By Kevin Chupka

Mar 1, 2010 8:01am

Carville on Health Care: Could be Obama’s ‘Waterloo’

On 'GMA' this morning, James Carville wasn't as optimistic as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.  Not sure that Democrats have the votes to pass the President's plan, Carville is sure that failure will be the "Waterloo" predicted by GOP Senator Jim DeMint.

 

“If it goes down" Carville said, "it’s gonna be a simple statement: the Democrats can’t govern.  They came in with a majority promising health care and they came away with nothing.”

  

ABC News political analyst Matthew Dowd said that passing the bill will hurt the Democrats more than it helps but added that the Republicans aren't safe from blow back for blocking the bill, “The vast majority of the country wants health care reform…they know the insurance companies have to reform they know costs have to be reformed and the republicans have to continue to say we have ideas we have ideas this is a bad bill but we have ideas”

See the debate here:

User Comments

THE DEMS HAVE TOTAL CONTROL AND THE REPUBS CAN’T STOP THEM. WHAT A CLUSTER.

Posted by: jjj | March 1, 2010, 8:39 am 8:39 am

America NEEDS Health Care Reform. I need it. My neighbors need it. Great for you if you don’t – you should THANK GOD. I’m personally losing years off my life because I cannot afford to go for diabetes checkups. Oh, I have “health insurance” but I have to pay it up front – and it’s $400 per workup. Sorry – get in line for that! It’s insane, and it’s the Health Insurance Industry that did it. Hiked up the price overwhelming businesses, then offering lower priced ‘coverage’ which makes the patients pay first – still covered, right? So we shouldn’t complain. I won’t. I’ll be dead.

Posted by: paintpaintpaint | March 1, 2010, 8:50 am 8:50 am

Would someone please explain to me how a program that is going take ten years of taxes to pay for six years of coverage is good for our fiscal house??
They are LYING when they say that this is going to “save” us money.
Wake up America, there are NO free lunches (or health care)!!!

Posted by: Alan | March 1, 2010, 8:55 am 8:55 am

Republicans are hypocritical. They object to Federal standards being set by an ‘unelected’ HHS secretary but they prefer the unelected insurance companies do it instead. In the name of preserving the market, they support monopolistic insurance companies and their tactics that restrain competition. They are complete sell-outs. Pass health care reform now!

Posted by: Joel Miller | March 1, 2010, 8:56 am 8:56 am

Not passing Health Care: Could be Obama’s ‘Waterloo’!! Really, why not “America’s Waterloo”!! What are our options; continue with the current system according to Republican’s or revise our system based on what the Democrats propose. It’s amazing I don’t see medical professionals (i.e. Doctors, Nurse) outraged with the Democrats position, the only eliminate opposed to healthcare reform are insurance companies who recorded record profits last year. This reminds of the oil industry in 2008 recording billion dollar profits after price gouging the America consumer… Outrageous!! Also, this nation spends billion on the defense budget annually with no questions asked but American’s are outraged with the notion of providing healthcare to citizens it’s deplorable.

Posted by: Martin | March 1, 2010, 9:07 am 9:07 am

The government should cut back ALL “entitlements”. What you have is an irresponsible generation in the Baby Boomers that has spent what was saved before them on themselves and is now spending the money of future generations on themselves.
A better use of health care money would be to take care of kids and provide proper health education–so they grow up knowing the risks of smoking,drinking, overeating–then we won’t spend 30% of our health money on the last six weeks of a person’s life.

Posted by: Jim | March 1, 2010, 9:09 am 9:09 am

Who’s waterloo is it, when the important people we put into office, on both sides only care about “Who wins” It is our Waterloo. It is the middle class Waterloo, becuase the people we trusted are like a bunch of irresponsible children. The Democrats trying to push something through while they have a chance, while half the Republicans just want to make the Democrats look bad, while people like Boehner is in there fighting for the wealthy, who throw their money at FOX News to turn people into puppets. The wealthy they are protecting will also lose, because like it or not the middle class money fills your pockets, and as that runs out you may wonder what happened. Who is the real winners and losers when you can’t go for WIN-WIN.

Posted by: parma hts gary | March 1, 2010, 9:20 am 9:20 am

good morning,
Go for it Mr. Obama and Democratic leadership…press on with your version of health care reform which is opposed by a majority of the electorate…see you this November Democratic Congressmen and Congresswomen…and see you in 2012 Mr. Obama.
Incidentally, I voted for Mr. Obama, and spent time and money on his campaign. But he is wrong in pushing this version of health care reform. Why not instead return to his campaign promise of lowering cost for all of us, without mandating coverage for any of us other than minor children, and thereby incidentally persuade the uninsued (whose number and reasons for being uninsured vary greatly) to purchase the resulting affordable insurance? Mr. Obama estimated that 85% of us would then be able to have affordable insurance coverage “comparable” to what he and others in Congress have. What happened? The election is over, as Mr. Obama recently reminded Senator McCain?
take care

Posted by: S.A. Leiseca | March 1, 2010, 9:21 am 9:21 am

Basically, the Dems weren’t able to do it right, and that’s why there is SO MUCH opposition.
So, until they are willing to look at how to do it RIGHT, they need to set it aside.
The bill they have, will actually accomplish nothing.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | March 1, 2010, 9:21 am 9:21 am

It is time to pass health care reform. With health insurance rates going up 17% to 39% this year alone, the cost of health care and health care insurance will soon bankrupt the nation and destroy what is left of the middle class.
The Republican plans are health care savings accounts which can be looted by big banks and their rich CEOs just as our retirement savings were looted, and privatizing Social Security. The second plan would turn Social Security over to the very people who are making billions by insuring fewer and fewer for higher and higher premiums and less and less coverage.
Reconciliation has been used 22 times in the past, 14 by the GOP. That includes the vote under GWB to drastically lower taxes on the rich while we were fighting two wars. That caused Bush to add more to the deficit than all the presidents before him combined.
If reconciliation can be used to pander to the rich, it can be used to help the middle class. Pass health care reform now! less

Posted by: JAB | March 1, 2010, 9:51 am 9:51 am

I predict the moderate democrats won’t fall on their swords for Pelosi…

Posted by: LongT | March 1, 2010, 9:56 am 9:56 am

I’m sorry jjj that you can’t afford your health care. What makes you think I can afford to provide it for you?

Posted by: Joe Pickens | March 1, 2010, 9:59 am 9:59 am

I agree we need health care reform and regulations, however not a complete overhaul of the entire system. That said I think both parties are responsible for getting nothing done. They are both more concerned with poiliticing then fixing America’s problems. In November ALL encumbents should be voted out !!!

Posted by: hkdakota | March 1, 2010, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Yes there is need for health reform. But he Dems have no intention of passing useful reform and every intention of using the health reform issue to implement extreme left controls into all of our lives. But getting back to Carville, the guy ain’t dumb. If Dems do not come back to center and do it very quickly, their party will suffer greatly. Trouble is, Obama and crew are hayull bent on “fundamentally transforming” America into a Marxist state and their version of health care, along with Cap and Trade, etc are the vehicles they need to succeed in destroying America. Focus on allowing companies to do business across state lines, on Tort reform and other things what WILL make a positive difference. But oh no, Obama was bought and paid for by the lawyers.

Posted by: fedup_11 | March 1, 2010, 10:10 am 10:10 am

Let’s get the Health Care Insurance Reform done for the people of America. The health insurance companies are out of control. The reason anyone is scared of “change” in our health care system is because the rotten Republicans have scared their stupid constituents into believing “it’s bad, it’s socialism, it’s evil, it’s pulling the plug on grandma, it’s a “death panel”, it’s abortion for anyone who wants one at taxpayer’s expense, it’s health care for all illegal aliens.” They are brainwashined into believing all these lies because they listen to Fox News all day and all night. What they don’t realize is if we DON’T do something about health care, it WILL bankrupt our country for certain. So, Dems, just get it done, will you please???

Posted by: geecee827 | March 1, 2010, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Oh, we need a Public Option, most definitely!!!

Posted by: geecee827 | March 1, 2010, 10:13 am 10:13 am

One more thing. My annual Social Security statement warns that program will be belly up by 2037. End all these socialist inspired entitlement programs now. Just give me back what I’ve put in the past 39 years and we’ll call it even. Every one of these government mandated ponzi schemes eventually blows up. And the Dems want you to believe big government will solve your problems. How sad. It’s government that creates these problems. Just say, not thanks to Pelosi and Reid.

Posted by: fedup_11 | March 1, 2010, 10:15 am 10:15 am

We desperately need health care reform. I am saddened by the various stories I hear regarding people’s lack of health care. However, we need to stop looking at republics as the problem. We need to start over and this time do it right together in an open forum. The current bills are train wrecks. Lets do this right and lets start doing it now.

Posted by: realliberal | March 1, 2010, 10:23 am 10:23 am

My sister (39 year old) just died after a long battle with cancer and with the health insurance companies which kept refusing payment because of a preexisting condition. They killed her. This is happening in the US. Nice country.

Posted by: David | March 1, 2010, 10:23 am 10:23 am

30+ million more people covered.
tax credits for health insurance for millions of americans below $88k income.
insurance companies can’t drop you for pre-existing or high cost illnesses.
tax credits for small businesses to provide health insurance.
cbo says: reduces deficit by $100 billion over the next decade (and more after that).
why are people against this?
please, let congress have a majority vote on this. stop blocking a vote.

Posted by: Jim Hanson | March 1, 2010, 10:33 am 10:33 am

The health care system in America is broken. Millions are uncovered or fighting to get care even as they suffer from illness. Health insurers are jacking up rates and getting rich as health costs explode for average folks and businesses. This bill is a start. The GOP likes things just the way they are. Step up Dems and Let’s Get This Done!!

Posted by: hopesprings52 | March 1, 2010, 10:38 am 10:38 am

JOE PICKENS ; I’m on your side. I was just pointing out how the Dems can’t get anything done because they’re inept and their constituents don’t want what they had to sell. They still want to ram this crapp down our throats even though they know they will be out in November.

Posted by: jjj | March 1, 2010, 10:39 am 10:39 am

david: did she have health insurance before she got sick? Why would anybody buy insurance if when they get sick they can go buy it. There needs to be reform but we also have to take responability for our own lives too.

Posted by: jjj | March 1, 2010, 10:42 am 10:42 am

Paintpaintpaint…why not save the country a few bucks. As I think of the possibilities of me sending more money to congress WHILE I am paying for my own insurance all ready, why don’t we save all of the red tape that will occur if this debt-generating, liberty-stealing bill ever makes it Obama’s desk. Just go ahead and send me your bills and I’ll pay them. After all, that’s exactly what you are asking and this way we cut out the 100,000 or so new employees the government will hire to send my money to you.

Posted by: wantingbalance | March 1, 2010, 11:15 am 11:15 am

Would someone please explain to me how a program that is going take ten years of taxes to pay for six years of coverage is good for our fiscal house??
They are LYING when they say that this is going to “save” us money.
Wake up America, there are NO free lunches (or health care)!!!
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I agree! It does not make any sense. What is the rush as nothing will not go into affect until 2014. If the Dems had any clue, they will shrink the package and only put in place reforms that will not affect the deficit and can be implemented within a 90 days e.g. pre-existing conditions, kids can stay on parents plans til 25, money for community clinics, medical records technology, and interstate or portability. none of this cost money with the exception of money for clinics.
I am a Democrat and even I think the Dems are making huge mistake in doing this. I voted for Obama but mane you best drop this idea and move on jobs.

Posted by: rsheppar | March 1, 2010, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Joe Pickens, no one is talking about providing health insurance for others, except the very poorest.
This bill creates a pool for those workers whose employers don’t offer insurance and those workers who are self-employed. It will simply enable them to buy insurance at an affordable rate, simply through the power of being part of a large pool of people. Just as wal-mart buys their goods at lower prices than a corner store.
The bill would do a lot of other good stuff for all of us, like prevent insurance companies from excluding or dropping you for pre-existing conditions.
All in all, this bill will make life better for those uninsured now, will keep premium prices from sky-rocketing for those who have insurance already and will stop insurance companies from discriminating against sick people. And let’s face it, tomorrow that could be you or anyone you love.

Posted by: Lydia | March 1, 2010, 11:26 am 11:26 am

WE HAVE PLANS….WE HAVE PLANS…Republicans have plans and they are? Hold off and hope they win back the House and Senate and Health Care again can be shelved. Their plan is a tax break for Health Care per Family? I am guessing if you make more money you get a higher amount each month to spend on Health Care? Sounds like a tax cut for the rich.Wake up Hospitals are losing Millions of dollars a year on charitable Health Care. For you on the right those are working people with no Health Care not Welfare people. At some point Hospitals will fail and then what?

Posted by: filbert | March 1, 2010, 11:31 am 11:31 am

I am sorry for your loss, David. I agree with jjj. Do not accuse the insurer of having killed you sister. I am assuming her insurance contract is much like mine. Then, your sister did not read her insurance contract and disclose her pre-existing condition before signing it, so there was no coverage for the condition pursuant to the very contractual terms she agreed to.
take care

Posted by: S.A. Leiseca | March 1, 2010, 11:37 am 11:37 am

Because of their role as caretakers for their elderly parents, the healthcare debate has moved many Baby Boomers, whatever their nominal political affiliation, to the Center.
Readers might find much to chew on in “A Daughter Among Daughters Reaps Scorn,” about an accountant whose life has been turned upside down by her decision to care for her aged Mom and Dad:
“When her elderly parents became ill, she gave up her job, her security, and her comfortable middle-class existence. If something isn’t done soon, she says, Baby Boomers will become the New Poor.”
(Dr. Ellen Brandt is founder of the Centrists Group at Linked In and the BoomerNetwork, IvyLeague, and Centrists Twibes at Twitter)

Posted by: Dr. Ellen Brandt | March 1, 2010, 11:45 am 11:45 am

If any of you who write these messages cannot afford health care then you should be receiving Medicaid. And, if you do receive Medicaid or you are on Medicare, you would know that government health care sucks. If health care reform passes and is run by the government, then this too will be the circus that Medicaid, Medicare, Post office, Social Security and any other government run entity is and endures. Wake up America competition is the only tactic that makes runners run faster. Otherwise, they lose..

Posted by: B. Robert | March 1, 2010, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Why would anyone want Health Care Reform that not one of your representatives has read and digested completely. Not one I repeat NOT ONE regardless of party can swear or state that they have read the complete bill. That being said remember what we the American Citizen got the last time this happened?? The Patriot Act read it sometime It will scare you to death but anyway if the Demos or the Repubos are going to pass this piece of junk bill then I will vote against any incumbent in Nov 2010 regardless of their party. Of course that will be like shutting the door after the cow is out of the barn. But None of them deserve to serve another term. NONE OF THEM FROM TOP TO BOTTOM

Posted by: BJ | March 1, 2010, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Attention Democrats its the Economy and Unemployment, if you can’t afford to eat health care isn’t important. People with jobs can buy health care.

Posted by: John | March 1, 2010, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

Jim Hanson wrote:
“why are people against this?”
Because they are smart enough to realize that Obama is selling a blue sky.
None of the Democratic plans (the House bill, the Senate bill, the Obama plan) will do what they are advertised to do.
Americans recognize lies and smokescreens, and you wonder why they don’t just mindlessly buy into it. That’s why.

Posted by: Joe White | March 1, 2010, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Just pass the bill…this is not a ram-job…most of what is in the bill is GOP and Demo…pre-sponsored ideas…GOP STOP the act…Demo’s have the (B—’s)get it done….Work for the People…not Business…We the People will make the change if you refuse to act.

Posted by: Mark | March 1, 2010, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

until they get to work and do something lets suspend their health care benifits and let the chips fall where they may if the congress and senetors had something to lose maybe they would quit playing the political games and do what they are elected to do represent us.

Posted by: corinne | March 1, 2010, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Sorry, but the Republicans don’t care, and just don’t want you having government-assisted healthcare. Need to work on getting them thrown out.

Posted by: Jenn | March 1, 2010, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

What we need is jobs.

Posted by: merlionasfriend | March 1, 2010, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

You need to reform everything at once. IF we just force the insurance companies to take on client with preexisting conditions without mandating coverage for most the population, premiums will sky rocket because the majority of the insured pool will be high risk. We need to spread the risk by insuring everyone; health and not so healthy. This is how employer based systems work and how auto insurance is so affordable. if only people who could afford auto insurance paid for it, then premiums would be ridiculous!
I say we need this. Let give it a try. We need to try something and it needs to be comprehensive in my opinion.

Posted by: as | March 1, 2010, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Health Care reform for America NOW !
Never mind the Party of NO !
Let’s Go Forward !

Posted by: PulSamsara | March 1, 2010, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

One thing that you can count on is that American’s can be easily scared. We in no doubt need Health care reform than anything else in our current state of affairs. The wars are secondary to this issue.
If we don’t do anything then 100% of the population will see health care premiums double in the next 4 years. 100%!!! Republicans are worried that 15% of the population may have minimal health care premium increases if this bill is passed. Guest what? That is a great sucess in itself.
You guys complain about jobs. Well if you lower health care costs and in turn premiums that is substantial money saved by all business across the board. As a physician and a small business owner, nothing would make me happier to see health care be reformed and help stimulate all our businesses across the board.
As an ex-Republican and campaigner for Bush Sr., I can firmly attest that the GOP has gotten off the tracks and if we follow their policy or ideas… we are done for as a great nation.

Posted by: tylerkad | March 1, 2010, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

The current proposed legislation should not be pushed through. It appears then that it about winning and not about what is right or what will work for this country. Regardless of political party, their are two sides to each story. So many of us fail to see that and can only view things in a partisan way. We should be working together to represent all people in this country to do what is best for all of us. I am a Republican and I care about people and want to help people. I just want to make sure that we eliminate the waste and that we fix the corruption instead of slapping a band aid on top of everything because we all know the band aid will end up eventually falling off.

Posted by: Erin | March 1, 2010, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

I don’t understand the mentality that says “just pass anything.” We need healthcare reform that works, that works for all of us. We need healthcare reform that is BETTER than what we already have. Frankly, I think neither congress or the president just aren’t smart enough smart enough to come up with the solutions. Only a few of them have medical degrees and it is obvious that even they can’t agree on the simplest trivia. To Congress I say start over. To the President I say polish up that peace prize – there’s a healthcare war in this country and you obvious aren’t listening to anyone.

Posted by: TheBon | March 1, 2010, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Which is why Obama needs to have a back-up bill, something dramatically scaled-back, ready to be on the table by the end of the month if nothing gets done. Carville is right in that something has to get passed to avert disaster.

Posted by: matt | March 1, 2010, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

The Democratic bill has NOTHING to do with reform and EVERYTHING to do with CONTROL of health care. It doesn’t take a math wiz to figure out the Dems are lying through their teeth about the cost of this bill.

Posted by: GarandFan | March 1, 2010, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

You know, people get sick, and whether or not they can afford expensive treatments currently depends on whether they can afford to pay for those treatments. So those who work hard, save their money, and don’t live beyond their means are at an advantage over those who “can’t afford” health care. And in some ways, we have the best health care system in the world, in that the best treatments are available for some. People come from all over the world to take advantage of those treatments. Some would prefer it if a government bureaucracy were given the power to decide who receives medical treatment and what type of treatment they receive. Under that type of system, you can be assured that in a short period of time, everyone will be entitled to receive whatever mediocre care is still available, if they don’t die first waiting for their turn. We can fix the system we have, and preserve the good parts of it, without transforming it into the type of system the extreme left is determined to get.

Posted by: mbs | March 1, 2010, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Opposition to this bill is not – IS NOT – expressing a desire to do NOthing. It is a call to do the RIGHT reform, the RIGHT way, for the RIGHT price.
After watching the way the government works when just trying to PASS health care laws, how much confidence do you have in their competence to MANAGE it when your well-being is in their hands?

Posted by: The Schaef | March 1, 2010, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

I am a cancer survivor, so this issue definitely hits home for me. I think everyone needs to have insurance coverage.
The problem is that nothing is free. If you want health care for everyone, you have to find a way to pay for it. In European countries like Greece, where the government pays for everything, they are now having financial crisis – Greece is going bankrupt. In Great Britain, there are growing problems with paying for entitlements.
We need health care reform, but we should do it in ways that will help people without breaking the bank. Obamacare doesn’t do that.
Some GOP ideas that make sense but which Obama and the Dems don’t want:
1) Tort Reform. In states where they’ve done this (Texas, Tennessee) they’ve seen dramatic lowering of health insurance costs. I’ve priced how much it would cost me to have insurance in Texas vs. New Jersey – and my premiums in Texas would be about half what I would have to pay in NJ.
2) Allowing people to buy insurance across state lines.
3) Give individuals the same tax breaks for having their own insurance that companies now have. This would give people portable insurance that is not dependent on their employer. Under the current system, if you get cancer and you get fired, you could lose your insurance because your next employer’s insurance could refuse to cover you. But if you were able to maintain your own private policy, then you would not see interruption of insurance coverage.
4) Using health savings accounts. In Indiana, under Republican Govenor Mitch Daniels, they’ve tried a program where workers are GIVEN almost $3000 a year in a health savings account that they can use for health care – whatever they don’t use by the end of the year, they can keep; if they have a critical illness, they pay a percentage below a ceiling of $8000; after that, the government covers it. This has apparently dramatically lowered medical costs in the state. We could try something similar as a safety net for those who, despite lowering of premiums, etc., still could not afford insurance.
Of course it should be illegal for insurance companies to drop someone because they get sick… HOWEVER, people need to get insurance BEFORE they get sick. That is just personal responsibility.

Posted by: Shefali | March 1, 2010, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm

GREAT POST wantingbalance!

Posted by: Looking for Sanity | March 1, 2010, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

This joke of a bill wont do anything but break our backs.
The evil socialist Democrats are only concerned with creating their leftist socialist utopia.
Thats waht this bill is aboout. It wont lower costs for anyone.
My insurance premiums are just fine, so stay out of my pocket.

Posted by: ObamaMarxist | March 1, 2010, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

The problem is – we have an enormously over regulated health care system, frivolous medical lawsuits, government run systems that are over flowing and under budgeted, and an insurance industry that is grossly mismanaged and bloated. The poor say “we can’t afford it!”, the middle class says, “We aren’t paying for you and us too!” and the rich – well the rich don’t give a damn.
Why not create a bunch of government run and managed Hospitals and medical clinics? The doctors and nurses and all the employees are government employed. All medicines are generic brands. All patients get treatment for FREE.
Will it be sub-standard healthcare? Yes. But beggars can’t be choosers. VA Hospitals are run this way – they seem to be working.
Only 15% of the population does not have any health care right now.
I will say this – I am tired of hearing from people who cannot provide for themselves and their own wanting to be provided for by the rest of us. I have my own responsibilities and worries, I cannot take on your responsibilities and worries too.

Posted by: MMax | March 1, 2010, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

“I’m personally losing years off my life because I cannot afford to go for diabetes checkups…
Posted by: paintpaintpaint”
Well we need to get this passed now so that you can check with the legislative bodies and determine if you qualify for a test in 2014… hope you’ve got some plan to ge through the next 4 years (or more) witht he nothing this bill provides.
Oh, and the bill will require you to buy approved health insurance (not give everyone insurance for free) so you may end up paying more… actually you almost certainly will.
But hey, you’ll pay more, get less, wait in more lines, and have to wait 4 years for it to start. I can see why you’re excited.

Posted by: Ertdfg | March 1, 2010, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

The USA leads the world in medical innovation. Yes, we pay for it too.
We could have the same system that everyone else has except, the other systems don’t have near the innovations but they are able to buy from us.
If we put a similar system in place, where are we going to buy the new, life-saving innovations?

Posted by: KevinBoston | March 1, 2010, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

David I’m sorry for your loss, but really in what nation do you believe she would have a better chance? China, North Korea,Cuba, Greece, Venezuela. Don’t blame Democrats or Republicans or even America. A best friend lost both legs but doctors here saved his life. Another survived combat with a steel plate in his skull because of the skill and equipment available here. This is not free or even cheap but it is available almost anywhere in this country. Yes much needs to be improved but the Federal Government as a practitioner is not the answer. Think about federal programs you have had to deal with, did you really look forward to doing so, and where you treated has anything but a number. April really a good month for you? I don’t think so. I do not want people like Nancy Pelosi H Reid, or C Rangel controlling my health care. We as a Nation deserve better but friend it is not free, never was, and never will be. But be sure bankrupt this nation with giveaways and everyone but the Elitists will lose.

Posted by: Rock | March 1, 2010, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

The gov’t already pays about 50% of the healthcare costs and the costs have been going up.
Why would the costs suddenly go down if the gov’t paid more of a portion of healthcare? This makes no sense.
And what gov’t model are we supposed to look to that shows cost controls that are better than what is in private sector?
$40,000 in taxpayer money for every clunker that was traded in? Why does it cost $40,000 to give someone $10,000?
How about that great stimulus success story where it cost about $50,000 to provide a few thousand dollars worth of winterization to each home that used the Obama winterization program?
There are countless examples of gov’t costing more than expected. Where are the examples of gov’t run anything that is more efficient???? There aren’t any.

Posted by: KevinBoston | March 1, 2010, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

Every single person who is posting here who is pro Obama care are exactly what is wrong with this country….every single one of you are spongers who want and demand that the “government”..that would be your neighbor who actually works…pay for and support you and your family. And the only ones out of control in this country is the anti-American president and his Marxist cronies. If you don’t like the coverage or care you get from your Insurance company..get another..that is how free market works…if you don’t like how government care works then you can do NOTHING! Oh here is a fact to chew on…Medicare (that’s government care!) turns down 5x as many requests/claims as any private insurance company. So maybe you all better get some facts and quit spouting your uninformed opinions. It is as simple as that. Oh and by the way..I lived in the UK and Canada..and having “insurance” sure as heck did NOT translate into getting ANY health care.

Posted by: Shivers | March 1, 2010, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

Go Shivers!
Don’t forget the enormous cost of providing healthcare to people in this country illegally. Sure they may not get the best preventive care, but when illegal immigrants need emergency care, they get it and we pay for it.
Rather than acknowledge this, we hear this baloney that greedy insurance companies are making the costs go up to pay for their mansions.
Grow up. If the health insurance industry is so lucrative and you can raise prices on customers any time you want, why don’t the labor unions start their own insurance company?
Then they could make some of this unfair easy money and either give it back to their members or they could use it to spend more on democrat hack politicians.

Posted by: KevinBoston | March 1, 2010, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Since when is a need a right? Why not have a national housing bill? We all need shelter. How about a national car bill? Most Americans (unless they live in big cities) need a car. How about a national food bill? We all need to eat. All these are needs, but they aren’t a right–unless you live in a Socialist country such as the former Soviet Union. As someone else said, the biggest issue is cost. Let’s take care of that first. Then let’s move on coverage. By cost I mean of course, the Tort Reform. Getting the mostly Democrat ambulance chasing lawyers to end the ridiculous law suits that cost billions of dollars and drive up malpractice insurance.

Posted by: oldpapajoe | March 1, 2010, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

“What you have is an irresponsible generation in the Baby Boomers …..”
My gosh, what a broad statement.
Why is it that some think people in need who have lost their jobs & are depserately looking for one are “irresponsible”, who don’t have health care because maybe they lost their job or are ill & simply can’t afford the premiums are “irrespondible”.
Boggles the mind …..
I’m not talking about myself, in fact a baby boomer, who has worked all her life & is still working & thankful I have a job.

Posted by: Linda | March 1, 2010, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

Just cover your ears and keep blaming George Bush. Oh, and “the rich.”

Posted by: Jim | March 1, 2010, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

So we get a choice between:
1. The Democrats can’t govern, and
2. The Democrats can govern badly.
How about a 3rd choice (and I know this sounds crazy):
3. The Democrats actually listen to the American People, dump Obamacare in its present form and tackle reforming healthcare piece by piece working in a bipartisan manner with Republicans.
Have we sunken to the point where the Democrats will ram through an unpopular bill American doesn’t want JUST so they can look like “winners”?
God help us.

Posted by: Bill Mitchell | March 1, 2010, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

The US Healthcare System is NOT the best in the world.
Among industrialised nations it is the most expensive – does that make it the best?
Among industrialised nations it ranks as the worst, with the UK’s NHS ranking as the best.
The UK’s health care system provides universal coverage from conception to the grave at no cost at point of delivery.
The US health system denies care to 50,000,000 citizens. Does its ‘lesser eligibility’ barrier to 50 Million make it the best in the world?
The US healthcare system loses 1000,000 patients a year to medical errors, and even more to malpractice, cross-infection, and sloppy standards of care and oversight. Do these make it the best in the world?
Anyone that believes that the US healthcare is the best in the world knows nothing about either the US’s badly broken and inadequate Systems, and even less about the Socialised Healthcare systems in the UK, Europe, Canada, and Australia that not only outperform the US systems at every level, but cost only one third to one half of the cost of operating the US’s badly managed systems.
The UK NHS has a standard fee for ANY prescription drug, free prescriptions for children under 18, people over 60, and for any with chronic or terminal conditions.
I have 45 years experience under the UK NHS and 10 years experience under the US HMO bureaucratic systems and I can tell you that the difference is as that between night and day.
The ‘waiting time’ myth about waiting weeks, months, or years for life saving medical and surgical procedures in the UK is exactly that – a myth. That was true under the Tories [Republican type stick-in-the-muds], but that was swiftly reversed under Blair’s New Labour government, and remains the best in the world, bar none!
The real question about universal health care in any nation boils down to two reconcileable positions:
1. Should every US citizen be afforded access to the best medical care available, or left to rot and die, and
2. Should the ability to pay inflated prices for inferior care determined by vested interests that seek to maximise their profits at the expense of the sick, disabled, and vulnerable [the actual death panels!] be the sole consideration in whether a needy person can see a doctor for themselves and their ailing babies, elderly, etc?
In short, is it humanity or profitability that should determine which Americans can get the treatments and meds they need and who cannot get the necessary access to healthcare in the Healthcare Systems in what the deluded believe is the greatest country in the world?
Thou art weighed in the balance and found wanting.

