Exclusive: All 7 Republicans on Senate Judiciary Committee Ask AG Holder to Appoint Special Prosecutor to Look Into Alleged Sestak Job Offer
In a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder today, all seven Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee "urge the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate Congressman Joe Sestak's claim that a White House official offered him a job to induce him to exit the Pennsylvania Senate primary race against Senator Arlen Specter."
The seven – Sens. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, Orrin Hatch of Utah, Chuck Grassley of Iowa, Jon Kyl or Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, John Cornyn of Texas and Tom Coburn of Oklahoma – allege that the offer would appear to violate federal criminal laws, including 18 U.S.C. 600, which prohibits promising a government position “as consideration, favor, or reward for any political activity” or “in connection with any primary election or political convention or caucus held to select candidates for any political office.”
Rep. Sestak, D-Penn., who defeated Specter in the primary last week, told Comcast’s Larry Kane in February that the White House had offered him a position in exchange for not challenging Specter. White House senior adviser David Axelrod said on Monday that White House lawyers had looked into it and judged everything “perfectly appropriate.”
CNN’s John King suggested to Axelrod that such a job offer “marches up into the gray area, perhaps into the red area of a felony. It is a felony to induce somebody by offering them a job.”
“If such things happened they would constitute a serious breach of the law,” Axelrod told CNN, “and when the allegations were looked into there is no evidence of such a thing"
That was not enough for the Republican Senators, who wrote to Holder that they “do not believe the Department of Justice can properly defer to White House lawyers to investigate a matter that could involve ‘a serious breach of the law.’ The White House cannot possibly manage an internal investigation of potential criminal misconduct while simultaneously crafting a public narrative to rebut the claim that misconduct occurred.”
Assistant Attorney General Ronald Welch last week told Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., that a special counsel is not needed; the Republican Senators are asking for Holder to reconsider that decision, though they suggest he could also refer the matter to the Justice Department’s Public Integrity Section or the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia.
-Jake Tapper
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
I wonder if they can get Ken Starr back?
This is becoming a trend with the Republican Congress: Waste time on special prosecutor attacks on the President. At this rate they’ll be calling Obama’s next missile strikes on terrorist camps “Sestack Missiles” or something; remember that Republicans were more than willing to give Bin Laden political cover in 1998 for the sake of a “Monica Missiles” soundbite.
Note that the Democrats had equal (far better in my opinion) opportunity to use the same sleazy approach to attack the Bush administration, but had enough respect for doing their jobs not to.
Posted by: jhw539 | May 26, 2010, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
This IS a BIG deal! It appears that Sestak has Obama/Emanuel over a barrel. Something DEFINITELY went down. Sestak continues to bring this up, continues to admit the offer was made and now, even Robert “the Fibbs” Gibbs admits there was a conversation. I applaud the GOP for wanting a special investigation. I’m a Democrat, voted for Obama, but this is WRONG! Its clear that President Obama WANTED Specter to win & someone went so far as to try to persuade Sestak to drop out. Sestak is now in a position…if he TELLS what the offer was and who offered it, he can save his political future…if not, then the people will lose even MORE trust in the Democrat and vote Toomey in. I have been a Democrat ALL my life, but this White House is ridiculous! I agree with James Carville in slamming President Obama…this BP oil spill IS his “Katrina”….hes at a (-22%) in job approval in Rasmussen today & down to 47% in Gallup. This is DISGRACEFUL! I wish I could get my vote back and give it to Hillary….this White House is sad and pathetic!
Posted by: David | May 26, 2010, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
I hope they find out the truth. Obama is definitely the “Liar in Chief”. Each & every day, there is more negative news coming out about Obama. 2012 can’t get here soon enough so we can vote him out!
Posted by: Jack | May 26, 2010, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
Seems like the best way to predict the direction this administration takes is to listen to what the White House says, and assume they will do the opposite. If Gibbs and attorneys say that there isn’t anything there, there is. Nixon and Clinton were guilty of less, and the exalted one cannot squirm out of this.
Posted by: Bri49 | May 26, 2010, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
Note that the Democrats had equal (far better in my opinion) opportunity to use the same sleazy approach to attack the Bush administration, but had enough respect for doing their jobs not to.
Posted by: jhw539 | May 26, 2010 1:37:35 PM
_______________________________________
Dirty pool has been the primary Republican tactic since the advent of the sleazy Atwater/Rove approach. It has little to do with making the country a better place, and everything to do with power.
Posted by: tierra | May 26, 2010, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
How typical of the Republican Party. Not one of these hypocritical wind bags asked for GW Bush to be investigated for anything. They are complacsent when Republicans break the law every God damned day by spying on Americans with no suspicion of wrongdoing or starting a war with a country that has done nothing to ours yet they will call for an investigation when a Democrat does something they view as illegal. If the Republican party would excercise some consistency in their “morals” I might begin to listen to them.
Posted by: n | May 26, 2010, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Nixon and Clinton were guilty of less, and the exalted one cannot squirm out of this.
Posted by: Bri49 | May 26, 2010 1:46:12 PM
_______________________________
Do you have any idea what Nixon did? Any at all? Have you heard of Iran/Contra? What about the ‘mushroom cloud’ of Iraq?
Posted by: tierra | May 26, 2010, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Crazy ain’t it how the liberals defend this mushball we have as a pResident? They’ll make excuses to no end just like the right did under Bush. Unbelievable.
Posted by: DimmuBorgir | May 26, 2010, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
“Note that the Democrats had equal (far better in my opinion) opportunity to use the same sleazy approach to attack the Bush administration, but had enough respect for doing their jobs not to. ”
Ha! Good one. Do you remember the Plame/Libby thing? I would say what transpirted here could be a far more egregious offense than what was uncovered during that whole ridiculous kerkuffle.
Now, I do agree that this could easily be handled by the Justice Department’s Public Integrity Section or the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia. We don’t need a special prosecutor again, unless Justice stonewalls and/or refurses or has some other conflict of interest, a special prosecutor is a waste of money.
Posted by: J.R. | May 26, 2010, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Nixon and Clinton were guilty of less, and the exalted one cannot squirm out of this.
Bri49 | May 26, 2010 1:46:12 PM
Americans weren’t very impressed with the Clinton witchhunt. In retrospect, I wonder if Republicans feel a bit bad about deriding Clinton’s clumsy attempt to kill Bin Laden in 1998 as “Monica Missiles” meant to distract from the important investigation into his pathetic personal life. You know, it would have been nice if Republicans had left politics at the water’s edge on that one rather than giving Bin Laden political cover from further “wag the dog” attacks on his Afghanistan infrastructure.
Posted by: jhw539 | May 26, 2010, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
I agree with David in the ealier post. I too, voted for Obama. I really thought he could change America for th better. I’m sorry to say, I have been dissappointed beyond belief. Whatever party affiliation you are doesn’t matter…first and foremost, we’re ALL Americans. I don’t see President Obama pushing forth “unity”, but rather, “divide and conquer”. After I voted for Jimmy Carter & was disappointed, I said I wouldn’t EVER vote Democrat again…I didn’t, until President Obama. Now I totally regret it….Carter and Obama, BOTH are the worst Presidents in American history…and I can’t stand George Bush, but even he did a better job than President Obama is. I say, investigate, get to the bottom, this is a felony and an impeachable offense. Time to get the corrupt politicians, even a corrupt President out of office.
Posted by: Sandi | May 26, 2010, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Most transparent admin. My foot. Sleazy, corrupt Chicago thugs.
Posted by: Leslie | May 26, 2010, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Leslie, your post about your disappointment in Obama mirrors my own. On top of that take a look at how his administration is going after privacy laws – arguing that they shouldn’t need a warrant to access a citizens email, cell phone or regular phone. Look at his use of signing statements that he criticized Bush for. If the Bush administration had suggested, as Obama is now suggesting, that Miranda rights need to be adjusted there would have been a huge outcry. I am no fan of Bush but using him as the boogy man to blame everything on has run its course for me. Obama has become Bush 2.0, the difference being Bush was kept on a short leash by the media and couldn’t get away with much unnoticed. Obama will not be getting my support in 2012.
Posted by: Mike | May 26, 2010, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Ha! Good one. Do you remember the Plame/Libby thing? I would say what transpirted here could be a far more egregious offense than what was uncovered during that whole ridiculous kerkuffle.
___________________________________
Criminal activity by Libby in the Cheney White House . .. a kerkuffle (sic).
Libby was charged, tried, convicted and sentenced to jail for ciminal activities in the White House. One count of obstruction of justice; two counts of perjury; and one count of making false statements to federal investigators.
Open and transparent . . .
Posted by: tierra | May 26, 2010, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
I agree with Senator Durbin, via Philly News (Thomas Fitzgerald):
‘”Senate Majority Whip Richard J. Durbin (D., Ill.) Tuesday called on Rep. Joe Sestak, Pennsylvania’s Democratic Senate nominee, to divulge details about his assertion that the White House had offered him a job in exchange for dropping his primary campaign.
“At some point, I think Congressman Sestak needs to make it clear what happened,” Durbin told reporters on Capitol Hill.
Durbin, a White House ally who is close to President Obama, is the highest-profile Democrat to push Sestak to be more forthcoming on the issue.’
Posted by: progressive mama | May 26, 2010, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
Whether there was a crime comes down to whether or not there was a quid pro quo. If someone from the Obama explicitly told Sestak he could have the job IF he didn’t run against Specter, then it’s bribery. If they offered Sestak the job without stating any condition, it’s not bribery. The intent may have been to convince Sestak not to run, but lots of luck proving that. As Karl Rove can tell you, guilt hangs on such fine points.
Now, seeing that Sestak is going to have to work with the Democrats if/when elected, I can’t see him being too helpful to the Republicans.
Posted by: CharlesinCA | May 26, 2010, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
I thought Sestak has already stated multiple times that he was offered the job to drop out of the race against Specter. Am I correct?
Posted by: David | May 26, 2010, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
The hounds smell blood.
Posted by: Rick McDaniel | May 26, 2010, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
jhw, you say this: “giving Bin Laden political cover from further “wag the dog” attacks on his Afghanistan infrastructure. ”
But from the washington post:
“Three times after Aug. 20, 1998, when Clinton ordered the only missile strike of his presidency against bin Laden’s organization, the CIA came close enough to pinpointing bin Laden that Clinton authorized final preparations to launch. In each case, doubts about the intelligence aborted the mission.”
It seems the policies were still in place to get Bin Laden, however he only launched missles once and the timing was purely coincidental, at least to you it was. Stop being so naive.
Curious, do you feel that an investigation is necessary or are you just OK with the Administration’s word?
Posted by: J.R. | May 26, 2010, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
Oh I’ll bet the Republicans are only trying to get at the truth…they would
never waste tax payer’s money on such an
obvious “political stunt”.
Plus, the Republicans only promise things to big business in exchange for campaign contributions, the way god intended. They don’t screw around with these little nickle and dime issues.
Posted by: Blackie | May 26, 2010, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
Why are you avid supporters of this administration so against to find out who is LYING?????????Don’t you care about that, or do you already know who is lying. The White House or Sestak.
Posted by: Lizzie | May 26, 2010, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
All of you liberals who are saying that this is a Republican witch hunt are forgetting one important detail: we only know about this situation because Joe Sestak told us first! And again, and again, and again. He’s kept his story consistent. It makes you wonder why he would have volunteered this info in the 1st place; certainly he knows the repercussions of such an allegation. The White House is deep mess with this and the law demands an investigation be done. There’s no way to brush this off. This is the beginning of the end of the Obama presidency.
Posted by: James | May 26, 2010, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Holder doesn’t have a very good track record of prosecuting anyone, and he may just have a conflict of interest on this one. A special prosecuter would appear to be in order.
Posted by: Jeff | May 26, 2010, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Mr. Obama can do whatever he wants without prosecution. His regime has taken over with the true spirit of dictatorship.
Posted by: Lori | May 26, 2010, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
No I don’t agree after one request after another from the Democrats to investigate the former village idiot they now want their way.
NO! Until you learn how to deal with your own.
Posted by: Ant | May 26, 2010, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Seems like the best way to clear this up is have Holder appoint an Independent Special Prosecutor, unless there really is something to hide.
Posted by: mikemc1970 | May 26, 2010, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
It’s absolutely amazing to hear Republican’s talk about ethics or breaking the law after the Bush’s Presidency and Cheney’s actions throughout their term, not a single Republican questioned the legality or destructive decisions which literally ruined this country but since President Obama’s historic election Republican’s and people of their ilk have made every attempt to destroy his Presidency… What a pathetic and self-righteous party Republicans have become!!
Posted by: Martin | May 26, 2010, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
“This is the beginning of the end of the Obama presidency.”
Posted by: James | May 26, 2010 2:32:30 PM
I agree with you, James. This is a BIG deal…someone is going down on this one. Holder shouldnt be able to prosecute because of the conflict of interest. A special prosecuter should do this. For all the Democrats, Sestak IS the one that came forward first with this allegation and has repeated it multiple times. Sestak’s political future is on the line here…I don’t think he’s lying…he knows WHAT was offered and WHO offered it. This is big..and, with the distrust of Washington & the plummeting approval ratings of President Obama, Americans are NOT going to let this slide….even the mainstream media is now on the attack to find out what REALLY happened.
Posted by: David | May 26, 2010, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Unfortunately, the only alternative to Obama is the Republican party that is filled with wackos. Not a very encouraging situation.
Posted by: leogorky | May 26, 2010, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Did you know BP contributed more to Obama than any other politician ever. Now we know why Obama isn’t doing anything about this spill. Obama is the special interest KING!
Posted by: 1termprez | May 26, 2010, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
Ummm Hello to you liberals … the allegations came from one of you! Sestak himself! Of course I know you will all over look that just like you over look every other illegal act that this administration perpetrates nearly on a daily basis to infuse your communist rule over the majority of this country … Your miserable days are numbered … count em and begin your slide back under the rocks from wence you slithered!
Posted by: Geoff Gray | May 26, 2010, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
Why are you avid supporters of this administration so against to find out who is LYING??
Posted by: progressive mama | May 26, 2010, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
It seems the policies were still in place to get Bin Laden, however he only launched missles once and the timing was purely coincidental, at least to you it was. Stop being so naive.
Curious, do you feel that an investigation is necessary or are you just OK with the Administration’s word?
J.R. | May 26, 2010 2:21:56 PM
I’m being naive? Sure, it was purely coincidental that after his first real attack on Bin Laden resulted in him being politically savaged by Monica Missile attacks from Republicans, Clinton never again struck Bin Laden. Pure coincidence, Clinton was a saint who didn’t care at all about how his actions polled.
I do not think a special prosecutor is warranted for the Sestak job offer. I also don’t think one is warranted for the Bush wire tapping of US citizens without approval of the special court.
Posted by: jhw539 | May 26, 2010, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
It’s absolutely amazing to hear Republican’s talk about ethics or breaking the law after the Bush’s Presidency and Cheney’s actions throughout their term, not a single Republican questioned the legality or destructive decisions which literally ruined this country but since President Obama’s historic election Republican’s and people of their ilk have made every attempt to destroy his Presidency… What a pathetic and self-righteous party Republicans have become!!
Posted by: Martin | May 26, 2010 2:42:18 PM
Agreed.
Posted by: progressive mama | May 26, 2010, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
Chicago thugs having the capacity to bribe Sestak? Is that really such a stretch? It’s time to get rid of communist Obama before he wrecks this country for good. I pity the poor children I see on playgrounds as they will have the trillions of Bush/Obama debt on their backs. We need Chris Christie to straighten this mess out. Someone who can’t be bought by cheap thugs. Impeach Obama!
Posted by: justin v. | May 26, 2010, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Downplay or “upplay” this all you like, depending on your ideology. The fact remains, however, that if orchestrated by the President, it constitutes a felony under federal law and is therefore an impeachable offense. But as befits a society of laws where Political Correctness is the supreme law of the land, good luck with the Constitution ever prevailing on this one…
Posted by: jnsesq | May 26, 2010, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Distorting elections definately deserves an investigation. I’m so tired of this liberal, “you didn’t do this to George Bush,” whining all the time. Fact is, he’s the president right now, and if he’s broken the law, he’s out. Then, we can say we’ve set the precedent whenever the next scandal under either a dem or a repub comes out. I’m personally tired of living in a country where the only employee who never gets fired is the one who matters the most. Tying job security to performance and ethics might actually be the most progressive change (a sea of change) in politics!!! How many elected officials would stop the dirty dealing if it meant they were the next person out – in jail for that matter??? If you reall want to see change people can believe it, quit waiting for the next guy in office to demand accountability.. The buck needs to stop here.
Posted by: Tony | May 26, 2010, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
“There is only one reason Barry Sotero or his administration hasn’t come forth on this: Sestak MUST have something over them.”
Posted by: Paco | May 26, 2010 2:44:04 PM
I agree. If there was nothing there, Obama would have already destroyed and made Sestak’s life a living hell. Sestak has something “over” on Obama…this is going to get ugly. Someone in a high position is going down.
Posted by: David | May 26, 2010, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
I am eating an Amish whoopee pie and it is delicious. Is this what elected officials like Joe Sestak get for being honest? Highly doubtful that Obama has his fingers in this pie, but it should serve as a lesson to his administration that when it comes to elections they need to let democracy run its course and let the people decide for themselves. It makes America stronger. Joe Sestak is being true to himself. If anyone needs to fess up it is the White House. Still, this whole thing is totally Tonya Harding. Goodbye, Rahm.
Posted by: Toaster | May 26, 2010, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
BS, don’t waste time. If you want to spend this money, then spend on creating real jobs. This is way lawyers make money. These politicians are in the pockets of lawyers, and they create intentionally situations like this so that they can have themselves investigated. History tells us, no one gets prosecuted, however, we tax payers end up losing millions of dollars. So shut up and stop this nonsense and invest the money in creating real jobs.
Posted by: rakesh K sharma | May 26, 2010, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
For all of you out there (and I believe there are many of you) this is what is commonly known as a”red herring” proferred by a Party (Republicans) that is really struggling for “something to point to”. Simply because they are leaderless and are getting their own “ranks” ripped up by their own “extremists” who “got out of their control”. But that is what happens when you “pander” to that type of element. My guess…tax payer money will be spent here unecessarily
in a stupid display of political gamesmanship.
Posted by: CND FOX | May 26, 2010, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
Seestak’s not the first person he’s done it to. Didn’t he try and strongarm Harold Ford? That wasn’t long after he and Blagojevich were trying to put a price on obama’s old senare seat.
Blagojevich probably won’t be too sympathetic toward obama.
Posted by: smartlillena | May 26, 2010, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
Martin
There was nothing “historic” about the affirmative action election of this DOPE to an office for which he is clearly unprepared, unqualified and ill equipped to perform. PLEEEEEZ
He is a product of the Chicago Thug machine and he knows NOTHING about serving America or her interests. He lies – FREELY and MASTERFULLY – about who he is, what he has done, what he wants and how he intends to get it. But the Americans who were PUNKED into voting for this despicable HOAX are finally waking up.
He is in way over his head and is relying on his spinmeisters and thug cronies to continue to cover for his hopelessly amateurish incompetence. He is nuts deep in Soros’ game…look out!
Posted by: sue | May 26, 2010, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
I thought Sestak has already stated multiple times that he was offered the job to drop out of the race against Specter. Am I correct?
Posted by: David
—
Yes, he has.
Posted by: smartlillena | May 26, 2010, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Obama is just the puppet of a group in the White House. His entire existence has been bought and paid for by the Chicago machine of criminals. Obama is a true village idiot.
Posted by: Andy | May 26, 2010, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
To any/all who suggest that Obama accepted campaign contributions from BP, please have a look.
Obama did *not* accept money from BP’s Political Action Committee, he accepted $71,000 from BP *employees*.
This doesn’t mean that the administration is doing a good job handling the situation, only that the common assertion outlined above is untrue.
It’s important to stick to the facts.
Posted by: jack | May 26, 2010, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
Does anyone really expect Holder to investigate something like an impeachable offense?
Hell, we could not get him to investigate ACORN and Obama pulled the House Judiciary Committee off their investigation. Holder also dropped charges against the New Black Panthers who paraded around the polling places in their black uniforms, matching Berets, and billy clubs intimidating voters in violation of the constitution. It couldn’t have been because one was a Democratic Precinct Captian,now could it? Also, there was no investigation of Americorp for their role in the misappropriation of taxpayer funds.
This is the most corrupt administration in American history. As Pelosi said, we need to drain the swamp. That would eliminate all the Leftwing radicals that now own our government.
Posted by: Cogito | May 26, 2010, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
Jack, you’re quoting mediamatters?, the biggest left wing disinformation machine on the planet. Please, get real
Posted by: Andy | May 26, 2010, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
There is no way the liberal media in this country will allow justice to be served in this matter. Not on their great black hope.
As we speak they are writing plausible deniabilty editorials to adorn what ever lie Gibbs finally pronounces as the innocent truth.
Posted by: george | May 26, 2010, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Holder won’t call a special prosecutor- and Issa and the republicans don’t have the power.
But the AGs of Pennsylvania and or Virginia (Sestak’s state of residence) should go forward with an investigation/prosecution.
Posted by: coolpillow | May 26, 2010, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
>>>shut up and stop this nonsense and invest the money in creating real jobs.<<<
Just curious but did you say the same thing when Obama pushed through HC legislation and do you agree with cap & trade? Both of these pieces of trash will cost us over 2 trillion. Also illegal immigrants are taking both jobs and draining precious resources (ie. hospital visits, schooling, welfare, etc.). Since you are all caring about jobs, I'm sure you think the above mentioned Obama waste is costing jobs.
Posted by: justin v. | May 26, 2010, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Obama is the biggest con man that ever hit Washington. “If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck it must be a duck”! The old saying rings true. Sestak WAS BRIBED, but didn’t take the bait-he needs to tell us with what and who bribed him? I have no doubt he was asked to drop out of the race for a promised position. I can guess who done it and most people can!! This has got to be the most corrupt administration in our history, I have never heard of so many payoffs, bribes, spending now has reached 13 trillion and more to come! Obama came in office with the USA at ONE trillion in debt and now we just hit 13 Trillion, can anyone beat that? Poll numbers falling. Bye, bye Dems.!!!
Posted by: TXAR.55 | May 26, 2010, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
This will go no where, because they sent him a letter and Holder doesn’t read (like the Arizona law).
Posted by: josh | May 26, 2010, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
Dodd says “blame Bush”! Bush hasnt been in office for a year and a half! How convenient, no responsibility, an
d no accountability, even though it happened on Obama’s “watch”! What B$!
This administration is a joke, always pointing the finger and never offering a solution! There are plenty of geologists, and oceanographers working in the Federal Government that can assist in solving the problem. Explosives experts could be consulted as well.
I guess the administration is just as happy pointing fingers and blaming Bush than utilizing the resources already in place within the government! Let it flow they say, that way Obama can pass Cap and Trade!
Posted by: talk from sf | May 26, 2010, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
It’s OK just trust Axelrod and Gibbs to tell us the truth!
Posted by: Ed Taylor | May 26, 2010, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
“Sue”…your 3:06 post….So full of “idealogue soundbites”…but no substance. What exactly is your point…?
Posted by: CND FOX | May 26, 2010, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
He is a joke after all.
The MAIN STREAM MEDIA is still protecting him – that will hurt our nation. Didn’t the so called journalists get it?
Posted by: talk from sf | May 26, 2010, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
Sestak: White House offered a job to keep him out of primary
Washington (CNN) – Rep. Joe Sestak says he was offered an unspecified job by the White House in an attempt to stop him from challenging Sen. Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania’s Senate Democratic primary.
Sestak, who defeated the veteran Specter in last week’s primary election for the Democratic nomination, answered “yes” Sunday when asked by CNN about the White House offer. Sestak has previously acknowledged the offer in other interviews.
However, Sestak refused to provide any further details “about something that happened months earlier,” saying “beyond that, there’s nothing to add.”
Posted by: smartlillena | May 26, 2010, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Obama came in office with the USA at ONE trillion in debt and now we just hit 13 Trillion, can anyone beat that?
TXAR.55 | May 26, 2010 3:30:48 PM
Is this what the typical Republican base voter thinks? Conservatives – guys like this are more embarrassing to you than even the PETA idiots are to the left…
Posted by: jhw539 | May 26, 2010, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Political Animal links to this blog post with a good post of its own, called “SENATE REPUBLICANS WANT SPECIAL PROSECUTOR…. It’s hard to overstate how incredibly dumb this is.”
Benen points out, in addition to other things, “Given the timeline of events, it’s not even clear that there was a job offer;” AND ” Even if a job offer was discussed, legal experts — including the chief ethics lawyer for the Bush/Cheney administration — have concluded that there’s nothing scandalous about this. Peter Zeidenberg, a former federal prosecutor with the Justice Department’s Public Integrity unit, said, “Talk about criminalizing the political process! … It would be horrible precedent if what really truly is political horse-trading were viewed in the criminal context of: is this a corrupt bribe?”
Posted by: progressive mama | May 26, 2010, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Jack, you’re quoting mediamatters?
Andy | May 26, 2010 3:25:24 PM
Sounded like he was quoting the official FEC numbers. And it doesn’t matter who else has quoted the facts, they are still true. Both Reagan and Carter agreed pi equals 3.1415… you know.
Posted by: jhw539 | May 26, 2010, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
This Administration and Democrats are the party of: “It’s not my fault, so I’m not going to fix it.”
Economy
Unemployment
Debt
Terrorism
Posted by: Tammy | May 26, 2010, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
jhw, so Clinton, our President at the time, was so flummoxed and overwrought by the partisan criticisms he received, he decided never to go after Bin Laden again. Either way his missle launch to get Bin Laden isn’t the high and mighty action you’re claiming it to be.
“I do not think a special prosecutor is warranted for the Sestak job offer.”
Neither do I, at least not right now. But is an investigation necessary? I believe it is.
Posted by: J.R. | May 26, 2010, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
If you voted for George W. Bush twice then John McCain you will be going to hell.
and you have ZERO business complaining about anything.
Posted by: Brad | May 26, 2010, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Now I know for sure, you have to be an idiot to be a Senator. These clowns voted to confirm Halter ( the fox guarding the hen house ) and now you want him to investigate what’s going on inside. Idiocy compounded by stupidity.
Posted by: savage24 | May 26, 2010, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Obama came in office with the USA at ONE trillion in debt and now we just hit 13 Trillion, can anyone beat that?
TXAR.55 | May 26, 2010 3:30:48 PM
____________________________________
When the indoctrination is thorough, little things like ‘facts’ and ‘the truth’ apparently matter little.
Check your figures TXAR.
Posted by: tierra | May 26, 2010, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
If you complained about Bush’s spending and deficits, and not about Obama’s… you’re a HUGE HYPOCRITE!
Posted by: ster | May 26, 2010, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
Sorry, Jack… it was almost $1,000,000 from BP employees… not $70,000.
Posted by: ster | May 26, 2010, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
Idiocy compounded by stupidity.
Posted by: savage24 | May 26, 2010 3:47:04 PM
Posted by: savage24 | May 26, 2010 3:47:04 PM
Yes, uh… idiocy compounded by stupidity and all that…
Bill Halter is Arkansas’ 14th Lieutenant Governor. Neither Sen. Blanche Lincoln nor Lt. Gov. Bill Halter got enough votes to win the Democrat nomination in their primary, so a runoff election will be held June 8.
Eric Holder– HOLDER– is the AG.
Posted by: progressive mama | May 26, 2010, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
“the PETA idiots are to the left…”
I agree with you in most cases jhw but in this case I must markedly disagree. Those who make the considerable effort against sometimes hopeless odds to try and protect defenseless sentient creatures from needless suffering and abuse merit better respect than being called “idiots”. At least they’re smart enough to have a conscience.
Posted by: Skip | May 26, 2010, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
I hope holder refuses so congress can hold him in contempt and jail him and his terrorists loving lawyers.
Posted by: Jim Rod | May 26, 2010, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
This needs to be addressed, and the media needs to COVER IT! Not cover it up.
Posted by: wheresmymoney | May 26, 2010, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
When a majority of Americans disagree with your view on government, do you still have a right to call the majority ‘Unamerican’? Of course. Does it make you right? No, of course not. Does it make you appear to be a fool? Definately.
Spectre, a former Republican-turned-democrat just for Obama. Sestak, the non-incumbant candidate riding an upswell of anti-government sentiment. It’s hard to say what the case might be. Is Sestak lying for no political gain? (Since if he’s found out, it’s doubtful he’ll win reelection if he’s no removed outright.) Is the White House lying to save one of Obama’s cronies, or even the Big O himself? Possibly. The fact that Big O’s mouthpiece Gibbs hasn’t said anything about this is almost a sure sign that Sestak is on the right side of this equasion. If there are no hearings or media coverage of this event, then we need to leave this country as government accountability is over and the era of shadowy government control has begun. I’d rather live anywhere else than see America fall to that. Either that, or revolt before Obama declares ammo unprotected by the 2nd Amendment.
Posted by: James Gage | May 26, 2010, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
the party of: “It’s not my fault, so I’m not going to fix it.”
…. Hmmm speaking of that, see Krugman, “On Blaming Bush”, Chait, “The Stigmatization Of Bush-Blaming” and for fun, Benen, “BOEHNER GETS BY WITH A LITTLE HELP FROM HIS (LOBBYIST) FRIENDS…”
Posted by: progressive mama | May 26, 2010, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
jhw, so Clinton, our President at the time, was so flummoxed and overwrought by the partisan criticisms he received, he decided never to go after Bin Laden again.
J.R. | May 26, 2010 3:43:12 PM
I like Clinton and think he was a very good president, but the guy had issues. Combined with the ongoing impeachment and having to explain the blue dress to Mrs Clinton, yeah, I think he dropped it. Note that at the time Bin Laden was one of many threats; just like at the start of Bush’s term he wasn’t an obvious threat of the same magnitude as now.
Posted by: jhw539 | May 26, 2010, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
For God sake, VOTE LIBRATARIAN!
Posted by: Johnna | May 26, 2010, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Clearly, the first order of business for new Speaker of the House Boehner in January will be to convene a special panel to begin IMPEACHMENT hearing for the high crimes and misdemeanors of hussein in relation the the sestak job offer and other offenses.
Posted by: TeaPartyPatriot | May 26, 2010, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
The White House announced that The White House investigation into White House wrongdoing has determined that The White House committed no wrongdoing whatsoever.
The principles of Truth, Justice and the American Way have been served.
Posted by: TruthTeller | May 26, 2010, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
How ’bout a little justice for da’ people?
Posted by: littleblindjeffymcrib | May 26, 2010, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
Posted by: TeaPartyPatriot | May 26, 2010 4:14:21 PM
Boehner will be way to busy kissing the rings of lobbyists… which is why seriously,you all should be voting Libertarian…. otherwise, you’re just sellouts, yes?
Posted by: progressive mama | May 26, 2010, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
About time……..stand up boys this president is a communist chicago thud..who needs to be thrown out of office, period.
Posted by: welovetheUSA | May 26, 2010, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
Timeline:
1. Jimmy Carter endorses Obama.
2. Obama is elected and appoints a person recently elected to his second term in the Georgia STATE senate to be the Ambassador to Singapore.
3. Jimmy Carter’s grandson wins the same state senate seat in a well-funded special election.
Coincidence or yet more quid pro quo?
Posted by: GMintheATL | May 26, 2010, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
1. Jimmy Carter endorses Obama.
…
Coincidence or yet more quid pro quo?
GMintheATL | May 26, 2010 4:39:24 PM
I don’t think Jimmy Carter’s endorsement is worth more than about a cup of coffee, never mind an ambassadorship.
Posted by: jhw539 | May 26, 2010, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Also lets start a new investigation on the Iraq war and alleged evidence fabrication…
Tony L | May 26, 2010 4:28:49 PM
Why stop there? Why not on breaking of the Geneva conventions, torture, illegal wiretapping of citizens… But ultimately that is all a waste of time. Bush’s ‘crimes’ were primarily those of implementing very bad policy. He was not out for personal gain or to harm America. Obama is right to leave most of this for historians to judge (the justice department politicization scandal being one possible, maybe, exception – that was for clear partisan gain, explicitly illegal, and could have long-term damage if left unchecked).
Posted by: jhw539 | May 26, 2010, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
“I don’t think Jimmy Carter’s endorsement is worth more than about a cup of coffee, never mind an ambassadorship. ”
Agreed, I would have said bag of peanuts myself though.
Posted by: J.R. | May 26, 2010, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Some posters here should stop shifting the focus to the wrongs of past Presidents. If Bush was bad, that still doesn’t make Obama good. Deal with the one you got in front of you.
Posted by: Munster42 | May 26, 2010, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
“Also lets start a new investigation on the Iraq war and alleged evidence fabrication that Cheney and Bush were involved in ”
Why? What new information do you think would come to light? And what are you going to do impeach Bush now? Logic and actions like this would just send us down a road where each new administration would go after the old one if there were serious policy differences.
I would like to know what happened. I also think that the administration that claimed it would be the most transparent in history would openly admit what happened when first questioned. I would also think that Pelosi’s most ethical congress ever wouldn’t allow this charge to fester without starting an ethics inquiry, but we all know that won’t happen.
Posted by: J.R. | May 26, 2010, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
This would be an issue if there was evidence of wrongdoing but Sestak has not indicated that he believed anything illegal was offered. He said that a job was offered in exchange for dropping out of the election but whether that was done explicitly, which would be illegal, or implicitly, which probably would not be, he did not say.
What’s important here is that the White House immediately and thoroughly investigated to determine if anything even remotely illegal was done and concluded that there was nothing to be concerned about. If we would all look at our own selves and businesses with such attention we could avoid many problems.
So the WH deserves accolades for its prompt investigation and public declaration that absolutely nothing improper occurred, and further commendation must be given for its bravery in looking into the matter on its own. Never in our history have we had such transparency in government. Really remarkable!
Posted by: Peter | May 26, 2010, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
YES! Keep up the pressure! The TRUTH has to come out!!!! NOW!!!
Posted by: Zander | May 26, 2010, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
“This would be an issue if there was evidence of wrongdoing but Sestak has not indicated that he believed anything illegal was offered. He said that a job was offered in exchange for dropping out of the election but whether that was done explicitly, which would be illegal, or implicitly, which probably would not be, he did not say.
What’s important here is that the White House immediately and thoroughly investigated to determine if anything even remotely illegal was done and concluded that there was nothing to be concerned about. If we would all look at our own selves and businesses with such attention we could avoid many problems.
So the WH deserves accolades for its prompt investigation and public declaration that absolutely nothing improper occurred, and further commendation must be given for its bravery in looking into the matter on its own. Never in our history have we had such transparency in government. Really remarkable!”
SERIOUSLY!!! did OBAMA himself write and post this. Oh, so the people accused of the crime investigated the allegations and determined that nothing was improper!!! Well, I guess we can all sleep well now. Transparency HA HA HA. Bunch of crooks.
Posted by: Jason | May 26, 2010, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
So the WH deserves accolades for its prompt investigation and public declaration that absolutely nothing improper occurred, and further commendation must be given for its bravery in looking into the matter on its own. Never in our history have we had such transparency in government. Really remarkable!
—————-
Hey Peter, lay off the kool-aid buddy. Start thinking like a freedom loving American. We don’t give people accused of a crime the authority to “investigate” allegations for themselves and tell the rest of us that there’s “nothing to see”.
That’s not transparency, that’s called a cover-up and, oh yeah, that too is against the law. Little side note opinion… this seems like the patterned behavior of despots and tyrants.
Posted by: Ivleague | May 26, 2010, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
Is it me or is this all quid quo crap!
How can the stupid Republicans even pipe dream that offering a political run-off deal is equivalent to a war declararion on Iran?
Give us a break and get back to BP!
Posted by: anthony perone | May 26, 2010, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
Hey Zander, What planet do you live on? “Never in our history have we had such transparency in government.” OMG…..investigate more than one news outlet and see what you come up with. Lets let criminals investigate other criminals and I’ll bet they find no wrong doing….go figure
Posted by: wildbill | May 26, 2010, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
We will see this investigation the same day that Obama releases a real birth certificate.
Posted by: wantingbalance | May 26, 2010, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Bill Ayers was only a guy who lived in Obama’s neighborhood, the Kenwood section of Chicago. Their is no direct evidence that he penned Obama’s memior, Dreams of My Father.
Posted by: Colonel Rebel | May 26, 2010, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
With the speed that things “happen” these days you begin to wonder what is real and what is a smoke screen. While the focus is on the oil spill, bailouts and other stuff new laws get passed with very little reflection on how it will effect us later down the road and more importantly who will be in charge of these great new fundamental changes.
The chance of Holder investigating anyone about any of the “going ons” behind the scenes, whose paying who, who promising what is not going to happen.
Posted by: david | May 26, 2010, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Tell all 7 Republicans on Senate Judiciary Committee to go fly a kite.Ask them where were they when Karl Rove and Alberto Gonzales wouldn’t testify under oath infront of congress for the firing of federal judges.Only one of many cover ups by the Bush administration that wrote the book on lies,deceit,and deception in the face of congressional hearings.
Posted by: pep103 | May 26, 2010, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
Why would anyone ask Holder?
Posted by: LongT | May 26, 2010, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
IMPEACH OBAMA and JAIL this bunch of CRIMINALS running Washington DC. The list of IMPEACHABLE OFFENSES is GROWING by the week.
Posted by: Steve | May 26, 2010, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
LMAO …..here we go again
Posted by: Casey | May 26, 2010, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
This is really deplorable. The guy who claims he was offered a job tells everyone about it meaning the beneficiary of the crime is the guy who has turned in the criminal! Yet, somehow there’s not yet a Special Prosecutor?
Posted by: Jon | May 26, 2010, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
Obama & Co = FELONS
Posted by: Ron | May 26, 2010, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
same-o-same-o GOP hacks tail waggin the dogs is all.
Posted by: stewart | May 26, 2010, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
Please folks – enticing another party member not to run in a primary happens all the time. Rove did it every other day.
You idiots want to impeach anybody who is not an ‘R’.
Let’s appoint some special prosecutors to look into the deals Cheney made with the oil companies that are affecting us today.
Posted by: Vet24 | May 26, 2010, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
Don’t EVER let up on this demand for a special prosecutor Republicans!!! Keep the ‘heat’ on, and FORCE them to testify under oath! If the situation were reversed, Dems and media wouldn’t ever let up.
Posted by: Don | May 26, 2010, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
Long T- there were not any judges fired by Bush/Cheney. There is no way to “fire” fed judges, they can only be impeached, and none were. Get the facts straight dude.
It is a Fed Offense if someone in the Administration offered a job to Sestak ( like Secy of Navy) , and if it happened to a Republican, you can bet the Dems would be demanding a special prosecutor…
Posted by: dakota | May 26, 2010, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
previous comment should have been addressed to Pep 103.
Posted by: dakota | May 26, 2010, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
They fired the attorneys illegally.
Posted by: secondlook | May 26, 2010, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
Can any Socialist Obama Supporter name anything that ObaMarxist did NOT lie about during the campaign?
I guess we can all see why you guys are sticking with the 100% Lying and Namecalling Agenda…..
Good luck with that…..
Posted by: Ron | May 26, 2010, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
Does ObaMarxist hang out with anyone who is not a convicted criminal?
Why should anyone be surprised that Obama’s administration is committing felonies? It’s what Chicago politician’s do.
Posted by: Ron | May 26, 2010, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
Hey pep103, you don’t know your facts. You can’t fire a federal judge, and the whole flap over the handful of federal prosecutors that were fired by the Bush Administration was pure left wing political theatre. A federal prosecutor serves at the pleasure of the President, and can be fired for virtually any reason. Look it up. Clinton fired all 90 plus federal prosecutors early in his first term, and nobody said a word about it. Nice try, but you can’t equate any of that with the fact that what Sestak claimed took place is a federal crime, and should be properly investigated by an independent counsel.
Posted by: S.C. | May 26, 2010, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Here’s is what I think about the latest demands of the republicans…my feeling is for them to shut up and get busy helping the country instead of being obstructionists. It is your fault we are in this recession, 8 years of nothing, taking away rules for banks, oil companies and everything else and taking the most money from the oil companies than anyone else. The democrats took much less and surprise, surprise…drill baby drill Sarah Palin took the next highest amount and finally, the lowest amount was taken by President Obama. I say to this President…stop cowtowing to the republicans..they don’t care or want to help you. You are doing fine without them,,,,keep it up. The oil company problems started when Cheney/Bush allowed the oil companies fewer regulations and the MMM who partied for 8 years and did not do inspections were part of your administration. Another thing Cheney had Halliburton pour the cement for this oil rig and the other one that exploded….what does this tell us?
Posted by: talmag | May 26, 2010, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
Nixon, Agnew redux!
Posted by: steve | May 26, 2010, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
I say flush the toilet in the White House, its overflowing and running on the carpeting.
Posted by: Haystack | May 26, 2010, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
Tell ya what. If republicans want to play these hard ball partisan games about trying to bring false non issue charges against this white house from the DOJ then I think the DOJ need to return the favor and pursue an extensive criminal investigation into bush/cheney war crimes, illegal torture, warrentless wiretapping, and boatload of other felonies the bush administration did. They are playing with fire. They are lucky that the obama administration wanted to move on to fix the problems he inherited instead of a relentless witch hunt against the bush administration, but if they want play this game of trying to bring down obama with this nonsense, then I say start issuing a criminal investigation. I betcha bush and his cronies wouldn’t want that.
Posted by: Nonie | May 26, 2010, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
OK i’ll post another if you insist.
VP Biden’s visit to the Middle East in march was part of a ceremony naming a West Bank public square in honor of a Palestine terrorist who killed Gail Rubin and 37 Israelis, 13 of them children, in a 1978 terrorist attack.
Posted by: Haystack | May 26, 2010, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
This is HUGE. Sestak will eventually be required to give (under oath) details of who offered him what job. Since he’s a Democrat why did he let the cat out of the bag back in February?
Posted by: Adam | May 26, 2010, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Allow me to translate what David Axlefraud said:
“We’ve already had the White House lawyers look into it (as soon as we realized we were in deep legal jeopardy) and we’ve covered up all of our tracks and came up with an alibi in case our stonewalling fails”.
Does anyone else notice the vast difference in behavior of the Lamestream Media concerning the treatment they gave Rod Blagojevich and how they’re treating Obama, who has done basically the same that Blagojevich did?
Posted by: OxyCon | May 26, 2010, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
You must be kidding? The Attorney General who would not go after the Thugs in Phila,at a voting poll trying to intimidate voters. You want him to investigate his boss?
Posted by: stormerF2 | May 26, 2010, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
Not only Republicans are demanding an investigation. Americans want an investigation. WE WANT ANSWERS NOW. Obama and Gibbs do not answer questions because they think very soon we will not ask about the scandal. But Obama and Gibbs are wrong. We will continue pressing for answers. Obama will not get away with this. Republicans and Democrats keep pressing the DOJ for the real answers.
Posted by: mina | May 26, 2010, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Sestak let the cat out of the bag because he is an egotistical idiot. Have you heard this guy interviewed. God, out quality of political candidates just stinks.
Posted by: jones | May 26, 2010, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
This scandal is more like Valery Plame than anything else. Oh, I forgot, a special prosecutor WAS hired for that egregious crime.
When Democrats get caught with their collectivist pants down, the first thing they do is blame Republicans for mentioning it. If Bush had done this, all hell would have broken loose in 24 hours. We are just now hearing about this after more than 3 months. Typical deal. The media carrying water for the President, just like they do for all Democrats.
Posted by: Jim Baker | May 26, 2010, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
Its a crime to offer a job as a reward for doing something political… not a crime to mention that running for office would knock him out of consideration for the same job… its a gray area the sharp minds in the White House know well. You’re either a fool or an obstructionist if you think a $25 million independent inquiry will find any different.
Bush fired folks because they would not press cases for him… not because he had replacements lined up, big difference. You can’t fire someone because they refuse to fabricate cases against your political opponents.
Posted by: DewyB | May 26, 2010, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
These Republicans are at it again. Whitewater politics all over again. Get a clue. They did nothing when it came to the Bush/Cheney Whitehouse. Secret meetings with the energy companies. High gas prices. Sickening political games by the Republicans that did nothing about all the money sent to Iraq that went missing. They did nothing about the Valerie Plame outing. Hypocritical investigation should not be heard. They are just trying to play this card for the November 2010 election cycle, period.
Posted by: Gwilsing | May 26, 2010, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
talmag (6:19pm): Funny, I don’t recall Libs “shutting up” and working to make the country better when Repubs were in charge. You Libs just can’t take what you dish out can you?!?
Posted by: free_dude | May 26, 2010, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
Whatever happened to that lie about the “most transparent” admin ever???
Posted by: free_dude | May 26, 2010, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
Asking Holder or the suck up ass kissing media to look into this is like looking for the pot of gold GOOD LUCK.
Posted by: daniel | May 26, 2010, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
I agree with >> Posted by: Nonie | May 26, 2010 6:26:22 PM
I say let’s not only impeach Obama, Pelosi, Reid and other US Criminals, let’s go after the Bush criminals too! Oh wait that’s what we tea-party-patriots are planning in November.
Thanks Nonie you have inspired me even more!
Posted by: Ron | May 26, 2010, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
We never did investigate all those missing e-mails from the Bush WH did we?
Posted by: secondlook | May 26, 2010, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
Reference Jones comment, at 6:49: “Sestak let the cat out of the bag because he is an egotistical idiot. Have you heard this guy interviewed. God, out quality of political candidates just stinks.”
Seems as if Jones is blaming Sestak and not the Administration for this. Not only does Jones blame Sestak, but he/she (Jones) refers to Rep. Sestak as an “egotistical idiot.” I can’t imagine what Jones will label Rep. Sestak if the Administration is justifiably dragged over the coals for this apparent ethical and legal violation.
Posted by: SelmaAla | May 26, 2010, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
“There are no rules, we make um up as we go along!” This statement is exactly what the black demon-rat said when shoving the HC bill down our throats when we did not want it passed! Great, teaching your kids about NOT HAVING ANY RULES NOW! Kids can now tell teachers there are no rules, we kids can make em up as we go along…I want to see a teachers face now
Posted by: HeyTrud | May 26, 2010, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
Wew’ll do it besides Obama….
Posted by: LongT | May 26, 2010, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
Did everyone hear that all fumigation efforts were halted in the White House? There are too many rats and can’t catch em all, can’t poison them all…so the Pope is going to the WH to give the rats in the WH a real exorcism. For, Of & By the people!
Posted by: HeyTrud | May 26, 2010, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
You say Bush and Company lied, cheated, stole, perjurized? You say you are unhappy about this? Fine, BUT if it is not OK for Bush to have done it, it is NOT OK for Obama to do it, either. I say we dig to the bottom of the dung heap and bring ALL of this to light…..now. OK with you? You can crucify Bush, we get to crucify Obama. Still OK with you? It is absolutely juvenile to think we are happy with Bush, he stunk up the joint bigtime. Let him pay. But, fair is fair, we get to nail Barry in the deal.
Posted by: bahmi | May 26, 2010, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
little things like ‘facts’ and ‘the truth’ apparently matter little.
Check your figures TXAR.
Posted by: tierra
—
Washington (CNN) – Rep. Joe Sestak says he was offered an unspecified job by the White House in an attempt to stop him from challenging Sen. Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania’s Senate Democratic primary.
Sestak, who defeated the veteran Specter in last week’s primary election for the Democratic nomination, answered “yes” Sunday when asked by CNN about the White House offer. Sestak has previously acknowledged the offer in other interviews.
However, Sestak refused to provide any further details “about something that happened months earlier,” saying “beyond that, there’s nothing to add.”
—-
Those facts?
Posted by: smartlillena | May 26, 2010, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
Holder will do like he did with the Black Panthers……Let him walk
Posted by: mike | May 26, 2010, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
Holder will do like he did with the Black Panthers……Let him walk
Posted by: mike | May 26, 2010 7:42:55 PM
_____________________________________
You mean those two clowns in outfits with one night stick who were standing around doing nothing but trying to look important?
What about open carry guns? Compared to one night stick?
Posted by: tierra | May 26, 2010, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
Holder will do like he did with the Black Panthers……Let him walk
Posted by: mike
—
After November Holder won’t have a choice.
Posted by: smartlillena | May 26, 2010, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
Obama came in office with the USA at ONE trillion in debt and now we just hit 13 Trillion, can anyone beat that?
TXAR.55 | May 26, 2010 3:30:48 PM
____________________________________
When the indoctrination is thorough, little things like ‘facts’ and ‘the truth’ apparently matter little.
Check your figures TXAR.
Posted by: tierra | May 26, 2010, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
Either Sestak or Obama is lying, DemoRats are not looking good. The reason DemoRats didn’t pursue Bush is not because they’ve mercy for Bush, the reason is Bush has never done any impeachable or illegal or immoral things. Only Crook politicians from Chicago and Kenya are low-class enough to do those things. Look at what Clinton did in the Oval Office with Monica and you know DemoRat is a real different breed.
Posted by: yuwei | May 26, 2010, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
Sestak in his own words against Gibbs. Who do you believe? And Yes Sestak did say when asked several times that he was offered this job to “Dropp out of the race, for this job”.
So why would he lie about his own party again?
What does this have to do with Bush again?
Video with Sestak & Gibbs montage…. Priceless…. Who do you believe?
Posted by: Gandalff | May 26, 2010, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
Holder won’t do anything to his buddies in the white house, he’s too busy trying to keep the state of Arizona from enforcing the law.
Posted by: Jon Weiss | May 26, 2010, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
Great….as if holder will do anything. This regime is so incredibly corrupt that I’m beginning to think that there is no use in even fighting it. The rule of law is ignored over and over by Obama and his posse.
If we can just delay any huge moves til Nov….
Posted by: mjishernameo | May 26, 2010, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
Holder sucks and so does the Obama administration. Where is the transparency? This is typical slimy Chicago politics run by crooks
Posted by: Pman | May 26, 2010, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
This Hiyakawa article plainly states that Reagan (via an Ed Rollins interview) offered him a job to drop out of the California Senate GOP primary. Read it for yourselves:
So you think this is a crime? Reagan did it! How could it be illegal then? Ronnie could not possibly break the law, right? Plus, this offer was made in the press, because it was not illegal…
Posted by: yuda99 | May 26, 2010, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
First time I see our money being put to good use in this regemine to go after the White House. I hope he brings his plug for that dam hole to LA.
Posted by: common sense | May 26, 2010, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
As usual, the media look the other way, perfectly satisfied that the White House’s own “unbiased” investigator says there is no evidence of wrongdoing.
Nothing to see here, folks, move on.
Posted by: oldpink | May 26, 2010, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
Remember that there have been special Prosecuters named by Democrats over the years. Well, this time it is the Republicans asking that same question. The Democrats refuse and I think the Democrats will be in worse shape in November than they would have been.
I think the Democrats are now in the “between a rock and a hard place.” type of situation.
Posted by: john smith | May 26, 2010, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
Republicans are trying everything and anything to try and hurt President Obama. The only ones that will get hurt in the end are you damn right wingers who have taken this country to the brink of ruin under Republican Leadership. The American people have seem right through your games and the Democrats will be the ones coming out the winner come November.
Posted by: bob | May 26, 2010, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
“In an interview earlier this week, Ed Rollins, who will become the President’s chief political adviser in January, said Hayakawa would be offered an administration post if he decided not to seek re-election.”
AP
November 26, 1981
Seems like offering people a position if they don’t run has a precedent. A Republican precedent at that.
Posted by: tierra | May 26, 2010, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
They are wasting their time under this crooked administration,to ask one crook to do something against another crook come on now.? This is the worse administration we have had in history.God save America.
Posted by: Joeray | May 26, 2010, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
Seems like offering people a position if they don’t run has a precedent. A Republican precedent at that.
“In an interview earlier this week, Ed Rollins, who will become the President’s chief political adviser in January, said Hayakawa would be offered an administration post if he decided not to seek re-election.”
AP
November 26, 1981
That’s under Ronald Reagan.
Posted by: tierra | May 26, 2010, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
And tierra,your point is what? Two wrongs make a right?An incident from nearly 30 years ago means what?The law is what it is-currently the the law forbids the offer Sestak received.Period.Maybe if you lived in this country you might understand that no one is above the law.Scooter Libby learned that.As I recall the reporting of scandals in Canada is much different-the only way you could find out about the shenanigans of the Grits prior to the last nationwide election was was by reading American blogs.
Posted by: Nephron | May 26, 2010, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
This is the most corrupt administration ever in Washington,D.C. We have a president who has disdain for America and the will of its people. It is sad the MSM still is bamboozled by this.
Posted by: Downwithsocialism | May 26, 2010, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
Comrade Barry is drunk with power.
Posted by: Windfall | May 26, 2010, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
And tierra,your point is what?
_________________________________
The point is quite obvious. Ronald Reagan set the precedent – offering someone a job in your administration if that person doesn’t stand for election is legitimate.
Posted by: tierra | May 26, 2010, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
Obama couldn’t DREAM of being more CROOKED than Bush and Cheney. Republicans wrote the BOOK on corruption.
Posted by: George | May 26, 2010, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
You mean those two clowns in outfits with one night stick who were standing around doing nothing but trying to look important?
What about open carry guns? Compared to one night stick?
——————
get a clue…I lived in philly at the time and the BP thugs shouted racist slurs to any whites that approached called them “Crackers”, Using the night stick in a threatening manner and dressed in the Black panther fatigues and barets… Why don’t you inform yourself before you type. Have you ever lived in Philly? That’s right …you’re CANADIAN !
Posted by: mjishernameo | May 26, 2010, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
This is the most corrupt administration ever in Washington,D.C
_________________________________
Huh? Have you looked into the number of criminal convictions in the Reagan administration during the Iran/Contra ‘operation’?
One of the most shameful and criminal scandals in American political history.
You need to study some history.
Posted by: tierra | May 26, 2010, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
.I lived in philly at the time and the BP thugs shouted racist slurs to any whites that approached called them “Crackers”
_________________________________
You weren’t at that polling booth and you don’t know.
I’d be glad to look at any legitimate newspaper article you have that document the racial slurs.
Got anything?
Posted by: tierra | May 26, 2010, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
And tierra,your point is what?
_________________________________
The point is quite obvious. Ronald Reagan set the precedent – offering someone a job in your administration if that person doesn’t stand for election is legitimate.
Posted by: tierra | May 26, 2010, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
Joe Sestak has also gone on record as stating he was the Lindbergh baby, but no one has taken him up on that either.
Posted by: Patriot_Act | May 26, 2010, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
Posted by: Rowdy Boots | May 26, 2010 9:38:24 PM
Don’t you get it? The Republicans already set the precedent.
“In an interview earlier this week, Ed Rollins, who will become the President’s chief political adviser in January, said Hayakawa would be offered an administration post if he decided not to seek re-election.”
AP
November 26, 1981
That’s under Ronald Reagan.
Posted by: tierra | May 26, 2010, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
So what happened almost 30 years ago cancels a law currently on the books?Jack Kennedy slept with a probable Stasi agent,so that set a precedent to make it OK for a President to get involved with a foreign agent? Boy I’ve seen some twisted logic in my time but that takes the cake.Franklin Roosevelt rounded up Japanese-Americans and put them in concentration camps.Since he set the precedent,Obama can round up Arab-Americans and put them in camps now?Truly you do not understand the American legal system.
Posted by: Nephron | May 26, 2010, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
Since most libs live in the past, it may come as a surprise to them that Reagan is dead.
Posted by: JimFogleman | May 26, 2010, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
So what happened almost 30 years ago cancels a law currently on the books?
__________________________________
You think its against the law – Reagan didn’t. I don’t think you know the law.
I’m sure it was done discreetly under Reagan, ‘should you HAPPEN to decide not to run, we have a position in our administration you might be interested in . . .’
Posted by: tierra | May 26, 2010, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
Amazing.tierra thinks that if Reagan did it it must be legal.Ever hear of Iran-Contra? It was a little thing during Reagan’s second term.Since Reagan thought it was OK,by golly he must be right.By the same logic Nixon should never have been forced from office since he thought that burglary laws didn’t apply to the Executive Branch.By the way,Reagan wasn’t a lawyer.
Posted by: Nephron | May 26, 2010, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
This press fiasco reminds me of the time that ABC news edited out some of Hillary Clintons statements in a clip and then accused her of not saying what she actually did say. Journalism at its worst.
How long do you think Jake can try to make a story out of this?
Posted by: Flash Override | May 26, 2010, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
“I don’t think you know the law.”Section 18 USC 211 and section 18 USC 600.This is from the Federal Code.But according to tierra,a President can override the Federal Code.Maybe in Ontario,but not in the USA.
Posted by: Nephron | May 26, 2010, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
Posted by: Nephron | May 26, 2010 9:59:44 PM
Actually Nephron, I think the crucial element is that this has been done before, and reported in the media under Reagan – and there were no charges brought to bear.
Also, are you sure its illegal to say to somebody – “if it turns out you don’t run for office, talk to us . .. we’ve got a job for you”.
Posted by: tierra | May 26, 2010, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
Roam free within the cage.
Posted by: bark of wonder | May 26, 2010, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
Don’t you all get it? Republicans and Democrats work TOGETHER to cause chaos and hosility among Americans so they can tend to more important tasks? These silly stories do nothing but pit us against each other. Real, important matters are at hand, and you all are so distracted with your namecalling and childish rants, it’s no wonder, as we’ve plainly proven here, that Administrations, Republican or Democrat, know exactly how to run the story. Wake Up.
Posted by: Sharing news | May 26, 2010, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
Just imagine if this would have happened under the Bush administration. The Impeachment hearings would already be in progress. I’m sick and tired of filthy, dirty, hypocritical liberals. Now that there guy is in Office, its all of the sudden OK for rules to be broken and scandals to occur. Come On 2012!!!
Posted by: Tim | May 26, 2010, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
We don’t have to go back thirty years. five members of Bill Clintons cabinet came under criminal investagation. It ended with thirty three convictions. I don’t care what Reagan, Nixon, or Clinton did. WE were promised change, transparency, an honest open Government. This administration has stonewalled, had back door deals, and made laws that sixty four percent of the American people want repealed. Is this what we really voted for. Who else feels like a sucker here. Wake-Up
Posted by: Phil Flores | May 26, 2010, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
It’s plainly obvious to everyone here that both Republican and Democrat, know exactly what to do to get out of situations like these. Don’t you see how childish we all act, pointing fingers all time? It’s all to create chaos, and, most importantly, distractions to tend to more important things, like enslaving American people. If we all realize that both parties do it, doesn’t that mean our TWO party system is thoroughly corrupt? I’d think before blaming your fellow, and take a hard look at what our leaders have in common over at least the last 40 years.
Posted by: Sharing news | May 26, 2010, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
I really don’t have a problem with the Sestak Bribe™.
It just shows NoBo is a standard lie in your face lawyer politician where the ends justify the means.
After all that’s the truth and it only matters that the American People know.
Unless, they are going to impeach the guy and get rid of him early.
If that’s the case then go for it! Special Prosecutor and Popcorn. Let’s Go!
Posted by: Noz | May 26, 2010, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm
Just imagine if this would have happened under the Bush administration. The Impeachment hearings would already be in progress.
Posted by: Tim | May 26, 2010 10:49:23 PM
_________________________________
What are you talking about?
There were criminal charges laid against Scooter Libby for crimes committed in the White House – and he was tried, convicted and sentenced to jail and there were no impeachment hearings.
Posted by: tierra | May 26, 2010, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
“There were criminal charges laid against Scooter Libby for crimes committed in the White House – and he was tried, convicted and sentenced to jail and there were no impeachment hearings.” – tierra
Silly tierra, that’s because Bush wasn’t in charge and he didn’t know what was going on, something I’m sure you can agree with. : o )
You wouldn’t impeach Scooter Libby.
Posted by: Noz | May 26, 2010, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
According to some posters, murder should not be against the law now because people have gotten away with murder in the past.
Legal precedent is exactly that: the precedent has to have been legal when set. If not, no precedent was set. Prior bad acts do not justify current bad acts.
IF the WH offered Sestak a job for dropping out of a primary race, that meets the definition of violation of 18 U.S.C. 600 as described in this article.
The fact that prior presidents and/or administrations were corrupt, does not give a free pass to the current or future administrations.
Some of you people are incapable of understanding the simple fact: Just because Billy hit Janie, Betty does not get to hit Bobby.
Posted by: malcat | May 26, 2010, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
IF the WH offered Sestak a job for dropping out of a primary race, that meets the definition of violation of 18 U.S.C. 600 as described in this article.
The fact that prior presidents and/or administrations were corrupt, does not give a free pass to the current or future administrations.
________________________________________
Are you sure its illegal to say to somebody – “if it turns out you don’t run for office, talk to us . .. we’ve got a job for you”.
And when prior administrations do exactly the same thing and its made public in the media and no charges are brought – what does that tell you?
Posted by: tierra | May 26, 2010, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
Posted by: flynny | May 26, 2010 11:53:14 PM
Even more juvenile name calling. Cute.
Yeah, Iran/Contra resulted in a LOT of people being indicted and convicted and sent to jail, that’s how much BS it was.
A shadow government operating out of sight of the American people – and you are light weight enough to call Obama a dictator.
Posted by: tierra | May 27, 2010, 12:03 am 12:03 am
Reagan is still looked back on as one of America’s most beloved President’s. Even by Democrat’s!
HAHAHA I know that burns you Libs up bad. Soak in it.
Barry will go down as the rotten waste of the Liberal establishment. That just sends you Libs off the handle.
25 years later still trying to erase the love the public has for Reagan. Keep trying it will fall on deaf ears.
Posted by: flynny | May 27, 2010, 12:10 am 12:10 am
Posted by: flynny | May 27, 2010 12:10:16 AM
If you think integrity is judged by popularity polls then you’ll be better informed knowing Clinton was and is more popular than Reagan.
Posted by: tierra | May 27, 2010, 12:16 am 12:16 am
You weren’t at that polling booth and you don’t know.\———————————–
And how, pray tell would YOU know that tierra?
google it.
Posted by: mjishernameo | May 27, 2010, 12:19 am 12:19 am
tierra wrote:”If you think integrity is judged by popularity polls then you’ll be better informed knowing Clinton was and is more popular than Reagan.”
.
Was that poll taken before or after folks found out he was bought off for the Marc Rich pardon.
Posted by: gk | May 27, 2010, 12:20 am 12:20 am
You weren’t at that polling booth and you don’t know.\———————————–
And how, pray tell would YOU know that tierra?
google it.
Posted by: mjishernameo | May 27, 2010 12:19:54 AM
___________________________________
Couldn’t find a single thing heh mjishernameo? Not one single article published in a legitimate newspaper to support your accusations?
Posted by: tierra | May 27, 2010, 12:26 am 12:26 am
After all this I will bet that Gov Blago took the heat for that empty senate seat…
Posted by: cliff claven | May 27, 2010, 12:28 am 12:28 am
Where is the transparency Obama? Either you or someone in your office needs to fess up to this
Posted by: Derek | May 27, 2010, 12:34 am 12:34 am
google it.
Posted by: mjishernameo |
Say, we google it and we watch the video– no racial slurs, no yelling, no upset when the police arrive and ask them to leave. The dude that seems a bit hyper and unstable is the right winger taking the video and yelling billy club. Funny he doesn’t get all that upset about people carrying guns to town halls and so on.
Much ado about very little from what I could gather.
Posted by: progressive mama | May 27, 2010, 12:47 am 12:47 am
But, of course, all this does not really matter…
The biggest threat to our country is the tidal wave of debt that is about to sweep over us…
It is amazing to see so many liberals who have such disdain for Faith-based anything place so much faith in a debased currency.
That is all there is to the Dollar… a faith that taxes on the American people will make good on the debt…
But the Obama administration is writing checks the American people cannot cash…
Interesting times are ahead … even this summer…
Posted by: Quo Warranto? | May 27, 2010, 12:51 am 12:51 am
When does the transparency Obama campaigned on kick in . . . just wondering?
Will it start with Sestak or maybe with birth credentials?
Posted by: Ed Taylor | May 27, 2010, 12:54 am 12:54 am
google it.
Posted by: mjishernameo |
Say, we google it and we watch the video– no racial slurs, no yelling, no upset when the police arrive and ask them to leave. The dude that seems a bit hyper and unstable is the right winger taking the video and yelling billy club. Funny he doesn’t get all that upset about people carrying guns to town halls and so on.
Much ado about very little from what I could gather.
Posted by: progressive mama | May 27, 2010 12:47:49 AM
______________________________________
******************************************
Posted by: tierra | May 27, 2010, 12:55 am 12:55 am
All the trash-talk both ways notwithstanding, there’s a genuine problem here. An ostensibly credible individual of considerable personal achievement in the realm of public service (Admiral Sestak) flatly states that a (by definition) illegal act has occurred. The vast human capacity for rationalization does not negate the facts as they are so far known. Both Sestak and the President would seemingly have every reason to be candid with the American people if there are details that compellingly explain away the obvious inference. For everyone resisting the demand for those details I have a very simple question: Why? Is the law the law, or not?
Posted by: Neal Warth | May 27, 2010, 12:57 am 12:57 am
The Admiral should tell the whole truth, who offered him what job, in what words, when?
This will not end well for him… his opponent in November will make an issue of his evasions… and rightly so.
Posted by: Quo Warranto? | May 27, 2010, 1:03 am 1:03 am
There was enough to impeach Bush without a lame charge like this. Ed Rollins offered Hayakawa a post so he wouldn’t run. That would have been under your God, Ronald Reagan. Rove gave out jobs like candy. Look at the seven fools who are embarrassing themselves over this. The beautiful think about this is that it will only help democrats get elected in November. Every time Rand Paul opens his mouth the republicans ratings go down.
Posted by: Bill | May 27, 2010, 1:05 am 1:05 am
I don’t think Obama or those in his administration care about the law, and I’m not sure a lot of members of Congress do either. But if they want a fast track for removing Obama from office, how about demanding a copy of the original birth certificate with the foot print and hand filled out by the doctor?
Posted by: John C | May 27, 2010, 1:07 am 1:07 am
An ostensibly credible individual of considerable personal achievement in the realm of public service (Admiral Sestak) flatly states that a (by definition) illegal act has occurred.
____________________________________
I agree with most of your post except the part above – and it should read “flatly states that a (by definition) possible illegal act has occurred”.
That is – it’s possible – it is not certain at all.
If for instance legally if someone said to you, “if you decide not to run, talk to me, I’ve got a job for you” it well may well not a considered legally a bribe at all – but a contingency offer.
Posted by: tierra | May 27, 2010, 1:10 am 1:10 am
There was enough to impeach Bush without a lame charge like this. Ed Rollins offered Hayakawa a post so he wouldn’t run. That would have been under your God, Ronald Reagan. Rove gave out jobs like candy. Look at the seven fools who are embarrassing themselves over this. The beautiful think about this is that it will only help democrats get elected in November. Every time Rand Paul opens his mouth the republicans ratings go down.
Posted by: Bill | May 27, 2010 1:05:25 AM
_____________________________________
It is interesting how these ethical breeches only mean something to Republicans when they sniff out the possibility of smearing the Democrats. When their own do it the corrupt silence from the right is deafening.
Posted by: tierra | May 27, 2010, 1:14 am 1:14 am
Republican Senators, who wrote to Holder that they “do not believe the Department of Justice can properly defer to White House lawyers to investigate a matter that could involve ‘a serious breach of the law.’ The White House cannot possibly manage an internal investigation of potential criminal misconduct while simultaneously crafting a public narrative to rebut the claim that misconduct occurred.”
you’ve got to hand to the Repubs for having the chutzpah to actually say that after Bush/Cheney..
just remember.. there were no domestic terrorist attacks on America during ‘W’s 2 terms.
Posted by: PO'd | May 27, 2010, 1:39 am 1:39 am
how about demanding a copy of the original birth certificate with the foot print and hand filled out by the doctor?
Posted by: John C
1st, you’ll need to go to your nearest secret FEMA detention/re-education camp., appear before a death panel…. file for a visa to Kenya, then go to the secret storage facility where Bush’s WMD’s are being held, move a few boxes and you’ll find what you seek
Posted by: PO'd | May 27, 2010, 1:41 am 1:41 am
none of this is about Obama, it’s about trying to smear Joe Sestak so that he loses the election. You don’t hear anyone praising him for doing the right thing and not accepting the offered position do you?
Posted by: dk | May 27, 2010, 1:57 am 1:57 am
Rat vermin corrupted Boss Tweed-Obama and his corrupted Tammany Hall regime exposed.
Otraitor is a man-child emperor with no clothes. He is a rat vermin traitor with a plummeting popularity rating because he hates America, hates freedom and hates liberty. He works for Goldman Sachs along with Dodd and Frank. He supports expanded wars – but is Soros funded Code Pink and media matters are silent for this baby-dictator Obama, he is weak and the world is destabilizing, he is an oligarchical colloquists and rules our population with an iron fist in a police state with a velvet glove, but he coddles terrorists, Iran, MS13, Mexican Narco-State Drug Czars. He cracks down on the middle class – the law abiding tax paying whom he considers subjects in his regime. His IRS has audited at a rate 300% above normal. His census is a Nazi-like info-gathering attempt. He has outspent all previous presidents in one year. He is big brother, he is a traitor and he is a little man child moron figurehead empty suit that acts childish and thin skinned because he is uneducated. Sure he was indoctrinated with progressive trash, but given what he says and thinks he is a stupid uneducated failure of a man that could not hunt, grow food for himself, even change his tire. He knows nothing of math, history, physics or chemistry, his ideas are idiot Alinsky eructations, his speech capabilities without a teleprompter is pathetic and he is one of the stupidest people to ever grace the Office of the President.
And this moron man child Otraitor looks like the thin skinned loser. He is a disgusting man and a communist rat that will rot in hell.
This Obama regime is the modern Boss Tweed Tammany Hall. The depraved nature of the Democrat party and its hidden progressive-marxist agenda has been a cancer on America for 100 years now, and today, the main stream media is controlled by the progressives so we don’t Thomas Nast drawings exposing what this rat vermin Obama is doing.
Posted by: Mick Russom | May 27, 2010, 2:23 am 2:23 am
Tierra:
The point I make is that the “facts” taken at face value (i.e. in terms of Sestak’s presumptively credible characterization) constitute a crime. His refusal to be more specific leaves open the theoretical possibility that there is a semantical explanation that absolves the President of criminality. But his and Mr. Obama’s refusal so far to fill in the blanks IN ANY WAY begs a negative aspersion. In other words, if there’s nothing to hide why the hell are they hiding ANYTHING??!!
Posted by: Neal Warth | May 27, 2010, 2:25 am 2:25 am
The point I make is that the “facts” taken at face value (i.e. in terms of Sestak’s presumptively credible characterization) constitute a crime.
_______________________________________
No they cannot be said to constitute a crime – possibly, but certainly not beyond any reasonable doubt. The information we have is far too vague.
Posted by: tierra | May 27, 2010, 2:42 am 2:42 am
Posted by: Mick Russom | May 27, 2010 2:23:06 AM
Lots of name calling and nonsense there Mick.
You state the President has “a plummeting popularity rating”.
The President’s approval ratings have been steadily at just below (or just above) 50% for months now.
So your ‘plummeting’ is just not true – at all.
If you can’t get something that simple right, why we would believe the rest of your ranting and nonsense?
Posted by: tierra | May 27, 2010, 2:46 am 2:46 am
Posted by: Mick Russom | May 27, 2010 2:23:06 AM
Unless of course it’s satire – in which case it’s brilliant.
Posted by: tierra | May 27, 2010, 2:48 am 2:48 am
Sorry Mick:
Obamas ratings are below 50% When are you going to realize you’ve been duped. Obama dosen’t look half as stupid as the people who believe he’s being transparent, and truthful, with CSPAN showing us all the back door deals. And how wounderful now he’s making sure we get to pay the union pensions. Even the ones for the millionare baseball, and football players. Check it out see if I’m telling the truth. My names not obama. I’m not a lair. You’ve been duped. Ha,HA,ha,ha,ha,ha
Posted by: Phil Flores | May 27, 2010, 3:03 am 3:03 am
Ok Mick:
We were both duped. But now I’m on the other side. SEE YA! Ha,ha,ha,ha,ha,
Posted by: Phil Flores | May 27, 2010, 3:08 am 3:08 am
Yeah, asking Holder to investigate anything is like asking Obama for his Harvard transcript.
Posted by: LongT | May 27, 2010, 3:11 am 3:11 am
progreesive mama; from what I can gather, you gather what you want.
Posted by: LongT | May 27, 2010, 3:12 am 3:12 am
This administration is absolutely Chicago corrupt.
Posted by: LongT | May 27, 2010, 3:29 am 3:29 am
If Holder does not want to investigate because Obama is his friend (Holder must be imparcial, but he is not), is there another way to force Sestak and the White House to provide specific names?
Posted by: mina | May 27, 2010, 3:53 am 3:53 am
Tierra, of course it’s presumptively. Duh! Now tell us what in the hell justifies the presumption of political leaders that they’re above having to explain themselves to the people when the “facts” reasonably infer malfeasance? What kind of citizens are we (really!) if we buy into a civic lethargy that requires we not ask too many questions? At some point even Dorothy has to question the imploring to ignore the man behind the curtain.
Posted by: Neal Warth | May 27, 2010, 6:15 am 6:15 am
I see people discussing Scooter Libby, but, my goodness, you all have short memories. Scooter Libby was pardoned by Bush shortly after his conviction…
Stop pointing fingers at each other in this politician created war you all are fighting with each other over. You’re so busy with your distracted partisan bickering, that Congress and The President have gotten a free pass to continue treasonous acts. We’ve proven here, Democrat or Republican, that isn’t new to this Adminstration. Obama speaks of a NEW International order, but I bet you’re so concerned about whether your neighbor is liberal or conservative that you have no idea what he is talking about, who the new people in charge really are, or that this New International Order plan has been in effect and plans to be implemented THIS YEAR. Stop being naive children, it’s no wonder other countries needed Obama’s apology tour.
Posted by: Sharing news | May 27, 2010, 6:36 am 6:36 am
Interesting times are ahead … even this summer…
Posted by: Quo Warranto?
—
Anyone play the lottery? I don’t. But for those that do, have you wondered when it will start paying off with IOUs?
Oliver North made a better case for his own innocence than Joe Sestak.
Posted by: smartlillena | May 27, 2010, 6:39 am 6:39 am
tierra, would you at least agree that such a “contingency” offer violates at least the spirit of the law? or are you okay with the chief executive office using contingency plans to manipulate democratic elections. whether it was criminal conduct or not is really not the issue. the issue is that some people in the white house apparently attempted to use the white house as a tool to affect the outcome of an election. that’s unacceptable.
Posted by: davidfrat21 | May 27, 2010, 6:55 am 6:55 am
Hey, sharingnews – maybe you should change your name to sharingmisinformation. Scooter Libby was not pardoned: his sentence was cummuted.
Posted by: mstruth77 | May 27, 2010, 7:09 am 7:09 am
These posts or so far off the subject. How about we comment about what is being written about. Does it really matter what administration, It appears there has been a breech in in the law perpetrated by the white house. Its simple investigate it and clear him or impeach whatever the case is. I give credit to Sestac it takes courage and the willingness to to loose his political career to do the right thing. Isn’t that the reason we run for office so we can better things make what we see as the right changes as lost as that seems. Do they not owe there constituents for there win and any victories for there cause.
Integrity seems to be a thing only of common men and women we should all be demanding our politicians be steadfast honest and a pillar of integrity for there voters. After all we are what it is about.
Posted by: rob | May 27, 2010, 7:51 am 7:51 am
Interesting times are ahead … even this summer…
Posted by: Quo Warranto?
—
Read up on Tim Congdon, International Monetary Research – the plunge in M3. I don’t know if he’s a loon or not, but he has some eye-opening (to the point of scary) stats on the diminishing dollar supply, lending rules, the US GDP, printing money and a double dip recession. And Obama’s head-in-the-sand, fingers crossed approach.
Posted by: smartlillena | May 27, 2010, 8:03 am 8:03 am
Reading many of the liberal posts here is quite entertaining. The serial illogic is truly laughable. Especially entertaining are the assertions that since Reagan was never prosecuted for so it must be OK for Obama. As if to say…
“Well, Capone got away with murder, so it must be legal.”
Posted by: Jon Weiss | May 27, 2010, 8:06 am 8:06 am
What the Obama administration is accused of doing is quite different than what Reagan did.
If you read the wording of the accusatory statements, the Obama administration offered Sestak a position contingent on his not running. In other words Sestak was offered a bribe, not to run.
Reagan offered a job to Hayakawa, as an alternative to running for the office, but the job offer was not contingent on his not running. Had Haykawa run and lost, the job offer still remained, not so with Sestak.
Posted by: Jon Weiss | May 27, 2010, 8:20 am 8:20 am
PO’d
“Every time Rand Paul opens his mouth the republicans ratings go down.”
Thats odd, considering that Rand Paul(R) KY is leading his Jack Conway(D) KY, in the polls. Even the daily kos(kook) has Paul leading;
RCP Avg-
Paul 47.3
Conway 37.7 Paul +9.6
Rasmussen Reports
Paul 59
Conway 34 Paul +25
R2000/Daily Kos
Paul 42
Conway 39 Paul +3
PPP
41 Paul
40 Conway Paul +1
[Source: Real Clear Politics]
I’m no Paul fan since he is way too liberal for me, but the numbers are what they are.
Posted by: Jon Weiss | May 27, 2010, 8:31 am 8:31 am
me thinks there are more than 1 promama and tierra. NOBODY can be up 24/7. NOBODY. They both claim to have other jobs and family yet they are on here 24/7. Unbelievable!
Posted by: whatsgoingonhere? | May 27, 2010, 8:42 am 8:42 am
Quid pro quo bribe much, Obamites?
That’s a no-no. It might have flown in the Corrupticrat cesspool of Chicago, but that crap doesn’t fly in Washington. Can’t wait to see some of the filth in this WH resign over this – or better yet, be frogmarched in handcuffs out of the White House, as liberals were fond of saying during the Bush years.
Posted by: Lt. | May 27, 2010, 8:46 am 8:46 am
I gotta wonder why the left is running to the defense of Sestak, since he is not accused of wrong doing, he (according to accusations) was offered the job by the Bamster. There is no crime in being offered a bribe, the crime is offering the bribe. Sestak would only be guilty , if he accepted which he apparently did not. If anyone is prosecuted it should be Obama, but with Holder running the show at DOJ, that ain’t ever gonna happen. As for impeachment of Bush, who was running Congress for the last two years of Bush’s Administration? Oh, yeah… it was the Dems, so why did they not prosecute? Could it be that they knew that an impeachment would reveal that they all had a hand in the prosecution of Bush’s wars as well?
Posted by: Jon Weiss | May 27, 2010, 8:49 am 8:49 am
Good luck getting Holder to do anything on this,he’ll more than likely drag his feet for a few years.
Posted by: actsnow | May 27, 2010, 8:53 am 8:53 am
Where are the Woodward and Bernstein’s of the world? Tirelessly following leads to see if this president is a crook. More signs of corruption have spilled out of this administration than the oil currently flowing into the gulf. It just amazes me how Obama keeps getting a free pass from the main stream propaganda outlets. I guess they don’t see an opportunity for some big budget Hollywood film, depicting these so called investigative reporters as American heroes after they bring down a corrupt president. Obama makes Nixon look like a Saint.
Posted by: BABS | May 27, 2010, 9:12 am 9:12 am
NONE of this is funny at all.If this occured in OUR WhiteHouse, then obama is in SERIOUS TROUBLE!! And SHOULD BE!obama seems to think he is ABOVE the laws of America,and HE needs to be investigated on MANY things.As it states…it’s “WE THE PEOPLE”..NOT “ME THE PRESIDENT”. obama is not my PRESIDENT…HE HAS NOT PROVED HIS ELLIGIBILITY, AND UNTIL HE does so,I CONSIDER HIM A fraud.
Posted by: LindaB | May 27, 2010, 9:16 am 9:16 am
re:”Every time Rand Paul opens his mouth the republicans ratings go down.
“Posted by: Jon Weiss
at least make an effort to get what I posted correct,.. I didn’t say that
Posted by: PO'd | May 27, 2010, 9:19 am 9:19 am
BABS,
Where are the Woodward and Bernstein’s of the world?
————————————-
They are stuck, stranded in the 1970′s, much like Obamas followers who are still stuck in the 60′s.
Posted by: Jon Weiss | May 27, 2010, 9:20 am 9:20 am
Oliver North made a better case for his own innocence than Joe Sestak.
Posted by: smartlillena
that’s funny…. even casually
equating the Iran-Contra scandal with Sestak..
as North was a National Security Council member involved in the clandestine sale of weapons to Iran, ..
diverting proceeds from the arms sales to support the Contra rebel group in Nicaragua…North admitted shredding government documents related to his Contra and Iranian activities
Posted by: PO'd | May 27, 2010, 9:28 am 9:28 am
HE HAS NOT PROVED HIS ELLIGIBILITY
Posted by: LindaB
REPORT TO THE NEAREST SECRET FEMA DETENTION CAMP
Posted by: PO'd | May 27, 2010, 9:30 am 9:30 am
What is it that nobody understands. We are under the thumb of Hussein II and there is no one in the United States Government legal system that is willing to go after this Hussein, so consequently we must wait for the Knight on the white Horse to come to our rescue and he( The United States of America) no longer exists as the country is now under seige
Posted by: bargal | May 27, 2010, 9:31 am 9:31 am
He is a rat vermin traitor with a plummeting popularity rating because he hates America, hates freedom and hates liberty.
Posted by: Mick Russom
colorful,.. not very eloquent, manages to get so much rightwing paranoia and hate into a short sentence… I give it a B for effort
Posted by: PO'd | May 27, 2010, 9:35 am 9:35 am
Nothing will happen these are Democrats and the vast bulk of the media admittedly leftists activists will massage the facts into fuzzy confusion so that the dim masses that vote for dems can’t understand and thus won’t pay attention
Posted by: laslavic | May 27, 2010, 9:39 am 9:39 am
Apparently bribery is business as usual with Democrats.
… or maybe he’s just a liar.
Posted by: Johnny B | May 27, 2010, 9:41 am 9:41 am
Will that be before or after we look into the influence Cheney had in getting halliburton the job of pouring the cement on this oil rig? Halliburton has poured the cement for the two oil rigs that have exploded. I think this is a little bit more important than some deal which happens every day in Washington by both parties. That is how they get things done…deals and everyone knows this. Anyway he did not take it so it is a moot point except to stir up another contraversy. How about looking into the deals the previous administration made with banks, insurance companies, etc….I would find that more interesting. Besides, it was the republicans who took the most money from the oil companie 71% more. the democrats were next and then guess who…Sarah Palin and the last person who took the least amount of money was Obama…so let’s start at the top and investigate the republicans first as we are still suffering from their deals.
Posted by: talmag | May 27, 2010, 9:46 am 9:46 am
This November and in 2012 we will remove from office ALL Democrats.
Posted by: PIRT
take a breath there good buddy….
‘ ALL Democrats’ eh?
make ya a small wager on your prognostication
bring back Nixon & Agnew
Posted by: PO'd | May 27, 2010, 9:55 am 9:55 am
TO: REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP
FROM: HARD WORKING MIDDLE CLASS AMERICAN
You need to shutdown all legislation and appointment approvals until a special prosecutor is appointed!!! You got the electoral mandate. Have the guts!!! President Obama has run out of political manna.
Posted by: Mr. T | May 27, 2010, 10:04 am 10:04 am
talmag,
“…so let’s start at the top and investigate the republicans first as we are still suffering from their deals.”
And while we are at it lets look into how this rig got a safety award and was dubbed “the model for others to follow” by the Obama Administration, as well as why the liberal establishment in LA, that supposed to be charged with overwatching operations on this rig were viewing porn on their government computers instead of tracking safety as they were paid to do.
Posted by: Jon Weiss | May 27, 2010, 10:05 am 10:05 am
shutdown all legislation and appointment approvals
Posted by: Mr. T
how would that be different from what the Republicans have been doing all along since the Pres. was elected
Posted by: PO'd | May 27, 2010, 10:06 am 10:06 am
Good, because somebody needs to do something about this situation. Either Joe Sestak is lying, and should be called out; or someone in the White House committed FRAUD. Burying your collective heads in the sand, like the MSM, is not morally or ethically right.
I agree with BABS, Where are the Woodward and Bernstein’s of the world? Tirelessly following leads to see if this president is a crook?
Posted by: Dump Box | May 27, 2010, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Oh those Bushies
‘In addition to the sex, drugs, and gifts, the employees are accused of rigging contracts, improperly helping oil company workers fix problems with their contracts, and working part-time as private oil consultants..’
Employees at the Minerals Management Service including the former head of the Denver division repeatedly and “without remorse” violated ethics rules over a four-year period, ‘
Posted by: PO'd | May 27, 2010, 10:12 am 10:12 am
The Repubican party upset me. After President Bush have sent thousands of soldier to die in Iraq for no weapon of mass destruction, after torture techniques were legalized in guantanamo bay, now, that want to go after a president. This is why I continue to strongly dislike the Republic party.
Posted by: Michael | May 27, 2010, 10:58 am 10:58 am
Did the Nixon AG appoint a special prosecutor? We can’t let the inept AG look into the matters of Whitehouse corruption. We need a special prosecutor now. Or in January when we own the house.
Posted by: Numbers29 | May 27, 2010, 11:04 am 11:04 am
I’m a Repub, but, that is irrelevant. This is a serious matter and MUST be investigated properly, with due diligence, by non-partisan independent individuals. if not, we might as well be living in a totalitarian regime.
Period, end of discussion. Wrong is wrong, right is right.
Fed up with relative morality/ethics, on both sides of the aisle.
Posted by: Desiree | May 27, 2010, 11:04 am 11:04 am
Somebody is going to be in trouble. Either one of Bammy’s cronies or Sestak for lying.
Posted by: Matt | May 27, 2010, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Posted by: whatsgoingonhere?
—
Ya don’t really think it, do ya? Naaah!
Posted by: smartlillena | May 27, 2010, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Sestak is committing a felony or he’s covering for a felon. You can bet your eyeballs he has an attorney right now. And if he has any brains, it isn’t an attorney by way of the WH.
Posted by: smartlillena | May 27, 2010, 11:32 am 11:32 am
This could work to the Democrats’ benefit in 2012. You impeach Barack Hussein by the end of the term 2010. Put him on trial by 2011. He gets sent off to prison forthwith to share a cell with Blackovich. In the meantime, Hillary revs up her campaign machine and runs in 2012.
With a 44% approval rating and nosediving like crazy, Barack Hussein would be a liability for the traditional blue collar Democrat (or what’s left of them) running for office in 2012.
With Barack Hussein out of the picture, Hillary would have a relatively clean slate to run on.
Posted by: Jack Feehan | May 27, 2010, 11:35 am 11:35 am
impeach the head traitor and vote out the rest of the america hating liers who call themselves leaders….the slime in washington is oozing out of every crack..they are doing their best to destroy this country and its working like a charm….liberalism is really a mental disease…people are fed up with all these crooks on both sides and were not going to look the other way while they ruin whats left of america…vote me all out, all of em, starting from the top down..
Posted by: wolverine45 | May 27, 2010, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Most of this country would jump at the chance to take Hillary Clinton in trade for being rid of Borak Ubama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi.
Posted by: smartlillena | May 27, 2010, 11:42 am 11:42 am
Of course this should be investigated independently, that’s a no brainer. Anybody that disagrees in Congress is a hypocrite to our laws, ending corruption in Washington, and at the very least claims of new transparency. This is just one of many similar instances that the WH has tried to influence politics around the nation in a less than honest and ethical way.
Posted by: John Q. | May 27, 2010, 11:50 am 11:50 am
This story will get buried by the media. Remember Gerald Walpin?
This administration has the arrogance to expect to get away with murder.
Posted by: changl019 | May 27, 2010, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Talking about the White House absolving itself of any wrongdoing “That was not enough for the Republican Senators…”
That shouldn’t be enough for any reporters or news organizations who don’t see themselves as part of the Obama administration. Sad when the idea of checking into what was actually done, based on what was actually said in public, has to be characterized as being motivated by party affiliation.
I seem to remember a few years ago a press corps that patted themselves on the back for being skeptical of the White House’s actions and statements, and proudly proclaimed to be objectively “asking the tough questions.” And when possible GOP misdoings were looked into, they weren’t characterized as being only issues to Democrats.
Posted by: David | May 27, 2010, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Maybe if the Obama Administration orders its lackeys in the national media to ignore Sestakgate the whole problem will go away? Gibbs will soon run out of spin and find out it isn’t possible to cover up Obama’s political oil spill.
Posted by: Dryden01 | May 27, 2010, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Impeachment is the answer. Start today.
Posted by: Aunt Bee | May 27, 2010, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
In the meantime, the bigger crime of COVERUP is going on NOW. This is the part that will end up being the real downfall for this administration.
Posted by: Instant Karma | May 27, 2010, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
If they WH is so sure it was all “appropriate”, why balk at the special investigation?
Posted by: Kim | May 27, 2010, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
OMG. I am so sick of this crap on both sides of the isle. Enough with the witch hunts already and get back to work!!!
Posted by: John | May 27, 2010, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
OMG, John. I bet you do wish this would just go away. I’m sure you obama supporters wish that all his underhanded, back-door deals wouls be overlooked and just ‘go away’.
Posted by: ticajun | May 27, 2010, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
The WH is balking, to buy time, while they decide who will be the scapegoat.
Posted by: christopher | May 27, 2010, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Obama could chop the head off a live baby and eat it raw on TV and the democrats would say it’s no big deal.
Brainwashed fools are destroying this country, hope enough people wake up before the election. USA RIP
Posted by: np2j | May 27, 2010, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
Most corrupt administration since Nixon. May even be worse than Nixon.
Posted by: Dennis D | May 27, 2010, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
My guess is it never occured to whoever that they were even doing anything wrong….from such comes the phrase “power corrupts…absolute power corrupts absolutely”. Now that they have thought about it, it’s all about damage control.
Posted by: LongT | May 27, 2010, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Impeach the puppet of the progressive socialist party. POTUS cant even give his own speeches as he reads the party dribble from a teleprompter.
Posted by: impeach da leach | May 27, 2010, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
The Republican party still doesn’t get it.
Both parties have been doing this for decades. Smearing one person or party is not the point. Reform and fixing a broken system is what is needed. Those who don’t understand are likely to be voted out in the fall.
Posted by: David Kisling | May 27, 2010, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
Does anyone doubt that if Sestak had accepted the offer, the White House wouldn’t have issued a press release about it? When they made Jon Huntsman the Ambassador to China, the political press lauded it as a brilliant political move. No foul play was claimed, and none would have been claimed here if Sestak had accepted the job offer.
Sestak’s potential dropping out is not some shady, negotiated quid pro quo condition of accepting the job. Rather, it’s an automatic, obvious and above-the-board condition of ANY job. And the administration is allowed to offer people jobs, even if it’s politically convenient for them to do so. Accepting a job equals rejecting other jobs. And being politically clever does not equal being nefarious.
Reply
Posted by: dug4000 | May 27, 2010, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
It they need a special prosecutor for this the Bush and Cheney should be in jail.
Posted by: debra | May 27, 2010, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
First of all David Kisling, both parties do offer jobs to people they want to get out of the way. Obama did it by making Hillary Secretary of State. That way she is out of the picture and under his rule. But they do not ofeer a job to someone who is running for public office so they won’t run against the person they want in. That is a crime. And for John, you are sick of this and they should get back to work. You mean get back to bankrupting America and turning it at best a socialist country, at worst communist. Is that what you mean. It would be better if those so called defenders of the constition just played checkers until the next election. Oh yeh John, this is not the first time Obama has to pull this before, or around the same time with Senator candidate Andrew Romanoff so he wouldn’t run agains Senator Michael Bennet in Colorado. Let’s just play checkers at this point.
Posted by: Not a Bleeding Liberal | May 27, 2010, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
I resent comparing Obama with Nixon. It is true that both of them mis-used words deceptively. It is true that the proper way to understand their real intent is to focus on “watch what we do, not what we say”. It is true that both of them are utterly deceptive sociopaths. BUT Obama is much better looking than Nixon.
Posted by: student1776 | May 27, 2010, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
They are losing sleep over this one. For sure!
Posted by: Dutra | May 27, 2010, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
” BUT obama is much better looking than Nixon.” You may think so but neither one does anything for me. In fact, I get a reflux feeling every time obama is on my tv screen.
Posted by: rebecca2656 | May 27, 2010, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
Only an ignorant fool would think that the position of “Secretary of the Navy,” could be offered without the President knowing it, which means Obama is to blame – or at least part of the conspiracy. Nixon resigned for a cover up, not the crime itself. Then, at least Nixon loved his country enough to resign rather than continue the “long national nightmare.” Obama only loves Obama, so there’s no way he’ll resign; so the criminal must be IMPEACHED!
Posted by: Hank hill | May 27, 2010, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
I cannot determine what Mr. Sestak has to gain by making such a claim. His party is in power and he won. He may have a political axe to grind against the President for trying to supplant him with the corpse formerly known as Arlen, but why would he want to drag down his own party in the process?
Posted by: Elvis | May 27, 2010, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
David, part of fixing a broken system is by ridding corruption. Interfering in a state’s political process with bribery is illegal and corrupt.
Posted by: Terry | May 27, 2010, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
I don’t get it, he has said he will have the most transparent admin. ever. He has, you see the back door corruption, you see all the crooks he has put in positions, you see all the Marxist, Socialist he has put in as czars and other positions. Everytime he decides to do something, they have to go back to it and try to fix their screw-up i.e. Cash for clunkers, stimulus, General Motors shall I keep going, So you see, it is transparent, transparent from the standpoint that No one, him or his cronies no what the —-
is going on, or what to do.
Posted by: nativeamerican | May 27, 2010, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
Even if the current admin is as crooked as the Bush admin, its just a he said she said case. Unless there is tape of the conversations, this lawsuit is a waste of taxpayer money. Lets get on with more pressing manners.
Posted by: tman | May 28, 2010, 12:32 am 12:32 am
Both parties have been doing this for decades. Smearing one person or party is not the point. Reform and fixing a broken system is what is needed.
Posted by: David Kisling
—
Doing the same thing, getting caught, defending it as ‘same ol, same, ol’, then calling it reform, is reform? Something about that don’t track. I guess it’s a democrat thing.
Posted by: smartlillena | May 28, 2010, 7:28 am 7:28 am
Unless there is tape of the conversations, this lawsuit is a waste of taxpayer money. Lets get on with more pressing manners.
Posted by: tman
—
Except that there is the credibility (if you can call it that) of those involved and an election in November.
So let’s see how this plays out.
Posted by: smartlillena | May 28, 2010, 7:33 am 7:33 am
“Unless there is tape of the conversations, this lawsuit is a waste of taxpayer money.” – tman
Maybe not.
Sestak could just tell the truth and then you don’t need a tape.
He’s the kind of guy that might do that.
He was a Military Man, a three-star Vice Admiral so he’s familiar with honor.
He is not a lawyer, that alone increase the chances of him telling the truth dramatically. I can’t say that of the other involved individual.
Posted by: Noz | May 28, 2010, 9:05 am 9:05 am
Politicians side-stepping. Remember the treatment of the Special Prosecutor in the Clinton Impeachment at the hands of the Media, and the craven lack of defense from Congressional Republicans. They’re always “busy” or “away” when the heat’s on. Compare that with the treatment of the Special Prosecutor in the Nixon removal from office. In the Press he walked on water, and the Republicans in Congress lined up to praise and kneel before him and his Press barkers. TRUST REPUBLICANS TO “DO THE RIGHT THING”? They’re lawyers and know how best to skirt the LAW while praising themeselve for their courage in defending it.viz their enactment of
laws in past few decades to abridge Rights protected in the FUNDAMENTAL LAW of the US, which they are bound on oath in accepting office to UPHOLD AND DEFEND
Trust Congressional Republicans? You’ve got to be kidding.
Posted by: jojo | May 28, 2010, 11:19 am 11:19 am
Wow… what a comedown for former President Clinton… Lap dog to a guy that called him a racist in the election of 2008… the humiliation…
Posted by: Quo Warranto? | May 28, 2010, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
We need the next Bob Woodward. Since the latter is a devout Democrat I doubt he will pursue this.
Between Illinois, Colorado and PA this is the third illicit offer.
Chicago politics.
This is a gem for a professional journalist who wants to make his mark in history.
Posted by: Chris J | May 29, 2010, 12:15 am 12:15 am
The next thing will be that Hillary’s campaign debt will be paid off and Bill Clintons will be invited to all the State dinners because up to now Bill Clinton was persona non grata in the Obama WH.
Posted by: Chris J | May 29, 2010, 12:20 am 12:20 am
Lies, lies and more lies from Obama’s evil and twisted mind… Appoint the special counsel and put Sestak under oath in front of a Grand Jury !!!!!!
Posted by: EMS | May 29, 2010, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Senator Kyl (R-AZ) is a hypocrite. When I reported DOD FWA to his office amounting to millions of dollars, and unjust enrichment overcharges to veterans and active military amounting to billions; he simply took the DOD response and closed the inquiry case. They (DOD) lied to a US Senator and committed numerous other felonies, but Kyl refused to get involved. He’s just as corrupt as the Obama Administration!
Posted by: Tom Sander, LtCol(Ret) | May 31, 2010, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
Lies, lies and only more lies from the evil and twisted mind of government!! why dont we put all these people running the show into the jail and get some nice god fearing people who will at least be good enough to look after humans and not ignore their own people!!
Posted by: Henna | June 2, 2010, 2:30 am 2:30 am
A dedicated bunch of lawyers need to be keeping a list on this administration. It appears that it is ignoring the law and doing what it wants, not what the law requires. Words are not deeds. Refusal to enforce the law and overlooking breaching of the law needs to have consequences; immediately! I’ll by the book that tells the tale of this impeachment, and so will many relieved Americans.
Posted by: Prudence | June 2, 2010, 6:08 am 6:08 am
don’t approve kagan.
Posted by: jerry session | June 3, 2010, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm