BP Official – Open Heart Surgery at 5,000 Feet; Believes Cause is Failed Equipment
BP America Chairman and President Lamar McKay told me efforts to trigger the blowout preventer to stop the flow of oil from the sea floor are like performing “open heart surgery at 5,000 feet in the dark with robot-controlled submarines.” During my exclusive “This Week” interview, McKay said he believes the cause of the explosion on the Deepwater Horizon oil rig that led the loss of 11 lives and to its eventual sinking was “a failed piece of equipment”. McKay added, “We don’t know why it failed yet in this contracted rig.”
McKay said BP, oil industry and government partners are working on four fronts to manage the massive spill: 1) stopping the leak at the source, 2) working on a containment system to collect the oil below the surface and channel the flow through a pipe, 3) fighting to keep oil from washing up on shore and 4) dealing with the clean-up of any oil on and off shore.
A containment dome, McKay said, has been fabricated and is in the final engineering phase. McKay said he expects the dome to be deployed in 6-8 days.
Estimates of how much oil is emanating from the sea floor are “very difficult,” McKay said, “because you can’t measure [it] in any way accurately.” He added that “there is a large uncertainty range” around the estimate of 5,000 barrels per day that is said to be flowing from the well.
WATCH VIDEO HERE
Email
Santorum: Money Will Not Defeat Obama, Ideas Will
Rick Santorum's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
Good interview with McKay – bringing in the predicted risks and the ability of BP to respond, and raising the issue of trustworthiness of BP. The quality of that interview set the stage for the best ‘This Week’ in recent memory. I think the conservative viewpoint was reasonably well represented though a few more conservative bodies would be nice. (I haven’t a clue as for names.) I would pay big money to hear Al Sharpton, George Will, Ron Paul, and Stephen Colbert have a civilized discussion for 2 – 3 hours. Yes, it’s true that Brazil has done great things with biofuels (that the USA probably is not able to mimic, in our climate), but Brazil has a VERY ambitious oil exploration program.
Mostly want to say – GREAT show …. great show this week.
Posted by: John | May 2, 2010, 10:16 am 10:16 am
I would pay big money to hear Al Sharpton, George Will, Ron Paul, and Stephen Colbert
John | May 2, 2010 10:16:57 AM
Colbert? He’s a comedian – completely scripted. He is very talented, and his writing team has received some well deserved awards for their work, but I’d hardly put him at that table. Dump Sharpton and get Pelosi for the left, and fill Colbert with John Stewart, whose unscripted work has clearly established him as the Mark Twain of our times.
Posted by: jhw539 | May 2, 2010, 10:36 am 10:36 am
The other oil execs had to be cringing at the way McKay came off (still spinning). O&G industry has had a free ride for 40 years in Louisiana and they need to be perceived and seen as stepping up. The solution is with them, and the state regs out of Louisiana. It was weird hearing the republican strategist chastising the government for not being effective.
Posted by: Craig Keefner | May 2, 2010, 11:11 am 11:11 am
@jhw539: Not sure that Colbert is all that scripted, but regardless — he’s a brilliant interviewer, bringing some magic to defuse angry situations. He’s not there for his positions or beliefs – who knows what they are? Stewart would also be very good, of course, but very different. As for Pelosi – she is politically calculating at all times. That’s her job description, and she does it very well. All her opinions are predictable. Sharpton is a brilliant man – yes he has an agenda, but he has insight and constantly surprises. He also is salt of the Earth who can genuinely feel warmth and kindness toward George Will when Will is obviously aching to strangle Sharpton! (And Will has some valid motivations for that; he is the most reasonable conservative alive today.)
Posted by: John | May 2, 2010, 11:29 am 11:29 am
No more deep sea drilling till the environmental impacts are known and understood. These oil companies are too big and powerful. Why shouldn’t this be treated as a criminal act on the part of BP? If I destroyed someone’s home or backyard I would be tried for property damage. So why aren’t these people? Is it because they are threatening an ENTIRE ecosystem?
