Today’s Q’s for O’s WH – 4/12/2010
We're at the Nuclear Security Summit in Washington, DC, and we were briefed by White House press secretary Robert Gibbs and White House counterterrorism adviser John Brennan about the summit and an announcement they made about Ukraine. (Read more about that HERE.)
TAPPER: I have a question for you and a couple for Mr. Brennan. You said that Ukraine is committed to have — having all this highly enriched uranium disposed of by the time of the next nuclear security summit. When is the next nuclear security summit?
GIBBS: 2012. We'll announce likely tomorrow the location for that.
TAPPER: OK. And then, Mr. Brennan, according to the Nuclear Threat Initiative that Ukraine has almost 70 kilograms of highly enriched uranium at the Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology; 13.2 at the Institute for Nuclear Research in Kiev, and up to 6.1 at the Sevastopol Naval Research Institute. Is that what you're talking about? That's all going to be disposed of? Or is there additional highly enriched uranium that we don't know about?
GIBBS: I would say that, if my math is correct, there's roughly 90 kilograms. I'm under the impression that it's actually more than that. I don't want to get into a specific amount. It's enough, as I said, for the construction of several nuclear weapons, and I would say many, many times greater than the amount that was recovered from Chile, although that obviously was an important announcement in ensuring that any of that highly enriched uranium is now under lock and key.
TAPPER: Can I have one more crack at Mr. Brennan?
GIBBS: Sure.
TAPPER: The — Gibbs said that — Mr. Gibbs said that the United States has been trying to do this for 10 years. What made the difference? Why is it happening now?
BRENNAN: There has been an effort over many years to try to ensure that nuclear materials are going to be safeguarded. This was one of the priority items that President Obama had when he entered office. And there has been a lot of work that has been done over the past 15 months in order to get to this point today where we can bring together so many major world leaders who recognize that there is a threat out there and it requires collective action. Because terrorist groups and international criminal organizations will look for the weakest link in a chain. And that's why it's so critically important that all countries take their responsibility seriously.
-jpt
Email
Biden Reflects on Grief, Suicidal Thoughts
Is Congress Sounding Dumber?
“There has been an effort over many years to try to ensure that nuclear materials are going to be safeguarded.”
Obama was involved in it when he was in the Senate, and it was something the Bush administration was also working on. This is good news, but just like the Nuclear Posture revision just another small step on a very important but very long path.
Posted by: jhw539 | April 12, 2010, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Did you ask what B.Hussein meant when he said we are still working on our democracy ?
Posted by: nat turner | April 12, 2010, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
If this happens I’d like to know how much US aid has been promised. How much of my money is obammmma willing to pay for a kilogram of uranium?
Posted by: smartlillena | April 12, 2010, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Did the WH serve No-Doze to survive Obama’s lectures?
Posted by: mick | April 12, 2010, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
BRENNAN: There has been an effort over many years to try to ensure that nuclear materials are going to be safeguarded. This was one of the priority items that President Obama had when he entered office. And there has been a lot of work that has been done over the past 15 months in order to get to this point today where we can bring together so many major world leaders who recognize that there is a threat out there and it requires collective action.
Posted by: tierra | April 12, 2010, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
BRENNAN: There has been an effort over many years to try to ensure that nuclear materials are going to be safeguarded.
—
And al-quaida/taliban hasn’t gotten hold of one yet. Now, supposedly, 30% of that material will be floating around in the unknown zone. I see that logic.
Posted by: smartlillena | April 13, 2010, 7:00 am 7:00 am
Question for Bob “Baghdad” Gibbs:
Obama once said that “We can disagree without being disagreeable.”
Is this platitude consistent with Representative Barney Frank sending his assistant to insult and antagonize two ophthalmologists who wanted to talk to Frank on a flight to Boston?? The two doctors approached the congressman on the flight to talk about government takeover of healthcare, he ignored them, and then had his minion insult them with obscene names—and then claim that the ladies were drunk.
So much for the right “to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Instead, our public servants demonize us.
Posted by: Health Redistribution Czar | April 13, 2010, 10:19 am 10:19 am