By Kristina Wong

Mar 1, 2010 12:01am

Sen. Bunning Single-handedly Causes 2,000 Federal Worker Furloughs

ABC News' Lisa Stark reports: Sen. Jim Bunning, R-Ky., didn't just stop extensions of unemployment and health insurance benefits with his "hold' on these funding measures last week, he also stopped an extension of the Highway Trust Fund for 30 days. That means the fund cannot be used to pay for any of its programs or its employees.  So, the Department of Transportation as of Monday morning, furloughed 2,000 federal workers. DOT says that number could climb if this stalemate over funding drags on. Employees affected include federal inspectors overseeing highway projects on federal lands. If the inspectors aren't there, the projects must shut down.  DOT says that will affect 41 critical construction projects from Alaska to the U.S. Virgin Islands. “As American families are struggling in tough economic times, I am keenly disappointed that political games are putting a stop to important construction projects around the country,” said Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “This means that construction workers will be sent home from job sites because federal inspectors must be furloughed.”  Without the highway trust fund dollars, the federal government also cannot reimburse states for any ongoing construction projects. There is usually a federal-state match and the states get reimbursed on a real-time basis. States are scheduled to get some $768 million dollars from the feds this week. They will get the money eventually, but will have to figure out how to make do without, for now.        The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (ASHTO) will hold a news conference today to try to put pressure on Congress to restore the money. In a press release, the group said that "Millions of dollars and thousands of projects, people and paychecks are on the line at a time when the industry can ill afford another set back."     DOT says that federal programs that help states combat drunk driving and reduce traffic injuries are also affected. The federal part of those efforts, funded by the Highway Trust Fund, will come to a halt today. Some wonder whether the administration is playing its own game of high-stakes political chicken.  On Friday, Congressman James Oberstar, D- Minn., Chairman of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, indicated that furloughs might not be necessary if it appeared that funding might be restored quickly.  Department of Transportation officials insisted there is no way to know how quickly Congress will act, and that the department cannot spend money it is not authorized to spend.   As an officials with ASHTO said late Sunday, "One Senator has thrown a wrench in the entire works. This is no way to run a railroad."  Or in this case – a highway.

User Comments

Republican scorched earth policy. You have a chance to fix this coming November. There are 18 more republican senate seats on the ballot including bunnings.

Posted by: rightbehind | March 1, 2010, 12:59 am 12:59 am

It is about time we start saving some of our money and past time we stop getting deeper into debt that we can never pay off! It is a start…

Posted by: Justme8811 | March 1, 2010, 1:48 am 1:48 am

I wish that we could get ourselves out of the mess this country is in. I wish I had a solution to it but I do not. I think we all need to take responsiblity for how things in government are turning out. We the people keep re-electing the same people who just continue to push their same strategy for their best interests and the lobbyist who buy them off. How much pork goes in to pass a bill to appease the senators and representatives to vote for the bill? That is just the federal government and not even talking about state, county and city government. All it does is drives this country in more debt. If you re-elect these people then take responsibility for your actions. I am of the opinion to only have 1 term in whatever office that you are voted for. Maybe then things will get done without companies influencing thost elected.

Posted by: Rachel M | March 1, 2010, 2:09 am 2:09 am

Welcome to Republican Land. They have tried for decades to have the opportunity to prove that “Government doesn’t work” Bush immediately got us into two wars and didn’t finanance them within the Budget, and Bush, with purpose, put people in charge of departments and responsibilities they were not at all qualified for. Remember the Veterinarian for Women’s Health? Welcome to the world the Republicans developed. They won’t “play” at this stage, they’re just getting going. I wish this process would get reported. Bushworld continues on; the worst President of the U.S.

Posted by: Marra | March 1, 2010, 3:28 am 3:28 am

its interesting to see the GOP completely mis-read the mood in the country at the moment… it is not anti Obama, anti-Democrat, as much as it is anti-incumbent…and Mr Bunning shows why the GOP have not changed, or got the message….

Posted by: indithinker | March 1, 2010, 4:38 am 4:38 am

Most people on the receiving end of a Government paycheck STILL do not GET IT and keep whinin’; The fact is, there ain’t no money and the payers can’t pay any more! You gotta cut back like the rest of us who HAVE been payin’ the bills! That includes jobs!! And benefits!! Unnerstand??

Posted by: Paul Mennick | March 1, 2010, 4:42 am 4:42 am

This senator deserves a medal for having the guts to force Congress to find the money before spending it. As a taxpayer I resent being in hock to communist China.

Posted by: Jackie Flynn | March 1, 2010, 5:21 am 5:21 am

Indithinker,
You need to study some economic theory. If start furloughing workers, then they will cut back on their consumption accordingly which will reduce consumption in the private sector even farther. Curtailing government spending now will just further exacerbate the recession. That is the whole point of stimulus spending. A government worker and a private sector worker both spend their paychecks in the private sector. The few paychecks, the lower consumption, the lower consumption, the more private enterprise has to reduce workforce. Its positive feedback, but in the wrong direction. Stimulus spending is the opposite. It increases the number of folks with paychecks which in turn stimulates private sector consumption.

Posted by: Junopr Samples | March 1, 2010, 5:22 am 5:22 am

U.S. government debt is a safe haven the way Pearl Harbor was a safe haven in 1941.

Posted by: Uncle Sam | March 1, 2010, 5:41 am 5:41 am

There is something very wrong with our ability to govern ourselves when one senator can denie so many people’s livlihoods. Protecting the minority power’s interest doesn’t mean one senator should be able to shut down our government from functioning at all. Why one senator, or in the case of health care reform, one senator again can stop what the majority wants is totally undemocratic. We need to fix the senate rules.

Posted by: Brian | March 1, 2010, 5:51 am 5:51 am

As a young Kentuckian, I am disgusted and embarassed to know that we are represented in the Senate by Jim Bunning! I am so glad that he is not running for re-election. I like Rand Paul as his replacement, but the fact that he endorses Sen. Bunnings actions of stopping the extension of these benfits bothers me. I am a swing voting democrat, and I am not sure any of the candidates to replace Sen. Bunning offer what Kentucky and the United States need. I am highly upset with the federal government, and in my opinion America would be better served if every member of Congress was replaced. Yes I am saying every incumbent should be replaced!

Posted by: John Horton | March 1, 2010, 5:57 am 5:57 am

John Horton: Did you get that spew from the dem talking ponit page? If you were in debt to the point you couldnt pay your mortgage or car payment and yo tried to borrow more money do you think you would get a loan? Do you think GM would let you keep your car or house? I think not you would be put out on the street. Bunning should get a gold medal for demanding cuts be made for actually paying for something instead of going more in debt.

Posted by: Stanley | March 1, 2010, 6:40 am 6:40 am

Next they’ll trot out the kids of these federal workers wearing stinky diapers and snotty noses from being without heat. I wonder where the press is when it is rumored that men and women are giving up their children to DSS because they can’t support them or how long some of our neighbors have been without meaningful work or stories behind the houses that sit empty. And while the citizens that front the money that pays the salaries of all federal workers it is the citizens that have no jobs and the Government that continues to grow jobs with borrowed money. They know that this will be a temporary layoff for these guys and are squealing like spoiled brats.

Posted by: david | March 1, 2010, 7:30 am 7:30 am

..DOT programs to combat drunk driving will be put on hold!!..(does that mean a hold on those “don’t drink and drive” signs DOT plants in the grass on the side of the highways?)***** We will NEVER-EVER-EVER make the tough financial decisions we need to in order to save our country, NEVER…We are a dumber people for having been exposed to another shallow article like the one above.

Posted by: cindy | March 1, 2010, 7:39 am 7:39 am

“This senator deserves a medal for having the guts to force Congress to find the money before spending it. As a taxpayer I resent being in hock to communist China.”
The Senator was a great pitcher but a dreadful Senator, a soon-to-be-out-of-office jackass looking for attention in an attempt to force his party to support him for re-election (at present they do not, they are looking for a replacement as we speak.)
You are right in resenting being in hock to China, but maybe you should have thought of that resentment before applauding those tax breaks for rich guys and corporations that ship our jobs off to China, and before cheering on the optional, pointless, and incredibly expensive adventure in Iraq that killed our economy.
I love the way ‘conservatives’ think nothing of cutting taxes and going to (optional) war, then suddenly decide it’s time to balance the budget and make ‘heroic’ stands defending the budget against working people in trouble because of the crappy economy caused by ‘conservative’ policies. And people fall for it, and fall for it again…sometimes I think we came out of the trees about 500,000 years too early.

Posted by: NovShmozKaPop | March 1, 2010, 7:39 am 7:39 am

SEN Bunning…..Good for you! Finally!!!! Finally someone with the strength of character to do the right thing. I applaud you Senator & will support “ANY” Republican who is like minded. Careful now, even if the candidate is a Republican, if he/she doesn’t have the will to keep down the debt & the will to eliminate this nonsense of welfare from the “womb to the tomb,” they won’t get a dime of my money for their campaign! So, pay attention…..you work for us the people. The democrats forgot who they work for and it cost them in MASS, VA & NJ. It wil obviously cost them even greater come November 2010. Anyway, careful now…..I’m “gently” reminding you of that! “CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?”

Posted by: Richard | March 1, 2010, 7:46 am 7:46 am

Good for Jim Bunning. Nice to see someone in Washington still has some integrity. 2,000 government workers is a start but it needs to get to about 500,000 if it is to get to where it needs to be. This government behemouth needs an enormous pruning. Only then, it might be more effective.

Posted by: Silverking | March 1, 2010, 7:51 am 7:51 am

Ten billion is only a drop in the bucket these days so Bunning´s actions are somewhat hypocritical. I recall that Time Magazine had an article several years ago on the ten most effective and the ten most ineffective Senators. Mr. Bunning defintely was in the latter group. I suppose he wants to show that he can be effective in something! What a jackass.

Posted by: BachisBest | March 1, 2010, 7:58 am 7:58 am

Subject: An idea whose time has come
For too long we have been too complacent about the workings of Congress. Many citizens had no idea that members of Congress could retire with the same pay after only one term, that they didn’t pay into Social Security, that they specifically exempted themselves from many of the laws they have passed (such as being exempt from any fear of prosecution for sexual harassment) while ordinary citizens must live under those laws. The latest is to exempt themselves from the Healthcare Reform that is being considered…in all of its forms. Somehow, that doesn’t seem logical. We do not have an elite that is above the law. I truly don’t care if they are Democrat, Republican, Independent or whatever. The self-serving must stop. This is a good way to do that. It is an idea whose time has come.
Proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution:
“Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to the Senators and/or Representatives; and, Congress shall make no law that applies to the Senators and/or Representatives that does not apply equally to the citizens of the United States “.

Posted by: Rob Dent | March 1, 2010, 7:59 am 7:59 am

Probably taking their lead from our elected officials, many government workers believe that they are immune from the pressures and events that impact those of us in the real world. While it is never good that anyone lose their job (temporarily or permanent), just as my company’s drive for profitability resulted in a 20% compensation reduction for and halt to 401K matching for me in 2009 and now part of 2010, why would federal employees, whom I pay, not feel the effect of a an equal drop in tax revenues caused by the general public’s un-, or underemployment? Folks in Washington talk about “hard choices” that await us common folk, but they seldom see those choices as impacting them. If ware all out of work because of policies they create, all they have to do is raise the debt limit and spend more money that we don’t have.

Posted by: wantingbalance | March 1, 2010, 8:10 am 8:10 am

First: I’m a Kentuckian who wishes Bunning would run again so I could vote against him..again.
But to those here bashing him I have a question. Just what did Bunning do that was so horrible about this issue?
All you liberals and Democrats were ready to hang President Bush for ignoring pay-as-you-go. I, a conservative Republican was also angry about that.
Everyone was thrilled that President Obama said pay-as-you-go was back!
Now here we have a Republican Senator who says: “Let’s find the funding for these.”
GASP!! The horror of it all. An evil Republican wants to pay-as-you-go. And the Democrats say no.
Hypocrisy, thy name is Democrat.

Posted by: malcat | March 1, 2010, 8:11 am 8:11 am

Where was this clown when the republicans were spending and not even bothering to add it to the budget? Once again republicans prove themselves to be hypocrites.

Posted by: rightbehind | March 1, 2010, 8:21 am 8:21 am

Maybe Bunning just thinks this is best for America and will pursue his agenda, no matter what. Go Bunning, they want to play hardball and with millions of Americans out of work it is time some Federal employees felt the pain.

Posted by: jerry | March 1, 2010, 8:23 am 8:23 am

Where was this clown when the republicans were spending and not even bothering to add it to the budget? Once again republicans prove themselves to be hypocrites.–
—————-
Rightbehind, what difference does it make whether he did or did not approve of Republican spending in the past? What has that got to do with THIS issue?
Do you think pay-as-you-go is wrong?

Posted by: malcat | March 1, 2010, 8:25 am 8:25 am

ouch….surely not the Party of NO!, eh?

Posted by: indithinker | March 1, 2010, 8:26 am 8:26 am

Sue, what did Bunning do that was wrong? He did not say he did not want to extend unemployment benefits. He did not say he did not want to extend COBRA assistance. He did not say he did not want to extend ANY of these.
He just said: Find the money.

Posted by: malcat | March 1, 2010, 8:32 am 8:32 am

Why would anyone utilize innocent individuals to make a point with the government. While it doesn’t seem logical the government must continue to spend money to slow the recession although I agree it should be spent wisely. I find it interesting that the Senator hasn’t bothered to give up anything for his cause. Has he offered not to take a salary or turn down some of his very nice benefits? In these economic times it seem irresponsible to take away folks income to make a personal point. How many of these individuals that are being furloughed are from his state?

Posted by: Citizen | March 1, 2010, 8:33 am 8:33 am

HOORAY FOR JIM BUNNING!!!!!!!!!!!!! as always in the liberal media they aren’t influenced by the TRUTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! isn’t there a law that obama signed into effect REQUIRING ALL NON DESCRETIONAL SPENDING TO BE PAID FOR????????????? now the LIBERAL MEDIA would have you believe that bunning is an IRRATIONA, UNCOMPASSIONATE DOLT!!!!!!!!!!! well to be honest these people have RECEIVED 99 WEEKS[ALMOST 2 YEARS] of handouts now. almost 30 states unemployment funds are now BANKRUPT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! we the TAXPAYERS WILL PAY FOR THIS FOR GENERATIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SCREW THE LIBERAL SPENDERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: matt | March 1, 2010, 8:36 am 8:36 am

Citizen, what did Bunning do that is wrong? We have the funds…stimulous…remember that? To create/save jobs?
These extensions sound perfect for stimulous money. Right?

Posted by: malcat | March 1, 2010, 8:37 am 8:37 am

2000 inspectors at 41 projects???? That’s 50 inspectors per project. NO WAY. Most of these “inspectors” must be paper-pushers.
Bunning is right. We should be spending unspent stimulus funds on the jobs bill. Hooray for him – he’s doing what we must do – control the runaway federal government.