Posted by: Mo | May 2, 2010, 11:32 am 11:32 am
If BP cares so much about Louisiana, why do they not have a single gas station in the state? Ask them that sometime !
Posted by: Hans de Jongh | May 2, 2010, 11:52 am 11:52 am
Was that equipment made in china ?
Posted by: bola | May 2, 2010, 11:57 am 11:57 am
Criminal Act?? If the blow-out preventer was working, there would be no discussion on this. This malfunction could happen to any oil company…….
Posted by: Paul | May 2, 2010, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Who cares how/why? Get your booties out there and fix it! Now!
Posted by: Jennifer Bannister | May 2, 2010, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
This Gulf oil spill can be managed by a product from Robert Bayless in Canton, GA. He has had the product for over 15 years and it has been successfully used in Europe and the Middle East. The people in charge need to contact Mr. Bayless as soon as possible. I wonder why his phone is not ringing?
Posted by: Wirefree | May 2, 2010, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
No advance plan to “perform open heart surgery at 5000 feet” was criminal.
These BP (and other responsible) executives need the damage taken out of their hides, not their wallets.
Posted by: Hunter Gatherer | May 2, 2010, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Containment dome? Why would one want complicated solutions while simple options exist?
Or put in more sarcastic terms: why do it simply if you can do it complicated?
I suggest to make a very shallow circular well right on the ocean surface where the oil first reaches the top. This well could have a diameter of 2 miles and a circumference of about 6.25 miles.
One could deploy 4-foot wide plastic strips, like a long ribbon, held upright by plastic tubes and buoys, and dropped into the ocean in the same way as a ship drops anchor, around the spot where the oil spill first reaches the surface.
Then have empty oil tankers come along and suck out the oil from this narrow artificially created surface well.
If such things don’t exist yet have a Chinese manufacturer deal with it, it will be delivered in 48 hours guaranteed.
Also make a barrier of this plastic fence along the coast line, as a protective wall. If they can protect beaches and bays with nets to stop shark attacks surely they can put something on top of the waters to stop the oil from spreading. Then they can do the cleanup on the ocean surface instead of the shore.
Maybe all that is needed for now is more cooperation between all the oil companies. It should be in their interest given that all future off-shore drilling is at stake.
The name-calling can wait until after the disaster has been dealt with.
Now BP owe me for saving them a ton of money. I will invest my windfall right here in Costa Rica where I will collect rainwater for communities that have to boil their drinking water.
Ulla de M
Posted by: Ulla de Mora | May 2, 2010, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
No, it is not like heart surgery at 5000 feet. It is like a plummer forgetting or deciding against putting in an shut-off value because it is too expensive. Or like a gas company deciding against putting in shut-off values in case of emergency. Dear BP, welcome to XOM’s world. Enjoy 40 years of US and world court systems and to condemnation of people around the world.
Posted by: Dr. Columbia | May 2, 2010, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
Your documents belie your comments now.
Your company asserted that is was impossible for an incident like what has happened to occur in order to save $500,000.00 in equipment costs.
NOW, you’ve ruined the oceans for decades.
Good going BP. When will you declare bankruptcy to avoid finishing the clean up or avoid the fines that are sure to come?
There is a special hell for people like you.
Posted by: AlienC | May 2, 2010, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
Mistakes may have been made, but did BP do this on purpose, No. Did BP comply will all regulations, Yes, as far as everything is known. BP did not want or have any idea this might happen. No oil company would have invisioned this to happen. BP is spending Billions now and nobody did anything criminal to cause this. Just like all large companies, they have catistrophic things happen. This type of accident has never happened before, and nobody could have forseen this event, especially to this degree.
Posted by: ron | May 2, 2010, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
Posted by: ron | May 2, 2010 12:47:19 PM
If so it makes a strong argument that deep drilling is too inherently dangerous. Investing what it would take to make it perfectly safe would also make it prohibitively expensive.
