By Matt Loffman

Mar 8, 2010 1:04pm

Obama Rallies Support for Health Care Reform by Pointing Finger at Insurance Companies

ABC News’ Karen Travers reports: President Obama hit the road today to once again stress the urgent need for Congress to pass health care reform, ratcheting up his criticism of insurance companies that he said are more concerned with their own profits than serving Americans consumers. “We need to give families and businesses more control over their own health insurance,” Obama said to an enthusiastic crowd of 1800 at Arcadia University outside Philadelphia. “And that's why we need to pass health care reform; not next year, not five years from now, not 10 years from now, but now.” Obama cited a conference call organized by Goldman Sachs which he said illustrated why reforms of the insurance industry are long overdue and critical to the overall reform effort. On this conference call, the president said, an insurance broker said that insurance companies are well aware that they will lose customers if they continue to raise premiums. Yet Obama said that because there is so little competition in the insurance industry, these companies have no incentive to put the needs and concerns of the consumer first or respond to rising pressure to bring down costs. “They’re OK with people being priced out of the insurance market because, first of all, a lot of folks are going to be stuck,” Obama said. “And even if some people drop out, they'll still make more money by raising premiums on customers that they keep,” “They will keep on doing this for as long as they can get away with it. This is no secret,” the president said. “They're telling their investors this – ‘We are in the money.  We are going to keep on making big profits even though a lot of folks are going to be put under hardship.’” With several Members of Congress in attendance, including Sen. Arlen Specter (D-PA) who is in a tough re-election battle this year, Obama dismissed the notion that health care needs to be put on the back burner because it’s a politically explosive issue. “Now, since we took this issue on a year ago, there have been plenty of folks in Washington who've said that, "The politics is just too hard."  They've warned us, "We may not win,” the president said. “They've argued, ‘Now is not the time for reform.  It's going to hurt your poll numbers. How's it going to affect Democrats in November?  Don't do it now.’” “My question to them is, when's the right time? If not now, when?  If not us, who?,” he said to cheers from the crowd. “Is it a year from now or two years from now or five years from now or 10 years from now?  I think it's right now, and that's why you're here today.” At times it sounded like the president was back on the 2008 campaign trail as he addressed the raucous crowd of about 1800 here in the perennially politically critical suburbs of Philadelphia. “I'm kind of fired up,” he said at the beginning of his remarks. Just like during the campaign season, Obama urged the crowd to get out the door and get working on the grassroots level. “So I need you to knock on doors, talk to your neighbors, pick up the phone,” he said. “When you hear an argument by the water cooler and somebody's saying this or that about it, say, ‘No, no, no, no.  Hold on a second.’” The president told the crowd they needed to “make your voices heard all the way in Washington D.C.” “They need to hear your voices because right now the Washington echo chamber is in full throttle,” he said. “It is as deafening as it's ever been.”

User Comments

Never mind the Inconvenient Truth that health insurers have to get any premium increase approved by a state insurance board for each state. Put away the torches and pitchforks.

Posted by: HealthCare Redistribution Czar | March 8, 2010, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

So Obama is trying to sell the idea that insurance companies keep raising premiums, knowing they’ll lose customers, because they believe that will raise profits?
Doesn’t that open the door for a competitor to come in and sell the same policies for less?
I had really hoped for a more honest debate from him. He’s got this all wrong, and is demonizing an American industry in order to get political support for his agenda.
What company feels comfortable operating in this environment? Remember, he did the same thing to energy/oil companies during the campaign.

Posted by: MayBee | March 8, 2010, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

It is time to do something about health care. If the Republicans want to do what is best for our country, they will work with the President and Congress instead of spending time creating Powerpoint presentations that have cartoons of the President and talk about spreading fear? This is childish behavior and right out of the negative playbook of Rush Limbaugh. He’s bringing down the Republican party. I’m an Independent and each time I hear his negative remarks, I swear I will never vote for a Republican again. Please get him out of the party.

Posted by: Ron1209 | March 8, 2010, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Doesn’t that open the door for a competitor to come in and sell the same policies for less?
____________________________________
Where are they? Seen any sign of premiums going down in the past years through competition?

Posted by: tierra | March 8, 2010, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Where are they? Seen any sign of premiums going down in the past years through competition?
========
exactly, tierra. Competitors aren’t coming in to offer lower rates because you can’t make money at the lower rates.
Health care companies aren’t raising prices to get rid of customers and keep making profits. They are raising prices because their costs are greater, too.
Obama is being disingenuous. He should be honest about what is going on.

Posted by: MayBee | March 8, 2010, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

someone below claims obama is “demonizing” health insurance companies. first off, that person clearly has great insurance. secondly, i work in a surgical ICU and have also worked in an outpatient setting and these companies have used every tactic at their disposal to jack up premiums while paying out less year after year, while keeping those with pre-existing conditions from getting coverage–which, in turn, makes the taxpayers pick up the bill. maybe it’s time to stop ignoring the facts for the sake of “conservative” idealism

Posted by: Steve | March 8, 2010, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

steve- insurance companies are certainly not angels, that is true. That doesn’t mean President Obama should misrepresent what is going on in an effort to sell his policies.
He should explain what his plans will do, and how it will address the real problems. If he can’t do that honestly, people should be cautious about his “fixes”.

Posted by: MayBee | March 8, 2010, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Obama is being disingenuous. He should be honest about what is going on.
Posted by: MayBee | Mar 8, 2010 1:51:36 PM
___________________________________
I think he was.

Posted by: tierra | March 8, 2010, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Fake outrage at fatcat bankers, fake outrage at the health care industry.
Obama has guaranteed the HC industry millions of new customers. He’s good at fooling a bunch of college kids.

Posted by: mick | March 8, 2010, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

“I think he was.”
Like he was about bonuses…

Posted by: Bonus 6 | March 8, 2010, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

steve- insurance companies are certainly not angels, that is true.
__________________________________
i think steve was saying a bit more than that . ..
“i work in a surgical ICU and have also worked in an outpatient setting and these companies have used every tactic at their disposal to jack up premiums while paying out less year after year, while keeping those with pre-existing conditions from getting coverage–which, in turn, makes the taxpayers pick up the bill. maybe it’s time to stop ignoring the facts for the sake of “conservative” idealism”

Posted by: tierra | March 8, 2010, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

He should explain what his plans will do, and how it will address the real problems.
_____________________________________
Agreed. Once the reconciled plan is finished – it should be explained fully in simply language.

Posted by: tierra | March 8, 2010, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

ok, tierra.
If Obama is accurately explaining the insurance companies’ motives, where is the lower priced competition?
Why would a smart entrepreneur not step in and offer lower rates and scoop up all the business?

Posted by: MayBee | March 8, 2010, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

From Politico and rollcall:
EMBATTLED DEM CONGRESSMAN: I WAS PUSHED OUT FOR HEALTCARE!
‘THEY KNEW I WOULD VOTE NO SO THEY GOT RID OF ME AND NOW IT WILL PASS’…
UPDATE: Will Resign Monday as Planned…
Lashes out in emotional radio appearance…
Obama VS America

Posted by: another crisis-another photo op | March 8, 2010, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

THE CONGRESSMAN AND RAHM: NAKED SHOWDOWN IN GYM SHOWERS…
‘I am showering, naked as a jaybird, and here comes Rahm Emanuel, not even with a towel wrapped around his tush, poking his finger in my chest, yelling at me…’
Obama VS America

Posted by: another crisis-another photo op | March 8, 2010, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

tierra:Agreed. Once the reconciled plan is finished – it should be explained fully in simply language.
———-
If there is no plan finished that can be explained fully in simple language, why is the President going in public demanding an up or down vote *now*?

Posted by: MayBee | March 8, 2010, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

–If there is no plan finished that can be explained fully in simple language, why is the President going in public demanding an up or down vote *now*?–
That is simple. See?

Posted by: Page 19 | March 8, 2010, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

If there is no plan finished that can be explained fully in simple language, why is the President going in public demanding an up or down vote *now*?
Posted by: MayBee | Mar 8, 2010 2:05:51 PM
___________________________________
Because he has confidence in either plan? And is similarly confident in the reconciled plan?

Posted by: tierra | March 8, 2010, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

Obama policies projected to add $9.7 trillion to debt by 2020…
Estimates show grim picture…
Obama VS America

Posted by: another crisis-another photo op | March 8, 2010, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

The states do have an anti-trust exemption, in the McCarran-Ferguson Act, however I encorage you to read the law and the court case associated with it(United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association).
McCarran–Ferguson basically says that as long as the states regulate the business of insurance they will not be subject to federal regulation or anti-trust laws, because according to the court case mentioned, insurance could be regulated under the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution.
Also the law allows for states to set up madatory licensing requirements, state regulation and preserves the preexisting state laws of insurance.
People who are clamoring for the federal government to come in and regulate the big-bad insurance companies ignore the fact that the states already heavyly regulate the business of insurance, and that to pass their sweeping reform legislation something must be done about the existing McCarran-Ferguson act.
The House bill removes it, and to my knowledge the Senate bill doesn’t mention it (which could open up court cases against it, with the states filing suit against the federal government for infringement on statesrights).
The more I study the issue and the comments and bills the more I see this as not an issue of healthcare for all, or “bending the cost curve” but rather the federal governemnt attempting to intrude upon the rights of states to regulate intrastate commerce as they see fit.
Some states are already fighting back, Utah(emminent domain) and Virginia(health insurance mandate) are the most recent two I can think of.
Should be an interesting few months.

Posted by: bobtherepublican | March 8, 2010, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Why would a smart entrepreneur not step in and offer lower rates and scoop up all the business?
Posted by: MayBee | Mar 8, 2010 2:03:29 PM
____________________________________
Long time domination of the industry by established players? Collusion? Anti-trust exemption?

Posted by: tierra | March 8, 2010, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Because he has confidence in either plan? And is similarly confident in the reconciled plan?
========
That’s great that *he* has confidence.
But as you said, you want the final bill to be explained completely, in simple terms. That should happen before it is passed.

Posted by: MayBee | March 8, 2010, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

Because he has confidence in either plan? And is similarly confident in the reconciled plan?
========
That’s great that *he* has confidence.
But as you said, you want the final bill to be explained completely, in simple terms. That should happen before it is passed.
Posted by: MayBee | Mar 8, 2010 2:15:47 PM
___________________________________
Yes, that is what was suggested – or as the bill is being passed.

Posted by: tierra | March 8, 2010, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

The insistence by the Administration and Congress that it is acceptable to use “reconciliation” to pass a bill that is so complex, pervasive, and UNPOPULAR WITH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, raises this issue to an even higher level. To insistence on passing this bill using a process that was never intended to be used in this way, raises this issue to the level where it puts our entire system of government at risk. WE THE PEOPLE must VOTE OUT anyone who votes for this bill in the House or Senate because they will be contributing and approving of a complete perversion of our system of government. If you value our system of government as designed by the Founding Fathers, you have a moral obligation to VOTE THEM OUT if they vote for this bill knowing “reconciliation” will be used to pass it against the will of the people and without any bipartisan support. It does not matter if you are for or against this kind of so-called healthcare reform; it does not matter if you are liberal or conservative; it does not matter if you are democrat, republican, independent, or tea party, you must raise up an VOTE OUT anyone that supports this process by voting in favor of this bill. Using “reconciliation” in this way sets a dangerous precedent that could be used in the future to tax as even more or infringe on our freedom even more.
All Americans should be outraged about what is going on with this Administration and Congress. It is time to VOTE THEM OUT before they do any more damage!!! This is no longer about healthcare, this is an issue about the very essence of our system of government. WE THE PEOPLE will VOTE THEM OUT!!!

Posted by: AngryMobVoter | March 8, 2010, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

“President Obama hit the road today to once again stress the urgent need for Congress to pass health care reform, ratcheting up his criticism of insurance companies that he said are more concerned with their own profits than serving Americans consumers.”
No doubt. Why, after the bailouts for the guys on Health St., you’d think they’d comply and help out the average voter with Tim Geithner playing a part. But no, they keep making risky moves while making an obscene 3.3% profit!

Posted by: Sickened | March 8, 2010, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

Obama is being disingenuous. He should be honest about what is going on.
Posted by: MayBee | Mar 8, 2010 1:51:36 PM
___________________________________
I think he was.
Posted by: tierra | Mar 8, 2010 1:59:20 PM
___________________________________
Tell us Robert “Tierra” Gibbs, does Obama have any more judge openings to hand out to Reps who happen to be voting ‘no’?? What a bunch if filthy frauds and shame on you for coming on here defending them.

Posted by: Denbo | March 8, 2010, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

If you value our system of government as designed by the Founding Fathers, you have a moral obligation to VOTE THEM OUT if they vote for this bill knowing “reconciliation” will be used to pass it against the will of the people and without any bipartisan support.
___________________________________
Nonsense.
Both health care bills passed their respective chambers with full majorities already.

Posted by: tierra | March 8, 2010, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

What a bunch if filthy frauds and shame on you for coming on here defending them.
____________________________________
More name calling and smear tactics from the Republican right – do the Republican not have any policies other than this?

Posted by: tierra | March 8, 2010, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Both health care bills passed their respective chambers with full majorities already.
======
Both bills can’t become law.
There’s nothing stopping the House from giving Obama the up or down vote on the Senate bill that he called for today.

Posted by: MayBee | March 8, 2010, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

Why anyone would still trying to defend Obama at this point is unbelievable. What else does he need to screw up before some of you figure it out??? I guess when this country is bankrupt and you dont have a job or a house or any insurance period, some of you might wake up.

Posted by: Billy Bob | March 8, 2010, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

Both health care bills passed their respective chambers with full majorities already.
======
Both bills can’t become law.
There’s nothing stopping the House from giving Obama the up or down vote on the Senate bill that he called for today.
Posted by: MayBee | Mar 8, 2010 2:38:58 PM
___________________________________
The common practise is for these bills to go through reconciliation at this point.

Posted by: tierra | March 8, 2010, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

I guess when this country is bankrupt and you dont have a job or a house or any insurance period, some of you might wake up.
_____________________________________
You’re describing almost exactly the situation the country was left in by the previous Republican administration when the national debt was doubled, the deficits were exploded and the economy collapsed on their shift.

Posted by: tierra | March 8, 2010, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Posted by: AngryMobVoter | Mar 8, 2010 2:25:49 PM
What’s odd to me is that you still don’t understand what is going on. The bill that will be passed via reconciliation isn’t complex or pervasive. The health care bill has already been passed by a supermajority in the Senate.
Personally I think using reconciliation to pass measures that INCREASED the deficit is a perversion of the intent. I hope you vote out the people that did that. It would be very useful to the country.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 8, 2010, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Billy Bob, just cling a little tighter to your guns and relegion and it will all be ok.

Posted by: texas outlaw | March 8, 2010, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

You’re describing almost exactly the situation the country was left in by the previous Republican administration when the national debt was doubled, the deficits were exploded and the economy collapsed on their shift.
Posted by: tierra | Mar 8, 2010 2:46:44 PM
Its funny how these sleeping giants have awoken to collective amnesia, isn’t it? Willing to make all the same mistakes again, while directing their anger in the wrong direction, and buying all the same propaganda that has been fed to them in the past.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 8, 2010, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

texas outlaw At least I can spell religion.

Posted by: Billy Bob | March 8, 2010, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

MayBee, no this does not open the door for anyone because their are no competitors that have lower prices. That is the point. 4 major insurance companies run the show. They all have rediculas rates. It is the republicans that need to put away the pitch forks.

Posted by: texas outlaw | March 8, 2010, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

I had surgery a few years back. My doctor could perform the surgery at either his small clinic or at the hopital. He charged $2,000 – $3,000 while the hospital charged $12,000 – $14,000. The hospitals have to charge more to help pay for illegals and overhead costs. I’m not defending insurance companies…I’m just putting out another cost contributer.

