By Jacqueline Klingebiel

Mar 14, 2010 11:08am

Graham to Axelrod: American People ‘Tired of This Crap’

Republican Senator Lindsey Graham dismissed White House Senior Adviser David Axelrod’s health care reform comments on “This Week” as campaign “spin” and that the “American people are getting tired of this crap.”  In my “This Week” interview with Graham, he told me that if Democrats pass health care reform using reconciliation, “it's going to poison the well for anything else they would like to achieve this year or thereafter.”

Graham also warned that “There will be a price to be paid to jam a bill through, the American People don’t like, using a sleazy process.

Watch video HERE:

Read full exchange HERE:

TAPPER:  And joining me now from Clemson, South Carolina is Republican Senator Lindsey Graham.  Senator Graham, thanks so much for joining us.

GRAHAM:  Thank you, Jake.  Good to be with you. 

TAPPER:  Now you have said that if the Democrats use reconciliation to pass the fixes to the Senate bill, it will be catastrophic to attempts to have any sort of bipartisan cooperation.  But you have voted for reconciliation in the past when Republicans were in the majority, the 2003 Bush tax cuts, more than $300 billion worth in the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 which slowed the growth of Medicare.

Those votes seemed to pass without catastrophe.  So why has this changed?

GRAHAM:  Well, number one, they related to income and spending.  And this is one-sixth of the economy about to be affected here.  Under reconciliation, you can't make any changes to Social Security because Senator Byrd understood it was never meant to be used for a purpose like this. 

Senator Byrd said you couldn't pass Senator — President Clinton's health care plan through reconciliation.  It was never meant — and you can repeal the Bush tax cuts if you don't like it.  If they use this device called reconciliation to deal out Republicans, it will open up Pandora's box. 

And the interview I just heard is spin, campaigning.  I thought the campaigning was over.  Are you trying to tell me and the American people that Scott Brown got elected campaigning against a Washington bill that really is just like the Massachusetts bill?

The American people are getting tired of this crap.  No way in the world is what they did in Massachusetts like what we're about to do in Washington.  We didn't cut Medicare — they didn't cut Medicare when they passed the bill in Massachusetts.  They didn't raise $500 billion on the American people when they passed the bill in Massachusetts. 

To suggest that Scott Brown is basically campaigning against the bill in Washington that is like the one in Massachusetts is complete spin.  I've been in bipartisan deals, I was in the "gang of 14" to stop the Senate from blowing up when the Republicans wanted to change the rules and use the majority vote to get judges through. 

If they do this, it's going to poison the well for anything else they would like to achieve this year or thereafter. 

User Comments

AMEN!

Posted by: cindy | March 14, 2010, 11:09 am 11:09 am

We tired of Graham’s obfuscation and worse. Best he stay of the air and let the public guess what he’s up to. As one who attended Court Marshals and was a serving officer in Armour before he was out of knee pants, I’m appalled at what has become of our GOP if he is a “moderate”. Tell him they can’t make the Poor into Sharecroppers again ! It is 2010, and democracy lives by truth in face od corporatocracy’s would-be takeover !

Posted by: John Buchanan | March 14, 2010, 11:19 am 11:19 am

TAPPER: Now you have said that if the Democrats use reconciliation to pass the fixes to the Senate bill, it will be catastrophic to attempts to have any sort of bipartisan cooperation. But you have voted for reconciliation in the past when Republicans were in the majority, the 2003 Bush tax cuts, more than $300 billion worth in the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 which slowed the growth of Medicare.
————————–
Translation: It is ok when the GOP does it but not ok when the Democrats do it.
I just read a lengthy artical in the San Antonio Express about the hell the uninsured and the underinsured go through when they are sick especially the way they are trated in ER.
What strikes me is that only the insured (hamsomely so) oppose health care reform. The uninsured/underinsured are saving their sayso for 11/2010.

Posted by: Bob Ramos | March 14, 2010, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Right on, I am sick and tired of the no party, no to everything except corp profits in the phony wars we are in. The funny part is the people making the most money on the wars are the very same ones that got deferments for Vietnam, yellow bellied cowards and chicken hawks. Push the health care through no matter what then send in the undercover spies to arrest the crooks stealing from Medicare etc.

Posted by: greg | March 14, 2010, 11:28 am 11:28 am

I live in Texas. if you’re sick you show up at the emergency and get treated. I just broke my arm with no insurance. Within one week I had the operation, with no insurance, no medicaid …..nothing.
It’s bull that you get mistreated at hospitals in Tx if you don’t have insurance.

Posted by: Bob | March 14, 2010, 11:34 am 11:34 am

It’s one lie or distortion after another with the Republicans. First it was death panels, still being promoted by the likes of Sarah Palin and then this bogus nonsense about cutting Medicare. The facts are that private Medicare insurance plans are being paid a higher premium by the federal government than the premiums paid by those who participate in the government Medicare program. In short, what the Republicans are advocating is that we continue to use $500 billion of taxpayers money to enrich insurance companies and their executives. Sound familiar?

Posted by: Stuart | March 14, 2010, 11:35 am 11:35 am

Where is the Axelrod part of this rebuttal? I guess it’s okay to report on the GOP side but heaven forbid balancing the equation!

Posted by: danny6114 | March 14, 2010, 11:35 am 11:35 am

Republicans keep saying “the American people” don’t want this bill and that is an inaccurate statement. I want the bill and I want it now. I don’t want or like to see grown men and women in Congress and the House fighting like children. It seems Republicans do not want anything our President wants. President Obama, has reached out to the Republicans and they said “No” you throw your proposal out and let’s start over. That does not sound like Republicans want to work with the President.

Posted by: Ernestine Gordon | March 14, 2010, 11:36 am 11:36 am

Right on, Bob. I live in TX also and have never had any trouble or been mistreated when I’ve had to go to the emergency. Most people where I’m from don’t have insurance. The emergency room is jam packed and everyone is treated with respect and if need be are admitted. I just spent 10 days in the hospital with no insurance. the doctor’s refused to let me go until they had run every test to could to determine what was causing my health problem. I had no insurance and am not covered under medicaid or any govt. program. My hats off to all the folks at the hospital. It’s a shame the San Antonio Express would run a hit piece on treatment of non insured patients.

Posted by: Jill | March 14, 2010, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Republicans keep saying “the American people” don’t want this bill and that is an inaccurate statement. I want the bill and I want it now. I don’t want or like to see grown men and women in Congress and the House fighting like children. It seems Republicans do not want anything our President wants. President Obama, has reached out to the Republicans and they said “No” you throw your proposal out and let’s start over. That does not sound like Republicans want to work with the President.
Posted by: Ernestine Gordon | Mar 14, 2010 11:36:56 AM
————————————–
You want this bill so much, can you tell me what’s in it? YOU don’t know, you are thinking of yourself and not the future! You are the American obama refers to when he says, “if I tell them what they want, they will want it”

Posted by: Nancy | March 14, 2010, 11:40 am 11:40 am

Back up Ernestine — you’re not being the least bit honest. After a year behind closed doors after Pelosi & Reid decided to pander to their left fringe and exclude Republicans, the President played a political game trying to make them look like obstructionists.
Danny–the videos are both there. Axelrod is a heck of a spinmeister.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 11:41 am 11:41 am

Lindsay Graham, you are so right. The American people are fed up with all this crap. Look at the mess the right-wingers have engineered over the last 40 years. The economy is trashed as is education. 15 million unemployed Americans with 40 million living in poverty and 50 million without healthcare. (Notice I did NOT say “affordable” healthcare.)
So what’s a good neo-con/reganite to do? You have two choices.
One is to continue your obstruction of reform. You and your party cannot conceivably embrace reform because that is an admission your philosophy and policies are undeniable failures. But you guys would rather go down with a sinking ship and take all of us with you, wouldn’t you. Better to reign in hell mentality.
Your second option is to resign, admit your philosophy is a failure. Admit you don’t have any solutions for the problems the GOP have caused. Admit you don’t want to have anything to do with building up America instead of tearing it down. But be man enough to stay out of the way while good Americans rebuild what the right-wingers have destroyed.
It’s up to you, embarrassment to humanity. Crap or get off the pot.

Posted by: Nova B | March 14, 2010, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Too many people feel they are owed by the government. The US government owes nobody any freebees. Health care is not a right it is a responsibility. How about people stop having kids they cannot afford. That is not a right; it is a responsibility for people to not live beyond their means. If you cannot afford children don’t have them. Get rid or change citizen by birth. No where in the constitution does it say we the people should get as many hand out from the government as we want or need. There are certain situations and time that people should get free health care. I do not want to see lazy welfare leaches milking the system any more. Illegal, I said illegal immigrants should get the emergency care and then a ride to the border or airport and sent on their way, extended or long term care is out of the question. If I have to take a drug test to work at my job then people should have to take drug tests to get the free medical care and welfare too. Unhealthy lifestyles should be scrutinized and people should get mitigated recourses because they are fat, drunks, or they smoke. Prevention is a great way to save money.

Posted by: C | March 14, 2010, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Maybe I spend too much time on internet but seems that by 7-3 margin they all want passage even with warts.
The sad irony is that by passing something, it gurantees that the other party (in this case repubs) will be forced to repeal/come up with something better 2 years from now.
And poisioning the water is almost insulting I think. Pretty clear from past 14 months Repubs intend on nothing happening. Don’t give Obama anything mandate is already in full force.

Posted by: Craig | March 14, 2010, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Let me ask everyone who thinks the insurance companies are evil because they don’t cover pre-existing conditions this question.
If you owned an auto insurance company, and someone that didn’t have auto insurance came to you and said, “I just cracked up my car last week, will you sell me auto insurance today and fix my car that is already damaged?”
Anyone with a brain would say, sorry, we can sell you insurance, but you cracked up your car BEFORE you had insurance.
Now, should there be a way to take care of people who lose their insurance and have a pre-existing condition, yes, but if this bill was what the american people truly wanted, it would have passed months ago, before the super majority was lost.
Had the democrats not been so arrogant with their majority from the beginning and sincerely tried to pass a bill both parties and the american people could stand behind, they wouldn’t be in the position they are in today,

Posted by: Donald Dziatkiewicz | March 14, 2010, 11:47 am 11:47 am

“Americans are tired of this crap?,,,He got ran out of…” I am tired of our country’s legislative poor English language skills. In California a large percentage of college freshmen are taking remedial English and math classes, perhaps Freshman Senators should be required to study basic English grammar before representing the American people before the ears of the world!

Posted by: Lynn Lautze Fonseca | March 14, 2010, 11:47 am 11:47 am

I was happier with Graham’s remarks today than I usually am.
For once, the Republican was able to respond to the Democrat Axelrod without the non-stop interruption of the Axelrod “types.”
Axelrod was all around the immigration issue. We are all really stupid if we don’t know by now that the illegals are going to have full access to the health care that may pass.
This will be the way the Dems will get the Guitierez
vote.
What a joke with the arm-twisting, bribes, threats against the members of their own party.
Corruption has not stopped — and this President made promises that he never intended to keep.
He is the ultimate deceiver with a personal, selfish agenda.
Don’t respond with comments about the last 8 years….I was never happy with the Bush administration. One reason was that they did not enforce the laws. The border should have been a border.
What is it that lawmakers don’t get about ILLEGAL?
Bad message to reward people who break the law.

Posted by: PC | March 14, 2010, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Bob Ramos…I live in tx and whatever you read in the San Antonio Express was not true. It takes a long time to be treated, but eventually everyone is treated with or without insurance. you don’t get special treatment if you have insurance. I’ve had insurance and now no longer have insurance and believe me the treatment is the same and it’s the best there is. If you need an operation you get it even if you have no way to pay for it. they give you the operation and worry about whether you can pay for it later. The hospital won’t put a band aid on you and send you out the door. That’s balony.

Posted by: Drew | March 14, 2010, 11:49 am 11:49 am

Poison the well indeed. He should know as it was the GOP who poisoned the well on this issue to begin with.

Posted by: Tom | March 14, 2010, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Not true, Bob. I am self-insured. I planned and saved and I don’t want insurance. I’m sure there are alot of people in the 30M that are like me — don’t have insurance — don’t want insurance — don’t want the government to tell me I do.
I also know that the target shouldn’t be the insurance companies. Further, when we are experiencing a doctor shortage already, giving free healthcare to 30,000,000 — oh, 29,999,999, not counting me, will tank the system.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 11:51 am 11:51 am

@mitchcove
Make that 29,999,998. I am in the same boat and I certainly don’t want anyone telling me I can’t do what works right for me.
It is cheaper for me to be self-insured, I get to negotiate with doctors and control my own healthcare destiny. Guess that’s not okay anymore and I have to be part of the “poor, injured americans” who have no healthcare.

Posted by: Nancy | March 14, 2010, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

Actually, Mr. Graham, I am heartily sick of your crap, and that of your party.

Posted by: NovShmozKaPop | March 14, 2010, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

I would like to see Mr. Tapper or whoever hosts This Week be a lot harder on these guys. Everything that Lindsey Graham said was spin. He should be called on it. And George Will should be called to the carpet for having no shame about spinning the President’s sincere effort to work with Republicans for a year to create a bi-partisan healthcare bill as being inept about message. Soooooo annoying!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Sarah Patrick | March 14, 2010, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Drew wrote…”I live in tx I’ve had insurance and now no longer have insurance and believe me the treatment is the same and it’s the best there is”
But I have to pay through MY insurance for YOU.

Posted by: Clint-Houston | March 14, 2010, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

By the numbers, insurance companies earn less than 5%, pay out 85% of what they take in, and their payouts are a fraction of what an individual would pay — Obama’s scapegoats reduce the overall cost of healthcare for their subscribers. History is littered with leaders that used scapegoating to deflect blame from themselves.
The best thing we could do for insurance rates is to work on jobs. Unemployment poisons the risk pool. Then get Healthcare savings accounts in place so people have a motivation to negotiate healthcare costs down.
We can do so much before letting the Democrats screw up another industry.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

Mr. Bush said that he is the best man to work on both sides of the aisle during his election and that he will bring togetherness and decency to the White House, then when he left office, you all know what happens.
Mr. Obama said that he will bring change and decency and togetherness during his election and that both sides of the aisle will come together under him, then when he’s in office, you all know what happens.

Posted by: young_voter | March 14, 2010, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

I’m sick of Republican folderal, distortion, lies, and grandstanding! All they care about is greed and power and having no government interference except that they want to tell us how to behave in our bedrooms…of course, they are exempt from any restrictions. Just a bunch of hypocrites!!!!!

Posted by: sosupernova | March 14, 2010, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

To all you people without insurance that are spouting off about how you get the best treatment etc. I PAY for my insurance through the yang-yang. One of the reasons my premiums are so high (and rising) is people like you that use the emergency room like the Drs office. Health Care Reform will mean that I may get a break, and I say pass it and to heck with what air heads say. Most of the people against it are either with the Insurance companies or dumber than a box of rocks.

Posted by: Clint-Houston | March 14, 2010, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

I don’t use emergency rooms, Clint. I don’t have to. Some of us invested, planned, and saved so we wouldn’t have to beg the government for free stuff. Others didn’t and notw want to burden our kids with the bill for a giant entitlement.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

young voter wrote”Mr. Obama said that he will bring change and decency and togetherness during his election and that both sides of the aisle will come together under him, then when he’s in office, you all know what happens”
Just shows you what a complete group of horses behinds the GOP are. They aren’t interested in what is good for America, only in destroying Obama.

Posted by: Joseph | March 14, 2010, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

To all you people without insurance that are spouting off about how you get the best treatment etc. I PAY for my insurance through the yang-yang. One of the reasons my premiums are so high (and rising) is people like you that use the emergency room like the Drs office. Health Care Reform will mean that I may get a break, and I say pass it and to heck with what air heads say. Most of the people against it are either with the Insurance companies or dumber than a box of rocks.
———————————-
Dumber than a box of rocks? Guess what, you qualify and here is why. Not only will you still be paying for those people you mention, but you will also be funding somewhere in the vacinity of 100 new government agencies and all those wonderful government benefit programs, and the pork and fat included in the bill for people who don’t live in your state, and for ………….
Who’s dumber than a box of rocks?

Posted by: Nancy | March 14, 2010, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

“I would like to see Mr. Tapper or whoever hosts This Week be a lot harder on these guys. Everything that Lindsey Graham said was spin. He should be called on it. And George Will should be called to the carpet for having no shame about spinning the President’s sincere effort to work with Republicans for a year to create a bi-partisan healthcare bill as being inept about message. Soooooo annoying!!!!!!!!!!!”
Posted by: Sarah Patrick | Mar 14, 2010 12:13:00 PM
———————————–
Gee, there’s no spin on the other side? You are so shameful. Agree with me or shut them up – that’s what you are saying. Go move to China.

Posted by: Nancy | March 14, 2010, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

Nancy wrote”Not only will you still be paying for those people you mention, but you will also be funding somewhere in the vacinity of 100 new government agencies and all those wonderful government benefit programs, and the pork and fat included in the bill for people who don’t live in your state, and for ……….”
You you please give me a credibility link to this information.

Posted by: Clint-Houston | March 14, 2010, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Just shows you what a complete group of horses behinds the GOP are. They aren’t interested in what is good for America, only in destroying Obama.
Posted by: Joseph |
—————————-
sorry, Joseph, Obama is destroying himself, he really doesn’t need anyone elses help.

Posted by: Nancy | March 14, 2010, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Looks like Nancy from AHIP is working over time today.

Posted by: Thomas | March 14, 2010, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

You you please give me a credibility link to this information.
Posted by: Clint-Houston
—————————————
Go READ the actual senate bill. If you do that, or even read a congressional summary of it, you will see how much more money is involved and how much MORE your premiums will be as noted by the congressional budget committee’s assumptions. Before you speak up, you should be informed.

Posted by: Nancy | March 14, 2010, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

Looks like Nancy from AHIP is working over time today.
Posted by: Thomas
—————————-
Gotta ask, what is AHIP? I read these sites to see if I can learn anything new. All I see are people spouting what they are being told. That’s quite irritating to me. Either make it a personal experience of your own or make it fact. Quit spouting your parties spins – be smart. Make up your own minds based on the facts, not the news. I just don’t like seeing that Obama is right when he says “if I tell people what it says, they will understand and support me”. This is really very depressing so I don’t think I will go on these sites any more!
Have fun being stool pigeons.

Posted by: Nancy | March 14, 2010, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Poison the well? How much more poison can it get? You are already voting 100% against any meaningful reform.

Posted by: ahumbleopinion | March 14, 2010, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

This Whitehouse and Obama are so full of crap.
According to the CBO insurance premiums will go up and addtional 2% over what they would if nothing was done if Obama Scam is inacted.
The bill does absolutely nothing to stop rate increases, in fact it will make them worse.

Posted by: robtr | March 14, 2010, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Unfortunately, rob, the CBO has to rate what is put in front of them — with all the wild assumptions. They are good at what they do, but when it comes to rating bills, the are not permitted to do what they are good at.
So, we are to believe that ObamaCare is going to insure 30M for free. Of course, you won’t see the first benefit until you’ve paid for nothing for 4 years.
After hearing about the 45,000 people that die every year — guess that we should ignore the 180,000 that ObamaCare will kill before there’s enough money to pay the first benefit. They don’t count?

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Yes we are sick of Obama, Axelrod, Gibbs, Rahm, Pelosi, and Reid.
I can think of one way the American people would support Obamacare.
If all of them agreed to resign after the bill was passed.

Posted by: mick | March 14, 2010, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

I thought the “time for talk is over”.
Then why is the teleprompter reader going on the campaign trail tomorrow?
Stop wasting our money flying everywhere trying to sell that crap sandwich called Obamacare.

Posted by: fran | March 14, 2010, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

A quote from Mr. Lindsey Graham: ..”there will be a price to be paid (polituically) if they jam this bill down the throats…” Interpreted: “at that point we (Rep[ublicans and conservatives) will have lost the battle, even though we spent a large amount of money with misinformation and lies to keep it from passing. So the best we can do now is spend more money lying to people about its contents. Especially to those who are not intelligent to find out the truth or even look honestly at their own socio-econmic situation and understand that it is in their best interest. THEN we will get them emotionally upset and enraged to what…? BACKLASH VOTE all those out who dared to make THE RIGHT DECISION FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS”. And that is the “sad tale” of a Party who are so entrnched with “special wealthy interest money” that they will never change for the overall good of the country.

Posted by: CND FOX | March 14, 2010, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

Dear Mr. Graham: People were tired of your crap and that is why you are not in power. If this crap gives us a health care bill and 30 million people get coverage and cannot be dropped off their insurance….I’ll take that kind of crap any day. You could have had your own health care crap when you were in power and chose not to do it because you knew it would be hard so back off. This is for the good of the whole not for the few like your party seem to do.

Posted by: talmag | March 14, 2010, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Why don’t we all call Graham’s office and let him know just whose ‘crap’ Americans are tired of. I guess he thinks the majority of our ‘amnesia prone nation’ has forgotten what disaster his republican congress wrought on this country. Well, we haven’t. And we’ll be glad to show him in November.

Posted by: pamp205 | March 14, 2010, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

Mr. Tapper…you did a fine job today..keep up the good work.

Posted by: talmag | March 14, 2010, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

The Senate health care bill is unconstitutional, and many of its provisions will be struck down by the US Supreme Court. By then, American voters will have voted out many of the Democrat representatives and Democrat senators. The American people oppose this bill.

Posted by: S. Temper | March 14, 2010, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

CND — get off of the special interest stuff — Obama collected $27M from the SEIU and Andy Stern walked away with almost 100% of the $800B stimulus — public sector unemployment is only 4%. SEIU is not a special interest?
The NEA gave the Democrats $2.3M and Obama immediately trashes the DC school voucher program. Tha NEA isn’t a special interest.
Tell me about the inner cities — tell me how free stuff has helped families escape poverty. You can’t.
Tell me about affordable housing and the Democrats blocking capital market regulation. Free stuff work out there?
Great track record you guys have handing out free stuff, I tell ya.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

The “PASS IT NOW, AND WE’LL FIX IT LATER*” crowd/politicians sound a lot like the management team at Toyota in regards to the “speed-up, then try to slam on the brakes, then crash, burn and die” folks managing the PRIUS et al issues
*BTW, for all you Pro-Lifers who think that the current abortion language will/can be fixed it reconciliation, super bad news. The abortion language in the current Senate Bill that The House will vote on CONNOT BE CHANGED in reconciliation, as reconciliation can ONLY deal with budget items, of which abortion does NOT qualify. So it is now/never on this issue, too.

Posted by: JMo | March 14, 2010, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Republicans are idiots. They are the cause of everything bad that’s ever happened to this country, from slavery to child labor. Nothing but self-centered hypocrites stoking fear in feeble-minded inbred illiterates. The only thing more sad and pathetic than their hollow nonsensical stabs at logic is their constant whining. At least they’ve largely stopped trying to be funny. It’s just painful when a conservative tries to be funny….

Posted by: Matthew | March 14, 2010, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

BTW — let’s not forget the track record the Democrats have in CA. The Democratic legislature handed the unions rediculous pension benefits in 1999 — the state will never recover. No money for universities now ,,, no money for anything. Great job!
We should put you in charge of healthcare ,, LOL

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

Obama is corporate owned and controlled.
When Obama made his sweetheart deal with Big Pharma and dropped the public option it proved his loyalties were with them not the people.

Posted by: mick | March 14, 2010, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

It can be one if its constitutionally legal – it’s not guesswork. It’s either legal or it isn’t.
The country operates on rule of law not opinion based on partisan political gain.

Posted by: tierra | March 14, 2010, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

JMO, I wouldn’t count on it. Unless the CBO has already rated that line item — I would think that infanticide would cost something — opps, unless they had the CBO rate the original Senate Bill as though infanticide was free. Possible they will get stuck in their own slime.
I think the bill will pass. Nancy has enough yank and is so left-fringe, she won’t let this opportunity pass.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

Yes, Senator Graham, we ARE sick of this crap. We’re sick of the Republican crap. We’re sick of the GOP blocking every attempt at health care reform for the last CENTURY! You always have excuses, you always have lies and fears and projections to rile people’s insecurities and anger. Health care reform was a major part of the reason we the people elected Obama and not McCain. We need health care reform and Republicans will never allow it. The obvious solution is to vote more Republicans out of office this November. It’s the only way anything is going to get done in Washington for the next three years. Otherwise, Republicans will simply paralyze our government until 2012 and continually wash their hands like Pontius Pilate to pretend it is not their doing.

Posted by: windrider | March 14, 2010, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

I personally am tired of having to beat back politicians who have a Freddy Kreuger-like ability to keep resurfacing with the same horror-show again and again and again..

Posted by: cindy | March 14, 2010, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

It is funny that if you look at say, Pfizer, it looks like their margin on drugs is 600%. Granted, they have R&D costs — but the patent laws they are subject to seem to me to be way out of line.
A little palm greasing goes a long way.
Guess the insurance companies didn’t pay them as much to keep their 5% margin.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

When we hear Pelosi say that she’s “on the verge of making history” just by reforming health care – it tells me that ‘reforming health care’ is the last thing they care about. What Pelosi et al. are really up to is transforming our country into an image of Venezuela – that and only that would “make history”. Reforming health care is a tune-up and doesn’t require such statements as this from people like Pelosi. Their intentions are not pure.

Posted by: EPU | March 14, 2010, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

What Pelosi et al. are really up to is transforming our country into an image of Venezuela
__________________________________
Nonsense, this legislation won’t even catch the United States up to the rest of the modern democracies with universal health care, never mind your knee-jerk talking point of ‘Venezuela’.

Posted by: tierra | March 14, 2010, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

The Republicans are desperate by the hour about healthcare reform. After the bill has passed, don’t be surprised that they are challenge the constitutionality of the “reconciliation” legislative peocedure in the court system. The laughable irony is that the GOP has used that procudure more than any party in history.

Posted by: what667 | March 14, 2010, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

EPU — when you talk about Venezuela, are you talking about “The Wonderful Revolution”, regression to Third World stature, or both. We are close to achieving the latter with all the debt we’ve monetized — just need to have our credit rating lowered and we’ll be there.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

windrider..Since you brought up Pontious Pilate..one could argue that the timing of having a debate over “Caesar” using the people’s money to abort unwanted children..during lent and right before Passover and Easter, well, that was probably not so well thought out..but then we are on his Excellency’s timetable here, and when he says it’s time for his legions to cross the Rubicon..his will be done.

Posted by: cindy | March 14, 2010, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

You’re right, what. It’s almost as funny as the Democrats talking about the Iraq War when they were the first to commit American combat troops in every major war in the 20th century, losing 666,390 Americans.
Hypocritical, aren’t we.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

American have come to the realization that government has failed, and, more importantly, government has been at the root of our financial collapse. Aside from Ron Paul, all have urinated on the constitution. This health care is just another example. This is a Tenth Amendment issue. Health care should not be mandated at the federal level.

Posted by: Huh | March 14, 2010, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

I’ve got six Independent voters in my family that are sick and tired of BOTH party’s crap, and that is why we are voting against every incumbent running for office on November 2, 2010.

Posted by: TPS | March 14, 2010, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

Democrats are idiots. They want to pass their health care costs on our children. They have no shame!

Posted by: jonny | March 14, 2010, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

Posted by: cindy | Mar 14, 2010 2:05:38 PM
Antiabortion religious leaders urge lawmakers to pass Senate health bill
With the House moving toward a final health-care vote, the White House circulated Friday night a letter from Catholic and evangelical leaders that refutes claims that the Senate health-care bill could lead to the federal funding of abortion coverage.
They strongly support passing of the Senate bill.

Posted by: tierra | March 14, 2010, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

I am tired of the crap also. I am tired of Lindsey Gramham’s CRAP. I am tired of the republican party’s CRAP. I am tired of their lying, cheating, and thieving. The only way to fix Washington is to send a stern message to the republican party by voting them out of office in 2010 and 2012. Good riddance.

Posted by: Steven Garn | March 14, 2010, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

jonny…what kind of “life” do you think your children will experience…if nothing is done? “Jonny” someone fed you this line of propaganda (the cost hysteria) and unfortunately you swallowed it “hook, line and sinker”.

Posted by: CND FOX | March 14, 2010, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

As usual, Sen. Graham is just spewing the usual Republican talking points (test marketed by Mr. Lutz) And lying to boot – there is not going to be any reduction in Medicare. However, Advantage plans that were set up solely to enrich the insurance providers, are going to be eliminated – as they should be.
In the interim, the donut hole is going to be closed. Ironically, the donut hole primarily affects middle class elderly – and not the elderly poor who receive Medicaid to offset payments for their part D and Part B plans and co-pays.
It is all complicated – and so easy for Republicans to scare those who are not willing or able to get the facts of what is actually in the bill.
If the Republicans were so concerned, they would have fixed health care long ago. But they have sold their collective souls to the health insurance industry and corporate interests across the land. His co senator, Jim DeMint is known to be closely tied to an insurance company that’s major money making product is selling and administering health insurance savings accounts”. Gee – guess what Jim DeMint thinks is the answer to health care reform?

Posted by: serious student | March 14, 2010, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Vote every last one of the Democrats out this next election. They have forced this UNWANTED health care reform on us. No one wants it in it’s present form. Go back to the drawing board or expect defeat. Pack your bags, current administration, you’re as good as gone!

Posted by: Kristen | March 14, 2010, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Why do all these news articles on ABC (and the other major networks) fail to mention that all the polls show a MAJORITY OF AMERICAN VOTERS OPPOSE THIS BILL? How can ABC pretend to be honest journalists? The REAL story is that Congress is about to pass a bill AGAINST THE WILL OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE! ABC is a propaganda machine for the left.

Posted by: S. Temper | March 14, 2010, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

“The most interesting questions in the poll were about whether people think reform went far enough or went too far: When asked about trying to “provide health insurance to as many Americans as possible,” 32% said that the plan goes too far, 35% said it doesn’t go far enough, and 22% said it is about right.”
__________________________________
Many of the people who ‘oppose’ the current legislation, do so because it does not go far enough.
This means the majority of Americans either support this legislation or something more ‘progressive’.

Posted by: tierra | March 14, 2010, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

Vote every last one of the Democrats out this next election. They have forced this UNWANTED health care reform on us. No one wants it in it’s present form. Go back to the drawing board or expect defeat. Pack your bags, current administration, you’re as good as gone!
Posted by: Kristen | Mar 14, 2010 2:39:50 PM
—————————————-
It’s an anti-incumbent movement, not anti-democrat movement going on. Thus, many republicans need to pack their bags as well. Also, quit speaking like your the voice for everyone by saying “we the people” don’t want health care reform, when in truth millions do want this bill simply because it’s better than what we currently have even though it may not be perfect.

Posted by: Logan | March 14, 2010, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

With all the backroom payouts, deals, trolling in showers that have been done you have to wonder if it wouldn’t have been cheaper just to send out checks to those who needed help in getting insurance.
Here we are a year into a brand new era, 3 years where Democrats have been in the majority and jobs which usually sustain people are no where to be found. A sort of acceptance of Government handouts seems to be settling accross the nation; Hungry? heres a some food stamps, Can’t find a job? We’ll extend your unemployment, Need to see a Doctor? Wait 3 years and you’ll be able to see one.
Accceptance of mediocrity seems to now be the American way.

Posted by: david | March 14, 2010, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

This bill will require those that don’t have insurance to get one. Reason why they can’t get insurance is it’s too expensive. The idea is that with everyone required to pay for insurance, the companies will have better chance of spreading the cost across the population. And so in return for the mandate, they are required to insure pre-existing health condition.
But …
1. Can the insurance companies raise the premium of those who have pre-existing conditions in such a way that it’s so high that they can no longer afford it? They did not refuse coverage but it can’t be the insurance company’s fault if a subscriber chooses not to pay.
2. Who will pay for the uninsured premium? Ultimately, someone will have to pay for them. Today, some 30 million people do not have insurance. At $1k per year premium, this is around $30B per year. And this won’t go down, it will only go up in time. These individuals don’t have it in their budget to pay for a premium today. Whereas before they did not pay anything, now they will be required to pay, how can this make them happier? They will surely want this insurance without paying or if someone else can pay for them. If they have to pay, then I believe there will be a political price to pay for the near term. How is this good for the Democrats?
3. Isn’t this a political suicide mission that these Democrats took on?
4. Will this really be beneficial for the country?
5. With the country’s growing debt, is it really wise to continue to create more programs and spend for more entitlements?
BTW, I also oppose the spending with Iraq and other wars. They were unnecessary. I also don’t think it was good to have Medicare Part D which the Republicans passed.
The Republicans get cozy with those hypocrites that go to church. I also hate that.
Both Democrats and Republicans need to take a grip and stop the waste of government spending. Bring back manufacturing in this country and produce our own stuff, stop importing so much.

Posted by: Commando | March 14, 2010, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

WASHINGTON — A group representing Catholic hospitals Saturday rallied behind President Barack Obama’s health care bill ahead of a House vote in which anti-abortion lawmakers could play a decisive role. The chief executive of the Catholic Health Association, Carol Keehan, wrote on the group’s Web site that although the legislation isn’t perfect, it represents a “major first step” toward covering all Americans and would make “great improvements” for millions of people. The more than 600 Catholic hospitals across the country do not provide abortions as a matter of conscience.

Posted by: tierra | March 14, 2010, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

Twenty-five pro-life Catholic theologians and Evangelical leaders yesterday sent letters to members of Congress urging them not to let misleading information about abortion provisions in the Senate health care bill block passage of sorely-needed reform.

Posted by: tierra | March 14, 2010, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

Commando: Your points hit right on! At what price are Americans willing to accept healthcare reform? $93B per year starting in 2016? Providing subsidies (entitlements) to families making under $88,000 gross per year? Taxing “Cadillac Plans”? More Government intrusion in our lives by requiring everyone to be insured? At what price do Americans really want European Socialism?

Posted by: AmericanSlave | March 14, 2010, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

Tierra, First of all Ms. Keehan is not a religious leader representing Catholics, she is representing her hospitals. No anti-abortion Catholic “leader” would be in favor of building their nation’s healthcare system on legislation that funds abortion..and if there are Catholics (Mrs Keehan?) who are soo sure funding aint in there..then WHY have Ms Sebilius, Ms Pelosi, Mr Stupak and the others been wrangling over what’s not in there for weeks?? Ms Keehan is saying in essence that her 600 hospitals don’t provide abortions, but hey, no problem if the others do? Does that make her an “anti-abortion in my hospitals only” catholic leader?

Posted by: cindy | March 14, 2010, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

It is obvious that you work for the WH or OFA…do you think Venzuela is a “modern democracy”? If not, please state your idea of one….
I read so much disdain for this country in your rhetoric.
_________________________________
None of that is true.
Typical Republican right response to attack the person rather than the ideas.
Please do some research on the modern democracies that have universal coverage.

Posted by: tierra | March 14, 2010, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

PS- There are all kinds of “Catholic leaders”, after all Pelosi is one.

Posted by: cindy | March 14, 2010, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Tierra, First of all Ms. Keehan is not a religious leader representing Catholics, she is representing her hospitals. No anti-abortion Catholic “leader” would be in favor of building their nation’s healthcare system on legislation that funds abortion..
__________________________________
“Twenty-five pro-life Catholic theologians and Evangelical leaders yesterday sent letters to members of Congress urging them not to let misleading information about abortion provisions in the Senate health care bill block passage of sorely-needed reform.”
In other words, religious leaders are saying the right wing is LYING about the abortion language in the Senate bill.
LYING.
Perhaps you could show us the part of the Senate bill that shows government money going to pay for abortions . ..

Posted by: tierra | March 14, 2010, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Please do some research on the modern democracies that have universal coverage.
————–
Ha!
Honey, I know the about democracy, remember, I’m the post grad right winger…I want to know what YOU believe to be these great democracies with universal coverage….besides, of course Venezuela..lol.
maybe you’ll be able to graduate to stamping some envelopes or better yet, organize a COFFEE PARTY ! LOL !….hopey changey…

Posted by: mjishernameo | March 14, 2010, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

Posted by: cindy | Mar 14, 2010 3:30:29 PM
Show us the specific part of the Senate bill that details how government money will be used to fund abortions . . .

Posted by: tierra | March 14, 2010, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

From God’s lips to the catholic theologian’s and Evangelical’s ears..about abortion funding that is..cause they must know something that our own elected representatives don’t..what’s in this bill!

Posted by: cindy | March 14, 2010, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Tierra, I am seriously more than happy to defer..I could barely understand the HIPPA forms I had to fill out the other day, let alone my closing docs when I bought my home, or the legal mumbo-jumbo in this bill….why did Sebilius say “we need to keep the conversation going” about the funding question? GEEZ, IS IT IN THERE OR NOT? YES or NO? Why can’t any of them say it..in two words?? YES or NO?

Posted by: cindy | March 14, 2010, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

S’cuse me – what exactly did he say…?

Posted by: DaveM | March 14, 2010, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

maybe you’ll be able to graduate to stamping some envelopes or better yet, organize a COFFEE PARTY ! LOL !….hopey changey…
Posted by: mjishernameo | Mar 14, 2010 3:33:57 PM
__________________________________
Again, the Republican right shows ignorance in attacking the person rather than the ideas. Clever.
Seriously – do some research on modern democracies and universal health care coverage.

Posted by: tierra | March 14, 2010, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

cindy – Show us the specific part of the Senate bill that details how government money will be used to fund abortions . . .

Posted by: tierra | March 14, 2010, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

From The National Catholic Reporter:
Twenty-five pro-life Catholic theologians and Evangelical leaders yesterday sent letters to members of Congress urging them not to let misleading information about abortion provisions in the Senate health care bill block passage of sorely-needed reform.
Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, a Washington-based advocacy group, said that the Senate health bill upholds abortion funding restrictions and supports pregnant women.
The letter included a page by page analysis of the Senate bill as it pertains to abortion.
The group asked members of Congress “to make an informed decision about this legislation based on careful deliberation guided by facts.”
“We believe that the provisions below provide extensive evidence that longstanding restrictions on federal funding of abortion have been maintained. Furthermore, this bill provides new and important supports for vulnerable pregnant women,” the letter states.

Posted by: tierra | March 14, 2010, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

“tierra” says: “cindy – Show us the specific part of the Senate bill that details how government money will be used to fund abortions . . .”
tierra, have you read the whole bill?
Why does Planned Parenthood support the bill? Would they be doing so if the knew that abortions would not be funded? No.
There, question answered.

Posted by: Jeanne T. | March 14, 2010, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

Tierra, we are talking past each other here..I could probably go online and find the page that discusses funding for abortion..and I, like the secretary of HHS, Bart Stupak, your theologians, and the league of lawyers would all come up with a different interpretaion..why? because these bills are crafted by lawyers who use elastic language specifically designed for loopholes and law suits..Why are all of these house members arguing over abortion funding? You are saying its either in there or it isn’t.. right? Why are democrats disagreeing over “language?” WHy did Pelosi say she had lawyers “interpreting” this aspect of the bill? This isn’t chinese, why do we need interpreters? This abortion issue has done a magnificent job highlighting the deception that is commom practice in Washington using words..as in this case..and math, like scoring a bill that takes in money for ten years when it only pays out for 6!!

Posted by: cindy | March 14, 2010, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

That long list of provisions regarding abortions is a great example of why no one knows if there is funding for abortion in this bill. It is the equivilant of me daughter asking if she can go to the movies this afternoon. I can say, “No, you may not go to the movies this afternoon”..or I can say, You may not see Alice in WOnderland, you may not see Shutter Island, you may not see Avatar..and on and on..This latter answer will do one thing, cause her to go online IMMEDIATELY to find the ONE movie I missed.

Posted by: cindy | March 14, 2010, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Lindsey Graham is right…this is a bunch of CRAP!!! If it was so good, why all this back room bargaining??? I hope it doesn’t pass. Nothing will be done with it for 4 years even if it does and by then someone will revoke half the stuff in the bill anyway. They need to come up with a simplified kickback FREE bill that everyone could understand and explain it all step by step rather than cramming down a 2000+ document down our throats.

Posted by: Retired | March 14, 2010, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

Until delivery costs are brought down – the cost of hospital stays, drugs, etc, – the cost of insurance will not come down. If you want to squawk about obscene profits, then look at the drug companies not the insurance companies. Or look at Government Motors. Abortion – well, if anyone receives a subsidy for insurance, then any money that person spends for abortion coverage is being subsidized ( write separate checks – right – just a shell game with taxpayer dollars). I am pro-choice, but not at the taxpayers expense. The student loan bill – just more buying of votes. Keeping the “shady deals” in the bill and now trying to justify them (it might happen to some other state sometime) is another “tap dance”, because without those special deals, the proposed bill cannot stand on its own merits. It needs “vote buying” if there is any hope for it to pass. And finally, if the bill is so great, then why is there such resistance, not only among the American people, but also among our representatives. That, more than anything, should be a clue that there are some serious deficiencies that should be addressed before plunging 16% of our GDP into a tailspin.

Posted by: tired of it all | March 14, 2010, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

why thank you tierra:
So it does cover abortion costs, either by state options or by requiring insurance companies to offer coverage.
Case closed.

Posted by: mjishernameo | March 14, 2010, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

here is a compromise…. stop paying for infertility issues for old career women who waited too long to have kids the normal way, stop paying for old men’s erectile issues, stop paying for ALL birth control and STD cleanups…. Then and only then will I say the so-called “pro-lifers” are not total hypocrites. Only then. Because I do not agree with any of that stuff either, so, why should I pay for it, using their logic? Everything I listed, is all “elective”.

Posted by: andielee5 | March 14, 2010, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

tierra: Again the Socialist Left attacks the right as being too rigid – the Left wants BIG GOVERNMENT no matter what the price. GOVERNMENT running our lives in every way.

Posted by: AmericanSlave | March 14, 2010, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

SOCIALISTS: KEEP YOUR GOVERNMENT OUT OF MY WALLET!!!! It’s hard enough taking care of your family, saving for retirement, paying for a house, keeping your job, and NOW we have to provide subsidies to families who can’t afford their own health insurance????

Posted by: AmericanSlave | March 14, 2010, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

ATLAS SHRUGGED BY AYN RAND: What happens when the consumers outnumber the producers; when there are more takers than makers. REAL REFORM would allow Americans to use more of THEIR money (which is taken in taxes) to PAY for HEALTH INSURANCE by allowing it to be a DEDUCTION. REAL REFORM would allow for more COMPETITION amongst INSURANCE COMPANIES by ALLOWING Americans to GO ACROSS STATE LINES to buy health insurance. EVERYTHING THE BIG MOMMY SOCIALISTS PROPOSE REQUIRE MO AN MO MONEY – MO MONEY – That’s just thro mo money at the problem.

Posted by: AmericanSlave | March 14, 2010, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Beware of GRAHAM. People of S.C., this guy will give in to Obama and allow 20 million illegals to come here and you had better believe that our system cannot withstand the trillions more in benefits for them and their children. Demint of S.C. is a real sandlapper and he supports the will of the people but not Graham the “Progressive Republican” Just beware of this man for he is far too liberal.

Posted by: rockychance | March 14, 2010, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Pelosi said she was “on the verge of making history” by ‘reforming health care’. However, reforming the best health care in the world isn’t historic; it’s a tune-up. Which tells me that there’s more to this health care legislation than merely ‘reform’.
When Pelosi calls what we all believe is supposed to be a mere tune-up as “making history”, she really means is that our country will be permanently transformed into a socialist freeloading Venezuela style junkyard – and she’s actually proud of that.

Posted by: EPU | March 14, 2010, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

I could probably go online and find the page that discusses funding for abortion..
Posted by: cindy | Mar 14, 2010 4:02:04 PM
___________________________________
Please do . .. otherwise guessing just isn’t enough.

Posted by: tierra | March 14, 2010, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

she really means is that our country will be permanently transformed into a socialist freeloading Venezuela style junkyard
_____________________________________
Even the smallest bit of research would show you every other modern western democracy has UNIVERSAL health care coverage – and that using ‘Venezuela’ is just a parroted talking point of the uninformed and paranoid right.

Posted by: tierra | March 14, 2010, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Tierra, your passion for how you feel is undeniable..its just unfortunate that you feel you need to buttress your arguments by pasting fragments of articles and polls and “conversations”.. like the one we were having. My point was that what is written in this bill is almost not as relevant as how it is written..as we can see with this abortion funding debate…but I dont want to waste your time, or put my comments on your chopping block again…

Posted by: cindy | March 14, 2010, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

reaganfan: I agree – I think payback with the Dems is just the beginning – STEP ASIDE REPUBLICANS, YOU FAILED: THIS IS WAR.

Posted by: AmercianSlave | March 14, 2010, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Anita Dunn?
Anita freakin’ Dunn on ThisWeek?
Please tell me Jake Tapper do not select that woman! Please tell me it was some misguided producer.
Why not put up pictures of Chairman Mao on the ABC set. Or, better yet… have Anita Dunn AND Van Jones on the panel.
Low moment for ABC.

Posted by: TexGEOas | March 14, 2010, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Why not put up pictures of Chairman Mao on the ABC set. Or, better yet… have Anita Dunn AND Van Jones on the panel.
Low moment for ABC.
Posted by: TexGEOas | Mar 14, 2010 5:36:15 PM
_____________________________________
So much for freedom of speech in America. Freedom to speak if you agree with the Republican right? And not otherwise?
Deal with the ideas, not the smear.

Posted by: tierra | March 14, 2010, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

It’s pretty obvious that the Congress and Obama (The Prince of Fools) all refuse to listen to We the People. This “bill” hasn’t even been WRITTEN yet, much less ANALYZED for any UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES (just as TARP wasn’t analyzed), but we have the deadbeats in our society on this blog touting how wonderful it will be when they can have something ELSE for FREE in exchange for their vote.
Well, in just 232 more days, WE THE PEOPLE will be asking ALL of them, CAN YOU HEAR US NOW, MORONS?!!!!

Posted by: Laughing_All_the_____Way | March 14, 2010, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Yes there is free speech for all. But use a little common sense when you open your mouth, do not just blurt out BS.

Posted by: d | March 14, 2010, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

I can understand Graham’s frustration in light of the fact that 99% of this bill was cobbled together behind closed doors in stark contrast to what was promised.
I am even more disappointed that Dodd, one of the architects of the meltdown decided to walk away from negotiation on financial regulation reform when the two sides were very close to agreement.
I don’t agree with Graham’s tone.
I am disappointed that Axelrod wasn’t pinned to the floor when he outright lied about the Louisiana purchase. There’s no surprise that he would lie about the astronomical cost of the bill — in fact, Axelrod was moving his lips — a clear indication he was lying.
This isn’t the hope and change that was promised and the fault lies squarely on Obama for allowing the backroom deals to poison the atmosphere in Washington.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

Why are you afraid to put the 9/11 evidence on the table in open court, Senator?

Posted by: thecrow | March 14, 2010, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

I am disappointed that Axelrod wasn’t pinned to the floor when he outright lied about the Louisiana purchase.
_____________________________________
“As far as the situation in Louisiana, let me tell you, Mary Landrieu fought for that because she has a situation that comes out of Hurricane Katrina that’s one of the worst in the nation where every county has been declared an emergency disaster area. If that happens at her state or in any other state, we ought to step up and help them. Mary Landrieu’s right to fight for Louisiana. She’s doing the right thing. And we ought to offer that kind of assistance to any state that deals with that kind of emergency.”
Where is the lie?