Posted by: Skip | May 2, 2010, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Anyone notice how he was trying to redirect the blame: “Contracted Rig” is the first clue.
BP’s safety record is a sham, they are proud of what they do right up until there is a problem. The “trust us” is BS.
I understand that they are in it for profit, but when they say the have the solution for any unanticipated problem and don’t they are lying, they know and so do we.
We get it: there is no such thing as Clean Coal, obtaining Natural Gas using Fracking has unintended and dangerous consequences, Oil Exploration and Retrival at depths where man cannot go is Very Dangerous. If these guys want cover, then they have to play by rules, not their own rules, but regulatory rules.
Posted by: afisher | May 2, 2010, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
Did BP comply will all regulations, Yes, as far as everything is known.
ron | May 2, 2010 12:47:19 PM
No. They did not have a functioning blowoff preventer valve on the ocean floor. That was THEIR regulatory responsibility, and they failed. Period.
Not really a need for new regulations, but BP needs to be fined enough for the blowout preventer not being functional (we’re talking billions) that oil companies will find it worth the cost to properly maintain, backup up, and test the blowout valve.
If that valve had worked per regulations, this story would have been only a human tragedy (good men working to put food on the family table died out there), not an environmental one.
Posted by: jhw539 | May 2, 2010, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
George Will needs to learn about wind power facts and bird kill rates before misquoting again. Buildings kill 550 million, then power lines 130 million, then cats 100 million then automobiles at 80 million, pestcides kill 57 million and wind turbines kill 0.0285 million birds per year in the U.S.A.
per Wallace P. Erickson, et al, in Bird Conservation Implementation and Itergration in the Americas, 2002.
Posted by: Vivian Fulk | May 2, 2010, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
Never really considered myself an “environmentalist” but this is really disturbing me. I think the damage we see from this will be terrible ad long lasting. It is enough to make me think twice about our future energy needs.
http://www.csdaley.com/2010/05/oil-blob.html
Posted by: Christopher | May 2, 2010, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Tapper I was reading an article – ‘NASA Tests Hair-Raising Technique To Clean Up Oil Spills’ ScienceDaily (Apr. 24, 1998)
- 25,000 pounds of hair in nylon collection bags may be sufficient to adsorb 170,000 gallons of spilled oil. Preliminary tests show that a gallon of oil can be adsorbed in less than two minutes with McCrory’s method.
- Also watched online how – Lisa Gautier & Paul Stamets Response to SF Oil Spill- DAY 1 in San Francisco in 2007 using this method.
- To bad there wasn’t a way to coordinated a national campaign to see if there was a way to use this method to see if it would help now along the coast?
Posted by: Cooday | May 2, 2010, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
I do not understand why there was a go ahead to set up the rig and put it into action if the potential downside was the scenario we are now seeing. Shouldn’t there have been govt agencies involved in looking over how to do damage control should this have happened, in that business plan ahead of time?
That BP said “BP Chairman: Stopping Leak Like Performing ‘Open Heart Surgery At 5,000 Feet’..” is clever, glib and a well crafted phrase but does not address that they had no plans to have arrested this man made catastrophe. His statement is irresponsible at this juncture. It is like Toyota saying “oops” to their recent gas pedal issues. Their fine needs to be so significant that they are put in a position to have to determine whether their business can stay afloat, like the oil is doing. Drilling like this has to have huge downside disaster recovery plans. The problem is that we don’t have wiggle room for disasters like this. One is more than enough. Who did they pay enough money to that a working disaster plan was not in place or that this drill would be shut down. This was an noncalculated risk that should not have occurred in the beginning. One has to plan for the worst and live with what shows up. Maybe there should be no drilling in the oceans. Period. Fine, baby, fine.
Posted by: F Altman | May 2, 2010, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
A small earthquake that could close the hole !!!
Shoot a conical cylinder under the terrain , it is auto unscrew (or open) and auto explosive, so it create a small earthquake that could close the hole. It is not sure, depend from the strong of explosion and from tube resistance. Only a local explosion !!!
Posted by: Giancarlo | May 2, 2010, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
So I am fascinated with the dodging of proper responses by the BP president. He still has yet to answer a valid question: How can anyone believe that there won’t be another spill when they are unsure of how the spill was caused in the first place? I wish reputation wasn’t as big a concern as honesty when it comes to interviews.
Posted by: Daman | May 2, 2010, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Classic: minimize the possibility of problems and the certainty of your technology when lobbying for offshore drilling, then emphasize the obvious inherent difficulties to deflect blame after something goes wrong.
Posted by: Joe C from Austin | May 2, 2010, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
If it’s so damned hard to fix the problem, then it never should have been built in the first place. There should be NO off shore oil drilling done until the process is fool proof.
Posted by: michael dusso | May 2, 2010, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
It’s human nature to push the envelope, break the rules, ignore what you don’t want to see.
The problem is, we can’t afford to do that when this is the outcome.
DO YOU GET IT LINDSEY GRAHAM??
Posted by: Marco | May 2, 2010, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
The blowout preventer valves weren’t put in knowingly malfunctioning. Sometimes equipment fails to operate properly, which happens period, no matter how much testing is done, and even with testing it can and will continue to happen. Was the valves put in working, I would say yes. Did they work after the accident, no. The reasons for this may come out in the investigations that will follow, but lots of things could be the reason(s) for these valves not working. Should more safety shutoff devices be used, absolutly, and surely this will be addressed after the causes are determined.
Posted by: ron | May 2, 2010, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
If an individual (even accidentally) were to spill a barrel worth of oil or gas into a waterway almost anywhere, they would face felon charges and jail time, as well as be bankrupted by the related fines. The Supreme Court just reaffirmed their (horrible) position that basically is corporations are people. If we are going to treat large multinational corporations like people, then BP should face the same penalty, and Lamar McKay, et al should be looking at no less than a few years in prison.
Posted by: Hermes | May 2, 2010, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Meanwhile nobody is certain they can stop this leak anytime soon. It has the potential to become the Chernobyl of off-shore drilling.
Posted by: Skip | May 2, 2010, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
GOOD TO SEE OBAMA’S LEADERSHIP IN THIS
It is good to see the President not just flying over to survey the damage, but actually being there on land to see for himself in the affected areas. I hope this incident puts finally to rest the hard right superficial slogan of “drill, baby, drill.” No true friend of humanity and the environment would ever say that.
This incident calls for strong AND decisive action from many fronts–from the President, Congress, state and local governments.
1.The president must remain connected to the people’s problems in the devasted areas.
2.There must be no delay or margin of error in federal emergency services for the affected areas. This requires constant monitoring.
3.The President must insist on full recovery from the oil company for the damages done by the spill. Alaska Exxon Valdez was not completely cleaned up. This time, the President must insist on full and complete clean up and recovery at oil company expense.
4.Congress must devise and impose new and more stringent regulation for oil, gas and coal exploration and drilling. 5.It is about time to impose an indefinite morotorium on coastal and off-shore drilling until a better technology exists to ensure no margin of error at all. All and coal companies must be stopped from saving money money at workers and people’s expenses. The standard is higher in Europe where oil companies were forced to use better technologies. Here in America, corrupt politicians are in the pocket of oil companies. Remember the deregulation of the Bush/Cheney years.
6.This is the time for a comprehensive energy policy and legislation. No more excuses.
Posted by: Dr. Sam | May 2, 2010, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
How is the valve down near the ocean floor to shut off oil defective? And why is the US Navy not present on scene in a very public way? The US Naval Academy is, among other things, one of the best engineering schools in the world. That means the Navy has some of the best engineering thinkers and doers around. And, they are our Navy. I would feel much better if the Naval presence was more apparent. And what ever happened to the clever idea of lighting the slic on fire? A little more smoke in the world would be a lot better than potentially destroying the entire habitat of the Gulf.
