Blueprint for ‘No Child Left Behind’ Overhaul Headed to the Hill Monday
ABC News’ Sunlen Miller and Mary Bruce report:
President Obama used his weekly address to announce that on Monday his administration will send Congress the blueprint for an anticipated overhaul of the “No Child Left Behind” education law.
“Through this plan we are setting an ambitious goal: All students should graduate from high school prepared for college and a career – no matter who you are or where you come from,” Obama said in his weekly address. “Achieving this goal will be difficult. It will take time. And it will require the skills, talents and dedication of many: principals, teachers, parents, students. But this effort is essential for our children and for our country.”
The current law, signed by President Bush in 2002, requires student achievement to be measured through standardized tests. Currently, states set their own standards for academic success and may risk federal funding if they fail to show adequate yearly progress in achieving their goals. Critics claim the system encourages states to lower standards so that they can report significant progress.
The blueprint will replace the accountability system with a new one focused on helping students graduate from high school college- and career-ready. Under the guidelines, the schools that achieve excellence and show “real progress” will be rewarded.
“What this plan recognizes is that while the federal government can play a leading role in encouraging the reforms and high standards we need, the impetus for that change will come from states, and from local schools and school districts,” Obama said. “So, yes, we set a high bar – but we also provide educators the flexibility to reach it.”
The president said that there will be cynics who claim this sort of reform can’t be done, but he highlighted the risks of American students falling behind other countries out-competing the United States. The president said that the nation’s lost ground on education over the last few decades “risks our leadership as a nation,” and, “consigns millions of Americans to a lesser future.”
The president’s budget includes a $3 billion increase in federal education spending, including $1.35 billion to continue the “Race to the Top” grant competition for education reform. An additional $1 billion in funding is on the table contingent on the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, otherwise known as No Child Left Behind.
-Sunlen Miller and Mary Bruce
Email
Obama: 'Now Is the Time For Common Sense Action'
Romney Takes Aim at Conservatives
Awww look, they gave him a “halo”.
Posted by: bo | March 13, 2010, 9:17 am 9:17 am
Know Jild Leff Behyne has failed. Thanks, Bushbaby. Awesome legacy you got there. “Miss me now?” yeah, right
Posted by: stephen | March 13, 2010, 9:26 am 9:26 am
He needs to stick with one major problem at a time. Healthcare and The Economy. Since they are laying off teachers and closing schools all over the place I feel many kids are getting left behind. So are adults. This is the worst mess I have seen in my lifetime and I will be making better decisions on who represents me in Washington from now on. Disgusting.
Posted by: Steve | March 13, 2010, 9:29 am 9:29 am
No child left behind is a huge failure. We waste too much time and resources on those who will never go to college and less time on those who will. The U.S. is no longer competitive when it comes to education. That is why 3rd graders from India are tutoring our 8th graders.
Posted by: Mark | March 13, 2010, 9:35 am 9:35 am
“Through this plan we are setting an ambitious goal: All students should graduate from high school prepared for college and a career – no matter who you are or where you come from,” Obama said in his weekly address.
Wow, is THIS ever going to cheese off the Republicans!
Posted by: Searambler | March 13, 2010, 9:37 am 9:37 am
I certainly hope this helps. The current system has set education in the United States back by decades and decades. My children have been taking the “honors” and AP classes and yet when they study “Hamlet” they don’t just read the brilliant work. Oh no. That might be too difficult. They first watch a movie of it, then they read selected sections to compare to parts of the movie. Give me a break. I graduated from high school in 1981 and we read the original works from start to finish without the aid of movies or special notes. My parents did the same, decades before me, but now my children have been cheated out of an excellent education by the lousy system we have and the moronic tests that states subject them to all with the hopes of keeping federal funds and receiving bonuses.
Posted by: sharon Harkavy | March 13, 2010, 9:44 am 9:44 am
Gee, who is going to be plumbers, electricians, mechanics, cooks?
Posted by: melissa | March 13, 2010, 9:52 am 9:52 am
No child left behind? Then why are so many schools closing around the country? I high school closed (it was on the news) and now those student have NO where to go. And they want an education.
Posted by: Debb | March 13, 2010, 9:52 am 9:52 am
No child left behind, isn’t that another Bush/Cheaney disaster started but never funded or properly implimented? The republicans seem to be proficient at leaving huge messes for the democrats to clean up and then you blame them and reselect another republican moron to creat another disaster for you to cry about. You did this and you deserve the spoils of you stupidity. You were warned but you failed to heed those warnings.
Posted by: anOPINIONATEDsob | March 13, 2010, 9:53 am 9:53 am
Your kids have been cheated out of a quality education. No child can be left behind or your child will be cheated even further with financial cuts to your school. No Child Left Behind means the bright, quick, smart and serious learners wait for those who aren’t.
Posted by: ccred | March 13, 2010, 9:54 am 9:54 am
Bush’s “No Child Left Behind” also means “No Child Move Forward”. That is why most 3rd graders in U.S. are still using fingers to count while Asian countries 3rd graders can solve division problem in their head.
Posted by: CC | March 13, 2010, 9:56 am 9:56 am
Yes, education in this country is pathetic and our kids suffer greatly. Every time a state gets in money trouble they cut education, but then, an ignorant society is easier to control. No Child Left Behind was a huge flop and our taxes should be giving our kids the best opportunity to get the education they need to keep this country moving forward. Maybe…just maybe…if we quit waging war all over the world that money could be used to benefit our country thourgh education.
Posted by: John | March 13, 2010, 9:56 am 9:56 am
Every knows education is necessary part of our life. Then why are so many schools closing around the country? I high school closed (it was on the news) and now those student have NO where to go. And they want an education.
Posted by: Ilan Ben Menachem | March 13, 2010, 9:57 am 9:57 am
there will be plenty of plumbers, electricians, etc b/c the act says kids are prepared for college and/or a career—read it.
Posted by: angela | March 13, 2010, 10:02 am 10:02 am
Every major government program has unintended consequences. They should all be rationalized periodically. Just as entitlement programs created generational poverty in the inner cities; Clinton’s ‘Affordable Housing’ initiative created a housing bubble that imploded when teaser rates on 3-,5-,and 7- year ARMs expired; NAFTA increased illegal immigration; C4C stripped poor people of a supply of used cars. It should tell us something about major Healthcare legislation.
Posted by: mitchscove | March 13, 2010, 10:05 am 10:05 am
“”"”Gee, who is going to be plumbers, electricians, mechanics, cooks?”"”"
Melissa…what do you think “career ready” is? It is important that when kids graduate high school that they be able to do something if they’re going right to work. Why work for minimum wage if you don’t have to?
As to the sarcasm in your post…a certified electrician or mechanic makes more per year after a couple of years than I do with a masters degree and nearly 15 years of experience. Shucks…a certified machinist makes more in the FIRST year of employment than I do with all of my education.
I have no problem whatsoever if either of my children want to be a plumber, machinist, hvac, electrician, etc. The are needed services and they pay well.
If they want to go to college and pursue some other type of career then that’s good, too.
Posted by: Jane | March 13, 2010, 10:05 am 10:05 am
Education is a states rights issue. The federal governernment should repeal the “no child left behind” and close the federal Dept of Ed. Then there would be less money needed by the federal and more available back in the pockets of the people. Teach reading, writing, arithmetic and the golden rule and you will preserve the American culture.
Posted by: J.J. | March 13, 2010, 10:06 am 10:06 am
Gee Debb, if grammar is a deciding factor, maybe ‘you is.’
Seriously though, your assumption that plumbers, electricians, mechanics, and cooks are uneducated is sad.
Posted by: Jay | March 13, 2010, 10:10 am 10:10 am
I agree, Jane. The job market has been skewed by labor monopolies to the point that I would have been far better off had I not gotten a Masters in Engineering. Perhaps a high school education and a tow motor certification would have served me better. Tells ya what we value and why we are no longer the innovators. Another hot button should be that we graduate 3 times the number of non-value-adding lawyers than doctors in this country.
Posted by: mitchscove | March 13, 2010, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Sorry Debb, my response was intended for Melissa.
Posted by: Jay | March 13, 2010, 10:14 am 10:14 am
You are correct: lots of stuff on the table now (health care, economy, Joe Bidden), but Debb is correct: many states lack the funding for schools and schools are being closed due to funds. In my state, Indiana, schools are being asked to cut even more out of their operating budget (aka Salaries and programs). Schools are not overspending in any means and now we are being asked to do more with less (with no hope that what is cut will be replaced).
So, is it an issue: yes. You almost wonder if schools should be returned to the local communities because once an outside “measurement” is enforced, that measurement is already treating all students as “equal” and not all students are equal.
Posted by: Chris | March 13, 2010, 10:17 am 10:17 am
“No child left behind” definitely prevents smart kids to learn more advanced topics, however there is a deeper problem – many kids simply don’t want to learn! And it’s not “ADD”, they are just simply lazy! School can’t educate someone who doesn’t want to be educated. America created a great condition where even a person with no education can live an OK-ish life. For some the opportunity cost seems to be on the no-education side. Kids need to be afraid of not getting education. That is the only way to make them study.
