Mar 1, 2010 8:05am

Pelosi Time: Speaker Seeks Switches Amid Political Crunch

By Rick Klein Who’s counting, anyway? (Everybody, actually.) Maybe this is the month where a deadline finally matters. Maybe time being up means the game has to end this time. Now comes the brutal politics that answers some brutal math. The House lacks the votes to pass comprehensive health care reform. That has to change, or President Obama and his party will be missing a rather important piece to take to the voters this fall. But the fact that we’re stuck here, shy of 217 votes at least for now, means not all Democrats see it that way. The only thing you need to know about the numbers is that, if health care is going to pass, some House members are going to have to have been against it before they ended up being for it. And nothing in the political environment has made that an easier switch to make. The political argument to get there is no cleaner: Democratic leaders can make their case about the need to pass something for the future of the party. Rank-and-filers, particularly Blue Dogs, can make the same argument back — looking out for the future of the same party. But the key decisions have already been made. Now it’s all about the votes. “Time’s up, yes. So we really have to go forth,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., told ABC’s Elizabeth Vargas on “This Week” Sunday. “What’s the point of talking about it any longer?” But the talking will continue, unless someone knows of another way to get to 217. John Harwood, in The New York Times: “When Ms. Pelosi looks for votes among the 39 Democrats who opposed the health care bill last year, the 14 first-term members must pit re-election concerns against the impact on their future advancement within the House. Veterans who lead committees and subcommittees, if blamed for the demise of Mr. Obama’s top domestic priority, could find those positions in jeopardy.” Pelosi gave herself an “A for effort” in her “This Week” interview — but she’s not in charge of the next marking period: “The coming months are a make-or-break period for her, a brutal reality check of her ability to manage all aspects of her job — consensus-building, agenda-setting, vote-counting, fundraising and campaigning,” John Bresnahan and Jonathan Allen write for Politico. “Health care: Pelosi and other top House Democrats say publicly that they have the votes to push through a comprehensive package, but privately, they know they don’t.” “Monday kicks off a critical week for Democrats to push ahead with their overhaul,” The Wall Street Journal’s Susan Davis reports. “That leaves Democrats with two critical challenges: figuring out how to maneuver through the reconciliation over Republican objections, and how to rebuild sliding public support for the bill.” Still waiting on that pivot to jobs: “Democrats on Capitol Hill say that the struggle to pass health care reform legislation will likely last well into this month, and perhaps into April,” ABC’s Jake Tapper reported on “Good Morning America” Monday. James Carville, on “GMA,” asked if he’s as confident as Pelosi that the House will have the votes: “No — but I’m glad to hear that she’s confident…. We’re going to see how effective our leaders are. We’re going to see how effective the White House can be… But if this doesn’t get done, it will hurt the Democratic Party — there’s no doubt about that.” Matthew Dowd: “If you’re a Republican, I think they should try as hard as they can, and jam it through and pass the bill. … Right now, it’s all upside for Republicans, whether the bill passes or fails.” Bloomberg’s Al Hunt says Obama needs to go “Chicago-style”: “It can only pass with the support of reluctant Democrats, with the House more of a problem than the Senate; and it’s only going to happen if the president uses forceful persuasion on his wavering party members,” Hunt writes. “If it goes past the scheduled March 29 recess, sayonara. Obama will have to employ some heavy persuasion in explaining the political and personal consequences to Democrats if a bill goes down.” Better something than nothing: “The political risk to Mr. Obama of appearing to be an inept leader cannot be underestimated if he fails to achieve the primary legislative goal to which he devoted his first year in office,” Jules Witcover writes in his column in the Baltimore Sun. “He needs to employ whatever means are available to him now to get it, and then to move on to other challenges with enhanced leadership credibility.” Leadership, now: “House Democratic leaders are ready to play hardball and charge forward on reform in the way that they want to: by taking full advantage of their majority,” Roll Call’s Jennifer Bendery reports. “The process by which it’s done won’t be long remembered,” said Rep. George Miller, D-Calif. Unless it is: “It looks like we’re trying to cram something through,” Rep. Baron Hill, D-Ind., tells Bloomberg News’ Kristin Jensen and Laura Litvan. “My preference would be to do smaller things,” Rep. Frank Kratovil, D-Md., told The New York Times’ Sheryl Gay Stolberg and Robert Pear. “Reconciliation cannot be used to pass comprehensive health care reform,” Senate Budget Chairman Kent Conrad, D-N.D., said on “Face the Nation.” Where’s the real enthusiasm for this? “It would be a political kamikaze mission for the Democratic Party if they jam this through,” Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., said on “This Week.” (And he’ll be on ABC’s “Top Line” Monday with more, live at noon ET, streaming at ABCNews.com.) And it gets harder: The retirement of Rep. Neil Abercrombie, D-Hawaii, took effect Sunday, as he runs for governor, costing Pelosi another “yes” on health care. In Arkansas, new heat on Sen. Blanche Lincoln, D-Ark., now from the populist left: “Lt. Gov. Bill Halter says he is seeking the Democratic nomination to challenge Sen. Blanche Lincoln this fall,” the AP’s Andrew DeMillo reports. “Halter’s spokesman provided a statement Monday in which the one-term lieutenant governor said he would file papers for the U.S. Senate this week. Halter is the only Democrat to formally announce a challenge to Lincoln as she seeks a third term.” A cleaner political battle — one that Democrats are more eager to have: Sen. Jim Bunning’s, R-Ky., hold on funding measures stopped a temporary extension of the Highway Trust Fund, too: “The Department of Transportation as of Monday morning must furlough 2,000 federal workers. DOT says that number could climb if this stalemate over funding drags on,” ABC’s Lisa Stark reports. “Employees affected include federal inspectors overseeing highway projects on federal lands. If the inspectors aren’t there, the projects must shut down.” It’s actually not all Bunning’s fault: “Democratic leaders scrambled during the weekend to overcome a series of roadblocks that have slowed progress on even the initial phases of their jobs agenda,” Politico’s Lisa Lerer reports. “House leaders are confident they’ll be able to move a jobs bill this week. But in the Senate, quick passage of popular unemployment benefits seems far less certain.”  