Posted by: Duncan | May 2, 2010, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
If you build a structure in an area prone to earthquakes, there are worst case scenario standards that must be followed, the same for bridges, tunnels, power plants, chemical factories, etc. It is impossible to believe that when harvesting highly flamable oil, a worst case scenario would not be considered, addressed and suitable remedies required and in place. This is a continuing example of capitalist greed putting the public at risk. Only this time, it is the public’s finances, their health and the planet; a trifecta of disasters. In the next weeks and months, just watch, all the red state politicians and right wing mouthpieces will shift the blame to the government out of lap of big oil.
Posted by: xargaw | May 2, 2010, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
Fines are never enough. If they broke the law, or knowingly mislead, then I think jail is the only solution.
Posted by: nottoobigforjail | May 2, 2010, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
these people should be hauled into the town square and ripped limb from limb. maybe executives wouldnt be as cavalier with public safety if they had to actually pay for their actions.
Posted by: wide stance | May 2, 2010, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
The reason this well is forty miles offshore and a mile deep is because environmental activists succeed in blocking attempts to harvest oil on land or just offshore where the difficulties, costs, and risk to the environment would be exponentially reduced. If this well were on land or in 1000 feet of water, it would already be capped. Its a catastrophe that is the direct result of allowing emotionally driven enviro-weenies to drive public policy.
Posted by: Banana Republican | May 2, 2010, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
Let’s use BP America Chairman and President Lamar McKay to plug the gusher!
Posted by: roninroshi | May 2, 2010, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
“If this well were on land or in 1000 feet of water, it would already be capped”
Maybe, maybe not, but if the rig were close enough to land to be in only 1000 ft of water the spill would almost certainly have hit shore already. Beware letting corporate stooges explain flaws in environmental policy.
Posted by: Skip | May 2, 2010, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
This is stupid – of course it’s hard to do. I’m not so concerned that BP pays a fine; that’s really not the point.
They are liable for all the damage their negligence has caused – they must compensate as costs are incurred, not after 20 years of litigation – and they can not be allowed to just declare bankruptcy, sell their assets to exxon and walk away.
Posted by: steve Baker | May 2, 2010, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
“and they can not be allowed to just declare bankruptcy, sell their assets to exxon and walk away”
Exxon practically walked away last time. How can you expect the USA, the biggest oil-junkie in the world, to come down hard on a big supplier?
Posted by: Skip | May 2, 2010, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Thanks Republicans, for propagating the meme that we can trash the environment with no real consequences. To bad we can’t force you to go clean up the mess.
Posted by: Bryan Miller | May 2, 2010, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
It doesn’t matter what forces permitted this rig to be in the environment it was in. That is IRRELEVANT, roninroshi. BP apparently felt that it could work successfully with this contracted rig. BP has done what most oil companies do – they have a process in place to extract oil and they have a weak process in place to address any number of possible catastrophes. So, like Goldman-Sachs they have privatized benefits and socialized risks. This is why oil companies make billions. They are always gambling with our environment. I’m certain that if you check, there are oil spills, fires, accidents that claim people’s lives in the oil “business” all over the globe. The media does not inform or investigate for the public. My hope is that this incident will bankrupt BP and
usher in a new era of regulated energy production.
Posted by: Lesley Palmer | May 2, 2010, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
Here we go again; another tentacle of the corporate oligarchy that is too big too fail but can kill us or harm us catastrophically when it inevitably does.
What we are seeing now is just more of the cumulative effect of the relentless deregulation of all branches of our economy.
Wall St, Health Care, the housing market, the mining disaster, this oil rig disaster – each and every one of them is a shining example of the non-sustainability of corporations allowed to run roughshod over every facet of our lives even as they steal every last cent on their way out the door.
