By Kristina Wong

Mar 8, 2010 6:20pm

A Complicated Enemy: Obama Seeks to Vilify Health Insurers, Give Them $336 Billion Check

 A Complicated Enemy: Obama Seeks to Vilify Health Insurers, Give Them $336 Billion CheckABC’s Z. Byron Wolf reports: President Obama and Democrats launched a campaign to vilify insurance companies in the final stretch of their health reform effort.

Republicans, meanwhile, pointed out that those very same insurance companies would get huge checks from the government if health reform is enacted.

“(Health Insurers) will keep on doing this for as long as they can get away with it. This is no secret,” the president said. “They're telling their investors this – ‘We are in the money.  We are going to keep on making big profits even though a lot of folks are going to be put under hardship,’” the President told supporters at a stop in Pennsylvania today.

HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, meanwhile, wrote to insurance company executives demanding that they justify premium hikes.

Neither mentioned that the Senate health reform bill, which is the basis for Democrats' last best chance at comprehensive reform, would give the insurance companies millions of new customers required by law to buy health insurance. It would also require insurers to cover everyone, regardless of age, gender or pre-existing condition.

To help pay for the new insurance requirements the government would give to people money to buy insurance – $336 billion over the next ten years. That money, ultimately, would have to go to… drum roll… insurance companies.

People without employer-sponsored insurance who make too much money to qualify for Medicaid and less than about $88,000 for a family of four, would get tax credits to help them buy insurance on the open market. But the payment of the tax credits would be made, point out Republican researchers, directly to insurance companies. See page 37 here of the Senate Finance Committee's exhaustive explanation of the plan: 

During the 2008 Presidential campaign, then-Senator Obama criticized a proposal by Sen. John McCain because it would send government help for people to buy insurance directly to insurance companies.

“But The New Tax Credit [For Health Insurance] He’s Proposing? That Wouldn’t Go To You. It Would Go Directly To Your Insurance Company – Not Your Bank Account," said Obama in October on the Campaign trail.

And yet that’s exactly what Democrats' proposal would do and why so many would prefer public insurance option to compete with the private market. Supporting the Senate bill will be tough for many liberal Democrats in the House.

To the Republicans’ (and Obama’s on the campaign trail) point about the payments going directly to insurance companies, remember that people with employer-sponsored insurance or current federal medical benefits do not usually get a separate check to buy insurance either. They pay premiums directly to the insurance company and so does their employer. The Senate proposal would create a similar relationship between people who don't have employer-based insurance and the government.

So why do Insurance companies, if they're set to receive more than $330 billion in government subsidies to insure people without insurance now oppose the Senate bill?

"Health plans proposed more than a year ago robust insurance market reforms and new consumer protections to guarantee coverage for pre-existing conditions. Much more needs to be done in the current legislation to address the skyrocketing cost of medical care, which is making health care coverage unaffordable for working families and small businesses," said Robert Zirkelbach, a spokesman from America's Health Insurance Plans, in a statement today.

He argued that health insurers should not be targeted by the President and their profits are lower by margin than other sectors in the health industry.

"For every dollar spent on health care in America, less than one penny goes towards health plan profits. The focus needs to be on the other 99 cents," he said.

User Comments

Yet another dart thrown by the leftist regime of Comrade Obama at the pillars of the traditional USA. Don’t think for a second that I and many “conservatives” don’t criticize “big business” for it’s lack of ethics BUT it’s a far cry from the campaign of the Obamanistas to destroy the core of USA’s economy. They WANT you to be dependent on being in the “good graces” of the politicians in power. Orwell’s Animal Farm IS Obama World!

Posted by: Jack Frost | March 8, 2010, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Where are the profits? Why doesn’t anyone ever present facts to support or refute these arguments? What is the 10 year trend for both profit margin (the percentage compared to expenses), and gross profit amount in the industry (and for the big 3)?

Posted by: Todd | March 8, 2010, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

Of course insurance co’s. make out huge by bringing in another 30million people who weren’t previously on the books… what do you think this is all about? That’s why they sit on their hands while Obama browbeats them…

Posted by: bob | March 8, 2010, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

I do not understand how anyone in their right mind can believe a single word from this person’s mouth. Everything Mr. Obama professed during his campaign he has reneged upon. When I was a young boy I viewed Huntly and Brinkly, and of course Walter Conkrite and though the word of god had spoken. The news was delivered straight forward without bias. There was much investigation into the truth. Today, sadly the only respected newssource is FOX news.

Posted by: Commonsense58 | March 8, 2010, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

Can anyone say with a straight face that Obama is a rational adult? He seems the personification of a 1960′s flower-child radical – all emotion and arrogance. A true embarassment and danger to our country.

Posted by: Jack Frost | March 8, 2010, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

That look of abject panic on Barack’s face is him wondering where affirmative action is to drag him across the finish line. Just like Columbia, just like Harvard, just like Harvard Law Review, just like U of Chicago faculty. He can’t figure out what the problem is.

Posted by: Carlito | March 8, 2010, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

Like the bankers on old that supported bank reform to usher in the 1913 FEDRES.
Sold out again by politicans and special interests!

Posted by: Jack | March 8, 2010, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

Obama smokes too much, drink too much and talk too much.

Posted by: myohmy | March 8, 2010, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

We are skrewed. If this man gets his way, America will change for the worse. Health Care will degrade and the cost will significantly increase for the average American. The man is blind.

Posted by: DavidArizona | March 8, 2010, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

The thrill is gone and the charm only works on haive college kids, and the liberal media swooners.
When those college kids wake up and realize Obama wants to control every aspect of their lives, when they realize he has wrecked their future with massive debt–they will abandon him too.
I’m convinced Obama is starting to crack up mentally. He cannot accept how far he has fallen in just one year.

Posted by: mick | March 8, 2010, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

50 Billion here, 1 Trillion there. Obama’s spending is starting to add up to some real money.

Posted by: Mike Jones | March 8, 2010, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Thanks to ABC’s Z. Byron Wolf for reporting this. Looks like the news stations are acting like news stations again and reporting the truth without bias.

Posted by: Woofie | March 8, 2010, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

doctors study til they are 30 to learn how to save your life…and Obama wants to tax/make them become govt employees/ignore the cost of the’ cover yer arse insurance’. Dont you get it?..Obama wants to pay them LESS than a federal employee janitor…(after taxes) dont you GET it? in canada the average doc makes 80k after expenses..OK YOU spend half your life learning to be a doc… and ask america to pay to same as a plumber. THINK! ppl

Posted by: ric | March 8, 2010, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

A pitch man is all Obama is. He rattles on about health care but he never brings any facts about this plan. Will our employers just drop our health care plans & we have to fend for ourselves? He hasn’t said a word about premium costs which I suspect will be higher than we pay now. People are scared because he’s hiding the facts.

Posted by: Kevin | March 8, 2010, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

I say all this bill really needed to be was one page and on that single page it was to say “you must purchase and carry health insurance at all times or face punishment of a severe fine or worse imprisonment”
Funny how during the 1920′s recession the federal gov’t actually cut its budget in half and the recession ended.
why do we consistently go against common sense thinking and keep growing our spending when we dont have the money to do so?

Posted by: Carl | March 8, 2010, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

obama vilifies an AMERICAN company making money?…yep he does it EVERY day. dont forget… americans invest in the stock of these companies..GET IT? it’s easy to vilify company X…and foeget to watch that Obama just reduced the stock price of company X by 20%. and idiotically NOT call that a .. tax on americans…when he says “not one dime” he forgets that every time he opens his mouth he loses ppl money

Posted by: ric | March 8, 2010, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

I don’t buy the insurance companys claims that only 1 cent on the dollar goes to profit.
I’m a fit and healthy 38yr old male. Two years ago my health insurance cost $271 a month. I have never needed to or gone to the doctors office. Yet over the past two years Kaiser has rasied my rate $113 to $384/month. $60 raise last year and another $54 this year.
There is no way to justify a $100 a month increase in just 2 years for a healthy person. I’ve actually canceled my medical insurance because of all of unjustifiable increases like this especially in our current economy.

Posted by: Sean | March 8, 2010, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

Fox & the internet, helped people who refused to be like Brainwashed Zombies listening to Liberal mass media & not Question his experience, his thought, who he associated with, what was his “Change” all about ? Change Washington or the Constitution & US ?
Americans are NOW going to wake-up & ask questions about these Guys who we are FORCED to give our hard money too??
It was Karl Marx & his bankster Connections that bank rolled him & his Book… Why ? Banksters knew the money they could make off of Free labor was the grandest way, when government forces people to pay from their Labor..
It was Karl Marx that called the “FREE Market”- Capitolism…

Posted by: Gina D. | March 8, 2010, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

Anyone who wants government to take over healthcare and continue to subjugate aspects of the capitalistic system are enemies of America. No where in our constitution is a government takeover of any aspect of the free market mentioned and so their actions are unconstitutional. To try is treasonous in my opinion.

Posted by: clarify | March 8, 2010, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

@Sean – Your premiums are increasing to cover other deadbeat’s premiums, not yours.
It’s the same thing with your SS payments – they are going to pay somebody else’s income today, not your income in the future.
Gotta lover progressivism.

Posted by: TheWiseOne | March 8, 2010, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

Man can this president lie? Or what,and you media types telling me what a nice guy he is. Course I’m a old Christian white guy. And back when I was a kid the good guys didn’t lie to ya. Of course these days the mere fact I brought it up makes me a racist. My how times have changed. Perhaps the mighty O would do well to remember the fact we the people have told him in New Jersey in Virginia and Kennedy-land, keep your hands of health care. And still you persist. We know insurance co. make about a 2% profit we know this. So going to the SEIU club house so you can get thunderous applause for your lies. Does not change what we know. But it tells us a lot about our President.

Posted by: Globalwarmer | March 8, 2010, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

ric “There is no way to justify a $100 a month increase in just 2 years for a healthy person. I’ve actually canceled my medical insurance because of all of unjustifiable increases like this especially in our current economy.”
You better go out and buy it again cause Nancy an CO are gonna put you in jail for not having it.

Posted by: Always Independent | March 8, 2010, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

Obama needs to get his facts right. Why is he attacking an industry that makes only 3.5% percent a year in profits. If he does his research he will fid that health care insurers rank at a measley 88 and hospitals at 77 in top corporate earnings. What he fails to mention are all the hidden taxes alraeady costing health care costs to rise most of them involvinr medicare and medicaid. As we all know, this is a tactic used by libs to try to attack a person or company even if what they say is a lie to get their agenda implemented. We do not need you or your agenda so leave us alone!

Posted by: Susan | March 8, 2010, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

two things will happen..guess which?…insurance companies will ignore the fact that they have to PAY their employees based on PROFITS….or they will change how much they CHARGE YOU..in order to pay employees..guess what happens.. you should run away from obama care. when the govt gets involved..everyone loses….name ONE instance where govt involvment MADE money?

Posted by: ric | March 8, 2010, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

“There is no way to justify a $100 a month increase in just 2 years for a healthy person. I’ve actually canceled my medical insurance because of all of unjustifiable increases like this especially in our current economy.”
Posted by: Sean | Mar 8, 2010 7:08:40 PM
Hey Sean — under Obamacare you would be fined, imprisoned, or both!

