By Kristina Wong

May 3, 2010 8:45pm

President Obama’s Joke About Predator Drones Draws Fire

A famous British actor once observed that "dying is easy, comedy is hard." 

A corollary might be that comedy can be especially hard when it comes from commanders-in-chief joking about the deaths they’re responsible for at times of war. 

At the White House Correspondents' Dinner Saturday night, President Obama noted that in the audience were the Jonas brothers.

"Sasha and Malia are huge fans," he said, "but boys, don't get any ideas. Two words for you: predator drones. You will never see it coming.”

The audience laughed approvingly but in the following days the joke has been met with a rising chorus of criticism — mainly from the Left. 

After all, unmanned predator drone strikes have killed innocent civilians in Pakistan. 

How many civilians? Unclear. Since the CIA's predator drone program is top secret, little is known about it. 

But writing in Foreign Policy, Peter Bergen and Katherine Tiedemann have estimated that their data shows that from 2008 until December 2009, drone strikes have killed between 384 and 578 individuals, with most of them militants but between 35 and 40 percent of them innocent civilians. Senior administration officials contend that the number of civilian casualties is far fewer than that. 

As the New Yorker reported last year, "the embrace of the Predator program has occurred with remarkably little public discussion, given that it represents a radically new and geographically unbounded use of state-sanctioned lethal force. And, because of the C.I.A. program’s secrecy, there is no visible system of accountability in place, despite the fact that the agency has killed many civilians inside a politically fragile, nuclear-armed country with which the U.S. is not at war." 

So given all that, should President Obama have made a joke about this program? 

"Let's be honest, fellow progressives," the Philadelphia Daily News' Will Bunch tweeted, "we'd be all over Bush if he made the same 'predator drone' joke Obama told last night." 

President George W. Bush did, of course, make a joke about war at the Radio and Television Correspondents' Dinner. In 2004, infamously, he joked about his inability to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, showing slides of himself searching for WMD under Oval Office furniture. 

"It's inappropriate to the thousands of people obviously who have been wounded over there," Terry McAuliffe, then the chairman of the Democratic National Committee, told Good Morning America. "This is a very serious issue. We've lost hundreds of troops, as you know, over there. Let's not be laughing about not being able to find weapons of mass destruction. … We certainly should not be making light of the situation." Then-RNC chair Ed Gillespie responded that "the people in the room obviously saw the humor in it at that moment. And to play it back now in a different context is unfair, frankly, I have to say." 

So far the criticism against President Obama seems to have been confined to the internet. 

Wrote Salon's Alex Pareene: "It's funny because predator drone strikes in Pakistan have killed literally hundreds of completely innocent civilians, and now the president is evincing a casual disregard for those lives he is responsible for ending by making a lighthearted joke about killing famous young celebrities for the crime of attempting to sleep with his young daughters." 

The American Prospect's Adam Serwer, noted that the "Obama administration has spent a great deal of time on outreach to Muslims worldwide, and on dialing down the volume and rhetoric of the prior administration in order to defuse al-Qaeda's narrative of a clash of civilizations between Muslims and non-Muslims. So you have to wonder why in the world the president's speech writers would think it was a good idea to throw a joke about predator drones into the president's speech during the White House Correspondent's Dinner, given that an estimated one-third of drone casualties, or between 289 and 378, have been civilians. It evinces a callous disregard for human life that is really inappropriate for a world leader, especially a president who is waging war against an enemy that deliberately targets civilians. It also helps undermine that outreach by making it look insincere." 

Serwer assessed that the relative lack of outrage, compared to the response to Bush's joke, might have "to do with whose lives were the butt of the joke — we recognize the names and faces of the American service members who died because of Bush's nonexistent weapons of mass destruction as friends, relatives, and family members. The people who die in drone strikes are anonymous — they have no faces or names — except for the suspected terrorist targets the administration celebrates as being neutralized." 

The Atlantic's Max Fisher has a round-up of some response HERE

What do you think? 

-jpt 

User Comments

What do you think? 
What did Jesus say about committing adultery and thinking about being the same thing?
As long as people are suffering, it shouldn’t be joked about. However, while Obama’s joke may have been in poor taste, in our human mind, Bush’s joke was worse. He should never have told it and shown oictures like that.
(No animals have been injured during the production of this comment.)

Posted by: For The Record | May 3, 2010, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaa…..omg….he is soooooooo funny ! Obummer is just soooooo funny ! Isn’t he?????

Posted by: mishernameo | May 3, 2010, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

I think that it was just the joke of a protective Daddy warning off the boys. No harm no foul. Bush on the other hand was joking about not finding the reason that we went to war in Iraq according to him. I can assure I did not find it funny then nor did I when my aunt’s stepson was killed in Iraq. Apples and oranges my friend. apples and oranges.

Posted by: gail | May 3, 2010, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

Obama is an idiot. Tapper, you and the rest of the White House Flock of Sheep press corps are largely responsible for putting this buffoon in office

Posted by: Barney | May 3, 2010, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

Surely this “controversy over an innocuous joke must be, well, a joke. Don’t Obama’s critics have better topics to stew over, like that he fired a missile at the oil platform to stop drilling, or that he’s really from Mars?

