will the Dems stoop?
Wait, wasn’t it Obama that went crawling to the Iranians? bowing and scraping, and listening to their lies? And we on the right are to blame?
I suppose that we are also to blame for the “punch” that is coming from Iran in the next few days too?
Get real.
Posted by: Terry | February 9, 2010, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Evidently, they haven’t read Al Kiada’s stated goals or listened to any of the tapes.
If they would have, they would hear the very words of Obama’s speeches and the Democratic party’s stances on issues.
This president is enabling the terrorists to advance and just like Jimmy Carter allowed this whole thing to start, Jimmy Carter on steroids (Obama) is going to get millions or perhaps billions killed due to their incompetence.
QUESTION AUTHORITY!!!! (esp. these guys)
Posted by: Saske Uchia | February 9, 2010, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Wouldn’t it be amazing if someone was hired to read this to the current administration? Obvious they can’t read. Or think. They no nothing of history, or economics, or technology. But they sure know how to lie: to the public, on their taxes, to their spouses. Great bunch of winners. Vote ‘em all out, regardless of party.
Posted by: Jubal | February 9, 2010, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Is BHO now invoking the burka rule to silence Americans against his policies & leadership? BHO & his ilk have only the destruction of our Constitution & America as their twin objectives. Only a fool cannot see that BHO has a big chip on his sholder and he is getting even with us/U.S.A.
Posted by: JLV | February 9, 2010, 10:23 am 10:23 am
April 19, 2007 _Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, “The war in Iraq ‘is lost’ and a US troop surge is failing to bring peace to the country…”
Posted by: Barry | February 9, 2010, 10:24 am 10:24 am
How can you be so stupid as to tell
your enemy where you intend to strike
in the new offensive in Afgan.
The people and the enemy are leaving
the area through the valley in droves.
During WW II Germany had to count the
rolls of toilet paper in order to
learn how many troops we had in the
area.
Now the idiots tell the enemy any
and everything we intend to do.
What the hell is this. Make the fight
fair ?
Posted by: Heller | February 9, 2010, 10:24 am 10:24 am
Whatta bunch of whiners.
Posted by: astralweeks | February 9, 2010, 10:24 am 10:24 am
Strange this tune was not being sung a few yrs ago when the left was ripping Bush on every front on the war on terror. How is it that now any criticism helps the terrorists? These people were actively helping the enemy by saying the war was lost etc and yet not the hot shot in the White House can’t stand up to criticism of any kind, without whining about how it is all Bush’s fault. Well if it is all Bush’s fault and you can’t handle it get out of the kitchen and bring Bush back. At least he was a man and never whined about what was left for him to clean up, never whined about Clinton, never attacked his critics and told them to shut up. He was a man and a leader, not a man-child and a whiner.
Posted by: LadyChurchill | February 9, 2010, 10:24 am 10:24 am
The Obama Administration must think American’s are stupid. Wake me when this four year nightmare is over, if there is anything left to awaken to.
Posted by: Vink | February 9, 2010, 10:25 am 10:25 am
“beclowned”? I didn’t even know that was a real word, but it is fitting.
Posted by: x32792 | February 9, 2010, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Mr. Brennen,
Complaining about someone who disagrees with an Obama policy reveals an administration in disarray. Defend the specifics of policies instead of whining about someone who does not agree with your world view.
Posted by: Dennis | February 9, 2010, 10:26 am 10:26 am
Four things that are scary beyond belief
1. Obama administration is in charge of national security
2. Obama administration is messing with the economy
3. Biden is number 2 in succession
4. Pelosi is number 3 in succession
Talk about a complete obliteration of hope, optimism and any chance of positive outcome……
Posted by: Brownville | February 9, 2010, 10:26 am 10:26 am
OBAMA is not my MAMA
Posted by: Oh Grover | February 9, 2010, 10:26 am 10:26 am
I guess when you criticize a Democratic president on terrorism policy you are helping al queda. When you criticize a Republican president on terrorism policy you are being patriotic and your patriotism should not be questioned.
When will the Elites in power now see through their double standard? The Elites think that us Common Folk are dumb and can be taken for a ride.
One more thing: on the issue of the current administration doing a better job because they have disrupted dozens of plots against the homeland. Well the Bush administration must have disrupted some plots too because their were no attacks after 9-11 on his watch. If the current administration is disrupting more plots, that means there must be more attempts on his watch. I guess going out of the way to show good will gestures to that part of the world didn’t work.
Posted by: Mr. S. | February 9, 2010, 10:26 am 10:26 am
Wait until Iran pops a nuk off later this week.
This administration is going to go nuts.
The ride is just starting boys and girls. You better buckle up.
Posted by: Mark | February 9, 2010, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Soooo….. When George Bush was prosecuting a war against Al Qaeda, criticizing everything he did was patriotic; it was the right thing to do. Now, if anyone criticizes President Obama, they are ‘helping Al Qaeda’.
The hypocritical and disingenuous nature of the Democratic Party is beyond belief, as is the bias of the mainstream media.
Posted by: TruthMonger | February 9, 2010, 10:27 am 10:27 am
The terrorists have already won.
Every little bit of our internet search history is scooped up and stored in massive archives.. all of the websites you visit are recorded… we have to arrive hours and hours early to airports before taking flights… our phones are wiretapped, and security cameras blanket every street corner – gas station – convenience store – and pizza shop.
Posted by: WilliamHaverstrawIV | February 9, 2010, 10:27 am 10:27 am
By the White House standard, doesn’t this mean that all the criticism from the Democrats and the Left when Bush was in charge mean that they were helping our enemies? For that matter, didn’t they help the North Vietnamese during that war? Didn’t the network press corps do the same thing?
Posted by: Bosco123 | February 9, 2010, 10:27 am 10:27 am
I keep hearing people say hurry up 2012. I say live it up before 2012.
As incompetent and deceitful as this administration has been, from deficits, to communist czars, to protection, we may not make it to 2012.
Posted by: Tex Taylor | February 9, 2010, 10:27 am 10:27 am
“Politically motivated criticism and unfounded fear-mongering only serve the goals of al-Qaeda.”
Oh, I get it. Criticizing the trying of a terrorist as a US citizen, giving miranda rights to a terrorist, closing down Gitmo where we can keep these terrorists actually serves the goals of terrorists but those actions do not. Unfounded fear-mongering my arse! We are living in opposite world now!
Posted by: Ron | February 9, 2010, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Maybe terrorists aren’t a hundred feet tall – but tell that to the victims of 9-11. Tell that to the men and women of Iraq, Afghanistan, Sudan, Indonesia, Yemen, Philippines, India, Spain, England, Israel and a host of other nations. WHat this administration is an abject failure at is recognizing the danger Islamo-fascist terrorism has. Obama has a world view that is created by his philosophy, whereas many of his critics have a philosophy shaped by events. I don’t care what Obama “thinks” I care about what he knows. Proof of what he “knows” is his ability to articulate that he doesn’t “know” everything. If he thinks that by disagreeing with him I am helping al-Quaeda he is proving that he “knows” little more than his predecessor who used the same idiotic argument. If this is truly what Obama thinks than he is not stemming the ranks of terror but actually building on the ranks.
Posted by: Robert | February 9, 2010, 10:28 am 10:28 am
This statemrnt shocked me back to the 50′s when I was a duck and cover kid, it sounds like a TASS press release written by the KGB from that era. The American people are not the enemy, radical Muslims are; focus on them not us .
Posted by: Mark | February 9, 2010, 10:28 am 10:28 am
I like our President. I think some of his policy decisions are worthless. But I believe he means well and could be great. But this spokesman deserves to fired!
It was OK for our current President to join with other Democrats in criticizing Bush when he had the job. And now that he is in the Hot seat wow! – if you criticize this president you are helping al-Qaeda.
We have freedom of speech in this country. No one has the power to take that away. There are many issues, the least of which is the STUPID decision by this administration to try foreign terrorists in the normal court system that should be complained about by any citizen.
Those folks who are helping al-Qaeda are those idiots in the administration who want to give these terrorist an open forum to spout their hate, a target for attacks in the middle of civilian-filled cities where these trials may happen, and a government that releases terrorists to return in triumph to their al-Qaeda friends as an example of how easy it is to attack us.
Posted by: Harnes | February 9, 2010, 10:28 am 10:28 am
“If you disagree with us, you are an Al Queda terrorist sympathizer.”
I didn’t write this…My post was much more colorful….the voice of the people and such.
Posted by: x32792 | February 9, 2010, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Once again, the Obama administration engages in doublespeak. Accusing their critics of help AQ, when in fact, their policies are actually doing more to help AQ. Specifics you ask? OK, how about trial for KSM in NYC? How about their dogmatic insistence that Gitmo gets closed even though it is the most cost effective and efficient way housing these folks? How about insisting on treating these folks as common criminals and giving them all the rights of an American citizen in our court system rather than as enemy combatants? How about the administration’s consistent and willful denial that events such as the panty bomber and the Ft. Hood tragedy are indeed terrorist attacks and should be treated as such? Etc, etc, etc.
These scoundrels in the current administration are unbelievable.
Posted by: Johnny Dangerously | February 9, 2010, 10:28 am 10:28 am
FEARmongering will only continue to result in more and more of our civil liberties being violated.
UBL is sitting in his posh digs, laughing his a$$ off right now reading the comments left by the jokesters on this article.
Posted by: DonnaKaranNY | February 9, 2010, 10:29 am 10:29 am
So we are bible thumping, gun toting, racist terrorists….nice
Posted by: Jason | February 9, 2010, 10:30 am 10:30 am
“Brennan writes that, “Terrorists are not 100-feet tall. Nor do they deserve the abject fear they seek to instill.”
umm, they killed 3000 innocent people that had no idea why they were even targeted. I say the have istilled terror. Plus, I would like to keep my head above my shoulders.
Brennan, you sir, are an IDIOT.
Posted by: Pobbi | February 9, 2010, 10:30 am 10:30 am
well! I guess that’s settled! The administration has Al Qaida on the run…um just like Iran. LOL..sheesh!
Posted by: Peter | February 9, 2010, 10:31 am 10:31 am
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
Posted by: JimBeam | February 9, 2010, 10:31 am 10:31 am
The Obama administration is providing the best recruiting tool. They are ruthlessly attacking innocent conservatives and independants. They should put their foreign policy theories into practice domestically. When you are criticized, do not retaliate, it only creates more terrori……errr….loyal opposition.
Posted by: natb1 | February 9, 2010, 10:31 am 10:31 am
the headline is wrong. it should read “critics: wh serving goals of al qaeda”.
Posted by: klr | February 9, 2010, 10:32 am 10:32 am
Look Jane Look, See The Neo-Cons And The Neo-Libs Fighting With Each Other. Run Spot Run, Get The Banksters, They Are Stealing Our Treasures. Come Sally Come, Help me Wake Up The Obamazombies And The Bushites. No Jane No, Put Down The Evil Game Of Divide & Conquer And Be A Real American. Yes Sally, Yes Jane, Yes Spot, There really Is A New World Order And America Is In Real Danger From The Demoncrats and The Repulicrats With Their False Diversions. They Don’t want Us To See Where The Real problems Are. They Only Know How To Fight With each Other And They Don’t Know That Both Sides Are Controlled By The Same People. The Neo-Cons And The Neo-Libs Have Merged Into One Entity. Yes Jane yes, Yes Sally Yes, Yes Spot Yes, It Does Suck.
Posted by: XPIOLT | February 9, 2010, 10:32 am 10:32 am
Does anyone here really think the CIA, FBI, the US military, are not doing every single dang thing they possibly can to prevent terrorist attacks? I mean, c’mon, seriously. Really. People who have made their entire careers, their entire lives even, in devotion to their service. Are they going to knowingly allow something bad to happen on their watch>>>>
On;y fools and knaves would think that our country is not doing everything possible to ensure our safety and security (did you know over sixteen F-15′s were on CAP’s – combat air patrols – over the super bowl this weekend? Or how many thousands of soldiers and police were mobilized from across the COUNTRY to protect the folks who bought tickets to the big game? Two decades ago that would have been unthinkable).
Posted by: Jill Brady | February 9, 2010, 10:33 am 10:33 am
The shoe bomber keeps popping up as an example of the past amin. reading terrorist there miranda right. At that time there was no Gitmo or Military Trials available. This whole argument is specious at best.
Posted by: paperpushermj | February 9, 2010, 10:33 am 10:33 am
Didn’t this argument go on during the Bush administration? The White House said that criticism undermined the nation and emboldened Al-Qaeda, while the democrats maintained they were free to criticize as they saw fit?
Funny how things go full circle. As it turns out, in their eyes, criticism of an administration at war is not so helpful (When your party runs the current administration).
They hypocrisy in politics defies all logic and common sense.
Posted by: WereTurtle | February 9, 2010, 10:33 am 10:33 am
Seems to me the Democrats vociferously criticized Bush’s efforts. Were they aiding and abetting al Qaeda? This logic says yes. Same old DOUBLE STANDARD demonstrated by the Democrats AND the mainstream media.
Posted by: Ariel | February 9, 2010, 10:34 am 10:34 am
Why is it if Bush did it must be terrible unless or when it serves their purposes for it not to be. Time for this group of amateurs to start taking responsibilites for their mistakes.
Posted by: Backliner | February 9, 2010, 10:34 am 10:34 am
I found it interesting that the other day we were wearned that we are certain to be hit again in the next 3-6 months. Yet, no instructions on what to do to prevent the attack. Nothing.
Classic case of what did they know and when did they know it and these morons have the nerve to say Bush allowed 9-11.
Google Alien and Sedition act of 1918. Very apparent we have traitors in this Administration.
Posted by: Pobbi | February 9, 2010, 10:35 am 10:35 am
If I hear the Richard Reid shoe bomber defense one more time, i.e. Bush arrested a terrorist and that was okay, blah, blah, blah, I think my head is going to explode. The fact is that that was then and this is now. Situations change and after eight years of the war on terror we, the people, just don’t want foreign terrorist brought to our country and given all the rights of an American citizen. We don’t want our tax dollars going to pay for their lawyers. We don’t want our taxes paying for a billion dollar New York trail. Obama and his idiot administration need to get a grip on reality. And, finally, BUSH IS NO LONGER PRESIDENT! WE DON’T CARE WHAT BUSH DOES OR DID! WE ONLY CARE ABOUT WHAT’S BEING DONE RIGHT NOW!
Posted by: John | February 9, 2010, 10:35 am 10:35 am
Ummm…ummmmm…ummmm…..yeah the critics of Obambie are helping Al-Queda..ummm..ummm..yeah right..cause you know…they are all for: Mirandizing terrorists, providing them civilian trials, blurting out to the world that the ball bomber is talking, talking to Iran and N Korea so as to understand them (kumbaya), prosecuting CIA agents engaged in protecting their country, tell the world how far the US will go to extract info for the purposes of national defense…yeah the critics sure are friends of Al-Queda..
Posted by: DeOppressoLiber | February 9, 2010, 10:36 am 10:36 am
Shame on ABC! I’m really! give me a break, what a disgrace! So anotherwords, support Obama and you will be fighting terrorism. ha ha ha ha make me freaking laugh some more.
Posted by: SHame_on_you_jack | February 9, 2010, 10:37 am 10:37 am
Another Obama appointee that needs to resign!!!
VOTE THE BUMS OUT THIS YEAR!!!!!
Posted by: dan | February 9, 2010, 10:37 am 10:37 am
here we go again. The WH telling us to SHUT UP and Follow like good little sheep.
Hey WH, you guys should have lightened up on Bush, Oh I forgot this is his fault to.
Here is what I know best, You have 3 years left, enjoy those date nights and golf games on my buck.
Posted by: Fran L | February 9, 2010, 10:38 am 10:38 am
Remember Hillary’s cry: “We have the right to criticize the President . . . blah blah blah?” Was Brennen on another planet during Bush administration?
Posted by: Elwood Baas | February 9, 2010, 10:39 am 10:39 am
Day after Day this administration and all its lackeys develop more and more arrogance. Do they even wonder why people have such gutter contempt for them? Like the Clown and Chief says…
Fired Up, Ready to GO? Yes we are sir…November we are so fired up and ready to go, that you truly will be able to kick back in your unbuttoned sport shirt, light up and camel and go play golf everyday….Your a lame President now, you’ll be a lame duck after November….you’ll be able to scratch you head and ask….What was all that about? If you could only stay off the media so we wouldnt have to go through the drama everyday with someone as thin skin and insecure as yourself. Do like the peanut farmer did…go to Plains, and fade away till its time to do volunteer work…
Posted by: JM | February 9, 2010, 10:39 am 10:39 am
this piece is a bunch of garbage and propaganda. we see through it, no one is buying it. Double standards abound! This Prez can’t handle the heat…where is the “gravitas”? The whole world sees him as weak and if he continues to whine at a little criticism then he has no leadership qualities at all. Imagine if Washington cried and whined everytime something was “hard”. good lord help us.
Posted by: Sheesh | February 9, 2010, 10:39 am 10:39 am
The Panty bomber is talking once again!!!!
WE brought his FAMILY in to help us get him to talk!!! He is SINGING like a a canary!!!!……..Incompetent fools
Posted by: dontdothat | February 9, 2010, 10:39 am 10:39 am
If anyone has weakened the USA’s security it’s this contencious and partisan administration. Siding with would be tyrants, bowing to other tyrants, mirandizing terrorists, failing to screen would be terrorists and apologizing to same doesn’t make for public confidence.
Arrogance and lack of experience are the hallmarks of the current administration. They can’t be replaced too soon.
Posted by: Walt K | February 9, 2010, 10:40 am 10:40 am
Guess the “everyone-who-criticizes-me-is-a-racist” line wasn’t trending well.
Posted by: Sharon | February 9, 2010, 10:40 am 10:40 am
To Astralweeks:”How can you be so stupid as to tell
your enemy where you intend to strike
in the new offensive in Afgan.”
When I saw those plans on my television, I had the same gut reaction! Like Jon Stewart said on Oreilly, “either this guy is playing chess on a 3 level chess board and he’s steps ahead” or he’s an idiot.
AFter I saw our military plans up on all the networks, proudly proclaiming our next moves, I’ll bank on idiot.
But, and I am not an Obama supporter, if our armies are fighting in the exact opposite zones 3 weeks from now, then Obama has learned to use media to trick our enemies. If so, then a hat tip to the rookie.
Posted by: Tim P | February 9, 2010, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Really? REALLY? You commenting idiots are going to take a Bush OR an Obama side? Really? WHEN, on God’s green earth, are you going to realize there is NO difference whatsoever. NONE. It’s all corrupt and we haven’t been a democratic society in decades. The economy is Bush’s fault, and Obama’s, but even more so Clinton and Reagan…NO DIFFERENCE. Bigger gov’t, bigger corporations and SLAVE LABOR. Welcome to the new millenium people.
Posted by: votarus4 | February 9, 2010, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Please, Obama and his miscreants are a bunch of liars and whiners!!! The clueless, delusional Obama is an inept, naive fool. He is destroying this great nation and setting us up for a huge terrorist attack. It will be on HIM – not the honest men and women in the FBI, CIA, NSA and the Military. He has done everything but send them a personal invite on WH stationary. He needs to be immpeached as a traitor.
Posted by: Allie F. | February 9, 2010, 10:42 am 10:42 am
What’s funny is the racist followers of Odumbo will all sit up straight in their chairs and say, “Yeah- stop helping the terriorists!”. Of course, room temperature Murtha never helped them nor Harry “The Living Dead” Reid when he declared, “The war is lost.” Or Nancy “Stretch” Piglosi. Rot in hell libs.
Posted by: Tom Jefferson | February 9, 2010, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Wow, just wow. These guys sure can dish it out but are now whining like toddlers. Have they forgotten how they (along with the New York Times) constantly fed and encouraged Al Qaeda during Bush’s presidency? Or perhaps they just hope WE have forgotten it. We haven’t.
Posted by: Virginia | February 9, 2010, 10:43 am 10:43 am
Reportedly, when Obama’s passport file at the State Department was breached in March before the 2008 presidential election, it was JOHN BRENNAN who headed the firm (The Analysis Corp.) that employed the breacher. According to a report by Kenneth Timmerman, the breacher “cauterized” Obama’s records of “potentially embarrassing information.” And what might that information have comprised? Surely nothing pertaining to Obama’s citizenship of whichever country (countries). /Sarcasm off
At that time, Brennan was an Obama campaign adviser. Does anyone think the Obama-Brennan relationship has changed since then, or that Brennan’s job is not to (allegedly) obscure Obama’s actions/history?
Posted by: ObamaWatcher | February 9, 2010, 10:43 am 10:43 am
Saul Alinsky would be soooooo proud of this administration. Following the playbook to the letter of the law
Posted by: STP | February 9, 2010, 10:43 am 10:43 am
We are supposed to assume that what the Obama Administration is doing in regard to terrorists is the correct thing to do. I will continue to critisize and do what I can do to unseat Obama as long as my lifestyle continues to deteriorate while he is in office. That includes any politician who believes that they can manage my life better than I can.
Posted by: ScottJonesIN | February 9, 2010, 10:43 am 10:43 am
So it was OK for the liberal progressive fascist Democrats to run their mouths for 8 yrs. but now criticism is unpatriotic. What a bunch of hypocrites.
Posted by: Fire Eater | February 9, 2010, 10:43 am 10:43 am
So let me get this straight – the democrats, the liberals, Hollywood and entertainment types criticized Bush from 9/12 and accused Bush of creating terrorist….and now criticizing the president helps the terrorists..????
What a wimp…what a sissy wimp this adminstration and democrats are! Get out of the kitchen and get out of the way…let someone with intelligence, common sense and a pair of cahones (None of which the current president has!) govern this great nation!!
Posted by: Michael | February 9, 2010, 10:44 am 10:44 am
There is no level of political hackery and chicanery that this bunch of incompetents won’t stoop to….
Coming soon to Dem porkbarrel spending…the John Murtha Memorial ABSCAM statue in his district and at a cost of only $111,000,000…of course
Healthcare failed thanks to Kennedy’s death; maybe this signals the end to Dem porkbarreling?…don’t hold your breath; he wasn’t anywhere near the biggest scumbag on that side of the aisle..
Posted by: freddy | February 9, 2010, 10:46 am 10:46 am
I’m really getting sick of all the stupidity coming from the White House and the Liberal media. Maybe if the idiots hadn’t placed an unqualified lying moron Hussein Obama in the White House wwe wouldn’t be having all these problems. Get rid of Obama and his commie czars and take our country back. Hussein Obama is the biggest threat this country is now facing.
Posted by: Ron | February 9, 2010, 10:46 am 10:46 am
The PANTY BOMBER should have been “WATER-BOARDED”, this is the POINT to this stooge Brennan. This man is a softball. We’re doomed.
Were are the MEN. This PANTY Bomber should have been tortured.
WHEN there is sanity on earth, then we should re-visit the ‘softball touch’ to terrorist handling.
Posted by: lipstick | February 9, 2010, 10:46 am 10:46 am
Gee – I guess Dems didn’t criticize Bush for all those years …
Posted by: Hover | February 9, 2010, 10:47 am 10:47 am
The WH is taking an interesting position on this – and one that should be watched with caution.
Logic 101 will confirm that IF Obama critics are helping terrorists, AND because helping terrorists is against the law, THEN people can be prosecuted for criticizing Obama.
Think that’s a stretch?! Watch and see.
Posted by: DRS | February 9, 2010, 10:47 am 10:47 am
Why is KSM being afforded American constitutional rights while predator drones operate on a presumption of guilt?
I agree with the newly elected senator from Mass., “We should spend our money on systems to defeat our enemies, not defense attorneys to protect them”. No wonder the ACLU wants to try all of our enemies! They want to get PAID!!
Posted by: natb1 | February 9, 2010, 10:48 am 10:48 am
I can’t believe that Obama is calling out his base like this. Is it good to attack Cindy Sheehan, Code Pink, ANSWER like this. They don’t seem to have a problem with Bushs war for oil now.
Lets see, Obama is attacking Pakistan Yehmen and is getting ready to start a big one with Iran. Obama makes Bush look like a flower child but us leftist will look the other way
Posted by: Steve | February 9, 2010, 10:48 am 10:48 am
Once again the WH is trying to act like they got everything covered when in fact they have nothing covered. Since Obama became Prez, He has tightened the rules of engagement to the point it is now costing more American soldiers lives not to mention the injured. The bad guys snipe us & all out fire on us then drop their weapons knowing our soldiers can’t fire back. Even when Bush was Prez, the ROE’s were ridiculous mainly because the bleeding heart Libs cried so much, & accused us of being the terrorists. Obama doesn’t even try to hide his support for the bad guys. Just look at what he has allowed since becoming CiC. Giving the terrorists rights as you would an American, stopping all military tribunals etc. h e ll, most of the Muslims really think Obama is one of them, & they know by this mans history, he will prosecute the American soldiers before he’ll do anything to the terrorists. If Obama would just allow our soldiers to do the job they are so well trained for,we would be much farther along… This oped is a joke ! ! ! If anyone is serving the goals of terrorists, it would be Obama & his cronies…that is indisputable, & this is why he is losing support by the day, & this is why 80% of the military isn’t supportive of him…
Posted by: GoldStarDad | February 9, 2010, 10:48 am 10:48 am
Thank you Rahm Emanuel… you truly are proving yourself a useful idiot… dispatching Brennan to USA a today with your homework in the form of an op-ed riddled with incendiary double talk and half truth’s… hold on America help is on the way!
COTUS see right through this administration’s true intent and there is nothing American about it!
We must hold the line on this administrations socialist agenda… Remember Virginia, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and (shortly with the passing of John Murtha) Pennsylvania.
Tic, Toc… November 2010 Cometh!
Posted by: COTUS | February 9, 2010, 10:48 am 10:48 am
I like our President. I think some of his policy decisions are worthless. But I believe he means well and could be great. But this spokesman deserves to fired!-posted by Harnes
——————-
Why fire the messenger? Do you think President Obama knew nothing about this op-ed?
Presidents use their aides and advisors and directors and whomever to release this stuff so they can remain ‘above it all’.
I have absolutely no doubt this came from President Obama and was released at his choice of time.
Posted by: malcat | February 9, 2010, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Osama and Obama have a great deal in common. Both seem to part of the Jihad on America!
Sorry White House – We will not go along with the destruction of our country.