Posted by: Hexorg | March 13, 2010, 10:18 am 10:18 am
“No child left behind” I’m a Bush supporter but not a support on this law. I see too many kids on a daily basis pushed through school not getting the need basic skills to succeed, due to this “No child left behind”, go back to the old way if a kid doesn’t get it the first time then retain him/her until he/she does, teach them, quite having students graduate who can’t do basic math or read a textbook designed for the 6th grade. Untie the teachers hands, if a student is disruptive to the class, let it be handled then and there. I agree with the comment first teach reading, writing, math and the Golden Rule, then the rest will fall into place.
Posted by: cyndi | March 13, 2010, 10:19 am 10:19 am
No matter what this President says or does sorry He is so full of lies ,and crap.
Posted by: Joeray | March 13, 2010, 10:19 am 10:19 am
Why is “education” so sacred? Sure the three R’s are nice but, putting many kids in debt, dwindling fish stocks (dead zones) and depleted water is a BIG problem. Much of our “education” does not adress these issues and we continue on a destructive path.
Posted by: Tap | March 13, 2010, 10:20 am 10:20 am
All of you need to read one book; it’s called Catching Up or Leading The Way: American Education in the Age of Globalization by Yong Zhou. Zhou is a Chinese educator who came to the US over 10 years ago to visit American schools. He will tell you that the Chinese, who supposedly outperform Americans in math and science, actually have a government established plan to model their schools after US schools. He will also tell you the the comparisons of US student standardized test scores with those of the Asian countries is comparing apples to ginseng. Only their elite students take those tests and their scores are compared to our average students’ scores because we are the only country in the world that attempts to educate every child. In China, where I have been to study their schools, only half of their students even get to go to and academic high school, and only half of those get to go to college! If you don’t read, shut-up!
Posted by: Edumacator | March 13, 2010, 10:21 am 10:21 am
As an ex-teacher, I know that the No Child Left Behind policy is absolutely absurd. I taught 3rd grade in North Carolina for many years, and in schools with highly disadvantaged children. Out of 20 students, for example, 5 of them may be on or above grade level. The other 15 were often 1 to 3 grade levels behind. Every year each of my students showed significant growth – sometimes as much as two years growth in one academic year – including students with learning disabilities, speech problems, among other disadvantages like coming from single-parent homes, low income/high crime communities, and lack of parental care or involvment. Yet, it was my fault when less than 70% of my students couldn’t pass the standardized test to go to the 4th grade. Education policy needs to account for growth, and quit insisting that all students are the same simply because they are the same age. They are not in the least. I was an excellent teacher – rookie teacher of the year for my school my first year teaching, my principal and peer evaluations were almost always perfect, and I was grade level chairperson my third year teaching. I know many teachers like myself who went (and still go) over and beyond school and district requirements to give the highest quality education and experiences to their students, all within a 7 or 8 hour school day, working as much as 60 to 70 hours a week (when pay is based on 35 hours a week), and yet the government still puts the blame on teachers when their students can’t pass a ridiculous test at the end of the year. Education, to be successful, needs to be holistic – involving parents, students, and the community, as well as teachers and school administrators. The government needs to recognize and accept the fact that not all students are the same, that many, many are at great risk due to many factors stemming from their family backgrounds, and very often come to school lacking even the most basic of skills. The government needs to quit evaluating teacher progress year to year, when each new batch of students is different from the last. The focus of education policy must be placed upon on individual student progress. It also needs to recognize and accept that there are many different ways for students to demonstrate progress other than standardized tests (not everyone is a good test taker…we all know that). All teachers know that growth can be documented through many different methods. Let teachers do what they do best – educate. When a significant number of students in a classroom fail to show significant INDIVIDUAL growth, THEN question the teacher. And the keyword here is “individual”.
Posted by: Pete | March 13, 2010, 10:26 am 10:26 am
Pete – You are absolutely correct!!! I couldn’t have said it better myself!
Posted by: Edumacator | March 13, 2010, 10:29 am 10:29 am
have his mind-numbed automatons yet realized that obama’s change actually means “overhauling” EVERYTHING about this country? it has become quite apparent that obama believes that every essential facet of this nation is wrong or broken and needs to be completely changed into something that would reflect his image of america? folks, we elected a demagogue to the presidency, one who clearly envisions himself an absolutist leader.
Posted by: davidfrat21 | March 13, 2010, 10:36 am 10:36 am
“Pete & Edumactor”…great posts and just curious of your thought on the “great state of Texas” and the conservatives attempt to “re-write” their history books. I would tell you more explicity what I think about it…but I doubt if it would get through the “censor”. All I will say; however, is this: And this ” re-write effort from the State that “leads the nation” in documented “Hate Groups”…LOL…LOL
Posted by: CND FOX | March 13, 2010, 10:36 am 10:36 am
Edumacator– While you may be correct, you have to remember that with over 1 billion citizens, the Chinese can afford to send less engineers to college, while still outperforming us.
Posted by: HA! | March 13, 2010, 10:39 am 10:39 am
as a teacher if obama wants to help our education get rid of the no child left behind act and listen to what teachers have been saying for years. give more control of the classroom back to the teachers and what they teach. but no obama will talk his pretty speech and do nothing just like bush, and just like clinton.
Posted by: kelly | March 13, 2010, 10:39 am 10:39 am
it’s kind of funny that, until obama began to critize NCLB, noone on the left criticized it during the last year. in fact, i have even heard some educators now praise the standards…even though they bashed them as the most incidious plot in history during the bush administration. the education “establishment” is one of the most ideologically corrupt and intellectually dishonest groups in the
country. and i say this from experience…having spent most of the last 20 years in academia.
Posted by: davidfrat21 | March 13, 2010, 10:39 am 10:39 am
Teachers hate NCLB because it requires them to actually have results. Kids have to pass a test. This has been so far outside of public school mainstream thinking that public school teachers are in shock. Schools have to have a certain number of kids making minimal adequate yearly progress, passing basic concepts needed to survive in a modern world like reading, comprehension, and ultra basic math. Every other high achieving country in the world has standardized tests for their kids. Teachers have had to face that if the kids are not learning, you are just a highly enriching babysitter. We can’t afford having public schools simply be daycare for kids ages 5-19. Undoing NCLB would be a disaster. If this is going to be Obama’s legacy, he’s a charlatan.
Posted by: lj | March 13, 2010, 10:39 am 10:39 am
There is ABSOLUTELY NO, NO, NO relationship between the federal gov and student successes. EVER SINCE THE FED GOT INVOLVED IN EDUCATION – TEST SCORES HAVE GONE SOUTH!!!! Retired parochial and public elementary teacher.
Posted by: Temagami | March 13, 2010, 10:41 am 10:41 am
The next step for the progressive Obama and his buddies who plan to convert the America to socialism. Start them early so they don’t know how we go to be so great in the world. Obama will have us looking European and spending Euros.
Posted by: James L. | March 13, 2010, 10:43 am 10:43 am
No child left behind? The federal government has been or will continue to be the reason why we have a failed educational systems. anything the government touches had been mediocre or failure.
I think the parents should start demanding the federal government to butt off. Parents could choose the right education of their children through private school. Stop wasting tax money for fund failed public school.
i would rather see our tax money go to private school of our choice. the public school system of America is dead!!!!!!!.
98% of our top political leaders send their kids to private school because the policy they push for public school were meant for votes and political motives…
I’m not rich and yet I was able to put my kids in private school because of determination and principle.
WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE
Posted by: graymatter | March 13, 2010, 10:45 am 10:45 am
NCLB allows children to be passed into grades with out passing. I have seen teachers in tears passing kids without the grades to do so. ITS A DISGRACE, NCLB HAS TO BE REDONE because all Children are being left behind because if the are not, no money for their schools. SO DISGUSTING!!!PLEASE PLEASE, I hope President Obama fixes this , it has to stop, we are rasing stupid people and its not right!!!!NO MORE NCLB!!!!!
Posted by: Marci B | March 13, 2010, 10:45 am 10:45 am
Did anyone else notice the subliminal “halo” above President Obama?
Posted by: DobermanSpencer | March 13, 2010, 10:47 am 10:47 am
Another “blueprint for reform” or another excuse to throw money at a problem rather than fix it, like health care? Why does it make sense to “reward” schools that are doing well, rather than target the money at schools that aren’t? Wouldn’t it make more sense to study WHY some schools succeed and other don’t, and use the successful schools as blueprints to change unsuccessful schools if this isn’t an “apples and oranges” comparison at the root?
Posted by: Publius | March 13, 2010, 10:47 am 10:47 am
please Obama spare us from your terrible plans…..again!!!!…
If there is such thing as Midas touch, this Obama is the equivalent to Kiss of Death…
Posted by: graymatter | March 13, 2010, 10:50 am 10:50 am
Well stated, Pete!
Posted by: Scott | March 13, 2010, 10:52 am 10:52 am
We definitely need to increase voc-ed; lots of high school kids have no interest in history or Hemingway. We should also LOWER the mandatory attendance age to 15. This will reduce discipline problems and court cases (at my school, we have a full-time employee making $60k whose only job is to attend truancy court). And we should have a No Pass/No Play policy – if a high school student fails to pass a majority of classes (50%?)he should not be allowed a free education.
