Mar 4, 2010 1:14pm

President Obama Tells Insurance Execs of Constant Premium Hikes: This Is ‘Unacceptable and Unsustainable’

Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller report:

As expected, President Obama popped by Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius’ meeting with executives from the five largest health insurance companies.

The news was first broken by White House press secretary Robert Gibbs on twitter, who tweeted: “POTUS went to ins. exec mtg w/ ltr from woman whose insurance will rise 40% nxt yr – more at briefing…"

Asked about Gibbs’ tweet at a stake-out with reporters after the meeting, Sebelius said the president at the meeting “described this as a constituent who had written from Ohio who was a cancer survivor but had been cancer-free for 11 years. Her premiums went up 25% this year. They’re going to go up another 40% in 2010. She is already paying $7,000. Plus most of her medical expenses she is paying out of pocket.”

Sebelius said that the woman, in a letter to the president, “enumerated what she is paying for pharmaceuticals. She has the highest deductible possible and yet she is still seeing these extraordinary rate increases.”

President Obama told the CEOs “this clearly is unacceptable and unsustainable,” Sebelius said.

The HHS Secretary said that the CEOs “admitted that it is unsustainable” after which “we talked about why this market is divided into little bits and pieces. Why sick people are segregated, essentially. And it’s a problem the president addressed at the summit.”

Participants at the meeting were WellPoint, Inc. CEO Angela F. Braly; CIGNA HealthCare, Inc. CEO David M. Cordani; Health Care Service Corporation CEO Patricia Hemingway-Hall; Aetna, Inc. CEO Ronald Allen Williams; and UnitedHealth Group CEO Stephen Hemsley.

The meeting also included various insurance commissioners including Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner Joel Ario, chair of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ health committee; Kansas Insurance Commissioner Sandy Praeger, another chair of NAIC’s health committee; West Virginia Insurance Commissioner Jane Cline, president of NAIC; and NAIC executive director Therese Vaughan.

Praeger gave a ringing endorsement to the administration-backed proposal from Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., that would give the HHS Secretary the power to block insurance company premium increases if they don't meet certain criteria in states where regulators do not already have that authority. The new powers are included in the “fix” to the Senate bill that the House and Senate are being asked to pass.

Before the meeting, sitting amongst attendees in the Roosevelt Room, Sebelius told reporters that “the input that I’ve had from people across America who are really frightened that they are priced out of the market, don’t know what’s coming next, want some information about how this is happening and what strategies we have for looking at costs into the future. Because they are terrified that they are next.”

Seated at the table directly across from the Secretary was Angela Braly, the CEO of WellPoint, Exhibit A in the president’s argument that corporate greed is what’s motivating premium increases. WellPoint’s Anthem Blue Cross division recently announced up to 39% rate increases for individual insurance consumers in California, thought WellPoint made $4.7 billion in profits in 2009.

Is it a fair case to make? Certainly no one can easily defend the health insurance industry policies of denying coverage to those with pre-existing conditions or dropping coverage for individuals once they get sick. But Dr. Mark J. Perry, a professor of economics and finance in the School of Management at the Flint campus of the University of Michigan, has noted that, according to data from Yahoo business, the health insurance industry, with an average profit margin of 3.3 percent, is the 86th most profitable industry.

As the Washington Post’s Ezra Klein notes, that’s a lower margin of profit than many other players in health care, such as the pharmaceutical industry (16.5 percent), “health information services (9.3 percent), home health care (8.4 percent), medical labs and research (8.2 percent), medical instruments and supplies (6.8 percent), biotech firms (6.7 percent), and generic drug manufacturers (6.6 percent).”

Secretary Sebelius did not single out the WellPoint’s rate hikes today, but said the problem is broader than just one company. “I think individuals and the smaller market is seeing double-digit rate increases across the board and is one of the reasons why the president is very eager to have a comprehensive health reform bill that among other things has a new marketplace and has a different opportunity for people to be pooled together,” she said.

After the meeting, Sebelius said she’d asked the companies “to follow up with an official letter that they file online their rate requests along with the actuarial data that supports those rate requests: what they’re paying out, what they are collecting for overhead costs, what they’re collecting for administrative costs. So at a minimum until we have comprehensive health  reform, until we have a new marketplace, until we have some rate review and some oversights people at least understand what it is that’s going on.”

“In the meantime we want to shine a bright light and hoping that the CEOS respond to the call for putting their information up in public,” she said. “Put it on a website.”

Sebelius described today as “a step in a conversation I’m hoping will be followed by some greatly increased transparency about what indeed is going on in these marketplaces, why it is that companies who have very healthy profits I think the top companies filed for a $12.7 billion worth of profits in ’09  and pivoted and in this marketplace have filed just dramatic increases.”

– Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller

 

User Comments

Oddly enough no mention of money to Goldman Sachs, Fannie, Freddie, bonuses, the lost money for small businesses. At least I’ve got a choice with health care I think costs too much.

Posted by: Unmentioned | March 4, 2010, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

The article by Ezra that is linked to is a good worthwhile read. As he rightly points out:
“What the profit motive does do is create an incentive for cruel practices such as rescission and risk selection. Those practices, it’s important to note, almost certainly save the system money in the aggregate. They are not why costs grow. But they are bad practices and should be stopped….
That said, the current insurance market does drive cost growth in two main ways.
The first is that it’s fractured among thousands of plans and competitors and business arrangements, and that fracturing is inefficient. Medicare negotiates better rates because Medicare has a large customer base, giving it power in those negotiations. An insurer covering a bunch of small businesses in Iowa does not.
The second is that the insurance market is broadly parasitic on the employer-based market, which as I’ve argued before, allows everyone to pass costs onto someone else and tricks individuals into thinking they’re getting a good deal when they’re really getting a terrible deal.”
I also think its hard to justify the lobbying money spent to maintain the status quo when innovation is clearly needed.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 4, 2010, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Before President Obama scolds yet another American about what is “unacceptable and unsustainable”, he needs to look to himself and begin addressing the “Costs Costs Costs” of his administration’s unimaginable sprees and his coercive BigGovernment solutions.
Where to begin? He needs to Kill that health care Bill.

Posted by: Carol | March 4, 2010, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

In the comment section of the blog post by the economist, Mark Perry that the article links to there is an interesting point made about efficiency and potential cost savings in the private sector when it comes to filings of challenges for even pre-approved services.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 4, 2010, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

You go Obama! Tell them what George W. Bush should have told them
signed – George H. Bush

Posted by: Jackson | March 4, 2010, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Before President Obama scolds yet another American about what is “unacceptable and unsustainable”, he needs to look to himself and begin addressing the “Costs Costs Costs” of his administration’s unimaginable sprees
___________________________________
What a joke to hear people attacking the Democrats for “Costs Costs Costs”.
It was the Bush Republican administration that doubled the national debt to $10 trillion and exploded the deficits – and this during the ‘good’ times when money should have been put away for a rainy day.
And what did we get for all that Republican spending? The biggest economic collapse since the Great Depression.
Sure . . . thanks Republicans – we’ll be sure to listen to you.

Posted by: tierra | March 4, 2010, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

What a joke to hear people attacking the Democrats for “Costs Costs Costs”.
It was the Bush Republican administration that doubled the national debt to $10 trillion and exploded the deficits – and this during the ‘good’ times when money should have been put away for a rainy day.
And what did we get for all that Republican spending? The biggest economic collapse since the Great Depression.
Sure . . . thanks Republicans – we’ll be sure to listen to you.
Posted by: tierra | Mar 4, 2010 1:58:21 PM
———–
So, by your own logic, doubling the national debt by Bush caused the economic collapse (not at all, but I’ll stipulate the point for the sake of argument), but more than doubling the national debt yet again will have no consequences?
You should sign up for Philosophy 101 next semester, it focuses on logic.

Posted by: Woody | March 4, 2010, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

“It was the Bush Republican administration that doubled the national debt to $10 trillion and exploded the deficits – and this during the ‘good’ times when money should have been put away for a rainy day.”
Every day is a rainy day if you’re named Fannie, Freddie or Goldman!

Posted by: Bonus Points | March 4, 2010, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

Precisely why Obama’s plan cannot work. The insurance companies cannot stay in business, and get reduced health care costs, at the same time.
Only National Health Care will work, because all of the profiteering in health care, has to be eliminated. That can only be done with a National health care system.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | March 4, 2010, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

I also think its hard to justify the lobbying money spent to maintain the status quo when innovation is clearly needed.
Posted by: progressive mama | Mar 4, 2010 1:34:58 PM
________________________________________________
I agree about lobbying. Which makes it hard to understand this exchange (taken from the White House website from last Friday at the presser with Robert Gibbs). You’d think the president wouldn’t meet with lobbies without transparency. I wonder what they talked about?
Q And, secondly, the President now admits that on health care the White House fell somewhat short on transparency. Now, I’m wondering if the White House would be willing to go back and rectify that and make available transcripts, tapes, documentation from the meetings that took place in the spring and the summer with the pharmaceutical lobby and the — health care.
MR. GIBBS: There are not tapes of any meetings. I think that ended about the mid-70s. There are not tapes or transcripts of –
Q Minutes?
MR. GIBBS: — of meetings. There’s not a stenographer in these — in these events.

Posted by: Shoe | March 4, 2010, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

What a joke to hear people attacking the Democrats for “Costs Costs Costs”.
It was the Bush Republican administration that doubled the national debt to $10 trillion and exploded the deficits – and this during the ‘good’ times when money should have been put away for a rainy day.
And what did we get for all that Republican spending? The biggest economic collapse since the Great Depression.
Sure . . . thanks Republicans – we’ll be sure to listen to you.
Posted by: tierra | Mar 4, 2010 1:58:21 PM
———–
So, by your own logic, doubling the national debt by Bush caused the economic collapse (not at all, but I’ll stipulate the point for the sake of argument), but more than doubling the national debt yet again will have no consequences?
___________________________________
It just so happens the Bush Republican administration was nice enough to give us BOTH – a doubled national debt to $10 trillion AND an almost completely collapsed economy.
Quite an accomplishment for those ‘fiscally responsible’ Republicans.

Posted by: tierra | March 4, 2010, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

People eat garbage, they smoke, they then take lots of meds to sustain themselves. We really can’t afford that type of behavior. Plus the hospitals love doing tests. Maybe well-care checkups should be a thing of the past. Too much use of the medical establishment.

Posted by: Huh | March 4, 2010, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

***“In the meantime we want to shine a bright light and hoping that the CEOS respond to the call for putting their information up in public,” she said. “Put it on a website.”***
I got a letter my from insurance company notifing me of a the annual policy holders meetting, a list of the topics discussed and a website to go to the review the minutes of the meetings if I was unable to attend.
The problem isn’t a lack of information, it is who is the scape goat for the administration at the time. Until the PHARMA deal drug companies were the enemy. Now that that the insurance companies are the enemy, because of rate increases, they will now be castigated until either they fold under populist pressure or the administration finds another scape goat.
These meetings and the hearings are not about right and wrong, or that the companies are being predatory, rather the adminstration is trying to create urgency to get the American people to say “This is a horrible crisis. We have to do something about it”. At which time they will say we can pass this bill that fixes all the problems and protects the healthcare rights of all people in America.
Its all games of words that doesn’t change the fact that the bills before Congress do not deal with rising health care costs, and by the CBO’s own report will increase the cost of health insurance for those who purchace individual policies between 10-13%, even after the subsidies.

Posted by: bobtherepublican | March 4, 2010, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

WE NEED TO REPLACE ALL LIBERALS IN CONGRESS.
Posted by: OBAMA-PELOSI-REID HAVE NO PROBLEM GOVERNING “AGAINST” THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE! | Mar 4, 2010 2:04:12 PM
Oh sheesh. Vote out the progressives and the liberals and then we’ll have nobody standing up for the ideals this country was founded on– they’ll all be wholly owned subsidiaries of lobbyists– insurance, oil, etc.
Brilliant. Good-bye small business and middle class.
What we need is more than two parties– four or five– and some bright innovative thinkers and doers from all over the political spectrum, who aren’t ideologues, are highly aware of present-day circumstances or aren’t tied to special interests.
The gridlock has to go. And we need politicians able to get out of the ruts that have been created.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 4, 2010, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

…. ‘fiscally responsible’ Republicans.
Posted by: tierra | Mar 4, 2010 2:08:20 PM
Its an oxymoron, isn’t it?
And its getting stale. I can’t believe anyone takes them seriously.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 4, 2010, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

Corporations run this country and we need to take it back.

Posted by: iSlate | March 4, 2010, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

BO is an okole puka. He can say this but somehow he thinks that the iresponsible spending of the federal government is OK even though he is on record stating that it is unsustainable. Obviously he never met an Economics class he could pass.

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | March 4, 2010, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Yes, this country was founded on the ideals of small government, low taxes and individual responsibility. Ben Franklin believed that the ‘unconfort’ of being poor would be the motivation to better ones self.

Posted by: bonbud | March 4, 2010, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

What we need is more than two parties– four or five– and some bright innovative thinkers and doers from all over the political spectrum, who aren’t ideologues, are highly aware of present-day circumstances or aren’t tied to special interests.
The gridlock has to go. And we need politicians able to get out of the ruts that have been created.
Posted by: progressive mama | Mar 4, 2010 2:10:38 PM
Absolutely agree, progressive mama. But I don’t think any of us need to be holding our breaths on that one. How long have we been listening to the same old gripes and complaints, only to have elections in which even a THIRD party is totally rejected.

Posted by: Shoe | March 4, 2010, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

The healthcare system is broken. I don’t think the Democrats plan is a good one, but something needs to be done. The republicans think’s the system is just fine, they need to wakeup and join the debate.

Posted by: Debt | March 4, 2010, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

…. ‘fiscally responsible’ Republicans.
Posted by: tierra | Mar 4, 2010 2:08:20 PM
Its an oxymoron, isn’t it?
And its getting stale. I can’t believe anyone takes them seriously.
Posted by: progressive mama | Mar 4, 2010 2:13:11 PM
_____________________________________
And then it extends into hypocrisy and lies for the Republicans – when they attack the Democrats.
This is where people lose their faith in politicians.
And anyone with a brain can see the complete hypocrisy in Republicans attacking this administration for ‘not being transparent enough’.
Republicans make no claims they will be ‘transparent’ in government. Never have.
If they get voted in, its’ back to all the doors being closed . . . back to the secret neo-con agendas, back to the lies that kill tens of thousands of people . . .
Obama’s moves towards transparency and booting out of lobbyists may not be perfect but it is many, many steps in the right direction.
The Republicans have promised – and will deliver – nothing

Posted by: tierra | March 4, 2010, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

Obama knows what he’s doing – slowly dragging down the economy. Just read the Cloward and Piven strategy. Healthcare bill must be stopped.

Posted by: bonbud | March 4, 2010, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

pick up the phone and call these swing Congressmen. Let them hear from you!
___
Call and weigh in, no matter who your rep is. I posted the House switchboard number earlier and it got scrubbed so I can’t imagine the numbers are going to stay posted as that would be unfair :^)
Call, don’t email. Give them your zip code. And if you’re in favor of health care reform and you’re rep is a Dem, assure the rep’s intern you’ll pressure the Senate to pass the fixes as well.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 4, 2010, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

“Sebelius said that the woman, in a letter to the president, “enumerated what she is paying for pharmaceuticals. She has the highest deductible possible and yet she is still seeing these extraordinary rate increases.”
This is really funny… what does she think a President, that is DEEP in debt to the Pharmas, for their support, is going to do… Obama is so in bed with the BIG DRUG CO’s.. he sold his soul
Obama names brother of undecided House Dem to Appeals Court…
‘Whatever it takes to get healthcare done,’ said Press Secretary Robert Gibbs…
The culture of corruption continues

Posted by: another crisis-another photo op | March 4, 2010, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

I also think its hard to justify the lobbying money spent to maintain the status quo when innovation is clearly needed.
Posted by: progressive mama | Mar 4, 2010 1:34:58 PM
I agree (gasp!).
This is NOT the lobbyist system that was originally intended for our country. Currying favor in ANY respect is unethical in a political system. We have to return to lobbying efforts that truly protect the rights of the people – not protect the pocketbooks of those who pay the lobbyists.

Posted by: For the Record | March 4, 2010, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

I could afford the constant premium hikes if I didn’t have to pay the constant tax hikes.

Posted by: Plumber | March 4, 2010, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

The biggest premium hikes are in Massachusetts which has government run health care.

Posted by: Plumber | March 4, 2010, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

He’s unpopular, doesn’t know how to reach out across the aisle and compromise to reach a solution.
How the hell will he govern when he has to deal with Republicans in the House and Senate?
You think it gets easier after this passes? We’ll be paying for years before we even get anything back. And what we are proposed to get back, the majority of the American people don’t even want! 80 percent of people are happy with their health care, this is destroying the system to cover the last 20 percent, which consist of young people who don’t get sick, and illegal immigrants who are living off the subsidies provided by the dwindling taxpayer class. (Which ironically doesn’t include members of THIS administration!)
Obama will either learn the lession of Bill Clinton and be rewarded with a 2nd term, or he will go the way of Jimmy Carter, and be drummed out of office after a long, hard, slog, of four miserable years…
If this is his choice, he has made the wrong one. Maybe this is what Bill was trying to warn us about in the primary, ya THINK!!!

Posted by: jafo | March 4, 2010, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

I could afford the constant premium hikes if I didn’t have to pay the constant tax hikes.
Posted by: Plumber | Mar 4, 2010 2:33:30 PM
__________________________________
What ‘constant tax hikes’?

Posted by: tierra | March 4, 2010, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Call, don’t email. Give them your zip code. And if you’re in favor of health care reform and you’re rep is a Dem, assure the rep’s intern you’ll pressure the Senate to pass the fixes as well.
Posted by: progressive mama
—————————————-
and if you are AGAINST this sham of a bill CALL and raise HOLY HECK.. Tell them we are voting you out
Howard Dean: Health bill hangs Dem incumbents and Obama out to dry in elections…
LMAO Yeppers.. Thanks MR DEAN
Obama VS America

Posted by: another crisis-another photo op | March 4, 2010, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

How long have we been listening to the same old gripes and complaints, only to have elections in which even a THIRD party is totally rejected.
Posted by: Shoe | Mar 4, 2010 2:20:01 PM
True– I think the problem there is a third party tends to divide one of the power parties more than the other, so folks, understandably, don’t go there. But what if there was a bigger market– both parties got divided at the same time.
I know it likely won’t happen in my lifetime, or till I’m an old, old woman. But I’ll keep pushing. Power and wealth tend to accumulate and corrupt and cronyism and everything we hate sets in. Enough.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 4, 2010, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

Obama VS America
Posted by: another crisis-another photo op | Mar 4, 2010 2:38:28 PM
___________________________________
Republicans trying to get re-elected at any cost to America by demonizing the Democrats and the President.
Same sleazy tactics.
Back to the days of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and the rest of the liars . ..
Back to the ‘good old days’ of ‘fiscal responsibility’ . .

Posted by: tierra | March 4, 2010, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

You’d think the president wouldn’t meet with lobbies without transparency. I wonder what they talked about?
______
I agree. I think the difference between me and those who didn’t vote for Obama is that I can see that steps have been taken that make it better– not good enough– but better. And he acknowledged the mistake. I wrote to him after the Pharma meeting and called my rep. But as Tierra points out, the Republicans don’t offer transparency. They don’t pretend its on the table.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 4, 2010, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Get your friends, call the local media, and go to your local congrssional office to tell them you are part of the 2/3 majoity (per the average of recent polls) that does not want this healthcare bill, since most of us don’t have the luxury to go to Washington.

Posted by: bonbud | March 4, 2010, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Every one of us is just one major health issue away from bankruptcy. Don’t believe it? Just look at your insurance policy, is it 80%-20% with a high deductible, with set maximum benefits paid. Any number of illness’s that put you into constant care in a major hospital can bankrupt you in less than 8 months.
Say you recover from that heart attack, think your insurance won’t say you now have an existing condition and won’t cover the next one.
The insurance companies are making up the rules as they go and you can believe, they win, you loose.

Posted by: indymind | March 4, 2010, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

They don’t pretend its on the table.

Hmmm. That sounded like I think Obama pretends. I think he means it. I’m not sure everyone in the admin means it quite as much as he does– and it may have turned out to be a little more difficult than it sounds on the campaign trail.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 4, 2010, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Have you heard the latest joke from the White House? We’re getting the biggest tax cut in history! Does that follow the largest tax increase in history whe the 2002-2003 tax cuts expire?

Posted by: bonbud | March 4, 2010, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Every one of us is just one major health issue away from bankruptcy. Don’t believe it
_______
I believe it.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 4, 2010, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

***The healthcare system is broken. I don’t think the Democrats plan is a good one, but something needs to be done. The republicans think’s the system is just fine, they need to wakeup and join the debate.
Posted by: Debt | Mar 4, 2010 2:20:53 PM***
Patient Choice Act of 2009(S. 1099).
If anyone honestly believes that Republicans have no ideas about health care reform, or they think that they don’t think there is a problem then they either having been paying attention for the last, or they are choosing to ignore their proposals because it doesn’t suit them to acknowledge the truth.
You can find the full text of the bill at the Libriary of Congress website. Its quite detailed.

Posted by: bobtherepublican | March 4, 2010, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

From the New York Post:
Oh, the irony.
After claiming that she would preside over the “most ethical Congress in history,” Nancy Pelosi is instead presiding over the same kind of shenanigans that cost Republicans their majority in 2006.
Yesterday, iconic Harlem Congressman and key Pelosi lieutenant Charles Rangel was forced to resign his chairmanship of the House Ways and Means Committee after he was reprimanded by the Ethics Committee for travel to the Caribbean.
Later in the day, one-term New York Congressman Eric Massa, a fellow Democrat, announced he would not be seeking re-election, though he claimed it was completely unrelated to charges that he made a sexual advances on a male aide.
LMAO
Obama VS America

Posted by: another crisis-another photo op | March 4, 2010, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Yeah, I’m sure these insurance companies are going to listen to him. Is this a joke?
Obama needs to enforce anti-trust laws to break up these big health insurance companies who have a monopoly on the market. That’s how you keep prices in check.

Posted by: Bubbles | March 4, 2010, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

Obama’s moves towards transparency and booting out of lobbyists may not be perfect but it is many, many steps in the right direction.
Posted by: tierra | Mar 4, 2010 2:24:19 PM
I agree (gasp!).
I hope they use good judgment however and don’t just sweep through the lobbyist system so that real expertise really helping these advisory committees isn’t compromised and they lose their effectiveness.
And since it is Obama taking this action, I’m afraid I have to look closely at the motivation and the track the results.
Changing your eating habits for the long-term always works better than a crash diet.

