Mar 11, 2010 11:46am
Is a Health Care Reform Compromise Imminent?
After weeks of intense negotiations, House and Senate Democrats say they are close to a compromise for health care reform. Sources say the compromise – a "fix" to the Senate bill that passed in December – might be reported to House committees for official drafting as soon as tomorrow.
You can read more about this HERE.
And we covered the story this morning on Good Morning America:
-jpt
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
The “PASS IT NOW, AND WE’LL FIX IT LATER” crowd/politicians sound a lot like the management team at Toyota in regards to the “speed-up, then try to slam on the brakes, then crash, burn and die” folks managing the PRIUS et al issues
Posted by: JMo | March 11, 2010, 11:52 am 11:52 am
The House is preparing its own Nuclear Option, called the “Slaughter Solution” named for House Rules Chairwoman Louise Slaughter. (I guess Congressman John Death Panel was unwilling to lend his name to this scheme. LOL!)
Under this sleight of hand, the House would basically say, yeah we passed the Senate bill–without all the fuss and muss of actually having to vote on it. Next the House would vote on the “fixes” to the bill and call it done.
See how easy and clean Deliberative Democracy is when you don’t have to actually…..deliberate??
Most Ethical Congress EVER! Hugo Chavez would be proud of a maneuver this clever!
Posted by: The Chicago Way | March 11, 2010, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
From what I hear, they are trying to load it up, with unrelated issues, to coattail through.
Talk about your bad behaviors, by the Congress.
I hope it fails miserably.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | March 11, 2010, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Wish a news agency…you know with real reporters, would ask HOW they change or ‘fix’ a bill and not have it go to conference. Anyone?
Posted by: rolltr | March 11, 2010, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
In other words all the payoffs, bribes, and sweetheart deals are completed.
Posted by: mick | March 11, 2010, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Nancy says we have to pass the bill to find out what’s in it.
Like the Stimulus Bill?
Obama signed it without reading it.
We’re still finding out all the crap that was in that.
Blatant incompetence and dishonesty.
How exactly has Obama changed how washington works?
Posted by: ollie | March 11, 2010, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Nancy says we have to pass the bill to find out what’s in it.
Like the Stimulus Bill?
Obama signed it without reading it.
We’re still finding out all the crap that was in that.
Blatant incompetence and dishonesty.
How exactly has Obama changed how washington works?
Posted by: ollie | March 11, 2010, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Why doesn’t Obama have the guts to say “reconciliation”?
It’s his only path to that legacy he would die for.
Posted by: kyle | March 11, 2010, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
Hugo Chavez would be proud of a maneuver this clever!
Posted by: The Chicago Way | Mar 11, 2010 12:20:03 PM
__________________________________
Get you talking points right, you left out Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Jack the Ripper and Marie Osmond.
Posted by: tierra | March 11, 2010, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
“Get you talking points right.”
Posted by: tierra | Mar 11, 2010 1:02:09 PM
Seriously?? This from someone who constantly regurgitates memos from George Soro’s Media Matters.
Posted by: The Chicago Way | March 11, 2010, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
I have one question regarding health insurance reform.
Once everybody is required to buy insurance and this ‘market place’ is created – how do we know insurance companies are going to lower their premiums? What guarantee is there?
Posted by: tierra | March 11, 2010, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
The constitutional laws of the land seem to be something Obama and his democrats wish to ignore. I quess they never heard of the class action lawsuit! By the way, did you all know about a provision in the bill that gives the government the right to access and electronically transfer funds out of your bank accounts! I kid you not!
Posted by: jay | March 11, 2010, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
By the way, did you all know about a provision in the bill that gives the government the right to access and electronically transfer funds out of your bank accounts! I kid you not!
Posted by: jay | Mar 11, 2010 1:12:47 PM
_____________________________________
Which bill? Please show us the provision.
Posted by: tierra | March 11, 2010, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
I have one question regarding health insurance reform.
Once everybody is required to buy insurance and this ‘market place’ is created – how do we know insurance companies are going to lower their premiums? What guarantee is there?
Posted by: tierra | Mar 11, 2010 1:07:18 PM
I have one question regarding health insurance reform, too. Why is student loan reform included with the healthcare bill?
Posted by: Shoe | March 11, 2010, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
By the way, did you all know about a provision in the bill that gives the government the right to access and electronically transfer funds out of your bank accounts! I kid you not!
