Michelle Obama tells Grocery Manufacturers Association to ‘Step it Up’
ABC News’ Yunji de Nies reports:
The First Lady faced what may have been her toughest audience yet in her fight against childhood obesity. Speaking at a meeting of the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA), she decried the added calories that snacking has added to kids’ diets. Snacks manufactured by companies like Kraft Foods Inc., and General Mills, represented in the audience.
“Today, snacking between meals has become more the norm rather than the exception. And while kids 30 years ago ate just one snack a day, we’re now trending toward three –- so our kids are taking in an additional 200 calories a day just from snacks alone,” Mrs. Obama said.
GMA members welcomed Michelle Obama with a standing ovation. In his introduction, Rick Wolford, GMA chairman and CEO of Del Monte Foods Co., called the industry “ an enthusiastic supporter” of her Let’s Move! Initiative.
“We are now in a watershed moment in the fight against obesity,” Wolford said, “We share the same goal.”
Mrs. Obama called on the GMA to help in that goal, telling them while parents, teachers and government officials bear much of the responsibility for the one in three children now obese or overweight, they too have a duty to “step it up.”
“If there is anyone here who can sell food to our kids, it’s you. You know what gets their attention. You know what makes that lasting impression. You know what gets them to drive their parents crazy in the grocery store. And I’m here today to ask you to use that knowledge and that power to our kids’ advantage. I’m asking you to actively promote healthy foods and healthy habits to our kids,” she said.
Mrs. Obama said she wants a fundamental shift on the products these companies are making and the information they offer with it.
“We need you not just to tweak around the edges, but to entirely rethink the products that you’re offering, the information that you provide about these products, and how you market those products to our children,” she said.
The first lady also pushed the industry to provide more consistent and clear food labeling and reminded them that replacing one unhealthy ingredient with another does not constitute improvement.
“While decreasing fat is certainly a good thing, replacing it with sugar and salt isn’t. And it doesn’t mean compensating for high amounts of problematic ingredients with small amounts of beneficial ones — for example, adding a little bit of Vitamin C to a product with lots of sugar, or a gram of fiber to a product with tons of fat doesn’t suddenly make those products good for our kids,” she said, “This isn’t about finding creative ways to market products as healthy. As you know, it’s about producing products that actually are healthy — products that can help shape the health habits of an entire generation.”
FLOTUS Fashion Watch: Mrs. Obama wore a sleeveless silk pink narrow striped blouse with large pink bow, matched with a dark pink skirt and diamond earrings.
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
So it is the GMA’s fault that parents buy their products and feed their products to their kids?
Hey, Michelle, stay out of our cupboards and refrigerators!
Get your husband to quit smoking and then perhaps you will have some credibility.
Posted by: tjp612 | March 16, 2010, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
Money talks.
Just fork over some of the taxpayer’s money. She has $10billion to play with.
Posted by: ollie | March 16, 2010, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
No thanks Michelle.
We don’t want you to fix America.
You raise your kids, we’ll raise ours.
Posted by: fran | March 16, 2010, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
Michelle is worried about the future of our children.
OMG!!
Then stop spending our money, stop piling up debt on the backs of our kids.
The rate we are going there won’t be much of a future for our kids.
Posted by: kandy | March 16, 2010, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
cure to obsiety…just shut your mouth. i like michelle o, but come on 50 miliion bucks to deal with obesiety.
Posted by: catman | March 16, 2010, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Mrs. Obama said she wants a fundamental shift on the products these companies are making and the information they offer with it.
Really? Well, I’d like to see a ‘fundamental’ shift in the COST of healthier food products. You pay almost double for the ‘good’ stuff, meaning many people can’t afford to eat well, they must eat what they can AFFORD. Any suggestions, Michelle?
Posted by: Shoe | March 16, 2010, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
The Republican right attacks EVERYTHING the Democrats do – and include personal attacks on the First Lady – pathetic.
Posted by: tierra | March 16, 2010, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
When Michelle convinces her husband to stop smoking then she may have a right to tell people not to eat to excess.
Posted by: milliej | March 16, 2010, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
Exactly, tjp612. I love the hypocrisy of the left: do as I say, not as I do. We don’t all have giant gardens where we can grow our own taxpayer-funded vegetables. And maybe if Washington stops taxing us so much, we would be able to afford more healthy food, which we all know costs more.
Posted by: DaveMN | March 16, 2010, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
No way will I be told how to raise my kids. I guess the progressives nuts need advice on what to feed their kids and how to live their lives, but not me.
And, really a big yellow bow ROFL
Posted by: Scott | March 16, 2010, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
oops. . .PINK bow, even worse
Posted by: Scott | March 16, 2010, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
My goodness so much of vitriol…..
Facts:
She is not raising your kids.
She is not feeding your kids.
She is not managing your grocery.
She is not making any policy decisions.
She is doing advocacy at best.
She is telling you to open your eyes and see what your kids look like and what they might look like 10 years from now, if they continue to eat junk and not move enough.
Do you even have any idea what all goes in the most simple of junk food like McD’s Chicken nuggets ? 30 different ingredients to make it tastier, juicier, fattier and appear very good.
Do you all want the future generation of this country to be on disability as soon as they hit thier 40s ? If so, you can kiss the Medicare / Medicaid / social security good-bye right now.
Posted by: Anup | March 16, 2010, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Get people off or restrict types of purchases with foodstamps. That’s the problem. Mrs. Obama makes issue and the impact is greatest with the poor then maybe we manage their purchases for them. It used to be that way. You couldn’t buy junk food years ago. Instead of Cheetos paid by government programs they should only buy carrots or lettuce.
Posted by: A_R_Med | March 16, 2010, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
Posted by: Anup | Mar 16, 2010 4:36:52 PM
“She is not raising your kids”
No – But she is spending my tax dollars. $10 BILLION for this program.
===================================
“Do you all want the future generation of this country to be on disability as soon as they hit thier 40s ? If so, you can kiss the Medicare / Medicaid / social security good-bye right now.”
Does it really matter at this point? These three programs are headed towards insolvency and the funds won’t be there to provide pay-outs to everyone anyway. Thanks, Progressives!!!
“Do you even have any idea what all goes in the most simple of junk food like McD’s Chicken nuggets ? 30 different ingredients to make it tastier, juicier, fattier and appear very good.”
Unlike Progressives, most Americans know there is no such thing as a “free lunch.” If it tastes good, it’s probably not good for you. Do we really need Michelle and the government to tell us to be responsible and not eat deep-dish pizza and Big Macs every meal?
Posted by: tjp612 | March 16, 2010, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
My goodness so much of vitriol…..
Facts:
She is not raising your kids.
She is not feeding your kids.
She is not managing your grocery.
She is not making any policy decisions.
She is doing advocacy at best.
She is telling you to open your eyes and see what your kids look like and what they might look like 10 years from now, if they continue to eat junk and not move enough.
_____________________________________
The Republican right doesn’t care about facts – their only goal is to oppose EVERYTHING the Democrats do with a fear, smear and insult campaign.
Republicans think only they have the divine right to rule America.
Just the type of people we’d like to have running the country.
Posted by: tierra | March 16, 2010, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Posted by: A_R_Med | Mar 16, 2010 4:53:57 PM
Your fine suggestion would be labeled as discrimination by our moral superiors in D.C.
Posted by: tjp612 | March 16, 2010, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
That’s right.
Let the government improve you.
They know best about what we should eat, how much we should weigh, what to teach our kids, what car to drive, how to set our thermostats, what light bulbs to use, the kind of health care we need, where to fish, what to grow in our garden.
How did we exist without the Obama’s advice?
Posted by: kyle | March 16, 2010, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
The future for our kids if Obama, Pelosi, Reid have their way?
Poor and dependent on the government cradle to grave.
One thing is likely–their kids are set for life.
Posted by: hank | March 16, 2010, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
What’s Michelle going to do outlaw junk food?
Hire food police?
Pay families to eat right?
Set up web cams in homes?
I wouldn’t put anything past the Obama Administration.
Posted by: larry | March 16, 2010, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
The future for our kids if Obama, Pelosi, Reid have their way?
Poor and dependent on the government cradle to grave.
____________________________________
Nonsense. The $10 Trillion dollar deficit at the end of the Bush Republican administration ‘enslaved’ your children as much as the economic collapse on Bush’s watch – almost threw you and your kids into the new Great Depression.
And we’re not out of it yet – that is why there has been deficit financing, stimulus programs and tax cuts. To try to keep the whole deal afloat after it almost sunk under the economic collapse under the Bush administration.
You seem to forget all that – kind of convenient for your Republican right wing cause.
Posted by: tierra | March 16, 2010, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
“Surely it’s better you just remain ignorant of all of this.”
It is woefully apparent that there are those in our society who need this government guidance due to their inability to think for themselves…(hint, hint)
Posted by: tjp612 | March 16, 2010, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
“that is why there has been deficit financing, stimulus programs and tax cuts. To try to keep the whole deal afloat after it almost sunk under the economic collapse under the Bush administration.”
So, Ms. Professor, care to explain why we now have projected TRILLION DOLLAR ANNUAL DEFICITS as far as the eye can see under your genius leftist president?
BTW – Bush’s annual deficits NEVER exceeded $500 million. The “Bush Did It” playing card has expired.
Posted by: tjp612 | March 16, 2010, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
It is woefully apparent that there are those in our society who need this government guidance due to their inability to think for themselves…(hint, hint)
____________________________________
Like the people marketing and selling all the junk food? They surely don’t need any guidance do they? Like the schools putting Coke machines in their cafeterias? No guidance needed there.
If you could think for yourself, you would understand these programs make a lot of sense in the face of massive advertising and sales campaigns from the junk food companies.
Awareness is the first step – and the First Lady is doing an excellent job of bringing the problem front and center.
Even you are talking about it.
Posted by: tierra | March 16, 2010, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
“that is why there has been deficit financing, stimulus programs and tax cuts. To try to keep the whole deal afloat after it almost sunk under the economic collapse under the Bush administration.”
So, Ms. Professor, care to explain why we now have projected TRILLION DOLLAR ANNUAL DEFICITS as far as the eye can see under your genius leftist president?
___________________________________
I know its better for your argument if it’s not mentioned Bush left a $10 trillion dollar national debt for this President.
I know its better for your argument if you forget Bush left a built-in deficit for this President.
I know its better for your argument if you ignore the massive economic collapse on the Republican Bush watch – the largest since the Great Depression – which he left for this President.
I know its better for your argument if you ignore the effect a massive economic collapse has on deficits and budgets.
Sorry, in the real world of economic none of those things can be ignored.
Posted by: tierra | March 16, 2010, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
“Like the people marketing and selling all the junk food? They surely don’t need any guidance do they? Like the schools putting Coke machines in their cafeterias? No guidance needed there.”