Posted by: Always Right | March 8, 2010, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

I bet those nasty insurance executives even go to Las Vegas for vacation! Obama math 101: Insurance companies = vile, contemptible….ACORN = virtuous, commendable

Posted by: TexasRick | March 8, 2010, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

KEY POINT: the reason President Obama was able to get the insurance industry on board last year was because they saw a simple trade:
a) president would be able to say HE made the industry end restrictions on “pre-existing conditions”;
b) industry would be able to sell to millions more people because the government would force some to buy and would pay for anyone who couldn’t afford it!
Anyone COULD have made that deal, so long as the industry was going to get at lease as much money after the deal as before….
But once it became clear that many potential customers would rather pay a fine than pay for insurance they didn’t want, the profits the President had promised disappeared.
But it sells well to the naive: “I made them change their ways!” …never mind I did it by paying them off.
What we need is to be given the power to buy what we find worthy of our $$$. Once we have that market power, we’ll see the industry fall all over itself to give us the best service at the best price… because we simply will buy insurance from their competitors until we find what we want at a price we think is satisfactory.
We lack that power because of two reasons:
1) most states regulate health insurance within their sates to the point where there is little or no choice between vendors available.
2) most insurance is sold through EMPLOYERS…. so obviously the customer they satisfy is the EMPLOYER and not the sick person!
Obviously, we need help from our government to stop this insanity of taxing us if we get the same money in our pay and buy our own insurance, but not taxing us when we allow our employer to buy the insurance and offer it as a “benefit” with which they can strong arm us to be “loyal” out of fear of losing our health insurance!!!
How, this many years after the end of slavery and “company town” intimidation, do we allow this final form of employer intimidation to be enshrined in tax law????

Posted by: Karl Quick | March 8, 2010, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

wow you wingnuts are insane and stupid read the article here is the important paragraph.
And yet that’s exactly what Democrats’ proposal would do and why so many would prefer public insurance option to compete with the private market. Supporting the Senate bill will be tough for many liberal Democrats in the House.
Yeah thats right because the people you support are in the pockets of the Insurance companies so no public option. I know that everything is Obama’s fault like the extraordinary deficit, two wars, an economy in shambles and ofcourse the wall street bailouts. Oh wait that all happened before he was President.

Posted by: Namor | March 8, 2010, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

This is a straw man argument. The Statists always have to vilify some entity in order to sell their snake oil to the public; in this case it’s the insurance companies. I sell health insurance, so I’m well aware of the pitfalls for policy holders. But, at the end of the day, these companies are businesses just like any other. They want MORE customers, not less. If they raise premiums and cancel policies or disqualify applicants based on pre-existing conditions, that doesn’t grow their business. It’s all about risk and cost. If the Dems were sincere about reform, that would be the focus of their reform. Sadly, they are only interested in a socialist takeover by fiat.

Posted by: Paul | March 8, 2010, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

I know this might be above your pay level Kathleen Sebelius but the people would like an itemized list of those so called stimulus jobs too and we don’t get what we want you don’t get information from the insurance companies.. BTW how about the increased cost of hospitals and drugs too?? come on no one is buying it when you attack ONE group.. The American people are smarter than you or your boss want to admit.. QUIT GRANDSTANDING

Posted by: Independent Voter Joliet | March 8, 2010, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

All politicians, media people and anyone who thinks health care is better in Cuba or Russia should, as a matter of principle, GO THERE when sick.
Please, PLEASE put your lives and your children’s lives in the hands of the very people you trust more than our “greedy” caregivers and their minions. …you can afford it… go prove to us all that health care is better over there! Personal demonstrations are always more convincing than talk…. In fact, why not set up a booth at the Houston airport and pay those poor dumb foreigners who stream in to go to M. D. Anderson for their cancer treatment… save them by paying them to go elsewhere. Let them demonstrate to us all that American medicine is inferior to Cuban or Russian or Chinese medicine.

Posted by: Karl Quick | March 8, 2010, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

To people who wonder why rates for healthy people rise, even if they never go to the doctor: You are in an insurance plan. You r rates subsidize the sick people’s rates. If your insurance rates were isolated from everyone else’s rates, then the system would have fallen apart a long time ago.
It will get more expensive and rationed when pre-existing conditions and non-payers are covered.

Posted by: Wait A Minute | March 8, 2010, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Oblunder claims that “my proposal would bring down the cost of health care for millions—families, businesses and the federal government.” He says it is “fully paid for” and “brings down our deficit by up to $1 trillion over the next two decades.” Never before has a vast new entitlement been sold on the basis of fiscal responsibility, and one reason ObamaCare is so unpopular is that Americans understand the contradiction between untold new government subsidies and claims of spending restraint. They know a Big Con when they hear one. The sock puppet in chief’s fiscal assertions are possible only because of the fraudulent accounting and budget gimmicks that Democrats spent months calibrating.

Posted by: 1GregM | March 8, 2010, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

On “This Week,” I believe George Will mentioned, and I didn’t hear the rest of the leftist panel deny it, that if you took all the profits that the insurance companies made it would cover a total of two days worth of health care. Did I mishear him? If this is true how can taking them out of the equation really save us anything?

Posted by: WMiller | March 8, 2010, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

I WOULD like to see an audit of where the money goes…. I was looking at a bill from my hospital. Very obviously, most of the cost was covered by the insurance company, but the cost seemed all out of proportion to what was actually done to me.
Why blame the Insurance company when it is clear that the rising costs are NOT significantly due to increases in their profits, but rather due to increased fees charged for the services provided?
What we need is some way to apply pressure on the providers to reduce cost. In the past, we basically trusted the system (doctors and hospitals and insurance companies) to police themselves. …that is VERY unrealistic today.
The government forcing prices down does not really fix the problem… the government is more profligate than ANY insurance company! Just look at the way they’ve failed to audit their own spending on Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, Post Office, Amtrak, Freddie and Fanny !!!! …consider how they pay their employees thousands of dollars (of our money) more than private employers, for the same work!
Obviously, the government is not the best “enforcer” we could hire.
Know who is best? You and I! We need some way to get control of the costs ourselves and select providers who offer the best performance for the price.

Posted by: Karl Quick | March 8, 2010, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

Obama shouldn’t be demonizing anyone. We are all Americans, even people who work for insurance companies.

Posted by: PoliticalCentrist | March 8, 2010, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

We don’t need a Community Organizer. We need a Government Organizer.

Posted by: Pete Miller | March 8, 2010, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

It’s all the Big Bag Insurance Companies Fault, Obama? Those companies are filled with honest, hardworking people and the companies exist and operate only within the laws that are on the books–enacted by idiots like you! How dare you! Like anything the government has taken over can operate as efficiently. The bottom line is that Obama wants all of our jobs to be GOVERNMENT jobs!

Posted by: Lilly | March 8, 2010, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Im all for big brother healthcare… the future of this country is a richer poor class, a poorer middle class, and smaller elite, and more powerful gov. The people that can see the future and swim with the current have a better chance of success. To fight against the lazy masses only drags you down.

Posted by: Aaron | March 8, 2010, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

I had enough. I am planning for my layoff shortly. I will collect unemployment for 2 years, jump on the GIMMEE BANDWAGON; free medicaid, foodstamps, subsidized housing.
I may just jump on social security disability a bit early (52) – pays a bit more.

Posted by: BBub | March 8, 2010, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

“To help pay for the new insurance requirements the government would give to people money to buy insurance – $336 billion over the next ten years. That money, ultimately, would have to go to… drum roll… insurance companies.”
—————————————
Another drum roll please, as $235 Billion of these same dollars will be paid out in health care claims.
Why can’t you folks differentiate between health care vs. health insurance, as the later is simply a means of financing the costs of the former. You want to bring down the costs of the later, you need to start by bring down the costs of the former, as one follows the other.
Proposed legislation attempts to bring down the cost of health insurance with no real meaningful attempt to bring down the costs of health care. This why the public is demanding that the WH hit the “reset” button, the public “get’s it;” the politicians don’t, as they are already way too heavily invested in time, energy and money.

Posted by: JMo | March 8, 2010, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

What the media and Democrats fail to point out is that health insurance premiums are largely driven by the high cost of the medical services provided by doctors, hospitals, physical therapists, etc. I am tired of this administration always having to demonize one industry after another. This is the party of fearmongering and scare tactics.

Posted by: Daisy21 | March 8, 2010, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

Hey Ric … thanks for never getting sick and helping to pay for my $70K motorcycle accident and my $50K gall bladder last year. Lets see .. I pay in about $350/month and my employer about the same, so someone had to come up with the other $116K. ‘Preciate it!

Posted by: JohnF | March 8, 2010, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

Anthiem Blue Cross made a press release of their 39% rate increase in california just as they revived the health care debate. They trumpeted this increase for all to hear. Of course they wanted to generate the anger of the voters. They must think the voters are stupid. Everyone knows that adding 30 million new subscribers would be a landfall of riches for them. Kill this bill, if not then we will repeal it. Wake up america.

Posted by: jay | March 8, 2010, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

This is outrageous. If I don’t like the rates my insurance company charges I go elsewhere, just like my car insurance. The govt has NO right to stick their nose in this, I am a life long dem and I am at wits end with this nonsense. NO MORE.

Posted by: Jim T | March 8, 2010, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

So the democrats are completely full of crap. What’s new? They’d never be elected if they were forced to be honest.

Posted by: Squeenter squillo | March 8, 2010, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

LOL- what nerve criticizing health insurers– whose rates are approved by government, and simply reflect the cost of services… which largely are set by government.
It’s like shooting me in the foot, then complaining about my limp. Fire these
people at the next possible election.

Posted by: YouDude60 | March 8, 2010, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

Of course the insurance companies will get this win fall,why do you think Obama held those closed door meetings? Obama got elected on the promise of a single payer health plan,….. he lied!
Just wait to see how much payoff he will get after he leaves office, not unlike the pay off Bill Clinton got after he left office with those trade deals!

Posted by: lyn | March 8, 2010, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

It’s a sad day when the President of the United States has to vilify the insurance industry in order to try to centralize even more power in the hands of the federal government by getting congress to approve this disastrous legislation. If you think health care is costly now, wait until it’s free.

Posted by: Jim | March 8, 2010, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Obama is doing the impossible, he’s making Ford, Carter, and GWB look like geniuses.

Posted by: Kent | March 8, 2010, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

Maybe if health care COSTS had been the focus of this administration, instead of a healthcare takeover, the insurance companies would have had to become more competitive, or (gasp) even eliminated as the middleman.

Posted by: What Not | March 8, 2010, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

I love how accurate everyone is… It’s really fascinating. Two points:
1. If you think “the man” is holding you back, don’t worry, you aren’t going to be worth a damn even if “he” wasn’t. What you’ve done is rationalized your excuses. That’s all. Plain and simple.
2. I’m willing to bet that no one commenting on this article has read a single paragraph out of the legislation itself and is simply regurgitating what they’ve “heard.” And just to be out ahead of another nonsense excuse, the bill is 2,016 pages with 3 inch left AND right margins, 1 inch top and bottom margins and double spaced. So you understand what that means – if it were an Ann Coulter book it’d be about 250 pages or so. Again the size of the thing is of course, something you’ve “heard.”

Posted by: Jason | March 8, 2010, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

Todd – Insurance companies have a profit margin of 2.2%. For every dollar they earn, they keep $.02.
Google it.