Posted by: matt | May 3, 2010, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

“s the joke has been met with a rising chorus of criticism — mainly from the Left. ”
So where are the sensitive souls from the right insisting that if Bush had made such a joke the Left would have criticized him? Err, just like the Left ARE criticizing Obama (and got their knickers in a twist about Bush’s Iraq jokes)…

Posted by: jhw539 | May 3, 2010, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

I’m as big an Obama critic as you’ll find, but who cares about the joke? I doubt anyone in the audience favors the death of civilians–or even the Jonas Brothers–at the hands of the U.S. military, yet they laughed in the spirit of the event.
Having said that, I think Bush’s WMD joke was much funnier and more in the tradition of the dinner, in that he was poking fun at himself.

Posted by: Scott | May 3, 2010, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

The one thing I have noticed is the “tradition” if there is indeed one is for it to “self-deprecating” humor, which I doubt Obama is capable of except in the most casual way. He could never really make fun of himself. Not REALLY.
Bush was better at this. Maybe he had more material to work with… ;-)

Posted by: For the Record | May 3, 2010, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

But are the drone attacks constitutional? Does striking into the territory of a sovereign state require a declaration of war from congress? They should have never militarized the CIA. It should have been an intelligence machine and not a separate military entity.

Posted by: Huh | May 3, 2010, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

So where are the sensitive souls from the right
Posted by: jhw539 | May 3, 2010 10:10:06 PM
I guess you’re implying there are none. We see sensitivity and the “navel gazing” that follows as a weakness.
“Take my President – please!”
Ba-da-boom.

Posted by: For the Record | May 3, 2010, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

Makes you wonder what is aimed at my computer right now.

Posted by: Jeff | May 3, 2010, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

Obama needs to think before he says things. He basically accused an innocent teenage boy band of being sexual predators. Like he needs to think before he opens his huge-ass democratic mouth. He’s such a freaking idiot. If he was more concerned about running our country instead of talking about the Jonas Brothers and his kids then maybe our country wouldn’t be suffering and losing money as we speak or rather read/type. He’s stupid and I hope he gets impeached for something! Because the future of America is in our hands. And he can’t just outlaw that we can’t eat so much sugar. It’s ridiculous. By the way, welcome to freaking Russia. If only all 14 year olds thought like me.

Posted by: Becky | May 3, 2010, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

Obama needs to think before he says things. He basically accused an innocent teenage boy band of being sexual predators.
___________________________________
Oh sure he did . .. .

Posted by: tierra | May 3, 2010, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

Now that we’ve put that to bed, how about correcting the record about border violence? Twice on This Week you said SB1070 was justified because immigrants cause violence. AZ crime rate has decreased and majority of crimes committed are done by US citiens

Posted by: Do I Look Illegal? | May 3, 2010, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

Wrote Salon’s Alex Pareene: “It’s funny because predator drone strikes in Pakistan have killed literally hundreds of completely innocent civilians, and now the president is evincing a casual disregard for those lives he is responsible for ending by making a lighthearted joke about killing famous young celebrities for the crime of attempting to sleep with his young daughters.”
That was well written. I’m surprised no liberals here have applauded it. In fact, I don’t see the usual suspects weighing in here at all. Tough living in that gray area…

Posted by: For the Record | May 3, 2010, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

That was well written. I’m surprised no liberals here have applauded it.
__________________________________
Bush’s joke about how the weapons of mass destruction might be hidden under his furniture – came while thousands of Americans were put in death’s way by those very weapons of mass destruction Bush’s administration said they knew the exact location. Bush should have been apologizing to the parents of those dead soldiers, not joking about it. Don’t you think?

Posted by: tierra | May 3, 2010, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

I’m no Obama fan by any stretch of the imagination. Of all of President Obama’s misleading statements and inaccurate insertions: This quip is the least of our laundry list of concerns.
Lighten up and give him a break.

Posted by: Vincent | May 3, 2010, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

Let’s see… Air attacks by pilotless vehicles in countries with which we are not at war, indiscriminately killing civilians as well as “bad guys”. Is there something about “war crimes” I am missing?
Maybe Mr. Obama will appear in the Hague not as President of the World, but defendant in the World Court!

Posted by: Quo Warranto | May 3, 2010, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

That was well written. I’m surprised no liberals here have applauded it.
__________________________________
Bush’s joke about how the weapons of mass destruction might be hidden under his furniture – came while thousands of Americans were put in death’s way by those very weapons of mass destruction Bush’s administration said they knew the exact location. Bush should have been apologizing to the parents of those dead soldiers, not joking about it. Don’t you think?
Posted by: tierra | May 3, 2010 11:38:06 PM
Well, gosh. That was a nice straw man argument. Maybe you should look at the first comment in this thread. Then go back a few days ago when Ryan mentioned what Bush said and I agreed with him. Wouldn’t that shock ya’
So why don’t you weigh in on the Salon comment or what Obama said?

Posted by: For the Record | May 4, 2010, 12:00 am 12:00 am

Maybe you should look at the first comment in this thread. Then go back a few days ago when Ryan mentioned what Bush said and I agreed with him.
Posted by: For the Record | May 4, 2010 12:00:24 AM
________________________________________
I saw your comment and you disagreed with Bush for good reason. And you pointed out the qualitative difference between what Bush said and what Obama said – I agree with you.

Posted by: tierra | May 4, 2010, 12:09 am 12:09 am

I agree with you.
Posted by: tierra | May 4, 2010 12:09:42 AM
Well don’t stop there. Do you agree with Alex Pareene or not?

Posted by: For the Record | May 4, 2010, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Well don’t stop there. Do you agree with Alex Pareene or not?
Posted by: For the Record | May 4, 2010 12:18:43 AM
___________________________________
I don’t think Obama was trying to make light of civilian deaths, nor do I think he was making a joke about killing celebrities.
I think the joke was about a father who happens to have ‘Predator drones’ as part of his repertoire to deter boys from dating his daughters. Fathers wanting to deter certain boys from dating his daughters is part of the language of the culture.
Do I like civilians being (accidentally) killed by drones – absolutely not. Nor did I like the ‘collateral damage’ as the Bush administration chose to term it – the tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians killed or maimed in the attack on Iraq.

Posted by: tierra | May 4, 2010, 12:44 am 12:44 am

Fathers wanting to deter certain boys from dating his daughters is part of the language of the culture.
Posted by: tierra | May 4, 2010 12:44:08 AM
Now see, that wasn’t so hard.
Fathers who don’t have Predator drones as part of their repertoire might keep a shotgun on the porch to keep the boys away from their daughter. Doesn’t mean the father is actually going to shoot the boys. But he might keep it visible – as a deterrant. ;-)

Posted by: For The Record | May 4, 2010, 12:52 am 12:52 am

The Philadelphia news post is spot on, if Bush had made this statement the left, but also the media, would have been all over him, demanding his ouster and calling the president a terrorist. So let’s have it lefties, is Obama a terrorist now like you labeled Bush?
On a different note meanwhile, the media is blatantly ignoring the latest report from Gallup which reports that Gallup’s Job Creation Index for April reveals significantly more hiring within the federal government than in the private sector. The only thing Obama has stimulated is government growth.

Posted by: EPU | May 4, 2010, 1:02 am 1:02 am

The only thing Obama has stimulated is government growth.
Posted by: EPU | May 4, 2010 1:02:12 AM
____________________________________
Not according to the Gallup numbers you seem so knowledgeable about. They state . ..
In non-government employers 28% are hiring vs. 19% who are letting workers go – for a job creation index of +9.
I guess you forgot to post that part . ..

Posted by: tierra | May 4, 2010, 1:08 am 1:08 am

There was laughter from President Obama’s press base at the WHCD – who – like spurned lovers – are eager to come back for more. Call it the Rihanna syndrome. His routine was petulant and petty and Leno’s was dull.

Posted by: PAXALLES | May 4, 2010, 3:23 am 3:23 am

The only thing Obama has stimulated is government growth.
Posted by: EPU | May 4, 2010 1:02:12 AM
____________________________________
In non-government employers 28% are hiring vs. 19% who are letting workers go – for a job creation index of +9.
Posted by: tierra | May 4, 2010 1:08:57 AM
Show us the data that proves the non-government jobs were stimulated by President Obama. Otherwise, the statement seems valid. “The only thing Obama has stimulated is government growth.” The non-government jobs were stimulated by free market growth.
State and local government is in the minus high 20′s I see. I guess they are “on their own” now that the Federal government is on a roll.

Posted by: For The Record | May 4, 2010, 3:31 am 3:31 am

I do not know who picks the guests for This Week but being from Georgia & seeing Cynthia Tucker at the round table makes this show look hard up for guests. No One really likes Cynthia Tucker in Georgia but Cynthia Tucker & the Atlanta Journal. That is why no one hardly buys the newspaper is because of her. She did get demoted but is still there & as long as she is I personally will never buy the paper. They are so bias that even when you get a few good journalists articles in their paper it is not worth buying it because there are so few. And why, all of a sudden is Al Sharpton on there? Someone does not know what a good guest list should look like. I hate it when Cokie comes on their & she rolls her eyes about something that George Wills says & makes another irrational liberal comment. It brings back the old days when they were so rude to him because he is a conservative that it makes me sick. She is suppose to be of the elite who are suppose to be so much smarter then the “White Trash”, as CBS calls us, in the South & should have better manners.

Posted by: wgep | May 4, 2010, 5:39 am 5:39 am

Extra Extra, read all about it! The party of know is critical of President Obama.

Posted by: jim | May 4, 2010, 5:46 am 5:46 am

I’m certainly no Obama fan but the guy was trying to make a joke. He’s a worse comedian than he is a president but at least his jokes can’t cause anything worse than ill feelings.

Posted by: oonogil | May 4, 2010, 7:04 am 7:04 am

And the Jonas brothers are concerned about the “pedophilia” insinuations and how it might reflect on them. “No one is immune from the gaffes from this administration, boys! Welcome to the real world.”

Posted by: Al | May 4, 2010, 7:35 am 7:35 am

Obama’s drone joke? very funny. The left confessing to their own double standards? priceless!