AP analysis, ready for wide circulation on Monday: “Last year, the first of the 111th Congress, there were a record 112 cloture votes. In the first two months of 2010, the number already exceeds 40. That means, with 10 months left to run in the 111th Congress, Republicans have turned to the filibuster or threatened its use at a pace that will more than triple the old record.” Other kinds of nuclear options: “As President Obama begins making final decisions on a broad new nuclear strategy for the United States, senior aides say he will permanently reduce America’s arsenal by thousands of weapons. But the administration has rejected proposals that the United States declare it would never be the first to use nuclear weapons,” David E. Sanger and Thom Shanker report in The New York Times. “Aides said Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates will present Mr. Obama with several options on Monday to address unresolved issues in that [Nuclear Posture Review] document, which have been hotly debated within the administration.” Also on the president’s Monday schedule: “In remarks at the US Chamber of Commerce this morning President Obama will discuss a national effort to help curb the dropout rate, better prepare students for colleges and careers, and target low-performing schools,” ABC’s Sunlen Miller reports. “The president’s remarks will be part of The America’s Promise Alliance Education event hosted by Alliance Founding Chairman General Colin Powell and his wife and Alliance Chair Alma Powell.” Deficit days: House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., speaks at 1 pm ET at the Brookings Institution in Washington, endorsing a “balanced approach” to addressing the deficit, per excerpts provided to The Note. “This, then, is our turning point and our choice: the point at which we join the debt-ridden powers who saw the story of their greatness end in fiscal ruin, or the point at which we as a nation refuse that ending and write a new chapter,” Hoyer plans to say. “Given the seriousness of our situation, the [president's fiscal] commission must come to a consensus, and Congress must act on its proposals at the end of the year…. It seems to me that the only solution that can win the support of both parties is a balanced approach: one that cuts some spending and raises some revenue while avoiding extremes in either direction. A balanced approach would spread the effects of change across American society.” Hoyer continues: “Our willingness to face reality is a measure of our character. Our willingness to reject easy answers from our leaders is a measure of our character. Our willingness to put the welfare of our children ahead of our own — to plant seeds for them whose fruit we may never taste — is a powerful test of our character.” Former Vice President Al Gore, pushing back after a snowy month: “The political paralysis that is now so painfully evident in Washington has thus far prevented action by the Senate — not only on climate and energy legislation, but also on health care reform, financial regulatory reform and a host of other pressing issues,” Gore wrote in a Sunday New York Times op-ed. “The pathway to success is still open, though it tracks the outer boundary of what we are capable of doing,” he continued. “Later this week, Senators John Kerry, Lindsey Graham and Joe Lieberman are expected to present for consideration similar cap-and-trade legislation. I hope that it will place a true cap on carbon emissions and stimulate the rapid development of low-carbon sources of energy.” Looking forward to Tuesday’s Texas primary — and beyond: “The eyes of Texas are on Tuesday’s Republican gubernatorial primary between Gov. Rick Perry and Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison. And that’s just how former Houston mayor Bill White likes it,” The Washington Post’s Chris Cillizza writes. “White is heavily favored to emerge as the Democratic nominee — he faces free-spending hair-care magnate Farouk Shami — and is seen by both state and national observers as the party’s first real chance of breaking the vise grip that Republicans have had on the state’s top office since George W. Bush unseated Democratic Gov. Ann Richards in 1994.” New model for voter turnout? “Rick Perry’s campaign has a radical approach that eschews traditional voter turnout efforts in favor of extensive use of social media networks to win Tuesday’s GOP primary,” Gromer Jeffers Jr. writes for The Dallas Morning News. “Haven’t seen a Perry yard sign? There aren’t any, and Perry has no local office to house them. Dreading yet another phone call from a political candidate? Don’t worry; Perry has no phone banks. And you probably won’t see supporters with T-shirts knocking at the door.” “But you may get a Facebook message from a friend in your social circle. You’re more likely to find Perry campaign appeals on Twitter, even craigslist, than to see his mug on a highway billboard,” he writes. In Massachusetts, a no-go for a Kennedy: “Joseph P. Kennedy III said yesterday that he will not run for Congress this year, ending feverish speculation that the young Cape Cod prosecutor would seek the 10th District seat if Representative William Delahunt retires,” Susan Milligan reports in The Boston Globe.  Said Kennedy: “Elective office and public service are obviously something that have long ties with my family, and something I’m definitely interested in. Right now, I’ve got a job I love, and hope to get better at.” In Nevada, a bad poll for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, but a good one, too: “Sue Lowden has emerged as a clear leader among Republicans fighting for the chance to run against Sen. Harry Reid this fall, according to a new poll that also shows the incumbent Democrat continues to trail against his major challengers,” Steve Tetreault reports for the Las Vegas Review-Journal. “But the polling done for the Las Vegas Review-Journal also shows this year’s U.S. Senate race could undergo a major shake-up if a Tea Party candidate gets involved. It would be a new ballgame, and Reid would be the big beneficiary.” Plus: “President Barack Obama’s approval rating remains low in Nevada despite a recent high-profile visit, according to a new poll that suggests state residents are taking a harsher view of the president than elsewhere in the country,” the Review-Journal’s Alan Choate reports. Coming Tuesday, in Chile: “Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is scheduled to visit Chile on Tuesday, part of a five country swing through Latin America that was planned well before Saturday’s massive 8.8 magnitude earthquake,” ABC’s Kirit Radia reports. The Kicker: “We share some of the views of the Tea Partiers in terms of the role of special interest in Washington, D.C.” — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, on Sunday, inviting activists to a new party. “What they want is a continuation of the failed economic policies of President George Bush which got us in the situation we are in now. What we want is a new direction.” — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, last April, preferring her own party to the Tea Partiers. For up-to-the-minute political updates check out The Note’s blog . . . all day every day:

http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/

User Comments

This bill needs extensive changes before it gets passed by any chamber. The president may need a new blueprint.

Posted by: matt | March 1, 2010, 8:12 am 8:12 am

Who would follow Peolosi off a cliff ?
We will see how many will accept all her
pap and vote for something that they
know will doom their own political lives.
She comes off as the insane and mad leader
that is asking for a suicide mission.
She is one crazy woman.

Posted by: wis134 | March 1, 2010, 8:28 am 8:28 am

Would you follow Pelosi?????

Posted by: Billy Bob | March 1, 2010, 9:00 am 9:00 am

The democrats better get their game in order. They need to pass the baucus bill and clean it up with a public option. They better please their base!

Posted by: rightbehind | March 1, 2010, 9:02 am 9:02 am

The Democrats worked alone for a year to produce a bill that 70% of Americans don’t want to see passed. Meanwhile, all the ideas the Republicans offered along the way have been rejected. The public has indicated by polls they’d like to see some of the Republican’s ideas in the bill. What is the right thing to do at this point? Why not let this piece of unsavory proposed legislation die and start over in a truly bipartisan effort to insure more people but at the same time to lower the expenses of delivering healthcare so the insurance companies can lower their premiums without compromising the minimal profits they get for administering a program that has worked for decades while delivering a more comprehensive and more readily accessible and durable product? It’s not the insurance industry that needs major overhaul. The cost problems are to be found primarily within the medical and pharmaceutical industies.