Posted by: Hassim Ha-nasi | March 1, 2010, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

Talk about working on something that is at the bottom of the priority list. Mr Odumba.
Mr. obama is nothing more that a petulant spoiled child and needs to be treated as such. it’s time for your nap little boy. Here is a glass of warm milk and a cookie. When you go outside to play later, remember to stay out of the street and come in before dark. You have school tomorrow young man. (Note: lower case O is on purpose).

Posted by: voted against carter | March 1, 2010, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

A lot of misinformation. The Republicans understand that we all want health care change–JUST NOT THIS 2500 PLUS PAGE BILL THAT NO ONE HAS A CLUE AS TO THE CONTENT!
The Dems keep trying to pass a terrible bill that will bankrupt and divide out country. The republicans are pragmatic in that they understand we must have competition across state lines and rein in lawyer costs with tort reform. WE ALL WANT HEALTH CARE REFORM–NOT THIS HEALTH CARE BILL. Obama is slippery and tries to pass the buck but he owns it!

Posted by: Jim | March 1, 2010, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

FEDUP WROTE:
My annual Social Security statement warns that program will be belly up by 2037. End all these socialist inspired entitlement programs now.
There is nothing wrong with socialism, you simply do not understand it.
You are clearly not a Military Veteran or else you would not want to demolish the socialistic VA admin programmes.
You are clearly not a widow or widower or you would not be shouting to demolish socialistic Survivor benefits.
You are clearly not retired of you would not be calling for immediate termination of socialistic retirement benefits.
You are clearly not a person entitled by law nor requiring access on grounds of low income to any of the 100 plus socialistic welfare benefits such as, unemployment benefit, disability, income supplement, maternity benefit, Medicare, Medicaid, retirement benefits, housing benefits, homeless benefits, disabled children’s benefits, benefits for people with intellectual disabilities,
The original socialistic Social Security Act was enacted in1935 and the current version of the Act, encompass several socialistic social welfare and socialistic social insurance programs.
Federal Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance, Unemployment benefits, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, Health Insurance for Aged and Disabled (Medicare), Grants to States for Medical Assistance Programs (Medicaid), State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP), Supplemental Security Income (SSI)
U.S. Social Security is a socialist insurance program funded through dedicated payroll taxes called Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA). Tax deposits are formally entrusted to the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund, the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund, the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund, or the Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund. The main part of the program is sometimes Old Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance, Retirement, Survivors, and Disability Insurance.
When initially signed into law by Roosevelt in 1935 as part of his New Deal, the term Social Security covered unemployment insurance as well. The term, refers to benefits for retirement, disability, survivorship, and death, which are the four main benefits provided by traditional private-sector pension plans. Reckoned by the annual dollar payouts, the socialist U.S. Social Security program is the largest government program in the world and the single greatest expenditure in the federal budget, with 20.8% for social security, compared to 20.5% for discretionary defense and 20.1% for Medicare/Medicaid.
Social Security is currently the largest social insurance program in the U.S., constituting 37% of government expenditure and 7% of the gross domestic product and is currently estimated to keep roughly 40% of all Americans age 65 or older out of poverty.
And youi want to pull the rug out from under Americans that need it and consign the to your Palin Death Panel?
That kind of dollar-sign mentality is what is rotten in America.
You could save money by stopping every cent of socialist benefits, and rounding up the deprived, herd them behind barbed wire fences, and ……
Get the picture?

Posted by: Hassim Ha-nasi | March 1, 2010, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

This legislation is a train wreck because the President and Congress have tried to obscure the basic choices in the legislation, and to lie about the fact there will be winners and losers. Americans know politicians are lying when they say this bill will be good for everyone and that it is solely a win-win proposition. We are tired of the arrogance and condescension. This is all about wealth redistribution.
The advantages of this program are that more people will have some type of health insurance. These people will be the winners.
However, people who have good insurance will be losers. The quality of their coverage and their health care will decline, and they will have fewer choices and less control.
The choices are clear. Do you want to have more people who have more basic care? If so, you must accept that the range of care will be limited, wait times will increase, there will be some form of rationing and limits on experimental and end of life care. Going to the doctor will be more like going to the DMV. Our current system ensures lots of innovation and medical break throughs because of the financial incentives involved, and ensures that the well insured (who are the vast majority of Americans) get state of the art care.
There are real advantages and disadvantages to Obamacare and definite winners and losers. The politicians need to stop infantilizing the public, and stop pretending this is fantasyland where more people will have even better care at less cost. This is a very generous, but also an exorbitantly expensive entitlement option. The have nots will do better, the haves will do worse. Outline the basic issues and choices, but stop treating us like we’re either stupid or ignorant children. It’s infuriating!