Posted by: jay | Mar 11, 2010 1:12:47 PM
_____________________________________
Which bill? Please show us the provision.
Posted by: tierra | Mar 11, 2010 1:15:44 PM
_____________________________________
The section of the legislation on which this claim is based states that the bill will “enable electronic funds transfers, in order to allow automated reconciliation with the related health care payment and remittance advice.”
The section is to “adopt standards for typical transactions” between insurance companies and health-care providers, and continues: “The legislation generically describes typical electronic banking transactions and does not outline any special access privileges.”
What it does is set up a voluntary automatic on line bill pay (like direct deposit, or automatic electronic loan payment).
It does nothing like jay thinks it does.
Posted by: Flash Override | March 11, 2010, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Once everybody is required to buy insurance and this ‘market place’ is created – how do we know insurance companies are going to lower their premiums? What guarantee is there?
A really good question. Without having to go into all of the specifics, you can just point to the FEHBP (which is how congressmen get their insurance) that the exchange is modeled on. Premium increases have been considerably less in the FEHBP than the general insurance market, and have even declined some years.
Posted by: Flash Override | March 11, 2010, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Why was Kennedy’s rant on the war in Afghanistan included in this story on health care…and presented as if it was part of the debate?
Posted by: Don | March 11, 2010, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
By the way, did you all know about a provision in the bill that gives the government the right to access and electronically transfer funds out of your bank accounts! I kid you not!
Posted by: jay | Mar 11, 2010 1:12:47 PM
_____________________________________
Which bill? Please show us the provision.
Posted by: tierra | Mar 11, 2010 1:15:44 PM
_____________________________________
The section of the legislation on which this claim is based states that the bill will “enable electronic funds transfers, in order to allow automated reconciliation with the related health care payment and remittance advice.”
The section is to “adopt standards for typical transactions” between insurance companies and health-care providers, and continues: “The legislation generically describes typical electronic banking transactions and does not outline any special access privileges.”
What it does is set up a voluntary automatic on line bill pay (like direct deposit, or automatic electronic loan payment).
It does nothing like jay thinks it does.
Posted by: Flash Override | Mar 11, 2010 1:55:32 PM
______________________________
Thanks Flash.
(one of my high school best friends nicknamed ‘Flash’)
Posted by: tierra | March 11, 2010, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
The House will pass the Senate bill that was passed in December with 60 votes – a supermajority! Shortly after they pass this particular piece of legislation, literally within hours, the fixes will be voted on by both the Senate and House and will be signed by Obama together with the original bill. The “fixes,” among other things, ELIMINATE sweetheart deals so odious to so many. For example, the ‘Cornhusker Kickback’ will be stripped, etc… While the end result may not be liked by some, and that is worth debating, please stop using unsubstantiated talking points created for you by others who smarter and richer than you. For example, this is not some kind of conspiracy and certainly is nothing related to “Pass it now, and we’ll fix it later” mentally equated to Toyota’s poor management of the current situation as described by JMo. The use of fear and terror through catch phrases that are disconnected to reality will surely harm our country. It is pure silliness and the end result is destructive. Perhaps it’s much easier for the perpetually ignorant to be duped by right wing talking heads. Does it at all feel weird to be controlled by others: to be told what to say and what to do? Can you or do you even want to think for yourselves?
Posted by: awt3 | March 11, 2010, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
It would probably be a good thing for the GOP.. if this passes with unilateral undertones.. the best campaign promise for the upcoming elections would be healthcare repeal..
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | March 11, 2010, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
the best campaign promise for the upcoming elections would be healthcare repeal..
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | Mar 11, 2010 3:16:07 PM
___________
Yes, lock the Republicans into that. Push it!!! Have them tell us exactly what they would do– repeal and then… what????
Get them on the record.
Posted by: progressive mama | March 11, 2010, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
I have one question regarding health insurance reform, too. Why is student loan reform included with the healthcare bill?
Posted by: Shoe | Mar 11, 2010 1:38:19 PM
Would anybody care to respond to my question? I thought the bill was about healthcare. WHY is student loan reform included with the healthcare bill? Unless someone’s student loan is going to give insurance coverage to someone else, there is NO reason to have anything about it included. Explanation please.
Posted by: Shoe | March 11, 2010, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
Shortly after they pass this particular piece of legislation, literally within hours, the fixes will be voted on by both the Senate and House and will be signed by Obama together with the original bill. The “fixes,” among other things, ELIMINATE sweetheart deals so odious to so many. For example, the ‘Cornhusker Kickback’ will be stripped, etc…
============
Although no bill for “fixes” has yet been written or scored, the current proposal is to EXPAND the ‘Cornhusker Kickback’ to all states.
Making it very expensive.
Posted by: MayBee | March 11, 2010, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
The insistence by the Administration and Congress that it is acceptable to use “reconciliation” to pass a bill that is so complex, pervasive, and UNPOPULAR WITH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, raises this issue to an even higher level. To insistence on passing this bill using a process that was never intended to be used in this way, raises this issue to the level where it puts our entire system of government at risk. WE THE PEOPLE must VOTE OUT anyone who votes for this bill in the House or Senate because they will be contributing and approving of a complete abandonment of the principles of our system of government. If you value our system of government as designed by the Founding Fathers, you have a moral obligation to VOTE THEM OUT if they vote for this bill knowing “reconciliation” will be used to pass it against the will of the people and without any bipartisan support. It does not matter if you are for or against this kind of so-called healthcare reform; it does not matter if you are liberal or conservative; it does not matter if you are democrat, republican, independent, or tea party, you must raise up an VOTE OUT anyone that supports this process by voting in favor of this bill. Using “reconciliation” in this way sets a dangerous precedent that could be used in the future to tax us even more or infringe on our freedom even more.
All Americans should be outraged about what is going on with this Administration and Congress. It is time to VOTE THEM OUT before they do any more damage!!! This is no longer about healthcare, this is an issue about the very essence of our system of government. WE THE PEOPLE will VOTE THEM OUT!!!
Posted by: AngryMobVoter | March 11, 2010, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Raising costs, denying coverage and claiming that your punishing insurance companies while enhancing their revenue base of clients, against their will… Doublethink at it’s finest? It MUST be another government program!!!
Posted by: jafo | March 11, 2010, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
“We have to pass the bill to know what’s in it?” OMG! Uh, have you heard of the Patriot Act? Oh wait, that was bad only under Bush, Obama has every right to spy on American citizens illegaly? Oh sorry…
(Constututional scholar my ASS!!!) He certainly knows what laws he’s breaking. Unless he didn’t bother to attend class and was just “awarded” his diploma by Brezinzski.
Posted by: jafo | March 11, 2010, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
Posted by: jafo | Mar 11, 2010 5:39:04 PM
Bush’s Patriot Act is so evil that the Liberal dominated House and Senate just extended it by a year–with no significant revisions–and Obama signed it into law.
Hypocrites!
Posted by: The War on the War on Terror | March 11, 2010, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Hello liberal posters….
I’m STILL waiting for the pushback and/or explanation to my earlier question. All we’ve heard for the past year is healthcare, healthcare, healthcare. 2010, according to Obama is supposed to be about JOBS. Yet, today I read the Democrats are trying to work in the ‘Student Loan Reform’ act into the healthcare bill and pass them at the same time. According to multiple sites I’ve read the story on, there will be approximately 35,000 LOST if this goes through. So, one last time, can ANYONE explain how this happens with an administration that’s supposed to be the “change” we’ve been waiting for? What happened to transparency? What happened to CREATING jobs, not forcing them out? Anybody?
Posted by: Shoe | March 11, 2010, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
The insistence by the Administration and Congress that it is acceptable to use “reconciliation” to pass a bill that is so complex, pervasive, and UNPOPULAR WITH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, raises this issue to an even higher level.
____________________________________
Nonsense, both the House bill and the Senate bill passed by majorities already. This is the point in the process where a reconciliation of those bills is SUPPOSED to happen.
Posted by: tierra | March 11, 2010, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
OK, SO THE HEALTH DEADLINE IS BEING PUT OFF……AGAIN. I HOPE THIS HEALTH-CARE DEBATE CONTINUES INTO NOV. AS IT PREVENTS CONGRESS FROM SCREWING UP SOMETHING ELSE. SAD FACT IS – I REALLY MEAN THAT.
Posted by: Temagami | March 11, 2010, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
A lot of the elected officials receive their health care from the Office of Attending Physician. They pay approximately $500 to $600 per year. They can get any specialist they want and that all they have to pay. That is probably why, they do not want to include themselves in health care reform.