Posted by: gollywiggle | March 1, 2010, 9:08 am 9:08 am

What I suggested in my last post would restore dignity to the Democratic party while delivering to the public a piece of legislation that benefits everyone. After all, in spite of the 70% disapproval of the legislation before the House, over 80% of Americans want to see the costs and availability of healthcare improved.

Posted by: gollywiggle | March 1, 2010, 9:13 am 9:13 am

It’s time to drop the political and bragging rights aspects of this debate and do what’s right for the people.

Posted by: gollywiggle | March 1, 2010, 9:14 am 9:14 am

Tort reform may account for only 2-3% of annual healthcare expenses to the government as our president has stated, but overall, according to Dr. Sanjay Gupta who refused to be the president’s yes man by turning down the surgeon general position, lawsuits add 600-700 billion dollars annuually to the cost of delivering healthcare in America.

Posted by: gollywiggle | March 1, 2010, 9:35 am 9:35 am

Pelosi, Reid and Obama just don’t get it. I guess in November they will understand what we the people mean when we say no. It is no joke. The houses will be cleaned out of the rif raf that in there now. Including some Reps.

Posted by: Jim Rod | March 1, 2010, 9:43 am 9:43 am

I predict moderate democrats won’t vote for it……it’ll be close…

Posted by: LongT | March 1, 2010, 10:00 am 10:00 am

“all ideas from republicans were rejected” – gollywiggle
Really. Try spending some time to read the actual bill or the President’s plan. Before you start shouting about the number of pages, please could you tell us how many pages were in the Social Security and Medicare bills when they passed years back?
A person who gets an inexpensive treatment when this bill passes would not care if the bill was 1 page or 10,000 pages. This GOP talking point confirms that fact that they take pride in being ignorant.

Posted by: New Wave | March 1, 2010, 10:20 am 10:20 am

Career politicians become enamored with themselves and narcissism rules.
Term limits are the only answer to protect the nation from both parties but especially the destructive ugliness of the ilk of Pelosi and Reid.

Posted by: Ed Taylor | March 1, 2010, 10:28 am 10:28 am

So much time and energy spent on a piece of legislation Americans don’t want. And yet, Obama does nothing productive to alter policy which would help the economy and be a catalyst for the private sector to create jobs (no more government jobs…please). You hear no talk of lowering the corporate tax rates, nothing about extending the people’s (Bush) tax cuts. NOTHING! It either that Obama does not understand business or, that his Marxist agenda has something else planned for us.

Posted by: fedup_11 | March 1, 2010, 10:29 am 10:29 am

Good job Pigolosi and dumBO! Go ahead, your so well liked and respected all ready why not make things better for yourselves and shove this garbage bill down the throats of 70% of Americans that don’t want it. The 30% that do want it are all ready government employees, or on welfare. What do you have to lose. By the way, even better job on the economy and unemployment! Congratulations idiots! I suppose you will be asking for more porkulus beings the first round has went so well.

Posted by: Todd | March 1, 2010, 10:54 am 10:54 am

We are still waiting for the GOP Senators and Reps agree to GIVE UP their own GOVERNMENT-RUN HEALTH INSURANCE. Since they do not want other Americans to have the same access to health care.

Posted by: New Wave | March 1, 2010, 11:11 am 11:11 am

why should the dems worry about pleasing their base? its the independents that count as a liberal democrat will always vote for a democrat regardless of what they do or stand for. top notch health care is not a right its bought and paid for. the emrgancy room is alredy free.

Posted by: catman | March 1, 2010, 11:12 am 11:12 am

CONTACT your Congressional Rep.: Let them know that a vote for Obamacare will be a vote against them in November.

Posted by: Ron | March 1, 2010, 11:15 am 11:15 am

New Wave; Everything you said in your 10:20:36 post is at least arguably correct. The only problem I have with your approach to intelligent discussion is that you continue to convolute what’s happening now with what happened in the past. We’re talking about a healthcare reform bill that’s intended to extend medical insurance coverage to more people and intended to reduce the cost of healthcare insurance for everyone. The bill villainizes the healthcare industry without doing anything to reduce the cost of delivering healthcare doesn’t get those two things done. Covering more Americans without addressing cost means more expense to the taxpayer and that’s why so many object. It seriously has little if anything to do with party affiliation. And it most certainly has nothing to do with how many pages of legislation are in the medicare and social security legislations of the past. Nor does extending free benefits to Americans parallel the social security and medicare programs that americans have paid into.