Posted by: Abbey | March 8, 2010, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

Obama clearly understands the concept of “spread the wealth around.” So why does he have such difficulty grasping the insurance industry’s age old axiom of “spread the losses around.”
If there is an insured pool of 1,000,000 people, each paying on average $2,000 per year in premiums, the insurance carrier would take in $2,000,000,000 annually. Per most state’s insurance laws (yes, each and every state has a series of laws that effect what a health insurer selling in that state can/cannot due with rates), health insurers must payout at least 70% of premiums collected in the form of claims paid out ($1,400,000 in this example), or $1,400 in claims per average insured.
What happens (and has happened) when this pool shrinks by 20% of your insured’s (and it will be the healthy ones that leave, due to other pressing financial responsibilities, and it WILL be the ones that have $0 claims, and believe they can afford to take the financial risk)?
The insurance carrier will have to raise their premiums (“spread their losses around”), so that the remaining 800,000 insured’s (80%) are paying enough premiums to cover the $1,400,000 in expected claims expenses. The formula would be $1,400,000 claims expenses, divided by 800,000 remaining insureds, or $1,750 in claims per average insured, or an increase in the average claims amount of 25% (and this assumes that the average remaining pool, which is guaranteed to be older in age–less healthy with higher claims per insured than the previous average–does not increase above the $1,400 per insured average).
Thus, you are now left with 800,000 insured people having to pay enough premiums ($2,500 per insured–or a 25% rate increase) to pay for the same $1,400,000 in claims paid.
Is the concept really that difficult to understand, Mr. President? Surely, if you can grasp “spread the wealth around” understanding “spread the losses around” is not that big of leap?

Posted by: JMo | March 8, 2010, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Government doesn’t run businesses, it ruins them!
Think what you are wishing for:
Medicare $36 Trillion in the hole
Social Security $16 Trillion in the hole
US Post Office $7 Billion in the hole last year
Amtrak we’ve lost count
Freddie/Fannie $15 Billion loss last quarter
When the Feds owned one of the most profitable little whorehouses in Nevada (taken for back taxes/tax evasion), they couldn’t even turn a profit.
Are you insane thinking that Obama’s healthcare plan will be any different, and now you are talking 1/6 of the entire US economy. The Scam will bankrupt the entire country, not just a few major institutions.

Posted by: JMo | March 8, 2010, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

You’re describing almost exactly the situation the country was left in by the previous Republican administration when the national debt was doubled, the deficits were exploded and the economy collapsed on their shift.
Posted by: tierra | Mar 8, 2010 2:46:44 PM
For you folks who cannot grasp someone telling you who has run up the biggest deficit, here is a picture you might be able to understand.

Posted by: Billy Bob | March 8, 2010, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

For you folks who cannot grasp someone telling you who has run up the biggest deficit
___________________________________
For those of you who cannot grasp what happens to deficits and budgets when the economy of a country collapses – study some economics.
Not only did the Republican administration double the national debt, and grossly enlarge the deficit – Bush presided over a disastrous collapse of the economy. Let’s just pretend that didn’t happen shall we – and that it had no effect.

Posted by: tierra | March 8, 2010, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

Another crisis – When they guy resigned he said it was because of his cancer. Now it is because he was pushed out? He could have stayed and been cleared by the investegation. Or could it be that the Dem leaders are not going to try and cover up for guys like this and he is accustomed to the same old politics doing exactly that. I guess the insurance companies could not do anything to stop the investegation. He will be keeping his insurance though and I bet his treatments will be covered. Just think about that for a sec. He just lost his job, has cancer and will be getting treatment. When they get this health insurance bill passed anyone that has cancer can loose their job and still get treatment. If he is so opposed to health insruance reform why doesn’t he offer to pay for som other cancer patients treatments that is out of work?

Posted by: texas outlaw | March 8, 2010, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

shame on you for coming on here defending them.
Posted by: Denbo | Mar 8, 2010 2:34:06 PM
“shame”???
LOL!!!
Unless you’re saying shame on the RNC or shame on Liz Cheney or shame on Tom DeLay and Jim Bunning, I think you’re shaming is hyperpartisan and not worth worrying about.
Personally.
I also think the senators holding up SAFRA are shameful. Per Steve Benen at POlitical Animal:
“The Obama administration has asked Congress to remove the middleman, streamline the process, save taxpayers a lot money, and help more young people get college degrees.
The House already approved the plan, and the Senate may follow suit through reconciliation. So, Republicans — who prefer the more expensive, less efficient status quo because bank lobbyists tell them to — are doing what they always do. Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.), a former Secretary of Education, had an op-ed in yesterday’s Washington Post complaining of the Obama administration’s attempted “Washington takeover … of the student loan system.”
Sounds like he’s following the aims of the RNC presentation– make people afraid, very afraid, even if that means propagating blatant falsehoods.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 8, 2010, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

Not only did the Republican administration double the national debt, and grossly enlarge the deficit – Bush presided over a disastrous collapse of the economy. Let’s just pretend that didn’t happen shall we – and that it had no effect.
Posted by: tierra
I see that even pictures are not enough to help you, too bad. Since you claim to understand economics then you should very well know that it is congress that sets budgets. And since you know that then you obviously know that it was a democratic controlled congress that has controlled both houses the last three years. Again, look at the pictures.

Posted by: Billy Bob | March 8, 2010, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

Billy Bob, just like a Republican to change the topic on a loosing argument.

Posted by: texas outlaw | March 8, 2010, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

If you have any common sense, you would recognize that it is immoral for healthcare to be entrusted to for-profit corporations. Obama’s plan is far too minute, far too conservative to make any difference. Nevertheless, the reactionaries laughably have labeled it “socialistic,” an attempt to “nationalize” healthcare. It isn’t, of course. A true nationalization is exactly what IS needed! Democrats=RepublicansLite

Posted by: CommonSenseIsMyPassion | March 8, 2010, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Question for the masses: If President Obama truly hates the insurance companies, then why is he proposing a plan that will INCREASE these companies’ membership rolls?

Posted by: CommonSenseIsMyPassion | March 8, 2010, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

Obama’s health care agenda and the case for a socialist alternative
27 February 2010
Thursday’s televised health care summit in Washington ended without any agreement on the part of congressional Republicans to support Obama’s health care proposals. Whatever the wrangling between the two parties, however, all sections of the political establishment are committed to two basic propositions: (1) It is necessary to cut government spending on health care programs that benefit millions of people; and (2) health care services for millions more must be rationed so as to reduce the costs to the corporate-financial elite.
Complete article at

Posted by: CommonSenseIsMyPassion | March 8, 2010, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

The only rational and humane solution to the health care crisis is a socialist one, where economic life is organized to meet social needs, not the accumulation of wealth by a tiny elite. The health care industry must be nationalized and placed under public ownership and the democratic control of the working population.
This requires a political struggle against the financial oligarchy and its representatives, the Obama administration and both the Democratic and Republican parties, and the fight for a workers’ government.

Posted by: CommonSenseIsMyPassion | March 8, 2010, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

Surely, if you can grasp “spread the wealth around” understanding “spread the losses around” is not that big of leap?
Posted by: JMo | Mar 8, 2010 2:58:48 PM
Its interesting that you talk about redistribution since that is what health insurance is spreading risk, health and wealth. Jonathan Chait has an interesting article called Sink or Swim posted at TNR, and it highlights how Republicans support leaving the sick out in the cold, as if health was entirely the responsibility of the individual and bad things never happened to good people. Check it out.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 8, 2010, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Rallying support, my backside. He went to one of the most depressed areas in the country and preached to a hand selected audience of his parasitic followers about more free stuff from the nanny state.

Posted by: rplat | March 8, 2010, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Question: How many Republicans does it take to change a light balb?
Answer: Uncertain, since conservatives are so reluctant to change anything. What is certain is that 41 of them in just the right place can prevent anything from changing.

Posted by: Kent | March 8, 2010, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

more free stuff from the nanny state.
Posted by: rplat | Mar 8, 2010 3:16:48 PM
__________________________________
More ‘free stuff’ from the nanny state went straight to the big corporations during the Bush administration.
Two wars financed on not paying for them (with huge amounts of money going to the military/industrial friends of the administration), a seniors prescription big pharma plan financed on not paying for it – and cuts on taxes for the rich, not payed for. ‘Free Stuff’ under the Republican president.

Posted by: tierra | March 8, 2010, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Obama is today finger pointing at health insurance companies in his latest spin-move and blaming them for raising premium prices – when in reality he is their biggest friend and wants to send them a captive audience of 30 million new customers. No where in his healthcare bill does it mandate (force by law) private insurance companies to lower the price of premiums by even a single penny. Another smoke and mirrors ploy and empty promise from maybe one of the most greedy selfish scheming divisive Presidents of all time – still ignoring the problem of unemploment -the real reason 10% of our nation is lacking in health insurance plans.

Posted by: superminority | March 8, 2010, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

CommonSenseIsMyPassion, I completely agree.

Posted by: knowerseeker | March 8, 2010, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

If they were smart the congress would be concentrating on finding us all jobs WITH healthcare coverage. The truth is its just a greedy power-grab on the part of democrats – it means more money, votes and power.

Posted by: superminority | March 8, 2010, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

I am sure insurance companies love the idea of the Obama administration still wanting to criminalize those who choose not to buy health insurance from the same insurance companies who wont lower the price for everyone – well thats not helping everyone is it? Its not even real reform. The bill they want to pass while pretending to be bi-partisan is the pretty much the same bill word for word. I call shennanigans on this article. It wont be socialist, it wont be Canada or France, it wont be cheaper, it will just be forced on us to pay for or pay a fine. Regardless of the price of premiums – which are sure to go up.

Posted by: superminority | March 8, 2010, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

The President needs to listen, we don’t need health care reform, let America remain the only industrialized nation without healthcare for its citizens. Just keep spending our tax dollars on weapons and the defense budget. The 700 billion wasted in Iraq could have paid for America’s healthcare but for 700 billion, 4,000 killed, 20,000 wounded and nearly 150,000 Iraqis killed and millions displaced America’s given Iraq elections!! Wow… Elections!!

Posted by: Martin | March 8, 2010, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

I can tell you that anyone in my congressional district who does not support the president and healthcare reform will not get my vote next election! I am tired of the fighting and blame game – It has paralized our government – it is past time we do something!

Posted by: confidential416 | March 8, 2010, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Those evil capitalist health care companies are just like those evil oil companies! We all need gasoline to fuel our cars. How about a government takeover of the wholesale/retail gasoline industry in this country? Let’s get the price of gas back to $1.09!

Posted by: s | March 8, 2010, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

superminority…stop with the fear mongering and distortion. Do you have a choice paying Social Security and Medicare taxes, or property and school taxes? If you don’t pay into these, you cannot receive it, and if you don’t pay property or school taxes, you lose your
property even if you never had a child to attend school. Same thing if you don’t register your car and renew the registration, you can’t drive it, and if you do, you can be fined or arrested in some states. There are many things we pay for which carry punitive action if we didn’t pay it. If you work, then you pay Social Security and Medicare taxes whether you want to or not. Why not just have a withholding medical tax applied the same way for those that don’t want to get medical insurance. This isn’t rocket science, but it needs to get done. We cannot continue to see the out of control rate increases the insurance companies are doing without thinking this won’t impact on all of us, it will. Right now they are writing the health policy for our nation, something unheard of anywhere else in the world. Is this right or should we be doing it?

Posted by: jake | March 8, 2010, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

What we need to realize is that there is no such thing as a ‘Health Insurance Company’ These are just investment/banking firms who get their seed money from the public and businesses via an insurance policy. They could care less about serving their policy holders. Stock holders, yes… policy holders?… only enough to keep them on the hook. Sort of like a drug pusher. Why would they want to serve the poor. The poor are… well, poor. These guys only want people with money and in good health. They are scum.

Posted by: gf | March 8, 2010, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

Let’s separate medical insurance from employers, and give us all the money we make in our jobs…and let us CHOOSE what to do with ourselves. There will have to be something for the uber-poor and disabled…but otherwise, hands off.
And put your jacket back on Mr. President. Such a windbag.

Posted by: jonec1200 | March 8, 2010, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

obamaCare is repugnant. obama is repugnant. democrats in general are repugnant. BUT….the saddest story of all is that the dems (with obama leading) is makng every fervent attempt to destroy our American Constitution & hence socialize America. God help us because obama is destroying America!

Posted by: Richard | March 8, 2010, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

Its interesting that you talk about redistribution since that is what health insurance is spreading risk, health and wealth. Jonathan Chait has an interesting article called Sink or Swim posted at TNR, and it highlights how Republicans support leaving the sick out in the cold, as if health was entirely the responsibility of the individual and bad things never happened to good people. Check it out.
Posted by: progressive mama
Almost compares to the dumBO administration telling women over 50 to pass on the mammogram, huh?

Posted by: Todd | March 8, 2010, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Fiscal calamity + mired in war in the Hindu Kush mountains = leveling of prideful ‘nations’. History about to repeat itself.

Posted by: jonec1200 | March 8, 2010, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

Hey, folks, we have to get past the debates and begin somewhere. Let’s pass the health-reform bill, and like any other legislative bill, add to it; modify it; amend it; and make it better. Just like we do with any other bill. BUT WE HAVE TO HAVE SOMETHING TO START WITH!

Posted by: Barry W. Shook | March 8, 2010, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Sorry, but your friends in the Republican party are the ones that are destroying America. They got a great head start with the guy that was there before in everything he touched. You have no idea what the word socialist is. No capitalist society can exist without socialism. Socialist programs like Social Security, Medicare, Medicade, Public Schools, Libraries, Police and Fire Services, our national parks, the list goes on and on. They are all socialist if you must know. And are you receiving Social Security or Medicare or ever attended a public school…then shame on you for being a socialist and calling others a socialist as if it were a shameful thing. Vent your anger at those capitalist guys that drove the economy into the ground while getting welfare money from the government (sounds socialist too), and giving themselves billions in bonuses for screwing America. That’s where your anger should be directed at, not programs that help all Americans.

Posted by: jake | March 8, 2010, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Two wars financed on not paying for them (with huge amounts of money going to the military/industrial friends of the administration), a seniors prescription big pharma plan financed on not paying for it – and cuts on taxes for the rich, not payed for. ‘Free Stuff’ under the Republican president.
Posted by: tierra
Maybe you forgot? Afghanistan is a dumBO deal.

Posted by: Todd | March 8, 2010, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

Almost compares to the dumBO administration telling women over 50 to pass on the mammogram, huh?
Posted by: Todd | Mar 8, 2010 3:56:04 PM
Uh, do you know what you’re talking about because your statement doesn’t logically follow from what I posted? PLUS, that’s not what happened– and I think people who have to distort the truth to make an arguments are morons– but overutilization is an issue.
Per CNN, “A federal advisory board’s recommendation that women in their 40s should avoid routine mammograms is not government policy and has caused “a great deal of confusion,” Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said Wednesday.
“My message to women is simple. Mammograms have always been an important life-saving tool in the fight against breast cancer, and they still are today,” Sebelius said in a statement.
“Keep doing what you have been doing for years: talk to your doctor about your individual history, ask questions and make the decision that is right for you.”
With her statement, Sebelius waded into the controversy over Monday’s announcement by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force that women in their 40s should not get routine mammograms for early detection of breast cancer.
Sebelius’ statement is aimed at “making it clear these recommendations are not ours,” a White House source said.
The report “shouldn’t be dismissed,” Sebelius said on CNN’s “The Situation Room.” But she added, “There are other groups who have disagreed with this information.” The task force is “making recommendations, not coverage decisions, not payment decisions.”
I imagine you just needed attention.
But, seriously, you’re just regurgitating misinformation.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 8, 2010, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Is it too much to hope for that the MSS could cease with the spin and just support the fact that the overwhelming majority of Americans are suffering, have NO health coverage, and cannot afford it. The constant coverage of the spin created by the MSS, in my opinion has enabled the insurance cos to do what they do best…profit off the backs of poor people.

Posted by: moxieme | March 8, 2010, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

Facts don’t matter to haters. All they see is Obama and they go nuts. If any wealth distribution has been done around here it has been the last ten years of the top 1% growing 20% richer while everyone else when down the drain. Health reform now, or continually increasing premiums until only the rich can afford their health care. It’s the Republican way.

Posted by: PoMan | March 8, 2010, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

I do not understand a president that doesn’t listen to the people?
Is Obama crazy, stupid or is just a arrogant sob? It has to be one of the three.
Today he represents the worst of Washington.

Posted by: q citizen | March 8, 2010, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

Exactly- allowing Obama to set up an ‘insurance company monopoly’ is not what the USA needs – certainly not now or ever.

Posted by: superminority | March 8, 2010, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

It’s a real joke to say rates will decrease under ObamaCare. They want the insurance companies to increase benefits by having no waiting periods, no waivers and unlimited maximums as well as no pre existing condition limitations. These increses will only force the insurance companies to raise rates. The insurance company profits now are only about 2% which is not the large profits Congress bad mouths the insurance companies on. The bill was obviously written by someone that knows nothing about health insurnce and what great options American have from all the insurance companies offer their clients. I still urge all those in Congress to read the bill and kill it.