Posted by: For the Record | March 4, 2010, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Posted by: bobtherepublican | Mar 4, 2010 2:47:40 PM
The problem with that bill, Bob, is the Republican caucus doesn’t back it. You can look up conservative criticisms. So, first, you’d have to call your Republican senators and congress persons and drum up some support.
The House plan that received backing was not the Ryan-Coburn bill– it was a joke mocked by the American Spectator, for crying out loud.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 4, 2010, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

What ‘constant tax hikes’?
Posted by: tierra | Mar 4, 2010 2:35:58 PM
You know, they can never ever point to actual tax hikes (because they haven’t had any!)
Low information voters– it would be really funny if it wasn’t so agitating.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 4, 2010, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

How odd that goverment will fault a business for raising it’s rates when it needs more revenue, yet goverment has no problem increasing our taxes for the same reason!
At least with a business you have a choice to buy from them or not!
This seems another case of goverment saying “do as I say, not as I do”……

Posted by: Heather | March 4, 2010, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

the health insurance industry, with an average profit margin of 3.3 percent, is the 86th most profitable industry.
As the Washington Post’s Ezra Klein notes, that’s a lower margin of profit than many other players in health care, such as the pharmaceutical industry (16.5 percent), “health information services (9.3 percent), home health care (8.4 percent), medical labs and research (8.2 percent), medical instruments and supplies (6.8 percent), biotech firms (6.7 percent), and generic drug manufacturers (6.6 percent).”
__________________________
Is this supposed to show him fighting for the little guy so much show did someone with a white coat walk in behind him?? Rate increases like that are very hard and real but get real. Please right now who has the White House made the backroom deal with? Big Pharma (at 16.5 profits they top the list of big profiteers WITH INSURERS AT THE BOTTOM WITH 3.3). It’s like a bully picking a fight with the smallest kid. Seriously and what is in this “healthcare reform” to address the costs for big pharma, health info, home health, labs, instruments/supplies, more pharma -nothing nada zip. This is not a health reform bill it it a health insurance expansion with US taxpayers picking up the even bigger price tag.

Posted by: obieone40 | March 4, 2010, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Changing your eating habits for the long-term always works better than a crash diet.
Posted by: For the Record | Mar 4, 2010 2:51:23 PM
Is this an imposter? You’re so agreeable today :^) I like it.
And I like the thing about the crash diet.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 4, 2010, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

jafo Said: “How the hell will he govern when he has to deal with Republicans in the House and Senate?”
=====================================
LOL! …. jafo, here’s a better question:
According to Medical News Today, Health Insurance Premiums increased 76% between 2000 and 2006, when we had a republican president and republican majorities in the senate and house of representatives. THIS PROBLEM DID NOT START YESTERDAY! Here’s my question… “Why didn’t the republicans do anything about the rapidly rising health care cost/insurance premiums during those years when they had the opportunity to do so?”
You’re a fool if you really think that voting republican is going to solve this crisis… they love the system, just the way it is, with 20%++ inflation each year on health insurance premiums! LOL.

Posted by: GeorgieBushie | March 4, 2010, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

: tierra | Mar 4, 2010 2:54:…..The pot calling the kettle black?

Posted by: bonbud | March 4, 2010, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

another crisis-another photo op | Mar 4, 2010 2:57:49 PM……The same honesty as CSPAN in the healthcare negotiations, I won’t raise your taxes 1 penny if you makes less than $250K, ad infinitum)?! That’s the source.

Posted by: bonbud | March 4, 2010, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

OBAMA VS America
HYPOCRISY!
Posted by: another crisis-another photo op | Mar 4, 2010 3:06:57 PM
____________________________________
Yes, setting this up as Obama vs. America is hypocrisy – and just plain sleazy Rove Republican tactics.
The Republicans have no interest in ethics or the decency in the country – their only interest is getting re-elected.
Republicans: Party and Sleaze First. Decency and Country Last.

Posted by: tierra | March 4, 2010, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

I had to laugh. Obama has to break up the monopoly that ALL these insurance companies have on the market.
Isn’t a monopoly when there is only one company?
Yeah, we got to break up the monopoly held by all these insurance companies! And then replace that with a single payer system, to avoid a monopoly!
Nothing like going from several payers to one payer to avoid that monopoly!
What we need is a drug company to come up with a treatment for whatever mental illness some liberals seem to have!

Posted by: Heather | March 4, 2010, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

Yeah, we got to break up the monopoly held by all these insurance companies! And then replace that with a single payer system, to avoid a monopoly!
Posted by: Heather | Mar 4, 2010 3:15:52 PM
_______________________________________
Heather who is proposing a single payer system? Which bill is this in?

Posted by: tierra | March 4, 2010, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

The use of these personal letters is just so lame. You know your argument sucks when you have to turn to such juvenile political tactics and argue on emotion instead of fact. Instead of answering why the numbers for this bill may be misleading because there are six years of outlays and ten years of receipts or addressing that CBO can only use the numbers that the congressmen and bills give them and cannot point out this fact, the Democrats and the President screech about a lady wearing her dead sister’s teeth, and then get mad when Cantor brings in a political prop. Message to the President, the letters are political props. They don’t add to the discussion. No one is saying that there aren’t health care problems. We’re just disagreeing on the method of solving the problem and pointing out that your plan has so many financial holes, it’s laughable.

Posted by: Aaron | March 4, 2010, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

when President Obama was a Senator, he criticized the use of the reconciliation process in health care reform.
Posted by: another crisis-another photo op | Mar 4, 2010 3:19:25 PM
__________________________________
Nonsense. Obama was pointing out it would be difficult to pass health care reform with 50 + 1 – and that it would be easier to get a bill in front of the President with a full 60 seats. He thought it might take 60 seats to do it – he did not say it was wrong to do it with less!

Posted by: tierra | March 4, 2010, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

Pretty soon Obama can just fire these execs like he did GM. And you wonder why people are labeling him a socialist? Nationalizing industries for the ‘good of the people’ is Socialism. Obama should have taken a cue from the Fabian society.
The whole House Progressive Caucus is supported by the DSA (Democratic Socialists of America). And PES just LOVES Obama.
Go to their websites and read how much they love Obama, Nancy, and most certainly Waxman.

Posted by: Denbo | March 4, 2010, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Heather Said: “Yeah, we got to break up the monopoly held by all these insurance companies! And then replace that with a single payer system, to avoid a monopoly!”
=======================================
LMAO! “single payer” isn’t even in the current proposals (senate nor house)… it was dropped from the senate and house bills about 6 months ago!
Geeze, can’t the right-whiners keep up with what’s going on with this legislation? Or, is Fox News not keeping you informed?

Posted by: GeorgieBushie | March 4, 2010, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

Pretty soon Obama can just fire these execs like he did GM.
____________________________________
Says who? What your imagination makes up – and reality are two different things.
Stick to facts and reality.

Posted by: tierra | March 4, 2010, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

Yeah, we got to break up the monopoly held by all these insurance companies! And then replace that with a single payer system, to avoid a monopoly!
Posted by: Heather | Mar 4, 2010 3:15:52 PM
_______________________________________
Heather who is proposing a single payer system? Which bill is this in?
Posted by: tierra | Mar 4, 2010 3:18:50 PM
As you are (I’m sure) well aware, the President is on record saying he wants a single payer system. So for HIM to say this is quite hypocritical when he wants to replace one ‘so-called’ monopoly (which it is not) for a definite govt run monopoly.
Just another reason why we can’t trust what he says. For him to call thousands of individual companies a monopoly is laughable and best and sinister at worst.

Posted by: For the Record | March 4, 2010, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

LMAO! “single payer” isn’t even in the current proposals (senate nor house)… it was dropped from the senate and house bills about 6 months ago!
Geeze, can’t the right-whiners keep up with what’s going on with this legislation? Or, is Fox News not keeping you informed?
Posted by: GeorgieBushie | Mar 4, 2010 3:29:06 PM
__________________________________
The Republican right has little to do with facts or reality – it’s more like religious cult. Creepy.

Posted by: tierra | March 4, 2010, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

You know your argument sucks when you have to turn to such juvenile political tactics and argue on emotion instead of fact.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 4, 2010, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

LMAO! “single payer” isn’t even in the current proposals (senate nor house)… it was dropped from the senate and house bills about 6 months ago!
Geeze, can’t the right-whiners keep up with what’s going on with this legislation? Or, is Fox News not keeping you informed?
Posted by: GeorgieBushie | Mar 4, 2010 3:29:06 PM
You need to think beyond the obvious and actually analyze the comment.
For Obama to call thousands of individual companies a monopoly is laughable and best and sinister propaganda at worst. This sounds like something Hugo Chavez would say. The President is on record saying he wants a single payer system. Heather’s comment is appropriate and shows she’s actually using her brain.

Posted by: For the Record | March 4, 2010, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Nonsense. Obama was pointing out it would be difficult to pass health care reform with 50 + 1 – and that it would be easier to get a bill in front of the President with a full 60 seats. He thought it might take 60 seats to do it – he did not say it was wrong to do it with less!
Posted by: tierra
—————————————-
LMAO Tierra call Katie Couric and tell her she is a LIAR LMAO…the left will love ya for it.
Obama VS America

Posted by: another crisis-another photo op | March 4, 2010, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

“Pretty soon Obama can just fire these execs like he did GM.”
After Tenn. Republican Sen. Bob Corker’s “let the Big Three go bankrupt” comment, it’s not surprising how that little Michigan/Tennessee plant closing was resolved. The Spring Hill Tenn plant was closed down and (surprise) was merged with the plant in Michigan.

Posted by: For the Record | March 4, 2010, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

You need to think beyond the obvious and actually analyze the comment.
___________________________________
By ‘think beyond the obvious’ you mean ignore the fact somebody is incorrectly talking about a single payer system.
p.s – you’ve heard about concerns about the need for anti-trust legislation regarding health care insurance?

Posted by: tierra | March 4, 2010, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

This is the pot calling the kettle black.
You want to see run away money, look
in the mirror you tone deaf politicians
in Washington !!! Can they not see the
folly in their own words. Can they be
this stupid or do they think the public
is stupid???? This bunch is unbelievable.
I would not trust them running a lemonade
stand, much less the health care system.
They are not experts in anything except
lining their own pockets.

Posted by: wis134 | March 4, 2010, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

LMAO Tierra call Katie Couric and tell her she is a LIAR
___________________________________
No, I’m calling your right wing sources liars and distorters of truth – and I would not trust them to accurately represent anyone’s words.

Posted by: tierra | March 4, 2010, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

Obama was pointing out it would be difficult to pass health care reform with 50 + 1 – and that it would be easier to get a bill in front of the President with a full 60 seats. He thought it might take 60 seats to do it – he did not say it was wrong to do it with less!
Posted by: tierra | Mar 4, 2010 3:24:36 PM
Just get this in your Inbox? It’s good spin.

Posted by: For the Record | March 4, 2010, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

Jake just put Gibbs and Obama in their place.. Go to the q&a blog….lmao
Obama VS America

Posted by: another crisis-another photo op | March 4, 2010, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

For The Record Said: “The President is on record saying he wants a single payer system. Heather’s comment is appropriate and shows she’s actually using her brain.”
=======================================
LMAO!…. but those who understand how congressional bills become laws understand that it doesn’t matter how much the President “wants” a single payer system, there is not a majority in the congress that will support it (including many Democrats)… therefore it was taken out of the “EXISTING” versions of the bills.
LOL… yeah, “using her brain”… LOL…more like “wasting brain cells” worrying about something that is no longer even being proposed… sort of like worrying about “death panels”, and “birth certificates”… you know, those little things that cause right-whiners to lose sleep over at night…hehehe!

Posted by: GeorgieBushie | March 4, 2010, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

No, I’m calling your right wing sources liars and distorters of truth – and I would not trust them to accurately represent anyone’s words.
Posted by: tierra
—————————————-
Katie Couric a right winger? LMAO this little guy has lost it

Posted by: another crisis-another photo op | March 4, 2010, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

No, I’m calling your right wing sources liars and distorters of truth – and I would not trust them to accurately represent anyone’s words.
Posted by: tierra
—————————————-
Katie Couric a right winger? LMAO this little guy has lost it
Posted by: another crisis-another photo op | Mar 4, 2010 3:47:58 PM
_____________________________________
newsbusters – right wingers.