WE THE PEOPLE, will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
This White House is hurting Americans more than any cowardly terrorist could ever dream of doing. Freedom, defense, economy and our children’s futures are being destroyed by these radical progressive communist traitors in the White House, Obama and his czars and insane progressives in Congress have an agenda that is anti American.
Posted by: Mickey 1776 | February 9, 2010, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Im a huge critic of this administration!
Come and get me.
What a bunch of LOSERS.
And Im not fully comfortable with calling them losers since it does not convey my entire disgust with them all.
Posted by: Dennis | February 9, 2010, 10:49 am 10:49 am
This administration is taking us back to pre 9-11 days. Eric Holder has no business getting involved with trying illegal combatants and giving them the rights of US citizens. If our soldiers are captured by these low life muslim radicals, they get a dull knife used to cut their heads off. Obama wants to befriend the terrorists and HE is playing into the hands of Al Qaeda and every other radical muslim terrorist organization. Remember, they want to infest every country in the world in order to take it over and we just want to play nice. No matter though, the Obama administration has already done more to destroy our country than any terrorist attack could ever do.
Posted by: NoMarxist | February 9, 2010, 10:50 am 10:50 am
aaaaaaaaauuuuuuuuuuuuggggggggggghhhhhh
HOW DARE THESE HYPOCRITICAL PIGS ON THE LEFT………7 YEARS OF BASHING BUSH WHEN WE WERE BEING BLOWN UP AND NOW THEY NEED SOMEONE TO BLAME FOR THEIR IGNORANCE….OBAMA IS LIKE CARTER, NEVER MET A TERRORIST HE DIDN’T LOVE…….
LISTEN BARRY YOU TOLD THE TERRORISTS EXACTLY WHEN WE WERE LEAVING THE WAR.
WITH BUSH THE PLANE BOMBER WOULDN’T HAVE BEEN ALLOWED ON THAT PLANE AND IF HE DID HE WOULD WAKE UP IN GITMO, NOT HAVE SKIN DRAFTS AND A LAWYER………..
AMERICA IS WATCHING, WE KNOW WHO IS ON THE TERRORISTS SIDE, YOU AREN’T CALLED COMMIES FOR NOTHING, YOUR DEEDS GIVE YOU AWAY LIBERALS AND MEDIA, YOUR DEEDS – WE QUIT LISTENING TO YOUR LIES….
Posted by: CATHERINE | February 9, 2010, 10:50 am 10:50 am
All Hail Obama!
All Hail the State!
Am I doing it right, Zip?
Posted by: JamesJ | February 9, 2010, 10:50 am 10:50 am
This adminstration is the biggest bunch of losers possible. BO just plain stinks it up. Almost everbody hopes he fails now.
Posted by: jjj | February 9, 2010, 10:50 am 10:50 am
“This war is lost!”
From “do We Want To Win?” 2006
“Their declamations further encourage the ferocity and turmoil, and contribute to OUR
casualties. It is sad irony that their “patriotism” contributes to OUR casualties, which, in
turn prompts more “patriotism” … and more casualties … and patently reiterates and
reinforces our internal lack of resolve … as the world turns and watches … many
foreign states with glee … as our internal cohesion disintegrates. [patriot = One who
loves his country and zealously supports its authority and interests (emphasis, mine).
Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary. 1936. How times have changed!]“
Posted by: E Brunson | February 9, 2010, 10:51 am 10:51 am
Whew! The Democrats sure don’t understand why they were elected… they are proving worse than Bush on just about every issue.
And oh, for those of you who felt indefinite detention and water boarding was inhumane… how about killing without warning in the middle of the night via remote control (i.e. 10x increase in the use of Predator Drones.) Is that humane?
It certainly solves the Guantanamo problem… if we take no prisoners we don’t have to house or try them!
The whole situation is dripping with irony… if only they had the honesty to recognize it!
Posted by: Karl Q | February 9, 2010, 10:52 am 10:52 am
Don’t all you good dimmocrats know that attacking your president is unAmerican and unpatriotic? Of course, attacking Bush was OK because he wasn’t YOUR president, was he?
Posted by: mastermind238 | February 9, 2010, 10:52 am 10:52 am
I guess the next step is for B.O. Plenty and his band of socialist idiots to come up with a new motto (a modern version of Sieg Heil)and to start teaching it to school children the next time the Messiah visits an elementary school with his teleprompters.
What a bunch of raving lunatics!
Posted by: AmericanInGermany | February 9, 2010, 10:52 am 10:52 am
I am reminded of when the Democrats were undermining President Bush every conceivable way possible, they insisted it was their patriotic duty to be the “loyal” opposition.
Remember when Nancy Pelosi and Dingy Harry declared that we had lost the war in Iraq? Remember the constant criticism that we were fighting the wrong war? We had the wrong strategy? Remember how the Democrats found nothing good to say about any of Bush’s policies?
But now that they are in power, criticism isn’t being the patriotic loyal opposition, but rather helping our enemies.
Well, what the heck were the Democrats doing for eight years during the Bush administration? What a bunch of hypocrites and cry babies.
Posted by: BMF | February 9, 2010, 10:53 am 10:53 am
What happened to the dissent is patriotic line the Liberals used under Bush? It seems to me that the Obama Administration are acting like spoiled children. If they don’t get “Their” way they pout and throw temper tantrums. It just displays the fact that Obama just isn’t ready for prime time. Take away the teleprompter and you have a know nothing, left wing, ideologue, with no business or military experience. He will be a one term President just like the second worst President in history, Jimmy Carter.
Posted by: Champsummers | February 9, 2010, 10:53 am 10:53 am
These lefties complain and whine about giving these terrorists “due process” in a civilian court.How is “due process” being served when they pronounce him guilty before the trial? Telling us not to worry because he would soon “meet his maker”. And WE are the ones making it political?!??!Where in the heck do they think they are going to find a “jury of his peers”, or an untainted jury pool? Isn’t that what a civilian trial calls for? These people are so ignorant and dangerous. 2012 may just come too late.
Posted by: heeee | February 9, 2010, 10:54 am 10:54 am
Obama wants us to call him a patriot for doing his job. But wait.. we were told that true patriotism was being critical when it was Bush doing his job.
I’ll tell you what I call Obamao.. hes a con man.. hes a weak sister.. a scrawny child-man.. a whiney socialist.. a thinker not a do’er.. everyone is afraid to tell him off.. liberals speak truth to power! I double dog dare you.. just do it.. unleash your inner screams.. treat Obama like you would Bush, press boys. He deserves it a lot more then Bush did. Speak now or forever hold your ideas to yourselves. Obama=fail…lmao
Posted by: Richard | February 9, 2010, 10:54 am 10:54 am
Brennon is an idiot. No one on the conservative side has ever said that the war is unwinnable, that we have lost in Iraq, that WE are the terrorists, that terrorism exists because we made them poor, etc. etc. Need I continue? Guys like Brennon don’t like to be criticized, don’t want to hear it, and will never believe that they are wrong about anything. He is a spoiled child just like almost every other person working in the WH today. Since when did dissent stop being the highest form of patriotism? Remember that old chestnut?
Posted by: mhrobson | February 9, 2010, 10:55 am 10:55 am
According to the MIAC report and HLS the American people are the real terrorist. Own a gun? Carry a pocket Constitution? Then you are a terrorist. Refuse to play Divide & Conquer? Have a Ron Paul bumper sticker? Then you are a terrorist. Home school your children? Protest against these illegal wars? Then you are a terrorist. Against this governments foreign policies? Then you are the terrorist! The Patriot Acts, the Veterans Disarmament Act, the Freedom Initiative Act, Body Scanners,FEMA Camps and Homeland Security etc are all for us! The Flu Pandemic was a hoax! The Bankster Bailout was a hoax! Global Warming is a hoax! 9/11 was an inside job! Al-CIAda is a hoax! When the hell are you idiots gonna wake up!
Posted by: XPIOLT | February 9, 2010, 10:55 am 10:55 am
Obama doesn’t like criticism. Typical narcisist. He does not make mistakes and can not understand why everyone does understand that everything he says or does is correct and the only way. What do we know? We just need to shut up, listen, drink the Kool-aide and follow this idiot mindlessly.
Posted by: Buck | February 9, 2010, 10:55 am 10:55 am
Installing them on OUR soil, and TRYING them in our courts, really encourages them.
Posted by: Mike | February 9, 2010, 10:55 am 10:55 am
Yawn.
Didn’t we hear this same line of BS from the BUSH administration?
Posted by: JerseyCity | February 9, 2010, 10:56 am 10:56 am
The “white house” (Obama) is attempting to vilify free speech. Make anyone that disagrees look like a bad guy. Pretty nasty of you Mr. Obama, pretty nasty. Vote him out!
Posted by: Reality | February 9, 2010, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Please help BO fail . He is ruining our country. Call your senators and reps and give them a piece of your mind. Google your rep or senator and call the toll free number and jamb the phones now.
Posted by: jjj | February 9, 2010, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Re-elect no one.
Posted by: jcrue | February 9, 2010, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Well well well – where were the “patriots” in the WH when GWB was President. Perhaps THEY were serving the interests of Al Qaida. It’s NOT that we think they’re 100 feet tall, you idiot. It’s that we believe you tie our soldiers hands behind their backs and force them into situations where they lose where they would normally win. And if it is so that a barbarian in a military trial gets “the same” treatment as in a civilian trial, why are there military trials in the first place? And more to the point – why didn’t you bring this up A LONG LONG LONG time ago? Answer: because you were either a lying weasel when you first made the decision or you’re a lying weasel now. Take your pick.
Posted by: Cleary | February 9, 2010, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Who can we blame now………….um um….aah…….um….Cheeny?
Um…. Let me be perfectly clear…..The problem was inherited from the previous administration. DC has a spending problem….that needs to be resolved. The deficit has grown under my watch……but that is due to my intentions to blame Bush and pass Pelosi’s pet projects. Since the Mass. voters……really never had a problem with me….I hear their anger.
As my administration moves forward with my agenda…….we will move towards deficit reduction. My office staff….at this moment….is working on new, low-cost ways of blaming Bush.
Oh, and I pledge to work for more bipartisianship……with the other party. Of course…with the full intention….of blamming them for my failed policies. I..want and deserve all the glory….as Americans recover despite government //…..my spending.
I um…. it was due to the past eight years of mismanagement from the previous administration so I will BLAME BUSH um um…. I mean Cheeny.
Posted by: Juan_One | February 9, 2010, 10:58 am 10:58 am
Bringing up reid is a typical canard. Reid’s attempt was in December of 2001, 3 months after 9-11. A time period way to early for any type of policy to have been considered and acted upon. After 8 years we know better now and their really is no excuse or reason to treat a terrorists in the same manner you treat a shoplifter.
As for critics serving the goals of al Queda…when does the investigation into the leaks from the State Departmnet to the New York Times of classified information during the Bush Presidency begin?
Posted by: kellyj | February 9, 2010, 10:59 am 10:59 am
Murtha’s criticism of the Iraq war intensified in 2006, when he accused Marines of murdering Iraqi civilians “in cold blood” at Haditha, after one Marine died and two were wounded by a roadside bomb.
When the left critisizes the Potus then it is considered patriotic……
Posted by: TRG | February 9, 2010, 11:00 am 11:00 am
IF THEY SPENT EVEN HALF of their time attacking our enemies, rather than the American public, maybe I could support them.
BUT THE FIRST TIME WE HEAR FROM THIS GUY. he’s call the public stupid. That is such a liberal way of thinking.
Posted by: MORONS ALL OF THEM | February 9, 2010, 11:00 am 11:00 am
Put a warfighter into Brennan’s position. Get rid of this politcal hack. Obama seems to be working hard to raise Jimmy Carter’s legacy above his own.
Posted by: Archie52 | February 9, 2010, 11:00 am 11:00 am
I’d feel safer if this administration wouldn’t put time deadlines on when we plan to withdraw. I’d feel safer if waterboarding terrorists was still being used. I’d feel safer if miranda rights weren’t given to non-citizen enemy combatants. I’d feel safer if terrorists weren’t turned back over to Yemen. The Obama administraton is WEAK!!! I’m not afraid because of the warnings, I’m concerned because of what the Obama administration is and isn’t doing. He gets EVERYTHING wrong!
Posted by: Tones | February 9, 2010, 11:00 am 11:00 am
I thought criticism was a sign of patriotism. At least that’s what Obama thought before November 2008. Oh, how things change. As for the important info gathered from the 30 minute interrogation of the Christmas bomber was his name, country of origin and the name of his new attorney.
Posted by: Duude | February 9, 2010, 11:01 am 11:01 am
Obama and most Democrats always support our enemies and actively fight against US interests. Obama is truly anti-American. For the “White House” to accuse anyone of helping the terrorist is quite hypocritical.
Posted by: Al | February 9, 2010, 11:02 am 11:02 am
I am reading the previous posts and it’s very sad that NO ONE can be objective here. It’s all partisan. I mean if anyone wants to have a logical discusion about what works and what doesn’t I would rather listen to the experts, thank you very much. The only thing we need to compare is the facts. Take the Reid “shoe” bomber and the Chrismast day “underwear” bomber. Compare how both cases were handled and then we can have an honest discussion of the facts, no spin. You guys are too political and when people are like that you can’t have an honest discussion with them. There may be things that Obama is doing that might not make us stronger in terms of fighting terrorist, and there may be things that Bush did that made us weaker. It’s better to say lets review the system and correct the wrongs but not to politicize every event. Totally interllectually dishonest!!
Posted by: Chuck | February 9, 2010, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Did any of you see ABC Evening News last night? …president meets with Democrats and “encourages”. In the very next breath, Republicans meet and “stir the political waters.”
If the president says it, Dianne’s heart skips a beat and if uplifted. If someone dare criticize or even question, they are trouble makers with evil motives.
So much for the honesty of “corporate” news media….
Posted by: Karl Q | February 9, 2010, 11:02 am 11:02 am
If I were the terrorists reading these comments I’d say we had done a good job weakening America. There are enough defeatists on the inside of the country wanting the President to fail that all we have to do is wait for them to prevail.
Posted by: bob | February 9, 2010, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Can you say paranoia? Will this be another Nixon presidency?
Posted by: Bob | February 9, 2010, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Ok, please correct me if Im wrong, but in military court dont you have to prove your innocence, whereas in civilian court your innocent until proven quilty. If I’m correct then there is a big differnce between the two courts Mr. Brennan!
Posted by: howard | February 9, 2010, 11:03 am 11:03 am
WH: “Some critics are serving the needs of al Qaeda… thanks for the help, but we have this covered already.”
Posted by: Royce | February 9, 2010, 11:03 am 11:03 am
“This administration’s efforts have disrupted dozens of terrorist plots against the homeland and been responsible for killing and capturing hundreds of hard-core terrorists, including senior leaders in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia and beyond — far more than in 2008.”
Clue…It’s Bush’s fault LOL
Posted by: Scott | February 9, 2010, 11:04 am 11:04 am
“Moreover, Brennan says, hundreds of terrorists have been convicted in criminal courts while only three have been convicted in the military tribunal system.”
That would be the very same Tribunal system that people like Brennan fought against so hard for the past 8 years forcing numerous delays and constraints…now he uses those very same delays/constraints to bolster his allegation that Tribunals are not effective.
Posted by: kellyj | February 9, 2010, 11:05 am 11:05 am
Gee. I remember when Hillary said she was ‘sick and tired of those who disagree with this administration being called un-American’.
Whatever happened to that, Democrats???
Posted by: Bob N | February 9, 2010, 11:05 am 11:05 am
You know, it used to be, back under GW Bush, that criticizing the President was a “patriotic duty”. It used to be that if you were not with us you were with the terrorists, and Democrats wholly embraced the concept of not being with us. They used every tool to politicize terrorism, plead for mercy on behalf of those who had attacked us or approved of attacking us. And now that they hold the reins, they say that the Right is undermining their efforts by criticizing. What absolute hypocrisy. If you can’t take it, don’t dish it out.
Posted by: Tony | February 9, 2010, 11:06 am 11:06 am
Globally the POTUS is loved by many and feared by NONE!!!
Yes Yes Yes, he and most Dems are DELUSIONAL. Just add it to the list of Obamas first year of “You LIE” administration……!
1. “will not sign any non-emergency bill without giving the American public an opportunity to review and comment on the White House website for five days.” then violates that in his first month in office.
2. “no more pork in the bills that I will sign,” then signs the 787 billion stimulus with 9297 plus pork projects added.
2a. “we must hurry and pass the monumental 787 billion stimulus bill so that unemployment will not go over 8%,” really…. unemployment has peaked at 10.2 percent and is currently at an adjusted rate of 17% or 10% unadjusted. Looks like it will jump up higher for Jan 2010 (can’t wait for the millions and millions of jobs created and saved rebutal speech again).
3. “lobbyist will not influence legislation,” then makes health care deals with big pharma, insurance companies, hospitals, medical device companies, AMA, AARP, unions, etc plus sweet heart deals with unwilling senators and congressmen.
4. “I guarantee you can keep your current Insurance if you like,” if you believe this God help you.
5. “negotiate health care reform in public sessions televised on C-SPAN,” who knew?
6. “I will close Guantanamo Bay in one year” still waiting.
7. “we’ll eliminate the no-bid contracts that have wasted billions in Iraq,” in January awarded a $25 million no-bid contract for work in Afghanistan to a company owned by a Democratic campaign contributor.
8. “I will barr people who were paid lobbyists from serving as administration offiials” over a dozen individuals currently employed by hs administration.
9. “allow bankruptcy judges to modify terms of a home mortgage,” thousands each month are losing their homes without a single judge ordered modification.
10. “I will give annual State of the World address,” this is when he believed he was the “chosen one” and now he is loved by many globally and feared by NONE!
11. “recognize the Armenian genocide,” forgot to mention because he became dizzy after bowing to the Saudi King on his 1999 middle eastern “apology tour”.
With his lack of confidence and experience he continues on playing the blame game. Costantly refers the the past 8 years when trying to defend his failed polocies from his critics. Then claimes, “people still upset for the past 8 years and, thats why they made changes in voting for Scott Brown”. So the understanding is the Mass voters were so angry at Bush they decided to vote for another Rep …. makes logical sense if you a drone Dem
The #1 concern for most all Americans is JOBS JOBS and more JOBS. Why do the Dems refuse to acknowledge this FACT? Its about control and power (tyranny), that’s why they have put the cart before the horse by pushing for Health Care legislation!!!!
To all you Dems, Libs, and Progressives let it be know that the American sleeping giant has been awakened and he likes TEA parties plus people who drive American made pick-up trucks.
Get ready for the Dem motto for all elections this year, “when in doubt BLAME BUSH”!!
Posted by: Juan_One | February 9, 2010, 11:06 am 11:06 am
“WH: Some Critics ‘Serving the Goals of al Qaeda’”
Hmm, that’s peculiar. That’s what a lot of us think about the occupant of the White House too.
Posted by: BigDaddyDK | February 9, 2010, 11:07 am 11:07 am
Sounds like they’re thanking the “Critics”.
Posted by: Monty | February 9, 2010, 11:07 am 11:07 am
Oh, but it was perfectly fine to do it when Bush was in office.
Is there anything at all that these guys “get”?
How obvious could it be that Americans just want you to fix the jobs situation. It doens’t take a morin to figure out that ervything else will get better once you do that.
As for Terrorism, the O team has no clue.
Posted by: franktalk | February 9, 2010, 11:10 am 11:10 am
It’s downright laughable that this President and his lackeys who spent an entire campaign making false promises and blaming Bush for everything while ignoring the fact that he was in the Congress that got us into the mess can’t handle any critisizm at all without pointing the finger at someone else.
Furthermore, now to critisize the handling of a Nat’l Security matter is to be a traiterous alqueda sympathizer.
These people have no shame nor honour.
Posted by: charleston | February 9, 2010, 11:10 am 11:10 am
ouch. if i don’t agree with chairman obama, then i’m an al Quaeda supporter?
Posted by: Joseph Chainpuller | February 9, 2010, 11:10 am 11:10 am
Since it’s on the record, the media should fact check and report on Brennan’s statement that “hundreds of terrorists have been convicted in criminal courts.” Is he speaking historically or over the past several years? When figures such as these are announced, the media have a responsible to research the numbers.
Posted by: ivoteny | February 9, 2010, 11:10 am 11:10 am
How come he didn’t blame Bush?
Posted by: McMal1bu | February 9, 2010, 11:12 am 11:12 am
These people are scary, they call you a terrorist sympathizer if you speak out against their socialist agenda.
They’re more concerned with putting their own citizens in place than anything else.
Posted by: Mike | February 9, 2010, 11:12 am 11:12 am
When you think about it the Republicans are just a bunch of HATERS AND HYPOCRITES!! STOP LISTENING TO TALK RADIO AND READ SOMETHING OTHER THAN AN ARTICLE WRITTEN BY A CONSERVATIVE WRITTER. YOU MIGHT ACTUALLY LEARN SOMETHING.
Posted by: Jon | February 9, 2010, 11:14 am 11:14 am
Laughable and sad at the same time. This from an administration that does not even utter the word “Terrorist” or “the war on terror”. After all Ft. Hood was a “man caused disaster” wasn’t it. Let me get this straight, the man who wants to bring KSM to NYC for trial, gives miranda rights to AL Qaeda and other terrorists, fly over the pit that used to be the WTC for a photo op causing a panic in Manhattan, bows to Saudi kings among others, befriends known (Ayers and Bernadine)terrorists and dictators (Hugo Chavez), Wants to close Gitmo, Issued a report on Ft. Hood never mentioning islamic terrorism, Want’s to prosecute CIA and other intel people for interrogating Al Qaeda,Allows a court martial of Navy Seals because they punched a known terrorist in the face who hung Americans off a bridge in Fallujah,Gave up a missile shield to protect our troops and Europe from Iran or other rogue regimes and received nothing for it, interrogated the underwear bomber for 50 minutes and then told us “the system worked”, told us in March or April of 2009 that he had set the policy for Afghanistan then only months later changed the policy, this occured only after the military had to wait for Obama to come down from the mountain carrying two tablets with the new policy, announced publicly timelines on withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan so our enemies can simply wait us out and on and on and on. After all that why should we the American people doubt this administrations will to fight terrorism.
This is what happens when you hire the man handing out the towels in the mens room to run the restaurant.
p.s. is it 2012 yet ?
Posted by: Chains We Can Believe IN | February 9, 2010, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Freedom of Speech will soon be taken away….
WHAT ON EARTH is his agenda.
What planet are these people representing?
Dictators NEED to control everything.
Seems he has plenty of work …
He needs to GO TO WORK and stop SEPERATING our NATION.
Posted by: Peace | February 9, 2010, 11:16 am 11:16 am
The critics are simply following the precedent set by the critics of the last president. I hope they enjoy trying to fight a war when half the country is against you, I know the previous president got to enjoy that….
If the current batch doesn’t like this
pressure, perhaps they shouldn’t have set the precedent that they did?
Posted by: DookyHH | February 9, 2010, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Our Obama, who art in the White House, annointed by thy name…
Mmmm, mmmm, mmmm. Barrack Hussein Obama. Mmmm, mmmm, mmmm…
My country ’tis of me, Obama’s all you see…
There. Is that better?
Posted by: D. Stovall | February 9, 2010, 11:16 am 11:16 am
WHERE IS OBAMA? When one of his dim-witted bureaucrats can’t seem to know when they should keep their mouths closed and stop adding to the injury they are doing to America, Obama is no where to be found. Instead now we will have to hear from his stooge Gibb again.
Posted by: Walter | February 9, 2010, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Obama’s BIG MISTAKE is closing Guantanamo Bay and giving terrorists miranda rights in a civil court in the United States. He is giving the terrorists a platform to the world for venting their attitudes and recruiting more terrorists to do what the Koran instructs . . . kill infidels. Gitmo was pl;aced there for a very good reason. Obama doesn’t get it!!
Posted by: Shearwater | February 9, 2010, 11:18 am 11:18 am
The next time you have the opportunity of electing someone who can read from a teleprompter but who has less EXPERIENCE than the neighborhood girl scout selling lemonade at MANAGING anything, STOP, i repeat STOP and THINK about what you’re doing !!!!!!! This BOZO is at a TOTAL LOSS. The DUMMY thinks he’s still campaigning. You got elected, try and lead
Posted by: wildbill6996 | February 9, 2010, 11:18 am 11:18 am
What Brennan is whould be labeled a political hack. He was in charge of the same position under the Bush administration, but passes blame for his own poor performance. This has turned into a common scheme to make those you didn’t support look bad and those you do support look better (AKA the Chris Mathews syndrome). Act II is just a rerun of Act I. Only a slight change in cast of political hacks and propaganda machine paints it as something new and improved. Success and failure are now a partisan perspective based on the direction of criticism.
Posted by: MeanJeap | February 9, 2010, 11:19 am 11:19 am
Helping terrorists? Helping terrorists would be to support civilian trials for these bums.
Posted by: snowcloud | February 9, 2010, 11:19 am 11:19 am
I’m surprised that Janet Napolitano didn’t respond instead of Brennan. After all the system worked. Qualifying the follow through with “we need to lectures” sounds like an open wound. Especially sensitive to incompetence which is being highlighted by the WH themselvse.
Posted by: Calvin Hobbes | February 9, 2010, 11:20 am 11:20 am
Well, he might be right. But on the other hand, the current critics have a point that the people now in the White House were not at all capable of holding their tongues over the previous 8 years, so they are no doubt now getting the type of support from their political adversaries that they asked for. Get real, Mr. Brennan.
Posted by: ttj | February 9, 2010, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Chuck. Your speech was nice. But you miss the point. If someone is lying and continues to lie, how can you have an objective discussion sith that? And if you say they (Obama, Brennan, Gibbs) aren’t lying, then you are and this discussion is over.
Posted by: Walter | February 9, 2010, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Oh c’mon. All you right wing f a c i s t s would have accused ANYONE who criticized president Bush of being traitors. And yet…it’s okay to complain about EVERY SINGLE THING the predsident does…even when he does it right.
I dunno, your false indignation grows old after awhile…you guys are starting to sound like a one-trick pony with an obsession to destroy all those who disagree with you…including the president.
Gee, sound familiar? Maybe we should start calling you al-Republicas.
Posted by: clist | February 9, 2010, 11:21 am 11:21 am
The real information in this story is how the WH thinks the American people are so stupid they don’t remember any of the antics the DemocRATS pulled.
