By Matt Loffman

Mar 8, 2010 12:05pm

Whip Count (No. 10 in a Series) Lipinski and Oberstar to Vote No Without Stupak Abortion Language

From Sunlen Miller:

The Weekly Standard reports that Representative Dan Lipinski (D-IL) will not vote for a health care bill that lacks the Stupak anti-abortion amendment.

“Congressman Lipinski will not vote for a health care bill that provides federal funding for abortion,” a spokesman for Lipinski wrote in a statement to the Weekly Standard’s John McCormack. 

Pro-life Democrat Representative Stupak (D-MI) is trying to flip votes on health care reform, if nothing is done about the Senate bill’s language on abortion.

Congressman Jim Oberstar (D-MN) told Congressional Quarterly late last month similarly that he will not vote for the bill without the Stupak amendment.

"I will not vote for a health care bill that doesn't have the House abortion language in it," Oberstar told Congressional Quarterly.

As we’ve previously covered, 220 members of Congress voted for the bill when Pelosi brought the House legislation to a vote.

Since then, four yes votes are no more: Rep. Anh “Joseph” Cao, R-Louisiana, has said he won’t vote for final passage, Rep. Neil Abercrombie, D-Hi., retired to run for governor, Rep. Robert Wexler, D-Fla., also retired, and Rep. John Murtha, D-Penn., died.

That means to pass the Senate bill, Pelosi starts out with 216 members of Congress who votes yes last time. With the pending retirement of Rep. Nathan Deal, R-Ga., there will soon be only 431 members of Congress total, meaning a majority will be 216 votes

-Sunlen Miller

User Comments

So abortion funding is the only reason for voting “No”?
How about voting No because Americans by a big majority don’t like this stinking bill.
I guess the underhanded, backdoor, sleazy deals made by the Senate aren’t a factor.
Is there any integrity left in politics.

Posted by: kyle | March 8, 2010, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

Hey, let’s just get Rahm “The F-Bomb” Emanuel and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer to set up a few more of these Democrats who voted NO on ObamaCare–and force them out of the House on false charges. It worked against Congressman Eric Massa from NY.
Hey, effective Community Organizing means breaking a few eggs. Gibbs said they’ll do “whatever it takes to get healthcare done.” He really meant it.

Posted by: The Chicago Way | March 8, 2010, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

RAHM ‘WOULD SELL HIS OWN MOTHER’
‘SON OF THE DEVIL’S SPAWN’.. drudgereport
Obama Vs America

Posted by: another crisis-another photo op | March 8, 2010, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin — who has gone to great lengths to hype the supposed dangers of a big government takeover of American health care — admitted over the weekend that she used to get her treatment in Canada’s single-payer system.
she must be a socialist…according to her logic

Posted by: watching | March 8, 2010, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

“Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin — who has gone to great lengths to hype the supposed dangers of a big government takeover of American health care — admitted over the weekend that she used to get her treatment in Canada’s single-payer system.
she must be a socialist…according to her logic”
Posted by: watching | Mar 8, 2010 12:57:33 PM
Nice spin, but not good enough. She did this with her family when she was a CHILD. Nowadays all the wealthy Canadians come to the U.S. for care. Like the Premier from the Maritime provinces.

Posted by: HealthCare Redistribution Czar | March 8, 2010, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Nowadays all the wealthy Canadians come to the U.S. for care.
________
Wealthy being the key word. Wealthy Americans get great care here too. As everybody knows, that’s not the problem. Never has been.
Meanwhile, medical tourism is up. That’s Americans going elsewhere for affordable health care.
Jonathan Chait writes, “What separates the two parties is not how far to go, but in which direction to go. The divide is simple. Democrats propose to shift resources from the rich and the healthy to the poor and the sick. Republicans want to do just the opposite. Republican health care plans reflect the party’s increasingly widespread belief that good health, like other forms of prosperity, is a matter of personal responsibility….The common element of all the Republican plans is to do the opposite-to separate the healthy from the sick….Republicans boast that the CBO says their plan would reduce insurance premiums. This is true. The CBO predicted this would happen because the GOP plan would reduce premiums for healthy people, bringing more of them into the insurance pool, and raise premiums for sicker people, driving more of them out.” (Sink or swim, The GOP’s Dickensian fix for health care, TNR)

Posted by: progressive mama | March 8, 2010, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

Finally a Democrat I can support.
Rep Eric Massa my new hero!
Tell it all Eric.
No Drama Obama–hilarious!!!

Posted by: millie | March 8, 2010, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

“That’s Americans going elsewhere for affordable health care.”
Posted by: progressive mama | Mar 8, 2010 1:18:42 PM
Prove it.

Posted by: HealthCare Redistribution Czar | March 8, 2010, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

The White House can’t get rid of Rahm.
He’s the only person keeping Obama from becoming Jimmy!
This is better than watching All My Children!

Posted by: callie | March 8, 2010, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin — who has gone to great lengths to hype the supposed dangers of a big government takeover of American health care — admitted over the weekend that she used to get her treatment in Canada’s single-payer system.
___________________________________
Why would she and her family as Americans go to Canada for health care treatment?

Posted by: tierra | March 8, 2010, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Having read Sandburg’s “Lincoln” biography, and having carefully observed their policies for the last thirty years, I was ready for the Democratic Party to disappear altogether. Their direction is so very, very often the opposite of the essence of what is good about the United States. But Congressman Stupak and Congressman Lipinski are acting very courageously. I wish them well.

Posted by: MKS | March 8, 2010, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Prove it.
Posted by: HealthCare Redistribution Czar | Mar 8, 2010 1:22:24 PM
See Medical tourism: ’5-star’ care at a discount, SFGate,
Lower costs lure U.S. patients abroad for treatment, CNN.
Medical and surgical tourism:
The new world of health care globalization and what it means for the practicing surgeon, Nora Institute
Medical Tourism: Update and Implications – 2009 Report, Deloitte
Center for Medical Tourism Research
Advice to Medical Tourists, Dr. Rich’s blog: “Medical tourism, where one travels outside one’s country in order to obtain medical care elsewhere, is a booming business. A number of supurb state-of-the-art medical centers expressly aimed at attracting medical tourists have been established in the Middle East, Singapore, India, China and elsewhere in Asia. These institutions cater to citizens of the world whose own healthcare systems cannot (or will not) provide in a timely fashion (or at all) the level of care patients may desire. They offer modern hospitals, numerous amenities, luxurious accomodations, attentive nursing care, top-notch doctors – and they do it all for a tiny fraction of what the same care might cost (if you can even find it) in the U.S. and other “first world” nations.”
And “WellPoint Introduces International Medical Tourism Pilot Program”

Posted by: progresive mama | March 8, 2010, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

Also, Gallup (Aug, 2009):
“Gallup finds that sizable proportions of Americans would “consider traveling outside the United States for treatment in a foreign country” for a variety of procedures and medical treatments.”
Also, ABC: A Cut Below, Americans Look Abroad for Health Care(from 2006– and prices have increased since then)
“More and more Americans are looking across the border and overseas to get their medicine. Jeff Schult, author of “Beauty from Afar,” a guide to medical tourism, estimates that more than 100,000 Americans a year travel beyond the boarder for cosmetic procedures alone.
In 2005, for example, Bumrungrad Hospital in Thailand served more than 50,000 American patients, a 30 percent increase from the previous year. Thailand is just one of the countries where foreign patients have flocked. India, Brazil, Costa Rica and Mexico all market themselves as medical destinations, according to Schult. “

Posted by: progresive mama | March 8, 2010, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Why would she and her family as Americans go to Canada for health care treatment?
Posted by: tierra | Mar 8, 2010 1:31:40 PM
I’m chuckling that she refers to it as “ironic.” Yes, Sarah… and that’s not the only thing ironic about many of your positions and much of your posturing.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 8, 2010, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

Posted by: HealthCare Redistribution Czar | Mar 8, 2010 1:12:31 PM
And now, its your turn to prove that ALL the wealthy Canadians come to the U.S. for care as you claim. LOL.
I know Republicans can’t help themselves but the exaggeration and distortion is ridiculous, and tiresome.
They can’t tell the truth, plain and simple, even when it would be fairly easy to do. LOL, LOL, LOL.
I encourage people to read Jonathan Chait’s piece mentioned in my post at 1:18:42 PM. The Dems have nothing on the Republicans when it comes to “redistribution.” Its just that they’re redistribution efforts benefit the wealthy and corrupt.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 8, 2010, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