Posted by: tierra | March 4, 2010, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

Which is why the RNC relies on exploiting the fear of their donors, right? progressive mama>>>>>
WOW this is sad. CRISIS CRISIS The economy is going to melt down. I NEED Billions to BLOW. WORST Crisis since the great depression.. ETC.
The Bush TARP was a loan and was paid BACK. NOW subtract that from BUSH spending how large was his deficit again?
And the economy was recovering before OBAMA got $1.
Health care is so bad people are dying in the street is that true? In American you can go to an ER and get treated even if you cant pay. We have free clinics. IS THIS a CRISIS? Its not GOOD its too expensive but does this BILL address cost? HMMM???
LOL YOU FOOLS.
OBAMA’s response I will ruin health care for the 90% of America that has health care and TAX you to death to get it cause I love a tax and spend policy.
The Senate BILL has 10 years of taxes with only 6 years of spending HOW is that an accurate measure on how this wont impact the deficit?
WHERE IS THE OBAMA BILL that the CBO has run the numbers on? Anyone? WHERE IS THE IMAGINARY BILL AT?
Thats OBAMA transparency all lies.
GOD, lies lies and more lies. Obama needs to go have another smoke and I don’t think its cigarettes he is smoking.

Posted by: ChicagoBob | March 4, 2010, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

The President is on record saying he wants a single payer system. Heather’s comment is appropriate and shows she’s actually using her brain.
Posted by: For the Record | Mar 4, 2010 3:36:10 PM
Actually, that is an inaccurate statement. The president is on record saying that if he were to start from scratch he’d go with single payer. He likes the idea, more or less, but doesn’t think its politically feasible, and he’s right.
Heather basically thinks a higher average IQ is a mental illness (see her comments about liberals)

Posted by: progressive mama | March 4, 2010, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

Posted by: For the Record | Mar 4, 2010 2:51:23 PM
Is this an imposter?
Posted by: progressive mama | Mar 4, 2010 3:01:06 PM
No it’s really me. Undue lobbying influence is something I hate. It’s gone way beyond what the original intent was. But as I said, I think that lobbyists can do the legwork and provide expertise in a a complicated world. I just hate the “agenda” and “influence” part.

Posted by: For the Record | March 4, 2010, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

ONE MORE THOUGHT. This coming from OBAMA who has never made an honest dollar in his entire life. WHERE is his work record? When has OBAMA built and created a product and sold it to people? When has he had to make payroll? When has he done anything that is totally dependent on the consumer and the market, you know the REAL WORLD. Instead he treats HONEST people who are playing by the RULES that the US government have given them as EVIL.
WHAT?? Obama is the EVIL one here. LEAVE the safety of you WHITE Palace and go out and scrape out an HONEST living. WE voted in a complete FOOL.

Posted by: ChicagoBob | March 4, 2010, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

Posted by: ChicagoBob | Mar 4, 2010 3:50:57 PM
I think I’ll stick with the CBO and a broad consensus of economists in regards to the need for TARP, the stimulus and health care reform.
But that was…er… interesting??

Posted by: progressive mama | March 4, 2010, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

“”"”"Stick to facts and reality.”"”"”
Posted by: tierra
Fact: Our government asked him to resign. Reality: He did.

Posted by: lfrichar | March 4, 2010, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

ChicagoBob Said: “NOW subtract that from BUSH spending how large was his deficit again?”
======================================
LMAO! Just the fact that you use the singular form of “deficit”, and not the plural “deficits”, shows your lack of research!
OK Right-Whiner Bob…. homework assignment… what were the Bush deficit”S” for 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, AND 2009?
Oh, and by the way, yes, I did include the 2009 budget because it was the outgoing Bush White House (Office of Management and Budget) that prepared the Fiscal Year 2009 budget for the incoming Obama administration…. but you probably wouldn’t even understand why that happens since you clearly don’t understand anything about how the federal budgeting system works…. LOL… “deficit” (singular)… hehehe.

Posted by: GeorgieBushie | March 4, 2010, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

ChicagoBob Said: “This coming from OBAMA who has never made an honest dollar in his entire life. WHERE is his work record?”
=======================================
LMAO! …. let’s see, graduate of Harvard Law School… which means he at least has 7 years of college.
Sure is a lot more than you did in your lifetime Bob… at least he completed “some” college, not just high school… hehehehe!

Posted by: GeorgieBushie | March 4, 2010, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

And I am tired of liability insurance not paying for getting rear ended . I think physicians errors and ommissions insurance should pay up on credit default swaps . Banks should not be able to discriminate against people with preexisting bad credit and no cash down .

Posted by: nat turner | March 4, 2010, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

let’s see, graduate of Harvard Law School… which means he at least has 7 years of college. GeorgieBushie >>>>>GEE some peoples kids but what do you expect from democrats.
Where was his corporate experience?
When did he have to hire fire manage
people? Who around him actually meets a payroll? You know pay people by what you make and sell. NOT the artifical I can borrow anything payroll, but a REAL payroll.
Harvard.. GOD that school should be closed after the genius’s from Wall Street that went there almost sank the entire country. Going to a good school dont give you a lick of common sense ya know nor does it make you a decent person. And Obama may be a decent person but common sense is something he sure dont have.
The people have rejected this in the best way the knew how. BUT Obama is either EVIL or has not sense. WE the people know that this massive BILL is the WRONG bill and the wrong way to reduce costs. 10 years of taxes doesnt seem like an honest measure for 6 years of spending does it?

Posted by: ChicagoBob | March 4, 2010, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

LMAO GeorgieBushie what does 7 years of college have to do with a work record? You remind me of Bluto in “Animal House”!Secondary education is not work experience-although the parents may have to work like dogs to support the students.Barack Obama was an affirmative action admission to Harvard Law,pure and simple.He was never offered a job with a top law firm, he has never met a payroll and he essentially lived off his wife’s salary from another affirmative action job.

Posted by: Nephron | March 4, 2010, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

OK Right-Whiner Bob…. homework assignment… what were the Bush deficit”S” for 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, AND 2009?
GeorgieBushie>>> LESS than the stimulus and bailouts of OBAMA. Yes BORROW and ruin our childrens future for your greed and selfish life style is what you are about. SELFISH democrats. FOR your comfort and to deny your children the opportunites that his nation has to offer you are trying to RAM this DEBT up our backsides. WHERE is your fiscal responsibility?
WHERE is unemployment since Obama has taken over? IN THE TANK.
30 MILLION people unemployed loosing homes and all this GOOF talks about is SPENDING another TRILLION for health care? What does it matter to those on the street. HE FIDDLES for his EGO while people loose their homes. THIS OBAMA is pure self centered ego.

Posted by: ChicagoBob | March 4, 2010, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

You people who cant get over bushie have issues.
Take your tin foil hat off for a while and look hard at whats going on NOW.
NOW we have 60 MILLION underemployed. DOES that sound like a CRISIS to you? Maybe a crisis more important that health care? EH? What is Obama doing? Protecting Wall Street every chance he and Timmy get. AND.. He is giving the bankers YOUR HOMES. Yes you loose your home and who wins? The bank.. THEY GET HUGE sums of your equity. Remember all that money you paid for a down payment and interest? THEY GET IT ALL.. WHY are you lossing your JOBS and your HOME? Because Obama wants his EGO stroked by passing whats important to him even though the American people DONT WANT it in POLL after POLL after POLL.
The Obama Health care disaster is unwanted.
Obama does not know how to build anything. All he has a string of failures under his belt and a huge EGO.
HE NEEDS HELP! Maybe he should stop smoking medical pot.

Posted by: ChicagoBob | March 4, 2010, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

“”"”"Obviously you just do not like Obama period….or you have no respect for higher education period!”"”"”
Posted by: stop being so selfish
Ever heard of being “book smart”? That’s what Obama is.What do you consider “higher education”? A masters degree? Obama studied constitutional law and this bill infringes on the constitution if we are forced to pay for private insurance.

Posted by: lfrichar | March 4, 2010, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

WHO RAN CONGRESS for the last three years? Democrats. Who voted for everyone of those budgets BUSH put out there Obama and the democrats. Who voted for TARP? Pelosi Obama Ried and the democrats after adding 80 billion in PORK. SO.. you ask about deficits and Bush? ROFL.. Democrats they are so funny.

Posted by: ChicagoBob | March 4, 2010, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

I still believe it would be a lot easier to expand medicare to severely under/un employed and people who have severe diseases and pre-existings.. make sure children under 16 have access to medical care without a lot of questions asked at all.. from a superfund.. and make health insurers a regulated industry..as well as larger hospital groups. Also.. people over 50 should be slowly taken off of private insurance and onto medicare. Soda, snack and sin taxes should be used to pay for a large portion.

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | March 4, 2010, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

stop being so selfish-have you ever applied to a professional school?I have great respect for higher education,just not for individuals who need “special help” to get in.Prove me wrong-why is Corpseman Obama afraid to release his transcripts? Why couldn’t he cut it at Occidental?What were his LSAT results?Where are his legal publications?Why couldn’t he renew his Illinois law license?These are easy questions for a bona fide scholar,but not for a sham.

Posted by: Nephron | March 4, 2010, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

“I happen to be a proponent of a single payer universal health care program.” obieone40 >>>> Let me run some history behind you. Did you know that we are famous graft corruption and loss of tax money? During Johnson and Carter and Regan there were measurments on HOW much money of every dollar you sent to Washington that was allocated for a program actually got to the program. It was less than 50cents on the dollar. A side note democrats ran everything then too. THIS historical fact is why I am against government running anything but our national defense and some minor programs.
The corruption is too easy, ask Charlie Ragel and a long list of others.
Should the protection of the insurance companies be lifted? YES. Should the meidical companies have a new way to get reimbursed for experiemental drug loses? Yes. TORT reform YES we need it.
POOLING to force people to compete? YES. Common medical record format to reduce costs? YES. Portable health care? YES.
Cant be dropped after X days of getting hhealth care yes.
ALL THESE THINGS dont need to be in a Huge bill nor do they need to be lumped together.
Fact Medicaid and Medicare is BROKE and nis now forced to reduce payments which is forcing doctors to drop those patients. WHY are doctors costs so high? Lawyers, staff, equipment and education. ALL expensive. Its an expensive business. WE DONT even have enough doctors do we? Is there anything here in this bill to help that?
There are so many things that are WRONG with the democrats but democrats are deaf. The proof of this is their desire to RAN this bill against the WILL of the American people.

Posted by: ChicagoBob | March 4, 2010, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Anyone with half a brain is aware that insurance companies are regulated to death by the states. They tell them what to cover and how long, they cant raise rates one dime without state approval.
Where is the outrage about state universities raising rates anywhere from 33% to 77%.

Posted by: Duane | March 4, 2010, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

I would be embarassed if I still called myself an Obama supporter. This guy has been in a downward spiral since the day he took office and I just dont know how much lower he can go before crashing. I almost feel sorry for him but hey, he brought it on himself.

Posted by: Billy Bob | March 4, 2010, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

What evidence is there that Corpseman Obama is “book smart”?Would someone please give me objective evidence that Obama has a superior intellect-something beside repeating talking points with no basis in fact.

Posted by: Nephron | March 4, 2010, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

Posted by: obieone40 | Mar 4, 2010 4:51:23 PM
And since 2003, he’s acknowledged that while he likes single payer, and would implement single payer if starting from scratch, its not politically feasible– and he’s right. You can also find quotes and clips that back me up on that.
The bill on the table is not single payer. In fact, Republicans played tricks with Bernie Sanders’ single payer amendment wasn’t even voted on. Nor is the public option in the bill.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 4, 2010, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

The proof of this is their desire to RAN this bill against the WILL of the American people.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | Mar 4, 2010 5:02:41 PM***********************Speak for yourself!!! I as an American want this bill(although imperfect) for me and my employees and many other Americans want this bill! I want the insurance companies to sweat! I would like the public option so there could be some competition. When there is competition in business, thats when the real customer service comes out….let see the insurance companines “serve” the American people…not the other way around. Besides there would be a greater demand for doctors, healthcare professionals and more jobs!

