Mar 10, 2010 4:21pm

Will Republican Senators Vote Pro-Choice to Kill Health Care Reform Bill?

ABC’s Z. Byron Wolf reports: All 41 Republican Senators vowed in a letter today to do everything in their power to kill Democrats' health care legislation and vote en bloc against procedural motions Democrats want to use to fix the health reform bill passed Christmas Eve by the Senate. This would include a scenario where the Republican Senators oppose language championed by anti-abortion rights Democrats in the House and side instead with abortion rights defenders. The House moderates want to ban any federal money from going to insurance companies that offer elective abortions. The Senate-passed health reform bill would create pools of segregated funds with only private money going to cover abortions.
 
“So you’d be voting with Barbara Boxer on an abortion measure?” a reporter asked Sen. Tom Coburn, the OB-GYN and Oklahoma Republican who vehemently opposes abortion rights, at a press conference this afternoon. Boxer, a California Democrat, is a vehement supporter of abortion rights. “Yes I would. I certainly would,” Coburn said, clarifying that he would oppose a procedural motion in the Senate to allow the stricter ban on federal funding for abortion from being added to the Senate health reform bill. Coburn argued that opposing language being demanded in the House by Rep. Bart Stupak of Michigan, even though it is supported by the Conference of Catholic Bishops and other anti-abortion rights activist groups. Coburn said that there aren’t even 51 votes in the Senate for Stupak’s language, so voting in a way to scuttle the entire bill – even if it is along abortion rights defenders and on an abortion measure – is the conscience vote for a foe of abortion rights. Because killing the health reform bill as a whole would kill the compromise abortion coverage language worked out by Democratic Senators in December, Coburn said. Only 45 Senators voted for the Stupak language – 54 opposing – when Senators considered the language as part of their health reform bill December 8th. This is the confusing part of Democrats’ strategy to enact health reform legislation. The reconciliation rules bypass 60-vote procedural requirements in the Senate for deficit reduction. Policy measures are supposed to be exempt from those rules. And there is precedent for abortion measures being ruled out of order on reconciliation bills. Regardless, it will take 60 votes for any non-budget-related items to be included in a fix-it bill Democrats want to pass alongside the Senate version of the health reform bill. The Senate parliamentarian would be in charge of determining what has to do with the deficit reduction (needing only 51 votes) and what is policy (needing 60). The four conservative Republicans appearing today said they would oppose any measure offered during the reconciliation process. They argued that Democrats in the House will not be able to provide cover for members squeamish about voting for the Senate health reform bill because it will have to become law before it can be modified with a list of fix-its during reconciliation.

User Comments

Proud American….. where are you?? It’s not time to clock out yet! Don’t you get paid by the blog comments you write?? Here comes a spoiler….. he’s going to say “how’s that hopey changey working out for you” along with some other dribble!

Posted by: Bart | March 10, 2010, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

Who wrote this sentence?
“The House moderates want to ban any federal money from going to insurance companies that offer elective abortions. ”
This is wrong on two counts: first, Stupak idiots are not “moderates.” They want to ELIMINATE FROM THE MARKETPLACE (the exchanges) any insurance company that insures women who want to use THEIR OWN MONEY to buy insurance that includes coverage for abortion. That is not moderate. It is deeply divisive and violates the legal rights of the insurance companies and women.
Second, insurance companies do not “offer elective abortions.” They provide insurance coverage to people, and those people go to hospitals and clinics that “offer elective abortions.”
You claim to be paid to produce such deeply misleading sentences?

Posted by: dollared | March 10, 2010, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

The GOP has finally admitted that they’re just pretending to be pro-life.
This is going to infuriate a lot of conservative voters.

Posted by: Pro-Life | March 10, 2010, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

I would say just protecting the voteing majority

Posted by: earl | March 10, 2010, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Re: dollared | Mar 10, 2010 6:03:09 PM
“You claim to be paid to produce such deeply misleading sentences?”
They won’t answer your question, but they do get paid to produce such deeply misleading sentences.
Disney (owners of ABC) is one of the hundred biggest companies in the world, probably the largest media or entertainment conglomerate in the world; their news division is far less propaganda than Fox “News” but if you want news from TV, watch the BBC.

Posted by: Janus Daniels | March 10, 2010, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

I recall when the senate committees were working on the health care bill last fall shown on CSPAN, the Rep. senators proposed amendment to the house passed bill that a more firm standing of anti-abortion be written into the bill , this amendment was quickly rejected by the Dem. majority. If the senate bill is forced to incorporate the Stupak’s language which is close to the Rep amendment in senate, some Dem. senators will be against the bill. Since all 41 Rep. senators will vote against the h.c. reform bill, it is likely that the Dem. can not get 50 or more votes. More importantly, the House Dem. may not be able to get the required 216 votes to pass the bill for being too pro-life and without public option. If the revised bill can not be passed in senate and house with simple majority, the bill for Obamacare is dead.

Posted by: austin | March 10, 2010, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

Dollared I need to address a few points you made.
“They want to ELIMINATE FROM THE MARKETPLACE (the exchanges) any insurance company”
Any plan that is. The companies will be doing just fine with the helping hand of Obamacare.
“that insures women who want to use THEIR OWN MONEY to buy insurance that includes coverage for abortion.”
So a woman can buy a rider and get coverage.
“That is not moderate. It is deeply divisive and violates the legal rights of the insurance companies and women.”
Now what are these legal rights you’re talking about? What about: the right to buy a policy with a high deductible. The right to buy a policy that does not include mental health services. All of these things and more will be banned under Obamacare. The right to not buy health insurance.
And now you complain about a bill affecting the marketplace?

Posted by: Mark | March 11, 2010, 3:36 am 3:36 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.