By Katie Cline

May 30, 2010 8:56am

Louisiana Gov. Jindal to Obama: Give Us More Power on Oil Spill

In an exclusive interview on 'This Week', Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal says he told President Obama “for us, it’s trust but verify.”

“You know, it’s that old saying that we’ve heard promises, we want to see that happen on the ground,” Jindal said.

The President met with Jindal and other state and local leaders on Friday. After that meeting, in a Sunday show exclusive, Jindal told 'This Week' anchor Jake Tapper that he was direct with the President: “We need more local decision-making authority.”

“We asked for senior Coast Guard officials to be put in each coastal parish,” the governor said he told the president.

When asked whether he agreed with Obama’s claim that the government was doing everything it could, Jindal said, “I think there could have been a greater sense of urgency.”

Jindal recounted to 'This Week' host Jake Tapper one instance where BP and federal government bureaucracy got in the way of the cleanup.

"Terrebonne Parish…submitted a plan for 180,000 feet of hard boom. The Coast Guard approved them for 90,000 feet. A week ago Friday, they didn't even have 90,000 feet. They didn't have that much boom, hard boom, in the parish…”

Tapper asked the governor what happened next.

“Well, in that case, they literally had hard boom sitting on the dock and they didn't deploy it,” Jindal said. “There was no excuse. The BP contractor said BP told them not to do it until the oil was coming. NOAA projections showed for days, and we saw the oil ourselves.”

“We finally brought the Coast Guard captain that was in charge of Louisiana's response with us on a National Guard Black Hawk helicopter, showed him the oil on the island, showed him the sheen in the bay, showed him the oil coming into that area, and said this needs to be boomed.  He agreed it needed to be boomed,” Jindal said.

The boom was finally deployed.

Tapper also pushed Jindal, an avowed conservative, to reconcile his belief in small government with his demands for more federal assistance.

“When government grows too big, it doesn't do its core functions properly,” he said. “Absolutely, I believe in a limited government that is effective and competent in what it does. We need federal government exactly — we need our federal government exactly for this kind of crisis.”

User Comments

Wow..this is hilarious. I had a discussion with friends as to which media poodle would be the first to try to shift the blame for the Obama administration’s incompetence on to Jindal, the Republican goevernor of Louisiana.
I said it would be you. It’s no surprise to me that I was right

Posted by: Barney | May 30, 2010, 9:10 am 9:10 am

I sounded like Jake was trying to place the blame on Louisiana. Maybe if Louisiana was receiving the royalties from the offshore drilling, in which it is entitled, this money could be invested in the protection for which Louisiana has been begging!

Posted by: Tsahmad | May 30, 2010, 9:30 am 9:30 am

Ha, Jindal talked about the “war” on the leak, and in complaining about the equipment said something like “contain it over there so we don’t have to contain it over here”.
So get ready for Repubs to start talking about nuking the leak.

Posted by: Chuck | May 30, 2010, 9:40 am 9:40 am

Bigger government = bigger mess..

Posted by: Sigmonde | May 30, 2010, 9:47 am 9:47 am

It did seem like blame was being placed on gov.Jindal in today’s news interview. However, what about using a filter mesh with carbon similar to what is used in a fish tank filter. This would be placed around the shoreline of Louisiana and other affected areas.

Posted by: Ty | May 30, 2010, 9:59 am 9:59 am

Jindal is the true hero in this mess….He HAS been on it since day one and has all the facts straight….
Compare with Obama, unprepared, uninformed, uncaring and political…a FAILURE.

Posted by: mjishernameo | May 30, 2010, 10:07 am 10:07 am

Bobby Jindal supported drilling in the gulf but he failed to insure safety precautions. Now he blames everybody to deflect blames on himself and the GOP.Pallin the drill baby drill poster child is also blaming Obama. Yup GOP tactics blames everbody to deflect blames away from them.The GOP under Bush deregulated the oil industry. Remember small government? This is what happens with lack of regulation. We get recessions, environmental disasters. Bush and the GOP leadership has alot of explaining to do.

Posted by: mambojam | May 30, 2010, 10:17 am 10:17 am

I think there are two issues here. BP is responsible at this moment for stopping the gush of oil. The US with state authorities are responsible for cleaning up the mess and later billing BP. The problem from the start is how many chiefs do we have. So is BP the ultimate authority on how the money is spent? If they don’t agree the request gets denied? If the Feds/state makes their own assessments without the agreement by BP, do they proceed anyway and sue for collection later? So if the feds o.k. the state to build berms, and they fail to do what is intended, does BP who is refusing this request pay anyway?
While the oil gush is being dealt with by BP, shouldn’t the government be skimming off the oil with tankers? Is it physically possible to separate both oil and water on those tankers and save most of the oil and retrieve it before it hits more shoreline? Is Carville right about this request?
For whatever reasons the feds did not make this a priority from Day 1. The media didn’t either. So there may well have been feds dispatched, but it was not an all out effort as it should have been.
This is exactly like the proclamation from then democrat Governor of LA after Katrina that next morning that all was pretty o.k. So the government stepped back waiting for the state to tell them what was needed. Now we know this was a huge mistake because Washington looked slow to act as they do now. So instead do the feds barge in ASAP and “take over” even when not asked?
From every disaster SHOULD come a learning experience.

Posted by: Susan | May 30, 2010, 10:32 am 10:32 am

America’s shores deserve defense and the federal government and BP seem to have decided South Louisiana wetlands are not worth the trouble to defend.
BP & USCG keep saying only 30 miles of marsh has been oiled. Is that true?
They keep saying they will clean it up.
Has BP demonstrated they can effectivly clean oil from amrsh?

Posted by: crescentCityRay | May 30, 2010, 10:55 am 10:55 am

The Federal government has been involved with this oil spill since day one. And Jindal knows it. A few months ago Jindal was one of the biggest accusers of the Obama administrations “big government” and was against regulating big corporate America. Well, now that the result of deregulatiion has slapped his state in the face with a big disaster created by greedy corporate politics, he wants to blame the very government that wants to regulate the big oil conglomeration. Hypocrisy at it’s finest, Jindal. Shut up and take responsibility for your own lack of involvement, incompetence, and judgement. Why weren’t you prepared? Why didn’t you have a plan? And like that boon would save the wetlands..get real. There’s nothing that can, or could have been done to save the coast. Not all the boon or sand in the world.The waters are not only contaminated with oil, but with dispersant as well.

Posted by: Bea | May 30, 2010, 11:01 am 11:01 am

All of these news message boards are swamped with hundreds of BP consultants trying to shift blame and minimize perceived damage.
Being one of their millions of victims, I’m not looking forward to all the slander they will be directing our way. I hate the blame it on the victim tactic.
The purpose of the dispersant is to hide evidence, a crime. OPA 1990 requires BP immediately remove, not disperse, oil pollution discharges. Marsh cannot be defended with booms and skimmers from subsurface partially dispersed oil. That is a hostile sneak chemical weapon attack on US soils. Where is our defense

Posted by: crescentCityRay | May 30, 2010, 11:02 am 11:02 am

It’s Jindal’s state. He IS responsible because he’s the governor and he HATES “bigguvmint”. Thinks volcano monitoring is a waste, per his speech. He talked to O everyday on the phone last week, yet he politicizes by whining on TV, too.

Posted by: cat48 | May 30, 2010, 11:08 am 11:08 am

Forget relief well success in August.
Each hurricane will cause relief well delays.
Meanwhile, BP should be removing as much of their oil as possible rather than purposely mixing dispersant remnants with our gulf waters. They should be preventing all oil from reaching shores, but they cannot do that because of dispersant use.
There should be five (5) rigs drilling relief wells. Just two is a nickle and dime approach, not in the best interest of the United States.

Posted by: crescentCityRay | May 30, 2010, 11:11 am 11:11 am

The U.S. Constitution clearly defines governments role. T-Baggers and Liberterians rail against the Obama administration. Paul Rand, a strict Constitutionalist?. A Liberterian. Randwants to either change or do away with the 14th ammendment in the Constitutuion. A law that has been in existence since 1828. Does that mean he wants to protect the Constitution? or, shred it until it looks like something the Liberterian party would like for Americans. All Americans. T_Baggers are spitting into the wind. Federal taxes are at a 50 year low. Is the Tax act just a dodge? Or, are the Baggers, Birthers and Deathers just a far right fringe of society who are highly religious and believe the Bible should replace or become a part of our country’s Constitution? BP and all the great scientific minds willing to help can not stop the oil gushing into the Gulf. Is this the presidents fault? Maybe he is partially to blame, as would every president that has allowed deep sea drilling at extreme levels. Our President is not a caped crusader with physical ability’s beyond mortal men and women. An unprescedented happening has made everyone understand the earth snb usedn as a garbage pail.
Right now in the pacific a trillion tons of plastic and other non bio degradable GARBAGE is spoiling our world. Stop the blame game. The President has done all he can. Send in the Feds and have the government take over? Isn’t that the exact ideaology T-Baggers and state rightists rail against? You do not get to pick and choose when the Constitution should be folowed or not be folowed. As Sen. McCain (Circa 2000) once proudly proclaimed, ” I’m a Maverick.” To which the same McCain recently said, ” I’m not a Maverick, never was”. SECREG_756

Posted by: secreg666 | May 30, 2010, 11:12 am 11:12 am

I’m offended by people using our latest Southeast Louisiana man made catastrophe of biblical proportions to bolster their inane political arguments. The insulting of BP’s victims, we see in posts here, is also unconscionable.
Be aware BP consultants are posting messages designed to minimize perceived damage, minimize perceived value of Louisiana’s damage, and try to shift blame for the damage, especially to their victims. They are going to slander their victims.

Posted by: crescentCityRay | May 30, 2010, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Obama lacks leadership ability. His inactions on this crisis have led to more environmental damage. It appears that Obama’s only ability is apologizing to our enemies, badmouthing previous administrations and creating combative relationships with real leaders that are moving our nation forward.

Posted by: Albert Friday | May 30, 2010, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Hey Barney, is it against the law for the individual states to prepare for this type of disaster? Jindal screamed loud and clear against any interference from the gummitt in anything local. Seems to me that people like him (and you) are just taking their shots at the biggest target (Obama). Just think how bad it would be if Jindal, aka Whiner-in-Chief was in charge instead of Adm Allen. The screaming would be deafening.

Posted by: John Henson | May 30, 2010, 11:24 am 11:24 am

While I deeply regret seeing Louisiana suffer again from a major disaster, I have become seriously fatigued with hearing their political leaders rant and rave against the federal government. Has the government done everything perfectly? No, but this is an unprecendented disaster. There is no magic wand to wave. When the oil is stopped and the clean up effort properly organized, both of which will happen, the time has come to have a discussion about Louisiana and its expectations. The state has long supported offshore drilling and its politicians have certainly filled their coffers with a great deal of money from the industry. For years many of its political leaders have done the oil companies’ bidding in Washington and Baton Rouge. Likewiase, after Katrina it was suggested that some of the of the very low lying areas not be rebuilt on since we seem to be in an era of increasing Hurricanes. Yet they continue to build in those areas. The marshlands that have protected the sate in the past have been allowed to decay. Maybe its time that Louisiana’s politicians take some responsibility for their state’s situation during calm times instead of going back to their business as usual. Going on television and screaming at and complaining about the federal government may help to raise sagging poll numbers and further political careers in Louisiana but it achives nothing. Especially when their fallback plan is to rely of the federal guvernment to take care of everything.

Posted by: DMR | May 30, 2010, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Albert Friday, blaming Obama for the Gulf incident is just wrong. His responcibility could stem from not having noticed the poor oversight work being done by government rgulators whoose job was to make sure safety regulations were being met. Beyond that, where do you see our president to blame? What should he have done? Changed into his Superman costume and sped to the scene of the hole and close it using his x-ray vision. Capitalism, Giant Corporations, dam the country and the people. Company profit at any price. Cut every corner, buy the politicians that need to be bought. Full speed ahead towards more profitability. Those types are the real culprits in this ongoing saga. As soon as you and the rest of the SHEEPLE understand it is BIG CORPORATIONS that are destroying us and the planet. The better off we will all be. havSECREG_756

Posted by: secreg666 | May 30, 2010, 11:29 am 11:29 am

While a huge part of me wants to watch this Republican anti-government worm Jindal beg for more government help, I come from Louisiana and those are great people down there, and they need to be helped as much as possible. There is no place in the United States, nay the WORLD, like southern Louisiana.
It is unfortunate but the best petroleum engineers in the world are ALREADY advising on this horrific oil spill. Is Jindal suggesting that the government set up a new czar and department to fully be able to clean up private industry’s mess like this? The government is doing everything it can and is capable of doing to contain and force BP’s hand (the creator of the problem, and unfortunately, the only viable solution).
It is the ultimate irony–this puny Republican anti-government governor begging for help like this. He has no alternatives. And he has no alternative but to play the blame game. How sad for Louisiana.

Posted by: B J McLaughlin | May 30, 2010, 11:37 am 11:37 am

Albert friday–do you have an IQ? If I walked up to you and for no apparent reason doused you with a bucket of blue paint. Does that mean you were being combatative? Or were you just on the other side of a potential crack pot’s ideas? Combatative? Really? if some one offered to help remove the paint from your soiled clothes, would you just say NO! SECREG_756

Posted by: secreg666 | May 30, 2010, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Be aware BP consultants are posting messages designed to minimize perceived damage, minimize perceived value of Louisiana’s damage, and try to shift blame for their oil pollution damage, especially to their victims. They are going to slander their victims.
The insulting of BP’s victims, we see in posts here, is unconscionable. Don’t blame the victims. We deserve emergency defense of our wetlands by BP.
BP is clearly at fault for this disaster, not fishermen, not Cajuns or New Orleanians. Understand that the people of south Louisiana are not anything at all like the rest of the state and don’t even vote the same, especially not in Southeast Louisiana.

Posted by: crescentCityRay | May 30, 2010, 11:39 am 11:39 am

To those that say they are tired of hearing complaints from the damaged parties of our periodic man made disasters in southeast Louisiana: How do you think we feel?
You might as well put in earplugs. We will be complaining about the destruction of our environment, culture and economy for at least another decade.

Posted by: crescentCityRay | May 30, 2010, 11:45 am 11:45 am

The Gulf spill is being politicized. It’s a corporate made disaster. It’s the oil spill equivalent of the Banking crisis. it’s simple to understand who is to blame. It’s simple to understand the problem. It is Capitalism running amuck. Do any of you SHEEPLE now understand how the Roberts led Supreme Court decision to allow corporations to back any politician to their maximum finanial ability will eventually lead us to Facism? Better wake up SHEEPLES. Or the Fairy Tales being spun by Beckians, will become a reality. And you SHEEPLE won’t like it when the true culprit is not Obama but corporate CEO’s like Hugo Chavez! SECREG_756

Posted by: secreg666 | May 30, 2010, 11:47 am 11:47 am

My family has lived off the land in southeast Louisiana since 1765.
This might be the second time the British run us Cajuns off our homeland.
I hate periodic diaspora. It is diluting my culture and causing misery.
Are we to be sacrificed, again?

Posted by: crescentCityRay | May 30, 2010, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Here is how you reform Wall Street, the banking and insurance industry too. Do away with the Graham-Baily-Leech Act and reinstate Glass/Steagal. That’s all it would take. Financial crisis solved.
Really, it’s just that simple. And one other point, regulate derivative trading, big time. If I reccomended 1/2 my clients buy a stock. And suggested to the other half they short the same stock. I would have my license taken away and banned from the business. Of course I’m just a worker bee like the rest of you. And I have to explicitly follow the rules. As Jason Roberts from match Box Twenty once wrote. I wonder what it’s like to be a rain maker. I wonder what it would be like if I could make it rain. SECREG_756

Posted by: secreg666 | May 30, 2010, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

Is he asking for bigger government and more government intervention? He should be asking, “Let the marketplace take care of it.”

Posted by: Bob | May 30, 2010, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

Sad to say that this oil disaster depicts Jindal as hypocritical for his emphatic stance on less “guvmint” and restrictions on “guvmint” regulation. I pray for the people of Louisianna whose livelyhood is threatened.

Posted by: anthony battista | May 30, 2010, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

Haven’t you SHEEPLE seen enough CORPORATE abuse this year? Goldman on the street! Johnson and Johnson big Pharma! BP, big oil! What will it take before you all undertand Obama nor Bush is the real enemy. When will you SHEEPLE
realize the Roberts led Supreme court sold EVERY AMERICAN CITIZEN down the river to big business? SECREG_756

Posted by: secreg666 | May 30, 2010, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

I think every American understands the President can not stop the leak himself. We understand BP is responsible for the leak. What we do not understand is the response to the clean up and prevention of the oil getting to the shoreline. Why such a struggle it seems to be to get action ? This response seems to be on the same scale as Katrina. Why haven’t we excepted help from all the countries who offered help ? To me those are the the very frustrating and unanswered questions.

Posted by: jd | May 30, 2010, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

No real discussion about chemical dispersants. How can a UK banned choice be used other than fact it’s a UK company wanting to use it. Of all companies you would think BP would know better. Oh yeah a former BP exec is on board of directors for Nalco the maker of Corexit. Excuses include “well we had a huge stockpile to use right away. Duhhhh maybe because the chemical is potentially a nasty chemical. Now is there any idea at what concentration the marine life will live but contain harmful to human concentrations.
Plug well is highest priority but knowing what will oil and chemical will do in food chain should be right there.

Posted by: ChemNo | May 30, 2010, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

What is apparent is the GOP’s turning of the tide on the Obama administration.The response was slow..according to who? The media, the republican governor? The president has been to LA twice. His response was imidiate. H has been involved from the beginning. Just because he’s not giving a speech every five minutes, doesn’t mean he’s not aware and working to help solve the crisis. Do you really think with billions of gallons of oil still spewing from the bottom of the ocean that more boon was going to help? People are angry and looking for someone to blame. They see oil reaching shore. Clean up crews are working hard to help thwart the damage. And clean up is continuous and on going until the leak is stopped.You have miles of shore being affected. It’s an impossibly grueling task. Nothing will ever be enough.

Posted by: Bea | May 30, 2010, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

Don’t the people of Louisiana find it ironic that the two biggest supporters of “drill baby drill” and “get the government out of our lives” are now screaming about the government not doing enough to stop the oil spill their policies created.
Jindal and Vitter are the worst kind of political hacks. They have done everything they could to stop the regulation of the oil companies and now they complain?
Obama is doing the best he can. He did not create this mess. British Petroleum and the Republicans who fought tooth and nail to let them do whatever they wanted are at fault here.
I hope Louisianan’s now see the consequences of electing people who care more about corporations than about the lives or ordinary people.

Posted by: normagene | May 30, 2010, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

They stand a better chance of getting that spill cleaned up if they let it settle for now. It’s best to burn it where they can and then collect the tar.

Posted by: rightbehind | May 30, 2010, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

Isn’t Jindal the one that said, “The strength of America is not found in our government.” And then Jindal pressed his view that government should not be the answer to all problems.
“It comes down to an honest and fundamental disagreement about the proper role of government…” – Jindal
I’m sure Jindal hopes everyone has forgotten about what he said now that he has his hand out to “government” to help solve the BP mess. It’s probably a case of Jindal’s motor-mouth getting his (whatever) in trouble.

Posted by: Tom in San Jose | May 30, 2010, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

would like to talk to eng about solution to oil spill

Posted by: paul gresh | May 30, 2010, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

Jindal is not making a case for bigger government in the present crisis. He is making a case for the better use of the existing resources and more say for his government on how to coordinate the effort. A smaller government that would understand its limitation and not allow the pffshore drlling to take place in the first place would have been better than a large corrupt regulatory body of big government.

Posted by: GJKOTW01 | May 30, 2010, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

LibertyAtStake — Jindal’s an idiot. There’s not a damn thing he can do that would be any more than Obama is doing and he knows it.

Posted by: dan | May 30, 2010, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

@ secreg666, not sure who Jason Roberts is, but I can guarantee that he NEVER belonged to Matchbox Twenty. Rob Thomas wrote and sings the song, titled “Real World” and the correct lyrics are; I wonder what it’s like to be the rainmaker, I wonder what it’s like to know that I made the rain. Just a little FYI for you ; )

Posted by: Frankie | May 30, 2010, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

i have called gov Jindal and was told to leave a message by secretary,thats ok,but i DO have a solution to plug the pipe and still be able to pump oil out safely.im not a nut and do have a solution that cant fail.but no one has returned my call yet,and so the oil still flows.i hope he gets the message before oil starts up the swannie.

Posted by: larry patterson | May 30, 2010, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

For all the complaints, can you imagine the horror if McLaim had been president. What with the alzheimers and everything, he probably wouldn’t remember from one day to the next that we had a gulf coast.
At least we can be thankful for something in this whole mess.

Posted by: normagene | May 30, 2010, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Our incompetent “leader” should give Bobby Jindal everything he needs and let HIM handle the spill. I guarantee you that he will do an infinitely better job than the dope in the White House. Good Grief, how much longer do we have to put up with this empty suit?
Remember in November!

Posted by: Sunnyr | May 30, 2010, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

No much to see here, I’m going on vacation, then a fund raiser, a concert, and play some golf. Good luck!
The One

Posted by: Fred | May 30, 2010, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

No much to see here, I’m going on vacation, then a fund raiser, a concert, and play some golf. Good luck!
The One
Posted by: Fred | May 30, 2010 5:06:13 PM
____________________________________
You’re right, the President should be IN the gulf with a snorkel 24 hours a day. Or at a command desk on the beach 24/7.

Posted by: tierra | May 30, 2010, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

From: Constantine Balakiryan, PhD, Professor
I have developed a concept to reduce the ecological catastrophe of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
In my opinion, the unique solution to reduce scales of ecological accident in Mexican
Gulf is to immediately start downloading liquid nitrogen into the oil well’s breakthroughs.
The low temperature will increase the viscosity of oil and may even freeze it.
The freezing will slow down the speed of emission of oil and make it easier to facilitate the collection of oil in the off shore sector.
BP has tried cement, mud and a dome to contain the oil spill. The “Top Kill” concept has not worked and will not work, it is dead concept.
So, BP wasted time with “top kill”?
And a new plan “B” of the BP only exacerbates the ecological situation.
I can offer “Know-How”

Posted by: Constantine | May 30, 2010, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

The government is a bunch of blubbering idiots! They knew when they allowed BP to drill 5k feet under the water and then another 30k feet into the ocean floor that they could hit some of the greatest pressures known in oil drilling!!! They knew it because Russia did it on land and got tremendous pressures! Both Republicans and democrat’s are to blame. They may not be able to stop this by drilling another well! These politicians should be hung on the capital steps. Mr. Bill Nelson, you allowed this drilling to take place now you act holier then thou!!! You deserve to go first!

Posted by: kennedy | May 30, 2010, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Obviously you idots must have slept through middle school civics and social studies classes. The FEDERAL Gov’t is responsible for protecting the coastline — and this means the coastline of LA, REGARDLESS of BP’s accident. Hurricane Katrina, tho, was the responsibility of the STATE & Local Gov’t since it happened inland from the coast. If you call the 3 1/2 minute Jake Tapper interview Jake Tapper had with a governor that’s pretty upset about what’s happening in his state, then turn around and criticize him for what’s happening to his coastline, you’re all pretty out there. Didn’t you hear your Demo friend Carville shouting earlier this week? So Jindal is stupid but Carville gets a pass. Let me tell y’all Jindal at 37 has more smarts than Oblahblan will ever have. He’s a SERVANT of the people, NOT a rock star who wants attention. By the way, did you notice it was the Gov of FLA that was standing beside Obamma during his Photo Op, NOT Jindal? Hypocrites. Mark my words, when FLA gets hit, you’ll see an enraged Obamma. So, until then, don’t call me, I’ll call you.

Posted by: WBGSJ | May 30, 2010, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

It’s become abundantly clear what is going on with the current oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Here are some steps you can take on your own to recover your property losses.
Take pictures of everything and document everything.
Most of your state officials can go on the Internet and find information about the Migratory Bird Treaty and the Clean Water Act. The residents with property loss can Google the Bouchard B-120 oil spill in Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts. Be sure to review the current class action litigation going on even today over the 2003 oil spill. The oil spills have to stop!
On April 27, 2003, eight years ago the Bouchard Barge B-120 hit an obstacle in Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts creating a 12-foot rupture in its hull and discharging an estimated 100,000 gallons of No. 6 oil.
Remember everyone must ask how likely are polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in crude oil  to cause cancer?

Posted by: Bill Carson | May 30, 2010, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

Government doesn’t have a solution to the problem. The solution is provided by private sector. Pretty much everything is going that way. So, why do we need to keep increasing taxes to fund these bureaucrats?

Posted by: Liberty | May 30, 2010, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

Why couldn’t very loud noises-as loud as a 747 or bomb or loud sound waves be implemented to get the wild life and underwater life be directed to another location-very far from the Gulf?

Posted by: D. Smith | May 30, 2010, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Frankie–I believe Robert Thomas, the lead singer of MB 20 would be the right name. SECREG_756

Posted by: secreg666 | May 30, 2010, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Frankie–sorry about the lyrics. I believe my intepertation of the lines
are relevant to many Americans.SECREG_756

Posted by: secreg666 | May 30, 2010, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Posted by: kennedy

It’s my understandind they TD’d at ’13K.
IIRC, Russia tried a ’50K TD.

Posted by: smartlillena | May 30, 2010, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

OH!!! I get it!!!
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW Tapper is investigating into LOCAL response to a disaster!!!
WHAT A LAUGH!!!
When Nagin DID NOT EVACUATE N.O. when he was told to THEY BLAMED THE DEATHS ON BUSH!!!
Ask yourself ONE question question:
If Nagin (and Blanco) had evacuated N.O. when the FED told them to, how many deaths would there have been?
I’ll answer for you: ZERO!
Now the press is concerned about LA local response???
THEY HAVE NO SHAME!

Posted by: CFlyJuice | May 31, 2010, 10:33 am 10:33 am

What a mess!
Obama’s handling of this matter will probably ensure that he’s a one-term president. And rightly so. He is not an expert at finance, he is not an expert at health care, he is not an expert at foreign relations. And now the reasons he found for delaying overt decisive active on the spill are likely to seem rather insignificant in comparison.
Jindal will probably not emerge unscathed from all this. Even if it is the federal government’s job to ensure that BP shoulder’s its responsibility. That’s because no one will want to hear from Jindal that he did all within his power to get others to do their job. For even if that is true, and if Jindal is doing all within his power to protect the interests of the people he represents (which I am not doubting), it will suggest that Jindal is ineffective at problem-solving or motivating others when those qualities are needed most; I mean, in a time of crisis. Saying that the law limited what he could do will sound lame.
Will Jindal succumb to the temptation to say, “If only you had followed my plan!”? Let’s see. But there is no way to know that what he proposed would have done any better; there is no control experiment for comparison, and he knows it.
Both Obama and Jindal have a marked tendency to substitute awareness of details for sound decisive action. Details obviously do matter when making decisions and implementing plans. But most people who are not directly affected don’t care about the details. They only want to know that sensible decisions are being made. Why, then, and Obama and Jindal press conferences often full of details?

Posted by: Solon | May 31, 2010, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

Talk about your hypercritical hypocritical
Jindal has relief he has not distributed according to a report by the Lousiana Times-Picayune
Democratic legislators criticize Gov. Jindal’s handling of Gulf oil spill relief money
By Bruce Alpert, Times-Picayune
May 29, 2010, 5:18PM
“Three Democratic state senators blasted Republican Gov. Bobby Jindal on Saturday for not quickly distributing $40 million in grants from BP at the same time he’s been criticizing the company and the Obama administration for taking too long to provide needed resources to combat the Gulf oil spill.
Jindal has “been out there talking to the people impacted by the disaster and the media and got his life jacket on and is out in the water, but I want him to use his executive power to get resources out there instead of standing on the bully pulpit and pointing fingers,” said state Sen. Karen Carter Peterson, D-New Orleans.
Peterson said that at a meeting Thursday with BP officials, coastal Louisiana legislators and representatives of the Jindal administration, it was disclosed that the state has spent only about $3 million of a $25 million BP grant for spill-related expenses, and that it has not yet issued a contract for BP’s $15 million grant to promote tourism attractions threatened by the spill.”

Posted by: JayG | May 31, 2010, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

Thanks to JayG for that news from the Times Picayune, which if I understand correctly, has been generally supportive of Governor Jindal for quite some time.
Here are a few things to consider:
New Orleans is a major US port. It is a significant concern with regard to homeland security. Jindal, therefore, having been governor for years now, can only be expected to have spent much time on disaster planning. That’s with regard to terrorism, you say?
Yes, but everyone knows that drilling presents significant risks. I am not saying there should be no drilling. But there are risks. Wasn’t this a major point of discussion in the last presidential election? How many hundreds of oil rigs sit off the coast of Louisiana? Didn’t Jindal spend time in the House of Representatives to get Louisiana its fair share of oil revenue?
Jindal cannot be considered unaware of the risks posed by drilling in waters near Louisiana’s precious wetlands. He will therefore have spent a lot of time considering an oil spill in his disaster planning, right? But isn’t this Obama’s disaster, since the rig was in US waters but not Louisiana’s?
Yes, legally. Obama is responsible (though maybe through proxies) for ensuring that BP be responsible. But if the response from the Obama administration has been weak, and most people would agree to that, then doesn’t this mean that Obama was unprepared? And if Obama was unprepared, shouldn’t Jindal have stepped in to ensure that he protected the interests of the people of Louisiana?
Yes, Obama was unprepared. Obviously. So was Jindal. Obviously.

Posted by: Solon | May 31, 2010, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

See. Now the GOP needs “BIG” government. When you people learn that the GOP are playing you for suckers. And by the way, our fore fathers created the “BIG” government. Perhaps you are mad at them. Anti-Americans.

Posted by: BlackUSAguy | June 1, 2010, 9:21 am 9:21 am

Tapper is a total embarrassment. Listening to his interview of Gov. Jindal one would have to wonder if the questions he asked were being provided in real time via an ear piece connected to the White House. Is there no end to Tapper’s blatant liberal bias?

Posted by: RHarrison Scott | June 1, 2010, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Salon & JayG – How insightful of you to critize Jindal for a GENERIC Contingency Plan for LA, especially since we all know he’d know EXACTLY what type of emergency he’d be handling. Perhaps we should give him credit for evaluating what he already had & taking appropriate steps to encompass nad make known the emergency that started back on 4/20. And we’re ALL aware of how well governors from RED states fare w/Oblahblah. Did you notice Crist standing next to Obamma at the spill site — and see how fast he used his $25Million for advertising the pristine beaches of his state. If you were Jindal, would YOU have used the $15Million he’d been given to “advertise” that beach? Take your glasses off please. Obamma doesn’t “visit” states that voted RED when he was elected. Only the BLUE ones.

Posted by: WBGSJ | June 1, 2010, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

BP testing President Obama’s patience
Constantine Balakiryan, PhD, Professor
The 43rd day is growing huge oil slick on the surface of the Mexican Gulf, with the dimensions exceeding the territory of many countries and many States.
How long this can be continued?
Does BP have sufficient technological resources to close the damned holes?
They certainly do.
Then, what is the real reason they aren’t resolving the problem, for example, using my know-how and equipment for freezing the oil with liquid nitrogen?
The point is that blocking well BP will lose the”frosting on the cake”.
That’s why BP proposed a new project “B,” which assumes not only drilling new wells, but also construction a new platform.
For this escapade BP requests another 60-90 days.
It is easy to imagine what kind ecological disaster awaits US, if plan «B” is approved.
Very important to consider that the hurricane season is started, so the first hurricane sends in hell, all these shielding floats and oil will gush out to the territory not only the coastal states of the Mexican Gulf.
It is time to act.
Tomorrow will be too late.

Posted by: Constantine | June 2, 2010, 3:24 am 3:24 am

Prioritising the placement of boon may have resulted in some areas of shore being compromised. That’s expected, sadly. There’s not enough boon nor sand in the world that could have stopped this catastrophe. Or make a difference to the areas affected. And they knew it. Now the slick is heading towards Florida, like predicted a month ago. And possibly up the East coast. Jindal is politicizing this cosmic event. There isn’t enough boon and never would have been. But instead of being honest with the people of LA, he catered to the frenzy and is now using it for his own political gain. And the fact that when Jindal was posed the question asking him if he was satisfied with the President’s previous trip and response, he refused to answer the question. Because he knows the truth of the matter. He’s pandering to his constituents. And trying to build a case for the GOP. It’s so transparent it’s nauseating. And where was your preparedness Jindal?

Posted by: Bea | June 3, 2010, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

From: Constantine B, PhD, Professor.
7 million barrels of oil in the Gulf of Mexico
To day is 68th day, since the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster. Oil keeps gushing from the leaking well into the Gulf of Mexico. The amount of spilled oil now is around 300 000 000 gallons.
BP significantly reduces this rate motivated by the fact that the daily capturing 15-20 thousand barrels of oil.
I have repeatedly explained, no matter how much oil BP capturing from the Cap, because the pump creates inside the Cap additional negative pressure which immediately compensated by the pressure in the petroleum layer and accompanied by an additional release of oil, correlated with this negative pressure.
So, the amount of gushing oil unchanged or unaltered is about 90-120 thousand barrels per day.
There are many people like myself, who would like to give alternative methods to BP and the government but lack the contacts to meet the right people. BP lacks thinking “outside of the box” and continues to solve its problems to the “best” of their knowledge.
Using my know-how and liquid nitrogen oil freezing equipment we can shut the well during the nearest 3 weeks.
Constantine B, PhD, Professor.

Posted by: Constantine Balakiryan | June 27, 2010, 12:21 am 12:21 am

From: Constantine B, PhD, Professor.
8 million barrels of oil in the Gulf of Mexico
To day is 80th day, since the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster. Oil keeps gushing from the leaking well into the Gulf of Mexico. The amount of spilled oil now is around 336 000 000 gallons.
BP significantly reduces this rate motivated by the fact that the daily capturing 15-20 thousand barrels of oil.
I have repeatedly explained, no matter how much oil BP capturing from the Cap, because the pump creates inside the Cap additional negative pressure which immediately compensated by the pressure in the petroleum layer and accompanied by an additional release of oil, correlated with this negative pressure.
So, the amount of gushing oil unchanged or unaltered is about 90-120 thousand barrels per day.
There are many people like myself, who would like to give alternative methods to BP and the government but lack the contacts to meet the right people. BP lacks thinking “outside of the box” and continues to solve its problems to the “best” of their knowledge.
Using my know-how and liquid nitrogen oil freezing equipment we can shut the well during the nearest 3 weeks.
Constantine B, PhD, Professor.

Posted by: Constantine B | July 8, 2010, 12:52 am 12:52 am

You know, it’s that old saying that we’ve heard promises, we want to see that happen on the ground,” Jindal said.

Posted by: sauna esofman | August 27, 2011, 4:53 am 4:53 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.