Posted by: cindy | May 4, 2010, 7:49 am 7:49 am

Let’s face it, his comedic timing sucks! I found this “joke” distasteful in that they are “soooooo” protective of their young daughters, don’t say anything about them (which is understandable) and yet he does it…not only that, but they are so young, to young to be insinuating that the Jonas Bros would be interested in them in that way…it was just bad and shouldn’t have been said, much less joked about.

Posted by: samhiguchi | May 4, 2010, 7:55 am 7:55 am

Come on people! Obama was having a good time and was just kidding. For God’s sake – let’s all calm down. Take a drink or a pill already

Posted by: Bob | May 4, 2010, 8:06 am 8:06 am

Maybe he can trade spots with Conan…and as far as the comment on “innocent civilians” goes, if you allow terrorists to use your home, your city or your country, the adults in the crowed are not innocent. The only innocents in any war are the children.

Posted by: wantingbalance | May 4, 2010, 8:24 am 8:24 am

Posted by: samhiguchi | May 4, 2010 7:55:49 AM
Good point Sam but from my stand point any joke is fine no matter who you insult.
Humor knows no bounds.
I do reserve the right not to laugh if it isn’t really funny.

Posted by: Noz | May 4, 2010, 8:37 am 8:37 am

Obama is the most ignorant and incompetent leader ever. Shortly Iran will have operational nuclear weapons. Our lives will take place in a much more dangerous world. It seems that the Obama World Apologetic tour has made us a weak nation….when coupled with his inability to manage events and issues from Iran , the oil spill, terrorist attacks on the US (don’t use the word “terrorist”, they’re just bad men,
the economy spending trillions, border security, etc. He’s a liar and a danger.

Posted by: buffetking | May 4, 2010, 8:37 am 8:37 am

Oh, come on! Even a social liberal like myself knows it was just a joke. Only a moron would take it out of context so far as to ruin the moment. Kill-joy!

Posted by: KsDevil | May 4, 2010, 8:37 am 8:37 am

Big deal…..but then again, if Bush said it….

Posted by: LongT | May 4, 2010, 8:46 am 8:46 am

tsk tsk tsk, looks like most people don’t have enough to fill their day, so they gotta nit pick the President. It was a JOKE, and anybody that can’t take it as such need to get a life.

Posted by: Trent | May 4, 2010, 8:46 am 8:46 am

You know what it is? No matter which president says something like that, you’ll have people jumping all over it because they look for any chance to criticize. I wish for once people could stick to issues, talk things over in a rational manner and compromise when necessary. Instead we have stupid things like this being picked on. And the same for Pres. Bush. If he mispronounced something it was all over the media. I mispronounce some things and I’m sure all of you do to at one time or another. People just keep bashing back and forth and nothing gets accomplished except for making this country look like a bunch of idiots. You know the terriorist will not bring us down, we will bring ourselves down.

Posted by: Barb | May 4, 2010, 8:52 am 8:52 am

If Bush had said the same thing, it would be on every news outlet in the World 24/7 for at least a month.

Posted by: Jerry | May 4, 2010, 9:02 am 9:02 am

Please!!!
If your job is to sit around and make an issue about anything and everything the President says, well, I feel very sorry for you. This is soooooo stretching what he said. Using similar logic, all gun jokes are out because they are used to kill people everyday. Oh, and ABSOLUTELY no food jokes because everyone knows that there is a significant portion of the population that over eat and die. And singling out the Jonas brothers was obviously a political jab at whale loving environmentalists everywhere and I am amazed the media AND the Repubs missed that one. This is an example of press created news where there really is none. Everybody wants to be the National Enquirer these days. A pity. The last REAL jounalists are gone.

Posted by: Robert M. Smith, MD, PhD | May 4, 2010, 9:15 am 9:15 am

This is where the side that took up for Bush looking for WMD’s in his office blasts Obama. Let’s ponder. Which has caused more lost lives? Bush’s war or the drones?

Posted by: secondlook | May 4, 2010, 9:22 am 9:22 am

I don’t find anything funny that this president says

Posted by: Elle | May 4, 2010, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Ok, I just got email—Obama was just kidding, lighten up, get a life, just having a good time…..

Posted by: whathappened08 | May 4, 2010, 9:33 am 9:33 am

Repubs were laughing it up when Bush did his WHCD skit looking for weaspons of mass destruction in the Oval Office. But what Obama says is over the top. Give me a break, you hypocrits.

Posted by: pamp205 | May 4, 2010, 9:34 am 9:34 am

Personally I thought it was funny, but then again I have a twisted sense of humor. I didn’t vote for the man and I’m counting the days till he is out of office, I thought it was a simple joke to make kids laugh. Interesting point about Bush though, would he have been crucified if he told the same joke? If I were a betting man I would have to say YES he would have. Its just the truth Obama gets away with a lot more than Bush ever did in the media. My 2 Cents……..

Posted by: pir808 | May 4, 2010, 9:35 am 9:35 am

Pamp205<———- Read the article again it said most of the criticism came from the LEFT….READ before you post!

Posted by: pir808 | May 4, 2010, 9:36 am 9:36 am

Hey Jake Tapper, is this really your job? Did you go to journalism school? If so I feel really sad for you. You always end up with the stupid fluff news to report. You might want to think of a new career.

Posted by: Atheist 1 | May 4, 2010, 9:42 am 9:42 am

People need to chill out and stop being so serious!

Posted by: gimphilly | May 4, 2010, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Come on people, it was just a joke. Get over it. I thought it was funny. This is just mongrels looking for any scrap they can use to complain about. Sad people, very sad.

Posted by: TroyRobertDavid | May 4, 2010, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Would Bush have been crucified? Yes, because the difference is people would have thought he MEANT it.

Posted by: Gogol | May 4, 2010, 9:45 am 9:45 am

OMG I can’t believe anyone would make this into a serious subject. Some people really need to get a real life and grow up.

Posted by: achillies | May 4, 2010, 9:46 am 9:46 am

This article is a distraction. The main problem with Obama is not his joking about Predator drones, it’s his whole approach to Islamic supremacism and jihad ideology. Obama’s political correctness has greatly endangered this country and has motivated Islamic supremacists and jihadists with renewed enthusiasm(as they perceive—quite correctly—that Obama is weak and will do nothing to stem the tide of Islamic supremacist movements or stop Islamic governments like Iran from pursuing nuclear weapons). Recent attempted jihad attacks in the U.S.(Fort Hood, Northwest underwear bomber, and the Times Square bomber) and Iran’s belligerence are the fruits of this political correctness. Further, in his desired to bow to the Muslim world(symbolized by the way Obama bowed almost prostrate to the Saudi King), Obama has abandoned Christians who have been persecuted in the Middle East, has turned his back on Iranian reformers by giving them little to no support, has wilfully left Middle East women to suffer the ravages and indignity of sharia law second class status, has abandoned gays in the Middle East, and has exhibited unprecedented hostility for an American President toward the Jews and Israel. And, all in the name of politically correct fawning in the hopes hard core jihadists and Islamic supremacists will be persuaded to lay down their arms by Obama’s narcisstic oratory. Obama is so weak he won’t even use the words “jihad” or “Islamic terrorism”(in fact he has banned those terms from national security documents—like this politically correct editorializing in an internal U.S. document is going to persuade Bin Laden and like minded Islamic supremacists to love us). Obama and the Democratic Congress and any politically correct Reopublicans must go.

Posted by: ConstantXI | May 4, 2010, 9:47 am 9:47 am

Obama sucks but this was just a joke. Actually a pretty good joke.

Posted by: Vince | May 4, 2010, 9:49 am 9:49 am

Blame it on Bush

Posted by: harley | May 4, 2010, 9:51 am 9:51 am

Go visit someone at the old folks home or help some kids do something-you people who need a life.

Posted by: lowes4321 | May 4, 2010, 9:59 am 9:59 am

I think Pareene gets it right. The whole thing puts the President, Obama now, and Bush then, in an odd position.
Pareene adds to the quote above: “But the problem isn’t specifically with the joke itself. It’s a sort of generic joke about the executive’s unconstrained power that any postwar president could’ve delivered. You know, it would’ve been Patriot missiles during the first Gulf War, or jokes about the CIA or Secret Service disappearing people during the Cold War. The problem is with the whole damn scene of the president delivering a stand-up comedy routine, on camera, to the press. The problem with the Bush joke about looking for WMD was that a roomful of journalists chuckled good-naturedly at it. It looks bad for everyone.
The joke mighta worked, and certainly would’ve been less offensive, coming from anyone else. It seems like a no-brainer that the people directly responsible for tragedies should not deliver jokes about those tragedies. That’s why Mel Brooks can tell Hitler jokes and Germans can’t.” (Salon)
I thought with Bush, and I think now that we have to cut some slack, and realize its humor and not overanalyze it… but, yeah… groan.
Comedy is hard.

Posted by: progressive mama | May 4, 2010, 10:25 am 10:25 am

You know, it is easy to continue to criticize Bush and Bush’s war, but you forget that Obama had a part in it. How much did Obama vote for as a senator that he is roasting Bush over now? Senator Clinton? Edwards? Kerry?

Posted by: Patrick | May 4, 2010, 10:29 am 10:29 am

“”Let’s be honest, fellow progressives,” the Philadelphia Daily News’ Will Bunch tweeted, “we’d be all over Bush if he made the same ‘predator drone’ joke Obama told last night.” ”
Progressives being honest? THAT would be newsworthy!
Folks, it was a joke. No big deal. Not a problem. Not from Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush, or Obama. It’s just a joke. Get over yourselves.

Posted by: Mark | May 4, 2010, 11:04 am 11:04 am

It was a joke, but there is something highly ironic and very funny about the surprise winner of the Nobel Peace Prize making jokes about predator drones killing people.
And yes, if this was Bush, we’d be hearing Progressive, Tierra, and Ryan C crying loudly about our Cowboy in Chief.
But that would be a dog bites man story.

Posted by: Aaron | May 4, 2010, 11:15 am 11:15 am

Ok, I may not like Obama, but that’s pretty funny. This is a simple matter of a dad doing what dads do, protecting his little girls. Funny that the Left is the side with their panties in a twist over this one. The Right admits it’s funny.

Posted by: Paul | May 4, 2010, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Obama and the Dems will always blame all of their problems on Bush. If Obama is re-elected then 7 years from now the Dems will be blamiing any negative issues on Bush. The Dems and Obama have no backbone. The Dems should rename their party the Socialists.

Posted by: donald | May 4, 2010, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Can some one tell me why some lefties have to complaint about every little thing they disagree with like this drone comment.Let these people go away or at best be ignored.

Posted by: Bobby | May 4, 2010, 11:38 am 11:38 am

It was a perfect joke for Obama.
He is the master of mixed messages.
Reach out to the Muslim world, bow to Arab tyrants, drop the words terrorism/Islamic Extremist, let Iran get a nuke, berate Israel.
Then joke about drone attacks knowing they have killed hundreds of Muslims.
A fitting joke for a president that is completely out of touch with everyone.

Posted by: millie | May 4, 2010, 11:44 am 11:44 am

What makes it funny is that the Obama Administration is terrified that they might insult Muslims.
But they thought it was OK to joke about drones.
Drone attacks infuriate the people of Afghanistan and Pakistan. Obama thinks GITMO is a recruiting tool?
So are drone attacks.

Posted by: hank | May 4, 2010, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Actually the point show the extreme hypocrisy in the media and the parties. If it was Bush there would have been holy hell raise in media, liberals, progressives, secularists, etc. Since the President is their “Manchurian Candidate” they don’t see as much of a problem because they are biased and driven by ideology. This President is a neophyte and usurper.

Posted by: dlmarsh | May 4, 2010, 11:50 am 11:50 am

The Left is morally bankrupt. They’d rather see schoolgirls have acid thrown in their faces than take responsibility and change things. But the death and destruction are soon going to be here, and people will stop listening to them.

Posted by: John Kantor | May 4, 2010, 11:55 am 11:55 am

It’s a common joke. And the left didn’t complain when the left-leaning TV show “The West Wing” used it, in slightly different form.
When talking to the guy about to date his daughter, President Bartlett said: “remember that you are 21 and she is 19, and the 101st Airborne works for me.”

Posted by: jock59801 | May 4, 2010, 11:55 am 11:55 am

It was a JOKE, and yes, a funny one (as the mother of a 10 yr old girl/Jonas fan myself, lol). Those on the “left” who noted and criticized it have a point about the lack of humor to be found in war-hardware in general, and were, imo, simply trying to be fair and balanced (something the right notoriously fails to do)…if Bush had said it, they would have noted and criticized it too, so….As Presidential jokes go, it was much better and far less offensive than Reagan’s famous off the mike “joke”, “We begin bombing the Soviet Union in 5 minutes.” It was NOT funny because it was a little too close to reality given his views and agenda AND, well, it simply was not funny.

Posted by: Raven | May 4, 2010, 11:55 am 11:55 am

p.s. reminds me of Hugh Grant’s line in Love Actually, where he plays the Prime Minister, re’ the ex boyfriend of a staffer..”I could just have him killed…trained assasins right at the other end of this line.” LOL. Of COURSE he was joking and of COURSE the President was joking here.

Posted by: Raven | May 4, 2010, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

When Bush joked about not being able to find the WMDs under the couch, he was talking about a mistake that got over 4000 American troops killed. While I realized even that was “just a joke,” that was a bit more over-the-line than a joke about drones.

Posted by: jock59801 | May 4, 2010, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

Obama needs to put some thought into his remarks. He is the President of our country, after all, and needs to maintain decorum and statesmanship. Instead, he continues disgracing the office of President.

Posted by: AZ Granny | May 4, 2010, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

I didn’t vote for Obama. I don’t like many of Obama’s policies. I don’t think the country is going the right direction (no pun intended). BUT, IT WAS A JOKE! and it was delivered in an appropriate context. And it was about the Jonas Brothers. And it was funny. Let’s move on.

Posted by: ken | May 4, 2010, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

so no matter what obama says or does we have to hear the right belly-ache…well okay , but I don’t think that is going to win you any elections. all I can say is ‘wow’. people get a life. stay away from fox i guess would be your cure.

Posted by: hcf | May 4, 2010, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

When Bush joked about not being able to find the WMDs under the couch, he was talking about a mistake that got over 4000 American troops killed. While I realized even that was “just a joke,” that was a bit more over-the-line than a joke about drones.
Posted by: jock59801
_______________
It’s amazing to me Jock, the magnitude of the double-standard you have. It seems if a Democrat robs a bank and a Republican robs a bank, for some reason the Republican is more guilty of robbing a bank than the Democrat.
Anyhow, it is YOUR party that is critizing Obama, not the Republicans. Frankly, I don’t mind a bit. If your party starts to fight among itself, the Republicans will have an easier time winning this November.

Posted by: ivan | May 4, 2010, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

So, a couple of weeks ago Sarah Palin shows targets drawn on targeted political areas. And, like clockwork, the left has a conniption fit because their tennie weenie brains concluded that Sarah is getting out her rifle and will be killing people. Reasoning with the left is like teaching a pig to sing. It is wasting everyones’ time, and it annoys the pig.

Posted by: Richard_Iowa | May 4, 2010, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

I saw the joke on TV and realized immediately it was in bad taste had it been the village idiot from Texas he would immediately have been called on it.

Posted by: s.gashman | May 4, 2010, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Patrick: Nice try, but Obama was vociferously against the war in Iraq from day one.

Posted by: minneapolitan61 | May 4, 2010, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Its a joke, get over it people. Just like in the episode of the Cosby show when Bill breaks out the huge knife to cut an apple with Vanessa’s would be boyfriend. I doubt Bill was going to carve the kid up, but I didn’t hear any complaints, but simply laughter. Its what dad’s do with their girls would be suitors.

Posted by: Mike T | May 4, 2010, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Comedy shows are supposed to be funny. Most of the time at someone elses expense. People need to get over their complaining.

Posted by: mjinmd | May 4, 2010, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Bush making the WMD joke was much worse because A) He had lied about them and B) he used the lie as a justification to go to war. Obama made a tasteless crass joke. He also has the power to drop a nuke yet I hope he would never joke about it.

Posted by: Boo | May 4, 2010, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

As predicted, they will now begin to eat their own. I have seldom had the opportunity for such a big told you so and not exercised it fully. So I will, told you so. Silent contentment fills the soul knowing that by the time Nov rolls around, they will all be pointing their fingers at their own. :)

Posted by: nunya | May 4, 2010, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

I don’t think the Jonas brothers have any interest in Obama’s children for christmas sake.

Posted by: Rusty | May 4, 2010, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Could you imagine the outrage if Bush said something like this? And these drones have killed thousands of innocent civilians in Pakistan, but that’s better than “torturing” one Al Qaida leader for info.

Posted by: oleironleg | May 4, 2010, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

“And these drones have killed thousands of innocent civilians in Pakistan”
Posted by: oleironleg | May 4, 2010 1:39:40 PM
____________________________________
This is not true at all. The information you post is wrong.

Posted by: tierra | May 4, 2010, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

This is a bad joke, just slightly less bad than Bush’s WMD joke.

Posted by: teddymaniac | May 4, 2010, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

OK…I am a very far right Republican and all I can say is get over it. It was a JOKE! I laughed when I saw the news clip. I do not like the president’s politics but come on. It was just a joke. What I find more interesting is the liberal media’s complete silence on the subject. I wonder if they would have been so silent has a republican made the joke…something tells me they would not have been

Posted by: Wells747 | May 4, 2010, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

The audience laughed approvingly but in the following days the joke has been met with a rising chorus of criticism — mainly from the Left.
That is a new one, the LEFT getting after Obama. Will wonders never cease?

Posted by: Cheryl | May 4, 2010, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Bush making the WMD joke was much worse because A) He had lied about them and B) he used the lie as a justification to go to war. Obama made a tasteless crass joke. He also has the power to drop a nuke yet I hope he would never joke about it.
Posted by: Boo
___________________
You seem to forget that the Iraq War got bi-partison support. YOUR heroes in Congress, including Hillary, John Kerry, made speeches on how Saddahm Hussein had WMD and that he must be stopped.
Since most Democrats are lawyers, and since lawyers are trained to know a lie when they see one, I’m sure they would have known right away that Bush was lying about WMD and voted against the war. Not only did they not do so, they made speeches backing Bush up.
And let’s assume Saddahm did not have WMD. Why don’t you tell me how our soldiers in 2992, got mysterious illnesses after returning from the very first Gulf War under Bush Sr.? Not a single Iraqi soldier had it but our soldiers did.

Posted by: ivan | May 4, 2010, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

That is a new one, the LEFT getting after Obama. Will wonders never cease?
Posted by: Cheryl | May 4, 2010 1:47:53 PM
________________________________________
You haven’t been paying attention – the President gets criticism from the far right and the left. His approach is too moderate for both.

Posted by: tierra | May 4, 2010, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

This is much ado about nothing. The joke is a retread of one used 10 years ago on The West Wing when Charlie Young started dating the President’s daughter.

Posted by: Richard Murphy | May 4, 2010, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

“predator drone strikes have killed innocent civilians in Pakistan.” Are we talking about the same innocent civilians that show up carrying AK-47s every time some idiot burns an American flag or effigy of the President? Or perhaps they are referring to the innocent civilians that cheered and beat the dead, burned bodies of US contractors in Iraq. News flash…there are no innocent civilians in Pakistan, Afghanistan or Iraq.

Posted by: Airborne Daddy | May 4, 2010, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

American has lost her sense of humor. What a shame.

Posted by: CJ | May 4, 2010, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

this is ridiculous. It was a JOKE peopele by a DAD about his Daughters dating, Get IT?! My cousin was in the military met his daughters dates at the doors wearing his sidearms. They didn’t berate him or anything. People are getting ridiculous and you are right – the US is losing its sense of humor.

Posted by: kay | May 4, 2010, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

by the way I’s a Democrat who even laughed at some of Bush’s jokes -the ones he actually MEANT as jokes.