“More and more Americans are looking across the border and overseas to get their medicine. Jeff Schult, author of “Beauty from Afar,” a guide to medical tourism, estimates that more than 100,000 Americans a year travel beyond the boarder for cosmetic procedures alone.
In 2005, for example, Bumrungrad Hospital in Thailand served more than 50,000 American patients, a 30 percent increase from the previous year. Thailand is just one of the countries where foreign patients have flocked. India, Brazil, Costa Rica and Mexico all market themselves as medical destinations, according to Schult. ”
Posted by: progresive mama | Mar 8, 2010 2:12:39 PM
_______________________________
I’ll thank you for the info in your last posts . .. since the Republican right seem to be unaware of what’s going on . . . and probably not all that thankful you’re providing the facts.

Posted by: tierra | March 8, 2010, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

since the Republican right seem to be unaware of what’s going on . . . and probably not all that thankful you’re providing the facts.
Posted by: tierra | Mar 8, 2010 2:28:21 PM
Yes, well, Republicans aren’t fond of facts or truth, are they? Its all about distortions, exaggerations, flat-out lies, sound bites, doing nothing and fear mongering.
I find it interesting that many conservatives, independents and moderates are agreeing that the RNC powerpoint presentation, and Liz Cheney’s bizarre witch hunt are “shameful.”
My question is how can anyone associate with that party. And why would they cheapen themselves to use their tactics on public forums?
To each their own, I guess.

Posted by: progressive mama | March 8, 2010, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Talk about the “sausage making” involved in passing this HC bill!!!..WOW..Eric Massa pulled the scab off one ugly mess today!! More disturbing than his allegations against the administration’s hench men..is ABC ignoring his comments…can you imagine if a republican went public with allegations like this??

Posted by: cindy | March 8, 2010, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Nice spin, but not good enough. She did this with her family when she was a CHILD. Nowadays all the wealthy Canadians come to the U.S. for care. Like the Premier from the Maritime provinces.
Posted by: HealthCare Redistribution Czar | Mar 8, 2010 1:12:31 PM
You shouldn’t have gone there! Where did Palin go as an adult? Do you even have any idea?
Alaskan Native Medical Center?
Yes
Indian Health Services?
Yes
Oh man! Palin seems to have a thing for socialized medicine for herself, but doesn’t want anyone else to be able to have the choice. Typical Republican hypocrite.

Posted by: Flash Override | March 8, 2010, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

“Congressman Lipinski will not vote for a health care bill that provides federal funding for abortion,”
I think your count is a bit screwy, since the Senate bill does not in fact provide federal funding for abortion, this statement is not a statement against the Senate bill.

Posted by: Flash Override | March 8, 2010, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

I think your count is a bit screwy, since the Senate bill does not in fact provide federal funding for abortion, this statement is not a statement against the Senate bill.
_____________________________
Fine then there shouldn’t be any conflict with adding the stupak ammendment, unless they are lying.

Posted by: obieone40 | March 8, 2010, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

obi—your comment is factually incorrect. The Senate Bill is very specific about situations under which Federal Funding for infanticide will not be provided. Outside of those narrow areas, the bill appears to me to be silent.
It is not hard to reach a desired end without going out of your way to throw mud in the faces of those with whom you disagree. Those that pat themselves on the back under the delusion that they are forward thinkers might learn a lesson from the defeat many hope they suffer.

Posted by: mitchscove | March 8, 2010, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

callie said:
The White House can’t get rid of Rahm.
He’s the only person keeping Obama from becoming Jimmy!
It’s too late Obama already is Jimmy!
The only thing he hasn’t blamed his
incompetence on is the country being in
a “malaise”!
Be patient I’m sure that’s coming soon!

Posted by: reaganfan | March 8, 2010, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

You shouldn’t have gone there! Where did Palin go as an adult? Do you even have any idea?
Alaskan Native Medical Center?
Yes
Indian Health Services?
Yes
Oh man! Palin seems to have a thing for socialized medicine for herself, but doesn’t want anyone else to be able to have the choice. Typical Republican hypocrite.
Posted by: Flash Override | Mar 8, 2010 5:28:53 PM
**************************************

Posted by: tierra | March 9, 2010, 2:26 am 2:26 am

Every where in Health care bill but why????
Only for vote…BANK…

Posted by: Ilan Ben Menachem | March 18, 2010, 6:28 am 6:28 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.