Posted by: stop being so selfish | March 4, 2010, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

I think I’ll stick with the CBO and a broad consensus of economists in regards to the need for TARP, the stimulus and health care reform. progressive mama<<<<< Define health care reform. Does that require a take over of the industry? Does that mean we increase our debt a TRILLION dollars so our dollar becomes junk currency? DEFINE reform and you will see that the PRESIDENTS version IS insulting to those with a lick of common sense. Harvard economists.. My god many of them graduated and went to Wall Street didnt they? ROFL.. They should burn that school down for the misery its caused the nation.

Posted by: ChicagoBob | March 4, 2010, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

I would be embarassed if I still called myself an Obama supporter.
____________
Since you apologize and vote for the GOP that really has very little credibility. Who cares?
Its more embarrassing that the GOP still is taken seriously by anyone who lived through the past decade.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 4, 2010, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

Speak for yourself!!! I want the insurance companies to sweat!
stop being so selfish>>>>> WHAT makes you think they are going to sweat? There is no premimum reduction in this bill. Obama is going to FORCE people to buy their product. The insurance companies are laughing at you. They are going to raise their premiums and say JUMP and you will have to say how high because I have to BUY insurance.
Happy now?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>Besides there would be a greater demand for doctors, healthcare
professionals and more jobs!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
WHO is going to want to be a doctor when you will get BEAT up by Obama on what you can make? BEING a GOOD doctor is VERY hard work. In fact they could make more money on Wall Street ripping you off as many of Obama’s and Timmys Harvard friends are doing right now.
So You think about WHY get under paid and beat up to WORK very hard and learn massive amounts of information and stay current and BE THREATENED by lawsuits to become a doctor?
YOUR desire for something or nothing is sad.

Posted by: ChicagoBob | March 4, 2010, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

The credibility of the GOP is that they kept this country safe after 9/11-the current administration is hell-bent on removing those policies that kept us safe.

Posted by: Nephron | March 4, 2010, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

stop being so selfish-have you ever applied to a professional school?I have great respect for higher education,just not for individuals who need “special help” to get in.Prove me wrong-why is Corpseman Obama afraid to release his transcripts? Why couldn’t he cut it at Occidental?What were his LSAT results?Where are his legal publications?Why couldn’t he renew his Illinois law license?These are easy questions for a bona fide scholar,but not for a sham.
Posted by: Nephron | Mar 4, 2010 5:00:28 PM***************Yes I have so that is why I made my statement to you. Since when in this atmosphere is okay to look down on someone who has advance degrees….it is hard work! That aside I just think you dont like him and that is fine but dont discredit the truth. That is the problem! YOu notice none of this has become a major issue for the republican “mature”party because it is rumors and your attacking him based on YOUR EMOTIONS. Most Americans want to know what solutions are you providing, how are you going to fix the current problems, what are your ideas. Personal attacks are just high school jargon with no real teeth. As a result…..he still was elected!

Posted by: stop being so selfish | March 4, 2010, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

Define health care reform. Does that require a take over of the industry? Does that mean we increase our debt a TRILLION dollars so our dollar becomes junk currency?

No, and no, and neither does the plan that will be enacted by the Senate and Congress. You clearly haven’t read the CBO or health economists’ analyses– and if you typically vote Republican you don’t have any economic or fiscal responsibility cred, imho– but given free speech, you certainly have the right to whine and howl.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 4, 2010, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

Its more embarrassing that the GOP still is taken seriously by anyone who lived through the past decade.
Posted by: progressive mama
Actually the last decade has been very good to most folks, its the last two years that have gotten bad. Now let me think, who has been in control of the purse strings for the last three years, democrats.

Posted by: Billy Bob | March 4, 2010, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

“”"”"Obviously you just do not like Obama period….or you have no respect for higher education period!”"”"”
Posted by: stop being so selfish
Ever heard of being “book smart”? That’s what Obama is.What do you consider “higher education”? A masters degree? Obama studied constitutional law and this bill infringes on the constitution if we are forced to pay for private insurance.
Posted by: lfrichar | Mar 4, 2010 4:51:10 PM************************UMMMM YOu have been paying for medicaid, social security, welfare benefits, va benefits….the list goes on…..I dont buy the “constitutional argument” because at age 65….YOU will be looking forward to those benefits!

Posted by: stop being so selfish | March 4, 2010, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Its more embarrassing that the GOP still is taken seriously by anyone who lived through the past decade.
progressive mama <<<<< SPOKEN like a true Koolaid drinker. I live in Chicago. I have seen demonrats and their poltical games. You talk about corruption and pay offs. I guess thats the kind of government you want. You know the best you can afford while the people suffer. IL is about last in everything and the honest folks pay a HIGH price for it all. WE are on the brink of bankruptcy and who runs our fair state? DEMOCRATS. Indiana right next door is run by republicans and DOING WELL. THEY have common sense. YOU DONT spend 24×7 because some day the rain will come. And Indiana hasnt. THEY were prudent and are now laughing at us in IL.
IL we pay high prices for teachers and rank very low in results.. WOW we are proud.. We are democrat controled. We have been the murder capitol of America. Thank you democrats. We have holes in our streets and now in the soles of shoes. Businesses are leaving because of high taxes. Thank you democrats. People are leaving.. Thank you democrats. We have doctors leaving because of the LAWYERs suing them all. Thank you democrats. We have massive corruption. Thank you democrats.

Posted by: ChicagoBob | March 4, 2010, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

“”"Speak for yourself!!! I as an American want this bill(although imperfect) for me and my employees and many other Americans want this bill!”"”
Posted by: stop being so selfish
I really get a kick out of you saying “speak for yourself” and right behind that you speak for “many Americans”, quite hypocritical. While you may enjoy the majority 51-49 option, we enjoy the simple majority of Americans AGAINST THIS BILL in every poll you see. So, are the majority of Americans selfish or do they understand this bill is wasting more money? I’ll go with the latter.

Posted by: lfrichar | March 4, 2010, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

“”"”"Obviously you just do not like Obama period….or you have no respect for higher education period!”"”"”
Posted by: stop being so selfish
Higher education gives a person enough knowledge to be dangerous. Experience is what counts.

Posted by: Billy Bob | March 4, 2010, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

WE the people know that this massive BILL is the WRONG bill and the wrong way to reduce costs. 10 years of taxes doesnt seem like an honest measure for 6 years of spending does it?
Posted by: ChicagoBob | Mar 4, 2010 4:33:16 PM******************************I didnt know you are the spokesperson of “we the people”! “We the people” elected him by the majority…..”we the people” still gives him a an approval on the war, “we the people” support measures in the break down of the health bill, and “we the people” look forward to the small business loans program, modifications program with the bank, etc. So are you the spokesperson of who????

Posted by: stop being so selfish | March 4, 2010, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

What professional school?Were you accepted?What undergraduate degree do you have?If you have gone through the process,you almost certainly seen someone like Obama with zero pre-admission credentials

Posted by: Nephron | March 4, 2010, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

You clearly haven’t read the CBO or health economists’ analyses– and if you typically vote Republican you don’t have any economic or fiscal responsibility cred, imho progressive mama<<<<<< lets see how to respond. You know they are juding this on 10 years of taxes against 6 years of spending correct?

Posted by: ChicagoBob | March 4, 2010, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Actually the last decade has been very good to most folks,
____
Oh, sure. Not just okay, but “very good.” That’s why there was a two term income decline, real wages have declined steadily since 1982, the number of uninsureds increased, medical inflation continues to skyrocket, poverty has increased, the stock market performance was mediocre, the gap between the wealthy and the poor has increased, jobs were shipped overseas, lives were lost in an unnecessary war, small businesses were squeezed, the housing bubble burst and so on…
But as long as YOU were doing okay, why think about anyone else, right? Let’s just exaggerate and call it “very good” because otherwise you might have to admit the GOP has no credibility. Just keep kicking chronic problems down the road and applying magical thinking to the real world.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 4, 2010, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

“”"”"UMMMM YOu have been paying for medicaid, social security, welfare benefits, va benefits….the list goes on…..I dont buy the “constitutional argument” because at age 65….YOU will be looking forward to those benefits!”"”"
Posted by: stop being so selfish
I am off for a beer, but first. And listen closely: when the government FORCES me to pay taxes to cover the above mentioned program IT IS NO LONGER A BENEFIT. My expectation is they manage MY MONEY in a manner that I should receive it back in my later years. This is the fundamental difference between us. The money I am giving right now for my future is going to people as a so called “benefit” right now. Call me selfish, but I don’t have the option of not paying, so the government shouldn’t have the option of “MISMANAGEMENT” now should they? The Constitution allows for taxation, not forcing to pay private companies, you need to examine the difference. Good day.

Posted by: lfrichar | March 4, 2010, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

Insurance company profits only 3.3? Executive pay on a par with other similarly sized companies. Democrats seem to need scape goats! Why not have the states set up scared risk pools like they do with auto insurance, for the uninsurable. Get rid of state mandates for health insurance(why must your health insurance cover chiropratic if you don’t plan to use it).Allow competition accross state lines. Allow meds from Canada. SIMPLE SOULUTIONS

Posted by: happyflier | March 4, 2010, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

You people who cant get over bushie have issues.
Take your tin foil hat off for a while and look hard at whats going on NOW.
NOW we have 60 MILLION underemployed. DOES that sound like a CRISIS to you? Maybe a crisis more important that health care? EH? What is Obama doing? Protecting Wall Street every chance he and Timmy get. AND.. He is giving the bankers YOUR HOMES. Yes you loose your home and who wins? The bank.. THEY GET HUGE sums of your equity. Remember all that money you paid for a down payment and interest? THEY GET IT ALL.. WHY are you lossing your JOBS and your HOME? Because Obama wants his EGO stroked by passing whats important to him even though the American people DONT WANT it in POLL after POLL after POLL.
The Obama Health care disaster is unwanted.
Obama does not know how to build anything. All he has a string of failures under his belt and a huge EGO.
HE NEEDS HELP! Maybe he should stop smoking medical pot.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | Mar 4, 2010 4:49:53 PM************************Talking about anger…..take a chill pill. People are loosing their jobs because maybe the companies are scaling back and consumers are buying less….not because of Obama…..the economy is not moving on “fake” debt anymore so it has to slow down and move on “real cash” Seriously what else you want to blame on him the dow jones???

Posted by: stop being so selfish | March 4, 2010, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

I don’t have the option of not paying, so the government shouldn’t have the option of “MISMANAGEMENT” now should they?
_______
Try being totally against war and finding out how money in Iraq was just squandered big time by contractors.
Its sickening.
But I think if we got stuck with an ill-begotten war that the GOP was all into, then the GOP can deal with the health care reform we want. We voted in Dems, and this was a big part of their platform.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 4, 2010, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

But as long as YOU were doing okay, why think about anyone else, right? progressive mama>>>> You know when money was puring into the coffers in 2007, 2008, 2009 and democrats were running the congress I heard no such arguements of fiscal sanity. Did you?
In fact I have heard few fiscally conservative democrats. Maybe when Kenedy was President.. Mmm, no then Johnson came and escalated VIET NAM and messed up the entire world.
The old fight for the working man demcorats are now gone. We are left with the I am for Wall Street Timmy and I am for Goldman Obama. YES the democrats have made new friends and learned they could scare the people into borrow so much debt that the Chinese do not even want our dollar.
THEY are so wise right? SPEND another TRILLION.. You are aware of the CBO estimates are always WAY under the actual cost because the bill handed to them is not the one that pasees right?
Where is the Obama Bill? OH thats right its imaginary so you can make up whatever you want.

