Kelly Ayotte: I Would Have Voted Against Senate Jobs Bill

Mar 2, 2010 5:03pm

ABC News’ Rick Klein reports: New Hampshire Senate candidate Kelly Ayotte — slammed by Democrats for not taking a position on the Senate jobs bill that passed last week — said today that she would have voted against it because it wasn’t paid for. ”I don't think that particular proposal I would have supported,” Ayotte, a former New Hampshire attorney general, told ABC News in an interview in Washington. “I did like pieces of it. I liked the payroll tax-cut piece. There were other pieces of spending in it that I don't think we would have; one of the concerns I had with the bill is how we're going to pay for it. And there wasn't a proposal on the table to say we're going to have corresponding cuts to pay for it, or even we're going to use existing stimulus money to pay for it.”The $15 billion proposal drew the support of five Republicans to break a GOP-led filibuster, including that of Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass., the newly installed senator from Ayotte’s neighboring state. ”I would have liked to have seen something that said we've got a way to pay for it,” Ayotte said. “So that would have been a primary concern of mine, and probably voting differently than [Brown] on it. But because fundamentally we do need to do something about jobs, and I certainly support whether it's a payroll [tax break] — some way to incentivize, too, on keeping the tax structure low for employers. But we do need to pay for it.  And I think the stimulus package — there's $500 billion that hasn't been spent on that. You know, maybe the best decision is to either apply [unspent funds] to our deficit, or if you are going to pass a jobs bill, makes sure it's paid for by that money.”

You are using an outdated version of Internet Explorer. Please click here to upgrade your browser in order to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus