By Jonathan Blakely

Mar 15, 2010 3:14pm

“I’m Here Because of Natoma,” Obama Pushes for Health Care in Ohio

From Sunlen Miller “I’m here because of Natoma,” President Obama said today making a personal and passionate plea to pass health reform now. The story of Natoma Canfield, who Mr. Obama introduced into the health care dialogue two weeks ago  was brought to a new level today, a presidential visit to her hometown at a time when Mrs. Canfield was too sick to participate in the event. “The reason Natoma is not here today is that she’s lying in a hospital bed, suddenly faced with this emergency, suddenly faced with the fight of her life,” Obama explained to the Cleveland, Ohio crowd of Natoma’s recent diagnosis of leukemia which she is now facing without health insurance, “She expects to face more than a month of aggressive chemotherapy.  She is racked with worry not only about her illness, but about the cost of the tests and the treatment that she’s surely going to need to beat it.” Natoma’s sister introduced the president at today’s event – and the president described Natoma’s story – being hit with a 40% premium hike on her insurance, forcing her to stop coverage even though she had been cancer-free for 11 years. “You want to know why I’m here, Ohio?,” a candidate-like Obama leaning close to the microphone yelled, “I’m here because of Natoma. I’m here because of countless others who have been forced to face the most terrifying challenges in their lives with the added burden of medical bills they can’t pay. I don’t think  that’s right.  Neither do you.  That’s why we need health insurance right now.” More here from ABC’s Jake Tapper and Karen Travers: -Sunlen Miller

User Comments

the Scammer in Chief is at it again – what did we do to deserve this guy and his woefully amateur team of thugs? He’s pathetic–simply pathetic–all you need to know about him was revealed with his Special Olympics “joke” – a classless politician, no more or less

Posted by: ted | March 15, 2010, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

The “PASS IT NOW, AND WE’LL FIX IT LATER*” crowd/politicians sound a lot like the management team at Toyota in regards to the “speed-up, then try to slam on the brakes, then crash, burn and die” folks managing the PRIUS et al issues
*BTW, for all you Pro-Lifers who think that the current abortion language will/can be fixed it reconciliation, super bad news. The abortion language in the current Senate Bill that The House will vote on CONNOT BE CHANGED in reconciliation, as reconciliation can ONLY deal with budget items, of which abortion does NOT qualify. So it is now/never on this issue, too.

Posted by: JMo | March 15, 2010, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

the Scammer in Chief is at it again – what did we do to deserve this guy and his woefully amateur team of thugs? He’s pathetic–simply pathetic–all you need to know about him was revealed with his Special Olympics “joke” – a classless politician, no more or less
Posted by: ted | Mar 15, 2010 3:30:55 PM
________________________________
Your thoughtful words about the President reveal who is really ‘pathetic’, ‘classless’, a ‘thug’ and so on . .
The Republican right campaign of juvenile name calling, smears and insults continues . ..
Anything to get back in power. Republicans think only they have the divine right to rule the United States – certainly not those evil Democrats.
Wh

Posted by: tierra | March 15, 2010, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

REMEMBER IN November!!!
If the average middle class American does not do what his boss wants, he gets fired. Since the Congress and Administration plan to ram a healthcare bill into law the American people do not want, they should be FIRED. It is time to VOTE THEM OUT!!! The Congress and Administration want to use a process that was never intended to be used for this purpose to ram this bill into law against the will of the American people. This sets a dangerous precedent that subverts our system of government. Anyone that votes in favor of this bill is the enemy of our system of government. It is time to VOTE THEM OUT!!! ABRAHAM LINCOLN said “and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth”. The American people are the boss not the Congress or Administration. It is time to take our government back from the arrogant members of Congress and Administration who think they know better how we should live our lives than we do. It is time to VOTE THEM OUT!!! REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER…VOTE THEM OUT!!!

Posted by: AngryMobVoter | March 15, 2010, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

obama does lie — the “special deals” were supposed to be taken out of the HC bill — but doesn’t look like he meant what he said…
And why won’t the WH confirm or deny the allegation by Sestak that the WH tried to bribe him with a job in the Obama Administration if he would drop out of the PA Senate primary???
The question has been asked 7 times — in the past 2 weeks and each time Robert “fibs” says he has no information “but will get back to us that”???
Tierra – that is an example of “Chicago way” bribes — and thugs.

Posted by: susie | March 15, 2010, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

Obama Comes to Ohio (Again), Nobody Shows Up
President Barack Obama, joined by Ohio governor Ted Strickland, came to Ohio today to continue his permanent campaign on health-care legislation. His campaign events during the 2008 presidential race attracted crowds of thousands of Ohioans; this time, President Obama managed a crowd of about 200 people. With his negative approval numbers in Ohio (44 percent approve, 52 percent disapprove), it isn’t much of surprise that few showed up to hear him once again talk about health care. On health care, Ohioans disapprove of the job President Obama is doing (34 percent approve, 58 percent disapprove). On the health-care proposal, 56 percent of Ohioans mostly disapprove of it, with 43 percent believing that the proposed changes go too far.

Posted by: JMo | March 15, 2010, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

It’s gonna pass no doudt about that but I’m still some what skeptic,to say the least.

Posted by: DanielDosser | March 15, 2010, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

tierra, It is unfortunate that the Democrats allowed left wing loons like moveon hijack their party. Until that point, the dialogue was civil. The left set a precedent — doesn’t justify the right following suit, but it certainly is understandable.
Having said that, REFORM is REFORM. The current bill is not REFORM. Moveon and let’s fix healthcare.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 15, 2010, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

Daniel–don’t use the word ‘skeptic’. You’ve opened yourself up to being called a ‘denier’, or worse yet, a ‘flatearther’. Have no fear. Phil Jones’ cousin will soon admit that Healthcare reform was a hoax after all.
Gotta love those left wing looney tunes.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 15, 2010, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

“I’m Here Because of Natoma,” Obama Pushes for Health Care in Ohio……
YOUR”RE HERE BECAUSE OF YOURSELF, WHO”S KIDDING WHO?

Posted by: pauldia | March 15, 2010, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Having said that, REFORM is REFORM. The current bill is not REFORM.
___________________________________
It most certainly is reform.

Posted by: tierra | March 15, 2010, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

The more I think about this the angrier it makes me. Using someone’s illness to push a very politically charged bill is about as low as low can get. Obama and Congress will do anything to pass this bill no matter how far in the gutter the have to get to do it. REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER…VOTE THEM OUT!!!

Posted by: AngryMobVoter | March 15, 2010, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

Tierra, what it is is a naked admission that the risk pool is causing rate increases. It’s the baby boomers. It’s the healthy unemployed dropping coverage.
If it is reform, why the coersion? If I could buy insurance the day I got sick without the IRS going after my house, I might support the bill. Whatcha think?

Posted by: mitchscove | March 15, 2010, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

I would ask one more thing. Why, when pharmas revenues are 6 times their cost of production — and medical payouts are 85% of Insurance Premiums — why is it that Obama is scapegoating insurance companies and not pharmas?

Posted by: mitchscove | March 15, 2010, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Don’t be Angry. The system worked. The lady is a 10 year cancer survivor. Under ObamaCare, her skeleton would still be waiting in line for her first chemo treatment.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 15, 2010, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