Posted by: David Krueger | March 8, 2010, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

The insurance companies claim a profit of only 2%. Well, if you believe that then there are some bridges I can sell you too. What their clever accounting doesn’t tell you is that this is after all the juice, gravy, and cream is taken off the top. Do you really think bonuses in the billions being doled out by the insurance companies equates with a 2% profit? Really, are you that naive?

Posted by: jake | March 8, 2010, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

This bill has severe problems. It’s not paid for. It takes away the individual’s rights and puts the government in charge. Obama needs a bad guy for people to be mad at so he can justify passage. Wake up America.

Posted by: Jeff | March 8, 2010, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

Obama stop playing politics and get with the program. Stop and call the parties together and figure a fair and good plan instaed of a throw the money at it plan and hope it works. This plan calls for taxing us for 2 to 5 years creating a slush fund that everyone knows the dems and reps will steal from just as they do and did to social security. Pass the plan and your party dies for 20 or 30 years.

Posted by: Jim Rod | March 8, 2010, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

Allowing Obama to set up an ‘insurance company monopoly’ – that doesnt require them by law to lower the price of anything – is not what the USA needs – certainly not now or ever.

Posted by: superminority | March 8, 2010, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

It seems there are a few commenting on here that work for insurance companies and are out to scare people. Fear will do it every time! Just ask the republicans. They use fear daily!

Posted by: Bart | March 8, 2010, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

When Obama won the Presidency with the help of the LEFTIST Media, Hollywood And Entertainment Liberals, Ethnic Socialists (ACORN), Stupid Non-Business Professionals and Bush Haters, I wrote: It won’t take six months until the People figure this guy out and realize how horrible a mistake they’ve made. And when they come to that realization, the damage to the United States of America will be so great it will take a generation or more to repair – IF EVER.
The IDIOTS who not only voted for the Messiah, but also worked [hard] to promote his Lordship, are now left holding the bag.
Here are two things they will NEVER do: They will NEVER admit to making a Blunder out of all proportion by electing a snake-oil salesman with no Positive social history or management experience of any kind. They will NEVER take responsibility for the curse they’ve imposed upon the immediate and long-term future of their country.
In essence, the people responsible for putting this horror show in power are themselves responsible for every cataclysmic decision he makes and the Consequences thereof.
In just six months, the Messiah’s polls are showing the following: On Healthcare Reform – He’s going under for the third time with polling well Under 50 percent, even within his own Party. Even though he might be able to Muscle a Healthcare Reform Bill by using Chicago BULLY tactics against his Fellow Democrats, it will just make things worse. On Cap and Trade (Cap and Tax) – The Fat-Lady is already singing. On the Stimulus Package (Tax and Spend) – His popularity is in FREE-FALL. On the TARP package he took and ran With from President Bush – It’s all but Good-Night Irene. On the closing of GITMO and “HIS” war on what he no longer wants called the War On Terrorism – He’s standing in quicksand with his head just about to go under. On a Comparison between himself and George W Bush at the same six months into Their respective first term Presidencies – Bush is ahead of him in the Polls On a comparison between He Who Walks On Water and the 12 preceding Presidents between WW II and now – Obama ranks 10th. On a Poll just Conducted, that asks who would you vote for today between Obama and Mitt Romney – It’s a dead heat. Between Obama and Palin – Obama’s ONLY ahead by 8 Points and she hasn’t even begun to campaign. It seems to me that Obama Wants to be everywhere where he shouldn’t be.
He’s personally invested in ‘totally insulting’ America ‘s ONLY REAL Middle Eastern ally ( Israel ) in favor of Palestinian Despots and Murderers. He’s traveling the world apologizing for the USA while lecturing others on how to do it right, when in fact and truth he has no experience at doing anything other than getting elected.
He went to the Moslem world in Egypt to declare that America IS NOT A CHRISTIAN NATION while he heaped praises on Islam, where he compared the “plight” of the Palestinians to the Holocaust.
The Russians think he’s a putz, The French think he’s rude.
The Germans want him to stop spending.
The Indians want him to mix his nose out of their environmental business.
The North Koreans think he’s a joke, The Iranians won’t acknowledge his calls.
And the British can’t even come up with a comprehensive opinion of him.
As for the Chinese, he’s too frightened to even glance their way. [After All, China now owns a large portion of the United States .]
Maybe if America’s first Emperor would stay home more, travel less, and work a little bit instead of being on television just about everyday or stop running to “papered” Town Hall Meetings, perhaps he would have a little bit of time to do the work of the nation.
In all fairness, it wasn’t HARD to be RIGHT in my prediction concerning Obama’s presidency, even in its first six months, so I’m going to make yet another prediction:
OBAMA WILL PROBABLY NOT FINISH HIS 4-YEAR TERM, at least not in a Conventional way.
He is such a political HORROR SHOW, and so detrimental to the USA and his Own Democratic Party, that the Democrats themselves will either FORCE him to Resign or figure out a way to have him thrown out.
Who knows, maybe he really isn’t a BORN US Citizen and that’s a way the Democrats will be able to get rid of him. [He is a citizen, but not a naturalized citizen with both mother and father being US citizens.]
Or – MORE LIKELY THAN NOT, the Democrats will make Obama THEIR OWN LAME DUCK PRESIDENT.
I don’t believe the Democrats have nearly as much love for their country as they do for their own political fortunes. And with Obama, their fortunes are rapidly becoming toast.

Posted by: Todd | March 8, 2010, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

The agenda for the Republican party is to stop anything from happening that will help anybody but the rich.

Posted by: bob anderson | March 8, 2010, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

It’s a real joke to say rates will decrease under ObamaCare.
__________
Somehow I take the New England Journal of Medicine and Atul Gawande more seriously: See Medicare’s Opportunity to Encourage Innovation in Health Care Delivery, and Testing, Testing (the latter at the New Yorker). See also What, You have a better idea for cost control by Jonathan Cohn at TNR.
As he puts it and I agree: “I would support health care reform if it did nothing more than expand and strengthen health insurance coverage. I think it’s a moral imperative, as much for the sake of the middle class as the poor. But it so happens that the bill moving through Congress will do something more. It will reduce the cost of care–not by a lot and not by as much as possible in theory, but as much as is possible in this political universe. That’s far better than the alternative, which is to do nothing.”

Posted by: progressive mama | March 8, 2010, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

Almost compares to the dumBO administration telling women over 50 to pass on the mammogram, huh?
Posted by: Todd | Mar 8, 2010 3:56:04 PM
Stop lying!!! It is sicking and disgraceful for Republicans to continue tto scare people with these lies so Corporations can make profits NOT covering sick American citizens… YOU must me one of those health care executives making 6 to 7 figures a year….

Posted by: Melanie n AZ | March 8, 2010, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

dumBO will say anything to anybody at this point to get the garbage bill passed. His credibility is at 0. His accomplishments in the last 14 months 0. The leftist camp that bought his last two elections are demanding that he pass something. Anything to prove their point. To bad the dumBO lemmings won’t get off the kool aid long enough to realize their king is wearing no clothing.

Posted by: Todd | March 8, 2010, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

Posted by: Todd | Mar 8, 2010 4:25:35 PM
Wow. A birther who is terrified of the left wing. The RNC has your number, don’t they? You could be their poster boy.
LOL.
I think your post will be enough of a turn off for normal people that I’ll leave it at that.
You just can’t make this stuff up.

Posted by: progresive mama | March 8, 2010, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

First of all the Government has no business being in the Health Care business. THey have failed at it when they tried to do it ,
like in Medi-Care . So why not leave it up tp corporations to provide Heath Care to their employees – Nation wide. Then all the Corporations have to do is suspend premiums to the Large Insurance companies for say 60 or 90 due complaints that they might have about Health Care and that will get the attention of these greedy Insurance companies with their money being put on hold.In other words ,the Fortune 500 companies would have alot more clout than the inefficient government does . Also this would mean no new Taxes for The American people and where could The Government help ,they could provide Tax Incentives for the Corporations to provide both : Jobs and Heath Care to their employees.
This is what you would call a real stimulas package that helps in two ways:Corpations will pay less in Taxes and make more profit and the Ameican People will enjoy real Health Care benefits.A win win situation for all of the People not just for some of the People And NO New Taxes for the American
People.
Thanks,
James

Posted by: James Chisholm | March 8, 2010, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Rates will decrease, isn’t that what he’s saying? So, we are going to take pre-existing conditions, cost controls on insurance companies, reform the insurance industry through regulation, not touch actual health care costs, pay for this for 10 years and get 6 years of benefits from it, pay $1.2 trillion and all of this will cost us significantly less than we pay now according to Obama budgetary estimate over 10 years and be deficit neutral? Hmm, does it seem like there is any chance this might not work?

Posted by: lfrichar | March 8, 2010, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

I just lost my health care because the company could no longer afford it along with higher taxes when is all of this going to stop!
The corporations just do not give a damn about the American public they are all owned by the Repbs who espouse fear and anxiety to control the masses!
America PLEASE WAKE UP!
This is not a test!

Posted by: Lou | March 8, 2010, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

For once, our President is working for US!

Posted by: Gerald | March 8, 2010, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

If the government can actually “fix” our insurance system while somehow making money doing it, I am all for it, but….. Can they “fix” the post office, medicare, Amtrak, Social Security, medicaid. Sorry for being so negative, but that is called a track record and it is not good. It’s like having a company install your roof, you find leaks, and ask that same company to fix it again. Open up insurance across state lines. Let’s have true reform of health care costs in pharmaceuticals, universities, med procedures and equipment, tort reform, insurance, etc. If you are going to reform a system, you need to reform the whole thing.

Posted by: lfrichar | March 8, 2010, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

Now hear this, Obama. Medicare fraud the highest in the country- Miami, Fl. A billion already this year and billions last year. Most of the time the doctors escape back to Cuba. Do your research? Now, hear this Obama, illegals have reached over 25 million and an increase recently; why probably because they are excepting legal free NHC that other countries do not provide. Start exporting illegals, and do something about the border. The border towns are bankrupt on medical care due to illegal care. Same problems exist in Georgia, Floria, Arizona and California.

Posted by: mim | March 8, 2010, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

why are most doctors , other than the phony ones that obama uses as props, againt this bill?

Posted by: catman | March 8, 2010, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

“”"”"I just lost my health care because the company could no longer afford it “”"”"
Posted by: Lou
Did they drop you or go out of business? We will see many go out of business when this reform is passed. When the government can dictate who and what you can charge, profit margins evaporate and companies fold. That is reality.

Posted by: lfrichar | March 8, 2010, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

not touch actual health care costs
_____________
Maggie Mahar, Health Beat Blog: “Let’s put to rest, once and for all, the idea–or rather, the notion (it’s not even an idea, just a vague impression, based on hearsay)–that the health reform legislation now under discussion includes no plans for containing health care spending…On the question of whether the reform bill would control costs, Noonan does acknowledge President Obama’s claim that reform will “‘bring down the cost of health care for millions’ that it is ‘fully paid for’ and that it will lower the long -term deficit by a trillion dollars.”
But her response is purely rhetorical: “Does anyone believe this?”
That’s the problem with Op-eds—no proof, no evidence. Much bombast, trimmed with rick-rack (metaphors found in the Notions’ Department of the mind.)
By contrast, one of the nice things about articles in peer-reviewed medical journals is that they are footnoted…
The piece by Robert Mechanic and Stuart Altman in last week’s NEJM may be less colorful than Noonan’s, but in place of self-expression, it offers truth grounded in careful analysis of the legislation: The Senate and House reform bills lay out a blueprint for cost-containment, spelling out precisely how Medicare can squeeze waste out of the system while simultaneously lifting the quality of care. Anyone who tells you that seniors will no longer have access to needed tests and treatments is, pure and simple, lying.
You may think that you have heard talk of Medicare slowing health care inflation in the past — with little in the way of tangible results. But as Mechanic and Altman point out, this legislation is different…” (Health Beat blog)

Posted by: progressive mama | March 8, 2010, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

other than the phony ones that obama uses as props, againt this bill?
Posted by: catman | Mar 8, 2010 5:03:10 PM
in some cases, because it will lead to health delivery reforms and eventually overutilization and fee for service will be a thing of the past.
But many good, honest, patient-oriented physicians are for single payer, or steps in that direction. If anything they feel this doesn’t go far enough.
Read Testing, Testing by Atul Gawande.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 8, 2010, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

progressive mama — OK, with ICU’s costing $20000 a night, MRI’s over $2000, show me ANYWHERE in this bill that will control those types of health care costs. There is a huge difference between health care costs and insurance premiums prices.

Posted by: lfrichar | March 8, 2010, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

with the fine being less than the cost of health care now,,,,many of you will lose your good insurance quicker than you think.as an employer will chose the cheaper fine. then you will be stuck on obama care and enjoy the public option.this is the plan. then once we are on this banana republic plan care will be rationed becasuse not enough dollars will go into the system.lastly forget innovation…because no one works for free.

Posted by: catman | March 8, 2010, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

We need HC REFORM — But definitely not the one OBAMA WANTS. People often have confusion on this and please be careful:
OBAMACARE DOES NOT MEAN REAL HC REFORM.
(Don’t be fooled by his campaign style propagada. We were fooled during the election and don’t make the mistake again. Too bad Hillary lost !!! OBAMA is very good at PROPAGANDA – he is always good at playing VAGUE AND RHETORIC LANGUAGE …
Voice from an Angry and waked up DEM.

Posted by: talk from sf | March 8, 2010, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

Personally, I think anything that is part and parcel of saving lives, or promoting wellness, or that is necessary for good health, whether by emergency services or health care should involve any profit making companies. The business of misery should not be motivated by profits, who pays what and how much. This is just simply wrong. Maybe what we really need is a single payor system, do away with all these insurance companies that profit from the misery and fears of our people, particulary those in dire straits. They are as someone else said, nothing but investment companies, making money off your premiums. They really are not interested in real health care, just profits. Wait until they start the wholesale outsourcing of major medical care overseas to India and others where they pay 1/10 in costs, including slave labor cost. Oh wait…Aetna, BSBC, and others are already doing something like this…they call it a “pilot program”. Sure, pilot my XXX

Posted by: jake | March 8, 2010, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

progressive mama — I know we disagree at times, but the only way our government could ever make the majority happy is probably through single payer. Trying to appease some while trying to leave those alone that are content never seems to work out for politicians.

Posted by: lfrichar | March 8, 2010, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

progressive mama…i work with several hospitals and 50 to 60 physicians. honestly i dont know one who has any thing remotely good to say about this plan. i want reform of insurance companies…not my health care.there is a better way to LOWER COST, thats what the people care about. not providing free health care.honestly, 99 weeks of unemployment, free health care, free education,mortgage assistance, why would someone want to work?

Posted by: catman | March 8, 2010, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

mr president you are doing what is best for america keep up the great work and too those against the health care if you don’t want help then you just keep paying your big insurance companies and the rest of us will get a good policy . and to the republicans sleeping with the CEO’S hope you don’t get pregnant . you might be refused health care because of a pre existing condition ..( your screwed by the people who own you LOL LOL LOL :)

Posted by: Gary davis | March 8, 2010, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

OK, with ICU’s costing $20000 a night, MRI’s over $2000, show me ANYWHERE in this bill that will control those types of health care costs. There is a huge difference between health care costs and insurance premiums prices.
Posted by: lfrichar | Mar 8, 2010 5:11:31 PM
True on the latter, but I really urge you to read what is posted in health care blogs, medical journals and health policy magazines, and my physicans who do medical writing, about the pilot programs and the Medicare commission. Good lord, over half the bill is an attempt to test and expand cost controls– things that get at medical inflation. I’m really tired of the canard. People say, read the bill, well, please, read the parts that start somewhere around 620-625 and then keep going. Then think about whether the best way would be to pick an untested method, or to do real tests that can be expanded.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 8, 2010, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Did they drop you or go out of business? We will see many go out of business when this reform is passed. When the government can dictate who and what you can charge, profit margins evaporate and companies fold. That is reality.
Posted by: lfrichar | Mar 8, 2010 5:03:45 PM
NO – that is NOT the reality!!! Stop lying and scaring people. The reality is that most small businesses can not AFFORD to provide health insurance for their employees – IT IS TOO EXPENSIVE – that is the reality!!! These employees can not afford to buy health insurance on their own for themselves and/or their family – that is the reality!!!
They wait until they are so sick that they must use the EMERGENCY ROOM for treatment – which has the highest cost for medical treatment – that COST is past onto everyone thru higher insurance premiums and/or higher medical costs and/or higher taxes.
40,000 people a year DIE because they do not have health insurance. Thousands go bankrupt because they do not have health insurance. Private insurance companies have a 20-30% profit rate because they get to pick and choose who they will cover – the more sick you are the more likely they will drop you!!! AND that is the reality!!!
Single payer plan is the BEST option. Take private insurance companies completely out of profit vs. sickness business. I rather have my company pass on my insurance premiums to the government who then pays my doctor bills then have them past it to a corrupt, for PROFIT private insurance company who will look for any reason NOT to pay my doctor. Or at the very least – this country needs a public option where small businesses and self-employed people can buy affordable health insurance. It is time that we CARE about the people NOT the corporations for a change.

Posted by: Melanie n AZ | March 8, 2010, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

Posted by: catman | Mar 8, 2010 5:19:23 PM
There’s always a better way, isn’t there– if you got to be king of the world and implement a vision without all the sausage making b.s. — or so each of us thinks. Right? That’s nothing new. We think Obama could come up with a better way, on his own. So could Atul Gawande. So could Bobby Jindal from a different political perspective. Problem is, Congress!!!! We all get that. Seriously, I don’t think Paul Ryan could get strong Republican caucus support on his plans and that’s why the House plan Boehner offered up was extremely lame.
Congress is slanted toward not making certains kinds of changes and the unholy alliance between business/special interests and government is pretty darned strong, and both parties are culpable there.
Anyway… that was a tangent, and I have to go do meet with some people in a minute here, but with physicans and providers, some things are motivated by region and specialty, so I’d keep that in mind. I’ll give you an example. In college, I dated a med student– and he moved to Texas and he was always against “socialized medicine” and still is. His roommate went to Minneapolis and then Chicago and is all about reform, and likes certain versions of single payer. Of course, he thinks his vision is the exact right one, and its not quite this bill, or any bill… but at some point we have to be willing to wade into the water as the status quo isn’t sustainable.
anyway, catman and lfrichar, have a nice evening.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 8, 2010, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

ap just released a change to the bill where business will be fined for not providing health care to part time workers. WAY TO FOCUS ON JOBS. what employer would hire part time workers now? i really wish this president had experience in the working world or running a real for profit business.

Posted by: catman | March 8, 2010, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

melanie in az…you get what you pay for.stop lying and using fear tactics please…58% of americans…AMERICANS do not want this bill.

Posted by: catman | March 8, 2010, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Five Wisconsin residents, including two who worked for community organizing group ACORN, were charged Monday with election fraud relating to the 2008 presidential election.
…. how can we trust OBAMA who has a 15+ year-long close tie to ACORN to handle our HC issue? (He denied it in recent abc / cbs interview)…
I don’t trust him. He plays Chicago politics all the way to WASHINGTON.

Posted by: talk from sf | March 8, 2010, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

progressive mama…you too. have a nice evening.

Posted by: catman | March 8, 2010, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

Isn`t President Obama the politician that made a back room deal with the insurance companies and big pharma last summer? So what gives? He still hasn`t shared with us peons, taxpayers actually paying the bills, what the deal was, though I hear big pharma has been raising prices like there`s no tomorrow lately. On the other hand, as I recall the big pharma deal, they agreed to raise prices 1% less than they had planned, so maybe that deal hasn`t technically been broken, yet. Reminds me of the Obama deals with the banks last year where the administration failed to use its leverage to get the banks to act right. I guess we now know what the deals he negotiates are worth.

Posted by: Luke Abrams | March 8, 2010, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

The anti-healthcare reform crowd have two lame arguments that they have spouted over and over. They are 1) the socialized medicine argument and 2)the (related) expansion of government into the economic sector. These arguments are vacuous and those who spout them are either ignorant, work for the insurance industry, or are hoping to get donations for their political campaigns from the insurance industry. Socialized medicine? By allowing insurance corporations a virtual monopoly on healthcare (healthcare insurance companies are exempt from anti-trust legislation), does that not constitute social welfare for industry executives? At best, this is not capitalism. Unprecedented intrusion into the economy? The government’s role SHOULD BE that it steps in to fix a market failure where and when it occurs. When 35-45 million Americans are denied healthcare, when healthcare companies can deny coverage to HUMAN BEINGS who REALLY need the coverage (Death Panels anyone?), when insurance companies can wantonly raise insurance premiums because they know that their “CUSTOMERS” are stuck – that is a market failure! The insurance companies have had the chance (60 years) to prove they are good capitalists. Now its time to reel them in.

Posted by: map2history | March 8, 2010, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

Yeah, it’s so urgent none of the benefits kick in for years.

Posted by: liz | March 8, 2010, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

liz…what a great point.if its so important why doesnt it kick in for years? cause they want you tax money now so it it be borrowed like social security and given to some other cause.

Posted by: catman | March 8, 2010, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Posted by: catman | Mar 8, 2010 5:36:59 PM
You get your news from FOX??? When the truth is explained to Americans – they want it health reform and they want the public option, etc. The fear-mongering (and racism) of the GOP is causing all the confusion and anger.
Like yesterday, I had two elderly people come knocking on my door pushing for a young Republican hopeful… He is against health reform because it is “SOCIALISM”, etc, ya-ya – ya-ya, b/s… I asked them if they received Social Security and Medicaid… they said yes, I asked them if their grandchildren attend public school – they said yes… I ask they if they like police, firefighters, teachers, the military, our infrastructure, libaries, museums, public hospitals, NASA, etc. – SOCIAL and/or GOVERNMENT SUBSIZED PROGRAMS – all paid for by the redistribution of federal/state taxes – they then left my house.

Posted by: Melanie n AZ | March 8, 2010, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

please, obama, stop with the annoying rallies.
this part of the president makes me vomit.
i’m for health care reform, but his rallying makes me vomit. he’s too infatuated with himself, when all he is is ANNOYING.

Posted by: tea | March 8, 2010, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

Bush is the one who made the back room deals with insurance and pharmacuticals last year. He practically gave them a blank check. Were in the world were you during the 8 years Bush was in office? Were you brain dead? All you have to do is use your “common sense”. The claims about Death panels, socialism, companies dropping their good insurance to make you get the public option, come on, public option will be depend on your You will not be eligible but feel lucky if something happens between now and then and you loose your job that we will have it. Socialism? I don’t know, public schools, Medicaid, Medicaire, Also, anyone who says Health Care is not important then complains if it is why is it going to take 2 years, ah-h-h, Rome wasn’t built in a day.

Posted by: Donna Hess | March 8, 2010, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

If this is such a wonderful plan for us citizens, why are the democrats having such a difficult time passing it? They had all last year with the majority. Why is the congress and the the administration eliminated from the plan proposed for the rest of us if it so great. Did you dems ever ask yourself that? Why don’t they focus on jobs. How can unemloyed people buy health care even with subsidies? Jobs aren’t important to this administration, power is and that is all they desiree. “Trust ME” IS WHAT Obama said. The devil said the same thng to Eve. Stop comparing Obama to Hitler and get the correct comparison.

Posted by: jmjeanettemjean | March 8, 2010, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

“Bush is the one who made the back room deals with insurance and pharmacuticals last year .”
He was Pres on 2009? I knew it!

Posted by: Hysterical | March 8, 2010, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

Posted by: map2history | Mar 8, 2010 5:54:26 PM
I agree with you about the gov’t involvement being a benefit! I, uh we, yes, we need more! Tarptastic!

Posted by: Goldman S. | March 8, 2010, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

melanie in az…look at todays rasmusem numbers. thats whay dems cant pass this thing. their constituents and independents like me dont want it. we need jobs and people working for their own benefits. you are not telling the truth. 58 % of AMERICANS say no ,

Posted by: catman | March 8, 2010, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

melanie in az…” fear mongering and raciscm” that you cited. frankly thats when i know a liberal is not telling the truth…they play race game.

Posted by: catman | March 8, 2010, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

Melanie n AZ—- Insurance premiums are expensive. The root cause??????? Rising health care costs. You can’t reform insurance until you stop the runaway health care costs. How can an insurance company stay in business lowering premiums when they will have to accept pre-existing conditions and be cost controlled by the government. I don’t believe the estimate of this bill. Furthermore, show me when the government has come within or under bedget in the past 50 years. Please show mw a program and maybe I will start to believe. The reality starts to hit doesn’t it?

Posted by: lfrichar | March 8, 2010, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

melanie in az…” fear mongering and raciscm” that you cited. frankly thats when i know a liberal is not telling the truth…they play race game.
Posted by: catman | Mar 8, 2010 6:48:34 PM
Why waste my time with a REP who picks and chooses his cut and paste…
I wrote so much more… Whatever… I can sleep at night knowing that I care about my fellow American… YOU not so much!!!

Posted by: Melanie n AZ | March 8, 2010, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

“”"”received Social Security and Medicaid… they said yes, I asked them if their grandchildren attend public school – they said yes… I ask they if they like police, firefighters, teachers, the military, our infrastructure, libaries, museums, public hospitals, NASA, etc. – SOCIAL and/or GOVERNMENT SUBSIZED PROGRAMS – all paid for by the redistribution of federal/state taxes “”"”"”"
Posted by: Melanie n AZ
Typical Dem rant. Government programs are paid for through taxes. Do you really think I want to pay for public schools when I don’t even have a child? So give me that tax back. These are programs set up by taxes we have no choice but to pay. Social Security is not socialism, you pay in and they pay you out later. Medicare is an entitlement because you paid for it through taxes. Capitalism is what keeps those programs alive not socialism. I would rather not pay tax and let me handle my own business, but I dont have a choice. Funny how Dems bring this up all the time. Show me one country that is flourishing due to socialism.

Posted by: lfrichar | March 8, 2010, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

“40,000 people a year DIE because they do not have health insurance.”
Mmmm….. will one DIE if she has an INSURANCE?

Posted by: cowboy | March 8, 2010, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

“”"”I can sleep at night knowing that I care about my fellow American… YOU not so much!!!”"”"”
Posted by: Melanie n AZ
Right in line with ALL the Dems soundbites. Now, because people want real reform, theydon’t care about their fellow man. Obama calls it Insurance Reform, Rangel calls it National Insurance. The day Obama is ready for real reform, he will have to be ready to upset doctors, lawyers, pharmaceuticals, med schools, illegal aliens and anyone on a government handout. Until then, allhe s going to do is give the insurance companies 3 years to do exactly what the credit card companies did in 8 months, gouge us for more cash before the program kicks in. I have an idea, I will sell you a new car, you start paying now, but you can’t drive it for 3 years. I gotta go. Have a good one.

Posted by: lfrichar | March 8, 2010, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Just get this passed and move on.Please!!!!!

Posted by: Kenny | March 8, 2010, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

“40,000 people a year DIE because they do not have health insurance.”
Never seen cause of death on a certificate to read “no insurance”.

Posted by: lfrichar | March 8, 2010, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

“…Show me one country that is flourishing due to socialism.”
Posted by: lfrichar | Mar 8, 2010 6:56:54 PM
We are talking about health care reform… France is # 1 in regards to health care treatment/ satisfaction/cost… enough said.
You keep living in your world where the GOP hasn’t destroyed the middle class… I keep living in the real world.

Posted by: Melanie n AZ | March 8, 2010, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

hey socialism worked in the USSR, right?

Posted by: Red sox | March 8, 2010, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

“Never seen cause of death on a certificate to read “no insurance”" – Is this what it has come to? Making jokes about the millions of men, women and children who suffer (many dying) due to lack of access to medical care. How do you Republicans and Blue Dogs sleep at night?

Posted by: Mark from atlanta | March 8, 2010, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

mark from atlanta, is it only Democrats who have no health insurance? If that’s the case, you might wonder why. If all Republicans are successful and capable of caring for themselves, perhaps youve made the wrong political choice.

Posted by: Red sox | March 8, 2010, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin — who has gone to great lengths to hype the supposed dangers of a big government takeover of American health care — admitted over the weekend that she used to get her treatment in Canada’s single-payer system.
Looks like Comrade Palin used that evil “socialist” system with poor doctors and terrible care. Hmmmm.

Posted by: More Hypocrisy from the Right | March 8, 2010, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

More Hypocrisy from the Right,
Move to Canada and enjoy their system. We’re still a country you’re free to leave, at least for now.

Posted by: Red sox | March 8, 2010, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin — who has gone to great lengths to hype the supposed dangers of a big government takeover of American health care — admitted over the weekend that she used to get her treatment in Canada’s single-payer system.
Looks like Comrade Palin used that evil “socialist” system with poor doctors and terrible care. Hmmmm
=======================================
You leftists say Palin is stupid and has no clue, yet she supports a single-payer system, just like you. Hmmmm

Posted by: Ruth | March 8, 2010, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

Why is it Americans polled favorably when asked about the provisions of the health care bill. But when asked about “the Dems bill” or “Obama’s bill” it goes the other way?
Obviously it’s just paritisan morons who have no clue what’s in the bill. The lemmings have been trained to absorb the propaganda. Why not, it’s easier than thinking right?
So the “reduce spending” pinheads have an issue with a bill that REDUCES the deficit? (Note they never said a word about spending while Pubs doubled the debt.)
The “we pay too much” parrots can’t handle the majority of premiums will GO DOWN?
Or are they just against everyone being able to afford health care. It apparently impacts their need to feel superior?

Posted by: More Hypocrisy from the Right | March 8, 2010, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

When you cannot sell your message find someone to blame to make the message sell. The Oblunder way.

Posted by: James | March 8, 2010, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin — who has gone to great lengths to hype the supposed dangers of a big government takeover of American health care — admitted over the weekend that she used to get her treatment in Canada’s single-payer system.
Looks like Comrade Palin used that evil “socialist” system with poor doctors and terrible care. Hmmmm.
**********
Visited as a child when Canada did not have socialized medicine. Just like a liberal, hear half of the message and attack on little none facts.

Posted by: Tina | March 8, 2010, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

Over 2 million abortions each year and Dems wants you to worry about the homeless 40,000 with no insurance and the illegal immigrants. Hypocrites.

Posted by: Jim | March 8, 2010, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Why arent you libs asking yourself why arent you mad at obama because he is one of the biggest evil insurance individuals denying people medical insurance everyday? Is he not in charge of social security, medicaid and medicare? Everyday people are being denies medicaid because they make to much money or medicare because of pre existing medical problems or social securitry benefits for a disability. So who is the biggest of all the evil insurance company its your man obama.

Posted by: Stanley | March 8, 2010, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

Why the urgency????? If the Bill was real reform we would not be against the bill. The bill the President and Democrats are pushing has nothing to do with reform just control.

Posted by: Mindy | March 8, 2010, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

Same old tired socialist/progressive garbage from the “V”s that have taken over the government. We don’t want this bill and if they push it down our throats they will pay with their jobs on election day.

Posted by: Garry | March 8, 2010, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

Which Insurance Next???
The WH is currently villianizing Health Insurers. When will he and the public decide the Auto, Home or Liability Insurers are next?
Just take Home Owner’s insurance for example. Anyone who has a mortgage HAS to have Home Owner’s, if for no other reason to protect their mortgage holder’s interest in case of a fire loss, which would cause a loss of the mortgage holder’s security for their loan. They will not loan you the money without this type of coverage in place.
Personally, I have been paying Home Owner’s premiums for nearly 40 years, and the premium has averaged about $2,250 per year, or $90,000. I’ve never had a loss. OMG, I am outraged, the unfairness of it all, lower my premiums, cut the CEO’s salary and perks, Federal takeover of them, Nationalize all of the carriers.
Also, I have paid Auto Insurance premiums for over 40 years, starting out at about $300 per year, and now at $1,400 per year, probably totaled about $35,000 over that time frame. I had one claim/loss, for about $6,000. Again, I am outraged, the unfairness of it all, lower my premiums, cut the CEO’s salary and perks, Federal takeover of them, Nationalize all of the carriers.
Where the hell will this nonsense stop? Who decides on the next victim in the WH’s gun sites? No one has a gun to your head to buy health insurance. If you don’t want to pay for it, don’t. However, be prepared to finance the consequences if something major should happen.
No one has a gun to your head to buy Home Owner’s insurance, live in a rental if you really want to avoid it. In CA they force me to by auto insurance, but I could use public transportation, ride share, ride a bike or walk. The POINT of all this, You HAVE choices.
PS What about the WH forcing Home Owner’s insurance carriers to issue standard rated policies to an arsonist who burned down the last two homes that he owned (it is a pre-existing condition, you know)? Shouldn’t the WH be forcing the Auto Insurance carriers to issue standard rated policies to a driver who has two DUI’s and three auto accidents (it is a pre-existing condition, you know)? This is more of the same nonsense. Health Care is ONLY the First Step.

Posted by: JMo | March 8, 2010, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

Even after factcheck and politifact have debunked the myth, there are still right wing sheep saying “we don’t want a gov’t takeover of health care”.
Do you guys ever check your sources? “Gov’t takeover” is a lie.
There are still insurance companies (unfortunately), there is still a private system, there is no gov’t takeover. Try FACTCHECK for a change.
Republican leaders never read the bill. They’ve admitted that much. Seems odd they “know” what’s in it and can condemn all of it. Their bstructionist policy was pre-determined before the bill was even started.
Pubs had Congress and the Presidency for years and did NOTHING to improve health care. Now that the Dems are actually going to make positive changes for all Americans, they know they look like insurance company patsies. They have no choice but to resist. It’s their only political hope.

Posted by: More Hypocrisy from the Right | March 8, 2010, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Remember the content of the Senate version of health care reform. It encompasses the following:
1. $400 billion in Medicare cuts
2. Establishes a government board to decide heath care benefits included and covered by all insurance policies
3. Creates a health care exchange controlled by the government
4. Requires the States to expand Medicaid to cover uninsured citizens at State expense, which means increased taxes.
5. Excludes Nebraska, and Louisiana from paying for Medicaid expansion in their states. Florida and Conneticutt also received favorable deals in the Senate bill.
6. Increases the deficit by $300-500 billion.
7. Raises taxes on medicine,services, and medical supplies.
8. Exempts members of Congress from having to participate in this program.
9. Will increase premium prices on existing policies, given that the individual mandate will not be enforced, which would otherwise legally compel young people to buy policies and offsett the cost of premiums overall.
10. Will allow government-subsidized abortions for the first time in 33 years.

Posted by: Independent | March 8, 2010, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

I am happy to see him out there pushing for this bill. Although not perfect, it is a start and we can get rid of the bad when it is signed and ammend as needed but to have no bill is a disaster. Unfortunately, people’s mind have been changed by the talk show hosts who have been mis-stating facts and minapulating them to fit their agenda. But remember one thing, if you have no health care now…you may not get it for a long time…can you afford it? I think not is the response I get from those I personally know.

Posted by: talmag | March 8, 2010, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

Visited as a child when Canada did not have socialized medicine. Just like a liberal, hear half of the message and attack on little none facts.
==============
She said until she was 5 – or 1965 to 1970. Canada’s system started in 1968. Thus she took advantage of Canada’s “socialized” medicine.
Her grandchild currently has “socialized” insurance. Check it out. But you keep attempting to deny the hypocrisy if you choose.

Posted by: More Hypocrisy from the Right | March 8, 2010, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

Alaska, upper North, has civilized medicine few and far far apart..Palins parents going to Canada was probably more to do with it being closer and having a train that ran to the town they went to. As Americans—it would have been unlikely that their health care would have been free or that the doctor that saw them had been fully socilialized considering how new socialized medicine Canada was at the time.

Posted by: MichelleLee | March 8, 2010, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

Its so amazing the number of people that think insurance companies are “evil”!! — They don’t make any more profit than similar companies their size, in fact, they averaged a LOT LESS in 2008!! — TYpical Obama, has to have a “evil” to rally the “uninformed” against — Dem tactic for decades!! — Remember “evil oil” two years ago?? — You don’t hear about them any more!! — Did they suddenly turn into Mother Theresa and “evil insurance” took their place? —Oh, yeah, change of legislative agenda!!!

Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | March 8, 2010, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

I believe the Democrats as far as I can throw them (especially Obama)!!!! —- When the Dems created Social Security, they promised us 1) That participation would be completely voluntary; 2) participants would pay 1% of the first $1,400 of income; 3) contributions would be tax deductible; 4) The money would be placed in a Trust Fund’, not the general operating fund; 5) payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income. —– NONE OF THESE PROMISES ARE STILL IN EFFECT!! —- And it was a DEMOCRAT in later years that repealed each and every one of those promises!!

Posted by: TheLoyalOpposition | March 8, 2010, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

Its sickening how these health insurance companies are screwing all of us. I am on Washington State Basic Health. My monthly premium in one years time, went from $30 a month to $130 a month. I have had to cut my food budget, get rid of my home phone and other things. If it keeps going up I will have to drop my insurance. I have diabetes and high blood pressure. I’ve even taken my meds once a day instead of the twice of day as I am supposed to do.
I’m scared that if I drop my insurance due to being such a hug cost, and I get really sick or have to be hospitalized.
Why is is a privileged to have good health care? I’m scared if I get really sick, what is my young daughter going to do????

Posted by: Anonymous | March 8, 2010, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

Thank God that President Obama is interested in America’s economic future being in a more stable state. He is wise is wanting health-care reform, because many Americans are suffering at the mercy of insurance companies who are raising premiums and denying their claims. Also, a long-term sustainable economic growth requires a health-care system that is not a drag on business, and that is what President Obama is proposing, doing, and rallying towards. And we are rallying behind him! We need health-care reform now! and not later!

Posted by: Javi | March 8, 2010, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

James Carville’s Democracy Corps today finds that, by 51-40%, Americans believe that the country’s standing in the world has declined since Obsma took office.
Only the most delusional cheerleaders cling to the notion that this man is not a colossal failure.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | March 8, 2010, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

There is little in this bill that will bend the cost curve down. You can’t add 33 million people to healthcare and expect the gov’t to run it effectively or efficiently. Look at medicare, medicaid, social security, fannie, freddie, post office, amtrac, AFG war, Iraq war, AIG, TSA and other programs are either broke or way over cost. Obama’s $787B stimulus from last year is already $75B over cost. His ten yr budget projections are already $1.2T over last summers estimates. A $1B cash-for-clunkers program cost $3B and was shut down 3 months early. Cash-for-caulkers cost tax payers $23K per home. Gov’t owned GM sales up 11% in Feb while privately owned Ford sales were up 44%. Gov’t, both parties, are incompetent and will bankrupt this country…..if there is no money, no one gets health care.

Posted by: Gwen | March 8, 2010, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

Watch-out all you business oriented businesses. You are the boogieman if you provide a service that the progressives are telling us is an entitlement that the well-managed government should provide. After-all the czars know what is best for us.
So you tea-party goers and libertarians need to stop talking about things you are not qualified to talk about. Unless you have an ‘accredited’ degree from a university that is part of the progressive establishment you are to sit down and shut up so we can take care of your future and necessities.
Does this sound familiar? If not you have been brain washed of the history of how tyrants gain power and govern.
Just how many of us are ready for the eulogy of the United States of America? Write it now because it will be scrubbed from the history books and the approved knowledge base.

Posted by: TX-MBell | March 8, 2010, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

Didn’t Obama critize McCain during the health care summit for still “campaigning”. So why is Obama in Philly and off to other cities to campaign for this garbage of a health bill

Posted by: Hammer | March 8, 2010, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

This mans ego is ruining this great country of ours. It seems he spends half his time campaigning and the other half finding someone to blame for his innadequacy to do the job he campaigned for.

Posted by: formerdem | March 8, 2010, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

A Complicated Enemy: Obama Seeks to Vilify Health Insurers,Then Give Them $336 Billion Check..from ABC
Obama VS America

Posted by: another crisis-another photo op | March 8, 2010, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

Follow Obama/Reid/Pelosi off a cliff. Don’t do it right, just do it fast. Who’s brainless?

Posted by: Red sox | March 8, 2010, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

We are not impressed by statistics that health care costs have increased 100% in the past ten years. The statistic means that health care costs have increased at an average rate of 7% per year, which is not the super-scary statistic that Obama would have stampede us into supporting his bad health bill. As for health insurers, they basically manage pools of insurance premiums money in a way that they can pay all the claims and make a profit on the money. They are protecting the premiums pool of money (our money paid in) AND protecting their own profits. That’s how insurance works. Obama wants the insurance companies forced to pay out money on claims regardless of what’s paid in. Apparently, Obama thinks the American people are simpletons who believe you can get something for nothing. As President, Obama is a good professor. Clueless, but fun to watch.

Posted by: Robbo | March 8, 2010, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

Obama pointing his finger and blaming is hardly newsworthy, that’s all he does. Insurance companies, drug companies, auto manufacturers, mortgage companies, banks, brokerage firm, then there’s TV news networks, Internet companies, the republican party and tea party, it goes on and one. He’s definitely got the blame thing down cold.

Posted by: Rob | March 8, 2010, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

I just had a wierd thought…well for me, maybe not so wierd..
Anyway, you know how the movies reflect current trends, ideas? Notice how the ‘action’ movies have to have a villian..right.
I remember shortly after 9/11 there was a lot of talk in the movie industry about how to deal ‘sensitively’ with Muslims. PC controls said they couldn’t be seen as villians.
Now, with President Obama demonizing health insurance companies I have to wonder when we will see some of Robin Cook’s novels on the big screen. I know he has at least 2 or 3 based on ‘evil’ insurance companies or HMOs.

Posted by: malcat | March 8, 2010, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

I am becoming concerned that Obama has a mental disorder. Last year when he thought he had insurance companies in the tank, he loved them. Now they’re the spawn of the devil (sorry Rahm)…but he’ll enrich them if Marxist care can only pass! Does anyone feel safe with such a narsacist boob in the Oval Office?

Posted by: JT | March 8, 2010, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

We’re the only advanced nation on earth that doesn’t insure its citizens. The right has spent twelve months obstructing this debate, spent fifty years sabotaging every attempt to fix the system, spent generations protecting no one except rising corporate profits while the death toll mounts, and then complain we shouldn’t be hasty, we should start over another day, year, generation. And the sheep keep falling for it.

Posted by: Al | March 8, 2010, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

It’s funny how ABC ignores that in his campaign speech today Obama claimed his legislation reduces most people’s premiums and brings down our deficit by up to $1 trillion dollars over the next decade…both are blatant lies but why do a fact check when you have that tingling feeling going down your leg.
This bill is a budget buster and who in their right mind would raid Medicare without first fixing Medicare’s viability problem.

Posted by: PathofDestruction | March 8, 2010, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

Is he not in charge of social security, medicaid and medicare? —–posted by Stanley
——————
To answer your question…no he is not.
In explanation of the above answer:
Social Security isn’t even related to medicine; it is a ‘retirement pension’ fund.
Medicare is governed by regulations passed by Congress and implemented via the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid. Much of the policy decisions for Medicare are managed by private corporations under contract with CMS. The implementation of changes to medical policy can take months and even years based on the controversy and cost.
Medicaid is a state-run program providing health insurance to the state’s citizens. The states each manage their own Medicaid programs under very broad guidelines from CMS. Medical policy is almost entirely left to the individual states.

Posted by: malcat | March 8, 2010, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

Is the bill perfect? No, but making a new one isn’t going to change it at this point. Republicans are making false claims because they don’t want a win for democrats. It’s not about what is best for them, it about how they look. If they can stall reform now, and then pass when they regain office, which they hope to due by voting against THEIR OWN IDEAS and making the President look incompetant, then they will look like the heroes. Lol, republicans (the insane ones, not the fiscal ones). It’s all about themselves….again.

Posted by: menace | March 8, 2010, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

Health insurers basically manage pools of insurance premiums money in a way that they can pay all the claims and make a profit on the money. They are protecting the premiums pool of money (our money paid in) AND protecting their own profits. That’s how insurance works. Obama wants the insurance companies forced to pay out money on claims, regardless of what’s paid in. Apparently, Obama thinks the American people are simpletons who believe you can get something for nothing. Also noteworthy, Obama wants young people forced to pay insurance premiums to pay health costs of older citizens, such as Baby Boomers. When the young people who voted for Obama figure out he is trying to take their money in order to pay for Baby Boomers’ health care, the young folks will not be happy! The fact the young people’s money would be paid as insurance premiums and not as taxes would be no comfort to those forced to pay. Maybe what we need is some incentive for competition among health insurers, and an opportunity for people to pay extra for pre-existing conditions. Why should the people who have paid insurance premiums all these years be forced to pay the full pop for people who have paid no premiums and now have a health condition needing attention?! I see nothing in Obama’s plan that addresses basic fairness. And his villification of insurance companies is merely lame propaganda.

Posted by: Robbo | March 8, 2010, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

Do unto Republicans as Republicans would do unto you. Pass the bill.

Posted by: Bob | March 8, 2010, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

I think one of the reasons implementing health care reform is so difficult in the U.S. is because people have become so polarized. On the one hand, you have liberals, screaming about the evil, greedy health insurance companies (and their conservative minion/masters – depending on which liberal is doing the screaming), and on the other, you have the conservatives, screaming about the evil, power-hungry liberals/socialists/communists/bad-peopleists.
Maybe if the left would stop demonizing everyone who doesn’t agree with them (that includes President Obama) and the right would do the same, people might be able to take a breath, find some common ground, and get down to the business at hand – getting America back on the right track.
All of the rhetoric and drama isn’t doing anyone any good – it is just dividing people further. You have to look no further than the comments on this article to see how obstinate and bitter both sides have become.

Posted by: I'm With Stupid | March 8, 2010, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

Wow, is this cat looking and sounding more angry and desperate with every stop or what?
He doesn’t give a crap about your health. But he is flat terrified of
losing all his credibility, that is , if he still has any.

Posted by: rednorth | March 8, 2010, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

If president Obama Health care reform plan is so great why did EXEMPT himself Michele Obama Congreaa, Senators and thier families from it all americans should have the same insurance that he has otherwise he should follow the same reform health care that he wants all americans to have

Posted by: TOM | March 8, 2010, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

Posted by: TOM | Mar 8, 2010 11:21:42 PM
Such humble public servants don’t deserve it!

Posted by: Exempt | March 8, 2010, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

-We’re the only advanced nation on earth that doesn’t insure its citizens.-
The gov plan in GB stinks. It is in the red in France. Success!

Posted by: Move | March 8, 2010, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

A Complicated Enemy: Obama Seeks to Vilify Health Insurers,Then Give Them $336 Billion Check..from ABC

Obviously, Barry wants them to strain their backs carrying scks of cash. Look what it did to the guys on Wall Street. They had to send Rangel out to spend it so they could go to physical therapy.

Posted by: Corporal Punishment | March 8, 2010, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

Another “Straw Man” aka the
insurance companies set up by this
carnival barker of a President to
knock down!
Listen up, Mr President, Stop Talking
and Start Listening!
We the American people want
Healthcare Reform but We Don’t Want
this Unconstitutional Bill!
Listen, Listen, Listen!
We know the basic elements of the bill
and we don’t want it to be passed!
Start over and try to come up with
a truly bi-partisan bill which includes
Republican input from day one not
last minute grandstanding!
If you continue to ignore the majority
of Americans in this country and pass
this bill by reconciliation(51 votes)
in the Senate you and your party will
suffer the largest political tsunami
in history this November!

Posted by: reaganfan | March 8, 2010, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

Do unto Republicans as Republicans would do unto you. Pass the bill.
Posted by: Bob | Mar 8, 2010 10:58:29 PM
************************************

Posted by: tierra | March 8, 2010, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

Obama has done NOTHING during his administration except double-cross us all. He was elected because of his “fierce moral courage” on Iraq and the Patriot Act. hahaha. Now he is taking credit for Iraq’s success and just renewed the (Pelosi Congress-passed) Patriot Act without a whimper.
The health care bill is an enormous double-cross on every level:
* A majority of Americans will be forced to make demeaning adjustments in their health care planning, their taxes and their servitude to the federal government.
* Financially it is a double-crossing fraud, as illustrated by Rep. Ryan in that Blair House summit(funny, you haven’t heard a response to his analysis by any Dems, nor have you seen Obama go after him — move along, nothing going on here, hmmm). The dollars alone will enslave and disable the economy of our nation for generations to come.
* Our own representatives have been double-crossed by the dreadful back-room dealings on this bill, and are only being pressured to swallow more.
It is now up to our Representatives in Congress. They alone stand between the imposition of this tyranny and the freedom to start fresh and get it right.
The Senate already passed their hideous bill, and if our Reps are duped into thinking they will get any reconciliation or fixes, they are averting their eyes from the double-crossing punk behind the curtain.
KILL THIS BILL. KILL IT DEAD. START AGAIN. GET IT RIGHT.

Posted by: Carol | March 9, 2010, 12:39 am 12:39 am

Do unto Republicans as Republicans would do unto you. Pass the bill.
Posted by: Bob | Mar 8, 2010 10:58:29 PM
************************************

Posted by: tierra | March 9, 2010, 12:50 am 12:50 am

When I read these posts I am reminded why we are in this mess to begin with. The hate mongers, the prejudiced, the right want to be wingers that believe their own rhetoric is what is destroying the very thing that our men and women in Iraq and Afghanistan are losing their lives to preserve. What Congress needs is a good taste of what a good portion of Americans are suffering, lack of health care. What if we took away all their perks and turned it into revenue to try to pay back the national debt. You know the debt that was caused by the last administration that walked away free and clear from committing the biggest heist in the history of the world.
For those of you that constantly ridicule a President that has been handed the worst of the worst conditions this country has ever experienced, I want you to know that it is beyond comprehension.
For those of you tea partying dim wits that continually say that President Obama’s health care bill is bad, please back that statement up with some substance. Saying something does not make it so.

Posted by: Catherine Nochella | March 9, 2010, 1:22 am 1:22 am

Congress and the President should have stood up to the billion dollar health care lobby a long time ago. I can not believe this is evening a debate. A 500 dollar headache. 500 dollars for two aspirin in a plastic cup. I kid you not. These idiots charge that much for one dose. It would be OK if we had decent health care in this country but because every high school kid wants to be a doctor and they think that it is right up there with hitting the lottery there is thousands of accidental deaths and malpractice suits out the wazoo simply because these people were in it for one thing and one thing only-to make money at all costs. You are 7 times more likely to be misdiagnosed in an American hospital. You are 4 times more likely to die in an American hospital than one in France or Canada. You are 3 times more likely to be prescribed the wrong medication. Best of all the United States is ranked 37th among nations for the quality of health care. Wow! that is awesome and now these sleazy idiots want us to pay them for their screw ups. They do not want to be sued either because they are incompetent and the majority of them should not even be doctors. Now, our sold out politicians want to insure they can legally rip us off by saying that we must pay the scum bags. I will pay the vandals vomited from helll when they stop acting like thieving lying scum bag politicians from Washington. This is sick! Do you get it-it is sick and to think that there are enough people that have been bribed or black mailed in the congress speaks volumes. Americans have something really bad being put into their water or they truly are freaking idiots.

Posted by: Roy West | March 9, 2010, 1:32 am 1:32 am

I am very disappointed in Obama. I voted for him. I donated to his campaign. I even helped to campaign for him. Not all of us living in Texas are bigots. I wanted to give the guy a real chance to make the changes that he claimed that he would. He said that first and foremost he would pull us out of Iraq. He now that we know and understand that President Cheney lied to us to start an illegal war to steal their oil we are going to pull out and apologize to the Iraqi people. Ooops that did not happen. He was going to stand up to the Wall st. bankers. He did so by hiring Timoothy hiestner or Geithner-whatever! He was swimming in the same cesspool with the very scum bags that destroyed the economy. He has sent billions of dollars overseas to help build Iraq. He spent billions on clean energy for other countries. I kid you not. The US borrowed billions from the Chinese and then we turned right back around and gave them a billion dollars to build wind turbines. No US jobs created. Iberdrola of Spain got another half billion. Oh, now how is that for change. We would have at least been entertained if we elected Sahara Palin. She could do a lap dance and pageant walk at the same time. Now, that takes some skill. John McCain was going to run with Joe Liberman but was he not the guy that ran with Al Gore? Duh! their is not one dimes bit of difference with these scum bag liars. Lets keep on destroying the planet. We have just about destroyed everything. Do you think God put us on the planet to destroy his creation? Evil idiots.

Posted by: Roy West | March 9, 2010, 1:43 am 1:43 am

This mans ego is ruining this great country of ours. It seems he spends half his time campaigning and the other half finding someone to blame for his inadequacy to do the job he campaigned for.
Posted by: formerdem
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
AGREE!!!

Posted by: getagrip | March 9, 2010, 1:52 am 1:52 am

we must pass this bill. the sheep must follow the shepard without question for what is right. we must obey or face the consequences.

Posted by: Obama sheeple | March 9, 2010, 1:52 am 1:52 am

tell your friends. tell your neighbors. you must obey the government. they know what’s best for you. health care will follow the success of the postal service. trust us.

Posted by: Obama sheeple | March 9, 2010, 1:57 am 1:57 am

Do unto Republicans as Republicans would do unto you. Pass the bill.
Posted by: Bob | Mar 8, 2010 10:58:29 PM
************************************

Posted by: tierra | March 9, 2010, 2:10 am 2:10 am

Obama and the Democrats have sold out the American people. They have caved in to their Republican enemies and the insurance industry, which is everybody’s’ enemy. I just don’t care anymore if this bill passes or not. Obama is a fool. He has failed, time and again, to stand up and fight HARD for what he believes in. Indeed, what on earth DOES he believe in? And now, he gives us this this pathetics eleventh hour demonstration of “resolve.” It stinks like Obama’s cowardice. And it is we, the American people who will suffer for it.

Posted by: David Riker | March 9, 2010, 2:38 am 2:38 am

EXEMPT Wrote:
“If President Obama Health care reform plan is so great why did EXEMPT himself Michele Obama Congreaa, Senators and thier families from it all”.
I would like proof of that statement please.
Post a link to your source for that, cuz that sure sounds like made up internet BS to me.
I’m waiting, but won’t be holding my breath.

Posted by: Doc Rock | March 9, 2010, 2:54 am 2:54 am

I have never seen a country that claims they are the greatest and are so divided in my whole life time…everyone is playing the game of politics everytime they talk or act…I dont even know who is patriotic anymore…republicans claim it and the democrates claim it as well…
When I was growing up, I use to talk like americans, act like them and just wanna be everything called america…but it is so pathetic to see how things are being played out in America…The RPN (Republican Party of No)are just there to say no to everything even when they have a chance to come to a concrete agreement on how to move the country forward…and the DWB (Democrazy With no Balls) with a leader that only talks the talk and can’t walk the walk…Obama should get a grip on his plans and run the country…I use to love him…and I still do but I think he needs to learn from Gordon Brown on how to talk to the RPN (Republican Party of No). Gordon Brown aint got the looks but the way he rubbish David Cameron and the lot is superb….
Get a grip boys and make America the greatest country it is….

Posted by: zizu soara | March 9, 2010, 5:11 am 5:11 am

This country (The Divided States of America), needs to stop playing this “Tug of War” game, and get serious, but unfortunately, there is too much money in the wrong hands, and too much power to fight over. The Health CARE Reform needs to look at every aspect of the problem, without throwing billions of dollars into the problem, but th insurance business IS a big part of the problem. The Republicans with their game playing, biased polls, and their personal “PUPPET MASTERS” at Fox News, is another part of the problem, taking the focus off of what needs to be done. The insurance cos. are in the business of making money, which is what any business tries to do, but when making money becomes the primary business, as opposed to their primary purpose, helping sick people, something is seriously broken, and the insurance cos. need intervention. The Republicans can do their socialism, crap, but it is what it is! They are protecting the almighty dollar, more than the people they are supposed to be doing the HONEST work for. Mitch O’Connell, and his buddies, DeMint, and Boehner, need to resign, their posts, for conflict of interest. Theuy are more interested in what their lobbyists are putting in their pockets than the people who voted for them. They are just good talkers, but who are they really working for?

Posted by: parma hts gary | March 9, 2010, 7:08 am 7:08 am

Someone Brainless Said: “tell your friends. tell your neighbors. you must obey the government. they know what’s best for you. health care will follow the success of the postal service. trust us.”
=======================================
LOL…. more right-whiner rhetoric. No facts, no figures, just right-whiner talking points.
Now folks…. don’t be a brainless right-whiner! At least do your homework.
Health insurance premiums have increased by 131 percent over the past decade, according to the National Coalition on Health Care, while wage growth and regular inflation has gone up under 25% during the same period!
Between 2000 and 2006, according to Medical News Today (AND WHEN REPUBLICANS WERE IN CONTROL) health insurance premiums climbed 76%. What did the Republicans do about this problem?? ANSWER: “NOTHING”, “NADA”, “Niente!”
The Republicans did nothing about the rising cost of health care….. and they did nothing about it during the 12 years that they controlled congress (1995 to 2007).

Posted by: GeorgieBushie | March 9, 2010, 7:17 am 7:17 am

Yes health insurance cos. keep raising prices but you can no thank you. Under this government plan you must have insurance your option of saying no thank you is taken away. And God know how many time they will raise prices if this passes.

Posted by: hkdakota | March 9, 2010, 7:41 am 7:41 am

What a choice! Health care managed by a corrupt incompetent political system OR health care managed by blood sucking insurance and bankers…. are we supposed to like either one? At least we can trust the bankers and insurance to be competent but greedy to everyone equally, I don’t know what to expect from a government who won’t follow it’s own laws and gives preferential consideration to political voting blocks !

Posted by: rock and hard place | March 9, 2010, 7:46 am 7:46 am

Why is the president so hell bent on bankrupting the country and bringing 1/6 of the U.S. economy under government control? Only 40% of the public support his health care plan – over 51% are against. Amazing.

Posted by: Patrick | March 9, 2010, 7:47 am 7:47 am

BIG, BAD INSURANCE COMPANIES AT 2.1 PERCENT PROFITS????? GO AHEAD – CHECK IT OUT YOURSELF! OBAMA IS FULL OF BULL. BY THE WAY – ANY IDEA HOW MUCH US MEDICAL RESEARCH WILL DIMINISH IF THIS BILL (EXACTLY WHAT BILL) PASSES? THE USA, WITH SIX PERCENT POPULATION IS RESPONSIBLE WITH AT LEAST 75 PERCENT OF THE WORLD’S MEDICAL BREAKTHROUGHS INCLUDING MEDS.

Posted by: Tom Barnow | March 9, 2010, 7:48 am 7:48 am

So I understand Democrats and liberals don’t like anyone who is able to make any money. But, why did the story ignore the fact that while Obama is telling people how awful the insurance companies are they are planning on handing them $330 billion dollars?

Posted by: mikemcdon321 | March 9, 2010, 8:04 am 8:04 am

“”"”"We are talking about health care reform… France is # 1 in regards to health care treatment/ satisfaction/cost… enough said.”"”"”
Posted by: Melanie n AZ
I get it, you can go off subject, but when you have no answer to my question you say that’s not what we were talking about. How convenient. If there was a health care bill, I would support it. This is an insurance bill and it does nothing to stop rising health care costs while at the same time it wastes $1.2 trillion. Get health care costs under control, they are driving insurance premiums.

Posted by: lfrichar | March 9, 2010, 8:09 am 8:09 am

Where is the story that Obama mis quoted by almost $1 trillion in savings over the next 10 years? Anytime he gets caught, he “misquoted”.

Posted by: lfrichar | March 9, 2010, 8:11 am 8:11 am

I’m just going by to see the ignorant…

Posted by: LongT | March 9, 2010, 8:35 am 8:35 am

tierra; I can guess you’ve never got yourself out of a big deal….I can tell…

Posted by: LongT | March 9, 2010, 8:37 am 8:37 am

I wonder if he is pointing the finger at the same Insurance companies that met with Angela Pelosi and Harry Reid behind closed doors while they wrote this Bill?
The American people, and media, are very easy to lie to.

Posted by: Mac | March 9, 2010, 9:23 am 9:23 am

What a choice! Health care managed by a corrupt incompetent political system OR health care managed by blood sucking insurance and bankers…. are we supposed to like either one? At least we can trust the bankers and insurance to be competent but greedy …
Posted by: rock and hard place | Mar 9, 2010 7:46:24 AM
I agree up to a point, though I disagree profoundly with the notion that huge biz is competent and trustworthy. Didn’t the year and a half of the bailout teach anybody anything?
One of my big problems with so-called libertarians and conservatives in this country, the laissez faire free market myth believers and propagandists, is that they talk about Liberty as if pursuing freedom from the state only to be a slave to another hierarchical coercive power makes sense– and as if one doesn’t rely to some extent on the other, as if all concentrations of power and wealth don’t become corrupt and serve as potential sources of oppression. LOL. They also rail against a pragmatic centrist Dem president proposing a very pragmatic centrist health care/insurance reform plan as he tries to pull the country back to the center and come up with solutions to chronic problems.
I’d very sick of idealogues clinging rigidly to their utopian notions. Personally, I’m both a libertarian and a progressive socialist, I guess, as I’m anti-big, which these days could be characterized as anti-statist since I’m not thrilled with big government and its cronyism and ties to special interests, and anti-capitalist if capitalism means multinational corporate giants get to rule the world.
I think the supposed dichotomy between liberty and equality is a red herring and I’m sick to death of false dichotomies like the one you present, but…you have to deal with the circumstances at hand. So, we have a deal on the table that doesn’t force the choice you discuss. That’s just the truth. Both government and private enterprise will be working together, and hopefully, there will arise solution-oriented innovation since none has arisen, or taken off, within the private sector.
Bob Black: “To demonize state authoritarianism while ignoring identical albeit contract-consecrated subservient arrangements in the large-scale corporations which control the world economy is fetishism at its worst.” (Bob Black)
And, yeah, vice versa.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 9, 2010, 9:34 am 9:34 am

Posted by: Mac | Mar 9, 2010 9:23:09 AM
Funny that the insurance companies were in those meetings, too, and they aren’t offering up much transparency as to what went down either. It appears to me that they pretended to be willing to negotiate while funneling millions of money into campaigns aimed at killing reform.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 9, 2010, 9:36 am 9:36 am

The Bush apologists want to blame the Dems for our economic malaise— they would have some credibility if they took half the blame— Do you think giving tax cuts to the Upper 3% while fighting two preemptive, simultaneous, wars of choice, might have created a good part of the deficit??? But no– they will skirt the issue– I blame both parties equally — However, obstruction is a political ploy, and is not governing — Obama is not a Messiah and neither is the GOP, being recent converts to the “fiscal responsibility” Religion !!! Too bad they didn’t convert when they were in charge— Look– Our current Health system is an overpriced beast — Why not get creative and start finding ,and taxing, all the off shored corps. and individuals who are circumventing the system — or try a 5% national deficit tax — One way or another we need Revenue— The Interest on the GOP addition to our deficits is 500 Billion
Thank you GWB and the Not Fiscally responsible Republicant’s — The Dems are equal partners in the debt— Its either cut services — raise revenue— or close the loopholes– Perhaps a flat tax and National sales tax — To replace the unfair Income tax disparity–

Posted by: brian | March 9, 2010, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Get health care costs under control, they are driving insurance premiums.
Posted by: lfrichar | Mar 9, 2010 8:09:48 AM
I like your posts, lfrichar, but I’m going to keep hammering on this point, not out of partisanship but because to me its very important to get the ball rolling and I am persuaded that the bill and plan contains several important measures that do attempt to get at cost and will beneficial to us all down the road. In addition to articles I’ve recommended in previous posts (by Atul Gawande, Jonathan Chait, Ezra Klein, Maggie Mahar, at NeJM), David Cutler, a Harvard economist, has a good op-ed at WSJ today called ” Health Reform Passes the Cost Test
The Obama plan will cut costs—$600 billion over the next decade. Why walk away from it?
Cutler writes, ” Many people are worried that the health-care reform proposed by President Obama and congressional Democrats will fail to bend the “cost curve.” A number of commentators are urging no votes because of this, and Republicans have asked the president to start health reform over, focusing squarely on the issue of cost reduction.
These calls overlook the actual legislation. Over the past year of debate, 10 broad ideas have been offered for bending the health-care cost curve. The Democrats’ proposed legislation incorporates virtually every one of them.”
As Jonathan Chait points out, “Cutler also makes an argument that’s been mostly lost in this debate: the administration’s multiple programs to nudge medicine toward more efficient practices don’t get “scored” as saving money by the Congressional Budget Office because they’re new, but that doesn’t mean they won’t work.”

Posted by: progressive mama | March 9, 2010, 9:43 am 9:43 am

Progressive mama, you may want to check out the government website that shows where the different Congressmen report who donates to them. Some of your favorite socialists…errrr…progressives like Pelosi are getting lots of money from Insurance companies. If the’Progressives’ actually researched stuff instead of just believing what Emmanuel and Maher told them to think, they might be surprised.

Posted by: Mac | March 9, 2010, 9:43 am 9:43 am

I sure am proud to be Old School American where I work for a living and provide for my family. I don’t expect Daddy Obama and Momma Pelosi to provide for me and control my life.

Posted by: Mac | March 9, 2010, 9:47 am 9:47 am

Some of your favorite socialists…errrr…progressives like Pelosi are getting lots of money from Insurance companies. If the’Progressives’ actually researched stuff instead of just believing what Emmanuel and Maher told them to think, they might be surprised.
Posted by: Mac | Mar 9, 2010 9:43:37 AM
Oh, please, Mac. You sound like a partisan hack. I’m well aware of who contributes to ALL of our elected representatives, regardless of party, and trying to pretend either party is untied from special interests is wholly ridiculous.
Try some fresh thinking, and talking points. And follow the insurance lobbying money and the money to front groups, and talk about ALL their meetings, will ya, with parties from both sides. Then follow the oil money.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 9, 2010, 9:54 am 9:54 am

What does the ‘Oil money’ have to do with Healthcare?

Posted by: Mac | March 9, 2010, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Oh, please, Mac. You sound like a partisan hack.
Posted by: progressive mama | Mar 9, 2010 9:54:19 AM
______________
Pot, meet kettle.

Posted by: Introductions seem necessary | March 9, 2010, 9:58 am 9:58 am

I don’t expect Daddy Obama and Momma Pelosi to provide for me and control my life.
Posted by: Mac | Mar 9, 2010 9:47:35 AM
Nah. If you’re “old school” you’re most likely into the corporate nanny state. Goody for you. You picked a heartless nanny that nearly pulled down the economy– and that has never been as free from a government alliance as you might like to think.
Moreover, you appear to think bad things never happen to good people, or that those who aren’t old school don’t provide for their families– and that there aren’t many ways to go about that. Maybe not– but the insinuation appears to be hidden in there.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 9, 2010, 10:00 am 10:00 am

What does the ‘Oil money’ have to do with Healthcare?
Posted by: Mac | Mar 9, 2010 9:56:17 AM
Look it up. Look it up.
LOL.
As for introductions, naievete meet reality.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 9, 2010, 10:02 am 10:02 am

Ok Mac But I expect you like the US military , and the Local Police and firemen Protecting you and your family from harm!!! Unbridled,unregulated capitalism creates sweat shops and feudal Lords — It gives us worthless credit default swaps– its naive to believe that business will police itself — Had the Nanny State not bailed out our financials 1 year ago — We would have had breadlines coast to coast !!!! Over 150 banks have failed in the last year– had the nanny state not raised FDIC rates — The run on the banks would have made the Great Depression look like a cakewalk !!! Govt. is unfortunately a necessary evil !!! But, then again, lets just get rid of Public schools, parks, and all essential services– We can follow the Somalia “Small Govt.” Model !!!!

Posted by: brian | March 9, 2010, 10:06 am 10:06 am

Actually, I followed $15 Million in Saudi Oil money to Bill Clinton last year. Remember that?

Posted by: Mac | March 9, 2010, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Schools are local…not Federal.(or they should be, like they were back when our schools were strong)
Our Government is to provide for a common defense, protect our borders and provide oversight.
There is a big difference in oversight and over-taking.

Posted by: Mac | March 9, 2010, 10:11 am 10:11 am

It’s fine..it’s all a difference of opinions. America has become dependent on the Government to take care of them instead of them working for it on their own. One of the few rights we have left is the right to have a different opinion.

Posted by: Mac | March 9, 2010, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Apologies for the jab, but it was a sitter at the net. Seeing you call someone partisan was laughable considering the talking points (some from talking points memo no less) that you post on a regular basis.
It was rude and uncalled for though, and not in the spirit of adult debate.

Posted by: Jen B. | March 9, 2010, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Progressive mam, since you hate Oil and Oil companies so much, I guess you ride a bicycle everywhere you go? And I suppose to you don’t use electricity, either?
How noble of you to back up your disdain for an evil empire by not using their services.

Posted by: Mac | March 9, 2010, 10:15 am 10:15 am

Actually, I followed $15 Million in Saudi Oil money to Bill Clinton last year. Remember that?
Posted by: Mac | Mar 9, 2010 10:08:26 AM
When you start mentioning money funneled to Republican and tea party groups and Republican politicians, then your concern will seem authentic rather than partisan hackery. More important to me are ideas, and health care reform is something I support. Our economy and the security of our citizens depends on it as the status quo is unsustainable.
Its really easy for folks to look up the Koch brothers and their think tank puppets — as well as oil money funneled toward killing health care reform and Obama’s agenda. Of course, many folks already have their eyes wide shut, whether they’ve awakened or not. Personally, I don’t consider collective amnesia an “awake” state.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 9, 2010, 10:18 am 10:18 am

I don’t expect Daddy Obama and Momma Pelosi to provide for me and control my life.
Posted by: Mac | Mar 9, 2010 9:47:35 AM
Nah. If you’re “old school” you’re most likely into the corporate nanny state. Goody for you. You picked a heartless nanny that nearly pulled down the economy– and that has never been as free from a government alliance as you might like to think.
Moreover, you appear to think bad things never happen to good people, or that those who aren’t old school don’t provide for their families– and that there aren’t many ways to go about that. Maybe not– but the insinuation appears to be hidden in there.
___________________________________
No I am old school as in my Father taught me how to work and think for myself. He taught me that if I was spending more than I make, or if I am not making enough then I need to get 2 jobs. He taught me not to blame people who had more money than I do for my financial problems. He taught me values that have led to me having a semi-successful small business that employs 10 people.
What values were you taught to be able to run the business you run?

Posted by: Mac | March 9, 2010, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Yea, like how the Dems and the Unions made a back room deal to make them expempt from the 40% tax on Cadillac plans that us small business’ have to pay? Yea…your great democrats and Unions are Saints!! The same small businesses that Obama claims publicly to want to help, he hurts in this bill. Obama could care less about small businesses. He wants Pelosi and Union bosses to run the country.
Enjoy that.

Posted by: Mac | March 9, 2010, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Posted by: Mac | Mar 9, 2010 10:15:04 AM
I walk a lot, and ride a bike– but I have to laugh at your jump in logic. I hate the oil industry’s influence and don’t like any huge hierarchical power centers of influence as I don’t think its healthy or in keeping with the founding fathers’ vision for the country– but I am an American and given to overconsumption as its been part of my cultural upbringing, yes? I’m working on it– but I occasionally take a plane ride, too. LOL. I look forward to the cultivation of alternate renewable energy sources, and have comparison shopped electric cars.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 9, 2010, 10:26 am 10:26 am

“”"”It appears to me that they pretended to be willing to negotiate while funneling millions of money into campaigns aimed at killing reform.”"”"
Posted by: progressive mama
Did you stop to think what is about to happen? Insurance companies will gain in the short term from this for sure. We will be forced to have coverage. Not only that, they will have 3 years to price gouge the system. Quite the same way the credit card companies did when they were given 8 months before legislation kicked in.

Posted by: lfrichar | March 9, 2010, 10:26 am 10:26 am

It was rude and uncalled for though, and not in the spirit of adult debate.
Posted by: Jen B. | Mar 9, 2010 10:13:21 AM
Nah. No worries. I jab back, and sometimes throw a killer right hook– I’m not a hypocrite and don’t hold grudges. Sometimes, just getting it off your chest clears the air so you can move on to actual debate, right?
Well, for me.
And yeah, I like TPM. Good website.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 9, 2010, 10:28 am 10:28 am

“More important to me are ideas, and health care reform is something I support. Our economy and the security of our citizens depends on it as the status quo is unsustainable.”
The security of our citizens is going to be risked by passing such a massive deficit increase that the President calls health care reform. Everyone knows its full of BS accounting because its been confirmed by the CBO.

Posted by: Zaggs | March 9, 2010, 10:31 am 10:31 am

I hate the invention of Corporations…they only built the greatest and most prosperous country the world has ever seen. I think Obama should just take over all of them, destroy them and then run the companies himself. Yea…that is a better business model for a country, don’t you think? It worked really well in Cuba, Venezuela, Russia and North Korea. All profits should go to Pelosi, so she can distribute the money and services where the all protective Government knows to be best. THAT is some Progressive thinking Comrade!

Posted by: Mac | March 9, 2010, 10:34 am 10:34 am

progressive mama – Would you please enlighten me as to exaactly where in the US Constitution the federal goverment is given the power to provide/subsudize health care/insurance for the people? I have read this document many times and have yet to find anything which grants the federal government this power. I also have been unable to find anywhere where the federal government is given the power to be in business outside of government (i.e. auto industry, banking, insurance).

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | March 9, 2010, 10:37 am 10:37 am

Also I find it funny how Obama attacks insurance companies. A week or so back they complained about outrageous profits and then attacked 2 non-profit insurance companies! Not only that but the left attacks against insurance company’s profits are just like those of big oil. They mention the dollar amount but never the percent of profit. For instance big oil companies that were attacked by democrats never posted a profit percentage higher then 8%. Insurance companies are happy if they can get 5%. Are profits less then 10% above breaking even outrageous? I guess if you’re on the far left it is.

Posted by: Zaggs | March 9, 2010, 10:37 am 10:37 am

Did you stop to think what is about to happen? Insurance companies will gain in the short term from this for sure. We will be forced to have coverage. Not only that, they will have 3 years to price gouge the system. Quite the same way the credit card companies did when they were given 8 months before legislation kicked in.
Posted by: lfrichar | Mar 9, 2010 10:26:32 AM
Yeah. I have thought about that quite a bit. I’m not big on the mandate without the public option– and I do not question that tweaks will need to be made. And I worry about how the potential for price gouging will be reigned in though in the “fixes” intended to be passed via reconciliation there will be a measure for keeping check on the price gouging.
If they do that– the insurers– it will make it easier to add a public option on down the road, or to amend the plan to allow states to come up with alternatives.
It may also force some innovation, which is what NEEDS to happen, with payment and delivery working together in new and fresh ways.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 9, 2010, 10:38 am 10:38 am

Progressive mam, I’m sure you are more than willing to run your company at a 6% profit right? (That’s what Exxon Mobile’s profit margin was as reported by CNN)…or wait, maybe even better is the Health Insurance industry that operates at a 4 1/2% profit margin? Maybe not? What profit margin do you run your business at?

Posted by: Mac | March 9, 2010, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Posted by: Mac | Mar 9, 2010 10:34:43 AM
More leaps in logic. LOL.
Stay enslaved, Mac. Cling to the status quo.
Personally, I work for myself and support small to mid-sized business every chance I get. I think its entrepreneurship, meritocracy, a strong national defense, our liberal ideals and the feisty and resilient American spirit that have made us the best country ever– but I know those beholden to the corporate nanny state like being beholden. LOL.
In any event, David Cutler, a Harvard economist, has a great op-ed at WSJ regarding the cost control and the health care reform proposal. Hope you all check it out.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 9, 2010, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Posted by: Mac | Mar 9, 2010 10:41:27 AM
Maybe if they didn’t spend so much money paying politicians, funding front groups, paying huge bonuses and lobbying, they’re profits would be greater and their stockholders would be better off. Worth thinking about as the unholy alliance between big business and big governments isn’t healthy for the populace.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 9, 2010, 10:46 am 10:46 am

Those evil corporations. Wait a minute..you talked of their shareholders…but a couple of years ago when their stock was going up because of profits, they were paying their share holders good money. All you progressives were killing them for that, too. Let’s not pay attention to the fact that tons of Teacher’s Unions and Government Union’s pension plans had large stakes in those evil Oil companies like Exxon Mobile. Your hipocracy, and ignorance, is really laughable.
Once again, what profit margin do you run your business at? Until you answer that question, any opinion on the Business world that you might care to type is really pretty worthless.

Posted by: Mac | March 9, 2010, 10:52 am 10:52 am

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | Mar 9, 2010 10:37:15 AM
I gotta roll for now, but both of the topics you mention have been debated by wonks and constitutional scholars. You can easily google the topic and read arguments on both sides, including the precedent and unlikelihood the legislation would be overturned by the SC. By asking the question at this stage in the game you’re basically showing your hand and where you’re at on the subject. I believe its constitutional and ought to be via the ability to regulate commerce, provide for the general welfare via a social safety net, and, for the mandate, though you didn’t ask, tax though there’s more than one way to skin that cat (e.g., the way we get to the minimum wage)

Posted by: progressive mama | March 9, 2010, 10:56 am 10:56 am

Oh, yea..minimum wage. I think we should just mandate a $20 per hour minimum wage. That’s only fare. That’ll fix poverty!!

Posted by: Mac | March 9, 2010, 11:00 am 11:00 am

progressive mama – Thomas Sowell who earned his Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from Harvard, his Master of Arts in Economics from Columbia University, and Doctor of Philosophy in Economics from the University of Chicago has many fine articles on Investors Business Daily. Sowell argues that the proposed health care buills currently in Congress will ruin our economy and is unsustainable over time. You should read his articles as in his younger years he was of a Socialist belief but over time has realized that is the wrong path to go down. A well respected economist who has a proven track record.

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | March 9, 2010, 11:01 am 11:01 am

Unbridled,unregulated capitalism creates sweat shops and feudal Lords — It gives us worthless credit default swaps– its naive to believe that business will police itself — Had the Nanny State not bailed out our financials 1 year ago — We would have had breadlines coast to coast !!!! Over 150 banks have failed in the last year– had the nanny state not raised FDIC rates — The run on the banks would have made the Great Depression look like a cakewalk !!! Govt. is unfortunately a necessary evil !!! But, then again, lets just get rid of Public schools, parks, and all essential services– We can follow the Somalia “Small Govt.” Model !!!!
Posted by: brian | Mar 9, 2010 10:06:30 AM
Nice posts, brian.
Meanwhile, per Plumline:
“Mitt Romney went on Fox News this past Sunday and described the universal health care plan he passed in Massachusetts four years ago as “the ultimate conservative plan.”
Romney made the eyebrow-raising claim because he aspires to the GOP presidential nomination in 2012, and thus wants to put as much distance as possible between Romneycare and Obamacare, which is loathed by conservative GOP primary voters — even though the two plans are very similar in various ways.
But guess who disagrees with Romney’s assessment? The Club for Growth, a powerhouse conservative group with a lot of sway in GOP primaries. A top Club official tore into Romney, telling us that if Romney believes this, then he’s “in the wrong party.”” (Greg Sargent)

Posted by: progressive mama | March 9, 2010, 11:06 am 11:06 am

Hey Sandcrab – the issue of strict v broad constructionism was settled back in 1803, when Jefferson – the very architect of strict constructionism – purchased Louisiana Territory and then passed the Embargo Act in 1807. Perhaps you should read any standard 8th grade American history text.
The federal government possesses the right, in fact the responsibility, to step in and fix a market failure. Why there are so many who believe the medical insurance industry to be entitled to anti-trust exemption is beyond me.

Posted by: map2history | March 9, 2010, 11:09 am 11:09 am

A well respected economist who has a proven track record.
Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | Mar 9, 2010 11:01:04 AM
the problem I have with Sowell is that he isn’t very solution-oriented, and he has a tendency toward sensationalistic fearmongering rather than getting into the nitty gritty. IMHO. I mean, can you recommend a work of his where he actually gets into practical solutions that don’t involve letting everything collapse and the laissez faire free market do its number on us?
He is a smart guy– but as conservatives point out, sometimes the smart professorial types aren’t all that pragmatic.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 9, 2010, 11:10 am 11:10 am

Anybody that believes that the Federal Government controlling 1/6th of the economy is a good and prosperous thing is just wrong. That’s pretty much the only way to put it. Whether it’s Romney, Castro or Obama. It’s just wrong.

Posted by: Mac | March 9, 2010, 11:10 am 11:10 am

College Professors that have spent their entire careers working for Universities, getting a paycheck that is funded by taxes taken from real working people and business owners, aren’t exactly what I think would know what it takes to make a dollar, or to be successful in business. I doubt any of them can even dig a straight ditch.

Posted by: Mac | March 9, 2010, 11:15 am 11:15 am

Posted by tierra:
Do unto Republicans as Republicans would do unto you. Pass the bill.
Posted by: Bob | Mar 8, 2010 10:58:29 PM
************************************
Here’s one for you tierra and Bob:
You reap what you sow!
Enjoy it now the political tsunami is
coming in November if this bill is
passed!

Posted by: reaganfan | March 9, 2010, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

Here’s one for you tierra and Bob:
You reap what you sow!
______________________________
Good! A decent health insurance system should reap great rewards then.

Posted by: tierra | March 9, 2010, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

“ratcheting up his criticism of insurance companies that he said are more concerned with their own profits than serving Americans consumers. ”
well, you could certainly make that statement about the current administration and congressional leadership.
Let’s see…. Since taking office O has asked us to hate insurance companies, finance companies, banks, oil companies, coal companies, car companies pharmaceutcial companies..who did I forget?
As the snake he is, he spits out alot of venom.