Posted by: tierra | March 14, 2010, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Do not hold your breath waiting for a sinple YES or NO answer, you will never get it.

Posted by: d | March 14, 2010, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

C’mon, tierra —oh, any state in which every county was under —- bull!
The Democrats crafted roundabout language that specifically said Lousiana except that it didn’t.
I was born at night, but not last night. The language was there specifically to buy a vote. If he admitted it was a slimy purchase, I could respect that — may not agree — but I could accept that.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

I am disappointed that Axelrod wasn’t pinned to the floor when he outright lied about the Louisiana purchase.
_____________________________________
“As far as the situation in Louisiana, let me tell you, Mary Landrieu fought for that because she has a situation that comes out of Hurricane Katrina that’s one of the worst in the nation where every county has been declared an emergency disaster area. If that happens at her state or in any other state, we ought to step up and help them. Mary Landrieu’s right to fight for Louisiana. She’s doing the right thing. And we ought to offer that kind of assistance to any state that deals with that kind of emergency.”
Where is the lie?
The extra funding to Louisiana arose out of the situation after Hurricane Katrina.
Where is the lie?

Posted by: tierra | March 14, 2010, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

tierra, don’t play dumb. The lie is his statement that the clause was meant to apply to any state in which every county was under a state of emergency.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

I know the about democracy, remember, I’m the post grad right winger…I want to know what YOU believe to be these great democracies with universal coverage….besides, of course Venezuela..lol.
maybe you’ll be able to graduate to stamping some envelopes or better yet, organize a COFFEE PARTY ! LOL !….hopey changey…
Posted by: mjishernameo | Mar 14, 2010 3:33:57 PM
Some post grad. LOL.Do you honestly think the US is the only democracy in the world? As another commenter put it,”Seriously – do some research on modern democracies and universal health care coverage. ”
As for dissing the coffee parties, I went to a coffee party yesterday and while the vast majority of the folks there were moderate and center-left,all pragmatic,there were some very intelligent libertarians and conservatives who have rejected the Tea Party and are sick of the Republican right because of this very thing– the disinformation, willful ignorance and lack of common sense.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 14, 2010, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Designated Counties for Louisiana Hurricane Katrina
Disaster Summary For FEMA-1603-DR, Louisiana
Declaration Date: August 29 2005
Incident Type: Hurricane Katrina
Incident Period: August 29, 2005, and Continuing
Hazard Mitigation Grant Program
(Assistance to State and local governments and certain private nonprofit organizations for actions taken to prevent or reduce long term risk to life and property from natural hazards):
All counties in the State of Louisiana are eligible for assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.
From the FEMA website.

Posted by: tierra | March 14, 2010, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

The money was specifically meant to give Landreau money for Louisiana in exchange for her vote. That’s not what Axelrod said. We both know that.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

tierra, don’t play dumb. The lie is his statement that the clause was meant to apply to any state in which every county was under a state of emergency.
Posted by: mitchscove | Mar 14, 2010 6:35:17 PM
___________________________________
Come on . . . Louisiana was an exceptional situation because of Katrina. You’re just playing dumb.

Posted by: tierra | March 14, 2010, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

Fine, what’s it doing in a healthcare bill?

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

The money was specifically meant to give Landreau money for Louisiana in exchange for her vote. That’s not what Axelrod said. We both know that.
Posted by: mitchscove | Mar 14, 2010 6:39:54 PM
___________________________________
That’s your poor guess.
Louisiana was an exceptional situation because of Katrina – and was acknowledged as such by everybody except those out to score partisan political points. You’re just playing dumb.

Posted by: tierra | March 14, 2010, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Tierra: No matter how many numbers or fragments of information you post, many Americans don’t like the bill, absolutely hate the process and have turned away from this Administration. Obama has lost the trust of many — they feel betrayed and powerless. Obama and the Dems run the risk of permanently altering American’s perception of their party — and obviously, not for the better.

Posted by: EATB | March 14, 2010, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

Fine, what’s it doing in a healthcare bill?
Posted by: mitchscove | Mar 14, 2010 6:41:07 PM
___________________________________
Good god! Research it!
It is in the health care bill because it deals directly with health care payment formulaes – Louisiana’s data was skewed falsely because of monies that poured into the state for the period of time of intense activity after Katrina.

Posted by: tierra | March 14, 2010, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Graham is so full of it. He calls Axelrod’s points about Brown “spin” but Think Progress gets it right:
“the plan implemented by former Republican Gov. Mitt Romney in Massachusetts is very similar to the Democratic proposal. Both plans require people to purchase coverage and both provide affordability credits to those who can’t afford insurance. Both create insurance exchanges, both establish minimum creditable coverage standards for insurers, and both require employers to contribute towards reform. The Wonk Room’s Igor Volsky created a chart outlining the similarities between Romney’s plan and the Senate bill that passed in December and will become the foundation of national health care reform.
Graham cites only two issues to support his claim: Medicare cuts and tax raises “on the American people.” But of course, no state has the authority to either change Medicare or raises taxes on all Americans.
Even conservatives see the similarities between the two plans. “[T]he public option has now vanished from the Obama plan. Which means that the federal plan bears a closer family resemblance than ever to Romney’s idea,” former Bush speech writer David Frum observed. American Spectator’s Philip Klein said there “ain’t” any substantial differences between the plans. The key parts of the Democratic proposal are the same as “those elements [that] formed the core of Romneycare,” Klein adds.” (Alex Seitz-Wald)

Posted by: progressive mama | March 14, 2010, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

As for dissing the coffee parties, I went to a coffee party yesterday and while the vast majority of the folks there were moderate and center-left,all pragmatic,there were some very intelligent libertarians and conservatives who have rejected the Tea Party and are sick of the Republican right because of this very thing– the disinformation, willful ignorance and lack of common sense.
———–
yeah, I heard that 7 white people went to a coffee shop and whined about their hybrid cars.. lol. And with all that funding from Obama that’s all you could produce? sad.

Posted by: mjishernameo | March 14, 2010, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

Obama has lost the trust of many — they feel betrayed and powerless.
___________________________________
Again, this is largely an uninformed guess . ..
The President’s approval ratings hold in at about 50% which they’ve been at for months.
The President is trusted on health care more than the Democratic congress AND the Democratic congress is trusted MORE than the Republican congress.
And the latest polls by Gallup have Democrats at 47% would vote for them, Republicans at 44%.
You have to remember this is in a VERY tough economy.
Reagan fell to 35% in a tough economy.

Posted by: tierra | March 14, 2010, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

Posted by: progressive mama | Mar 14, 2010 6:48:08 PM
progressive mama you prove once again the value of real research over parroted slogans.

Posted by: tierra | March 14, 2010, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

We have a problem with healthcare. We have an aging population. We have high unemployment. We have too few doctors to meet current demand much less the added demand this bill will create. Our patent laws appear to me to be way too generous to pharmas. Our liability laws, not only medical but in general, are crazy relative to those elsewhere(second hand from an German expert witness who works here, ‘cuz we’re stupid).
If the research I did uncovered inefficiencies or egregious profits, I would say that competition would help. It didn’t and I sampled the Wellpoint & United Healthcare annual reports.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

Katrina?
Oh yeah, that was the inevitable CAT5 storm that finally came ashore and whipped out that city that was built underwater, protected only by the CAT3 levies they decided they could only afford to build, since to build CAT5 levies would have been politically untenable to the free-loaders living along the CAT3 levy.
And since the CITY and the PARRISH failed to even develop an emergency evacuation plan, much less exercise and practice it, and the CITY and PARRISH and STATE refused Federal assistance PRIOR to Katrina coming ashore, the REST of us now have to help PAY and PAY and PAY for the CITY and PARRISH and STATE’S collective ignorance?
NOT!
New Orleans DESERVED what it got – no, what it EXPECTED, and it DOESN’T deserve special treatment in a HEALTH CARE BILL, special treatment that has been added SOLELY to BUY the LA state “representative’s” vote.

Posted by: Seriously__Fed__Up | March 14, 2010, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

Why does Planned Parenthood support the bill? …
There, question answered.
Posted by: Jeanne T. | Mar 14, 2010 3:49:28 PM
Hmmm…. because its a good, albeit not perfect, bill which addresses a chronic problem and the status quo is unsustainable?
Riddle me this, using your flawed logic– why would the Catholic Health Assn SUPPORT the bill, as well as Senator Casey and Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good?
Sister Carol Keehan, Catholic Health Assn president and chief executive officer (published at Catholic Health World)
“As I watched our president present his plan to pass the health reform legislation, it was clear this is an historic opportunity to make great improvements in the lives of so many Americans. Is it perfect? No. Does it cover everyone? No. But is it a major first step? Yes.
The insurance reforms will make the lives of millions more secure, and their coverage more affordable. The reforms will eventually make affordable health insurance available to 31 million of the 47 million Americans currently without coverage.
CHA has a major concern on life issues. We said there could not be any federal funding for abortions and there had to be strong funding for maternity care, especially for vulnerable women. The bill now being considered allows people buying insurance through an exchange to use federal dollars in the form of tax credits and their own dollars to buy a policy that covers their health care. If they choose a policy with abortion coverage, then they must write a separate personal check for the cost of that coverage.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 14, 2010, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

continuing from last post, see NYT blog called Prescriptions and specifically the post titled, “Senate Abortion Restrictions Are Sufficient, Catholic Group Says”
“According to the National Catholic Reporter, Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, a Washington-based advocacy group, sent a letter to members of Congress on Friday urging support for the Senate-passed health care bill and expressing its view that the bill contains sufficient provisions to prevent the use of federal money to pay for insurance coverage of abortions. “

Posted by: progressive mama | March 14, 2010, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

It’s refreshing to find someone on the left that does research as opposed to copying & pasting talking points from HufPo.
Thankfully, then, you know that the tough economy was created largely by the Democrats and Obama wasn’t innocent. I cringe when he utters the word ‘inherit’.
You’re a breath of fresh air.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

yeah, I heard that 7 white people went to a coffee shop and whined about their hybrid cars.. lol. And with all that funding from Obama that’s all you could produce? sad.
Posted by: mjishernameo | Mar 14, 2010 6:48:21 PM
Check the website. At the meeting I went to there were 42 of us. And that was just one of hundreds of parties across the country. There are lots of photos. What’s refreshing is you can actually “see” how much more sensible the coffee types are (no signs that spell moron as MORAN, lol). I’m more radical than many of them, I admit– but people actually were informed.
You wouldn’t fit in, but others might be interested. Its a good place for dialogue.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 14, 2010, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

Come on . . . Louisiana was an exceptional situation because of Katrina. You’re just playing dumb.
______________________________
You won’t find that in Axelrod’s words. My point.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

im glad the bill will cover people. thats great. thats what we all want and support.
is it worth the cost using this bill? i do not believe so.
how about doing all that stuff without the backroom deals.
how about a bill that obama doesn’t sell out the public option to the lobbyists.
you guys..and ladies, progressivemama..are so intent on getting any bill through..”oh its not perfect but its good”
you know what ? how about making it better first, then pass it? will it be prefect? prolly not. but whats the harm in republicans and democrats getting together on live tv, cspan, and crafting a bill that republicans and democrats can agree on without the lobbyists present? whats the rush to jam such a problematic bill through?
start over.

Posted by: tony | March 14, 2010, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

Come on . . . Louisiana was an exceptional situation because of Katrina. You’re just playing dumb.
______________________________
You won’t find that in Axelrod’s words. My point.
Posted by: mitchscove | Mar 14, 2010 7:08:31 PM
__________________________________
Seriously? You can’t figure out that a state in which every county has been declared a disaster area is an exceptional situation? You ought to be able to put that together on your own don’t you think? Not trying to be mean here – but really . ..

Posted by: tierra | March 14, 2010, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

whats the harm in republicans and democrats getting together on live tv, cspan, and crafting a bill that republicans and democrats can agree on without the lobbyists present? whats the rush to jam such a problematic bill through?
start over.
Posted by: tony | Mar 14, 2010 7:10:28 PM
The Republicans had a decade to do something on health care–both the number of uninsureds and medical inflation have been escalating for longer than that– but they did nothing. They mouth fiscal responsibility now, as they have in the past, despite no record which matches their rhetoric. They’ve let it be known that their strategy is to work with lobbyists to kill bills and Obama’s agenda, and they’ve said flat out they wanted to make health care reform Obama’s Waterloo. Most Republicans and a good number of Dems are wholly owned subsidiaries of either the insurance and health sector and/or oil lobbies (and yes, Big Oil has been contributing to derailing this bill in hopes it would upset the applecart for climate change legislation). I don’t trust the Republicans in Congress. I don’t trust many of the Dems either. We’ve been trying to do something for nearly 100 years. We’ve never gotten this far. It is not time to stop.
Now you say I’m intent on getting ANY bill through — not true. My lines in the sand involved insurance exchanges and pooling opportunities for small businesses and the self-employed, insurance reforms involving pre-existing conditions and recision, CBO analyses which show a positive effect on the deficit in the long range, covering a large number of the currently, uninsured, something to address fraud and cost (see pilot progams for the latter) and STRUCTURE — a structure that allows for further improvement. I also like Bernie Sanders’ amendment. I don’t think something like tort reform and high risk pools alone do enough.
I like aspects of Grayson’s proposal. I like Wyden’s free choice amendment. I don’t think this will be the end-all. But its a start. Kicking the can down the road, burying our heads in the sand, doesn’t solve chronic domestic problems.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 14, 2010, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

If this bill were any good, they would not be having to bribe members of their own party. That is a fact!

Posted by: bo | March 14, 2010, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

PM:
Coffee gives me diarrhea. I’ll stick with tea.

Posted by: mjishernameo | March 14, 2010, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

The Senator here can’t see the hypocrisy. Bush and the Republicans used reconciliation to pass tax cuts for the rich, which helped dig our deficit hole much deeper. Those tax cuts cost us 2.4 trillion dollars over a ten year period. By comparison, the health care reform bill will cost 1 trillion over 10 years. And think of all the jobs in the medical field it will create!
Retired, if this health care bill is being fought so strongly by senators taking big insurance lobby money, as well as the insurance industry itself (over 8 million spent in the fight so far) that tells me as a savvy consumer, this bill will help a great deal to keep my crazy-high insurance premiums down.

Posted by: Lydia | March 14, 2010, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

If you want health insurance…buy it yourself!
____________
So, you agree we need to support insurance reforms so that’s possible for those who have been denied or had their contracts rescinded shadily.
And I’m sure you agree small businesses should have the same opportunities that large corporations do to pool risks — as small business owners often work harder than suits in corner offices, yes?
And you must be sick to death of the corporate nanny state and the current unsustainable system that keeps entrepreneurial types job-locked.
So, health care reform makes sense, more or less.
We disagree as to who is lazy (just saying no is a pretty lazy, imho) but that’s less essential.
Its time to pass health care reform.
Oh, and one last thing…
Since government cheese isn’t on the table the rest of your post makes little sense, really. As Paul Krugman at NYT notes:
“if having the government regulate and subsidize health insurance is a “takeover,” that takeover happened long ago. Medicare, Medicaid, and other government programs already pay for almost half of American health care, while private insurance pays for barely more than a third (the rest is mostly out-of-pocket expenses). And the great bulk of that private insurance is provided via employee plans, which are both subsidized with tax exemptions and tightly regulated.
The only part of health care in which there isn’t already a lot of federal intervention is the market in which individuals who can’t get employment-based coverage buy their own insurance. And that market, in case you hadn’t noticed, is a disaster — no coverage for people with pre-existing medical conditions, coverage dropped when you get sick, and huge premium increases in the middle of an economic crisis. It’s this sector, plus the plight of Americans with no insurance at all, that reform aims to fix. What’s wrong with that?”

