Democrats Retain Money Advantage
ABC News’ David Chalian Reports: As the national party committees tallied up their fundraising numbers and filed their monthly reports with the Federal Election Commission, it became clear that Democrats have been able to hang on to a financial advantage over the Republicans as we approach the six month mark from Election Day 2010. The combined Democratic cash on hand from the three national party committees (DNC/DSCC/DCCC) totals up to $57.8 million compared to a Republican combined total (RNC/NRSC/NRCC) of $36.3 million, giving the party in power a $21.5 million cash on hand advantage. (And it is not lost on anyone in Washington circles that more than 75% of that cash on hand advantage is due to the huge DCCC advantage over the NRCC’s money machine.) It isn’t all that surprising, of course, that the party in control of the House, Senate, and White House can emerge victorious in the fundraising battle over the minority party. Republicans are eager to point to the narrower cash on hand advantage Democrats hold over Republicans this cycle than they did at this point last cycle as a sign that momentum and enthusiasm are on their side. At the end of the first quarter in 2008, Democrats had $32 million more in the bank than their GOP counterparts and that was despite the DNC being significantly outraised by the RNC at the time. A former chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee, Rep. Tom Davis, told ABC News’ “Top Line” that party committee money probably won’t have a huge impact in the key races that will end up determining control of Congress. “You have a new Supreme Court ruling allowing corporations to come in. A lot of this money is 527 money, this isn't even recorded. You already have high profile people out there raising money to come in as entrants from the outside,” said Davis. “I'm not sure these numbers mean as much as everybody's reading into them because I think there's going to be a lot of outside money going into these midterms. There's going to be a lot energy on the right this time at the grassroots because they're the outside party. So it's going to be very very interesting, but I think at the end of the day in these competitive races money's not going to be a significant advantage,” he added. Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Tx., the national finance chairman for the NRCC, told reporters on Tuesday, “I think the first quarter is certainly our best fundraising quarter in the memory of mankind so we feel the trend lines are clearly in the right direction.” Republicans and Democrats alike contend that the passage of health care helped fill their coffers toward the end of the quarter. "House Democrats' grassroots individual donors are energized by passage of health insurance reform,” a DCCC spokesman told ABC News of the committee’s $9.77 million haul for the month of March. Last week, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, informed Democratic leadership on the Hill that the DNC would be kicking in $50 million to the midterm election effort. In a briefing session with reporters on Tuesday, NRCC Chairman Pete Sessions seemed to suggest he wasn’t expecting such a robust investment from his colleagues at the RNC. “To the limit of their ability, I’m sure they will help us,” said Sessions. “We do not have the White House. We do not own the Senate or the House. So, we will have to stay after it.”

Email
Santorum: Money Will Not Defeat Obama, Ideas Will
Rick Santorum's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
Dems are going to need every penny to hire a hypnotist so we forget the healthcare scam, and B.O.’s odd choices for cabinet and czars and…..
Posted by: scoty | April 21, 2010, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
The best government money can buy…..
Posted by: LongT | April 21, 2010, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
Both groups are corrupt (for the most part).
Posted by: deanbob | April 21, 2010, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
Seems to me the Party holding the Majority historically gets the most contributions.
Especially from Corporate Groups that seek the majorities support on current and proposed legislation. Why would they contribut to those that can’t possibly push their agenda through or block agenda they oppose.
Therefore, the way I see it, donations to Republicans are likely doing so to help get Republicans elected to oust Democrats.
Posted by: tbeth | April 21, 2010, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
If I’m a business owner, giving to the Democrats is like paying any other insurance bill.
Posted by: cindy | April 21, 2010, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
Of course Dems hold the edge…Obama is flying all over the country fundraising for his party at tax payers expense. Once a person is President, he works for EVERYONE 24/7. Instead he uses his office to help out one side only. So much for his speech of “No Red State, No Blue States,…” blah blah blah
Posted by: free_dude | April 21, 2010, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
Best Government money can buy eh?
Posted by: ChicagoBob | April 21, 2010, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
How do you stop a charging elephant, take away their charge card.
Republicans: Borrow and Spend!
You people who say that Repubs will do better, ha, they had 16 yrs, what did they do? Borrow and Spend baby, borrow and spend! Where do you think they got the money to invade Iraq, borrowed from china! China is going to own us, oops, they already do! They give tax cuts and then borrow money from other countries to pay for those tax cuts.
Posted by: Reichwing is Clueless | April 22, 2010, 3:22 am 3:22 am
If the Dems can’t find a way to buy off the Tea Partiers they have no hope for 2010 or 2012 election success. Obama peaked too early. He’s already used up his political collateral. We’ve already seen him resort to backroom dealing and payoffs, Chicago style.
Posted by: gollywiggle | April 22, 2010, 11:46 am 11:46 am