Posted by: mooreso | March 13, 2010, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Obama’s inner motive is to radicalized our kids to get more vote for the liberal backward politician…
the dumber young american kids are. the more likely they will believe in liberalism as their salvation.
Posted by: graymatter | March 13, 2010, 10:58 am 10:58 am
A presidential decree should grant all American citizens a high school diploma. They will then be eligible to enter college. Our nation will then take the world leadership in promoting higher education. It will be the task of the colleges to educate and turn out millions of bright mathematicians and scientists. No child will be left behind except those that refuse to take advantage of this golden opportunity.
Posted by: melvin polatnick | March 13, 2010, 10:58 am 10:58 am
Excellent post by ex-teacher Pete. No Child Left Behind is a nice name, but that’s about it. This is not because it involves taking “big” tests. It is because every state has a DIFFERENT test, but the consequences for not passing the test are the same. Wouldn’t YOU make your test as easy as possible?
It also encourages a teacher to use teaching methods and curriculum that can be very easily measured, scored and plotted on a graph. Many teachers are so obsessed with “data” that they no longer offer quality instruction. My two most hated examples of this are Accelerated Reader, and Accelerated Math. With AR, every book in the classroom and school library are assigned a number. Children take a short multiple choice test on a computer, and then the computer tells that child what “number” they can read. The children can only choose books that have a particular number, for example 3.0 – 4.0. Then the student is told that they have to read a certain number of these books in order to reach a “goal.” They go to the library, look for books with their number on it (not for books that interest them) and choose a book. After they have read the book they return to the computer, take another quick multiple choice test, and the computer tells them if they “pass” that book and how many more they have to read to reach their “goal.” The teacher can print out a report on how close each student is to reaching their “goal.”
My son got in trouble at school because he wanted to read “The Hobbit.” His teacher told him it was “too long” and that he wouldn’t reach his “goal” soon enough. After he protested, she told him that he could read “The Hobbit” if he would put it aside at least once a week, and read a few “AR” books so that the computer would “know” that he was reading, and he would ensure that he reached his “goal.” This is what NCLB has done to the quality of instruction in SOME schools. My son’s teacher could have encouraged him to read a challenging book like “The Hobbit.” She could have spent a few minutes each day, or each week discussing the book with him. He could have written a report or given a short presentation when he finished it, that could have been graded. BUT, his teacher would not have been able to provide the documentation needed to meet the NCLB requirements for data, scores and percentages, and meeting those requirements means the teacher can keep her job and the school can keep its doors open.
Don’t even get me started on Accelerated Math!
Posted by: wyogirl | March 13, 2010, 11:14 am 11:14 am
Historically no matter how much money taxpayers poor into education it has never made it any better. Private schools have the incentive, because of competition, to outperform Government (Public) Schools – don’t believe, look up the actual studies done.
Posted by: ThomasJeffersonLives | March 13, 2010, 11:18 am 11:18 am
What do you expect? This President was admitted to Harvard Law School after fizzling out at one college,after graduating from another university without any academic honors,without any memberships to academic societies,without any documented participation in extracurricular activities.He was a self-admitted user of cocaine,marijuana and alcohol at that time.Obviously he doesn’t like standardized tests because he did poorly on them.Better to extend the affirmative action he received to everybody; then everybody can be described as wise and intellegent without any evidence,like he has been.
Posted by: Nephron | March 13, 2010, 11:20 am 11:20 am
NCLB is a joke! My son was bringing home A’s and B’s in most of his subjects and there were no problems brought up in parent-teacher conferences, but something just didn’t seem right. So prior to his entering the 4th grade I went online to see what level he should be at. He wasn’t even able to pass 2nd grade Math! I confronted his teacher who told me “He’s doing the best he can, so we have to pass him.” That’s not acceptable to me. So needless to say from that moment on I have Homeschooled my child-and I have him do it until he passes. My child will not be left behind.
Posted by: Jackie | March 13, 2010, 11:21 am 11:21 am
the fact is the nuclear family unit is falling apart. 40% of kids are born to single moms. the schools can’t do it all and the families at home aren’t doing their part. no amount of money will fix that. 2 billion dollars were poured in kansas city, missouri school system in the mid 90′s and look how that money was blown. i am an ex principal. i quit to stay at home with my kids. what i see is we do need more vocational education in schools. not all kids need to go to a 4 year liberal arts program. we need plumbers, electrician, welders, biotech, etc. BUT AGAIN—–you can’t deny the fact that kids from a single parent home do poorly. 70+ % of blacks are born to single mom, 50% of hispanics are born to single moms, and 20+% of whites are born to single moms…..these kids will suffer.
Posted by: freda | March 13, 2010, 11:24 am 11:24 am
WHEN WILL HE WORK ON THE WARS, HOMELAND SECURITY, CREATING JOBS, LESS SPENDING, LOWER TAXES, ETC.??? This week, Obama told a fundraising audience in St. Louis that “it’s nice to get out of Washington.” WHAT???–He spent his first year in office JOY-RIDING to FOREIGN countries — many times with his family — at our expense. He made more foreign trips during his first year (10 trips involving stops in 21 nations) than any U.S. president before him. Now, with the fate of HCR, the Campaigner-In-Chief is visiting American cities to ram Obamacare down our throats. This is the most corrupt administration in American history.
Posted by: GOD BLESS AMERICA --- LAND OF THE FREE??? NO MORE! | March 13, 2010, 11:27 am 11:27 am
obama has no clue what to do. he seriously has no plan for our country which very much scares me. he flip-flops on every issue. our only hope is to get a overhaul of congress in november…democrat or republican…i don’t care. if you have been in DC for more than 10 years, you need to go! you have obama and pelosi running the country, this should scare the poop out ya.
Posted by: quinton | March 13, 2010, 11:35 am 11:35 am
I’m a full-fledged conservative and a high school math and science teacher. I teach at a highly successful public school. Despite these facts, I’ll be the first to say that NCLB, while well-intended, is impractical and misguided. Do yourself and a favor and read the first few posts on this blog. Then go out and do some research on the fine print regarding what NCLB considers “progress”. Pay special attention to the details on what they call “subgoups”. After this it will be difficult to justify supporting its continuance. I’m not familiar with the details of Obama’s new proposal, so I’ll hold my judgement until I am. I’d just like to finish by asking my fellow conservatives to get all of their facts straight before blindly attacking the dismissal of NCLB. It’s great to support teacher, student, and parent accountability, as I do. But you really don’t want to go down with that sinking ship, which supports these ideals only in theory rather than in practical implementation.
Posted by: Will | March 13, 2010, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Lame reporting. So, Obama wants to replace standardized testing with “a new (system) focused on helping students graduate from high school college- and career-ready.” Gee, Jake, do ya think maybe your readers would like to know a few details?? And pardon my ignorance, but how in the heck can anyone possibly know how a child measures up to standards without a standardized test?? ESP? The color of his skin? His height and weight? The look on his face? Oh wait, I get it, the teachers have tricorders!! My bad!
Posted by: walter | March 13, 2010, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Will, give a few bullet points, please, that illustrate the failings of NCLB. Thanks!
Posted by: walter | March 13, 2010, 11:42 am 11:42 am
We no longer have a manufacturing and service oriented base, those countries that have taken those industries are also much more highly educated than our work force…how are we to compete with that?
Posted by: phallon | March 13, 2010, 11:48 am 11:48 am
All of you posters do one thing for me. Read through these posts and denote the informed and educated ones versus the ones that are full of “cynicism, distrust of government and just plain negativity”. LOL…And we wonder why we are no longer the “United” States of America. The “conservative, narrow minded propaganda machine” of the last twenty five years or so has really done a “job” on the narrow minded and less educated segments of our society – hasn’t it?
Posted by: CND FOX | March 13, 2010, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Quick example (there are many more), then I’ve gotta go run a baseball practice…
The state of Illinois defines a subgroup size as 45 students. There are many subgroup categories: impoverished, special ed, minority, etc. So, if on a given year your school is required to have 80% of students pass a standardized test, and you have, say, 50 impoverished students, 40 or them must pass. When 39 or fewer pass, you are considered to have not met “annual yearly progress” in this subgroup. At this point, your school begins a multi-step process, which costs our state a lot of money, time, and effort, to “fix” the problem. Eventually, state funding might be pulled.
Here’s the big problem. Yes, we all want to help those 11 kids that failed. However, the majority of your school’s resources are now allocated to help a very small percentage of your student population. Whether we’ll admit it or not, this now detracts from the eduacation of the greater student population. So begins a vicious cycle…
Posted by: Will | March 13, 2010, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Will, it sounds like you’re saying we need to ignore the 11 who fail. If so, then yes, I can see why you’re at odds with the concept of no child left behind, and with accountability in general. For my part, I believe the 11 who failed have just as much right to an education as the 39 who passed — regardless of what subgroup they are in. And when we stop caring about those 11, then whether you want to admit it or not, we stop caring about the 39 who passed. No child left behind means exactly that: every child counts.
Posted by: walter | March 13, 2010, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
i was also a gifted student teacher. those are the ones really forgotten. we have dumbed down our country. we spend so much money and time on the ones not passing (the “11″) that we do not challenge the bright students. life isn’t fair and there will always been students who don’t do well, poor people, etc.