Posted by: progressive mama | March 14, 2010, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

One of the ironies of all this, is that the younger voters of our country who voted for Obama are now going to be forced to buy health insurance they probably do not need at their age. This is the Change you can believe in, being forced to buy something you do not need.

Posted by: jim 234 | March 14, 2010, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

The “PASS IT NOW, AND WE’LL FIX IT LATER*” crowd/politicians sound a lot like the management team at Toyota in regards to the “speed-up, then try to slam on the brakes, then crash, burn and die” folks managing the PRIUS et al issues
*BTW, for all you Pro-Lifers who think that the current abortion language will/can be fixed it reconciliation, super bad news. The abortion language in the current Senate Bill that The House will vote on CONNOT BE CHANGED in reconciliation, as reconciliation can ONLY deal with budget items, of which abortion does NOT qualify. So it is now/never on this issue, too.

Posted by: JMo | March 14, 2010, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

jim234, even the young need insurance, unless they have a death wish. Look at the cancer numbers, even young people get it. Pneumonia can strike anyone, as can a number of debilitating diseases. To say the young don’t need insurance is just pure foolishness.

Posted by: Lydia | March 14, 2010, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

I’ll stick with tea.
Posted by: mjishernameo | Mar 14, 2010 7:31:32 PM
Of course.
Bob Cesca:
Thomas Frank (WSJ), author of What’s the matter with Kansas:
“Not too long ago, Kansas would have responded to the current situation by making the[jerks] pay. This would have been a political certainty, as predictable as what happens when you touch a match to a puddle of gasoline. When business screwed the farmers and the workers–when it implemented monopoly strategies invasive beyond the Populists’ furthest imaginings–when it ripped off shareholders and casually tossed thousands out of work–you could be damned sure about what would follow.
“Not these days. Out here the gravity of discontent pulls in only one direction: To the right, to the right, further to the right. Strip today’s Kansans of their job security, and they head out to become registered Republicans. Push them off their land and next thing you know they’re protesting in front of abortion clinics. Squander their life savings on manicures for the CEO and there’s a good chance they’ll join the John Birch Society. But ask them about the remedies their ancestors proposed–unions, antitrust, public ownership–and you might as well be referring to the days when knighthood was in flower.”
Bob Cesca: “It doesn’t make any sense. Which leads me to believe there’s something else going on here. Something uglier.Why aren’t the tea party people gathering on Wall Street? ”
“From the outset, the tea party was based on a contradictory premise (the original tea party was a protest against a corporate tax cut). And when you throw out all of the nonsense and contradictions, there’s nothing left except race. There’s no other way to explain why these people were silent and compliant for so long, and only decided to collectively freak out when this “foreign” and “exotic” president came along and, right out of the chute, passed the largest middle class tax cut in American history — something they would otherwise support, for goodness sake, it was $288 billion in tax cuts! — we’re left to deduce no other motive but the ugly one that lurks just beneath the pale flesh, the tri-corner hats and the dangly tea ornamentation.”
Andrew Sullivan: “A reader writes: If these Tea Party people were serious about fiscal sanity, they would boo Ryan on sight for his vote for Medicare D.
They would boo Cantor on sight. They would boo Boehner on sight. They
would run primary challenges against all these people, and not let them
forget the sins they committed against their country. But the Tea Party movement is not serious. It is an act
of collective amnesia, for Republican voters to convince themselves
that everything bad that’s going…”
It suits.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 14, 2010, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

oops, cut that last part off. “But the Tea Party movement is not serious. It is an act of collective amnesia, for Republican voters to convince themselves that everything bad that’s going on is all Obama’s fault, and everything was going great until he showed up and ruined us all.” (Andrew Sullivan’s Daily Dish)
Anyway… enough of that.
Tea suits some, coffee and real dialogue suits others.
Personally, I want health care reform, financial reform, alternate energy, jobs and more than two parties.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 14, 2010, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

jim — you hit the nail on the head. The reason insurance rates have risen recently may be to get ahead of a bad bill, but low rates require that the young and healthy buy it when they don’t need it.
Basically, the Democrats have said (without saying it) that the insurance companies are not bad — they just can’t force people to buy insurance when they’re healthy.
By forcing people to buy insurance, they control the risk pool. Does the most favorable end justify any means? I would argue that it is a bad precedent that leads to tyranny.
It’s instructive to read the Citizens United v. FEC decision – the first couple of pages is enough. It is clear that the justices were listening when this administration attacked members of the press ,, when words like net-neutrality started being batted about. I see their decision as an affirmation of the first amendment — as a response to the end justifies the means mentality — ya know — shut down free speech if it gets in the way of left-wing bliss.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

you guys are not considering
the heath care industry stands to gain much if this HCR passes. I dont think they are as strongly opposed to it as we hear. theyve made thier sweetheart deals already, so what do they lose if this passes? they GAIN 30 million MANDATORY new customers. hello!
public option? DEAD
how about that exemption on antitrust being repealed?
STALLED in senate. and not likely to pass.
so where is their competition?
both measures that would increase their competition are not likely to pass, so what do they have to lose if it passes, and what do they have to gain?
I would say 30 million new customers be required by law to purchase my product is a darned good thing.

Posted by: tony | March 14, 2010, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

draw a line in the sand…yes i really believe you would vote no on HCR based on your talking points.
oh no exchange? well geesh than i dont want hcr!
would you vote no on covering millions of people if they kept the provision for denying people based on preexisting conditions? I HIGHLY doubt it.

Posted by: tony | March 14, 2010, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

There’s no question that this is attractive the Health Insurance Companies.
I’m sure their biggest challenge today is that when people lose their jobs, the healthy ones don’t pick up COBRA. The insurance companies are left with the bad apples. Then, they are behind the 8-ball. They have to go to the state insurance commissions and justify rate increases. That takes time and when you’re operating at a 5% margin, you don’t have the time.
I have checked a couple of the PACs. They tend to give the Democrats a little more than the Republicans so far in the 2009-2010 — not enough difference to scream about.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

mitch, yup, axelrod got it right when he said
“that health care industry lobbyists were descending on skeptical Democratic lawmakers “like locusts” ”
he just didnt say that they have landed on pubs and dems alike, nor that both pubs and dems are deeply owned by them.
huffpuff had a great article on it.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/miles-mogulescu/the-real-reason-obamas-pl_b_473924.html
On August 13, The Times reported that while President Obama had presented himself as “aloof from the legislative fray,” particularly in connection with the public option, “Behind the scenes, however, Mr. Obama and advisors have been…negotiating deals with a degree of cold-eyed political realism potentially at odds with the president’s rhetoric.” One of the deals reported in The Times article was the Pharma deal. The other was a deal with the for-profit hospital lobby to limit its cost reductions to $155 billion over 10 years in exchange for a White House promise that there would be no meaningful public option.
According to The Times:
“Several hospital lobbyists involved in the White House deals said it was understood as a condition of their support that the final legislation would not include a government-run health plan paying-Medicare rates…or controlled by the secretary of health and human services. ‘We have an agreement with the White House that I’m very confident will be seen all the way through conference’, one of the industry lobbyists, Chip Kahn, director of the Federation of American Hospitals, told a Capitol Hill newsletter…Industry lobbyists say they are not worried [about a public option.] ‘We trust the White House,’ Mr. Kahn said.”

Posted by: tony | March 14, 2010, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

If Senator Graham doesn’t believe that the American people want health care reform, he should insist that it be put on the ballot and allow Americans to vote on the issue. I believe that a majority of Americans would want health care reform that would insure all Americans and would prevent the big insurance companys from ripping of the public the way they are currently doing. The Republican politicans love to say that Americans dont want health care reform but in order to know for sure, it should be put to a vote. I for one would bet that a majority of Americans would vote in favor of it.

Posted by: johnnylee | March 14, 2010, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

Tony,
I wrote:
“My lines in the sand involved insurance exchanges and pooling opportunities for small businesses and the self-employed, insurance reforms involving pre-existing conditions and recision, CBO analyses which show a positive effect on the deficit in the long range, covering a large number of the currently, uninsured, something to address fraud and cost (see pilot progams for the latter) and STRUCTURE — a structure that allows for further improvement. I also like Bernie Sanders’ amendment. I don’t think something like tort reform and high risk pools alone do enough.”
Your comment doesn’t make sense. And I don’t really care what you think, to be frank. I don’t pick one thing and get hyperpartisan about it. I think we need health care reform. I’ve thought that since 1991. There is more than one way to build a canoe, and my mind is flexible enough to weigh several measures at once– if I end up with a canoe that works, I’m good.
I disagree in regards to the insurance industry. My evidence is the millions of dollars they’re spending on advertising against it versus using that money to keep premiums down and pay claims.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 14, 2010, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

mama ,,, the teaparty has nothing to do with the Republican Party. I know a couple — you may see them tomorrow since I live 20 mins from where Obama is stumping.
If you did your research, you would find that we got into this mess because Affordable Housing advocates blocked regulation of Fannie & Freddie — where the mess started.
I thought you were an independent thinker. At least that’s what tierra said.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

um what? hyperpartisan? which side am i partisan on considering im fully supporting public option and abortion coverage? and allowing illegals to use their own money to buy in? you are obviously confused.
but thats not my making.
and really?
” My evidence is the millions of dollars they’re spending on advertising against it versus using that money to keep premiums down and pay claims. ”
yes cause insurance really want to keep premiums low and pay claims right?
millons now…but billions to be made later.
well trillions really.
and I dont really see them opposing all forms of hcr. I see them being involved in certain aspects and even approving certain aspects.
“Mr. Obama’s call for a public plan, however, omitted any discussion of what rates it might pay or who might control it…’He worded it really carefully, because he said ‘not for profit’ and he didn’t say it had to be controlled by the government,’ Mr. Kahn [the hospital lobbyist] added. ‘The way he described it, we could support that!”

Posted by: tony | March 14, 2010, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

jhonny, you would be right. most of america does want hcr. most of america also wants public option to be involved, and not obamas sellout bill.
no reason why we cant have both.
no reason why we cant force obama to keep his word.

Posted by: tony | March 14, 2010, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

Don’t visit HufPo — it’s just an echo chamber for the left wing nutcases that have no tolerance for a diversity of perspectives. Guess intolerance & progressive have become synonomous.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

If you did your research, you would find that we got into this mess because Affordable Housing advocates blocked regulation of Fannie & Freddie — where the mess started.
I thought you were an independent thinker. At least that’s what tierra said.
Posted by: mitchscove | Mar 14, 2010 8:34:03 PM
I am an independent thinker and think that’s a gross simplification. When reasonable folks say it was a democratic mess– they don’t mean the dems are to blame. They mean there are plenty of culprits– Republican and Dem admins, Republicans and Dems in Congress, the repeal of Glass-Steagall, the Fed, Wall Street, Main Street, greed, and on and on. Moreover, Bush’s lack of fiscal responsibility did damage because it didn’t leave us in a good position to deal with the mess as it escalated. Personally, I like the witty take in Vanity Fair’s 100 to blame, because it covers everybody in a humorous way (and sometimes a little levity helps when the situation is so dire.) Here’s a quote, that sums it up for me: “As Bethany McLean wrote in her vivid and insightful Vanity Fair story tracking Fannie and Freddie’s descent in insolvency, “The argument that Fannie and Freddie caused our entire economic calamity is absurd.” But holding almost half the mortgages in America, they certainly played a role in it.”
I also think BOTH the Republicans and Dems AND Bush let the perfect be the enemy of the good when it came to regulating the GSE’s.
Its hard for me to take partisans on the subject truly seriously. I can play the partisan talking point game– but in the end, it’s a democratic mess, meaning lots of folks from all sides have their hands dirty.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 14, 2010, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

hey PM, maybe you and your 42 coffee ground friends can watch us on 3/16 at the capitol, there will be several THOUSAND of us…tens of thousands..
ta-ta
PS: that stuff keeps you up at night, be careful. lol!

Posted by: mjishernameo | March 14, 2010, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

I have just a few questions.
To any member of the US Congress who oppose the HCR bill: Are you not covered by a health care packet that is better than most Americans get? If you refuse to cover the hralth care needs of the majority of Americans, are you ready to IMMEDIATELY eliminate the health care you receive at our expense? If not, would we not be justified in calling you hypocrites.
To the Tea Party people who do not want taxes raised but rather lowered, are you ready to give up your government checks? If not, why not?

Posted by: Sarah | March 14, 2010, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

Mr. Graham may be right depending on which “American people” or which “crap” he’s referring to. There are some who are tired of the GOP’s brand of crap i.e. misinformation, surrogat unofficial spokespersons on right wing talk shows and generally exploiting the anti-Obama backlash for all it’s worth. Many Americans know that we shouldn’t be the only industrialized nation wherein citizens aren’t universaly covered. The GOP never brings that up and don’t seem to mind having that dubius distinction. That is an indication that the health and welfare of millions of us are of no concern to them. They have done an excellent job of being deliberately divisive. They have no souls from the looks of their positions on this issue.

Posted by: Mike from Carolina | March 14, 2010, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

jhonny, you would be right. most of america does want hcr. most of america also wants public option to be involved, and not obamas sellout bill.
no reason why we cant have both.
no reason why we cant force obama to keep his word.
__________________________
The average of all recent polls says most people oppose the Democrats’ plan by 48.9% to 41.3%.
Among probable voters, the opposition is 53% to 42%.
There is no evidence that it’s because they want the public option. As far as I can tell, that statement is bunk. According to Rasmussen, 55% (on March 5) would like to see the current bill scrapped. and HC started over.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

huh…
Don’t visit HufPo — it’s just an echo chamber for the left wing nutcases that have no tolerance for a diversity of perspectives. Guess intolerance & progressive have become synonomous
“no tolerance for a diversity” but you tell me dont visit huffpuff?
im a centrist. im no pub and no dem. but I do like to hear what both say so do look at huff and thinkprogress.
oddly enough I avoid fox, but will once in awhile check out freep.
but usually if I want a rightys opinion I can find what rightys think in MSM.

Posted by: tony | March 14, 2010, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

The only thing we Americans are tired of is the ” biggest piece of crap there is and that is YOU LINDSEY GRAHAM AND YOUR BOSOM BUDDY–” KNOW NOTHING MCCAIN”

Posted by: Dan A | March 14, 2010, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

um what? hyperpartisan? which side am i partisan on considering im fully supporting public option and abortion coverage? and allowing illegals to use their own money to buy in? you are obviously confused.
___________
Tony, I think you’re still confused. I didn’t say anything about you and whether you’re partisan, one way or another. You seem to have a problem with me and I did say I don’t really care, and I don’t.
I wrote: ” I don’t pick one thing and get hyperpartisan about it.” Meaning– I wasn’t all “public option or nothing” or “no mandate or that’s it” — I listed a range of things that were important to me. So, what I clearly meant was I didn’t pick one hyperpartisan line in the sand. I was open to negotiation. I liked Wyden-Bennet.
I have no idea what your deal is, but I do know that I don’t care about your assessments of me or my so-called “talking points” meaning your remarks like this (I’ll be specific because your uptake seems a little off): “draw a line in the sand…yes i really believe you would vote no on HCR based on your talking points…oh no exchange? well geesh than i dont want hcr!”
Best of luck to you in whatever point you’re trying to make.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 14, 2010, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

Sarah,
The problem with Healthcare in this country is Healthcare. Health insurance will take care of itself to a large extent if we fix cost problems in the Healthcare system.
If we started there, then see where we are in 4 years — ya know — the same four years you’ll be paying and not receiving anything, we might see a path to making Medicare solvent and providing healthcare. As it is — this bill doesn’t solve the big problems.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

lowered, are you ready to give up your government checks?
Careful how you write. I assume that most people pay taxes that is until I read recently where 60% of Americans get more back than what they pay. Assuming the protestors against healthcare have paid taxes and get a check aren’t they suppose to? If they have paid into social security and medicare then it is not like it is some sort of handout, we are forced to pay into these ponsi schemes, should we at least get something from them. If you read your earnings statements, assuming you earn income, you will see a hefty amount deducted each pay period for the benefits later in life. Add those to what your employer pays and you’ll find it is a staggering amount.
Obama said his priority was jobs, had we more jobs then more could afford their own insurance and help to reduce the number of Government dependents. After watching a newsprogram tonight, finance reform has gone nowhere and greed is still as rampant now on Wall Street as it was before and nothing has been done about it.
No jobs no reforms but promises of more social programs, will ideas like this last forever?