Posted by: meab | March 1, 2010, 8:46 am 8:46 am

I for on am on these unemployment benefits, and have been for 17 months.I am 51 yrs old and am going back to school soon to be retrained to be in the work force again. It is very hard to get a job,especially in Michigan.I cant believe this lone senator can affect my future. The power hungry senator whom used to be a part of our Detroit Tigers and am quite sure he knows the work climate here as well as many places around our country. Does he want all the people to go on welfare? Would that make it better? I just find it hard to believe his stance on this. It is disgusting to say the least. I am sure there are people who abuse the system,But there are those who really count on uia benefits.How can he live with himself?

Posted by: mary kay | March 1, 2010, 8:48 am 8:48 am

Jim Bunning for President. Finally, a senator who knows how to add and subtract. It is about time those federal workers feel the pain of the the private sector. We have been subsidizing the lavish lifestyle of these big spenders too long!
OVer 2,000 workers in the Federal DOT make over $170,000. Tell those bozos to take a pay cut. Why isn’t the media asking Harry Reid how his bill is being paid for? Why isn’t it coming from the Democrat slush fund/stimulus bill? Because they are using taxpayer money to buy votes!!
Bunning opened the eyes of the American people to the more backroom deals by these sleazy democrats.

Posted by: Karen | March 1, 2010, 8:49 am 8:49 am

The people who talk about not having money to pay taxes are forgetting about how the Republicans have over the years REDUCED the taxes of those folks who are able to pay them. Maybe during good times that worked…but we are in bad times now and the tax money must be found somewhere if we are going to avoid another Great Depression.
There are those that give us the BS that if you tax those that have, they will take their business somewhere else. They conveniently ignore that was what those folks did when they were given the tax cuts under Reagan and Bush.

Posted by: msgijoe | March 1, 2010, 8:52 am 8:52 am

Mary Kay, Bunning does not want to stop unemployment benefits. All he wants is Congress to say where the money is coming from.
There are funds from the stimulous bill that will pay for these extensions. All the Senate has to do is agree to use those funds instead of borrowing more money…putting us deeper into debt.
You need to address your outrage to the Democrats who will not show fiscal responsibility. If the Democrats would agree to use the stimulous funds, the benefit extension bill will be passed.

Posted by: malcat | March 1, 2010, 9:00 am 9:00 am

Government is the solution! Government is the problem! Republicans! Democrats!
The problem is one third of all money earned the last ten years went to .01% of the population. The rich, who are not in the government, still run the nation. I vote and encouragae others to vote but that will never solve the problem of the richest one peercent of our population. Like any nation ruled be a dictator of dictators, this nation must tumble and be rebuilt for the people.

Posted by: Kenneth Pennington | March 1, 2010, 9:06 am 9:06 am

Just another worthless Govt. agency.
I should know, I worked for one for 35 years. At least 3/4 of Govt. agencies could be eliminated.

Posted by: stan | March 1, 2010, 9:07 am 9:07 am

Could Bunning actually want to see the recession get worse in order to increase discontent against the Democrats? Is he just grandstanding? Are these Republicans so cynical they would jeopardize the welfare of thousands of families in need of unemployment extensions not to mention critical infrastructure projects just to gain political advantage? Seems like the answer is yes.

Posted by: Joel Miller | March 1, 2010, 9:09 am 9:09 am

I can’t believe our president is allowing one a-hole, Senator Jim Bunning , to mess with the American people like this. ONE!!!! I have no faith in our government whatosoever anymore. I just don’t.

Posted by: Sheila | March 1, 2010, 9:12 am 9:12 am

Joel Miller, did you read this article. All Bunning wants is Congress to say where is the money to pay for this.
There are stimulous funds available..you need to ask yourself: Why won’t the Democrats agree to use that money instead of borrowing it?
All that is necessary to get these extensions passed is for the DEMOCRATS to stop playing games for THEIR political advantage.

Posted by: malcat | March 1, 2010, 9:16 am 9:16 am

I can’t believe our president is allowing one a-hole, Senator Jim Bunning , to mess with the American people like this. ONE!!!! I have no faith in our government whatosoever anymore. I just don’t. posted by Sheila
————
President Obama is the President of the United States…he is not the Dictator of the United States.
Are you aware that ALL Bunning is asking for is that Congress find the money to pay for these extensions. There are funds from the stimulous bill to do exactly that.
All that is necessary to get these extensions passed is for the Democrats in Congress to agree to using stimulous money to pay for them. Stimulous… remember …save/create jobs. That money has already been used to provide the benefits in this extension bill.
Instead of ranting against a Senator who is trying to stop us from borrowing more money, insist that Democrats in Congress agree to use money intended for this purpose.

Posted by: malcat | March 1, 2010, 9:22 am 9:22 am

The Republicans say the Democrats aren’t listening to the people. The Democrafts say the Republicans aren’t listening to the people. THEY ARE BOTH RIGHT! Neither the Republicans nor the Democrats are listening. And Jim Bunning is just the latest example of this tone deaf Congress. Vote them ALL out! Jim, you’re just the South end of a North-bound mule!

Posted by: IndigoSkipper | March 1, 2010, 9:23 am 9:23 am

There’s the problem with too many things in one bill, that are actually unrelated.
It really is time that Congress moved away from hiding unrelated things, in various bills, which have absolutely nothing to do with the main bill.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | March 1, 2010, 9:23 am 9:23 am

The American People will not put a stop to this type of behavior until it effects everyone not just the unemployed. Not until everyone is unemployed will the people business come before big business!!!

Posted by: Vernon | March 1, 2010, 9:31 am 9:31 am

IndigoSkipper, All Bunning wants is for Congress to abide to pay-as-you-go.
There is money to pay for these extensions but the Democrats are refusing to abide to pay-as-you-go.

Posted by: malcat | March 1, 2010, 9:33 am 9:33 am

Finally; someone is stopping the spending! Truth be known…all he did was tell congress to fund it through the Stimulous Funding…They would not do it…Dems need that money for their reelections come November…Release funds to unions and they then support democrat candidates like they did in New York recently…They are not about to let go of that stimulous…Keep up the fight…someone finally has a backbone!

Posted by: PwTexas | March 1, 2010, 9:35 am 9:35 am

Whoah. Obama signed paygo legislation into law on February 13, 2010. What’s wrong with asking him to earmark money that is already allocated to extend benefits as opposed to allocating new money we don’t have?
Further confusing is spending $800B in ‘stimulus’ money to stimulate Andy Stern instead of the economy.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 1, 2010, 9:44 am 9:44 am

Obama does not qualify to be president so the GOP will make sure his time in office is as memorable memorable possible! Republicans Rule!

Posted by: sore_looser | March 1, 2010, 9:53 am 9:53 am

I vividly recall as a kid listening by transistor radio at our local neighborhood pool to Jim Bunning’s stunning perfect game with the Philadelphia Phillies. But what he has turned out to be of late as an aging, useless U.S. senator is quite pathetic. He’s an example of why I voted for most Democrats, including Obama, in the November election. The Republican Party offers no concrete alternatives. It’s a shame, though, that voters have to wait until November to see Bunning replaced.

Posted by: rsgradio | March 1, 2010, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Thank you Sen Bunning! I am a small business owner, and I really appreciate you looking out for the little guy. You see, I own a construction company in South Carolina. We’ve already received an e-mail and a phone call this morning that the bridge widening project we are working on will be halted by most likely Wednesday if the furloughs go into effect, because government engineers, as well as inspectors will not be able to come on-site.
Fantastic! I employ approximately 100 workers. Sixty of them are on this project right now. All sixty (who are paid hourly) will have to go home now, unpaid. These are people whom I pay between $18-$24/hour to, with foremen who make close to $30/hour. Let’s do the math: that is approximately $275,000 a month in salaries (before benefits, payroll taxes, etc) that will not be infused into our economy because of the “furlough ripple effect.” In accordance, that means that my employees will not be frequenting local establishments for their lunches each day, because they will be at home. Joey C. told me that he’ll never be able to afford his daycare now, but I guess that’s okay he said: he’ll be at home to watch his daughter… so that daycare loses their revenue.
Sunbelt Rentals, where we receive more than 50% of our equipment from, will lose the $50k a month in rental revenue because I will have to return that equipment. Lowcountry ash, where we purchase our asphalt from, will probably be delayed months before our order which is in excess of $1MM. Where do they get the stone for their product from? West Virginia – whose miners will now probably have reduced hours as well due to this large order being cancelled/delayed.
One of my engineers (who is one of the actually salaried workers) is preparing to embark on a renovation project at his home, which includes installing a swimming pool as well as an addition to the home. I am more than certain he’ll hold off on this $100,000 project now out of fear he might be jobless soon. How many more companies (and people) does that ripple effect?
Twenty of the sixty workers on my project have single-earner households due to their wives being laid off from administrative/clerical, or other type jobs in the past year. Now these families will have to subsist on NO income, especially with the coupled effect of stopping unemployment payments!!
Thus I am relegated to only one option: in order to keep the most skilled of my workers from disappearing forever, while I “furlough” I am going to have to find a way to pay weekly severance to keep them from losing their homes, trucks, etc., or else jeopardize my own workforce which I so desperately need to come back once this project resumes.
So before you applaud this “amazing, glorious move” by Sen. Bunning, think about the deleterious effects it will have across the economy.

Posted by: SCconstructor | March 1, 2010, 9:56 am 9:56 am

The Republican Party offers no concrete alternatives. It’s a shame, though, that voters have to wait until November to see Bunning replaced.-posted by rsgradio
————–
Just what did Bunning do that has upset you about this issue?
He offered a concrete alternative here. He says “Use stimuous funds to pay for these extensions.”
Shocking!! Use funds we have to pay for what the funds where intended for.
How dare he!

Posted by: malcat | March 1, 2010, 9:57 am 9:57 am

So before you applaud this “amazing, glorious move” by Sen. Bunning, think about the deleterious effects it will have across the economy.–posted by SCConstructor
————-
Why not call your congressional representatives and tell them to insist that stimulous funds be used to pay for these extensions?
If they had done that when Bunning brought it up, the extensions would be available.

Posted by: malcat | March 1, 2010, 10:02 am 10:02 am

You praise Bunning for what he is doing? Why isn’t he going after the banks who caused this economic debacle.
They are refusing operating capital to those who pay their bills, causing businesses to shut down. Now our gov’t has to intervene with a stimulus package, which means more gov’t spending. Where was this concern with the gov’t spending last administration? Someone has to clean up the mess. We do not need a repiublican come lately to do something about gov’t spending when it is needed. But I suppose it is alright if the GOP is doing the spending. The GOP run banks need to be taxed as heavily as they are charging for credit card rates and fees. And not be allowed to disguise their discontent with gouging the consumer. Remember China and the rest of the world knows if The USA goes broke they all do, which doesn’t bode well for them. Afterall a sovereign nation can cancel their debts. If the US can’t pay its debts and the world knows. Why would they continue to invest in the US? Why throw good money after bad? The Banks can not control all the money. If they do, you haven’t seen and thing yet.

Posted by: patman | March 1, 2010, 10:17 am 10:17 am

Patman, what does banking issues have to do with extending benefits?
Senators and HOR Reps work on many things at the same time.
What do you think about Congress not agreeing to use stimulous money to extend these benefits? Benefits for which stimulous money has be used already.

Posted by: malcat | March 1, 2010, 10:20 am 10:20 am

The only thing we can do right now is “laugh and learn” about this unfortunate incident. I know I read something on Mr. Bunning back in “W”‘s administration that related the problems his Party was having with his diminished powers of thought process ability. The bigger thing to learn here, however, is the “type” of people that the Republicans push on “certain demographic areas” of our country. Those of you who are “big picture thinkers” will get what I mean.

Posted by: CND FOX | March 1, 2010, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Gee..my heart bleeds for those government workers who have to take a day off without pay! The entire governmnet payroll should have to hurt like those of us who have been due to no fault of our own who have lost much much more.
The Dems are to blame for recently passing a law ( feeble attempt to look like they are fiscally responsible) that says they have to have a way to fund expense programs when they propose them only to make this yet another exception!
Want to blame someone..blame the Dems!

Posted by: S.Morgan | March 1, 2010, 10:28 am 10:28 am

CND FOX, I’ll ask you: What did Bunning do wrong?

Posted by: malcat | March 1, 2010, 10:30 am 10:30 am

Oh no – 2,000 government employees were laid off and we panic?
I never hear the same outrage when the private sector lays people off.
You’re not entitled to anything.

Posted by: Oscar | March 1, 2010, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Bunning is up for re-election. Get rid of him! – ITWARZ

Posted by: ITWARZ | March 1, 2010, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Bachisbest: Your first mistake is reading Time magazine. Read an economics book and find out what debt/income ratio means. If 10 billion dollars is a drop in the bucket then why dont you donate the money yourself?

Posted by: Scott | March 1, 2010, 10:54 am 10:54 am

I have an idea, Mr. Bunning. Why don’t YOU take your fat paycheck and pay the salaries of all the people you’re screwing ? You and your buddies “W” and Ernie Fletcher have all done enough damage that will take YEARS to repair. Aren’t you proud of yourself ?

Posted by: tutu | March 1, 2010, 11:02 am 11:02 am

Bunning is up for re-election. Get rid of him! – ITWARZ
—-
No, his own party here in KY don’t support him.

Posted by: malcat | March 1, 2010, 11:04 am 11:04 am

tutu, what did Bunning do that was wrong?

Posted by: malcat | March 1, 2010, 11:10 am 11:10 am

Throw them ALL out. We need to bring all our troups home, put them on OUR borders,sea & air ports, stop all foreign AID and take care of ourselves ONLY.

Posted by: William John Webb | March 1, 2010, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Stanley: do you feel the same way regarding two unpaid wars which is actually what has put the economy in the position it is in, along with the unpaid tax cuts for the rich? Would you still feel the same if you were one of the federal workers unable to provide for his family? I wonder????

Posted by: Kathy | March 1, 2010, 11:21 am 11:21 am

malcat…If I have to answer that question for you, I guess I know how you think as an individual. Either you yourself do not “work” Or you are gainfully employed and do not give the first crap about those less fortunate – especially those that got their jobs destroyed by the past administration. But I musst add this. “Old goats” like Bunning need to be voted out. The Republican Party is unfortunately full of insulated “good old boy types” like him. Every time I see them on TV, I am reminded of “apartheid and South Africa”.But see the Republicans all
ready knew that several years ago and
have not suppoted any further “power
efforts” he tried to achieve. I pay attention to politics.

Posted by: CND FOX | March 1, 2010, 11:22 am 11:22 am

interesting to see the GOP completely mis-read the mood in the country at the moment… it is not anti Obama, anti-Democrat, as much as it is anti-incumbent……….- if that’s true how do you explain martha coakly loss, she wan’t an incumbant. neither her or scott brown are incumbants. if you would open your eyes, the mood is anti obama and anti democrat.

Posted by: B | March 1, 2010, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Yes, but no jobs have really been lost. According to conservative Republicans, government jobs aren’t “real jobs” anyhow. Maybe we should consider furloughing several hundred thousand members of the U.S. Armed Forces. They’re paid by Uncle Sam, and being a soldier isn’t a real job.

Posted by: Kirk | March 1, 2010, 11:26 am 11:26 am

CND FOX, I am employed AND I do have a great deal of concern for others. I have friends and family who have been unemployed for months now.
I share you opinion about Bunning; I live in KY myself and think he is a disgrace to our state.
But I am not asking about anything he has done in the past. I’m asking about this specific event. He asked Congress to abide by President Obama’s own stipulation that everything has to be funded. What is wrong with that?
He didn’t say he did not want to fund these issues. He just asked that the money to fund them be identified.
We’ve used stimulous money before to pay for these things. Why won’t the Democrats in the Senate agree to use stimulous money to pay for these extensions?
Save/create jobs is what the stimulous bill was all about…right? So why the outrage against Bunning for asking that stimulous money be used now.
As for your comments about ‘old goats’ in Congress…check the ages of a few Democrats.

Posted by: malcat | March 1, 2010, 11:31 am 11:31 am

What Bunning did that was wrong was wait until most of the senate had went home for the weekend. His “offer” to pay it out of Stimulus funds would have taken an act of congress… and he knew they were not there.
More “Sleight of Hand” from the GOP… act like you have a solution that of course cannot be implemented.
If Bunning REALLY had a solution he would not have waited until 9pm on a Friday night to offer it.
So Mr. GOP who is not supported by the GOP has thrown a wrench into plans to put AMERICANS to work… not Government workers… AMERICANS… not immigrant labor, not offshore jobs… AMERICANS.
Does that mean anything to you “Bunning” fans?

Posted by: DewyB | March 1, 2010, 11:35 am 11:35 am

Yes! Yes! Let’s put even more people out of work so ONE MAN make some kind of a stupid point! People all over this country are very afraid they will be out on the street soon. And the government is their last hope. Thanks for caring Mr.Bunning. I’m sure you will be remembered come election day.

Posted by: B3matic | March 1, 2010, 11:39 am 11:39 am

DeweyB, hmmm waiting til late hours to do anything. Working weekends and holidays hoping those who may oppose votes won’t be there. Sounds familiar.
So I guess you disapproved of all the times the Democrats pulled those stunts. Right?
Stimulous funds have been used in the past for these very things. You say Congress wasn’t there? Was he in the Senate chambers by himself? I don’t think so. Were only Republicans there? Nope, not buying that either.
If it takes an act of Congress, and they knew these extensions were coming due, why weren’t all congressional members there?
I’m not a fan of Bunning. But I’m not a fan of Democrats refusing to do their job.

Posted by: malcat | March 1, 2010, 11:43 am 11:43 am

B3matic, Bunning isn’t running for re-election.

Posted by: malcat | March 1, 2010, 11:45 am 11:45 am

” If you want to stop some spending do it to those who can afford to take the hit and at the right time where the cuts are fair and just.” John Stephenson

Posted by: Secondlook | March 1, 2010, 11:46 am 11:46 am

Malcat – “He asked Congress to abide by President Obama’s own stipulation that everything has to be funded. What is wrong with that?” You’re kidding, right? After BILLIONS on wars, pill bills, deficits out the ying yang, bail-outs . . .etc’s too much to mention? You honestly think in the middle of a massive recession it’s kewl to mess with the only thing keeping people from foreclosing (which more hurts you) and eating? It’s just o.k. to play politics with those you hurt to begin with? BTW, there’s been entirely more pay go with this guy than Bush. This is all games.

Posted by: Secondlook | March 1, 2010, 11:50 am 11:50 am

malcat…you can dissect this down to a point where your “sugar coating of this issue” is maybe “tolerable to you but not to the rest of us who think in “bigger picture terms”. That was not the “time or place to play that ‘game’.” “Deficit hysteria” does not work on those of us who “think”. We know the problem is that people do have money to spend because of the past administrations penchant to run all the jobs off to other countries. That is the “issue” that should be discussed NOT “where the money is coming from”. If we had had a decent “economic plan” the past 8 years this other “issue” would be a moot point.

Posted by: CND FOX | March 1, 2010, 11:50 am 11:50 am

malcat …please insert “not” in the sentence of “..people do NOT have money spend”…I posted too fast.

Posted by: CND FOX | March 1, 2010, 11:52 am 11:52 am

” If you want to stop some spending do it to those who can afford to take the hit and at the right time where the cuts are fair and just.” John Stephenson
———–
SecondLook, he didn’t want to stop the spending. He wanted the Senate to use existing funds to cover these extensions. Spend existing funds instead of borrowing.
You have criticized the Republicans in general and President Bush specifically for spending money that had to be borrowed.
So now that Senator Bunning says to abide by pay-as-you-go, liberals and Democrats are calling for his ‘impeachment’.
Sounds hypocritical to me.

Posted by: malcat | March 1, 2010, 11:54 am 11:54 am

When the Democrats are doing stuff like trying to ram through health care legislation via ununusual methods, is it unexpected that a Republican would gum up the works this way?
I suspect that if the Democrats drop health care via ‘reconciliation’, things like the highway funding will magically go through without anyone blocking it.
This is what happens when BOTH sides are more interested in partisan politics than doing work.

Posted by: jim | March 1, 2010, 11:59 am 11:59 am

CND FOX..first, correction noted, thought that is what you meant. ;-)
You say I am dissecting. I’m talking about a specific event. I know how bad the economy is. I know Bush screwed up..OK?
But everyone is criticizing Bunning for wanting to stop borrowing…stop putting us further into debt when it is not necessary.
It’s not necessary because we have funds in the stimulous package that can be used.
I don’t Bunning either…said that already, will repeat…I don’t like Bunning.
But I’m not blinded by my dislike to not see that he is right about this specific issue. All that needs to be done is for Congress to use stimulous funding to pay for the same things it has been used in the past.
Do you think Bunning is wrong about using existing funds we have and not borrowing?
Can you give me an answer to that question without insulting my intelligence or ability to think?

Posted by: malcat | March 1, 2010, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

Bravo! Finally, someone with some intelligence! Still, Americans would rather squander their children’s energy future and planetary future(global warming) than turn off the 100′s of millions of lights that burn unnecessarily every day and night. Overlighting, overheating, overcooling, OVERDRIVING; we are irresponsible and ungrateful hedonists.

Posted by: ConservationMatters | March 1, 2010, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

malcat…I don’t think it matters way. He should NOT have let the benefits lapse, period. As bad as this economy is malcat, “borrowing to keep people afloat” will continue. He was NOT thinking in big picture terms. And he gives the bigger “black eye” to Republicans who are viewed as being iinsulated and out of touch with working class Americans. You are tring to “narrow it down” in a “purist” sense, to “win an argument”. I believe in “people” too much to do that. Now I hope that is “insulting” it is just the difference you and I have when it comes to a “mess” and how to handle it.

Posted by: CND FOX | March 1, 2010, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

malcat…I am obviously “hurrying too much”. Please insert NOT in front of “insulting”.

Posted by: CND FOX | March 1, 2010, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

CND FOX, Bunning wasn’t the only one to let them lapse, the Senate did by not agreeing to his request. Right or wrong.
I know that borrowing money will continue to help people. I have no problem when borrowing is necessary. It wasn’t in this case.
The big picture consists of a whole bunch of little issues that must be assembled together.
I am not trying to narrow it down to ‘win an arguement’. Unless we all work together on the little pictures, our nation’s big picture is going to very, very frightening.
By using the stimulous money for what it was intended and not borrowing means the US can borrow for things the stimulous was not intended.
You say you care about people, again implying I don’t. I do, I care deeply. That’s why I want our government to work to its greatest efficieny so that Americans can get the help they need. Our government needs to get back to following its own rules; abiding by the laws Congress passes; and thinking about each issue on its own AND its impact on other issues.
..and I hope you meant “Now I hope that is NOT insulting…

Posted by: malcat | March 1, 2010, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

I’ve heard from several people who have met him that Bunning is not all there mentally. This proves it.

Posted by: Zenguy1213 | March 1, 2010, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

malcat…I am obviously “hurrying too much”. Please insert NOT in front of “insulting”.
That’s OK, I’m having a typo-crisis myself today.

Posted by: malcat | March 1, 2010, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

Has anyone ever seen a government road crew with one guy in the ditch digging and 5 guys standing around the hole watching? The government should get their act together. The only place where jobs have been created are in government.

Posted by: Rod89301 | March 1, 2010, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Senator is an American Patriot! Let’s all support getting this multi-trillion dollar waste under control!

Posted by: JoeKPJoker | March 1, 2010, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

Do these idiots think? If they stop Unemployment, those eeking by will not only go into foreclosure and worse, they will stop spending their meager checks, which affects every business that depends on that business to stay alive. Grocery stores, gas stations, discount stores, etc. Hey, let’s just stop all commerce and see what happens! Hello Herbert Hoover!

Posted by: A reader in GA | March 1, 2010, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

Why does this article fail to mention that Bunning has no problem with additional payments, but ONLY wants to know HOW they propose paying for it. Thats is the hold up….interesting how the Liberal media can skew a story…

Posted by: angus | March 1, 2010, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

IndigoSkipper, Jim Bunning is an embarrassment to Kentucky. Ranting about missing a ballgame for pete’s sake!
But, he did reach across the aisle to find the funding. It’s right where it’s been since the stimulous bill was implemented.
The Democrats said no. Bunning was following the rules laid down by President Obama for pay-as-you-go. The Democrats didn’t want to do that.
I don’t like what Bunning did, but I consider it hypocritical to put all the blame on Bunning. Every senator knew or should have known these extensions were about to expire. Every senator should have been present and ready to make sure they didn’t.

Posted by: malcat | March 1, 2010, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

malcat…I meant that but one last thing. It is not the “little pictures” ala “Bunning” that are the problem. It is; however, these “little pictures” used as “philosophical divisiveness while ignoring and not working together on the bigger proble of “unemployment” – that is the “800 pound gorilla”. And it is these “little devisive maneuvers” that Bunning did, that deepen the divide. And that is as wrong as it can be – when it comes to the “big picture of our nation”. As long as devisive maneuvers like this are made, we will never solve the bigger problems our nation faces.

Posted by: CND FOX | March 1, 2010, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

CND FOX, I agree completely about unemployment being a critical issue to resolve. I also believe it is right to use stimulous money to extend unemployment benefits and COBRA assistance to those suffering because of this vile economy. Who else is more deserving!
I’m thankful that I still have a job, even with the paycuts and other cutbacks by my employer.
I just have a problem with the unfairness of blaming ‘just’ Bunning. This was a perfect opportunity for some true bi-partisanship and the Senate failed the test.
I mean the Democrats wanted these benefit extensions, but they refused to accept Bunning’s request to use money the government already has set aside.
Our Congress is totally dysfunctional because of bull-headedness and political games from both parties.
We may not totally agree, but I have appreciated the chance to discuss the issue. I find that I can learn so much from people with whom I agree and even more from people with whom I don’t agree.

Posted by: malcat | March 1, 2010, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

What’s missing in this story?

Posted by: debra | March 1, 2010, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

malcat commented on ‘Sen. Bunning Single-handedly Causes 2,000 Federal Worker Furloughs’
Today, March 01, 2010, 2 hours ago | malcat
” If you want to stop some spending do it to those who can afford to take the hit and at the right time where the cuts are fair and just.” John Stephenson
———–
SecondLook, he didn’t want to stop the spending. He wanted the Senate to use existing funds to cover these extensions. Spend existing funds instead of borrowing.
You have criticized the Republicans in general and President Bush specifically for spending money that had to be borrowed.
So now that Senator Bunning says to abide by pay-as-you-go, liberals and Democrats are calling for his ‘impeachment’.
Sounds hypocritical to me.
**************************************
Wrong. Hypocritical is not giving a squat about a deficit until you decide to make it some talking point to get the power back. Hypcritical is cutting off unemployment during the nastiest recession in my life time when there are other things you could cut, and after your party has the two top porkers of this session. I hate this deficit too mal. Only I get right now it’s the only thing going for our economy. And I especially get that hundreds of thousands are out of work thru no fault of their own and if we cut them off they foreclose, etc. Besides, they kept extending them under Reagan like this. Look it up. I bet Bunning was in on that one. I bet all of your boys were. But NOW they care. My arse. It’s ALL games and pathetic that they use the little people to play them.

Posted by: Secondlook | March 1, 2010, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Here’s another point mal. This is about Reid’s scrapping a jobs bill that gave even more big huge tax cuts to the wealthy (which never gave us jobs under Bush I might remind you). Packed full of republican stuff and the left said no. They’re hacked and it’s pay back. And they don’t mind using the tiny people to show it.

Posted by: Secondlook | March 1, 2010, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

malcat…I have never stopped trying to learn and even though you and I may disagree – sometimes only from a technicality standpoint – it is not the two of us that we need to worry about or get upset with. It is; however, the people that don’t understand “anything” outside “propaganda soundbites” and “their own constricted little world”. They are the ones who are being “focused on” by pundits, extremists and politicians without a conscience. I have never seen politics so divisive and pathetic in my life, as what we are witnessing today.

Posted by: CND FOX | March 1, 2010, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

Do you understand why Europe is so concerned about Greece and Spain ? Debt. Britain is now dealing with their out of control deficit. The USA is in just as bad a shape if not worse. We must get our deficit under control. Find ways to pay for what we need and cut wasteful spending. Our debt will destroy our country. President Obama has just recently promised a pay as you go government. Has he changed his mind already ? If we need the spending in this article we need to find a way to pay for it.

Posted by: jd | March 1, 2010, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

Malcat,
My point is that people seem to be skirting the issues, hiding their misdeeds and passing the blame. The policies we are undergoing now, are due to banking policy. It is like dominoes. Look the benefits are needed to spur spending, but things are being done to circumvent the stimulus. If the stimulus is promoting spending which we need to start jump the economy, why are the banking policies not being addressed? Afterall banking policies started the mess. The banking policies are preventing the stimulus from doing its job. money has to be poured into the economy. Who best at doing this then those who most of the spending. But banking policy is taking the money out of the system faster than the stimulus program is putting it in. Personally when I went to close out my credit card accounts so as not to be gouged due to the banks posturing to protect themselves. They said not to woory it won’t effect you. Now the money that i got from the stimulus program has to go to the credit card companies instead of putting it back into the economy. The banks are not putting the money into the economy, they are doing other things taking it out. But Bunning is preventing money from entering the economy. Aftreall no money to spend limits the spending power of the masses causing the economy to what it is doing. No demand no supply no jobs. ADDRESS THE ISSUES PERTINENT to fixing the economy. If Bunning is so concern about spending where was he when we needed him last adminstration? If he was as diligent then as he is now it might have helped. Afterall what is bad to do sometimes is what you need to do othertimes. Afterall according to American history, Alexander Hamilton said,”The national debt is what is going to make this nation great.” He built this nation using the national debt. Adam Smith says the free market economy will take care of itself if left alone. It seems the banks won’t do it, neither will GOP policies. This is from a devout republican.

Posted by: patman | March 1, 2010, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Amen, CND FOX. Politicians make up such a teeny-tiny part of America’s population. It’s the ones who blindly follow party line who vot to put them in power that scare me.
I find it hard to understand how some people are absolutely positive about a politician’s motives or intents based on whether they like them or not.
I may be a registered Republican, but I’m completely aware of just how stupid some of them can be.

Posted by: malcat | March 1, 2010, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

Bunning is a reminder of what republicans have done in the past on unemployment benefits. They don’t give a rats behind about people out of work. i’m sure Bunning has some big money projects that he makes sure gets through for his state though. GOP= Greedy Old Party

Posted by: bob s | March 1, 2010, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

patman…I am a “lender” and you hit the nail squarely on the head when you said that money is “not getting into the system”. Small business people are NOT coming to us for loans for one reason. They do not have the NEED for money to grow because there are too many unemployed who cannot afford to “buy their goods and/or services”. THAT is the MAIN problem. And all the rest of this is “hype, hyperbole, posturing and pandering” to constituencies incapable of seeing the “big picture”.

Posted by: CND FOX | March 1, 2010, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

Jackie Flynn wrote: “This senator deserves a medal for having the guts to force Congress to find the money before spending it. As a taxpayer I resent being in hock to communist China.”
So you find it ok that he supported tax breaks for the wealthy, 2 unfunded wars, and unfunded Medicare prescriptions that he knew would cause trillions in deficits – including so much borrowing from China we now pay them $100,000,000 a day in interest, but not ok to allow 1.2 million American Middle Class and Poor families to avoid destitution for $10B – an amount equal to what we pay to China every 100 days for just a small fraction of the previous debt Bunning approved?
And while this bill is called a “Dem” bill, note that it also has the support of the GOP.
Bunning is absolute garbage.

Posted by: The_Mick | March 1, 2010, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

If you really want to see change in this country then you mut demand that lobbying money gets eliminated. As long as we have a supremem court who thinks corporations are individuals this place we call the USA is toast.

Posted by: bob s | March 1, 2010, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Patman, thanks for the response. I understand what you were talking about.
I agree banks and other financial institutions are out of control and are destroying our economy and threatening the very survival of our nation.
I don’t think the President or any member of Congress is sufficiently committed to doing something about the problems caused by these banks, etc. President Obama started out tough, but he seems to have backed away lately. That bothers me.
But back to Bunning. It seems that whenever a Republican tries to do something good…keep down the deficit, abide by pay-as-you-go, that folks like you bring up what he/she did in the past. And I don’t understand that.
For example, say a driver is caught speeding. He gets a ticket. Now the next week he drives down the same highway and is observed by the same cop who gave him a ticket. But he’s not speeding…he doesn’t want another ticket. Should the cop pull him over and bash him for the speeding ticket he got last week? Of course not.
People grow and learn from both successes and failures. Now I’m not saying Bunning has changed his ways; probably hasn’t from what I know of him. But folks like you don’t even give him the benefit of doubt. Instead of being happy he has followed the rules, you just keep on droning about his past offenses. Doing the right thing now doesn’t erase his past screw-ups by any means, but his past screw-ups should not be used to bash him now.
I’m thrilled when a politician does something right (shocked as well)..even if it’s the only right thing he/she has ever done. I’m still ticked at them for their past screw-ups…but that doesn’t mean they can never do a good thing.

Posted by: malcat | March 1, 2010, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

The guy’s vilified for wanting Congress to first find a way to pay for the extension of benefits. Just print more money, we’ll worry about the TRILLIONS in deficit spending later. We’re always going to deal with it later. Good for Bunning to stand up for what he believes. It’s about time someone did!

Posted by: s | March 1, 2010, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

So I get how angry Democrats are at Republicans but here’s the ultimate question: Why have these two very different issues been tied up in the same bill and why are people OK with that? Thats a sure fire way to get pork through.

Posted by: Pedro | March 1, 2010, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

jackie flynn: how about we get back some of that money that bush spent spent in iraq? all that money would pay for extended unemployment, healthcare, education, and a slew of other programs to help americans…

Posted by: justsane | March 1, 2010, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

Good grief…what makes our country great is because we have the best infrastructure in the world for a country our size. Bunning is impeding, let alone letting Americans starve.

Posted by: JJ | March 1, 2010, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

To me, Bunning is the perfect symbol for the GOP. I just read where he made an obscene gesture to an ABC producer. When he did that, he was making an obscene gesture to all those unemployed people and all those who might need reduced-premium COBRA coverage, as well as to all those now furloughed from their jobs because of his stalling. He had already used an obscenity in regard to his filibuster.
To me, Bunning represents the GOP attitude perfectly. They are telling all of the hurting, unemployed middle class to buzz off and leave the government to the bonus-rich CEOs and their billion-dollar corporations.

Posted by: JAB | March 1, 2010, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

dot workers laid off, what a shame. ever hear about the DOT worker who smashed a turtle crossing the road with the shovel he was leaning on? the co worker said “why did you do that” he said”that sob ‘s been following us all day.

Posted by: scrouge | March 1, 2010, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

How’s that cope and hang working out for ‘ya.

Posted by: ksdavid | March 1, 2010, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Bunning SHOULD BE commended. He is demanding that Congress quit with the unfunded mandate attitudes. They make it sound like we’re in debt to China? I have news for you, as long as their is FIAT money in play – we’re all in a HASBRO game of Monopoly – DO NOT PASS GO, DO NOT COLLECT $200. Once upon a time, Ben Franklin and others got us away from the European Banking Cartel and into our own FREE currency state .. THEN, we “were” free. The nonsense you read in this Article is the result of Politicians selling our Freedom back to the Banking Cartel – who loan us our own money, at interest. What are you gonna do once the North American Union dissolves the Constitution? You seriously think most of these comments are on point with reality ???? How about all of you go do some homework before you post…..

Posted by: Born Conservative | March 1, 2010, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

This is tipical of most Republican U.S. Senators, their unconcern about the U.S. working class, they just ‘don’t get it’. Are you hearing me Sen. MaCain?

Posted by: Sylvanus Goff | March 1, 2010, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

Just read another article about Bunning…being his usual foul self.
But when he reached the Senate floor, he explained his reason for holding up the bill. Here it is:
“I support extending unemployment benefits, cobra benefits, flood insurance, highway bill fix, doc fix, small business loans, distant network television for satellite viewers. If we can’t find $10 billion to pay for something that we all support, we will never pay for anything on the floor of this U.S. Senate,” he said.
Sounds like a logical premise for me…just wish it could have been settled Thursday!

Posted by: malcat | March 1, 2010, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

All Sen. Bunning was doing was putting into practice all this big talk of Obama and Democrats using PAYGO. Dems love to spend money and can only pay for their spending by increasing taxes or fees.
ABC ignored why Sen. Bunning was holding up the funding and trying once again to blame Republicans like they always do.
Get a life!

Posted by: ihatewhiners | March 1, 2010, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

Good!
That is the new American way. If I don’t get paid from it why care? And if a tax doesn’t affect me…why care? That is the attitude instilled by all the previous spending and taxing decisions before. Why is it so different now?

Posted by: Mike | March 1, 2010, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

Any thing to keep his own political party down. This should be interesting who runs as fast as possible away from Bunning. Makes one think that it’s possible other GOP politicians will try to do their part in ruining the country on their way out the door while flipping the people “the bird”.

Posted by: Wayne | March 1, 2010, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

How do old stupid idiots get elected to the Congress? Geeze I hope I get lucky when I am an old senile geezer like Bunning The Heartless Wonder. Then I can run for Congress when I turn 90!. This guy should hide his face in shame.

Posted by: Robert | March 1, 2010, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

God bless Jim Bunning! I wish all our senators were like him!

Posted by: Phyllida | March 1, 2010, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

Isn’t it interesting how this guy has no problem approving funds for the iraq and afganistan wars,(billions),and he does care where that money is coming from, but try to pass an extension for unemployment benefits,(millions), ans WHAM!!,we must find a way to pay for this?? Why is it when it comes to making someone fat and rich no problem, we got the money!! But when it comes to helping out a regular person to keep food on their table,NO SALE WE CAN’T DO THAT!!!What in the hell is going on in this country????????????

Posted by: Eric | March 1, 2010, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

If Senator Bunning got the mainstream media and the Democrat party that mad he must have done something AWESOME!
Way to go Senator Bunning!

Posted by: Jersey Dave | March 1, 2010, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Rightbehind…
It is about time we start saving some of our money and past time we stop getting deeper into debt that we can never pay off! It is a start…
Well, we would have the money if your old boy – GW Bush did not start a baseless war. Just remember that. Also, Clinton left office with a SURPLUS. Yes economies have cycles, but had you boy had 1/4th of a brain we would not be in this debt.

Posted by: Sanjiv | March 1, 2010, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

None of you on here say nothing about tax cuts for the rich which have cost the American tax payer millions. Rich people have it so good in this country and poor and middle class are treated like dogs.

Posted by: gr | March 1, 2010, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Justme8811 – Cut the Bull. Where were you for the last 8 years you HYPOCRITES?

Posted by: gr | March 1, 2010, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

MR Bunning needs to go home and shovel cow poop.The republicans are making him there flunky I called my senator lugar who seemed to be a straight shooter he doesnt take any position on this in other words he is running for relection

Posted by: john m logansport indiana | March 1, 2010, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

Have you ever watched a road or highway being built? One man working and 4 men watching him!

Posted by: carol in Alabama | March 1, 2010, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

You people are sadd. You are not concerned about those who lost their paychecks because of one person. If this had happen to you, you would crying the blues. You say you don’t want to be in hock with china! That is a moronic statement. You as an individual will not owe china anything nor will your children are grand children. When I pay my taxes I could careless what happens to my tax money. To worry about where your tax money is going is moronic. As long as your needs are met through your hard work is all that matters. I have not had my taxes increased. I have not been denied any rights under the constitution. I have not had my guns taken away.

Posted by: Curtis | March 1, 2010, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

Where do they get these so-called “journalists” Who? What? When? Where? Why?
The most important fact was left out of the story….the WHY he did this.
Congress is operating under Pay/GO. They can’t pass bills to pay for something unless they cut other spending to compensate. This bill didn’t cut any comparable spending so, according to Obama’s wishes for Pay/Go, it couldn’t be passed.
You’d think an impartial journalist would have pointed that out.

Posted by: E Pluribus Unum | March 1, 2010, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

i have been looken for work for six months every were i go they pull out a stack of apps iam a licences plumber 17 years exp so i think the repulicans just want hard worken poeple to go hungry iam loosing my truck to the repo man hope u people or happy becouse iam fixen to be homeless thanx

Posted by: jeremy grimes | March 1, 2010, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

Why was there no mention in this story of the recently passed PAYGO BILL?

Posted by: gWibz | March 1, 2010, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

Marra,
Some very funny comments you made——-
“Bush, with purpose, put people in charge of departments and responsibilities they were not at all qualified for.”
Obama was real qualified to be president with his 140 days in the US Senate wasn’t he. At least Bush’s staff all knew how to pay their taxes.

Posted by: ott2000 | March 1, 2010, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

There is PLENTY of “Stimulus” money that is not going to be spent on a project until beyond 2012 … If the Dem’s need time to figure out where the Highway funds are going to come from then use that money.
They JUST passed the “pay as you go” bill and wanted adulation for that one and NOW they also want an exemption from it on the first “crisis”.
Along the same lines you or I would be in jail for what Rangel did … but because his “transgressions” did not affect the “security of the nation” he gets a pass.
COME ON PEOPLE!

Posted by: Iowa Transplant | March 2, 2010, 5:40 am 5:40 am

Go get a job lazy slackers

Posted by: rog | March 2, 2010, 7:47 am 7:47 am

Time someone said stop spending money we do not have.Where is the Pay Go system the Democrats touted and Obama praised last week? All the Senator did was stand up for the Tax Payers,and the Pay Go Bill just past.

Posted by: stormerF2 | March 2, 2010, 8:01 am 8:01 am

So with the economy starting to improve and unemployment starting to level off and maybe in somestates, go down, Sen Bunning now wants to artificially MAKE the country fail in his attempt to further the republican party chances in midterm elections. Is this not proof positive that republicans WILL MAKE THE COUNTRY FAIL in order to get power back!!! All those wishes that Obama fail, that the country do badly, oh now that it seems obama was RIGHT and his plans were working, by all means, let’s stop the things that are making the economy better, let’s FORCE The economy to be worse, let’s FORCE unemployment to go up, let’s MAKE more folks lose their homes so foreclosures go up. Let’s BRING misery to the american people so that more republicans can get elected and turn on Obama. It’s the republican way!

Posted by: just the facts | March 2, 2010, 10:35 am 10:35 am

This guy really gets under my skin. I’m living in a state of over 15% unemployment and 30% of that is in the area I live SE Michigan. I’ve been out of work since October. Sending resumes, writing letters, networking and doing everything I can to find a job in my field. I’ve sent resumes all over this fine country. With 10 years experience you’d think someone would hire me. I’m not sitting on my butt like some of you are saying. 2 interviews in that amount of time and no call backs. Why because they are getting hundreds if not thousands of applicants. WE NEED WORK. Until that happens I need something to feed my 3 year old and keep the roof over our heads. It took my wife 2 months just to get an interview at Old Navy to help out until things work out for me. This man and that party are the bane of many honest Americans. Why can’t they help “We the people” and not “We the warmongering corporate shilling poor mortgage lending practice enforcing jerks that got us into this mess” kind of people? Because he’s got money coming in for the rest of his life and he’s got medical for the rest of his life that’s why.

Posted by: JIm R | March 2, 2010, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

Bunning is up for re-election this year. I can’t see how on Earth this could hurt his chances for re-election. given the mood of the country it can only help.
The comments here against him say a lot more about the “let-them-eat-cake” attitude of the political class than about the mood of the country.
Question for Progressives: Why shouldn’t government workers be downsized and outsourced just like the rest of us? The “stimulus” spent enough money to buy over 150 Nimitz-class aircraft carriers (the Navy currently has 11.) As a Progressive, would you feel the country was on the wrong track if Congress built 150 new aircraft carriers? If the answer to that is “yes,” then you should understand that what Sen. Bunning did was a good thing.

Posted by: Philster | March 2, 2010, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

Interestingly the problem is: congress is not follow normal procedure for this bill. Why didn’t congress send the bill through in time and correctly, this deadline didn’t just happen. Bunning is taking the blunt for congress one again being not getting things done on time and correctly. He is just calling their hand and the Dems are making him look like the bad guy when they are the ones who did not get it done!

Posted by: JimC | March 2, 2010, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

He stopped this stuff from passing by unanimous consent. It can still all be passed by majority vote, it just takes time. One man cannot stop majority rule, even in the Senate.
The fuss is all about having to devote more of the Senate schedule to these matters and, most important of all, having to go on record as voting to expand the size of gov’t debt. Bunning’s point, if anyone cares to hear it, is that none of these spending items were “paid for” by new taxes or compensating spending cuts.

Posted by: Bob White | March 2, 2010, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

I just wonder if all the people against reconciliation object to the fact that one Senator can create so much havoc, and hurt so many people in the process.
2,000 federal workers were furloughed, and untold numbers of people who’ve been unemployed for at least a year got shafted to prove some point. Not to mention that projects that provide work were interrupted.
I am glad that his proposal went down to defeat, and that the jobs bill passed with overwhelming support. When I read comments about how “courageous” Bunning was, it’s worth remembering that it cost him nothing, but others plenty. Where is the courage in kicking people who are already down?

Posted by: Anne | March 3, 2010, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.