By Alex Pepper

May 28, 2010 1:27pm

Chamber President Says His Group Will Find Way to Get Government to Share Cost of Gulf Coast Clean-Up

ABC News’ Teddy Davis reports: The head of the United States Chamber of Commerce said Friday that his group is not yet lobbying against legislative efforts to raise BP’s liability cap, viewing the issue as not yet "ripe." He signaled, however, that his group would figure out a way to get the government to share in the cost of cleaning up the Gulf Coast. “It is generally not the practice of this country to change the laws after the game,” said Tom Donohue, the president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. “. . . Everybody is going to contribute to this clean up. We are all going to have to do it.  We are going to have to get the money from the government and from the companies and we will figure out a way to do that.” Donohue made his remarks during a roundtable with reporters sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor in Washington, D.C. The event came at a time when the BP liability cap is coming under increasing scrutiny. At present, BP’s liability bill is capped at $75 million. That cap could be lifted, however, if the company is found to have acted with gross negligence or to have broken rules that led to the spills. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar told a Senate panel earlier this month that the Obama administration will hold BP and other companies "fully accountable" for cleanup of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico as well as for economic damages to businesses and residents. BP has pledged to pay economic damages in excess of the $75-million liability cap. Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., believes that pledge does not go far enough and has introduced legislation which would raise the liability cap from $75 million to $10 billion. ABC News’ Alexander Pepper contributed to this report.

User Comments

BP should be the primary source for clean up funds. They acted improperly, and should be held liable.

Posted by: Rick McDaniel | May 28, 2010, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

Isn’t this the same organization whose been savaging the Obama administration for 16 months about too much government spending and government control of business? Finally, he doesn’t think the issue of the liability cap is ripe? Are you kidding?

Posted by: B.Bear | May 28, 2010, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

The right wing game plan in regard to the President is simply to abuse the leader of the free world until he missteps or falters. The right wing will distort, deceive, divide, delude, and abuse. Anyone who isn’t in their little right wing tent is subject to the continuing abuse of the GOP and talk radio and Clear Channel and the tea party bunch. It is standard operating procedure. The Republican right wing considers themselves superior and expect subservience from everyone else. Theyfeel themselves to be aristocratic and due the respect of which superior human beings are naturally entitled. They will distort, blameshift, abuse, deceive,and generally blow a smoke screen around the criminal negligence of BP. They are stopping legislation in the Senate to raise BP’s liability in this disaster from 75 million to 10 billion dollars. They are lobbying for a “federalization” of the Gulf response which will stick the taxpayers with a large percentage of the tab for the remediation and cleanup of this environmental catastrophe. The GOP is Wall Street. The GOP is big oil. The GOP is absolutely corrupted with the greed of Wall Street and the robber barrons. Don’t expect this to change. .

Posted by: mstrknightstarr | May 28, 2010, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

This is an absolute outrage. The oil spill is totally BP’s doing and they are 100% liable. BP should pay all of the cleanup costs, plus reimburse the government for its expenses above and beyond what it would normally spend.
That the Chamber of Congress, basically a mega-industry group, is trying to stick taxpayers with the bill shows their true colors. If you weren’t already sure they were on the side of the big corporations and not the American people, now you can be sure.

Posted by: giantslor | May 29, 2010, 1:51 am 1:51 am

The MMS has collected more than 250 BILLION dollars in lease fees and royalties over the past ten years, not to mention income and other taxes collected from the oil industry. US citizens have a right to expect that the government does something for citizens with that money besides drop it in the general fund. Where’s the funding for scientific research on blowout prevention or oil remediation? Where are the booms to stem the flow of oil after a spill? Nothing on the entire gulf coast? That means no response plan AT ALL because no one can drill anywhere except the Gulf Coast. The feds make more on every ghallon of oil than any private company. We deserve something for our money!

Posted by: Dave C | May 30, 2010, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

Does Tom Donohue not realize that he is a US taxpayer? While he is more than welcome to give his money to help with the clean up, suggesting that the rest of us should dig into our own pockets is absurd.
Not only is Donohoe advocating that US taxpayers dig into the their pockets to pay for the damages that should rightly be paid for by BP, his proposal is meant to save the skin the of a foreign company.
He thinks US tax payers should bail out a British corporation who may very well have caused this spill due to their own negligence. Talk about cluelessness.

Posted by: yumyum | June 10, 2010, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Companies like BP either carry insurance or are self insured.
The royalties provided are not payment for insurance, but rather payment for permission to extract a limited natural resource and sell it for a profit. This arguement that the US Govt should pay for this clean up is absurd. Just because one pays the govt to inspect cars and provide roadways, that doesn’t make the govt liable when someone gets in an accident. The resulting damages are paid for by insurance or if the owner doesn’t have insurance, then the owner is liable.

Posted by: Fed Up | June 10, 2010, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

We don’t “owe” BP anything. They invested, profited more than handsomely, took a risk, and are now both taking the consequences of that failed risk, as well as harming a big part of our planet, its people, animals, and ecosystem. Donohue is a spawn of Satan to say that the taxpayers should share the cost — what, so BP can be immortal and continue to profit? What kind of business attitude is that??? BP is not a public service, they are a for-profit company. In business you risk, and sometimes fail, that’s how it is. BP also already received its corporate benefit, in the form of a charter which protects their owners from personal culpability. They are NOT “entitled” to anything more.

Posted by: mayalibre | June 10, 2010, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

We also have to consider that the oil extracted in the Gulf is not intended for U.S consumption but is sold on the open market, most likely to China and others. A fine kettle of fish. Damm the US Chamber of Commerce.

Posted by: Robert Margouleff | June 10, 2010, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

It’s easy to see who’s on the side of Americans and who is on the side of the corporate pirates who bleed us dry. In the one corner you have virtually no body. Representing Corporate Interests ALL THE TIME is the US Chamber of Commerce and most of the Politicians in Washington. In local elections, I’ve found a rule that always seems to hold. Look at who makes the argument. When you see what side the Chamber of Commerce comes down on, vote the other way.

Posted by: Russron | June 11, 2010, 6:48 am 6:48 am

Lewis Black had it right. Declare war on PB, after all they are causing war time equivalent damage. Seize their assets to clean up the mess. Even every penny they are worth, won’t do the job, so let’s get 10 cents on our dollar by taking them over now. In World War II, assets were taken under the “Trading with the Enemy” provisions (i.e. Brown Brothers Harriman Union Bank/Prescott Bush). Use this type of logic to seize these assets and do the clean up and take care of those who’s lives have been ruined by BP. Once that’s done, the entire executive suite of BP goes to prison. Hell, they did more damage than Osama Bin Forgotten. In time, the toxic effects will kill more Americans than 9/11 did. I worry about the chemicals BP added, coming down on our farmland as Rain. 1/3 of our Seafood supplies are now gone. If that doesn’t amount to war on America, what does?

Posted by: Russron | June 11, 2010, 7:01 am 7:01 am

If this is how the chamber of commerce wants to be then I say it should be disbanded IMMEDIATELY, it’s assets seized to pay for the damage they continually do to the citizens of this country. This is just one more way they are proving that they are devoid of humanity. Anyone who lives for nothing but money needs to be removed from the decision making process. PERIOD. The chamber has shown that to us every time they open their corporate mouths. Corporations are the problem in this country, NOT something to be worshiped and glorified. They need to start paying their way, and STOP thinking we are going to bail them out. No one is bailing US out, why should corporations get anything but a swift butt kicking? If corporations are the same as people, then it’s time the corporations start dong jail time, being executed, and having their lives ruined just as OURS have been. Pay for THEIR screw ups? NOT A DIME! Break up the chamber of commerce NOW.

Posted by: WJM | June 11, 2010, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Hey I have an idea, le tthe chambe rof commerce clean it up. Then they would have done one useful thing in their sorry lieve.

Posted by: harry canary | June 11, 2010, 11:29 am 11:29 am

Raise the limit to 10 billion???? Forgive what might appear to be a pun….10 billion is a drop in the bucket. Some experts are now saying the damage will be over one TRILLION. Only those still believing the 1/4 truths being regurgitated by BP and the US Administration would believe that 10 billion would begin to the damage. Every single person on earth will feel the effect of this disaster in some way.

Posted by: Paul | June 11, 2010, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Given the Chamber of Commerce’s vast connections, member resources and unquestioned patriotism, it should take the lead and contribute say, . . a billion dollars toward the clean-up. Such a splendid demonstration of leadership and responsibility could only perpetuate the unparalleled level of affection the American people hold for Mr. Donohue and his cronies, . . er, colleagues.

Posted by: Harry | June 11, 2010, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

First off, why is the US Chamber standing up for and defending BP, which is NOT a US company?
Would they not be doing more appropriate work by standing up for all of the US businesses that will fail because of this BP’s criminal acts?
I guess we know who has been funneling money to the Chamber lately.

Posted by: Johnny | June 11, 2010, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Hypocrisy raises its head, yet again. The Chamber shows what it really believes, that government must be there to protect big business, while the Chamber harps continually about reducing the size of government when it comes to doing something for the people of the US. Hypocrisy! ! !
Oh, and I’m sure they won’t want taxes raised to fund the bailout of BP which means more of that debt they continually condemn. Hypocrisy! ! !

Posted by: Annie | June 12, 2010, 1:16 am 1:16 am

wasnt there 3 of them
fighting for whos fault it was
from the very beginning. Where is transocean, and halliburton?

Posted by: x-nay | June 14, 2010, 5:49 am 5:49 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.