Posted by: kay | May 4, 2010, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Airborne Daddy-I believe they are talking about the ones that go errant and take out a bus of civilians for example. I believe we should be asking whether or not the drone attacks are unconstitutional acts of war. This question warrants some serious thought.

Posted by: Ben | May 4, 2010, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

The traditional weapon of choice for protective fathers is a shotgun. Obama is just up-to-date. And who doesn’t know about predator drones? Not an Obama fan but it’s obvious he’s joking and I think it’s funny. So there.

Posted by: rwsmith | May 4, 2010, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

It was a joke. Get it a JOKE.

Posted by: Tammi P | May 4, 2010, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

Once critics panned Truman’s daughter’s singing and he said he was speaking as a father, not the president, and pretty much said he would beat the crap out of them. It raised a hullabaloo but most people thought they would do the same thing, and America laughed. Something we dare not do today.

Posted by: rwsmith | May 4, 2010, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

Well, we certainly know he can deliver a punch line with a straight face…just look at what he told Americans about the benefits of his health care “reform.”

Posted by: wantingbalance | May 4, 2010, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

I thought it was hilarious! BTW, I didn’t think of Bush’s WMD joke, I was reminded of Reagan’s “bombing begin’s” joke.

Posted by: Cassandra | May 4, 2010, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

And for those who can still spell WMD…this just in. Obama’s Justice Department Guy says that charges will be filed against the most recent NY terrorist and they will include WMD charges. So if that’s not also a joke, one must assume that either (a) the guy had a nuke on him when he got caught, or (b) the definition of WMD is a bit less than what you think.

Posted by: wantingbalance | May 4, 2010, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

There is so much I do not approve of when it comes to Obama HOWEVER I was not in the least upset over his joke about the drones. It was funny and something you would expect from a Dad in response to his daughters, Obama happens to have drones as opposed to shotguns.It’s his politics and not his jokes that we all should be wary of.

Posted by: chez532531 | May 4, 2010, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

The faux umbrage is amazing but predictable for those who reserve their worst venom for those opposing and defending against jihadis and mass murderers yet can’t seem to muster umbrage when jihadis go off and murder in the name of their god.
I’m not Obama fan but that way darn funny. If he keeps that up, I’m might have to switch party affiliation.
Only kidding but what he said was funny.

Posted by: So Cal Mike | May 4, 2010, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

I feel like this post must be the joke. If we’re at the point where we are so sensitive that a joke like this seems really offensive, we’re in trouble. Frankly, this was not a joke about war, but if it had been, well, that would probably be ok. This was a comedy routine. People joke about war. It’s true. When did liberals become so puritanical?

Posted by: DemButApparentlyNotLiberal | May 4, 2010, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

What’s interesting is that Obama accused the Jonas Bros of being pedophiles–maybe the daughters like them, but I’m sure they have zero interest in the daughters. Have they sued him for defamation yet?

Posted by: Heather | May 4, 2010, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

This is the first thing that Obama has said that I agree with. And it’s probably the first time he has said something that’s not a lie. Get over it America! Even though I can’t stand the guy, I do appreciate the humor he showed!

Posted by: JackO | May 4, 2010, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

All you people who think it was hilarious are PART OF THE PROBLEM.

Posted by: Kenric L. Ashe | May 5, 2010, 8:37 am 8:37 am

I don’t see what the fuss is. There is no way that the Jonas Brothers can be called innocent civilians.

Posted by: Auntie | May 6, 2010, 12:12 am 12:12 am

“It was just a joke. Get over it etc.”
Perhaps people submitting these kinds of remarks would be happy to explain that to the families of the innocent civilians who have been blown to bits by these missiles.
Yes, there are innocent civilians even in Afghanistan.

Posted by: Ari Kindalg | May 6, 2010, 10:47 am 10:47 am

I read the headlines and thought, “omg, he made a horrible joke about bombing civilians?” NO! It is about having daughters, boys and being a Dad! Doesn’t the media have a story to cover on Tiger Woods or something? Give me a break! And I thought it was funny!

Posted by: TB | May 11, 2010, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

I yield to no one in my low opinion of The One. He is the most pompous, racist, condescending and perhaps dangerous person we have had as POTUS in my lifetime.
Having said that, lighten up. For once, he made a decent joke–one that any father of soon to be young ladies would make–half seriously. Most of us do not have access to predator drones, but surely would have liked to.
A friend of mine made it a point to be cleaning his firearm collection whenever a prospective boyfriend would show up. But, I guess that is just for us bitter clingers, the elites have Predators.
As far as all the lefties fussing over the “innocents” killed by the drones–hey–he is your man, go talk to him.

Posted by: rpm | May 11, 2010, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from
oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that
will reach to himself: Thomas Paine
I think it very revealing of the characters of those who thought the “joke” was funny. I think it would benefit us to remember the Golden Rule more often, to whit, how would you feel as an Afghani or Pakistani non-combatant to hear this joke. In other words, try putting yourselves in their shoes/sandals for the duration of this joke. It’s callous disregard for the security and dignity of innocent people. Period. Not funny.

Posted by: Ocooch | May 20, 2010, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

I think this country (that I truly love) has gone down a road from which it cannot return.

Posted by: Hugo | March 27, 2012, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.