FEHB most of the policies premiums went up this year. The Fee for Service 3 decreased and 4 stayed the same, the rest increased. Most of these are available to all federal employees and federal retirees (with certain requirements while employed). The increases ranged from 72 cents to $54.24 bi-weekly increase. (Employee portion)
The HMOs about 60 decreased their premiums but there are several hundred and not available in all areas.
For the most part the benefits are good but dental and vision are terrible. You have the option to buy vision and/or dental but the employee pays the whole premium.
Posted by: rebecca2656 | March 11, 2010, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
AS OF LATE THIS AFTERNOON, TALKING HEADS ARE GIVING THE OBAMA HEALTH-CARE BILL ABOUT A FORTY PERCENT CHANCE OF PASSING. COUNT IS EVEN RIGHT NOW, BUT WHEN YOU THROW IN THE ABORTION ISSUE IT PUSHES THE SCALES HEAVILY TOWARD THE OPPOSITION. AND… THE LONGER A VOTE IS PUT OFF THE CHANCES OF PASSAGE LESSONS EVEN MORE.
Posted by: Temagami | March 11, 2010, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
“I’m STILL waiting for the pushback and/or explanation to my earlier question. All we’ve heard for the past year is healthcare, healthcare, healthcare. 2010, according to Obama is supposed to be about JOBS. Yet, today I read the Democrats are trying to work in the ‘Student Loan Reform’ act into the healthcare bill and pass them at the same time”
I realize right wingers are very slow but even they should realize that Congress has MANY things it has to address.
Senate Democrats are considering adding the student reform bill to the healthcare bill but it has not come to pass.
The Senate on Feb 24th has passed a $15B jobs bill creating tax credits for employers who hire those who have been unemployed for 6 months or longer.
Yesterday, the Senate passed a $140B jobs bill in addition to the previous one which extends unemployment benefits, extends some tax credits and helps states and doctor with medicaid/,edicare.
Now you can switch to whining about spending.
Posted by: Ryan C | March 11, 2010, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
“It would probably be a good thing for the GOP.. if this passes with unilateral undertones.. the best campaign promise for the upcoming elections would be healthcare repeal..”
Except when said repeal would have to be signed by Obama.
But please make that the GOP platform.
Make the Party of No official.
Posted by: Ryan C | March 11, 2010, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
“Would anybody care to respond to my question? I thought the bill was about healthcare. WHY is student loan reform included with the healthcare bill”
Why did Republicans try to load the last Jobs bill with an estate tax repeal?
Why do budget bills often contain points that have little to do with the budget?
Did you just arrive in this country or something or are you not aware how Congress works?
Posted by: Ryan C | March 11, 2010, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
PARTY OF NO REMINDS ME OF PARENTS BEING SOMETIMES A PARTY OF NO – TO INSURE THE SURVIVAL OF THEIR OFFSPRING!!! SAME STUFF – DIFFERENT SETTING!!
Posted by: Temagami | March 11, 2010, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
Obama has wasted over a year pushing his HCR down our throats. He should have been working on more important issues (jobs, the wars, less spending, lower taxes, etc.). I don’t know anyone (personally) who approves of government-run healthcare. None of my family or friends want it. It appears Obama, Pelosi and Reid have no problem governing against the will of the people.
Posted by: PELOSI WILL | March 12, 2010, 12:29 am 12:29 am
Obama has wasted over a year pushing his HCR . . .
_________________________________
For you perhaps – but not for the people who have been kicked off their insurance plan, or have no coverage and are facing major medical issues in their family stemming from accident or illness, or people who have been denied coverage, or people whose premium costs are going through the roof.
Posted by: tierra | March 12, 2010, 12:33 am 12:33 am
The Senate on Feb 24th has passed a $15B jobs bill creating tax credits for employers who hire those who have been unemployed for 6 months or longer.
Yesterday, the Senate passed a $140B jobs bill in addition to the previous one which extends unemployment benefits, extends some tax credits and helps states and doctor with medicaid/,medicare.
Now you can switch to whining about spending.
Posted by: Ryan C | Mar 11, 2010 7:57:45 PM
Why shouldn’t we whine about spending? After all we know a lot about it, and can’t believe we’ve been outdone simply because of little stupid things like an economic crisis, “inherited” sky high unemployment and years of neglecting things like infrastructure, medical inflation and millions of uninsureds.