Posted by: david | March 14, 2010, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

fran and freddie may have got the ball rolling, but, imo, neither pres is to blame for unemployment situation.
back in 2008 banks tightened loan restrictions. within a few months unemployment started spiraling. this is important. those tightened restrictions caused employers looking to expand and grow to not be able to get loans.
according to obama, and I agree with him, small businesses are the engine of job creation. so thats why unemployment grew and grew.
ya it was frannie and freddie that caused them to do so, but they could have handled it differently for one,
and for 2 a wise investment from stimulus would have been government backed loans for those businesses looking to expand, and a tax break a year later if they prove they created and maintained a new position.
instead you had cbo claiming 2 million jobs were created despite BOL’s numbers, and independent analysis’s from agencies such as AP that showed no effect on unemployment numbers when stimulus was pumped in.
remember the same cbo report also said the most effective use of stimulus dollars was federal spending, (which we already have a budget for) and more generous unemployment benefits.
apparently those unemployed are now employed as “job creation specialists” …taking tax payer dollars and investing them in their local economy to save jobs of people at walmart. or the local corner store.
but anyway I digress.
what we should have done was invest in those businesses.
or put pressure on the banks to be more lenient to small businesses.
heck imagine if we just passed a hundred billion dollar stimulus and actually used it to create jobs.
would have saved 700 billion.
thats why im in no rush to see hcr passed as is. I do not and will not buy that dems cant for some reason craft an entire new bill on cspan as promised, and still get it passed by november.

Posted by: tony | March 14, 2010, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

mitch polls are funny things. for example, your not mentioning the fact that answers change when public option specifically is mentioned. that one has a 67% approval.

Posted by: tony | March 14, 2010, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

Mike,
I don’t watch Maddow; you don’t have to watch Hannity (I don’t watch him either). What I do find is that as wacky as he is, he’s not afraid to have left wingers like Beckel on his show.
Reilly is kind of moderate, but he’s not scared to have Alan Colmes on his show.
You’ll never see a diverse viewpoint on any of the leftwing shows, including the MSM.
It’s useful to understand all viewpoints. That’s why major legislation should be bipartisan. Nobody can, with a straight face, say the Reid & Pelosi were making a good faith effort at bipartisanship and Obama was just going thru the motions when the polls started tanking.
Congress owes us a bipartisan process and 55% of the people agree.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

prog, my point is you are dishonest. I said you would take any bill that comes, desperate to pass just anything. you denied it and said you drew a line in the sand. so I said I doubt your vote would change to no if some of those things you mentioned were not incorporated.
for example, would you vote no on obamas HCR if they still were allowed to deny preexisting conditions? would you refuse coverage for millions because of it?

Posted by: tony | March 14, 2010, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

prog mama…your name is hyperpartisan. you identify your self as an leftist. a democrat. a liberal. leftwing.
or hyperpartisan : “Extremely partisan; extremely biased in favor of a political party.”

Posted by: tony | March 14, 2010, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Tony,
It’s a given that small business is the engine for employment.
The market is all about emotion. About confidence. Mounting debt doesn’t help. Threats against industries don’t help. Uncertainty about the cost of employing people doesn’t help. Uncertainty about the cost of energy doesn’t help.
Yes, credit is an issue — but banks are as uncertain as the small businesses they would like to lend to — but won’t take the risk.
Obama’s best strategy would be to keep his mouth shut and hide his credit cards.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

mitch..yes thats why we should have targeted those types of businesses with a much smaller 100 billion dollar package.
you would have to convince banks to work against thier best monetary interest to pressure them to be more leniant with those growth engines. so ok. a hundred billion in government backed loans and tax breaks. to business that actually create and maintains jobs.

Posted by: tony | March 14, 2010, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

The only one full crap is Graham and the rest of good old boys of his party.
It was good enough to pull half-baked intelligence to start the invasion of Iraq or tax cuts that were not really needed as economic stimulus which in hind sight both policies have proven bad and costly national decisions.
Let me remind Mr.Graham and his friends, that President Obama was elected with a clear and concise win = a mandate.
As Lee Iacocca would say, become part of the solution or get hell out the way – whiners.
The Republicans need to put something on the table that is pragmatic to the agenda of cutting cost and improving healthcare to ever become creditable on the issue of healthcare.
It is sad enough even Costa Rica has a better world class health care system the the United States.

Posted by: threeriverscrossing | March 14, 2010, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

mitch polls are funny things. for example, your not mentioning the fact that answers change when public option specifically is mentioned. that one has a 67% approval.
___________________________
I doubt you — as only 66% of Democrats want to build on the current bill. 85% of Republicans want to start over. No room anywhere for 67% wanting the public option unless you poll HufPo, dKos, or mediamatters wackjobs.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

The only one full crap is Graham and the rest of the good old boys of his party. It was good enough to pull half-baked intelligence to start the invasion of Iraq or tax cuts that were not really needed as economic stimulus which in hind sight both policies have proven bad and costly national decisions.
Let me remind Mr.Graham and his friends, that President Obama was elected with a clear and concise win = a mandate.
As Lee Iacocca would say, become part of the solution or get hell out the way – whiners.
The Republicans need to put something on the table that is pragmatic to the agenda of cutting cost and improving healthcare to ever become creditable on the issue of healthcare.
It is sad enough even Costa Rica has a better world class health care system the the United States.

Posted by: threeriverscrossing | March 14, 2010, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

half baked intelligence?
thanks alot mr.clinton!
“People can quarrel with whether we should have more troops in Afghanistan or internationalize Iraq or whatever, but it is incontestable that on the day I left office, there were unaccounted for stocks of biological and chemical weapons.”
Former President Clinton
During an interview on CNN’s “Larry King Live”
July 22, 2003

Posted by: tony | March 14, 2010, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

and three riddle me this…
if tax breaks were bad for the nation why did unemployment shrink every month after bushes tax cuts all the way till 2008 during the fredde/fran thing?

Posted by: tony | March 14, 2010, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

Don’t worry graham. We are going to hold you accountable for your inaction and loyalty to big corporations and their lobbyists.You are one worthless piece of sh!t.

Posted by: con me not | March 14, 2010, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

Tony,
It’s called risk. Look at how jittery the stock market is.
To add insult to injury, Obama wants to take over student loans at a cost of $1T in the next 10 years. The CBO head basically said his rating was bogus (he has no choice but to use bogus assumptions handed to him). This is all adding to the climate of uncertainty.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

con me not – you’ve been conned.
Obama is handed $27M by the SEIU and hands Andy Stern a huge chunk of the $800B stimulus. Public sector unemployment is 4% — how does that rub ya.
NEA kicks in $2.3M to the Democrats and Obama shuts down the school voucher program in DC.
If you want to clean up the mess in Washington, start with Obama & the Democrats.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

tony,
I keep hearing about that — even though the CBO said the Bush Tax cuts increased tax revenue per GDP. Kent Conrad (D-ND) tried to nail Bush on the tax cuts in 2007 – their response is available to all. When facts don’t matter, we’ll make the mistake of letting them expire. It’s gonna be a long recession. Carter’s second term.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

Obama is handed $27M by the SEIU and hands Andy Stern a huge chunk of the $800B stimulus.
____________________________________
Where does it say Andy Sterm got a ‘huge chunk of the $800B stimulus’?
Or did you just make that up? Source and date please.

Posted by: tierra | March 14, 2010, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

tierra — where did it disappear? State & local governments? What union do the saved and created workers belong to? Why is the overall unemployment rate 10.4% and the unemployment rate in the public sector is 4%?
A little math and several videos of Andy visiting the White House.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

you can find the employment data on the Fed website. February’s numbers.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

I’m glad my insurance premiums went up $320 last year. I’m really ecstatic that it went up $650 more this year. Let’s see, at this rate of doubling every year, I’ll be paying $10,000 a year in 4 more tears. I’m glad the insurance companies are so generous. We against Obamacare are really glad about this.

Posted by: rich | March 14, 2010, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

Oh, you can find the campaign contribution data easily as well — 2008 cycle

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

where’s the money going rich? Insurance company margins are 5% and they operate at 85%. Got a problem — find it — fix it. Insurance companies make good scapegoats, but I haven’t found egregious profits — and I’ve looked.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 14, 2010, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

JOBS !!!! JOBS !!!! JOBS !!!!!

Posted by: godhearus | March 14, 2010, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

The GOP Conservative Republican Party of No to someone’s else’s idea for health care reform is going to lose BIG TIME in November 2010 and 2012. They lie, cheat, distort polls and the truth. They just want all Americans to work for the GOP (Deep South – Confederates) where Graham is from, and they want all monies for themselves. They don’t want Americans to be well. They want all Americans to pay huge health care premiums, and high pharmaceutical costs to line the GOP Republican Conservatives Deep South Confederates pockets. They are — racists, hypocrits, hated and murdered President Lincoln. The deep south confederates during reconstruction “dissed” President Lincoln, and continued slavery and poverty well into the 1960s. Then President Johnson, a Democrat, had the decency to bring slavery and poverty to an end. At that time, deep south turned Republican and have been since. They want to keep slavery and poverty in check for those individuals they deem “unworthy” of American values. Vote Democrats to finally put an end to Deep South Confederates like Graham and his buddy McCain. Vote Democrat and allow all Americans opportunities to thrive. Go Health Care Reform and vote Democrats in November 2010 and November 2012. Get rid of pests like Graham and McCain. They aren’t wanted anymore since they support Deep South Confederate values of keeping slavery and poverty alive and well in GOP Republican Conservative Deep South Confederate Slate. That’s Repulican values — all for them and none for anyone else. Vote Democrat!

Posted by: Gig76 | March 14, 2010, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

Mr. Graham, I am an American, and I am SICK of your CRAP for decades…using the “American” people by spinning your CRAP, while sitting in Washington and ALLOWING the “American people toget ROBBED” for 8 years by your “big business cronies”, while putting your feet on the Necks of the “American people”. What have you done for your country or me lately?

Posted by: sara | March 14, 2010, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

Oyé Jake,
I’ve read the latest blog entries.
You are being infiltrated by Democrat operatives.
They are trying to make it look like public opinion is in favor of the stupid bloated health care reform bill. We all know that isn’t true.
Keep in mind, this kind of blogging was used to get Obama elected during the 2008 election.
Can you please try to make sure that only normal citizens post here not ones who are being paid to do so.
Thank you in advance.

Posted by: Noz | March 14, 2010, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

my point is you are dishonest….for example, would you vote no on obamas HCR if they still were allowed to deny preexisting conditions? would you refuse coverage for millions because of it?
your name is hyperpartisan. you identify your self as an leftist. a democrat. a liberal. leftwing.
or hyperpartisan : “Extremely partisan; extremely biased in favor of a political party.”
Posted by: tony |
_________
Again, I wrote: “I don’t pick one thing and get hyperpartisan about it.” Meaning– I wasn’t all “public option or nothing” or “no mandate or that’s it” — I listed a range of things that were important to me. So, what I clearly meant was I didn’t pick one hyperpartisan line in the sand. I was open to a range of ideas. I liked Wyden-Bennet.”
I’m taking it logic was never a strength, because truth is picking on my screen name doesn’t mean what I said above is false or “dishonest.” Moreover your definition of a progressive as necessarily a Democrat is flawed– most likely are, but most Green party candidates and voters are also “progressives”. And Teddy Roosevelt was a progressive. And have you never heard of progressive libertarians? (Never mind the latter– I know a lot of the people on these forums think inside very limited boxes.)
Anyhow… whatever on all that.
Since you can’t seem to string together the right question, I’ll first say my answer to your question about whether I’d “vote no” on the health care bill if they still were allowed to deny preexisting conditions and whether I would refuse coverage for millions because of it?– is (a) I’m not in Congress so I don’t get a vote, and (b)depends on the underlying structure set up, pooling opportunities for small businesses and the self-employed, the cost and CBO analysis, whether medical inflation was addressed as it is via the pilot programs. Ultimately, the pros and benefits versus the cons and costs. How many insureds would be covered and how many would be left out and what would be done about pre-existing conditions?
Your insistence on dumbing down my initial response to meet the way you look at things doesn’t change my response or how I look at it. If you want to regard me as hyperpartisan, that’s fine. I do loathe the GOP platform and overall party and have never voted for a Republican, so in that regard I am hyperpartisan, and I would look very long and hard at supporting their obstructionism this year or at being in common cause with them and the insurance and oil lobby on something like this, given their agenda and disinformation campaign. On a few things, I’m more willing to talk– for example, to some extent, I’m pro-nuclear energy despite safety and cost concerns (and enough pragmatism to know those need to be addressed) while many progressives are not. I also am very strong on the second amendment and own a gun myself, though I understand the concerns of those who live in large cities. Some people have called me an anarchist because my intellectual of choice is Chomsky, though I’m not an anarchist. i believe in both small business, small government, slow food and slow money.
I’m more sympathetic to actual libertarians (not the glibertarians, but those like Will Wilkinson) than straight-up centrists. I think centrism is status quo– but I do support Obama who is a centrist Dem, not much left of center, but certainly better than the alternative of McCain and Palin– and/or Clinton though I would’ve voted for her if she’d won the primary.
In any event, buckle up… its going to be an interesting week on the health care reform front. I’m proud to support this big first step in the right direction, and proud to press Dems to pass it. In the future, I’ll press for further improvements.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 14, 2010, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

They are trying to make it look like public opinion is in favor of the stupid bloated health care reform bill.
___________
Public opinion is in favor of health care reform.
Americans know the status quo isn’t sustainable.
Moreover, taken separately several reforms in the senate bill and Obama’s proposals poll well.
Onward.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 14, 2010, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

What did Obama and the Democrats have to do to get big pharma to fund ads supporting their government controlled healtcare takeover?
Time to get rid of these socialist Democrats…every stinking one of them!

Posted by: jon | March 15, 2010, 12:03 am 12:03 am

I do not know what polls you are reading, but any one that has a spit of truth shows the majority against the bill. I will stop paying my taxes if this gets through the Supreme Court. I do not need a judge to tell me this is unconstitutional.

Posted by: Bay Area Patriot | March 15, 2010, 12:06 am 12:06 am

I do not know what polls you are reading, but any one that has a spit of truth shows the majority against the bill. I will stop paying my taxes if this gets through the Supreme Court. I do not need a judge to tell me this is unconstitutional.
Posted by: Bay Area Patriot | Mar 15, 2010 12:06:50 AM
__________________________________
Every citizen has the right to not pay taxes – and to deal with the consequences.

Posted by: tierra | March 15, 2010, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Thank you Senator Graham. As I was listening to Axelrod I was thinking the same thing. The spinning with these people never stops. Its clear by the polls that we don’t want this bill.
They could easily pass a smaller bill with the items that everyone agrees on. This administration chooses not to.

Posted by: wow | March 15, 2010, 12:24 am 12:24 am

Thank you Senator Graham. As I was listening to Axelrod I was thinking the same thing. The spinning with these people never stops.
__________________________________
Actually the spinning from the Republican right never stops.
The AP/GFK poll shows that almost the same percentage of people want the legislation to move forward as not.
And that almost the same percentage of people would rather the legislation move forward rather than start over.
By the way, legislation is not passed or declined on polls – elections are the only REAL polls that include everyone who votes. Politicians are then required to do what they think is best.

Posted by: tierra | March 15, 2010, 12:35 am 12:35 am

In the Ipsos/McClatchy Poll on health care reform . ..
A majority of both Democrats AND Independents support the proposed health care reform.
It is only Republicans who oppose it.

Posted by: tierra | March 15, 2010, 12:44 am 12:44 am

They ought do produce the healthcare equivalent of food stamps. Just give people the money they need for care.
Catastrophic care, i.e. cancer, would be covered via a low cost catastrophic care insurance. This is much less expensive than the Cadillac plans that pay for every flu shot and office visit. The incidental care.like pediatrics – shots etc., should be paid via the food stamp model.
That is very cheap to do and does not sell out the American people to the insurance industry.

Posted by: welldirected | March 15, 2010, 12:48 am 12:48 am

Also, in the Ipsos/McClatchy poll – amongst those who oppose the current legislation, 37% were opposed because they “favor healthcare reform overall but think the current proposals don’t
go far enough to reform healthcare”.

Posted by: tierra | March 15, 2010, 12:52 am 12:52 am

41.3 for 48.9 against summary of the 8 top polls. ANy one who tells you different is not informed or paid to mis-inform.

Posted by: welldirected | March 15, 2010, 12:55 am 12:55 am

41.3 for 48.9 against summary of the 8 top polls. ANy one who tells you different is not informed or paid to mis-inform.
Posted by: welldirected | Mar 15, 2010 12:55:37 AM
__________________________________
As was just pointed out, some of those people who ‘oppose’ the current health care reform oppose it because they don’t think it goes far enough – in other words they want even more reform.
Polls must be looked at in depth. And even then, polls are not what decides legislation.
The only REAL poll that counts everyone who vote is the election.
By the way, you’ll also find in polls that people by a large majority (57 – 36) think Republicans are DELIBERATELY AVOIDING COMPROMISE.

Posted by: tierra | March 15, 2010, 1:06 am 1:06 am

The plain unvarnished fact is that the majority of the American people are against this bill.
___________________________________
Not really . . . the latest poll is the Associated Press/GfK poll and it has the numbers VERY close (43 – 41).
And again, some people are ‘opposed’ because they think the legislation should go further (ie. be more progressive).

Posted by: tierra | March 15, 2010, 1:17 am 1:17 am

This bill and the people who are pushing it stink. Lets tell them that. We are the people of the center of politics. We are not aligned, but we read the papers and know the facts.
When they stink, we should tell them they stink.

Posted by: welldirected | March 15, 2010, 1:25 am 1:25 am

This bill and the people who are pushing it stink.
____________________________________
Oh come on . . . you don’t like something about their insurance reforms but there is no need to start insulting people.

Posted by: tierra | March 15, 2010, 1:27 am 1:27 am

If this bill passes it will keep good legislation from being proposed.
People who argue for this bill do it for reasons other than providing care to those who need it. Pick you reasons – all corrupt.
Flier from Harvard Med says we should do health savings accounts and catastrophic care.

Posted by: welldirected | March 15, 2010, 1:30 am 1:30 am

Do not just post on this site – CALL your Congressman and tell them we are TIRED OF THIS CR*P!!!
Graham has used the very word I have been thinking all this time… C-R-A-P!

Posted by: clr | March 15, 2010, 1:37 am 1:37 am

Tierra only sites the weird polls that fit her even weirder (paid) view of this bill. The polls from February and March all show more opposed to this bill than in favor. From Tierra’s comments one would assume that was not the case.
This bill stinks. Those who insist on pushing it on us stink worse.
Ok Tierra you can now lie all you want and go on your dillusional way thinking we are all buying it.

Posted by: welldirecteda | March 15, 2010, 1:41 am 1:41 am

Chiara, I agree. I think we have to call them out when we see it. There has been a flood of those drones on these lists.
We will not have any voice if we let them take over these forums with nonsense.
Thank you for your post. We have got to keep the discussions going to generate the new solutions.
I have come to think that a solution similar to food stamps is a good way to pay for those people who truly cannot afford day to day healthcare. The idea is to just target those who truly do not have care – similar to the idea of feeding those who need food.

Posted by: welldirected | March 15, 2010, 1:53 am 1:53 am

welldirected: exactly — if only there had been a dialogue on health care from the beginning, we wouldn’t be in this situation now. From the beginning their strategy has been to shut down, smear, and demonize the opposition, and attempt to confuse those of us who actually want to consider things from all angles instead of blindly following the party line. We could really have been doing something productive here, but instead it has come to this. It’s a travesty.

Posted by: Chiara | March 15, 2010, 2:00 am 2:00 am

please do not talk in the name of the american people
remember people voted for obama because of the health care reform
obama numbers are down of course because of the economy..what else do you expect? this is normal
health care reform must be passed

Posted by: holly | March 15, 2010, 4:26 am 4:26 am

41.3 for 48.9 against summary of the 8 top polls
lets say the numbers are correct
48.9 does not represent a majority ..am i missing something? last time i checked majority is usually 2/3 or a simple majority is 51%
so everone is saying the majority of the american people..is a Liar

Posted by: holly | March 15, 2010, 4:29 am 4:29 am

health care reform must be passed
Posted by: holly | Mar 15, 2010 4:26:34 AM
_______________________________
It will be passed.
The latest poll (March 3 – 8, 2010) by Associated Press/GfK has 41% supporting the proposed legislation, 43% opposed.
Not much difference at all.
Besides, legislation is not decided by polls – the only REAL poll is the one that counts – the election – where everybody who voted counted.

Posted by: tierra | March 15, 2010, 4:39 am 4:39 am

Lindsey Graham is exactly right when it comes to this health care bill. It is no more then a rationed, socialized, government run health care bill that has more to do with tax then with health care. Canada & Britain have same kind of health care & it doesn’t work. Canada had a politician come here to America for surgery rather then having to wait for it up there & the gentleman who is a member of Parliament was on several TV shows here warning us about this kind of health care bill. They are having serious trouble with it over there with people not getting the help they need soon enough & some, especially cancer victims, or dying before they can even see a doctor much less a specialist. They are having trouble paying the medical providers & do not have enough of them. I believe if you would check they have a higher mortality rate then we do. We have the best health care system in the world & Obama, Pelosi & Reid want to force this more expensive with less coverage down our throats rather then just leaving us alone & let us keep our on health insurance. They need to let us shop over state lines to get competitive prices but the government does not need to take it over. This would give Obama control of 1/6 of the economy & that will lead to more & more control by the government on everything else. We need Big Government out of our lives. Pelosi, Reid & Obama are ignoring what the majority of Americans want & are trying to tell us what we need. They work for us, we do not work for them.

Posted by: Elaine | March 15, 2010, 6:17 am 6:17 am

The American people are tired of the Republican obstructionist crap.
The Democrats should have passed a health care reform bill with their super-majority long ago, instead of letting Obama pander to the Republicans under the guise of “looking for bi-partisanship.”
The GOP is not at all concerned about doing anything helpful for the American people. They are ONLY concerned with obstructing anything and everything this administration attempts to accomplish, so they can stand around for the next election and say, “See? We told you so.”
Heck, they even vote against their OWN bills, just to keep anything from getting done.
And it’s gonna come back and bite ‘em in the butt. By November 2012, most people will have identified their obstructionist tactics and they’ll STILL be out in the cold.

Posted by: JaylahPriest | March 15, 2010, 7:04 am 7:04 am

health care reform must be passed
Posted by: holly | Mar 15, 2010 4:26:34 AM
_______________________________
It will be passed.
_______________________________
Posted by: tierra | Mar 15, 2010 4:39:42 AM
You’re right tierra, just not this smelly lame attempt of a bill.
Vote it down.
Let the Congressmen and Senators go home for their leave.
There they will hear from their constituents.
When they come back they can take the good elements add in the needed Tort Reform and competition ideas and give it another go with something that has a chance of controlling costs and helping to solve the problem.

Posted by: Noz | March 15, 2010, 7:19 am 7:19 am

The Democrats should have passed a health care reform bill with their super-majority long ago, instead of letting Obama pander to the Republicans under the guise of “looking for bi-partisanship.”
__________________________________
Posted by: JaylahPriest | Mar 15, 2010 7:04:50 AM
And they would have if the Bill was any good.
Remember they started out with that ill conceived idea, “Government Option”.
So enough Democrats knew that was a bad idea that they had to modify.
But by then enough people could see the rest of the trash in the bill and it started to stink pretty bad, so it hasn’t passed.
Actually Jaylah, legislation of this size is supposed to include the minority.
That’s what the founding fathers intended.
That’s why we are a Republic.
But I bet you don’t care about that now do you?

Posted by: Noz | March 15, 2010, 8:05 am 8:05 am

we sure are, and it is his crap we are sick of. this new entitlement will be taken out of the income of working and retired people. Our gift to the freeloaders of the country.

Posted by: madmax | March 15, 2010, 8:09 am 8:09 am

Tierra and Holly: Please quit referring to this bill as a health care bill. It is an insurance bill, look no further than Obama’s own web site. Thanks

Posted by: lfrichar | March 15, 2010, 8:37 am 8:37 am

Obama wasn’t pandering to the GOP, he was appeasing special interest groups.

Posted by: DontGet818onMeNow | March 15, 2010, 8:39 am 8:39 am

“”"”"”"there is no need to start insulting people.”"”"”"
Posted by: tierra
So you don’t think the closed door deals and bribes are insulting? Obama said there would be no more “business as usual” in DC and no more pork, yet they continue with the bribes and adding pork. What part of Obama’s promise am I missing?

Posted by: lfrichar | March 15, 2010, 8:40 am 8:40 am

More scare tactics and no real solutions. That’s what the American people are tired of.
Let’s get this bill passed and deal with any problems it creates later on. At least it will keep politicians employed.
If this bill is killed, there won’t be any reprise for decades. Suffering will continue and politicians will get wealthier off insurance corporations.
Just do SOMETHING!

Posted by: Wayne | March 15, 2010, 8:44 am 8:44 am

Chiara — If the Dems put as much energy into writing a good bill and selling it than they did trying to demonize the GOP as “party of no and obstructionists” and back room bribes, we might have a bill worth something. This bill stinks, period. Incremental bipartisan reform is what is needed.

Posted by: lfrichar | March 15, 2010, 8:45 am 8:45 am

CRAP?
Can’t
Re-elect
Any
Politicians

Posted by: lfrichar | March 15, 2010, 8:46 am 8:46 am

” What part of Obama’s promise am I missing?” – lfrichar
The part where he said he’d unite people and work with both sides.
Some of Obama’s promise was really Obama’s propaganda.
He needed to say certain things to get elected.
Remember Rev Wright said Barack will say whatever he needs to get elected.
He’s a politician after all.

Posted by: Noz | March 15, 2010, 8:50 am 8:50 am

The only reason this stupid bill MUST be passed is to save this presidency. He MUST have a victory, any victory. Pelosi and Reid have far too much gambled to lose now. Trophies and egos are on the line. SS is now calling in iou’s (more gov’t borrowing forthcoming), Feb showed the largest deficit for any one month in our history, Medicare will be broke in 7 years, and Obama’s budget is now estimated to have a shortfall of $1.2 trillion per CBO. Yes, indeed, the American people really trust Washington and their “pie-in-the-sky” estimates.

Posted by: Salty Dog | March 15, 2010, 8:52 am 8:52 am

“Just do SOMETHING!” – Wayne
I hear and feel you Wayne!
[sarcasm]
Hey I have an idea!
Let’s pass a bill that will put our country deep in debt and not solve the problem.
The we can say we did something and that should make us feel better.
right?
[/sarcasm]

Posted by: Noz | March 15, 2010, 8:54 am 8:54 am

Totally agree.
This government is supposed to be run for the people, not the President’s personal, misguided, agenda.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | March 15, 2010, 9:43 am 9:43 am

Canada & Britain have same kind of health care & it doesn’t work.
—-
Elaine, can you list out how those plans are the same kind of health care, in detail?
No?
Of course not, because that isn’t true and it makes your entire post incredible. But you are putting forth the same tired canards. For example, you write, “his would give Obama control of 1/6 of the economy”, a tired canard Paul Krugman mentioned and debunked in his column titled “Health Care Myths”.
You also claim we have the best health care system in the world– if by best, you mean the most expensive and the biggest drain on the economy, you’re right. We have the best health care system in the world for the wealthy and if you very specifically exclude accessibility and affordability. For the middle class, working poor and poor, our health care system is not the best, and our payment system is crap.
The status quo simply isn’t sustainable. And the parroted debunked myths are getting old.
Obama was elected on a platform that included health care reform. I admire his tenacity in the face of pressure from lobbyists, their wholly owned subsidiaries and those who are repeatedly duped by them.
Onward. Its time to move into the 21st century with the first step toward meaningful health care reform. Letting the perfect be the enemy of the good doesn’t serve us well (see the debacle in the 00′s regarding regulating GSE’s, derivatives and the financial industry.)

Posted by: progresssive mama | March 15, 2010, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Posted by: lfrichar | Mar 15, 2010 8:46:19 AM
We don’t agree often, but I did grin at that one :^)

Posted by: progresssive mama | March 15, 2010, 10:00 am 10:00 am

From the beginning their strategy has been to shut down, smear, and demonize the opposition, and attempt to confuse those of us who actually want to consider things from all angles instead of blindly following the party line.
____
Chiara, I think that is in the eye of the beholder as its been clear to me that the insurance and oil lobbies have been working with Republicans and certain conservaDems to kill bills. It reminded me very much of the 90s. There were discussions of derailing, delaying, death panels (with the same debunked players as the 90s plus Palin pushing the disinformation), Waterloos– and a real attempt by astroturfers to drown out all sane voices at town halls.
Obama promised if we elected him that he would work hard for health care reform. I’m glad he is. I’m glad Pelosi and others have been doing the same. The Republicans have not.
Its time to pass health care reform. That status quo is unsustainable. Further fixes and improvements can be made as we finally evolve into a more civilized 21st century nation.

Posted by: progresssive mama | March 15, 2010, 10:05 am 10:05 am

Any good community organizer knows you must find a devil and then hammer, hammer, hammer regardless of the half-truths. The devil today is the medical ins companies. The half-truths concern those millions and millions in profits while never mentioning profit margins. The avg margin is less than 3%. Two companies actually lost money. Now, go and look at the profit margins of drug companies, medical device companies, and trial lawyers (at 33% per victory). By the way, paid for aspirin at a hospital lately? Had any unnecessary medical tests done lately just to keep your doctor from being sued by the trial lawyers?
Remember when Obama was all for importing drugs until PHARMA stepped in? Remember when Menendez (D-NJ) made certain fellow Dem Dorgan’s bill to allow for the import of drugs was defeated (the Canadians were going to poison us)? The one proposal that would have saved us millions shot down by the Dems. By the way, look up and see how many major drug companies are in NJ. Yes sir, the Dems are looking out for you. Apparently PHARMA and trial lawyer locusts are better locusts than are medical ins locusts.
Then we remember the old Georgia judge who said, “Don’t confuse me with the facts. My mind is made up.”

Posted by: salty dog | March 15, 2010, 11:27 am 11:27 am

If this was bush and he proposed this healthcare bill the republicans would be voting for it.

Posted by: Andrew | March 15, 2010, 11:34 am 11:34 am

Everyone continues to put all the blame on the insurance companies…yes they’ve denied for pre-existing conditions and have denied coverage when people get sick…but lets look at the big picture here. The price of healthcare is skyrocketing and it’s not because of the health insurance companies. Let’s get to the bigger issue here…Why is the cost of healthcare going up? Everyone wants to point the finger at one group of people when there are a large number of factors here…for instance the Rx companies…Do people really need all these drugs for good health? Some drugs are necessary but a large majority are not…There are better ways of taking care of ourselves like good exercise, eating healthy foods. Rx drugs is just the lazy way out for people not to take the extra time to take care of themselves. Then these Rx drugs cause other side affects like depression, thoughts of suicide, heart problems, insaumnia, etc. So then you have to take another drug for that! Also there are procedures done that aren’t necessary, and provider’s don’t know how to bill causing delays in payments, and sometimes don’t get paid….it’s just a matter of everyone staying on top of their game.