Posted by: Troika37 | March 8, 2010, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Obama is willing to do anything to get his bill passed because it’s all about HIM. If the bill fails, he fails. If it passes, he wins — nevermind the absurd cost to the American people and obvious gift to the insurance companies. He is an egomaniacal betrayer of the people. If he were an honest man, he would have insisted on the public option from the get-go (and stuck with that position) and not met behind closed doors to cut a deal with insurance company execs before the bill writing even got underway. Even though nearly all Dem incumbents will be kicked out in November if this bill passes, he apparently doesn’t care. He thinks he can undo the damage before his next election. Good luck with that, Obama. You’re a con artist who got the masses to vote for you, including myself. I want my money back. You’ve proven yourself to be a FRAUD.

Posted by: frankj | March 8, 2010, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

No mandate. If the plan is so great, everyone will beg to be included. If the plan is another scheme to rake in more taxpayer moneys, people will avoid it like the plague and pandemic it promises to become, and NO vaccine will prevent this one, and NO medication will cure it.

Posted by: What Not | March 8, 2010, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

@ric
what a minute…you actually canceled your health insurance? what are you going to do when you are forced to purchase health insurance?

Posted by: dan | March 8, 2010, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

Obama is lying/ No way! The scandal. How dare he!
Okay all of you folks who voted for this egomaniacal, socialist whack job. Told you so, although that does not quite cover it or make up for the money I will be paying out to cover your mistake. He spends like a drunk sailor on leave, blames everyone but himself, calls himself bipartisin until he sees his precious bill about to go down in flames and uses class warfare better than Stalin and Marx combined. Hopefully the congress feels more threatened by losing thier jobs than by this Chicago thug.

Posted by: Kurt | March 8, 2010, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

Isn’t it amazing how this `schlub’ finds it so easy and ethical using other people’s money to formulate his own dominance and path to destroying capitalism?

Posted by: Omniscient | March 8, 2010, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

The insurance companies are making crazy profits and are even bragging about it. In a conference call today with Goldman Sachs they were touting how they would make gobs of cash by dropping customers (mainly the old, sick ones) while ratcheting up premiums on everyone else. They promised Goldman they’d be more profitable than ever. Under the proposed health “reform” bill, there are no caps on premium increases. This bill is a terrible one. We desperately need real reform, not this crap that’s a gift to the insurance companies and one that Obama will do anything to pass. If Obama doesn’t get this rammed through, he’ll look like a loser and he can’t have that.

Posted by: frankt | March 8, 2010, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

The greatest blessing that could be bestowed upon America would be for Obama’s total Socialist agenda to collapse on its own demerit. Only then will our economy , relieved of the Marxist millstone, rebound and once again bear the fruits of the most vibrant free-enterprise system in the history of mankind. Greg Neubeck

Posted by: gneubeck | March 8, 2010, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

Think about this – the president so vivifies the “big” insurance companies – because of rising rates and BIG profits … well the truth is something entirely different – According to 2009 figures, the Health Insurance Industry Ranks #86 – with 3.3% profit margin.

Posted by: Dale Caruso | March 8, 2010, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

This is one time when abortion is moral, ethical and a patriotic duty: ABORT this plan.

Posted by: What Not | March 8, 2010, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Obama, you idiot. Insurance companies are raising premiums because of your being caught high-center on the economy. The high unemployment especially in California, New York, Michigan and other 10% percent plus unemployment states just happen to be the places that insurance companies are raising rates. Obama you are creating the very situation you are complaining and creating such a fuss about. Please stop trying to fix anything, you are not capable.

Posted by: rscott | March 8, 2010, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

Mr. President,
I do not authorize you to give away any more of my tax dollars. This is not “government” money. This is taxpayer money. Cease and desist.
Thank you.

Posted by: Eric | March 8, 2010, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

Impeach OBAMA

Posted by: Carl | March 8, 2010, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

What the H its not just the insurance companies, doctors are guilty of overcharging. So vilify insurance companies and bankrupt them. The doctors will be next. Do we really want the government in-charge of our “health care?”
look at social security and medicaid. Yes lets let all the Super smart retards in charge of our health

Posted by: mike | March 8, 2010, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

73% of Americans DO NOT want this health care reform bill to be passed. 52% of Americans DO NOT want reconciliation to be used to pass health care reform. Mr. Obama has stated publicly on several occasions that reconciliation SHOULD NOT be used to pass health care reform. The debate is OVER-the clear majority of citizens are OPPOSED to Obamacare. Once again, our president has shown himself to be a FRAUD-tell the public what you think they want to hear and then do the opposite, hoping no one will remember.

Posted by: pvanhoy922 | March 8, 2010, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

============================
Obama is a divisive, anti-capitalism thug.
============================
And Obama is so predictable – he keeps operating from the anti-American Saul Alinsky Rule for Radicals playbook.

Posted by: N Waff | March 8, 2010, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

Once again, more solid proof that democrats care more about big corporations than the little guy. All of their policies hurt small business and benefit the corporations. Somebody cue the “corporate anthem” from Rollerball…..

Posted by: Rob | March 8, 2010, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

Obama is the epitome of a mediocre child that’s been told his entire life that he’s special. He’s never been told no. He’s the product of affirmative action, where merit counts for nothing and skin color counts for everything. He’s a narcissistic man-child still struggling with the fact that his mother, and two fathers abandoned him.
He looks around the room, and honestly can’t comprehend why not everyone agrees with him. He’s incompetent. Whatever room he walks into, he’s the most inexperienced guy there. Think about that for a moment. To add insult to injury, his chief of staff is roaming naked in Congressional shower rooms picking fights with Democratic Congressmen.
He’s a prime example of why we shouldn’t be giving 9th place trophies to children.
And if I hear one more untrue anecdotal health care story from him, blood’s going to shoot out of my eyes.

Posted by: GavinInTucson | March 8, 2010, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

Obama’s drivel is standard progressive class warfare with zero facts to back up his claims. His teleprompter script could get mixed up with Chavez’s speech notes and you’d never know the difference.

Posted by: Pyronaught | March 8, 2010, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

This has got to be the greatest snake oil scam of all time…and will prove to be the costliest in terms of money and the freedom to say no to big government.
Truly, if the great liberator of the poor and down trodden, Barry Obama, was a real leader, then he and his minions would live by example. What right does he, or his ordained, or those who worship the gas he passes exempt themselves from the law and mandates they would impose on others?

Posted by: IraqVet | March 8, 2010, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

@Ric… perhaps you should move to Arizona, where your monthly premium (like mine) would be about $130 per month.
If you want to get to the heart at why your premiums are going, look to your State, which mandates what coverage is minimal. In some States, that mandate that things like liposuction, and breast and penile implants be covered, premiums are going through the roof.
And I hate to beat the politically incorrect dead horse here, but illegal aliens are a big problem as well. They stroll into a hospital and get “free” health care. And since nothing is free, that cost is passed onto hospital patrons that either have insurance and/or those that pay cash. So, naturally, the cost ultimately gets passed to you.
Also, write your congressmen and demand that they repeal the law, passed by the Federal Government in 1946 by the Truman administration (McCaran-Ferguson Anti-Trust Act of 1946). This law basically give health insurance companies anti-trust exemption status in the States in which they operate. In other words, they’re allowed to run a monopoly. If this law were repealed, it would allow (force) the 1300 (1300!!!!) insurance companies to compete with each other, driving the costs down big time (just like your auto insurance).

Posted by: GavinInTucson | March 8, 2010, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

guys guys, we need to keep our laser-like focus on the evilness of the insurance companies. we all know government is the holiest and most honest system of control.

Posted by: StarveTheBeast | March 8, 2010, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

So many of you here are calling President Obama stupid. Listen up for your own fiscal well-being: he’s not stupid.
Really, he’s not. He’s brokered deals with the pharmacy industry, the AMA, the insurance industry, the unions, his own party members in Congress to get what he wants.
Just think about that. He is getting want he wants. And he’s happy because he thinks he’s going down in history as the president who saved Americans from health insurance whether we want it or not.

Posted by: malcat | March 8, 2010, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

Also:
How many of you posting here have contacted your Senators and HOR Representatives? If you haven’t done that, you are part of the problem.
Stop just complaining on these blogs and start bending the ear of your Congressional members. Heck, contact all the Democrats and all the Republicans and the independents and tell THEM what you like or don’t like about the bills. They work for us; they are our employees.
It’s time for our elected officials to know what we want. I don’t care if you are for or against the Senate and/or HOR bills. Be responsible, educated Americans and tell your ‘employees’ what you want them to do.

Posted by: malcat | March 8, 2010, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Vilify healthcare? I just read that Health insurers profit margin is between 3-4%. Hardly an evil villain. Recent study found the highest rate of denied health coverages were from MEDICARE–our government run agency. Hmm–make demand increase, lower supply equal less health care and more cost. Lets look at free market cures. Eliminate insurance except for catastrophic, direct cost for users–EVERYONE has some sort of pay out relative to income.
I never understand government math. Lets see, 35 million uninsured (if you believe the fake numbers). How about each family-person receive one million health credit for their life time to buy insurance or place in HSA? That would cost hmmm,… 35 million. Where does this trillion dollars go they are purporting?
Dr. H

Posted by: Dr. H | March 8, 2010, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

This is great Obama is pushing hard to just say he signed something and yet we never here in the news this is what he compaigned against until now? Gotta love MSM!
For those that are blaming insurance companies for the increased rates lately, remember that states control the practices of those policies… So if the state requires coverage of a new treatment or procedure as required coverage your rates have to go up because that was never underwritten in the policy. This and the amount your insurer pays out in that state usually will determine rates. So simple math says, if people drop coverage and there was an uptick in payments for services rates are going to go up a lot! See California as an example.
The real culprit here is the cost of care itself not the insurer, they are just putting in a margin with their insurance product. The Hospital, Dr., med lab, etc. are the one’s charging you. By the way, what do you think happens to those rates from service providers when the taxes go up on medical equipment and lower medicare/medicaid payments? Oh wait someone has to pay for it and that’s the guy/gal paying for a policy! Thanks Dems and Obama, only you could actually believe this will lower costs!

Posted by: John | March 8, 2010, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

i only have 1 word: IMPEACHMENT

Posted by: gee | March 8, 2010, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

Its Time to “Pick Up The Torch” – Milktoast Intolerant

Posted by: Annie89 | March 8, 2010, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

This entire health care push by democrats has been a stain on this country. I’ve never seen such ugliness and blatant vote buying in my life. They ought to be embarrassed and ashamed of their actions.

Posted by: kramer | March 8, 2010, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

Dear Senator Reed,
You stated that 45,000 people die every single day because they have no health insurance. Could you provide more information regarding your claim? At the rate of death suggested, the deceased list from last year alone would contain 16.5 million names. Your own facts suggest there have been over 33 million uninsured victim deaths since the Presidential election. Other U.S. Government statistics claim a 2008 U.S. death rate of around 2.5 million. In which states are the death rates the highest? Will imposing a Government-Run Pharmacy Co-Pay for all reduce the reported death rates? Such a plan may generate over 300 million in windfall revenues each day. Will it be enough to cover Union pension fund shortfalls?