That Superbowl commercial about the ECO Police is not just fantasy folks. It is efin scary and not above these people. Just check out the COPS program under the Dept of Justice funded to the tune of $1 billion dollars. No joke. If that doesn’t get your attention nothing will. How long until neighborhood units are setup?
Posted by: Ken | February 9, 2010, 11:21 am 11:21 am
So what’s next arresting everyone who criticizes the president?
Posted by: Lynn | February 9, 2010, 11:22 am 11:22 am
Where was OBAMA when the democrats were blasting Bush on the wars? I tell you where he was, he was right there in the middle of the liberal, progressive(or whatever they call themselves) onslaught against Bush and all for political game. So, the Obama crowd should just get the job done and shut up about the criticism, which many think is well deserved.
Posted by: Rockychance | February 9, 2010, 11:22 am 11:22 am
Priceless criticism from the Whitehouse.
By this logic Al Qaeda should have attacked us repeatedly from 2001 to 2008 under the Bush Administration years.
What ever happened to Free Speech rights?
Posted by: Mike Short | February 9, 2010, 11:23 am 11:23 am
“Dissent is the highest form of patriotism.”
–Hillary Clinton
“Only if you’re not dissenting against me.”
–Barack Obama
Posted by: TeapotTempest | February 9, 2010, 11:23 am 11:23 am
“The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the presidency. It will be easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails us. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president.”
Posted by: MDScott | February 9, 2010, 11:24 am 11:24 am
THIS ENTIRE ADMINISTRATION IS “AMATEUR HOUR” !
OBAMA HAS BEEN A COLOSSAL MISTAKE.
Posted by: jamie | February 9, 2010, 11:25 am 11:25 am
Just wait till the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians who lost loved ones start “serving the goals of Al Qaeda”.
If our leaders had any intelligence they’d of just ignored Al Qaeda like the attention seeking children they are, instead – just like a bad parent – they play right into their hands with lots of attention, showing them clearly how they can get more attention: more attacks!
Posted by: John | February 9, 2010, 11:26 am 11:26 am
Brennan states that the feds received useful information from the Christmas Bomber after he was read his Miranda rights, obviously in an attempt to justify giving the terrorist the same rights as a common criminal. The so called useful information came days if not weeks later. The reality is that in hours after the terroist is known by his handlers to have been in custody they close bank accounts, destroy computors, erase the trail and all this is lost as a result of misguided administration policies. The information may have been useful but unfortunately too late. Now Chuck characterize this as a partisan acccount.
Posted by: RALOREE | February 9, 2010, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Mr. Brennan, perhaps you should counsel your boss regarding ‘politically motivated comments’ when addressing national security issues…I* never heard you or him complain when the NYT published classified information AFTER Pres Bush asked them to desist.(It is very difficult when you are on the recieving end, eh?
Posted by: doctor sam | February 9, 2010, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Discent is the highest form of patriotism.
Posted by: Dean | February 9, 2010, 11:28 am 11:28 am
The snow job in Washington continues. Any opposition is UN AMERICAN, no one but the democrats know what is best. A good example is the healthcare proposal. The Republicans and the majority of American says no and they stick their heads in the sand and move ahead without us. Then they tell us we are the ones who have a problem. This includes Homeland Security. This administration is more of a danger to us than terrorists!! They are destroying us from within. I thought our government was supposed to work for us but Obama & Chicago politics think we work for them.
Posted by: Ray | February 9, 2010, 11:28 am 11:28 am
MAYBE OBAMA SHOULD USE A WEBSTER DICTIONARY WITH AUDIO PRONUNCIATIONS…. ALONG WITH HIS TELEPROMPTER.
“CORPSE-MAN”
Posted by: jamie | February 9, 2010, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Me thinks that the WH is thinned skin. Mum should have been the word from Gibbs. Earth to the WH….Just do the freaking job and shut the heck up. Whining might just be your favorite color.
The man-child needs to control his children.
Posted by: Loadmaster | February 9, 2010, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Let’s see how many people jump on the misspelling. :-)
Posted by: Dean | February 9, 2010, 11:29 am 11:29 am
The groups actually helping terrorists are all far left organizations like Code Pink, ACLU, SEIU, ACORN, Greenpeace, IPCC and Al Gores Green police, oh, and Hollywood. Traitors the lot!
Posted by: vitamin v | February 9, 2010, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Critics of the almighty obama admin are’Serving the Goals of al Qaeda’? Have any of you freaking demonicrats paid attention to what you were saying during the Bush administration? You people are bloody hypocrites! YOU, the liberals, the demonicrats, or more accurately neomarxists are in bed with these terrorists.
Posted by: Arnold Ziffle | February 9, 2010, 11:31 am 11:31 am
Just keep quiet please and show mw the birth certificate
Posted by: Teaparty01 | February 9, 2010, 11:31 am 11:31 am
Yeah but…there have been 3 terrorist attacks since Obabble took office. There were none after President Bush dealt with the problem following 9/11. What does that say about the Babble Administration ?
Posted by: Ron | February 9, 2010, 11:32 am 11:32 am
They are bragging how good they interrogated this guy. He should not have even made it to the plane. If not for other passengers he still might have brought the plane down in a ball of fire. Sick of this whitehouse spinning everything. Just trying to cloud the fact their intelligence system dropped the ball using a non-issue.
Posted by: sellmygmshares | February 9, 2010, 11:32 am 11:32 am
First time I ever laughed out loud at a headline.
Posted by: Bill in Scottsdale | February 9, 2010, 11:32 am 11:32 am
So are the Dems admitting that THEY served the Goals of al Qaeda everytime they critized Bush?
Posted by: Mike | February 9, 2010, 11:33 am 11:33 am
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
Gee, I thought dissent was the truest form of patriotism. Hope and change? No change, not for the better, anyway, and hope is not a plan.
Get rid of Brennan, he does not belong in his job. Neither does his boss, but we have to wait to 2012 to vote him out.
Posted by: Tom in NY | February 9, 2010, 11:33 am 11:33 am
It’s patriotic to protest.
Remember?
Posted by: Andy | February 9, 2010, 11:33 am 11:33 am
One non productive year blaming Bush 43 for the ills of the planet is long enough! NOBAMA!
Posted by: fred kirby | February 9, 2010, 11:35 am 11:35 am
“The “white house” (Obama) is attempting to vilify free speech. Make anyone that disagrees look like a bad guy. Pretty nasty of you Mr. Obama, pretty nasty. Vote him out!”
The funniest part in that is that is exactly what Bill O’Reilly was saying about people criticizing Bush’s decisions when he was president.
You support the president in time of war, to do otherwise is treason, unAmerican and aiding the enemy. Was Bill’s exact mantra then….
Now, he and Fox News are criticizing EVERY move Obama makes and completely forgetting the past.
It really is funny when you think about it.
Posted by: John | February 9, 2010, 11:36 am 11:36 am
Gee – I guess you’re only a “racist” if you disagree with BHO’s domestic leadership/policies but if you state a disagreement with his handling of the “war on terror” you are a “terrorist”…this is from a university Constitutional law professor.
Posted by: JLV | February 9, 2010, 11:36 am 11:36 am
If the goal of the terrorists is to reduce America to a third-world has-been world power then it is this administrations’s misguided policies that are in league with them, not the critics merely pointing out that fact.
Posted by: IOpian | February 9, 2010, 11:37 am 11:37 am
I remember a formal Republican POTUS with the initials GW getting BBQ’ed in the MSM for saying the same thing…my, how times have changed…wonder what will happen when Israel brings out the heavy lumber?
Posted by: BlackJack06 | February 9, 2010, 11:38 am 11:38 am
when bin laden/al qaeda THEMSELVES got on video tapes stating that the demoncrats were the “party of al qaeda” I believed it. Demoncrats have invited terrorism and caused deaths in iraq/afghanistan for YEARS when Bush was in office with their constant lies and bashing. We all know who the real weak, evil, terrorist inviting folks are, the ones who give them US CITIZEN RIGHTS and TAX PAYER PROVIDED defense lawyers. What a joke.
Posted by: dave c | February 9, 2010, 11:38 am 11:38 am
Obama, Brennan are blaming us since instead of Bush. These guys are nutsy coo coo.
Posted by: Ray | February 9, 2010, 11:38 am 11:38 am
Now wait a minute! We Dems have been on the same page as Al Qaeda for years. We bash America like our Al Qaeda brothers do and now the credit goes to our critics….That’s unfair! Give credit where the credit is due….to US!
Posted by: Al_Gore | February 9, 2010, 11:38 am 11:38 am
That’s funny. Everybody called Bush a “fear-mongerer” for saying the same thing.
Posted by: Mike | February 9, 2010, 11:39 am 11:39 am
First I was a racist, now I’m a traitor?
Posted by: dbski4it | February 9, 2010, 11:39 am 11:39 am
“I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you’re not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration.”
- hillary clinton
Posted by: Andy | February 9, 2010, 11:40 am 11:40 am
WHAT BS! They can hear the people disagreeing with them on their ridiculous, liberal ways they are trying to “fight” this WAR against the terrorists. They didn’t even want to use the word WAR….REMEMBER?????
But none of these fools can hear anyone of the majority of Americans who are telling them “KEEP YOUR HANDS OFF MY HEALTHCARE”. Go figure.
Posted by: DJSGT | February 9, 2010, 11:40 am 11:40 am
The dems oughta know, they spent 8 years helping Al Qaeda. The democrat party put power above country and actively undermined the Bush administration’s war effort. They are getting nothing of the kind from Republicans, who are mutedly criticizing the weakest areas of Obama’s defense strategies. The modern democratic party makes me sick.
Posted by: Akbar Zeb | February 9, 2010, 11:40 am 11:40 am
There are hundreds of editorials and news stories every day, some criticizing the president, and others complementing him. If the White House spends all of its time reacting to critical stories, how can it get anything done. Does anyone remember any previous president in history so thin-skinned that they have to defend themselves over any criticism? Can you imagine Bush reacting to every critical article? This guy is paranoid and a danger to our country.
Posted by: JCIll | February 9, 2010, 11:40 am 11:40 am
Obama et al are cowards. This Brennan dude is low class!!! Get back to the oval office and shine some more boots.
Posted by: Kim Estrada | February 9, 2010, 11:41 am 11:41 am
The depth of the stupidity in almost all the comments on this story is astounding.
Fox News drones… keep drinking the kool-aid.
Us thinking people are getting quite a laugh.
Posted by: John | February 9, 2010, 11:41 am 11:41 am
1. If you look like prey, you are.
2. Don’t look like prey.
3. Kill your adversary with no remorse, and with efficient ruthlessness
Simple rules that would negate all this terrorism crap.
Posted by: j6p | February 9, 2010, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Brennan must have slept through the Bush era.
John @ 11:26, We actually could defeat al Qaeda by treating them as outlaws (in the original “outside the protections of the law” sense), if we had the political will to do so.
We don’t.
That means we have to use the military.
Posted by: Phillep Harding | February 9, 2010, 11:42 am 11:42 am
Many Americans believe that THIS ADMINISTRATION IS AL-QUEDA!
Posted by: Arcy | February 9, 2010, 11:42 am 11:42 am
Can a man who needs a teleprompter when speaking to sixth-graders really be counted on to defend us????
Posted by: Arcy | February 9, 2010, 11:44 am 11:44 am
What scum. After “This War Is Lost”, “The surge has failed” and all the rest — the unmitigated gall of these Democrats is staggering, yet not surprising.
Get your “RECYCLE ALL INCUMBENTS” and other great stickers and gear at keep2theright.com
Posted by: StephenRex | February 9, 2010, 11:45 am 11:45 am
Now, look. It was just a few days ago when OBL released his ‘algorant’, an executive shortening of ‘Al Gore rant’.
During the diatribe, OBL espressed fealty with the ideas of the far, kooky Left Wing U.S. DeamonRAT Party.
So, let’s not confuse ourselves with this. OBL is HAPPY as a claim with the DeamonRATS, NOT the ReBoobs.
Posted by: Dandy Man | February 9, 2010, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Wild. ABC News is heavily biased to the left, yet most of the posts I’ve read are from people who disagree with “American Broadcasting Corp’s” politics.
Gee, I wonder why ABC News keeps losing viewers?
Posted by: Phillep Harding | February 9, 2010, 11:47 am 11:47 am
Now wasn;t this the same gang that said it was patriotic to be a critic of the Bush administration, but now you are helping the enemy if you are a critic of Obama? And the drive by media like ABC, NBC and CNN actually help by putting out stories in a fashion that favors the anointed one! What a bunch of thnned skinned, spineless, weak bunch of jelly fish the Obama administration and the Democrats( excuse me – communinsts) really are!
Posted by: dawg9999 | February 9, 2010, 11:47 am 11:47 am
John, there is a major difference between a White House official blasting critics of the administration and a political commentator doing it. If you can’t understand that difference you are a very confused person.
Posted by: JCIll | February 9, 2010, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Blah blah blah
These babies can’t take criticism, although they were pros at dishing it out.
Posted by: Steve | February 9, 2010, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Al-qaeda could really give a damn about political bickering between the banker’s stooges. They are above that. Thankfully, so are those who protect us from them.
Posted by: heatherfeather | February 9, 2010, 11:48 am 11:48 am
It really is amazing as I don’t remember Bush ever criticizing the ones who were constantly criticizing him. But if you say one thing against Obama and/or his administration, then you are automatically a racist, unamerican, a tea-bagger, a right-wing extremist, or now serving the goals of al-qaeda. Whatever happened to freedom of speech. This administration is retarded.
Posted by: Jose | February 9, 2010, 11:49 am 11:49 am
What a joke this guy, Barrack Hussein Obama is. He doesn’t get his way and he whines and cries and blames George W. and all others before him.
A pathetic anti-American joke!
Posted by: HiPlainsDrifter | February 9, 2010, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Barack Hussein Obama is trying to distract everyone from questioning his impotence towards Iran.
Posted by: None | February 9, 2010, 11:51 am 11:51 am
The military justice system can save us millions of taxpayer dollars because they are already on the payroll and do not make a fortune in litigation. As Carville would say ” It’s The Cost Stupid !”
Posted by: Rhinobuster | February 9, 2010, 11:51 am 11:51 am
This guy, Brennen, was a failed Operations Officer at the CIA who was promoted above his level of competence to be a Chief of Station, and now he is WAAAAYYY out of his element in the White House. But then, he fits right in with all those other morons in the White House who are totally and completely incompetent, including the President.
Since Obama is only interested in Domestic Policy, it it any wonder the vacuum he has created by ignoring Foreign Affairs is being criticized? The “son of an unmarried woman” is clearly incompetent in all that he has undertaken.
Posted by: HMichaelH | February 9, 2010, 11:52 am 11:52 am
this moron may not be able to pronounce corpseman but he sure can say klansman.
Posted by: tireofkuhn | February 9, 2010, 11:52 am 11:52 am
They killed more AQ leaders in 2009 Bush killed in 2008, and 2007 too I suppose
Let’s see now, WHERE and WHEN did the
O’ Admin develope the Current Drone
System, must have been during the 08
Campaign, ore es that Campane, Corpse?,
Core?, Koar?, Whatever, facts do not
MATTER!
Posted by: Apeon | February 9, 2010, 11:52 am 11:52 am
Great article. The Obama administration calls enemies anyone who doesn’t go along with their agenda. Obama blames Bush and the American people while apologizing to every country he visits that we’ve done all wrong!
Our administration needs a wake up call.
Posted by: Ruth | February 9, 2010, 11:52 am 11:52 am
how pathetic and thin skinned can an administartion be? when you apologize to the world for being an american you are going to be abused by those you suck up to.america is the best country in the world bar none.please quit trying to tear us down.
Posted by: catman | February 9, 2010, 11:53 am 11:53 am
Hmmm…I wonder if the White House remembers this one? “Don’t you dare challenge MY patriotism.”
Posted by: CPLUSMC | February 9, 2010, 11:53 am 11:53 am
Everything that happens in DC would be hilarious …..IF IT WAS HAPPENING IN ANOTHER COUNTRY! Sadly, no, tragically, it is happening in ours. We do a lot of things pretty well in this country, but choosing our leaders is not one of them.
There are two wings of one ruling party in our country. One of them likes big government at home and pretends to dislike it abroad, and the other likes big government abroad and pretends to dislike it at home.
As long as they can continue to convince us to pick one of the two sides and spend our time calling each other names, liberty and prosperity will continue to vanish out of our pockets and into the pockets of the ruling class. (I know, the “liberty in a pocket” picture doesn’t work very well, but you get my point….)
Posted by: mark | February 9, 2010, 11:54 am 11:54 am
On ABC “This Week” regarding the botched interrogation of Abdul Mutalabb, John Podesta said “the proof is in the pudding” because now the underwear bomber is talking.
Podesta is misguided but I agree that the proof is in the pudding.
The pudding has been rotting on the table for five weeks! Now, Thanks to these buffoons it’s worthless, we have to throw it out.
We’re at war with Islamic terrorists who are hell bent and wanting to kill us.
And when you have confused lawyers and law professors who can’t tell the difference between fresh pudding and five week old pudding, of course, you’re going to see a growing percentage of Americans who are fed up of with confused lawyers.
More and more Americans are longing for a Commander in Chief who can think on his feet and quickly make the right decisions on national security.
Posted by: Rodney | February 9, 2010, 11:54 am 11:54 am
Senator Bond: Don’t back down by being put on the hate list!
Posted by: coach3 | February 9, 2010, 11:56 am 11:56 am
I dont recall the Bush administration crying about being attacked politically when dems trashed Bush during the height of the Iraq and Aphgan war. Now THAT was serving the goals of terrorists. The hypocrisy of the dems is sad. Now they are complaining about the very thing they did daily to Bush on the senate floor. I recall dem leadership calling Bush a loser, and saying the war is lost. Im sure terrorists loved those statements.
Posted by: Spedrow | February 9, 2010, 11:58 am 11:58 am
How does it feel Obama?
You left wingers spent the whole Bush Admn fighting every move they tried to make for our security.
You definitely helped the terrorists while Bush had to fight them with one are and fight you with the other.
Posted by: mmagdillon | February 9, 2010, 11:58 am 11:58 am
At least the Bush admin never told us that being critical was helping terrorists.
Posted by: JF | February 9, 2010, 11:59 am 11:59 am
This is laughable. These twits raised a fortune by criticizing Bush.
What hypocrites!
Posted by: fred | February 9, 2010, 11:59 am 11:59 am
You don’t need a lecture? Well, you certainly need a vast amount of reason that you obviously are severely missing in your decisions. Maybe you all need to resign. Maybe we as a country need to hold another Presidential election. Let’s see if what we really need is just simply new leadership. It would be a LANDSLIDE!
Posted by: Pointer | February 9, 2010, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
Brennan should resign immediately. In fact, all Obama appointees should resign forthwith. These are the same morons that called Bush a baby killer. These are the same people that accused Bush of playing politics with people’s lives. These are the same fools that called Bush a liar for 5 years. What gives them the right to play hypocritical games like this?? You have to be a grown up to govern. Keep your foul “hope and change”. I reject it.
Posted by: Jay Johnson | February 9, 2010, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
We’ll I know for a fact there is some truth in that one. When the Oklahoma City building was blown up I watched a guy get excited about it. When they were carrying the babies out he said that’s where you have to hit them. Couldn’t believe what I was hearing. His beliefs, hard religious right republican. Guess he wasn’t so pro life that day.
Posted by: rightbehind | February 9, 2010, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Wow…how quickly we forget. Does anyone remember all the network news anchors, leftist columnists, Democratic members of congress and all the rest being so critical of Bush? What a bunch of hypocrites?
How does if feel Mr. President?
Posted by: Kenneth Blizzard | February 9, 2010, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
It was ok to make everything political during the last administration but now its aiding Al Qaeda? The only ones helping the terrorists are Nancy Pelosi and her cronies and the best thing we could do for our country is to see them all removed from their jobs on the basis of criminal negligence.
Posted by: Sean | February 9, 2010, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
The Democrats have spent 8 years helping Al-Queda. Murtha aka “worm food” and “the porkmeister” accused MArines of raping and killing just to deflate the war effort and bring Bush down a notch. Hillary did her part as did Pelosi, Reid, and don’t forget Defamed Daschle. Obama – the putz that he is – at least didn’t pretend to be for the US then bash the war effort – he was the only one that was against it from the beginning which at least I can respect because he didn’t lie like the rest of the bunch……but this is just ridiculous.
Posted by: Billy Romps | February 9, 2010, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
It has been over thirteen years since OBL declared war on the US. We have spent our posterity’s inheritance and stolen their chance at the American Dream. We have destroyed thousands of our best and brightests’ lives; willingly surrendered our liberties in the name of “safety and security”; bloated our bumbling and ineffective bureaucracies to the point of absurdity; and brought our economy to the brink of destruction. And to this very day, you can still be blown out of the sky on Christmas Day, by a martyr with a bomb in his tightey whiteys.
Now more than ever, I am proud to have supported Ron Paul in 2008, for he is absolutely, one hundred percent, RIGHT.
Posted by: NOQTR4TR8RS | February 9, 2010, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
Doesn’t this just scream that we need REAL change in Washington?! To say that if you don’t agree with the President that you are aiding terrorists is laughable, not surprising anymore, but laughable if not completely offensive. We’ve got to kick these idiots out and get a government that wants to help this nation.
Posted by: JoeNY | February 9, 2010, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
All this gutless coward and his cronies ever do is make inane speeches read off a teleprompter and cry about the criticism they recieve. Finger pointing, blamegaming and excuses are all we get from this moron. Please tell me WHEN Oba-Mao has any time to do any work?! Anyone who has seen this act and still supports this clown is clearly either a communist or drooling open mouthed breather. Harvard owes this idiot a huge refund.
Posted by: Rob | February 9, 2010, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
I wasn’t so sure, but after reading some of these posts, I think he’s correct, this whole thread is politicized with barely a semblance of rational thought, just the usual crude and vulgar idiocy
Posted by: Mike Kistler | February 9, 2010, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Harry Reid and the late John Murtha must have really rallied the enemy with their rants against the Bush administration. I had heard the Saddam had a plan to show America blood and they will fall to their knees. They showed blood and the democrats fell to their knees
Posted by: Stanley | February 9, 2010, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
The comments from this “whine seller” are the type that has come to be expected from the office of the boy king! Never take responsibility for anything which you can blame on your opponents. This time his apologist is blaming Americans who can see that the emperor has no clothes, and have been speaking up about the ineptitude of these morons to effectively protect the country. As long as BHO and his fawning minions continue to treat al Quaeda as merely criminals, and not the hate filled insane terrorists which they are, this country faces continued attacks. With any luck at all, and with some divine intervention this Fall, the American people will terminate the employment of those in Congress who have spent the entire length of time since the turn of the century, doing nothing but giving aid and comfort to those who wish to end the American way of life. To blame those who elected the current occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue would only be stating the obvious. The real blame should fall on the shoulders of those who go on political hiatus for the four years between presidential elections, only to resurface long enough to pull the lever for the party, not the candidate, of the party whose name they hear the most, for whatever reason, during their enforced political stupor. There is a saying that “a country gets the government it deserves”, but I fail to see where any country could possibly deserve this group of incompetents. The article only serves to prove this to be the case!
Posted by: Dave | February 9, 2010, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
They NEVER can argue issues. When someone criticizes the president, he immediately tries to turn AWAY from the issue and try to personally criticize the person or group.
“Helping” al quada? I am not surprised in the least that they would pull this one out. Next thing they will say is that people criticizing the president are “offending God”, and they will throw them in prison for it – just like a few other specific, foreign nations do.
Posted by: JVJ | February 9, 2010, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Following this logic, one could say that every problem we have with terrorism today is due to 8 years of liberal criticism of every little thing the Bush administration did. These people can dish it out but put some on their plate and they get political indigestion.
Posted by: Ksera | February 9, 2010, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
By what authority do the Democrats complain after they spend 8 years screaming about Bush and CLEARLY aiding and abetting our enemies?
Democrats completely lack integrity.
Posted by: Brubeck | February 9, 2010, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
ok WH you stepped in this one. Name them. And if you can’t Brennan should be fired. in fact, obama should be fired
Posted by: DJ | February 9, 2010, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
And when the White House silences criticism of IT’S policies that action only serves the President. Stop passing the buck, own up to, take control and responsibility for the situation inherited. The American public knows about this. Don’t pull the wool over our eyes. It’s called leadership. There appears to be none in the White House.
Posted by: Joe Sevin | February 9, 2010, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
NOW WAIT A MINUTE – IT SEEMS THOSE COMPLAINING IN THE WHITE HOUSE NOW WERE THE TRAITORS (BY THIER OWN DEFINITION) JUST OVER A YEAR AGO WHEN THEY SOUGHT TO DESTORY OUR WAR ON TERROR EFFORT. LETS QUIT REWRITING THE HISTORY. IF THE BONEHEAD MISTAKES BEING MADE NOW MUST BE IGNORED – “IN THE INTEREST OF PROSECUTING A WAR” – I DON’T BUY IT. THEY JUST WANT IT OUT OF THE HEADLINES
Posted by: Eem | February 9, 2010, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Deflective at best coming from the White House, they Mess up the Christmas bomber Intel, gave this terrorist the right to shutup. Then once they have the guy talking, they release the information to the press…
Someone should be fired for this.. Political smack down to try to show they (White House) is doing something against Terrorism…
Weakness and lack of ownership for their mistakes..
What’s next… Blame Bush for their fail.
Posted by: ArriusWill | February 9, 2010, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
The only set of folks who are helping al qaeda is you, Mr. President and democrat congressional cronies, with your ineptitude.
Posted by: sleestak | February 9, 2010, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Excuse me, but who was in charge of this nation during 9/11? – The LARGEST security FAILURE in the history of this nation. Go back and research the SECURITY FAILURE hearings and then compare that to the failed bombing attempt on Christmas day. These media terrorist republican neocons are freakin’ psycho.
Posted by: kevinsart | February 9, 2010, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
This “president” (in name only) is a lying, anti-American clown. How he even manages 44% ‘approval’ rating is a mystery – most likely people afraid to tell the truth about what they really think.
A glorious show would be the dumbocrats having to impeach their own clownish jerk in order to remain a political party.
Posted by: thx1139 | February 9, 2010, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
HEED THE WORDS OF THE CO-CHAIRMEN OF THE 911 COMMISSION.
Posted by: DAN SHANTEAL | February 9, 2010, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
I see the Coward-Americans are posting in earnest, begging us to re-stoke terrorism fear and give up rights and freedom to the government in exchange for security.
tsk tsk.
This person is telling you, don’t be such a wuss. Don’t cry like a child over terrorism. Man up!
Posted by: FatSean | February 9, 2010, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
This is about the most hypocritical stuff I’ve heard yet from this White House. Rather unbelieveable really! IT’s a stupid point of view and makes absolutely no sense.
Posted by: LongT | February 9, 2010, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
This noise by Brennan is outrageous. Regardless of whatever was done in the past, it was absurd to tell Abdulmutallab that he had “the right to remain silent.” Anyone who can’t see that is unfit to serve in the security services.
Posted by: Isaac Sanchez | February 9, 2010, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
An analogy…
Liken our counter-terrorism units to a Formula One race car. Suit me up and strap me in and I can possibly manage a half dozen laps without wrecking.
If though, you are concerned with performance, lap times that might be something impressive, perhaps best to let someone with real experience take the wheel.
We have neophytes running the show; People with neither the skills or mind set to do the job properly.
Please quit your whining, hand over the helmet and take a seat in the stands.
Posted by: J Reid | February 9, 2010, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
This is the best we have here today? We all knew the country would take a real intellectual hit once G-Dub hit the road. You’ll all be just fine once we get that “how’s all that changey stuff workin out for ya” gal in there.
Posted by: gb | February 9, 2010, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
Time to own up Mr. President… International Terrorist and Tyrants (ITT’s) are laughing at you…
This administration is either too scared to do something or they are not sure what to do..
“Domestic policy can only defeat us; foreign policy can kill us.” John F. Kennedy
-+- -+-
Posted by: ArriusWill | February 9, 2010, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
This administration is intent on prosecuting terrorists as if they are common criminals, just like former President Clinton did as well. Look at what it did for Clinton: Navy ship attacked in Yemen, U.S. embassies in Africa attacked, World Trade Center attack ’93, attack on oil tanker. This adminstration is attempting to further deflect blame for its continued failures. Truth be told, for all of GW’s issues with the press, I felt much safer with him in charge. Think about it.
Posted by: kevin davis | February 9, 2010, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
From the people that brought you “We support the troops but not the war!”. For 8 years the Democrats maligned the military services. For 8 years the Democrats proclaimed all was lost in the War on Terror. Talk about completely offensive and hypocritical.
Posted by: Michael | February 9, 2010, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Obama helps Al-Qa’eda.
It’s pretty obvious.
Posted by: Swale | February 9, 2010, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Do they really think they can just say ANYTHING, and we’ll be so hypnotized by Obamas cult of personality we’ll believe it? By the looks of Mr. Tappers story they sure as hell do.
I wonder if Mr. Brennan consulted with John Kerry and Nancy Pelosi, about helping out Al-Qaeda, as he was posting his op-ed? They are the professional you know.
Posted by: Dire Thinker | February 9, 2010, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
I certainly can’t be the only one who remembers the howls of protest when, during Bush II, some accused the Dems and the media of abetting the enemy when they criticized the war effort.
Hypocrites.
Posted by: Arglebargle | February 9, 2010, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
The only thing fanning the fuel for the clowns in the Middle East are the clowns on Capitol Hill. Hope the snow keeps you guys home!
Posted by: PManager | February 9, 2010, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
“” Kevinsart posted “Excuse me, but who was in charge of this nation during 9/11? – The LARGEST security FAILURE in the history of this nation. Go back and research the SECURITY FAILURE hearings and then compare that to the failed bombing attempt on Christmas day. These media terrorist republican neocons are freakin’ psycho.”"” ———————————————————-You have to be kidding, right? The only obvious psychotic behavior is coming out of Obama and his cast of criminals.
Posted by: Reality | February 9, 2010, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
An administration not serious about the GWOT serves al Qaeda’s goals.
Posted by: kjatexas | February 9, 2010, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
I seem to remember the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi declaring that dissent was “patriotic”. Now, suddenly it’s not? To quote the Senate Majority Leader Dirty Harry, “The War is lost”. Need I go on? The Republican leadership has raised some serious issues regarding the Obama administration’s questionable policies regarding the prosecution of the War on Terror and now we’re being told to shut up? Wait until November, it’s going to be awfully lonely up on Penn Ave.
Posted by: Mike Jefferson | February 9, 2010, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
If you oppose the President you’re helping Al-Qaeda kill American citizens…
Oh, and fearmongering is wrong; so don’t do any of that either.
Also, holding two contradictory and impossible thoughts in your head simultaneously… HURTS LIKE ALL HELL!
Posted by: Ertdfg | February 9, 2010, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
The most troubling aspect of this administration is how stupid they believe the masses are, how easily they believe we the people can be manipulated, how totally disconnected they are from the majority of Americans. The big lie being laid before us now is the administration simply hasn’t done a good job explaining all of their great ideas to the population. Translation, we’re too dumb to understand what’s good for us. If the administration thought differently, they wouldn’t make such outrageous statements that defy history, logic and current memory.
Posted by: pam | February 9, 2010, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
@kevinsart:
“Excuse me, but who was in charge of this nation during 9/11?”
Answer: An enormously bloated, totally inept, bumbling, inefficient, disorganized, demoralized, over-tasked and un-Constitutional alphabet soup of bureaucracies, headed by an intellectually-challenged, aristocratic son of New England bankers, posing as a charismatic Texas cowboy.
With that said, do you believe for one minute you are ANY safer under the Obama administration?
Posted by: NOQTR | February 9, 2010, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
I can not wait to throw this BUM out of the white house.
The obamanation is a miserable failure!
Posted by: Will | February 9, 2010, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
By putting the Bone Head into office and his henchman helped al Qaeda’
Posted by: Tony Fox | February 9, 2010, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
“…one of the things that we have to change in our politics is the idea that people cannot disagree without challenging each other’s character and patriotism. ” – Candidate Obama
No surprise that Candidate Obama and President Obama are on opposite sides of this issue; why should this issue be any different from every other issue?
Posted by: Ertdfg | February 9, 2010, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
“The same people who criticize the president today were silent back then.”
Seems like the reverse would be true as well. Stupid politicians. You are a scourge on our nation.
Posted by: Mark | February 9, 2010, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
Dang ol blah blah blah talkin bout under thong plane Mucktallah rights Miranda and dang ol over lookin there all sudden BOOM.
Like waterboard and all that should hmmm.
Posted by: Boomhauer | February 9, 2010, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
This is along the same mental lines as Nepolitano’s “the system worked” statement.
Posted by: LongT | February 9, 2010, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
Nobody helps AlCIAda more than the main stream media and the left wing ..for ABC to be posting story’s like this is simple turd licking..ABC MAY AS WELL START WEARING TURBAN WHEN THEY BROADCAST THE NEWS!
Posted by: Kelly | February 9, 2010, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
NOQTR, Actually Obama is the weakest president since Carter. It’s hard to believe you are still trying to sell Obama’s snake oil by smearing Bush.
Posted by: Reality | February 9, 2010, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
health care is more important that terrorists,
you can not disagree, or give any criticism of Obuma and the clown crew.
they do not like it an have to get
offensive, an blame everyone else but
them selfs.
when are the people in this admin. going to get some balls and tell this jerk off.
2010/2012 can not come fast enough.
Posted by: David | February 9, 2010, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
So far,..every step this administration takes to keep us safe, put’s us deeper into harms way-This white house works and gives more to those who try to harm us then to America’s own people! When Barack said he wanted to rebuild America, I guess Americans didn’t understand-To rebuild something- you must first bring it down! EVERYTHING that comes from this crew in the white house is all based on smoke and mirrors! Don’t believe a word!!!I wonder why the liberal don’t make more of a stink about Barack and his “private” BB?!?!
Posted by: AmericaWakeUp | February 9, 2010, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
So far,..every step this administration takes to keep us safe, put’s us deeper into harms way-This white house works and gives more to those who try to harm us then to America’s own people! When Barack said he wanted to rebuild America, I guess Americans didn’t understand-To rebuild something- you must first bring it down! EVERYTHING that comes from this crew in the white house is all based on smoke and mirrors! Don’t believe a word!!!I wonder why the liberal don’t make more of a stink about Barack and his “private” BB?!?!
Posted by: AmericaWakeUp | February 9, 2010, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Does this make anyone who disagrees with Obama a domestic terrorist?
Posted by: kfor777 | February 9, 2010, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
“Does this make anyone who disagrees with Obama a domestic terrorist?”
Why not…that’s what happened to anyone who disagreed with Bush!
Posted by: willardthegreat | February 9, 2010, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Just another blame shift. If the Obama administration acted with responsibility and didn’t use the tax payers as an ATM perhaps there would be less critics. The first rule of fixing a problem is admiting that there is a problem and admitting ones own mistakes.
Posted by: Paul | February 9, 2010, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
I see, so it was patriotic to express differences when Bush was in office. Now it’s helping the enemy. I guess this is possible in Obama’s Bizzaro world.
Posted by: doug | February 9, 2010, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Brennan is an idiot. Is Obama even worse than Cheney and Bush? Seems like it.
Posted by: Josie Wales | February 9, 2010, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
“It’s hard to believe you are still trying to sell Obama’s snake oil by smearing Bush.”
You’re right there…Bush’s smearing sells itself! lol Obama is infinitely more competent than W. Bush ever was.
Posted by: willardthegreat | February 9, 2010, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
This is a joke right? When Bush was being excoriated we were told dissent was the highest form of patriotism.
Posted by: John Nostromo | February 9, 2010, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Wow — the White House really doesn’t have ANY class. The White House attempt to demonize or vilify those who disagree with their ultra-liberal social views is…disappointing.
Is it 2012 yet?
Posted by: MireyaAyala | February 9, 2010, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
What the White House means to say is:
“Please don’t criticize us while we’re trying to fight terrorists. I emboldens them.
We know such criticism by us was fine for the last administration. But, we need a little lower standards; we can’t take criticism at home AND fight abroad.”
This is just typical socialist lowering of standards towards mediocrity.
Posted by: matt | February 9, 2010, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
And all the criticism of Bush and calling for withdrawal from Iraq by Democrats was harmless. Politicians are shameless. Everybody, open your eyes and stop gulping Kool-aid.
Posted by: jhk | February 9, 2010, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
“Why not…that’s what happened to anyone who disagreed with Bush!”
How’s that hope and change working out for you?
Posted by: McGehee | February 9, 2010, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Is this grasping at straws, or what?
Posted by: pipian | February 9, 2010, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
First “Big Sis” calls me dangerous to the country and now this. This guy sounds more like Hugo Chavez every day. I think it’s time this administration to grow a pair an start to lead!
Posted by: bigdoglv | February 9, 2010, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
I am sorry, but this is pathetic. Seriously. The Mad Fools are in charge.
Posted by: Amos Bosco | February 9, 2010, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Is it not amazing what can be said via the White House and then reported by the media without a chance of anyone for a response. The media is currently a propaganda machine Nazi Germany would envy.
Posted by: fred astaire | February 9, 2010, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Obama is the ideological love-child of:
* Saul Alinsky (political trickery & deceit);
* Jeremiah Wright (hatred of America and whites);
* Antoin “Tony” Rezko (Chicago-style political corruption), and;
* William Ayers (anti-military/anti-business).
Posted by: Spanky | February 9, 2010, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Another Tapper article void of intelligence, logic or reason…of course!
It was patriotic when the commie liberals called G.W.Bush “Hitler”, when they call our Marines ‘murderers’ and the like. But if anyone calls Barry out on blatant mistakes, over the top socialism and massive redistributions of wealth they are helping alqueda? Get real Jake, please go back to journalism school 101 your hypocrisy is sickening.
Posted by: KennyP | February 9, 2010, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Hijinx, the numbers you quote on terrorist convictions in criminal courts are (intentionally) misleading. The Democrat party quotes them because they sound good for them, but include largely non-Islamofascist offenders.
Althought the idiots from ELF or PETA or Sea Shepard should be locked-up and terror statutes are used to help get that done, they are not the type of terrorists most people are referring to in “The War on Terror”.
Posted by: CJC | February 9, 2010, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
@David,
Actually, no. I am NOT supporting Obama at all. He is at least as poor a President as Carter, and I suspect that history will show him to be even worse. But faithful GOP types like you are too blinded by partisanship to see that both GWB and Obama are equally bad for the country.
Posted by: NOQTR4TR8RS | February 9, 2010, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Democrats are engineering the eradication of the party from power.
Posted by: 2morrow | February 9, 2010, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
So, are they finally ‘fessing up to the fact that their fanatical criticism of Bush aided our enemies? They said that criticizing the President helps Al Queda– but they probably believe that this logic only applies to “The One”. They can’t seem to make an unbiased application of any ideas these days. Do they think that We the People are too dumb to recognize their hypocrisy for the grand-standing propaganda that it is?
Posted by: Joy | February 9, 2010, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Stupid!
Posted by: LongT | February 9, 2010, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
“I have observed that each People has exactly the Government they deserve.” Benjamin Disraeli, PM, Great Britain, circa 1895.
Posted by: Mike | February 9, 2010, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Don’t you people believe what Obama tells you to believe?
We are all a bunch of “ignorant, uneducated country-hicks” who spew “hatred” because we don’t want higher taxes, government-funded abortions, gay marriage, freedom OF religion, and safe borders.
Sigh.
This just proves how OUT-OF-TOUCH the Obama Administration has become from the rest of America. It is almost as if they truly believe that most Americans are ultra-liberals. Of course, they still want to force their expensive, ultra-liberal policies on us even if we do NOT embrace them.
Obama is quite the “audacious” know-it-all…who raises his nose at the rest of us non-liberals from real America.
Posted by: MireyaAyala | February 9, 2010, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Obama was elected to be a CHANGE from Bush!
Terrorists should NOT be given Miranda Rights…like Bush did!
When dealing with Terrorists…the following should be enacted.
1 Arrest them
2 Interrogate them
3 Execute them
…NEXT!
Posted by: hockeymatt | February 9, 2010, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
I believe that the liberals considered crticism of the president okay when Bush was in office. It wasn’t serving Al Qaeda’s purpose then. They said it was good for the country to have a certain amount of dissent. What’s changed? Only that a Socialist is in the whitehouse. Now you dare not have a dissenting voice. Sounds very Third World and USSR ish.
Posted by: 2 faced liberals | February 9, 2010, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
National Security is just another term for foreign intervention, natural resource allocation (theft), regime change, bribery, corporatism, etc…
Whatever the will of the CFR happens to be at the time… regardless of party.
The U.S. is “used” for our military might at the detriment of civil liberties, the constitution, and everything else that once made this country great…
We’re living on past wealth of a manufacturing industry that’s been long outsourced, and the only thing that lies ahead is insolvency…
We’ll see what national security really means at that point.
This is all faux
Posted by: B | February 9, 2010, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
O.K. Let me finish wiping away the tears of laughter from my eyes………There, done. Now, let me take you on a little trip back to 2004/2005, remember those days. Now let me remind you of the mantra…..
ATTACKING AND DEMEANING THIS ADMINISTRATION IS THE HIGHEST FORM OF PATRIOTISM!!! Remember that great stuff??? Well, if it was true then, why not now?
Posted by: Matt | February 9, 2010, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
My god, we have a child for a president.
Posted by: Marie | February 9, 2010, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
How’s that hope and change thing working for you?
Posted by: Katherine | February 9, 2010, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
On ABC’s “This Week” yesterday regarding the botched interrogation of Abdul Mutalabb, John Podesta said “the proof is in the pudding” because now the underwear bomber is talking.
Podesta is misguided but I agree the proof is in the pudding.
The pudding has been rotting on the table for five weeks! Now, Thanks to these buffoons it’s worthless, we have to throw it out.
We’re at war with Islamic terrorists who are hell bent and wanting to kill us.
And when you have confused lawyers and law professors who can’t tell the difference between fresh pudding and five week old pudding, of course, you’re going to see a growing percentage of Americans who are fed up of with confused lawyers.
Americans are longing for a Commander in Chief who can think on his feet and quickly make the right decisions on national security.
Posted by: Rodney | February 9, 2010, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
Obama has become a laughing stock of the entire world. Just read the couple of on-line newspapers. For example, Der Spiegel. Not only is Obama incompetent, he seems to have surrounded himself with dolts that he believes makes himself look good.
A joke!
Posted by: EGHolder | February 9, 2010, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
John Brennan’s blunt common sense makes him the Bush-Cheney veteran who may save the nation from under-reported abuses and atrocities committed by Bush-Cheney against the American people — in the false name of national security. Thank you for your courage and for your patriotism, Mr. Brennan. Now, please read this, because the abuses continue:
Posted by: Vic Livingston | February 9, 2010, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
LOL, great joke Obama! Now put your big boy pants on and stop whining. If you can’t handle the critics, how do we expect you to keep the US safe from people who really want to kill us?
Posted by: Joke | February 9, 2010, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
John Brennan’s blunt common sense makes him the Bush-Cheney veteran who may save the nation from under-reported abuses and atrocities committed by Bush-Cheney against the American people — in the false name of national security. Thank you for your courage and for your patriotism, Mr. Brennan. Now, please read this, because the abuses continue:
Posted by: Vic Livingston | February 9, 2010, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
Gee, that is the same thing that was said about those that opposed Former President Bush….
Posted by: David GS | February 9, 2010, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
Nothing is Obama`s fault, he just wants credit.
I have never seen a leader that runs from responsibility like he does.
But I guess that’s why he is not a true leader!
What a fool he is , and all of his minions.
Posted by: Russ | February 9, 2010, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
“How’s that hope and change working out for you?”
A lot better than the previous 8 years that left our country in this current mess…huge deficits and economic fallouts don’t happen in one year people! Pull your heads out. Obama is trying to undo the damage that took Bush 8 years to do. It takes time. Or you could all just keep patting each other’s backs like the good sheeple you are.
Posted by: willardthegreat | February 9, 2010, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Hypocrites and liars, all of them.
One, there is no alQaeda, there’s a manufactured “war-on-terror” by the every agencies claiming to be fighting it.
If 9/11 was a false-flag operation, which it was, than fighting those that supposedly caused it is ludicrous. We’re simply occupying territory and killing people for their resources.
This is nothing but a shot across the bow for those of us that know the truth, and the coming Martial Law. Soon it will be against the law to criticize the government.
We best start pushing back now, or soon we won’t be able to.
Posted by: MrM | February 9, 2010, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
So the millions of Americans that are against the 1 Obama is helping the Terrorists?
The answer is obvious, Mr. Obama, you should resign, and that way save us all.
Posted by: Tom Genin | February 9, 2010, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
“I believe that the liberals considered crticism of the president okay when Bush was in office.”
Actually, we were all unAmerican and needed to move to another country remember? or have the barbs you’ve all hurled for years simply escaped your memory? Selective ignorance must be nice…
Posted by: willardthegreat | February 9, 2010, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
LOL — gotta love the 9/11 conspiracy nuts and the Obama lovers…..
Posted by: Mark | February 9, 2010, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Who cares about the POTUS anyway? He’s only got one look.
Blue Steel?
Ferrari?
La Tigre?
Democrat???
Republican???
They’re the same thing!!! I feel like I’m taking CRAZY PILLS!!!!
Posted by: Mugatu | February 9, 2010, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Apparently this incompetant fool Brennan was asleep for the last nine years when it was patriotic to bash a President during a war. He has an awful reputation and needs to lose his job.
Posted by: RobCon | February 9, 2010, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Give it a rest. AL Qaeda is happy to have Obama sitting as President. He is weak on all levels. He is an intellectual moron. His policies have emboldened the enemy. Obama’s actions speak volumes.
The military has no confidence in Obama.
Obama has friends who cheered for the 9/11 attacks. They are some of his czars.
Posted by: james | February 9, 2010, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
I am convienced Obama appoints these light weight losers because it supposedly makes him look smart.
Until you realize who their boss is.
Posted by: RobCon | February 9, 2010, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Remember, Mr. Liar-In-Chief, it was you and your party who cried like babies when that was said about you just a few years ago. You and your party said that criticizing the war under W. was patriotic and that people who said that your criticism was emboldening the enemy were “un-american”. Now you’re engaging in the tactics you deplored a few years ago? Do you suffer from memory loss? or are you so mixed up with your lies that you can’t remember? Which one is it? Were you lying then? or are you lying now? Furthermore, it’s the criticism (and the soft-on-terror approach) that comes from the Democrat party that serves and emboldens the enemy, not the Republican criticism. So you’re wrong twice.
Posted by: lvtalon | February 9, 2010, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
I say we get Mr. T in the Oval Office. ;) Fool. At least he says what he means and does what he says. No foolary. I am counting around a dozen or so really pathetically sorry things this administration has done that show there is something missing upstairs, and that is quite scary indeed. Leaders with no couth. Enough is enough already. People are fully entitled to their opinions, esp. when said respectfully. But now there is no respect for the people that voted them into office in the response.
Posted by: Joe | February 9, 2010, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Another blatant attempt by this Orwellian horror of an administration to stifle dissent. Dissent was good when it was against Bush, but hazardous now? I think NOT. Hopey-changey = hoax and chains.
Posted by: AliceLouise1 | February 9, 2010, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
This is how they see and resolve terrorism? I really don’t think it is that simplistic.
Would be funny…instead it is frightening.
I trust those that voted for the Hope and Change are proud of themselves.
Posted by: Madonna | February 9, 2010, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
I had to read this twice to be sure I had not missed the disclaimer to satire! Since he was serious, let me ask him a couple of questions…
1. Does he believe that his party adhered to ANY of the requirements he sets forth for the Obama dissenters, during previous administrations?
Since the answer to number 1 has to be a resounding “NO” …another question come to mind.
2. Does this actually mean that the left’s attitudes to Bush and the War on Terror are mostly responsible for the resurgence of terror in the US?
To quote someone I am sure he knows and loves…”YOU BETCHA!!!!!”
Thanks, John, for calling to everyone’s mind, your administration’s dire problem…kind of hard to fix something that does not exist, though!! Perhaps you should write your next op-ed about there needing to BE a war on terror!
Posted by: Dee Strickland | February 9, 2010, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
I would rather trust our 007s folks!
- The former CIA official also asserts that the Obama administration is doing a better job than the Bush administration did in taking the fight to al Qaeda. “This administration’s efforts have disrupted dozens of terrorist plots against the homeland and been responsible for killing and capturing hundreds of hard-core terrorists, including senior leaders in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia and beyond — far more than in 2008.”
Posted by: 007 Fan | February 9, 2010, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Now the WH is at the receiving end of the criticism it wants to be critical of the critics by making trivial arguments. I am sure the Bush administration made a similar argument against the critics of the Iraq war including the former senator from Illinois. Too much is being made about the threat from the ill prepared and poorly trained Nigerian underwear bomber. He was no way in the same league as the 911 terrorists who were precise, no-nonsense and deadly. Nothing of that scale will ever happen again.
Posted by: gjkotw01 | February 9, 2010, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
In an article I read today,Mr. Mukasey seems to disagree with Mr. Brennans supposition on the guidelines. According to Mr. Mukasey, the guidelines that Mr. Brennan is referring to applies to intelligence gathering. They do not deal with whether someone in custody is to be treated as a criminal defendant. Second, as for gathering intelligence, it begs the question about whether he (Abdulmutalab) should have been designated a criminal suspect. According to Mukasey, there is nothing in those guidelines that makes that choice. I’m curious why ABC didn’t mention this part of the story.
Posted by: rigoman33 | February 9, 2010, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
Willard, what on earth are you smoking? The so-called mess you believe the Republicans left us in…and there is indeed some of that…is no way near…I say again, no way near…what this group has done.
Guess you are one of those who voted for him. If so, may I send my share of the unfunded, unreported debt to you? I certainly cannot pay it. I won’t. I will quit working and let someone else take care of me. Isn’t that what Hope and Change was all about? No more rent to pay, gas bills, etc….but then I plagiarize so many.
Posted by: Madonna | February 9, 2010, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
Y’know, it seems that the President would get over the “Blame Bush” game and stop trying to point out who caused the mess and try and fix it, we should also point out the failures in this current administration and the President should not be the one saying, “It’s not my fault if it doesn’t work, Bush caused it.” The President shouldn’t be a Michael Scott, “It’s simple, I want to take all of the credit without any of the blame.” I supported Bush, for the most part, but I do realize the failures in his administration that we all should be able to criticize, just like in the current administration. But let’s get past the “Bush caused it” or the “Clinton caused it” and get to work on fixing problems.
Posted by: Troy | February 9, 2010, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
Brennan needs to be removed from his position as an incompetant embarrassment to the administration and the nation. The American left is guilty of sedition; recruiting Al-Qaeda members by encouraging them to resist in the hopes of another Vietnam result, and whining about Guantanamo and Abu Grahib in order to stir up discontent and Islamic bitterness. They saw an opportunity to install their community organizer and took it, leaving the military and the nation at risk
Posted by: Dryden01 | February 9, 2010, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
One problem is that Obama is technically a bigger threat than Al Quaeda.
Posted by: MAC59 | February 9, 2010, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
No, the White House is serving the goals of Al Queda all on their own.
Posted by: Carl Parsons | February 9, 2010, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
Doen’t it seem like the Obama administration just can’t take the heat? How about this, instead of being in perpetual “campaighn mode”, do your job and keep the people who want to kill me and my family from blowing us up. This would require Obama to stop living by opinion polls and start showing some spine. He has pent more time proterating himself in front of foreign leader than he has protecting US citezens.
Posted by: Dufresne | February 9, 2010, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
Brennan is essentially reinforcing what has gotten Obama his present 44% rating from the American public. He issues criticism of those who have a legitimate perception that Obama et al have been protecting the American people in a meek way. In point of fact, many of the steps Obama has taken to act more aggressively have only come as the public sentiment resonated amongst his cabinet. The analysts of the Massachusetts win of Scott Brown all concluded that it was Scott’s very down to earth insistence that instead of being more concerned about polishing the U.S. image and providing legal help to terrorists, that the U.S. should be out there killing them. But my MAJOR debunking of Brennan’s claim is that Obama and his circle have been nearly TOTALLY SILENT while perhaps the GREATEST THREAT to Americans is ongoing–Iran’s illegal race to nuclear weapons. Mark my words, with Obama at the helm (for speeches) we will be witnessing RADIOLOGICAL bombs exploding in American (and EU) cities in the near future. Iran is accelerating its production of plutonium and I still hear Obama drone on about his obscure “health care” plans. Good God, how about health care in the form of protecting Americans from RADIATION SICKNESS, Barack??????? Military confrontation holds the ONLY hope with Iran today and he knows it.