Posted by: gollywiggle | March 1, 2010, 11:24 am 11:24 am

Way to go GOP. A Georgia county GOP chose to elect a man who had an affair with his mother-in-law while his wife was pregnant.
So much for family values.

Posted by: New Wave | March 1, 2010, 11:26 am 11:26 am

gollywiggle: so you guarantee that we would no more hear whines about the number of pages in the health insurance reform bill?

Posted by: New Wave | March 1, 2010, 11:33 am 11:33 am

New Wave; You don’t want the Cadillac healthcare plan the legislators have. They have to pay 2/3 of their insurance premium while the government (taxpayers) only pay 1/3. I’ll bet they end up exempting themselves from the upcoming tax on Cadillac insurance plans.

Posted by: gollywiggle | March 1, 2010, 11:33 am 11:33 am

And New Wave, I don’t see any Dem legislators volunteering to give up their insurance either.

Posted by: gollywiggle | March 1, 2010, 11:35 am 11:35 am

gollywiggle: why don’t the GOP Sens and Reps agree to open up their healthcare insurance exchanges to other Americans?
You stated 2/3 of premiums, what is teh $ cost? I bet it is a lot lower than other people currently have out there.
Also are they affected by the 39% premium increases?

Posted by: New Wave | March 1, 2010, 11:36 am 11:36 am

You’re right catman. The centrist Democrats are embarrassed by the conduct of this administration. They’ll help vote out this band of thieves.

Posted by: gollywiggle | March 1, 2010, 11:37 am 11:37 am

New Wave; I don’t know why I waste my time responding to you when you twist everything I say. There will be whining about legislations as long as they are so long no one who is to vote on them actually reads them. Next topic: The amount of money the legislators pay out of their own pockets is more than you want to think about paying for healthcare insurance yourself. And no the legislative group insurance will probably not have a big premium increase. I’d expect the insurance companies have better sense than to raise the rates on a group that is attempting to destroy them.

Posted by: gollywiggle | March 1, 2010, 11:44 am 11:44 am

gollywiggle: The DEMs are NOT the ones blocking access to other Americans.
It is very simple: If you have something and claim that it is no good, you should give it up to prove that you believe what you are saying.
We keep hearing from GOP Senators that the American people do not like the bill.
If they are very confident of this fact, why are they threatening a filibuster? They should allow an UP or DOWN vote and let’s get the result.

Posted by: New Wave | March 1, 2010, 11:49 am 11:49 am

Obama ” I will bring hope and change to this country and bring all parties together” Hows that Hopey Changy thing working? How that togetherness working for you?

Posted by: jjj | March 1, 2010, 11:59 am 11:59 am

new wave…are you describing jon edwards, bill clinton or newt gingrich?

Posted by: catman | March 1, 2010, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Catman. The name of the scandalous GOP Chair in Georgia is Daniel Stout.
You can google his name and wonder why anyone would elect such a person.

Posted by: New Wave | March 1, 2010, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

new wave… i wouldnt. unlike many people, public officials who cheat on their spouses will definitely cheat on their constituients and it does make a difference to me. its not just sex as many try claim.daniel stout should step down if he did as you say.

Posted by: catman | March 1, 2010, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

New Wave; One more time I’ll respond to your jibber jabber. The Republicans are threatening to filibuster the legislation because “It is very simple: If you have something and claim that it is no good, you should give it up to prove that you believe what you are saying.” The bill stinks. It doesn’t do what it’s supposed to do. The Republicans recognize that and they are trying to protect the majority of taxpayers, those in the political middle from the extreme liberal left. And one more time I’ll tell you…I’m not a Republican. I’m part of that 50% of the American public that votes for the man/woman, not the party, and I’ll forever vote against any right or left wing extremist that holds or tries to hold political office because I love my freedom, fought for it and continue to fight for it. I also love my country, fought for it and will continue to fight for it. All I want from the government is to stay out of my way while I pursue happiness, enjoy the liberty to do so, and cling to the life I’ve been granted. I well understand there are no guarantees of attaining that happiness. And I have little respect for the opinions of people who expect someone else to deliver happiness to them.

