Mar 4, 2010 12:11pm

16 Finalists Announced in “Race To The Top”

ABC News' Mary Bruce Reports: The Obama administration announced 15 states and the District of Columbia as finalists in the first phase of the “Race To The Top” stimulus grant competition.

Colorado, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina and Tennessee made the cut.

States competing for the $4.35 billion “Race to the Top” funds were asked to document past reform successes, as well as outline plans to: embrace common academic standards; improve teacher quality; create educational data systems; and turn around their lowest-performing schools. The first round of winners will be announced in April.

“These states are an example for the country of what is possible when adults come together to do the right thing for children,” Education Secretary Arne Duncan said. “I salute all of the applicants for their hard work. And I encourage non-finalists to reapply for phase 2.”

Notably absent from the list are several states that took legislative action or made policy changes to better compete, including Indiana, California, Wisconsin, Connecticut and Michigan. Not surprisingly, Rhode Island made the cut – the state has gained a lot of attention recently for its decision to fire every teacher at a struggling high school, a turnaround model embraced by the Obama administration.

Despite the higher than expected number of finalists, Duncan told reporters this afternoon that the number of winners will likely be in the single digits. The department expects to award no more than $2 billion in the first phase of the competition.

“We are setting a high bar and we anticipate very few winners in phase one. But this isn’t just about the money.  It’s about collaboration among all stakeholders, building a shared agenda, and challenging ourselves to improve the way our students learn. I feel that every state that has applied is a winner – and the biggest winners of all are the students,” Duncan said.

Applications from 41 states and the District of Columbia were judged by 60 anonymous peer reviewers from across the country, including policy experts, former teachers, and lawyers. To determine the finalists, the Department arranged the applications in order from high to low scores and determined the strongest competitors based on “natural breaks” – i.e. scoring gaps in the line-up. In the coming weeks, finalists will present their applications in person in a series of closed door meetings.

Although the Education Department plans to make videos of the presentations and all of the reviews available online once the winners are announced, questions are being raised about the transparency of the process.

“They’ve been saying how transparent they are going to be and then there are 60 people deciding how $4 billion are going to be spent and we don’t know who they are?” said Andy Smarick of the Thomas B. Fordhman Institute.

Based on competition’s early effect on national education reform, President Obama requested $1.35 billion in the FY 2011 budget to continue the program next year.

User Comments

What is also noticeable is that only one is from west of the Mississippi river and most of these states voted for obama in 2008. Hmm. Highly suspicious

Posted by: DJ | March 4, 2010, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

States hould not have to compete for education funds. All schools in all states should be funded just like they used to be. Of course, the money went back east, even though much of our tax base comes from CA.
Obama is a disaster (!!) and I can’t wait until the 2012 election. And I am a liberal Democrat!

Posted by: Bubbles | March 4, 2010, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

I bitterly resent what this party’s leadership has done this past year AND since 2006 when they took control of Congress. I do NOT believe nor trust anything they say. They say what we want to hear for one purpose: to get themselves re-elected. There can be only one response: Vote them all out of office! NO MORE! They all need to go in 2010 and 2012. RECONCILIATION IS NOW CALLED: “THE UP OR DOWN VOTE”??? THAT “HOPEY-CHANGEY” STUFF IS NOT WORKING! WE NEED TO REPLACE ALL LIBERALS IN CONGRESS.

Posted by: OBAMA-PELOSI-REID HAVE NO PROBLEM GOVERNING "AGAINST" THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE! | March 4, 2010, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

Doesn’t this sort of undercut all of the work being done to convince people to participate in the census?

Posted by: Flash Override | March 4, 2010, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

What is also noticeable is that only one is from west of the Mississippi river and most of these states voted for obama in 2008. Hmm. Highly suspicious
Posted by: DJ | Mar 4, 2010 1:15:26 PM
Funny you should complain about that, since the ‘red states’ always receive a disproportionate share of the federal government’s largesse.
The ‘blue states’ have been subsidizing the ‘red states’ for many years now.

Posted by: Flash Override | March 4, 2010, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Funny you should complain about that, since the ‘red states’ always receive a disproportionate share of the federal government’s largesse.
The ‘blue states’ have been subsidizing the ‘red states’ for many years now.
You mean like at the oil and natural gas that you are getting from New York
Posted by: Flash Override | Mar 4, 2010 4:29:02 PM

Posted by: DJ | March 4, 2010, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

I can’t believe how stupid the commentators are here. “All but one of these states voted for Obama…” Really?
Tennessee, Kentucky, Georgia, Louisian and South Carolina all voted for McCain moron. Clearly YOUR state needed some educational funds.

Posted by: Teresa | March 4, 2010, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

wow have you ever such a mass of red turned blue – wishful thinking, though – come 2012 – RED IS BACK – no matter the bribe

Posted by: jo | March 4, 2010, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

Hmmm “race” to the top… more failed equal opportunity?

Posted by: Quo Warranto | March 4, 2010, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.