Posted by: Hankelvis | March 8, 2010, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

been in insusrance for over 40 years. Stop selling health because the profit of the company was to small and was afraid companies would go bankrupt. If health insurance is so profitable why does only one of all the 15 companies that I sold for, which are still in life and annuities all out of the health insurance market? Because it is not profitable. One company I sold for only made 1 million profit one year. That is when I got out. That is to small of margin of profit for a multistate insurance company to make. One claim on triplets was a quarter of a million that year. That company did not insure the wife. So no premium was paid on her yet when she had her husbands babies my company had to pay the quarter of million. She was insured with another company and her company did not have to pay one cent. Why? State law. Why does Ky. have less people insured now. All five of my companies left due to having to take all applicants. So now sickies are insured and premium so high everyone else dropped theirs so now less insured due to goverment inference. Why such high premiums. Indiana law forced companies to not allow riders on policies so less insured now. Goverment involved created our current high premiums and health costs. Indiana has laws that cut the commission to agents but never lowered the premiums to clients. Agents like me got out so there are less insured people than before. I had to sell three policies to make what I was making on one. 33,000 instead of 99,000. Guess who got less taxes from agents. Federal and State tax loss. Anything the govermeent touches turns sour, does not make sense and cost the clients grief and money.

Posted by: george | March 8, 2010, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

Ask any doctor where the problem is and they will tell you “insurance”…….”mal-practice insurance”!
Lawyers will reap billions from this monstrocity!

Posted by: Bill | March 8, 2010, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

Obama wants to take lifetime limits off, no pre-existing conditions, cover everything, etc. and then he thinks premiums will go down. Math challenged Lobbyist-In-Chief.

Posted by: Herodutus | March 8, 2010, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

Obama has lost it. You can’t believe him, you can’t trust him and you certainly don’t want him controlling your health insurance.
I agree that the government has no business running health insurance. They can’t even get Medicare, Social Security, the Post Office, AmTrak and everything else government touches to run in the black. They are already bankrupting this nation and just want to pile on.

Posted by: Wally | March 8, 2010, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

This is clearly nothing more than an Obama hit piece. Clearly, the Note is more interested in manufacturing links from Drudge than reporting the news. Shame on you, ABC!

Posted by: TenuredJournalismProfessor | March 9, 2010, 12:02 am 12:02 am

If 30 million people are added to the insurers rolls won’t their costs go up? Especially when adding in those that they could previously DENY coverage to… Those with high risk ailments cost more to cover. Therefore, the 33 billion annually will go to assist those in purchasing insurance. Insurance that they previously could not afford. So that they can (hopefully) be healthy.
@GinaD.
it’s called antitrust. insurance companies dominate states with only a few covering a state. This doesn’t encourage competition. An insurance exchange would allow TRUE competition. And bring down costs.
@JackFrost
I can say he is a rational adult. A politician that attempts to convey a very complex issue to the people of the United States. Not relying on fear as others have to pass legislation. But, rather offers realistic rational evidence that the course this nation is on is one that will bring us to ruin. Premium increases are crippling Americans(@Sean). The attribute you call arrogance is called confidence. Confidence in the nation to understand this complex issue and not revert to fear mongering, as so many of the comments here have offered.

Posted by: Will | March 9, 2010, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Obama seems to be good at borrowing money to give to large companies. Banks, car companies, now insurance companies. All Bush did was give tax breaks to oil companies. Obama is giving cash.

Posted by: oonogil | March 9, 2010, 12:21 am 12:21 am

All the health care/insurance/drugs/government etc want the peoples money..they will not solve the problem..they need us the people…we need to organize and solve this our own way and leave those other interests in the dust. thanks

Posted by: Erich Kronberger | March 9, 2010, 12:24 am 12:24 am

Obama keeps demonizing the insurance industry and bringing up anecdotes about how insurance companies withhold treatment for Americans. The federal government denies a 1000 times more people of medical procedures, including denying treatments in Medicare and Social Security benefits. Obama is far worse and dangerous than any insurance executive!

Posted by: JoeB | March 9, 2010, 12:31 am 12:31 am

@TheWiseOne – While costs may be going up because of “deadbeats”, I still maintain that there is no reasonable excuse for a 41.6% premium hike over 2 years.
I have VA health coverage as well because of my status as a retired Vet. I only maintained private health care for cases when I wasn’t near a VA facility and didnt want to deal with the paper work or being moved to a VA facility after stabilizing in a Private hospital. But I am not going to support them jacking my premiums over 40% regardless of the spin they give. maybe their costs went up 20% at most, the other 20% is going into the companys pocket. Regulation is needed more than another forced tax.

Posted by: Sean | March 9, 2010, 12:55 am 12:55 am

Do you really understand how insurance companies work???? Your insurance rate is not based on you personally but on the shared risk of all those who are insured. Yes you get discounts for your health and habits, but you are also group into a “risk group” for your final rate. Insurance company does not have any money except the money of those they insure. When the expend money paying for their policy holders, on insurance bill, this is not a personal saving account for you, it is a group plan to pay those bills, thus, if the insurance company expends more funds then, they have allocated to the risk group, they have to raise their rate in order to pay those bills. Yes, insurance companies make a profit, they also invest in real estate and other things, which they put back into the economy, they also, have investors which share those profits, and spend money into the economy. This administration continues to demonize companies which employ people and generate taxes and spend money into the economy is detrimental to economic growth and long term employment in the United States.

Posted by: David | March 9, 2010, 12:58 am 12:58 am

Folks, this has never been about improving access to health care or lowering costs. This is strictly about control. Absolute control over nearly 20% of our economy. One of the foundations of radical socialism is to overload the system (government entitlement programs) to the point of failure. It then becomes imperative that government “step in” with even greater control over a larger portion of our lives. Capitalism must be destroyed before Socialism can be “inserted.”
If Obama really cared about creating jobs and pulling our economy out of this recession, economics 101 tells us that a simple accross-the-board tax cut would put more money into everyone’s hands, increasing demand for goods, and allowing businesses to grow and create more jobs. AND, the tax cut would cost less that the billions that have been wasted over the past year for political reasons.
We’ll never see a tax cut from the messiah…that would give him less wealth to redistribute.

Posted by: Doug | March 9, 2010, 1:00 am 1:00 am

I have to ask, because it keeps on coming up over and over, about how the big, bad insurance companies are making money hand over fist, and raising their rates; aren’t most of them publicly traded companies? God forbid another company raise its rates to ensure profit for shareholders.

Posted by: DaveN | March 9, 2010, 1:19 am 1:19 am

Someone should explain insurance to some of these morons. Just because u don’t use it doesn’t mean other aren’t. You pay into a pool and the ins. co. pays claims of everyone from the pool. If the pool is shrinking, everyone must pay more to keep the pool in business.
If u r healthy and don’t use insurance, then opt out and get a cheap high deductable plan and a health savings account. You can then spend ur own money on medical tax free and send less to the ins. co.

Posted by: Bob | March 9, 2010, 1:33 am 1:33 am

One thing that I have noticed in the past 4 months: the defenders of Obamacare are few and far between on comment pages like these. They used to post endless ad hominem attacks on those who questioned Obama. Not anymore. They have gotten the message and their silence speaks loudly. This country is BANKRUPT and more and more entitlements is not making it any better for any of us. If the health insurance industry is broken lets fix it. If the healthcare industry is broken lets fix it. Obamacare does neither. If this thing is rammed down our throats I demand a White House ceremony when the first American Citizen is hauled off to jail for not buying health insurance. I demand a White House ceremony when the first check from OUR MONEY is handed out for aborting an unborn child. If these people are so D**** proud of this bill then they need to quit hiding like a bunch of cowards and stand behind it so we can see who they are.

Posted by: Mad Jayhawk | March 9, 2010, 1:35 am 1:35 am

It’s funny seeing republican talk radio talking points regurgitated like the gospel. “Obama,” they say, “Is a leftist radical!” How silly.
This plan is not the “Obama plan,” it is not the “Democrat Plan.” It is, in fact, essentially the exact same plan that the GOP and McCain supported just a short year ago. Republicans supported it then while Democrats claimed to oppose it. Today Democrats support it while Republicans pretend to oppose it.
The reality is this. It is, in fact, the INSURANCE COMPANY PLAN. They wrote it, they paid for it, and they are planning to cash in on it. For them, despite their protestations, it is the biggest payoff in history. Customers mandated by law to buy their products.

Posted by: ChrisP | March 9, 2010, 1:49 am 1:49 am

Sean said: “I don’t buy the insurance companys claims that only 1 cent on the dollar goes to profit.”
That’s not what the article said… it said: “For every dollar spent on health care in America, less than one penny goes towards health plan profits. The focus needs to be on the other 99 cents,”
That’s the TOTAL of health care costs, (drugs, doctor visits, hospital stays, etc.) Insurance companies make a WHOPPING 3.3% profit margin, which is far, far below most other industries, ranking #86 on the list

Posted by: DFinley | March 9, 2010, 1:58 am 1:58 am

Obama: “(Health Insurers) will keep on doing this for as long as they can get away with it. This is no secret They’re telling their investors this – ‘We are in the money. We are going to keep on making big profits even though a lot of folks are going to be put under hardship,’” … This quote should be made against the Federal Reserve, not the health insureres. Our government is completely backwards, and so are we.

Posted by: Julius | March 9, 2010, 2:26 am 2:26 am

A lot of common folk who voted for him are probably really regretting they did. Majority of Americans are freedom loving and conservative.
I was in the Group Health Insurance business for 17 years. Cost containment was always an issue.
This is a very difficult problem that cannot be solved by the proposed Senate bill which does not even address containing costs.
If you insure all, there might be some small savings but you still have to lay out government money for the 30M plus uninsured and over a period of time say 10 years, who knows how much this will cost.
The`solution has to be restructuring the delivery of medical care services and the claims administration with the govt. as the excess reinsurer.

Posted by: Maiki | March 9, 2010, 2:36 am 2:36 am

Jack Frost said it all. Take heed.

Posted by: Vince | March 9, 2010, 3:59 am 3:59 am

this sort of drivel only works with college kids who haven’t lived yet, and other Liberals who think the same way as he does.
Those of us in the real world, know this is all a bunch of BS.

Posted by: Scott N TX | March 9, 2010, 5:12 am 5:12 am

Hey Obama! Kiss my patooti!

Posted by: Scott N TX | March 9, 2010, 5:14 am 5:14 am

Medicare, food stamps, education, social security, fema, ssi, etc…
What government program works as intended, saves money, etc… all are failures, all are collosal juggernauts unable to function efficiently, or effectively. What will make socialized medicine different. When it has failed in every country it has been tried in, how will Obama’s plan be different. All the programs i mentioned are going broke, or they are broke. year after year schools need more money, we keep throwing more and more at them, but there is little improvement. They actually only get worse. People the world over come here to get the best possible care they can get. Our medical system is second to none! Obama’s plan will crush it!

Posted by: Scott N TX | March 9, 2010, 5:25 am 5:25 am

Obama is back to community organizing mode. Attack private companies and shake them down! Does this allegedly “educated” person even understand the CONCEPT of insurance? They have to make money to be viable. They aren’t like the Obama/Pelosi/Reid government that can run trillions of dollars of red ink for perpetuity. All these cheap rhetorical shots are beneath a president. Obama is proving, yet again, that he’s not up to the job. He should have spent a decade or so in the Senate and matured before scamming his way, via the gullible media, into such a position of responsibility. Our nation is worse off for having elected this clown.

Posted by: Mike from Saline | March 9, 2010, 5:52 am 5:52 am

Looking at the numbers, the % of profit Ins. company’s make is around 3 to 5%. Hell Government motors far exceeds that by at least 50 to 75%.
Time to remove the socialist party from society.

Posted by: RUDY | March 9, 2010, 6:04 am 6:04 am

Of course any money OBAMA “gives” to anyone has to abide with the PAYGO law – RIGHT? RIGHT? Thought we were out of money, so where are the cuts and rollbacks? Anyone?

Posted by: Amazingoly | March 9, 2010, 6:14 am 6:14 am

Sean said:
“There is no way to justify a $100 a month increase in just 2 years for a healthy person. I’ve actually canceled my medical insurance because of all of unjustifiable increases like this especially in our current economy.”
Sean, by dropping coverage, and eliminating several thousand dollars a year from the insurance pool you were just in, you have directly contributed to the increases you say you can’t understand. Healthy people are fleeing heathcare plans as money gets tight and they realize they are over-paying for services rendered to themself.
The democrats want to eliminate your ability to “opt-out” and cover your own expenses (that’s selfish!), instead you will not only cover your own expenses, but you will help pay for the treatments those sicker than you receive AND you will be helping to pay for healthcare coverage for those that the government feels can’t afford to pay as much as you can (you know, folks whose votes the ruling party wants to secure in the next election).

Posted by: n2vip | March 9, 2010, 6:52 am 6:52 am

Millions of new customers for ins companies? Whom are you kidding? The insurance mandate, combined with a much smaller ‘fine’ for not buying, coupled with no denial for pre-existing conditions, spells DOOM for the ins companies. Do I have to explain it? It’s called “Incentive to NOT buy policy until disaster strikes, then buy”. How’s that gonna work? I tell you, the Senate Bill is a ticking time bomb. What an ugly monstrosity, at absolutely the worst time since the 1930s to try it!

Posted by: sbourg | March 9, 2010, 7:01 am 7:01 am

Obama and his administration caught in (another) case of duplicity? Say it ain’t so? These thugs are “taking the last copter out of Saigon” and have bet the store on health care. Perhaps Obama should sit down, have a beer, a smoke, and read about another megalomaniac who took a similar course; Captain Ahab.

Posted by: Mike Jefferson | March 9, 2010, 7:02 am 7:02 am

Do you really want to give our US Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius the power to control how much health care you can receive as is in the current senate bill . Do you really trust her to control cost with out limiting access for medical care.
I don’t know about the rest of you but I do not want a person who supports late term abortions to have that much power of my families medical decision.
Kill the bill.

Posted by: Jim D | March 9, 2010, 7:05 am 7:05 am

As has been pointed out over and over, insurance companies have lower profit margins than a lot of other business sectors (and so does Big Oil, but that’s another story). The key problem with this legislation therefore is NOT that it adds a bunch of “new customers”, but that insurance companies will no longer have any control over who they can accept and reject, meaning the only way they can remain profitable is to shift the extra burden to you. Result? Massively higher insurance costs, a collapse of private insurance, and a complete takeover by the federal government. There are enough examples of failing socialist health care systems for any rational person to easily see this is a very bad idea.
What we SHOULD be doing rather than sacking the insurance companies, is increasing the supply of health care and lowering its cost. Lawsuit reform and subsidizing medical schools would be a good start – you could solve most of the problem with 30 billion dollars rather than several trillion.

Posted by: TJP | March 9, 2010, 7:17 am 7:17 am

OBAMA KNOWS AND UNDERSTANDS THAT WE DO NOT HAVE THE MONEY TO PAY FOR HIS BRIBES AND PAYOFFS. WHY ARE WE LETTING HIM PROMISE AND GIVE AWAY MORE MONEY THAT WE DON’T HAVE. I DO NOT UNDERSTAND THOSE OF YOU WHO SUPPORT HIM AND HE NEEDS TO BE THROWN OUT OF OFFICE.

Posted by: Charles | March 9, 2010, 7:19 am 7:19 am

So, according to the Administration, healthcare companies should tell investors “We are going to STOP making profits, and lose YOUR money!”

Posted by: BRS | March 9, 2010, 7:29 am 7:29 am

Let the soccer moms decide the price of healthcare. The biggest impediment to lowering healthcare costs is that nobody knows the price. Make the consumer aware of the price and watch the industry innovate like no other – that is, of course, if the consumer has to pay for that healthcare. Health Savings Accounts and high deductible policies are absolutely the single most powerful way to impact healthcare costs. Let’s try that first, then see if we need to introduce more competition or whatever it is that needs to be done. A bit more of an American approach…

Posted by: Rick Brad | March 9, 2010, 7:48 am 7:48 am

Obama is trying to do to insurance companies what Hitler did to the Jews, make them scapegoats. This vile evil anti-American Marxist President will destroy this country if he is not removed from office and neutered by Congress soon.

Posted by: ricardo maxwell | March 9, 2010, 7:51 am 7:51 am

Walter Cronkite was NOT unbiased. He was a leftist from the gitgo.

Posted by: The Bobster | March 9, 2010, 7:59 am 7:59 am

Government trying to elbow its way to the top of everything it doesn’t know how to run or manage. Power is craved like a drug and though they are never satisfied still their answer is more, more, more.

Posted by: nonono | March 9, 2010, 8:09 am 8:09 am

Government trying to elbow its way to the top of everything it doesn’t know how to run or manage. Power is craved like a drug and though they are never satisfied still their answer is more, more, more.

Posted by: nonono | March 9, 2010, 8:09 am 8:09 am

Too bad that Wolf’s report will never make it into mainline ABC news. ABC is having a hard time admitting that it was fooled by the image of Obama that it promoted during the election. Now that everyone has to deal with the reality of an under qualified individual imposing new law on a majority of Americans who really don’t want it, ABC appears to be happy to clear its guilt by letting its internal bloggers post the truth. This post should be required reading at the top of ABC’s home page and is an ideal example of how our current elected leader has one position for the public but another for his own political effort. In the meantime, the object of his “wrath” increases its sells, Americans lose more liberty and the liberal base is lulled into believing that health care will be better and available for all. Political bases for both parties comprise the current “ship of fools.” Fortunately, us independents see through this charade and will ensure that some new faces are in Washington at mid-term and thereafter until someone actually has the talent and nerve to govern correctly.

Posted by: wantingbalance | March 9, 2010, 8:10 am 8:10 am

9/11 leak
9/11 exposure
whistle blower
corporate profit
extortion blackmail bribery

Posted by: nader paul kucinich gravel mckinney | March 9, 2010, 8:24 am 8:24 am

I do not believe one word of this when it comes to the HealthCare Industry only making 1 cent profit out of dollar. They must really think Americans are all stupid.

Posted by: Steve P | March 9, 2010, 8:32 am 8:32 am

WellPoint stock spikes whenever it appears that healthcare “reform” will pass. This is not reform, it is a corporate boondoggle.
I voted for President Obama, but I wish Congress would let this bastardized reform die and then restart back with the public option.
The push to shove this terrible legislation through in order to give the president a “win” is selfish and destructive.

Posted by: Phil McKann | March 9, 2010, 8:33 am 8:33 am

I’ve never seen so many people completely uninformed as the current crop of right wing nutjobs.
This bill makes people purchase private insurance (private, for profit insurance, there is no government option), and even provides $336 billion in government subsidies, and you’re still calling Obama a “socialist”.

Posted by: gary | March 9, 2010, 8:39 am 8:39 am

Well – the conservatives in both houses have stopped the public option so we’re stuck with the greedy insurance companies in a for-profit industry which really should be not-for-profit. Who will regulate what they do if health reform is not passed? Will they continue to cherry pick just the young and healthy? Will they continue to drop coverage on the sick?

Posted by: Bob | March 9, 2010, 8:50 am 8:50 am

Well this is a real laugh. The reason why insurance rates keep increasing is because of taxes and government mandates set by the state. Up here in michigan, blue cross and blue sheild of michigan lost 257 million dollars last year because they are a company that does not deny prexisting conditions. The insurance companies make around 2.5 percent of a profit margin. This guy lies so bad I am starting to believe he can not keep track of his lies. What I would like to know is where/when is the assualt on soft drink companies? They make a much larger profit some up into 30 percent tile and soda causes many health conditions, obesity, diabetes, etc. Mrs Obama is attacking Obesity in children as her agenda, so that will be the next business to get destroyed once they control your health, they will control everything and with the usage of reconciliation this time it sets the precedent for the future, which means our republic will be destroyed and we will turn into a direct democracy a democracy where we have no individual rights. Thanks to all the lame brains that voted for this loser.

Posted by: Don | March 9, 2010, 8:53 am 8:53 am

A socialist government is one that takes control of the country’s capital within the framework of free market capitalism, establishes wages and establishes prices.
Obama continues to use taxpayer dollars to ‘buy’ control of the country’s capital. Government owns the banks, the lending institutions, the mortgage companies, securities, has control of student loans, and seeks control of private 401-k’s, owns over $6 trillion in real estate through Fannie Mae and Freddy Mack. Now wants to effect a hostile-take over of Health care and Insurance.
In addition he wants control of the citizen’s health care from cradle to grave through Obamacare. His health care program violates the 3rd amendment by accessing our personal records, namely medical and fincial, without warrant, and violates the 4th amendment by assessing fines and imprisonment without due process, namely without a trial by our peers.
He must be stopped before he owns each of us.

Posted by: Cogito | March 9, 2010, 8:56 am 8:56 am

GOVERNMENT? HMPH.
THE GOVERNMENT SAID
THE GOVERNMENT SAID OUR “SSI” WOULD SUPPORT US IN THE GOLDEN YEARS. – HMPH
BRIDGE AND ROAD TAX IS WITHHELD FROM EVERY CHECK! EVERY GALLON OF GAS HAS ROAD AND BRIDGE TAX AND THE GOVERNMENT SAYS THERE HAS TO BE A TOLL ROAD! WHAT THE HELL AM I PAYING FOR TAX ON GAS AND WITHHOLDINGS FROM MY CHECK! THE ENAMY “IS NOT” CAPITALISM IT IS THE PEOPLE WE HAVE IN OFFICE AND I SAY ITS TIME TO BRING BACK “TAR AND FEATHERS” AND IN SOME CASES THE GUILLATINE!!!!

Posted by: DISGUSTED WITH GOVERNMENT | March 9, 2010, 8:58 am 8:58 am

Obama….please stay away from St Louis….You’re giving our State a bad reputation as a liberal hide-out.

Posted by: Di-Condo | March 9, 2010, 9:03 am 9:03 am

If you listen to any political party or person you will be miss informed. Here Obama is trying to get a win to point to and he does not care who has to pay. Both parties speak of health insurance for everyone, well why are they not stopping their own free health insurance that pays 100% health, eyes, dentist and RX and joining this GREAT INSURANCE AS THEY PUT IT?

Posted by: Dan | March 9, 2010, 9:07 am 9:07 am

While I agree with all the comments here, we have got to do something besides complain on the internet. CALL YOUR REPRESENTATIVES NOW. We still have time to stop this before our economy and country are ruined.

Posted by: Annie | March 9, 2010, 9:14 am 9:14 am

Our premium increases the last few years primarily go to cover those who can’t pay already and also to help insurers/doctors deal with the Medicare/Medicaid fraud and inefficiencies. Typical government bluepring at work – intrude into a market system and bring about waste and fraud and then scream that the problems they created need to be fixed by more government intervention.
Listen, insurance companies exist to make a profit. And their profits are in-line with businesses as a whole. A true insurance company brings about benefits to all parties – the insureres make money and the insured get peace of mind and dramatically reduced health care costs. Are they perfect? Obviously not. But I for one am glad they are there.
Maybe we should have a system where certain doctors don’t deal with insurance companies or Medicare/Medicaid at all and the only patients they can see are those that don’t have or want insurance. Their rates would presumably be lower since they don’t have to deal with the inefficiencies of insurance forms and government waste. My opinion is even with those lower rates, people would learn very quickly the benefits of the “evil” insurance companies.

Posted by: Mike | March 9, 2010, 9:19 am 9:19 am

This is now a war between the majority of Americans and Obama. We are not going to pushed around by some Chicago politician. I can’t wait until November.

Posted by: Brian | March 9, 2010, 9:19 am 9:19 am

“Update data are now available for Q4 of 2009, and the Health Care Plan industry (includes Humana, Aetna, WellPoint, Magellan, Unitedhealth Group, etc.), and the health insurance industry slipped to #88 with a profit margin of 3.4%. Actually, that industry profit margin was boosted by WellPoint’s 18% profit margin for Q4 2009, which was due largely to a one-time sale of its Pharmacy Benefit Management division. Without that sale, WellPoint’s profit margin would have been only 3.9%, the industry average profit margin would have been closer to 3%, and the ranking for the industry would have fallen a few places down to #92.
America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), the industry’s trade association representing 1,300 members, reported last October that annual health insurance premiums averaged $2,985 for individual coverage and $6,328 for family plans in 2009. Using the industry average profit margin of 3.4% means that insurance companies make about $100 per policy in profits for individual coverage, and a little more than $200 in profits for each family policy.
So even if we could strip away 100% of the health insurance industry’s profits, it would only save patients between $100 and 200 per year in health insurance costs.”

Posted by: RaeMarie | March 9, 2010, 9:22 am 9:22 am

The government has tried to provide universal care since 1938.From F.D.R. to Obama the insurance companies have managed to fight it off everytime.The president cannot do this without the help of congress.Every citizen wants insurance and needs it.If congress was for the people and not influenced by the insurance companies greed to have it on their own terms with their built in profits we would have it.
This time the president wants to cover everyone it’s labeled socialism.
Health care and oil companies are the same.We could be independent of oil now if the oil companies didn’t lobby congress just like we could all be insured if health care didn’t obstruct the legislation.
Remember the oil shortage in the early 70′s. A blatant desperate lie to increase oil prices. If we don’t get health care this time what will they call it next time since socialism will be used up like oil shortage.

Posted by: creig | March 9, 2010, 9:27 am 9:27 am

@Gary
Your own comment criticzing others for calling Obama “socialist” proved the point for them. Well done! As you mention, he is providing $336 billion in government subsidies. Where do you think that money comes from Gary? Do you really think it comes from the government? It comes from those taxpayers with the ability to pay and goes to those who can’t. Sure, smells like Socialism to me.
Even if there is no public option in any bill that might come to pass, it doesn’t take too much reading between the lines to conclude it will be on the table in the future. Obama himself is on record saying he supports a single payer system and many in Congress have said the same. It is just a matter of time and the current Senate bill is the first large step down that path.
Also, nice job with the ad hominem nutjob crack. That certainly helps promote honest and legitimate debate!

Posted by: Mike | March 9, 2010, 9:46 am 9:46 am

The dirty little secret about health care reform is that Congress has squandered all the Medicare overpayments they’ve been collecting for the past 40 years. The Senate bill costs shifts from the old to the young to cover up the theft. In the meantime the insurance companies get a hugely profitable, mandated market of millions of young healthy people, charging 2-3 times the actuarial rate. This whole thing smells, and it keeps getting worse and worse.

Posted by: Nexialist | March 9, 2010, 9:57 am 9:57 am

One more thing about health care. Our President tells us not to smoke as it is bad yet how much does he smoke a day? When he gets lung cancer guess who takes care of him. We have an overweight HHS Director yet Mrs Obama talks about obesity and how unhealthy it is. When the HHS gets diabetes and a stroke because of her weight who pays for her? Lets get our own house in order Mr. President

Posted by: Randy | March 9, 2010, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Yeah, Cubbies lets demonize the Insurence companies they only make 3 cents of profit on the dollar!!! Look, public debt is out of control and this ilk seeks to add to this by making a new entitlement program that WE CAN”T PAY FOR!!! I don’t believe that this bunch of ilk know how to do something for the business sector to get them where they are hiring people for work!! You cut the payrole tax, and capital gains tax so businesses have money to invest and to hire people!!! But we have this ilk that can’t understand this simple fact of econ.

Posted by: buddy9 | March 9, 2010, 10:00 am 10:00 am

This just shows the extent this president and this democrat congress will go to pass the progressive health care plan. They want it both ways and talk out of both sides of their mouth…They know the insurance companies will benefit no matter how the final bill is structured… One thing this current bill will do is put smaller companies out of business and benefit greater the larger companies, maybe that’s why the large companies aren’t pushing back from the president’s rhetoric…they know Obama care will benefit them because of the mandate, and put much of their competition out of business..

Posted by: cooperscopy | March 9, 2010, 10:01 am 10:01 am

@ Ric…
I think there are many factors that have contributed to the rising cost of health care.
I am a fit and healthy 37 year old male. The last time I went to the doctor was 2 years ago to get antibiotics ($10) for a respiratory infection. The doctor visit incurred a $25 co-pay, so the total was about $35 for a bottle of anti-biotic.
If you go down to Parkland Hospital in Dallas, especially this time of year, you will find HUNDREDS of hispanic women, pregnant, and giving birth on the taxpayer’s dime.
The cost for care and procudures for them in astronomical, and yet they get it for free.
This is only one example of why health care costs are rising.

Posted by: DRH | March 9, 2010, 10:05 am 10:05 am

B.O.’s comments about the insurance industry’s lust for profits are BALD FACED LIES! But then again, what else is new. He’s been lying to the American People since he started his campaign. This is not about reform, this is about POWER. The left wants to control every aspect of your life, and this is where they start. For the next 3 years get used to the fact that you are now living in a left wing dictatorship (at least that’s what B.O. and his henchmen are trying to build)….

Posted by: grumpyoldb | March 9, 2010, 10:26 am 10:26 am

In other words, Obama is speaking by both sides of his mouth? Or should we say he is a hypocrite? I still do not understand why people are not outraged by the fact that this bill forces younger and healthy people to pay the bill for those who have illnesses. By the way, I am na older person, who has bigger health bills than the younger people. But I do not think it is fair to impose that the younger people for the elder! After all, the younger people are already inheriting a big debt, which will have a big impact in their lives. Furthermore, how about the big problem with the jobs? And guess what, the younger people are having trouble getting work. So, I imagine the government will be backing those who can’t buy insurance which means: bigger deficits/debt. Wake up people! Obama is socialist! Obama is a fraud!

Posted by: FanDaElis | March 9, 2010, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Regarding ric’s comment on his insurance rates increasing when he hasn’t used his insurance:
Ric, the insurance companies need people who are healthy to cover those that are sick. One person on chemotherapy costs them hundreds of thousands of dollars. If that one person pays what you pay, then it will takes tens of thousands of healthy people to pay for it. That is one person, now multiply that by the number of people requiring medical attention and you can see why you pay more. If pre-existing conditions are added, then expect your insurance premiums to increase since the insurance companies will have to pay out more and more. Eventually they will go out of business with the Obama healthcare plan since he will limit what they can charge but not limit what they have to pay. This will eventually lead to the government taking over the entire industry.

Posted by: kpgrad | March 9, 2010, 10:40 am 10:40 am

Sean – Thats only a 50$ a month increase a year, now take into account we do not only pay for ourselves in an insurance policy, we pay for the ones who use it more.
You will see an increay of 6000$ a year for a family of four in taxes a year (500 dollarts a month) if Obamacare passes, and it will go to the government who will pass it on to the insurance companies and all to pay for illegals also!!
So now you will pay a lot mor, have it rationed and have no choice and and did I forget to mention you will lose your Liberty!!

Posted by: Spock | March 9, 2010, 10:46 am 10:46 am

The democrats always have to vilify some industry. Health Ins Companies are their target now, prior to them it was big oil, or big tobacco, or wal mart, or banks, ect….it is always some boogeyman. Who will it be next ?

Posted by: AFSGTSAM | March 9, 2010, 10:46 am 10:46 am

Scott N TX said:
“Medicare, food stamps, education, social security, fema, ssi, etc…
What government program works as intended, saves money, etc… all are failures”
Ummm… The military? Let’s see – yes we’re better at killing people than any other country in the world and yes we’re not afraid to save a dime on things like body armor.
In fact all of this discussion would be moot if we didn’t spend as much money as we do on killing people, but whatever, we have to right?

Posted by: Jason | March 9, 2010, 10:47 am 10:47 am

will obama apologize to the health insurers as he has with everything else??

Posted by: Sheryl | March 9, 2010, 10:49 am 10:49 am

This headline is misleading and the story is meant to infer that President Obama is speaking out of both sides of his mouth. I don’t buy it and you should, as a “respectable” news outlet, present a full story, not just one filled with more fear-mongering, tired talking points and arguments from a candidate, who was overwhelmingly rejected by the voters of this country in the 2008 national election. Of course, insurance companies are going to get more money from the increase in 30 million more people who will be able to have health insurance. No story here, that’s the whole point of the healthcare bill – increase the number of people with access. And, of course, the public option would have been preferable – but when did you present that evidence during the year-long debate? Now that it’s off the table you say it was a good option. It is so shameful that once “respectable” sources of news are just as guilty as the Republicans in spreading false and misleading information and pandering to the fear of people who depend on them for real news. When you could be presenting valid arguments on both sides you choose instead to say the very same things that are proven to be Republican talking points and outright lies. In fact, your article ends with a final statement from a health insurance company talking head, stating that only one cent out of each dollar earned by health insurance companies go to profits is not only incredible but total BS. You want to do journalism? Try researching whether that is accurate instead of trying to find a way to jam up the President by faking a story. There is no story here. Sometimes, one side of an argument is just more factually accurate, you know. Your bias is evident in your willingness to give insurance companies the last word.

Posted by: Tanya | March 9, 2010, 10:49 am 10:49 am

Carl – interesting Question, but it is about control, the Libs (aka Socialists) need this to happen to take away our Liberty. If it was just about money into governemt, BEFORE the Libs took over Congress ion 2006 the Government with lower taxes and lowest unemployment rate also had the biggest intake of money into the Government. But they started in 2006 to eat away at the economy and blamed Pres. Bush.
Lets stop the Word games and call them what they really are Socialists!!
What do they call Obamas unconstitutional Appointees (did not go thru Senate) CZARS what other Country used the CZAR reference – Soviet Union under Stalin!!

Posted by: Spock | March 9, 2010, 10:51 am 10:51 am

@Jason, “we are better at killing people!” Who do you think you are at judging what we do keep not only our nation safer, but even people from other country safer?

Posted by: FanDaElis | March 9, 2010, 10:51 am 10:51 am

@Tanya, I am so glad most people do not think like you do!

Posted by: FanDaElis | March 9, 2010, 10:53 am 10:53 am

Bottom line: the President is lying. Again.
How’s all that hopey changey stuff working our for ya?
Call your congressperson. Email him or her. Today. Before they are bribed or beat up in the congressional gym’s shower room.

Posted by: Mad Jayhawk | March 9, 2010, 10:56 am 10:56 am

Namor – First the two wars were started not by us!! and it is one war not two!!
Who quadruppled our Deficit Pres. Obama, not before him!!
Bailouts, did he not vote for them in the Senate (oh thats right did he even vote) and by the way the Bank bailout was the only one started under Pres. Bush and Obama even stated the government made a profit from it!!
Who took over GM – Obama
Who wants to make it illegal to Fish – Obama
Who wants to tall you what you can eat – Obama
Who wants to take away your liberty – Obama
All Hail Obama!!!

Posted by: Spock | March 9, 2010, 10:59 am 10:59 am

This is called a Bribe, anyone who bribes should be in jail, including Pelosi, Reid, Obama, Sebiles. Here is my solution America Drafts a an Articles Impeachment on Obama for tax payed bribes for something no one wants. I truely Believe Obama is a paranoid delusional Dictator than definitly not fit to be a Presidentof a free country that he wants to destroy the USA!

Posted by: Hondo | March 9, 2010, 11:03 am 11:03 am

So wait a minute… Are people more concerned with government mandated health insurance coverage or the fact that the government is offering to help people pay for it?
Did I miss the debate on government mandated auto insurance? Don’t people get fined and / or go to jail if they don’t have auto insurance in almost every state in the union? (if not all) Aren’t the people enforcing those rules the product of a social program themselves?
Then we have the thing about the government attempting to make sure that everyone gets coverage… Since it’s reasonable to assume that people that don’t want coverage believe they are healthy – if we say that just 51% of those people are right, well then that would produce lower insurance costs because more healthy people are entering the system than not.
I guess I’m really missing the point of the over-extended resistance and sometimes I have to believe that people are just fed “half-facts,” choose to take them as proven facts, then make no attempt to think about anything other than what has been told to them.
I mean it’s not like anyone here is going beyond what the key arguments against this plan are and most of that is regurgitation of what they’ve heard from Glenn Beck and everyone else at Fox News.

Posted by: Jason | March 9, 2010, 11:06 am 11:06 am

@FanDaElis
It’s interesting how you would assume I’m passing judgement on someone when I say “we’re better at killing people than any other country in the world.” Am I lying? Is there anything in that statement that even implies I’m passing judgement?
Yes… we keep our country safe by killing people – before they kill us. When I state that, it doesn’t mean that I am passing judgement. I even included the quote I was responding to so that everyone would understand what I was referring to. Then original commenter asked what government program worked as it was intended. Is my bringing the reality of how the military works to your attention offensive to you?

Posted by: Jason | March 9, 2010, 11:14 am 11:14 am

@Jason, when reading your comment there is clearly a negative tone towards our military. If you meant to communicate something else, you should be more careful on how you make your statements! Government should have a limited role: enforce laws, keep the nation safe, manage the infrastructure. As for “which government program worked?” I worked for government, except for national security, government is always innefficient! Look at Social Security and Medicare!!! We should keep government out of as many aspects of life as possible.

Posted by: FanDaElis | March 9, 2010, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Picture the Joker. Picture the Joker smiling and whispering softly “Trust me”.

Posted by: Mad Jayhawk | March 9, 2010, 11:29 am 11:29 am

carlito…well said!!!

Posted by: wavesofgrain9 | March 9, 2010, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Obama is a liar.

Posted by: Stephen | March 9, 2010, 11:32 am 11:32 am

the only enemy is Obama

Posted by: last1 | March 9, 2010, 11:33 am 11:33 am

This plan is really easy to understand. Currently Doctors and hospitals loose money on Medicare/Medicad patients. To make up for this they have to charge more to private health insurance patients. Combine this with the lawyers and all the lawsuits results in skyrocketing private insurance costs. The ideal socialist plan is take over all health insurance, have a public option, like Medicare that will pay very little to docs/hospitals. Private insurance will skyrocket faster, everyone then ends up on the public gov plan. Then to keep the costs down the rationing of your health care begins but he socialists don’t care becuase they are in charge at that point and feel good about themselves since everyone is equally suffering. All is happy, happy. (except themselves on the special “congress” plan plan of course)

Posted by: Fred, Utica NY | March 9, 2010, 11:37 am 11:37 am

Recently in countries where there is socialized medicine like the President wants to shove down our throats there have been disturbing stories of breakdowns in care, not due to medical incompetence, due to bureaucratic bungling of the worst kind. All the Democrats tell us, pass this legislation and we will have a healthcare utopia where armies of smiling caring white-jacketed good looking healthcare professionals will gently tend to our every bump, bruise, and fever immediately at no cost to you. The reality will be what happens not infrequently in Canada and the UK where people die because their healthcare delivery system is screwed up. When in the UK recently I watched story after story about scandals where hospitals were killing or maiming their patients. One patient died of thirst even, not because of practitioner incompetence but because of the ‘rules’. The Democrats will tell you that these stories are all lies. They are the ones lying.

Posted by: Mad Jayhawk | March 9, 2010, 11:43 am 11:43 am

“So wait a minute… Are people more concerned with government mandated health insurance coverage or the fact that the government is offering to help people pay for it? ”
The government doesn’t pay for anything. WE, the AMERICAN TAXPAYERS (and/or the Chinese) pay for it. Only the totally ignorant think that the “government pays for it.” This is how it works: Look at your paycheck. You can see that big hunk of it going to the government. The government then just takes the hard-earned money they extracted from you and gives it to other people ‘to help you’. Like that expensive trip Pelosi and all her buddies took to Copenhagen really helped you didn’t it?

Posted by: Mad Jayhawk | March 9, 2010, 11:54 am 11:54 am

We are exposing the traitors trying to write laws and policies that are against freedom, liberty and US constitution – and they should be in jail.
The progressives and Statists may suggest we need to be locked up for exercising 1st amendment rights, which are both enumerated and god given. It is always interesting and telling since the original liberal, Voltaire, was prone to saying things like: “Think for yourselves and let others enjoy the privilege to do so too.”
Progressive Statism is not able to be implemented in compliance with root law/US constitution. Sorry about that. Why dont you move your progressive Statist butts to Venezuela or whatever failed state du jour that is crumbling under left-wing Statist policy. India and China wont take idiots like you, and they are our main economic/geopolitical rivals right now. Idiots like progressives, Statists and authoritarians weaken America by betraying our constitution and make the denigration and disintegration of this superpower all the more trivial by the other autocratic authoritarian governments who want our power.
Progressive politicians have woken the silent majority, and criminal acts of treason will be evaluated if we can restore freedom, liberty and the US Constitution.

Posted by: Mick Russom | March 9, 2010, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

@FanDaElis, no… that’s how you interpret it. Am I to dodge the fact that part of the military’s objective is to kill the enemy? Maybe I missed the wars where no one died – otherwise I am to assume the more people on the other side you kill, the greater your chances of victory. We’re pretty good at it. And that is my point! Nothing more, nothing less. I wasn’t bringing the military up to vilify it. I brought it up as an example of where the government is efficient – which you seem to agree with.

Posted by: Jason | March 9, 2010, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

@FanDaElis – “@Tanya, I am so glad most people do not think like you do!”
She brings up pretty valid points. You argue what seems to be a Libertarian stance, ie. “Government should have a limited role: enforce laws, keep the nation safe, manage the infrastructure.” Let’s just say more people think like her than think like you. Remember if more people thought like you we’d actually see Libertarians holding major public office every once in a while.
If the government did only those three things – your kids couldn’t go to school, because you wouldn’t be able to afford the private education, and then you’d complain about it. No one would come over for free to put out the fire at your house, and you’d complain about it. You wouldn’t be able to mail a letter or a package for anything less than FedEx or UPS charges, and you’d complain about it, etc, etc, etc…

Posted by: Jason | March 9, 2010, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

Let me get this straight: Obama hates insurance companies–gives them billions of dollars. Obama hates bankers–gives them billions of dollars. Obama hates Wall Street–gives them billions of dollars.
Please hate me next Mr. President.

Posted by: Matt | March 9, 2010, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

My fellow conservatives, I urge you to demand a patriotic public option from Congress.
All Americans in this great country of ours deserve healthcare. Our brave men and women have died on foreign shores to preserve this freedom.

Posted by: Susan | March 9, 2010, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

You all need to just stop worrying. Our spiraling national debt is actually a good thing. When our debt becomes so huge that other countries would go bankrupt if we failed, then they will give us all kinds of concessions and forgiveness on debt just to keep us afloat.
Oh, wait, does that only happen in America?

Posted by: N. Sane | March 9, 2010, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

Thank you for the censorship Mr. or Mrs. Moderator. Now on to my point, again:
@Mad Jayhawk
You are not thinking clearly or competently if you honestly believe that when I say “the government pays for it” I don’t understand that it means it’s the taxpayers responsibility.
See, the truly ignorant believe that when someone makes a statement like that the statement maker doesn’t understand the fundamental relationship. What’s funny is you think that what comes out of your paycheck is what you owe in taxes, and what you get back in April is some sort of “free money.”

Posted by: Jason | March 9, 2010, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Sir – Many feel as I do!
WE ARE SCARED TO DEATH OF OBAMA!
yES HE FRIGHTENS US AND WE FEAR
FOR OUR CHILDREN UNDER HIS RULE.
If it were any other president and he was told over and over that we did not want this HEALTHCARE that really harms
us rather than helps….THAT PRESIDENT
WOULD DROP IT!
obama carE — WILL HURT US ALL!
we are frightened of OBAMA RULE!

Posted by: tess | March 9, 2010, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

@Sieg Heil, Nobama and @tess
All of this talk of the President “trying to destroy our country” is just getting silly. Calm down. The man is a politician. Nothing more, nothing less. There is no grand plan to destroy the country from the inside out. He is trying to get votes for himself and his party. If he’s wrong, he gets voted out, which is of course what you want to happen. Enough with all of the sensationalism.
You have no clue if his plan will harm us or help us. You are just regurgitating what your favorite pundits say. You just don’t know, it’s that simple. What we do know is that the current system has been in place for generations and it’s broken.

Posted by: Jason | March 9, 2010, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

If the Democrats were serious about the cost of health care they could come out with “Wage and Price controls” for all healthcare workers, labs, hospitals etc.
Boy could you imagine the screaming we would hear from Unions and the AMA

Posted by: ReaganDemocrat | March 9, 2010, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

Doesn’t it seem strange that Obama and the Dems vilify Insurance Companies, when it is insurance companies who are the biggest beneficiaries of the Obama and Dems health plan? Yes, and didn’t it seem strange that these same companies raised their premiums about 30%, just when it looked like Obama had no ammo to pass the plan? Why did they give Obamacare life, if they were not in bed with Obama and the Dems? It all makes sense now, they are being vilified so the plan can pass and they can make a ton of money…! Talk about conspiracies!

Posted by: Jason | March 9, 2010, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

Health insurnace companies’ profit margins are around 3-4%. That is a relatively thin margin in the business world.

Posted by: DZ | March 9, 2010, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Why doesn’t government go after the pharmaceutical companies instead of the insurance companies? The prescription prices in the USA are so much higher than elsewhere. Example: Lipitor. Cost at Costco per pill is $4.11 US. In Candad, Australia and New Zealand the cost is $1.24 per pill. No wonder health insurance is so expensive. Prescription drugs are outrageous.

Posted by: Ruth | March 9, 2010, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Hey Ric, the reason your premiums will keep going up is because you’re paying for 1. 80% of the costs associated with medicare and medicaid that are not paid by the government 2. the deadbeats who use emergency rooms all across the country for free medical care 3. “windfall profits” of all the 1-800-bad drug lawyers

Posted by: mydog8myballot | March 9, 2010, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

Mandatory Drug Tests for Members of Congress. Make the test results public.
I want to know how many prescription drug addicts there are in the House and Senate.
And I want them sent to Drug Treatment facilities or removed from office.
Drug abuse is the only reason I can think of for the irrational behavior our Congress is exhibiting.
Mandatory Drug Tests for Congress with the results published in a public forum.

Posted by: Bryan Abbott | March 9, 2010, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

It should go to hospitals, doctors and clinic bills. (bypassing insurance companies) Your doctor knows best. Its true. It would cost less this way, and remove unnecessary administration.

Posted by: sushineinwa2000 | March 9, 2010, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

I heard Pelosi was quoted as saying the bill needs to pass, so we can learn about whats in it. Clearly a Bankers Bill, that they dont want the public to fully understand.

Posted by: wowowowow | March 9, 2010, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Health Insurer Execs should answer Sebelius’ letter by taking out full page add in WSJ or NYTimes or USAToday and outline why the premium increases the Dems quote were requested. Like the 39% in one region in California they keep talking about. The insurer lost tens of millions of dollars in that region the prior year, mostly due to a new coverage provision required by NEW regulation. They have to apply the premium rates to the region they represent otherwise areas without onerous regulation have to pay for the sins of the nuts. They should do it, but they likely won’t because who knows what blunt objects the administration might try to kneecap them with for speaking out of perceived turn. Although, can it get much worse???
It’s shameful, and personally I’m very tired of seeing the Prez on TV speaking like he’s at a pep rally. Quite unpresidential.

Posted by: Michelle | March 9, 2010, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Barack Obama: Change We Can Deceive In –A critique from the Left By Lori Price 19 Aug 2009
http://www.legitgov.org/price_obama_change_deceive_in_190809.html

Posted by: Lori Price | March 9, 2010, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

Are you really blaming Obama for not having a Public Option? So all of this is bad because now the Insurance companies will get the new business?
Ok, the Republicans absolutely killed the public option so exactly where else would this money then go?
Oh, that’s right, these are Right Wingers…they make up the rules as they go along.
No Public option. No public options means money for Insurance boo. But Republicans, you killed the public option. Republican option, “So what, no reform is good reform. Keep the status quo.”
Kinda like marijuana laws. People want to study. Govt (rightwing esp) says no. Marijuana is illegal you can’t study. We say its bad, that makes it bad. The only marijuana that can be studied belongs to the Govt and you can’t have access.

Posted by: JCJess | March 9, 2010, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

You people are funny, selfish and mal-informed….to bad you didn’t express this level of disdain for the party that did nothing but ruin the country…..I guess you all were trying to show white solidarity by voting repug…..read george bush and affirmative action for angry white guys…and you will see how you have been duped the last eight years…

Posted by: Kevin H | March 9, 2010, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Oh I see…the moderator deletes anything that is contrary to your delusional state…..

Posted by: Kevin H | March 9, 2010, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

My advice buy an rifle learn how to shoot it accurately and move from cover to Another position, and be ready for the revolution! It’s coming

Posted by: David | March 9, 2010, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

My advice buy an rifle learn how to shoot it accurately and move from cover to Another position, and be ready for the revolution! It’s coming

Posted by: David | March 9, 2010, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

My advice buy an rifle learn how to shoot it accurately and move from cover to Another position, and be ready for the revolution! It’s coming

Posted by: David | March 9, 2010, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

This is hilarious…you wingnuts have lost it…..

Posted by: Kevin H | March 9, 2010, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

I got such a kick out of the report yesterday that Obama said he asked health insurance executives why they were raising premiums and they could not give him a straight answer. It’s really very simple. The answer is: “Because we can.” But of course, they couldn’t admit that to the President.

Posted by: Baloney55 | March 9, 2010, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

American heath care is a joke and rather must be called “money extortion care”. Unfortunately, neither democrats nor republicans understand the source of the problem, who control and dictates price. Even if they understand, they would not like to touch them because all these government, senate, and congress officials are on insurers’ payroll one way or another.

Posted by: Mark Bernadiner | March 9, 2010, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

@wowowowow
You do realize you can read the bill any time you’d like to, right? The “excuse” of it being 2,016 pages is overblown. It has 3 inch right and left margins, and 1 inch top and bottom margins, double spaced. It would be about 250 pages if it were a regular hard cover book.
@David
Believe me when I say people are MUCH more scared of you and your agenda than the President’s. You’re either not serious or very dangerous and I’m glad you’ve exposed your IP address to the world.

Posted by: Jason | March 9, 2010, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

No matter what legislation is proposed, if you don’t address the high-cost of medical care (that’s medical care, not insurance premiums), you are accomplishing NOTHING.
To fix a problem, you have to identify the root cause. Without that, you are only shifting the problem elsewhere – in this case, to Washington. And along with that comes more taxes and loss of personal freedoms. Without attacking the sources of high cost, it will end up being paid for from Washington. Add the usual “waste, fraud and abuse” found everywhere in government, and you have created a pending disaster.
So, would you rather have the highest level of medical care in the world, with insurance companies making a profit (oh, shutter the thought), or second-rate, government mandated healthcare that is losing money by the boatload (can you spell Medicare, or Social Security), which will lead to rationing and tax hikes(Great Britain & Canada)?

Posted by: AlwaysRight | March 9, 2010, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Health insurance companies averaged a 2.2% profit on revenues in 2008, placing them 35th among industries in the USA. Does this mean all 34 more profitable industries are also making “obscene profits” too?
Let’s face it: Obama and his wing of the Democratic Party are Marxists. They may not like the label, but they walk the walk, talk the talk, and quack like the duck.

Posted by: Estragon | March 9, 2010, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

@AlwaysRight
One could easily argue that a LARGE portion of the increased cost of medical care is related to treating patients who do not have any means to pay for the care they’re receiving. You think doctors and hospitals simply eat those costs and don’t attempt to make up for them elsewhere?
This, by the way, is effectively socialized medicine already in practice. If someone has to pay $300 for an IV, it has nothing to do with the actual cost of the saline, the salary of the nurse, or the cost of the equipment – it’s because there were ten other people in that same ER that day who are either going to (directly or indirectly) pay the hospital nothing, or pennies on the dollar for their care.

Posted by: Jason | March 9, 2010, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

You are saying the money is going to the insurance companies? Yeah, to cover the cost of covering the sick. If people would stop abusing the healthcare system and seeking medical treatment when it isn’t needed or getting expensive prescriptions rather than taking the alternate options, insurance companies could lower their rates.
The problem is insurance companies cannot charge members based on their usage, thus everyone has to share an equal cost based on age, zip code and family staus.
Insurance companies are in favor of reform, but the government is not listening to them to understand why things are the way they are. It needs to be a combined effort without being forced down peoples throats.

Posted by: AJ | March 9, 2010, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

Wait a minute, Democrats’ proposal for a single payer system or public option for health insurance was vilified by Republican propaganda as “massive government takeover” that would put the insurance companies out of business.
Democrats, trying to reach bi-partisan agreement, drop the public option.
Then what’s left to get the nation universally covered with health insurance? Private providers.
So Democrats put together the plan with private providers…but they are repealing the anti-trust law protecting insurance companies, setting up provider pools & opening up competion across state lines, forcing providers to eliminate recission, pre-existing conditions, price or lifetime limits, going to make sure providers are regulated so they can’t hike prices, make providers spend more of the $ on health services and less on marketing & CEO salaries…etc etc…the uninsured will get healthcare, people won’t go bankrupt with medical expesnes anymore, and on & on & on.
And now you’re accusing them of giving windfall profits to insurance companies?
I’m sorry, the problem in America, and for health care right now is not President Obama, it’s irresponsible coverage like this, combined with Republican misleading propaganda + obstructionism.
Let’s get on with it and let Democrats do what Republicans have been blocking for decades – get health care reform passed.

Posted by: Arabella | March 10, 2010, 4:40 am 4:40 am

The content of this inaccurate, biased, shallow, misleading article has been bugging me.
HOW, I wondered could ABC write something like this? Drivel-check: if Obama is in cohoots with insurers and giving them a big windfall…why are they launching a multi-million dollar TV ad campaign to kill the reform? Huh, duh?
I read it again. 3 tip-offs as to HOW ABC could write such defamatory drivel:
1. REPUBLICANS MEANWHILE POINTED OUT THAT those very same insurance companies would get huge checks from the government if health reform is enacted.
2. “But the payment of the tax credits would be made”,POINT OUT REPUBLICAN RESEARCHERS, “directly to the insurance companies.
3. “Much more needs to be done in the current legislation to address the skyrocketing cost of medical care”, said Robert Zirkelbach, A SPOKESMAN FROM AMERICA’S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS, in a statement today.
This was placed by Republican propagandists to help kill health reform. Note where Mr Wolf got his info…REPUBLICANS and there’s one comment from HEALTH INSURANCE PROVIDER
(wanting stronger reforms???LOL) BUT Mr. Wolf didn’t fact check & ask a single Democrat involved with the bill for a comment.
Mr. Wolf, you owe the President an apology. You also show the old Senate bill – have you reviewed the President’s bill, or just swallowed everything the “Republican researchers pointed” out to you so you’d write up how they want the reform bill & the President demonized?

Posted by: Arabella | March 10, 2010, 6:00 am 6:00 am

We hate this current administration and any health care they force on us will be over turned and they will be voted out . Obama is the most dispised President ever in the history of this country.

Posted by: Bill | March 10, 2010, 9:44 am 9:44 am

Illegal Mexicans are the cause of this health care problem! Kick them out of our country and go after the employers that hire them and we’ll solve the health care problem and the unemployment problem at the same time.

Posted by: Bill | March 10, 2010, 9:49 am 9:49 am

Not all people against this massive government expansion are Republicans or Tea Party members. I myself am an Independent and have been since my voting age of 18. I believe firmly in our Constitution. I also have very low quality health insurance yet I still want nothing to do with this idea of reform that is over 2000+ pages and riddled with shadowy deals for votes to pass. I have already informed my congressmen that represent my district and state that although they received my votes, if they vote yes on this monsterous bill, they will be actively campaigned against by myself and like minded voters. The source of the problem here is a lack of integrity by those sent to represent the consent of the people, removing the corrupt bartering and unneccessarily complex language could alleviate most of the debate and add sincerity to the words health care reform. Our Congress merely making a 50 or less page law banning lawsuits for those trying to aid patients, requiring insurance companies to maintain coverage if a person gets sick and requiring the person to repay backdue premiums when they get better or insurance company to accept a loss if the patient dies, eliminating the state border limitations to promote competition, making it illegal to deny coverage of pre-existing conditions (e.g. diabetes), and computerizing an individuals medical records so doctors, patients, and health facilities can utilize the information to save on duplicate testing, negative prescription reactions, over-medicating, and redundant ineffective treatments.
Obviously this would not catch everything, but aren’t the few easy to comprehend ideas I have described much better than an enormous government corrupted takeover of our medical system. If a person looks at America today with looming bankruptcy of Medicare or the 76% under-funded social security system you can see government run anything will end in ruin. The original Constitution of the United States is less than 100 pages, including our Bill of Rights. Why don’t people see that modern ambiguity in the laws adds more oppurtunity for twisting the intent of otherwise originally good ideas?

Posted by: Bernard | March 10, 2010, 10:50 am 10:50 am

Afer reading this I see why W was president TWICE….he took advantage of the brain deficit here……..

Posted by: Kevin H | March 10, 2010, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

Tuesday March 9th ABC news reported Health Insurance companys profit margen
was 4%. Low by most standerds.

Posted by: DeQuick1 | March 10, 2010, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

general insurance
future///
Amzing

Posted by: xlai | March 16, 2010, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.