Posted by: fred | March 13, 2010, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
NCLB has been a TOTAL FAILURE for this Country since President Bush signed the thing into law. Our children are not just let down by a system that doesn’t prepare them well for either attending a higher education but sometimes life as well. I also put the blame not just at the feet of the states and educators, but us parent’s. Why? Because as the generations have grown up in the system, that have lost monies to fund schools because people don’t like paying taxes that school’s used to get their funding from at one time. I live in a small community that because the parent’s care about the quality of our children’s education we renewed a $1.50 per $1,000 on property taxes last year. To raise money for art’s programs we have a concert series that brings in to music artist such as Michael McDonald or Hal Ketchum to perform with our students. We have classes that my son at another school never had, like Chinese Language, taught by a retired executive that if the kid’s that take this full course will be able to challenge it for a language college requirement. This is just one example. We have a zero drop out rate as well. So when parent’s like to blame the educators they also need to turn the mirror on themselves and take some of that financial responsibility.
Posted by: Katie | March 13, 2010, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
Katie, you say in your opening sentence(with emphasis) that NCLB has been a “TOTAL FAILURE.”
Yet, you provide no insight, no evidence, nothing to support your thesis statement.
Instead, you describe how your community raised money for arts education.
You should learn how to do more than just yell out an unsupported opinion.
Posted by: walter | March 13, 2010, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Constance, I’m not sure what you’re trying to say other than gifted students are short-changed in schools. Your rambling essay, your citation of studies that are decades old, and use of sentences like “our new goal for our intellectual capital is pressing it through” left me with tired head. And for the life of me I can’t find a definition for “lusory.” So, are you for educational reform, or are you against?
Posted by: walter | March 13, 2010, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
One idea, not entirely thought out, is, if corporations are now allowed directly into the national political debate, perhaps they could pay a visa-fee to the public schools so that the issue of no-acceptable-citizen-candidate can be rectified; corporations have had a parasitic relationship to the political system; now that they’re acknowledged and on-board, it’s time to get them to take on some burden.
Posted by: Constance | March 13, 2010, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
I work in education. Yes, we have “data” now, and due to the big test, then the pretest, on target tests, and post test, we know what each child is achieving. However, I feel we are overlooking several details. First, educators have no control over the child’s homelife, which definitely affects their tests. If they are wondering where they will spend the night that night, or what they will eat, or where mom or dad were, our test is not likely to mean alot to them. Also, we test everyone. Special education students, who are educated on their ability level under IDEA, are TESTED on their grade level, under NCLB. Also, we are compared to other countries based on “scores”, and usually fail to measure up. We are one of the only countries in the world who educate and test EVERYONE. Most of the countries we are compared to separate their students into education or work tracks at a relatively early age. I don’t know the answers, but encouraging and challenging students in vocational or functional programs, in addition to academic makes more sense to me.
Posted by: Kim | March 13, 2010, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
Walter, the problem with NCLB is that it does not do anything to determine WHY those 11 children failed, and it does not provide funding to support those specific 11 children. Children are not “widgit’s.” NCLB asks us to lump them into “subgroups” but they are individuals. Maybe 1 of the 11 is living in hotel room with his drunk father and he had no dinner the night before and no breakfast the morning of the test (I currently have a student in that exact situation.) Maybe the same student has made huge gains that year, but on the day of the test, was tired, irritable and hungry. Maybe child number two just got over Strep Throat, maybe child number 3 just got in a fight on the playground and can’t concentrate on filling in the bubble’s on his test form, so he just randomly fills them in. The list goes on and on. I am ALL FOR teacher accountability, and for monitoring INDIVIDUAL student progress (see an earlier post by Pete), and I don’t want any child to be left behind. I agree with you that EVERY child deserves a quality education. Those children ARE receiving a free education – these same children would not be found in a private school or in most charter schools. BUT schools cannot solve all of societies ills, in some regards they are the canary in the mine. BUT, no amount of money a school throws at these 11 children (draining resources from the other 79%) can guarantee that they will do better on one test on one given day of the year. AND if we continue to drain our school resources on NCLB mandates the entire system will no longer function and ALL of our children will be left behind.
Posted by: wyogirl | March 13, 2010, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
Historically no matter how much money taxpayers poor into education it has never made it any better.
Posted by: ThomasJeffersonLives | Mar 13, 2010 11:18:39 AM
Absolutely correct. As the old saying goes, you can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make him drink. One of THE main problems in our schools today that no amount of money is going to take care of is lack of interest in getting an education by the students. Just take a look at what they are exposed to everyday… the conveniences of life without the work. These kids thrive on American Idol, reality shows, overpaid sports ‘heroes’, and so on. They live in a society that values what ever ‘talent’ you have (or don’t have in some cases) more than a well rounded educational background. Who needs to learn anything when you can be a bimbo, get on TV, do your bimbo reality show, and make a fortune? Who needs to learn anything when you can pass a football, or throw a baseball and make a fortune? Who needs to learn anything when you can get onstage, possibly make an idiot of yourself by NOT being able to sing, and STILL make money? Not to mention some of these kids live in areas of crime, drugs, pimps, murderers, etc. and have no interest in school. They see the drug king down the street being treated like a king, and a bank account to match. They know of someone who makes a living off stealing and other crimes.
And then, of course, you have the distractions in the classrooms everyday that constantly draw the attention away from the chalkboard/computer and down to the ipod, cell phone, iphone, etc. they are holding in their hands. I heard about an alarming statistic the other day on a radio program that said the instance of taking ‘inappropriate’ photos of oneself and sending them to boyfriends is almost 1 in 6 girls UNDER the age of 15. Which leads to the next problem…discipline.
Does anyone remember when you messed up and got paddled? Sent to the principal’s office? Cracked on the knuckles with a ruler? Sat in the corner? I do. But not anymore. Discipline is a dying breed. Too many lawsuits and ‘therapists’ telling us that discipline ‘scars’ the students in psychological ways. Really? I’m not saying teachers/principals should have the right to beat a child. That would be insane! But a little correction never killed anybody and now more than ever is very, very necessary.
Unless all this money being pumped in is somehow going to change the mindset of people toward education, I’m not so sure I back it completely.
Posted by: Shoe | March 13, 2010, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
What gets me about the new EASA budget proposal is the defunding of the Jacob K. Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Program, a SMALL program that supports RESEARCH, and funneling the money instead into AP and college prep courses. The feds, in doing this, say they’ve lost interest, curiosity, in even KNOWING more about best ways to educate an intellectually diverse student population at the elementary and secondary levels, but tack on AP and college prep at the end of secondary in lieu of any consideration. It is “giving up.”
Posted by: Constance | March 13, 2010, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
Good for you Jackie, if more parents would get involved in their childrens school and homework and not just look upon the school as babysitters and make sure that the teach the children the 3 R’s then it would be better for everyone.
Posted by: Lizzie | March 13, 2010, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
Wyogirl, you make two points: the unfunded mandate (i.e., take care of the 11 who fail, but provides no funds to do so), and “Johnny had a bad hair day.”
Unfortunately, the federal government often enacts unfunded mandates. The fact that it is unfunded does not undermine the nobility in its objectives. After all, most schools derive almost all of their funding at the local or state level, not the federal level. Federal contribution to public education is minimal at best. But I can see the federal government’s point of view: If you want my pittance, then here are a few rules.
Your “Johnny had a bad hair day” argument, in which Johnny would have done OK if he had gotten something to eat or wasn’t tired and irritable, or hadn’t gotten into a fight, is mitigated by the fact that Johnny gets several chances to pass the test. Johnny’s bad hair day is certainly not an argument that testing is part of Johnny’s problem.
One thing I do fully agree with you is that schools cannot cure all of society’s ills. Parents are a vital part of the solution, and unfortunately, not all parents care to contribute. But that doesn’t mean we give up on the low achievers.
Posted by: walter | March 13, 2010, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Ha-ha, walter, yes, my point exactly. The same points made over decades are not taken up. American superiority in education is a pretty lie; our own federal studies say we’ve been waddling to catch up since Sputnik. As to “lusory,” the WIKI definition is adequate; but basically, “accepting an artificial constraint to play a game.” As to “for or agin’” educational reform; of course an EASA budget will be issued, and there are changes, some positive and some negative, and NCLB will be gone, no matter what foot-dragging you are doing. Thanks for responding.
Posted by: Constance | March 13, 2010, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
This is a very good example of why the federal government needs to get out of the education business. The federal government gives money to states; that’s good because it’s our money we sent to them. If we, the states, don’t do as the federal government mandates, they will not give the states the money. Does this sound like coercion? What have we come to? Why are we sending so much money to Washington? Do any of you believe ‘they’ can do a better job than the states? It may be a toss-up but at least it would be local and local official cannot leave the state to hide.
Posted by: grey0066 | March 13, 2010, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
After decades of starving the educational system of funding, does anyone think that imposing more rules is going to help?
Why should kids do well in school if they aren’t going to be able to afford college?
Posted by: Flash Override | March 13, 2010, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
More promises he can’t keep, so he can make himself look good. Ick.