Posted by: jdalabama | March 9, 2010, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

Ins. Co. & CEO With 2008 Total CEO Compensation
* Aetna, Ronald A. Williams: $24,300,112
* Cigna, H. Edward Hanway: $12,236,740
* Coventry, Dale Wolf: $9,047,469
* Health Net, Jay Gellert: $4,425,355
* Humana, Michael McCallister: $4,764,309
* U. Health Group, Stephen J. Hemsley: $3,241,042
* Wellpoint, Angela Braly: $9,844,212
____________________________________
How much does the President of the United States get paid for his or her responsibilities?
How does anyone deserve to get paid $10,000,000 per year? Profits perhaps?

Posted by: tierra | March 9, 2010, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

tierra–”Good! A decent health insurance system should reap great rewards then. “— Yes it would, except this isn’t a good health care reform bill, its a terrible one…
Does it lower private insurance costs? no, in fact at the state level in places like Mass. and Tenn. it has caused rate to more than double.. Will it allow more businesses to purchase insurance for theier employees? no, since the “fines” will be far less than the cost of the premiums, it will actually promote companies dropping people who are currently covered. Will it provide coverage for all the uncovered people in this country? No, of the 47 million uninsured, this bill will only cover an additional @20-25 million. 20 Million + will still be uninsured AND, the deep cuts it makes to medicare will greatly reduce the benefits available to our seniors who live on a fixed income. So MORE will go without quality care. Will it increase the quality of care? NO, since private preacitce will be stifled by limitations of Medicaid rates +/-10%. It will discourage physicians from entering private practice. Will R/D be unaffected? No, taxes on R/D productes and procedures will skyrocket under this plan… gone will be the days where 80% of all new medical innovations come from the US…
_________________________________
This bill is horrible for almost all aspects of our current healthcare situation in this country.. the only thing it does succeed at is giving the government control of an additional 3 trillion in private moneys AND too much control in the decision making portion of our own health care…

Posted by: arkie vet | March 9, 2010, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

Hey! Another good reason to pass health care reform has arisen!
We get rid of Limbaugh! LOL!!
Limbaugh: “I’ll just tell you this, if this passes and it’s five years from now and all that stuff gets implemented — I am leaving the country. I’ll go to Costa Rica. ”
At least he didn’t say he was going Galt to France or Canada. Ha!

Posted by: progressive mama | March 9, 2010, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

tierra—”How does anyone deserve to get paid $10,000,000 per year? Profits perhaps?”—- Franklin Raines made 60 million in 5 years as the head of Fannie Mae… this was at the height of Fannie and Freddie selling bundled loans in a ponzi style scheme that almost wrecked our economy… When Obama was running for the presidency, guess who could be seen on the podium behind him in several appearances.. Franklin Raines. You can villianize anyone… is 24 million alot? definately But thats 24 million to run and be responsible for a multi-BILLION dollar company. Are you aware that health industry profits margins are barely in the top 50 companies in the US (about 3.3%) Compare that to Beer companies whose profit margins are over 26%… And while you are at it, do a little research and compare those numbers with other major company chairs. In the private business world, share holders can pay anything they see fit to make sure that the best person is running their company and insuring its continued success.. whether you like it or not, thats the American way…How would you like it if someone came to you and siad that they thought you made twice as much as you should? What right do they have to challenge your paycheck? I know you will say, “but I am not an insurance company”.. true, but where do you draw the line between those who are and are not “touchable”? You should be able to make whatever your boss is willing to pay you for your services.. whether thats 12 dollars and hour or 12 million a year…

Posted by: arkievet | March 9, 2010, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

progressive mama—-”Limbaugh: “I’ll just tell you this, if this passes and it’s five years from now and all that stuff gets implemented — I am leaving the country. I’ll go to Costa Rica. “—
I love it when people make quotes taht they have never heard… that is not what he said.. its a lie propogated by teh MSM toonce again smear someone with a differing view.. In context– someone asked him what he would do to get health care once this bill raised everyones costs to the point that they could not afford healthcare.. rush siad when it got too expensive here, he would probalble go to Costa Rica to healthcare. he didn’t say he would move there, just taht he would use their healthcare after our system was destroyed by this administration… Get your facts right… oh wait.. you’re a liberal…thats probably impossible for you…

Posted by: arkie vet | March 9, 2010, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

Get your facts right… oh wait.. you’re a liberal…thats probably impossible for you…
Posted by: arkie vet | Mar 9, 2010 2:30:08 PM
Oh, good lord, a Limbaugh apologist. LOL. Talking about facts of all things. LOL, LOL, LOL.
After that previous fact-impaired post I have to say you certainly have chutzpah if not the facts and truth on your side in most instances.
Turns out Costa Rica has both national universal health care and private health care, which I didn’t realize– so he is nearly, though not quite, as silly as my employees who claimed they’d go Galt to Canada. LOL.
And just as an FYI, Arkie, progressive blogs posted the entire exchange and I was able to listen to it, too. And yet… if Rush were telling the story about a progressive, I’m pretty sure he’d tell it however he wished, wouldn’t he? Bottom line, he suggested we could get rid of him by passing health care reform.
Its a no-brainer. Let’s do it. Let’s cover millions of uninsureds, tackle medical inflation through using the pilot programs in the bill and expanding those that work, and get rid of Rush!
(Maybe if we add a public option sooner rather than later, we’ll get rid of him more quickly.)

Posted by: progressive mama | March 9, 2010, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

The combined profits of America’s ten largest health insurers are $8.3 billion. That’s less than two-thirds of the profits of Wal-Mart alone, less than half of the profits of General Electric alone
__________________________________
It seems to me that health insurance profits being 2/3rds of Wal-Mart is not small potatoes. Nor is earning half the profits of General Electric. Those are huge, huge corporations who earn huge, huge profits.

Posted by: tierra | March 9, 2010, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

The Obama Healh Reform Bill “gives” Health Insurance Companies $800 million; so Obama is full of it as usual; he says one thing and does another.

Posted by: Peter Smith | March 9, 2010, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

helloooo

Posted by: secreg756 | March 9, 2010, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Making every one buy insurance is good for the insurance companies,so why is Obama just paying lip service to false accusations. The Gov,has two medical programs now and they deny certain tests and are in the red so why would we want another. Medicare and Medicaid are both Gov run and both nonfunctional.

Posted by: stormerF2 | March 9, 2010, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

DEMONIZE those greedy insurance companies!!! That’s really unfair. Health insurance companies make on average 3.3% profit. Their executives make no more than, and often less, than similar size companies( I looked it up). Allow cross state lines compition, elimanate state mandates, allow drug importaion. This will decrease the cost of health care. Let the market place really work!

Posted by: happyflier | March 9, 2010, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Mac, or Mac1014US is back defending corporations and their right to a certain profit margin. MAC is a paid poster. His handle is run by a group of paid posters. Insurance companies routinely have handles like Mac omn boards defending their egrgious behavior. UNUMProvident a notorious Disability insurance company had paid posters spreading lies and misleading readers on boards such as this. MAC’s postings should be given ZERO crdibility. Note how his postings defend the poor insurance coNpanys rights to make profits. All the billions they make, net billions, only represents a small margin of costs to operate. MAC’s postings should be given no credibility what so ever.
SECREG756

Posted by: secreg756 | March 9, 2010, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Sandcrab, crdentials can be bought and sold. Expert witnesses with CV’s the length of Montanna can explain something shoulod or should not cause something to happen. The Buisness Daily is owned by Ruphert Murdoch, who also owns the times and Fox Entertainment. He is an extremely ultra conservative, with a healthy disliking of average Americans. he is an Aussie who wrangled a way to take a large control of what people read and hear. So yes, heb has a credentialled guy saying hcr won’t work. Yes, he has the resources to get his expert’s word out. But, there are just as many equally credentialed economists who say just the opposite.
They say hcr will reduce the deficit by 120 billion dollrs (over 10 yeaqrs), if a strong public option is included.
SECREG756

Posted by: secreg756 | March 9, 2010, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

S/B Murdoch owns the WSJ not the Times.
SECREG756

Posted by: secreg756 | March 9, 2010, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

Storm, items chnages through reconcilliation can only be budget oriented. There are six tests that a recnciled idea must pass before it requires a 60 vote majority in the house. If the issue is not affecting the budget, it can not be changed through reconcilliation w/o a super majority. That’s why what Stupak is doing is causing everyone who wants an up or down vote grief. The abortion language that passed the Senate bill has nothing to do with the budget of the bill. Stupak and our procedrial ridden government are going to be the death ofn our country. Unfortunately only a handful of Americans have any idea of how grid locked our government is and that’s why it’s ineffective. I read the other day that posters thought the “nuclear option’ had something to do with reconcilliation. FOX Entertainment allowed their viewers to believe that reconcilliation was the nuclear option. The talking heads on Fox either allowed other’s or had their anchors tell viewers they were one and the same. The nuclear option has to do with doing away with the current filibuster rules. Nothing at all to do with reconcilliation. Lies, more lies, and that’s why polls still show unfavorable opinions for the option and hcr. 73% of Americans who understand how it would work approve of it.
SECREG756

Posted by: secreg756 | March 9, 2010, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

60 vote supermajority s/b the Senate and not the House.
SECREG756

Posted by: secreg756 | March 9, 2010, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Bottom line, he suggested we could get rid of him by passing health care reform.
Posted by: progressive mama

Face it, Progressive Mama, you were being reckless with the truth and got nailed.

Posted by: smartlillena | March 9, 2010, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Face it, Progressive Mama, you were being reckless with the truth and got nailed.
Posted by: smartlillena | Mar 9, 2010 6:05:51 PM
Sorry, pal. You’re wrong again. Listen to the audio. It’s available. Its the Republicans that flat out lie.
Whats comical is when Limbaugh apologists suddenly get all worried about full context. Ha! Even then, the other commenter got it wrong. S/he claimed Limbaugh didn’t say what he said.
Oops– he did.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 9, 2010, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

There is so much distortion on health care reform that it is starting to morph into a debate about style rather than substance. The simple truth is that we cannot have insurance companies dictate our health policy, who lives and who dies, what illness they will pay on and which ones they won’t, or that only perfect human specimens can receive insurance coverage. All of us, liberals, conservatives, left wing, right wing, white, black, and everything in between will at some point in their lives be confronted with a major illness or life threatening event. Do we honestly want some bean counter sitting in a cubicle to decide what treatment, what medicines, what tests, what care, or what doctor we can see or have? And if this bean counter decides in his “wisdom” that your child, your husband, your spouse, or your parents had this illness as a pre-existing condition and thus not covered, will you take comfort in that they “know better”? Surely, you do not want your dear ones on this slippery slope, but that is exactly what will happen if we don’t have health care reform. No health care reform is the same as giving these insurance companies a license to decide who lives and who dies, and bleed all of us for every penny they can with higher premiums, higher deductibles, higher copays, higher whatever new fees they will come up. It is staggering to think that in this day and age, we are even having a debate on health care reform. Much of the civilized world has long done that while we like cavemen can’t figure this out. It’s amazing that something as simple as this can be twisted and distorted to the point that it scares people. This is about saving lives over profits and greed. Sooner or later we will all get to a point in our lives that someone we love is involved and needs the life option.
SECREG666

Posted by: secreg666 | March 9, 2010, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

YES It’s time to talk turkey. All those in favor of health insurance companies depriving people of life saving coverage because of pre existing conditions yell NO! Wait till next year! All those in favor of scrapping medicare and privatizing medicare so the elderly and the sick are subjected to health insurance company executive decisions to profit or not to profit. Just say NO! Wait until next year. All those in favor of keeping thirty six million Americans uninsured. Just say no! Wait until next year! All those in favor of voting against your own suggestions. Just say NO! Wait until next year! All those who believed the original bill was too long! Just say NO! Wait until next year! All of those who are unhappy about the new eleven page bill being to short! Just say NO! Wait until next year! All those who are in the minority and want to see nothing get done to help sick Americans! Just say no! Wait until next year! All of those who bellieve it’s OK for large insurance coNpanies to lose policyholders, raise premiums by 39.5 and make obscene profits by screwing the American people. just say NO! Wait till next year. Health insurance is a right all Americans should have. It is not a privilege. Our country has changed since our founding fathers fought England for our independence. Let’s keep our moral compass and do the right thing. SECREG666

Posted by: secreg666 | March 9, 2010, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

Oh shoot. Smartlilena, sorry to come back to this but you’re right. I did say we could get rid of him by passing health care reform when he was talking about where he’d get health care, so it was wishful “hearing” on my part, even when I listened to the clip–
As they said on another thread, context is in the ear of the beholder, and sometimes we hear it wrong.
Ah well. At least I can admit it, after being sure I was right!

Posted by: progressive mama | March 9, 2010, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

Health insurance is a right all Americans should have. It is not a privilege. Our country has changed since our founding fathers fought England for our independence. Let’s keep our moral compass and do the right thing. SECREG666
___________
It is staggering to think that in this day and age, we are even having a debate on health care reform. Much of the civilized world has long done that while we like cavemen can’t figure this out. It’s amazing that something as simple as this can be twisted and distorted to the point that it scares people. This is about saving lives over profits and greed. Sooner or later we will all get to a point in our lives that someone we love is involved and needs the life option. SECREG666
___________
Nice posts with so many good points.
Meanwhile, from Dan Pfeiffer’s blog:
“If we enact health reform, it will restrict how much of your premium dollars can be spent on profits and overhead by requiring health insurance companies to spend 80-85% of the money they take in on care.
That’s worth keeping in mind. Because right after the Insurance companies announced huge rate increases for families across the country, they gathered at the luxurious Ritz Carlton in Washington to announce that they are spending $1 million on ads to defeat health reform.
That money could probably be better spent keeping rates down for customers.”

Posted by: progressive mama | March 9, 2010, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

The obama admin wants to rile up the loony left. The loony left really loves to hate those evil companies. They just love the stories of the overpaid exec. And they think that that is the reason why the sky is falling. Meanwhile, back on planet earth most of us work for those companies.

Posted by: jonny | March 9, 2010, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

This is crazy! Why you all fighting? We all agree that reform is needed, but no one wants to compromise, its either this way or that way! Come on ya’ll we got to get behind something and make it work. Who says we can’t change it if it doesn’t. “Fail fast, learn quick, Move on!” Think big as so many people go without insurance. A lot of people are willing to pay for it, but can’t pay cobra prices. Most people aren’t asking for a handout! They are simply asking for a way to take care of their families. Have we forgotten about the main focus of reform. Its easy to forget about the “Have nots” especially if you’re one of the “Haves” Reform is needed, stop the fighting, grow up, make a decision and move on so that other problems get some attention.

Posted by: Deval769 | March 9, 2010, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

Why can’t republicans grasp that frequently profits are subjective? The evolution of the so-called “book-tax” gap–the difference between profits reported to tax authorities and those reported to capital markets–over the last 15 years demonstrates a growing disjunction between the two types of profit reports.

Posted by: Secondlook | March 9, 2010, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Jonny, you’re making a case for a business that deals death cards to sick people. You say, “most people work for insurance company’s”. I know not. Find a conscience.
SECREG666
SECREG666

Posted by: secreg666 | March 9, 2010, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

Jonny, you’re making a case for a business that deals death cards to sick people. You say, “most people work for insurance company’s”. I know not. Find a conscience.
SECREG666
SECREG666

Posted by: secreg666 | March 9, 2010, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

There are many problems with the healtcare plan. Having everyone to buy in, is just one of them. It has flaws, but it is a start. Getting everyone to agree on everything is impossible. The Republicans who say they were always for health reform the last eight years are lying. Bush let a few big companies buy up all their competition, 5 companies have 90% of the market. As someone wrote a couple years ago, the problem with healthcare companies, is, they think they’re energy companies or some other group. Health care companies consider, any “treatment” a loss. I’m sorry to someone above but these people are greedy and immoral. Maybe they weren’t at sometime in their lives, but they are now. They are also evil, yes evil, because they make decisions everyday that ruin and kill people. Of course it’s easy when they are removed from the consequences. I would also like to see their books, about their so called small profit margins of course they won’t let anyone see how much they spend on non-treatment expenses. Right now they will do anything to show profit on wall street, even if people die, of course they don’t ever see those little people.

Posted by: mark | March 10, 2010, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

Ah well. At least I can admit it, after being sure I was right!
Posted by: progressive mama

Damn! I enjoy telling you when you get ahead of yourself. You can burn RL at the stake. I could care less, but not much, about that slug.

Posted by: smartlillena | March 11, 2010, 6:24 am 6:24 am

All this for health care bill….thats is …

Posted by: Ilan Ben Menachem | March 18, 2010, 6:27 am 6:27 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.