For 40 years the energy business has done everything in it’s power to keep a strangle hold on every means of energy production and to aggressively squash any attempts to get us on renewable sources of energy.
This is what happens when corporations are allowed to monitor themselves. The CEO of BP says this is too hard to fix, then what the hell were they doing drilling that way in the first place?
And it isn’t like they couldn’t have foreseen this – it happened last year in Australia, and Halliburton was there then too.
Of course they knew it was possible – but the money is sooooo good…..
The big question is: when’s the next time-bomb left by the Bush misAdministration going to go off?
Posted by: ral | May 2, 2010, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
Look, the President was driven to support offshore drilling because of rightwing pressure. It is a tiny amount of our consumption. And the Horizon platform was in the plan long before Obama became president. Therefore, as with other bad, stupid things, we need to blame George W Bush for fomenting environmental atrocities. President Barack Obama will save us, now.
Posted by: Jawaralal Schwartz | May 2, 2010, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
Let the Republican Oil Bigs pay for this mess.
Posted by: James Katt | May 3, 2010, 1:46 am 1:46 am
resign!
Posted by: John Bonti | May 3, 2010, 5:06 am 5:06 am
Look at the list of contributors.
4 Cougars with uniquely american teeth. Frankly, it blows the whole article for me.
A few real people in the contributors list would suggest that it might be a ‘real’ news piece.
As it is, it looks like a template piece fronted by fashion plate heads.
Whatever.
Posted by: someguy | May 3, 2010, 5:51 am 5:51 am
michelle obama looks like shirley hemphill
Posted by: hhgg | May 3, 2010, 8:16 am 8:16 am
Should have thought of that before you drilled that hole, Lamar.
Posted by: Richard | May 3, 2010, 8:37 am 8:37 am
How is it possible that three weeks into the spill they still have no emergency plan? Why was a containment system not required before they began operations? Did no one conceive that anything could possibly go wrong drilling at 5,000 feet? I am so angry and disgusted. Meanwhile, where is the injunction to stop other “exploratory” drilling? No one should be allowed to move forward with any drilling plans until there has been a full investigation and this mess is completely cleaned up. Then we can discuss it.
Today I heard the words from a fisherman in LA “if we lose our total fishing capacity” total fishing capacity? What have we done….
Posted by: jo | May 3, 2010, 8:45 am 8:45 am
As I understand it, BP fought rules that would have required it to install a safety device that would have allowed it to remotely cap the well. The Bush administration allowed them to avoid the rule. If that is the case, it should not matter how difficult and expensive the operation to cap the well is – BP, get it done!
Posted by: DaveM | May 3, 2010, 9:01 am 9:01 am
where are all the idiotic “drill, baby, drill” syphocants now?
Posted by: DaveM | May 3, 2010, 9:02 am 9:02 am
This is what happens when BP Chairman Hayward’s severe cost-reduction drive over the past three years eliminates the top tier employees with all the experience. The investigation of BP should look into the number of severance packages handed to employees over 50.
Posted by: Always Amazed | May 3, 2010, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
BP:
1. Fix the mess
2. Lamar, resign
3. Hope BP gets bankruptcy
4. Lamar, jailed.
Posted by: Albert | May 5, 2010, 4:56 am 4:56 am
When you put more pressure above the well than the pressure from the well the leak stops. Dump million of tons of boulders and chunks of concrete; to fill the bowl the well sets in. Then layers of sand and gravel 5 gallon bags 50 feet thick. Then boulders and concrete 50 feet thick dispersing pressure. Then repeating layers tell the leak stops the a few hundred feet more layers. Then encase with 50 feet of concrete feet. This isn’t rocket science. Some body needs to stop this and it looks like the fox is watching the hen-house. Save Florida before it is to late.
Posted by: Richard rogers | June 5, 2010, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
I have technician decision – STOP OIL
Posted by: Vladimir | June 16, 2010, 10:45 am 10:45 am