Posted by: JustMe | March 13, 2010, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
In The seventies I taught in an inner city ethnic Catholic elementary school. Forty-five kids in each class. If there was any problem, the problem was taken care of THAT NIGHT. Those kids went on to college and careers and are leading productive lives. Until those days come back through morality and religion. FORGET IT. WHY WASTE MORE MONEY ON A DYING BREED?? FED GOV in educatION – more bull!!
Posted by: Tom Barnow | March 13, 2010, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
More promises he can’t keep, so he can make himself look good. Ick.
Posted by: JustMe | Mar 13, 2010 3:06:53 PM
________________________________
The Republican right smear campaign continues – the President is selfish and doesn’t care about the country, just himself.
The Republican right is lame . .. and slimy.
Posted by: tierra | March 13, 2010, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
My personal belief is that the focus on standardized testing is wrong. We need to focus on fundamentals such as reading, spelling, mathematics..
I wonder if the money spent is more to support the school’s vendors and employees than to educate the students.
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | March 13, 2010, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Of course he loves his country and wants to help the people.. that’s his job after all..
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | March 13, 2010, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Dontget: your comment carries an error in logic – namely, that standardized testing and fundamentals (reading, writing, math) are mutually exclusive. They’re not. You can have both. I think it’s likely you don’t understand the role of standardized testing. A test is standardized because it measures academic achievement against a standard. And a standard is a level of achievement that a wide body of academics agree is a realistic target for a particular grade level.
Let’s say a school focuses on teaching fundamentals, just like you want. Let’s say you are paying tuition for your children to attend that school. Wouldn’t you want to know that your children are learning the fundamentals you value? Of course you would. You’d want to make sure that if nothing else, you’re at least getting your money’s worth. You’d ask for test results, right? And what if the school produced test results for your children with good grades on them? Good, right? But what would you do if you examined the test and saw that the hardest question on your 5th grader’s math test was “what is the sum of 5 + 5?” Bet that would get your attention! See the point? Any school can make their own test scores look good. That’s why you need standardized testing that is professionally constructed to measure performance against a standard.
If you take away standardized testing, you’ll never know whether your children are getting an education that will allow them to compete for college and, more importantly, jobs.
Posted by: walter | March 13, 2010, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
Walter.. I agree.. good response..
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | March 13, 2010, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
jobs…jobs
Posted by: catman | March 13, 2010, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
For better or worse,standardized testing is the best practical predictor of academic success.Granted,more personal education and evaluation could potentially give better indications of success,but we are never going to have one-on-one teaching in this country,except in specialized(expensive) private schools or in home schooling.The tests are not perfect, but abandoning them would probably lead to a “dumbing-down” of education in this country.
Posted by: Nephron | March 13, 2010, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
“My personal belief is that the focus on standardized testing is wrong. We need to focus on fundamentals such as reading, spelling, mathematics..
I wonder if the money spent is more to support the school’s vendors and employees than to educate the students.”
Spending money… More on “Edumakation” each year and test scores still go down.
Posted by: Stu Pidd | March 13, 2010, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
I know little about the subject, I’ve heard teachers (friends) say that they will teach toward the CATs in lieu of things they deem more important.. it’s purely chatter talk..
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | March 13, 2010, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
jobs…jobs
Posted by: catman | Mar 13, 2010 3:59:31 PM
catman, what do you want the President to do to get jobs besides the usual Republican mantra of tax cuts? If he ordered the Federal government to produce jobs, you people would have a hissy fit. How about demanding the banks that received bailouts do what they can to start lending or helping small business owners to expand their hiring? What about those that received the Bush tax cuts weren’t they somehow going to benefit us all by producing jobs? How about asking what your Governors, Mayors or State Senators and Representatives are doing to create jobs in their states. Why must you people blame the President for something he has no real control of. How about stop whining about President Obama and start demanding that your Senator and Representatives begin to work with this President rather than working to destroy him at the cost of destroying our country.
Posted by: catmom | March 13, 2010, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
Sort of like Krugman’s 1979 reference.. there are structural changes in employment that make job creation the ultimate perplex.. manufacturing jobs are not likely to resurface as they have in the past.. we cannot compete.. it is almost certain that the middle class will continue to dissolve as we create a polarized have/have not society..
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | March 13, 2010, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
as always, the real danger to any educational reforms in America is what’s happening in Texas with their ‘new’ need for selective textbooks featuring christian/conservative revisionism of US History.
These idiots in Texas are as great a threat to the US as any we face, as they will doom the upcoming generations to repeating the same american mythology that led Bush to invade Iraq and claim that ‘intelligent design’ is science.
Posted by: PO'd | March 13, 2010, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Sure looks like another four years of Bush, just a different face!
Posted by: CC | March 13, 2010, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
catmom….i am an independent. if it were me running the show. our streets and highways would b paved in gold for all the money wasetd to date. nuclear power plants, many not one but many, would be started . the levee system in louisanna would be fixed, dams in california would be raised and elsewhere, oil exploration would be increased domestically, anything that illegals do would also be turned over to americans, then i would start thinking about some green jobs. i would legalize pot immeadiately, tax it and reduce prison size as a result. then if there is anything left over i would entertain some of the utopian dream projects that we currently put in front of the logical choices.thats what i would do.instead of giving money away build something or fix something…its not tooo difficult.
Posted by: catman | March 13, 2010, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
PO’d, can you tell me where you found that quote on the possibility of dinosaurs on the Ark? From the time I was a child the idea of an ark seemed preposterous. My dad had a mini-farm, so we knew you couldn’t keep breeding related animals without creating genetic problems. So the whole idea of two of each being enough just doesn’t make sense.
I always pictured the Ark story has really happening, but just to save that one family and his farm animals from a widespread flood but not a world-wide flood. That in itself is enough of a miracle, when you think of the faith that man must have had to build a boat in his yard and stock it in time.
Posted by: Lydia | March 13, 2010, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
the key too education is discipline at home pure and simple. if mom and dad or mom and mom or dad and dad or whatever you got going on do not demmand effort from their children nothing will happen. teachers are somewahat hammstrung by the talent they have to work with. rarely does the apple fall far from the tree. we are asking teachers to do the immpossible and no amount of money can fix it. its all at home.
Posted by: catman | March 13, 2010, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
catmom…its amazing how progressives spend so much time looking back instead of ahead. obama is the man now and its time to man up and he and his do nothing congress control where the deniero goes. like lets spend some money on obesiety. i know its a problem but its easily controlled by controlling what one puts in their mouth.
Posted by: catman | March 13, 2010, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
I’m hoping this reform passes. Something has to be done with our educational system, with almost 30% of our kids not graduating high school.
While I admire teachers for the difficult job they do, their unions have made it too difficult to fire bad teachers. My 3 kids have had a few great teachers, some good ones, some poor teachers and a few damaging ones. When you multiply the effect one bad teacher does in their career, 30 or more years times 20 children a year, the loss is tremendous. I’ve seen confident kids reduced to shy, unmotivated, or angry children after a school year with a bad teacher. This is too great a loss for our society, as well as for those kids.
Surely there must be a way to fire incompetent teachers in a fair way. There was a story in the news that there are ‘rubber rooms’ in n.y.c. where dozens of bad or predatory teachers sit daily, with full pay for years. They aren’t safe to be around kids but their tenure protects them. This is a huge financial drain. Even in our small town there was one middle school teacher who kept touching kids. They actually assigned a paid ‘assistant’ to remind him not to and if he did to write down notes! And yes, he had tenure. There isn’t any other job that has so much protection for incompetence.
Posted by: Lydia | March 13, 2010, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
grey006…”Do any of you out there believe that ‘they’ ( the federal government) can do better than the States…” in the education of our children. Well, let me put it this way grey…Look at all the different “opinions” on this blog, then go down to good old boy Texas where the conservatives are “re-writing” history. LOL…LOL…Just what I would want. 50 States doing “whatever they thought was right”. If that happens, we better start thinking of a different name for the “United States of America”. Your “fear” of the federal government just never seems to amaze me.
Posted by: CND FOX | March 13, 2010, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
If standardized tests were produced by the federal government and were not dumbed down by respective states, it would be interesting to see how the states would compete to produce results…
Posted by: phantomniter | March 13, 2010, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
money and teachers unions are not the answer. local schoolboards need more authority to can non producing teachers with out the threat of some union suing them or walking out on the kids would help. most of all mom and or dad is the key. you get out your kids based on what you put into them.
Posted by: catman | March 13, 2010, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
catman, I disagree that local school boards having the power to fire would be the answer. In our town, they have too much power and are inept. For instance, the school board gets to pick the texts to be purchased. They go against the recommendations of the teachers and even the department heads of the high schools. One school board member was overheard saying she chose a history book because it had a lot of photos and she likes books like that. Even though the history teachers found it poorly written, they are now stuck teaching with it for the next 6 years.
I think firing could be handled with a system of a few warnings and then a hearing with a union rep and the superintendent, as well as hard evidence and witnesses.
Posted by: Lydia | March 13, 2010, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
Obama and the other politicans who send their kids to expensive private schools have no clue on how to help the public schools help the students. We need to have more technical high schools that will actually teach the kids a useful trade so they can get a decent job. Everyone does not need or want to attend college. Most kids start getting in trouble in middle school (grades 7 & 8)
The main problem in America that leads to kids not doing well in school is because they are allowed to be in charge instead of the teachers.
Posted by: Connie Jenkins | March 13, 2010, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
obama really has spread himself way to thin. he cant finish anything, and he really cant do more than one thing at a time. the country is SCREAMING jOBS JOBS JOBS, not all of this if we were rich ideas.
Posted by: catman | March 13, 2010, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
PO’d, thanks!
Posted by: Lydia | March 13, 2010, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
local schoolboards need more authority
Posted by: catman
where I live in Pa, the local school board does whatever it wants, as we have no vote for what they authorize and want budget wise, plus they keep on building and raising taxes in an area with no businesses to support the increased taxes, so the residents are bled to death with increasing school and property taxes.
Posted by: PO'd | March 13, 2010, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
lydia…you get to vote for those who sit on the board. the board makes up the the majority thinking of the community. if your board doesnt perform you can make it public or run for office and make a difference. i have taken on school boards and prevailed. i have more faith in my local school board than i eevr will from a state or federal crat.
Posted by: catman | March 13, 2010, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
It’s so nice to have a President that can actually do 2 things at once. And he pronounces things correctly, too! I couldn’t help notice all the idiots that didn’t read the article, just posted crap about Obama, they just couldn’t resist saying something BAD, just had to insult his ideas….by-the-way…what was your ideas?
Posted by: able | March 13, 2010, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Obama, who refuses to send his children to public schools, always TALKS about his support for public schools but, really, he is more concerned that children get indoctrination into the Obama messianic message (the singing, presidental addresses, chanting, Obama pictures and symbology, etc). Of course, he sends his children to an elite,expensive private school because he wants them to get a good education.
Also Obama/Bush’s focus on college is wrong. While every children should be prepared, and have the opportunity, for college we also should have some technical and vocational training. Also we should focus on alternatives like Junior colleges, etc. It is not realistic for EVERYONE to go to university and we need real, practical skills and jobs also.
Posted by: Ed | March 13, 2010, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
We are teaching to the test! Everything is geared towards benchmarks, that do not accurately assess our students’ learning. The students are tested so frequently that they no longer see a purpose in testing and therefore, do not try. Over testing our children is not going to fix the problems in our education system.
We need to change a culture! Performing well is no longer “cool” and children leave school to a home that does not support their education, nor protect them from criminal activity that offer a “quick fix” to financial struggles. The truth is, we are being out performed because the general population no loner values education or our teachers.
Posted by: MDEducator | March 13, 2010, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
Notice Obama wants to take over and do EVERYTHING except the one thing that people need, and tht doesn’t increase Governmental power: let the private sector recover and create jobs!! And why doesn’t he? Because he WANTS people out of work, and dependant on the Government for their subsistence. That increase the Democratic voting bloc. The only other reason is that he is completely incompetent!!
Posted by: dainmezron | March 13, 2010, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
Because he WANTS people out of work, and dependant on the Government for their subsistence.
__________________________________
Sure he does . . .
Posted by: tierra | March 13, 2010, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
Bush is to be commended for NCLB as a beginning point. I suspect most of the complaining from dems about NCLB is due to the fact Bush, a republican, proposed it and a Republican congress passed it. Was it underfunded? Nope, not if discipline in the public schools is taken care of by parents in partnership with their schools making sure their children behave and do their homework. I, for one, am fed up with more dollars being funded to make up for poor parental oversight of children by those who brought them into the world. If our public schools could have one initiative happen that would change the face of public education tomorrow for good, it would be for parents to make sure their children do their homework, bathe, get their sleep, dress in clean clothes, eat breakfast, and brush their teeth on the way out to the bus or car ride to school every single school day, AND be respectful of their teachers and classmates all day every school day. That doesn’t require more money. It requires parents to behave like responsible adults after siring children and raise them up properly.
Posted by: Rob | March 13, 2010, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
Rob, No Child Left Behind is NOT a beginng point and Bush can only be credited with signing the bill, not writing it. NCLB is only the latest version of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), which was first passed in 1965, I believe, under President Lyndon Johnson, as part of his Great Society reforms. The main gist of the law at the time was to mandate remedial reading and math instruction for kids whose families earned poverty wages. The intent of the law is good, but the way schools are mandated to recognize student achievement are flawed. I sincerely hope that the next version of ESEA will be a significant improvement over NCLB, and I really hope they get rid of that name, which is a slap in the face of educators – as if we get up in the morning and intentionally conspire to leave children behind.
Posted by: Linda | March 13, 2010, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
Here’s a thought: why not just educate our kids. I was dead set against being educated myself, but they managed to do it anyways.
The current mentality is that it’s ok to fail if you feel good about doing it. We need to get back to encouraging success.
Posted by: Hosfac | March 13, 2010, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
Walter. I do not have to support it being that in what I have seen happen to the education in this country. In order for the states to keep up with a program that is a unfunded mandate and ties school districts hands in educating students. Programs have been cut to make sure that student’s meet certain criteria of the NCLB. I have worked with teachers and have talked with educaters because of my two children. They hate this NCLB. I have seen less time on math, reading and history disappear so they can mandate this FAILURE. America at one time had a great education system, yet when countries such as China, Japan, and even Eurpean countries have better accademics for their children to compete in this technology bound world. My point as much as you may not like to hear the truth, parent’s have along with massive tax cut’s (property tax) has hurt the young people. When it get’s through many BRICK HEADS, the only way to stay up with the changing world is by making sure that education in all forms is strengthened. Not a program like NCLB that focusses only on so much, that teaching chilldren a real education get’s back burnered. When young people cannot recite American History, nor Social Studies, when common writing skill’s are looked over. When math that should make them compete is minimal. Sorry this program stinks. Talk to your educators they’ll tell you.
Posted by: Katie | March 13, 2010, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
It’ll be interesting to see what kind of attack the GOP makes against this, even though most repubolicans don’t favor the ‘No Child Left Behind’ crap, I bet they resist just because they are the:
G “Obstruction” P.
Posted by: JR | March 13, 2010, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
What crap!! We do not need another round of the Dumbing Down of America. We all want people to finish high school, that should give us an electorate with basic skills. My suggestion is that without a High School education, a person should not be allowed to have a drivers license until they are 21, nor be allowed to vote, nor should the family get government assistance (welfare) if the kids cannot stay in school. If anyone cannot pass Public School in the USA they are too dumb to drive, vote (look at the mess we are in now), or be worth pouring taxpayer dollars into.
Posted by: LibertinTexas | March 13, 2010, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
Get rid of the teachers union !
Problem solved along with taxpayers money.
Posted by: Holly | March 13, 2010, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
as always, the real danger to any educational reforms in America is what’s happening in Texas with their ‘new’ need for selective textbooks featuring christian/conservative revisionism of US History.
These idiots in Texas are as great a threat to the US as any we face…
Posted by: PO’d | Mar 13, 2010 4:41:49 PM
I agree that the news out of Texas is very disturbing. What the…????
Posted by: progresssive mama | March 13, 2010, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
I agree with those who say that educators and child advocates across the country have had issues with NCLB. I used to substitute teach occasionally, and I have friends and family who teach and work for school districts. The big issues with it since its inception have been the two A’s– Assessment and Accountability. Basically, NCLB is a punitive program that uses flawed standardized tests– one size fits all assessment requirements that lead to undervaluing subject areas like science (which is only tested periodically) and social studies and the arts — to label schools as failures and punish them with counterproductive sanctions. Schools in certain areas– often urban and lower income– spend way, waaaay too much time teaching to the test, distorting the curriculum and curricular goals. The tests are very poor when it comes to individual assessments (diagnosing individual needs) and for assessing higher learning needs. In one sixth grade class I taught for a month, there was a boy that always tested at the 97th to 99th percentile in the subject areas. Since so much time was spent teaching to the test in his school, he was bored out of his mind, and he just wasn’t a concern, nor was the girl who always tested in the 94th to 96th percentiles. They were shocked when I came them higher level projects to work on– and pushed them.
Another thing, the way testing and sanctions have worked, its pretty much punished and dissuaded good teachers from going to schools where they could have an impact and do some real good.
As WSJ puts it, “At its heart, the Obama approach would set firmer standards for success while lifting nearly all the measures that the Bush law uses to try to prod change at failing schools. Obama aides describe the plan as “tight on goals, loose on means.”
The proposal reflects the administration’s belief, shared by many in the teaching profession, that the Bush-era law is too prescriptive and too punitive, and that it allows states to set too low a bar for measuring whether a school is succeeding or not. Critics have also singled out the law’s heavy focus on standardized tests and its emphasis on reading and math over other skills.
The Obama version would essentially flip the government’s focus by setting firmer, nation-wide goals for success while allowing more latitude for how states reach those goals. The proposal would also judge schools by the growth of individual students instead of overall class performance.”
I like that and agree with those that say that democratic local participatory groups of parents, educators, students, and the school board with input from the state should be working together to make policy decisions AND, ideally, to get away from simply teaching to the test, information about student achievement ought to be gleaned both from standardized tests AND student classroom work, looking at growth and diagnosing individual needs.