Why is it the Leftists want so badly to take away choices from Americans? Why are they so quick to subvert themselves to the will of the government?
tierra – I could care less if there are Coke machines in schools. Here’s a thought: Don’t give your kids money to buy Cokes if you don’t want them drinking them! Don’t buy junk food for your kids if you don’t want them to eat it. It’s not that difficult.
Leftists appear to be unable to think for themselves.
Posted by: tjp612 | March 16, 2010, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
“Sorry, in the real world of economic none of those things can be ignored.”
TRILLION DOLLAR ANNUAL DEFICITS UNDER OBAMA.
THE U.S. IS ON THE VERGE OF LOSING IT’S TRIPLE-A RATING (I do not expect you to understand the impact of this).
Sorry, in the real world of economics, this cannot be ignored.
Bush = Bad
Obama = DISASTROUS
Posted by: tjp612 | March 16, 2010, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
Leftists appear to be unable to think for themselves.
Posted by: tjp612 | Mar 16, 2010 5:42:54 PM
And yet I meet tons of obese faux conservatives and Republicans.
Tons.
Go figure.
Its a public health issue. The hysterics over the issue is insane. I’m glad Michelle is giving it the public attention it deserves.
Posted by: progressive mama | March 16, 2010, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
“Like the people marketing and selling all the junk food? They surely don’t need any guidance do they? Like the schools putting Coke machines in their cafeterias? No guidance needed there.”
Why is it the Leftists want so badly to take away choices from Americans? Why are they so quick to subvert themselves to the will of the government?
____________________________________
Oh, so educating children is ‘taking away their choices’?
That is just plain dumb.
Posted by: tierra | March 16, 2010, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
I’m still waiting for her to bust out with a James Brown song.
On a more serious note I love how liberals are ban happy and love to blame people like manufacturers not parents.
Sorry some of us don’t need a nanny state running our lives to force common sense (or not so common I guess).
My philosophy: take the warning labels off everything and let nature sort it out ;)
Posted by: Cryos | March 16, 2010, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
Posted by: Cryos | Mar 16, 2010 5:51:28 PM
Try not to be afraid of information and education – it’s part of American life. Knowledge is power.
Posted by: tierra | March 16, 2010, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
“And yet I meet tons of obese faux conservatives and Republicans. Tons. Go figure.”
And how is this your business? Is it not their (regardless of ideology) choice if they are obese? Who are you to dictate the ideal body shapes of your fellow Americans (BTW – I’m not obese – not even close – but I will defend the “rights” of those who are, even if I disagree with their lifestyle choices).
Very, very partisan of you.
BTW, not that it matters, but according to the Kaiser Family Foundation the highest obesity rates by race in the U.S. are Black (69.9%) and Hispanics (62.1%), two voting blocks who consistently support Democratic candidates.
Posted by: tjp612 | March 16, 2010, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
“Again tjp, your dumbly ignore the massive economic collapse under the Bush administration”
The corner on “dumbly” is already occupied…
So you are OK with the TRILLION dollar deficits as far as the eye can see under Obama? Blame Bush all you want but (a.) Bush NEVER came close to this level of deficit spending, and (b.) Obama was elected to “fix” the problem. Perhaps he is not up to the task?
Posted by: tjp612 | March 16, 2010, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
“My philosophy: take the warning labels off everything and let nature sort it out ;)”
AGREED!
Posted by: tjp612 | March 16, 2010, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
Control their diets, control their education, control their college loans, control their minds.
Posted by: larry | March 16, 2010, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Posted by: Cryos | Mar 16, 2010 5:51:28 PM
Try not to be afraid of information and education – it’s part of American life. Knowledge is power.
Posted by: tierra | Mar 16, 2010 5:53:06 PM
====================
Coming from a liberal LOL. See information like this is common sense to someone like me. I’m not like you where I have to be told the basics of life.
I guess that’s why liberals are so heavy handed; they know how helpless their constiuents are.
Look at your clueless rants on this board. Guess what genius. Democrats have been in charge of congress since 2007 and congress writes the laws.
Democrats in February 2008 were still trying to lower loan standards for Fannie and Freddie and lecturing baseball players. But no they had nothing to do with the economic issues.
Get a clue.
Posted by: Cryos | March 16, 2010, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
BTW, not that it matters, but according to the Kaiser Family Foundation the highest obesity rates by race in the U.S. are Black (69.9%) and Hispanics (62.1%)
____________________________________
1) 25% of all white children overweight 2001, 2) 33% African American and Hispanic children overweight 2001 . . .
Not much difference, it’s a major problem and will impact on the health care system in the future if its not addressed.
All power to the First Lady for putting this on the agenda.
Posted by: tierra | March 16, 2010, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
“Again tjp, your dumbly ignore the massive economic collapse under the Bush administration”
The corner on “dumbly” is already occupied…
So you are OK with the TRILLION dollar deficits as far as the eye can see under Obama? Blame Bush all you want but (a.) Bush NEVER came close to this level of deficit spending, and (b.) Obama was elected to “fix” the problem. Perhaps he is not up to the task?
Posted by: tjp612 | Mar 16, 2010 6:01:10 PM
=========================
The 13% budget increase by Obama was totally Bush’s fault lol.
Posted by: Cryos | March 16, 2010, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
Democrats in February 2008 were still trying to lower loan standards for Fannie and Freddie
________________________________________
Bush homeownership plan aims at $5.5 million lift for minorities
Date: Monday, July 1 2002
“President Bush announced an Administration effort to increase home ownership rates among African Americans and Hispanics by 5.5 million by 2010.
“The plan would provide down payment assistance to 40,000 minority homebuyers each year . .
“Bush’s plan would be closely tied to some $440 million in minority loan programs offered by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. President Bush commended Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s efforts . . .”
Posted by: tierra | March 16, 2010, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
” 25% of all white children overweight 2001, 2) 33% African American and Hispanic children overweight 2001. Not much difference, it’s a major problem and will impact on the health care system in the future if its not addressed.”
Well, if you consider 25% “not much difference” (the difference between 25% and 33%), then I guess you are right. Personally, I think 25% is “a lot”.
Obama math on display. You probably also believe (as Obama stated yesterday in Ohio) that “your employer, it’s estimated, would see premiums fall by as much as 3000%, which means they could give you a raise!”
It’s sad that the so-called “leader of the free world” doesn’t even understand the fundamentals of mathematics.
Posted by: tjp612 | March 16, 2010, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Democrats in February 2008 were still trying to lower loan standards for Fannie and Freddie
________________________________________
Bush homeownership plan aims at $5.5 million lift for minorities
Date: Monday, July 1 2002
“President Bush announced an Administration effort to increase home ownership rates among African Americans and Hispanics by 5.5 million by 2010.
“The plan would provide down payment assistance to 40,000 minority homebuyers each year . .
“Bush’s plan would be closely tied to some $440 million in minority loan programs offered by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. President Bush commended Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s efforts . . .”
Posted by: tierra | Mar 16, 2010 6:10:36 PM
==================================
This was in 2002. After 2002 no less than a dozen times republicans brought up paring back FF because it was too exposed and being overused.
But your 2002 article trumps it all I guess.
Posted by: Cryos | March 16, 2010, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
“Try not to be afraid of information and education – it’s part of American life.”
Based on the posts I’m reading from my Leftist friends, I’m not so sure this is true…Indoctrination, yes. Education, no.
Posted by: tjp612 | March 16, 2010, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
Posted by: Cryos | Mar 16, 2010 6:09:55 PM
Don’t be afraid of education and information – it’s part of American life.
Your concerns seem misplaced. You would be smarter to be addressing the multi-million dollar advertising campaigns from junk food dealers – who deal their ‘dope’ right in our schools – rather than worrying about a public information campaign against obesity.
Posted by: tierra | March 16, 2010, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
This was in 2002. After 2002 no less than a dozen times republicans brought up
___________________________________
No, it was a program instituted by Bush to run through to 2010 . . . read more carefully.
Regarding, ‘after 2002′ – Republicans held the presidency AND the congress from 2002 through to January 2007 – what held them back?
Posted by: tierra | March 16, 2010, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
“You would be smarter to be addressing the multi-million dollar advertising campaigns from junk food dealers – who deal their ‘dope’ right in our schools – rather than worrying about a public information campaign against obesity.”
If they can’t buy it or if it is not available at home, they can’t eat it!
Why is this so difficult for you to understand?
Why do Progressives/Leftists believe the government should assume the roles and responsibilities of parents? Is it because they are poor parents themselves and realize they need “help”?
Posted by: tjp612 | March 16, 2010, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
Why do Progressives/Leftists believe the government should assume the roles and responsibilities of parents?
_____________________________________
Not at all, but we do believe in education and information in schools – not junk food dealers. It’s not that difficult to figure out.
Posted by: tierra | March 16, 2010, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
More Nanny State BS so Big Sister can diaper the butts of every living human being in this country! Go away, CONTROL FREAK! Teach PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY in school along with good nutrition and then back the hell off. If stupid parents allow their kids to gorge themselves on sugar, they will pay the price. If kids continue after learning the consequences of bad choices, they will pay the price. So be it. This is AMERICA and we still enjoy FREEDOM to choose our own path and we should NOT have to pay for the stupidity of others!!
Posted by: Sunnyr | March 16, 2010, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
The Republican right wingnuts are opposed to the First Lady spearheading a program to combat a major problem in America – childhood obesity! Stunning! Stupid. Creepy.
Posted by: tierra | March 16, 2010, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
“New Agency Proposed to Oversee Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae
By STEPHEN LABATON
Published: September 11, 2003
__________________________________
In 2003, the Republican held the presidency and the congress, but were unable to deliver any reform? Sounds to me like incompetence or the inability to compromise.
“The president spent years pushing a recalcitrant Congress to toughen regulation of the companies, but was unwilling to compromise when his former Treasury secretary wanted to cut a deal. And the regulator Mr. Bush chose to oversee them — an old prep school buddy — pronounced the companies sound even as they headed toward insolvency.”
Posted by: tierra | March 16, 2010, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
This was in 2002. After 2002 no less than a dozen times republicans brought up
___________________________________
No, it was a program instituted by Bush to run through to 2010 . . . read more carefully.
Regarding, ‘after 2002′ – Republicans held the presidency AND the congress from 2002 through to January 2007 – what held them back?
Again, a stunning lack of honesty and integrity from the Republican right.
Posted by: tierra | Mar 16, 2010 6:19:17 PM
===========================
Oh wow I must be misinformed. I didn’t know Bush was president in 1999 and before. This article mistakenly put Clinton on the program Bush started.
“”Fannie Mae Eases Credit To Aid Mortgage Lending
By STEVEN A. HOLMES
Published: September 30, 1999″
WASHINGTON, Sept. 29— In a move that could help increase home ownership rates among minorities and low-income consumers, the Fannie Mae Corporation is easing the credit requirements on loans that it will purchase from banks and other lenders.
Posted by: Cryos | March 16, 2010, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
“Not at all, but we do believe in education and information in schools – not junk food dealers. It’s not that difficult to figure out.”
IF.YOU.DO.NOT.WANT.YOUR.KIDS.TO.EAT.JUNK.FOOD.AT.SCHOOL.DO.NOT.GIVE.THEM.MONEY.TO.BUY.IT.
It’s that simple. No education needed. It’s the same way my parents taught most of us.
The root cause of obesity is lack of responsible parenting and self-discipline, not due to the “evil GMA”. Government cannont fix this problem (at least without coming into our homes and interfering with our lifes…which is what the Progressives ultimately want).
Posted by: tjp612 | March 16, 2010, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
“New Agency Proposed to Oversee Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae
By STEPHEN LABATON
Published: September 11, 2003
__________________________________
In 2003, the Republican held the presidency and the congress, but were unable to deliver any reform? Sounds to me like incompetence or the inability to compromise.
“The president spent years pushing a recalcitrant Congress to toughen regulation of the companies, but was unwilling to compromise when his former Treasury secretary wanted to cut a deal. And the regulator Mr. Bush chose to oversee them — an old prep school buddy — pronounced the companies sound even as they headed toward insolvency.”
Posted by: tierra | March 16, 2010, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
“New Agency Proposed to Oversee Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae
By STEPHEN LABATON
Published: September 11, 2003
__________________________________
In 2003, the Republican held the presidency and the congress, but were unable to deliver any reform? Sounds to me like incompetence or the inability to compromise.
“The president spent years pushing a recalcitrant Congress to toughen regulation of the companies, but was unwilling to compromise when his former Treasury secretary wanted to cut a deal. And the regulator Mr. Bush chose to oversee them — an old prep school buddy — pronounced the companies sound even as they headed toward insolvency.”
Sorry, the facts bother you so much Cyros. You seem unable to accept the fact Bush instituted a major program to provide DOWN PAYMENTS to mortagages from the tax payers’ money to try to get housing for 40,000 minority homebuyers EACH YEAR.
And you seem unable to accept the fact Republicans held the presidency and the congress 2002-2007 and accomplished nothing in terms of Freddie and Fannie reform.
Posted by: tierra | March 16, 2010, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
And you seem unable to accept the fact Republicans held the presidency and the congress 2002-2007 and accomplished nothing in terms of Freddie and Fannie reform.
Posted by: tierra | Mar 16, 2010 6:36:26 PM
=======================
I know you think your paragraph is real clever but it is an opinion from a NY times writer trying to put the blame on Bush. Please introduce facts not opinion based junk.
That article was totally faulty in its reporting. It was a hit piece for clueless rubes like yourself.
Frank, Dodd and other democrats refused to even let it get out of committee.
There is this thing called the fillibuster; you know the thing democrats are whining about trying to change the law about.
Democrats can’t even get anything done with supermajorities yet republicans are supposed to with slim majorities? LOL.
Posted by: Cryos | March 16, 2010, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
I think if we listen to Michelle, we can reduce obesity 3000%, just as her husband states that premiums paid by employers could drop 3000%!
(in other words, insurers will pay employers to buy their products – what a country!)
ObamaMath
Posted by: tjp612 | March 16, 2010, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
“Frank, Dodd and other democrats refused to even let it get out of committee.”
S.190 (the bill we are talking about) was reported out of the committee and the GOP could have held a vote on it in committee but did, not in 2003 when it was orig intro’d, nor in 2005.
“There is this thing called the fillibuster; you know the thing democrats are whining about trying to change the law about.”
Actually it was the Republicans who sought to eliminate the filibuster because they didn’t like the Democrats holding up Bush’s judge appointees.
But there was no filibuster on S.190 or even a cloture vote.
It never even came to the floor.
The lesson as always? Right wingers lie.
Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2010, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
Millions of Americans are jobless, homeless, eating at soup kitchens, stretching their budgets as far as they will go.
And FLOTUS gets a budget of $10 BILLION taxpayer dollars to fight obesity!!
Why in God’s name is that important when America is about to go bankrupt?
Put a sock in it Michelle until your husband stops spending like our hard earned money is Monopoly money.
Totally tone-deaf and out of touch with everyday struggling people.
Posted by: fran | March 16, 2010, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
…uh.. Ms. FLOTUS.. we just asked you whether you wanted paper or plastic..
Posted by: DontGet818onMeNow | March 16, 2010, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
“Why in God’s name is that important when America is about to go bankrupt?”
Because obese kids today with be taxpayer health costs tomorrow.
I realize right wingers are incredibly short sighted but try and think beyond tomorrow and beyond yourself for a change.
Posted by: Ryan C | March 16, 2010, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
Posted by: Cryos | Mar 16, 2010 6:39:37 PM
Um…. you need to do a fact check on what you think you know. LOL. Read up on the efforts, the amendments, what made it out of committee and the House in 2005, who did and didn’t step up, etc, etc, etc– what Oxley said, Greenspan, and so on. There were ways for Bush and the Republicans to get something passed– they didn’t because they let ideology and the perfect get in the way of doing something. Ever heard of the Republican Study Committee.
Posted by: progressive mama | March 16, 2010, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
Honestly is it really the job of the government to determine what we should eat? Seriousley? Lets face it the majority of Americans like sugary and greasey foods I myself like a good balance between tasty greasey and healthy food and I should be able to enjoy a greasey burger as much as a healthy salad. Companies are profit driven they produce what sells Period!
Posted by: Missy | March 16, 2010, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
Companies are profit driven they produce what sells Period!
Posted by: Missy | Mar 16, 2010 8:16:32 PM
______________________________
Same with crystal meth dealers.
Posted by: tierra | March 16, 2010, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
“And yet I meet tons of obese faux conservatives and Republicans. Tons. Go figure.”
And how is this your business? Is it not their (regardless of ideology) choice if they are obese? Who are you to dictate the ideal body shapes of your fellow Americans (BTW – I’m not obese – not even close – but I will defend the “rights” of those who are, even if I disagree with their lifestyle choices).
Very, very partisan of you.
BTW, not that it matters, but according to the Kaiser Family Foundation the highest obesity rates by race in the U.S. are Black (69.9%) and Hispanics (62.1%), two voting blocks who consistently support Democratic candidates.
Posted by: tjp612 | Mar 16, 2010 5:55:44 PM
Hmmm… are you serious? You indicated that lefties can’t figure out how not to be obese without the government telling them how– right? We can’t think, you said? We need instruction, you said– guidance.
Given that, forgive me if I laugh out loud when you hypocritically say “Very, very partisan of you.”
For one thing, so what? Everybody by now knows that I think the GOP is an outdated, backwards, fearmongering party and that I can’t fathom why anyone would vote for them.
My point was in relation to your point was this:a lot of overweight and out of shape people are conservative, too. Tons. And they come in all the time with all kinds of excuses and rather clueless, needing “help”–just like the overweight people on the left. They want exercise programs, menus, wake up calls and, frankly, babysitters. Not all– but enough. The Right has NOTHING on the left in that department.
Btw, its my business cuz its my business. LOL. I own a gym. I have a close friend who owns an organic farm. My husband owns a deli and has a line of health food. I think Michelle Obama is doing public health a great service. Obesity is a very serious public health issue.
And it does effect all of us whether we’re obese ourselves or not, as all public health issues do.
But I don’t want junk food and pop outlawed. I want it taxed heavily alongside legalized pot.
Posted by: progressive mama | March 16, 2010, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
The Right has NOTHING on the left in that department.
———-
By that I meant no higher ground– though I see you’re trying to use race to make a case that there are more obese people that vote Democrat.
Posted by: progressive mama | March 16, 2010, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
Because obese kids today with be taxpayer health costs tomorrow.
I realize right wingers are incredibly short sighted but try and think beyond tomorrow and beyond yourself for a change.
Posted by: Ryan C | Mar 16, 2010 8:03:57 PM
_________
I think you’re being too sensible. These folks are freaking out because Michelle Obama is highlighting a huge public health problem that Health Affairs dedicated its entire March issue to. Common sense has nothing to do with their objections and crazy talk.
Personally, I think its related to the big freak out now that health care reform legislation is likely to pass.
Posted by: progressive mama | March 16, 2010, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
I have never seen so many idiots fight so hard for the status quo. You talk about your right to eat whatever you want. Well eating junk is what’s killing Americans!
We have bigger problems with obesity, heart disease, diabetes, cancer than any other country.
Talk about survival of the fittest – this country is literally killing itself. The shortsighted, uninformed, morons who don’t get that combatting health care costs and living longer and high quality lives is dependant on our environment and what we eat. But leave it to the crazy conservatives to yell and fight to live in polluted environments with their call for de-regulations over air or water safety. They are foaming at the mouth to hold on to their soda pop, potato chips, fast foods, and processed foods, with no regard to chemicals that go into manufactured and processed foods.
Humans were not built by God to be able to withstand eating all these chemicals in our foods. Numerous studies have been done to show the linkage between what we eat and cancer. I don’t understand why people are foaming at the mouth and a COMMONSENSE and important mission the First Lady is taking on!
We don’t have to worry about Iran setting off a nuclear bomb, heck Americans are eating themselves to death!
Posted by: Susan | March 16, 2010, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
Companies are profit driven they produce what sells Period!
Posted by: Missy | Mar 16, 2010 8:16:32 PM
______________________________
Same with crystal meth dealers.
Posted by: tierra | Mar 16, 2010 8:26:03 PM
Excellent point. How much money do we spend on the War on Drugs again?
Posted by: progressive mama | March 16, 2010, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
So let me get this straight….it is the COMPANIES fault for producing snacks that I suppose automatically jump in the shopping cart as it trolls through the aisles. Obesity is never the person’s fault or the parent’s fault is it? They are innocent bystanders forced at gunpoint to buy unhealthy snacks. Do people really believe the fault lies with grocery stores and food manufacturers? Are we to be insulted and think we are incapable of curbing our own behavior? Does Michelle Obama really have that low opinion of people in this country that she feels people are too weak and stupid to fix their own problems?
Posted by: srb | March 16, 2010, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
“If there is anyone who can sell food to our kids, it’s you.” Michelle Obama -last time I checked, its the parents who buy the food. What the heck is going on in our country? Nobody wants to take responsibility for anything. If your kid is raiding the pantry and eating tons of snacks, stop buying the stuff. It’s like the mother wringing her hands over her 700 pound, bedridden son whom she feeds like a waitress. C’mon America, are we ready to give up our freedom to choose because we are too weak to make the choices ourselves? What’s next? A ban on cartoons because we can’t tell junior to turn the TV off?
Posted by: cindy | March 16, 2010, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
Like Mr. Obama’s health plan for Americans, the food that he would give the kids has some healthy nutrients and some rusted nails. He want to push this food and nails down our throats, saying that it will come out all right.
Posted by: young_voter | March 16, 2010, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
I have never seen so many idiots fight so hard for the status quo. You talk about your right to eat whatever you want. Well eating junk is what’s killing Americans!