Good heavens– who cares about job bills passed by the party of solutions, solutions, solutions. Solutions are overrated!!! We the real people are ticked off and want to whine and support those who just say no. And ask questions over and over again. And repeat debunked health care myths. And its a free country with free speech so your common sense cannot stop us.
Posted by: adversus solem ne loquitor | March 12, 2010, 1:10 am 1:10 am
not for the people who have been kicked off their insurance plan, or have no coverage and are facing major medical issues in their family stemming from accident or illness, or people who have been denied coverage, or people whose premium costs are going through the roof.
Posted by: tierra | Mar 12, 2010 12:33:51 AM
Oh c’mon! Why are liberals always trying to soften the hard cruel edges of capitalism and corporate power? The real Americans — even those who won’t benefit from it– are dedicated to waging a zero sum battle over wealth and resources for BIG corporations and the most fortunate members of society — the really rich ones–versus everybody else. Who cares if churches are now calling for boycotts of Glenn Beck? He’s right. Social justice is all about fairness and equality and corny collectivist community-oriented stuff. That only matters to moochers and looters and people unfortunate enough to not have an abundance of good health and wealth. Okay, and artsy elitist types. And apparently some church people. But most of us get that compassion is for the civilized and solutions are for geeks. Give me a break, libruls! Just say no. Its easy, and requires very little reading. Or thinking.
Posted by: adversus solem ne loquitor | March 12, 2010, 1:34 am 1:34 am
Yes, lock the Republicans into that. Push it!!! Have them tell us exactly what they would do– repeal and then… what????
Get them on the record.
Posted by: progressive mama
—
Now, it would be almost as stupid for republicans to do that as it would be for obama and his zombies to name the premiums, deductibles, and coverage of the obamanation/disaster they are threatening us with.
In all of my past lives I’ve never done one thing to democrats. What in the hell do they have against me?
Posted by: smartlillena | March 12, 2010, 6:04 am 6:04 am
Although no bill for “fixes” has yet been written or scored, the current proposal is to EXPAND the ‘Cornhusker Kickback’ to all states.
Making it very expensive.
Posted by: MayBee
—
Yep. The Nelson Deal will be nixed then multiplied by 57 (or everhowmany states we have these days) and returned to the bill. The Landrieu Deal stays exclusive to Lousianna with the Nelson/Medicare money added to it. And that’s just the senate. They’ve still not bought the votes it will take to get this disaster through the house once more.
Posted by: smartlillena | March 12, 2010, 6:18 am 6:18 am
All of those complaining about healthcare and it’s cost please keep this in mind: You pay taxes now, and don’t actually get the healthcare until 2018. That means your sick loved ones are still going to need medical care and youre still going to have to pay for it. Then you have to pay extra in addition to your premiums in addition to co-pays. So it will cost way more than what youre thinking. The effects of this bill will hit you so hard much harder than what you experience now. By taking away funds to allow businesses to pay workers (i.e. taxing the crap out of them), you are creating less jobs. California and NY did this to their buisnesses and lost a huge amount of money. Now they are running humungous deficit to feed people who either don’t make enough to pay taxes or people who just don’t work.
Posted by: Amby | March 12, 2010, 6:23 am 6:23 am
Nonsense, both the House bill and the Senate bill passed by majorities already. This is the point in the process where a reconciliation of those bills is SUPPOSED to happen.
Posted by: tierra
—
Like you said, both bills have gone through the PROCESS and passed their houses of congress. Byrd Rule Reconciliation (read: up or down vote) is NOT part of that PROCESS.
But, vote on it.
-
LOL. Just imagine the deficit Pelosi’s liquor cabinet is running these days!
Posted by: smartlillena | March 12, 2010, 6:45 am 6:45 am
And its a free country with free speech so your common sense cannot stop us.
Posted by: adversus solem ne loquitor
—
Well, without using worn out phrases like ‘we can’t afford to not do it’ or ‘granny was ran over by a medicare truck’, etc…, tell us about the individual benefits of this disaster.
Tell us how much premiums will cost.
Tell us about the deductibles and copays.
Oh, I’m sure premiums will be qualified by income but somewhere there is a benchmark.
What is that number?
When did it materialize?
Just don’t tell us this disaster pays for itself with savings. It’s getting to the point Borak Obamma can’t even bring himself to say that.
Posted by: smartlillena | March 12, 2010, 7:10 am 7:10 am
You have to love Patrick Kennedy’s rant against the press.