Posted by: Chad | March 1, 2010, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

“but added that the Republicans aren’t safe from blow back for blocking the bill,”
Quit pushing this lie. Democrats had a super majority!!! Get your own party in line.
Republicans are in favor of smaller government and lowering costs. This bill is the opposite of that!

Posted by: SA | March 1, 2010, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

This bill and the way the Dems have handled it proves their only goal is complete control of the American economy. If you think this will make things better, READ the bill. Everything Obama said during the campaign was a lie – he has done just the opposite. The good news is that if they jam this through, the Democrat party may be destroyed for years to come.

Posted by: Planner | March 1, 2010, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

Why was it I never heard of this healthcare crisis until the 2008 election? I am saddened thet we have a country full of irresponsible dolts who only want to take, take, take from others. I go to the doctor a couple of times a year and guess what? It only costs 80.00 dollars for each visit, I also carry MY OWN CATASTROPHIC HEALTH INSURANCE. Buy your own insurance like I do mine, the crisis here is the entitlement mentality and it is sickening. Equal opportunity is promised not equal outcome. Government is not a charitable organization, it steals money from some to give to others, that is not charity that is THEFT!

Posted by: Michelle | March 1, 2010, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

That piece Jake did was totally ONE-SIDED, as was the beginning of your interview with Mc Cain.
Please do not pretend to be doing news. You need to either do a disclaimer or have an animation with the US middle class drowning in $5,500,000,000 of new debt to illustrate the other side of the health plan.
I am extremely disappointed . I expected fairer reporting by GMA.

Posted by: 2 sides | March 1, 2010, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

How is that universal health care gig going in MA? I was just reading where they have the highest insurance premiums in the nation, and it is going broke.
TN had a go at it few years back, and they too are now busted out.
TANSTAAFL, face it citizens, the US is going to hell in a hand basket, and we are now on steroids racing to that end.
All this socialist entitlement chit sounded great decades ago when first implemented, but the Piper now wants his pay.
Every damn economic and fiscal problem, from fenderal, state and local level, was brought to us by the damned government. The road to hell is always paved with good intentions.

Posted by: Travis | March 2, 2010, 2:34 am 2:34 am

Its too bad the WH is determined to blow it’s political capital on bad HC bills. Good ways to go forward would be very easy to follow, like scrapping the HC bills and doing a step-by-step approach. Instead, a stubborn clinging to rejected ideas has caused a loss of trust and good will of the American electorate; trust betrayed is almost impossible to regain.

Posted by: Prudence | March 2, 2010, 5:33 am 5:33 am

James Carville sounds more like his “lovely” wife, Mary Matilan. He sure isn’t the same “fire in the belly” kind of guy he was when he worked for Bill Clinton. Now he is just another blathering talking head.

Posted by: findlayway | March 2, 2010, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

==========================
It’s too late for Obama to gain any political capital on Healthcare. It’s been ugly, compromised and nationally divisive.
==========================
Ending the healthcare debate is like waiting for the end of a nasty root canal procedure.
==========================
Obama won’t gain any legacy. It will collect taxes the remaining 3 years of his one-term presidency with no benefits to Americans. And the next president and congress will rip it out because of the pain inflicted on the American people.
==========================

Posted by: N Waff | March 3, 2010, 10:58 am 10:58 am

deal with the legislation to eliminate rejection for pre-existing conditions and cancellations when you actually get sick. Do some thing about the constant denial of coverage- Pass something NOW
Go back with a bill for universal single payer coverage, like the rest of the free world has, at a latter time.
Sure the insurance companies will throw their millions at it. It puts them out of business, as most of them deserve for the way they have done business up to now. One grows tired of hearing from these multi-million dollar CEO s that we are wrong and they are not crooks

Posted by: 1tourist | March 3, 2010, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

How soon will the measure be having a nice house, car and health care, be the mark of the upper class?

Posted by: 1tourist | March 3, 2010, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Senator Byrd, a Democrat who wrote the Reconciliation rule, says it should not be used for passing Obamacare.
But Democrats will go ahead and misuse the rule anyway.

Posted by: Joe White | March 3, 2010, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

It could be said that President Obama passing health care could be the Republicans “waterloo”! They are so afraid of this healthcare reform becoming really popular like SSI and Medicare!

Posted by: jas | March 3, 2010, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

I’m jumping off this democrat ship, whoever thinks the government can run healtcare is a fool, like government bureaucrats are going to be better than insurance bureaucrats. ye right. We’re supposed to believe we cant cover 30 million more people without changing the whole system into an entitlement program? And in a few years when costs of this is spiraling out of control then how do they contain costs? Is it fair for taxpayers to have to pay more for someone who doesnt control their body fat or smokes and gets cancer? Does that not pit citizen versus citizen in the long run? Doctors beholding to govt standards will they have to report your BFI to your govt helthcare rep in Washington? Is it “fair” for me to get to smoke and eat ice cream all day driving up healthcare costs hence increasing your tax responsibility? This Reform bill is Big Brother not healtcare reform so be careful what you wish for!

Posted by: john | March 4, 2010, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

nice article!

Posted by: UncleSaw | March 5, 2010, 9:48 am 9:48 am

rsheppar, you sound just like a republican.

Posted by: Stella | March 9, 2010, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.