Posted by: progressive mama | March 13, 2010, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
In 1980, the Dept of Education’s annual budget was $14B. By 2001, the budget had risen to $42B. By 2006, the budget peeked at 100B during the “No Child Left Behind” program, and had settled back to $65B by 2009. —- So the question, did you notice how much better the schools were in 2006 with the budget DOUBLING within 5 years?? —No???? —– Then why do liberals think throwing more money at education is the amswer????
Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | March 13, 2010, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
UNDERSTAND THIS FOLKS, OBAMA is totally corrupt! He now has the student loan attached to the healthcare-why, simple. It gives some more control over lousy American education so he can protect lazy union teachers and now he is going to take away the no child, why, so he can stop punishing the rotten he says and reward the rotten teachers unions again. This man is a total socialist, totalitarian or communist-whatever you want to call him. He knows that the more lazy people that he has on the federal payroll, the more they vote for him and his totalitarian rule. WAKE UP boneheads and vote these lousy democrats out of office.
Posted by: rockychance | March 13, 2010, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
We need to have more technical high schools that will actually teach the kids a useful trade so they can get a decent job. Everyone does not need or want to attend college. Most kids start getting in trouble in middle school (grades 7 & 8)
The main problem in America that leads to kids not doing well in school is because they are allowed to be in charge instead of the teachers.
Posted by: Connie Jenkins | Mar 13, 2010 5:47:04 PM
I agree with the need for technical programs, trade schools and junior colleges as university education isn’t necessarily appropriate for everyone, nor should it be. Just like owning a new home wasn’t within everyone’s means. Equal opportunity and high expectations are important but there ought to be multiple paths to being successful as a productive member of society.
And, yeah, classroom discipline is ESSENTIAL for learning to take place.
Posted by: progressive mama | March 13, 2010, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
Afterthought– it would be great if we tied technical programs and trade schools to our need for new technologies and innovation in the alt. energy sector.
Posted by: progressive mama | March 13, 2010, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
I am damned tired of hearing our President talk about folks getting college ready….all of them are not college material, and I, sure as hell, don’t want them to be “college ready.” (the President can explain to me what he means by “career ready”….does he mean a pro bowler, a fullback for the Patriots, a practical nurse, or what?
He’s already tied up subsidizing college loan expenses to his beloved Obamacare legislation……..a cheap political trick straight out of Cook County. The first thing we need to do is get a Secretary of Education from the ranks of public school teachers who know kids, their parents, other teachers, administrators and….yes, even unions who make our schools tick…and that ain’t Arne, is it? Second, we need to be wary of Washington’s involvment in the education of our youth…..until kids get to college … or trade schooling… or Mc Donalds….ALL EDUCATION IS LOCAL..if the feds want to throw in money they don’t have, that’s a different problem, but the education of our kids is our “thing,” not Washington’s……………in fact, since, Barack and Arne are right there, why don’t they focus for change in the DC schools?
Posted by: justj joey | March 13, 2010, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
Obama:”All students should graduate from high school prepared for college and a career – no matter who you are or where you come from”. This is true if the student want to become a lawyer, teacher, engineer, scientist or medical doctors. While in the real world, a huge number of jobs related to roads and housing construction, carpentry , plumbing and home care do not require to have a college degree.
Posted by: austin | March 13, 2010, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
HURRY! HURRY! Throw it in the reconciliation stew with the healthcare bill and the student loan bill!
Posted by: cindy | March 13, 2010, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
There are still teachers who are just there for the paycheck and say it is okay to pass a child even if they are not ready. Take a good look at where my son’s attends school. The third and fourth grade teachers both stated that it was okay as someone else could deal with it. If a person is just in it for the paycheck then why bother being a teacher? If a child can’t do simple math there is no reason to pass them, but here, they just cover up the bad grades by the grading curves.
Posted by: Daura | March 13, 2010, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
Why is it about ALWAYS MONEY….. more taxpayers dollars for the feds to dump into that education black hole…
Posted by: Vet1973 | March 13, 2010, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
I can not name one person that knows a thing about NCLB that likes it. This includes my republican friends. So I suppose I’m saying I can’t imagine how anybody can get on here and knock this one. Oh wait! Yes I can. Career whiners.
Posted by: secondlook | March 13, 2010, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
Yeah, Obama sure can do two things at once. For instance watch him do his health scam, and push for the crap and Tax scam at the same time all while pronouncing his lies all very well. Just lovely, and this is what you bots like about this guy? Geez.
Posted by: No To Marxism | March 13, 2010, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
This education scam is about buying teacher union votes. It will do nothing to actually help kids, but will certainly cost taxpayers.
Posted by: No To Marxism | March 13, 2010, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
Amusing that we are pushing our expectations of teachers higher and higher and higher and higher while — at the same time, due to budget cuts — cutting the number of teachers in our schools, increasing the number of students in each class, and entirely eliminating classes in art, music, and physical education.
Before long, we’ll be back to just teaching our children “readin’, writin’, and cypherin’.” Heck, why do they need to learn history? Seems we have an abysmal track record of learning from our mistakes anyway. Geography? All you need to know about geography is which countries we’re currently fighting wars in, right?
Posted by: JaylahPriest | March 13, 2010, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
I agree with the need for technical programs, trade schools and junior colleges as university education isn’t necessarily appropriate for everyone, nor should it be.its wonderful decision.
SMoke Relief
Posted by: james moly | March 14, 2010, 12:01 am 12:01 am
The big issues with it since its inception have been the two A’s– Assessment and Accountability. Basically, NCLB is a punitive program that uses flawed standardized tests– one size fits all assessment requirements that lead to undervaluing subject areas like science (which is only tested periodically) and social studies and the arts — to label schools as failures and punish them with counterproductive sanctions. Schools in certain areas– often urban and lower income– spend way, waaaay too much time teaching to the test, distorting the curriculum and curricular goals. The tests are very poor when it comes to individual assessments (diagnosing individual needs) and for assessing higher learning needs.
Posted by: Ilan Ben Menachem | March 14, 2010, 12:13 am 12:13 am
Throwing more money to a program that isn’t working is not a good idea. WE THE PEOPLE ARE PAYING ATTENTION! Everytime I hear more about Obama and the present administration, I wonder how Obama ever got to be president. Corruption is rampant in Chicago and he was part of it. Now this country is in the midst of all this turmoil and the healthcare project isn’t about people’s welfare but CONTROL. Why do people think they will get quality care from this? Band-aid treatment for catastrophic illnesses will occur and there will be a lot more deaths. Wake up America. You are being had. See you in November!
Posted by: EAST COAST | March 14, 2010, 12:24 am 12:24 am
all the education ‘experts’ have appeared, just like all the economic ‘experts’, the health care ‘experts’ as well as the ‘foreign policy’ experts..
so, how many teachers do we have here ?
I would bet that most of the folks who post on this forum couldn’t pass the citizenship test that immigrants must take to become citizens..
nor… could they draw a proper map of America with the names of all the states in the right place.
re: My suggestion is that without a High School education, a person should not be allowed to have a drivers license until they are 21, nor be allowed to vote,
Posted by: LibertinTexas
Texas already has enough on it’s plate with regard to it’s insane educational policies without anyone from that secessionist state whining about what’s good for the rest of America.
Posted by: PO'd | March 14, 2010, 12:26 am 12:26 am
This guy is our biggest mistake ever.
All he ever says is NOTHING.
He told us NOTHING and the particulars of his new proposal. You can bet it is a payoff to his cronies.
Posted by: Tom Massey | March 14, 2010, 1:49 am 1:49 am
All he ever says is NOTHING.
He told us NOTHING and the particulars of his new proposal. You can bet it is a payoff to his cronies.
Posted by: Tom Massey | Mar 14, 2010 1:49:00 AM
_______________________________
Tom you’ve told us nothing . . .
Posted by: tierra | March 14, 2010, 3:02 am 3:02 am
Bush tactics: Talk about NCLB as you aggressively activate plans to privatize the school system and hope people aren’t alert or smart enough to pick up on it.
I just have to ask. Is Obama a democrat or a republican? Because at this point he looks like a republican to me.
Posted by: jan | March 14, 2010, 5:28 am 5:28 am
WE NEED TO LEAVE THE WHOLE FEDERAL DEPT OF EDUCATION BEHIND. WHENEVER THEY GET MORE INVOLVED – TEST SCORES GO SOUTH!!!!!
TO BE FAIR, OUR CULTURE (OR RATHER LACK OF) IS MOSTLY TO BLAME. THROWING MORE MONEY, STANDARDS OR PROGRAMS AT THE PROBLEM IS LIKE BLOWING FRTS IN THE WIND – TOTALLY USELESS.
I AM A RETIRED CATHOLIC ELEMENTARY TEACHER. OFTEN WE HAD FORTY-FIVE KIDS TO A CLASS THEN, SELF CONTAINED!!! KIDS WENT ON TO COLLEGE, CAREERS, FAMILIES AND BECAME PRODUCTIVE CITIZENS. DIFFERENCE? “CULTURE, PURE, SWEET CULTURE!!” AND ALSO, A MINOR POINT – A LITTLE RELIGION, TOO.