Posted by: marat | February 9, 2010, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
ohhh, so it’s folks criticizing Obama that makes terrorist want to blow us up, not letting those terrorist out of prison to do it again, not showing weakness to Iran as they mock Obama, of course it has nothing to do with sharia law. it’s Fox news!it’s Glenn Beck! Can anyone tell me, who else used tatics like this? Don’t watch fox or cnn, don’t criticize the fueher/savior.
Posted by: Dusty Campbell | February 9, 2010, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Update: The White House also put out a press release stating “When you criticize Mr. Obama, you make the Baby Jesus cry…”
Posted by: JohnGaltPodcast | February 9, 2010, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Wa, wa, wah. The some leftists that attacked bush and war on terror for 7 years. Those that turned Guantanamo into a political issue now are acting like babies. Your proving what we knew all along, you are not fit to lead.
Posted by: jefcostello | February 9, 2010, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
I’ve written over and over on the politics of Fear that the Republican Party has participated in for 9 years now. They are now “railing” against the very policies they sat in place for handling terrorist….378 of them was TRIED in our Federal Court systems, and Now those same systems are Not appropriate. So are they saying now that they were Failures? I agree with Brennan, these Terrorist, no matter what name You choose for them are Not SUPERMEN, AS THE REPUBLCIANS WANT YOU TO FALL RIGHT INTO their Mindset of Fearing Them! They need to Stop!!!!! We are all Americans, and it’s as if they Wants Attacks on our country. If our Federal Court systems not appropriate for these “supermen” then they can’t be appropriate for Any of our OWN.
Posted by: sara | February 9, 2010, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
Here lies the problem -
He calls it “naive to think that transferring Abdulmutallab to military custody would have caused an outpouring of information. There is little difference between military and civilian custody, other than an interrogator with a uniform. The suspect gets access to a lawyer, and interrogation rules are nearly identical.”
We are in a war against terrorist. These terrorist are enemy combatants. They should not be given access to U.S. lawyers and be afforded rights similar to U.S. citiens BECAUSE THESE TERRORISTS ARE NOT U.S. CITIZENS!
Number of terrorist attacks/attempts within U.S. borders since 9-11 under Bush – 0
Number of terrorist attacksattempts within U.S. borders since 9-11 under Obama – 3 (all within first year of this ass-clown’s presidency!)
So, whose policy is really more effective, Brenner!?!?
Posted by: Joe Duffy | February 9, 2010, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
Obama WANTS a terrorist attack!
Then when people cry for security
he will put his “security force”
around the country to “keep the
people in line!”
We are beginning to see just who is
the real threat to our country!
Posted by: Mary | February 9, 2010, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
As for myself, BHO scares me way more than OBL.
Posted by: JohnnyV | February 9, 2010, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
Is it ME an O critic that is causing China to threaten to DUMP our Bonds, is it me ano O critic that is causing Iran to go NUKE, is it me that is causing Russia to stupidly accuse US that our missle shiels is aimed at them, is it me that is causing the ME stalemate, is it me causing the lost Jobs and FAITH in America? Cause if it is I’m one powerful m o f o!
Posted by: Dave | February 9, 2010, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
Can it with the balloon juice, Sara. For eight years (during an administration I DIDN’T support, btw), we heard folks like yourself say “dissent is the highest form of patriotism.” Now that your Commander-in-Thief is in there, it’s “can’t we all just get along?” Here’s 1.6 trillion dollars; buy a clue.
Posted by: JohnGaltPodcast | February 9, 2010, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
The danger posed to the future of this country of self-inflicted damage by Progressive (liberal) government is far worse than that of any external force.
Posted by: John Q Public | February 9, 2010, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
Miss me yet? heh, heh, heh.
Posted by: G. W. Bush | February 9, 2010, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss.
Posted by: Brad | February 9, 2010, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
Mob rule means lynch mobs. The rule of law equals a civilization. You republicans that want endless war and government sponsored torture are fascists, nothing more. Go curl up in front of the fire with your Mien Kampf and stay very very afraid of loons that pack bombs in their underpants.
Posted by: Mike Ross | February 9, 2010, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
The Obama administration continues its exhibition of circus clowns speaking out to defend a comedy of errors. The Chief Clown is more of a danger to our national security than the terrorists. I thought his election and subsequent bowing and apologizing to the world was supposed to make everyone love us. America’s real danger: These people are in charge, and they are clueless.
Posted by: Pat Riot | February 9, 2010, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Critics helping terrorists…??? So is the Left apologizing for 8 years of badgering Bush?
Posted by: Jeff | February 9, 2010, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
What did the liberal democrats and left wing media do to President Bush? New York Times must be owned by al Qaeda.
Senator Bond’s quote at the end of the article is exactly right. The Obama “Czarist” White House is the enabler here.
Most democrats have no clue what leadership is or what it means. Governing based on poll results IS NOT leadership. Remember Bill Clinton? What a joke! Now Obama is here to save us! Come on November so we can clean “house.”
Posted by: Excuse me! | February 9, 2010, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
criticizing the president’s policy does aid and abet the terrorists. George Bush, Karl Rove and their bosses at Haliburton told us so for years.
Posted by: deb sprague | February 9, 2010, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
No way Dude
Posted by: les | February 9, 2010, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Not that I care for Comrade Barack, but the GOP does fire up the fear campaign to get the sheeple moving in the direction of their agenda.
If Obama really was a change agent he would have done a 180 degree turnaround on foreign policy so that the people with nothing to live for might decide to try to make their life worth living. “Conservatism” means conserving money(ala balanced budgets) & conserving lives. That’s why the GOP isn’t conservative.
Posted by: Blow up DC! | February 9, 2010, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Actually, we were all unAmerican and needed to move to another country remember? or have the barbs you’ve all hurled for years simply escaped your memory? Selective ignorance must be
nice.
Willard, liberals would certainly know alot about that. The last year is a constant example.
I actually don’t remember it as you do. The Main stream media gave liberals all kinds of positive press while thay were critisizing the president and seemed to be completely suppotive of your “Freedom of Speech”. An ideal they now seem willing to forfeit for the common man, as long as he disagreea with them, but not themselves and their liberal string pullers.
Posted by: 2 faced liberals | February 9, 2010, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
David GS see my comments to Willard they apply to you also.
Posted by: 2 faced liberals | February 9, 2010, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
How is that Hopey-Changey thingy working out for ya, liberals?
Liberals (Progressives) are the most loathed group in America, and you lost Ted Kennedy’s seat. Yet, the narcissism of your “great one” makes you believe that we want more Bolshevik ideology.
Posted by: Marvin | February 9, 2010, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
There are some legitimate complaints but the overall flavor of the GOP & right wing view of Obama is that they want him to fail & or he & all of his people are failures. They would know after GWB 8 years what failure looks like, not to belittle Obama’s issues, but come on, on each and every issue the right/GOP is the party of no. No cooperation with Obama or the Democrats & absolutely never any praise or approval of anything the Obama administration or democrats do. Hey, this is Bush2 in reverse- Get over it YOU LOST THIS TIME, what about US the USA the citizens, we are sick of all the figthing & partisanship, and if you think electing Palin would cure it your wrong…2012 will be interesting but clearly the GOP fears an Obama 2nd term, so obstructionism is the name of the game. attack, etc. How about getting together to fix some problems as opposed to just bytchin, sick of Hannity, Beck rants & Obama anti-Fox rants….elect a 3rd party that is not a right or left wing bastion…what an idea!!!
Posted by: Ronny Raygun | February 9, 2010, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
If this presidency spent half as much time solving problems as it did casting blame, we would be in the clear.
Posted by: Gayle | February 9, 2010, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
Terrorism only affects those foolish enough to reside in the likely target cities – urban liberals.
When the next 9/11, or worse, happens, it’ll be Obama base voters who do the dying….so, I could care less.
Posted by: Malik Nidal | February 9, 2010, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
“WH: Some Critics ‘Serving the Goals of al Qaeda”??????
It seems more like who ever critics on Obama and this administration are serving for the enermy’s goal.? Isn’t WH and Obama try to raise the politics Fear among the American in this election year. Start of 2010, 1st is the China threat, so one can spent more on arms and sell more weapon, now is al Qaeda. What is next?
When will politicians stop spread of fear, stop doing blaming others for your own failure? stop just doing more PR and talk; but to show some results in inmprove in our economy.
Posted by: Wc | February 9, 2010, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
I was talking to my father while we watch the SuperBowl. My father was born Maryland in 1936. He, an economist, worked for government for over 40 years. I don’t know his party affiliation, but I know he does not suffer fools. Our discussion, during a commercial break, happened to meander to talking about Obama. He said, and I quote,”most of the criticism this guy gets is rooted in racism.” Needless to say, i was shocked. When I asked him to explain. He gave the simple rejoinder that Obama had done a great job with a crap hand…and like him or not, folks should treat him with respect. He is the duly elected President of the United States and that the majority of his critics can’t accept the simple fact of his ethnicity. My dad has never spoken so explicitly about race–ever. I take his comments seriously and I wonder what folks in this forum think. Is antipathy to Obama partly rooted in a resistance to the end of the White dominance in the United States? Just askin…
Posted by: BBaptiste | February 9, 2010, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Is Brennan suggesting a soft CENSORSHIP?
The only pending CENSORSHIP I can see is the 2010 and 2012 ELECTIONS!
Posted by: Howard Ino | February 9, 2010, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Jake Tapper is the brand of liberal who believes he is one of the smartest people in the room.
Most liberal believe that anyone who does not agree with their ideas is either too stupid to understand how great their ideas are, or is an evil racist.
I bet he truly cannot remember how much vitrol his paper shoveled at Bush during the war.
The problem with journalist is that they get the job and then slap each other on the back with awards and the honors from like minded liberals who are beltching the same crap on paper.
Reporters like this tool are the prime reason print is dead.
Posted by: Cale | February 9, 2010, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
This is an administration that is letting JAG look over every soldiers shoulder and then demoting grade level commandeers in the field. There incompetence in Afghanistan is appalling.
Posted by: Dan Smith | February 9, 2010, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
To “Mike Ross” My whole family is Republican and we don’t want continual war. Hitler was Socialist Dictator. If you read “Mein Kampf” you’ll see that his policies were very socialistic. If he were a conservative fascist, he would have been a monarchist. Next, the article states that there is very little difference between civilian detainment and military detainment. If that statement is true, then why is the administration trying so hard to keep the terrorist in civilian custody?
Posted by: L Ray | February 9, 2010, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Let me get this right. By wanting to do everything possible to get vital information on timely basis from terrorists, Conservatives are putting us at greater risk.
And treating terrorists the same way we treat shoplifters keeps us safer.
Am I living in Bizzaro World?
Posted by: Jim Bitros | February 9, 2010, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
I think that just as big a story would be all the predominantly anti-Progressive, anti-Obama comments on this ABC news story and message board. America is waking up. Only time will tell if we woke up in time to prevent irreparable damage to our country.
My opinion is that mostly all of the MSM (excluding MSNBC, of course) are discovering that we the people are so sick of the Obama media lovefest. If they want to draw viewers, they need to get back to objective journalism, which was conspicuously missing leading up to and during the elections of ’08. Of course, they could still cling to their ideologies like NBC and continue to get their collective clocks cleaned in the ratings. For those who don’t buy my assertion, watch and compare MSNBC to Fox News. Obviously, one leans right, and the other hard left; almost horizontal. But look deeper; MSNBC seems to now have more commercial content than actual news programming. For goodness sakes, MSNBC regularly goes from commercial break, to maybe 2 minutes of continued news, than back to another commercial break. I am in the broadcast media profession, and one of the first things you learn is how to pay the bills. Good ratings transcends into low volume-high price advertising rates. Low ratings transcends into high volume-sell at costs as low as necessary advertising rates. While the rest of the MSM is finally getting the point, MSNBC languishes with all their “colorful” punditry. I see a day soon, where MSNBC becomes the 24 hour “To Catch a Predator” channel.
Lastly, I wonder why Fox doesn’t run a 6:30PM nightly newscast on all their broadcast affiliates. That would be a true game changer. The broadcast audience is much, much larger than the cable news audience that Fox regularly dominates.
Posted by: Brian | February 9, 2010, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Cale: posted @ 1:37:26 PM
Cale gets it, his comment says it all. Kudos to you sir!!!
Posted by: Pat Riot | February 9, 2010, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Republicans wanted Obama to fail? Really? I recall all the support Democrats gave to GW’s policies and how well Bush was treated in the media and how civil the “dissent” was back in the days.
BS.
Republicans, particularly Conservatives, want the United States to succeed. This cannot be said of Democrats and certainly not the Obama –never let a crisis go to waste–administration. Sorry it’s suck a bitter pill to swallow.
Posted by: mikeb | February 9, 2010, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
John Brennan, BH Obama, and the democratic Party couldn’t secure a latrine! The only person who has the slightest understanding of their job, is the one who has no official job: Michelle Obama, who is at least attempting to address a very real problem in America: Child Obesity. The administration is too busy trying to give America away, purchase votes from the poor with promises they know they can not keep for long, in a bankrupt country; while deluding themselves with the same old Democrat Party Line: If we can just share the wealth: Crime and War will disapper and we will be safe! We meaning the Democrats in Government like Pelosi, Reid and Kerry. Think these people are the least bit worried about the average Democrat citizen? Wrong, beyond his/her vote they could care less! There will be a reconing with the American People, not the Rrepublican People or Democrat People, but the American People! Come November, spin it as they may, Pelosi and Reid are out. I heard both may face prosecution when they return to their home states. Obama will lose control both Houses and likely cut and run before a renewed Congress pries open that vault of his to expose the greatest fraud and Conspiracy ever rammed down the American People’s throat! It’s a shame, really. He represented the hopes and dreams of an entire generation, not just African-Americans. He has let everyone down. Two Trillion dollars later, the creditors are knocking on the door.
Oh, one more tidbit: Brennan, run and hide. When we have to defend our homes, street-to-street against our Greatest Enemy: The Federal Government! Your butt is going to be right there on the front lines. Which side, remains to be seen!
Posted by: Polkat | February 9, 2010, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
Welcome to the good old right wing USA. I want everything, but i’m not paying for anything. I want no government, but God help you if you dont keep me safe. I want to run around the world bullying other people, but if the hit back i’ll be crying on my knees for the next decade. Why dont you just out and say it “we want african americans back in shackles, all muslims are terrorists, all hispanics are illegal aliens, and only white christian men are worthy of being called American…at least then you would have one redeeming quality… honesty. And don’t you dare call me liberal, those idiots could’nt tie their own shoes. CAN WE PLEASE HAVE A FISCALLY RESPOSIBLE, SOCIALLY PRUDENT PARTY. While I’m on the little rant…
Posted by: Andy | February 9, 2010, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
I wonder what the freak show at the WH thinks the news media, Democrats, and other left-wing nut cases did to the war effort under Bush? This is the most cowardly, anti-American, worthless bunch of eunuchs I have ever seen in my life. The whining, complaining, and crying from Obama and his gang rivals that of any day care center in the world.
Posted by: Annie | February 9, 2010, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
It is clearly the fear mongering of the right that has led to this claim from Obama, but did not Bush2 say the same thing? Did not BUSH2 try the show bomber in civil court & read him his rights soon after arrest? Does Senator Shelby really get to freeze 70+ appointments because he wants money/earmark for Alabama & Airbus a European Co. things are not always black & white (hummmm could that be a % of it?) there is alot of green
involved….the dollar needs protection & neither Obama not Bush2 did such, if
they dont the Chinese wilL!! PS- I am & was a Liberal…TJ!
Posted by: Thomas Jefferson 2o1o | February 9, 2010, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
This partisan finger-pointing is detracting from what we really need to be doing — quickly interrogating captured terrorists in ways which are not torture and don’t require their willingness — namely:
- using sodium pentathol,
- p300 recognition signal in EEG (for faces, names, locations),
- functional MRI,
- tricky interrogation methods (e.g. good cop/bad copy, your friend ratted you out), and
- other lie-detector methods if they are talking at all,
- plus quickly checking the validity of info given up.
Posted by: JohnHunt2001 | February 9, 2010, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
The only group Obama’s critics are helping is the American people by saving them from his socialist policies.
Posted by: bobby | February 9, 2010, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
Republicans wanted Obama to fail? Really? I recall all the support Democrats gave to GW’s policies and how well Bush was treated in the media and how civil the “dissent” was back in the days.
BS.
Republicans, particularly Conservatives, want the United States to succeed.
Posted by: progressive mama | February 9, 2010, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Anyone who voted for this a**clown of a president should have their civil rights taken away, drug into the streets and shot in the head, and strung up in town centers and pelttheir lifeless bodies with sticks and stones, a la Musolinni.
The Progressive movement should be branded as the terrorist/communist orginization that it is, and should be banned from the United States. And anyone who votes Democrat should be branded a criminal for the rest of their days.
Posted by: Mike M. | February 9, 2010, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
How can one respect a president that has no respect for this nation?
On Sept. 7, 2008 on Meet the Press Sen.Obama was asked about wearing a flag pin and he stated “As I’ve said about the flag pin, I don’t want to be perceived as taking sides.” On the National anthem,
“The anthem itself conveys a war-like message. You know, the bombs bursting in air and all that sort of thing.”
He goes on to say “It’s my intention, if elected, to disarm America to the level of acceptance to our Middle east brethren. If we, as a nation of waring people, conduct ourselves as the nations of Islam where peace prevails — perhaps a state or period of mutal accord could exist between our government. We as a nation have placed upon the nations of Islam an unfair injustice which is why my wife disrespects the flag and she and I have attended several flag burning ceremonies in the past.”
There you have it folks, this is the man that is in the White House. Can you really respect someone like this who has no respect for what we, as a nation, stands for. When I was in grade school, we were taught respect for the anthem and the flag.
And the Christmas bomber, if he had been able to blow up the plane, some of it would have rained down on Canada. In fact, if he had done it too soon, maybe all of it would have come down on Canada, so it would have been an international terrorists attack.
Posted by: Rosalee | February 9, 2010, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
You republicans, conservatives and democrats stop your whining on who is better. The country is in need of unity right now not division. Learn from history you ignorant. This great division will bring us closer be our end. It is time to stop whining and support our country. Start with yourself, stop hating and start doing something about it, write your congeressman, write the president, do something useful for once.
Posted by: S | February 9, 2010, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
Ronny Raygun, The Democratic Party has not needed GOP support to pass any law. They’ve had a majority in the House, The Senate and own the Presidency. If they have not accomplished anything it is because of bickering among their own party. However, when a government starts taking over private businesses, that verges on Communism and the American people do not want that. We have a right to criticize policies that we do not like. When Bush was President Nancy Pelosi said that “dissent was the highest form of patriotism” But now, since Obama has been elected, any criticism is labeled “obstructionism” by the Democrats. What hypocrits!
Posted by: L Ray | February 9, 2010, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
We reserve the right to kill all Muslims for their oil. How dare a few of them stand against us.
Posted by: Ben | February 9, 2010, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
Brennan writes that, “Terrorists are not 100-feet tall. Nor do they deserve the abject fear they seek to instill.”
—
Well said. It was a good op-ed. Steve Benen has an interesting post at Washington Monthly:
“As baseless Republican criticism of administration counter-terrorism policies has intensified, the president’s team has come up with some pretty straightforward defenses. When the GOP gets hysterical over trying accused terrorists in the U.S. justice system, Obama administration officials remind folks that more than 300 terrorists have already gone through this exact same system — with nary a complaint from Republicans.
In response, instead of adapting their argument to reality, GOP attack dogs have decided that the “more than 300″ number has to be a trumped up number and the result of Obama administration deception.
Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), the Judiciary Committee’s top Republican, called the number “unsubstantiated” and questioned its validity. Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) called the number “disingenuous.” National Review called the figure “bogus.” Dana Perino concluded, “The 300 number is as false as false gets.”
So, who’s right? Newsweek’s Mark Hosenball sets the record straight.
Maybe it’s time to stop some of the name calling over counter-terrorism policy and start checking the facts….
[I]t turns out that the Administration’s claims do appear to be well-documented — assuming that an official budget request sent to Congress by Bush’s last attorney general was truthful itself.
Yes, the figure Republicans insist was manufactured by the Obama administration was actually published in the budget released by Bush’s Justice Department.”
Posted by: progressive mama | February 9, 2010, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
so Obama has made us all into racists.. terror supporters.. and conservatives.. how the messah has fallen.. we also ele cted him.. remember that?
He won by lieing his ass off on his programs.. America is wakeing up to his con man hand fakes.. the war is still going on.. in Iraq for years more.. more killing in Afganisatn.. Gitmo is open.. no open government.. he follows crooks in congress on what ever they want.. corporations buy him with every bill.. I think he’s just like Bush.. except Bush held out for his own ideas. Obama is not black.. he’s clueless.
Posted by: richard | February 9, 2010, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
“I’m sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and disagree with this administration, somehow you’re not patriotic. We need to stand up and say we’re Americans, and we have the right to debate and disagree with any administration.”
— Hillary Rodham Clinton
Posted by: hillary | February 9, 2010, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
“Conservatism” means conserving money(ala balanced budgets) & conserving lives. That’s why the GOP isn’t conservative.”
So true! I pray that the Tea Party is collectively wise enough to fend off GOP scalawags/clingers-on. The Tea Party may be our country’s last hope of any form of representative democracy. We need a viable 3rd party option. Bush, Clinton, Bush, and Obama have lead us off a cliff. I hope we survive the fall.
Posted by: Brian | February 9, 2010, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Jack Tanksley wrote: “Good thing Bush’s critics weren’t helping Al Qaeda. Such as wanting him to announce a time table for withdrawal.”
Note that Bush announced a time table for withdrawal from Iraq.
Posted by: The_Mick | February 9, 2010, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Nice comment Andy so do you go by progressive if you can’t handle being called a lib?
Posted by: Scott | February 9, 2010, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
“Republicans are pursuing a scorched earth policy and they care very little about anything except being angry, fearful and bringing down everyone around them.”
Obviously! That explains Scott Brown’s win in a deep blue state (won with a positive campaign, incidentally).
Sorry, Americans are awake, and progressivism is dying before your very eyes. It’s long overdue.
Posted by: Mary | February 9, 2010, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Obama has far more glowing things to say about muslim nations than the one he was elected to protect. He calls patriotic Americans who attend town hall meetings and Tea Parties “bitter clingers, domestic terrorists in the making, extremists” and more, but calls terrorists “these folks”. He’s a complete disgrace, unpatriotic, un-American and a traitor, giving comfort and constitutional rights to our enemies. And now he says that those who criticise him are aiding Al-Qaeda. Un-freaking-believable.
Posted by: Nico | February 9, 2010, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
look at the LIBERAL HYPOCRITES – they cant take what they dished out toward real Americans for 8 years
Posted by: Jack Kennedy | February 9, 2010, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
What did the Bush critics do then?
Posted by: okie75 | February 9, 2010, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
L Ray: to your comment that the Democrats have had a majority. The filibuster takes that away and the “No to all things non-Republican” Republican party has not been afraid to use this “nuclear option” on all things not of their making. There has never been a party in all of the history of America that has been more obstructive, destructive and anti-American than the present day Republican party. It truly does say no to everything and has become extremely more Republican than American.
Posted by: dlboggan | February 9, 2010, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Progressive Mama, enlighten us. What is the progressive agenda in the U.S. Is it “redistribution of wealth”, Higer taxes and more government control? What do you mean when you say that you are a “progressive?”
Posted by: L Ray | February 9, 2010, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
The w/s should be happy. The progressives are the enemies best friend.
Posted by: gibonski | February 9, 2010, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Americans are awake, and progressivism is dying before your very eyes. It’s long overdue.
Posted by: Mary | Feb 9, 2010 1:59:35 PM
Ah yes– the sleeping giant roars. The neanderthals are paying attention because a Democrat is in office again, and they’re making all the same mistakes because they’re brains are the size of peas– but they’re the real Americans (you know, the ones who can be tricked into yelling at a tea party that all descendants of European immigrants should just go home– lol!!) We know, we know. We’ve heard all about it. But the Boomers and their older counterparts won’t be around forever. Thank God. I wouldn’t count progressivism out just yet there. Sooner or later everyone gets sick to death of negative nellies stuck in the way past with no economic sense whatsoever.
Posted by: progressive mama | February 9, 2010, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
Mr. Brennan stated “Politically motivated criticism and unfounded fear-mongering only serve the goals of al-Qaeda.”
Someone should have told his boss and his party that when they started politicizing the war 7-8 years ago. Jeremiah Wright was right in one regard…the chickens have come home to roost.
Posted by: positronictom | February 9, 2010, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
It is the Obama administration that has the impression terrorists are larger then they are. Obama is the one running away from calling them terrorists, running away from tough interrogations, running from the war on terror, running from swiftly prosecuting and executing them, and running all over the world apologizing for American strength and exceptionalism. What a bunch of academic babies.
Posted by: russ | February 9, 2010, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
LOL Boggan, you make no sense. The so-called “nuclear option” is a tactic that could have been used by the Democrats not the Republicans. The Democrats just lost this week their super majority in the house. And, what is anti-American about supporting the U.S. Constitution? It is Obama that has criticized the Constitution and the American system.
Posted by: L Ray | February 9, 2010, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
just curious… can someone point out the socialist in the whitehouse? I keep hearing about one, but everytime I look its Americans doing the job of fixing the debt and keeping our country safe… So do you oppositionists have anything besides socialist slurs to support your point, or are you content to be haters?
Posted by: DewyB | February 9, 2010, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
On ABC’s “This Week” yesterday regarding the botched interrogation of Abdul Mutalabb, John Podesta said “the proof is in the pudding” because now the underwear bomber is talking.
Podesta is misguided but I agree the proof is in the pudding.
The pudding has been rotting on the table for five weeks! Now, Thanks to these buffoons it’s worthless, we have to throw it out.
When you have confused lawyers and law professors who can’t tell the difference between fresh pudding and five week old pudding, of course, you’re going to see a growing percentage of Americans who are fed up of with confused lawyers.