Does he have a problem with the scrutiny? Maybe the transparency? Maybe actually being accountable?
He is sick of it because – well – he doesn’t like to have his actions questioned by the informed quadrant of the public that do this everyday.
What is despicable, Mr. Kennedy, is that you want to govern (before you decided to quite, I might add) this country from behind closed doors. You want to do your side deals, your pay offs, your outlandish earmarks in the smoke filled rooms where you have no accountability.
We want the press there watching, reporting, constantly reporting and forcing accountability. We are sick and tired of the scam that members of Congress are pulling on us – we are sick of the likes of you, Sir, telling us one thing (a la President Obama) and doing something entirely different. We are tired of these pay offs to your colleagues (e.g. The Louisiana Purchase) and the gross misrepresentation.
When we have members of Congress like you in business with no accountability then we are sheep getting ready for slaughter. We hire people like you, Sir, to represent our interests because you have the credentials to do that. Then we find out that you lie
and you sell us out. The press is our one hold out that there is a moniker of accountability for the likes of you, Mr. Kennedy. They get it wrong from time to time (more often than should be permitted) but they are in it and steady holding you and your colleagues at task.
Go Press Go.
Posted by: Lone Star Rules | March 12, 2010, 7:40 am 7:40 am
Just don’t tell us this disaster pays for itself with savings. It’s getting to the point Borak Obamma can’t even bring himself to say that.
Posted by: smartlillena | Mar 12, 2010 7:10:55 AM
Right on! I don’t have to tell you to get real because you get it! Don’t read the CBO analyses or what the best health economists and medical writers have to say about anything– c’mon! Thats for geeks!! Just ask the same inane questions over and over, say no and obstruct. Deny! Derail! Ask the opposition to define and be well-versed on the subject– but don’t bother ourselves! Don’t offer substance! Substance is dull! Be the questioner, not the one with answers or solutions!!! Its much easier!!!!! Solutions are overrated!!! Zero sum battle over wealth and resources for BIG corporations and the most fortunate members of society — the really rich ones–versus everybody else. I’m in!!! Who needs a middle class???!!!
(And never mind that the current insurance system is unsustainable or all those pesky moochers and looters who claim affordable health care and universal coverage are worthy goals– they can move to Costa Rica, or Europe, or just about anywhere else in the world for more affordable universal coverage on par with what the middle class gets here. The BEST care is for the Rich, as it should be in a nation founded on ideals it refused to live up to from the get-go in order not to tick off slaveowners. )
Posted by: adversus solem ne loquitor | March 12, 2010, 8:29 am 8:29 am
I will not sit here and debate the need for reform as I believe we can all agree that it’s needed to some extent.
All I want is to know what it will cost ME (average joe)
What’s the break-point on coverage/premiums (tax)?
What are the co-pays going to be?
What are the deductibles?
What service am I getting for my money?
If you can’t even give a WAG to any of the 4…don’t expect me to just “jump on the bandwagon”.
Posted by: Jim | March 12, 2010, 11:09 am 11:09 am
All I want is to know what it will cost ME (average joe)
____
Right on!!!! We have to demonstrate that we haven’t read the bill and that we don’t care!! Just say no. Its easy!! And never mind putting forth what you pay now and what those premiums are likely to be in seven years!!! Just play dumb!!! The libruls have no idea what to do in a face off with dummies!!!It flabbergasts them!!! They can’t believe we live in the country, but we do and they can’t do anything to educate us! NO WAY!! We don’t WANT to be informed.
Posted by: adversus solem ne loquitor | | March 12, 2010, 11:47 am 11:47 am
Right on! I don’t have to tell you to get real because you get it!
Posted by: adversus solem ne loquitor
—
I don’t know anyone who’s purchased insurance without asking the basic, obvious, questions like cost and coverage. Only fools are not asking those questions. When a salesperson starts hedging on those types of questions I smell a RAT. And I leave. I smell a RAT, right now.
The majority of this country smells a RAT, right now.
But keep the wit coming. When the goal is obfuscation, it (wit) is as good as a direct answer to those pesky details you’d rather not mention.
Posted by: smartlillena | March 13, 2010, 7:59 am 7:59 am
We don’t WANT to be informed.
Posted by: adversus solem ne loquitor
—
Would you please inform us? Please.
Posted by: smartlillena | March 13, 2010, 8:17 am 8:17 am
I don’t know anyone who’s purchased insurance without asking the basic, obvious, questions like cost and coverage.
_____
Wow!!! So, you know the answer!!! Or you’ve never bought insurance!!! You know what’s awesome is that even though you know, you ask!!! You are in the tank, dude!! High five!!! Keep it going!!
Posted by: adversus solem ne loquitor | March 13, 2010, 10:37 am 10:37 am
Would you please inform us? Please.
Posted by: smartlillena | Mar 13, 2010 8:17:46 AM
NO!!!! Information turns people into those geeky libruls!!!! What you and I need are fearmongering, contrarian, sound bite TALKING POINTS!!!
Posted by: adversus solem ne loquitor | March 13, 2010, 10:39 am 10:39 am
NO!!!!
Posted by: adversus solem ne loquitor
Awe, c’mon. It couldn’t possibly hurt to tell people what they’ll be paying and what they’re not going to get.
Posted by: smartlillena | March 14, 2010, 8:13 am 8:13 am
It couldn’t possibly hurt to tell people what they’ll be paying and what they’re not going to get.
Posted by: smartlillena | Mar 14, 2010 8:13:48 AM
No, it wouldn’t hurt at all, but your questions make little sense. That’s par for the course given the lack of understanding of the reform for most average right-leaning citizens. They’ve fallen for the disinformation campaign, and those they vote for are wholly owned subsidiaries of the insurance lobby.
Read the bill. Its not a one size fits all bill or health care plan. The private insurance market will still be in operation. Hence, your question makes no sense in context. Rather, it shows willful distortion, disinformation and disingenuousness. If you have insurance now, you will be able to keep it. Its not that hard, really. If you’re interested in going on an exchange, there will be a range of affordable options, which will vary by state yet meet minimum standards for quality care. Price gouging will be prohibited. Your contract won’t be rescinded, nor will you be denied for pre-existing conditions. If you’re a small business owner, or self-employed, you will eventually be able to pool your risk in a larger group. In the mean time, there will be temporary high-risk pools.
If you’re at all familiar with insurance and the bill, you know that your question is a red herring as there is an underwriting process.
You’re question implies that the comprehensive reform package is actually an insurance plan underwritten by the government that offers everyone the same contract. That is not the deal.
Indeed, nearly half the bill is devoted to pilot programs designed to figure out how we can best bend the cost curve, getting at medical inflation.
The better question for you to ask is what the answers will be to your questions in seven years, fourteen years, and for your children if we do nothing. The current system is unsustainable and promotes inequity.
Posted by: progressive mama | March 14, 2010, 10:10 am 10:10 am
The private insurance market will still be in operation. Hence, your question makes no sense in context. Rather, it shows willful distortion, disinformation and disingenuousness. If you have insurance now, you will be able to keep it. Its not that hard, really. If you’re interested in going on an exchange, there will be a range of affordable options, which will vary by state yet meet minimum standards for quality care. Price gouging will be prohibited
Posted by: progressive mama
—
Progressive Mama, you’re not a fool. Contrary to the lovely compliments you keep piling on me, I’m not either. I’ve no doubt the private market will not disappear. It is complete foolishness to think that whatever form this bill takes it will not have drastic consequences for private insurers and their customers. Those consequences will depend ENTIRELY upon their newly born “competition”, it’s PRICES and COVERAGE. Very likely, private insurers will be forced to reduce coverage and increase deductibles/copays to stay in business. The bamma/disaster’s “minimum standards” will set that bar. I’ve given you grief about the price (will continue to) but I’ve given you some grace on that as well. But no grace on coverage/deductibles.
What are those minimum standards?
Hence, the question makes PERFECT sense and is in PERFECT context.
Posted by: smartlillena | March 14, 2010, 10:51 am 10:51 am
Health care bill was only for vote bank that’s it…
Posted by: Ilan Ben Menachem | March 18, 2010, 5:57 am 5:57 am
Health is always a great concern for most people.
Posted by: Sal Baldacchino | October 19, 2011, 2:30 am 2:30 am
Since my latest trips to the doctor I have been a lot more concerned about my health.
Posted by: Houston Norat | October 19, 2011, 3:18 am 3:18 am
Health is always a great concern for most people.
Posted by: Cameron Seegars | October 19, 2011, 4:58 am 4:58 am