Posted by: ChicagoBob | March 4, 2010, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

But as long as YOU were doing okay, why think about anyone else, right? Let’s just exaggerate and call it “very good” because otherwise you might have to admit the GOP has no credibility. Just keep kicking chronic problems down the road and applying magical thinking to the real world.
Posted by: progressive mama
Thanks to the democrats wanting “afforadable housing for all” kind of sounds like “healthcare for all” Fannie and Freddie relaxed their regulations for borrowers and guess what, the housing bubble blew up and burst. Now thanks to the democrats and their spending we have a goverment debt bubble that is going to pop soon. After that happens “healthcare for all” will be a distant memory.

Posted by: Billy Bob | March 4, 2010, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

What professional school?Were you accepted?What undergraduate degree do you have?If you have gone through the process,you almost certainly seen someone like Obama with zero pre-admission credentials
Posted by: Nephron | Mar 4, 2010 5:29:04 PM********************lol…..remember 52% of Americans voted him in so something was desirable about his ideas for the future. Sorry you didnt find them appealing. Undergraduate and masters in sociology with concentration in statics. My business is in social research and now we are concentration on healthcare and healthcare services.

Posted by: stop being so selfish | March 4, 2010, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

ChicagoBob…While your at it why don’t you also tell us about the number of “unemployed”, number of “uninsured”, the number of forclosures due to job losses of the good people of Indiana etc. I am sure of one thing. Since the state is run by Republicans/conseravtives that those numbers are also part of your description of “Indiana doing well”. Republicans/Conservatives have a funny way of defining that term “doing well”, I have found. It always depends if you are one of the “lucky haves”.

Posted by: CND FOX | March 4, 2010, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

And since 2003, he’s acknowledged that while he likes single payer, and would implement single payer if starting from scratch, its not politically feasible– and he’s right. You can also find quotes and clips that back me up on that.
The bill on the table is not single payer.
Posted by: progressive mama | Mar 4, 2010 5:09:10 PM
_____________________________
Yes and if you read my post before I acknowledge that in ’09 they’ve stopped short of having full single payer/public option in the bill because they hit a sort of wall (mod dems). What they do now have is something that moves us there like dominos (of course it’s just as unsustainable and unacceptable as hiking insurance premiums).
This Senate bill moves us much closer to acheiving single payer (based on O’s quotes including any that you’re referencing -I’ve seen most of them) and when someone as far back as ’03 shows how committed they are to single payer you know what they push is going in that direction. I mean he’s got Andy Stern (SEIU) appointed to the economic committee for pete’s sake which is a whole other topic.
Next time pro mama don’t call someone else like Heather stupid just because she doesn’t agree with you.
The facts are there and you can believe that since ’03 Obama has seen the light and really wants some hybrid public private system but that really doesn’t line up with a)what he & his party are pushing and b)where this things is trending based on past uses of these policies in the past.
Another very reasonable interpretation is the one I described and Heather seemed to think so as well.

Posted by: obieone40 | March 4, 2010, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

“”"Speak for yourself!!! I as an American want this bill(although imperfect) for me and my employees and many other Americans want this bill!”"”
Posted by: stop being so selfish
I really get a kick out of you saying “speak for yourself” and right behind that you speak for “many Americans”, quite hypocritical. While you may enjoy the majority 51-49 option, we enjoy the simple majority of Americans AGAINST THIS BILL in every poll you see. So, are the majority of Americans selfish or do they understand this bill is wasting more money? I’ll go with the latter.
Posted by: lfrichar | Mar 4, 2010 5:24:40 PM******************The Americans ARE FOR THE proponents IN THE BILL period and that is an overwhelming majority when it is explained in an informative unbiased way! I thought you had to go!

Posted by: stop being so selfish | March 4, 2010, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

People are loosing their jobs because maybe the companies are scaling back and consumers are buying less….not because of Obama.stop being so selfish >>>>> OH you who rewrite history. When Obama came into office he yelled CRISIS CRISIS every day and spooked everyone with the bully pulpit. WELL he got his wish we ALL got spooked pulled back and you have 60 million under employed and a president who doesnt have a CLUE about business. NO he just goes around like a bafoon and a BULLY threating everyone with a big STICK making things worse. You cant grab power without beating down the masses first. And Obama is trying SO HARD to beat down the masses. IF HE GAVE any care about the masses he would be working WITH business on gettin the ecomomy working. INSTEAD THE HARVARD moron is at war with business EVERY single day and we LOOSE our HOMES WE LOOSE OUR JOBS our KIDS SUFFER and you want me to be HAPPY? The only Crisis in this country is the democrats in CONGRESS and OBAMA in the White House. I LIVED through the misery index and this is MUCH worse. This man is COLD and cares NOTHING about the people driven by his EGO and desire for a legacy. What an utter disaster.
IF he wanted to fix health care then he would accept changes one BILL at a time. HE would FIX the things to make them work. BUT NO.. HE REFUSES. He makes this an ALL OR NOTHING fight. What arrogance and stupidity.

Posted by: ChicagoBob | March 4, 2010, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

Obamas LIES.
The Missing “Doc Fix”
Look up on how they are cooking the books. And why this plan is far more expensive than anyone things.
LIES LIES and more LIES.

Posted by: ChicagoBob | March 4, 2010, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

Here are some current static on healthcare*************
There are also deep splits in the new poll over whether the proposed changes would go too far or not far enough in expanding coverage and controlling costs. Twice as many see the plan as leaning toward too much government involvement, but since last month there has been a nine-point increase in the number who say government should be more involved.
On the issue that has been perhaps the most pronounced flash point in the national debate, 57 percent of all Americans now favor a public insurance option, while 40 percent oppose it. Support has risen since mid-August, when a bare majority, 52 percent, said they favored it. (In a June Post-ABC poll, support was 62 percent.)
If a public plan were run by the states and available only to those who lack affordable private options, support for it jumps to 76 percent. Under those circumstances, even a majority of Republicans, 56 percent, would be in favor of it, about double their level of support without such a limitation.
Fifty-six percent of those polled back a provision mandating that all Americans buy insurance, either through their employers or on their own or through Medicare or Medicaid. That number rises to 71 percent if the government were to provide subsidies for many lower-income Americans to help them buy coverage. With those qualifiers, a majority of Republicans say they support the mandate.

Posted by: stop being so selfish | March 4, 2010, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Posted by: stop being so selfish | Mar 4, 2010 5:55:48 PM
_____________________________
Regarding your poll numbers cited would you be willing to please share where those poll numbers are from because they really go against the majority of respected, main stream polling out there.

Posted by: obieone40 | March 4, 2010, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

ChicagoBob, you have mixed up a few details of the past years. The economy was tanking under the administration of Bush. The stock market plummet happened in the fall, before Obama got to office. Sheesh, if you have to rewrite history to make a point, you really aren’t fooling anyone.
One point in this article which is misleading, is the insurance industry’s claim that their profits being lower than other industry’s, shows that they aren’t being greedy.
A more realistic way to look at the greed is to look at the overhead of the insurance industry. With 15% to 35% overhead, too many of our premium dollars is not turned into health care but into big ceo salaries & perks, general ineffiencies, etc. After all, what incentive do they have for running a tight ship? They have no real competition, since they are all overcharging us. The rules of the game now guarantee that a customer with a pre-existing condition will pay through the nose with their current insurance, since they know no new carrier will pick them up.
The health care reform bill will give folks now being ripped off, the chance for affordable insurance. It will give small businesses a way to afford insurance for their workers.

Posted by: Lydia | March 4, 2010, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Next jobs to be lost. Check the newer flat screen TV’s and Blu-ray DVD players. The upper end models are starting to come with internet connections which will allow them to directly connect to the internet. How will this cause job loss? Check the software installed on them, they come with both Blockbuster & Netflix which will allow you to get movies directly to your entertainment system. Once this technology makes its way into the lower end products then we can all say goodby to the neighborhood video store as they won’t be able to compete and all those people now employed renting videos will be out of a job.

Posted by: Sandcrab1612 | March 4, 2010, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

It will give small businesses a way to afford insurance for their workers.
________________________________
Yep send them to the gov’t for insurance and watch the price of the program skyrocket.

Posted by: GO | March 4, 2010, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

Of course these high premiums are unsustainable.
They are killing small businesses. They are making the pool of 46 million Americans unable to afford insurance, larger every year which kills 45,000 of them every year.
The lack of common business sense involves boggles the mind. As the premiums go up, more people drop out, so the next year the premiums go up even more, causing… you guessed it more people to drop out. Anyone see a pattern here?
Obama’s right, the premiums rising many times faster than wages is unsustainable.

Posted by: Lydia | March 4, 2010, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

Obama’s right, the premiums rising many times faster than wages is unsustainable.
_______________________________________
You and Pres Obama are so right people can’t afford all these insurance costs so the gov’t will do it. It has all the money we need. It can make the US taxpayer make up that difference to cover rising healthcare costs for services.
The US taxpayer can do it they can pay for anything that won’t mean people have to pay more out of their pockets because the US taxpayer is not really people. You’re right it really boggles the mind.

Posted by: GO | March 4, 2010, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Cannot believe the news that just broke out..
“Leaked documents reveal GOP plan to use scare tactics to raise money”.
Main stream media was waiting for an opportunity to go to the bottom of GOP political agenda and now they got it.Authenticity of tea party movement and their connections to GOP is very much exposed in the document. what a shame..

Posted by: Rahm | March 4, 2010, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

The US taxpayer can do it they can pay for anything that won’t mean people have to pay more out of their pockets because the US taxpayer is not really people. You’re right it really boggles the mind.
_____________________________
Talk about increasing expenses beyond increasing wages:
avg private sector job $50,000
avg public/gov’t sector job $70,000
tax that $50,000 for those $70,000 jobs, increased federal spending/debt/obligations, the fact that the private sector has consistently contributed to 2/3 of the high unemployment numbers and you begin to really see some unsustainable numbers.

Posted by: obieone40 | March 4, 2010, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

I hope this Healthcare Bill passes, its not perfect, but its better than doing nothing,which so many in the GOP seem perfectly happy doing while Americans are losing their jobs,homes,
insurance, yeah just sit back and do nothing and yell socialism, socialism, at people who are trying to help the average american. How to Fix the American economy? End outsourcing of jobs, bring back some of the jobs that were outsourced to our friends in China,India,Mexico,Vietnam,etc, stop allowing companies to hire illegals, stop allowing illegals into the US period. No more govt benefits to illegals. Stop allowing companies to pay one person 20 to 80 million dollars and then laying off some 10,000 workers or not giving anyone a raise for two or three years. Bring the cost of insurance down, cost of prescription drugs down, cost of doctors visit down, bring the average workers wages UP. Unless workers start getting wage increases there will be no substantial economic recovery. Without wage increases no one can spend more money on goods and services, wage increases just for the CEO type folks will get this country nowhere fast, except further into a tanking economy.
America can not survive unless serious changes are made. Right now the average american worker is working longer hours for less money. More Americans are working two and three jobs just to break even. This MUST END. If the US is to survive. IT MUST END. The Greedy corrupt corporate elite must be stopped and brought to justice. NO MORE working all the time and getting breadcrumbs in return.

Posted by: Larry | March 4, 2010, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Next time pro mama don’t call someone else like Heather stupid just because she doesn’t agree with you.
Posted by: obieone40 | Mar 4, 2010 5:48:16 PM
I didn’t. Try to follow along, and read what I actually wrote. I disagreed with ftr, who agreed with Heather– and then I responded to this —
Heather: What we need is a drug company to come up with a treatment for whatever mental illness some liberals seem to have!
Progressive Mama: Heather basically thinks a higher average IQ is a mental illness (see her comments about liberals)
The news you have to be up on to get the joke—
CNN (and other news sources): Liberalism, atheism, male sexual exclusivity linked to IQ: “Evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa at the the London School of Economics and Political Science correlated data on these behaviors with IQ from a large national U.S. sample and found that, on average, people who identified as liberal and atheist had higher IQs.”
Thanks for the lecture. But if someone takes a swing, I land a shot myself.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 4, 2010, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

What they do now have is something that moves us there like dominos (of course it’s just as unsustainable and unacceptable as hiking insurance premiums).
—-
Right, and quickly I suppose as well. Because passing health care reform is such a cinch. LOL
You realize how much reality you have to dismiss to get us to single payer quickly, right?

This Senate bill moves us much closer to acheiving single payer (based on O’s quotes including any that you’re referencing -I’ve seen most of them) and when someone as far back as ’03 shows how committed they are to single payer you know what they push is going in that direction.

that doesn’t make any more politically feasible in the near term. I wish it were, personally. It also dismisses the possibility for innovation in another direction.
Its conjecture, which is nice if you’re a witch and live in a fantasy novel, but… the fact remains we’re not talking about single payer, nor that Obama has said he would prefer single payer but its not politically feasible at this time. He’s right.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 4, 2010, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

Posted by: ChicagoBob | Mar 4, 2010 5:24:33 PM
Speak for your own school district in Illinois, Bob. I live in Illinois as well, and we have a very good school district.
And, btw, Gary is the murder capital– and its in Indiana.
Good grief.

Posted by: There is no Planet B | March 4, 2010, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

I hope this Healthcare Bill passes, its not perfect, but its better than doing nothing,which so many in the GOP seem perfectly happy doing while Americans are losing their jobs,homes,
insurance, yeah just sit back and do nothing and yell socialism, socialism, at people who are trying to help the average american.
__________
I agree. Nice post, Larry. Bunning held up unemployment payments. These crazy people just don’t care. Its scorched earth and fearmonger 24/7 to make up for the fact they have no solutions. Just greed and lust and fear.

Posted by: There is no Planet B | March 4, 2010, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

Just let the free market decide what is fair.

Posted by: Matt | March 4, 2010, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

Its conjecture, which is nice if you’re a witch and live in a fantasy novel, but… the fact remains we’re not talking about single payer, nor that Obama has said he would prefer single payer but its not politically feasible at this time. He’s right.
_____________________________________
Wow first people who don’t agree with you are stupid, now delusional.
I am not saying that Obama and his party ARE NOW passing single payer. I am saying they are setting up structures for it to occur and without a legislative push.
Obama said in his own quotes that your posts referenced- employment based insurance was the biggest obstacle HE said to the transition to single payer.
This Senate bill restructures that. Show me where it doesn’t. It’s the biggest things your posts have been cheering about regarding this bill, getting insurance off the back of your business.
It’s not fantasy nor does it take a genius I certainly am not one. But I have eyes and a working brain to look around and see a few things.
This bill does not significantly address healthcare costs but it does greatly increase the gov’t (US taxpayer) role in paying for them through subsidies or in full. It does not pursue any other means to address healthcare besides gov’t intervention to ensure insurance coverage. That was what Obama in the quotes your posts pointed to said was his own first step towards single payer.
It’s really not about getting anything more than this foot in the door right now to force it open a little more.
1/3 of health insurance in the US before this bill goes through is paid for by the US taxpayers (Medicare, Medicaid, SChip) and those things have already shown themselves to be unsustainable. This bill will greatly increase that burden. Even some of the states are looking at how to cut back on these insurance benefits because they are going bankrupt. The gov’t in these programs already grossly underpays for services and is looking to cut back even more. I’ve already gone into the ripple effect (that involves no legislation) of that on private insurance and healthcare industries in earlier posts if they haven’t been deleted you can see them.
Who would have thought 40 years ago that the UAW would own GM or Chrysler and that the federal gov’t would make sure they were given that ownership ahead of legitimate stockholders like pension/mutual funds.

Posted by: obieone40 | March 4, 2010, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

Wow first people who don’t agree with you are stupid, now delusional.
———-
Or use conjecture and don’t read well. Read previous post:
“Next time pro mama don’t call someone else like Heather stupid just because she doesn’t agree with you.
Posted by: obieone40 | Mar 4, 2010 5:48:16 PM
I didn’t. Try to follow along, and read what I actually wrote. I disagreed with ftr, who agreed with Heather– and then I responded to this —
Heather: What we need is a drug company to come up with a treatment for whatever mental illness some liberals seem to have!
Progressive Mama: Heather basically thinks a higher average IQ is a mental illness (see her comments about liberals)
The news you have to be up on to get the joke—
CNN (and other news sources): Liberalism, atheism, male sexual exclusivity linked to IQ: “Evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa at the the London School of Economics and Political Science correlated data on these behaviors with IQ from a large national U.S. sample and found that, on average, people who identified as liberal and atheist had higher IQs.”
Thanks for the lecture. But if someone takes a swing, I land a shot myself.
And if you follow along, whether or not she agrees with me has nothing to do with anything. I didn’t say she was dumb– I said liberals have higher average IQs. Studies back me up.
LOL.
Want to keep misstating what I said, shedding further doubt on your interpetation skills (which would lead thinking people to extrapolate that to other things… like health care reform legislaton, single payer, fiscal responsibility and so on.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 4, 2010, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

This Senate bill restructures that. Show me where it doesn’t.
____
Actually, show me where it does.
I do want it to go that way, yes. Many conservatives do, too. Read Charles Krauthammer. But we’re not there yet.
Going that route doesn’t mean single payer follows. Though I certainly hope it does.
_____
it does greatly increase the gov’t (US taxpayer) role in paying for them through subsidies or in full. It does not pursue any other means to address healthcare besides gov’t intervention to ensure insurance coverage. That was what Obama in the quotes your posts pointed to said was his own first step towards single payer.
___________
This is completely false. It addresses things besides subsidies to expand coverage. See the pilot programs, community health centers, Medicare fraud provisions, insurance reforms, prevention and so on. Read Testing, Testing by Atul Gawande. Read the bill!
You appear to be completely unfamiliar with the actual bill or proposal. Sorry to have wasted both of our time.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 4, 2010, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

There is no Planet B Said: “Bunning held up unemployment payments. These crazy people just don’t care. Its scorched earth and fearmonger 24/7 to make up for the fact they have no solutions. Just greed and lust and fear.”
=======================================
Completely AGREE! The republican party, even today, identified “Scooby Do” of being a socialist.

Posted by: GeorgieBushie | March 4, 2010, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

ChicagoBob Said: “OH you who rewrite history. When Obama came into office he yelled CRISIS CRISIS every day and spooked everyone with the bully pulpit. WELL he got his wish we ALL got spooked pulled back and you have 60 million under employed and a president who doesnt have a CLUE about business.”
========================================
LMAO! So, the current financial crisis was caused by President Obama (even before he became president)…hehehehe! Good God “Bobby”, where do you come up with your whacko economics?… hehehe!
OK Bobby, new homework assignment for you (LOL… let’s see if you’ll at least come close with this one).
Question # 1–> What is the National Bureau of Economic Research?
Question # 2–> Why did the National Bureau of Economic Research DECLARE, in December 2008, that the current recession began in December 2007?
Here’s a “clue” for question # 2 ChicagoBob…LOL… the current recession (which, according to the NBER, started in December 2007), didn’t “start” because of Obama (during that time period)… LOL.

Posted by: GeorgieBushie | March 4, 2010, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

This is completely false. It addresses things besides subsidies to expand coverage. See the pilot programs, community health centers, Medicare fraud provisions, insurance reforms, prevention and so on.
_________________________________
Have read it, watch your spin you’ll get dizzy and miss key points.
I didn’t dispute the breadth of COVERAGE the gov’t is funding. It is where it leads to and it’s unsustainability.
Please consider who does the Senate bill from Dec 2009 say is funding/running the pilot programs, community health centers, investigating Medicare fraud? Pray tell which insurance reforms address lowering cost: is it that up to 26 years olds now get covered by their folks, increasing the levels of income based on FEDERAL poverty levels for people entitled to Medicaid & gov’t subsidies, preexisting conditions/ continuation of coverage, exemptions of qualifications for benefits/subsidies are more limited for citizens than even for undocumented immigrants, distribution of premiums and other regulations of the way private insureres offer coverage and expands medicare for some while eliminating advantage and forcing those people onto another propgram? Still looking for those cost cutting measures which would truly be health reform not just increased taxpayer payment of insurance coverage. If people can’t compensate for any of these things out of their own pockets who will subsidize them?
Even though you reference Charles Krauthammer typically just relying on left wing editorials/articles, (such as reforms using Atul Gawande’s research in Texas to allow the fed gov’t as your new insurer to designate how to lower costs by deciding which procedures are “necessary”- as opposed to the patient and a private plan they’ve decided on) alone so others can spoon feed you only their interpretations of the facts isn’t really being informed.
Try reading the critics too, look at where things have been tried (what has really worked what hasn’t) think about the impact of their policies on not just you but the big picture too.
Please you seem pretty smart don’t waste people’s time with condescending namecalling and spinning about info you’re really not prepared to go deeper with especially when it’s doesn’t fit inside your box.

Posted by: obieone40 | March 4, 2010, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

Mr. Obama’s fiscal policies have taken the concept of “unsustainable” to a new level. I fear a backlash…

Posted by: Quo Warranto | March 4, 2010, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

Please you seem pretty smart don’t waste people’s time with condescending namecalling and spinning about info you’re really not prepared to go deeper with especially when it’s doesn’t fit inside your box.
Posted by: obieone40 | Mar 4, 2010 10:58:50 PM
I’ll do as I wish and see fit. I don’t micromanage others and don’t allow them to micromanage me either. I also don’t take advice on climbing out of boxes by anyone who is clearly in a box and shows few signs of ever having lived on the outside. I’ve read all the Republican bills and quite a few critics, on both the left and right, btw. I’m also familiar with the health care systems in England and France, and have had some firsthand experience. But, no matter, as I agree our conversations are a waste of time.
Just a quick example, you wrote: ” It does not pursue any other means to address healthcare besides gov’t intervention to ensure insurance coverage. ”
Then when its pointed out what goes beyond “government interventions to ensure insurance coverage,” you go off on some tangent, which doesn’t acknowledge the problem with that statement.
Anyone can turn to p. 621 of the Senate bill and read the section titled Health Delivery reforms, which goes into the pilot programs.
There’s also Bernie Sanders’ amendment which added $10 billion for primary care and forgives medical school debt for doctors who choose primary care, increasing the number of primary care doctors by 20,000. It also more than doubles the number of primary care clinics.
Since you seem concerned about cost controls, a partial list includes bundled payments (Bundling payments moves medical charges away from the traditional fee-for-service system that pays providers separately for individual services; critics of the fee-for-service correctly acknowledge that it often leads to doctors and hospitals delivering more care, but not better care; overutilization);prudent purchasing; a Medicare Commission which offers a process to take small programs and convert them into systemwide reforms; comparative effectiveness review; preventive medicine measures.
(and p.s. the article Testing, Testing isn’t the one about Texas. He’s a very well-respected medical writer, but I do realize bias keeps a lot of people from reading widely.)