Posted by: Tom Barnow | March 14, 2010, 8:51 am 8:51 am
This presidency reminds me of an episode of “flip this house” I saw years ago- A young Starbucks barista pays an astonishing $500,000 for a tiny old home in California motivated by visions of a quick flip and a tidy profit. Instead of planning out his renovation, he guts every single room in the first week, leaving the entire place uninhabitable. Long story short-He runs out of cash, the market buckles, and by the end of the show he is stuck trying to offload a house he has essentially turned into a garage. Never mind that he should never have borrowed all that money in the first place, never mind that he ignored the weakening economy, his methodology of attacking every room simultaneously left him penniless AND homeless. Mr. President, impatience is not a virtue. It is the enemy of due dilligence, and more often than not leads to unforeseen disaster.
Posted by: cindy | March 14, 2010, 9:28 am 9:28 am
Kennedy’s No Child Left Behind Act signed by Bush was a disaster to begin with, it has caused the “dumbing” down of all children so minorities could pass which did not help anyone. Minorities need to rise up to America’s standards and quite being given a free ride at the expense of everyone!!!!
Posted by: HH | March 14, 2010, 10:07 am 10:07 am
No doubt this is a priority. The NEA dumped $2.3M in the Democratic coffers in 2008 and the first thing he did was deep six school vouchers in DC. No doubt, like every program, NCLB needs to be rationalized and amended based on experience — but this is about the payoffs — not the children.
The SEIU dumped $27 million in Obama’s coffers, and he stole $800B from our children and pretty much handed it to Andy Stern. Unemployment in the public sector is 4% versus 10.4% overall.
The country is following California’s path — where the Democratic legislature handed the bank book to the unions in 1999 in the form of a rediculous pension program and now everyone else is suffering.
These people are thieves! Is it November yet?
Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 10:21 am 10:21 am
impatience is not a virtue. It is the enemy of due dilligence, and more often than not leads to unforeseen disaster.
Posted by: cindy
curious no one bothered to explain that to Bush before he invaded Iraq, or just ‘had to’ roll out 2 unpaid tax cuts while 2 wars were being waged..
Posted by: PO'd | March 14, 2010, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
The country is following California’s path
Posted by: mitchscove
elect an actor, you get the Reagan corruptions
and ‘Arrnold’, republican actors don’t do very well when elected do they…. oh those right wing elitist hollywood types
Posted by: PO'd | March 14, 2010, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
I am an educator and everything that I have read about this proposal seems to be heading in the right direction. It is important to remember that our students are over tested and class time has been completely ruined to prepare for test and to take them. On average 30 days are used for testing!!!!
Posted by: Hello | March 15, 2010, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
I care that if our government commits time and money to teach children that it achieves the intent. As a homeowner I don’t throw away my house and purchase another every time something needs repaired. I live within a budget and fix what and when I can. Seems to me that politicians complain, explain and place blame to get elected or reelected but they don’t really fix anything.
My point remains that the federal government committed time, money and legislation to NCLB, which was in spirit and scientific foundation intended to help children learn. In the specific instance of my children it has been and continues to be ineffective. In my opinion, primarily because it’s foundation, science and spirit were never communicated properly to critical audiences and was executed poorly. Again, in the instance of my children it simply taught districts that if they instructed to the test the children would pass. There is little regard for what my children have actually learned. The result is that schools receive good marks and my children still can’t read even close to grade level. I believe it sets a bad example for children. If a child cheats in school they are punished. Conversely, if a school cheats they are rewarded. I have always believed that children learn what they live and I believe this sets a potentially dangerous example for kids in addition to leaving them without necessary life skills such as the ability to read effectively.
I’ve read a great deal about parental involvement in and responsibility for their children’s education. I understand like doctors, politicians and ditch diggers that there are good parents and bad. As a stay-at-home mom, I for one can afford the time to be very involved with the education of my children. I understand that not all parents can. Further, involved parents have learned to be very prudent in that if they asked questions of the district they are labeled as troublemakers and whether consciously or not, it’s their children who suffer the consequences. As a parent it’s a catch 22 because you’re da*ned if you’re involved and da*ned if you’re not involved.
Home schooling, private schools and tutoring are always options. However, the fact remains that our government committed time, money and legislation to improve education under NCLB and it didn’t work for my children. Now it’s proposed to spend more time, money and legislation on education. The fundamental issue of how education is executed and measured and the validity of the results of spending billions of dollars are not addressed. It is my fear that children will simply be taught to take a different test, and schools will be rewarded and children like mine will still be unable to read.
As a parent I will see to it that my children learn to read. Pardon me though if I have a difficult time believing that throwing billions more toward new goals in education will benefit my children or change the reality of many others.
There was once a rather eccentric congressman who called members of congress political prostitutes. Of course he was made to publicly apologize for his comment and he said something to the effect that “I apologize to those who I offend, to those I didn’t I commend.” Reading used to be fundamental. Now it is not. We had academic measures such as a Woodcock Johnson, we spent billions to create new ones. We have college preparedness measures such as the SAT or ACT, but we propose to spend billions to create new ones. And at the end of today, my children still can’t read.
Posted by: MSC3 | March 16, 2010, 10:07 am 10:07 am
My children pass state reading proficiency tests. My children can’t read.
My children don’t count in anyone’s statistics because they pass proficiency tests in Ohio and Tennessee. They not only pass them but they pass them at advanced proficient levels. Their reality is vastly different. My 6th grader reads at the first grade level in application, with a private tutor and according to other scientifically-proven achievement, phonological and reading measures given by school personnel. My freshman in high school reads at a forth grade level. My children have no cognitive impairment. My children are honor roll students. My freshman is taking honors classes with an AP pathway. I read course work to my children because they haven’t yet learned to adequately read so they may learn.
My children are either absolute freaks of nature, learning anomalies or the States of Ohio and Tennessee only expect children to be able to read five grade levels below average to exceed proficient standards.
“No Child Left Behind” was intended to help kids like mine learn to read and create some accountability. But NCLB was legislated and the Reading Panel’s findings were not communicated or educated. Over the years I’ve met not one single educator or school administrator that’s actually read the Panel’s findings. Districts clearly understand what must be done to get or keep funding but they still don’t get how to teach my children to learn to read. Schools are willing to purchase any reading program that’s documented to increase proficiency scores and care very little that they don’t move the needle on commonly accepted, scientifically-proven individual achievement, reading and phonological tests.
I feel like I’m experiencing a flashback to a Susan Powter infomercial. I want to scream “stop the insanity.” Do you know reading isn’t a pathway? And, now the administration wants to prepare and measure students for college readiness. My children attend one of the best schools in the state and reading isn’t offered in high school. If children can’t learn to read so that they can read to learn by the time they reach high school they might just be out of luck. I’m not going blind reading Chaucer but perhaps that might contribute to a kid dropping out of school.
As a matter of fact a department head for the district just a few short weeks ago asked me why did it matter if my child could read, after all, he’s passed his proficiency tests, he’s a gifted student, taking honors courses, has a 3.6 average and is in the top 20% of his class. Apparently she hasn’t been informed that every child that does not have a cognitive impairment can learn to read. It’s supposed to be simply a matter of frequency, duration and the right program. And, that if a reading program fails a child once it will fail that child again. But hey, she doesn’t have to care because again my children pass state proficiency tests. The truly sad part is that my kids still want to learn to read.
I would really appreciate if someone could help me understand state reading assessments because perhaps I just don’t get it. Are my children supposed to be able to pass a proficiency test but not be able to read when they graduate school?
Is the government just going to create some “new and improved” college readiness standards and measurements that again don’t really measure validity? Measurements and statistics can be skewed any which way a person desires but hey let’s throw billions more at something just to make education look effective.
The education of children has become a great American public relations campaign with very little meat and a great deal of sound bites. Educators are not allowed to educate. Students aren’t empowered to learn. But hey we look great on paper. We care about the socio-economically deprived. Seems to me we just don’t really care if the kids actually learn.
Posted by: MSC3 | March 16, 2010, 10:08 am 10:08 am
I agree with the need for technical programs, trade schools and junior colleges as university education isn’t necessarily appropriate for everyone, nor should it be.its wonderful decision.
SMoke Relief
Posted by: Ilan Ben Menachem | March 18, 2010, 5:36 am 5:36 am
Where is a copy of this blueprint for Americans to read viewing the overhaul of NCLB ? “Free Bird Fly law….15 students per classroom for our American school buildings ! Is that in the blueprint ? Drive the money directly to the school buildings to benefit the students.
Posted by: Kim | March 19, 2010, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
So i dont know how everyone else thinks about this program in general, but it seems to me that parenting is, has always been, and will continue to be the number one reason why children do or do not graduate high school, middle school, etc. We dont need a federal law passed to help kids graduate school. Why dont we pass a bill that spends billions of dollars providing jobs for kids who dont graduate, or we can just give them money for not working at all…. Its rediculous that the government has its fingers in the STATE education system, and takes the responsibility away from parents. I say if a kid doesnt want to go to school, dont make him. If he/she doesnt want to get a job, dont make them. I assure you the attrition rate will work itself out. Be a parent if you want your kids to succeed, dont let the government do it for you!
Posted by: James | April 25, 2011, 9:57 am 9:57 am