By Matt Loffman

Feb 4, 2010 5:40pm

What’s Holding Up Security Nominees? Alabama Pork

ABC's Z. Byron Wolf reports: Democrats are accusing Republicans of threatening Natl. Security by blocking votes on nominees to be the top Intelligence officers at the State Department and the Department of Homeland Security as well as the number three civilian at the Pentagon. We learned why Thursday when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid asked again to have votes on the nominees and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell objected, he said, on behalf of Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Al. The reason? Shelby is concerned his state might lose some (very) lucrative defense contracts. In other words – pork. Shelby calls them “unaddressed national security concerns.” McConnell called it “an issue with which I'm not terribly familiar.” “He is not able to be here at the moment to state his position,” said McConnell of Shelby. McConnell implied that that he’d rather go ahead with the votes. “Maybe we can in discussions with him make some progress on these sooner rather than later. but for the moment I'm constrained to object on his behalf,” said McConnell. Later in the day Sen. Carl Levin, who chairs the Senate Armed Services Committee, gave a frustrated speech on the Senate floor. “They've been sitting on our calendar since December 2, over two months, while these positions go unfilled and we're in the middle of two wars,” said Levin of five total defense department nominees Shelby has held up (civilian positions only, points out Shelby’s office). It all has to do with Alabama-based defense contracts. First and foremost is the large ($35 billion, so large does not do the contract justice) government contract to build a new generation of refueling tankers for the air force. It appeared that Northrop Grumman and an international partner EADS had won the contract several years ago. Alabama would have benefited because it has plants in Alabama. But the prospect of the tankers being built by a foreign company sent lawmakers representing states with facilities for EADS competitor Boeing, like Washington and Missouri. Shelby is holding up the nominees because he wants more assurances that the contracting process will be “transparent and fair.” He’s also frustrated that an FBI explosives lab planned for Huntsville, Alabama, and appropriated for with $45 million in 2007, hasn’t been built yet. Here is a defense offered by his office late this afternoon: Sen. Shelby has placed holds on several pending nominees due to unaddressed national security concerns.  Among his concerns is that nearly 10 years after the U.S. Air Force announced plans to replace the aging tanker fleet, we still do not have a transparent and fair acquisition process to move forward.  The Department of Defense must recognize that the draft Request for Proposal needs to be significantly and substantively changed.  Sen. Shelby is also deeply concerned that the Administration will not release the funds already appropriated to the FBI to build the Terrorist Explosives Devices Analytical Center.   This decision impedes the U.S. military, the intelligence community, and federal law enforcement personnel in their missions to exploit and analyze intelligence information critical to fighting terrorism and ensuring American security worldwide.  The Obama Administration wants to read terrorists our Miranda rights and try them in U.S. courts but is impeding the processing of evidence that could also lead to convictions.  If this administration were as worried about hunting down terrorists as it is about the confirmation of low-level political nominations, America would be a safer place. The administration claims to take a tough stance in fighting terrorism, yet the fiscal year 2011 budget request proposes to rescind these funds, contradicting the concerns of the FBI Director and the commander of the U.S. Army’s Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization (JIEDDO), both of whom are responsible for the safety of soldiers and agents fighting on the front lines in Afghanistan and Iraq.  There is currently a 20-year backlog of forensic evidence that has been extracted from explosive devices, many of which were used to kill American soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq.  JIEDDO projects that submissions to the FBI could reach as high as 1,500 to 2,500 boxes per month when the war-fighting season in Afghanistan resumes in the Spring of 2010.  Evidence from the backlog examined by the FBI has matched the fingerprints of individuals applying for positions with the Iraqi National Police force, as well as individuals who have moved to the United States.  The backlog continues to grow, sitting idly filling multiple warehouses, as the administration proposes to cut funding for the FBI that would allow them to more expeditiously process this evidence.  Sen. Shelby will continue to work with the FBI to give them the capability to coordinate intelligence as well as forensic and technical exploitation related to IEDs, but this administration’s coddling of terrorists makes this an uphill effort.  He has made the Administration aware of these concerns and is willing to discuss them at any time.

User Comments

Shelby seems to have either forgotten we have two ongoing wars, or, more likely he doesn’t really care as long as his defense industry campaign donors get their pork. At least, he could come to the Senate floor and personally defend his position. In the words of that neo-con sage, D.Cheney, “Low class-big time.”

Posted by: B.Bear | February 4, 2010, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

They have the biggest of pork spending, and McCain has been yelling for years, and Not bringing his own party to task. Southern states has plenty of Pork spending….Georgia has plenty, so do North Carolina. This reminds me of the “screaming” last year that these republicans was doing about letting America’s auto industry to FAIL instead of saving them….why, because most foreign car makers are in the SOUTH. Mercedes, BMW….high end cars built by non-union low wage workers. Go figure!

Posted by: sara | February 4, 2010, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Shelby has legitimate concerns. It is perfectly ok to say no.

Posted by: Downwithsocialism | February 4, 2010, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

I hope Shelby takes down the party with him.

Posted by: mike from Arlington | February 5, 2010, 12:39 am 12:39 am

This is unprecedented.
He needs to be investigated to determine if this isn’t blatant blackmail or quid pro quo.

Posted by: mike from Arlington | February 5, 2010, 12:42 am 12:42 am

Is this even legal?

Posted by: mike from Arlington | February 5, 2010, 12:47 am 12:47 am

Richard Shelby is as good as hiding the fact he is a huge jerk as his hair is at pretending it is still 30 years old.

Posted by: Mike Ross | February 5, 2010, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

Why can’t we impeach senators?

Posted by: Malcolm | February 5, 2010, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

silly “downwithsocialism” doesn’t understand that Shelby’s “concerns” do not warrant jeopardizing the entire nation’s security apparatus. For what? For pork. Were this a Democratic senator, you can be sure the situation would be TOTALLY different to people like that.
One single Senator should never be able to hold up the business of defending the nation. Ever. Unless he’s willing to take the floor and speak endlessly, like in the old days. End the default filibuster and secret holds, and make ‘em work for it–then it will go back to being the truly extraordinary statement it was INTENDED to be.

Posted by: jxn | February 5, 2010, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Hopefully, the next terrorists attack will occur in Alabama.
After all, Shelby could care less about National Security, so I guess the people in his state wouldn’t mind getting attacked.
And lets see how John McCain responds to this “Pork Blackmail”. Most likely, he’ll say it’s perfectly fine what Shelby is doing.

Posted by: Tom | February 5, 2010, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

I guess pork is OK for the GOP.

Posted by: Steve J. | February 5, 2010, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

Here’s a good example of a career politician having twenty-something years in office. I’ve vowed to vote against all incumbents from the town level up to president.
Unenrolled (independent) in MA

Posted by: Venison | February 7, 2010, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

Shelby has his own jobs program. Blackmail the government to get his pork jobs. I could see putting a hold on a few nominations but 70! He’s angling for his own sweetheart deal, while complaining about the Dems.

Posted by: Carolyn | February 8, 2010, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

Alabama needs federal help. Go there. Their education is poor.

Posted by: Michael | February 9, 2010, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.