We have bigger problems with obesity, heart disease, diabetes, cancer than any other country.
Talk about survival of the fittest – this country is literally killing itself. The shortsighted, uninformed, morons who don’t get that combatting health care costs and living longer and high quality lives is dependant on our environment and what we eat. But leave it to the crazy conservatives to yell and fight to live in polluted environments with their call for de-regulations over air or water safety. They are foaming at the mouth to hold on to their soda pop, potato chips, fast foods, and processed foods, with no regard to chemicals that go into manufactured and processed foods.
Humans were not built by God to be able to withstand eating all these chemicals in our foods. Numerous studies have been done to show the linkage between what we eat and cancer. I don’t understand why people are foaming at the mouth and a COMMONSENSE and important mission the First Lady is taking on!
We don’t have to worry about Iran setting off a nuclear bomb, heck Americans are eating themselves to death!
Posted by: Susan | Mar 16, 2010 8:41:23 PM
__________________________________
******************************
Posted by: tierra | March 16, 2010, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
Hey if parents don’t have a problem with their kid being obese then why the hell does anyone else? If you don’t like looking at a fat kid don’t.
Posted by: trish | March 16, 2010, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
As I mentioned previously, the March issue of Health Affairs is dedicated to obesity as a serious public health issue.
“…the estimated annual cost of treating obesity-related illness in adults reached $147 billion in 2009. With child obesity growing three times faster than adult obesity, Martin-J. Sepulveda and colleagues cite data showing that the average claims cost of children with type II diabetes, at $10,789, exceeds the $8,844 average claims cost of adults with the same condition. Other research shows that overweight and obese children are more likely than others to repeat a grade in school or to miss more than two weeks of school in a year. Employers, write Sepulveda and colleagues, “are at risk of inheriting a future workforce” in which many are obese and have costly chronic illness.
The solution, as Jonathan D. Klein and William Dietz write, is a broad-based set of interventions comparable in scope to the four-decade assault on smoking. Since “default” conditions in this country now predispose many to obesity, the goal should be defaults that predispose everyone to better health, urge Kelly D. Brownell and coauthors. This means taking action in agriculture, food labeling and marketing, education, transportation, parks and recreation, and health care. A strong federal role is key, but much will also fall to the states, which face big differences in obesity rates relative to each other and within their borders.” (Susan Denzer, Editor-in-Chief, Health Affairs)
Posted by: progressive mama | March 17, 2010, 1:50 am 1:50 am
If you don’t like looking at a fat kid don’t.
Posted by: trish | Mar 16, 2010 11:19:09 PM
Hmmmm…. from Health Affairs:
“America is guilty of child abuse. That’s a central conclusion to be drawn from this issue of Health Affairs, devoted to combating child obesity. It is one thing to be a nation that’s allowed two-thirds of its arguably “personally responsible” adults to become overweight or obese. It’s quite another that nearly one in three children now fall into the same category, including kids entering Head Start programs at the ripe old age of four. We also know that the obese among them are predisposed to develop chronic health conditions including diabetes and colon cancer, and to face shorter life spans than their parents’. So what charge would one level against a nation that allowed this to happen, if not of a form of child abuse with horrific consequences?”
Seriously, do you have a problem with efforts to keep children from smoking or doing drugs or drinking alcohol???
Posted by: progressive mama | March 17, 2010, 1:52 am 1:52 am
Humans were not built by God to be able to withstand eating all these chemicals in our foods. Numerous studies have been done to show the linkage between what we eat and cancer. I don’t understand why people are foaming at the mouth and a COMMONSENSE and important mission the First Lady is taking on!
We don’t have to worry about Iran setting off a nuclear bomb, heck Americans are eating themselves to death!
Posted by: Susan | Mar 16, 2010 8:41:23 PM
Excellent post, Susan.
I’m a proponent of the Slowfood and Local food movements, and they support Michelle Obama’s efforts 100%. The following information was posted on the Slow Food International blog in January:
“Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) researchers have pointed the finger at America’s large-scale food production and distribution system as a cause of the nation’s child obesity epidemic. The current approach to food production means children — especially those in lower income families — are surrounded by high-calorie products, and the solution lies in local food production and consumption, the group has concluded.
In a situation where 90 percent of the country’s food is processed, only one to two percent of all food is locally produced, and the price of healthy food has risen more quickly than the price of unhealthy food in the last several decades, childhood obesity has become a major public-health problem. ‘The problem lies not just in a child, but the whole environment around a child,’ said Dr. Tenley Albright, director of MIT’s Collaborative Initiatives program. ‘To end obesity, we need to produce healthier, more accessible, more affordable food.’
The solution, the researchers say, is for each metropolitan area to obtain most of its necessary food from its own “foodshed,” a term similar to “watershed” that signifies the area that naturally supplies its kitchens. Furthermore, these local efforts should form a larger “Integrated Regional Foodshed” system, with the overall goal of lowering the price and caloric content of food by decreasing transport distances between farms and consumers.”
People who think its simply a parenting issue have shut their eyes to another chronic problem.
Posted by: progressive mama | March 17, 2010, 2:00 am 2:00 am
What’s wrong with being fat.. maybe they could smoke a cig and drink an energy drink.. keep some of that weight off.
Posted by: DontGet818onMeNow | March 17, 2010, 7:39 am 7:39 am
She’s barking up the wrong tree.. if you take away their snacks at home, they just start grazing at the nearest quick service trough.
Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | March 17, 2010, 8:06 am 8:06 am
trish, your comment, ‘Hey if parents don’t have a problem with their kid being obese then why the hell does anyone else? If you don’t like looking at a fat kid don’t.’ is missing the point. This isn’t about people not wanting to see fat kids, it is about the quality and length of their lives. Fat people get diabetes, heart disease, joint problems, etc. at a much higher rate than appropriate-weight-for-their-frame people. It is about quality of life, too, as feeling ill is awful and that much excess weight severely limits the activities you can enjoy. And in the end, the extra medical expenses a fat person racks up in a lifetime, we all pay for in higher insurance premiums.
So for kids and adults to slim down a bit is a terrific goal for our country.
Posted by: Lydia | March 17, 2010, 9:24 am 9:24 am
Remember folks, if you are trying to lose weight, it isn’t only how much or what you are eating, it is your activity level. Studies have shown, even working out an hour a day won’t help as much if you are sedentary the rest of the day. The experts recommend pacing while talking on the phone, not sitting longer than an hour at a time without moving a bit and you will keep your metabolism burning calories at a much fast pace all day. Fidgeting turns out to be good for us!
Weight training, as simple as push-ups and curls for your arms, by increasing your muscle mass even slightly will also burn more calories all day long, as muscle burns more calories than fat. Good luck to all those trying to lose a little or a lot. Little changes in diet and lifestyle work best, and add up quickly.
Posted by: Lydia | March 17, 2010, 9:31 am 9:31 am
The Citizens of the United States still have “Free Well” and can make their own decisions. I suppose what she is opposed to is marketing in free enterprise. Private companies competeing. Could have sworn that was just one of the reasons so many want to immigrate to this country legally.
Posted by: Toni Keener | March 17, 2010, 10:34 am 10:34 am
The Citizens of the United States still have “Free Well”
_________
There’s no free “well.” But there is a cheap well of highly processed calorie-laden non-foods.
I prefer real food, and think Michelle Obama has every right to focus on what she wishes to focus on. Good for her for addressing a HUGE problem.
Posted by: Truth has a liberal bias | March 17, 2010, 10:45 am 10:45 am
As a parent in our home we find the word NO very helpful before and at the grocery store. We also explain to our kids about healthy choices and little splurges once in a while (like today we’re getting our shamrock shakes). The GMA doesn’t write my shopping list and neither does the executive branch. They also don’t regulate my exercise schedule any more than my local YMCA does. While I applaud the work she is doing to raise awareness (and I really do APPLAUD this) I think this crosses the line from public roles to private, parental roles.
Posted by: GO | March 17, 2010, 10:54 am 10:54 am
Michelle & the Grocery Manufacturers Association do not belong in my shopping cart. I feed my family the way I want to. I don’t need them telling me what to do for my family. I am fairly intelligent and make good choices for food consumption. Snacks? Soft drinks? Yes, there is a place for them in my family’s eating/drinking habits. But that’s my business!
Posted by: Sarah | March 17, 2010, 11:10 am 11:10 am
NEXT THEY WILL TELL US WHEN TO SLEEP, WHAT TO WHERE, AND WITH HEALTH CARE WHAT DOCTOR TO GO TO…WILL IT EVER END…..HELP…2012..CHANGE BACK TO AMERICA
Posted by: betty11 | March 17, 2010, 11:36 am 11:36 am
“Mrs. Obama called on the GMA to help in that goal, telling them while parents, teachers and government officials bear much of the responsibility for the one in three children now obese or overweight, they too have a duty to “step it up.”” – ABC News
This is plain wrong and misguided.
This type of social thinking is flawed and has no place in America.
Michelle should have edited out teachers and government officials.
They are not responsible for children’s eating habits.
The responsibility falls squarely on the parents and that’s it.
Michelle should redirect her message to parents if she wants to be effective.
Posted by: Noz | March 17, 2010, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
Maybe Michelle Obama and other people have a problem reading nutrition labels and package ingredients, I don’t. About the only way I see to improve it is to install a button on the side of each package that plays a voice recording listing everything out. Now there’s a cost saving measure. Here is a voice recording that you can use that worked very well on my kids.
“Don’t eat that.”
Posted by: WhatsNext | March 17, 2010, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Michele Obama preaching to the large food manufacturers to care about nutrition is the equivalent of her husband preaching to the defense industry to care about peace. She is on the wrong stage. Who is she kidding? Of course they will applaud, the First Lady is empowering them to stay in control and continue to shamelessly market armful food to our kids.
Posted by: Louis | March 17, 2010, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
The Citizens of the United States still have “Free Well”
_________
There’s no free “well.” But there is a cheap well of highly processed calorie-laden non-foods.
I prefer real food, and think Michelle Obama has every right to focus on what she wishes to focus on. Good for her for addressing a HUGE problem.
Posted by: Truth has a liberal bias | Mar 17, 2010 10:45:45 AM
__________________________________
The Republican right seems to think education and good information threaten their freedom to be stupid.
Posted by: tierra | March 17, 2010, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
OBAMA = CHANGE = NOPE … PROPAGANDA !
HOPE = NOBAMA = AMERICA !!!!!!!!!!!!
Education reform bill is not about education, it is about POWER GRAB.
Health Care reform is not about health care, it is about POWER GRAB.
CHANGE IS ALL ABOUT POWER GRAB.
Posted by: talk from sf | March 17, 2010, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
Michelle said to change the Grocery Manufacturers Association…but it is not possible…
Posted by: Ilan Ben Menachem | March 18, 2010, 4:32 am 4:32 am