Posted by: justayreal74 | March 15, 2010, 11:43 am 11:43 am

About time somebody said it the way it is. We the majority do not want Obamas plan simply because he thinks he has to pass something. Makes a whole lot of sense to pass a bill because he thinks he has to pass something. Working without the full congress and senate is not working together. The dems will suffer hard for this. The campaining againts them has begun. Do not be fooled thinking we will forget before November. Ever heard of laying back to see what happens. The silent will swoop down and celan it all up very soon.

Posted by: Jim Rod | March 15, 2010, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Though I’m not a big Gibbs fan, I enjoyed his appearance on Fox, delivering the news that health care reform is going to become the law of the land (finally!)
Jed Lewison: “Thus far, the conventional wisdom has been that Republicans are enthusiastic and Democrats are demoralized. … But the thing you have to remember is that thus far the Democrats have failed to pass health care reform. Republicans were actually winning, against all odds.
But in this coming week, all that changes. Health care reform will pass. Democrats will have demonstrated their ability to tackle big issues. Republicans will have demonstrated their irrelevance. After reform passes, there might be an initial surge of excitement among Republicans, but that will quickly fizzle in the wake of the GOP’s failure to stop reform.
If you want to preview the reaction of the GOP base, check out the comment thread … It’s not that anybody believes this bill is perfect. It’s not. But it’s progress. And it’s a sign that on the next issue, instead of just talk, we’ll be able to make progress as well. ” (Daily Kos)

Posted by: progressive mama | March 15, 2010, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

are the republicans going to do anything? Give any ideas? No they are more concerned about saving their money… what a joke Congress is these days.. start reducing the pay then maybe they will do something worth while.. republican and democrat.. the issue is not the President it’s congress..

Posted by: VA is blue | March 15, 2010, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

and I agree w/ Holly.. we didn’t elect President Obama so he’s agenda could go ignored and changed by Congress!!! These politicians will pay when it comes down to it..

Posted by: VA is blue | March 15, 2010, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

and who would really be against health care reform? It’s clear they are ripping the American people off every year as premiums go up. I do have a right to have affordable health care, even though I dont make millions of dollars a year. I work everyday to provide a service that most of those jerks couldn’t live without, and then you tell me o well sorry you can’t afford health care? and my job doesn’t pay into our health care so?? they get to keep making profits while I dont know whether I can go to the doctor if I’m sick? Get outta here w/ that mess! It shows how selfish and ignorant people are when they get in here complaining about socialism (probably dont even know what the word means!) and people out here are struggling.. I wonder would you be mad if God didn’t give a care about you and left u in the cold? these people are stupid and I hope they pass health care reform because THATS WHAT I VOTED FOR!! CHANGES!!! not doing the same mess that got us in to this mess!! I wish Republicans would shut up because they showed for 8 years they can’t run anything!

Posted by: VA is blue | March 15, 2010, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

Come on! enough already. Vote on it now. Get it over with. Stop playing and vote now. So we can get on with Getting the yes voters kicked out of offce.

Posted by: Jim Rod | March 15, 2010, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

The big lie from the Left is that this bill is deficit neutral. We already have unaffordable entitlements; medicare alone has future unfunded liabilities of $30T (that’s trillion). And now the Left wants the biggest new entitlement program since 1962…with NO way to pay for it. All these people bleating about their “rights”…what do they NOT understand about the word “bankrupt”? I guess they’re just greedy people in denial.

Posted by: JohnR22 | March 15, 2010, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

Grahmnesty can be very good on issues like the time he blasted Holder on Gitmo and trials for the Islamofascists and on this issue on Ax. Other times, he is appalling. But, here, he is point on. Every Pub in all 435 House districts should campaign on REPEALING THIS SOCIALIST HORROR. There are many other issues to blast his inept socialist in the WH and his minions in the Dem Congress: amnesty, education, cap and trade, energy, border protection, national security as well as this Care disaster. Americans should be repulsed and revolted by these socialists who would turn American into Venezuela by the time they are done legislatively.

Posted by: Glenn Koons | March 15, 2010, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

Let’s do SOMETHING!! That is exactly what the Dems are doing. SOMETHING. A 2300 page bill costing the countries trillions of dollars. Yeh,yeh, the bill is for about 800 billion. But it does not go in effect til ’14,and the taxes start now. The American public is being asked to bend over. We can not afford this bill, even though it is,as many ask for,SOMETHING. It is an atrocious piece of legislation,being pushed just so the Doofus in Chief can say that he got it done. Once more, the country can NOT afford it.

Posted by: dave | March 15, 2010, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

I was told to post another comment. SO I will. Following orders, just like the sheep who are following the commands of Nancy the Vapid and Harry the Horrible,who are pushing a bill which equates to 1/6 or so of our economy. The government runs nothing efficiently,be it schools,post office,train service,DMV. Why do we possibly think that this bill will cost 800 Bill. when more likely it will cost at least 5 times that much. And then I,the President will tell us we need to pass Kneecap and Trade,then Border reform NOW (before the Nov. Elections).
And the Dems will follow like sheep (and history repeats itself). This country is broke and this HC bill will just make it even broker. Call your Congress(wo)man and tell him/her NO.

Posted by: dave | March 15, 2010, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

dave, you’re sounding horribly worried that people are awakening from their collective amnesia and anger at the world, and tired of being hoodwinked by and listening to the crazy rants and smears of the wholly owned subsidiaries of special interests. LOL.
They are.
But of course the conservative Republican right health care reform freak out is on. Oh noooooes! We’re actually going to do something about the unsustainable status quo and medical bankrupcies!!! How dare we?!?
its time to make the step, and press for further improvements once the legislation is passed.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 15, 2010, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

Steve Benen at Washington Monthly’s Political Animal blog has a good post up regarding Graham’s “crap”:
“Graham’s understanding of the basics of health care policy has always been rather tenuous, but this is just silly. The Democratic reform proposal is quite similar to the Massachusetts policy that Brown supported and Mitt Romney signed into law. And by “quite similar,” I mean “almost identical.”
Graham stresses the fact that Romney and Brown didn’t “cut Medicare.” Well, no, they didn’t, but that’s probably because state officials can’t cut federal programs, even if they wanted to.
Besides, as Paul Krugman explained, this talking point doesn’t really fit into the GOP framework anyway: “[T]hink about this a bit more: Republicans are saying that what makes Obamacare a socialist takeover, whereas Romneycare wasn’t, is the fact that unlike Romney’s plan, Obama’s plan cuts government spending. Oh, Kay.”
I realize why Graham has to rely on … what’s the word … spin. After all, President Obama and congressional Democrats are advancing a reform plan that’s exactly the kind of proposal that moderate Republicans — back when they existed — enthusiastically embraced. For Graham to acknowledge this would be to paint today’s GOP as having moved aggressively to the far-right. And while that would be true, it’d also be inconvenient.”

Posted by: progressive mama | March 15, 2010, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

Graham is correct that Americans oppose this so-called health care reform legislation.
However, another piece of crap Americans are tired of is Lindsey Graham.

Posted by: lance sjogren | March 15, 2010, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

“If this was bush and he proposed this healthcare bill the republicans would be voting for it”
Absolutely right. Thank God that Bush is no longer in office, otherwise hideous legislation like this would probably sail through Congress.

Posted by: lance sjogren | March 15, 2010, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

” We’re actually going to do something about the unsustainable status quo and medical bankrupcies”
Right, we’re going to accelerate the collapse of the economy by accelerating unsustainable health care policies.
I found it interesting a couple months ago Chuck Schumer said any bill is better than no bill. In other words, no matter what you do, even if you make things even worse, is better than the status quo.
That is the progressive mantra. Peace, love, dope, just feel good about yourself, promise everything to everyone and find some boogieman you claim can pay the bill, and everything is hunky dory.
I wonder when progressives are going to grow up and become adults.

Posted by: lance sjogren | March 15, 2010, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

People are tired of this crap. They’re tired of the arguing. They’re tired of the non-stop posturing and nothing getting done. Obama is right, everything that has been said about health care has been said (although he’s still stumping for it…kinda funny). Nothing is going to change anyone’s mind at this point so dems just need to man up and do something or shut up and get out of the way, and prepare the republican takeover in November.
I can’t wait until republicans get power again and they get a taste of their own medicine. They complained about the democrats and Bush derangement syndrome and now they do the exact same thing. SSDD.

Posted by: Aaron1982 | March 15, 2010, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

That is the progressive mantra. Peace, love, dope, just feel good about yourself, promise everything to everyone and find some boogieman you claim can pay the bill, and everything is hunky dory.
I wonder when progressives are going to grow up and become adults.
Posted by: lance sjogren | Mar 15, 2010 2:13:33 PM
Oh, lordy… self righteous hypocrisy while stereotyping is grown up in your opinion? LOL.
Personally, I wonder when Republicans are going to hold themselves and their politicians accountable, which would at least appear “grown up” (in contrast to Bachmann’s whining, for example, or Paul Ryan’s Potemkin plan that wouldn’t help the deficit at all, even given two generations) or actually check numbers and data on job creation, deficits, fiscal responsiblity and so on, and see the folks progressives vote for tend to have better records on all that.
As for the progressive mantra, you forgot the treehugging environmental stuff, civil liberties, social justice, equal opportunity, shop local, transparency in government, do unto others, build infrastructure, promote science, progress, and people over profits. And the dope thing often is “legalize dope and tax it” not just “dope.”
But when you’re motto is likely in common cause with IOKIYR, its easy to get a lot of things wrong. Never mind that the latter part of the motto you put forth says more about the faux “conservatives” in this country as well as Republicans and conservaDems and moderates promoting the centrist status quo than any progressive. LOL.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 15, 2010, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

p.s.
lance, shouldn’t you be over weighing in on immigration. Usually, you’re all over the place pontificating on that, yes?

Posted by: progressive mama | March 15, 2010, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

They need to shut up and vote…period. There’s been enough said, now find out how many and who are for and against. Then, when it doesn’t pass, sit down with the other party and find common ground and pass it in increments. Is it just mme or did common sense just never apply to politicians?

Posted by: lfrichar | March 15, 2010, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

“If this was bush and he proposed this healthcare bill the republicans would be voting for it”
Absolutely right. Thank God that Bush is no longer in office, otherwise hideous legislation like this would probably sail through Congress.
____________________________________
Posted by: lance sjogren | Mar 15, 2010 2:10:44 PM
Lance, you are the official Blogger-Hero-of-the-Day™
I can’t put in words how refreshing it is to have someone as obviously intelligent as you here sharing your superior world views.
Kudos my Man!
Thanks for posting!

Posted by: Noz | March 15, 2010, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

That is the progressive mantra. Peace, love, dope, just feel good about yourself, promise everything to everyone and find some boogieman you claim can pay the bill, and everything is hunky dory.
I wonder when progressives are going to grow up and become adults.
Posted by: lance sjogren | Mar 15, 2010 2:13:33 PM
————————-
Oh, lordy… self righteous hypocrisy while stereotyping is grown up in your opinion? LOL.
Posted by: progressive mama | Mar 15, 2010 2:48:07 PM
_________________________________
Bingo . . .

Posted by: tierra | March 15, 2010, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

“Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedies.” Groucho Marx.
Nuff said…

Posted by: salty dog | March 15, 2010, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

More sour grapes from the party of No after not being able to hoodwink enough gullible voters to keep their party in office for another disastrous 4 years. Also note from Sen. Graham’s greeting that republicans still feel they are “Gods Party”

Posted by: JohnF | March 15, 2010, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

Vote!…Graham..Vote!.Vote!….Vote!……Obama is right, everything that has been said about health care has been said. Nothing is going to change anyone’s mind at this point……America still wants single payer. The “Party of No” will lose more seat this November!!! They are in for a real treat with their unwillingness to work with others? The GOP is totally mis-reading America. It is obivous that they are trying to destroty OBAMA with their “No” to everything. This The gang of “41″ senators will go down. America will reward them with seat at home this coming election.

Posted by: hot coffee | March 15, 2010, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

aint nuttin gonna happen for 4 years…no change their. how lame can you be to support this give away from people who have jobs and work hard to keep em. the revolt will be stagerring and will be reversed because it will take away something that doesnt exist for over 4 years. all of this for this piece of d@ng. good luck in your new carreers as lobbiests dems.

Posted by: catman | March 15, 2010, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

We need to start a pool… how many hours will pass after this bill passes will the first lawsuit be filed challenging it on Constitutional grounds? And when the Supreme Court overturns the “law” as being unconstitutional, showing us all once again that Obama is and always has been a MORON, what will the liberal loonies on here be chanting about then, disbanding the Supreme Court through reconciliation??
I’ll take first pick… I say 4 hours.

Posted by: Seriously__Fed__Up | March 15, 2010, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Mr. Graham….speaking of crap as you put it…if you guys had been this busy trying to keep health care from happening and did some actual worthwhile things while you were in power….maybe we would not be in this crap.The banks actually started to fail in 2005 not 2007 as I thought so you had plenty of time if you had done a decent job of preventing this thing from getting so bad. Your efforts on this health care bill, I am sure directed on some problems in 2007 and 2008 would haver prevented this recession….however, that is not the story so let’s stop talking crap.

Posted by: talmag | March 15, 2010, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

A Tiny Peek at The Government’s Slippery Slope:
1. Census: Sure the questions are unconstitutional, but there’s only ten of them.
2. Patriot Act: We don’t listen to your conversations, just for certain words and phrases.
3. Global Warming: If it seems warmer then man must have caused it, what does science have to do with anything?
4. Cap and trade: We don’t care about the fact against manmade global warming, this bill will only cost you 50 cents per day.
5. Obamacare: So you don’t want it, just cowboy up and live with it it will only add to the debt, increase your insurance premiums, ration your healthcare and we added ten pages of doublespeak to try to convince you that funding for abortion will be hidden.
6. PayGo: It sounds good, but unfunded liabilities of the US government are more than double the net worth of the US and we just have to keep spending after all that’s what we do.

Posted by: Ed Taylor | March 15, 2010, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

Nobody supports this far left agenda besides the brainwashed youth in America’s colleges & universities. Obama lives in liberal la la land. America is trillions in debt. How in the world can you lower the deficit by spending $1 trillion more of taxpayer money? What planet is President Obama on? I deeply regret my vote for him it was a big mistake. I am tired of this crap!

Posted by: Dan | March 15, 2010, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

“What planet is President Obama on?” – Dan
Planet Obamatron, where every decision is a good decision.
The place where any progressive idea is a good idea and all that matters is that you do something, anything.
The place where no one ever fails and excrement smells like roses in springtime.

Posted by: Noz | March 16, 2010, 8:07 am 8:07 am

LINDZ WHO DEALT IT SCHMELT IT!
What a joke these open borders, globalist RINO’s McAmnesty (shamelessly running for reelection in Arizona) and his lap dog Grahamnesty are! In violation of Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution and the 1986 Amnesty Agreement, they facilitated the invasion of our country by over 30 MILLION illegal aliens (BUT NO TERRORISTS?!) to destroy our institutions, including the hospital/medical care system. Now they come to the taxpayers and say, “Oh look, YOU have a healthcare problem,” all the while plotting with neo-comm Obamnesty for ANOTHER AMNESTY!
Hey halfwit Grahamnesty, that’s RINO dung you’re sniffing!

Posted by: Straight Talk Hawk | March 16, 2010, 8:11 am 8:11 am

I know only politics is very bad game and tuff…….no can judge what will happen in politics.

Posted by: Ilan Ben Menachem | March 18, 2010, 5:28 am 5:28 am

Do you have a spam issue on this blog; I also am a blogger, and I was wanting to know your situation; we have created some nice methods and we are looking to exchange solutions with other folks, please shoot me an e-mail if interested.

Posted by: veg mocking party | October 18, 2011, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.