Posted by: progressive mama | March 5, 2010, 12:31 am 12:31 am

On a lighter note, The Citizen’s Posse is having an event built around the concept of a citizen’s arrest of the insurance lobby industry in DC.
“The insurance industry’s lobby front group is back in DC to defend their criminal health care system and plot to kill health reform. Reform groups are gathering a citizen’s posse to hold them accountable for their crimes against Americans’ health — and make sure Congress passes reform now.
We need Congress to listen to us, not the insurance companies. We won’t allow another year of 45,000 deaths and a million bankruptcies. Our health and our future are too important to let the insurance giants continue with business as usual.”
check it out. I think many of us are sick of the insurance lobby bullying Congress and playing its dirty tricks on the citizenry.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 5, 2010, 12:42 am 12:42 am

$12.9 bln profits in 09 and now 25-39% rate hikes ! It can’t all be proft taking ! Sounds to me like the insurance companies are just accepting rate hikes associated with inefficient hospitals/medical centres and are just passing in on. The whole system is a complete joke and needs proper Government oversight & regulation.

Posted by: Kwakasmith | March 5, 2010, 8:05 am 8:05 am

Most people who are the most enthusiastic about single payer really don’t fully understand what they are asking for. Most simply think it’s what we have now but everyone will get to use it because they can’t in an ongoing way now. They look at chart and graphs and read the progressive only info analyzing that international info. Some (unfortunately quite a lot having listened at length to my progressive friends) actually call it free. You know like people did in the 90′s about the great free college tuition in CA (you can see CA fiscally now).
As for experiencing those single payer systems first hand and comparing facilities and care it’s pure conjecture for most. I have been uninsured here and seen first hand facilities in Russia (a country with the population closest to ours) as well as the UK (another one of the larger countries with single payer). I have spoken at length with friends actually living in those countries like France and Canada (two of the other most populous single payer). It is not the same. The care in the US is way better. Even for major medical which can bankrupt you here. There you may only get things to treat your symptoms but not cure your disease and since it is gov’t run unless you go out of country (which will bankrupt you there) there is no timely recourse. Ours is by far not perfect, needs some serious reforms especially addressing medical inflation, but it currently is really better than anything else out there for 300 million people.

Posted by: GO | March 5, 2010, 8:13 am 8:13 am

I don’t micromanage others and don’t allow them to micromanage me either.
__________________________
No you just advocate the fed doing it.
____________________________
We won’t allow another year of 45,000 deaths and a million bankruptcies.
___________________________________
Progressively inflated numbers and misinformation a big part of the problem in this debate is factual info.
_____________________________________
Page 621 of the senate bill from Dec 2009 HR 3590)is about healthcare for kids in gov’t foster care as they come of age. It then goes into deciding the value of medical services for hospitals and their payment by the fed gov’t that falls to HHS- that’s what it means when it keeps on saying “the Secretary shall”).
Bundled payments actually mostly described in the sections regarding the pilot program (which doesn’t begin until 2013 but you pay now as the actual bill begins from date of passage) p. 759 and their values, applications, and services they are applied to is ALL under the discretion of HHS (ie fed gov’t).
The rest of your examples, if someone examines the healthcare bill from the standpoint of whose getting what and whose responsible (to decide & pay) not just what they’re talking about all point to increased fed responsibility (again HHS)for healthcare values for services and whether they are even used. These are all examples of what some refer to as rationing and price setting. Cost cutting for misusing services is primarily denying services.
Citizens Posse yep keep beating up the insurance companies with their 3.3% profits that will certainly get you to single payer faster while Pres O makes deals with Big Pharma with their 16.5 profits. People had to live through progressives passing prohibition before it was repealed we may have to live through growing closer to single payer (ie this bill) before people wise up like they did in Maine, and Tenn.
But you can get into the weeds or just do simple math. 45 million (I’ll use your number) more insured probably mostly by the fed since they can’t afford it now and it may even be higher when employers drop coverage and point their employees to the gov’t programs) and the cost is actually going to lower expenses. Talk about a fantasy.
Gotta go to work someone has to pay for these things even if it’s unsustainable. Have fun.

Posted by: GO | March 5, 2010, 9:01 am 9:01 am

Have fun.
Posted by: GO | Mar 5, 2010 9:01:54 AM
thanks. And while your post makes sense and makes clear your anti-government sentiment, it doesn’t acknowledge that in fact while you may have objections to the bill and government involvement in health care, the original statement made by another commenter was false– which was the point. And single payer isn’t on the table, at least not yet, and its unlikely it will be on the table during President Obama’s term as its politically unfeasible here. Nor is dismantling the private industry, particularly when it comes to delivery.
Interesting tidbit about progressives: Alan Grayson is popular in his district, even among Republicans. When asked to comment on it, he said,
“People like a Congressman with guts. They want someone who works hard, pays attention, and gets things done. For goodness sake, we increased federal competitive grants in this district by 98% in our first year. That extra $100 million benefits Republicans, Independents and Democrats equally. People of every political persuasion want to see action to help solve their problems, and that’s what they’re seeing from us.”
I agree. Republicans don’t accomplish anything.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 5, 2010, 9:20 am 9:20 am

For progressives, an interesting tidbit about Obama’s meeting with progressives yesterday:
” A key House progressive says President Obama blamed the Senate Thursday for the fact that a public insurance option has been dropped from healthcare reform legislation — but promised to push for one in the future, after the current bill passes.
“The meeting with President Obama today was productive and necessary, and I was glad to hear him speak frankly about where we stand on healthcare legislation,” said Rep. Raúl Grijalva, D-Ariz., the co-chairman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, in a statement after meeting with Obama Thursday. Grijalva had told Salon Wednesday he might not vote for the healthcare bill, in part because the public option had been dropped. The meeting at the White House Thursday was aimed to keep him and other liberals on board. “He said the public option — a well-known and long-standing progressive priority — lacks enough Senate support to be included in the final package. However, he personally committed to pursue a public option after passage of the current bill.” (Salon)
I do think its feasible we’ll get a public option in the near-term. And with a free choice amendment that does put us in a good position to innovate further.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 5, 2010, 9:24 am 9:24 am

Most people who are the most enthusiastic about single payer really don’t fully understand what they are asking for.
_____________
I think that can be said for those debating across the spectrum. LOL. I have two employees who claim they’re going Galt to Canada if health care reform passes.
LOL. High information voters are not what most Americans are, which is why hearing so many people mindlessly repeat the insurance industry’s talking points is unfortunate to me.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 5, 2010, 9:28 am 9:28 am

Good posts GO.
Wow pro mama read the posts for a quick update. Thanks so much for the chuckle, Alan Grayson, going back to work break over.
Pro Mama rule your blogs today in good health hope your injury is healing well.

Posted by: obieone40 | March 5, 2010, 9:48 am 9:48 am

Ours is by far not perfect, needs some serious reforms especially addressing medical inflation, but it currently is really better than anything else out there for 300 million people.
Posted by: GO | Mar 5, 2010 8:13:12 AM
I have close friends who live in Japan, France, Italy, Ireland, Sweden, Australia and Canada– and they think we’re crazy. While our medical care is the best in the world for the rich that is not true as you move into the lower middle class and poverty.
Also, I note that many of you think the single payer is necessarily what must follow from the reforms. Just on my own, I can think of five different directions it could go. Personally, I don’t underestimate American ingenuity once the status quo gets a good shake. Everyone is so stuck in their ruts. In the mean time, insuring more people is the humane thing to do.

Posted by: There is no Planet B | March 5, 2010, 9:52 am 9:52 am

Pro Mama rule your blogs today in good health hope your injury is healing well.
Posted by: obieone40 | Mar 5, 2010 9:48:42 AM
Thanks. Actually, I’m going to start a couple new classes today and teach them myself — so you all are off the hook here starting in a few minutes. Self defense for women over 50 and Tae Kwon Do for mommies and toddlers.
Have a good one. Its likely you all won’t miss me :^)

Posted by: progressive mama | March 5, 2010, 9:57 am 9:57 am

Nsurance premiums are established to cover the costs of the covered services, and are approved by state insurans commissioners. Anyone who believes that any of those costs will be reduced by a single penny under a government program is deranged, and will in time become very disappointed. Their children will be even more disappointed.

Posted by: Fascist Hyena | March 5, 2010, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Thanks so much for the chuckle, Alan Grayson,
_______
Obie, you probably won’t appreciate the source on the latest, but this is from Markos at Daily Kos:
Rep. Grayson Has Huge Lead in Republican Primary
“No, that’s not a typo. According to a poll of registered Republicans last week, Congressman Alan Grayson has an enormous lead in the Republican primary for Florida Congressional District 8 (FL-8).
Of course, Grayson is a Democrat. Yet Grayson is far and away the leading choice among registered Republicans in FL-8. In fact, he has almost twice as much support among Republicans as all his Republican opponents combined.”
It makes me chuckle too.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 5, 2010, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

progressive mama wrote: “We won’t allow another year of 45,000 deaths and a million bankruptcies.”
.
No we won’t allow another year, but looks like the Democrats will allow another 3-4 years however. You gotta collect a whole lot of taxes before allowing the benefits to kick in…. otherwise you can’t make the funny number come in under the magical $1 trillion dollars cost and you sure can make it deficit neutral. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac accounting at its best.

Posted by: gk | March 5, 2010, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

Meant to say… CAN’T make it deficit neutral.

Posted by: gk | March 5, 2010, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

but looks like the Democrats will allow another 3-4 years however.
————
Actually, there are several interim measures in the bill that will extend coverage to some uninsureds during those years– extension of COBRA, temporary high risk pools, allowing children up to age 27 stay on their parents’ policy, banning recision immediately, disallowing denial for pre-existing condition for children 19 y.o. and younger immediately… and so on.
Also, that “another year” quote was from the Citizen’s Posse, it didn’t originate with me. I agree with it but would have worded it differently as I realize start-ups take time– to get the exchanges up and running properly, etc, etc.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 5, 2010, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

“allowing children up to age 27 stay on their parents’ policy”
.
Unbelievable… the next generation of non-producers in the making.

Posted by: gk | March 5, 2010, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Unbelievable… the next generation of non-producers in the making.
Posted by: gk | Mar 5, 2010 10:24:03 PM
On that one, I cannot disagree.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 5, 2010, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

All this rante hike scare is designed to support ObamaCare. The Gov’t will save you from those bad insurance co’s. Actually look into the health czar, oh my gosh the, the quarterback is betting on the team.

Posted by: Fake | March 6, 2010, 1:36 am 1:36 am

Why doesn’t Obama make the statement “this clearly is unacceptable and unsustainable” to the environmentalists who are also responsible for damaging the economy. With their legislative lobby, power in the white house, and influence with the Democrats, Obama is propping them, allowing them to ruin our economy. So while Obama watches the economy downspiral he has the audacity to rebuke the health care industry? When is Obama going to learn, it’s not health care that is on the top of America’s priorities, it’s JOBS!

Posted by: EPU | March 6, 2010, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

At this point, we need any kind of reform which covers most everyone and prevents insurance companies from denying care due to preexisting conditions. Why do we need this…once everyone is covered and can not be denied coverage, the issue of cost can finally be addressed. See cost is not an issue for those who can afford it and so our health care industry will progressively let those most in need financially slip through the cracks as long as every body is not guaranteed coverage.

Posted by: Gabriel | March 6, 2010, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

I know many self-employed people (like me) in Canada, UK, France, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Italy, New Zealand, Australia – they all pay just a few percent of their income for a very satisfactory health care system, with the option for very affordable private insurance supplementation (for co-pays that are very reasonable because of regulation). They think the US is barbaric when they hear our stories.
I want what they have. After 4 decades of being insured, I just had to cancel my health insurance because in these troubled times, after the latest increase it would be 53% of my net income after business deductions (before taxes). The increases in premiums for me over the past few years by Celtic have been 30% to 34%. Between the high deductible forced on me by earlier rate increases and the cherry-picking they do after the deductible – I might as well be uninsured, I’ll be bankrupt if I get sick anyway.

Posted by: jwoolman | March 8, 2010, 12:00 am 12:00 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.