Posted by: gollywiggle | March 1, 2010, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

Way to go Republicans.
You just proved you lie all the time.
How dare I say that?
Because during the debate, the Republicans said more than once that “the people on welfare who are the uninsured…!”
Why is that a lie?
Because Welfare people Do Have Medical Insurance!
Fact: it is a number of Working middle class people who Do Not Have any Medical Health Insurance since companies cut down or cut out the medical health insurance for employees beginning in 2002!
So when you yell the lie that the unisured should get a job to get medical health care, You Sound Like Idiots!

Posted by: Angie | March 1, 2010, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

new wave …no one allows an up or down vote. you either filibuster or do this reconciliation thing and face the music. to alter 20% of our economy where 300 milion have health insurance using a gimmick doesnot seem to be what reconcilliation is used for. that being said, use it if the dems wish but they will pay the price for an unconstitutional bill that will get reversed in the second week of november whan nancy pelosi will have to fly commercial and buy her own booze once again.great saturday night liveskit.cant wait

Posted by: catman | March 1, 2010, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

angie..if you had a job you could buy health care other than the free health care already provided at emergancy rooms.JOBS JOBS JOBS. thats where the focus should have been rather than handouts handouts and handouts.so when you are paying someone else health care who is not working…who is the idiot? the guy paying for someone elses health care.there is no free lunch in america

Posted by: catman | March 1, 2010, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Pelosi is such a suck up.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | March 1, 2010, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

GOP Wins Gold Medal for Obstructionism

Posted by: New Wave | March 1, 2010, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

new wave ; thank god for that

Posted by: jjj | March 1, 2010, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

the mere fact she is the face of the democratic party shows what phony politicians they really are

Posted by: billybob | March 1, 2010, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

They pass an unpopular peice of legislation on the back of an unpopular President and the GOP will take a bunch of seats in the House and Senate.
At some point the special interests have to take a back seat to the interest of the American people.
Kill the bill, start over from scratch and don’t subsidize the insurance industry. And if you can’t stomach that, how about SOMETHING, ANYTHING directed towards the economy… (How about getting rid of Bush’s boy Bernanke for once!?!) Nah, Wall St. OWNS this bum just like the last one.
I wonder if our next President will be sponsored by Goldman Sachs like the last two turkeys!?! Crikey!

Posted by: jafo | March 1, 2010, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

Let the bribes fly to advance Obama’s REJECTED politcal agenda.
No matter what he does, he will lose. The people have to pay for years, for something they won’t benefit from until much later. (Yes your politicans really ARE this STUPID!)
And people will be crying “Where’s the benefits, all I see is higher taxes…” right in time for his fated re-election.
Give him a Democrat congress and people will see ALL of them as a failure. Give him a Republican congress, and he just might HAVE to compromise, like Bill Clinton did, enough to appeal to moderates and swing voters to gain re-election…
Barky, Barky, Barky… Clinton got TWO terms, Jimmy Carter got one! Biography may get you elected once, but competency is the key to gaining a second term.
Maybe that’s what Bill was trying to tell the Democrats with his warnings throughout the primary… No???

Posted by: jafo | March 1, 2010, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

New Wave-I will listen to your statement when the Dems. give up their insurance, and the Rep. don’t. Don’t you think that would be a more unbiased statement? Guess not.

Posted by: stevemb12 | March 1, 2010, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

“”"”80% of Americans want to see the costs and availability of healthcare improved.”"”"”
Posted by: gollywiggle
Unfortunately, this insurance legislation does absolutely nothing to stop the rising trend of health care costs.

Posted by: lfrichar | March 2, 2010, 11:30 am 11:30 am

ifrichar; Exactly why the writers should scrap this bill and start over with cost control being their focus.

Posted by: gollywiggle | March 2, 2010, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

I don’t buy that tort reform is only 2% or so of total cost. they might be counting verdicts, and leaving out settlements. also not taking into account needless test preformed to avoid lawsuites. then look into the insurance premiums they need to pay. some states have very few doctors too deliver babies due to insurance cost

Posted by: streetsmarts22 | March 2, 2010, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

Boycott Nevada and California. No more corporate meetings, vacations, money spent on hotels, food, ect., until Pelosi and Reid are voted out. I could care less who you elect locally. But, when you send such toxic waste to DC, that does impact on my pocketbook-and it should yours as well!

Posted by: stevemb12 | March 2, 2010, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.