Americans want a Commander in Chief who can think on his feet and quickly make the right decisions on national security.
Posted by: Rodney | February 9, 2010, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
AND
The Obama adminstration now has the policy that with “special permission” Americans can be assassinated!
Maybe Republicans ought to think twice about not complying with Obama, eh?
Posted by: drjohn | February 9, 2010, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
There are very few sensible arguments here from Republicans as far as I’m concerned.. ONLY LOTS OF NAME CALLING AND TRASH TALKING AS USUAL.. OH BTW I THOUGHT ONLY THUGS DID THAT?? LOL
Posted by: Charlie | February 9, 2010, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
and here I thought that “dissent is patriotic”
Posted by: NotAgain | February 9, 2010, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
What do you mean when you say that you are a “progressive?”
Posted by: L Ray | Feb 9, 2010 2:05:45 PM
I believe in progress– you know, science, staying competitive in regards to education, energy, jobs, new markets, health care– not relying solely on the military and war to remain a superpower, but also on our work ethic and our wits. I also am against the corporate nannystate that conservatives support.
Posted by: progressive mama | February 9, 2010, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Yeah, Obama killed at that meeting with the Pubs. He beat that strawman unmercifully. Turned it into a corpse-man.
Posted by: Hank the Tank | February 9, 2010, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
“I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you’re not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration.”
Posted by: drjohn | February 9, 2010, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
Read “The MIND of HITLER” by Langer and you’ll come to KNOW the mind of Barack Hussein Obama…!!
Also you’ll know the minds of Obama’s associates: William Ayers, Rashid Khalidi and Jeremiah Wright…!
Posted by: Airborne869 | February 9, 2010, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
Umm.. Pat Riot, “Won’t Get Fooled Again” was a lob against your hero Nixon. There’s also a line that states “I know that the hypnotized never lie” and that still stands for the Palin gazers. Myself, I wouldn’t mind another 3-7 years of Republican crybabies and watching the party continue to implode.
Posted by: Patriot_Act | February 9, 2010, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
“Sooner or later everyone gets sick to death of negative nellies stuck in the way past with no economic sense whatsoever.”
Progressive programs have produced $107.7 TRILLION in unfunded liabilities for Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. The government is only projected to bring in $2.2 TRILLION in tax revenues this year (it’ll be less), and they project a $1.6 TRILLION deficit (it’ll be more). Progressivism is dying because Americans are sick to death of its ideas that are destroying our republic and bankrupting us all. How’s that for “economic sense”?
Posted by: Mary | February 9, 2010, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
DewyB, I will be happy to point out the Socialists. Van Jones, appointed Green Jobs Czar, is an avowed radical communist. Google his name and you can read all about him. The “manufacturing czar has said that “free enterprise” is a joke and that he agrees with Mao Tse Tung that political power comes at the point of a gun. Anita Dunn, who was the White House Communications Director, said in a graduation speech that one of her favorite political philosophers was Mao Tse Tung. Obama himself in his first book said that he sought out for friends in college “Marxist professors” and commented about attending several “Socialist Conventions”. Surely you understand that “redistribution of wealth” which Obaama advocates is a Marxist idea.
Posted by: L Ray | February 9, 2010, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
progressive mama…taking the greatest country in the world a marching it toward 3rd world socialism is not progress its regress. i am tired of the media calling liberals progressives. its an oxymoron. they should be called the regressives.we cant all get along in the world never have and never will.
Posted by: catman | February 9, 2010, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
And “Some Hater”- it’s a documented fact that Prescott Bush helped fund Hitler’s rise to power
Posted by: Patriot_Act | February 9, 2010, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Wow! We’ve come full circle. Remember when Obama said it was patriotic to criticize and question Bush?
Now that the shoe is on the other foot it’s unpatriotic huh?
One term president for sure.
Posted by: former democrat | February 9, 2010, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Obama and the Demos criticized President Bush unmercifully and claimed this just exemplified their patriotism. But now when the table is turned; Obama’s critics are characterized as allies of Al Qaeda. Isn’t it interesting that the Bink and his kool-aide drinkers are no better than the previous administration. Sorry, it just doesn’t compute. The change that was asked for never happened. The sad part of it all was that the accontability that the Media was supposed to demand just vanished. JOURNALISM HAS DIED!
Posted by: Plas Jaramillo | February 9, 2010, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
So now it is helping the enemy to criticise the government and the liberals posting here don’t see the irony? Are you blind or stupid or both…I ususlly consider liberals to be stupid…but am willing to go with blind if you admit to the hypocracy of Obama on this one.
Posted by: godsmotive | February 9, 2010, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
Two years ago dissent was the highest form of patriotism, but now it’s the lowest form of treason.
CHANGE!
Posted by: McGehee | February 9, 2010, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
This administration is the biggest bunch of babies I’ve ever seen. They cry and whine about fox news. They cry and whine about the Republican congressmen and senators who are in a superminiority, whine about talk show hosts, whine about change being tough. This my folks is what you get when you hire a community organizer into something well over his head.
Posted by: Alaskan | February 9, 2010, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
John,
It is amazing that Obama wants to give terrorists Constitutional protection, and at the same time use the Patriot Act to deny those same rights to American Citizens. Did you miss Obama’s latest Executive Order exempting Interpol from having to operate under our Laws and Constitution? What about the Navy Seals who are being Court Marshaled because they gave a Terrorist a fat lip during his captured. Seems they are not worthy of the same Constitutional protection that Obama provides to Muslim Terrorist. How do you rationalize this injustice? Socialist as yourself like to refer to Conservatives as Fascists, but fail to look at the person who owns the Democrat Party. George Soros, is a Nazis Jew who turned his own people in to the Germans and stole their property. That is how he started his financial empire. Google George Soros and read some of his interviews, then tell me who the Kool-Aid Drinkers are. Liberal Socialist like to rant that they are more educated that Conservatives which I do not believe. An education is not “paying for certification” that Socialist Professors have formally indoctrinated you. Liberals form opinions and then only consider facts that support their conclusion or in most cases fabricate them. Basically you don’t have the mental ability to collect all the facts and arrive at logical conclusions. For instance, I give you Cap & Trade, the Democrats solution on how to tax the air we breathe. And you Liberals who buy this baloney accuse Conservatives of drinking Kool-Aid.
Posted by: icespur | February 9, 2010, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
Mama, that is not the political definition of a progressive at all. Political progressives believe that that Government should control our lives to the extent that we have social perfection in the country. They want to tax those who earn lots of money and give it to those who have less. If necesarry they believe in controlling the economy even to the extent of seizing control of private businesses such as GM and Chrysler. They do not believe the U.S. Constitution is an adequate document and want to circumvent it. Progressivism is simply another term for liberal or socialist.
Posted by: L Ray | February 9, 2010, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
What happened to “Dissent is the highest form of patriotism.”???
Leave it to ABC to give this moron a soapbox on which to stand.
Posted by: Western Conscience | February 9, 2010, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
I wonder if the democrats can take in the irony of what this official effectively said – that criticism of the administration only serves the goals of the enemy. This was the issue that the democrats flipped out about for the last decade – that the Bush White House intimidated them.
Bush said “Either you’re with us or you’re against us”. Now Obama’s administration is saying the exact same thing. The difference however, is that the Bush administration really believed that the country was in danger, whereas the Obama administration is just trying to shame us into not criticising them.
Do these people realize the level of hypocracy to which they have sunk? Shame on you!
Posted by: Bill G | February 9, 2010, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
The most important breakthrough in the interrogation occurred “after Abdulmutallab was read his rights, which the FBI made standard policy under Michael Mukasey, President Bush’s attorney general,” he writes, noting that failed shoe bomber Richard Reid “was read his Miranda rights five minutes after being taken off a plane he tried to blow up. The same people who criticize the president today were silent back then.”
While this statement is true, it fails to mention that Richard reid was an American citizen and as such the Miranda reading was required.
Posted by: BWS | February 9, 2010, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
This White House is “clueless” when it comes to either the economy or national security. The faster we dump the Obama Marxist Administration the faster we can recover our lost edge against IslamoFascist terrorists.
Posted by: jgreene | February 9, 2010, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Candidate Obama – and now President Obsma — has never honored the dictum “policy disagreements should stop at the water’s edge. He was dogged on the campaign trail in criticizing the surge strategy in Iraq — even as it was succeeding — note: he is copying the Bush surge strategy in Afghanistan — imitation being the highest form of flattery. Candidate Obama also repeatedly taunted Bush/Cheney for not catching Osama in Tora Bora — did not such rhetoric play into Al Qaeda’s hands? So this midnight conversion by the Obama Administration to a bipartisan foreign policy is the height of hypocrisy.
Posted by: Dennis | February 9, 2010, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Isn’t this what the Left mocked Pres. Bush and the rest of us for when he said “if your not with us, your with the terrorists?” Boy, they thought that was just war-mongering rhetoric that should not be tolerated. Wasn’t it considered Patriotic when they criticized? Why is it that criticism of THEIR terrorism policy isn’t ok now, but it was then? Same old, same old politcal crap.
Posted by: Robert | February 9, 2010, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Is John Brennan for real? Has this guy been living in a cave the last 9 or 10 years? Are we really hearing this from the same people who have granted Geneva Rights and then US Constitutional rights to enemy combatants and terrorists? Wow. Talk about calling the kettle black.
Posted by: Craig K | February 9, 2010, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Hmmmm Muffy, Al Quaeda began to surface during Clinton’s Administration, so I guess it was the Clinton Democrats that helped create the “BS” as you call it. And since Great Britain has been our staunch ally during all of this, I suppose that the British Government had some part of creating Al Quaeda also? And what about Osama Bin Laden? Does he ever exist?
Posted by: L RAy | February 9, 2010, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Blithering idiot.
Posted by: joboy | February 9, 2010, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
When president Bush was in charge the liberals fought every effort to stop the muslin terrorists. The liberals would have considered losing a major city in America to a sneak nuke attack a major democratic victory just to have a reason to hurt America and Bush. Now we have a million reasons to reject obama! It will take way too much time to stop us all on all of them!
Posted by: keister7 | February 9, 2010, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
Short answer: That was then. This is now.
Longer answer: This is a different world than the world in which Richard Reid was taken off the plane he tried to destroy. There was no Gitmo camp. Military tribunals had not even been set up at that time.
Obama’s only reason for closing Gitmo is because terrorists were “inspired” to attack us because of the camp. But, what was Richard Reid’s excuse? Poor service on the airline?
It wasn’t until 9/11 that we began to consider long term solutions for dealing with the muslim threat.
It took time to plan and organize the Gitmo camp, the interrogation process and the tribunals. Obama’s policies are a giant step backwards in the war against terrorism.
Thank You,
Sujan
Posted by: Jeff Colclasure | February 9, 2010, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
It’s good that the liberal left nor “any” of the socialist democrats ever criticized President Bush while he was in office…. isn’t it.
(anybody at ABC News want to find some quotations from the looney left during that time that might have underminded the war efforts and given aid to the enemy?)
Posted by: LBlanks | February 9, 2010, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
What most of you ‘progressives’ seem to forget is that it was the ‘Bugs Bunny/Road Runner Hour”, not the other way around. Do you think Foghorn Leghorn would have stood by and done NOTHING had Huckleberry Hound tried to get his name out there first? I can remember Yosemite Sam THREATENING Bugs because, as he said on numerous occasions, ‘I hate that rabbit!’…Look it up…It’s ALL public record!!!
Posted by: KPN | February 9, 2010, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
USA today is absolutly correct about Americas security. This administration is totally amatuer hour. Come to think of it Obama looks a lot like Barney Fife with a suntan.
Posted by: jeckelmyhyde | February 9, 2010, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
It would be funny if it weren’t so sad but it seems the democrats are acting as if the previous 8 years of assaulting Bush day in/day out never happened.
Wasn’t Richard Reid an American citizen? I’m pretty sure the underwear bomber was NOT!
What helps al-qaeda is when someone like Jack Murtha convicts our soldiers in public before the facts were in. What helps a-Qaeda is when democrats call Bush a liar day in and day out regarding Iraq knowing full well Bush the father did lie to the Shi’ite when he told them to rise up against Saddam.What helps al-qaeda is when democrats say Iraq was only a war for oil.
etc…..
etc…
My what a selective memory this administration has!
Posted by: RichN | February 9, 2010, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Awesome. Love seeing the FNC idiots tactics turned around and used on them.
Posted by: AMB | February 9, 2010, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
Don’ worry. Be happy. And just let the people you elected take care of you. We’ll do the worrying for you, so just be happy.
And SHUT UP!
Posted by: don'worry,behappy | February 9, 2010, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Where is the hypocritical Left leadership, crying out that Obama is a war criminal for using all the Drones in Pakistan that kill innocent peasants indiscriminately, yet he is so quick to give proven enemies of the state Constitutional rights and civil trials?
As usual, the Liberal thinking in this area, as with economics, is fatally flawed!
Posted by: Franklin Cain | February 9, 2010, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
“what I’m not is stuck mired in the status quo desperately trying to “conserve” the past and keep out everyone different because they could maybe be a little scary to those who are xenophobic.”
Wow, you don’t have a clue what conservatism even means! Or progressivism for that matter!
Posted by: Mary | February 9, 2010, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Mama, I think if you do a little research you will find out that I am right. Do you believe in the Constitution of the U.S. or do you find it outdated? Do you want the U.S to be more like the European Socialist countries. Oh by the way I am not home schooled. I have 3 college degrees and I know what I am talking about. I don’t think you really know what a modern political “progressive” really is. It doen’t just mean moving forward, it means moving forward in a specific political way. A way in which the majority of Americans do not want.
Posted by: L RAy | February 9, 2010, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
There’s nothing in the streets
Looks any different to me
And the slogans are replaced, by-the-bye
And the parting on the left
Are now parting on the right
And the beards have all grown longer overnight
……..
Yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!
Meet the new boss
Same as the old boss
Posted by: RichN | February 9, 2010, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Oh, I see…it’s Obama’s CRITICS who are helping Al-Quaida, here. Gee — and I thought it just might have been Obama himself. Silly me.
Posted by: Majority | February 9, 2010, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Unfortunately for the White House.. they have already lost the confidence of the American public with their pathetic handling of terrorists. They look very weak and feeble in their handling of ‘terrorism’ in general. This administration is very thin-skinned. Any criticism leveled against them and we get a response that suggests that the critics are clueless. “He suggests that many critics are hypocritical and clueless”. We are also too stupid to understand this wonderful health care monstrosity they are trying to force down our throats with an unprecedented and unconstitutional “forced purchase” of a policy. I’m tired of being lectured to. I’m tired of being called stupid because I’m questioning the wisdom of the powers that be. My feeling that everything this administration has done makes the USA look very weak and feeble. Imagine the biggest superpower having to run and ask the boys parents to come and help us to get information out of him. Imagine the optics of this in countries like CHINA and IRAN. We can’t even handle an 18 year old boy (or however old he is). I am not suggesting that we would torture anyone as China or Iran would do… however, a thorough harsh interrogation (away from the CAMERAS) would be better…. Every other country must be laughing hysterically at the hapless USA fumbling on this and deciding to try KSM in a circus court. IT SIMPLY DEFIES COMMON SENSE. And it isn’t that we are be ‘afraid to try him in our judicial system’.. but rather… I don’t want to give him a platform to spew hate… I don’t want to invite another terrorist attack where the trial is being held… I don’t want to SPEND A BILLION dollars on security to ‘make a point’ so the liberal elite can ‘feel good about themselves’ and give KSM the show trial that he wants so desperately.
Posted by: GrowSome | February 9, 2010, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
It’s okay for the Dems to criticize President Bush while he’s in office but it’s a little different with O’Bama in charge,huh?
Posted by: cls | February 9, 2010, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
“We need no lectures about the fact that this nation is at war.”
Then why did they change the name from “Global War on Terrorism” to “Overseas Contingency Operation”??
Posted by: C Erickson | February 9, 2010, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
The terrorists have been given the rights of U.S. citizens because of comrade Hussein’s allegiance to allah. He, and sadly, the Demoncrats, or at least most of them, owe no allegiance to the U.S., but rather to the marxist/progressive movement. Total destruction of the U.S., and its culture and economy is the goal of comrade Hussein and his progressive gang. We have perhaps one chance to stop this madness in November, but don’t bet on it, as marxists and jihadists will never concede defeat, or stop trying to destroy us.
Posted by: jgalt | February 9, 2010, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Lets make it simple and straightforward:
Criticize Bush = patriot
Criticize Obama = traitor
Now you understand.
Posted by: Winston Smith | February 9, 2010, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Does this means the Lefties has been serving al Qaeda for decades.
Posted by: Young Independent | February 9, 2010, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
To suggest that dissent of present administration policies with respect to terrorists plays into their hands only brushes over the real issue, and is offensive to thoughtful patriots.
It is clear that we do not have the fortitude to seek out move forward, engage,and destroy those who attempt to kill us.
For this highly placed leader who is charged with our national security to make this statement,he is saying,”I have no idea what I am doing.”
Dissent may point to the solution.
There are many people outside of goverment who understand what we are up against. Find them, listen to them, and then take action.
The road we are on can only, and will end badly.
Posted by: Ron Maines | February 9, 2010, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
But there seems to be one misstep after another. Anti-terror departments don’t work together, minimum safety precautions are not there, and there’s no knowledge of best procedures once a terrorist is caught. Actions speak louder than words. All the anti-terrorist departments come off looking as spacey as Condi Rice ignoring the words “iminent attack.”
I see a pattern of this throughout Obama’s government. Don’t criticize this? Somebody needs to.
In my opinion, this is squarely the result of Obama’s appalling lack of leadership ability. He’s reactive and passive. He lacks mature, seasoned advisors. He’s completely unaware that he can set the agenda by sticking to the liberal Democratic party goals. He wants to “work with Republicans” so badly that he waters down changes too much.
I voted for him, but wow he’s not what our country needs today.
Posted by: LA42 | February 9, 2010, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Mary, I don’t think you really know what conservatism really means. It is adherence to a set of political principles such as fiscal responsibility, personal liberty, and ownership of property. Now you tell the actual definition of political progressivism. I want the real definition not some fantasy definition in your head.
Posted by: L RAy | February 9, 2010, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Uh-oh, looks like the Drudge-bots are descending on the comments section. Armchair critics thinking they know jack about anything after listening to Rush Limbaugh. Hey, you think any administration is going to tell us about every attack they have foiled? And, funny how these same kind of comments by Brennan were used by the Bush team, and I’ll bet you didn’t say a word back then. Bunch of partisan stooges..
Posted by: JP | February 9, 2010, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
“Serving the goals of Al-Qaeda”
How about giving the group a venue in which they can get attention and make a mockery out of the US justice system on the same ground where 4,000 Americans lives were lost due to the acts of the same group?
Again, if there’s any Al-Qaeda puppet, it’s apparent who that servant is.
Posted by: Marvin | February 9, 2010, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Liberals lie to support their cause. A proven fact! Ideology is far more important than truth……..just look at “Climate Change” or “Global Warming” the lies just keep unfolding. If they do it for one, they will do it for all.
Posted by: Jim2shou | February 9, 2010, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
I SERVED THIS COUTRY AND TOOK 2 BULLETS WHILE DOING IT . YOUR A BUNCH OF IDOITS !!!!!
Posted by: JIM | February 9, 2010, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
You’re kidding, right? Were the Looney Left afraid or the ACLU (but I repeat myself) afraid of helping Al Qaeda when Bush was president. They undermined our troops during war time at every possible chance.
Grow up, obummer. Your magic is gone.
Posted by: You're Kidding | February 9, 2010, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
When I am abroad, I always make it a rule never to criticize or attack the government of my own country. I make up for lost time when I come home.
Sir Winston Churchill
Posted by: jimmerz | February 9, 2010, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
I don’t see why so many are bothered by the fact that he was read his rights. I would of covered my bases too. Because we all know he will probably end up with an American lawyer or an American trained one. Who would probably bring that up, since he/she would be looking for anything and everything. I believe, they should just pull him off the plane and shoot him in the head. End of story. But if we are going to do the whole trial song and dance, then you should definitely read him his rights. Period.
Posted by: camicus | February 9, 2010, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
What there are still terrorists? I thought that Obama’s election was going to so change the world that the Terrorists would see how nice the US was and they would give up their Holy war. It was all Bush’s fault… that is the great Obama alibi for EVERYTHING! He doesnt govern he whines.
Posted by: McDonalds | February 9, 2010, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
I love it. The dems make it their “right” to make all kinds of comments about George Bush and our military…mostly just looking for self promotion at the cost of our warfighters…now, they are on the other side and all of the sudden it becomes a problem? For whom? The left has never given one second of thought into anything until it ends up hitting them in the face. Obama doesn’t want us to listen to political news on “cable channels”, they don’t want us to listen to “am talk radio” and now, they don’t want us to have “our own opinions”…all they want is our vote and they wonder why we are pushing them out of office as fast as we can vote. Thanks Murtha for not having us wait so long…mean, yeah maybe but what comes around goes around. Obama must be swazi for Stalin…2014 cannot come fast enough.
Posted by: Greg | February 9, 2010, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Amateur hour sums it up.
Can you imagine being charged with creating the High Value Detaniee Interrogation Program in August ’09, not having it in place by December…if you worked in the private sector? Say hello to the unemployment office.
Every effort by this administration illuminates the fact that nobody working there has actually ever run anything in the private sector …where results matter.
They give nice speeches, then entrust change to government workers? Huh? The strangest part of this is that they still don’t understand that taxpayers’ demand results because that’s the world we inhabit. Excuses get old.
Posted by: work4alivin | February 9, 2010, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
Claiming that the Obama Administration has done more to fight terrorism than the Bush Administration is like claiming President Obama cares more about the unborn than President Bush. This article is one of the biggest pieces of fiction I have ever read (and I read a ton).
I’m not from Texas (one of the greatest states in the Union) but if I may borrow an expression from those brave folks in regards to these ridiculous claims:
That dog don’t hunt.
Posted by: CommonSenseKid | February 9, 2010, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
This bunch of cry babies make me laugh. America will be better off without these clowns. And we thought George Bush was stupid. He had the intellect of a rocket scientist compared to these morons.
Odumba seems to ALWAYS blame someone when his ideas and policies are rejcted.
hey Odumba we dont you or your ideas. That hopey changey thing aint workin no more.
Posted by: Dave | February 9, 2010, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
Dave,
If your tormented by the fact that Prescott Bush helped fund Hitler’s rise to power.
Why don’t you check out John D. Rockefeller’s involvement with the Germans.
Posted by: icespur | February 9, 2010, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
For all of the conservatives and patriots out there…Don’t waste your breath, just live the life and fight the fight…Talking to these traitors is like trying to nail jell-o to the wall. Lots of work and no progress to show for it.
Posted by: MR BILL | February 9, 2010, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
baloney
Posted by: Dave | February 9, 2010, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Brennan speaketh with forked tongue..
The administration is getting senile… they do not recall (sarcasm) the events of last week when they told the whole world the little guy was talking (Gibbs already let the cat out of the bag at his daily harangue)and went one step further in meeting with reporters to provide details (as he put it “contextualize”
Can’t have it both ways buddy!
Posted by: Awake | February 9, 2010, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
Wow, you don’t have a clue what conservatism even means! Or progressivism for that matter!
Posted by: Mary | Feb 9, 2010 2:45:31 PM
i didn’t say anything about conservatism— I said what I’m not. And most on the Right can’t say they haven’t voted for candidates from a party that isn’t associated with those types of things that I’m not– at least not honestly. Have you talked to many tea party ‘conservatives”? Interviewed them? Do you get the differences between the tea party populists, the standard Republicans, the neocons, the more cerebreal/intellectually elite libertarians and true independents– do you know textbook cases, real life not-so-perfect examples and where most the garbage in the comments here fits? Do you know the difference between a Dem, a centrist Dem, a liberal, a socialist, a communist, a progressive and so on, or do you lump them together and then act all arrogant when someone doesn’t like the party you associate with for stereotypical reasons? I’m a progressive independent who tends to vote Dem in national politics because I think Republicans are morons– BUT i carry a gun, and I do want the government out of my business. if my gay cousin wants to marry, I don’t want to hear what you have to say about it– or the Rethugs you vote for. If my sixteen year old niece is sexually active, i don’t want your reps getting up all in her business either. I think untying health care from employment and making it single payer is a fantastic idea that promotes entrepreneurship– and art. (I own a gym and I write so i’m all about the small business owner and the self-employed.) I hate the corporate nanny state and parties with no ideas.
I’m probably more conservative on certain things than you are. But I’m not a Republican.My ideology isn’t fixed and rigid and I’m not into clinging to the past or being xenophobic.
Posted by: progressive mama | February 9, 2010, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
I’m not as concerned with AL QAEDA as I am with AL OBAMA.
Posted by: pencilvanian | February 9, 2010, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Dear N.S.A.:
Given that all electronic communications in the U.S. are intercepted, would you please post the intercepts of the world’s most dangerous person:
former President-VICE Richard B. Cheney.
Thanks for your patRIOTism,
Kilgore Trout.
Posted by: Kilgore Trout | February 9, 2010, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Nope, “FEDS”, the White HOuse is not just hiring crack heads, they’re also hiring socialists and Marxists and Communists.
Posted by: LR | February 9, 2010, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
And we thought George Bush was stupid. He had the intellect of a rocket scientist compared to these morons.
_______________________________________
George Bush – rocket scientist? I don’t think so. He couldn’t even successfully run the businesses he was eased into by his father and his father’s friends.
You discredit your argument with such nonsense.
Posted by: tierra | February 9, 2010, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Moreover, Brennan says, hundreds of terrorists have been convicted in criminal courts while only three have been convicted in the military tribunal system.
_________________________________
This is the essential shameful hypocrisy of the Republicans. Hundreds of terrorists were tried in criminal courts by the Bush administration – yet for political points – the Republicans pose as is the Obama administrations is somehow ‘weak’ for doing exactly the same.
Shameful hypocrites = Republicans.
Posted by: tierra | February 9, 2010, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Terrorism is more CIA war propaganda. It’s being used to take away freedom. Any future attack will be helped out by the CIA.
Propaganda example: “Support the Troops” what they really mean is “Support U.S. foreign policy” obviously our Foreign policy is detrimental so the media replaces “foreign policy” with Troops. Classic Propaganda tactic from “Crystalizing Public Opinion.”
Posted by: J | February 9, 2010, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.
Winston Churchill
Posted by: jimmerz | February 9, 2010, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
First they said that people who criticize Obama were racists. Then they said that people who criticize Obama were stupid. Now they are saying that people who criticize Obama are supporting Al Qaeda. So much for bringing hope and change to Washington.
Posted by: James | February 9, 2010, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Wait, what? Terrorists aren’t a hundred feet tall?!?
Dog!
Posted by: margaret | February 9, 2010, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
This is the essential shameful hypocrisy of the Republicans. Hundreds of terrorists were tried in criminal courts by the Bush administration – yet for political points – the Republicans pose as is the Obama administrations is somehow ‘weak’ for doing exactly the same.
Shameful hypocrites = Republicans.
Slow on the uptake here little lib…This was done prior to us delcaring war on Terrorism, which made the military tribunal a reality.
We all argue these points as though we are the worst of the worst…For my money, I would just as soon do to the terrorists what their people do to those of ours that get captured…Save the tax payers a load of cash, and we can’t be any worse than Satan, right?
Posted by: mr bill | February 9, 2010, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
Mama, I’m shocked. I’m not a registered republican either and I have many libertarian tendencies. However, I do believe in fiscal responsibility. I tend to vote for Republican candidates because so many democrats want to spend so much money. I think, after all, that you and I have many of the same political ideas, but I think I am correct. I don’t think you’re a true progressive.
Posted by: L RAy | February 9, 2010, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
@Pat Riot(or anyone else). Forgive me for being didactic. However, could you name specific Communists, Marxists and/or Socialists in the Obama Administration? Also, as the son of an economist, what are your credentials on the economy? Have you taken any graduate level economics courses? Undergraduate? High school?
I ask these questions because a lot of folks spout nonsense in these forums. For instance the lede (above) discusses price-gouging by an insurance company that made over huge profits last year. Clear-cut, right?
Yet, a majority of the posters are up in arms defending the company’s rank exploitation of their consumers. Why? Well, if Obama is against it, we must be for it.
My citizenship comes before my partisanship. My golden rule is empiricism, if it works…good. Generally, Obama’s policies have been well thought out and well within the toolkit of centrist public policy (I have an Masters in Public Policy). My biggest pet peeve is the high level of ignorance about economics and public policy in these comments fields. Talking point after talking point, blah, blah, blah, ALL CAPS SCREEDS, blah, blah. No ideas, no intelligent discussion, just the inchoate ramblings of the intellectually bankrupt.
Is it any wonder we are at the historical pass we’re in. GWB ran the country into the ground. None of you said anything. Now, instead of joining the effort to clean up the mess, you whine, you obstruct, all for short term advantage, patently ignoring our crumbling national infrastructure, our remedial educational system, our overpriced and woefully inadequate healthcare system.
Guess what? We NEED to raise taxes. We NEED to cut military spending and we NEED healthcare reform. If we don’t we f’ed. I say this as a 40 yr old man with no children. I’ll be fine. I’ve dual citizenship and an Ivy League education, I’m marketable globally. I feel sad for the inbred goobers screaming “Socialism!” They’re f’ed and they know it. Unfortunately, like any drown victim, they are fighting against their last best hope of rescue.
O’tempore…
Posted by: BBaptiste | February 9, 2010, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
This is the essential shameful hypocrisy of the Republicans. Hundreds of terrorists were tried in criminal courts by the Bush administration – yet for political points – the Republicans pose as is the Obama administrations is somehow ‘weak’ for doing exactly the same.
Shameful hypocrites = Republicans.
_______________________________
Slow on the uptake here little lib…This was done prior to us delcaring war on Terrorism, which made the military tribunal a reality.
____________________________________
Nonsense.
Posted by: tierra | February 9, 2010, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
“The problem is not that we have too many fools, it’s that the lightning isn’t distributed right.” – Benjamin Franklin
I think he was talking about Obamaniacs.
Posted by: JKDRAWDE | February 9, 2010, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
MAJORITY said it: Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. About working people, Bush didn’t care. Obama doesn’t care. And our Senators couldn’t care less. The bankers pull the strings of these puppet-people we call our elected representatives. Government has become one big puppet show and the audience (we taxpayers) continue to be ripped off. Bankers thrive on disruption and fear-mongering, using their shills in high places to help manipulate the system for their personal gain. Why else has money been flowing out of the middle class to the mega-rich at an ever-accelerating pace over the past decade or so? Can a Wall St. bankster ever have enough? No, just a little more. Just a little more. Money is God to them.
Posted by: bobjones | February 9, 2010, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
*Hundreds of terrorists were tried in criminal courts by the Bush administration – yet for political points – the Republicans pose as is the Obama administrations is somehow ‘weak’ for doing exactly the same.*
Which hundreds? The ones I hear the WH touting were either set up (1) BEFORE 9/11, when we WEREN’T at war, or (2) shortly AFTER 9/11, BEFORE the military tribunals were set up to handle such prosecutions.
Personally, I’d like to hear more about where the WH is getting this “hundreds of terrorists” number from.
Posted by: Tim | February 9, 2010, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Republicans, particularly Conservatives, want the United States to succeed.
=
Republicans, particularly Conservatives, want the United States to be a Christian Nation.
(If it was, do you think they’d be screaming so loudly?)
A non-partisan Nevadan, I’m not sure who to vote for yet, but it looks like there are more (sound) choices in the Republican department. I think I’ll register as a Republican to have a voice in the primaries (I’m non-partisan and not afraid of garnishing a nickname of “flipper”)
You have more power than you realize, or at least you have more potential than realized.
Posted by: wikiBuddha | February 9, 2010, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
What hypocrisy!!! For 8 years, democrats and the U.S. Media did everything they could to undermine the war on terror, malign the U.S. military, and cement the resolve of Al Qaaeda and boost the morale of our enemies.
Posted by: Vic | February 9, 2010, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
“Terrorism is more CIA war propaganda. It’s being used to take away freedom. Any future attack will be helped out by the CIA. ”
—————————————–
Ring-ring-ring…
The 1960′s called. They’re missing their paranoid Soviet apologist.
:)
Posted by: Tim | February 9, 2010, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
Everyone knows the Al Queda sham is a cover story so the imperialist Pentagon planners can raid any country they wish of national resoutces (i.e. oil and gas)
Posted by: Fred | February 9, 2010, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
What Brennan is saying in effect is “if you criticize Obama the terrorists will have won”.
Posted by: Oxbay | February 9, 2010, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
I think when an administration says when they will pull out of a theatre of operation, they have alerady lost the war.
Which does more harm? Telling the terrorists we don’t like our president’s actions, or telling the terrorists when we are pulling out?
Posted by: JKDRAWDE | February 9, 2010, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
Personally, I’d like to hear more about where the WH is getting this “hundreds of terrorists” number from.
Posted by: Tim | Feb 9, 2010 3:37:51 PM
_____________________________________
Tapper and abc have used the same figure of hundreds of terrorists having been tried by Bush administration in civil court.
Posted by: tierra | February 9, 2010, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
Liberals think VP Cheney is more dangerous then OBL !!!!
____________________________________
Cheney and Halliburton are the military/industrial complex President Eisenhower warned us about.
Posted by: tierra | February 9, 2010, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
Bush used civilian courts while the military tirbunals were in the concept stage and being vetted for legality and personnel and locations were being set up. Further, some of the more dangerous types were denied civilian courts if it appeared to expose USA to compromise of intelligence info and mthods. OhBummer and Holder are fools and liars.
Posted by: Osamas Pajamas | February 9, 2010, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
LMAO – So, tierra, you are saying that the administration gets it’s info from ABC News?
Posted by: JKDRAWDE | February 9, 2010, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
The Administration is wrong. It’s Obama and his policies that are help Al Qaeda.
Posted by: Mike | February 9, 2010, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Ah the Obama/DNC do as I say, not as I do administration.
Posted by: RHG | February 9, 2010, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
So what the Obama administration is saying is that criticizing them only emboldens the terrorists….hmm…I think I have heard that somewhere before
Posted by: Bill | February 9, 2010, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
I wonder if the Administration has considered the awful down sides of their choice of venue? What if one of their very own super liberal judges tosses their case because of the myriad legal questions that simply do not come up in a military court? If such a disastrous decision happens will they still wish to brag about our wonderful legal system? Be afraid!
Posted by: Ovid | February 9, 2010, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
This from the same “dissent is patriotic” crowd who did all they could to undermine the Bush Administration in a time of war. Well, they ought to know; they did all they could to insure the USA failed in the fight against terrorism.
Posted by: Silence Dogood | February 9, 2010, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
“Fear mongering only serves the goals of al Qaeda”… Really? My question is this: why shouldn’t we be afraid? Al Qaeda means to hurt us. They’re proven to us that they’re very serious about that. And when you consider that our borders are porous, we almost lost 300 people on a plane on Christmas day, 14 people were slaughtered by an Islamic militant at Ft. Hood, radical imams deliver their message of hate every day in mosques and madrasses here in our own country… why shouldn’t we be afraid? The far-left progressives have destroyed the very fabric of our security with their socialistic, politically correct nonsense. Damn right I’m afraid. Afraid that this president and his cronies do NOT fear the enemy enough. Obama obviously does not understand the nature of our enemy, nor does it seem that he even believes we’re fighting a real war. We don’t even use the coded threat levels anymore. Even in Britain they haven’t abandoned that.
Vote them out, America. The sooner we vote all these anti-American, fascist, communist progressives out of office and send them all home, the safer we will all be.
Posted by: Hamlet | February 9, 2010, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
BBaptiste, you’re hopeless. Do a little internet research about the Directors in the White HOuse and you will find out about the communists and socialists. Specifically, look up Ron Bloom, Anita Dunn and Van Jones. Obmam himself in his book stated the his best friends in college were “Marxist professors” and that he attended Socialist conventions.
Posted by: L RAy | February 9, 2010, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
All of the hysteria plays into Bin Laden’s hands, regardless which side invokes the hysteria. Bin Laden stated long ago that his goal was to defeat America economically, not militarily. Bin Laden is winning. America has bankrupted itself since 9/11 mostly with the excuse of fighting the war on terror. The Abdul Mutallab action probably cost less than $20k and we react by spending almost a billion, plus split the country even further politically. Whether you politic from the left or right, the partisan politics defeat ourselves. Brennan is correct.
Posted by: Independent1959 | February 9, 2010, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
Obama makes every move from a political point of view. That is why so much of what he does, or tries to do, doesn’t pass the smell test. All he has ever experienced in his working life, is based on politics. You can’t solve financial problems with politics. You can’t turn a sow’s ear into a silk purse with politics. He thinks he can say something and make it so. President Obama is in way over his head, and hasn’t a clue about what is needed to heal the country.
Posted by: Hooridian | February 9, 2010, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
Mama, I’m shocked. I’m not a registered republican either and I have many libertarian tendencies. However, I do believe in fiscal responsibility. I tend to vote for Republican candidates because so many democrats want to spend so much money. I think, after all, that you and I have many of the same political ideas, but I think I am correct. I don’t think you’re a true progressive.
Posted by: L RAy | Feb 9, 2010 3:19:12 PM
Perhaps I’m not a typical one– I think I’m a progressive libertarian– sorta kinda, in the same way that I’m a liberal, but a rather classical one. After all, our country was founded on liberal– and beatuiful, imho– ideals. Fortunately, the left isn’t as hell-bent on bizarre “purity tests.” I voted for both Bill Clinton and Barack Obama because they were/are moderate. I’m definitely left of center on social issues/equal rights (gay rights, pro-choice)– and moderate to conservative on fiscal issues. Maybe more moderate, in our times, because I do think big corporations need to be held in check, and that we need some regulation and regulation reform– and because I’m geared toward increasing the middle class and small business opportunity. In my lifetime that has tended to occur under Democratic presidencies, not Republican. Moreover, the Republicans are the ones who have increased the deficit and not given a crap. More than once, and over my entire adulthood.
To me the difference between right-leaning and left-leaning libertarian types is that right-leaning libertarians wish to weaken the state without simultaneously weakening other institutions that have grown fat on the state– corporations and the military-industrial complex, for example. To me, they underestimate the extent to which state coercion has initiated and perpetuated corporate power– and they want to perpetuate the status quo there. I value cooperation, equal opportunity and a safety-net (even with less production, if that turns out to be the cost, as it might not) over competition and a bottomless pit of despair (even with more production, if that turns out to be the benefit, as it might not).
Personally, I’d prefer no war, and no need for TARP or ARRA– but I do believe the latter two were necessary, and that I’m not going to see world peace in my lifetime(understatement). I also believe if the Republicans had acted in good faith, health care reform would look different and include both tort reform and more portability/choice– but they go nuts when a Dem is in office. They screw up, then go into scorched earth mode when they lose power. I can’t stand it. Its no good for anyone. And the tea party types? They’re just ticked — and they’re going to end up voting in the same kind of tools they’ve voted in previously as standard Republicans, imho. Seriously, who do they have to vote in that is any good at all, and who ultimately won’t end up representing big corporate rights over the rights of the people?
Anyway… enough about me and my pontificating. LOL. (I know, I know.. who cares.)
I’ll move on to the topic..
James wrote: Now they are saying that people who criticize Obama are supporting Al Qaeda.
Actually that’s not what they said. They said that unwarranted fear-mongering helps further the terrorists’ goals (because it spreads fear, anger and “terror”…. get it? Forehead slap!)
Posted by: progressive mama | February 9, 2010, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
. Damn right I’m afraid.
—
Of course you are. Registered Republicans tend to be more fearful, risk-averse and independent-minded in general than the more courageous, independent, adventurous registered Democrats. There’s been a wide range of interesting studies.
Posted by: progressive mama | February 9, 2010, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
So let’s see telling our president he’s an ### for mirandizing terrorists, giving them lawyers telling them not to talk when they tell us there’s 300 more of them waiting to attack, leaking information that the terrorist us talking so Al Qaeda can hide and adjust, for bringing terrorists responsible for 9/11 into New York endangering the city and costing it a fortune, for closing guantanamo and releasing fanatics that will kill our troops while we’re still at war is the problem. Telling the jackass in the white house he’s doing all these things is helping Al Qaeda yeah right! I hope all you fools that voted for this moron have had enough!
Posted by: Mike OBrien | February 9, 2010, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Answering the question posted “Why shouldn’t we be afraid?”: Because we are supposed to be the Home of the Brave, which obviously we are not (exception: our military personnel). Americans have become pawns of those who sell fear. I’ve been disgusted with the fear tactics and resultant cowering since 2003.
Posted by: Independent1959 | February 9, 2010, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Bin Laden stated long ago that his goal was to defeat America economically, not militarily. Bin Laden is winning. America has bankrupted itself since 9/11 mostly with the excuse of fighting the war on terror. The Abdul Mutallab action probably cost less than $20k and we react by spending almost a billion, plus split the country even further politically. Whether you politic from the left or right, the partisan politics defeat ourselves. Brennan is correct.
Posted by: Independent1959 | Feb 9, 2010 4:27:03 PM
Totally agree. Well put.
Posted by: progressive mama | February 9, 2010, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
Obama is desperate. How much more stupid can this WH get?
It is Obama who is helping Al Qaida by giving terrorists the same rights as American citizens.
Osama has a great ally in Barak Hussein
Posted by: Roar | February 9, 2010, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
Wow obama sound sjust like someone else. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.
Posted by: cv | February 9, 2010, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
The headline of this article is off the mark. It should have said: “Growing Number of Americans Think Obama Is More Dangerous Than Al Queda”
Posted by: WeMadeAmistake | February 9, 2010, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
Aren’t these the same people that bashed Bush and America for 8 years to score political points? Hypocrisy is on full display
Posted by: Greg | February 9, 2010, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
I have a son in the Marine corp/ Infantry, headed for Afghanastan in 45 days ask him what he fears most. A taliban with a gun or a president that takes months to make up his mind on what’s next. He states clearly he has faith in his mission and his men, but not his Washington leadership. So what does that tell you? And yet he is willing to shed his blood. This President and his “followers” hath not a clue.
Posted by: David | February 9, 2010, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
BRENNAN NEEDS TO RESIGN NOW!!!
Posted by: CRAMOS | February 9, 2010, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
The harder you try the MORE you FAIL!!!
This ol’ dog knows your tricks and he’s not putting up with your Bull!!!
Blame the Terrorist on another American. Lame!!!!!! How disgraceful! Al Qaeda is and always be, RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORIST. THEY WILL STOP AT NOTHING!!
They will not stop until we BOMB them into submission.
Posted by: resipsa | February 9, 2010, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Any criminal attorney knows that all interrogation of the suspect stops as soon as a letter, phone or fax is sent from the attorney so stating. They cannot continue interrogating. That is a huge difference from military custody. Brennan does not know the law. Even in civilian custody, the administration could and should question him. The responses could not be used against him in a court of law, but the point is to prevent the next attack and save lives.
Posted by: Stark Reality | February 9, 2010, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
“It is Obama who is helping Al Qaida by giving terrorists the same rights as American citizens.”………Its difficult to not respond to comments steeped in ignorance. Abdul Mutallab is following the same routine as every terrorist arrested/captured in the US during the Bush administration. It is the GOP politicians and the TV/radio talking heads convincing you otherwise.
Plus…the current administration has stepped up attacks on Al Qaida since Bush/Cheney left office.
Regarding GITMO, if you pay attention enough you will learn our use of GITMO is a TOP recruiting tool for Al Qaida.
And these subjects are much more easy to understand than economics theory. Simpleton economics concepts being argued from the right would guarantee a lower GDP for years to come, plus bankrupt the country even more than the track we are now on.
Posted by: Independent1959 | February 9, 2010, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
Oh really? Now what? Your going to start interrogating and holding them as “terrorists” if they don’t like the President’s agenda and actions? You will have to use the U.N. to get that job done, because I don’t think American soldiers are going to be on the same page.
Posted by: American | February 9, 2010, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Read “The MIND of HITLER” by Langer, and you’ll come to KNOW the mind of Barack Hussein Obama…!!
Also you’ll know the minds of Obama’s associates: William Ayers, Rashid Khalidi and Jeremiah Wright…!
Posted by: Airborne869 | February 9, 2010, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
These incompetent buffoons are more of a threat to this country than any grubby terrorist.
Posted by: STEVE5150 | February 9, 2010, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
This is so pathetic. Do they really believe people don’t think, “Then why was it okay for all news agencies to attack Bush for 8 years?”
Moveover, no rational person can believe that terrorists are more afraid of obama than they are of Americans demanding stronger national security!
Obama has become a national disgrace and an international liability.
He needs to shape up and do his job as dictated by the Constitution, not by Alinsky’s ‘Rules for Radicals’ or Marx’s ‘Communist Manefesto!’
Posted by: mysticmouse | February 9, 2010, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
Obama:
Gives terrorists rights as common citizen criminals!?
Plays down the terrorist connection to the Fort Hood shooter!?
Bows to foreign dignitaries showing weakness and compliance?!
Creating a nation of dependent ninnies, preferably without firearms?!
Turning his back on the Constitution by refusing to settle the dispute regarding his qualifications for President and Commander in Chief as being a “Natural Born Citizen.” ???!!!
Seems to me that Obama is doing the kind of thing that helps Al Quaeda
Posted by: MrFlippy | February 9, 2010, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
Progressive = the new Marxist
Posted by: MrFlippy | February 9, 2010, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
A pathetic op ed piece and, as pointed out graphically above, hypocritical and untruthful
a. When an enemy combatant is turned over to military, he does not get lawyered up.
b. Full interrogation in 50 minutes is IMPOSSIBLE. Are regular FBI agents even familiar with terrorist interrogation? I seriously doubt it.
c. If our system and the DoJ are so great, why was the Black Panther case, in which the accused refused to show, resulting in a default and automatic conviction, thrown out by DoJ. Is that not proof that the Administration cares not a whit for the rule of law?
Posted by: John Corn | February 9, 2010, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
Another words if we criticize Obama for his failures we are somehow helping terrorist. That’s a good one. This is a classic case of Marxist terminology. I remember when Castro decided to destroy Cuba he did the same thing. Chavez and Ahmadinejad are doing it now. So we got one too! but we have freedom of speech according to the law of the land and if he wants to violate that then when it comes time to impeaching the Moran we will have plenty of reason.
Posted by: Dave | February 9, 2010, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
By the amount of sheer idiocy displayed in these comments, this story MUST have been linked from Drudge.
You morons are shining examples of our failed education system.
Posted by: Kukulkan | February 9, 2010, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
Well, it is pretty obvious that after the change in leadership in Washington, and the change of interrogation techniques that the best friend a terrorist could have was in Washington, because they would now be treated like the common criminal in the USA. They now would have more rights than their victims. What a bunch of pathetic whining losers.
Posted by: In_Tampa | February 9, 2010, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
Looks like it the return of “Real Americans” versus us Ersatz-Americans. Is there anything this guy (BHO) does that isn’t GWB?
Posted by: Mike Zarowitz | February 9, 2010, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
As I see America more and more,and having falling in deep love with Socialism/Communism plus the most abusive and corrupt militaristic Empire beginnig way back, these evils are to America what in true life, termites are to a wooden structure, with in inhabitants therein in either event, absolustely not aware of such destructive, in a figure speech. The true National Debt, due the afore mentioned evils America chose, is now already way of $100 trillion due to the unfunded liabilites that of Social Security and Medicare. Yes, all one hears from the politicians and from the ingnorant News Media including, most holy Fox News, is that the National Debt is only $12+ trillion, yes referring to it as only! America has already crossed its Rubicon with both parties guilty as sure as hell and heaven exit. This present blame game, back and forth in that nest of corruption in Washington DC, is but the circus Bin Laden enjoys seen daily.
Posted by: H. D. Schmidt | February 9, 2010, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
Real laffer! Obama IS al queda!
Posted by: Teutonic Titwillow | February 9, 2010, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
“We” disagree with mirandizing terrorists and granting them the same rights as citizens and “We” are the ones accused of abetting al Qaeda? That does not compute!
Posted by: Mac McFatter | February 9, 2010, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
I see how it works. When libs hammered Bush, that was patriotic. When the masses dane to criticize the Big O, we’re helping al Crapola.
Posted by: BigWhtPony | February 9, 2010, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
How about a Commander in Chief who can think on his feet and make the right decisions on national security?
On ABC’s “This Week” yesterday, regarding the botched interrogation of Abdul Mutalabb, John Podesta said “the proof is in the pudding” because now the underwear bomber is talking.
Podesta is misguided but I agree the proof is in the pudding.
The pudding stinks… because it’s been on the table for five weeks! Thanks to these buffoons, now it’s worthless, we have to throw it out.
When you have confused lawyers and law professors who can’t tell the difference between fresh pudding and five week old pudding, of course, you’re going to see a growing percentage of Americans who are fed up of with confused lawyers.
Posted by: Rodney | February 9, 2010, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
Next Time you Americans Elect a MOTIVATIONAL SPEAKER, remember this: “Change Can Also Be Downward.” Obama should not only have renounced receiving the Nobel Prize (the only WORSE one was given to Yassir Arafat, who invented the Infitada and Airplane Hijackings), he should RESIGN from the White House for the Good of the Nation. I never fell for his phony emotional manipulation of the public. His record spoke volumes, a record of nothing but political ladder climbing and arrogance of image, hypocrisy. No?? One of his VERY FIRST acts was the nomination of THREE Tax Cheats in a Row. Geithner got in and Daschle and a woman withdrew the very day the N.Y. Times published a highly critical editorial. Go, Barack, Go….Home. Make room for someone who doesn’t talk down to Americans, respects CONSERVATIVE VIEWS without VILIFYING those Americans who hold them. And most importantly, someone who can lead with conviction and good sense for the DANGEROUS time we are in. Barack–do you REALLY want Islamist Radiological Bombs dropping on America?? We NEED “racial profiling” at airports. Its not even THAT because Muslims and Islam are not “racial.” We also are going to need to bomb the hell out of Iran before it is too late and Americans wind up with Radiation Sickness through Iran’s terror proxies. Do the patriotic thing and resign…
Posted by: marat | February 9, 2010, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Just you all wait…………………..
Obama is going to use his influence with Iran and they are going to stop enriching uranium. If not, he will talk to them again.
Then Iran will be real sorry.
Posted by: gregore | February 9, 2010, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
I am so sick and tired of people who have a different view in our country now feel the need to trump up and distort facts. We have turned into a country of weasels. where truths are ignored and hype and lies given access to the media pulpit.
Posted by: bud dingler | February 9, 2010, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
“I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration, somehow you’re not patriotic, and we should stand up and say, “WE ARE AMERICANS AND WE HAVE A RIGHT TO DEBATE AND DISAGREE WITH ANY ADMINISTRATION!”
Hillary Clinton
Posted by: Dennis D | February 9, 2010, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Obama is creating more new terrorists. He is using predator drones increasingly in Pakistan resulting in civilian collateral deaths. Bombing villages and killing babies in the dark of night.
Posted by: Dennis D | February 9, 2010, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
USA Today is the McDonald’s of newspapers.
Posted by: jarjar | February 9, 2010, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
John Brennan needs to be fired or if he has any conscience or is man enough resign.
I am an American by birth, (something OBAMA can’t prove) and if I want to disagree with OBAMA and his moronic dangerous policies, it is my right.
It doesn’t make me unpatriotic or
aid the enemy. OBAMA and his policies have done more damage to America
than any other president. Benedict Arnold should have done so well!
Posted by: Don in Virginia | February 9, 2010, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
Are there any objective empirical data and studies to back up many of the outlandish Liberal claims made in this article and by the ‘Progressive’ posters or is this all just more of the same “feel good, made up studies, quotes” that these folks keep dishing out?
Just cause some Liberals say they are wonderful people doesn’t make it so.
Posted by: CommonSenseKid | February 9, 2010, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
Wait a minute, I thought criticizing the President was a patriotic duty and a cornerstone of democracy…that’s what the Democrats said when they were demonizing Bush for 8 years.
Posted by: Joe | February 9, 2010, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
What ever happened to “dissent is the most sincere form of patriotism?” We heard that for almost eight years. Yet suddenly, Obama’s critics are the ones who are helping Al Qaeda and the ones who spent years protesting in the streets didn’t?!?!