Robert A. Hall is a Marine Vietnam veteran who served five terms in the Massachusetts State Senate wrote the below…. Our so called President should read this….
I’m 63. Except for one semester in college when jobs were scarce, and a six-month period when I was between jobs (but job-hunting every day), I’ve worked, hard, since I was 18. Despite some health challenges, I still put in 50-hour weeks, and haven’t called in sick in seven or eight years. I make a good salary, but I didn’t inherit my job or my income, and I worked to get where I am. Given the economy, there’s no retirement in sight, and I’m tired. Very tired.
I’m tired of being told that I have to “spread the wealth” to people who don’t have my work ethic. I’m tired of being told the government will take the money I earned, by force if necessary, and give it to people too lazy to earn it.
I’m tired of being told that I have to pay more taxes to “keep people in their homes.” Sure, if they lost their jobs or got sick, I’m willing to help. But if they bought Mc Mansions at three times the price of our paid-off, $250,000 condo, on one-third of my salary, then let the left-wing Congress-critters who passed Fannie and Freddie and the Community Reinvestment Act that created the bubble, help them with their own money.
I’m tired of being told how bad America is by left-wing millionaires like Michael Moore, George Soros and Hollywood entertainers who live in luxury because of the opportunities America offers. In thirty years, if they get their way, the United States will have the economy of Zimbabwe , the freedom of the press of China , the crime and violence of Mexico , the tolerance for Christian people of Iran , and the freedom of speech of Venezuela .
I’m tired of being told that Islam is a “Religion of Peace,” when every day I can read dozens of stories of Muslim men killing their sisters, wives and daughters for their family “honor;” of Muslims rioting over some slight offense; of Muslims murdering Christian and Jews because they aren’t “believers;” of Muslims burning schools for girls; of Muslims stoning teenage rape victims to death for “adultery;” of Muslims mutilating the genitals of little girls, all in the name of Allah, because the Qur’an and Shari’a law tells them to.
I think it’s very cool that we have a black president, and that a black child is doing her homework at the desk where Lincoln wrote the Emancipation Proclamation. I just wish the black president was Condi Rice, Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams or someone who believes more in freedom and the individual, and less arrogantly of an all-knowing government.
I’m tired of a news media that thinks Bush’s fundraising and inaugural expenses were obscene, but that thinks Obama’s, at triple the cost, were wonderful; that thinks Bush exercising daily was a waste of presidential time, but Obama exercising is a great example for the public to control weight and stress; that picked over every line of Bush’s military records, but never demanded that Kerry release his; that slammed Palin, with two years as governor, for being too inexperienced for VP, but touted Obama, with three years as senator, as potentially the best president ever. Wonder why people are dropping their subscriptions or switching to Fox News? Get a clue. I didn’t vote for Bush in 2000, but the media and Kerry drove me to his camp in 2004.
I’m tired of being told that out of “tolerance for other cultures,” we must let Saudi Arabia use our oil money to fund mosques and madrassa Islamic schools to preach hate in America , while no American group is allowed to fund a church, synagogue or religious school in Saudi Arabia to teach love and tolerance.
I’m tired of being told I must lower my living standard to fight global warming, which no one is allowed to debate. My wife and I live in a two-bedroom apartment and carpool together five miles to our jobs. We also own a three-bedroom condo, where our daughter and granddaughter live. Our carbon footprint is about 5% of Al Gore’s, and if you’re greener than Gore, you’re green enough.
I’m tired of being told that drug addicts have a disease, and I must help support and treat them, and pay for the damage they do. Did a giant germ rush out of a dark alley, grab them, and stuff white powder up their noses while they tried to fight it off? I damn sure think druggies chose to take drugs. And I’m tired of harassment from cool people treating me like a freak when I tell them I never tried marijuana.
I’m tired of illegal aliens being called “undocumented workers,” especially the ones who aren’t working, but are living on welfare or crime. What’s next? Calling drug dealers “Undocumented Pharmacists?” And, no, I’m not against Hispanics. Most of them are Catholic, and it’s been a few hundred years since Catholics wanted to kill me for my religion. I’m willing to fast-track for citizenship any Hispanic person who can speak English, doesn’t have a criminal record, and who is self-supporting without family on welfare, or who serves honorably for three years in our military. Those are the citizens we need.
I’m tired of latte liberals and journalists, who would never wear the uniform of the Republic themselves, or let their entitlement-handicapped kids near a recruiting station, trashing our military. They and their kids can sit at home, never having to make split-second decisions under life and death circumstances, and bad-mouth better people than themselves. Do bad things happen in war? You bet. Do our troops sometimes misbehave? Sure. Does this compare with the atrocities that were the policy of our enemies for the last fifty years and still are? Not even close. So here’s the deal. I’ll let myself be subjected to all the humiliation and abuse that was heaped on terrorists at Abu Ghraib or Gitmo, and the critics can let themselves be subject to captivity by the Muslims, who tortured and beheaded Daniel Pearl in Pakistan, or the Muslims who tortured and murdered Marine Lt. Col. William Higgins in Lebanon, or the Muslims who ran the blood-spattered Al Qaeda torture rooms our troops found in Iraq, or the Muslims who cut off the heads of schoolgirls in Indonesia, because the girls were Christian. Then we’ll compare notes. British and American soldiers are the only troops in history that civilians came to for help and handouts, instead of hiding from in fear.
I’m tired of people telling me that their party has a corner on virtue, and the other party has a corner on corruption. Read the papers; bums are bipartisan. And I’m tired of people telling me we need bipartisanship. I live in Illinois , where the “Illinois Combine” of Democrats has worked to loot the public for years. Not to mention the tax cheats in Obama’s Cabinet.
I’m tired of hearing wealthy athletes, entertainers and politicians of both parties talking about innocent mistakes, stupid mistakes or youthful mistakes, when we all know they think their only mistake was getting caught. I’m tired of people with a sense of entitlement, rich or poor.
Speaking of poor, I’m tired of hearing people with air-conditioned homes, color TVs and two cars called poor. The majority of Americans didn’t have that in 1970, but we didn’t know we were “poor.” The poverty pimps have to keep changing the definition of poor to keep the dollars flowing.
I’m real tired of people who don’t take responsibility for their lives and actions. I’m tired of hearing them blame the government, or discrimination or big-whatever for their problems.
Yes, I’m damn tired. But I’m also glad to be 63. Because, mostly, I’m not going to have to see the world these people are making. I’m just sorry for my granddaughter.

Posted by: tanarg | March 15, 2010, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Posted by: mitchscove | Mar 15, 2010 4:41:50 PM
Ah yes, the crazy leftist looney tunes– they care about people over profits, the security of the American people, small businesses, the middle class, labor, health, environment, energy, civil liberties, equal opportunity. What nuts. Never mind that we’ve seen this smoke and mirrors pertaining to science before: the climate disinformation campaign looks a lot like the tobacco industry’s pro-smoking campaign, as many have pointed out, including Energy Secretary, Steven Chu, a well-respected scientist.
an excerpt of Steven Chu’s interview with the San Jose Mercury News:
“SJMN: Are you worried that the political will to enact a national policy or somehow tax or price carbon emissions is gone now? If you look at recent polls, the number of Americans who believe that global warming is real and man-made is declining. The political trends are not in your favor.
Chu: Americans were believing because of sound bites, and now they’re disbelieving because of sound bites. One can honestly say that if we don’t do this, we will not be economically competitive. Ten and 20 years from now, the price of oil will likely be higher — this is not a stretch of the imagination. The debate for whether smoking causes lung cancer and emphysema was actually in the first decade among scientists, but they muddied the waters for 2½ more decades. Climate change, on a global scale, is a much bigger deal, and people are trying to muddy the waters, particularly people who think they might lose. Unfortunately, it’s easier to propagate fear than seeing a vision of prosperity.” (h/t Treehugger– yes, Treehugger.)

Posted by: Truth has a liberal bias | March 15, 2010, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

I don’t see how throwing money at Natoma’s problem helps Michelle Obam’s children . Everybody dies , some get sick first .

Posted by: nat turner | March 15, 2010, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Posted by: tanarg | Mar 15, 2010 5:32:16 PM
Not only is he tired, in every sense of the term, he’s one heck of a whiner! yikes!!

Posted by: Truth has a liberal bias | March 15, 2010, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

This is pathetic of our Apologizer In Chief. He is grasping at straws now.
Personalizing a sympathy story to promote an unconstitutional power grab by the federal government is just an act of desperation and it won’t work.
Echos of Copenhagen are resounding now.

Posted by: Scott Jerome | March 15, 2010, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Truth — The political will to enact carbon policy should be gone. Dr. Phil Jones as much as admitted it was a hoax. The earth hasn’t been warming for 10 years — and it was probably warmer during the Medieval Warm Period. Jones was the paleoclimatologist responsible for the lions share of the reconstructions that turned tree ring data into temperatures. He admitted it was a hoax and “his dog ate the data”. I can’t wait ’til the EPA tries to enforce CO2 as a danger. They have no justification — will lose in court.
Does that mean I don’t care about the environment — NO. I installed a high efficiency furnace because I felt it was the right thing to do. I don’t want the gov’t to tell me what to do when they can’t even balance a budget.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 15, 2010, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

I have much compassion for Natoma. I’m sure her trial with cancer is something none of us ever want to face ourselves. My question though, is this: if Natoma is a single lady, and not a rich one by any means, why did she not apply for Medicaid? Would she have been rejected? And if she had been, why? Just some questions that need to be answered, since, after all, Medicaid is a GOVERNMENT system, and one that should be held accountable, as insurance companies, as to who is covered, how much it costs, and coverage for pre-existing conditions. Does anyone know anything about this?

Posted by: Shoe | March 15, 2010, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

Furthermore, Truth, if Obama was going after egregious profits, I could support him. He isn’t. He’s doing the politically expedient, going after Companies that earn 5% profit instead of those with margins exceeding 600%.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 15, 2010, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Shoe ,,, I believe Medicaid covers the indigent. She would have to spend her money first. So, she wants first class treatment for a terminal disease — wants us to pay the bill so she can will her belongings to her kids. It’s easy.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 15, 2010, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

Dr. Phil Jones as much as admitted it was a hoax.
_____________
No, he didn’t. You’re part of the disinformation campaign now. As fact checkers have pointed out (incuding one at the Loom blog at Discover Magazine, whom I quote here) a statement Phil Jones made during an interview with the BBC “got run through a sausage grinder run by journalists who are apparently both innumerate and illiterate.”
So here’s the first response you reference about the past 10 years:
“Q: Do you agree that from 1995 to the present there has been no statistically-significant global warming?
A: Yes, but only just. I also calculated the trend for the period 1995 to 2009. This trend (0.12C per decade) is positive, but not significant at the 95% significance level. The positive trend is quite close to the significance level. Achieving statistical significance in scientific terms is much more likely for longer periods, and much less likely for shorter periods.”
People who wish to discuss this and sound informed need to become familiar with statistical signficance. As the Loom blog explains, “Just because a trend over a particular stretch of time doesn’t quite meet the 5% cutoff doesn’t necessarily mean it’s not real. It just means that scientists cannot reject the null hypothesis that noise is the cause. One way scientists can deal with this challenge is to look at longer sets of records. In the case of climate, looking at longer stretches of time reveals that there is indeed a real trend of warming temperatures. Just because the BBC’s questioner arbitrarily set the cutoff for analyzing the climate at 1995 doesn’t change that fact. Jones openly addressed this fact, but George Will [and many others] conveniently omitted it.”
I’d also look up the actual verbiage on the question about Medieval Warming as nothing new was to be gleaned from Jones’ response if you’re familiar with the topic. (hint: what you’re looking for to explain your misunderstanding deals with hemispheres vs. the globe.)

Posted by: Truth has a liberal bias | March 15, 2010, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

if Obama was going after egregious profits, I could support him. He isn’t. He’s doing the politically expedient, going after Companies that earn 5% profit instead of those with margins exceeding 600%.
Posted by: mitchscove | Mar 15, 2010 6:14:26
Frankly, I don’t believe you, but that’s neither here not there. I’ve found that Republicans often come up with one excuse or another when it comes to failing to address problems or support solutions. Perhaps, you’re not a Republican but an “independent” or “moderate” who leans Republican– they too have a lot of excuses. While it is true that Pharma and the health care provider complex make more in profits than insurance providers; however, they also provide services and innovation in various ways– though not in terms of delivery and payment. The insurance industry is a middle man that thrives on the status quo and has failed to innovate and solve problems. It also spends inordinate amounts of money on lobbying and negative campaigns.

Posted by: Truth has a liberal bias | March 15, 2010, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Ezra Klein has a humorous point up that is semi-related:
“If they jam through health care,” said Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, then Democrats will have “poisoned the well” on other issues. He was interviewed Sunday on ABC’s “This Week.”
Stimulus didn’t get a single Republican vote in the House. The Gang of Six didn’t secure Republican votes for health-care reform. Bob Corker won’t support the financial regulation plan that he admits has been fundamentally transformed to address many of his concerns. Graham himself has declared cap-and-trade dead in the Senate. If Graham doesn’t think the well is already poisoned, then I dare him to take a sip from it.” (Wa Po)

Posted by: Truth has a liberal bias | March 15, 2010, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

Posted by: mitchscove | Mar 15, 2010 6:17:49 PM
Well, that’s part of my question. What is the ‘cut off’ for income to receive Medicaid? Did she even apply?
If Obama and the Dems want to use this woman as one of their ‘props’ to pass the bill, the least they can do is give us the WHOLE story. Maybe uncovering more about Medicaid would give people some insight into what happens when Government steps in, yet doesn’t have to play by the same rules they want to impose on insurance companies.

Posted by: Shoe | March 15, 2010, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

Hmm, quick correction: While it is true that Pharma and the health care provider complex make more in profits than insurance providers; they also provide services and innovation in various ways (and yes, its less politically expedient to criticize them because of that. Fortunately, the bill does offer ways to test various health delivery reforms, and it provides a structure that will easily allow a public option add-on down the road if needed.
In contrast to pharma and health care providers, the insurance industry is a middle man that thrives on the status quo and has failed to innovate and solve problems. It also spends inordinate amounts of money on lobbying and negative campaigns.

Posted by: Truth has a liberal bias | March 15, 2010, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

Facts are facts.
Posted by: mitchscove | Mar 15, 2010 6:40:22 PM
That’s pretty humorous coming from someone who is obviously part of the climate disinformation campaign (or fails to understand statistics and science and spreads lies anyway, take your pick) and who offers up a defective link. LOL. What am I supposed to be looking at, specifically and I’ll google it later? Dollars spent on lobbying and negative campaigning? Exec salaries and bonuses? Fuel costs for corporate jets to DC and back? Something related to their failure to innovate when it comes to payment and delivery

Posted by: Truth has a liberal bias | March 15, 2010, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

“the insurance industry is a middle man that thrives on the status quo and has failed to innovate and solve problems.”
Those numbers for Wellpoint don’t indicate that they negotiate rates down by large factors. Innovate?
Are they supposed to solve the problem that people don’t prioritize health insurance until they are sick?
What do they do when unemployed healthy people never opt for COBRA and their risk pool is poisoned by the chronically ill?
Are life insurance companies suppposed to insure dead people?
Are auto insurance companies supposed to insure wrecks?
Are flood insurance companies supposed to insure houses that are under water?
Innovate? Bull hockey!

Posted by: mitchscove | March 15, 2010, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Posted by: mitchscove | Mar 15, 2010 6:55:44 PM
Okay, I have things to do. Its pretty clear you don’t understand some of the issues. Negotiation of PPO rates did come out of the efforts in the 90s, but I worked for managed care companies and insurance companies for several years, and there is more that could be done if the momentum wasn’t more toward maintaining the status quo. Watch Moyers’ pieces on the topic, and read up on what Wendell Potter has to say.

Posted by: Truth has a liberal bias | March 15, 2010, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Well, here’s the thing. Obama may be there but I won’t. After everything he’s done, he’s not getting my vote for the next two election cycles. Baiting Kucinich was strictly “no class”.
The bit about breaking teachers unions and shutting down the public school system?
After watching Obama and the democratic party trash just about every democratic ideal the party ever had, I question whether he’s actually a democrat and wonder what the rest of them are thinking. Certainly, the democratic party I’m seeing is not one that I can support or vote for. Bye guys.

Posted by: jan | March 15, 2010, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

Shoe,
I don’t know anyone that’s been on Medicaid. My father had Medicare and TriCare. My mother died of esophageal cancer in 2007. Bills for procedures that were never performed were coming in after my mother’s death. My father reported the fraud to Medicare. Just “Funny Money” to them. No response.
A prominent FL hospital made alot of money and pretty much killed my mother, but not before they made a mint from the Medicare idiots in DC.
Unfortunately, Obama’s anecdotes blasted on national TV don’t include stories like mine that don’t support the HC Insurance Reform dogma. Too, bad — I now lost two parents that were well insured — due to a Healthcare system that’s diseased — and the Democrats are so well paid off that the problems will never be addressed.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 15, 2010, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

I will not change my view on OBMACARE. The above is one side of the story. He doesn’t tell the other side of the story. He is very good at playing politics as usual + he is very good at propaganda.
The OBAMA HC is all about politics and about himself, it has not much to do with the real HC ISSUES. If his HC bill is a great one, why not many people support him (mamy of us voted for him in the election)? He can fool himself or he can fool someone not paying much attention on the issue, but he can’t fool me again.
an angry LONG TIME DEM SUPPORTER

Posted by: talk from sf | March 15, 2010, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

>
Shoe, because you can’t be accepted for Medicaid if you have the dignity and self-respect to work and earn money. Medicaid is available only to people with limited income. According to the 2010 guidelines, a single person is eligible for Medicaid with an annual income of $8,479 or less ($707 a month or less). Natoma, like me, is self-employed; she operates a business that generates income (presumably) higher than that. Therefore, she is ineligible for Medicaid. Yet she can’t afford to pay the skyrocketing premiums for private health insurance either. She is not alone. The self-employed people in the middle class are always the ones who get squeezed.

Posted by: notasailor | March 15, 2010, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

sf ,,, whoah ,,, I’d better be more tolerant of those from the left coast.
Yes, Obama was 20 mins from my home stumping. I was in Strongsville this afternoon, but didn’t feel a strong enough breeze to sway me to support his version of HC Reform.
Personally, an approach that attacks the HC cost problem for starters would help. We have to admit that HC insurance is a tough issue, but the American people deserve an explanation of the challenge without the political bull and scapegoating. I would support that. It’s what I expected from this president after the campaign. Not what I feel we have gotten.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 15, 2010, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

Obama was there to save his butt.
Waterloo

Posted by: ollie | March 15, 2010, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

We don’t need health insurance, we need health care.
Insurance isn’t the solution, its the problem.

Posted by: Flash Override | March 15, 2010, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

After watching Obama and the democratic party trash just about every democratic ideal the party ever had
______________________________________
Hogwash. Please provide ALL of your documentation of this . . . it’s nonsense meant to smear the President and the Democrats.
Start providing backup for these groundless accusations.

Posted by: tierra | March 15, 2010, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

Lets look at Natomas options:
There is Medicaid, medicare (which is fully offered for those who are under 65 and disabled by disease)
Social Security disability would kick in when she can’t work
I loathe the way Obama holds up sick people to push a bill that does NOTHING to lower health care costs….NOTHING. I wonder if he’s making her wear an Obama T?
Lower costs, increase coverage…should be our goal.
He’s loathesome and everyone who favors this mess is participating in the death of many, many people. Less will get decent care, bet the farm.

Posted by: mjishernameo | March 15, 2010, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

And a little background..Natomas mom is an officer at SEIU !
__________________________________
What? Just mentioning SEIU is supposed to be an intelligent ‘argument’ and automatically win something?
Nice try. It isn’t and it doesn’t.

Posted by: tierra | March 15, 2010, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

We don’t need health insurance, we need health care.
Insurance isn’t the solution, its the problem.
Posted by: Flash Override | Mar 15, 2010 8:22:04 PM
There’s certainly truth in that. Both Daily Kos and Time Magazine have posts up about a new Amnesty International report highlighting that too many women are dying while having babies in the United States. Part of the problem is inequitable access to quality care. The report is called “Deadly Delivery.” Worth reading up on and thinking about.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 15, 2010, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

Less will get decent care, bet the farm.
Posted by: mjishernameo | Mar 15, 2010 8:38:12 PM
If you’re talking about the Republican plans put forth, that’s absolutely true as they separate the healthy and wealthy from the sick and middle and lower classes, giving those who don’t need it most the best deals and benefits and increasing costs while decreasing benefits for those who need quality coverage.
Other than that, your post is just disinformation, Obama-bashing and fearmongering.
Those who support health care reform believe in real people and doing the humane, compassionate and civilized thing over windfall profits and an unsustainable status quo.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 15, 2010, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Jake has done some tough reporting when almost no other mainstream reporter would knock the Obama Administration. But the chips are down. ANd Jake shows where his sympathies are by getting on two knees, not one, to kiss Obooty.
Fox already posted a story about how this woman was elegible for aid of different kinds.
Didn’t stop Jake from swabbung rump, though. Keep those facts in check. Might reflect poorly on the Democrats, dontcha know.
The sucking sound you hear is Tapper’s credibility going down the drain.
By the way, the crowd was around….200.

Posted by: James | March 15, 2010, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

The argument is made that not passing a bill will create an aura of failure around the administration and the Democrats, hurting them much more than passing a bill with a bare majority in the face of public opinion.
Possibly moderate and conservative Democrats in districts taken by either Bush or McCain, the calculus is different. Those members, who are probably the key to assembling a majority, are probably thinking that they’re in some trouble either way considering the general anti-Democrat mood, but that helping to make sure no bill is passed will earn them more credit in their home districts than standing idly by while it passes.
The search for votes will almost always include favors paid for by taxpayers, and “reconciliation” is a process almost guaranteed to produce polarization rather than reconciliation.
But here’s a good bet: The Democratic Party will never be the same. Democrats have been arguing with each other about what kind of country this is, and what kind of party they should be. Will America move even more toward a “European style” welfare state?

Posted by: bl | March 15, 2010, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Sad to say that even the current bill for HC “Obama Care” will not help Natoma.
He only told half the truth. She has options under current Medicare and Social Security. This new HC stinks.
Shame on ABC for not doing a better follow-up. Why have reporters stop reporting the investigated truth. Guess this is why Charlie stepped down.

Posted by: Dennis | March 15, 2010, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

She is receiving care right this minute. She qualifies for financial aid and is not going to lose her house.
Barack Obama is an execrable liar.

Posted by: drjohn | March 15, 2010, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

Quit the phony pity.
Medicare/Medicaid has been covering the needs of people that can’t afford insurance or no longer meet the viability of private insurance coverage. A coverage that is already a tax from every working income.
This administration has been fabricating a crisis and is pulling the safety-net of Medicare/Medicaid out from under those that have been and would be using it. They are deliberately stripping it of its viability so that they can push their agendas.
This Bill is ‘NOT’ about health care. It is a power grab by a movement that seeks to strip America of ‘State’s Rights’ and ‘Personal Liberties’. There is nothing in this Bill that guarantees affordable ‘Quality’ and universal health care to everyone. Promoting passage of this confessed ‘imperfect’ Bill is an attempt at giving the American people a ‘Sucker’ punch. There is no guarantee that the ‘imperfect’ Bill would be amended to keep the ‘politician’s’ vain promises that are being used to promote its passage. It is a fraud because the politician’s ‘out’ would be that they could not get the votes to fix it. The Democrats will sit on it and the Republicans won’t be able to move the fixes through committees for a vote.
These con-men and women weaseled their way into office and now we’re stuck with little hope that anyone with integrity in government office can hold them at bay or purge them from power.
The fact of the matter is that if someone needs essential health care they can get it. Illegal aliens are very much aware of this and so are many others that play the system. Just because someone opts not to pay into a program does not mean they cannot find essential care through Federal, State, Local, or private grants. For those that want something beyond essential care they will rant for an entitlement that they themselves would not be required to pay into.

Posted by: TX-MBell | March 15, 2010, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

Posted by: TX-MBell | Mar 15, 2010 11:34:43 PM
Ah yes, the grand conspiracy theory of those evil Democrats . … sure thing.

Posted by: tierra | March 15, 2010, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

Fortunately some Democrats are holding their ground on this. My reference to the Democrats is relative to the controlling majority of them.
As far as a conspiracy theory. One only needs to review the discourses, books, and policies of the members, advisers, and czars of this administration. It would be naive to believe that they would put their ideologies aside and not do all they can to push their goals through while they are in positions of power.
Time is running out for them as more Americans become wise to them. For now it is too close a call to know whether the American people have the representation to preserve our Constitution.
Hindsight will do us little good.

Posted by: TX-MBell | March 16, 2010, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Obama’s statement that insurance companies are only returning $900 in benefits for every $10,000 they take in revenues stands diametrically opposed to a statement made by Jonathan Karl, last week, that insurance companies are only earning a profit of four percent. I’m not quite sure how Karl’s conclusion was reached, but I would sooner believe Karl than a man whose entire presidency hangs on successfully passing an insurance bill by the end of the week.

Posted by: Lenn Zonder | March 16, 2010, 12:57 am 12:57 am

Posted by: TX-MBell | Mar 16, 2010 12:21:02 AM
Ah yes, the grand conspiracy theory of those evil Democrats . … sure thing.

Posted by: tierra | March 16, 2010, 1:23 am 1:23 am

Obama’s statement that insurance companies are only returning $900 in benefits for every $10,000 they take in revenues
Posted by: Lenn Zonder | Mar 16, 2010 12:57:33 AM
____________________________________
Lenn the President referred directly and
specifically to Natoma Canfield’s situation – and quoted figures from her payments and benefits received. That was the situation with her payments and benefits.

Posted by: tierra | March 16, 2010, 1:27 am 1:27 am

Obama is such a drama queen.

Posted by: EPU | March 16, 2010, 4:06 am 4:06 am

More sob stories and child human shields to sell the greatest ponzi scheme ever.

Posted by: HealthCare Redistribution Czar | March 16, 2010, 9:11 am 9:11 am

But hey, ObamaCare will save you 3000% (yes, three thousand precent!) on your premiums! He said it.

Posted by: HealthCare Redistribution Czar | March 16, 2010, 9:12 am 9:12 am

Now we are hearing the House will try to pass the Bill without voting on it.
Cram what where?
This must be the parachuting in that Pelosi mentioned.
I sense a revolt brewing. And then Obama asking for emergency powers. Where have I heard of that before? Star Wars… Oh yeah; early 20th Century Germany!

Posted by: TX-MBell | March 16, 2010, 9:46 am 9:46 am

What? Just mentioning SEIU is supposed to be an intelligent ‘argument’ and automatically win something?
Nice try. It isn’t and it doesn’t.
——————–
All in the “family” commrade…

Posted by: mjishernameo | March 16, 2010, 10:18 am 10:18 am

Medicaid does not cover everyone unless you have a disabling illness.

Posted by: trucker6 | March 16, 2010, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

Where was everyone when we spent money on starting two wars borrowing money from China to help finance them and finding no weapons of mass destruction.Preventive care is better than no care.Medicare is for the elderly.We will spend more money to protect our dogs than we will to help protect another from illness.That sad.

Posted by: trucker6 | March 16, 2010, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Does he really – reallly? – think what he’s proposing is going to cure this kind of problem? Anyone who does needs to read the healthcare bill … really read it. This is a political stretch for more power and it will not take care of the people that need taking care of. It will just cost all of us a small fortune. STOP IT NOW.

Posted by: Cheri S | March 16, 2010, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

Pelosi is considering DEEM AND PASS (Slaughter Rule)! They will get the Senate Bill passed in the House “without votes”!
Scenario No. 1: The Senate Bill is deemed passed with the passage of the House Rule for debate. So, once the House has passed the rules for debating the reconciliation package, the Senate Bill could immediately be sent to the president for his signature.
Scenario No. 2: The Senate Bill is deemed passed with the House’s passage of the Reconciliation Bill. Since the vote on “the rule” happens before the vote on Reconciliation, this would delay the Bill being sent to Obama. The Bill must be signed by the president before the Senate takes up the Reconciliation.
What’s the advantage for Democrats? Why are Democrats considering this, even though there will still be a roll-call vote? There are a number of House Democrats — either vulnerable in their re-election bids or who don’t like the Senate Bill — who want to avoid a DIRECT vote on the Health Reform Bill. They feel this indirect vote — even though it includes the health-Care Bill — gives them a measure of cover “politically”.
A little history: “Deem and Pass” has been used often and by both parties. Democrats point out that Republicans used it quite a bit in the 1990s, in fact — THOUGH NOT FOR SOMETHING QUITE AS LARGE AS THIS!
In this Congress, Democrats used “Deem and Pass” for raising the debt ceiling, which was tucked into the PayGo Bill.
God only knows what this Bill will cost us! Most Americans are afraid of this Bill. This corrupt administration will do anything to get what they want!

Posted by: SAY NO TO OBAMACARE! | March 16, 2010, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Now I know why Obama is stayint clear of Washington these days making redundant speeches about dying folk without healthcare……Barack, we all have those stories….but we are Americans, and we do the best we can do under the circumstances. Anyway, while you are chewing up mileage in these rough times, you have Pontius Pelosi dragging up the old deeming routine. Ain’t that cute….that way we have no vote on healthcare………what a lot of Demoncrat Deeming Do. Why don’t people who say they want to govern, govern. This gameplaying charade really must stop……or deem a 3 party…or 3, the way it is going….for the next Congress. I have never been so embarassed by my government. Simply, it stinks!

Posted by: justj joey | March 16, 2010, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

Again and again…Health care bill is here…

Posted by: Ilan Ben Menachem | March 18, 2010, 5:06 am 5:06 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.