What a sack of…
Posted by: Mattski | February 9, 2010, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Politics should never get in the way of national security? Ok, braniac, tell that to the mantra our joke of a President ran on. The passive ankle grabbing and clueless ignorance he displays as he bows whenever he has the opportunity to apologize for a strong America and assure them that he’ll correct our ‘woes’ by fundamentally changing our nation with progressivism policies and agendas that would make marxist dictatorships proud has only WEAKENED our image abroad to those that matter in terms of our national security. Every move this president makes ridicules the rule of law, the Constitutional principles our nation is founded upon, and has brought disgrace and ineptitude to the White House.
More attacks after 9/11 were thwarted under the Bush administration.. and since Obama’s taken office, we’ve already had deadly attacks that could have and should have been easily prevented with common sense but were instead successful with this politically correct administration in charge.
Posted by: commonsense247 | February 9, 2010, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
Then they will rule the world with our muslin president doing everything in his power to help them willingly.
Posted by: Fred Koch | February 9, 2010, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
I was waiting for this one.
Posted by: RicardoCabeza | February 9, 2010, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
In case any of the uneducated want to understand the obama admin please goggle alinskys rules for radicals. You will then see who is useing them on this post and in our gov. Yea its real and they are activly useing them. If you know you can better reply. Brennen is useing
#1,5,8,9 maybe you can see more.
Posted by: Kommencents | February 9, 2010, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Doing a better job than the Bush administration? Really? I know Christmas was a bit more than a month ago, but didn’t Obonehead have to come on the TV and admit they weren’t doing such a great job at that whole “protecty-defendy” thing?
Posted by: ted | February 9, 2010, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
Was John Brennan talking about our President and Democrats when he talked about politically motivated criticism? Isn’t that what we had to listen to during the Presidential campaign coming from Barack Obama’s mouth and also during the 8 years that George Bush was in office? It seems dissent is only patriotic if the President is a Republican and the dissent is coming from a liberal.
Posted by: Daisy21 | February 9, 2010, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
Dear Kukulcan,
Since your a liberal let me speak slowly.The Drudge Report is a list of links to articles and stories, most of them from mainstream liberal sources such as the New York Times and the Washington Post. Matt Drudge is not a commentator. You are trying to blame the messenger for the message. Is that the world you really want to live in? Where only your views are heard. Im very conservative. I dont wanna shut down Olberman. Huffington, or the Dailey Kos, I enjoy their display of stupidity. Why is it that liberals cannot tolerate dissent or political “diversity”?
Posted by: GorillaG | February 9, 2010, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
I support the Troops and the efforts done by President Bush and Vice President Cheney.
I condemn those who like Kerry, Clinton, Harry Reid, Pelosi, Murtha, Kennedy, Durham, and Obama, made mockery of the previous Administration…the blood of our soldiers taints their hands.
I specially despise Obama’s double speak
Posted by: DrEdu | February 9, 2010, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
So we cannot criticize the White House when a democrat is in office, because it is harmful, but if a Republican is in office, no problem? The audacity of this administration has no bounds.
Posted by: TXMAN | February 9, 2010, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
“You people” need to …do…what I say. I am your leader! You just don’t understand yet! I know what’s best for uhh…you. Do not gaze directly upon me! Avert your eyes, so that I may guide you.
I HAVE SPOKEN!
Posted by: Barack The Destroyer | February 9, 2010, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Of course, Obama and his tribe are going to call the conservative Republicans akin to the terrorists. Obama has run out of steam on his own agendas, and now he is going to “play dirty”, or “hit below the belt”, as we used to say. Obama has, or is now, becoming unhinged, and perhaps it is now time for he to resign and let someone run the country who is not only legally allowed to do so, but able to do. We can skip the vp, and the next few. There just HAS to be someone out there who can do the job, but I don’t see anyone at this point.
Posted by: lizzitishpp | February 9, 2010, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
How could anyone possibly help al Qaeda any more than the “Progressive” media and Democrats (Obama’s people) did during Bushes years in office! Keeping the tally on the scores of Americans they were successful in killing on the battle field on or near live feed!! If America’s enemy wanted to see how successful each attack was, all they had to do was tune in to our traitorous broadcast networks to stay well informed of their brutal handy work!!! The “Progressive” networks were the inspiration for the suicide bombers suiting up for their turn for American blood!! As the election elation died down, so did the daily coverage of the carnage!!!
Posted by: DEF | February 9, 2010, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
The hypocrisy of this administration is astounding. This one billion dollar charade of trying KSM in NYC is for purely political purposes, and serves only to embolden terrorists.
Posted by: Springer | February 9, 2010, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
You know, the more I read comments from the average American, the more I despair. Many Americans are obviously historically ignorant. Many don’t even know their own history. Many are economically, politically and philosophically illiterate. Many don’t even understand the nature of their own political process – its strengths or its weaknesses. Many assume credibility of incredulous idiots like Sarah Palin, Glen Beck and Sean Hannity. There is a general failure to recognize good leadership over bad, virtuous intentions over self-interested ones, intelligence over the appearance of intelligence, policies in the interest of all of the country over policies in the interest of the country’s financial classes and of the country’s enemies. When Obama fails to pass a meaningful healthcare bill, and the country continues along it’s current path to financial perdition, consigning it to the same dustbin of history as the Ottoman empire, the Roman empire and the Soviet empire, leaving China to reign supreme for the next 300 years, you will only have yourselves to blame. Americans, get a grip. Your Founding Fathers are rolling in their graves.
Feel free to respond with idiotic, baseless, counter-factual and illogical arguments, but please, please do use a SpellCheck. Its that little link at the top of your screen, under “Tools”.
Posted by: Jason | February 9, 2010, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
It is interesting that when Bush was in office every liberal and major news media can rip the President on every little issue, reveal strategic war information, and lie out their sphincter and view themselves as doing what was right and just for the American people. But when the libs and news media support the President any opposition is seen in the harshest light. Its amazing these people have the balls to throw this kind of story after the stunts they pulled on the previous administration. I have NO respect for them and will never support them.
Posted by: Justin | February 9, 2010, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
@ BBaptiste | Feb 9, 2010 3:19:34 PM
“My citizenship comes before my partisanship”…”. I’ll be fine. I’ve dual citizenship”…you’re also full of manure. You forgot that part. How bout’ the part where such a well rounded person has nothing better to do than post on news sites like the rest of us plebians.
The story was about the White House, suggesting dissent of Obama, contributes to supporting terrorists.
I guess you felt the need to enjoy the smell of your own flatulence. Nice job LIB!
Posted by: Manure finder | February 9, 2010, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
If the Underwear Bomber was “thoroughly interrogated and provided important information” then why is it that he is now providing information? I thought the FBI got all the information that would ever be available in the 50 minutes of initial interrogation!
Posted by: Tom | February 9, 2010, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
The proverbial 1000 lb gorilla in the room is that the intelligence communities instructed the State Dept and FBI to stand down and let him on the plane so he could lead us to the bigger fish. Look past the talking heads on the television and research for yourself. Can u say False Flag. Now, coincidentally all those body scanners purchased PRIOR to this foiled attempt have now found a home and Chertoff who owns a major stake in the company is that much richer
Posted by: Scott | February 9, 2010, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
Well isn’t that special. Obama claims criticism of the anointed one helps Al Qaeda… So is that a freudian apology to GEORGE W. BUSH…We’ll give them some slack when they admit they systematically tried to destroy Bush. Blaming him for everything from mudslides, global warming, hurricane patterns, and of course the failed war on terrorism (their words, not mine). The reason Obama is being criticized is because his academic, pointy headed, liberal leadership really sucks. Oh the irony…The most vocal critic of Bush now whines that he’s being criticized. That’s better than poetic justice.
Posted by: Patriot | February 9, 2010, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
I don’t recall an uproar when the only strategy the democrats had between 2004 and 2008 was to undermine virtually every DoD and national security policy President Bush supported.
Posted by: Heywood Jablowme | February 9, 2010, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
I still think obama smacked his head too hard on the white house window when he tried to walk through it. or maybe it was out of the helicopter – that was obama, wasn’t it? of course, i didn’t like him before that either so who knows.
Posted by: obama lol | February 9, 2010, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
Bless you Lord Obama, while I have always hoped for the downfall of the DNC and all it’s apparatchiks, I had no means or vision to accomplish this lofty goal. Who would have thought that an Alinsky acolyte with zero experience at running anything except his mouth could destroy the entire party structure in one short year? Sure you’re taking the country with it which was your goal all along but at least I get to watch all the idiot OBOTS suffer immeasurable pain as reality strikes them in the forehead like a mallet wielded by union thug with pockets flush with bailout money. I knew you were going to fail Obama, I simply could not imagine the magnitude of your epic fail. Larger than your ego, now that’s large. Peace out OBOTS.
Posted by: Red Ruffansore | February 9, 2010, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
@ Jason.
Some of us have read our history and our philosophy. What is one man’s good for the nation is another man’s anathema.
While I earnestly agree significant health care reform is needed, doing the wrong thing is even worse than doing nothing at all. Insurance reform with nothing to contain costs is not going to solve anything, other than the short term benefit to the currently uninsured.
Long term solutions require far more drastic measures. Either we go down the European path and create a completely different set of problems in our health care system(we are well down that path already considering over half of all insurance is publicly administered now), or we get serious about actually incentivizing competition in the marketplace. This is the part that has never even been discounted by the left as it is so against everything they believe in they cannot even fathom it. Gut the employer provided structure completely by giving the tax breaks companies get for providing health care to individuals. The money they currently spend on health care (5k per employee per year or so) could be added to salaries or placed in tax free HSA’s, then people could shop for the insurance they want and need in a truly open market, with the government playing it’s actually important role as referee. No preferences to one company over another, no tax breaks nor subsidies, capitalism not corporatism.
You are right, the founders are rolling in their graves as they see any vestige of a free and open society slipping through the cracks and into the dustbin of history. America is an experiment, and it has become what it is by being different than the rest of the world. By innovating and trying new ideas.
Posted by: Ian | February 9, 2010, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
From: Posted by: Ian | Feb 9, 2010 8:40:17 PM:
@ Jason.
Some of us have read our history and our philosophy. What is one man’s good for the nation is another man’s anathema… etc.
Good Lord, an educated and informed American with a handle on the issues. By-Jesus you must be lonely over there. It’s not me you have to convince – that’ preaching to choir. It’s the other 200 million or so dolts you live with you need to convince. I sure hope you succeed, too. If America goes down the pan the rest of the West goes down with it. Do you know how bloody hard it is to learn Chinese?
Posted by: Jason | February 9, 2010, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
The Demorats like to say Bush forced the intell people to accept HIS war.. but intell people kept leaking stuff to the press to make bush look like a bad leader.. so now Demorats are in power, and Obama is forceing his intell people to say obama’s handleing of the war is even better then Bush’s was.. the intell is still being leaked that shows the lie to this one too. if political leaders would get out of the way.. the intell and military would solve this in short order.
Posted by: Richard | February 9, 2010, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
Brennan says:
It is “naive to think that transferring Abdulmutallab to military custody would have caused an outpouring of information. There is little difference between military and civilian custody, other than an interrogator with a uniform. The suspect gets access to a lawyer, and interrogation rules are nearly identical.”
If this is true, then what was the criticism about Guantanamo Bay, military interrogations, and military tribunals all about. And what about the alleged torture that occurs as a matter of practice in “military prisons.”
You can’t have it both ways. This is another example of this administration’s lies. Representative Joe Wilson of South Carolina called it right. “Liar!”
Posted by: SouthCarolinaMarineVeteran | February 9, 2010, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
shades of nixon and the anti vietnam movement: if your against the war, your against america! Is obama stupid?
Posted by: doctordoctor | February 9, 2010, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
Tierra – “Cheney and Halliburton are the military/industrial complex President Eisenhower warned us about.”
Nice try, Tierra! Eisenhower, in his farewell address, identified Congress as a full member of the MIC.
Do a little research before regurgitating memorized liberal talking points!
Posted by: Patriotic Chicagolander | February 9, 2010, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
Democrats from 2001-2009: “Dissent is the highest form of patriotism!”
Democrats from 2009-present: “Dissent is helping the enemy!”
Posted by: Troika37 | February 9, 2010, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
Blatant hypocrisy from the spineless administration. they screwed up and don’t have the guts to admit it, while that clown Robert Glibbs continues his side show demeaning the administration.
They are a second rate circus act.
Posted by: Peter | February 9, 2010, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
Ergo, critics of the Bush administration also served Al Qaeda’s goals.
Posted by: Heywood Djashuddup | February 9, 2010, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
The gang that couldn’t shhot straight.
First the obama adminsistraion says they got everything possible from the dude. Of course the republicans criticized. Then the admionistration sayd he started talking again. Well what is he talking about if he already gave up everything.
Can anyone with a brain belive this administration?
Posted by: jonny | February 9, 2010, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
Yet another intelligence lapse from the White House.
How do you guys sleep at night? I know I don’t sleep as well knowing the idiots we have guarding the county. I know the troops certainly can’t be getting any rest at all with the keystone cop mentality that this administration is displaying. What a bunch of morons.
Why don’t you guys invite the terrorist over to stay in the Lincoln Bed Room…. bet they would like us a lot more than they do now.
Does anyone out there not get that the Obama playbook is to apply his faults and failures to anyone else beside himself.
Type this into your teleprompter next time you speak Mr. Prez….. “I accept full responsibility for the actions of my administration because if it were not for Bush and Fox News we wouldn’t be in this mess.”
Posted by: Duuuh | February 9, 2010, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
Jason….characterized by arrogance! You obviously neglected to study the last two world wars. Obama is taking America on the road to financial perdition.
Did I spell everything correctly??
Posted by: Tom | February 9, 2010, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
You guys keep this up and I’m telling MY MOM!
Posted by: John Brennan | February 9, 2010, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
So does this mean that Obama’s critics inside the military are helping Al Qaeda? This is just a stupid statement.
Posted by: sme1 | February 9, 2010, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
BTW… Anyone know where I can get one of these “saved or created” jobs? I just don’t know how much more of this Hope and Change I can stand.
Signed… One of the 10% that wasn’t going over 8 or 9 but is really over 17% criticizers of the Obama administration.
Posted by: Duuuh | February 9, 2010, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
Newsflash:
Point 1: Obama lies.
Point 2: Obama’s minions lie.
Point 3: Do not trust anything coming from Obama or his minions.
End Newsflash
Posted by: tanarg | February 9, 2010, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
Interesting, this from those that criticized our troops in the battlefield and did everything they could to destroy George W. Bush in fact there were times when the words of OBL matched the words of the Democrat leaders. Another point that the media doesn’t push is to ask the Obama Administration since they feel that using an matrix that is unprovable i.e., saved or created jobs to tout their economic recovery plan isn’t then fair to give George W. Bush the same kind of accounting for all the Saved American lives that Bush was responsible for by proactively removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and installing a civil, democratic form of government there? I mean does anyone actually believe that Saddam Hussein was not emboldened by Al-Qaida’s success on 911 and even if he was not in direct coordination with that terror group it was evident that he had the resources to fund, equip, train, terror groups or affiliates to carry out similar attacks on America which because he acted never materialized.
Seems like Obama only wants to talk about the things that work to his agenda that is not bi-partisanship that is DICTATORSHIP and America is waking up to it. We will not be ruled by a scoundral or a tyrant because WE ARE A COUNTRY THAT SELF GOVERNS. Progressives like Obama haven’t figured that out yet.
Posted by: Tom | February 9, 2010, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
The current Administration is failing to gain the confidence of the American people with regard to national security and terrorists. This Administration has only itself to blame for America’s doubt.
Posted by: Daniel | February 9, 2010, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
Let’s enjoy our 1st Amendment while it lasts. Yay Patriot Act! Gun owners, Libertarians, conservatives, and returning veterans are all considered potential terrorists. Wake up to the false Left/Right Paradigm. It’s all WWE Wrestling. These guys at the top are all buddies. It’s a giant theatrical pageant of deception. We thought Bush was bad, then we got Obama. Everyone woke up to Obama, now Palin is posing as the savior. Thanks New World Order – we love our enslavement. More American Idol anyone? I’d like to go back to sleep.
Posted by: Riggghht | February 9, 2010, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
Do we really have three more years?
I feel like he has been in office for ever.
We need another change…..
Posted by: Caroline | February 9, 2010, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
Posted by: Tom | Feb 9, 2010 9:53:05 PM
“Jason….characterized by arrogance! You obviously neglected to study the last two world wars. Obama is taking America on the road to financial perdition.
Did I spell everything correctly??”
Yes, you did. And you also proved my point: your reference to the last two WWs is entirely moot, i.e. an invalid argument against my own. A sampling of some of the posts here further proves my point. Neither, incidentally, does the bravery and good virtue of your ancestors excuse the state of your country today, nor, again, does it invalidate my point.
Oh, and one last point: “Obama is taking America on the road to financial perdition” ? Really, Tom? I’m truly sorry, but this just seems to me to be almost wilfully ignorant of your economic history, or, for that matter, just plain chronology. Do you really think your country’s budget deficit, long term debt and future liabilities all happened in the last 12 months? The Chinese bought over $700 billion dollars worth of your Treasury bills and accumulated $1.2 trillion of reserves in US currency – in the last 12 months? Really, Tom?
I’m afraid your ill-thought-out tirade only serves to demonstrate the distinct lack of intellectual rigour you and your compatriots are known for, and, in this case, it further serves to validate my own argument. It must be hard living a life where someone else does all of your thinking for you. Try doing some for yourself sometime.
Posted by: Jason | February 9, 2010, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
Oh, lookie here!
The left accuse the right of being “for the terrorists” when they criticize Obama?
Wow!
I never could have seen that one coming.
All that talk about “protest is the highest form of patriotism” finally reveals itself for what it really was: a liberal slogan couched in nobility, but actually used for cynical purposes.
Thanks, lefties!
Posted by: oldpink | February 10, 2010, 12:08 am 12:08 am
If we disagree, we are racist. If we critize, we are helping the enemy. This Admin is very Chicago style predictable. This country can’t afford any more lost time with this!
Posted by: logical one | February 10, 2010, 12:09 am 12:09 am
“Terrorists such as Jose Padilla and Saleh al-Mari did not cooperate when transferred to military custody, which can harden one’s determination to resist cooperation,” he writes.
So then, when we catch these bad guys we should take them to a couple of sock hops to loosen their determination to resist our interrogators! Good God! Liberals! Folks you gotta love ‘em! Just pat ‘em on the head before you boot them out of office!
Posted by: picomanning | February 10, 2010, 12:52 am 12:52 am
HA HA HA!! What a joke! Good try, Obama! Remember when Pelosi tried to DE-FUND the war?
Posted by: Ron | February 10, 2010, 1:36 am 1:36 am
It makes sense that a White House which has been serially insincere about bipartisanship, and transparency, would assume that its critics are also insincere.
But Obama and the democrats are just digging the hole deeper by insulting those with legitimate concern over run-away spending, and government expansion at the cost of private sector recovery.
Just keep accusing everyone of being brainwashed by “cable news” (Fox hint, hint).
Just go into campaign mode and hope that Obama can talk his way out of it all.
But the great hope of the left has lost his shine – his credibility.
Unless Obama moves well over into the center (highly doubtful for a Rev. Wright ideologue), all his sweet talk is just going to add fuel to the fire.
Posted by: Parker1227 | February 10, 2010, 2:08 am 2:08 am
The dissent and criticism of those who do not agree with Obama’s policy seem to me to be a highly patriotic activity.
It’s the ludicrous policies of the Obama Administration that are quite suspect, i.e. that are far more likely to be helpful to our nation’s enemies than are those who protest them .
I hope and pray that Americans send a strong message of dissent to the antics of this very, very liberal administration in the November 2010 congressional elections.
Posted by: kenflot | February 10, 2010, 3:59 am 3:59 am
Okay, Obama supporters, explain to me how our Commander in Chief was not “Serving the Goals of al Qaeda” when he proposed a bill in 2007 that would have mandated all combat troops out of Iraq by March 31, 2008. That date was far before the surge had a chance to work. It would have been a disaster and millions of Iraqis would have died at the hands of al Qaeda and others. Obama supporters, please explain that.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/03/today_is_obamas_iraq_withdrawa.html
On January 30, 2007, Senator Barack Obama introduced the Iraq War De-escalation Act of 2007 in a speech from the floor of the U.S. Senate. In describing the proposed legislation he said,
“This plan would not only place a cap on the number of troops in Iraq and stop the escalation, more importantly, it would begin a phased redeployment of U.S. forces with the goal of removing all U.S. combat forces from Iraq by March 31, 2008.”
Posted by: Plucko | February 10, 2010, 4:24 am 4:24 am
So is 0bama now saying that all of President Bush’s critics, 0bama himself included, were aiding and abetting the terrorists too?
Or is 0bama somehow special?
Posted by: Bob | February 10, 2010, 4:31 am 4:31 am
the only effective govt the USA can ever have is gridlock… the election of Scott Brown is the most hopeful sign of 2010, what a relief. We may actually survive this.
Posted by: erik in manhattan | February 10, 2010, 5:28 am 5:28 am
Can the Obama administration do anything besides blame Bush or anybody else? Instead of making Americans feel safe, I honestly feel they have no clue we are at war. Democrats were so consumed with a government takeover that they are at a loss of what to do besides use their blame tactic. You would think that at least one of them could come up with a better solution. Just more of the same.
Posted by: justavoter | February 10, 2010, 5:38 am 5:38 am
Was Harry Reid helping our troops or al-Qaeda in Iraq when he declared the was there “lost?”
Were Murtha (RIP) and Kerry giving aid and comfort to the enemy when they declared –without evidence and later charges dismissed–that our soldiers were guilty of atrocities?
Was Obama helping McChrystal or playing politics and helping the Taliban by delaying his decision on a troop surge for 6 months?
What liars and hypocrites.
And the democrats can’t understand why people are angry.
Must be all racists.
Posted by: EJM | February 10, 2010, 6:07 am 6:07 am
WoW! It took them one year to come up with this one!!! They are stupid!!!
Posted by: Mr. T | February 10, 2010, 6:24 am 6:24 am
Hillary Clinton: “I am sick and tired of people who call you unpatriotic if you debate this administration’s policies. We are Americans and have the right to participate and debate any administration.”
Posted by: Jeff | February 10, 2010, 6:40 am 6:40 am
Ah when the Libs were criticising the previous administration that was simply patriotic and their constitutional right. Now that Obama is on the receiving end, it is helping Al Q. Ironic isn’t it? So, when the NY Times published secret info was that helping Al Q? When Bush had to fight the war on Terror and the war with Democrats was that helping Al Q? Interesting how the perspective changes eh?
Posted by: thefedupamerican | February 10, 2010, 6:50 am 6:50 am
Obama doesn’t need anyones help in helping al Qaeda. He does a fine job all by himself!
Posted by: hempstead1944 | February 10, 2010, 7:00 am 7:00 am
Did…did not, did…did not. Ugh, I miss having adults in charge. Must be time for another world apology tour.
Posted by: Catherine | February 10, 2010, 7:05 am 7:05 am
This administartion is PATHETIC. For 8 years Bush was villified by these idiots and now decorom is our patriotic duty lol. Cant wait for the grownups to take over in Washington cause these guys are not ready for prime time. In fact Obamas incompetance is putting us all in danger.
Posted by: mary | February 10, 2010, 7:25 am 7:25 am
Since it’s in politically correct California, I trust the new sign will also be written in Spanish for those illegals that came across the border.
Posted by: Vince Hugh | February 10, 2010, 7:54 am 7:54 am
obama admin becomes more predictable daily-blame others, don’t do anything but propose more govt, hire more czars,and demonize anyone who doesn’t just capitulate to their loser policies. obama was one big mistake america. this man is a loser.his wife is worse. they are a scary couple.
Posted by: dkb | February 10, 2010, 8:00 am 8:00 am
umm, my name is jason, and like obama is like a god, maybe a demi-god at least, i voted for change,or emm something.
Posted by: dkb | February 10, 2010, 8:06 am 8:06 am
Moreover, Brennan says, hundreds of terrorists have been convicted in criminal courts while only three have been convicted in the military tribunal system.
Hundreds??? Is that all of them or just the tip of the iceberg????…
‘Hundreds’…That’s an invasion…
Obamamen can kill all the Al-Qaeda and all the Taliban, and jihad against the west will continue…
Posted by: duh_swami | February 10, 2010, 8:12 am 8:12 am
In an oped in USA Today, John Brennan — Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Advisor for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism — responds to critics of the Obama administration’s counterterrorism policies by saying “Politically motivated criticism and unfounded fear-mongering only serve the goals of al-Qaeda.”
He suggests that many critics are hypocritical and clueless.He notes that failed shoe bomber Richard Reid “was read his Miranda rights five minutes after being taken off a plane he tried to blow up. The same people who criticize the president today were silent back then.” HE FORGETS THAT THERE WERE NO TERROR LAWS NOR GITMO THEN SO WHAT ELSE COULD BE DONE.
He also asserts that the Obama administration is doing a better job than the Bush administration did in taking the fight to al Qaeda. “This administration’s efforts have disrupted dozens of terrorist plots against the homeland and been responsible for killing and capturing hundreds of hard-core terrorists, including senior leaders in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia and beyond — far more than in 2008.” HE FORGETS THAT IN LESS THAN 12 MONTHS WE HAVE HAD 2 MUSLIM TERRORIST ATTACKS ON US SOIL AND UNDER BUSH THERE WERE NONE AFTER 9/11.
Of course some others he mentions who were caught and read miranda rights were actually US citizens and not technically enemy combatants so again, what alternative was there
Loose cannon or naive fool. Either way, its bad news for us considering the position he is in.
Posted by: smokedsalmoned | February 10, 2010, 8:31 am 8:31 am
The Dems have a long track record of cooperation and molly-coddling America’s enemies. I would say to President Obama: Take it like a man and please keep an eye on the evil, leftist radicals in your own party.
Posted by: Gershom | February 10, 2010, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
What a bunch of bs. America is not so dumb anymore so just keep it up.
Terrorists…lol…tell the cia to quit paying them and they’ll quit being terrorists. simple…
Posted by: nwoisgoingdown | February 11, 2010, 12:47 am 12:47 am
Devastated. I did not miss a show, irrespective of where I was, for my entire childhood. Which was where we SHONE. Almost every other dance show since was just trying to keep up.
Posted by: Rene Butera | February 3, 2012, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm